00:00:11
well the re the reason I say uh starting
00:00:13
a company is like eating glass and
00:00:14
staring thus is that um in order to make
00:00:17
a company successful it it requires uh
00:00:20
doing a lot of painful work work that is
00:00:22
not fun working very long hours um and
00:00:24
then uh maybe your company survives
00:00:26
maybe it does not um and the vast
00:00:28
majority of startups fail so that's why
00:00:31
um you know that's the eating glass and
00:00:33
staring to the US is starting a company
00:00:36
uh lots of hard work followed by death
00:00:38
is usually what happens when people
00:00:39
start companies um that's why I say if
00:00:42
people need words of encouragement to
00:00:44
start a company they should not start a
00:00:45
company um U with respect to government
00:00:49
um you
00:00:51
there's really the the the challenge is
00:00:54
overcoming uh bureaucracy um and I think
00:00:57
bureaucracy is perhaps uh
00:01:01
the the I'd say the penultimate bus
00:01:04
battle the the ultimate bus battle is
00:01:05
defeating entropy which we physics tells
00:01:08
us we cannot defeat entropy
00:01:11
um the second hottest battle is
00:01:14
defeating
00:01:15
bureaucracy um but you know it's that's
00:01:19
that's how difficult it is to improve
00:01:21
government um now one of the things
00:01:24
that's happened which which always
00:01:25
happens with an extended period of Peace
00:01:28
time is that you have a steady increase
00:01:30
in the amount of bureaucracy um the size
00:01:32
of government grows the the laws and
00:01:35
regulations that um are put in place uh
00:01:38
get um larger every year so it stands
00:01:43
the reason that you know if you have
00:01:46
Regulators Regulators are going to add
00:01:48
more regulations every year lawmakers
00:01:50
will add more laws every year um the the
00:01:54
cleansing process normally for getting
00:01:56
rid of nonsensical laws and regulations
00:01:58
is war now obviously would prefer to not
00:02:00
have War Drive the uh Reformation of
00:02:04
government so in the absence of War you
00:02:06
have to um you have to have something
00:02:10
like what we have have formed here in
00:02:12
the US um a department of government
00:02:14
efficiency in order to get rid of uh
00:02:17
laws and regulations well with laws we
00:02:19
have to require obviously the the
00:02:22
consent of Congress but for regulations
00:02:24
this can be done at with at the
00:02:26
executive branch level is to reexamine
00:02:28
the vast body of regul
00:02:30
and get rid of those where the they do
00:02:32
where there's more harm than good um of
00:02:35
which there are many um and and then
00:02:38
reducing the size of the government um
00:02:42
and and and then also balancing the
00:02:44
budget so that we are not driving the
00:02:47
country
00:02:48
bankruptcy um these things are all very
00:02:51
hard um and I want to be clear like we
00:02:54
we may indeed fail in this objective
00:02:56
that's why I described it as an
00:02:57
extremely difficult battle um the the
00:03:00
this has never succeeded before so prior
00:03:03
attempts to reduce the size of
00:03:05
bureaucracy to uh make government more
00:03:07
efficients have uh generally failed
00:03:11
um even when parties are elected for
00:03:15
that
00:03:16
so if you take say uh Reagan uh he've
00:03:20
campaigned on getting rid of the Federal
00:03:21
Department of Education and having that
00:03:23
be done at the state level um and the
00:03:27
Department of Education at the federal
00:03:28
level is a
00:03:30
uh creation it was um I think created
00:03:33
about 45 years ago or something like
00:03:35
that you're also very familiar with the
00:03:37
German economy and the German market so
00:03:40
would you recommend a department of
00:03:41
government efficiency for Germany
00:03:45
too um I would um I I think generally
00:03:49
for governments that having you
00:03:51
basically need to have some process for
00:03:54
trash trash collection garbage
00:03:56
collection um so if you if you a if you
00:04:00
only have a process for creating um
00:04:03
regulations but no process for deleting
00:04:06
regulations eventually everything is
00:04:08
illegal and nothing is allowed to happen
00:04:11
um and and progress uh comes to a
00:04:13
grinding halt um so uh it's very
