Polycarbonate and Trivex Lenses: A Shocking Comparison

00:30:45
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WO-hoibxBOY

Ringkasan

TLDRThe video discusses a series of tests comparing Polycarbonate and Trivex lenses, focusing on their performance under various conditions. It covers aspects such as weight, chemical resistance, optical clarity, tensile strength, impact resistance, UV protection, tintability, and pricing. Notably, while Trivex proved lighter and performed better in some tests, Polycarbonate showed resilience in impact tests. The video highlights that lens performance can significantly vary based on coatings, manufacturing processes, and other external factors, advising caution when choosing between the two materials.

Takeaways

  • 🔍 Trivex lenses are generally lighter than Polycarbonate lenses.
  • ⚗️ Polycarbonate lenses may degrade in certain chemicals like acetone.
  • 💡 Optical clarity can vary, but Trivex shows clearer results in some cases.
  • 🛡️ Impact resistance greatly depends on the lens coatings applied.
  • 🌞 Both materials typically claim 100% UV protection, but Polycarbonate allows some UV light to pass.
  • 🎨 Tintability is influenced more by the coating than the base lens material.
  • 💰 Trivex is usually more expensive and less widely available than Polycarbonate.
  • 🏗️ Trivex edges more cleanly, making it easier to work with for precise fittings.
  • 🚫 Be cautious—lens performance can change based on coatings and manufacturing.
  • 📊 Knowledge of materials and coatings is crucial for predicting lens behavior.

Garis waktu

  • 00:00:00 - 00:05:00

    This video explores the performance of Polycarbonate and Trivex lenses in various tests using everyday tools and chemicals. The presenter emphasizes that these tests are informal, conducted in a garage, and aim to compare the two materials without a vested interest in the outcome. The objective is to provide insight into real-world applications and characteristics of both lens materials, which are often compared but not thoroughly analyzed in terms of actual performance.

  • 00:05:00 - 00:10:00

    The presenter weighs lenses made of Polycarbonate and Trivex to determine any weight differences. It is found that while Trivex is slightly lighter, the difference is negligible for standard prescriptions. Overall, both lens types weigh in a similar range, resulting in no significant weight advantage for either material in practical applications.

  • 00:10:00 - 00:15:00

    Chemical resistance is tested by exposing both lens types to acetone and alcohol for 10 minutes. The Trivex lenses show no damage, while the Polycarbonate lenses begin to degrade, indicating that Poly may be more susceptible to chemical damage. The presenter points out that real-world lens cleaning practices involve minimal exposure to harsh chemicals, putting the severity of these findings into context.

  • 00:15:00 - 00:20:00

    Optical clarity is examined through the Abbe value, suggesting Trivex should perform better in terms of chromatic aberration. However, results show inconclusive evidence as both lenses display some color dispersion. Ultimately, the clarity is affected by various factors, leaving it up to the viewer to assess which lens provides a clearer image in practical tests.

  • 00:20:00 - 00:25:00

    Tensile strength tests indicate that Trivex lenses hold up better in both pull and push tests compared to Polycarbonate. The presenter highlights a significant failure in Polycarbonate lenses during testing, while Trivex performed robustly. The comparison between both lenses reveals that Trivex exhibits superior tensile strength under real-world stress conditions despite inconsistent results in some earlier tests.

  • 00:25:00 - 00:30:45

    The video concludes by reiterating that lens performance is greatly impacted by the coatings rather than the lens materials themselves. Both the price and availability of Trivex and Polycarbonate lenses are discussed, noting that Polycarbonate is more widely available and affordable than Trivex. Viewers are encouraged to understand the materials, their coatings, and respective performances before making purchasing decisions.

Tampilkan lebih banyak

Peta Pikiran

Video Tanya Jawab

  • What are the main materials being compared in the tests?

    Polycarbonate and Trivex lenses.

  • Was the testing environment scientific?

    No, the tests were conducted in a garage and not in a scientific laboratory.

  • Which lens material is lighter?

    Trivex is slightly lighter than Polycarbonate.

  • How did Polycarbonate perform in chemical resistance tests?

    Polycarbonate showed signs of degradation when exposed to acetone.

  • What was the outcome of the impact tests with hammer and firearms?

    Polycarbonate lenses did not shatter under hammer impact but performed poorly compared to Trivex, which shattered under similar conditions.

  • Do Trivex lenses have better optical clarity than Polycarbonate?

    The optical clarity is generally better in Trivex, but results can vary by manufacturer.

  • How do the lens materials compare in terms of UV protection?

    Both materials claim 100% UV protection, but tests showed Polycarbonate allows 3% UV light through.

  • Which material is better for tintability?

    The ability to tint depends heavily on the coatings rather than the base material itself.

  • How do prices of Trivex and Polycarbonate compare?

    Trivex is typically more expensive than Polycarbonate.

  • Which lens is easier to edge and drill?

    Trivex edges more cleanly than Polycarbonate, making it easier for precise work.

