Matthew Pines on the Geopolitical and National Security Implications of Cryptocurrency Adoption
ๆ่ฆ
TLDRIn this episode of Macro Musings, host David Beckworth engages with Matthew Pines to explore the critical intersection of cryptocurrencies and national security. Pines, who navigates between the fields of finance and national security, offers an insightful perspective on the geopolitical implications of digital assets, particularly Bitcoin. He highlights Chinaโs deliberate strategy to augment its geopolitical influence via network power, and contrasts it with the US's historical, organic growth of network capabilities. A key focus is the strategic advantage Bitcoin could provide to the US, not only in bolstering its financial networks but also in countering China's ambitions. The idea of a strategic Bitcoin reserve is discussed, noting Senator Cynthia Lummis's proposal for such a reserve as a national asset to enhance security. The conversation extends to broader geopolitical dynamics, defense budgets, and the burgeoning attention on Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP) within national security discourse. Pines argues for a more deliberate integration of private fintech innovations like Bitcoin into national security strategies to maintain US network dominance. This episode offers a profound look into the potential financial and strategic benefits of cryptocurrencies amid great power competition.
ๅฟๅพ
- ๐๏ธ Cryptocurrencies are increasingly linked to national security discussions.
- ๐จ๐ณ China is intentionally building networks for geopolitical competition.
- ๐ผ Bitcoin can offer strategic advantages for the US in global finance.
- ๐ก Senator Lummis has proposed a strategic Bitcoin reserve for the US.
- ๐ US defense budget has inefficiencies and strategic concerns.
- ๐ National Defense Authorization Act discusses UFOs in current policy.
- ๐ Stablecoins might enhance US dollar dominance globally.
- ๐ The US has historically relied on organically developed networks.
- ๐งญ There's a need for more strategic thinking on fintech innovation.
- ๐ National Security increasingly involves network power dynamics.
ๆถ้ด่ฝด
- 00:00:00 - 00:05:00
The podcast episode opens with the introduction of the host, David Beckworth, who welcomes Matthew Pines as the guest. Pines is described as a director at Sentinel One and an expert in national security issues, particularly in relation to cryptocurrencies. The discussion aims to explore the linkages between national security and finance, highlighting crypto's role.
- 00:05:00 - 00:10:00
Matthew Pines shares his career journey from studying physics and philosophy to delving into national security and economics. He worked at the National Science Foundation and with startups conducting war games for the government. Pines transitioned to advising on geopolitical and cyber security risks, leveraging his expertise in national security and finance.
- 00:10:00 - 00:15:00
Pines emphasizes the importance of understanding the broader historical and geopolitical context in which financial policies are made. He argues that during periods of instability, traditional economic frameworks may fail, requiring policymakers to consider new solutions. His work bridges the gap between national security and finance, particularly during geopolitical shifts.
- 00:15:00 - 00:20:00
The discussion highlights the changing nature of defense expenditures and the strategic objectives guiding US military capabilities. Pines discusses the gap between strategic military goals and actual defense funding, noting political and economic constraints. He argues for a reassessment of military spending in light of evolving geopolitical threats.
- 00:20:00 - 00:25:00
Pines explains China's strategic approach to building its network power through digital infrastructure and settlements systems like CIPS, positioning itself to reduce US influence in financial networks. He argues that China's efforts can undermine US financial coercive power, prompting the need for alternative strategies, including cryptocurrency utilization.
- 00:25:00 - 00:30:00
The conversation turns to how the US can leverage cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and stablecoins to enhance its own network power in the face of Chinese competition. Pines suggests embracing cryptocurrencies as strategic assets can extend dollar influence globally and counter China's techno-authoritarian expansion, thus complementing US national interests.
- 00:30:00 - 00:35:00
Pines presents the idea of using Bitcoin and dollar-pegged stablecoins to extend the reach of the US dollar, particularly in under-banked regions. He argues stablecoins can augment dollar demand abroad while aligning with US interests in promoting financial inclusion and liberal values, thereby countering Chinaโs influence via digital currency networks.
- 00:35:00 - 00:40:00
The dialogue covers the potential strategic benefits of establishing a US strategic Bitcoin reserve. Pines discusses proposals from political figures like Trump and Lummis, highlighting that holding Bitcoin could act as a financial contingency against geopolitical shocks or domestic fiscal pressures, enhancing economic stability and strategic signaling.
- 00:40:00 - 00:45:00
Pines warns about the risks of a large-scale US Bitcoin reserve potentially undermining the US dollar. He stresses the need for balanced strategic planning to avoid destabilizing the financial system. The exploration of Bitcoin as a reserve requires careful consideration of how it complements the dollar without posing existential threats to existing monetary frameworks.
- 00:45:00 - 00:50:00
The latter part discusses Pines' insights into the National Defense Authorization Act and the potential importance of issues such as unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAPs) in national security considerations. The podcast explores how these non-mainstream topics could impact strategic defense policies and broader geopolitical dynamics in unexpected ways.
- 00:50:00 - 00:58:09
The episode concludes with a call to reconceptualize the role of crypto networks in national strategy. Pines emphasizes the importance of forward-thinking policy that integrates financial, technological, and defense sectors to maintain US strategic dominance. The guest also hints at future disclosures in national security domains that could influence economic resilience.
ๆ็ปดๅฏผๅพ
ๅธธ่ง้ฎ้ข
Who is the guest on today's episode of Macro Musings?
The guest is Matthew Pines, director of intelligence for Sentinel One Strategic Advisory Group.
What is the main topic of discussion?
The discussion focuses on the linkages between cryptocurrencies, particularly Bitcoin, and national security.
What is Matthew Pines' professional background?
He has a background in intelligence, having worked in national security, and has written on cryptocurrencies' implications for national security.
How does China approach network power compared to the US?
China is intentionally building networks for geopolitical influence, while the US has organically developed networks due to historical dominance.
What are the potential advantages of Bitcoin for U.S. national security?
Bitcoin could improve the US's strategic positioning, create demand for stablecoins, and counter China's network expansion.
What recent legislation pertains to cryptocurrency and national security?
The idea of a strategic Bitcoin reserve has been discussed, notably by Senator Lummis with her Bitcoin Act proposal.
How does Matthew Pines propose the US should view cryptocurrencies?
He suggests the US should consider them as strategic assets to enhance its network dominance.
What is the National Defense Authorization Act?
It is the annual must-pass legislation that authorizes the budget and policies for the U.S. Department of Defense.
What unusual topic is becoming noteworthy in National Defense Authorization Act discussions?
Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP) or UFOs have been gaining attention in defense discussions.
How does Matthew Pines view the current US defense budget?
He believes there is inefficiency and potential underfunding in U.S. defense budget allocations.
ๆฅ็ๆดๅค่ง้ขๆ่ฆ
How To Learn ANY Language With These ChatGPT Prompts
Harvard CS50โs Introduction to Programming with Python โ Full University Course
P. Diddy's Lawyer is A Clown
Teach every child about food | Jamie Oliver
Why The U.S. Canโt Solve Hunger
A Family Faces Food Insecurity in Americaโs Heartland | National Geographic
- 00:00:02welcome to macro musings where each week
- 00:00:04we pull back the curtain and take a
- 00:00:06closer look at the most important
- 00:00:08macroeconomic issues of the past present
- 00:00:11and future I am your host David
- 00:00:13beckworth a senior research fellow at
- 00:00:15the marqueta center at George Mason
- 00:00:17University and I'm glad you decided to
- 00:00:20join
- 00:00:24us our guest today is Matthew Pines Matt
- 00:00:27is the director of intelligence for
- 00:00:29Sentinel one strategic Advisory Group
- 00:00:32and a veteran of the National Security
- 00:00:33World Matthew is also the author of
- 00:00:36several papers on cryptocurrencies and
- 00:00:38their implications for National Security
- 00:00:41including a recent one titled great
- 00:00:43power Network competition and Bitcoin
- 00:00:46Matthew joins us today to discuss these
- 00:00:48linkages Matthew welcome to the show
- 00:00:50thanks for having me well it's a great
- 00:00:52time to have someone like you on the
- 00:00:53show there's a lot of crypto issues in
- 00:00:55the news we have a presidential election
- 00:00:58when one of the candidates claims to be
- 00:01:00the going to be the president for crypto
- 00:01:02industry we also have talks of stable
- 00:01:05coins lots of things happening in that
- 00:01:07space so I'm delighted to have you on
- 00:01:10Matt you covered this in your work but
- 00:01:12you are also a part of a national
- 00:01:14security world that I'm not very
- 00:01:16familiar with and you kind of bridge the
- 00:01:19gap between those two and I think that's
- 00:01:20our connection we've met before and that
- 00:01:22connection is because I'm more in the
- 00:01:24finance world you're in the National
- 00:01:26Security world and and the linkages
- 00:01:28between National Security and finance
- 00:01:29come together together and we have
- 00:01:30become acquaintances because of that
- 00:01:32tell us about your career and your
- 00:01:34journey into that space yeah I'll give
- 00:01:36you the Abridged version so as an
- 00:01:37undergrad at Hopkins I studied physics
- 00:01:39and philosophy I thought I was going to
- 00:01:40become an academic did a hard pivot
- 00:01:42after realizing working in the lab eight
- 00:01:44hours a day wasn't for me I went over to
- 00:01:47the lond School of economics and did a
- 00:01:48masters in public policy and philosophy
- 00:01:50again kind of stall figure out what I
- 00:01:52want to do with my life I came back to
- 00:01:53DC I got a fellowship at the National
- 00:01:55Science Foundation actually where I was
- 00:01:56a science assistant helping manage the
- 00:01:59grant programs w for all of Economics
- 00:02:00discipline but also decision risk
- 00:02:02management sciences and the science of
- 00:02:03organizations programs so worked for two
- 00:02:06years there kind of helping to convene
- 00:02:07those panels review and kind of support
- 00:02:09the program officers make those grants
- 00:02:11that was kind of a feeder program to do
- 00:02:13phds in economics or or related field
- 00:02:16but I again kind of like sort of tapped
- 00:02:17out of going into Academia I got my
- 00:02:20start in nity W essentially working as a
- 00:02:23analyst for a startup that was doing war
- 00:02:25games for the US government and so there
- 00:02:27we we were essentially you know
- 00:02:29simulating whether it's on a tabletop
