00:00:00
they obviously never talk about
00:00:01
themselves and how much propaganda they
00:00:03
put out to create this facade of a
00:00:06
democracy where essentially they work
00:00:08
with the power elite in Washington from
00:00:10
one party or another and they they
00:00:12
basically decide hey here's the people
00:00:14
that we we uh were okay with voters
00:00:17
being exposed to these are the
00:00:18
acceptable people and here's the people
00:00:20
who are unacceptable to the elite and
00:00:23
therefore we got to destroy them so tol
00:00:26
gabard is now the new Director of
00:00:28
National Intelligence
00:00:30
in a 52 to 48 vote along party lines
00:00:34
gabbard was confirmed on Wednesday
00:00:36
morning as the new Director of National
00:00:38
Intelligence we'll get to all of that
00:00:40
and the changes that Tulsi Gard is going
00:00:42
to make but firstly listen to this Joe
00:00:45
Rogan and his jaw drop when speaking to
00:00:48
Tulsi gabbard and hearing her plans
00:00:51
around National Intelligence a bunch of
00:00:53
people that are out there now that I'm
00:00:55
very excited about one of them is v a
00:00:57
big one is tulsy gabard and FK Jr of
00:01:00
course um I love that guy I love what
00:01:03
he's done his entire career and I love
00:01:06
what he's trying to do with health I
00:01:07
mean this is a real issue that we all
00:01:09
face and we're all being poisoned and
00:01:13
they're profiting off of it and we're
00:01:15
not doing [ __ ] about it meanwhile you
00:01:17
stop psychedelics from being given to
00:01:20
Veterans to help them with PTSD it
00:01:21
doesn't make any sense this makes zero
00:01:23
[ __ ] sense and they have so much
00:01:26
control over what you say and do because
00:01:29
if you you can decide that something is
00:01:33
it's unsuitable for the population like
00:01:36
like the drug schedule program they have
00:01:38
in the United States right they have
00:01:39
schedule one two and three depending
00:01:42
upon if there's any medicinal use for it
00:01:44
and psychedelics are all schedule one
00:01:46
that is crazy if you're telling me
00:01:48
there's no medicinal use you could get
00:01:51
thousands of people to testify in
00:01:52
Congress about soldiers in particular I
00:01:55
know so many soldiers no one prepares
00:01:58
them for that they go over were they're
00:02:00
19 years old and they see people get
00:02:02
blown up they lose their friends they
00:02:04
come back and then they're supposed to
00:02:06
just integrate and there's no [ __ ]
00:02:08
program that can help you do that
00:02:10
there's you're on your own and you got
00:02:12
to sort through what you've seen that's
00:02:15
so different than all these people
00:02:17
around you you have to sort through
00:02:20
seeing your friends die you have to sort
00:02:21
through having to kill people you have
00:02:23
to sort through that and just exist and
00:02:25
then there's a tremendous amount of
00:02:27
veterans who commit suicide it's a crazy
00:02:29
number
00:02:30
and psychedelics are proven to help that
00:02:34
so the fact that there's some sort of an
00:02:35
organization that thinks that somehow or
00:02:38
another that is bad that this thing that
00:02:41
doesn't kill anybody literally like the
00:02:43
ld50 rate for psilocybin is something
00:02:45
insane it's like you have to take it's
00:02:48
like a 100 pounds of it or something I
00:02:49
don't know what it is like let's find
00:02:51
out what's the ld50 rate which means
00:02:54
lethal dose at 50% of the population
00:02:56
like what kills half the people it's
00:02:58
just like you can't do it it's not
00:03:00
that's not what the concern is are there
00:03:02
concerns about people losing their
00:03:04
marbles when they do it yeah yeah there
00:03:05
is concerns it ain't it's not a [ __ ]
00:03:08
free ride you know there's some people
00:03:09
that are mentally fragile and they have
00:03:12
mental issues already they shouldn't be
00:03:14
doing that but for everybody else there
00:03:18
should be a conversation where we figure
