👞 How are monopolies formed?

00:07:14
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eJa65E2TKv4

Zusammenfassung

TLDRJohn, en skoproducent i Los Zapatos, opnår succes gennem innovation, men bliver doven og vælger at lobbyere for reguleringer for at begrænse konkurrencen. Han danner en forening med andre producenter for at pålægge høje tariffer på import og indføre licenskrav for nye producenter. Dette skaber en oligopolistisk situation, hvor forbrugerne lider under højere priser og færre valgmuligheder, mens de gamle producenter nyder godt af beskyttelsen mod konkurrence. Johns beslutninger fører til en markedsstruktur, der er til skade for både forbrugerne og potentielle nye konkurrenter.

Mitbringsel

  • 👞 John er en skoproducent, der tidligere var innovativ.
  • 💼 Han blev doven og valgte at lobbyere for reguleringer.
  • 📈 Høje tariffer blev pålagt udenlandske producenter.
  • 🚫 Licenskrav blev indført for at begrænse nye producenter.
  • 🤝 John dannede en forening med andre producenter.
  • 📉 Forbrugerne fik færre valgmuligheder og højere priser.
  • 🏭 Oligopolistisk situation blev skabt i skomarkedet.
  • 💰 Gamle producenter nød godt af beskyttelsen mod konkurrence.
  • ⚖️ Johns beslutninger skadede potentielle nye konkurrenter.
  • 🔒 Indgangsbarrierer for nye producenter blev betydeligt højere.

Zeitleiste

  • 00:00:00 - 00:07:14

    John, en skoproducent i Los Zapatos, opnåede succes gennem innovation og kundetilfredshed, men blev doven og forsømte at følge med i markedet. Konkurrencen voksede, og Johns salg faldt, hvilket fik ham til at overveje to muligheder: øge produktiviteten eller lobbyere for reguleringer. Han valgte den lettere vej og besluttede at lobbyere for at begrænse konkurrencen.

Mind Map

Video-Fragen und Antworten

  • Hvad gjorde John for at bevare sin markedsposition?

    John lobbyede for reguleringer for at begrænse konkurrencen i stedet for at forbedre sin virksomhed.

  • Hvad var konsekvenserne af Johns beslutninger?

    Det førte til højere priser og færre valgmuligheder for forbrugerne, samt højere indgangsbarrierer for nye producenter.

  • Hvordan dannede John en monopol-lignende situation?

    Han dannede en forening med andre producenter og lobbyede for tariffer og licenskrav, der begrænsede konkurrencen.

  • Hvem var de største tabere i denne situation?

    De største tabere var forbrugerne, udenlandske producenter og potentielle nye indenlandske producenter.

  • Hvad var Johns motivation for at lobbyere?

    John ønskede at beskytte sin markedsposition og maksimere sine profitter.

