Doctor reveals undisclosed risks of COVID-19 vaccine

00:24:55
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AaER9tkgdqs

Zusammenfassung

TLDRThe doctor reflects on his experience during the COVID-19 pandemic, highlighting the vascular nature of the disease and the implications for patient care. He critiques the medical establishment's response, particularly regarding the mRNA vaccine and its potential adverse effects, including myocarditis and clotting dysfunction. He emphasizes the need for independent research and open-mindedness in medicine, arguing that the current approach may overlook significant health risks associated with COVID-19 and its vaccines.

Mitbringsel

  • 🩺 The doctor was an internist managing clinics and 200,000 patients annually.
  • 🔍 COVID-19 is primarily a vascular issue, not just respiratory.
  • 💉 The mRNA vaccine instructs the body to produce a pathogenic spike protein.
  • ⚠️ Myocarditis can have long-term consequences, especially in young men.
  • 📊 Vaccine data collection methods may have missed serious side effects.
  • 🧬 Clotting dysfunction can lead to significant health issues in small vessels.
  • 📚 Open-mindedness in science is crucial for medical progress.
  • 🔬 Independent research is necessary to challenge established narratives.
  • 🚨 The FDA and CDC need to better inform about vaccine risks.
  • 🤔 Long COVID symptoms may be confused with vaccine side effects.

Zeitleiste

  • 00:00:00 - 00:05:00

    The speaker, a former internist and clinic owner, discusses his experience during the COVID-19 pandemic, emphasizing the need to understand COVID as a vascular disease rather than a respiratory one. He highlights the importance of addressing vascular issues and coagulation problems in treating COVID patients, which he believes could save lives and prevent long-term consequences.

  • 00:05:00 - 00:10:00

    The speaker explains the nature of vascular diseases and how they differ from traditional respiratory issues. He notes that many physicians initially misdiagnosed COVID as acute respiratory distress syndrome, failing to recognize the underlying vascular problems affecting patients' lungs and overall health.

  • 00:10:00 - 00:15:00

    The discussion shifts to the COVID vaccine, particularly the mRNA vaccines, which the speaker critiques for their approach to inducing the body to produce the spike protein. He argues that this method is fundamentally different from traditional vaccines and raises concerns about the unknown long-term effects and biodistribution of the vaccine components in the body.

  • 00:15:00 - 00:24:55

    The speaker expresses skepticism about the vaccine's effectiveness in saving lives during the pandemic, attributing the control of the virus more to natural viral evolution than vaccination. He also raises concerns about the potential increase in autoimmune diseases and other health issues linked to the vaccine, particularly in children, and emphasizes the need for more thorough research and transparency in vaccine safety.

Mehr anzeigen

Mind Map

Video-Fragen und Antworten

  • What did the doctor observe about COVID-19 in patients?

    He observed that COVID-19 was more of a vascular issue rather than a respiratory infection.

  • What is myocarditis?

    Myocarditis is inflammation of the heart muscle, which can have long-term consequences.

  • How does the mRNA vaccine work?

    The mRNA vaccine instructs cells to produce a spike protein, which is pathogenic, for an unknown duration.

  • What are the concerns regarding vaccine safety?

    There are concerns about the lack of long-term data and potential adverse effects, including autoimmune diseases.

  • What is long COVID?

    Long COVID refers to persistent symptoms following COVID-19 infection, but its relationship with vaccination status is unclear.

  • What is the doctor's stance on the COVID-19 vaccine?

    He questions the vaccine's effectiveness and safety, particularly regarding myocarditis in young men.

  • What are the implications of clotting dysfunction?

    Clotting dysfunction can lead to serious health issues, particularly in small blood vessels.

  • What lessons should be learned from the pandemic?

    Open-mindedness in science and the need for independent research in medicine.

  • What is the role of the FDA and CDC during the pandemic?

    Their role is to regulate products and inform practitioners about potential dangers.

  • Why is there a concern about the data on vaccine side effects?

    The data collection methods did not adequately capture serious side effects like chest pain or shortness of breath.