00:04:18
important I think that all governments
00:04:19
have um have a have a team that's
00:04:23
responsible for reducing the size of
00:04:25
government and for uh getting rid of
00:04:28
regulations that may made sense at one
00:04:30
time um but no longer makes sense
00:04:32
currently uh and simplifying the process
00:04:34
otherwise you get um these things build
00:04:38
up like like you know plaque on arteries
00:04:41
like you start having uh the the the the
00:04:45
sort of the flow of of blood through the
00:04:47
government get const constricted uh with
00:04:49
more and more buildup on the walls of
00:04:51
the arteries um so you must have this
00:04:54
cleansing process very important
00:05:01
well I think president Trump likes to
00:05:02
get things done um and he he's not
00:05:06
looking to you know punish country
00:05:08
countries um or do or to do things that
00:05:11
are economically insane um but he does
00:05:13
view tariffs as a means to uh gain
00:05:17
cooperation of countries for important
00:05:20
matters um so uh and and and obviously
00:05:23
if countries have implemented asymmetric
00:05:26
tariffs where they are taxing the import
00:05:28
of American Goods uh while America does
00:05:30
not tax the import of their goods uh
00:05:33
then we have an imbalance so um what I
00:05:37
suspect you will see is that uh
00:05:40
president Trump will be
00:05:42
uh will will want to for countries that
00:05:46
have asymmetric tariff barriers like and
00:05:49
it could be either tariff or regulatory
00:05:50
barriers that which are basically any
00:05:53
any Restraint of trade um then the the
00:05:56
president Trump will will want to take
00:05:58
action to stop the Restraint of trade
00:06:00
and ensure that there is a fair Level
00:06:02
Playing Field for American companies and
00:06:04
companies in Europe or China or wherever
00:06:06
the case may be so um that's my guess my
00:06:11
my sense of it is is that there need to
00:06:13
be um there needs to be he he's simply
00:06:16
looking for a fair and Level Playing
00:06:22
Field yeah um well first of all uh I
00:06:25
think actually Tesla would would have
00:06:27
existed without a
00:06:30
if the FD had been in power we would
00:06:32
still have put the the factory uh in
00:06:34
Berlin um the I'm generally um against
00:06:39
uh government incentives that distort
00:06:42
markets um and there are tend to be a
00:06:44
lot of government um tariffs and
00:06:47
incentives and penalties that distort
00:06:49
markets so uh that's uh you know now now
00:06:54
if if those things are put in place by
00:06:55
others then we obviously must take
00:06:56
advantage of them or Tesla is at a
00:06:58
competitive disadvantage
00:07:00
um but uh the you know the reason that
00:07:04
I'm uh in favor of afd is that um
00:07:08
there's some fundamental things that
00:07:09
must happen without which uh I you know
00:07:12
I'm concerned that um Germany will will
00:07:16
fail which is that there has to be there
00:07:18
have to be sensible controls on um
00:07:21
immigration uh there has to be uh if you
00:07:24
know if there are criminals in Germany
00:07:26
uh who are committing crimes and hurting
00:07:28
people in Germany they must be deported
00:07:30
um and that's not happening um then
00:07:33
there must also be freedom of speech
00:07:35
such that the people know what the truth
00:07:36
is um otherwise they cannot make an
00:07:38
informed decision so if you do not have
00:07:40
freedom of speech you cannot be a
00:07:42
democracy because the public cannot make
00:07:44
an informed decision about their vote if
00:07:46
there is not Freedom of Information um
00:07:49
so the there the in Germany right now
00:07:51
there are
00:07:52
Draconian uh laws rules against uh
00:07:56
freedom of of expression uh where even
00:07:58
insulting politician can get to uh
00:08:01
prison time which is insane so uh I like
00:08:05
the fact that the afd is in favor of
00:08:06
freedom of speech um I like the that the
00:08:08
afd is in favor of sensible immigration
00:08:11
policies and deportation of criminals um
00:08:14
and I like the generally generally
00:08:15
libertarian policies of the
00:08:19
afd uh well it it is obviously easy to
00:08:22
straw man my statement uh which is what
00:08:24
he's done uh to say that uh you know
00:08:27
