00:00:00
what's up everybody welcome to heresy
00:00:01
financial my name is Joe Brown and today
00:00:04
we are diving into Stephanie Kelton's
00:00:07
new book the deficit myth this book came
00:00:10
out on Tuesday this week I've read it
00:00:13
I've taken copious notes and we have a
00:00:16
lot of material to get through today in
00:00:18
this video pretty much a systematic
00:00:21
rebuttal and not just rebuttal she says
00:00:23
a lot of things in this book that are
00:00:25
true that I want to point out as well
00:00:27
and so we're gonna go through and pretty
00:00:29
much dismantle the entire argument
00:00:31
behind modern monetary theory you
00:00:34
excited cuz I am let's dive in alright
00:00:40
so this book the deficit myth by
00:00:42
stephanie kelton she's one of the
00:00:43
leading proponents and most outspoken
00:00:45
advocates for modern monetary theory and
00:00:48
it was a pretty hard read look I read a
00:00:50
lot of books and I do think that it's
00:00:53
important to read books from
00:00:54
perspectives that you disagree with or
00:00:56
things that you don't understand or
00:00:57
unfamiliar with and so that's why I read
00:00:59
this book so that I could give you a
00:01:00
little bit of a rundown on basically
00:01:02
what's coming down the pike this is
00:01:03
pretty much the future of what our
00:01:05
economic system and our leaders are
00:01:08
moving towards as we're pretty much
00:01:10
experiencing the beginning of mmt right
00:01:13
now with what our policy makers both of
00:01:15
the Federal Reserve and Congress are
00:01:17
implementing right now the Distilled
00:01:19
argument behind modern monetary theory
00:01:21
is that basically the deficit doesn't
00:01:23
matter the government can print as much
00:01:25
money as they want using their central
00:01:28
bank which in our case is the Federal
00:01:30
Reserve and so it doesn't matter how
00:01:32
much money the government spends because
00:01:34
we can never default on our debt it
00:01:37
doesn't matter if we raise enough taxes
00:01:38
to pay for what we're spending because
00:01:41
we can just issue new debt which is
00:01:43
purchased by the Federal Reserve with
00:01:44
money they print out of thin air so it
00:01:46
doesn't matter the amount we can't
00:01:48
default we can print as much money as we
00:01:50
want with the push of a button and so
00:01:53
she says instead of worrying about how
00:01:55
much that we have how much the deficits
00:01:57
are and how much we're spending instead
00:01:59
we should be worried about what we're
00:02:02
spending that money on and whether it
00:02:05
essentially whether it has a positive
00:02:07
ROI for our overall economy
00:02:09
she says typically people look at the
00:02:12
government budget
00:02:13
as if it's similar to a household budget
00:02:15
she said that's not true there are very
00:02:17
big differences between currency issuers
00:02:19
and currency users which is true if you
00:02:23
or I want to spend money what we have to
00:02:25
do is either take out debt you know use
00:02:27
a credit card or get a car loan to buy a
00:02:29
car get a mortgage to buy a house or we
00:02:31
have to earn that money ahead of time
00:02:33
and then spend what we've earned the
00:02:35
government is different they don't have
00:02:36
to do that they tax money to get money
00:02:38
in they they borrow money to get money
00:02:41
in or they have the Federal Reserve
00:02:42
print money to buy their debt to loan
00:02:45
them money they can borrow from the
00:02:47
Federal Reserve but ultimately that's
00:02:48
just a technicality in the system left
00:02:51
over from the old days when we were on a
00:02:53
gold standard in practice it's really
00:02:55
just as if the Federal Reserve prints
00:02:57
money to finance the government spending
00:03:00
and this is her whole argument it's
00:03:01
basically hey we have a lot of systems
00:03:04
and rules and laws in place that are
00:03:07
remnants of a gold standard that we
00:03:10
should just forget about because they
00:03:11
don't apply under a Fiat standard they
00:03:14
don't apply when we print our own
00:03:15
currency that's true
00:03:17
a lot of these things were stepping over
00:03:19
anyway debt monetization was supposed to
00:03:22
be illegal there are laws against the
00:03:24
Federal Reserve directly purchasing
00:03:26
Treasuries from the United States
00:03:28
Treasury they can't loan that money
00:03:29
directly to the government be for
00:03:31
obvious reasons it makes it too easy for
00:03:34
our government to spend money and so
00:03:36
they can only purchase it from the open
00:03:38
market and so the way they get around
00:03:39
that is primary dealers these large
00:03:41
banks they buy the debt from the
00:03:42
government they loan the money but then
00:03:44
they just sell that debt straight to the
00:03:45
Federal Reserve so technicalities that
00:03:47
don't really apply the Federal Reserve
00:03:49
is essentially just monetizing the
00:03:50
United States debt at this point problem
00:03:53
is that she treats fiat systems and fiat
00:03:56
currency as if it's some magical new
00:03:58
technology that's never been tried
00:03:59
before as if it's the latest and
00:04:01
monetary evolution when in fact it's
00:04:04
been tried over and over and over for
00:04:06
thousands of years and every time it
00:04:08
fails miserably the best example that I
00:04:10
can give to wrap your head around
00:04:12
basically what she's saying here is
00:04:14
think of think of real estate investing
00:04:16
in if you're watching this channel
00:04:17
you've probably seen or read books
00:04:18
you've seen videos on real estate
00:04:21
investors that basic I know like Robert
00:04:24
Kiyosaki a Rich Dad Poor Dad the classic
00:04:25
example of
00:04:26
hey it doesn't matter how much debt you
00:04:28
have as long as what you're doing with
00:04:30
