Absurdism - (Albert Camus)

00:15:07
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sR3sK_aNJ-k

Sintesi

TLDRThis philosophical discussion delves into Albert Camus' theory of absurdism, which posits a fundamental conflict in human existence: the desire for purpose in a universe devoid of inherent meaning. While Camus did not align with existentialism, his views often intersect with it as both explore human meaning. Camus challenges traditional resolutions to this conflict—explicitly rejecting both suicide and religious faith as philosophical suicide, which is an avoidance of life's absurdity rather than acceptance. He introduces the concept of the absurd man who, aware of life's meaninglessness, revolts by living passionately and freely without pursuing preconceived purposes. The myth of Sisyphus serves as a metaphor for human perseverance, where happiness is found through embracing life's inherent absurdity. The discussion questions the validity of absurdism as a philosophical stance, suggesting it may unknowingly rely on a form of 'negative faith' in the non-existence of meaning or deity. This existential approach calls for an acceptance of life's inherent lack of universal values yet remains open to personal happiness in the face of absurdity.

Punti di forza

  • 🎭 Absurdism centers on the conflict between human's search for meaning and a meaningless universe.
  • 📚 Albert Camus, through works like 'The Myth of Sisyphus', highlights absurdism.
  • 🔄 The absurd experience involves recognizing life's inherent meaninglessness yet still seeking personal purpose.
  • 🚫 Camus critiques suicide and religious faith as inadequate responses to life's absurdity.
  • ✊ The absurd man revolts by acknowledging absurdity, living passionately, and embracing freedom.
  • ⚖️ Absurdism does not explicitly deny meaning but claims we lack the means of knowing any grand purpose.
  • 🎓 Camus sees existentialism's creation of personal meaning as escaping, rather than accepting, absurdity.
  • 🗿 Sisyphus, eternally pushing a rock, symbolizes the perpetual human struggle.
  • 🤔 Critics suggest absurdism maintains a sort of 'negative faith' in the non-existence of inherent values.
  • 🕌 Happiness in absurdism is found by living in the moment without reliance on faith or preconceived meanings.

Linea temporale

  • 00:00:00 - 00:05:00

    The video introduces the concept of Absurdism, a philosophical idea primarily associated with writer Albert Camus. Absurdism is categorized under the existentialist movement, though Camus himself resisted this label. The philosophy highlights the conflict between humans' quest for meaning in life and the inherently meaningless nature of the universe. This conflict gives rise to the absurd condition of human existence. Camus asserts that the inherent desire for meaning and the indifferent universe are not inherently absurd, but it is their coexistence that creates absurdity. Absurdism, thus, acknowledges the absence of universal values, as humans project values onto a purposeless universe.

  • 00:05:00 - 00:10:00

    The discussion proceeds to contemplate the implications of recognizing the absurd condition. Upon realizing the absurdity of life, individuals might succumb to nihilism, resulting in suicide or religious faith, both of which Camus critiques as forms of escaping reality. Instead, Camus proposes the idea of 'the absurd man,' who acknowledges the lack of ultimate meaning while continuing to seek personal meaning. The absurd man revolts against suicide, embraces freedom by not binding themselves to preconceived purposes, and pursues personal passion, focusing on a life rich in experiences rather than abiding by universal moral codes. Camus likens the human struggle to the myth of Sisyphus, suggesting that acceptance of the perpetual struggle leads to happiness.

  • 00:10:00 - 00:15:07

    The critique of Absurdism points out its reliance on a kind of 'negative faith'—a belief in the absence of meaning or divine presence. This notion of negative faith assumes a certainty in what cannot be known. Critics argue that Absurdism does not address the possibility of proving the existence of God or inherent meaning, which renders the absurd position arguably simplistic and shallow. Moreover, it is criticized for potentially promoting naive realism or hedonism by not considering the inadequacies of human perception and knowledge. Therefore, while thought-provoking, Absurdism may be seen as lacking depth compared to other philosophies. The video concludes by promoting further exploration through an ebook and invites viewers to comment on their own perspectives on Absurdism.