Weitere Video-Zusammenfassungen anzeigen

Erhalten Sie sofortigen Zugang zu kostenlosen YouTube-Videozusammenfassungen, die von AI unterstützt werden!
Untertitel
en
Automatisches Blättern:
  • 00:00:00
    Um just tell me a little bit about kind
  • 00:00:01
    of your background, what you do as a
  • 00:00:03
    doctor. So historically I was just your
  • 00:00:05
    uh average internist that basically
  • 00:00:07
    tried to care for people. I also owned a
  • 00:00:09
    lot of my own clinics. Um and so uh you
  • 00:00:12
    know we typically saw about 200,000
  • 00:00:13
    patients a year. Had about 250
  • 00:00:15
    employees. Um and so when COVID came
  • 00:00:18
    along, it really required me to kind of
  • 00:00:20
    figure out what's going on not only from
  • 00:00:21
    the patients that I've got to take care
  • 00:00:22
    of, but also for my employees as well.
  • 00:00:25
    And so that really what kind of drove me
  • 00:00:26
    to get really almost um hyperfocused on
  • 00:00:30
    trying to figure out the problem and
  • 00:00:32
    actually figuring out how to help
  • 00:00:33
    people. And so in a sense a lot of my
  • 00:00:36
    knowledge base is interestingly fairly
  • 00:00:39
    new uh because a lot of this was new but
  • 00:00:41
    if you actually applied yourself at the
  • 00:00:43
    time uh you could become an expert in
  • 00:00:45
    something that was relatively new
  • 00:00:46
    relatively quick. And so, and let's not
  • 00:00:48
    forget this was not only new for you, it
  • 00:00:50
    was new for everybody from the top
  • 00:00:51
    doctors in America% um to the interns um
  • 00:00:55
    to the residents. Um what were some of
  • 00:00:57
    the things that you observed in your
  • 00:00:59
    patients during CO that sort of stick
  • 00:01:00
    out to you to this day? So, it was
  • 00:01:02
    pretty obvious in the spring and summer
  • 00:01:04
    of 2020 that we weren't really dealing
  • 00:01:06
    with a respiratory infection. What we
  • 00:01:07
    were really dealing with was a vascular
  • 00:01:09
    issue in the lungs and vascular issue
  • 00:01:11
    everywhere. And in fact uh what my
  • 00:01:14
    collaborators in South Africa really
  • 00:01:15
    discovered is we were barking up the
  • 00:01:17
    wrong tree. It wasn't a respiratory
  • 00:01:19
    disease. It was actually a vascular
  • 00:01:21
    disease of the lungs. And that's one of
  • 00:01:22
    the reasons if you have a vascular issue
  • 00:01:24
    of the lungs. The worst thing you can do
  • 00:01:25
    is increase the intrathoracic pressure
  • 00:01:27
    which is what ventilation does. And in a
  • 00:01:29
    sense is why most people that got on the
  • 00:01:30
    ventilator did not live. So, in a sense,
  • 00:01:33
    what we discovered was if we attack the
  • 00:01:35
    vascular and coagulation or the clotting
  • 00:01:37
    issues that go on with COVID that we
  • 00:01:39
    could pull people out of the hospital,
  • 00:01:40
    save their lives, and actually not have
  • 00:01:42
    any long-term consequences
  • 00:01:44
    for those who have never studied, you
  • 00:01:47
    know, the body. Um, what is vascular?
  • 00:01:50
    So, vascular would be the vessels. So,
  • 00:01:52
    you know, there's two things. A lot of
  • 00:01:53
    times when we think about pneumonia or
  • 00:01:54
    asthma or those kind of things, what
  • 00:01:55
    we're thinking about is how we move air
  • 00:01:57
    in and out of the lungs. But the
  • 00:01:58
    interesting thing is when you move air
  • 00:01:59
    in and out of the lungs, it have to it
  • 00:02:01
    has to interface with something called
  • 00:02:03
    vessels for that oxygen exchange. And if
  • 00:02:05
    you have a disease that attacks the
  • 00:02:06
    vessels, you also have I mean a lot of
  • 00:02:08
    people are monitoring their pulseox and
  • 00:02:10
    those kind of things, the actual pulseox
  • 00:02:12
    goes down as well. And so what really a
  • 00:02:15
    lot of physicians started to realize is
  • 00:02:17
    we were treating this like the classic
  • 00:02:18
    what we call acute respiratory distress
  • 00:02:20
    syndrome or arg pneumonia, but it wasn't
  • 00:02:22
    that. And in a sense what we needed to
  • 00:02:24
    do was treat it as if it was a
  • 00:02:26
    vasculopathy. and some of the people
  • 00:02:27
    that I work with in England, what we've
  • 00:02:29
    kind of defined as what we call primary
  • 00:02:31
    pulmonary vasculopathy, which is a fancy
  • 00:02:33
    word for saying the issue is a primary
  • 00:02:36
    issues of the vessels of the lungs, not
  • 00:02:38
    necessarily the airways, which is what
  • 00:02:40
    most people associate when they think
  • 00:02:41
    about a pneumonia. And I think a lot of
  • 00:02:43
    people would be surprised to hear that
  • 00:02:45
    the ventilator actually could have
  • 00:02:47
    contributed to people dying. Is that
  • 00:02:50
    right? 100%. Yeah. was actually if you
  • 00:02:52
    think about the vessels, if you already
  • 00:02:53
    have vessels that don't work very well,
  • 00:02:55
    what's the worst thing you can do to
  • 00:02:56
    them? Actually blow more air in them,
  • 00:02:58
    increase the intrathoracic pressure and
  • 00:03:00
    actually close down more vessels and
  • 00:03:02
    actually make the oxygenation worse.
  • 00:03:04
    Let's talk a little bit about I know
  • 00:03:06
    you've written a lot uh about the COVID
  • 00:03:08
    vaccine. What are some of your big
  • 00:03:10
    takeaways from what you've learned about
  • 00:03:12
    it? So the interesting thing was what we
  • 00:03:15
