THIS JOBS REPORT IS A DISASTER

00:17:16
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f4NvAc_3e6E

摘要

TLDRThe video discusses the recent decline in the stock market, particularly the Dow Jones, which is down significantly. It highlights a disappointing job report for July, showing only 73,000 new jobs added, well below expectations, and significant downward revisions for previous months. The speaker expresses skepticism about the stock market's representation of the economy and critiques the reliability of job statistics, suggesting they may be manipulated. The conversation touches on the impact of tariffs on job growth, the sectors contributing to job gains, and the political implications of the job report, including Trump's response to the labor statistics.

心得

  • 📉 The Dow Jones is down 1.65%.
  • 📊 Only 73,000 jobs were added in July, below expectations.
  • 🔽 Major downward revisions for job growth in May and June.
  • 🏥 Most job gains came from healthcare and social assistance sectors.
  • ⚠️ The unemployment rate has risen to 4.2%.
  • 💼 Tariffs have negatively impacted manufacturing jobs.
  • ❓ The speaker questions the reliability of job statistics.
  • 🗣️ Trump wants to fire the head of labor statistics after the report.
  • 📉 Job growth has been weak for three consecutive months.
  • 🤔 The stock market may not reflect the true state of the economy.

时间轴

  • 00:00:00 - 00:05:00

    The stock market is experiencing a significant decline, with the Dow Jones down over 700 points. The speaker expresses skepticism about the stock market's representation of the economy, suggesting that it primarily reflects the wealth of the rich. A recent job report indicates limited job growth, with a shocking revision showing only 14,000 new jobs instead of the previously reported 114,000. This discrepancy raises concerns about the accuracy of job estimates and the overall health of the economy.

  • 00:05:00 - 00:10:00

    The job report reveals that the US economy added only 73,000 jobs in July, significantly below expectations, with major downward revisions for previous months. The unemployment rate has increased to 4.2%. Most job gains came from healthcare, while sectors like retail and finance saw minimal growth. The speaker criticizes the current administration's handling of job statistics and the impact of tariffs on job losses, particularly in manufacturing and federal government sectors.

  • 00:10:00 - 00:17:16

    In response to the disappointing job numbers, Trump plans to fire the head of the labor statistics department, claiming manipulation of job data for political purposes. The discussion highlights the inconsistency in job statistics and the challenges faced by job seekers. The speaker notes that the only stable job growth is in healthcare, while other sectors are struggling. The conversation reflects skepticism about the government's ability to provide accurate job data and the implications of immigration policies on job availability.

思维导图

视频问答

  • What is the current status of the Dow Jones?

    The Dow Jones is down significantly, approximately 1.65%.

  • What was the job growth reported for July?

    The US added only 73,000 new jobs in July, which is below expectations.

  • What sectors are primarily hiring?

    Most job gains came from healthcare and social assistance.

  • What happened to the job numbers for May and June?

    The job numbers for May and June were revised down significantly, indicating much worse performance than previously reported.

  • What is the unemployment rate currently?

    The unemployment rate has increased to 4.2%.

  • How do tariffs affect job growth?

    Tariffs have contributed to job losses in manufacturing and created instability for foreign corporations operating in the US.

  • What is the speaker's view on the stock market?

    The speaker believes the stock market does not accurately represent the overall economy or people's well-being.

  • What are the implications of the job report for the economy?

    The job report suggests that the labor market is in trouble, with limited job growth and significant downward revisions.

  • What is Trump's response to the job report?

    Trump has expressed a desire to fire the head of the labor statistics department following the disappointing job numbers.

  • What does the speaker think about the accuracy of job statistics?

    The speaker questions the reliability of job statistics and suggests they may be manipulated or inaccurately reported.