00:03:20
out how to make the world a better place
00:03:23
and one of the ways to make a world a
00:03:24
better place is to make people more kind
00:03:26
more compassionate and more
00:03:28
understanding and that's something that
00:03:29
P provides and the fact that that is
00:03:32
somehow or another listed by a country
00:03:35
that is the leader of the Free World in
00:03:38
the most information Rich time alive
00:03:42
there's so much access to information we
00:03:44
all know what they really are and what
00:03:47
they're not and yet this organization
00:03:50
that somehow this Shadow organization
00:03:53
that controls what we do tells you you
00:03:56
can't have that if you have it you go to
00:03:58
jail that's bananas that doesn't make
00:04:01
any sense and as long as we keep stupid
00:04:03
[ __ ] like that people will never have
00:04:05
hope that there's going to be a better
00:04:08
Horizon a better future they would think
00:04:09
that all these things are so it takes so
00:04:11
long just for marijuana look marijuana
00:04:14
is still not federally legal but it's
00:04:15
legal in like half the states it took so
00:04:18
long for people where they're drinking
00:04:20
whiskey on every [ __ ] Corner people
00:04:23
are just doing shots and drinking
00:04:25
tequila and marijuana's something that
00:04:29
gets you locked in cage as long as
00:04:30
something like that exists that's
00:04:32
preposterous and completely illogical
00:04:34
the good that it serves is the ruling
00:04:36
class it gets to rule without logic CU
00:04:40
they don't have to it doesn't have to
00:04:41
make sense [ __ ] you you're going to
00:04:44
jail as long as they say that you're
00:04:46
like ah we raise your taxes you got to
00:04:48
pay them [ __ ] you you're going to jail
00:04:49
but the [ __ ] Constitution shut up so
00:04:53
if if there's like an illegal situation
00:04:55
like that or an illogical situation like
00:04:57
that rather it makes you lose faith in
00:05:00
the whole system but when someone like
00:05:02
RFK Jr comes along and says hey I think
00:05:05
we can fix this it's like give him a
00:05:08
[ __ ] chance maybe he can maybe he can
00:05:11
fix this whole Health System where we've
00:05:14
been co-opted by these these giant
00:05:17
organizations that want you to make
00:05:18
money so gavot has said in the past
00:05:20
before we get to more clips from Tulsi
00:05:22
and Joe Rogan Tully explaining her
00:05:25
thesis and her plans to how we can and
00:05:27
should reform the intelligence agencies
00:05:29
gabbard said in the past that Hillary
00:05:31
Clint sonified so-called rot that is
00:05:34
sickened the Democratic party the
00:05:36
congresswoman gabbard fought back after
00:05:38
Hillary Clinton appeared to continually
00:05:40
call her once again a favor of the
00:05:42
Russians a Russian asset this is a
00:05:44
phrase that has always been repeated it
00:05:46
is commonly touted today this is so
00:05:48
because once again Tulsi gabard is not
00:05:50
an advocation for for other Wars she's
00:05:52
an advocation for War as an absolute
00:05:54
Last Resort when a necessity instead of
00:05:57
this policy in which we've had over the
00:05:59
past few Decades of war first Clinton
00:06:01
said that the Russians she believes have
00:06:04
got their eye on somebody namely tulsy
00:06:07
gabard and they're apparently grooming
00:06:09
her to be the third party candidate
00:06:11
listen to what tulsy gabard said here to
00:06:13
Joe Rogan about who really controls the
00:06:15
party and the true threat to democracy
00:06:19
and what tulsy will do about it yeah
00:06:21
it's it's very spooky and it's spooky
00:06:23
how prevalent that that mindset is and
00:06:27
how many Democrats not even just
00:06:29
politici just people that are Democrats
00:06:31
how many people share that position that
00:06:33
you should silence people that you don't
00:06:35
agree with and it's just it's such a
00:06:38
foolish perspective and it's it plays
00:06:42
out historically over and over and over
00:06:44