- 00:02:31level sort of discussion or full scale
- 00:02:33you know thousands of people around the
- 00:02:34country all sorts of Bad Case scenarios
- 00:02:36and so that's kind of got my start in
- 00:02:37sort of government work in the
- 00:02:39classified and and security space and
- 00:02:41throughout that portion of my career I
- 00:02:42really focused on helping the government
- 00:02:44evaluate essentially worst case
- 00:02:46scenarios so that was either you know in
- 00:02:49these types of simulations sort of
- 00:02:50exercises war games or more sort of
- 00:02:52analytic assessment sort of program
- 00:02:54evaluations of our national continuity
- 00:02:56programs and our programs to understand
- 00:02:58how prepared the country is for all
- 00:03:00hazards both natural disasters as well
- 00:03:02as you know the range of sort of
- 00:03:03man-made contingencies so that's kind of
- 00:03:05where I kind of jumped from Project to
- 00:03:07project Consulting for a number of
- 00:03:08different government agencies FEMA naal
- 00:03:10Security Council parts of the
- 00:03:11intelligence Community defense
- 00:03:12department kind of understanding a lot
- 00:03:14of different problems I transitioned
- 00:03:16from doing government Consulting a few
- 00:03:17years ago to lead the intelligence
- 00:03:19practice within another small
- 00:03:21consultancy that was focused on advising
- 00:03:23multinationals critical technology
- 00:03:25companies on the intersection of
- 00:03:26geopolitical and cyber security risk so
- 00:03:29I joined the Stamos group founded by
- 00:03:30Chris Krebs and Alex Stamos former
- 00:03:32assist director former Chief secret
- 00:03:34officer for Facebook and Yahoo and our
- 00:03:36clients of course were facing kind of a
- 00:03:38change in Global Order where sort of
- 00:03:40premises of globalization of free trade
- 00:03:43of kind of international relations were
- 00:03:45being upset and so there was a acute
- 00:03:47demand from SE Sues and boards to
- 00:03:49understand how to navigate these fields
- 00:03:51and so we are our core expertise was
- 00:03:52kind of cyber security but I sort of
- 00:03:54brought some of the geopolitical
- 00:03:55dimension to integrate with that but
- 00:03:57also um advise multinationals and kind
- 00:03:58of how to how to navigate that so that's
- 00:04:00what I've been doing for the last
- 00:04:00several years now that firm was acquired
- 00:04:02by a large cyber security company called
- 00:04:04Sentinel one and so I've been there ever
- 00:04:05since as the Director of intelligence
- 00:04:07for Pinnacle one which is the rebranded
- 00:04:09kreb Stamos group within the cyber
- 00:04:11security business so that's kind of the
- 00:04:12tldr I have had a parallel track in sort
- 00:04:14of the Bitcoin policy space so I'm a
- 00:04:16national security fellow for the Bitcoin
- 00:04:17policy Institute I've been with them for
- 00:04:19about four and a half years and there
- 00:04:21I've been sort of writing and thinking
- 00:04:22about and helping you know engage with
- 00:04:23policy makers on the intersection
- 00:04:25between Bitcoin digital assets more
- 00:04:27broadly National Security and
- 00:04:28geopolitics very fascinating since
- 00:04:31you're in that space I want to ask a
- 00:04:33question since I had a guest on recently
- 00:04:35from the Atlantic Council I believe Josh
- 00:04:37lipsky and he talked about this gap
- 00:04:41between people on my side who are into
- 00:04:43Finance International econ issues we
- 00:04:46think about dollar dominance a lot and
- 00:04:48then people on the other side think
- 00:04:49about National Security issues and these
- 00:04:51issues are connected but we often don't
- 00:04:53see the other side's perspective do you
- 00:04:55also see that that kind of that missing
- 00:04:57middle part there I do I think think
- 00:04:59when you're in the trenches when you're
- 00:05:01kind of a technocrat when you're an
- 00:05:02expert in a particular policy field you
- 00:05:04tend to you know rightly so sort of
- 00:05:06focus on the the immediate details of
- 00:05:09policy debates informing whatever sort
- 00:05:11of the political mandate is of whoever's
- 00:05:13in power and sort of driving the
- 00:05:14internal policy discussion inside
- 00:05:16different different administrative
- 00:05:17bureaucracies from my perspective you
- 00:05:19know I look at a broader sweep of
- 00:05:21History you know you know there are
- 00:05:22different regimes there's sort of stable
- 00:05:24regimes where that sort of policy
- 00:05:26discourse and policy apparatus is very
- 00:05:28finely tuned and to help you navigate
- 00:05:30kind of the the day-to-day volatility
- 00:05:32the year-to-year volatility in sort of
- 00:05:34macroeconomic and and political and
- 00:05:36economic conditions and then there are
- 00:05:37regimes where there's increasing inst
- 00:05:39stability increasing fragility and
- 00:05:41National decision makers are confronting
- 00:05:43conditions that they don't have a
- 00:05:45template for and where the probability
- 00:05:47of sort of more radical disruptions to
- 00:05:50assumptions behind the current monetary
- 00:05:52geopolitical framework become unsettled
- 00:05:55and that's where you can see in history
- 00:05:57like big changes made right so big
- 00:05:59Summits big Accords that radically
- 00:06:01change the structure of the monetary
- 00:06:02system and those to first order you know
- 00:06:05in the you know over a generational time
- 00:06:07scale are Downstream of geopolitics
- 00:06:09right and so you know when you hit those
- 00:06:10inflection moments when you hit those
- 00:06:12points where National interest and
- 00:06:13strategic competition start to overweigh
- 00:06:16the sort of traditional economic and
- 00:06:18policy prerogatives then you can see
- 00:06:20things coming in from outside those
- 00:06:22traditional policy debates that can
- 00:06:24affect how you think about those
- 00:06:25questions yeah it's easy for me to think
- 00:06:27about monetary policy the federal Reser
- 00:06:29erve very domestically maybe even
- 00:06:31internationally but I don't think about
- 00:06:33it often in terms of National Security
- 00:06:36uh a while back we had Paul Tucker on
- 00:06:38the show and he told this story which is
- 00:06:39in a book we talked about where when the
- 00:06:41currency swap lines were announced 2008
- 00:06:44also 2020 I believe it was India was not
- 00:06:47included and he thought that was a
- 00:06:48mistake he goes you should have
- 00:06:49consulted the state department when you
- 00:06:51made this list of who's going to get the
- 00:06:52currency swap lines and I hadn't
- 00:06:54processed it along those Dimensions now
- 00:06:56the paper we're going to discuss today
- 00:06:57you do that you look at the linkages
- 00:06:59between you know dollar dominance
- 00:07:01National Security crypto world and all
- 00:07:03those issues so I appreciate you
- 00:07:05bridging this Gap in fact that's what we
- 00:07:06do at mercades our motto here is
- 00:07:08Bridging the Gap between academic ideas
- 00:07:10real world policy problems and so you're
- 00:07:12doing that very well so glad to have you
- 00:07:14on the program now before we jump into
- 00:07:16your paper I want to get there but
- 00:07:18before we do that since you're in the
- 00:07:20National Security space I just want to
- 00:07:22maybe step back and talk about the US
- 00:07:25Government funding expenditures applied
- 00:07:27toward defense so my understanding it's
- 00:07:29around 4% of of GDP around a trillion
- 00:07:33dollars if you look at like a a chart
- 00:07:36historically it's come down quite a bit
- 00:07:38I mean obviously way down from World War
- 00:07:39II but even relative to say the 1980s
- 00:07:41Ronald Reagan's buildup of Defense it's
- 00:07:43come down quite a bit even the uh
- 00:07:47interest on debt now I believe is the
- 00:07:48same or higher levels than what we put
- 00:07:50towards defense expenditures from your
- 00:07:53assessment is is that too little or or
- 00:07:55were we doing it about right so the way
- 00:07:57the US government approaches its defense
- 00:07:59planning is it sets out kind of its
- 00:08:01strategic objectives for its military
- 00:08:03strategy and we have had for a long time
- 00:08:06kind of a two- war strategy that we feel
- 00:08:08like we need to have the military
- 00:08:09capabilities to fight and win at least
- 00:08:11in one theater while holding one other
- 00:08:13theater of conflict with the near
- 00:08:14adversary and so that's kind of like the
- 00:08:16top level kind of strategic guidance is
- 00:08:18like we need to be able to essentially
- 00:08:19hold Russia while while fighting China
- 00:08:21right and then maybe a contingency here
- 00:08:23there that's like a very top level sort
- 00:08:25of framework and then of course the
- 00:08:27defense department is also given kind of
- 00:08:29Topline budget guidance and says well
- 00:08:31this is basically the pot of money we
- 00:08:32have to work with you know what do you
- 00:08:34think that a portion looks like across
- 00:08:36the different services and so there's a
- 00:08:38pretty big gap between tracing what we
- 00:08:41actually think we want the military to
- 00:08:42do and what we actually are funding it
- 00:08:44to do and so bad yeah 850 billion was I
- 00:08:46think in the fy2 National Defense
- 00:08:48authorization act Roger wicker who's the
- 00:08:50ranking member of the armed services
- 00:08:51committee has come out with a proposal
- 00:08:53that he wants to you know reach a target
- 00:08:55of 5% of GDP and he makes sort of a
- 00:08:57similar argument that if we're in
- 00:08:59essentially an environment of increasing
- 00:09:01you know geopolitical competition if
- 00:09:03there is a threat of of great power war
- 00:09:04on the horizon then the sort of the
- 00:09:07operating assumptions behind how much we
- 00:09:09abortion to defense should be more
- 00:09:10conasur with kind of our Cold War era
- 00:09:12maybe not the peak of Cold War and say
- 00:09:149% of GDP in the in the 60s but you know
- 00:09:17maybe going back to that sort of Reagan
- 00:09:19Era sort of steady state I don't have
- 00:09:21like a particular like number that I
- 00:09:23would say if you talk to a lot of folks
- 00:09:24inside the defense budget Community
- 00:09:26which of course is whole cottage
- 00:09:28industry inside inside DC
- 00:09:30they'll say there's kind of a mix of one
- 00:09:32there's just immense inefficiency in the
- 00:09:34way that we currently execute these
- 00:09:36large government expenditures and
- 00:09:38there's lots of questions about whether
- 00:09:40we should be first trying to prioritize
- 00:09:42how we're apportioning the budget for
- 00:09:44example the army during the global war
- 00:09:46and Terror got a massive sort of
- 00:09:47relative upweight in terms of how much
- 00:09:49that that budget it received to you know
- 00:09:51it was on the ground fighting in Iraq
- 00:09:52and Afghanistan where I say the Air
- 00:09:54Force and the Navy got kind of
- 00:09:56proportionally less I think a lot of
- 00:09:58folks that are looking at the more
- 00:09:59likely sort of contingency scenarios
- 00:10:01where defense resources would be would
- 00:10:03be stressed are in in Conflict scenarios
- 00:10:05with China and those are principally
- 00:10:07going to be fought in Space by the Air
- 00:10:09Force and by the Navy but you haven't
- 00:10:10really seen a kind of a Readjustment in
- 00:10:12kind of the proportions received by
- 00:10:14those service branches as opposed of the
- 00:10:15army and this is of course a classic
- 00:10:17political economy question and so we're
- 00:10:19kind of stuck with kind of the current
- 00:10:20budgetary process and in general like if