that debt is buying assets that produce
00:04:32
cash flow right so the typical you know
00:04:35
the the conservative fine financially
00:04:37
conservative like Dave Ramsey he would
00:04:39
say get out of debt then invest with
00:04:41
your cash right kind of the opposite
00:04:43
viewpoint of that is somebody like
00:04:45
Robert Kiyosaki who says take out as
00:04:46
much debt as you can and if the interest
00:04:48
rate on that debt that you're holding is
00:04:50
you know six percent you just have to
00:04:52
make sure that the investments the real
00:04:53
estate that you're buying is going to be
00:04:55
returning to you an excess of six
00:04:57
percent then you have positive cash flow
00:04:59
and so it doesn't matter how much debt
00:05:01
you have as long as you're deploying
00:05:02
that debt into investments that are
00:05:05
producing positive cash flow for you she
00:05:07
says it's the same thing with the
00:05:08
government the government doesn't have
00:05:10
to worry about how much debt it has how
00:05:11
much it's spending as long as it's
00:05:13
spending those resources spending that
00:05:15
money in areas that will provide a
00:05:17
positive ROI for the economy and for the
00:05:20
GDP the problem is when you get into the
00:05:22
nuances and when you really break it
00:05:23
down it it doesn't hold up to reality
00:05:26
and this is one of those areas that
00:05:28
doesn't hold up to reality because in a
00:05:30
in a personal investment situation
00:05:32
you're the one taking out the debt
00:05:34
you've got the liability to pay it back
00:05:36
you're the one paying the interest but
00:05:37
you're also the one that's receiving the
00:05:39
benefits from the investment you're
00:05:41
receiving the cash flow you're the same
00:05:42
person when the government operates
00:05:44
that's not how it works
00:05:46
when they print money or borrow money to
00:05:49
spend there are actual some people who
00:05:52
are actual losers and some people who
00:05:54
are actually winners it's a
00:05:55
redistribution of resources it's
00:05:57
transferring wealth from one area to
00:05:59
another so that's the big that's the the
00:06:02
first big problem that comes up with
00:06:03
this is that there's it's not just the
00:06:06
economy or the nation is just one big
00:06:08
homogeneous blob there's actual real
00:06:11
individual actors who are losing and
00:06:13
real individual actors who are winning
00:06:14
here so over and over and over through
00:06:16
the book she mentions how really the
00:06:18
only cap or the only extent to which you
00:06:21
can participate under this mindset this
00:06:23
the system of of just printing money as
00:06:26
much as you want to finance the good
00:06:28
things that the government should spend
00:06:29
money on the only the only cap on the
00:06:31
only limitation is inflation now she
00:06:33
says that a bunch throughout the but as
00:06:35
she never really deals with the issue
00:06:37
that those practices are what cause
00:06:40
price inflation in the first place now
00:06:42
there are a lot of people that talk
00:06:43
about how mmt advocates using taxes to
00:06:46
manage inflation and she's a little bit
00:06:47
wishy-washy on this actually you can see
00:06:49
in videos where she says no I
00:06:52
she lived this is a direct quote she
00:06:54
says I reject the idea that mmt
00:06:56
advocates using taxes to regulate
00:06:58
inflation but in the book she actually
00:07:00
discusses how to use taxes to prevent
00:07:03
inflation at least specifically in
00:07:05
certain sectors or areas and she she
00:07:07
actually says in the book that one of
00:07:09
the main uses or purposes of taxes is to
00:07:13
regulate activity it's you're gonna tax
00:07:15
the areas that you think you don't want
00:07:16
things to happen and you don't want
00:07:17
money spent there and you're going to
00:07:19
give tax cuts or remove taxes in areas
00:07:22
that you do want money flowing into
00:07:23
classic example of how the tax code
00:07:25
works right now they have lots of taxes
00:07:27
on alcohol and cigarettes because they
00:07:28
don't want that happening but they have
00:07:30
lots of tax cuts and deductions for real
00:07:32
estate investing because they want
00:07:33
people to invest in real estate
00:07:34
especially low income housing they want
00:07:36
you know affordable housing for people
00:07:38
who have you know low wages and so they
00:07:40
give tax cuts and tax benefits to
00:07:42
developers and investors who are
00:07:44
building affordable housing for
00:07:46
low-income people and it's kind of funny
00:07:48
that she says hey we need you know taxes
00:07:50
to be used to regulate behavior like
00:07:52
this because in another part of the book
00:07:54
she says that we need to close all the
00:07:56
loopholes in the tax system and get rid
00:07:58
of all of the ways that people are
00:08:00
evading taxes and manipulating the tax
00:08:02
code in order to take more than their
00:08:04
fair share that's all the tax code is
00:08:06
the tax code is just a system that is
00:08:08
laid out of a bunch of ways that
00:08:10
investors and business owners and
00:08:11
entrepreneurs can save money it's it's
00:08:13
it's designed to incentivize behavior in
00:08:16
the way that politicians think will
00:08:17
benefit the country now the other thing
00:08:19
that she says taxes are for which she
00:08:21
mentions quite a bit is for
00:08:22
redistribution of wealth to flatten the
00:08:24
wealth gap and to flatten that wealth
00:08:26
curve now this is particularly dangerous
00:08:28
and dark in my opinion because she
00:08:31
recognizes throughout the book that
00:08:33
taxes are not necessary for any
00:08:36
government spending whatsoever the
00:08:37
government could spend what it needs
00:08:38
without taxes and so the only purpose or
00:08:41
in her mind a very good and moral
00:08:44
