00:00:00
[Music]
00:00:06
hello and welcome to philosophy vibe the
00:00:08
channel where we discuss and debate
00:00:09
different philosophical ideas
00:00:11
today we'll be looking into the theory
00:00:13
of absurdism
00:00:15
interesting now absurdism is a
00:00:18
philosophical position
00:00:19
put forward by the writer albert camus
00:00:22
camus in fact did not consider himself a
00:00:24
philosopher just a writer
00:00:26
however in his books the outsider the
00:00:29
plague
00:00:30
and his essay the myth of sisyphus he
00:00:32
did in fact put forward absurdism
00:00:35
to describe the human experience broadly
00:00:38
speaking
00:00:38
absurdism falls under the existentialist
00:00:41
movement
00:00:41
although camus himself did not actually
00:00:43
agree with this label
00:00:45
in short absurdism notices the
00:00:48
fundamental conflict in the human
00:00:50
experience
00:00:51
as humans we have a desire to find
00:00:54
inherent purpose and meaning in life
00:00:57
however
00:00:58
we ultimately live in a meaningless
00:01:00
world
00:01:01
devoid of any purpose or reason this is
00:01:04
the juxtaposition
00:01:05
the two opposing and incompatible ideas
00:01:08
we live looking for meaning in a
00:01:10
universe that is silent
00:01:12
that cannot offer any meaning or purpose
00:01:15
this is the absurdity we must live with
00:01:18
i see the term absurd refers to two
00:01:21
incompatible ideas being put together
00:01:24
if for example we refer to a man as a
00:01:27
law-abiding citizen but at the same time
00:01:29
this man is a thief and regularly breaks
00:01:31
the law then this would be an absurd
00:01:33
claim
00:01:34
correct so absurdism comes about due to
00:01:37
our contradicting nature in the universe
00:01:40
camus claims that there is nothing
00:01:42
absurd in our innate desire for meaning
00:01:44
and there is nothing absurd in the
00:01:46
chaotic meaningless universe
00:01:48
the absurdity arises when we put these
00:01:51
two
00:01:51
ideas together man's innate instinct to
00:01:54
find meaning and purpose
00:01:56
in an inherently meaningless purposeless
00:01:58
and outright irrational universe
00:02:01
is absurdity we build values and morals
00:02:05
we project alts on the world and believe
00:02:08
the world ought to be a certain way
00:02:10
and we ought to behave a certain way
00:02:12
however
00:02:13
there is no fundamental values the
00:02:16
universe is just made of matter and
00:02:18
energy
00:02:19
we are just particles and cells and so
00:02:21
the values we instinctively hold
00:02:24
actually mean nothing they do not even
00:02:27
exist
00:02:27
yes i understand this is a very hard
00:02:30
truth to acknowledge as
00:02:32
ultimately it is going against our basic
00:02:34
instincts
00:02:35
people see this realism as a form of
00:02:38
nihilism
00:02:39
the discovery that there is no grand
00:02:40
truth no god to give a life an inherent
00:02:43
value or meaning
00:02:44
however camus is not necessarily saying
00:02:48
there is no meaning or value
00:02:50
but rather we have no way of knowing we
00:02:52
cannot know
00:02:53
any of the answers to these questions so
00:02:56
we must live
00:02:57
and act as though they do not exist the
00:02:59
only thing we can accept
00:03:01
is that in which we have experience of
00:03:04
and all we have
00:03:05
experience of is the absurd world
00:03:08
absurdity
00:03:09
is the only certainty okay so
00:03:12
once we realize the absurdity of the
00:03:14
human experience
00:03:16
then what how are we to live with this
00:03:18
understanding
00:03:20
good question camus noticed that in life
00:03:23
people often do come to this absurdist
00:03:25
realization
00:03:26
we sometimes get into the habit of life
00:03:29
we live our routines we go through the
00:03:31
motions and sometimes we feel like we
00:03:33
are just
00:03:34
mindless drones it is at this time we
00:03:36
ask ourselves
00:03:37
what is the point why am i here and why
00:03:40
should i carry on
00:03:42
this begins the absurdist realization
00:03:45
now people have different ways of
00:03:47
dealing with it one way
00:03:48
in which the most severe nihilist will
00:03:50
take would be suicide
00:03:52
a life devoid of any purpose or meaning
00:03:54
is one that they cannot live with
00:03:56
so they would rather not live at all
00:03:58
however
00:03:59
camus challenged this approach he did