- 00:10:23you say we're going to be more efficient
- 00:10:24that doesn't actually help you inside
- 00:10:25the Pentagon because there's always
- 00:10:26different rice bows that people want to
- 00:10:28protect and a lot of politics involved
- 00:10:30and so at the end of day everyone just
- 00:10:30asked for more I would say increasingly
- 00:10:32in the last year or two it's been
- 00:10:34grumbling for a while I mean AD Admiral
- 00:10:36Mullen in particular said this a while
- 00:10:37ago but it's become more of kind of like
- 00:10:39a standard part of the discourse is just
- 00:10:42recognizing that there isn't necessarily
- 00:10:43going to be a whole lot more money
- 00:10:44coming that the fiscal constraints are
- 00:10:46real and that I mean there was a you
- 00:10:48know part of the debt limit agreement
- 00:10:50last year was there only be a 1% Topline
- 00:10:52increase for the defense budget of
- 00:10:53course there they created a whole
- 00:10:55emergency supplemental package to sort
- 00:10:57of get around that and of course that's
- 00:10:59the way they always do this sort of
- 00:11:00stuff but that 1% kind of Top Line is of
- 00:11:02course below you know what inflation has
- 00:11:04been over the past year and I know some
- 00:11:06folks that are you know involved in kind
- 00:11:07of the trenches of planning for how do
- 00:11:09we expand our defense industrial
- 00:11:10capacity and that are you know
- 00:11:12responsible for laying out what how
- 00:11:13would we actually make these Munitions
- 00:11:15right how do we make the 155 mm shells
- 00:11:16how do we make the sm2 sm6 missiles at a
- 00:11:18scale and at a rate that you know we
- 00:11:21need to meet what we see as increasingly
- 00:11:22stressed you know conflict scenarios and
- 00:11:25you know what they're telling me is
- 00:11:26essentially the just the basic unit cost
- 00:11:28to produce standard missile has gone up
- 00:11:3130 to 50% in the past two years and they
- 00:11:33expect that to continue over the next
- 00:11:34one or two years and so if your budget
- 00:11:35doesn't change you're going to be buying
- 00:11:37a lot less of the same stuff at the same
- 00:11:39time that people look at these scenarios
- 00:11:40and realize we're going to need a lot
- 00:11:42more defense industrial capacity that's
- 00:11:44doesn't seem to be coming online quickly
- 00:11:45enough okay well we'll Circle back to
- 00:11:47this whole process near the end of the
- 00:11:49show I want to come back and talk a
- 00:11:50little bit more about what I believe is
- 00:11:52called the National Defense
- 00:11:53authorization act and how that works but
- 00:11:55I want to get into your paper and your
- 00:11:58paper is part of a book book that's
- 00:11:59titled National Security in the digital
- 00:12:01age Bitcoin as a tool for modern
- 00:12:03statecraft and again your specific
- 00:12:05contribution your your paper in the
- 00:12:07book's titled great power Network
- 00:12:09competition and Bitcoin so maybe begin
- 00:12:12with kind of an executive summary of of
- 00:12:14your chapter and then we'll we'll kind
- 00:12:16of dive into the details yes so I wrote
- 00:12:18this to try to bring you know a slightly
- 00:12:20different perspective on the traditional
- 00:12:21topic of analysis when it comes to
- 00:12:23bitcoin National Security which has been
- 00:12:25you know mostly focused on its
- 00:12:27intersection with sanctions evasion with
- 00:12:29sort of illicit Finance with obviously
- 00:12:31big sort of criminal sort of drug
- 00:12:32markets and most of the folks in the
- 00:12:34government that have digital asset
- 00:12:35experience with the folks that were sort
- 00:12:36of tasked with you know standing up
- 00:12:38those sorts of units and and analyses
- 00:12:40and sort of law enforcement and
- 00:12:41intelligence activities early on in
- 00:12:43bitcoin's history so they're you know
- 00:12:44Frontline experience with it has been
- 00:12:47bad guys using it to to do bad things
- 00:12:49therefore it must be a bad thing that's
- 00:12:50kind of the basic syllogism that has
- 00:12:52been implanted in the minds of a lot of
- 00:12:54National Security officials a lot of
- 00:12:55sort of senior leadership it just
- 00:12:56becomes kind of just an unquestioned
- 00:12:58assumption and while you know certainly
- 00:13:00that has been a part of the of bitcoin's
- 00:13:01History I want to take a more
- 00:13:03forward-looking view a much more sort of
- 00:13:05maybe outside the box view to think
- 00:13:06about well where is Bitcoin today what
- 00:13:08could it look like in five or 10 years
- 00:13:10and what would intelligent informed us
- 00:13:13strategic approach look like if it was
- 00:13:15trying to maximize potential advantages
- 00:13:17and minimize potential risks and so
- 00:13:18that's why I kind of wrote this this
- 00:13:20paper to sort of situate Bitcoin digital
- 00:13:22assets more generally with what I see as
- 00:13:24kind of the unfolding and like core
- 00:13:26Dynamic facing us and challenging us
- 00:13:29power in the next 5 to 10 years and
- 00:13:30that's why I sort of focused it on
- 00:13:31network power because I think
- 00:13:33increasingly you know everyone
- 00:13:34recognizes this is sort of the the
- 00:13:36fundamental premise of modern power is
- 00:13:38Network Power right both power over
- 00:13:40monetary networks power over you know
- 00:13:42digital and Telecommunications networks
- 00:13:44power over trade networks subc cable
- 00:13:45networks satellite and terrestrial
- 00:13:47communication systems like cultural
- 00:13:49networks of diffusion of ideas this is
- 00:13:51how a globalized civilization is now
- 00:13:53functioning in the modern era and so you
- 00:13:56know you want to look at to what extent
- 00:13:57is US poised to
- 00:13:59win that Network Power competition
- 00:14:01versus its principal adversary China
- 00:14:03which has a strategy of trying to win
- 00:14:05that Network Power competition and so I
- 00:14:06got kind of go through essentially and
- 00:14:08and make an argument on different
- 00:14:09different layers that you know
- 00:14:11especially on the financial Dimension
- 00:14:13the current monetary system the sort of
- 00:14:14structure of correspondent banking that
- 00:14:16has sort of emerged over the past you
- 00:14:18know 80 years or so has accured certain
- 00:14:20advantages and those advantages may have
- 00:14:22waned and now maybe resulting in
- 00:14:24disadvantages for the US government and
- 00:14:26so I kind of laid it out in sort of
- 00:14:27three main sections essentially what are
- 00:14:29the Strategic advantages or
- 00:14:30disadvantages to the United States from
- 00:14:31its current monetary Network dominance
- 00:14:34and then the second section is how is
- 00:14:35China approaching from a position of
- 00:14:37relative weakness trying to grow it its
- 00:14:39endogenous National strength how is it
- 00:14:40trying to sort of block the ability of
- 00:14:42the US from constraining it via its
- 00:14:45power over existing networks while also
- 00:14:46building its own to kind of act as a
- 00:14:48failover or redundant capacity for its
- 00:14:50own monetary Network Ambitions and then
- 00:14:53where does Bitcoin fit into that role
- 00:14:54right so that's kind of the basic kind
- 00:14:55of framework but I try to I try to pack
- 00:14:57a lot in I like it I I like the Network
- 00:14:59framing as someone who's an economist
- 00:15:01Network effects it really resonates with
- 00:15:03me but I but everything about this was
- 00:15:04was I think clever because communication
- 00:15:07networks monetary networks cultural
- 00:15:10networks as you mentioned they're all
- 00:15:12very important and the dominance that we
- 00:15:14have now as as you know in your paper
- 00:15:16allow us to both have surveillance on
- 00:15:19our competitors but also these choke
- 00:15:21points so networks are they're great for
- 00:15:23efficiency but they're also great from
- 00:15:25the state perspective in terms of
- 00:15:26surveillance and also choke points when
- 00:15:29necessary let's talk about some of the
- 00:15:31challenges that you bring up in the
- 00:15:32paper with our current Network approach
- 00:15:36and I want to read a a quote from your
- 00:15:38your paper you and you're talking about
- 00:15:41the use of Financial statecraft and
- 00:15:42sanctions which we've talked about in
- 00:15:44the show before there's talk of overuse
- 00:15:46of it and you you put it very clearly
- 00:15:48here you say but like a sword overuse
- 00:15:51its blade has grown dull as the go-to
- 00:15:54bloodless instrument of international
- 00:15:56coercive force it has given us a
- 00:15:58security officials a misplaced
- 00:16:00confidence in the ability to achieve
- 00:16:03action at a distance without blowback
- 00:16:05that is no longer the case these tools
- 00:16:08won't suffice for great power
- 00:16:10competition expand on that yeah I mean I
- 00:16:12think you've had some great guests on
- 00:16:13the show kind of walk through the
- 00:16:15history of of financial sanctions as a
- 00:16:17as a tool of us statecraft and we sort
- 00:16:19of Pat ourselves on the back after 9911
- 00:16:21when we stood up these new capabilities
- 00:16:23within Treasury and we had some big wins
- 00:16:25sanctioning Gaddafi's money and then
- 00:16:27going after terrorism and then obviously
- 00:16:29with jcpa really you know using as a
- 00:16:31course of strategic lever over Iran and
- 00:16:33then we came into the Russia invasion
- 00:16:36and we sort of you know brought it to a
- 00:16:37whole another level you know there was a
- 00:16:38lot of I think cheerleading at the
- 00:16:41possibility that we were going to turn
- 00:16:42the rubble into rubble and I think we
- 00:16:44realized you know in the lessons from
- 00:16:46that episode that you know sanctions
- 00:16:48against a great power like Russia you
- 00:16:50know just as a a matter of like material
- 00:16:52capabilities aren't going to replace
- 00:16:54other instruments of US national
- 00:16:56strategic and coercive force and I think
- 00:16:59were kind of lulled into a sense that we
- 00:17:00could just kind of use this hegemonic
- 00:17:02power to kind of get our way and I think
- 00:17:05we sort of saw where its limits hit and
- 00:17:07B essentially with with the Russia
- 00:17:09sanctions that they were effectively
- 00:17:10able to you know absorb the blow it
- 00:17:13added frictions it certainly as ground
- 00:17:15some of their their war machine made a
- 00:17:16little bit more difficult but we're
- 00:17:18facing an environment geopolitically
- 00:17:19where Russia is in an alignment with its
- 00:17:22adversaries on the Eurasian continent
- 00:17:24including Iran China North Korea that
- 00:17:26have large industrial capacity that have
- 00:17:29large technological capacities and have
- 00:17:31an interest in ensuring Russia can
- 00:17:33sustain its its war and we are not
- 00:17:36willing to sanction maybe not capable of
- 00:17:37sanctioning those actors sufficiently to
- 00:17:39deter those activities and so when we
- 00:17:41reach that point of kind of strategic
- 00:17:43Reckoning we have to think about okay
- 00:17:44well what is our plan B you know we've
- 00:17:47been using tools of of sanctions for the
- 00:17:50last 20 years as a very effective way of
- 00:17:51imposing pain imposing costs try to
- 00:17:53change decision- making but now we're
- 00:17:55see seeing an environment where it just
- 00:17:57manifestly has failed those decisions
- 00:17:59haven't been deterred those leaders
- 00:18:01haven't been turned to a different
- 00:18:02course of action so that's kind of like
- 00:18:04my basic point is like we should just
- 00:18:06like reassess well how are we actually
- 00:18:08going to deter China Russia Iran North
- 00:18:10Korea if the sanctions don't seem to be
