The Science of Online Dating | Bella Glanville | TEDxPCL

00:10:35
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WPlKNQPVNQI

Ringkasan

TLDRBella Glanville, a psychologist and TV show participant known for winning on CelebsGo Virtual Dating, critiques the inefficacies of online dating algorithms. She argues that these algorithms fail to capture the essential human elements necessary for deeply connected relationships, suggesting that online interactions often remove barriers such as shyness and awkwardness but fill in gaps inaccurately when constructing perceptions of potential partners. Research indicates that people on dating sites can present misleading profiles, leading to mismatches in real-life encounters. Bella emphasizes that the ease of switching partners online has increased disposability and superficial assessment of compatibility, especially among Generation Z. Despite the challenges and superficial focus online, romance is here to stay with an increasing trend toward online beginnings of relationships, foreseeing that by 2035, more than half of UK relationships might start online.

Takeaways

  • 🎥 Bella Glanville questions online dating efficiency on CelebsGo Virtual Dating.
  • 🔍 Algorithms overlook essential human connection factors.
  • 🤔 Absence of gaiting aids online over real-life dating.
  • 🧠 Daters may inaccurately perceive ideal partners online.
  • 💡 Online conversations can lead to quick but shallow intimacy.
  • 📱 Society's short attention spans affect relationship views.
  • 📊 US survey: 12% find committed relationships online.
  • 🔄 Different priorities online vs. real life for men and women.
  • 🌐 Future trend: Majority of relationships beginning online by 2035.

Garis waktu

  • 00:00:00 - 00:05:00

    Bella Glanville introduces herself as a psychologist and motivational writer and discusses her experience as a winner on a virtual dating show. She critiques the algorithms used in online dating, arguing that they don't account for personality traits that might make people less likely to engage in relationships in real life, such as shyness or awkwardness, which are absent online. She explains theories like the absence of gaiting and the strangers on a train effect, suggesting that people are more open online, creating a false sense of intimacy.

  • 00:05:00 - 00:10:35

    Bella examines how online dating has transformed relationship dynamics, making partners appear disposable in the eyes of many due to the enticing prospect of easily finding new partners. She discusses studies showing discrepancies in male and female interactions on dating platforms and notes how algorithms favor superficial attributes over genuine personality assessments. Despite technological advancements, these platforms often fail to foster long-term commitments, raising questions about the success and future of online dating as it grows increasingly prevalent.

Peta Pikiran

Video Tanya Jawab

  • Who is Bella Glanville?

    Bella Glanville is a psychologist, motivational writer, and participant in CelebsGo Virtual Dating.

  • What does Bella say about online dating algorithms?

    She believes they are rubbish and unreliable for forming genuine connections.

  • Why did Pete Wicks choose Bella in the show?

    Theories suggest the absence of gaiting and a deeper first interaction played roles.

  • What is the 'absence of gaiting'?

    It's a concept where online interactions remove barriers like shyness and awkwardness.

  • What does Bella say about modern online dating behavior?

    People view potential partners as disposable due to short attention spans and the ease of swiping.

  • What effects do online dating sites have, according to studies?

    People open up quicker online but often don't meet in person due to lack of sustained trust.

  • Is there a gender difference in online dating preferences?

    Yes, women online care more about attractiveness, whereas in-person men tend to prioritize it more.

  • What is the catch-22 of online dating discussed by Bella?

    While people might connect faster, sustaining relationships often fails due to initial superficial grounds.

  • What predictions about online dating are made for the future?

    Over 50% of UK relationships might begin online by 2035.

  • What is the main takeaway from Bella's talk?

    Despite its flaws, online dating has changed relationship dynamics profoundly.