    knew and actually when we talk about
  • 00:03:16
    coagulation and how things attack the
  • 00:03:18
    vessels was the spike protein was really
  • 00:03:20
    what was causing that the spike protein
  • 00:03:22
    attaches to this thing called the ACE2
  • 00:03:24
    receptor that's present in the inside of
  • 00:03:26
    your vessels and that's why COVID is
  • 00:03:28
    really a vascular disease but it was
  • 00:03:31
    interesting as we started to understand
  • 00:03:33
    COVID and understand that the pathogen
  • 00:03:35
    was the spike protein that the solution
  • 00:03:38
    that was offered was actually to tell
  • 00:03:40
    people to make the spike protein for an
  • 00:03:42
    unknown amount of time for an unknown
  • 00:03:44
    amount. And that is actually where we
  • 00:03:47
    got off. Meaning historically when we
  • 00:03:49
    think about vaccines, vaccines are
  • 00:03:50
    passive, meaning your body interfaces
  • 00:03:52
    with a foreign protein. But usually that
  • 00:03:54
    protein is not something that's active
  • 00:03:57
    biologically to most people. But instead
  • 00:03:59
    to pick the very protein that is
  • 00:04:01
    pathological and actually have people
  • 00:04:03
    make it in a in a way that we didn't
  • 00:04:06
    really even understand. And even the
  • 00:04:07
    biodistribution studies are just now
  • 00:04:09
    catching up where the old it stayed in
  • 00:04:11
    your arm is completely false. Uh and we
  • 00:04:14
    know that now. But of course the the
  • 00:04:16
    studies just came out because really we
  • 00:04:18
    weren't studying it before we basically
  • 00:04:20
    told everybody it was safe and
  • 00:04:22
    effective. So in a sense uh it is what I
  • 00:04:24
    would consider not even in the same
  • 00:04:26
    classification as a typical vaccine and
  • 00:04:28
    it's kind of the redheaded stepchild of
  • 00:04:29
    vaccines. It's almost the person you
  • 00:04:30
    don't want in your family because it's
  • 00:04:32
    going to ruin the reputation of all the
  • 00:04:33
    others. And is this all the vaccines or
  • 00:04:35
    just just the mRNA vaccine and so the
  • 00:04:38
    mRNA vaccine is but that was fizer that
  • 00:04:41
    was yeah and then uh I will say the
  • 00:04:44
    Johnson and Johnson was an adno vector
  • 00:04:46
    vaccine so it used the capsit of a virus
  • 00:04:48
    and had your body utilize the uh the
  • 00:04:52
    outside of a virus called the adno virus
  • 00:04:54
    to actually have your body be attacked
  • 00:04:55
    and replicated but it was in a very
  • 00:04:57
    different way. We also had a lot of
  • 00:04:58
    history with utilizing adn novector
  • 00:05:01
    viruses to vaccinate and so we had a lot
  • 00:05:03
    more data on what was going on. The mRNA
  • 00:05:06
    was a technology that not is isn't new
  • 00:05:09
    but even in 2018 the NIH itself said
  • 00:05:11
    that this technology had lots of holdups
  • 00:05:14
    and actually a lot of those holdups are
  • 00:05:16
    the very adverse events and adverse
  • 00:05:18
    effects that we're seeing which is we
  • 00:05:19
    didn't know where it went. Uh we didn't
  • 00:05:21
    know how it impacted things. We didn't
  • 00:05:23
    know how long people were going to
  • 00:05:24
    produce it. In a sense, think of the
  • 00:05:26
    mRNA as almost like a blueprint that
  • 00:05:28
    you're giving your cells to make the
  • 00:05:30
    protein. And again, a protein that we
  • 00:05:32
    knew was pathogenic. And the reality is
  • 00:05:35
    is we don't know how everybody reads
  • 00:05:37
    those blueprints and how long they read
  • 00:05:38
    those blueprints and how long they make
  • 00:05:40
    the blueprints effects. And that's a
  • 00:05:42
    very different thing. That's called
  • 00:05:43
    active. It's an active mechanism as
  • 00:05:45
    opposed to a passive mechanism. passive
  • 00:05:47
    mechanism is you take a small amount of
  • 00:05:50
    a protein or uh a other kind of live
  • 00:05:54
    attenuated basically vaccine and your
  • 00:05:57
    body interfaces it but we interface with
  • 00:05:58
    a known amount of the protein. This is
  • 00:06:01
    very different in a sense that we're
  • 00:06:02
    actually making the body make something
  • 00:06:04
    for an unknown amount of time for an
  • 00:06:06
    unknown amount. And then the other thing
  • 00:06:08
    is is the biodistribution studies
  • 00:06:10
    specifically recently in a paper in
  • 00:06:12
    January of 2025 show that it actually
  • 00:06:15
    targeted things like the ovaries, the
  • 00:06:17
    heart, the liver, those kind of places.
  • 00:06:19
    And again that just shows you the lack
  • 00:06:21
    of knowledge about the biodistribution
  • 00:06:23
    when we thwarted this on the entire
  • 00:06:25
    population with the mantra that it was
  • 00:06:27
    safe and effective. During the height of
  • 00:06:29
    the pandemic, we were measuring deaths
  • 00:06:31
    by the millions. Tens of thousands of
  • 00:06:32
    people a week were dying. Are you
  • 00:06:34
    advocating that the vaccine not be used?
  • 00:06:37
    I mean, this is crediting with saving
  • 00:06:38
    lives and from making this a global
  • 00:06:40
    pandemic to something that we only talk
  • 00:06:42
    about, you know, once in a while. Yeah,
  • 00:06:44
    I think the vaccine itself um is
  • 00:06:47
    questionable on whether it saved lives
  • 00:06:48
    looking at the data. Does that make
  • 00:06:50
    sense? And so, the other thing is is
  • 00:06:52
    what they knew about the technology is