- 00:18:12sufficient so when you look to China
- 00:18:15which is the competitor in this paper
- 00:18:18are they more intentional about this
- 00:18:20whole network approach are they thinking
- 00:18:22explicitly we need to build this network
- 00:18:24that Network whereas in the US we've
- 00:18:26been blessed with the network because
- 00:18:28we've been the leader of the world are
- 00:18:30we kind of like kind of happy go-lucky
- 00:18:32oh shucks at works and less intentional
- 00:18:36about it is that is that kind of the
- 00:18:37problem you see I mean the US's kind of
- 00:18:40network monetary power dominance has
- 00:18:42really evolved kind of organically right
- 00:18:44to the point where we had kind of this
- 00:18:45network of correspondent banking
- 00:18:46relationships that sort of sprouted up
- 00:18:48in centers of global trade Finance you
- 00:18:50know created sort of offshore euro
- 00:18:51dollar markets that you know generated
- 00:18:53this flywheel of sort of you know dollar
- 00:18:54Surplus recycling to us assets and it
- 00:18:57sort of created this obviously course
- 00:18:58responded with the the sort of hyper
- 00:19:00growth of American military power in the
- 00:19:0120th and the 21st century and and when
- 00:19:04they were able to kind of use that
- 00:19:05existing kind of hierarchical
- 00:19:06correspondent banking system to then
- 00:19:08exert this financial sort of power
- 00:19:10statecraft China of course doesn't have
- 00:19:11that you know 8ye history of trying to
- 00:19:13internationalize its currency or to try
- 00:19:15to you know create sort of novel
- 00:19:17entrepose of trade finance that they can
- 00:19:19sort of use as a locust to you know
- 00:19:21reach a larger geopolitical and economic
- 00:19:22ambition so it has had to find a maybe
- 00:19:24an asymmetric strategy because to first
- 00:19:26order it does not want to be constrained
- 00:19:28and defitely by this existing kind of
- 00:19:30Matrix of sort of G7 capital and and
- 00:19:33dollar based settlement and clearing
- 00:19:34systems and so it's trying to find like
- 00:19:37a different strategy right a more modern
- 00:19:38digital strategy to both block the
- 00:19:41ability of the US institutions but also
- 00:19:43you know G7 kind of aligned States from
- 00:19:45constraining it in different scenarios
- 00:19:48and so it you know wants to have
- 00:19:49essentially these failover networks
- 00:19:51right so in particular one that that
- 00:19:52they've invested a lot in has been has
- 00:19:55been sips which is kind of their version
- 00:19:57of Swift but it kind of combines both
- 00:19:59kind of messaging as well as settlement
- 00:20:00activities and while it doesn't
- 00:20:02necessarily exist to fully replace Swift
- 00:20:04in fact most of their transactions still
- 00:20:06take place over Swifts and most of those
- 00:20:08still get most of those dollar
- 00:20:09transactions still get cleared through
- 00:20:10chips in the US it serves as a as a
- 00:20:13capable redundant failover that
- 00:20:15mitigates the deterrent threat from the
- 00:20:17United States because if there was a
- 00:20:18contingency where we were in a an
- 00:20:21escalation environment over Taiwan or
- 00:20:23full full-blown conflict we wanted to
- 00:20:25you know apply similar sanction regime
- 00:20:26as we've done for Russia they would have
- 00:20:28the ability to still settle their terms
- 00:20:30of trade with their main Partners
- 00:20:32especially in the Middle East and
- 00:20:33throughout Asia and and and Eurasia and
- 00:20:36in increasingly it seems like also
- 00:20:37Europe right and so the existence of
- 00:20:40those of that sort of failover network
- 00:20:43does you know materially diminish the
- 00:20:45deterrent threat of us sanctions and so
- 00:20:47that's been their strategy sort of first
- 00:20:48to block and then build these sort of
- 00:20:50redundant failover just in case
- 00:20:53settlement and clearing systems but they
- 00:20:55have a larger strategic objective to
- 00:20:57expand right and so this block build
- 00:20:58expand kind of sequence is sort of a
- 00:21:00common strategic Motif that you see
- 00:21:02played out across all their different
- 00:21:04activities you know rash DOI who is the
- 00:21:05National Security Council director for
- 00:21:07China a few years ago wrote this book
- 00:21:08and he basically unpacked that thesis in
- 00:21:10immense detail and sourced it to their
- 00:21:12party statements about this is the
- 00:21:13strategy essentially a longterm plan how
- 00:21:16do they grow to a position of national
- 00:21:17strength where they're a great power
- 00:21:19peer you know on the world stage the
- 00:21:20United States this is the sequence that
- 00:21:22they need to go about whether it's in
- 00:21:23the military domain whether it's in the
- 00:21:24economic domain whether it's in the
- 00:21:26financial domain and this is the the the
- 00:21:28the plan that they've that they've
- 00:21:29executed so it sounds like they are
- 00:21:32being intentional they're thinking this
- 00:21:34through and you have to when you're
- 00:21:35behind when you're the smaller kid on
- 00:21:37the street you got to be more
- 00:21:38intentional how you walk where you go
- 00:21:40just in case the bully sees you or the
- 00:21:42big kid on the Block sees you but it
- 00:21:44also means then that it's easy for the
- 00:21:46United States to become complacent to
- 00:21:49not think what you're doing in this
- 00:21:51paper is trying to help the us see all
- 00:21:53its possibilities including crypto and
- 00:21:56using the private sector as a tool to
- 00:21:58continue this dominant Network effect
- 00:22:01right yeah exactly it's like we we have
- 00:22:03to you know one in in my experience it's
- 00:22:06always think about what different worst
- 00:22:08case scenarios right not just assuming
- 00:22:09that that your plan a is always going to
- 00:22:11work and then if your plan a is just
- 00:22:13going to double down on the treasury
- 00:22:14market you know maybe have to patch it
- 00:22:16together with Central clearing and you
- 00:22:17know addition of more repo facilities
- 00:22:19and you know increasing Capital
- 00:22:21requirements Basel 4 you know it seems
- 00:22:23like this is a sequence that is going to
- 00:22:25play out it's obviously the primary
- 00:22:27sequence that we would expect policers
- 00:22:28to choose is you know we want to have
- 00:22:30our to we want to just keep the same
- 00:22:32party going that we've always you know
- 00:22:34able to dance to but we just want to do
- 00:22:36minor technocratic tweaks along the
- 00:22:37margins and make you know little
- 00:22:38bargaining trade-offs with different
- 00:22:39centers of political power and that's
- 00:22:41fine like that's plan a right but
- 00:22:43National Security officials never just
- 00:22:44think the plan a is going to work right
- 00:22:46you have to think what's Plan B what's
- 00:22:47plan C what if the adversary actually
- 00:22:48does succeed in their objectives what if
- 00:22:50your plan a fails but you've put all
- 00:22:52your chips on it then then you're not in
- 00:22:53a great strategic position that's
- 00:22:55basically what I'm sort of calling for
- 00:22:56is thinking about what does the plan be
- 00:22:58what does the plan C what are these
- 00:22:59Alternatives that are maybe right now
- 00:23:00relatively low cost they don't require a
- 00:23:02whole lot of analytic or even you know
- 00:23:04strategic Capital to invest in but that
- 00:23:06could pay off if our plan a doesn't
- 00:23:08succeed yeah so people in your space the
- 00:23:10National Security space they think about
- 00:23:12multiple options right they have to I
- 00:23:14guess out of necessity out of training
- 00:23:16out of the fact they could be fighting a
- 00:23:17war where people in my world Central
- 00:23:19Banking world they're very like oh let's
- 00:23:22just tweak this parameter that parameter
- 00:23:24so we get inflation on track and we need
- 00:23:26to be doing more is what you're saying
- 00:23:27we think about the longterm stability of
- 00:23:30the networks yeah and Paul Tucker I mean
- 00:23:33a great book right Global Discord I read
- 00:23:35that with extreme interest and he makes
- 00:23:37this exact point that you know central
- 00:23:38banks are increasingly geopolitical and
- 00:23:40therefore they shouldn't be surprised if
- 00:23:42all of a sudden you know do political
- 00:23:44prerogatives start to supervene on their
- 00:23:46on their policy objectives and of course
- 00:23:48this has been refracted in various
- 00:23:50guises and US policy and political
- 00:23:52discourse of you know fiscal dominance
- 00:23:54or the independence of the FED but I see
- 00:23:56this is a structural Trend where when
- 00:23:57the chips down the you know the chairman
- 00:24:00of the fed you know answers to the
- 00:24:02commanderin-chief
- 00:24:03and just you have to bake that in right
- 00:24:06that was what happened World War II they
- 00:24:08they they they pegged the price of
- 00:24:09treasuries they bought up the debt they
- 00:24:12supported the war effort so they became
- 00:24:14a tool for National Security and I think
- 00:24:16you've had a recent guest on not just
- 00:24:17you know the FED but the treasury right
- 00:24:19and usually see these forces play out in
- 00:24:21our political economy in ways that you
- 00:24:23know if you're looking for symptoms of
- 00:24:25this conditions starting to develop
- 00:24:26whether you call it fiscal dominance
- 00:24:27whether you call it of geopolitical
- 00:24:29supervenience on monetary policy you
- 00:24:31would start to see it manifest in
- 00:24:33portions of our bureaucratic apparatus
- 00:24:35that are say more exposed to the
- 00:24:37prerogatives of the White House right
- 00:24:38and of course you've had you know active
- 00:24:40treasure issuance you know debates about
- 00:24:42well why are we actually issuing so many
- 00:24:44bills relative to coupons when we don't
- 00:24:46have to make up for the debt sealing
- 00:24:48kind of you know TGA build we actually
- 00:24:50are now just continually just you know
- 00:24:52issuing more bills right why are we
- 00:24:54doing that right it if functional QE is
- 00:24:56it to stabilize political conditions you
- 00:24:58know in a contested election and or is
- 00:25:00it a reckoning of the fact that we just
- 00:25:02can't allow you know kind of Market
- 00:25:04perception to understand that the
- 00:25:07long-term yield of the US Treasury
- 00:25:09Market is highly fragile and that we
- 00:25:11don't want it to go above a certain
- 00:25:12level right then effectively this is
- 00:25:14yield curve control but very indirectly
- 00:25:16very obliquely and without acknowledging
- 00:25:18it right and this is ultimately the
- 00:25:20history of of large indebted sovs is you
- 00:25:23know they want to control the price of
- 00:25:24their borrowing and they look around for
- 00:25:26any balance sheet or any or instrument
- 00:25:27of power that they'll that they can
- 00:25:29wield to ensure that they don't have to
- 00:25:31pay a market price for their debt that's
- 00:25:33what history tells you so I don't know
- 00:25:34why why any why now would be different
- 00:25:36right you have to make an argument why
- 00:25:37now would be a special case where we're
- 00:25:39going to resist those forces okay one
- 00:25:42last thing on the National Security
- 00:25:43space before we move into your proposals
- 00:25:45for for Bitcoin and and the use of
- 00:25:48crypto private crypto space for national
- 00:25:50security purposes but you seem like
- 00:25:53someone who is well read on things that
- 00:25:55I normally cover on this podcast I know
- 00:25:58you listen to the podcast you just
- 00:25:59mentioned you read Paul Tucker are other
