How the French Army Compares to the British Army

In this video, Michael Shuren discusses the comparative analysis of the British and French armies, stemming from viewer feedback on his previous video. He highlights the similarities in their challenges, particularly regarding their capacity for major land warfare against a peer competitor like Russia. The video is structured into four parts: credentials, differences, similarities, and conclusions on both armies' future paths.

Shuren establishes his credentials, detailing his experience with the British military through institutions like the Rand Corporation and the United Services Institute. He notes his deeper expertise in the French military, citing his publications and contributions to understanding French military strategies and modernization efforts.

The key differences between the British and French armies are outlined, primarily focusing on their sizes: the French army is nearly twice as large as the British army. Shuren emphasizes that, while the French army is larger, it also is in better shape due to more successful modernization programs compared to the British army's troubled projects such as the Future Rapid Effects System (FRES).

In discussing modernization efforts, Shuren contrasts the French military's effective implementation of networked warfare technologies and modernization programs, such as Scorpion, with the British approach, which has struggled with delays and setbacks in modernization efforts, leading to gaps in capabilities on the battlefield.

Both armies share significant similarities, particularly in their insufficient capabilities for modern warfare. Key areas of concern include inadequate air defense, weapon systems, and logistical capabilities. Despite having advanced technology, both armies lack the mass required for prolonged engagements, leading to a reliance on quality over quantity, reminiscent of challenges faced during the Cold War.