purpose for taxes is to take money from
00:08:46
the rich and she specifically says mmt
00:08:49
is not about being Robin Hood to take
00:08:51
from the rich and give to the poor like
00:08:52
Democrats usually say
00:08:53
should be four she says nots for it's
00:08:55
not for that the we don't need to tax
00:08:57
the rich in order to spend money we can
00:08:59
print as much money as we need but we do
00:09:01
need to tax the rich because they have
00:09:03
too much that's it she says they have
00:09:05
more than their fair share and so we
00:09:08
need to tax them in order to reduce how
00:09:10
much they have to flatten that wealth
00:09:12
gap to reduce that wealth gap in reality
00:09:14
if your goal is to reduce the wealth gap
00:09:17
you could also just print money and give
00:09:19
that money to poor people that would
00:09:21
also reduce the wealth gap so there's
00:09:23
this dark communistic agenda behind mmt
00:09:26
that is that starts to unfold as you
00:09:28
read the book that says hey you know we
00:09:30
need to take from those who have a lot
00:09:32
not because we have to but because they
00:09:35
shouldn't have as much as they have now
00:09:37
we all know people like Bernie Sanders
00:09:39
and Nancy Pelosi and people who advocate
00:09:42
for this these kind of politics a lot
00:09:44
they're super rich they're millionaires
00:09:46
but when they talk about the super-rich
00:09:48
they're talking just about people who
00:09:49
are richer than them just about people
00:09:51
who have more money than them that they
00:09:53
never consider themselves rich now she
00:09:55
stays pretty apolitical considering the
00:09:58
two parties in this book I'll give her
00:09:59
that she equally rags on both
00:10:01
Republicans and Democrats which is great
00:10:03
they're both two sides of the same coin
00:10:05
she says Democrats are constantly saying
00:10:07
that we need to you know tax the rich
00:10:09
and we need more income in order to fix
00:10:12
our deficit and Republicans are
00:10:13
constantly saying no we need less
00:10:15
spending we need to spend less in order
00:10:17
to fix the deficit and she says no you
00:10:18
guys are both morons we print as much
00:10:20
money as we want we don't need to fix
00:10:22
the deficit so stop arguing about
00:10:24
increasing taxes and reducing spending
00:10:26
let's focus on where to spend the money
00:10:28
instead now the last thing that she says
00:10:30
about taxes specifically before I move
00:10:32
on to the rest of the book is that she
00:10:33
says the purpose for tax is the main
00:10:35
purpose the biggest one is to create a
00:10:37
demand for the currency she gives an
00:10:39
example of a dad who wants his kid to do
00:10:41
chores and so he says I'll give you
00:10:42
these these dad coupons and they said we
00:10:44
don't want those dad coupons and he says
00:10:46
okay well at the end of every week you
00:10:48
owe me 30 dad coupons or else you know
00:10:51
you're and you know you're grounded and
00:10:52
so in order to create a demand for those
00:10:55
dad coupons which are really worthless
00:10:57
to him he says well you owe them to me
00:11:00
or else there will be a punishment and
00:11:01
so all of a sudden now they have to go
00:11:03
and do all these tours in order to you
00:11:05
know get these accumulate these dad
00:11:06
coupons so that at the end
00:11:07
the week they can pay some of them back
00:11:09
to him and ultimately he doesn't care
00:11:11
what they are he could destroy them he
00:11:12
doesn't need them he made them up he
00:11:14
printed them and so she says this is
00:11:15
exactly what the government does the
00:11:17
government just you know they have to
00:11:18
include taxes in the system in order to
00:11:20
create a demand for the currency if you
00:11:22
don't turn in a certain number of their
00:11:24
fake printed money at the end of the
00:11:27
year you go to jail and that's exactly
00:11:29
the purpose of taxes I made a video
00:11:31
about that that is the biggest reason
00:11:33
why we have taxes is just to create a
00:11:34
demand for a currency that wouldn't have
00:11:37
a demand otherwise because there is no
00:11:38
intrinsic value to it all right so next
00:11:40
she talks about the limitations and she
00:11:42
continually says that the only
00:11:44
limitation to spending is inflation and
00:11:48
this this is not true and we'll get to
00:11:50
inflation in a minute and but this is
00:11:52
not true because it ignores the the
00:11:55
devastation and the destruction that
00:11:56
happens from a miss a location of
00:11:58
resources now this is something that
00:12:00
Hayek talks a lot about in his road to
00:12:01
serfdom book and all of the resources
00:12:03
that I'm talking about here I'm gonna
00:12:05
link them in the description below if
00:12:06
you want to take you know go down the
00:12:08
rabbit hole into any of the areas that
00:12:09
I'm talking about today there's a lot of
00:12:11
great resources out there but this is
00:12:13
something Hayek talks a lot about is
00:12:14
that in order for in order for the the
00:12:17
government to make good decisions
00:12:19
there's there's three things that are
00:12:21
necessary the government or the the
00:12:23
person in power number one has to be
00:12:25
all-powerful so anytime you move towards
00:12:28
socialism you increase that distance
00:12:31
towards you or do you decrease the
00:12:33
distance towards totalitarian control
00:12:35
because anytime you're trying to
00:12:37
redistribute the resources or make
00:12:38
decisions that you think are going to
00:12:39
benefit everybody you have to control
00:12:41
things in order to do that there can
00:12:43
there has to be less and less freedom of
00:12:45
individual actors because anytime you
00:12:47
start to manipulate one area the rest of
00:12:50
the the free participants will have kind
00:12:52