Lihat lebih banyak ringkasan video

Dapatkan akses instan ke ringkasan video YouTube gratis yang didukung oleh AI!
Teks
en
Gulir Otomatis:
  • 00:00:08
    my name is bella glanville and
  • 00:00:11
    you might recognize me from shows such
  • 00:00:13
    as celebsco virtual dating
  • 00:00:15
    where i made it to the finale and won
  • 00:00:17
    pete wicks's heart
  • 00:00:18
    but i'm also a psychologist and a
  • 00:00:20
    motivational writer
  • 00:00:22
    and after seeing the title of this talk
  • 00:00:24
    you might be thinking
  • 00:00:25
    this girl is an expert on online dating
  • 00:00:28
    and she's going to teach us the secret
  • 00:00:29
    to cracking the algorithm
  • 00:00:31
    well think again because this entire
  • 00:00:34
    talk is about why the algorithm
  • 00:00:36
    is rubbish i was the only virtual date
  • 00:00:40
    that pete had throughout the show yet he
  • 00:00:42
    still
  • 00:00:43
    chose me and there are a couple of
  • 00:00:45
    scientific
  • 00:00:46
    theories that could explain why he
  • 00:00:48
    preferred me to the in-person dates
  • 00:00:52
    when you meet someone online the
  • 00:00:53
    characteristics that limit you from
  • 00:00:55
    getting into relationships in real life
  • 00:00:58
    aren't there and this is called the
  • 00:00:59
    absence of gaiting
  • 00:01:02
    shyness awkwardness and irritating
  • 00:01:05
    sneeze
  • 00:01:06
    these are all things that aren't present
  • 00:01:07
    online but the problem is that we fill
  • 00:01:10
    in the gaps of who we think
  • 00:01:12
    someone is and we make them out to be
  • 00:01:14
    our definition of a dream partner
  • 00:01:17
    but people fool us and these gaps that
  • 00:01:19
    we fill in aren't always accurate
  • 00:01:22
    an american study actually found that
  • 00:01:24
    online data's
  • 00:01:25
    present a more socially desirable self
  • 00:01:28
    and even steal
  • 00:01:29
    other people's profile ideas
  • 00:01:33
    we also might prefer the people that we
  • 00:01:34
    meet online because of the strangers on
  • 00:01:36
    a train effect
  • 00:01:37
    and there's been so much research about
  • 00:01:39
    this you're more likely to open up to a
  • 00:01:42
    stranger on a train or say
  • 00:01:44
    maybe a hairdresser because you can
  • 00:01:46
    trust that the information won't get out
  • 00:01:48
    to people that you know
  • 00:01:50
    in the same way you're more likely to
  • 00:01:53
    open up to people that you don't know
  • 00:01:55
    online
  • 00:01:56
    and a skype study found that people
  • 00:01:57
    prefer dates that they can have a deep
  • 00:02:00
    intimate conversation with in fact uh
  • 00:02:04
    the conversation that i had on my first
  • 00:02:05
    celebrity virtual date was very deep
  • 00:02:07
    which
  • 00:02:08
    probably stood out from the usual
  • 00:02:10
    somewhat fruity talk and humorous dates
  • 00:02:13
    that you get on that show
  • 00:02:15
    there's also a biological basis behind
  • 00:02:18
    why people like to talk about themselves
  • 00:02:21
    tamara and mitchell found that when we
  • 00:02:23
    do there's an increased
  • 00:02:25
    mri activity in the brain regions
  • 00:02:27
    associated with reward
  • 00:02:30
    and speaking of reward what was my
  • 00:02:33
    reward for making it to the finale of
  • 00:02:34
    that dating show
  • 00:02:36
    well we never saw each other again
  • 00:02:40
    online dating has changed the game of
  • 00:02:43
    relationships
  • 00:02:44
    nowadays if you don't like the
  • 00:02:46
    relationship that you're in
  • 00:02:48
    you can just swipe left and get a new
  • 00:02:50
    one
  • 00:02:51
    and a one night stand is now at the end
  • 00:02:53
    of people's fingertips
  • 00:02:55
    the instant fix of a tinder match or
  • 00:02:57
    scrolling through pawn sites gives
  • 00:02:59
    instant gratification but is it truly as
  • 00:03:03
    gratifying as
  • 00:03:04
    old-fashioned courtship is the catch not
  • 00:03:07
    more thrilling when you've earned the
  • 00:03:08
    thrill of the chase
  • 00:03:11
    our attention spans are becoming shorter
  • 00:03:14
    and conditions like adhd are escalating
  • 00:03:17
    it's so easy now to switch and change
  • 00:03:19
    between
  • 00:03:20
    jobs and women and lifestyle that
  • 00:03:22
    generation z
  • 00:03:23
    feel no reason to settle for fidelity or
  • 00:03:26