  • 00:06:53
    it would rapidly cause mutations. And so
  • 00:06:55
    in a sense, everybody got vaccinated for
  • 00:06:57
    something and protected them. And by the
  • 00:06:59
    time they were vaccinated, that virus
  • 00:07:00
    wasn't the virus that was attacking
  • 00:07:02
    them. And in a sense, that means that
  • 00:07:03
    the vaccine continued to have to be
  • 00:07:06
    boosted and updated. And that's not a
  • 00:07:08
    way to actually engage with the immune
  • 00:07:09
    system. In fact, the immune system
  • 00:07:11
    doesn't necessarily like being poked all
  • 00:07:13
    the time. And in sometimes, if it gets
  • 00:07:14
    poked all the time, it roars. And so the
  • 00:07:16
    onset of new autoimmune diseases and
  • 00:07:18
    other inflammatory syndromes are kind of
  • 00:07:20
    just out of control. There was a recent
  • 00:07:22
    meta analysis that looked at autoimmune
  • 00:07:24
    diseases in children and in the
  • 00:07:25
    vaccinated it and it and this was about
  • 00:07:28
    400,000 kids the in the vaccinated
  • 00:07:31
    population of children there was a 2%
  • 00:07:33
    increase in autoimmune diseases. That
  • 00:07:35
    doesn't sound like many people but when
  • 00:07:36
    you think about it that's about 8,000
  • 00:07:37
    kids that have a new autoimmune disease.
  • 00:07:39
    That doesn't seem like something that we
  • 00:07:41
    should be doing to children especially
  • 00:07:43
    when they had no benefit from it. What
  • 00:07:45
    would you credit then in terms of
  • 00:07:47
    getting the pandemic under control if
  • 00:07:48
    not the vaccine? Well, in a sense, it's
  • 00:07:51
    actually what we call viral evolution.
  • 00:07:52
    In a sense, the viruses themselves, if
  • 00:07:55
    they are deadly, that's not a benefit to
  • 00:07:57
    them. Very few people get infected in a
  • 00:07:59
    morg. And so, in a sense, what it does
  • 00:08:01
    is attenuate over time to become more
  • 00:08:03
    infectious and at the same time be less
  • 00:08:05
    virilent. And that's just the natural
  • 00:08:07
    history of how viruses work. And that's
  • 00:08:08
    what we saw over time. I want to talk
  • 00:08:10
    about um long co. I know there's some
  • 00:08:13
    recent studies that have linked long CO
  • 00:08:15
    to some of these vascular issues. You
  • 00:08:17
    have a problem with some of those
  • 00:08:18
    studies. talk a little bit about that.
  • 00:08:20
    So I don't necessarily have any problem
  • 00:08:21
    with it. I I mean I'm probably one of
  • 00:08:23
    the people that look I guess that I
  • 00:08:26
    don't I don't have a pro. What studies
  • 00:08:27
    you um so the one I think that I I read
  • 00:08:31
    that you um question some of the links
  • 00:08:34
    to the vascular issues and long co
  • 00:08:37
    because you say they they haven't um
  • 00:08:39
    asked the vaccination status of some of
  • 00:08:41
    these. Oh yeah yeah yeah. So yeah, I
  • 00:08:43
    think the problem with the the problem
  • 00:08:45
    with the context of long COVID is
  • 00:08:46
    because now we have really a u basically
  • 00:08:50
    a society that's been vaccinated at the
  • 00:08:52
    same time that they got COVID because
  • 00:08:54
    the vaccine didn't work that it mixes
  • 00:08:56
    the data and basically no one is being
  • 00:08:58
    asked when did the onset of these
  • 00:09:00
    symptoms happen. Was it temporary
  • 00:09:02
    related to your COVID or was it
  • 00:09:03
    temporarily related to your vaccine?
  • 00:09:04
    Instead, we're throwing them all in a
  • 00:09:06
    basket and basically saying you have
  • 00:09:08
    persistent symptoms after COVID. But in
  • 00:09:10
    a sense, no one's actually, you know,
  • 00:09:12
    chronologically going back and asking
  • 00:09:14
    them. It's one of the deficiencies in
  • 00:09:15
    all these studies. I know during COVID,
  • 00:09:17
    you spoke out about kind of what you
  • 00:09:19
    were seeing and you were kind of
  • 00:09:20
    shunned. Um, talk a little bit about
  • 00:09:23
    kind of the reaction from the uh, you
  • 00:09:26
    know, establishment medical class in
  • 00:09:29
    America in terms of the narrative and
  • 00:09:31
    kind of trying to shut out other voices.
  • 00:09:34
    Yeah. I I think in some ways medicine is
  • 00:09:36
    a very hierarchial profession and in a
  • 00:09:38
    sense even in residency and medical
  • 00:09:40
    school we're taught to think that the
  • 00:09:42
    people above us are infallible and what
  • 00:09:44
    they say is the only thing that can be
  • 00:09:46
    said and what the last five years has
  • 00:09:48
    exposed is when there isn't somebody
  • 00:09:50
    that's questioning the narrative that
  • 00:09:52
    the narrative actually in itself could
  • 00:09:54
    be completely wrong and the outcomes can
  • 00:09:56
    be completely awful. I mean just exa
  • 00:09:58
    another example recently would be
  • 00:10:00
    Alzheimer's research. Alzheimer's
  • 00:10:02
    research they they were focused on
  • 00:10:03
    something that was completely fraudulent
  • 00:10:04
    for the last 20 years and only only
  • 00:10:07
    funding those studies that went went
  • 00:10:09
    along with that narrative. It's the same
  • 00:10:11
    thing that happens and I think that's
  • 00:10:12
    one of the reasons that the uh medical
  • 00:10:15
    system continues to need independent
  • 00:10:17
    physicians and independent research. The
  • 00:10:20
    problem with the with really Fouchy and
  • 00:10:22
    a lot of the things that actually the