Lihat lebih banyak ringkasan video

Dapatkan akses instan ke ringkasan video YouTube gratis yang didukung oleh AI!
Teks
en
Gulir Otomatis:
  • 00:00:00
    - What do power tools
  • 00:00:01
    (drill)
  • 00:00:02
    caustic chemicals,
  • 00:00:06
    firearms,
  • 00:00:08
    (gunshots)
  • 00:00:09
    and twelve-ton jacks,
  • 00:00:10
    (jack pumps)
  • 00:00:12
    have in common?
  • 00:00:13
    Well for one thing,
  • 00:00:14
    you wouldn't want to try to bring them on an airplane.
  • 00:00:17
    The other thing they have in common
  • 00:00:18
    is that we used these items
  • 00:00:20
    to put Poly and Trivex lenses through their paces
  • 00:00:25
    to see how they would perform in some real world,
  • 00:00:29
    ordinary, and extraordinary circumstances.
  • 00:00:33
    Before you go saying,
  • 00:00:34
    "I know all about Poly and Trivex"
  • 00:00:36
    I think you're gonna be surprised.
  • 00:00:40
    (upbeat music)
  • 00:00:54
    (majestic trumpet music)
  • 00:01:02
    Why would I say that I believe that you might be surprised?
  • 00:01:06
    Well because I was.
  • 00:01:08
    I was genuinely shocked at the outcome
  • 00:01:10
    of some of the tests that you're about to see.
  • 00:01:14
    Now three disclaimers before we get started.
  • 00:01:17
    Disclaimer number one, I have no vested interest
  • 00:01:21
    in the outcome of these tests.
  • 00:01:24
    I work for a whole sale optical lab,
  • 00:01:26
    not an optical lens material manufacturer.
  • 00:01:31
    Disclaimer number two:
  • 00:01:33
    I don't care which one of these materials you use.
  • 00:01:37
    Look, that's up to you.
  • 00:01:39
    This is not Poly versus Trivex,
  • 00:01:41
    this is simply a comparison
  • 00:01:43
    of the performance of the two materials
  • 00:01:45
    because they're often mentioned kind of in the same light.
  • 00:01:48
    Disclaimer number three, and this is the biggie:
  • 00:01:52
    these are not scientific tests.
  • 00:01:56
    As you can clearly see, this is my garage.
  • 00:01:59
    This is not an engineering laboratory.
  • 00:02:02
    However, we did do the very best that we could
  • 00:02:05
    working with what we have.
  • 00:02:07
    Everywhere possible I used common, ordinary, stock lenses,
  • 00:02:11
    exactly like the ones that may very well
  • 00:02:14
    be sitting on the shelf behind you right this minute
  • 00:02:16
    and that you sell every single day.
  • 00:02:19
    So watch this through, and as I said,
  • 00:02:22
    I think you might be surprised.
  • 00:02:26
    (majestic trumpet music)
  • 00:02:31
    - Trivex has a specific gravity of 1.11, Poly 1.20
  • 00:02:37
    meaning that a lens made of Trivex
  • 00:02:40
    everything else being equal, same script, same size,
  • 00:02:43
    should weigh less than those made of polycarbonate.
  • 00:02:48
    Let's find out if that's true.
  • 00:02:50
    I've got four lenses here, two Trivex, two Poly,
  • 00:02:53
    two different manufacturers.
  • 00:02:56
    I've got a super super accurate scale here
  • 00:02:58
    and let's just take a look at what a couple
  • 00:03:00
    common items weigh.
  • 00:03:03
    There's a block, that's 1.985 or two grams there.
  • 00:03:10
    A leap pad, that's a quarter, .23
  • 00:03:15
    and a PD stick, PD stick weighs 5.35 grams.
  • 00:03:21
    These are all 70 millimeter blanks
  • 00:03:23
    or cut down to 70 millimeter blanks.
  • 00:03:26
    They're all minus three, they're all spherical,
  • 00:03:29
    they're all hard coated, no other bells or whistles,
  • 00:03:32
    so I did the best I can to kind of keep this real world.
  • 00:03:34
    Let's see what that weighs.
  • 00:03:37
    Alright our first Trivex is 13.555
  • 00:03:42
    Now our second Trivex is 13.81
  • 00:03:49
    and our first Poly is 13.64
  • 00:03:57
    and our last Poly is 14.0
  • 00:04:02
    so we've got roughly about half a gram difference.
  • 00:04:06
    We're talking about the weight of two leap pads.
  • 00:04:09
    I don't think anybody out there is gonna
  • 00:04:11
    notice a difference in weight between
  • 00:04:13
    a Trivex and a Poly in these mid-range,
  • 00:04:15
    bread and butter kinds of prescriptions.
  • 00:04:18
    Here are the numbers as they came in,
  • 00:04:20
    our winner was the Trivex, that was the lightest,
  • 00:04:22
    but then came a Poly, not Trivex, Trivex.
  • 00:04:26
    Trivex, Poly, Trivex, Poly.
  • 00:04:29
    Between the high and the low,
  • 00:04:31