again in a terrible way I just don't
00:06:47
understand why people don't learn that
00:06:49
lesson I think that I think that the
00:06:53
Democratic Party leaders people like
00:06:55
Hillary Clinton uh people who've been in
00:06:57
charge for a very long time
00:07:00
um F this kind of culture of fear and
00:07:04
like hey if you go against us like
00:07:06
you're dead you're on the [ __ ] list uh
00:07:09
you have kind of the the very loud
00:07:12
activists and the who don't represent I
00:07:14
think even the majority of the
00:07:15
democratic party but the aoc's of the
00:07:18
world um who who who are almost like
00:07:21
these these uh radical religious zealots
00:07:25
and they are ideologues
00:07:27
and whatever they choose is the Battle
00:07:31
of the day yes if you are against them
00:07:34
on that forget it you're done to also
00:07:37
said this to Joe rugan listen to this
00:07:39
one it's amazing when I talk to people
00:07:41
and it happened recently with Alex
00:07:43
baronson he was like uh isn't she crazy
00:07:45
I'm like what's crazy how's she crazy
00:07:47
tell me how she's crazy and then no
00:07:50
examples I'm like well why you saying
00:07:51
that like why does someone say he's like
00:07:53
yeah you're actually you're right like I
00:07:55
don't have a an example I'm like isn't
00:07:58
that weird that you just like have
00:08:00
you're and he's a journalist I mean work
00:08:02
for the New York Times and it just isn't
00:08:04
she crazy yep yep accepting that and
00:08:07
that's how they do it wild that's how
00:08:09
they do it is is like hey let's just
00:08:11
plant a seed of Doubt or suspicion so
00:08:14
that most people I mean as a journalist
00:08:16
he's got no excuse but most people don't
00:08:19
have um just I honestly they don't have
00:08:21
the time they hear one thing they're
00:08:24
like shoot like I got kids I got work we
00:08:27
got soccer games we got this we got that
00:08:29
you want me to do re like wait what
00:08:31
right it's such a bizarre system that we
00:08:36
have and it's so easy to to rig yeah
00:08:41
because there's only two parties and
00:08:42
both parties are controlled by these
00:08:44
gigantic special interest groups
00:08:46
gigantic special interest
00:08:48
groups uh corporate for-profit
00:08:51
media big Tech and then the powers in
00:08:56
both parties uh and that's where I'm I'm
00:08:59
I'm glad you use the word rigged because
00:09:02
uh it's an important word and usually
00:09:03
when you use it people aren't thinking
00:09:06
of it in the way that we're talking
00:09:08
about uh it's what I experienced during
00:09:10
that campaign is that collusion between
00:09:13
those very very powerful entities to
00:09:16
decide before voters even get a chance
00:09:18
to be exposed to different candidates to
00:09:20
choose from they decide all right here
00:09:22
are the cand here's the people that
00:09:23
we're going to you know we think will be
00:09:25
all right we think they're going to play
00:09:26
the game and we'll promote them we'll
00:09:28
say nice things about them maybe throw
00:09:30
in a tough question here or there just
00:09:32
to not blow our cover but these are the
00:09:34
people that we want voters to choose
00:09:35
from and these other people are the ones
00:09:37
that we're going to try to either uh
00:09:39
just slide into the darkness and hope
00:09:42
nobody notices them or if people are
00:09:44
noticing them we're going to do
00:09:46
everything that we can to smear them and
00:09:48
and uh and undermine their credibility
00:09:51
so that when they do speak you get that
00:09:53
kind of reaction from uh baronson so as
00:09:56
I mentioned at the start Tulsi Gab is
00:09:59
going to oversee the 18 intelligence
00:10:01
Community agencies and will advise the
00:10:03
president as National Security Council
00:10:05
and Homeland Security Council on
00:10:07
intelligence matters now here are some
00:10:09
things in which I want to discuss about
00:10:11
what we can expect from her and her new
00:10:12
role as head of the US intelligence