that that uh what that that we should
00:08:30
flip from entirely uh a a sort of a
00:08:33
where where we sort of torture uh young
00:08:35
children in Germany with with nothing
00:08:38
but guilt uh to saying oh we should
00:08:41
completely ignore the sins of Nazi
00:08:44
Germany I've said obviously uh neither
00:08:47
of those things uh what I have said is
00:08:49
that it we should not be torturing
00:08:52
children in Germany uh and telling them
00:08:54
that Germany is the worst country in the
00:08:55
world uh and that is all they are taught
00:08:57
and they are taught nothing about about
00:09:00
uh you know uh the the the great things
00:09:04
that Germany has done in the past um and
00:09:06
and that the that Germany cannot be
00:09:10
defined and and and and children whose
00:09:13
great-grandparents may not have even
00:09:14
been nais um are told that Germany is
00:09:17
the worst country that has ever existed
00:09:19
in the face of the Earth and they must
00:09:21
live with nothing but guilt and shame
00:09:23
this is
00:09:24
wrong this is wrong this is this is not
00:09:27
what I'm not saying is that that Nazism
00:09:29
should be ignored I I never said
00:09:32
that um but I am saying that the
00:09:35
tremendous uh cultural history of of
00:09:37
Germany uh is is incredible if you think
00:09:41
of the the great philosophers uh the
00:09:43
great composers uh the incredible
00:09:46
contributions in terms of engineering
00:09:48
and science that Germany has made uh
00:09:51
including for those of the of Jewish
00:09:53
people in Germany who you know Einstein
00:09:56
you know good example um uh
00:10:00
these these things should be celebrated
00:10:03
um not to the exclusion of Nazism not to
00:10:07
ignore it but not to say that this is
00:10:10
all Germany is about is absurd and
00:10:14
false okay and so so people should be
00:10:16
proud of the great things that Germany
00:10:19
has done proud of the the that that
00:10:22
Germany is an an ancient Nation
00:10:25
thousands of years old um that was the
00:10:28
the one of the few
00:10:30
Nations to actually resist incorporation
00:10:32
into the Roman Empire you go back 2,000
00:10:35
years ago even Rome could not defeat
00:10:38
Germany Rome was the most powerful EMP
00:10:41
Empire in the world at the time but
00:10:42
could not defeat could not defeat
00:10:44
Germany they gave up so uh one simply
00:10:48
one simply needs to understand the full
00:10:50
context of German history the great
00:10:52
things as well as the Terrible
00:10:54
Things um and uh you know when you look
00:10:58
at say
00:11:00
America like what happened to the native
00:11:03
people of
00:11:04
America where are
00:11:07
they uh what happened to the native
00:11:10
people of Judea before the Jewish people
00:11:12
got there where are
00:11:14
they so at some point the things cannot
00:11:18
be simply about terrible things that
00:11:21
have been done the terrible things must
00:11:23
be learned but also the good things
00:11:30
well I mean this is simply uh I mean
00:11:32
that's that's you know we're going from
00:11:33
like deep philosophical and political
00:11:35
issues to uh trivia of the week um this
00:11:39
is
00:11:41
a there are a lot of very smart uh very
00:11:46
motivated uh engineers in China um so
00:11:50
you should expect that China will come
00:11:52
up with many great things and they have
00:11:54
come with many great things again look
00:11:56
at the and if one looks at the long
00:11:57
history of China also an ancient Nation
00:11:59
uh that has invented and developed many
00:12:01
things and for most of actually human
00:12:03
history China has been the most powerful
00:12:06
Nation on Earth um so you know I think
00:12:10
particularly from say the possession of
00:12:12
people in China they they simply view
00:12:14
China's ascendency as um resuming the
00:12:18
the normal sort of place in history
00:12:20
which is the most powerful country on
00:12:22
Earth um and so you you can expect that
00:12:26
they will do many great things deep seek
00:12:28
being being one of them
00:12:29
um but that that is simply um a result
00:12:33
of of the immense amount of talent um in
00:12:37
China that is very impressive um but but
00:12:41
it's not is it is it some sort of
00:12:43
complete revolution in AI it no it is