    there's less than half a gram difference,
  • 00:04:35
    and remember that we're talking about
  • 00:04:36
    full size blanks here,
  • 00:04:38
    which is not what we're putting on our customer,
  • 00:04:40
    but this little tiny piece of the larger blank.
  • 00:04:44
    So you can imagine that that really becomes
  • 00:04:46
    pretty negligible.
  • 00:04:49
    (drums)
  • 00:04:53
    Industry belief is that polycarbonate
  • 00:04:55
    does have a tendency to have some chemical problems,
  • 00:04:58
    particularly acetone, where we're told that we'll
  • 00:05:00
    craze the lens and cause some problems.
  • 00:05:04
    Did some online research, found this wonderful article
  • 00:05:07
    about chemical resistance,
  • 00:05:08
    and as I read through the article
  • 00:05:10
    they had a picture of this Poly lens
  • 00:05:12
    that was all milky and white and destroyed,
  • 00:05:15
    and I read closer and it said that it had been
  • 00:05:16
    in the acetone for 10 days.
  • 00:05:21
    I guess that's like leaving your tint tank
  • 00:05:23
    on over the weekend or something.
  • 00:05:25
    We didn't go for 10 days, we went for 10 minutes.
  • 00:05:29
    Let's see what happened.
  • 00:05:32
    I'll give you a little bit better close up of this,
  • 00:05:34
    but what I did was edge these lenses
  • 00:05:36
    so that there's plenty of exposed raw material
  • 00:05:39
    to work with for the chemical to get into.
  • 00:05:41
    I actually even drilled some holes in there
  • 00:05:43
    for added contact.
  • 00:05:46
    What I've used is some hardware grade acetone
  • 00:05:51
    mixed with some good old fashioned nail polish remover.
  • 00:05:56
    Kind of a 50/50 mix there.
  • 00:05:59
    And some 91% isopropyl alcohol.
  • 00:06:03
    Alright I guess it is time to dump these into the drink.
  • 00:06:07
    We'll go Trivex, Poly, Trivex, Poly,
  • 00:06:13
    and we will start our timer.
  • 00:06:17
    About ready to pull these out,
  • 00:06:18
    I'm gonna hit them with some lens cleaner.
  • 00:06:29
    Alright, let's see what we have got here.
  • 00:06:31
    We have our Trivex lens that was in acetone for 10 minutes,
  • 00:06:37
    I see no effects there at all.
  • 00:06:42
    Alcohol Trivex, no real ill effects there.
  • 00:06:49
    And our polycarbonate in alcohol,
  • 00:06:54
    I see no ill effects there.
  • 00:06:56
    But we are gonna take a closer look at our Poly here.
  • 00:07:00
    I think that may have suffered a little bit.
  • 00:07:04
    To me it doesn't even sound quite right,
  • 00:07:06
    it sounds like it's softening a little bit.
  • 00:07:10
    Let's see.
  • 00:07:12
    Yeah I mean there's no doubt.
  • 00:07:14
    I'll take some close ups for you,
  • 00:07:17
    obviously you can't feel it, but all the edges here
  • 00:07:20
    are kind of rolling, there's some degration there.
  • 00:07:24
    You know, yeah, the Poly lens, it sure did,
  • 00:07:26
    it started to break down after 15 minutes in the acetone
  • 00:07:29
    with all that exposed edge.
  • 00:07:32
    In the real world, what are we gonna do?
  • 00:07:34
    We're gonna put a little acetone on a, dab on a cloth
  • 00:07:37
    and clean of some lens markings or something.
  • 00:07:39
    That's gonna be on the scratch coating,
  • 00:07:42
    it's not gonna be on the raw surface,
  • 00:07:44
    so you know, who can say?
  • 00:07:46
    Doesn't mean that down the road
  • 00:07:48
    that these chemicals may have an effect on the lens,
  • 00:07:51
    but obviously we're not testing that.
  • 00:07:54
    (majestic trumpet music)
  • 00:07:58
    We are taught the higher the Abbe value
  • 00:08:01
    the better the optics of the lens,
  • 00:08:03
    or less prone to chromatic aberration that it will be.
  • 00:08:07
    Trivex is in the forties, depending on the manufacturer,
  • 00:08:11
    polycarbonate in the thirties,
  • 00:08:13
    depending on who's making the lens.
  • 00:08:15
    All things considered, we should have better optics
  • 00:08:18
    in a Trivex lens than a Poly.
  • 00:08:20
    I think we may actually have caught
  • 00:08:24
    the very concept of Abbe, which is really kind of cool.
  • 00:08:27
    Here are the results.
  • 00:08:29
    Here's a contraocular view with,
  • 00:08:32
    for the lack of a better term, no vertex at all.
  • 00:08:35
    Here's a contraocular view with about
  • 00:08:38
    three quarters of an inch of vertex.
  • 00:08:41
    Here is a contraocular view
  • 00:08:43