00:10:14
Community National Intelligence
00:10:16
directors have three very important
00:10:18
tasks firstly adding as the main
00:10:19
advisers to the presidents on
00:10:21
intelligence masses over seeing matters
00:10:23
related to the budget and Military
00:10:25
priorities and leading the wider
00:10:28
intelligence Community to ensure that
00:10:30
the priorities all fall under the
00:10:32
intelligence umbrella and are in line
00:10:34
with the administration's requirements
00:10:36
and so what we can expect just a few
00:10:39
things off the bat where I play you a
00:10:40
clip tabard confronting Pi Morgan about
00:10:44
the war in Ukraine and this liberal
00:10:46
hegemonic worldview which has totally
00:10:48
destroyed uh I think uh the West on the
00:10:52
global stage to a strong degree Go's dis
00:10:54
insane ingrained dogmatic belief that
00:10:57
the West should and must go around the
00:11:00
world and engage in regime change as
00:11:01
we've done in Cuba in Vietnam in Iraq in
00:11:04
Afghanistan and it never ever works and
00:11:07
so the the the the major things just
00:11:09
Topline before I get into more details
00:11:10
and play you this clip gav said that
00:11:12
she's going to sue four serious policies
00:11:15
firstly is increasing intelligence
00:11:18
sharing and identification of holes in
00:11:20
US intelligence collecting and analyzing
00:11:22
a political and unbiased information
00:11:24
this is the most important thing leading
00:11:26
on to a second point we must end and she
00:11:28
will end the plitz Iz ation of the
00:11:29
intelligence communities to ensure that
00:11:32
the mission is focused on the core
00:11:34
unbiased apolitical collection of and
00:11:37
Analysis of intelligence to secure the
00:11:38
United States now this is key we've seen
00:11:40
the politicization of the intelligence
00:11:42
agencies and it always fails it always
00:11:45
leads to division this is why I say
00:11:47
again this is why we have the so-call
00:11:49
populist backlash it is because of this
00:11:52
uh this total politization of these
00:11:54
Central agencies and in addition as I'll
00:11:57
mention later on the weapon ization of
00:11:59
secrecy to a massive degree trust we
00:12:02
will be rebuilt through accountability
00:12:04
and transparency and there will be
00:12:07
tential efficiencies and there will of
00:12:09
course be redundancies I imagine as one
00:12:12
of her priorities to ensure that these
00:12:14
organizations are less bloated and
00:12:15
bureaucratic now Chuck Schumer in
00:12:17
response before I get to what Tuli gabal
00:12:19
said in response to took to P Morgan
00:12:21
Chuck Schumer in response said on a post
00:12:23
on X that she has spent her entire
00:12:26
career sympathizing with the likes of
00:12:28
Putin and assart and she's not qualified
00:12:30
to lead the intelligence agencies John
00:12:33
fetman as well previously shown some
00:12:35
degree of openness in the past to
00:12:37
Trump's nominees announced last week he
00:12:39
would not vote for RFK Jr or gabbard the
00:12:42
President's Choice to lead of course the
00:12:43
human health services at dep department
00:12:45
and he mentioned in a quote that I have
00:12:47
met with most of the cabinet nominees
00:12:48
and carefully watched their confirmation
00:12:50
hearings he said on the post on X after
00:12:52
considering what is at stake vetman said
00:12:54
I voted against moving forward to the
00:12:56
confirmation of gabbard and Kennedy I'll
00:12:58
be voting no on their confirmations and
00:13:01
so there is this like insane just spread
00:13:04
of Lies regarding tulsy gabbard the fact
00:13:06
that she wants more dialogue it's
00:13:08
unbelievable Joe Biden did not speak to
00:13:11
President Putin for four years
00:13:12
irrespective as as as to if you agree
00:13:15
surely there is a necessity to at least
00:13:17
engage in a degree of dialogue with your
00:13:19
so-called opponent as a means of trying
00:13:22
to resolve the conflict in hat we
00:13:24
constantly just heard from the