Mappa mentale

Mind Map

Domande frequenti

  • What is absurdism?

    Absurdism is a philosophical theory that explores the conflict between humans' search for meaning and the meaningless universe.

  • Who proposed the theory of absurdism?

    Absurdism was put forward by Albert Camus, a writer who examined these ideas in his works.

  • How does Camus describe the human experience?

    Camus describes the human experience as a conflict between humans' natural desire to find meaning and the reality of a purposeless, indifferent universe.

  • What are the main components of living as an absurd man according to Camus?

    The main components include revolt, freedom, and passion—accepting the absurdity, embracing freedom without a pre-determined purpose, and living passionately.

  • How does Camus use Sisyphus to explain absurdism?

    Camus uses Sisyphus as a metaphor for human struggle against the absurd. Sisyphus's ceaseless task represents the human struggle for meaning.

  • What is philosophical suicide in Camus' view?

    Philosophical suicide is accepting faith or creating one's own purpose as a way to escape life's inherent absurdity, which Camus sees as rejecting the true nature of the universe.

  • Why is absurdism often associated with existentialism?

    Absurdism is linked to existentialism because it deals with the individual's confrontation with life's lack of inherent meaning, though Camus himself rejected the existentialist label.

  • What alternatives to dealing with the absurd does Camus reject?

    Camus rejects suicide as an escape from a life without inherent meaning and religious faith as philosophical suicide.

  • Can the absurdist position be falsified?

    Critics argue that if no scenario could change the absurdist view, then it remains a non-falsifiable philosophical position.

  • What led Sisyphus to be condemned in Greek mythology, according to Camus' text?

    Sisyphus was condemned for repeatedly defying death, leading to his punishment of endlessly pushing a boulder up a hill.