00:04:02
not agree with it and he asked
00:04:04
does a meaningless life mean that life
00:04:06
is not worth living
00:04:08
other people turn to faith often
00:04:10
described as a leap of faith
00:04:13
these would be the religious people who
00:04:15
will have faith in the existence of god
00:04:17
even though they have no experience or
00:04:20
evidence of god
00:04:21
or any meaning they will still believe
00:04:23
they will still have faith
00:04:25
again camus challenged this he saw this
00:04:28
as a form of philosophical suicide
00:04:31
blind faith in something that is not
00:04:33
there to see
00:04:34
right camus instead developed the
00:04:37
concept of the absurd man
00:04:39
there are three facets to the absurd man
00:04:42
number one
00:04:43
is revolt when we face the absurd it
00:04:46
will initially lead one to either
00:04:47
suicide or philosophical suicide
00:04:50
they will not be able to handle the
00:04:52
absurdist truth and they will try to
00:04:54
escape it
00:04:55
but the absurd man revolts against this
00:04:58
instinct
00:04:59
the absurd man accepts the absurdity of
00:05:01
life
00:05:02
and lives with it the absurd man accepts
00:05:05
that the world they live in is devoid of
00:05:07
any purpose
00:05:08
or meaning but still carries on living
00:05:10
with the innate desire to find one
00:05:13
the absurd man is conscious of the
00:05:15
conflict aware of the contradiction
00:05:18
and accepts it and lives with it by
00:05:21
committing actual suicide or
00:05:22
philosophical suicide
00:05:24
all this is is an attempt to escape the
00:05:27
absurd
00:05:28
even the existentialist position of
00:05:30
trying to create your own meaning out of
00:05:32
life
00:05:32
is still an attempt to escape the absurd
00:05:35
it is not
00:05:36
acceptance the absurd man revolts
00:05:39
against this
00:05:40
he accepts and lives with the conflict
00:05:42
lives with the juxtaposition
00:05:44
and lives with the absurdity i see the
00:05:47
second facet is freedom
00:05:50
the absurd man accepts their freedom
00:05:52
they know that they have no
00:05:54
fate or great destiny they also do not
00:05:56
try to create their own
00:05:58
role they do not give themselves a
00:06:00
purpose to fulfill
00:06:01
the absurd man embraces freedom they
00:06:04
take each moment as it comes they live
00:06:06
in the now
00:06:07
okay and the final facet is passion
00:06:10
the absurd man approaches the world as
00:06:12
amoral they see no universal values and
00:06:15
they understand that with no values
00:06:17
there is no reason to do one thing over
00:06:20
another
00:06:21
so instead they build a life of quantity
00:06:24
by quantity camus means a life full of
00:06:27
passion
00:06:28
to fill up life with as many great
00:06:30
moments fill it up with passion
00:06:32
and pleasure very interesting camus
00:06:34
gives examples of the type of people
00:06:37
living the absurd life one is the serial
00:06:40
seducer who spends his time
00:06:41
sleeping with many women he is not
00:06:44
looking for love or commitment
00:06:45
or anything beyond the pleasure of the
00:06:47
moment the other is the great actor
00:06:50
who is only concerned with fame in this
00:06:52
life
00:06:53
unlike writers who look for everlasting
00:06:55
fame in their work after death
00:06:58
the actor knows they will only have
00:07:00
short-term fame on earth so they live
00:07:02
for the here and now
00:07:04
there is also the conqueror who foregoes
00:07:06
any promise of an afterlife
00:07:08
but chases his passion to conquer the
00:07:10
world in this
00:07:11
lifetime yes this makes sense and
00:07:14
finally
00:07:15
camus uses the analogy of sisyphus
00:07:18
camus uses sisyphus as the absurdist
00:07:21
hero
00:07:21
and even titles his essay on absurdism
00:07:24
as the myth of sisyphus
00:07:26
now sisyphus was an ancient greek
00:07:29
mythological
00:07:30
character without going into too much
00:07:32
detail the story goes that sisyphus
00:07:34
cheated death twice
00:07:36
when [ __ ] first first died he descended
00:07:38
to the underworld
00:07:39
but managed to capture death itself and
00:07:42
chain it up so
00:07:43
no humans could die from here on he then
00:07:46
went back up to earth
00:07:47
eventually death was set free when
00:07:49
sisyphus died a second time he went back
00:07:52
to the underworld but this time he met