- 00:26:02people in your space as actively engaged
- 00:26:05in these issues because you are Bridging
- 00:26:07the Gap right and and I I guess my
- 00:26:09question is do people sit around in in
- 00:26:11the Pentagon thinking man I wish the FED
- 00:26:12would talk more about or think more
- 00:26:14about X Y and Z when it comes to
- 00:26:16National Security issues because their
- 00:26:17decisions are impacting how you know we
- 00:26:20play out these these War Games how we
- 00:26:21play Out World War III scenarios Etc
- 00:26:25there's pockets of folks inside the CIA
- 00:26:27in particular that obviously has deep
- 00:26:29expertise and does these assessments
- 00:26:31there's someone I know who's in there
- 00:26:32who's you know written about kind of the
- 00:26:34the sanctions risk in terms of changing
- 00:26:37uh Reserve manager Behavior preferences
- 00:26:39for different assets including Bitcoin
- 00:26:42and so there's there's pockets of people
- 00:26:44that look at this I think at the say the
- 00:26:47political level right the SCS is in
- 00:26:49leadership I think ironically probably
- 00:26:51the biggest wakeup call was the svb
- 00:26:53failure last year which was you know
- 00:26:55this major bank that you know banked a
- 00:26:57huge number of defense Tech startups
- 00:26:59deep Tech startups and the the major
- 00:27:00sort of invogue wave of kind of Defense
- 00:27:03Tech Innovation how are we going to kind
- 00:27:04of get out of the the Strategic sort of
- 00:27:07sclerosis we have from our existing
- 00:27:09defense primes while meeting kind of the
- 00:27:10the pacing threat from China oh we'll we
- 00:27:12we'll do the move fast and break thing
- 00:27:14Silicon Valley you know we'll get paler
- 00:27:16we'll get SpaceX we'll get andil the
- 00:27:18whole cottage industry of kind of the
- 00:27:19Segundo Valley in you know kind of 20
- 00:27:22somethings wanting to build drones and
- 00:27:23Ai and and space capabilities but most
- 00:27:26of those startups were banked by this
- 00:27:27one bank that all of a sudden had a run
- 00:27:30in two days and the Pentagon had um
- 00:27:32defense Innovation unit and had office
- 00:27:33of strategic Capital that they've stood
- 00:27:35up in the past few years specifically to
- 00:27:37kind of nurture and develop this this
- 00:27:38ecosystem that they feel is like going
- 00:27:40to be their asymmetric you know plan to
- 00:27:42kind of jumpstart the capabilities that
- 00:27:44they need to to fight and win at least
- 00:27:45deter a conflict in the South China Sea
- 00:27:47or over over Taiwan and all of a sudden
- 00:27:50they fa this this panic and they were
- 00:27:52scrambling that weekend to figure out
- 00:27:53how they could maybe change contracts
- 00:27:55frontload payments or even use existing
- 00:27:57res ources in say the office of
- 00:27:59strategic Capital to try to bail some of
- 00:28:00those firms out but that was like a
- 00:28:02downstream you know kind of the the
- 00:28:03health and maturity aspects of those
- 00:28:05Bank portfolios kind of got upside down
- 00:28:07and there was of all all of a sudden of
- 00:28:09course the ability to sort of wire money
- 00:28:10on a second note so you had you know1
- 00:28:12to150 billion doar basically flee the
- 00:28:14bank in like 48 hours and Venture
- 00:28:16Capital just like lost their minds and
- 00:28:18so this intersection between minary
- 00:28:20policy kind of QT wind down the effect
- 00:28:23on the regional banking system
- 00:28:25intersection with defense technology and
- 00:28:26our strategic objective was never really
- 00:28:29pulled together until that until you had
- 00:28:30a panic moment right now I don't know if
- 00:28:32they've come up with a plan but I think
- 00:28:34now that the now now leadership
- 00:28:35understands oh this is a new thing right
- 00:28:37and it also turned out that there was a
- 00:28:38huge number of say unsecured Chinese
- 00:28:41deposits in those banks that were also
- 00:28:42bailed out um really I did not know that
- 00:28:44yeah you know we become the money
- 00:28:46laundering capital of the world right
- 00:28:47most of our our financial insurance real
- 00:28:50estate and Technology sector exist to
- 00:28:52create scarce and desirable assets to
- 00:28:54absorb foreign dollar surpluses and so
- 00:28:56we need to keep those flowing in in
- 00:28:58order to keep the basic architecture of
- 00:28:59the global so uh I I view this as the
- 00:29:01safe asset provided to the world you're
- 00:29:03redefining this as a money launderer to
- 00:29:05the world I mean tomato tomato right I
- 00:29:07mean it's basic it's what we're doing
- 00:29:09that's a very sobering interpretation of
- 00:29:11the safe asset provider to the world or
- 00:29:13the banker to the world I mean if you
- 00:29:14talk to any sort of major venture
- 00:29:15capitalist right their job is to
- 00:29:17basically create pools of money from
- 00:29:19Mostly foreigners you know and
- 00:29:20increasingly right politically
- 00:29:22disfavored to go after Chinese money or
- 00:29:23Russian money but Saudi Emira other you
- 00:29:26know Qatari sovere wealth funds or the
- 00:29:28rich individuals they exist to create
- 00:29:30pools of capital and then funnel you
- 00:29:32know with that money and then funnel
- 00:29:33that into scarce
- 00:29:34assets okay well that's a whole new take
- 00:29:37on that I'll have to process that and
- 00:29:39we'll come back have some more
- 00:29:40discussion later all right let's talk
- 00:29:42about your proposal least you're
- 00:29:44thinking on how like Bitcoin or crypto
- 00:29:47stable coins how could they
- 00:29:50enhance the dollar dominance the network
- 00:29:52effects the US currently has in terms of
- 00:29:54advantages over other nations yeah so I
- 00:29:56think in terms of a few different kind
- 00:29:58of tiers of analysis right the more sort
- 00:30:00of basic tier is Bitcoin and
- 00:30:02dollar-based stable coins right now are
- 00:30:04a very large market right so the
- 00:30:05question is this not going away how do
- 00:30:07you position yourself strategically in a
- 00:30:09way that maximizes the benefits while
- 00:30:10minimizing the risks and there are kind
- 00:30:13of you know immediate you know benefits
- 00:30:15from having stable coins continue to
- 00:30:17grow and dollarize parts of the world
- 00:30:19that haven't been dollarized thus far
- 00:30:21because you networks of correspondent
- 00:30:22Banks or admittances or you know the The
- 00:30:25Hop of of payment systems are just so
- 00:30:27expensive that there's just like an
- 00:30:29endogenous demand to use a dollar to pay
- 00:30:31for the dollar around the world and that
- 00:30:33the existing system doesn't really
- 00:30:34enable that very effectively it's very
- 00:30:36expensive and there's you know folks
- 00:30:38inside Argentina folks inside Niger
- 00:30:40folks inside Egypt that want to hold
- 00:30:41dollars that can't and it's better for
- 00:30:43the United States if they hold dollars
- 00:30:44and if those stable coins grow and are
- 00:30:46fully reserved there's like an
- 00:30:47endogenous demand for more dollar debt
- 00:30:49especially more bills if we're going to
- 00:30:50be pushing out more bills right that's a
- 00:30:52more like tactical question I'm not sure
- 00:30:53that's like a strategic game changer but
- 00:30:55it's like hey that's like a net positive
- 00:30:57thing the more dollar based stable coins
- 00:30:59there are essentially it's crypto Euro
- 00:31:00dollars essentially helping spread the
- 00:31:02dollar and if they're properly you know
- 00:31:03reserved and well regulated that can be
- 00:31:05you know another source of demand for
- 00:31:06our debt and there's a Synergy sort of
- 00:31:08fly will between the demand for Bitcoin
- 00:31:10the demand for dollar Bitcoin rails and
- 00:31:13the and the stable coin market so those
- 00:31:14sort of things have sort of emerged and
- 00:31:16evolved in tandem around the world to
- 00:31:18the extent that that sort of flywheel
- 00:31:19continues going it leads to sort of
- 00:31:21positive externalities for for the US
- 00:31:23fiscal position like again not
- 00:31:24strategically gamechanging but an
- 00:31:26important positive sort of attribute the
- 00:31:28Strategic kind of overlay with China and
- 00:31:30you know that's like the watch word in
- 00:31:32you know DC is like China competition
- 00:31:34right how do we counter China's
- 00:31:35Ambitions and they have this you know
- 00:31:36strategy you know the digital Silk Road
- 00:31:38kind of a counterpart to the Belt Road
- 00:31:40initiative but focused on sort of
- 00:31:42creating a digital Network ecosystem
- 00:31:45especially in the global South but also
- 00:31:46interpenetrating the middle east and
- 00:31:48south Asia where they're trying to
- 00:31:49export kind of their techno
- 00:31:51authoritarian governance model right
- 00:31:53where they're trying to sign people up
- 00:31:54for you know a kind of a full techno
- 00:31:56authoritarian stack built on Chinese
- 00:31:58information communication technology
- 00:32:00that includes the digital Yuan or
- 00:32:02crossbridge cbdc platforms like project
- 00:32:04mbridge that you know have imbued within
- 00:32:07them the kind of surveillance and
- 00:32:09control you know authoritarian ethos
- 00:32:11that China has and there's like willing
- 00:32:13subscribers to that techno
- 00:32:14authoritarianism as a service model
- 00:32:16throughout Africa throughout the Middle
- 00:32:17East throughout Asia throughout EUR Asia
- 00:32:19even maybe in Europe increasingly and
- 00:32:21that is a you know from Us's kind of
- 00:32:23standpoint of you know the global system
- 00:32:26you know that is a major threat right
- 00:32:27not only do you have countries
- 00:32:29potentially signing on for a techno
- 00:32:31authoritarianism that you know runs
- 00:32:33counter to our liberal values but it
- 00:32:34also ens snares those governments and
- 00:32:37their National populations into a fully
- 00:32:39surveilled fully controlled stack that
- 00:32:41our adversary has sort of roote access
- 00:32:43to and so to the extent that one we
- 00:32:45don't have like a compelling alternative
- 00:32:47that is going around and really you know
- 00:32:48competing element for element within
- 00:32:50that stack whether it's you know the
- 00:32:52sort of cloud infrastructure whether
- 00:32:53it's sort of the huway 5G whether it's
- 00:32:55cell phones whether it's ZT surveillance
- 00:32:58AI all the way up through the digital
- 00:32:59currency electronic payment platform and
- 00:33:01and the crossbridge cbdcs we don't have
- 00:33:03like a you know natural competitor
- 00:33:05that's like you know that is helping to
- 00:33:07win over some of those governments
- 00:33:08whereas Dollar by stable coins and
- 00:33:10Bitcoin is is naturally being adopted
- 00:33:12around the world and sort of as a more
- 00:33:14organic bottomup development in terms of
- 00:33:16bringing essentially a reserve asset for
- 00:33:18the people in the hands of populations
- 00:33:20that they're maybe more corrupt
- 00:33:22kleptocratic and authoritarian inclined
- 00:33:24governments would rather not have have
- 00:33:26them hold and so to the extent that we
- 00:33:29want to counter China's Ambitions to ins
- 00:33:30snare those countries and to the extent
- 00:33:32we also want to encourage the you know
- 00:33:33proliferation of liberal values and
- 00:33:36individual autonomy the the growth of
- 00:33:38Bitcoin dollar Bas stable coins around
- 00:33:39the world is in in both in our sort of
- 00:33:41values interest as well as in our
- 00:33:42strategic interest and so that's kind of
- 00:33:44like the the tldr very fascinating so
- 00:33:47again China's been very intentional
- 00:33:49trying to grow its networks around the