00:12:46
not um
00:12:48
the xai and others will soon be
00:12:51
releasing models that are better than
00:12:56
deeps well as you know the Europe
00:13:00
actually has more bureaucracy than wait
00:13:03
can you guys is it okay connection looks
00:13:06
good
00:13:07
the Europe actually has more bureaucracy
00:13:10
than the US does because you don't just
00:13:12
have the provincial um and sort of uh
00:13:15
National level you you also have the EU
00:13:18
uh on top of that um and to be totally
00:13:20
Frank uh EU headquarters in Brussels is
00:13:23
a essentially a cathedral to bureaucracy
00:13:27
um so if one wishes to visit the Grand
00:13:30
Cathedral of bureaucracy visit EU
00:13:32
headquarters in Brussels
00:13:34
um uh I do think that uh Europe probably
00:13:39
needs um government efficiency more than
00:13:42
than the US does and this needs to
00:13:44
happen at the at the country level and
00:13:46
at the EU level
00:13:50
um and and actually I think the Java is
00:13:52
more difficult in Europe than it is in
00:13:54
the US um you know the I I think
00:13:59
regulation has inhibited a tremendous
00:14:01
amount of progress and innovation in
00:14:04
Europe and and and unless and and if if
00:14:07
the over I call it the sort of the slow
00:14:11
strangulation by overregulation um it
00:14:14
because it's a slow strangulation
00:14:16
because it's not like at any one moment
00:14:18
you you feel like this is this is this
00:14:20
is it but but the the no around the neck
00:14:23
just gets a little tighter every year um
00:14:26
and and eventually uh you know it's it's
00:14:28
going to kill Europe so there must be in
00:14:31
my opinion immediate action uh to reduce
00:14:34
regulation at the EU level at the
00:14:36
country level and at the local
00:14:42
level well I think we'll see that um
00:14:45
open source models uh lag generally lag
00:14:49
the uh commercial models um so whatever
00:14:53
is commercially powerful today will
00:14:56
probably be open source in a year or
00:14:58
less and I expect that Trend to
00:15:03
continue so so essentially everyone will
00:15:06
have
00:15:09
ai do you see in fact this is this is
00:15:12
maybe the most profound
00:15:14
change you know the Advent of digital
00:15:17
super intelligence um if you stand back
00:15:20
and say like from from a thousand years
00:15:23
ago sorry thousand a thousand years from
00:15:25
now what will historians well assuming
00:15:28
they're even human at that point not
00:15:30
computers um what will historians regard
00:15:33
as the most important thing or the most
00:15:36
important milestones in history um one
00:15:40
of those fundamental Milestones will be
00:15:42
the Advent of digital superintelligence
00:15:44
no
00:15:45
question um they will long ago have
00:15:47
forgotten who's in charge of of which
00:15:50
country um or that will be a minor by
00:15:52
comparison with the Advent of digital
00:15:54
super intelligence I think also um the
00:15:58
human becoming a multiplet
00:16:01
civilization um would also fit on that
00:16:03
on that list because I think that fits
00:16:06
on the list I mean one could say like
00:16:09
looking at from a very broad uh
00:16:12
standpoint very high level look at say
00:16:16
what what are the what are what are
00:16:19
Milestones that would perhaps be in the
00:16:20
top 10 from an from the general
00:16:24
standpoint of evolution in general uh
00:16:26
you'd say like there would be single
00:16:28
cell life multicellular life
00:16:30
differentiation into plants and animals
00:16:33
uh life going from Ocean to land mammals
00:16:38
uh cognitive function in mammals that's
00:16:41
like humans um then also then then then
00:16:44
would be life becoming
00:16:47
multiplanetary
00:16:49
and digital super intelligence would fit
00:16:52
on on that you know essentially top 10
00:16:55
list
00:16:59
I mean with great difficulty um it is
00:17:01
quite a challenge uh the you know our
00:17:05
our brain only consumes 20 watts of
00:17:08
power and uh and of that only 10 of
00:17:12
about half of that is higher brain
00:17:13
function so I've got basically a 10 watt
00:17:14
meat computer to do all this um and and
00:17:16
I find this all to be very challenging
00:17:18
for my 10 watt meat computer that is my
00:17:19
brain um uh one thing that I think is
00:17:24