of a snapback reaction to that and so in
00:12:55
order to then continue to control that
00:12:57
with the outcome that you want now you
00:12:58
have to control more and more and more
00:13:00
it's like whack-a-mole until it's
00:13:01
complete to Italian totalitarian control
00:13:03
and when you have a bureaucratic system
00:13:06
with checks and balances and gridlock in
00:13:08
place to prevent changes or new laws
00:13:10
from happening like the American
00:13:12
government you have a system that's put
00:13:13
in place that kind of prevents decisions
00:13:16
be from being made that need to be made
00:13:19
in order to completely 100%
00:13:21
controla system and so the first thing
00:13:23
that you need in order to be able to you
00:13:26
know in a perfect world control a system
00:13:29
in a completely communist or socialist
00:13:30
way with perfection in utopia is one
00:13:34
person to have utter control of every
00:13:36
action every decision in the entire
00:13:38
system so you need control number one
00:13:41
because if you don't have control you
00:13:42
can have you can you can know the right
00:13:45
thing to do but if you're not able to
00:13:47
actually do it and make that change
00:13:48
happen
00:13:49
it's useless so you need control the
00:13:51
second thing that you need is the right
00:13:53
information because you can have the
00:13:55
right intention and you can have the
00:13:56
control but if you don't have the right
00:13:57
information the decision that you make
00:13:59
and the action that you cause to happen
00:14:01
is going to be the wrong one because you
00:14:03
don't have all the right information now
00:14:04
this is also something that is
00:14:06
impossible to get its way up to the top
00:14:08
to the decision make sure makers and the
00:14:10
policy makers because the information
00:14:12
necessary to make the right decisions is
00:14:15
literally the aggregate of the entire
00:14:17
system of all of the you know the
00:14:19
billions of different decisions or in
00:14:21
the case of America 300 million
00:14:23
different decision makers and all of
00:14:25
their own individual wants and needs
00:14:26
that make up their own decisions
00:14:28
throughout the day all of that
00:14:29
information would have to be distilled
00:14:31
and get up to the top in order to make
00:14:34
the right decisions that information is
00:14:36
not possible it's just not possible to
00:14:39
all make it and make it to the top in a
00:14:43
way that can be processed in order to
00:14:44
make decisions that are good for
00:14:45
everybody and then the third thing that
00:14:47
you need is morality you need something
00:14:50
where it's you're not going to be making
00:14:51
decisions that are for your own benefit
00:14:54
or if for the benefit of your friends
00:14:56
you need to you know have a have a moral
00:14:59
system in place where the right decision
00:15:01
is being made once you have the control
00:15:02
and you know the ability to make the
00:15:04
right decisions and the information so
00:15:07
that you're making right decisions you
00:15:08
also need the the ethics so that that
00:15:11
power doesn't corrupt you and you start
00:15:13
to you know use that power for your own
00:15:16
benefits instead of the good of
00:15:17
everybody and so this is why that's the
00:15:19
idea of Jesus as the King of Kings right
00:15:22
the Jesus being God the all-powerful
00:15:24
all-knowing and perfect you know right
00:15:27
that's the idea of the king of kings in
00:15:28
order to have really a dictator you know
00:15:31
the King of Kings somebody who's able to
00:15:33
do that perfectly and create utopia
00:15:35
to have all those three things all the
00:15:36
right information all the control and
00:15:38
all the morality and clearly none of
00:15:41
those are possible especially with the
00:15:43
United States government and any
00:15:45
government that's tried in the past
00:15:46
obviously has failed miserably
00:15:48
the three most communist countries have
00:15:51
killed more people than any war than any
00:15:54
religious cleansing or other
00:15:55
governmental regime in history of the
00:15:58
world and so essentially when she says
00:15:59
the only limitation to mmt is basically
00:16:03
inflation that's not true because it
00:16:05
ignores the fact that when you're trying
00:16:07
to make decisions from the top in order
00:16:09
to allocate resources in a way that's
00:16:11
going to make the economy better it
00:16:14
ignores the fact that you actually can't
00:16:16
do that from the top that's why
00:16:17
centralized planning it doesn't work
00:16:19
because you don't have the three
00:16:20
ingredients necessary in order to do
00:16:22
that correctly and so taking into
00:16:24
account the errors in not having all the
00:16:27
power you need or not having all the
00:16:28
information you need or doing something
00:16:30
that's immoral you're going to have a
00:16:32
miss a location of resources and
00:16:35
malinvestment happen and there's real
00:16:37
resources being deployed here not just
00:16:38
money there's actual people labor
00:16:41
materials that are being deployed and
00:16:43
redirected from certain areas in the
00:16:45
economy and there will be brokenness
00:16:47
there will be devastation there will be
00:16:49
destruction there will be a
00:16:50
misallocation of resources that causes a
00:16:52
destruction of wealth rather than just
00:16:54
being neutral or beneficial and that
00:16:56
brings us to the other really big
00:16:58
mistake that she makes here all
00:17:00
throughout the book is that she
00:17:01
completely equates money and wealth she
00:17:05
said basically uses the two terms
00:17:07
interchangeably which is a massive
00:17:10
mistake there is a big difference
00:17:11
between wealth and money money is the
00:17:14
measure of the wealth money isn't the
00:17:17