    with about an inch and a half of vertex.
  • 00:08:49
    Here is an ocular view with no vertex.
  • 00:08:53
    Here is an ocular view with about
  • 00:08:55
    three quarters of an inch of vertex.
  • 00:08:57
    Here is where things get interesting.
  • 00:09:01
    This is an ocular view with about an inch and a half
  • 00:09:03
    of vertex.
  • 00:09:05
    Look closely, and you can actually see
  • 00:09:07
    some color dispersion at the periphery of each lens.
  • 00:09:11
    I'll let you decide how much you think you see.
  • 00:09:19
    This one for me was kind of inconclusive.
  • 00:09:23
    I think I see a little bit more of color dispersion,
  • 00:09:26
    a wider range of color in the Poly lens periphery
  • 00:09:30
    than I do on the Trivex.
  • 00:09:32
    I can't really say for sure,
  • 00:09:34
    and I think that the optics are a little bit clearer,
  • 00:09:36
    it seems like you can see a crisper
  • 00:09:38
    letter out a little bit further in the Trivex
  • 00:09:41
    than you can in the Poly, but I will let you decide that one
  • 00:09:45
    (majestic trumpet music)
  • 00:09:53
    Tensile strength is, if you've ever played
  • 00:09:54
    tug of war with your dog,
  • 00:09:56
    you know, you've got the rope,
  • 00:09:59
    and the force between your hand and the dog's mouth,
  • 00:10:02
    that's tensile strength, it's a pulling force.
  • 00:10:05
    We ran this test in two ways.
  • 00:10:06
    We did a pull test and sort of a push test as well.
  • 00:10:10
    Trivex is a stronger tensile strength,
  • 00:10:13
    it comes in at 61.2, Poly, 44.9.
  • 00:10:17
    Trivex lens should be stronger in the tensile strength pull.
  • 00:10:23
    Let's find out if that's true.
  • 00:10:26
    Alright this is actually test number three
  • 00:10:28
    for tensile strength
  • 00:10:31
    and these lenses are starting to get a little bit distorted.
  • 00:10:36
    This is test three because the first test
  • 00:10:38
    I actually broke the cable,
  • 00:10:41
    the cable was rated for 96 pounds
  • 00:10:44
    and it broke before the lens did.
  • 00:10:46
    Then I went to a three 32nds cable
  • 00:10:49
    and the cable actually pulled out of the ferrule
  • 00:10:52
    before the lens broke.
  • 00:10:54
    So let me give this one more try.
  • 00:10:56
    If I have a cable failure,
  • 00:10:58
    either in the cable itself or the ferrule,
  • 00:11:00
    we're just gonna call it a lost cause.
  • 00:11:03
    But let's give this one more try with our 12 ton jack
  • 00:11:07
    and see if we can get one of these two lenses
  • 00:11:10
    to actually break for us.
  • 00:11:13
    (jack pumping)
  • 00:11:18
    I would say we have a winner.
  • 00:11:20
    And the winner is actually Trivex.
  • 00:11:23
    Alright, and polycarbonate is still to go.
  • 00:11:27
    Let's see what we can do with that.
  • 00:11:31
    And we pulled the cable again, so,
  • 00:11:34
    there is our test result for tensile strength.
  • 00:11:38
    Our Trivex lens broke before our polycarbonate did.
  • 00:11:42
    We posted on social media, asked for some feedback,
  • 00:11:45
    suggestions for other tests and other things
  • 00:11:46
    that we could do during this series.
  • 00:11:49
    One thing that came up was
  • 00:11:51
    tensile strength can be a pulling force,
  • 00:11:53
    then in a way, tensile strength could also be
  • 00:11:55
    a pushing force.
  • 00:11:58
    And in particular people were interested in
  • 00:12:00
    the old story about leaving your glasses
  • 00:12:03
    on the dashboard of the car.
  • 00:12:06
    I went out and shot the dashboard of our car,
  • 00:12:08
    windows up, August, South Carolina, bright sunshine.
  • 00:12:11
    I got about 195 degrees.
  • 00:12:14
    Somebody else insisted that that can get up to 300,
  • 00:12:18
    so I kind of shot for around the 250 mark.
  • 00:12:21
    Let's see what happens,
  • 00:12:24
    and once again, the results here are kind of startling.
  • 00:12:27
    Here's the set up.
  • 00:12:28
    What I did was try to replicate
  • 00:12:31
    an old style three-piece mount.
  • 00:12:33
    I went a step further, I drilled through the lens
  • 00:12:36
    and actually tapped the hole,
  • 00:12:38
    so this is actually threaded through
  • 00:12:40
    leaving even less room for expansion and contraction
  • 00:12:42
    than an open hole would.
  • 00:12:45
    Got a washer, washer, nut, snugged everything down,
  • 00:12:49