00:13:26
Democratic party that we must win we
00:13:28
must win the war Ukraine what exactly
00:13:30
does a win mean does a win mean the
00:13:31
total and utter annihilation of Ukraine
00:13:34
does it mean this total fallacy this lie
00:13:36
of trying to push Putin back into a
00:13:38
corner because of course that would
00:13:39
massively escalate and likely need lead
00:13:42
to nuclear confrontation so what exactly
00:13:44
does a win mean nobody could answer that
00:13:46
so tulsy and Trump's approach is
00:13:47
massively different hence why they shall
00:13:49
end the war in Ukraine very shortly and
00:13:51
Tulsi also recently has received much
00:13:55
praise from men and woman and which
00:13:56
served with her during her stints in the
00:14:00
US Military and the backing the do the
00:14:02
nomination for Director of National
00:14:04
Intelligence there are about 20 men and
00:14:06
women who served with gabbard praising
00:14:08
her unwavering commitment to the
00:14:09
military's most precious resource namely
00:14:12
the young men and women of the Armed
00:14:14
Forces this is the thing a sign of
00:14:16
respect as Tulsi will say now it is a
00:14:18
necessity that war is the absolute Last
00:14:19
Resort that does not mean appeasement
00:14:21
that does not mean being weak but it
00:14:23
means trying to utilize all diplomatic
00:14:26
Solutions prior towards putting anyone
00:14:27
in arm's way and Democrats frankly just
00:14:30
do not want to do that they're just
00:14:31
obsessed with this policy of regime
00:14:33
change and interventionism which never
00:14:35
works on on on a global level it always
00:14:37
has mass unintended consequences listen
00:14:40
to uh gabot here talking about her
00:14:42
political and geopolitical worldview and
00:14:44
how she thinks about for instance St in
00:14:45
Ukraine one of the things in the book
00:14:47
which I passionately disagree with you
00:14:49
about is Ukraine I've been there I've
00:14:51
interviewed president zalinski and I'm
00:14:53
just surprised I've been very surprised
00:14:55
that a significant number of Republicans
00:14:57
in the last two years have gravitated to
00:15:00
a position it seems to me of saying we
00:15:02
should just let Putin take what he's
00:15:03
taken he should keep it we should end
00:15:05
this war by allowing him to keep all
00:15:06
land he stolen with his murderous
00:15:08
illegal Rampage of a sovereign
00:15:10
Democratic European country I never
00:15:12
thought I'd hear Republicans make that
00:15:14
argument you yourself were in Iraq you
00:15:15
were there actually I think at the same
00:15:17
time as my brother who was a colonel in
00:15:19
the Royal Welsh regiment so thank you
00:15:21
for your service as I always thank him
00:15:22
for his you were in Iraq which you know
00:15:24
just to remind viewers was a war that
00:15:27
was fought on an entirely false pretext
00:15:29
as it turned out that Saddam Hussein had
00:15:31
weapons of mass destruction here you've
00:15:33
got someone who absolutely has weapons
00:15:35
of mass destruction Vladimir Putin he's
00:15:37
a ruthless Russian dictator he's IL
00:15:39
legally invaded a democratic country and
00:15:42
I'm baffled why people like you on the
00:15:44
right the Republican side of this
00:15:46
argument seem to think it would be by
00:15:48
default really a good thing or a thing
00:15:51
that has to happen inevitable thing to
00:15:54
happen that Putin wins I don't think
00:15:56
that's an accurate characterization at
00:15:58
all of course it was wrong for Putin to
00:16:01
invade Ukraine my criticism of our
00:16:03
American policy and the Biden Harris
00:16:05
administration's leadership is on this
00:16:07
that they should see the situation for
00:16:10
what it is not what they wished it to be
00:16:12
they should clearly have defined what
00:16:15
does winning look like if you ask 10
00:16:17
different people in in Washington DC
00:16:19
this question you'll get 10 different
00:16:21
answers you'll get different answers
00:16:23
from the state department versus our