wealth itself money is a wealth delivery
00:17:20
system it's like it's like a chip and
00:17:22
salsa salsas the wealth chip is the
00:17:25
money that the chip is the delivery
00:17:28
mechanism for the salsa it's not the
00:17:31
salsa itself the dollar is just the
00:17:33
delivery mechanism for the wealth it's
00:17:35
not the wealth itself and it's actually
00:17:37
very devastating and and significant
00:17:40
when you make this mistake and think
00:17:42
that money and wealth are equivalent to
00:17:44
each other and that's where the idea
00:17:45
comes from that we can just print money
00:17:47
in order to pay
00:17:48
things because you think printing money
00:17:50
is actually creating new wealth and
00:17:53
deploying that into certain areas and
00:17:55
it's not I'm really bad with graphic
00:17:58
design but imagine that this was a video
00:17:59
where you had graphic designers and you
00:18:01
had a big graphic of a pie chart' come
00:18:04
up here okay imagine a big pie chart and
00:18:06
on this pie chart there's millions of
00:18:09
tiny little pie pieces okay so the pie
00:18:12
itself represents the wealth right and
00:18:15
some some of these pieces of pie
00:18:18
and each one of this slices the size of
00:18:21
the slice represents the units of money
00:18:23
in the system in this case the dollar
00:18:25
now when the Federal Reserve prints
00:18:28
money in order to finance government
00:18:29
spending what happens is new pieces of
00:18:33
pie are inserted into the pie graph
00:18:35
right so you have the same sized pie the
00:18:39
pie is not growing but there are more
00:18:42
slices now now there are so many slices
00:18:44
or so many dollars and the wealth is so
00:18:46
distributed throughout so many you know
00:18:48
300 million different players that
00:18:50
nobody notices right when it happens
00:18:53
when that money gets printed for
00:18:54
government financing but that money
00:18:56
that's printed those are new slices that
00:18:59
are inserted into the pie those slices
00:19:01
get transferred over into the
00:19:03
government's spending power and then
00:19:05
they deploy those into certain areas and
00:19:07
so it goes to business a business B and
00:19:10
all government employees you know you
00:19:13
know pie pie slice number three and so
00:19:16
you have some players that their slice
00:19:19
of the pie gets smaller and that's the
00:19:21
only thing that happens the purchasing
00:19:24
power of their money goes away a little
00:19:26
bit and that's the only thing that
00:19:27
happens but for other players their
00:19:30
existing slices of pie yeah they get
00:19:32
smaller but then they also get new
00:19:34
slices of pie which makes their portion
00:19:38
of the overall pie grow and so it's
00:19:40
government employees and it's
00:19:42
contractors that the government hires
00:19:43
and it's businesses that lock up giant
00:19:45
contracts with the government and it's
00:19:47
businesses that benefit from all of the
00:19:49
giant government spending military
00:19:52
contractors healthcare on all the other
00:19:54
areas that government spends money on
00:19:56
they're getting new pieces of the pie
00:19:58
that are really just coming from other
00:20:01
pieces of the
00:20:02
getting smaller and I think this is
00:20:04
probably the biggest mistake that she
00:20:06
makes because if you don't realize money
00:20:08
and wealth are different you think
00:20:10
printing money is printing wealth it's
00:20:12
not it's really just giving the
00:20:14
government the means to redistribute and
00:20:17
move resources away from some people and
00:20:20
hand them to other people with most not
00:20:23
really knowing because it's basically
00:20:24
like spending financed by taxes that
00:20:27
nobody realizes is happening so she
00:20:29
basically says we need to focus on where
00:20:32
to spend this money rather than how much
00:20:33
money we're spending a lot and she
00:20:35
doesn't really give a whole lot of
00:20:37
concrete examples for that other than
00:20:39
extreme left green New Deal type of
00:20:42
programs to spend money on she really
00:20:44
wants to spend money on renewable energy
00:20:46
stuff she really wants a guaranteed
00:20:48
government job a guaranteed federal job
00:20:51
that anybody can get anytime that's a
00:20:54
really good job you know $15 minimum
00:20:56
wage benefits vacation paid maternity
00:20:58
leave things like that so she really
00:21:00
wants a guaranteed job available to
00:21:02
anybody to force all other employers to
00:21:05
either bump up their minimum wage or
00:21:07
their benefit packages or just not hire
00:21:09
these employees and these employees will
00:21:11
then go work for the government instead
00:21:12
and she doesn't really give any examples
00:21:14
of what those jobs will be because she
00:21:16
says that should be left up to the
00:21:17
communities but the small communities
00:21:19
who are getting all this federal money
00:21:21
in order to hire all these people
00:21:23
they've got no skin in the game they're
00:21:24
not having to show that this you know
00:21:26
these have been official these these
00:21:29
jobs are you know providing economic
00:21:31
benefit to society overall this is
00:21:33
funded from the outside there is no skin
00:21:35
in the game
00:21:36
there's no PNL assigned to them that
00:21:38
will shut them down if they don't
00:21:39
produce or have any economic viability
00:21:42
this is just free money and so how do
00:21:44
you think that there won't be miss
00:21:46
allocation of resources how do you think
00:21:48
that this won't be devastating for all
00:21:49
the small businesses who can barely
00:21:51
afford to hire people as it is it's not
00:21:54
like businesses are out to you know
00:21:56
predatory pricing and trying to pay
00:21:58
people as little as possible but
00:22:00
businesses get ahead by hiring the best
00:22:02