    and the assumption is of course that
  • 00:12:51
    everything here is going to expand and contract
  • 00:12:53
    at a different rate.
  • 00:12:54
    So let's pop this into the oven,
  • 00:12:58
    and what I'm doing, I'm just maintaining the temperature,
  • 00:13:01
    building it up real real nice and slow
  • 00:13:04
    from the 100, 150, 200,
  • 00:13:07
    and then the magic moment appears,
  • 00:13:10
    I'm hitting the 280 mark, 270s, 265,
  • 00:13:16
    and this is where things started to get really interesting.
  • 00:13:21
    And yes, those are a couple of melted lenses.
  • 00:13:25
    Just to add insult to injury,
  • 00:13:27
    I took those out of the almost 300 degree oven
  • 00:13:30
    and plunged them into some nice ice water,
  • 00:13:33
    and regardless of how bad that lens looks,
  • 00:13:37
    nothing really bad happened at the insertion point.
  • 00:13:41
    I'm sure that that nut, bolt, and washer
  • 00:13:43
    are were expanding and contracting at different rates,
  • 00:13:46
    but did not crack near that area.
  • 00:13:49
    Last I did was really, really grabbed a hold of that
  • 00:13:53
    and yanked it around, you know,
  • 00:13:54
    there's no inherent weakness there even.
  • 00:13:58
    There's some nice close up shots.
  • 00:14:00
    Again, wow, that's one ugly looking pair of glasses
  • 00:14:04
    if you left them on your dashboard.
  • 00:14:06
    So what we're really concerned about is there,
  • 00:14:08
    obviously there's no cracking, no crazing, no splinters.
  • 00:14:13
    This is your Trivex, no cracks, no splinters.
  • 00:14:18
    For tensile strength, I think it's pretty clear
  • 00:14:21
    that either one of these materials
  • 00:14:22
    is going to make a fine choice for a drill mount frame.
  • 00:14:26
    (drums)
  • 00:14:30
    I shot some video of this,
  • 00:14:32
    and I've got some really nice close ups
  • 00:14:34
    of the finished edges of both Trivex and Poly.
  • 00:14:38
    Thing is that we have got Santinelli's
  • 00:14:40
    absolute state of the art, top of the line, Lex 1200,
  • 00:14:44
    so absolutely everything you throw at it
  • 00:14:47
    comes out looking beautiful.
  • 00:14:49
    I give Trivex about an A minus
  • 00:14:51
    where Poly is a B plus.
  • 00:14:54
    Trivex just simply finishes a little bit nicer.
  • 00:14:57
    Now as far as the actual physical act
  • 00:14:59
    of cutting those materials,
  • 00:15:02
    man, Trivex is some quirky stuff,
  • 00:15:04
    we're working on a separate video for that,
  • 00:15:06
    but that is for another time.
  • 00:15:08
    (saw)
  • 00:15:25
    Super important, Trivex is rather tricky to edge.
  • 00:15:29
    But there are some things you can do to make that better.
  • 00:15:32
    Basically this all boils down to,
  • 00:15:34
    when pretty counts, use Trivex.
  • 00:15:38
    (trumpet)
  • 00:15:43
    We are told by the industry that Trivex is
  • 00:15:45
    the very best thing for drill mounts.
  • 00:15:49
    Probably is, can't say for sure,
  • 00:15:51
    but here are some results of a little drill test that I did.
  • 00:15:56
    I went online and I found a really good article
  • 00:15:58
    on the best practices to use when drilling
  • 00:16:02
    the two materials.
  • 00:16:03
    So what I'm gonna do is the exact opposite.
  • 00:16:06
    Rather than have a really slow, methodical,
  • 00:16:09
    almost like a hand drilling speed,
  • 00:16:12
    I'm gonna be running this thing at
  • 00:16:15
    540 RPM.
  • 00:16:17
    It said be sure you use very very sharp drill bits.
  • 00:16:21
    Well, I work with metal a lot,
  • 00:16:23
    so I can guarantee you that my drill bits
  • 00:16:24
    are not all that sharp.
  • 00:16:27
    It says be sure to try to let the material cool
  • 00:16:29
    by drilling in, releasing, drilling in, releasing.
  • 00:16:33
    I'm just gonna be running these drill bits
  • 00:16:34
    right on through this material.
  • 00:16:36
    (upbeat music)
  • 00:16:52
    I knew there was one more thing I wanted to say here.
  • 00:16:56
    The way I'm doing this, I'm gonna generate a lot of heat,
  • 00:16:59
    and heat damage to the material during the drilling process
  • 00:17:02
    does not show up immediately,
  • 00:17:04
    so to be fair, that is gonna create an issue down the road.
  • 00:17:08
    So what we're really looking at here today,
  • 00:17:11
    the results are gonna be the quality
  • 00:17:13
    of the holes that we're drilling.
  • 00:17:17