Visualizza altre sintesi video

Ottenete l'accesso immediato ai riassunti gratuiti dei video di YouTube grazie all'intelligenza artificiale!
Sottotitoli
en
Scorrimento automatico:
  • 00:00:00
    [Music]
  • 00:00:06
    hello and welcome to philosophy vibe the
  • 00:00:08
    channel where we discuss and debate
  • 00:00:09
    different philosophical ideas
  • 00:00:11
    today we'll be looking into the theory
  • 00:00:13
    of absurdism
  • 00:00:15
    interesting now absurdism is a
  • 00:00:18
    philosophical position
  • 00:00:19
    put forward by the writer albert camus
  • 00:00:22
    camus in fact did not consider himself a
  • 00:00:24
    philosopher just a writer
  • 00:00:26
    however in his books the outsider the
  • 00:00:29
    plague
  • 00:00:30
    and his essay the myth of sisyphus he
  • 00:00:32
    did in fact put forward absurdism
  • 00:00:35
    to describe the human experience broadly
  • 00:00:38
    speaking
  • 00:00:38
    absurdism falls under the existentialist
  • 00:00:41
    movement
  • 00:00:41
    although camus himself did not actually
  • 00:00:43
    agree with this label
  • 00:00:45
    in short absurdism notices the
  • 00:00:48
    fundamental conflict in the human
  • 00:00:50
    experience
  • 00:00:51
    as humans we have a desire to find
  • 00:00:54
    inherent purpose and meaning in life
  • 00:00:57
    however
  • 00:00:58
    we ultimately live in a meaningless
  • 00:01:00
    world
  • 00:01:01
    devoid of any purpose or reason this is
  • 00:01:04
    the juxtaposition
  • 00:01:05
    the two opposing and incompatible ideas
  • 00:01:08
    we live looking for meaning in a
  • 00:01:10
    universe that is silent
  • 00:01:12
    that cannot offer any meaning or purpose
  • 00:01:15
    this is the absurdity we must live with
  • 00:01:18
    i see the term absurd refers to two
  • 00:01:21
    incompatible ideas being put together
  • 00:01:24
    if for example we refer to a man as a
  • 00:01:27
    law-abiding citizen but at the same time
  • 00:01:29
    this man is a thief and regularly breaks
  • 00:01:31
    the law then this would be an absurd
  • 00:01:33
    claim
  • 00:01:34
    correct so absurdism comes about due to
  • 00:01:37
    our contradicting nature in the universe
  • 00:01:40
    camus claims that there is nothing
  • 00:01:42
    absurd in our innate desire for meaning
  • 00:01:44
    and there is nothing absurd in the
  • 00:01:46
    chaotic meaningless universe
  • 00:01:48
    the absurdity arises when we put these
  • 00:01:51
    two
  • 00:01:51
    ideas together man's innate instinct to
  • 00:01:54
    find meaning and purpose
  • 00:01:56
    in an inherently meaningless purposeless
  • 00:01:58
    and outright irrational universe
  • 00:02:01
    is absurdity we build values and morals
  • 00:02:05
    we project alts on the world and believe
  • 00:02:08
    the world ought to be a certain way
  • 00:02:10
    and we ought to behave a certain way
  • 00:02:12
    however
  • 00:02:13
    there is no fundamental values the
  • 00:02:16
    universe is just made of matter and
  • 00:02:18
    energy
  • 00:02:19
    we are just particles and cells and so
  • 00:02:21
    the values we instinctively hold
  • 00:02:24
    actually mean nothing they do not even
  • 00:02:27
    exist
  • 00:02:27
    yes i understand this is a very hard
  • 00:02:30
    truth to acknowledge as
  • 00:02:32
    ultimately it is going against our basic
  • 00:02:34
    instincts
  • 00:02:35
    people see this realism as a form of
  • 00:02:38
    nihilism
  • 00:02:39
    the discovery that there is no grand
  • 00:02:40
    truth no god to give a life an inherent
  • 00:02:43
    value or meaning
  • 00:02:44
    however camus is not necessarily saying
  • 00:02:48
    there is no meaning or value
  • 00:02:50
    but rather we have no way of knowing we
  • 00:02:52
    cannot know
  • 00:02:53
    any of the answers to these questions so
  • 00:02:56
    we must live
  • 00:02:57
    and act as though they do not exist the
  • 00:02:59
    only thing we can accept
  • 00:03:01
    is that in which we have experience of
  • 00:03:04
    and all we have
  • 00:03:05
    experience of is the absurd world
  • 00:03:08
    absurdity
  • 00:03:09