Weitere Video-Zusammenfassungen anzeigen

Erhalten Sie sofortigen Zugang zu kostenlosen YouTube-Videozusammenfassungen, die von AI unterstützt werden!
Untertitel
en
Automatisches Blättern:
  • 00:00:00
    John is a shoe producer in a  far country of Los Zapatos.
  • 00:00:03
    He achieved his significant market position in  an honest manner, i.e. through offering desirable
  • 00:00:09
    products to customers, introducing innovations and  making sure to be up to date with current trends.
  • 00:00:15
    For many years he managed to correctly  anticipate his client tastes, and this
  • 00:00:19
    has lead to huge success and handsome profits.  Unfortunately, success made John a little lazy.
  • 00:00:26
    He started to invest a little less in his  business, he was basing on “good old bestsellers”,
  • 00:00:31
    rather than seek for new trends as well. He  certainly didn’t expand his business as before,
  • 00:00:36
    rather focusing at maintaining status quo. The  competition, however, had a different approach.
  • 00:00:42
    When John slowed down, competitors rapidly  expanded. Both domestic and foreign competitors
  • 00:00:49
    increased their market shares, and lured John  clients with lower prices and better quality.
  • 00:00:55
    John observed his tumbling  sales records with great worry.
  • 00:00:59
    He still had a powerful market position, but he  knew something has to be done to maintain it.
  • 00:01:03
    He had two choices. Either he could increase  his productivity, once more focus on innovation,
  • 00:01:09
    cut costs, invest in better capital goods OR… he  could simply start lobbying for some regulations,
  • 00:01:15
    which would constrain his competition. John  chose option number two. Why? Well, for one:
  • 00:01:21
    because he could, and second: because it  was much easier than the option number one.
  • 00:01:26
    After he made his decision, he had  to think about what should be done,
  • 00:01:29
    for his plan to be successful. Oh, but  he had so many potential tools to use!
  • 00:01:34
    He could, for example, lobby that the government  should grant him an exclusive license to sell
  • 00:01:39
    shoes in his country, or mandate people to buy  at least one pair of shoes a year from him.
  • 00:01:45
    He quickly realised, that this would be  excessive and no one would go for that.
  • 00:01:49
    Not with shoes anyway. He knew that he  must be much more subtle with his demands.
  • 00:01:54
    Best way would to present his demands in a  way, that people would think, that he cares
  • 00:01:59
    not for his profits, but rather about the  common good, about employees or about customers.
  • 00:02:05
    He also knew that he wouldn’t be able to be a sole  monopolist, so he decided to join forces with the
  • 00:02:10
    other existing domestic producers in order to  constrain (maybe even eliminate) all foreign
  • 00:02:15
    competition, and also to make it almost impossible  for a new domestic competition to emerge.
  • 00:02:22
    He presented his ideas to his main domestic  competitors, and when they were on board,
  • 00:02:26
    together they started a Shoe Producers Association  of the Great Nation of Los Zapatos. John was
  • 00:02:33
    elected a new president of the association, which  quickly started working on a bills proposals.
  • 00:02:38
    The point of the first bill proposal was to  impose a very high tariff on shoe imports.
  • 00:02:43
    The explanation was, that the foreign  competition was “unfair” as they use
  • 00:02:47
    price dumping. The argument was made, that the new  tariff would also save domestic jobs, which were
  • 00:02:53
    endangered by foreign competition. John and other  associates gave many tv and radio interviews,
  • 00:02:59
    in which they were presenting arguments in  favour of the bill proposal, the wrote articles,
  • 00:03:03
    statements and declarations, and tried to convince  local politicians to their cause. The clients were
  • 00:03:08
    very much against this proposals, as it would  limit their possible choice, but their voice
  • 00:03:13
    wasn’t heard enough. After all, it wasn’t as if  they were in some kind of “consumer association”.
  • 00:03:20
    The shoe producers thus won,  and the new bill was passed.
  • 00:03:23
    From now on, if a consumer wanted to buy shoes,  he had to go to domestic producer, because foreign
  • 00:03:29
    competition product was too expensive, due to  tariffs. So, that’s one of Johns problems solved!
  • 00:03:37
    There was one more problem however. John knew,  that lack of foreign competition would lead to
  • 00:03:43
    higher profits for domestic producers, and higher  profits would eventually lead to new domestic
  • 00:03:47
    competition. Blocking new domestic competition  was harder, than blocking foreign competition.
  • 00:03:53
    In case of foreign competition, Association  could invoke job saving or unfair competitive
  • 00:03:58
    advantage as an argument, but it wouldn’t make  sense in case of new domestic competition.
  • 00:04:04
    John proposed a different approach, and said that  bad shoes are a cause of various afflictions,
  • 00:04:09
    which is not the case for quality shoes.  And because everyone should want to have
  • 00:04:13
    good quality shoes, shoemaking should  be licensed, and shoes certified,
  • 00:04:18
    to make sure, that clients feet would  be protected from the bad producers,
  • 00:04:21
    who produce low quality shoes. License would not  be free of course. Quite the opposite, it would
  • 00:04:28
    be very expensive - and – if anyone wanted to get  it, would have to fulfil some harsh requirements.
  • 00:04:34
    The requirements was to be set by Shoe Producer  Association of the Great Nation of Los Zapatos,
  • 00:04:40
    as they were clearly the experts on this matter.  The certificate would be granted by the special
  • 00:04:45
    commission, in which members of Association  would participate as well. From now on,
  • 00:04:50
    new shoe producer would have to follow detailed  instructions during the production process,
  • 00:04:55
    to have a chance to get a certificate, and sales  without the certificate would be forbidden,
  • 00:04:59
    for the good of the customer – of course. Association once more created a bill proposal,
  • 00:05:05
    which quickly passed, because who wouldn’t want to  protect the customers from the low quality shoes!
  • 00:05:11
    John and the other “old” producers could afford  to buy an expensive license, but unfortunately
  • 00:05:16
    the cost was too big for the “new players”. This  effectively discouraged potential competition.
  • 00:05:22
    “Luckily” John and the “old players” met every  production requirement, that they themselves
  • 00:05:27
    created, so their shoes could be certified.  This was a smart move from John, because he
  • 00:05:32
    started small, and although he always cared very  much about the quality of his product, it took
  • 00:05:37
    him years to meet all the high requirements,  that the Association now imposed on everyone,
  • 00:05:42
    thus he knew very well that this would discourage  potential competition even more. Of course John
  • 00:05:48
    would never admit publicly, that his ideas has  anything to do with discouraging the competition.
  • 00:05:53
    He would always talk about the good  of the customer and his healthy feet.
  • 00:05:57
    And that’s how the John and the others  created a monopoly, or should we say,
  • 00:06:01
    oligopoly in Los Zapatos. From now on, someone  who wanted to enter the shoe manufacturing market,
  • 00:06:07
    would have to have a huge determination, and much  higher financial means. Entry barriers went up
  • 00:06:12
    significantly. Who gained and who lost? The obvious benefactors of this monopoly
  • 00:06:18
    privileges are John and other “old” domestic  producers. They can rest easy, that a new
  • 00:06:23
    domestic or foreign competition is very unlikely  to emerge. They will be able to achieve monopoly
  • 00:06:29
    price if theirs, as Rothbard writes, “demand  curve is inelastic, or sufficiently less elastic,
  • 00:06:35
    above the free-market price.” 1 It is possible  that Johns’ employees would also benefit,
  • 00:06:40
    as they would keep their job, otherwise lost  if John would have lost his market position.
  • 00:06:45
    Who looses? The foreign competition,  who are blocked by the high tariff.
  • 00:06:51
    Potential domestic competition, as the entry  barrier is much, much higher, and the customers,
  • 00:06:56
    who now have less choice and pay higher prices  due to lower shoe supply and/or monopoly prices.
Tags
  • skoproduktion
  • lobbyisme
  • monopol
  • konkurrence
  • tariffer
  • licenskrav
  • forbrugerbeskyttelse
  • markedssituation
  • Los Zapatos
  • innovation