    loyalty
  • 00:03:27
    and that's why this generation includes
  • 00:03:29
    less people who want a monogamous
  • 00:03:31
    relationship
  • 00:03:33
    we have this notion of entitlement and
  • 00:03:36
    we want it all
  • 00:03:37
    but the lack of depth in our goals and
  • 00:03:39
    life choices
  • 00:03:40
    leaves us forever wanting more so now if
  • 00:03:43
    we're sitting on a tinder date
  • 00:03:45
    we're more likely to sit there and think
  • 00:03:47
    about who we can swipe right on next
  • 00:03:49
    that's better than the person we're
  • 00:03:50
    already sitting with
  • 00:03:52
    so we see potential partners now as more
  • 00:03:54
    disposable
  • 00:03:56
    because the attention span of society is
  • 00:03:58
    becoming so much
  • 00:03:59
    shorter in fact a recent study found
  • 00:04:03
    that only
  • 00:04:03
    50 percent of people on tinder will meet
  • 00:04:06
    up with
  • 00:04:07
    one of their matches that being said
  • 00:04:10
    another study found
  • 00:04:11
    72 percent of people with internet
  • 00:04:13
    access to be in a relationship
  • 00:04:15
    whereas only 36 of people without
  • 00:04:18
    internet access
  • 00:04:20
    were in a relationship online dating has
  • 00:04:23
    displaced the original ways of meeting a
  • 00:04:26
    partner
  • 00:04:27
    instead of meeting a potential partner
  • 00:04:30
    getting a snapshot
  • 00:04:31
    impression of how well you interact with
  • 00:04:33
    them and then slowly learning facts
  • 00:04:35
    about them over time
  • 00:04:36
    online dating typically involves
  • 00:04:38
    learning a broad range of facts about a
  • 00:04:40
    potential partner
  • 00:04:42
    before deciding whether or not you want
  • 00:04:44
    to meet them in person
  • 00:04:46
    but is this a good thing
  • 00:04:49
    my friend was talking to a guy
  • 00:04:51
    throughout lockdown and as they legally
  • 00:04:53
    couldn't meet in person
  • 00:04:54
    they just voice noted every day and
  • 00:04:55
    eventually had a seven hour phone call
  • 00:04:58
    seven hours so he passed the absence of
  • 00:05:02
    gating test
  • 00:05:02
    he passed the disposability test but by
  • 00:05:05
    the time they were able to meet in
  • 00:05:07
    person
  • 00:05:07
    they had nothing left to talk about and
  • 00:05:10
    that's why people who match on these
  • 00:05:12
    apps often don't meet in person at all
  • 00:05:15
    the boom and bust theory because of the
  • 00:05:17
    strangers on a train effect
  • 00:05:19
    boom people on these apps get really
  • 00:05:21
    close really fast because they open up
  • 00:05:23
    to each other
  • 00:05:25
    but they don't know the other person
  • 00:05:27
    well enough yet
  • 00:05:28
    to give them the trust that they need to
  • 00:05:30
    hold and sustain their information
  • 00:05:33
    and that causes the relationship to bust
  • 00:05:36
    so what does it take to go from matching
  • 00:05:39
    on these apps
  • 00:05:40
    to actually meeting in person is it
  • 00:05:43
    attractiveness
  • 00:05:44
    what job they have or is it something
  • 00:05:47
    even more shallow
  • 00:05:48
    well an italian study actually assessed
  • 00:05:51
    people on dating apps
  • 00:05:52
    and found that they were more likely to
  • 00:05:54
    respond to each other's messages if they
  • 00:05:56
    were equal in attractiveness
  • 00:05:58
    but in the skype study that i mentioned
  • 00:06:00
    earlier people preferred dates who were
  • 00:06:02
    more attractive than them
  • 00:06:05
    so this is another problem that online
  • 00:06:07
    dating has created for us
  • 00:06:09
    we can't fall in love with people based
  • 00:06:11
    off their personalities anymore
  • 00:06:13
    they have to pass the attraction test
  • 00:06:15
    first
  • 00:06:17
    in real life women have been found to
  • 00:06:19
    care more about job status and wealth
  • 00:06:21
    and men have been found to care more
  • 00:06:23
    about physical attractiveness because it
  • 00:06:25
    shows the women to be more
  • 00:06:26
    healthy and therefore fertile but online
  • 00:06:29
    this all gets thrown out the window
  • 00:06:32
    a youtube experiment set up two tinder
  • 00:06:35
    profiles of a man and a woman
  • 00:06:37
    both equal in attractiveness both with
  • 00:06:39
    identical discovery settings
  • 00:06:42
    they then swiped right on a thousand