    is the only certainty okay so
  • 00:03:12
    once we realize the absurdity of the
  • 00:03:14
    human experience
  • 00:03:16
    then what how are we to live with this
  • 00:03:18
    understanding
  • 00:03:20
    good question camus noticed that in life
  • 00:03:23
    people often do come to this absurdist
  • 00:03:25
    realization
  • 00:03:26
    we sometimes get into the habit of life
  • 00:03:29
    we live our routines we go through the
  • 00:03:31
    motions and sometimes we feel like we
  • 00:03:33
    are just
  • 00:03:34
    mindless drones it is at this time we
  • 00:03:36
    ask ourselves
  • 00:03:37
    what is the point why am i here and why
  • 00:03:40
    should i carry on
  • 00:03:42
    this begins the absurdist realization
  • 00:03:45
    now people have different ways of
  • 00:03:47
    dealing with it one way
  • 00:03:48
    in which the most severe nihilist will
  • 00:03:50
    take would be suicide
  • 00:03:52
    a life devoid of any purpose or meaning
  • 00:03:54
    is one that they cannot live with
  • 00:03:56
    so they would rather not live at all
  • 00:03:58
    however
  • 00:03:59
    camus challenged this approach he did
  • 00:04:02
    not agree with it and he asked
  • 00:04:04
    does a meaningless life mean that life
  • 00:04:06
    is not worth living
  • 00:04:08
    other people turn to faith often
  • 00:04:10
    described as a leap of faith
  • 00:04:13
    these would be the religious people who
  • 00:04:15
    will have faith in the existence of god
  • 00:04:17
    even though they have no experience or
  • 00:04:20
    evidence of god
  • 00:04:21
    or any meaning they will still believe
  • 00:04:23
    they will still have faith
  • 00:04:25
    again camus challenged this he saw this
  • 00:04:28
    as a form of philosophical suicide
  • 00:04:31
    blind faith in something that is not
  • 00:04:33
    there to see
  • 00:04:34
    right camus instead developed the
  • 00:04:37
    concept of the absurd man
  • 00:04:39
    there are three facets to the absurd man
  • 00:04:42
    number one
  • 00:04:43
    is revolt when we face the absurd it
  • 00:04:46
    will initially lead one to either
  • 00:04:47
    suicide or philosophical suicide
  • 00:04:50
    they will not be able to handle the
  • 00:04:52
    absurdist truth and they will try to
  • 00:04:54
    escape it
  • 00:04:55
    but the absurd man revolts against this
  • 00:04:58
    instinct
  • 00:04:59
    the absurd man accepts the absurdity of
  • 00:05:01
    life
  • 00:05:02
    and lives with it the absurd man accepts
  • 00:05:05
    that the world they live in is devoid of
  • 00:05:07
    any purpose
  • 00:05:08
    or meaning but still carries on living
  • 00:05:10
    with the innate desire to find one
  • 00:05:13
    the absurd man is conscious of the
  • 00:05:15
    conflict aware of the contradiction
  • 00:05:18
    and accepts it and lives with it by
  • 00:05:21
    committing actual suicide or
  • 00:05:22
    philosophical suicide
  • 00:05:24
    all this is is an attempt to escape the
  • 00:05:27
    absurd
  • 00:05:28
    even the existentialist position of
  • 00:05:30
    trying to create your own meaning out of
  • 00:05:32
    life
  • 00:05:32
    is still an attempt to escape the absurd
  • 00:05:35
    it is not
  • 00:05:36
    acceptance the absurd man revolts
  • 00:05:39
    against this
  • 00:05:40
    he accepts and lives with the conflict
  • 00:05:42
    lives with the juxtaposition
  • 00:05:44
    and lives with the absurdity i see the
  • 00:05:47
    second facet is freedom
  • 00:05:50
    the absurd man accepts their freedom
  • 00:05:52
    they know that they have no
  • 00:05:54
    fate or great destiny they also do not
  • 00:05:56
    try to create their own
  • 00:05:58
    role they do not give themselves a
  • 00:06:00
    purpose to fulfill
  • 00:06:01
    the absurd man embraces freedom they
  • 00:06:04
    take each moment as it comes they live
  • 00:06:06
    in the now
  • 00:06:07
    okay and the final facet is passion
  • 00:06:10
    the absurd man approaches the world as
  • 00:06:12
    amoral they see no universal values and
  • 00:06:15
    they understand that with no values
  • 00:06:17
    there is no reason to do one thing over