people possible it's only because they
00:22:04
don't have enough money there aren't
00:22:06
enough profit margins in order to hire
00:22:08
more people or pay them more you want to
00:22:10
retain good talent and the companies who
00:22:13
are doing this in a bad way are the
00:22:14
companies that are massive
00:22:16
specifically because of government
00:22:18
finance spending these giant companies
00:22:21
that are too big to fail they're getting
00:22:23
all his bailout money that lock up these
00:22:25
giant government contracts they're the
00:22:27
ones that have too much money coming in
00:22:29
they're the ones that in reality left
00:22:31
alone they'd be fragile and they'd
00:22:33
collapse because they can't compete
00:22:34
except for all the red tape because of
00:22:36
their lobbyists got government to pass
00:22:38
new rules and new regulations and
00:22:39
regulations always favor the incumbents
00:22:41
and the large ones who you know they're
00:22:43
just closing the door behind them all
00:22:45
over the books she's ignoring the fact
00:22:46
that the problems she says we need to
00:22:48
avoid are caused by the solutions she's
00:22:51
proposing in the first place
00:22:53
she's saying inflation is the only
00:22:55
limitation that we have to watch out for
00:22:56
but a growth of government spending is
00:22:59
what causes inflation because it's
00:23:01
financed by monetary expansion she says
00:23:04
we need to stop predatory pricing and
00:23:06
giant businesses from having more of
00:23:08
their fair share but that only happens
00:23:10
from red tape from regulation that only
00:23:13
happens when your rent-seeking and
00:23:15
skimming off the top and that's only
00:23:16
there because governments are allowing
00:23:18
you to do that government sanctioned
00:23:20
monopolies and regulation preventing
00:23:21
competition from putting you out of
00:23:22
business that doesn't happen in the free
00:23:24
market in a completely free market you
00:23:27
don't get more than your fair share
00:23:28
fair share or less than your fair share
00:23:30
you get exactly what your fair share is
00:23:32
if you make a good product and you have
00:23:34
good business you make a lot of money
00:23:36
that's your fair share and so because of
00:23:38
that with the jobs guarantees and
00:23:40
focusing money on different areas she
00:23:42
talks a lot about slack in the economy
00:23:44
and capacity in the economy and
00:23:46
unemployment means that the government's
00:23:48
not spending enough because the
00:23:49
government needs to be spending more in
00:23:51
order to create jobs in these areas and
00:23:52
again it completely ignores the fact
00:23:55
that you cannot make the right decisions
00:23:56
because you don't have the right power
00:23:57
and you don't have the right information
00:23:59
or the right ethics in order to make
00:24:00
decisions that are beneficial for all
00:24:02
from the top the best way to do that is
00:24:04
to leave a system where every individual
00:24:05
is free to choose exactly what they want
00:24:07
to do on their own and there are no
00:24:08
safety nets and there are no bailout
00:24:10
packages available and there is no free
00:24:12
money coming in from Big Brother
00:24:13
upstairs every individual has all the
00:24:15
upside to themselves and all the
00:24:16
downside to themselves so she addresses
00:24:18
some of the issues where we say hey if
00:24:20
we act like that we're just gonna become
00:24:21
like Greece and she says no you can't
00:24:23
become like Greece because Greece is the
00:24:25
way they are because they're borrowing
00:24:26
money in a currency they don't control
00:24:28
if you just borrow
00:24:29
or spend money in a currency you control
00:24:31
yeah you don't have those problems and
00:24:33
it just it bothers my mind because the
00:24:36
reason that they got into that place in
00:24:37
the first place where they had to resort
00:24:39
to using somebody else's currency is
00:24:40
because they abused their own currency
00:24:42
in the first place
00:24:43
irresponsible fiscal and monetary policy
00:24:45
lands you in a place where you cannot
00:24:47
use your own currency anymore because
00:24:48
it's lost its purchasing power so you
00:24:49
have to resort to using somebody else's
00:24:51
currency in order to get the purchasing
00:24:52
power that you want that leaves you at
00:24:54
the mercy of that other currency if it
00:24:56
starts to become more expensive for you
00:24:58
and lands you in problems and so she
00:24:59
says just use your own currency well
00:25:01
that's what they did that got them into
00:25:03
that position in the first place and she
00:25:05
talks about hey the United States has
00:25:06
always run too little deficits and the
00:25:08
Federal Reserve has always been a little
00:25:09
too tight and you know we can we have a
00:25:11
lot more capacity to spend a lot more in
00:25:14
the right way and it ignores the fact
00:25:16
that we've done this before we've gotten
00:25:18
ourselves into the position where we've
00:25:20
spent so much money that we didn't
00:25:22
actually have we just created out of
00:25:23
thin air that we actually had to borrow
00:25:25
money in somebody else's currency nobody
00:25:28
remembers this but in night in the late
00:25:30
70s America actually had to borrow money
00:25:33
denominated in Deutsche marks and Swiss
00:25:36
francs because nobody would take debt
00:25:38
denominated in dollars anymore
00:25:40
the United States couldn't issue
00:25:42
Treasuries at an interest rate that was
00:25:44
high enough that they could afford it
00:25:46
and so instead of borrowing in dollars
00:25:48
they had to borrow in someone else's
00:25:50
currency in order to get new purchasing
00:25:52
power this is what happens when you
00:25:54
abuse your currency nobody else wants it
00:25:56
anymore
00:25:57