00:07:54
with hades
00:07:55
the lord of the underworld he managed to
00:07:57
convince hades to let him back up to
00:07:59
earth again
00:08:00
because his wife had not performed the
00:08:02
correct rituals and sacrifices
00:08:04
for his death working on the promise
00:08:06
that sisyphus would correct this and
00:08:08
come back down to hades
00:08:10
he allowed ceci sisyphus to go back to
00:08:12
earth sisyphus however
00:08:14
did not keep his promise and did not
00:08:16
return to the underworld
00:08:17
but instead he lived a long life to an
00:08:20
old age on earth
00:08:22
when he eventually died again zeus now
00:08:24
intervened
00:08:25
as he was angry that sisyphus had
00:08:27
escaped death twice
00:08:29
as punishment for his actions zeus
00:08:31
condemned sisyphus to an eternity of
00:08:33
pushing a large rock up a hill
00:08:36
sisyverse would push this very heavy
00:08:38
rock all the way up the hill
00:08:40
and when it reached the top the rock
00:08:42
would just roll back down to the bottom
00:08:43
of the hill
00:08:44
sisyphus will run down grab the rock and
00:08:47
start all over again
00:08:48
this constant struggle over and over for
00:08:51
eternity
00:08:52
great story but why does this make
00:08:54
sisyphus the absurdist hero
00:08:56
firstly camus explains that sisyphus has
00:08:59
a hatred for death
00:09:00
a disdain for the gods and a passion for
00:09:02
life he lives how he wants
00:09:05
he lives for the moment and does not
00:09:07
think past it
00:09:08
this is how the absurdist man should
00:09:10
live right
00:09:11
but more so the struggle that sisyphus
00:09:14
goes through
00:09:14
the pushing of the rock up the hill this
00:09:17
represents the struggle of the human
00:09:19
experience
00:09:20
life is a constant struggle we cannot
00:09:23
avoid or deny it
00:09:24
we are all pushing the rock up the hill
00:09:27
even though it will roll back down
00:09:28
we will chase it and we will carry on
00:09:31
there's no reason
00:09:32
there's no meaning there's nothing just
00:09:35
the constant struggle
00:09:36
however camus imagined sisyphus running
00:09:39
down the hill for a brief moment
00:09:41
free from the labour at this moment
00:09:44
camus suggests that sisyphus will become
00:09:46
aware
00:09:47
of the absurdity of his eternity pushing
00:09:50
a rock up a hill
00:09:51
only for it to roll down again no
00:09:53
purpose
00:09:54
no reason just meaningless repetition
00:09:57
if like the absurd man sisyphus accepts
00:10:00
his eternal struggle
00:10:02
acknowledges that this is how he will be
00:10:04
spending his eternity
00:10:05
that there is no such thing as anything
00:10:07
better or anything preferable
00:10:09
then he will come to see that he is no
00:10:11
longer being punished
00:10:12
[ __ ] versus eternity is only tragic if
00:10:15
he believes that there is a better
00:10:17
alternative
00:10:18
if sisyphus hopes for something greater
00:10:21
hopes to be reprised
00:10:22
then his eternal struggle is devastating
00:10:25
however
00:10:26
if sisyphus does not expect anything
00:10:28
more
00:10:29
then camus claims one must imagine
00:10:31
sisyphus happy
00:10:33
if happiness is real we must be able to
00:10:35
find it in life
00:10:37
not in faith or outside our media
00:10:39
experiences
00:10:40
if happiness is true it must be found in
00:10:43
the absurd
00:10:44
so like sisyphus if we accept the absurd
00:10:48
accept our constant struggle and our
00:10:50
constant conflict
00:10:52
we too will find happiness in the absurd
00:10:54
a truly fascinating look on life
00:10:57
i think everyone at some point goes
00:10:59
through an absurdist line of thought
00:11:01
however as a philosophy i feel there are
00:11:04
some fundamental problems
00:11:05
what's that i understand the absurdist
00:11:08
rejection of faith
00:11:09
but i feel absurdism itself relies on
00:11:11
faith
00:11:12
or you can say negative faith what do
00:11:14
you mean
00:11:16
well absurdism relies on the claim that
00:11:18
there is no god
00:11:19
there are no objective values or meaning
00:11:21
to life this is a type of negative faith
00:11:25
it is faith in the non-existence of
00:11:27
these things
00:11:28
because should life have an inherent
00:11:30
meaning or value
00:11:31
or should there exist a god or deity
00:11:33
then the absurd position becomes null
00:11:35
and void
00:11:36