查看更多视频摘要

即时访问由人工智能支持的免费 YouTube 视频摘要!
字幕
en
自动滚动:
  • 00:00:00
    Stocks are sinking sharply right now.
  • 00:00:05
    The Dow is down. Take a look at this.
  • 00:00:08
    The Dow is down right now uh a lot of
  • 00:00:12
    points. Uh 1.64 1.65%.
  • 00:00:14
    The Dow Jones is down 729.
  • 00:00:17
    Is this good? I don't really understand
  • 00:00:20
    numbers and stons and the economy or
  • 00:00:22
    tariffs. Is this good, chat? I mean,
  • 00:00:25
    it'll rebound again. It's just like
  • 00:00:27
    he'll just go he'll just go back to it
  • 00:00:29
    and be like, "No more tariffs. We don't
  • 00:00:32
    have it." and then everyone will bye bye
  • 00:00:35
    bye and then sell sell sell. There's a
  • 00:00:37
    there's a market correction. I don't I
  • 00:00:39
    don't really care about like uh market
  • 00:00:41
    movements of this sort. I don't think
  • 00:00:44
    the stock market is representative of
  • 00:00:46
    the economy in general like the health
  • 00:00:49
    of the economy. I don't think the GDP is
  • 00:00:53
    an adequate metric to understand the the
  • 00:00:55
    uh way that people uh exist. I don't
  • 00:00:56
    think that it's a good metric. I don't
  • 00:00:58
    think the stock market is a good metric
  • 00:01:00
    either. It's a good metric for how much
  • 00:01:02
    wealthy people are making money, like
  • 00:01:04
    wealthy people who have parked all of
  • 00:01:08
    their uh net worth into stons. But um
  • 00:01:10
    yeah, there a job report came out and it
  • 00:01:13
    was insane. Um a job report came out
  • 00:01:17
    with uh with that showed some numbers
  • 00:01:20
    for the month of July, but that wasn't
  • 00:01:22
    the real uh interesting part of this.
  • 00:01:24
    Like the there was uh limited job
  • 00:01:27
    growth. It was uh it was less than
  • 00:01:30
    expected but not like too much. The real
  • 00:01:32
    scary part of the job report that came
  • 00:01:35
    out was actually the correction in the
  • 00:01:37
    past month's job reports where
  • 00:01:41
    apparently uh we did not get 114,000 new
  • 00:01:45
    jobs. It was more like 14,000 new jobs
  • 00:01:48
    which is crazy. I feel like this is if
  • 00:01:51
    your estimate is off by I don't know a h
  • 00:01:55
    100,000 or 200,000 then you're not doing
  • 00:01:57
    much of an estimate at all. You're just
  • 00:01:59
    kind of making stuff up. It's no
  • 00:02:01
    different than when Donald Trump says
  • 00:02:03
    you don't understand. The nation of
  • 00:02:06
    Japan has given me seven quintillion
  • 00:02:09
    dollars that I can purchase as many
  • 00:02:11
    laboo as I want with. That's right.
  • 00:02:13
    They're making America great again. It's
  • 00:02:15
    like, okay, so we got some IUS. All
  • 00:02:18
    right, got it. Where is the money going?
  • 00:02:20
    Like I don't do we the roads are still
  • 00:02:22
    dog I don't think that is going
  • 00:02:25
    there. The ISPs still offer horrible
  • 00:02:27
    service. So I don't think it's going
  • 00:02:29
    there either. Yeah. The net correction
  • 00:02:33
    was minus 258,000
  • 00:02:36
    jobs than first reported. Now look, I
  • 00:02:39
    don't know if this is normal or not. I
  • 00:02:41
    don't understand. I'm not an expert,
  • 00:02:44
    right? But people that seemingly are
  • 00:02:47
    experts here are saying just in a week
  • 00:02:50
    jobs report uh the US economy added only
  • 00:02:52
    73,000 jobs in July. That's way below
  • 00:02:54
    expectations. May and June revised down
  • 00:02:58
    by 258,000.
  • 00:03:00
    75% of the July job gains came from
  • 00:03:02
    healthcare. The unemployment rate take
  • 00:03:06
    back up to 4.2 from 4.1 in June. Wages
  • 00:03:10
    grew 3.9 in the past year versus 2.7
  • 00:03:13
    inflation. Heather Long continues, chief
  • 00:03:15
    economist for Navy Federal, columnist at
  • 00:03:16