- 00:33:51world digital currency these crossb
- 00:33:54payment system embridge that you
- 00:33:55mentioned so your sugesting China would
- 00:33:58use a not not only for like payments
- 00:34:01efficiency but also to to spy on on
- 00:34:03these collaborators other nations I've
- 00:34:06read an article recently you know why we
- 00:34:08shouldn't use cbdc like well who do you
- 00:34:10want spying from abroad into potentially
- 00:34:13you know breaking in and spying into the
- 00:34:15transactions so you're suggesting that
- 00:34:17China could use this to monitor other
- 00:34:19countries closely and we would lose that
- 00:34:21that edge I mean project emage maybe
- 00:34:23itself isn't going to be fully
- 00:34:24compromised from sort of its back end
- 00:34:26although you know that remains to to be
- 00:34:27seen on on its implementation but there
- 00:34:29have been cases you know all Republic of
- 00:34:31where China has offered you know cyber
- 00:34:33security assistance and part of the
- 00:34:35package deal when they offer say their
- 00:34:37cloud service providers or whether it's
- 00:34:38Huawei or the spread of their mobile
- 00:34:40payments infrastructure like alipay we
- 00:34:41chat around the world those are
- 00:34:43basically like P focus on the digital
- 00:34:45uan but really alipay and WeChat are the
- 00:34:48digitals uan right like that was the
- 00:34:49whole Tech kind of Crackdown was that
- 00:34:52these were massive payment platforms
- 00:34:53that were expanding rapidly in in China
- 00:34:56the central government didn't have one
- 00:34:57ibility or control over and they wanted
- 00:34:59to get visibility and control over those
- 00:35:01digital payment platforms and they did
- 00:35:03that's why also you haven't seen as much
- 00:35:04pressure from the Chinese government to
- 00:35:05like spread the digital uan is because
- 00:35:07they basically got it through these
- 00:35:09platforms right that's essentially gives
- 00:35:10them the same capability and those are
- 00:35:12extremely popular around the world right
- 00:35:14and not just for individuals but for
- 00:35:16e-commerce right so you can imagine this
- 00:35:17whole you know surveilled infrastructure
- 00:35:20that is you know plugged into Chinese
- 00:35:22information communication technology
- 00:35:23providers and you know there's National
- 00:35:25Security laws where all those all those
- 00:35:27compan had to provide that information
- 00:35:29and so that's just baked into the to the
- 00:35:31operating model that is so interesting
- 00:35:33so China is really expanding its reach
- 00:35:37through all these mediums here this
- 00:35:39technology these networks we really
- 00:35:41don't have any kind of intentional you
- 00:35:44know thought out plan to counter that
- 00:35:47but we do have something organically
- 00:35:49emerging around the world that could
- 00:35:50take that role and that's the crypto
- 00:35:53space the crypto assets that that exist
- 00:35:55stable coins and you you mentioned in
- 00:35:57your paper
- 00:35:58Randy corl former Vice chair and a
- 00:36:00regular listener to the podcast thank
- 00:36:01you Randy also past guest I should say
- 00:36:03as well he had a speech he talked about
- 00:36:05how stable coins could expand the reach
- 00:36:08of the dollar as well as serve I think
- 00:36:10the bigger Point you're making here as a
- 00:36:12a national security purpose so why not
- 00:36:14run with it in other words don't view
- 00:36:17stable coins and and crypto as a threat
- 00:36:20view it as an opportunity right yeah I
- 00:36:23think you've seen this history play out
- 00:36:24with the euro dollar market throughout
- 00:36:26the history of the 20 yeah leev has you
- 00:36:29know done a great history of the euro
- 00:36:30dollar system and sort of you know
- 00:36:32explicated the sort of the tensions that
- 00:36:34that has generated inside the fed and
- 00:36:37also you know other central banks about
- 00:36:38to what extent do we want to let this
- 00:36:40flourish and proliferate to the what
- 00:36:42extent do we need to like keep it under
- 00:36:44control right and so I think that's
- 00:36:45basically the same tension is right to
- 00:36:46what extent do we want to kind of have
- 00:36:48this natural phenomenon play out that
- 00:36:50could you know increase you know the
- 00:36:52risk of say sanctions evasion criminal
- 00:36:54use obviously my day-to-day is cyber
- 00:36:56security so like digital currencies are
- 00:36:58the preferred medium of exchange and to
- 00:37:00a certain extent story value
- 00:37:01increasingly not of cyber criminals
- 00:37:04ransomwares right it's you know usually
- 00:37:06they want to get paid and they then they
- 00:37:07want to cash out right that's the whole
- 00:37:09point is they want to like try to find
- 00:37:10you know these unregulated offshore
- 00:37:12exchanges where they can take their ill
- 00:37:14gotten crypto gains and cash them out
- 00:37:15into dollars or hard currency somewhere
- 00:37:17and so there's a game of cat and mouse
- 00:37:18that's going to keep playing the same
- 00:37:20sort of thing happened with Euro dollars
- 00:37:21right there was you know it was a wild
- 00:37:23west for anyone to basically you know
- 00:37:26play all sorts of shady games but but
- 00:37:27over the course of the 20th century
- 00:37:29would you say the US government net
- 00:37:30gained more from having those offshore
- 00:37:32dollar nodes proliferate and expand even
- 00:37:34if it came out of significant cost in
- 00:37:36terms of criminal or or sort of money
- 00:37:38laundering use I think most historian
- 00:37:40would say it was basically that was what
- 00:37:42gave us the powers we're using today
- 00:37:43absolutely so Matt let's talk about then
- 00:37:46proposals that are out there that could
- 00:37:49strengthen this potential Network effect
- 00:37:52for the US government for National
- 00:37:53Security and I want to jump to something
- 00:37:55president Trump endorsed recently in
- 00:37:58Nashville there was been a call a
- 00:38:00senator from Wyoming for a strategic
- 00:38:02Bitcoin Reserve now were you at that
- 00:38:04conference I was yeah it seemed pretty
- 00:38:07high energy he I mean Trump was well
- 00:38:10received there and it's understandable
- 00:38:12because I mean the the the current
- 00:38:13Administration has not been as friendly
- 00:38:15or at least has been inconsistent in how
- 00:38:17it approaches crypto but let's let's
- 00:38:19start with Trump and we'll come back to
- 00:38:20to Biden tell me about this strategic
- 00:38:23Bitcoin Reserve what is your
- 00:38:24understanding of of how it would work
- 00:38:26one mhm and then two tell a story of how
- 00:38:30it would complement what you're arguing
- 00:38:31in this paper yeah I think this is
- 00:38:33certainly a new policy idea you know it
- 00:38:35came as I think more as like a meme and
- 00:38:37is now fleshed out into like some
- 00:38:39serious ideas and so like in keeping
- 00:38:40with my larger focus is like I take it
- 00:38:42as a serious policy proposal I think
- 00:38:44it's worthy of serious analysis and so
- 00:38:46you know at least in Trump's speech he
- 00:38:47just sort of was very very vague in
- 00:38:49terms of creating a stockpile and not
- 00:38:52wanting to sell the existing Bitcoin
- 00:38:53that's held by the US government which
- 00:38:54is about 200,000 that has been seized
- 00:38:56from Criminal prosecutions and you know
- 00:38:59that's basically the minimum policy
- 00:39:01proposal from Trump Senator lumus has
- 00:39:02introduced the Bitcoin act which is
- 00:39:04essentially a much more discreet
- 00:39:06proposal is maybe worth unpacking
- 00:39:08because she makes a very clear case you
- 00:39:10know in her in her legislation that the
- 00:39:12US government should essentially
- 00:39:13diversify its its Reserve assets Bitcoin
- 00:39:16is a novel Reserve asset that should
- 00:39:18sort of make up some part of its overall
- 00:39:20asset mix and that she sets a target of
- 00:39:231 million Bitcoin so going from our
- 00:39:24current 200,000 over a 5-year plan to
- 00:39:27purchase you know a total of 1 million
- 00:39:29Bitcoin that would be custody
- 00:39:31essentially you know in geographically
- 00:39:32distributed hard wallets like she you
- 00:39:34know specifies the specific security
- 00:39:36requirements for those for those
- 00:39:37Holdings the way that she would fund
- 00:39:39that purchase program would be to
- 00:39:41revalue essentially gold certificates
- 00:39:44that are are held by the FED that are
- 00:39:46you know had not been marked to Market
- 00:39:47and so she basically proposes remarking
- 00:39:50those gold certificates to the present
- 00:39:51value unleashing you know tens of
- 00:39:53billions of dollars in liquidity
- 00:39:54depending on the price of of gold and
- 00:39:56using that you know that those new
- 00:39:58Assets in the treasury general account
- 00:39:59to go out and just purchase Bitcoin on
- 00:40:02on the market that's basically the
- 00:40:03mechanics of her proposal she has a few
- 00:40:05other things in there about preserving
- 00:40:06the right for self- custody using the
- 00:40:08novel features of Bitcoin that you can
- 00:40:10do you know essentially cryptographic
- 00:40:11proof of reserves right so unlike audits
- 00:40:14of say gold under Liberty Street this
- 00:40:15would just be like you know open
- 00:40:17verification of us government's Bitcoin
- 00:40:19Holdings using its proof of reserves
- 00:40:20capability so that's the basic mechanics
- 00:40:23I think the argument that has been given
- 00:40:26I would maybe give a version of this
- 00:40:27argument I haven't really thought enough
- 00:40:29to like fully endorse this argument but
- 00:40:31I'm like pretty close but like I'm you
- 00:40:33know I'm playing with it right and so I
- 00:40:34think the two main arguments for such
- 00:40:36strategic Bitcoin Reserve would be one
- 00:40:38is more like a essentially a signaling
- 00:40:40benefit right like in keeping with my
- 00:40:42broader thrust of the Strategic benefits
- 00:40:43of Bitcoin US Government establishing a
- 00:40:46strategic Bitcoin reserve of sort of any
- 00:40:47di Minimus size sends a positive sort of
- 00:40:50enduring signal of support for Bitcoin
- 00:40:53in the US right so that we can attract
- 00:40:56more Bitcoin to United States right more
- 00:40:58more people feel safe and comfortable
- 00:40:59holding Bitcoin in the United States
- 00:41:00with us custodians more Bitcoin
- 00:41:02businesses sort of financial integration
- 00:41:04can can continue here as opposed to you
- 00:41:06know Dubai or Abu Dhabi or Singapore or
- 00:41:09Hong Kong so like to the extent that you
- 00:41:11send a positive signal you sort of
- 00:41:13attract the marginal unit of Bitcoin and
- 00:41:15Bitcoin businesses you know it doesn't
- 00:41:17cost you a whole lot so like that's a
- 00:41:18good you know positive thing the more
- 00:41:20like I'd say hard sort of technical
- 00:41:23benefit and this is more speculative is
- 00:41:25as like an option value for the US sort
- 00:41:27of fiscal position CU if you actually
- 00:41:29were to acquire say million Bitcoin the
- 00:41:31US government does also send this
- 00:41:32positive signal the premise behind that
- 00:41:34could be essentially maybe short
- 00:41:36circuiting what would otherwise be the
- 00:41:38risk of a sort of fiscal sort of spiral
- 00:41:41in the next 5 or 10 20 years right that
- 00:41:43if there is a risk that at some point
- 00:41:45the market realizes that the US
- 00:41:47government isn't necessarily going to be
- 00:41:49good for it that monetizing Bitcoin
- 00:41:51relative to say gold benefits us
- 00:41:53relative to adversary so if we're going
- 00:41:54down a path of say marginal maybe more
- 00:41:57oblique debt monetization right to meet
