Husserl: Phenomenology and the Life World
ๆ่ฆ
TLDRThe video discusses the philosophy of Edmund Husserl, a crucial figure in 20th-century philosophy known for his complex writings and foundational work in phenomenology. Husserl aimed to establish a new base for knowledge based on internal consciousness, aspiring to address the uncertainty of knowledge with a rigorous science-like approach. This radical epistemology involves setting aside external perceptions to explore the self-evident consciousness, mirroring Cartesian methods. Despite these aspirations, the speaker critiques Husserl's work as largely unsuccessful, characterized by repetitiveness and methodological vagueness, yet acknowledges the noble ambition and serious cultural intent behind his work. The discussion contrasts Anglo-American philosophical traditions with Husserl's continental approach, highlighting the former's emphasis on external empirical knowledge against Husserl's focus on internal subjective experience. The attempt to find absolute essences of human experience through phenomenology, despite its ambitious scope, falls short due to alleged circular reasoning and problematic verification processes. Despite acknowledging the failure of Husserl's methods, the speaker admires his moral seriousness and commitment to philosophy.
ๅฟๅพ
- ๐ Edmund Husserl is a key figure in 20th-century philosophy, known for phenomenology.
- ๐ His extensive and complex writings make interpretation challenging.
- ๐ง Husserlโs philosophy aims to establish knowledge based on internal consciousness.
- โ๏ธ He draws parallels with Cartesian traditions, emphasizing inward knowledge.
- ๐ His mathematical background influences his structured approach to philosophy.
- ๐ฆ Phenomenology seeks to discern eternal essences of human psyche through 'epoche.'
- ๐ Critics argue Husserl's method is circular and lacks empirical backing.
- ๐ฏ Husserl's philosophy is ambitious but considered unsuccessful by some.
- ๐ The video contrasts Anglo-American and continental philosophy approaches.
- ๐ Husserlโs moral dedication to philosophy is compared to Don Quixoteโs noble quests.
ๆถ้ด่ฝด
- 00:00:00 - 00:05:00
Edmund Husserl was a prominent figure in 20th-century philosophy, known for his complex and difficult-to-interpret style and for coining new terms. His background in mathematics inclined him towards Platonism, seeking a universal foundation for knowledge akin to the work of Descartes. Husserl aimed to establish a 'science of sciences' to inform all other human knowledge, similar to Cartesian philosophical projects. He posited that the self is self-evident and that internal consciousness precedes external reality. This reflects the continental tradition, focusing on internal consciousness before outward realities.
- 00:05:00 - 00:10:00
Husserl's philosophy aimed to create certainty through phenomenology, a method to identify eternal essences in human psychology, treating philosophy as a 'rigorous science.' His writings, though vast, were largely published posthumously. Despite the challenges and perhaps failure of his project, Husserl's dedication to unifying knowledge into a single foundation reflects a noble pursuit, similar to Don Quixote's fictional endeavors. His approach contrasts with the Anglo-American tradition by prioritizing the internal over the external.
- 00:10:00 - 00:15:00
The phenomenological method emphasizes intuition, often seen as unreliable yet essential in discerning internal truths. Husserl borrowed the idea of intentionality from Brentano, similar to Freud, highlighting that mental life is irreducible to physical phenomena. He sought to establish a rigorous scientific foundation for philosophy, combating the effects of materialism by focusing on self-knowledge preceding external phenomena. His ideas challenged modern science's misguidance in understanding human experience.
- 00:15:00 - 00:20:00
Husserl's phenomenological method involves suspending the external world to focus on pure human consciousness, seeking essences common to all humans while bracketing externalities like scientific theorems. The aim is to uncover the elements that don't pass through phenomenology's sieve, similar to Cartesian reduction. Yet, the process is critiqued for its nebulous and seemingly endless nature, lacking clear truth conditions and consensus on what constitutes essential predicates.
- 00:20:00 - 00:25:00
Husserl tries to identify essences by subtracting non-essential predicates from human experience but his method faces criticism due to epistemological circularity. Husserl believed in empathy as a link to other minds, though offering no satisfactory explanation within his framework. His late work shifted towards the 'Lebenswelt' or 'life-world,' emphasizing human-centric time and experience over scientific abstractions, yet it remained largely theoretical and ungrounded in practical phenomenological application.