    the Washington Post. The labor market is
  • 00:03:18
    in trouble. Healthcare or social
  • 00:03:20
    assistance are pretty much the only
  • 00:03:22
    sectors hiring. This is not healthy.
  • 00:03:25
    Retail plus 16,000. Finance plus 15,000.
  • 00:03:28
    Hospitality plus 5,000. I mean, this
  • 00:03:30
    makes sense. Do we really need more
  • 00:03:32
    hospitality workers when tourism is
  • 00:03:34
    taking a major hit? what to do with
  • 00:03:36
    hospitality when Donald Trump is
  • 00:03:38
    basically saying we're shut off to the
  • 00:03:39
    rest of the world. If you come here, we
  • 00:03:41
    will arrest you. You might actually be
  • 00:03:43
    prosecuted. You might actually spend
  • 00:03:45
    some time in an immigrant detention
  • 00:03:46
    facility for an extended period of time
  • 00:03:48
    for the crime of trying to come into the
  • 00:03:49
    country and having like a JD Vance meme
  • 00:03:51
    in your phone or something. Who the
  • 00:03:53
    is going to want to come here? State
  • 00:03:55
    government plus 5,000. Transport and
  • 00:03:57
    warehouse plus 4,000. Construction plus
  • 00:03:59
    2,000. Professional business services
  • 00:04:01
    are down 14,000. Federal government is
  • 00:04:05
    down 12,000. down 84,000 since January.
  • 00:04:08
    There were almost a 100,000 people that
  • 00:04:10
    lost jobs at the at in federal
  • 00:04:13
    government, 11,000 in manufacturing
  • 00:04:15
    directly tied back to tariffs and the
  • 00:04:18
    tariffs mania. Because on the one hand
  • 00:04:21
    with tariffs, the inconsistency and the
  • 00:04:23
    instability might be good for Trump's
  • 00:04:26
    close friends and associates that know
  • 00:04:28
    that he's not going to pull the trigger
  • 00:04:30
    on the tariffs or whatever, but
  • 00:04:34
    obviously foreign corporations that have
  • 00:04:37
    manufacturing facilities on US soil do
  • 00:04:39
    not like that inconsistency. It seems
  • 00:04:43
    like they will respond by downsizing.
  • 00:04:45
    This is a predictable outcome. Something
  • 00:04:48
    that people warned about, not me, again,
  • 00:04:51
    not an expert, but uh experts have
  • 00:04:52
    warned about. Local government down
  • 00:04:56
    3,000. Information down 2,000. My
  • 00:04:57
    company just had layoffs announced
  • 00:05:00
    today. Jesus Christ. But hey guys, did
  • 00:05:03
    you get laid off from your manufacturing
  • 00:05:07
    job because the foreign company that uh
  • 00:05:10
    hired you for a manufacturing job in a
  • 00:05:12
    facility is worried about what the
  • 00:05:14
    impact of tariffs? So they have to move
  • 00:05:17
    some numbers around. You're not. You can
  • 00:05:22
    become a Gestapo officer.
  • 00:05:22
    That's great. can't wait until we have a
  • 00:05:28
    nation that produces nothing except for
  • 00:05:31
    pain and violence. Both in terms of
  • 00:05:33
    manufacturing weapons, of course, but
  • 00:05:36
    also domestic pain so that everyone can
  • 00:05:41
    be a Trumpbacked loyalist SS guard. I
  • 00:05:43
    thought you meant like wrestling. No, I
  • 00:05:45
    mean like literally the it's going to
  • 00:05:48
    get to a point where the only the only
  • 00:05:51
    jobs that are available are ICE agents,
  • 00:05:55
    like snitch hotline uh snitch hotline uh
  • 00:05:59
    person, concentration camp guard, brown
  • 00:06:02
    shirt brigade. Great. Love that.
  • 00:06:04
    Arresting the the remaining people that
  • 00:06:07
    actually work uh in in construction and
  • 00:06:09
    things of that nature. Meanwhile, Trump
  • 00:06:12
    is in a wake in wake of bad jobs report,
  • 00:06:14
    Trump wants to fire head of labor
  • 00:06:16
    statistics department. Trump said on
  • 00:06:17
    True Social that he will remove Erica
  • 00:06:19
    McNarfer
  • 00:06:21
    McAnnanter as the commissioner of labor