00:16:24
Department of Defense you'll even get
00:16:27
different answers within the White House
00:16:28
house all they say is well we will be
00:16:30
there for as long as it takes we will
00:16:32
spend as much uh hundreds of billions or
00:16:34
trillions of dollars of American
00:16:36
taxpayer dollars whatever it takes as
00:16:38
long as it takes but not defining what
00:16:40
that is and P it it is because of my
00:16:43
experience serving in different War
00:16:45
zones in the military that I know that
00:16:47
there are very simple questions that
00:16:49
need to be asked and answered before
00:16:51
committing American taxpayer dollars and
00:16:53
our support to go and intervene what is
00:16:56
our objective what are we trying to
00:16:58
accomplish how does it serve the best
00:16:59
national interests of the American
00:17:01
people and our own country's security
00:17:03
what President Biden should have done
00:17:05
from the very beginning was exercised
00:17:07
his leadership to get Putin and zalinsky
00:17:10
or their representatives across the
00:17:11
table from each other to broker a peace
00:17:14
deal the details to say well we're just
00:17:16
going to be in this until you know
00:17:18
zalinsky standard which is they get
00:17:20
every inch of Ukrainian territory back
00:17:22
how many Ukrainian lives are going to be
00:17:24
sacrificed in the process hang
00:17:26
hangable as that goal is period on that
00:17:29
point let me ask you if this was an
00:17:31
attack on American soil you would want
00:17:33
every single inch that was taken by
00:17:35
Russia or whoever it may be back you and
00:17:38
you would join the fight to do it
00:17:39
because you've served your country and
00:17:41
you would be absolutely outraged of
00:17:43
course but this this is how yeah but
00:17:47
that's how ukrainians feel about their
00:17:49
land they feel exactly the same way that
00:17:51
you would or I would about ourand I I I
00:17:54
understand the feeling the feeling and
00:17:56
the emotion is very different from the
00:17:58
reality that Ukraine is facing a much
00:18:01
larger country with a much greater
00:18:03
military force with many more people and
00:18:05
its own military industrial complex that
00:18:08
has been able to reconstitute its
00:18:10
hardware and its weapon systems far more
00:18:12
quickly than even our American
00:18:13
intelligence agencies thought that they
00:18:15
would be able to and oh by the way Putin
00:18:18
also has both tactical and strategic
00:18:20
nuclear weapons there's a long history
00:18:22
here and I know you've gone into this
00:18:23
with different guests over time we won't
00:18:25
get into it now but my view on foreign
00:18:28
policy I'm not an ol aist I'm not a
00:18:29
pacifist I'm a realist and understanding
00:18:32
that it is not doing any good for the
00:18:34
Ukrainian people to and I've been to
00:18:36
Ukraine many times like you I have many
00:18:38
friends there and it's heartbreaking to
00:18:40
see what they are going through
00:18:42
continuing to fuel a war of attrition
00:18:45
it's not a peer-to-peer war that is
00:18:48
going on there and an unwillingness by
00:18:50
our leaders to be honest with the
00:18:52
American people about number one how how
00:18:55
much further are we going to go into
00:18:57
debt to go and fuel this proxy war and
00:18:59
number two the reality and the honesty
00:19:01
of the fact that as tensions continue to
00:19:04
increase we are pushing us closer to the
00:19:07
possibility whether intentionally or
00:19:09
unintentionally of of a nuclear war
00:19:11
being sparked off the best thing would
00:19:14
be and and our military leaders have
00:19:16
said this for quite some time the only
00:19:17
way this war ends is through a brokered
00:19:19
treaty some kind of agreement where both
00:19:22
parties are are going to walk away not
00:19:24
happy my position has been consistent
00:19:26
throughout that this should have been
00:19:28
done done as quickly as possible after
00:19:30
this war broke out which could have