    Here's a close up of the Trivex lens
  • 00:17:19
    and we're gonna take a closer look at the hole
  • 00:17:21
    indicated by the red arrow.
  • 00:17:24
    Here's a close up of the Poly lens,
  • 00:17:26
    and we'll look at the hole indicated by the arrow.
  • 00:17:31
    And what I want you to look at,
  • 00:17:32
    look really closely at the wall of the hole.
  • 00:17:36
    See how much cleaner it is on the Trivex?
  • 00:17:39
    And then look at the Poly,
  • 00:17:40
    and see how it kind of chews the material
  • 00:17:43
    rather than cuts nice and clean?
  • 00:17:45
    That's really the big difference there.
  • 00:17:48
    I would give Trivex drilling an A, Poly an A minus.
  • 00:17:51
    Much for the same reasons that I gave those scores,
  • 00:17:53
    similar scores, to edging.
  • 00:17:56
    Trivex simply turns out cleaner,
  • 00:18:00
    it has a more finished, sharp, crisp clean edge,
  • 00:18:05
    drill hole pattern than polycarbonate does.
  • 00:18:09
    (majestic trumpet music)
  • 00:18:15
    Trivex, depending on who's making it,
  • 00:18:17
    has an index of refraction of about 1.53.
  • 00:18:22
    Poly, pretty consistent, 1.586.
  • 00:18:26
    The higher the index of refraction,
  • 00:18:28
    the thinner the lens should be.
  • 00:18:30
    So Poly should be our winner here.
  • 00:18:33
    Let's find out if that's true.
  • 00:18:36
    This is what we're gonna do.
  • 00:18:37
    We're gonna measure three spots on each of these four lenses
  • 00:18:40
    and see what we come up with,
  • 00:18:42
    and I'm going to kind of do
  • 00:18:44
    a little fast forward thing here for you.
  • 00:18:46
    So just bear with me.
  • 00:18:47
    We're gonna be popping the numbers up as I go along,
  • 00:18:49
    then we'll do an average and post the results.
  • 00:18:57
    Here are the results of our averages
  • 00:19:00
    of the measurements around the edge
  • 00:19:02
    of each of those lenses.
  • 00:19:05
    The thinnest one came in as a Poly,
  • 00:19:07
    which you might expect, at 4.96.
  • 00:19:10
    Then we have a tie, Poly and Trivex, 5.11, 5.11
  • 00:19:16
    and then one of the Trivex was at 5.22.
  • 00:19:20
    A difference of only .26 millimeters,
  • 00:19:24
    again in a full size blank.
  • 00:19:26
    That's not what we're selling.
  • 00:19:28
    We're selling these.
  • 00:19:30
    So again, just like weight really,
  • 00:19:32
    you know, this is really negligible,
  • 00:19:35
    especially in these bread and butter prescriptions.
  • 00:19:38
    Not really gonna make a difference in full edge thickness.
  • 00:19:42
    (drums)
  • 00:19:47
    This was a truly startling one.
  • 00:19:49
    That's me going
  • 00:19:52
    You know, all you ever hear, you know,
  • 00:19:54
    polycarbonate, it's safe for kids, super impact resistant,
  • 00:19:57
    safety, bullet proof.
  • 00:20:00
    Trivex, equal to or better than polycarbonate.
  • 00:20:05
    Well it turns out that in reality
  • 00:20:09
    the impact resistance of Poly or Trivex
  • 00:20:13
    depends solely about the coating or coatings that it gets.
  • 00:20:20
    Be prepared for a bit of a shock.
  • 00:20:22
    In case you haven't figured it out by now,
  • 00:20:24
    I'm just a big kid, so I still love hitting things
  • 00:20:28
    with a hammer to see what happens.
  • 00:20:31
    Here we have a stock single vision, uncut, minus 2 Trivex.
  • 00:20:39
    And a stock single vision, uncut, minus 2 Poly.
  • 00:20:50
    Okay, well there's a, well let's just say, a huge surprise.
  • 00:20:54
    Trivex, nothing.
  • 00:20:56
    This particular series of polycarbonate lenses
  • 00:20:59
    shattered like a piece of glass.
  • 00:21:06
    And one more time on the Trivex, just for good measure.
  • 00:21:16
    And because no real impact test is complete without firearms
  • 00:21:20
    we took these lenses out to the range
  • 00:21:22
    to see how they would hold up under fire.
  • 00:21:30
    For my first test, I fired a .177 lead pellet
  • 00:21:34
    at both the Poly and the Trivex lens.
  • 00:21:38
    (gunshot)
  • 00:21:39
    As you can see, the lens made of Trivex shattered,
  • 00:21:44
    and the lens made of Poly actually repelled the pellet.
  • 00:21:49
    After that I moved to a .22 caliber bullet
  • 00:21:53
    at a range of approximately 25 yards.
  • 00:21:56
    I only shot the Poly since the Trivex shattered
  • 00:21:58
    in the last test.
  • 00:22:00
    Here you can see the bullet did pass through the lens,