  • 00:06:23
    statistics after the July employment
  • 00:06:25
    report found that just 73 jobs were
  • 00:06:27
    added. I don't know if this is because
  • 00:06:29
    he's mad about like how little new jobs
  • 00:06:31
    were added and she didn't lie enough or
  • 00:06:34
    because she lied in the past or like the
  • 00:06:37
    previous estimate was um the previous
  • 00:06:39
    estimate was so off base that they they
  • 00:06:41
    think it's like ridiculous. I was just
  • 00:06:43
    informed that our country's job numbers
  • 00:06:45
    are being produced by a Biden appointee,
  • 00:06:48
    Dr. Erica Mkinarfer, the commissioner of
  • 00:06:49
    labor statistics who faked the jobs
  • 00:06:50
    numbers before the election to try and
  • 00:06:52
    boost Kamala's chances of victory. This
  • 00:06:53
    is the same Bureau of Labor Statistics
  • 00:06:55
    that overstated the jobs growth in March
  • 00:06:58
    2024 by approximately 818,000 and then
  • 00:07:00
    again right before the 2024 presidential
  • 00:07:02
    election in August and September by
  • 00:07:05
    112,000. These were records. No one can
  • 00:07:07
    be that wrong. We need accurate jobs
  • 00:07:08
    numbers. I've directed my team to fire
  • 00:07:09
    this Biden political appointee
  • 00:07:11
    immediately. She will be replaced with
  • 00:07:13
    someone much more competent and
  • 00:07:14
    qualified. Important numbers like this
  • 00:07:16
    must be fair and accurate. They can't be
  • 00:07:19
    manipulated by political purpose. Wait,
  • 00:07:21
    but isn't isn't she doing what she did
  • 00:07:23
    for Biden but for you? And you're mad
  • 00:07:26
    that she actually didn't continue doing
  • 00:07:29
    for you what she did for Biden? Also,
  • 00:07:32
    the the thing that I don't understand
  • 00:07:34
    about this the thing that I don't fully
  • 00:07:36
    understand about this is like are these
  • 00:07:39
    jobs numbers just like phony madeup?
  • 00:07:42
    someone is just going around and just
  • 00:07:44
    saying like, "No, shit's great." Or is
  • 00:07:46
    it like I don't know how these uh
  • 00:07:49
    statistics are tabulated? Is it because
  • 00:07:53
    uh companies constantly have these like
  • 00:07:56
    ghost jobs that they never fill and then
  • 00:07:59
    the Bureau of Labor Statistics actually
  • 00:08:00
    responds to that as though these are
  • 00:08:03
    like real job openings? Like, how do you
  • 00:08:06
    get something like this so wrong? I I
  • 00:08:08
    don't understand. Also, I mean, this is
  • 00:08:10
    anecdotal and it's not a great way to
  • 00:08:13
    make an assessment, but the the report
  • 00:08:16
    from most people that have jobs that
  • 00:08:19
    want to get other jobs and also most
  • 00:08:21
    people that don't have jobs currently
  • 00:08:24
    and want to get a job is that they just
  • 00:08:27
    keep applying to these millions of
  • 00:08:29
    different job openings that seemingly
  • 00:08:32
    are out there and people don't even like
  • 00:08:34
    call them back. Like there is something
  • 00:08:36
    so inconsistent with what's going on.
  • 00:08:38
    Brutal. If you exclude these two
  • 00:08:39
    categories, job growth has been running
  • 00:08:41
    negative for three straight months.
  • 00:08:45
    Basically, the only US sectors uh in the
  • 00:08:46
    US economy that are adding jobs are
  • 00:08:48
    healthcare and social assistance. That's
  • 00:08:51
    crazy. It's also crazy cuz like we are a
  • 00:08:54
    growing nation, right? I mean, we have
  • 00:08:56
    330 million people here. So, there's
  • 00:08:59
    like constantly new babies popping up.
  • 00:09:01
    the population is constantly increasing
  • 00:09:04
    and therefore there should be more need.
  • 00:09:06
    There should be more jobs. There should
  • 00:09:08
    be more people working to fill those
  • 00:09:10