  • 00:10:23
    NIH did over the last 40 years is they
  • 00:10:26
    tied medical research to following the
  • 00:10:28
    narrative that Fouchy and Anthony
  • 00:10:30
    Collins decided. And in in a sense that
  • 00:10:33
    means that there is no science. I'm
  • 00:10:34
    going to have you say that again because
  • 00:10:35
    Francis Collins, right? Yeah. Franc Oh,
  • 00:10:37
    sorry. Sorry. Anthony Fouchy, Francis
  • 00:10:38
    Collins, mixed their names. Yeah.
  • 00:10:40
    Francis Collins. Uh and basically they
  • 00:10:42
    were going to fund things that agreed
  • 00:10:44
    with what their narrative was. And in a
  • 00:10:46
    sense, science, the other thing about
  • 00:10:48
    science is science, you hear a lot of
  • 00:10:50
    follow the science. Science is not a
  • 00:10:51
    leader. Science is an informer. It gives
  • 00:10:54
    you data. Leaders lead. They utilize
  • 00:10:56
    science to make effective decisions. And
  • 00:10:58
    if you ever hear a leader say follow the
  • 00:11:00
    science, they're actually abdicating
  • 00:11:01
    their responsibility to somebody else
  • 00:11:03
    instead of actually leading as a leader.
  • 00:11:06
    Let's talk about myocarditis. This is
  • 00:11:07
    something I read a little bit about. I
  • 00:11:09
    think a lot of people don't know about
  • 00:11:10
    it and I think you might argue that they
  • 00:11:13
    should know more about it. 100%. So
  • 00:11:15
    myocarditis is inflammation of the
  • 00:11:17
    tissue of the heart, the muscle of the
  • 00:11:19
    heart. And why it's so such a
  • 00:11:20
    delotterious thing is you really don't
  • 00:11:22
    get new heart muscle. So if you actually
  • 00:11:24
    have the heart muscle attacked, you
  • 00:11:26
    don't get new muscle. If you have your
  • 00:11:28
    arm attacked in a sense, you can
  • 00:11:30
    actually rebuild new muscle. But cardiac
  • 00:11:32
    myioytes don't come back. And that's one
  • 00:11:34
    of the reasons heart disease is such an
  • 00:11:35
    awful thing because in a sense, once
  • 00:11:37
    cardiac muscle is destroyed, you're
  • 00:11:40
    you're in for a long hard life because
  • 00:11:42
    you're not going to get new cardiac
  • 00:11:44
    muscle. Now, I will say there are kind
  • 00:11:45
    of researchers that are looking at ways
  • 00:11:47
    to actually make new heart muscle, but
  • 00:11:49
    currently that isn't the case. And so,
  • 00:11:51
    when we're talking about children or
  • 00:11:53
    young men that have myocarditis,
  • 00:11:56
    myocarditis is a significant thing. They
  • 00:11:58
    might say that for instance, they might
  • 00:12:00
    feel better after 6 months being treated
  • 00:12:02
    by ibuprofen or culticine or those kind
  • 00:12:04
    of things. But in a sense, they've had
  • 00:12:05
    an attack of the heart muscle that for
  • 00:12:08
    the rest of their life will not be
  • 00:12:09
    different than that attacked heart
  • 00:12:11
    muscle. Does that make sense? So the
  • 00:12:12
    long-term consequences if you look at 5
  • 00:12:14
    to 10 year studies on people that have
  • 00:12:15
    myocarditis they're awful. And so in a
  • 00:12:18
    sense when the uh CDC and FDA were
  • 00:12:21
    saying hey myocarditis but it seems
  • 00:12:22
    self-limited and people seem to go back
  • 00:12:24
    to back to their life. We're talking
  • 00:12:26
    about 17 and 18 year olds without any
  • 00:12:29
    benefit are actually having heart
  • 00:12:30
    damage. It's a heart damage that will
  • 00:12:32
    last the rest of their life. That is
  • 00:12:34
    never a good balance at all. What's the
  • 00:12:37
    connection to COVID and myocarditis? So
  • 00:12:39
    CO or the vaccine or the vaccine. Yeah.
  • 00:12:40
    So the vaccine uniquely when we were
  • 00:12:42
    talking about that mRNA the the research
  • 00:12:44
    that came out in January looked at lip
  • 00:12:46
    nanoparticles which is what actually the
  • 00:12:48
    mRNA gets wrapped in and interestingly
  • 00:12:51
    enough what they found was is the L&P
  • 00:12:53
    the lip nanoparticles with the mRNA
  • 00:12:56
    actually go to the endthelium the inside
  • 00:12:58
    of the vessels of the heart and actually
  • 00:13:00
    cause changes in multiple proteomics
  • 00:13:04
    meaning like what they produce to
  • 00:13:06
    downregulate repair and upregulate
  • 00:13:07
    inflammation. And in a sense, what that
  • 00:13:10
    proves is exactly what we thought was
  • 00:13:11
    going on, which is mRNA vaccines cause
  • 00:13:14
    myocarditis. Now, the problem was this
  • 00:13:17
    was being seen very early in the CDC and
  • 00:13:20
    FDA data, we're talking April or even
  • 00:13:22
    March, actually even back to February.
  • 00:13:25
    The interesting thing is, as much as the
  • 00:13:28
    uh FDA and CDC were telling you they had
  • 00:13:30
    this program called Vssafe, Vssafe,
  • 00:13:33
    interestingly enough, only asked
  • 00:13:35
    questions about fatigue, fever, rash.
  • 00:13:38
    didn't ask anything about chest pain,
  • 00:13:41
    shortness of breath, palpitations. And
  • 00:13:43
    so as the Israeli data came and started
  • 00:13:46
    to see this signal of a significant
  • 00:13:47
    amount of young men, especially after
  • 00:13:49
    the second dose, having myocarditis, the
  • 00:13:51
    CDC and FDA started to actually from the
  • 00:13:55
    bottom up by physicians that weren't
  • 00:13:56
    scared to report started saying, "Hey,
  • 00:13:58
    we're seeing this in these patients that
  • 00:14:00
    are young, young men. We need to do