  • 00:22:03
    yet the lens deformed and actually reclosed
  • 00:22:06
    and it didn't shatter.
  • 00:22:10
    For impact resistance, all I can say for myself is, wow.
  • 00:22:14
    I did not expect a Trivex lens to shatter
  • 00:22:17
    when I hit it with a pellet at 10 meters.
  • 00:22:19
    I did not expect one of the Poly lenses to shatter
  • 00:22:22
    when I hit it with a hammer.
  • 00:22:24
    Those results made us do some more digging
  • 00:22:28
    and we ended up talking with the companies
  • 00:22:29
    that manufacture the material, manufacture the lenses,
  • 00:22:34
    and manufacture the coatings that go on the lenses.
  • 00:22:37
    I'm gonna paraphrase what we got back from those companies
  • 00:22:40
    and what we found online in three parts.
  • 00:22:43
    Please pay attention here,
  • 00:22:45
    because this is really, really important.
  • 00:22:49
    Differences in the manufacturing process,
  • 00:22:52
    curing times, curing temperatures,
  • 00:22:54
    and mold-release agents can play a key part
  • 00:22:58
    in final lens performance.
  • 00:23:02
    That is why labs have a challenge on their hands.
  • 00:23:05
    If they assume a lens is the same
  • 00:23:07
    across all manufacturers, and they expect it to perform
  • 00:23:10
    the same way with the same coating stack,
  • 00:23:13
    it simply may not behave the same.
  • 00:23:17
    Labs specifically have to test each manufacturer of the lens
  • 00:23:22
    and each specific coating for impact performance.
  • 00:23:26
    They cannot assume Company A's lenses
  • 00:23:29
    will behave the same as Company B's lenses,
  • 00:23:33
    even with the same type of monomer and coating stack.
  • 00:23:37
    One.
  • 00:23:39
    And if you think you missed something,
  • 00:23:40
    just rewind and listen to it again.
  • 00:23:41
    It's a lot to take in there.
  • 00:23:44
    Trivex claims to be as strong or stronger than polycarbonate
  • 00:23:48
    in impact resistance.
  • 00:23:50
    This is not the case when the product is scratch coated
  • 00:23:53
    or AR coated.
  • 00:23:56
    An abrasion resistant coating is going to be harder
  • 00:23:59
    and more brittle than the lens
  • 00:24:01
    in order to be abrasion resistant.
  • 00:24:04
    This makes the lens easier to break due to that coating.
  • 00:24:09
    The average coating reduces the strength 45%
  • 00:24:14
    and the average AR coating reduces the strength
  • 00:24:18
    another 20% for a total of 65%.
  • 00:24:24
    Wow.
  • 00:24:24
    And this one, nice, short, sweet.
  • 00:24:27
    Coatings may alter the impact resistance
  • 00:24:30
    and overall performance of any lens material.
  • 00:24:34
    Any lens material.
  • 00:24:37
    So think for yourself
  • 00:24:39
    and think about those statements.
  • 00:24:41
    And again, if you missed something,
  • 00:24:42
    rewind it, listen to it again.
  • 00:24:45
    And because I am just a big kid at heart,
  • 00:24:48
    anything worth doing, is worth overdoing.
  • 00:24:51
    (gunshots)
  • 00:24:56
    (explosion)
  • 00:25:01
    (majestic trumpet music)
  • 00:25:09
    One of the categories that's always included
  • 00:25:10
    whenever there's a side by side
  • 00:25:12
    or a lens material overview is UV protection.
  • 00:25:17
    And Trivex is shown as having 100%
  • 00:25:20
    and Poly is shown as having 100%.
  • 00:25:24
    Let's see if that's true.
  • 00:25:26
    And first up is a Poly lens which blocks 97%
  • 00:25:31
    or allows three percent of UV light through.
  • 00:25:36
    And then Trivex which blocks 100%
  • 00:25:40
    or allows none of the UV light through.
  • 00:25:45
    For UV, our quick and easy one.
  • 00:25:47
    Both are rated at 100, but would I sell Poly
  • 00:25:51
    as 100% UV protection,
  • 00:25:53
    no I guess I'd sell it as 97%.
  • 00:25:57
    Still passes, right?
  • 00:25:59
    (drums)
  • 00:26:04
    The other one of those things that's always mentioned
  • 00:26:06
    in lens material brochures is the tintability
  • 00:26:10
    or tinting capability of the lens.
  • 00:26:12
    And I guarantee, I admit you can go to my website
  • 00:26:17
    and you'll see Trivex, great, easy to tint,
  • 00:26:19
    nothing to it, A plus.
  • 00:26:21
    Poly can't be tinted, D minus, F material, doesn't work.
  • 00:26:27
    Or is it like a lot of these other things.
  • 00:26:31
    Is it really all about the coating.
  • 00:26:34
    Let's find out.