    roles. You know, you you need new
  • 00:09:12
    houses, you need new homes, you need new
  • 00:09:14
    roads, you need new cars. People need to
  • 00:09:16
    build those things. That's why there's
  • 00:09:19
    no lump sum of labor technically. Now,
  • 00:09:22
    of course, you can create a second tier
  • 00:09:25
    of labor to depress the existing wages,
  • 00:09:27
    and America has done that consistently
  • 00:09:31
    for decades with uh undocumented
  • 00:09:33
    immigration. But even then, especially
  • 00:09:35
    at a time when uh undocumented
  • 00:09:36
    immigration has been curbed
  • 00:09:39
    dramatically, there shouldn't be uh this
  • 00:09:41
    kind of a response. I think yeah this is
  • 00:09:43
    the other side of the story that David
  • 00:09:45
    Dayne correctly points to which is that
  • 00:09:48
    the only source of labor stability right
  • 00:09:50
    now the only sector of labor stability
  • 00:09:52
    right now healthcare and and assistance
  • 00:09:54
    social assistance is getting at least a
  • 00:09:56
    trillion dollar cut with insurance being
  • 00:09:59
    cut to 15 million people. So that growth
  • 00:10:01
    will bleed in the coming months. In my
  • 00:10:03
    opinion, today's job numbers were rigged
  • 00:10:06
    in order to make the Republicans and me
  • 00:10:08
    me
  • 00:10:10
    look bad. Just like when they had three
  • 00:10:12
    great days around the 2024 presidential
  • 00:10:14
    election and then those numbers were
  • 00:10:16
    taken away. Okay, but you're literally
  • 00:10:19
    describing what the same person did for
  • 00:10:23
    Biden doing it for you. I don't get it.
  • 00:10:25
    He is saying that the very same person
  • 00:10:28
    that he's now firing did this for Biden
  • 00:10:31
    and now is doing it for him and now he's
  • 00:10:33
    but he's saying it was bad when she did
  • 00:10:35
    it it was good like she was working in
  • 00:10:37
    favor of the Biden administration when
  • 00:10:38
    she did this exact same thing for the
  • 00:10:40
    Biden administration but now when she's
  • 00:10:42
    doing the exact same thing for him it's
  • 00:10:45
    it's bad right after the election down
  • 00:10:47
    jobs were massively revised downward
  • 00:10:50
    making a correction of over 818,000 jobs
  • 00:10:53
    a total scam Jerome too Powell is no
  • 00:10:55
    better. But the good news is our country
  • 00:10:57
    is doing great. I don't think I don't
  • 00:10:59
    think the country is doing great. Cuz if
  • 00:11:02
    it was, you wouldn't be doing this.
  • 00:11:05
    Whatever the this is, okay? He's a
  • 00:11:06
    idiot. Once you start viewing
  • 00:11:07
    everything he says through this lens, it
  • 00:11:09
    will make sense to you all. No, I I know
  • 00:11:11
    he's an idiot. I know that. I know that.
  • 00:11:13
    I understand. I promise you. I
  • 00:11:16
    understand that. It's just like how
  • 00:11:18
    stupid could he get is is still
  • 00:11:20
    something that has the capacity to shock
  • 00:11:23
    me. a Trump stan, a Trump follower,
  • 00:11:25
    someone who has followed Donald Trump
  • 00:11:29
    for fairly closely for quite some time.
  • 00:11:31
    Breaking news this morning. Economic
  • 00:11:34
    news. Brand new jobs numbers just out.
  • 00:11:37
    You can see them behind me. In July, the
  • 00:11:40
    US added just 73,000 new jobs below
  • 00:11:42
    expectations. The unemployment rate at
  • 00:11:46
    4.2%. But the big news, really big news,
  • 00:11:50
    major revisions for May and June. major
  • 00:11:53
    downward revisions. Those months much
  • 00:11:55
    much worse than thought.
  • 00:11:57
    It's crazy cuz like they they cooked
  • 00:11:59
    Brandon when this happened. Trump
  • 00:12:01
    literally brought it up. Trump brought
  • 00:12:03
    this up with the Brandon regime, too.
  • 00:12:05
    In order for us not to be in the danger