  • 00:06:20
    another
  • 00:06:21
    so instead they build a life of quantity
  • 00:06:24
    by quantity camus means a life full of
  • 00:06:27
    passion
  • 00:06:28
    to fill up life with as many great
  • 00:06:30
    moments fill it up with passion
  • 00:06:32
    and pleasure very interesting camus
  • 00:06:34
    gives examples of the type of people
  • 00:06:37
    living the absurd life one is the serial
  • 00:06:40
    seducer who spends his time
  • 00:06:41
    sleeping with many women he is not
  • 00:06:44
    looking for love or commitment
  • 00:06:45
    or anything beyond the pleasure of the
  • 00:06:47
    moment the other is the great actor
  • 00:06:50
    who is only concerned with fame in this
  • 00:06:52
    life
  • 00:06:53
    unlike writers who look for everlasting
  • 00:06:55
    fame in their work after death
  • 00:06:58
    the actor knows they will only have
  • 00:07:00
    short-term fame on earth so they live
  • 00:07:02
    for the here and now
  • 00:07:04
    there is also the conqueror who foregoes
  • 00:07:06
    any promise of an afterlife
  • 00:07:08
    but chases his passion to conquer the
  • 00:07:10
    world in this
  • 00:07:11
    lifetime yes this makes sense and
  • 00:07:14
    finally
  • 00:07:15
    camus uses the analogy of sisyphus
  • 00:07:18
    camus uses sisyphus as the absurdist
  • 00:07:21
    hero
  • 00:07:21
    and even titles his essay on absurdism
  • 00:07:24
    as the myth of sisyphus
  • 00:07:26
    now sisyphus was an ancient greek
  • 00:07:29
    mythological
  • 00:07:30
    character without going into too much
  • 00:07:32
    detail the story goes that sisyphus
  • 00:07:34
    cheated death twice
  • 00:07:36
    when [ __ ] first first died he descended
  • 00:07:38
    to the underworld
  • 00:07:39
    but managed to capture death itself and
  • 00:07:42
    chain it up so
  • 00:07:43
    no humans could die from here on he then
  • 00:07:46
    went back up to earth
  • 00:07:47
    eventually death was set free when
  • 00:07:49
    sisyphus died a second time he went back
  • 00:07:52
    to the underworld but this time he met
  • 00:07:54
    with hades
  • 00:07:55
    the lord of the underworld he managed to
  • 00:07:57
    convince hades to let him back up to
  • 00:07:59
    earth again
  • 00:08:00
    because his wife had not performed the
  • 00:08:02
    correct rituals and sacrifices
  • 00:08:04
    for his death working on the promise
  • 00:08:06
    that sisyphus would correct this and
  • 00:08:08
    come back down to hades
  • 00:08:10
    he allowed ceci sisyphus to go back to
  • 00:08:12
    earth sisyphus however
  • 00:08:14
    did not keep his promise and did not
  • 00:08:16
    return to the underworld
  • 00:08:17
    but instead he lived a long life to an
  • 00:08:20
    old age on earth
  • 00:08:22
    when he eventually died again zeus now
  • 00:08:24
    intervened
  • 00:08:25
    as he was angry that sisyphus had
  • 00:08:27
    escaped death twice
  • 00:08:29
    as punishment for his actions zeus
  • 00:08:31
    condemned sisyphus to an eternity of
  • 00:08:33
    pushing a large rock up a hill
  • 00:08:36
    sisyverse would push this very heavy
  • 00:08:38
    rock all the way up the hill
  • 00:08:40
    and when it reached the top the rock
  • 00:08:42
    would just roll back down to the bottom
  • 00:08:43
    of the hill
  • 00:08:44
    sisyphus will run down grab the rock and
  • 00:08:47
    start all over again
  • 00:08:48
    this constant struggle over and over for
  • 00:08:51
    eternity
  • 00:08:52
    great story but why does this make
  • 00:08:54
    sisyphus the absurdist hero
  • 00:08:56
    firstly camus explains that sisyphus has
  • 00:08:59
    a hatred for death
  • 00:09:00
    a disdain for the gods and a passion for
  • 00:09:02
    life he lives how he wants
  • 00:09:05
    he lives for the moment and does not
  • 00:09:07
    think past it
  • 00:09:08
    this is how the absurdist man should
  • 00:09:10
    live right
  • 00:09:11
    but more so the struggle that sisyphus
  • 00:09:14
    goes through
  • 00:09:14
    the pushing of the rock up the hill this
  • 00:09:17
    represents the struggle of the human
  • 00:09:19
    experience
  • 00:09:20