helpful though is um there's a big
00:17:27
difference between training
00:17:29
uh how much mental workload training to
00:17:31
do something takes versus uh inference
00:17:35
or executing that thing so you could
00:17:37
take like let's say uh chess as an
00:17:40
example it might take proba say 10,000
00:17:43
hours to become a Grandmaster of Chess
00:17:47
but then you can play the game in a few
00:17:51
hours um so that's sort of what H has
00:17:55
happened here with uh say Tesla and
00:17:57
SpaceX is that I've I have really way
00:18:00
more than
00:18:00
$10,000 uh into understanding how to
00:18:03
build and grow a car company and a
00:18:05
rocket company uh and satellites and uh
00:18:08
all these things um I also before SpaceX
00:18:13
uh you know was a co-founder of of two
00:18:16
internet companies so I understand the
00:18:18
internet I understand payments and all
00:18:19
that kind of thing um and so the mental
00:18:23
workload required once you have trained
00:18:25
on something is very low compared to the
00:18:27
training itself
00:18:29
um that is how I'm able to do
00:18:32
things uh that requireed immense amounts
00:18:35
of training over decades uh but only but
00:18:38
do not require um much mental workload
00:18:42
once the training is completed um now
00:18:45
right now for for government although
00:18:46
I've interfaced with government
00:18:47
tremendously uh this is this is my first
00:18:50
time actually trying to improve
00:18:52
government so there will be some initial
00:18:56
training workload that is significant
00:18:57
and then we'll move to inference which
00:19:00
is several orders of magnitude easier
00:19:01
than
00:19:06
training um I have not actually I'm not
00:19:10
put in a vid for Tik Tok um and
00:19:15
um I mean I I don't I don't have any any
00:19:18
plans for what would I do if if I had
00:19:20
Tik Tok I mean I guess I I would look at
00:19:24
the algorithm and try to decide you know
00:19:27
how how
00:19:29
how harmful or or useful is this
00:19:31
algorithm and and what can we do to uh
00:19:34
shift the algorithm to be more
00:19:36
productive um and ultimately be
00:19:38
beneficial to humanity um you know we
00:19:41
should just generally lean in the
00:19:43
direction of something which is uh more
00:19:45
beneficial than than more harmful um I
00:19:48
don't use Tik Tok personally
00:19:51
so you know that's I'm not that familiar
00:19:54
with it I've just seen you know I just
00:19:55
see the videos occasionally appearing on
00:19:57
X or people show me something
00:19:59
um but I'm not trumping at the at the B
00:20:02
to acquire Tik Tok um I I don't know
00:20:05
acquire companies in general it's quite
00:20:07
rare the acquiring Twitter now called x
00:20:11
uh was was highly unusual I I usually
00:20:13
build companies from from scratch and um
00:20:18
the reason I acquired Twitter which is
00:20:20
what I said at the time which is that it
00:20:21
was important for to preserve freedom of
00:20:23
speech in America and to the extent
00:20:25
we're legally allowed to in the rest of
00:20:26
the world um that's
00:20:29
uh it was I felt like acquiring Twitter
00:20:32
would be an important productive step
00:20:34
for the future of humanity um and uh
00:20:37
even though it's it's really quite
00:20:39
painful U and has been very difficult um
00:20:42
it was I thought I think nonetheless
00:20:43
important to do so um I don't know if
00:20:47
the same logic I don't know if the same
00:20:48
logic applies to Tik Tok but
00:20:53
um so I'm not I'm not I I don't B I
00:20:57
don't acquire things just for economic
00:20:59
reasons um and so it's not clear to me
00:21:02
what what the purpose of acquiring Tech
00:21:04
talkk would be apart from
00:21:09
economics sure well I generally regard
00:21:11
these movements as as positive um so and
00:21:15
and this this whole definition of what
00:21:17
is right what is what is sort of a
00:21:19
rightwing what is leftwing this whole
00:21:22
thing has shifted over time um you know
00:21:25
policies like simply having uh sensible
00:21:27
immigration
00:21:29
um and um you know uh s will govern
00:21:34
spending uh are those used to be uh in
00:21:38
fact people on the left used to have
00:21:39
those uh opinions as well and the
00:21:42
Centrist government certainly had those