  • 00:12:07
    zone in this economy. The economy should
  • 00:12:10
    be chugging along at least 100,000 jobs
  • 00:12:12
    every month. The fact that this is below
  • 00:12:14
    that is significant. You have to go back
  • 00:12:16
    to October last year to find a worse
  • 00:12:18
    number. As you mentioned, the downward
  • 00:12:20
    revisions are really problematic. We're
  • 00:12:24
    talking about June being 14,000 instead
  • 00:12:26
    of 147,000.
  • 00:12:28
    That's a huge huge discrepancy.
  • 00:12:30
    Huge. When I came on here,
  • 00:12:32
    last month telling you, you know, the
  • 00:12:34
    economy is resilient. That's actually
  • 00:12:35
    that wasn't actually the case because of
  • 00:12:36
    these down revisions.
  • 00:12:37
    If we can get that other board up
  • 00:12:38
    because that's the one that actually
  • 00:12:40
    tells the story. when you see job growth
  • 00:12:44
    from month to month of 14,000 19,000 and
  • 00:12:45
    then in the 70s hopefully that can come
  • 00:12:47
    back up because that's the news here.
  • 00:12:51
    You've got three anemic months of jobs
  • 00:12:53
    growth. These are two of the weakest
  • 00:12:54
    months we've seen since 2020,
  • 00:12:55
    right?
  • 00:12:58
    14,000 19,000 that those are very very
  • 00:13:00
    weak numbers. And it's also just
  • 00:13:01
    statistically and for those who keep
  • 00:13:03
    track of things way off from what they
  • 00:13:05
    said before. But if you looked at a
  • 00:13:06
    three-month stretch like this, you say,
  • 00:13:08
    "Wait a second. We've got an economy
  • 00:13:10
    that's got some real challenges,
  • 00:13:11
    that's got a lot of work to do." And
  • 00:13:13
    when you think about the fact that
  • 00:13:15
    Liberation Day, yes, October, uh, April
  • 00:13:17
    2nd, rather, liberation day, we were
  • 00:13:19
    sort of wondering when we were going to
  • 00:13:19
    see the
  • 00:13:22
    It's so great to call it Liberation Day.
  • 00:13:24
    Last bar seems fake. I mean, who knows?
  • 00:13:26
    Who knows what it will look like when
  • 00:13:29
    when those job numbers get liberated too
  • 00:13:31
    next month when we go back and we're
  • 00:13:34
    like, "Actually, we had 12 new jobs."
  • 00:13:37
    Not 12,000, just 12. We were wrong. Our
  • 00:13:40
    estimation was wrong. Oops.
  • 00:13:40
    All these.
  • 00:13:42
    Except that won't happen cuz Trump will
  • 00:13:45
    probably put like some freak at the
  • 00:13:47
    Bureau of Labor Statistics. If next
  • 00:13:49
    month all of a sudden you see
  • 00:13:52
    unprecedented job growth, tremendous job
  • 00:13:56
    growth, just understand that the new guy
  • 00:13:59
    is in charge. Next month we have uh
  • 00:14:02
    actually we found out there are a
  • 00:14:05
    million new jobs. It's crazy. So many
  • 00:14:08
    jobs. More jobs than there are people.
  • 00:14:11
    More pe it's no one's ever seen anything
  • 00:14:14
    like it. It's so much job. It's jobs.
  • 00:14:16
    We're doing so many jobs. jobs like
  • 00:14:20
    you've never seen before. The hottest
  • 00:14:22
    economy from the standpoint of heat.
  • 00:14:23
    Good morning. Thanks for having me.
  • 00:14:25
    Look, you know, this jobs report isn't
  • 00:14:27
    ideal. There's no there's there's no way
  • 00:14:28
    around that. But nevertheless, I think
  • 00:14:30
    that the downward revisions reflect a
  • 00:14:32
    couple of anomalous factors. First of
  • 00:14:34
    all, about 60% of the downward revision
  • 00:14:35
    is due to quirks of the seasonal
  • 00:14:37
    adjustment process. Then on top of that,
  • 00:14:38
    there's the fact that the president
  • 00:14:40
    created about in the in the household
  • 00:14:42
    survey since the president took office,
  • 00:14:43
    he created about 2 and a half million
  • 00:14:46
    jobs for Americans, whereas he's whereas