    life is a constant struggle we cannot
  • 00:09:23
    avoid or deny it
  • 00:09:24
    we are all pushing the rock up the hill
  • 00:09:27
    even though it will roll back down
  • 00:09:28
    we will chase it and we will carry on
  • 00:09:31
    there's no reason
  • 00:09:32
    there's no meaning there's nothing just
  • 00:09:35
    the constant struggle
  • 00:09:36
    however camus imagined sisyphus running
  • 00:09:39
    down the hill for a brief moment
  • 00:09:41
    free from the labour at this moment
  • 00:09:44
    camus suggests that sisyphus will become
  • 00:09:46
    aware
  • 00:09:47
    of the absurdity of his eternity pushing
  • 00:09:50
    a rock up a hill
  • 00:09:51
    only for it to roll down again no
  • 00:09:53
    purpose
  • 00:09:54
    no reason just meaningless repetition
  • 00:09:57
    if like the absurd man sisyphus accepts
  • 00:10:00
    his eternal struggle
  • 00:10:02
    acknowledges that this is how he will be
  • 00:10:04
    spending his eternity
  • 00:10:05
    that there is no such thing as anything
  • 00:10:07
    better or anything preferable
  • 00:10:09
    then he will come to see that he is no
  • 00:10:11
    longer being punished
  • 00:10:12
    [ __ ] versus eternity is only tragic if
  • 00:10:15
    he believes that there is a better
  • 00:10:17
    alternative
  • 00:10:18
    if sisyphus hopes for something greater
  • 00:10:21
    hopes to be reprised
  • 00:10:22
    then his eternal struggle is devastating
  • 00:10:25
    however
  • 00:10:26
    if sisyphus does not expect anything
  • 00:10:28
    more
  • 00:10:29
    then camus claims one must imagine
  • 00:10:31
    sisyphus happy
  • 00:10:33
    if happiness is real we must be able to
  • 00:10:35
    find it in life
  • 00:10:37
    not in faith or outside our media
  • 00:10:39
    experiences
  • 00:10:40
    if happiness is true it must be found in
  • 00:10:43
    the absurd
  • 00:10:44
    so like sisyphus if we accept the absurd
  • 00:10:48
    accept our constant struggle and our
  • 00:10:50
    constant conflict
  • 00:10:52
    we too will find happiness in the absurd
  • 00:10:54
    a truly fascinating look on life
  • 00:10:57
    i think everyone at some point goes
  • 00:10:59
    through an absurdist line of thought
  • 00:11:01
    however as a philosophy i feel there are
  • 00:11:04
    some fundamental problems
  • 00:11:05
    what's that i understand the absurdist
  • 00:11:08
    rejection of faith
  • 00:11:09
    but i feel absurdism itself relies on
  • 00:11:11
    faith
  • 00:11:12
    or you can say negative faith what do
  • 00:11:14
    you mean
  • 00:11:16
    well absurdism relies on the claim that
  • 00:11:18
    there is no god
  • 00:11:19
    there are no objective values or meaning
  • 00:11:21
    to life this is a type of negative faith
  • 00:11:25
    it is faith in the non-existence of
  • 00:11:27
    these things
  • 00:11:28
    because should life have an inherent
  • 00:11:30
    meaning or value
  • 00:11:31
    or should there exist a god or deity
  • 00:11:33
    then the absurd position becomes null
  • 00:11:35
    and void
  • 00:11:36
    so the absurdist must take a leap of
  • 00:11:39
    faith themselves
  • 00:11:40
    and hold that there is nothing more to
  • 00:11:42
    life than what we immediately perceive
  • 00:11:44
    i do not know if i agree with that
  • 00:11:46
    firstly i would object to the existence
  • 00:11:48
    of negative faith
  • 00:11:49
    to have faith means to believe in
  • 00:11:51
    something and to believe in something
  • 00:11:53
    means you should prove that that
  • 00:11:55
    something exists
  • 00:11:56
    you cannot prove a negative and so the
  • 00:11:58
    burden of proof should be on the one
  • 00:12:00
    making the claim
  • 00:12:01
    this is very much the absurdist position
  • 00:12:04
    it is not a strict solid belief that
  • 00:12:06
    there is no god
  • 00:12:07
    or meaning or purpose but rather we
  • 00:12:09
    cannot ever know if these things exist
  • 00:12:12
    and so we should not live by them but
  • 00:12:14
    there is a difference between saying we
  • 00:12:16
    do not know and saying we cannot know
  • 00:12:18
    saying we do not know is a comment on