  • 00:14:02
    something about it." the CDC and FDA
  • 00:14:04
    were about to ex basically give
  • 00:14:07
    something called a health alert notice.
  • 00:14:08
    And that health alert notice would have
  • 00:14:10
    told physicians, hey, be on the lookout
  • 00:14:12
    for this because this is happening. Not
  • 00:14:14
    only that, the Israeli data confirmed
  • 00:14:17
    it. But at the same time, the people
  • 00:14:18
    were saying, well, we don't have a
  • 00:14:20
    signal yet. But they didn't have a
  • 00:14:21
    signal because guess what? You don't
  • 00:14:23
    have evidence if you never visit visit a
  • 00:14:25
    crime scene. question and so and they
  • 00:14:27
    actually had multiple people from their
  • 00:14:29
    own agencies come in and say, "Hey,
  • 00:14:31
    we're missing this because we're not
  • 00:14:33
    asking the question." And in a sense,
  • 00:14:35
    when they were about to elicit a health
  • 00:14:37
    alert notice to all the physicians, the
  • 00:14:39
    worry was more about if we tell doctors
  • 00:14:42
    to look for it, we might get more of it.
  • 00:14:44
    That's your job, by the way. And if
  • 00:14:47
    doctors aren't reporting it, we'll never
  • 00:14:49
    have the signal. And so instead in
  • 00:14:51
    instead of actually giving a health
  • 00:14:53
    alert notice to all the physicians, they
  • 00:14:54
    decided with the help of the Biden
  • 00:14:56
    administration to actually just update
  • 00:14:59
    the website of the CDC instead of
  • 00:15:01
    telling the physicians and also were
  • 00:15:03
    communicating with Madna and Fizer
  • 00:15:05
    letting them know what they were doing
  • 00:15:07
    at the same time that they were all
  • 00:15:08
    saying, "Hey, we need to be careful
  • 00:15:10
    because we might drive vaccine
  • 00:15:11
    hesitancy." Well, the interesting thing
  • 00:15:13
    is vaccine hesitancy is one thing. a
  • 00:15:16
    17-year-old with a damaged heart for the
  • 00:15:18
    rest of his life is another. So, that
  • 00:15:20
    health alert notice never went out.
  • 00:15:22
    Never went out. And that's what we're
  • 00:15:23
    discussing today at the Yeah. So, uh
  • 00:15:26
    that's my next question is kind of what
  • 00:15:27
    are you doing here in Washington today?
  • 00:15:29
    Uh why was this report kind of put
  • 00:15:32
    together and what are you going to be
  • 00:15:34
    talking about? So, a lot of it is
  • 00:15:35
    looking at um the failure to notice,
  • 00:15:39
    meaning like literally the the job of
  • 00:15:41
    the FDA, the job of the CDC and the FDA
  • 00:15:44
    more than the CDC is to actually
  • 00:15:46
    regulate our products and inform
  • 00:15:49
    practitioners and people about the
  • 00:15:51
    dangers that they might see as soon as
  • 00:15:53
    they see them. And then they need to be
  • 00:15:55
    proactive and get them off the market or
  • 00:15:57
    restrict them to the people that don't
  • 00:16:00
    only need them, meaning people that
  • 00:16:02
    don't have that delotterious
  • 00:16:04
    consequence. And in a sense, they didn't
  • 00:16:05
    do that. In fact, the CDC went around uh
  • 00:16:10
    instead of basically giving a health
  • 00:16:12
    alert notice, they decided to update the
  • 00:16:14
    website at the same time that they told
  • 00:16:16
    Madna and Fizer to uh update their
  • 00:16:19
    labeling. And so now all of a sudden,
  • 00:16:21
    the labeling starts to say myocarditis.
  • 00:16:22
    Again, this is two months into this
  • 00:16:24
    discussion. Uh but at the same time, the
  • 00:16:27
    CDC hasn't said anything about it, which
  • 00:16:29
    is an interesting way to do it as well.
  • 00:16:31
    Uh then lastly, um some of the
  • 00:16:35
    interesting things that were were part
  • 00:16:36
    of those part of the actual health alert
  • 00:16:39
    notice that never got sent out. uh there
  • 00:16:42
    was many additions to continued claims
  • 00:16:44
    that we know for sure they were saying
  • 00:16:47
    that the benefits outweigh the risk at
  • 00:16:49
    the same time that they don't know the
  • 00:16:51
    risk and in fact the risk are just
  • 00:16:53
    developing. So that is a complete lie
  • 00:16:56
    because you can't know that because it's
  • 00:16:57
    a brand new product that's under an
  • 00:16:59
    emergency youth authorization. So if
  • 00:17:01
    you're going to have a health alert
  • 00:17:02
    notice, it didn't even get out to us as
  • 00:17:04
    physicians. I mean, as physicians that
  • 00:17:06
    are asked to actually tell people to get
  • 00:17:09
    this product based on somebody's word at
  • 00:17:11
    the CDC and FDA to tell our patients
  • 00:17:13
    that we have a long history and a long
  • 00:17:15
    relationship with that this is safe and
  • 00:17:17
    effective and it's the best decision for
  • 00:17:18
    your 17-year-old. That is crazy to think
  • 00:17:22
    that how many physicians went with the
  • 00:17:24
    word of these people as they debated
  • 00:17:26
    whether it should be released. Any um
  • 00:17:29
    can you just tell me why you think it
  • 00:17:30
    was more prevalent in young men than
  • 00:17:32
    women? So, there's a couple different
  • 00:17:33
    reasons. uh there's actually uh hormones
  • 00:17:36
    related. So testosterone actually so one
  • 00:17:38
    of the things in terms of the spike
  • 00:17:40
    protein actually getting into the cell
  • 00:17:41
    it has uh it's actually basically
  • 00:17:44
    potentiated or increased its ability to
  • 00:17:46