- 00:25:00 - 00:30:00
Husserl's philosophy highlights the challenge of transitioning between internal and external awareness, where the Anglo-American tradition errs on external precision and neglects the internal realm. The continental tradition, while nebulous, aims to incorporate internal consciousness, promoting understanding over precision. Husserl's concept of intersubjectivity attempts to bridge isolated consciousnesses, although without clear methodology, reflecting the insoluble divide between internal and external worlds.
- 00:30:00 - 00:35:00
Husserl, described as transforming German romanticism through Cartesian methodology, insists on self-knowledge as foundational, though his ambitious project remains incomplete. The difficulties in his phenomenology reflect broader challenges of bridging inner consciousness with communicable expression, making real progress elusive. His romantic vision of introspection champions personal experience as primary, warning against theories that deny internal realities.
- 00:35:00 - 00:44:59
Husserl's phenomenology, despite its challenges, underscores the primacy of personal experience against an overly empirical Western philosophy. It asserts the necessity of aligning theories with internal realities rather than dismissing them for lack of precision, advocating a philosophy starting from experience ('the things themselves'). This position highlights the strength of continental philosophy by emphasizing personal and subjective experience as central to understanding reality.
ๆ็ปดๅฏผๅพ
ๅธธ่ง้ฎ้ข
Who is Edmund Husserl?
Edmund Husserl is a significant figure in 20th-century philosophy known for developing phenomenology.
What is phenomenology?
Phenomenology is a philosophical method developed by Husserl that aims to discover the essences of human experience by examining internal consciousness.
What was Husserl's educational background?
Husserl had a background in mathematics, which influenced his philosophical approach.
What was Husserl trying to achieve with his philosophy?
Husserl aimed to establish a presuppositionless foundation for knowledge, a 'science of sciences,' by focusing on internal consciousness.
How is Husserl's philosophy related to Descartes?
Like Descartes, Husserl aimed to ground knowledge in self-evident consciousness, focusing on the internal self as the basis of truth.
What criticisms are presented about Husserl's philosophy?
The speaker argues that Husserl's method is nebulous and fails to provide a clear connection between internal knowledge and external reality.
What does the speaker admire about Husserl's project?
The speaker admires Husserl's intellectual ambition and dedication, comparing him to Don Quixote for his noble, albeit impractical, quest.
What issues does the speaker find with the phenomenological method?
The method is criticized for being circular and subjective, lacking a way to verify its conclusions universally.
How does the speaker compare Anglo-American and continental philosophical traditions?
The speaker suggests that the Anglo-American tradition focuses on external precision, whereas the continental tradition, including Husserl, emphasizes internal consciousness.
What is the 'epoche' in Husserl's philosophy?
The 'epoche' is a method of suspending belief in the external world to focus purely on internal consciousness during phenomenological analysis.
ๆฅ็ๆดๅค่ง้ขๆ่ฆ
Cooper v. Aaron Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained
Why Change Is So Scary โ and How to Unlock Its Potential | Maya Shankar | TED
A 3-Step Guide to Believing in Yourself | Sheryl Lee Ralph | TED
Why can't we talk about periods? | Jen Gunter
Marbury v. Madison, EXPLAINED [AP Gov Required Cases]
Luther and the Protestant Reformation: Crash Course World History #218
- 00:00:01[Music]
- 00:00:14so
- 00:00:27edmund husserl is one of the most
- 00:00:29important and influential figures in
- 00:00:3120th century philosophy
- 00:00:33and this is despite the fact or perhaps
- 00:00:35because of the fact that he's a
- 00:00:36particularly difficult philosopher to
- 00:00:38interpret
- 00:00:39his style is extremely recondite his
- 00:00:42writings are voluminous almost to the
- 00:00:44point of compulsiveness
- 00:00:46and he has a tendency to construct
- 00:00:49neologisms
- 00:00:50to correspond to the new paths that he's
- 00:00:53breaking
- 00:00:54into the realm of this of the psyche or
- 00:00:56the realm of the mind
- 00:00:59husserl uh his early background was in