  • 00:26:36
    Now of course Laramy-K's an independent
  • 00:26:38
    wholesale optical lab.
  • 00:26:40
    We do a whole lot of tinting,
  • 00:26:42
    years and years of experience.
  • 00:26:44
    I'm gonna get you just look at this for a moment or two
  • 00:26:48
    and let you think about it,
  • 00:26:49
    because I want you to try to predict
  • 00:26:52
    which one is which.
  • 00:26:55
    Made your decision?
  • 00:26:57
    Good, because you're probably wrong.
  • 00:27:01
    This, believe it or not, is a stock Trivex lens,
  • 00:27:04
    one just like we pulled out of the envelopes
  • 00:27:06
    for the other test, put into the tint tank,
  • 00:27:09
    same one as these for 10 full minutes, nothing.
  • 00:27:13
    Basically zip.
  • 00:27:15
    This was a stock polycarbonate lens
  • 00:27:18
    dumped into the tank for 10 minutes,
  • 00:27:21
    not a tintable Poly, just an ordinary stock Poly lens.
  • 00:27:25
    This was a surfaced Trivex.
  • 00:27:30
    This is a surfaced Poly.
  • 00:27:33
    So to my eye I think our darkest
  • 00:27:35
    is probably this Poly, the surfaced one.
  • 00:27:38
    Followed by Trifex, followed by a stock Poly,
  • 00:27:43
    and then followed by what basically is nothing
  • 00:27:45
    in this particular Trivex.
  • 00:27:47
    For tinting, it's just like impact resistance.
  • 00:27:50
    It all comes down to what coating is on the lens.
  • 00:27:54
    If you want a great polycarbonate
  • 00:27:57
    with a sunglass tint, Simcoe makes a great
  • 00:28:01
    tintable poly lens, other than that,
  • 00:28:04
    you're gonna have to go to your lab
  • 00:28:05
    and you're going to have to tell them
  • 00:28:06
    exactly what material you want,
  • 00:28:08
    then tell them that you want it tinted
  • 00:28:09
    and they will put on the appropriate coating
  • 00:28:12
    to allow that to happen.
  • 00:28:15
    (trumpets)
  • 00:28:19
    In the past, in my head,
  • 00:28:21
    I have Trifex be fairly expensive
  • 00:28:23
    and having somewhat limited availability.
  • 00:28:25
    It's nice to be right once in a while.
  • 00:28:29
    Clear polycarbonate, you have 11 choices,
  • 00:28:32
    single one in Trivex.
  • 00:28:34
    You have a low price of 3.44 an average of six.
  • 00:28:37
    That's pretty cheap, you can make some money there.
  • 00:28:39
    Clear Trivex is going at 22.
  • 00:28:42
    AR coated you have 18 choices in polycarbonate,
  • 00:28:46
    seven in Trivex, more than double,
  • 00:28:48
    and in polarized polycarbonate,
  • 00:28:50
    you have seven choices to one in Trivex
  • 00:28:53
    with a low of 18 for that
  • 00:28:56
    and an average for the Trivex of 31.
  • 00:28:59
    Trivex, availability, maybe around a C.
  • 00:29:02
    Polycarbonate, A, tons and tons of
  • 00:29:04
    every style imaginable available.
  • 00:29:07
    Price, yes, Trivex consistently runs more expensive
  • 00:29:10
    than Poly.
  • 00:29:12
    As I mentioned in the introduction to this piece,
  • 00:29:15
    I was genuinely started at the results of some of the tests.
  • 00:29:19
    Turns out, and this is really really important,
  • 00:29:24
    that unless you know the material,
  • 00:29:28
    the process, and the coating,
  • 00:29:31
    you cannot predict how that lens will perform
  • 00:29:34
    under different circumstances.
  • 00:29:38
    Really important.
  • 00:29:40
    I just want to leave you with this,
  • 00:29:43
    before you go selling either material, Trivex or Poly,
  • 00:29:47
    as having specific characteristics,
  • 00:29:50
    impact resistance, chemical resistance, tintability,
  • 00:29:55
    just think twice,
  • 00:29:56
    and that's where I'm gonna leave this.
  • 00:29:58
    Be careful out there.
  • 00:30:00
    You don't know how these materials will perform
  • 00:30:04
    until you know the coatings that are on them.
  • 00:30:08
    Think about it.
  • 00:30:14
    Price and availability,
  • 00:30:16
    I knew in my own head in the past
  • 00:30:18
    that Trivex, (stuttering)
  • 00:30:24
    These tests.
  • 00:30:25
    I have no vested interest here.
  • 00:30:29
    (coughs)
  • 00:30:34
    Or a drill (stutters)
  • 00:30:39
    For price and availability,
  • 00:30:41
    hey it's nice to be once right.
  • 00:30:44
    (coughs)
Tags
  • Polycarbonate
  • Trivex
  • Lens Comparison
  • Impact Resistance
  • Optical Clarity
  • Chemical Resistance
  • Tensile Strength
  • UV Protection
  • Tinting
  • Price Comparison