- 00:41:59geopolitical objectives to meet climate
- 00:42:01objectives to meet social transfer
- 00:42:02objectives that we're eventually going
- 00:42:04to have to you know own up to the fact
- 00:42:06that we're not going to make money good
- 00:42:08all of these you know us promises that
- 00:42:11there there's going to be haircuts
- 00:42:12imposed somehow some way and that at
- 00:42:14some point you know the cost of that
- 00:42:16could become quite prohibitive and could
- 00:42:18be a nonlinear jump right where that you
- 00:42:20know set of common expectations flips
- 00:42:22and you get essentially a run on the
- 00:42:24treasury market right that' be
- 00:42:26enormously dest iing very expensive
- 00:42:28thing for the US government to endure if
- 00:42:29there's like a lowcost option that you
- 00:42:31can pay for now that essentially could
- 00:42:34pay off you know 5 10 years down down
- 00:42:35the line you know it's a risk weighted
- 00:42:38calculation about is it worth paying say
- 00:42:405 10 20 50 billion dollar for that
- 00:42:42option value now if it helps to fray a
- 00:42:44multi- trillion dollar you know bout of
- 00:42:46QE 10 years down the line okay like I
- 00:42:49you need to do the math right but like
- 00:42:50at least in theory I could see an
- 00:42:52argument say that there's an option
- 00:42:53value from holding Bitcoin I guess the
- 00:42:55question would be would it be enough
- 00:42:57to stem the Run would would it really
- 00:43:00matter relative to the size of the the
- 00:43:01debt which is you know 26 27 trillion
- 00:43:05versus but any I I hear your point I
- 00:43:07guess here's a tension I see in this
- 00:43:09proposal so I I like what you're saying
- 00:43:11in terms of the signaling enhancing the
- 00:43:14network the the demand for for for
- 00:43:17Bitcoin could it take Bitcoin to the
- 00:43:20place where it becomes so powerful so
- 00:43:25ubiquitous that it really doesn't help
- 00:43:28the dollar maybe it displayes a dollar
- 00:43:30you know yeah I mean your argument is no
- 00:43:32they're compliments but they could
- 00:43:34become substitutes should they it become
- 00:43:36so successful I think you're putting I
- 00:43:38mean this is exactly my anxiety with
- 00:43:40kind of going too far too fast or just
- 00:43:42yoloing in or just doing it as like a
- 00:43:44meme right like you need to be extremely
- 00:43:46deliberate if you're going to make a
- 00:43:47strategic policy shift on something like
- 00:43:49this you need to think it through you
- 00:43:50need to go slow and you'd have sort of
- 00:43:52off ramps in case you get to a point of
- 00:43:54of instability because I think Josh
- 00:43:55Hendrickson who's I think you've had him
- 00:43:56on the Pod he's a colleague of mine at
- 00:43:59the Bitcoin policy as as a fellow fellow
- 00:44:01you know he's written about how you know
- 00:44:02Fiat monies exist essentially you know
- 00:44:04sort of bable equilibrium right where
- 00:44:06everyone believes they're worth you know
- 00:44:07something positive value or they're
- 00:44:08worth nothing right and so if the
- 00:44:10reserve issuer of that fiat currency
- 00:44:12unit basically is telling sort of
- 00:44:14signaling that it doesn't have a whole
- 00:44:15lot of trust in its own it could sort of
- 00:44:17it could stimulate you know the thing
- 00:44:19it's very it's trying to prevent right
- 00:44:21so I think you need to be very careful
- 00:44:22about essentially as National decision
- 00:44:24makers causing the run that you're
- 00:44:25trying to prevent and I think that's a
- 00:44:27matter of it's a matter of deliberation
- 00:44:29it's a matter of policy execution
- 00:44:30implementation and the size and scale of
- 00:44:32such a reserve right and so that's where
- 00:44:34if it was like four million Bitcoin or
- 00:44:36six million Bitcoin now that that that's
- 00:44:38a risk right is it if it if it was just
- 00:44:39keep the 200,000 I don't think that's a
- 00:44:41risk right so somewhere along that line
- 00:44:44between 200,000 and 4 million Bitcoin
- 00:44:46there probably is a risk that you could
- 00:44:48stimulate the sort of negative feedback
- 00:44:51loop that you're trying to prevent and
- 00:44:52so that's where I I be careful yeah be
- 00:44:54careful and that's why I don't come down
- 00:44:56on a particular side or particular scope
- 00:44:58in terms of how fast you would apply it
- 00:45:00it's more just the basic idea of having
- 00:45:02such a reserve is the premise that I
- 00:45:04just want to like first analyze and then
- 00:45:06if you think that's at least that's a
- 00:45:07sound premise worth looking at well then
- 00:45:09you can have the more deliberative
- 00:45:11analysis of well then how big should it
- 00:45:12be yeah so you want it big enough so
- 00:45:15that Bitcoin grows and remains a
- 00:45:18complement to the US dollar not a
- 00:45:20substitute and where that magic
- 00:45:21threshold is who knows at this point are
- 00:45:24there any other proposals that would
- 00:45:27want to see the US government pursue to
- 00:45:30enhance this network effect I mean
- 00:45:33there's like basic things but I I sort
- 00:45:35of look around at our current approach
- 00:45:37to International statecraft and economic
- 00:45:39policymaking and I still see like basic
- 00:45:40work to be done in terms of bringing
- 00:45:42different arms and legs of our current
- 00:45:43bureaucratic apparatus into a common
- 00:45:46understanding of of of these of this
- 00:45:47very topic right so I would first want
- 00:45:49to just bring these different these
- 00:45:51different capacities and and have a more
- 00:45:54coherent and like thoughtful strategic
- 00:45:55Dialogue on it before I say oh go out
- 00:45:58and like do exp Z specific policy
- 00:46:00implementation right get the National
- 00:46:01Security apparatus with the economics
- 00:46:03statecraft folks with our state
- 00:46:04department folks with folks you know in
- 00:46:06Wall Street and think about like how
- 00:46:08this could actually work and just kind
- 00:46:09of YOLO it I think you've covered on on
- 00:46:11this on this discussion I think it's
- 00:46:13been written about other places like
- 00:46:15again Trump versus Harris you know
- 00:46:17different policy progress will come into
- 00:46:18play but I think it's been talked about
- 00:46:20at Leen a trump Administration a pretty
- 00:46:22radical shift in the structure of the
- 00:46:24dollar system right the explicit
- 00:46:26erection of Tech and tariff walls
- 00:46:28essentially around our allies and
- 00:46:29partners as essentially a non-economic
- 00:46:32you know Mafia style tactic to sort of
- 00:46:35force them to term out their debt right
- 00:46:37so okay how do we basically weaken the
- 00:46:39dollar at the same time we want to you
- 00:46:41know Goose our exports and keep our
- 00:46:43geopolitical and economic alliances
- 00:46:45intact our cake and eat it too yeah we
- 00:46:46basically were like okay we're going to
- 00:46:48instead of devaluing the gold content of
- 00:46:50you know a bar of gold or gold
- 00:46:51certificate back in the 30s we're going
- 00:46:52to devalue the duration content of
- 00:46:54sovereign Reserve Holdings of Treasury
- 00:46:56securities and we're going to use
- 00:46:57geopolitical levers inducements and
- 00:46:59threats to do that we could do that but
- 00:47:01that would be extremely costly in terms
- 00:47:03of you know diplomatic Capital we're
- 00:47:04going to have to get the Japanese the
- 00:47:06Taiwanese the South Koreans the Brits
- 00:47:08the Germans that have you know their own
- 00:47:10economic issues and demographic issues
- 00:47:12and and security issues and we're going
- 00:47:13to essentially cudle them into you know
- 00:47:16whether it's swapping coupons for
- 00:47:17Century bonds and that could work yeah
- 00:47:20sounds like a hot mess yeah that's
- 00:47:21essentially what what what sort of
- 00:47:22Imperial systems do is right they
- 00:47:24usually cannibalize the periphery to
- 00:47:25keep the core alive and you can extend
- 00:47:28and pretend for five or 10 years but
- 00:47:29doesn't seem like an enduring basis yeah
- 00:47:31so you're saying look let's let's maybe
- 00:47:32focus on what we can do that's
- 00:47:34productive given these organically
- 00:47:37growing networks already in the crypto
- 00:47:39world let's let's run with that let's
- 00:47:40don't destroy what we have or canalize
- 00:47:42what we have and and go from there all
- 00:47:45right Matt and in time we have left I
- 00:47:46want to Circle back to where we started
- 00:47:48this conversation and that was with the
- 00:47:50defense industry and you know we're here
- 00:47:52at mercada Center we we follow things
- 00:47:56that happen
- 00:47:57in the policy world so we follow for
- 00:47:59example closely bills that go before
- 00:48:01Congress you know I I have followed the
- 00:48:03omnus spending bills because sometimes
- 00:48:05there's things in there that affect the
- 00:48:06Federal Reserve you follow though the
- 00:48:09National Defense authorization act so
- 00:48:11tell us about that what is it yeah so
- 00:48:13every year you know this is like one of
- 00:48:15those must-pass bills the National
- 00:48:16Defense authorization act and then it
- 00:48:18sort of twin the intelligence
- 00:48:19authorization act sometimes they even
- 00:48:20get merged depending on the the policy
- 00:48:22timeline into a single package but this
- 00:48:24is essentially the authorization for for
- 00:48:26all of our military and with our
- 00:48:28intelligence program so it's you know it
- 00:48:30comes out of the Senate arm Services
- 00:48:31committee the house arm Services
- 00:48:32committee um the intelligence acts come
- 00:48:34out of the Senate s Comm intelligence
- 00:48:35and the house permit SEL Comm
- 00:48:36intelligence and these are you know the
- 00:48:38defining bills that lay out kind of the
- 00:48:40policy priorities and programs that will
- 00:48:42be funded for the next fiscal year so I
- 00:48:45pay a lot of attention a lot of the
- 00:48:46policy comes out say on like restricting
- 00:48:48Chinese information Communications
- 00:48:50Technologies get introduced and add to
- 00:48:52this bill stand up of studies around
- 00:48:54cybercity vulnerabilities for us ports
- 00:48:55or the Panama Canal are inserted here so
- 00:48:58you get a window into what senior policy
- 00:49:00makers that sit on those committees are
- 00:49:02really worried about and are trying to
- 00:49:03basically instruct the defense
- 00:49:05department intelligence Community to do
- 00:49:07in the next years like we really want
- 00:49:08you to study the vulnerabilities of our
- 00:49:11ports the vulnerabilities from you know
- 00:49:12these different adversary capabilities
- 00:49:14um we really want you to build a new
- 00:49:16capability here and so I I I review
- 00:49:19those every every time they come out you
- 00:49:20know they they give a good clue as to
- 00:49:22like what their priorities are and then
- 00:49:23the last several years has been you know
- 00:49:25a a new thing that has been introduced
- 00:49:27to the National Defense authorization
- 00:49:28act that has come in from kind of The
- 00:49:30Fringe but is now like a very serious
- 00:49:31topic inside DC and that's sort of this
- 00:49:33topic of unidentified anomalous
- 00:49:35phenomena uaps you know prosaically
- 00:49:38known as UFOs and this sounds like a
- 00:49:40taboo kind of like snickering thing yeah
- 00:49:42but like inside the Senate inside the
- 00:49:44house inside the executive branch inside
- 00:49:46the intelligence community and others
- 00:49:48this has become an increasingly serious
- 00:49:50topic and you've seen bills being
- 00:49:52introduced and passed and made into law
- 00:49:54from a whole sequence of National