    in get inside the cell if there's a
  • 00:17:48
    testosterone receptor engaged and guess
  • 00:17:50
    what males have more testosterone. It
  • 00:17:52
    also has to do with catakolamine. So
  • 00:17:53
    again it was just kind of the the actual
  • 00:17:56
    uh makeup of a male was more likely to
  • 00:17:58
    have that effect. Does that make sense?
  • 00:18:00
    Yep. Totally. Um, as far as the report
  • 00:18:02
    that's going to be released today, what
  • 00:18:04
    are some of the glaring, you know, red
  • 00:18:06
    sirens in that report? Well, the glaring
  • 00:18:07
    thing was they knew about the Vsafe not
  • 00:18:10
    being effective. And the Vssafe was the
  • 00:18:12
    way that basically uh patients that got
  • 00:18:15
    the vaccine were supposed to report back
  • 00:18:16
    to the CDC and FDA about side effects.
  • 00:18:20
    And those side effects that they listed
  • 00:18:21
    were the very minimal side effects. They
  • 00:18:24
    were 10 things that were listed. They
  • 00:18:25
    did not list chest pain. They did not
  • 00:18:27
    list shortness of breath. They did not
  • 00:18:28
    list palp palpitations. They basically
  • 00:18:30
    listed fatigue, mild fever, those kind
  • 00:18:34
    of things. And in a sense, it was
  • 00:18:35
    brought to them in April to say, "We're
  • 00:18:38
    not getting this signal because no one's
  • 00:18:40
    being asked the question." And instead
  • 00:18:42
    of actually updating the list of things
  • 00:18:44
    that would be asked to the people that
  • 00:18:46
    were in that database, they actually
  • 00:18:48
    just restricted the amount of calls they
  • 00:18:50
    would make to people to only call people
  • 00:18:52
    that went to the doctor. Mhm. And I will
  • 00:18:55
    remind you in 2021 if you had chest pain
  • 00:18:57
    or shortness of breath, you weren't
  • 00:18:59
    really somebody that was ready to jump
  • 00:19:01
    out and go to the doctor because we were
  • 00:19:03
    told not to seek medical care. So, in a
  • 00:19:06
    sense, they were restricting even more
  • 00:19:08
    reporting by saying the only people that
  • 00:19:09
    we're going to call and actually inquire
  • 00:19:11
    with are people that visit the
  • 00:19:13
    physicians and the hospitals. Just a
  • 00:19:15
    couple more questions for you.
  • 00:19:17
    um have we learned the or I guess what
  • 00:19:20
    lessons have we learned and what lessons
  • 00:19:22
    have yet to be learned from this
  • 00:19:24
    pandemic? So I I think the first thing
  • 00:19:26
    is is open-mindedness and that science
  • 00:19:30
    is not a closed book. Okay. And in a
  • 00:19:32
    sense especially the way our medical
  • 00:19:35
    system is run the problem is is over
  • 00:19:38
    time as consolidation. I mean most
  • 00:19:40
    physicians now are either employed by
  • 00:19:42
    some type of corporate entity. they're
  • 00:19:44
    employed by the government or they're
  • 00:19:46
    employed by some academic medical
  • 00:19:47
    center. The problem with that is most of
  • 00:19:50
    those places receive their funding from
  • 00:19:53
    one big place and it's called the NIH.
  • 00:19:55
    And so going against the grain with what
  • 00:19:57
    the NIH would say through their agencies
  • 00:19:59
    like CDC and FDA means that you're on,
  • 00:20:02
    you know, on the chopping block. And in
  • 00:20:05
    a sense that really restricts the
  • 00:20:06
    ability to think outside the box. And so
  • 00:20:09
    what we need is actually people that
  • 00:20:11
    first of all realize medicine is about
  • 00:20:13
    taking care of another human who's not
  • 00:20:15
    only physical but spiritual. And that
  • 00:20:17
    makes them different than rats. And in a
  • 00:20:19
    sense, if we treat everybody like rats
  • 00:20:21
    and look at a lot of spreadsheets,
  • 00:20:23
    you're going to get exactly what
  • 00:20:24
    happened in the last five years. And
  • 00:20:26
    that's not what you want from your
  • 00:20:27
    doctor and that's not what you want from
  • 00:20:29
    society and the medical system. Um, do
  • 00:20:32
    you think that, you know, with President
  • 00:20:34
    Trump's, you know, people like Dr. Marty
  • 00:20:36
    McCary at the FDA. Um, you know,
  • 00:20:39
    different people that he's brought in on
  • 00:20:40
    his medical team. Do you think that
  • 00:20:42
    things are heading in the right
  • 00:20:43
    direction? Yeah, 100%. I think Marty
  • 00:20:45
    already even the announcements yesterday
  • 00:20:47
    in terms of what they're going to do in
  • 00:20:49
    terms of further approvals for vaccines
  • 00:20:50
    for CO 19 that came out uh where they're
  • 00:20:53
    going to actually have to require
  • 00:20:54
    especially on the boosters that there
  • 00:20:55
    needs to be randomized control trials
  • 00:20:57
    that they're going to restrict it to
  • 00:20:58
    only people with significant health
  • 00:21:00
    conditions. I think this is the first
  • 00:21:02
    step in the right direction instead of a
  • 00:21:05
    trust us we know and then find out later
  • 00:21:07
    that they didn't. That's really what the
  • 00:21:10
    changes are making. And I think some of
  • 00:21:11
    the biggest things that have happened in
  • 00:21:12
    good ways are getting rid of somebody
  • 00:21:14
    like Peter Marx. Peter Marx was actually
  • 00:21:16
    head of Sber which was basically the the
  • 00:21:18
    regulatory body involved in actually
  • 00:21:21
    approving and licensing vaccines. Yet at
  • 00:21:23
    the same time in the summer of 2021 was