she says the Federal Reserve could write
00:25:59
a check tomorrow and pay off the entire
00:26:00
national debt it would basically just
00:26:02
absorb it onto its balance sheet they
00:26:04
could cancel it if they wanted nothing
00:26:05
would change it would matter absolutely
00:26:07
zero yeah that's true nothing would
00:26:09
change because the United States
00:26:11
government doesn't actually pay back its
00:26:12
debt it just continually rolls it over
00:26:14
and it more and more and more so is
00:26:16
rolling that over into the Federal
00:26:17
Reserve so it's basically doing that
00:26:19
already so yeah nothing would change
00:26:21
it's not debt that is deciding to pay
00:26:23
back at some point and she says the only
00:26:25
way to you know pay it back at some
00:26:26
point you know the traditional way would
00:26:28
be to run a surplus but the problem is
00:26:30
every time the government has run a
00:26:31
surplus in the past it's led to a
00:26:33
depression afterwards and you think hmm
00:26:35
why would is why would the government
00:26:36
running a surplus cause a depression to
00:26:39
happen cause an economic recession or
00:26:40
depression or slump to happen that does
00:26:42
makes sense the government you know
00:26:43
doing you know smart responsible fiscal
00:26:46
with choices resulting in an economic
00:26:48
depression while she says it's because
00:26:50
the government takes too much money out
00:26:52
of the economy and leaves it destitute
00:26:54
but the problem is again there's a month
00:26:56
difference between money and wealth when
00:26:58
you extract money from a system there's
00:27:00
less money to go around that increases
00:27:03
the demand for money the amount of money
00:27:05
in the system compared to the goods and
00:27:07
services means that everything gets a
00:27:09
lot cheaper the spending power the ratio
00:27:12
of money to goods and services goes in
00:27:14
the favor of money so money becomes a
00:27:16
lot more valuable you can buy a lot more
00:27:18
things for that money than you could
00:27:21
before so if the government's
00:27:22
withdrawing money out of the economy it
00:27:25
should make people better off well you
00:27:28
actually have depressions because
00:27:30
depressions are cures for malinvestment
00:27:32
when you have monetary deflation and
00:27:34
money being money not wealth money being
00:27:37
extracted from an economy it exposes
00:27:39
malinvestments it creates a higher
00:27:42
threshold for investments investments
00:27:44
that are not performing or having a high
00:27:47
enough return they'll be cancelled
00:27:48
because the cost of money is too high to
00:27:50
afford something that is not producing
00:27:53
and so it raises the bar for investment
00:27:55
and so it kills it's like chemotherapy
00:27:57
and goes through and kills all the
00:27:59
cancer cells it kills all the
00:28:00
investments in the system that are bad
00:28:02
and wrong these are things that should
00:28:03
be allowed to happen recessions and
00:28:05
depressions and business cycles not
00:28:07
credit cycles business cycles in order
00:28:09
to allow a cleanse and a cure so that
00:28:12
resources can be distributed in a better
00:28:15
way that's more productive long-term she
00:28:17
also talks about how it's not true that
00:28:19
the government spending money crowds out
00:28:21
investors but she's only looking at it
00:28:22
from the standpoint of savers debt and
00:28:25
deficits she's ignoring the aspect of
00:28:27
real resources really bar being diverted
00:28:30
like all the government money that goes
00:28:32
into military spending right now there
00:28:34
is a massive amount of miss allocation
00:28:35
of resources there all the scientists
00:28:37
and all the brilliant mathematicians and
00:28:39
all the brilliant engineers who are
00:28:40
siphoned out of the productive sectors
00:28:42
of society who are not making medical
00:28:44
devices who are not making computers who
00:28:46
are not making all these things that
00:28:48
would actually make life better for
00:28:49
everybody they're going to produce
00:28:51
missiles and fighter jets and guns and
00:28:54
things that are at
00:28:55
destructive of resources and destructive
00:28:58
of wealth and so you have a massive
00:29:00
amount of real resources real mental
00:29:02
power labor real metal oil energy real
00:29:06
actual resources that are misallocated
00:29:08
and put into areas that the free market
00:29:10
would not decide to do on its own
00:29:12
therefore that means it's a Mis
00:29:14
allocation of resources the whole crux
00:29:17
of the idea is to spend money in areas
00:29:19
that the free market won't do by itself
00:29:20
but the problem with that is that the
00:29:23
free market is just a bunch of
00:29:24
individuals who are making up their
00:29:26
minds on how to get ahead in life and
00:29:27
how to make more money how to earn a
00:29:29
wage a living wage for myself and how to
00:29:32
earn a make a business grow business
00:29:34
that's enough to pay employees and grow
00:29:36
and make investments and so the free
00:29:38
market is just a bunch of individuals
00:29:40
who collectively have decided that's not
00:29:42
profitable that's not worth it so how do
00:29:44
you think a government that siphoning
00:29:46
resources out of an economy can deploy
00:29:48
resources into those areas in a way that
00:29:51
is gonna be beneficial for the economy
00:29:53
by definition it doesn't make sense look
00:29:55
the most prosperous countries all
00:29:57
throughout history have always been the
00:30:00
most economically free the greatest
00:30:02
amount of growth that the world has ever
00:30:04
seen was in America between the period
00:30:07
of the Civil War and the creation of the
00:30:09
Federal Reserve we had massive deflation
00:30:11
most people don't know that for decades
00:30:13
deflation but real wages rose because