00:21:43
opinions so uh what what we've seen in
00:21:47
the media is a
00:21:49
defining uh things that used to be
00:21:51
Centrist to Center left such as a
00:21:54
sensible immigration policy as somehow
00:21:56
far right which is absurd um and false
00:22:00
uh because uh really far right should
00:22:02
refer to extremely fascist situations
00:22:05
like far right should refer to you know
00:22:07
electing regimes that want to uh launch
00:22:09
Wars uh or or genocides or something
00:22:12
like that that's what that farite is
00:22:14
supposed to mean far is not supposed to
00:22:15
mean sensible immigration policy um that
00:22:20
that literally if you took speeches from
00:22:22
politicians that were Center left and
00:22:24
just go take their speeches from 10 15
00:22:27
years ago they were literally saying
00:22:28
this the same thing so what what we've
00:22:31
seen is really a a drift left to to um
00:22:37
you know hesitate use the same modifier
00:22:39
but where a lot of governments actually
00:22:41
are far left but think they are Centrist
00:22:44
or think they are merely left or
00:22:45
Centrist but they are actually far left
00:22:47
compared to what the left
00:22:50
uh was
00:22:52
even years
00:22:55
ago um you can take speeches for that
00:22:58
Obama or Hillary Clinton gave about
00:23:00
immigration and they sound identical to
00:23:02
president Trump and that's just as of 10
00:23:04
15 years ago not that long ago um so I
00:23:09
think what we've seen is a redefinition
00:23:10
of what is right and left but an
00:23:12
inaccurate uh redefinition and frankly
00:23:15
it's just propaganda because people are
00:23:18
are generally have the association that
00:23:19
well anything far right must be bad so
00:23:21
then we're going to just label things
00:23:22
that are common sense far right which is
00:23:24
absurd um now what what what I'm a big
00:23:27
fan of uh
00:23:29
president mle he's doing fantastic job
00:23:31
in Argentina the results speak for
00:23:33
themselves Argentina Argentina is
00:23:35
experiencing unpressed intoed growth he
00:23:37
has inflation under control finally uh
00:23:40
he has reduced the size of government
00:23:42
dramatically um and and reducing the
00:23:44
size of government is very important
00:23:45
because you need to move people from low
00:23:47
to negative productivity roles in the
00:23:49
government sector to high productivity
00:23:51
roles in the private sector this is what
00:23:53
actually results at a fundamental level
00:23:54
in economic Improvement if you move
00:23:57
people from to negative productivity
00:23:59
roles to high productivity roles uh then
00:24:01
the output of goods and services
00:24:02
increases and the standard of living
00:24:04
increases this is uh leaving aside
00:24:08
because sometimes people get caught up
00:24:09
in the they think money is real but
00:24:11
money is not real U output of goods and
00:24:13
services is real money is simply a
00:24:15
representation of
00:24:20
that um yes well let's just Define what
00:24:23
what is meant here I mean um if um by
00:24:26
workism one means
00:24:29
uh uh you know just like racism on the
00:24:33
basis of of sex and gender and other
00:24:36
matters which um you know Dei is simply
00:24:40
racism
00:24:41
rebranded um then yes I'm Against Racism
00:24:44
and sexism no matter who it's directed
00:24:46
against uh it is entirely possible to be
00:24:48
racist against white people or black
00:24:50
people or Asians or anyone else um and
00:24:53
and we should really accept no racism or
00:24:55
sexism in any form no matter what it's
00:24:57
called Uh Dei and and workism uh advoc
00:25:01
essentially Advocate racism and sexism
00:25:03
sexism that is wrong they're also anti-
00:25:05
meritocratic uh so we should really in
00:25:08
my view have a mer meritocratic Society
00:25:10
where people succeed on the as a
00:25:12
function of their abilities and how how
00:25:14
hard they work that should be the only
00:25:17
way that that people um succeed not
00:25:20
through any some arbitrary measures uh
00:25:23
that are discriminatory so so we need a
00:25:26
meritocratic society and we need freedom
00:25:27
of speech
00:25:28
um and freedom of speech is only
00:25:30
relevant if people are allowed if people
00:25:32
you don't like are allowed to say things