  • 00:06:43
    people and a day later the mail account
  • 00:06:46
    had
  • 00:06:46
    216 matches whereas the female account
  • 00:06:50
    had 701
  • 00:06:53
    so the match rate of the female account
  • 00:06:55
    was 43 percent
  • 00:06:57
    higher than the one of the male
  • 00:07:00
    so their significant gender disparity
  • 00:07:03
    when it comes to the importance of
  • 00:07:05
    physical attractiveness on dating apps
  • 00:07:08
    and as i said this is different in real
  • 00:07:10
    life where personality
  • 00:07:12
    makes a huge difference in fact in
  • 00:07:15
    another
  • 00:07:16
    study a man and a woman met their tinder
  • 00:07:18
    matches wearing a fat suit
  • 00:07:20
    four out of five of the men took off
  • 00:07:24
    when they saw the women whereas all of
  • 00:07:26
    the women
  • 00:07:27
    stayed and got to know the man
  • 00:07:30
    so what these studies have shown us is
  • 00:07:32
    that online
  • 00:07:33
    women care more about superficial
  • 00:07:36
    attractiveness
  • 00:07:37
    whereas in person it's the men
  • 00:07:40
    and the algorithms of these dating apps
  • 00:07:42
    don't take into account the differences
  • 00:07:45
    between what each gender prefers even if
  • 00:07:48
    it doesn't represent what we prefer in
  • 00:07:50
    real life
  • 00:07:52
    are our virtual preferences just
  • 00:07:54
    completely different to the ones we have
  • 00:07:56
    in person
  • 00:07:58
    and are they successful in helping us
  • 00:08:01
    find a long-term partner
  • 00:08:04
    well in america alone it's been found
  • 00:08:06
    that only 12 percent of the people who
  • 00:08:09
    use these apps have found committed
  • 00:08:11
    relationships from them
  • 00:08:14
    there's actually no compelling evidence
  • 00:08:17
    that the mathematical algorithms of
  • 00:08:19
    these dating apps work
  • 00:08:22
    and there's also no evidence that they
  • 00:08:24
    lead to more romantic outcomes
  • 00:08:26
    than those created by relationships
  • 00:08:28
    formed elsewhere
  • 00:08:30
    not only do these algorithms leave out
  • 00:08:32
    things such as personality
  • 00:08:34
    they don't take into account the
  • 00:08:36
    differences between
  • 00:08:38
    each person on these dating apps and
  • 00:08:40
    they don't take into account how each
  • 00:08:42
    relationship will develop over time
  • 00:08:44
    so these algorithms were only created
  • 00:08:47
    for a short-term
  • 00:08:49
    initial attraction
  • 00:08:53
    when it comes down to it everywhere we
  • 00:08:56
    go
  • 00:08:57
    people are looking for love think about
  • 00:09:00
    it
  • 00:09:00
    how many times have you been in a
  • 00:09:02
    grocery store made eye contact with
  • 00:09:04
    someone
  • 00:09:05
    and automatically been convinced that
  • 00:09:07
    they're the love of your life
  • 00:09:09
    a movie no matter the genre always tends
  • 00:09:13
    to include a romantic plot
  • 00:09:15
    and this seems to be reflected in our
  • 00:09:17
    lives too
  • 00:09:19
    so it was only a matter of time before
  • 00:09:22
    romance hit the internet
  • 00:09:24
    in fact i've actually been asked out a
  • 00:09:26
    number of times on linkedin
  • 00:09:29
    true story but here's the paradox
  • 00:09:33
    has the internet ruined romance
  • 00:09:37
    or simply made it easier
  • 00:09:40
    what will the future hold will romantic
  • 00:09:44
    tales be turned into stories of
  • 00:09:46
    meaningless hookups
  • 00:09:48
    will cinderella become tinderella
  • 00:09:52
    or do we just need to search for that
  • 00:09:54
    faithful 12
  • 00:09:59
    so who knows whether i would have made
  • 00:10:01
    it to the finale of that dating show
  • 00:10:03
    had our first date been in person who
  • 00:10:06
    knows
  • 00:10:07
    whether a virtual relationship might
  • 00:10:09
    boom or bust
  • 00:10:11
    but what we do know is that by 2035
  • 00:10:15
    the uk has been predicted to reach its
  • 00:10:17
    tipping point
  • 00:10:18
    with more than 50 percent of
  • 00:10:20
    relationships beginning online
  • 00:10:23
    online dating has changed the
  • 00:10:26
    relationship game
  • 00:10:30
    forever
  • 00:10:32
    thank you
Tags
  • online dating
  • algorithms
  • relationships
  • psychology
  • society
  • romance
  • technology
  • social dynamics
  • gender differences
  • futurism