00:30:16
the cost of living of everything was
00:30:18
just plummeting year after year after
00:30:20
year after year and we had a massive
00:30:22
amount of growth the greatest in
00:30:24
American history arguably the greatest
00:30:26
in world history and that was a period
00:30:28
of time where there are relatively no
00:30:29
laws relatively little regulation no
00:30:32
income tax people were just afraid to do
00:30:35
business as they wanted and it resulted
00:30:37
in an explosion of growth like the world
00:30:39
had never seen when you rank countries
00:30:40
right now by their freedom their
00:30:42
economic freedom when considering taxes
00:30:45
and the judicial system and laws and how
00:30:47
easy it is to do business and make money
00:30:49
the countries that are most economically
00:30:51
free are the ones that are the most
00:30:52
prosperous and had the least amount of
00:30:55
inequality quite frankly she talks a lot
00:30:57
about welfare packages and welfare
00:30:59
benefits and entitlements and Social
00:31:01
Security and she says while Social
00:31:02
Security is not funded and it's just
00:31:05
because there's a law that prevents
00:31:06
Congress from actually just paying for
00:31:08
Social Security
00:31:09
benefits if the trust fund isn't
00:31:10
actually fully funded and they could
00:31:12
just change that lawn so she's talking
00:31:14
about this like it's a horrible thing
00:31:15
like Congress really needs to get on the
00:31:16
ball and change that change that law in
00:31:18
reality of course they're gonna change
00:31:20
that law when the time comes and it's
00:31:21
all these old people are not gonna get
00:31:23
their Social Security checks that would
00:31:24
be a political suicide to not change
00:31:27
that law and not vote to change that law
00:31:29
just to let it be paid for like other
00:31:31
things in Medicare and Medicaid
00:31:32
she pontificates about inequality and
00:31:34
wealth gaps and income gaps and how MMT
00:31:37
if we just really you know go all-in on
00:31:39
that can solve all these problems when
00:31:41
in reality the the government spending
00:31:44
and mis allocation of resources is what
00:31:46
causes these things in the first place
00:31:48
I've made videos about inequality in the
00:31:50
past you can go check them out
00:31:51
relatively recently one on inequality
00:31:52
and it's government spending unhinged
00:31:56
government spending that causes these
00:31:57
that's empirically proven all throughout
00:31:59
history and regarding her constantly
00:32:01
saying the biggest problem or the only
00:32:03
limitation really is inflation she never
00:32:06
really deals with you know how that will
00:32:08
be resolved how that will be avoided
00:32:11
because by really by definition the the
00:32:13
the free market has decided where it
00:32:16
wants to allocate resources when
00:32:17
something gets too expensive
00:32:19
it stops allocating resources there or
00:32:21
substitutes it with something else right
00:32:23
and so when you see Neal from a
00:32:25
centralized planning perspective from
00:32:27
the top down if you see slack or if you
00:32:30
see capacity in a certain area you're
00:32:33
gonna see hey well you know there's jobs
00:32:35
disappearing in this area we need more
00:32:37
jobs there or there's resources not
00:32:39
making it to this area we need more
00:32:40
resources deployed there the
00:32:42
government's gonna start to spend money
00:32:43
there but the reason why there's slack
00:32:45
or capacity there is because individuals
00:32:48
have by choice looked at that and seen
00:32:50
that isn't profitable so you are just
00:32:53
virtually by nature of redistribution of
00:32:56
resources at least in those specific
00:32:58
areas you have price inflation whenever
00:33:01
the government comes in to spend money
00:33:02
there because it pushes the prices and
00:33:04
the cost past what the free market has
00:33:07
decided at once and the more you have
00:33:09
this across the board you more you have
00:33:11
really just price inflation across the
00:33:13
board and cost of living going up for
00:33:14
everybody and ultimately especially if
00:33:16
it is financed just by printing money
00:33:18
you have more money in the system
00:33:21
chasing this
00:33:22
same amount of goods and services every
00:33:25
time you print money instead of letting
00:33:26
wealth grow naturally from the system
00:33:28
because well is not a zero-sum game
00:33:29
wealth actually is created and destroyed
00:33:31
and so wealth actually does grow if
00:33:33
wealth was a zero-sum game we'd still
00:33:36
all be - you know fighting over the same
00:33:38
you know caves and the same sticks and
00:33:40
the same fire pits and the same hunting
00:33:42
grounds technology and innovation and
00:33:45
growth actually happened wealth is not a
00:33:47
zero-sum game but printing money is not
00:33:49
the answer and it's never been the
00:33:51
answer and it's been tried a lot the
00:33:53
state theory of money came around in the
00:33:54
early 1900s it's an old theory and it
00:33:57
never works and it's been the theory
00:33:58
that has contributed to the downfall of
00:34:01
many nations all throughout history
00:34:03
every time you have governments that
00:34:05
want some sort of justification for more
00:34:07
spending to fulfill their political
00:34:10
agendas by monetary debasement the only
00:34:13
thing that happens is a collapse of
00:34:14
their currency and a collapse of the
00:34:15
empire as a result but if that wasn't
00:34:17
exhaustive enough for you don't take my
00:34:19
word for it I've linked the book in the
00:34:21
description below go ahead and check it
00:34:23
out take a look for yourself let me know
00:34:25
what you think thank you so much for
00:34:26
watching this was a long one you guys
00:34:28
have a great day
00:34:31
[Music]