- 00:49:56Defense authorization acts really
- 00:49:57starting in fy22 and then ratcheting up
- 00:49:59year after year to place more scrutiny
- 00:50:03and more reporting requirements on the
- 00:50:04Pentagon in particular to come back to
- 00:50:06Congress and answer some hard questions
- 00:50:07on what exactly does the Pentagon know
- 00:50:09about unidentified anomalous phenomenon
- 00:50:11what are they doing to reduce the
- 00:50:13internal stigma from Pilots so they can
- 00:50:15get a better understanding of what's the
- 00:50:16nature of this Potential Threat if it's
- 00:50:18coming from foreign adversaries or if
- 00:50:19it's coming from exotic origin
- 00:50:21understand exactly what that looks like
- 00:50:22and actually report back to them and
- 00:50:24that's been a sequence that's been
- 00:50:25playing out for the past few years
- 00:50:27we sort of reached an inflection point
- 00:50:28about 12 months ago with the National
- 00:50:30Defense authorization act for
- 00:50:32fy4 where a senior Senators including
- 00:50:35the Senate Majority Leader Senator
- 00:50:36Schumer with his main partner Senator
- 00:50:38rounds introduced what they called the
- 00:50:40unidentified anomalous phenomenon
- 00:50:42disclosure act and they had bipartisan
- 00:50:44co-sponsors from Jill brand Todd young
- 00:50:46Martin heimrich Mar Rubio from the arm
- 00:50:48services committies from the
- 00:50:49intelligence communities and the
- 00:50:51unidentified anous phenomenon disclosure
- 00:50:52act mouthful the uapa is a quite
- 00:50:55remarkable Bill like I read these things
- 00:50:57and you know most of them are kind of
- 00:50:58dry we're going to fund a new investment
- 00:51:01program here we want you to do a study
- 00:51:02on this they specifically laid out a
- 00:51:0464-page bill with definitions of what
- 00:51:06they call non-human intelligence they
- 00:51:08Define Technologies of Unknown Origin
- 00:51:10they Define unidentified Nom phenomena
- 00:51:12as being non prosaically attributed
- 00:51:15objects right so things that cannot be
- 00:51:16attributed to foreign adversary programs
- 00:51:18or debris or you know mological
- 00:51:20phenomenon like explicitly saying we
- 00:51:23have credible evidence and testimony
- 00:51:24from a whole series of witnesses and
- 00:51:25whistleblowers have come to the senate
- 00:51:27in particular over the past few years
- 00:51:29and have given you know a protected
- 00:51:31disclosures of unreported potentially
- 00:51:34illegal government programs that have
- 00:51:35been in existence related to this topic
- 00:51:37for decades and so this disclosure act
- 00:51:40would create like an independent review
- 00:51:42board modeled after the JFK records
- 00:51:44review board assassination group to you
- 00:51:47know get to the bottom of this right
- 00:51:48what exactly is going on what are the
- 00:51:50government records and or materials
- 00:51:53associated with those records that might
- 00:51:54be in possession of the US government or
- 00:51:56private Aerospace contractors and make a
- 00:51:59recommendation to the president on how
- 00:52:01to disclose that information to the
- 00:52:02public in a controlled disclosure
- 00:52:04campaign plan and so this is this bill
- 00:52:06was introduced in FY 24 it was passed
- 00:52:08out of the Senate it was actually in the
- 00:52:09Senate's version of the National Defense
- 00:52:11authorization act and it went over to
- 00:52:12the house the house didn't have a
- 00:52:13version of that they met in conference
- 00:52:15committee in December of last year and
- 00:52:17most of the key Provisions that the
- 00:52:19Senate wanted in were taken out and so
- 00:52:21in particular the main provision was for
- 00:52:22this independent review board that would
- 00:52:24have powers of subpoena would have
- 00:52:26powers of you know unilateral
- 00:52:27declassification with only a
- 00:52:28presidential veto and also powers of
- 00:52:30eminent domain to take possession of any
- 00:52:33Technologies of Unknown Origin and
- 00:52:34biological materials in the possession
- 00:52:36of any private entity and make you know
- 00:52:38disposition determinations those pieces
- 00:52:40were taken out what was kept in was a
- 00:52:42establishment of UAP records collection
- 00:52:44at the National Archives and that has
- 00:52:46been you now is is coming into place
- 00:52:48this year and it sort of is now a major
- 00:52:51political issue coming into this fall
- 00:52:53where it has been reintroduced by rounds
- 00:52:56and Schumer they doubled down on it they
- 00:52:58actually went to the senate floor after
- 00:52:59they introduced it and said we're not
- 00:53:01happy basically with the house taking
- 00:53:03this out of the bill this independent
- 00:53:05review board and we want to have further
- 00:53:06disclosure for further transparency on
- 00:53:08behalf of the American people and it's
- 00:53:10being motivated by lots of different
- 00:53:11things but you know there's a worry of
- 00:53:13technological surprise from foreign
- 00:53:14adversaries there a worry that you know
- 00:53:16our scientific Paradigm has been
- 00:53:17stagnated for the past 6 years and that
- 00:53:20we need to have sort of more open
- 00:53:21science and technological Discovery
- 00:53:23based off of these programs and so this
- 00:53:25is one of those things coming in from
- 00:53:26the tales of the distribution you know I
- 00:53:29thought about like what are things that
- 00:53:30are not currently in the Overton window
- 00:53:32of kind of policy discourse that if they
- 00:53:34did materialize would be quite
- 00:53:36disruptive to our current policy
- 00:53:37Frameworks and this is probably the top
- 00:53:39of that list and so I think I would
- 00:53:41expect that this topic will continue to
- 00:53:44increase in official salience over the
- 00:53:46next few months and years there might
- 00:53:48even be some quite dramatic things
- 00:53:49happening this year on on this subject
- 00:53:51as part of the political pressure to get
- 00:53:53this disclosure Act passed and so yeah I
- 00:53:56mean there's been you know folks looking
- 00:53:58at this from lots of different angles
- 00:53:59including folks from you know a
- 00:54:01financial stability angle which has been
- 00:54:03a major concern of how do you have
- 00:54:04something like this you know emerge into
- 00:54:06the public discourse in a way that
- 00:54:08doesn't lead to you know panic panic or
- 00:54:11disruption or major negative
- 00:54:12externalities right and so the payment
- 00:54:14system obviously is critical we wouldn't
- 00:54:16want folks you know have loss of Faith
- 00:54:19or the basic mechanisms of of our of our
- 00:54:21of our payment system collapse and so
- 00:54:23there's been some you know solid
- 00:54:24research and papers now being produced
- 00:54:26to try to prepare the ground for some of
- 00:54:28this slow but it's going to happen wow
- 00:54:32there's a lot there let me go back to
- 00:54:33where we started on on this particular
- 00:54:34point so the National Defense
- 00:54:36authorization act you call it
- 00:54:39ndaa you and other people like you you
- 00:54:41look at those to see what's of Interest
- 00:54:44what's what's kind of The Cutting issues
- 00:54:46in terms of National Security issues and
- 00:54:48what you're saying as you look across
- 00:54:50that one that really stands out that's
- 00:54:52different potentially important very
- 00:54:55important is more disclosure on
- 00:54:59uaps and it was in last year's Bill n
- 00:55:02NDA didn't make it it's in this year's
- 00:55:05is it going to be past this year do you
- 00:55:06think that is right now the big question
- 00:55:10right the Senate is pushing hard they
- 00:55:11introduced basically The Identical bill
- 00:55:13as a signal to the house that they're
- 00:55:15still pushing in this direction it's
- 00:55:18likely that it will be introduced as
- 00:55:19part of a manager's package which is how
- 00:55:21it was introduced last year essentially
- 00:55:22by the leadership same way and then it
- 00:55:24will be kicked over to the house again
- 00:55:26and there'll be back back room
- 00:55:27negotiations in conference committee
- 00:55:29probably around November of December and
- 00:55:31so it will be really in the hands of the
- 00:55:32next president if this Bill gets gets
- 00:55:34signed to make nominations to this
- 00:55:36review board you know individuals of
- 00:55:38national stature to make this to make
- 00:55:40these determinations folks with National
- 00:55:42Security backgrounds foreign policy
- 00:55:43backgrounds sociologists economists
- 00:55:46historians folks representing Civil
- 00:55:48Society to try to you know bring all
- 00:55:50different facets of National Power and
- 00:55:51interest to bear on making these these
- 00:55:53determinations on on how to selectively
- 00:55:54disclose this information so I wouldn't
- 00:55:56handicap the odds maybe 50/50 at whether
- 00:55:58the full package gets gets through I'd
- 00:56:01say regardless of the uapa right that's
- 00:56:03the official policy kind of process like
- 00:56:06trying to stand up an Institutional
- 00:56:07framework for this issue but there are
- 00:56:09other ways this could erupt into the
- 00:56:10national conversation and it we have
- 00:56:12geopolitical implications as well as you
- 00:56:13could imagine so there's a lot tied up
- 00:56:16in this um absolutely and I think you
- 00:56:18know there's there's I've had
- 00:56:19conversations with folks that are more
- 00:56:20on the national security or intelligence
- 00:56:22side on this and some of the attitude
- 00:56:24has been you know we need to disclose
- 00:56:27this you know it's a matter of you know
- 00:56:29geopolitical or other sort of urgency
- 00:56:32and that the private sector will just
- 00:56:34have to like adapt that there I there
- 00:56:36hasn't been as much rigorous thought as
- 00:56:38to how to manage the financial stability
- 00:56:40the overall economic implications of
- 00:56:42this you know they're mostly National
- 00:56:44Security folks they think in terms of
- 00:56:45you know a military campaign phase one
- 00:56:47phase two phase three and then this is a
- 00:56:49phase two or phase three problem it's
- 00:56:51not a phase one problem yeah and you
- 00:56:52know because of the taboo because this
- 00:56:54isn't necessarily inside the Overton
- 00:56:55window there isn't serious policy
- 00:56:57attention focused on it and that that
- 00:56:59could be a problem well that is a very
- 00:57:02interesting development and maybe we'll
- 00:57:04have you back on should this Schumer
- 00:57:07rounds Amendment actually become law and
- 00:57:09we learn new things but we've had a
- 00:57:10great conversation today on the role of
- 00:57:13uh networks and the big rivalry between
- 00:57:16China the US and the role that crypto
- 00:57:19stable coins could play we need to view
- 00:57:21it as an opportunity not as a threat Our
- 00:57:24Guest today has been Matthew Pines Matt
- 00:57:25thank you so much for coming on the
- 00:57:26program thank you so
- 00:57:29much macro musings is produced by the
- 00:57:32marada center at George Mason University
- 00:57:35Dive deeper into our research at
- 00:57:37marcus.org
- 00:57:39monetary policy you can subscribe to the
- 00:57:42show on Apple podcast Spotify or your
- 00:57:46favorite podcast app if you like this
- 00:57:48podcast please consider giving us a
- 00:57:50rating and leaving a review this helps
- 00:57:52other thoughtful people like you find
- 00:57:55the show find me on Twitter at David
- 00:57:58beckworth and follow the show at
- 00:58:01macro Mings
- Cryptocurrency
- Bitcoin
- National Security
- Network Power
- US-China Relations
- Defense Budget
- Strategic Reserve
- Stablecoins
- UAP
- Geopolitics