  • 00:14:47
    we've eliminated about a million jobs
  • 00:14:49
    for foreignb born workers. That's a
  • 00:14:51
    result of our strong immigration policy
  • 00:14:51
    of our
  • 00:14:56
    Oh. Oh, that's what they're doing. Oh my
  • 00:15:01
    god. This is the meta. Okay. The meta is
  • 00:15:02
    No, you don't understand. We're getting
  • 00:15:05
    jobs for the Americans. Okay. The
  • 00:15:08
    layoffs are just the Mexicans. Okay, you
  • 00:15:10
    don't understand.
  • 00:15:13
    Oh, hell yeah, bro. This is This is
  • 00:15:15
    great. Remember when they tried to pull
  • 00:15:17
    this spin? Not that they needed to do
  • 00:15:19
    this spin at all because like we're not
  • 00:15:21
    going to see the Medicaid cuts until uh
  • 00:15:23
    after the midterms, but they were like,
  • 00:15:24
    "No, no, no, no. You don't understand.
  • 00:15:26
    We said we weren't going to cut Medicaid
  • 00:15:27
    and now we're cutting Medicaid by almost
  • 00:15:32
    aing trilly." Okay, but that actually is
  • 00:15:34
    for the Mexicans. We're cutting off
  • 00:15:37
    Medicaid for the Mexicans. Your Medicaid
  • 00:15:40
    is fine. They just literally slam that
  • 00:15:43
    talking point on everything no matter
  • 00:15:45
    what. Whichever way this goes, they're
  • 00:15:46
    like, "No, no, no, no. You don't
  • 00:15:48
    understand. The job layoffs are Mexican
  • 00:15:51
    layoffs. Mexican style layoffs.
  • 00:15:53
    Americans are getting good jobs." I
  • 00:15:55
    don't know how long you can lie like
  • 00:15:58
    this. For the record, I don't know.
  • 00:16:00
    Like, because at a certain point, people
  • 00:16:01
    are going to be like, "This is not
  • 00:16:03
    happening. I thought it was just the
  • 00:16:05
    Mexicans, but I don't I don't think it's
  • 00:16:07
    just the Mexic. I think my job I lost my
  • 00:16:09
    job. Yeah. JD Vance, I was told six
  • 00:16:10
    months ago that Americans losing jobs
  • 00:16:12
    and the foreign born gain jobs was an
  • 00:16:13
    irreversible demographic fact. Turns out
  • 00:16:15
    you just needed a new president and a
  • 00:16:17
    new immigration policy. Holy I
  • 00:16:18
    thought this was a typo. In the last
  • 00:16:20
    four months, native born Americans have
  • 00:16:22
    gained 1.8 million jobs. Meanwhile, 1.5
  • 00:16:24
    million foreignb born workers, legal and
  • 00:16:27
    illegal, lost a job. A sharp reversal of
  • 00:16:29
    the last few years. I specifically note
  • 00:16:31
    legal plus illegal immigrants because
  • 00:16:32
    the government does not separate the two
  • 00:16:33
    groups in their data on foreignb born
  • 00:16:35
    workers. However, based on numbers, a
  • 00:16:36
    large percentage are certainly illegal
  • 00:16:38
    immigrants. No, no, this is this is
  • 00:16:41
    happening. This is for sure. Once again,
  • 00:16:43
    having to remind myself that Americans
  • 00:16:44
    would quite literally rather be
  • 00:16:45
    unemployed than work any sort of
  • 00:16:47
    agricultural job. Yeah. No, you don't
  • 00:16:50
    understand. They're lining up, dude.
  • 00:16:51
    They're lining up, dude. You don't
  • 00:16:54
    understand. They are working the crops
  • 00:16:56
    left and right. Zero white people lost
  • 00:16:58
    their jobs. I swear to God, bro. Come
  • 00:17:01
    on, bro. No, you don't understand, bro.
  • 00:17:04
    You don't understand, King. White people
  • 00:17:06
    are getting the jobs. They're getting
  • 00:17:08
    good paying jobs right now. I promise.
  • 00:17:11
    Not your cousin. Not you. You're white.
  • 00:17:13
    You just didn't get it. But there's I'm
  • 00:17:14
    sure white people out there that are
  • 00:17:18
    getting the good jobs. I promise.
标签
  • Dow Jones
  • job report
  • stock market
  • unemployment
  • tariffs
  • economic health
  • job growth
  • healthcare
  • social assistance
  • Trump