  • 00:12:20
    reality i do not know that god exists
  • 00:12:24
    fine saying i cannot know this seems
  • 00:12:27
    like a belief
  • 00:12:28
    how can one possibly know that we cannot
  • 00:12:31
    know
  • 00:12:31
    the existence of god or the meaning to
  • 00:12:33
    life
  • 00:12:34
    if you hold that we cannot ever know
  • 00:12:37
    either
  • 00:12:38
    as a collective species or as an
  • 00:12:40
    individual experience
  • 00:12:41
    then i'm sorry this to me is negative
  • 00:12:44
    faith
  • 00:12:44
    hmm and then i think the falsification
  • 00:12:48
    principle can come into effect at this
  • 00:12:50
    point
  • 00:12:51
    for the absurdist to hold on to this
  • 00:12:53
    position i would ask them
  • 00:12:55
    is there any situation any event
  • 00:12:58
    anything
  • 00:12:59
    that you could witness that would get
  • 00:13:00
    you to change your position
  • 00:13:02
    is there anything that you could
  • 00:13:04
    experience that would lead you to
  • 00:13:05
    believe that there is a god
  • 00:13:07
    or that there is meaning or that there
  • 00:13:09
    is objective value in life
  • 00:13:11
    is there anything personal or universal
  • 00:13:14
    that would show you a greater purpose to
  • 00:13:16
    life
  • 00:13:16
    if the answer is no then the whole
  • 00:13:19
    absurd disposition becomes meaningless
  • 00:13:21
    if there is no possible or hypothetical
  • 00:13:23
    scenario
  • 00:13:24
    that would lead the absurdist to see
  • 00:13:26
    value or purpose in life
  • 00:13:28
    if there is nothing that can falsify the
  • 00:13:30
    absurdist position
  • 00:13:32
    then discussions around absurdism become
  • 00:13:34
    meaningless
  • 00:13:35
    i see absurdism then becomes a shallow
  • 00:13:38
    philosophical position
  • 00:13:40
    one that does not go beyond immediate
  • 00:13:42
    experience
  • 00:13:43
    and everyone who has dealt with any
  • 00:13:45
    philosophical investigation
  • 00:13:47
    knows that there is more to our life
  • 00:13:49
    than what we immediately perceive
  • 00:13:51
    this is just a form of naive realism and
  • 00:13:54
    will lead us solely
  • 00:13:56
    into hedonism no deep thought or inquiry
  • 00:13:59
    is then required
  • 00:14:00
    and what happens when we discover that
  • 00:14:02
    our senses
  • 00:14:03
    do not give us the true representation
  • 00:14:05
    of what is really there in the external
  • 00:14:08
    world
  • 00:14:08
    what happens when we discover that what
  • 00:14:11
    we immediately perceive
  • 00:14:12
    comes with errors and falsehoods more is
  • 00:14:15
    needed
  • 00:14:16
    i understand that camus does not
  • 00:14:17
    consider himself a philosopher
  • 00:14:19
    and that is fine as i would argue that
  • 00:14:22
    absurdism
  • 00:14:23
    is too simplistic and shallow as a
  • 00:14:25
    theory for a serious philosopher to
  • 00:14:27
    adopt
  • 00:14:28
    very well if you would like the script
  • 00:14:31
    to this video it is part of our
  • 00:14:32
    existentialism ebook available on amazon
  • 00:14:35
    this is a great compilation of scripts
  • 00:14:37
    it covers the videos for kierkegaard
  • 00:14:39
    nietzsche and sartre so definitely worth
  • 00:14:41
    a read and of course you will be helping
  • 00:14:43
    support the channel
  • 00:14:44
    the link is in the description but
  • 00:14:46
    that's all the time we have for now
  • 00:14:47
    thank you for watching we hope you
  • 00:14:49
    enjoyed the vibe
  • 00:14:49
    and what are your thoughts who out there
  • 00:14:51
    is an absurdist
  • 00:14:53
    who lives and embraces the absurd life
  • 00:14:55
    and are you happier because of it
  • 00:14:57
    let us know in the comments below don't
  • 00:14:59
    forget to like and share
  • 00:15:00
    and for more philosophical debates
  • 00:15:01
    please subscribe to the channel
  • 00:15:03
    take care and we look forward to seeing
  • 00:15:05
    you all soon bye
Tag
  • absurdism
  • existentialism
  • Albert Camus
  • Sisyphus
  • meaning of life
  • philosophy
  • nihilism
  • faith
  • freedom
  • passion