00:25:34
you don't like that is the only time
00:25:35
freedom of speech is relevant um it it
00:25:38
can't be that the government is deciding
00:25:39
what is Mis what is or is not
00:25:41
misinformation or disinformation uh
00:25:43
because then uh you get politics applied
00:25:45
to those uh labels and in fact you
00:25:48
simply get the suppression of freedom of
00:25:49
speech so really
00:25:52
um I think it's rism is is evil because
00:25:56
it is it is um R IST sexist um and and
00:26:00
and anti-free
00:26:05
speech yeah I mean it's it's it's very
00:26:07
basic that if if people stop having you
00:26:11
know if there are no babies people if
00:26:12
people stop having babies Humanity will
00:26:14
come to to a halt um and uh we we we've
00:26:19
seen now for many years very low birth
00:26:21
rates uh in almost all of the world um
00:26:25
so even India recently went Bel low
00:26:27
replacement rate
00:26:29
um so sometimes people say well we'll
00:26:31
just we'll just replace people with
00:26:33
immigration like immigration from where
00:26:35
um if you look at China for example they
00:26:37
are roughly at half replacement rate I
00:26:39
think maybe at maybe at 60% or something
00:26:42
like that so that means call it
00:26:44
something like 600 million people will
00:26:47
be lost in in of this generation where
00:26:50
where are you going to get 600 million
00:26:52
uh immigrants that would require almost
00:26:54
two Americas to move to China uh that's
00:26:57
impossible possible if you look at Korea
00:27:00
Korea has a replacement the birth rate
00:27:02
is now one3 replacement rate that means
00:27:05
in three generations Korea the size of
00:27:07
the Korean population will be about 3 to
00:27:09
4% of what it's current currently is and
00:27:12
basically Korea will
00:27:14
disappear um and I I think that there
00:27:16
[Music]
00:27:18
are uh great things in every culture um
00:27:21
we don't want the German German culture
00:27:23
to disappear we don't want french
00:27:25
culture to disappear we don't want
00:27:27
Korean culture to disappear or or Japan
00:27:30
or America or anywhere um I think it's
00:27:34
it's you know this is part of why I'm
00:27:36
like I think we should be very cautious
00:27:38
about uh having some sort of global
00:27:40
mixing part because we will then not
00:27:44
have every place will look will be the
00:27:46
same and there won't be any unique
00:27:48
cultures in the world which I think
00:27:50
would make the world
00:27:52
worse so I think we need to preserve
00:27:55
these country cultures um and uh and
00:28:00
that and that that's that's the future
00:28:01
that I think is is better I think that
00:28:03
that most people would agree is is
00:28:05
better we should
00:28:06
not have cultures
00:28:08
disappear um and currently based on the
00:28:12
current birth rates and the sort of uh
00:28:16
so-called multiculturalism and
00:28:18
globalism uh what we're actually seeing
00:28:20
is the dilution of individual cultures
00:28:23
and the the destruction and death of
00:28:25
individual cultures which I think is
00:28:27
terrible for the future
00:28:33
well I think we are at an inflection
00:28:35
point so we the I would
00:28:40
recommend you know radical change in in
00:28:42
Europe uh that uh encourages a much
00:28:47
higher birth rate I think this may
00:28:48
require some very dramatic incentives um
00:28:52
I think Europe needs to have a sensible
00:28:54
immigration policy uh you know that
00:28:57
where people are vetted before coming to
00:28:59
Europe and if they commit crimes they
00:29:01
are deported um otherwise you will have
00:29:04
uh the destruction of Europe um the also
00:29:08
you have to have uh significant a
00:29:11
significant effort in
00:29:12
deregulation um and and basically
00:29:15
removal of laws and regulations um so
00:29:18
that you do not get hardening of the
00:29:20
arteries until basically everything it's
00:29:21
illegal to do anything in Europe which
00:29:23
is what's basically happening now um so
00:29:26
I'd recommend immediate and dramatic
00:29:27
action for deregulation freedom of
00:29:29
speech um and sensible immigration and
00:29:33
improving the birth rate if those things
00:29:35
happen Europe will have a good future
00:29:36
and if they do not Europe will fail