  • 00:21:26
    on YouTube advocating for the vaccine.
  • 00:21:29
    in a sense that's not his job that his
  • 00:21:32
    job is actually to regulate the very
  • 00:21:34
    industry that he was out promoting and
  • 00:21:37
    in fact even if that industry went on
  • 00:21:38
    YouTube and promoted their vaccine like
  • 00:21:40
    he would they would be fined and in a
  • 00:21:43
    sense he thought it was okay and he's
  • 00:21:44
    never held been held to account for it
  • 00:21:46
    and I think he needs to be uh just last
  • 00:21:48
    question we we've talked about the
  • 00:21:50
    vascular issues we've talked about
  • 00:21:51
    myocarditis are there any other issues
  • 00:21:53
    that you've come across either in
  • 00:21:54
    patients um so so the other thing that
  • 00:21:56
    we see is clotting dysfunction and so
  • 00:21:58
    clotting dysfunction function is
  • 00:21:59
    downstream from endothelial dysfunction.
  • 00:22:01
    But when we think about clotting, a lot
  • 00:22:02
    of people think about blood clots. And
  • 00:22:03
    I'm pretty sure most people have noticed
  • 00:22:05
    that maybe somebody that they wouldn't
  • 00:22:07
    have expected has had a blood clot.
  • 00:22:09
    Heck, heck, the NBA and NFL are full of
  • 00:22:11
    them that you would think, why are these
  • 00:22:13
    guys having blood clots? They're
  • 00:22:14
    literally active every day. But if you
  • 00:22:16
    inappropriately activate the endothelium
  • 00:22:18
    and the coagulation system, you cause a
  • 00:22:20
    cascade that causes fibrin to form
  • 00:22:23
    inappropriately. And a lot of what I
  • 00:22:24
    study especially under the microscope is
  • 00:22:26
    looking at what we call abnormal amaloid
  • 00:22:28
    fibbrin. So amaloid fibrin is like
  • 00:22:30
    typically we want our body to make
  • 00:22:32
    fibbrin in response to a need to stop
  • 00:22:34
    blood flow. And in a sense what that
  • 00:22:36
    usually looks like is spaghetti that
  • 00:22:38
    just came out of the colander. You know
  • 00:22:40
    it's basically you're able to pull it
  • 00:22:42
    apart when it's needed to. The actual
  • 00:22:44
    fibbrin that's formed because of the
  • 00:22:45
    spike protein is actually looks like
  • 00:22:47
    burnt spaghetti casserole that you have
  • 00:22:49
    to get a brillow pad to get off the
  • 00:22:51
    casserole dish. That's not easy for your
  • 00:22:53
    body to break down and in a sense what
  • 00:22:55
    that does is cause a cumulative process
  • 00:22:57
    and result in clotting and dysfunction
  • 00:22:59
    especially in the small vessels. So a
  • 00:23:01
    lot of people that we see that have long
  • 00:23:03
    COVID or persistent issues after the
  • 00:23:05
    vaccine, a lot of it is not necessarily
  • 00:23:07
    the big vessels, it's actually the very
  • 00:23:10
    small vessels where red blood cells line
  • 00:23:12
    up and actually get oxygen and other
  • 00:23:14
    things out to the tissues. In a sense, I
  • 00:23:16
    usually use the metaphor. It's like you
  • 00:23:18
    standing in your shower and no water's
  • 00:23:20
    coming out of your shower head. You call
  • 00:23:22
    a plumber and the plumber stays out in
  • 00:23:24
    your yard and tells you your water mane
  • 00:23:25
    is open. That's what a lot of the
  • 00:23:27
    cardiologists and doctors are doing. The
  • 00:23:29
    you would fire that plumber. But in a
  • 00:23:31
    sense, what's happening here is instead
  • 00:23:34
    these people feel awful. Their big
  • 00:23:36
    vessels are fine. Their small vessels
  • 00:23:38
    are destroyed. And in a sense, small
  • 00:23:40
    vessels are what matters. It's what
  • 00:23:42
    actually gets you the shower. They knew.
  • 00:23:45
    I mean again early in the vaccine roll
  • 00:23:48
    out they had a list of all the possible
  • 00:23:49
    vaccine adverse events that they should
  • 00:23:51
    expect to see and they limited that to
  • 00:23:55
    ask people to 10 things that were really
  • 00:23:57
    non nonsequittors meaning people feel
  • 00:24:00
    fatigued people feel you know like they
  • 00:24:03
    have a headache those kind of things not
  • 00:24:05
    questions that were at you know like
  • 00:24:07
    shortness of breath chest pain um
  • 00:24:09
    palpitations those kind of things and in
  • 00:24:11
    a I mean how does how does not asking
  • 00:24:13
    the right questions impact the health of
  • 00:24:16
    the country? Well, if you don't ask the
  • 00:24:18
    right questions, in a sense, you're not
  • 00:24:20
    going to know what's causing it. Does
  • 00:24:22
    that make sense? Totally. So, um you
  • 00:24:24
    know, again, it goes back to it's like
  • 00:24:27
    as we see increased cardiac event rates
  • 00:24:29
    in in society, we see early coronary
  • 00:24:32
    disease or actually young kids with lots
  • 00:24:34
    of new arrhythmias. Um, a lot of doctors
  • 00:24:37
    and I I deal with them all the all the
  • 00:24:39
    time are they don't even have the
  • 00:24:41
    framework or the lens to think that
  • 00:24:43
    COVID or the vaccine might have caused
  • 00:24:45
    it. And in a sense, what they're left
  • 00:24:47
    wondering is this is the weirdest thing
  • 00:24:49
    I've seen, but I guess it's just them. I
  • 00:24:51
    guess it's just a outlier. Exactly. But
  • 00:24:54
    it's not.
Tags
  • COVID-19
  • vascular disease
  • myocarditis
  • mRNA vaccine
  • long COVID
  • clotting dysfunction
  • vaccine safety
  • medical establishment
  • independent research
  • health risks