Whistleblow Uncovers Covid Scam

The speaker begins by expressing gratitude for being invited to present for the second time, highlighting that significant progress has been made since the last presentation due to a whistleblower providing data from the RKI (Robert Koch Institute). This leak offers comprehensive, unredacted internal documents and additional materials that are valuable for understanding the international coordination of COVID-19 policies, especially lockdowns. The presentation questions whether the RKI operated independently of political influence, referencing a statement by the German Health Minister denying political interference, despite heavily redacted released protocols.

The speaker provides examples of political influence on the RKI, stating that the institute felt compelled to follow governmental directives to maintain relevance. They explain that testing strategies were politically driven, with an emphasis on mass testing regardless of the medical necessity, influencing public perception of the pandemic. The speaker notes that early lockdown measures in Germany were based on PCR test numbers rather than actual medical emergencies, highlighting inconsistencies in the government's public statements and internal documentation.

The presentation discusses the RKI's focus on aligning with political agendas over scientific findings, maintaining public measures by crafting justifications. Internal data suggested hospital bed occupancy was low, contradictory to government narratives. Concerns about the causality between measures and declining case numbers were internally acknowledged, indicating a deviation from usual policy standards. The presentation points to an RKI graphic showing normal epidemic patterns, contradicting the severity of the lockdown measures initiated in March 2020.

The discussion shifts to vaccine development and rollout, noting initial skepticism about mRNA and DNA vaccines due to lack of experience, with decisions to bypass extensive trials. The RKI documents revealed that safety data would be collected post-marketing. Despite unknown effectiveness during initial vaccinations, media and government messaging underplayed risks and promoted widespread public immunization campaigns, leading to significant public trust issues.

Further examination of vaccination policies reveals contradictions in public messaging versus internal understanding concerning vaccine efficacy, including the absence of evidence for transmission prevention (Fremdschutz). The speaker criticizes the imposition of public health measures and policies based on overstated benefits of vaccination, pointing out the discrepancy between the internal knowledge of RKI and government communication. The decision-making process is questioned, highlighting the complex interaction between policy, scientific data, and public narratives.