so the absurdist must take a leap of
00:11:39
faith themselves
00:11:40
and hold that there is nothing more to
00:11:42
life than what we immediately perceive
00:11:44
i do not know if i agree with that
00:11:46
firstly i would object to the existence
00:11:48
of negative faith
00:11:49
to have faith means to believe in
00:11:51
something and to believe in something
00:11:53
means you should prove that that
00:11:55
something exists
00:11:56
you cannot prove a negative and so the
00:11:58
burden of proof should be on the one
00:12:00
making the claim
00:12:01
this is very much the absurdist position
00:12:04
it is not a strict solid belief that
00:12:06
there is no god
00:12:07
or meaning or purpose but rather we
00:12:09
cannot ever know if these things exist
00:12:12
and so we should not live by them but
00:12:14
there is a difference between saying we
00:12:16
do not know and saying we cannot know
00:12:18
saying we do not know is a comment on
00:12:20
reality i do not know that god exists
00:12:24
fine saying i cannot know this seems
00:12:27
like a belief
00:12:28
how can one possibly know that we cannot
00:12:31
know
00:12:31
the existence of god or the meaning to
00:12:33
life
00:12:34
if you hold that we cannot ever know
00:12:37
either
00:12:38
as a collective species or as an
00:12:40
individual experience
00:12:41
then i'm sorry this to me is negative
00:12:44
faith
00:12:44
hmm and then i think the falsification
00:12:48
principle can come into effect at this
00:12:50
point
00:12:51
for the absurdist to hold on to this
00:12:53
position i would ask them
00:12:55
is there any situation any event
00:12:58
anything
00:12:59
that you could witness that would get
00:13:00
you to change your position
00:13:02
is there anything that you could
00:13:04
experience that would lead you to
00:13:05
believe that there is a god
00:13:07
or that there is meaning or that there
00:13:09
is objective value in life
00:13:11
is there anything personal or universal
00:13:14
that would show you a greater purpose to
00:13:16
life
00:13:16
if the answer is no then the whole
00:13:19
absurd disposition becomes meaningless
00:13:21
if there is no possible or hypothetical
00:13:23
scenario
00:13:24
that would lead the absurdist to see
00:13:26
value or purpose in life
00:13:28
if there is nothing that can falsify the
00:13:30
absurdist position
00:13:32
then discussions around absurdism become
00:13:34
meaningless
00:13:35
i see absurdism then becomes a shallow
00:13:38
philosophical position
00:13:40
one that does not go beyond immediate
00:13:42
experience
00:13:43
and everyone who has dealt with any
00:13:45
philosophical investigation
00:13:47
knows that there is more to our life
00:13:49
than what we immediately perceive
00:13:51
this is just a form of naive realism and
00:13:54
will lead us solely
00:13:56
into hedonism no deep thought or inquiry
00:13:59
is then required
00:14:00
and what happens when we discover that
00:14:02
our senses
00:14:03
do not give us the true representation
00:14:05
of what is really there in the external
00:14:08
world
00:14:08
what happens when we discover that what
00:14:11
we immediately perceive
00:14:12
comes with errors and falsehoods more is
00:14:15
needed
00:14:16
i understand that camus does not
00:14:17
consider himself a philosopher
00:14:19
and that is fine as i would argue that
00:14:22
absurdism
00:14:23
is too simplistic and shallow as a
00:14:25
theory for a serious philosopher to
00:14:27
adopt
00:14:28
very well if you would like the script
00:14:31
to this video it is part of our
00:14:32
existentialism ebook available on amazon
00:14:35
this is a great compilation of scripts
00:14:37
it covers the videos for kierkegaard
00:14:39
nietzsche and sartre so definitely worth
00:14:41
a read and of course you will be helping
00:14:43
support the channel
00:14:44
the link is in the description but
00:14:46
that's all the time we have for now
00:14:47
thank you for watching we hope you
00:14:49
enjoyed the vibe
00:14:49
and what are your thoughts who out there
00:14:51
is an absurdist
00:14:53
who lives and embraces the absurd life
00:14:55
and are you happier because of it
00:14:57
let us know in the comments below don't
00:14:59
forget to like and share
00:15:00
and for more philosophical debates
00:15:01
please subscribe to the channel
00:15:03
take care and we look forward to seeing
00:15:05
you all soon bye