00:19:32
saved so many people's lives and cost so
00:19:35
this is the main thing that I want to
00:19:37
wrap up with many in the west especially
00:19:40
the foreign policy so-called Elites
00:19:41
consider this idea of liberal hegemony
00:19:44
as a wise policy that states that that
00:19:47
that asserts that states should
00:19:48
axiomatically adopt this idea of
00:19:50
spreading liberal democracy around the
00:19:52
world is said to make eminently good
00:19:53
sense from both a strategic and a moral
00:19:56
perspective and this is primarily
00:19:58
because Li liberalism prices the concept
00:20:00
of inalienable natural rights in
00:20:02
committed Liberals are deeply concerned
00:20:03
about the rights of virtually every
00:20:05
single individual on the planet and that
00:20:06
this universalistic logic basically
00:20:08
creates powerful incentive liberal
00:20:10
states to get involved in the Affairs of
00:20:12
other countries which massively violate
00:20:14
their citizens rights so this logic
00:20:15
leads straight into a policy of regime
00:20:17
change where the goal is to top
00:20:19
autocrats and to put liberal democracies
00:20:20
in their place but as we've seen for
00:20:22
instance in Iraq and Libya and Afghan
00:20:23
and Cuba and Ukraine and lazos in
00:20:25
Ecuador in Brazil and various other
00:20:27
places especially post War II when
00:20:29
regime change is utilized it vitally
00:20:31
never works there there's really not any
00:20:33
examples that you can give where in
00:20:36
modern regime change post 1991 for
00:20:38
instance has been successful it always
00:20:40
fails every single time in the case of
00:20:42
Iraq 4.4 million individuals internally
00:20:45
displaced 2.3 million refugees
00:20:48
widespread violence as a power vacuum
00:20:50
was created when Saddam Hussein was was
00:20:52
removed Civil War escalation economic
00:20:55
instability over 210 civilians killed
00:20:57
since 03 at least so I'm not trying to
00:21:00
back St Hussein or any of these tyrants
00:21:03
at all but I'm simply saying that whilst
00:21:05
liberal hedony may sound good
00:21:07
hypothetically it never works and the
00:21:08
same has happened in Ukraine leading to
00:21:10
the total and utter destruction of
00:21:12
Ukraine and frankly pushing Russia into
00:21:16
the arms of various adversaries serious
00:21:19
adversaries in addition to bolstering
00:21:22
these adversaries on the global scale
00:21:24
now you have China Iran and Russia and
00:21:28
North Korea in which are going to
00:21:30
collaborate further in the future and
00:21:32
this is just a terrible idea this is
00:21:34
just bad so the point that I'm making is
00:21:35
that liberal hedonic this worldview of
00:21:37
regime change never solves the issue it
00:21:40
literally every single time it backfires
00:21:42
millions of millions die unnecessarily
00:21:44
and terrorism is literally always rif
00:21:46
and so this backlash against Tuli gabard
00:21:49
is just totally and utterly un unfounded
00:21:52
and so once again Tulsi believes that we
00:21:54
must exhaust all diplomatic Solutions at
00:21:56
literally every single step before going
00:21:58
to this seems fairly logical I mean this
00:22:00
seems very logical why would you want to
00:22:02
put your soldiers in H's way
00:22:03
unnecessarily before any diplomatic
00:22:05
Solutions have been exhausted as we've
00:22:07
seen in Ukraine war should be the last
00:22:10
resort TTY gambal has been at the
00:22:11
Forefront of brutal conflicts she seen
00:22:14
some terrible things she understands
00:22:17
unlike prior National Intelligence
00:22:19
director she understands the true
00:22:21
dangerous and the true issues around
00:22:24
conflict she's done it and she's also
00:22:26
against this liberal hegemonic W you
00:22:28
regime change and interventionism which
00:22:30
never works on a global scale and so the
00:22:32
backlash from Chuck Schumer from
00:22:34
betterman and all these people is just
00:22:36
totally and utterly unfounded it's
00:22:38
insane