- 00:01:01mathematics which is very important
- 00:01:02josurel is
- 00:01:03perhaps like all mathematicians is a
- 00:01:05sort of closet platonist
- 00:01:07i think that mathematicians on the whole
- 00:01:09tend to look for something universal and
- 00:01:10abstract in all the thinking that they
- 00:01:13do
- 00:01:13and husserl who got his phd under
- 00:01:15wyastros
- 00:01:16in germany in the 1880s has a definite
- 00:01:19set of platonic tendencies and
- 00:01:20commitments
- 00:01:21so when you read his philosophy when you
- 00:01:23think about husserl's work
- 00:01:25if you were to connect it and think of
- 00:01:27it in terms of plato and the cartesian
- 00:01:29tradition the tradition of western
- 00:01:30rationalism and idealism
- 00:01:32you will be on the right track at the
- 00:01:33very least
- 00:01:35now like descartes what husserl wished
- 00:01:37to do was to construct a new foundation
- 00:01:40for knowledge
- 00:01:41it's a radical epistemological move
- 00:01:43which attempts to create
- 00:01:45certainty in the face of contingency and
- 00:01:48the uncertainty that is generated by the
- 00:01:50other realms of knowledge
- 00:01:51so in some way respects perhaps like
- 00:01:53kant what husserl's project involves
- 00:01:56is finding a presuppositionless
- 00:01:58foundation
- 00:01:59to human knowledge and what this would
- 00:02:01be is a sort of science of sciences
- 00:02:03that would inform and direct and correct
- 00:02:06all the other activities of the human
- 00:02:08mind including natural science
- 00:02:10so what horseroll is trying to do is get
- 00:02:12down to the urs stuff
- 00:02:13the bedrock of the human psyche and from
- 00:02:16there to generate
- 00:02:17all the other realms of knowledge which
- 00:02:20correspond to it
- 00:02:21in some respects this is like the
- 00:02:23cartesian product project
- 00:02:24of looking into oneself and after
- 00:02:27finding an
- 00:02:28indubitable foundation for that and for
- 00:02:30the contents of your mind
- 00:02:32to move from there to generating the
- 00:02:34external world
- 00:02:35so like descartes husserl is working on
- 00:02:38the assumption
- 00:02:38that first of all the self is
- 00:02:40self-evident
- 00:02:42right it's in other words it's not
- 00:02:43controversial that we ourselves that we
- 00:02:44have selves that we are conscious
- 00:02:46he takes that to be simply a given and
- 00:02:49that that is indubitable
- 00:02:50and not only is that indubitable the
- 00:02:51interesting thing about it is that the
- 00:02:53knowing
- 00:02:54self the kagito is in his earl's view
- 00:02:57both temporally and logically prior to
- 00:03:00the world that's known by the kagito in
- 00:03:02other words the knower comes before the
- 00:03:03known
- 00:03:04right that has to come first and if you
- 00:03:05think about the idealist tradition all
- 00:03:07these guys believe that
- 00:03:08think about descartes think about uh
- 00:03:11spinoza think about uh
- 00:03:13kant the whole idealist or rationalist
- 00:03:15tradition tends to emphasize inwardness
- 00:03:18in turn internality and perhaps that's
- 00:03:20the most not only
- 00:03:21an important characteristic of facial
- 00:03:22but i would be inclined to say that
- 00:03:23that's one of the most
- 00:03:24characteristic moves the characteristic
- 00:03:27intellectual deployments
- 00:03:28of continental philosophy in other words
- 00:03:30unlike the anglo-american tradition
- 00:03:32which looks outward like hume and
- 00:03:35develops a theory of
- 00:03:36the external world and then afterwards
- 00:03:38as a sort of postscript to that activity
- 00:03:40develops a theory of the psyche of the
- 00:03:42mind of what's internal to a human being
- 00:03:45well the continental tradition does the
- 00:03:46opposite they start out with a theory of
- 00:03:48what's inside
- 00:03:49and then from there they try and work
- 00:03:50outwards and both the anglo-american
- 00:03:53tradition and the continental tradition
- 00:03:54suffer from a sort of common problem
- 00:03:56when they try and make the jump from one
- 00:03:59realm the exterior what we might call
- 00:04:00the exochasm
- 00:04:02to the what the internal realm the
- 00:04:03psyche the soul or
- 00:04:05the mind or what i call the intracosm
- 00:04:08there's always a problem in making and
- 00:04:09leaping that hurdle and it doesn't
- 00:04:11really matter which side you start on
- 00:04:12the problem is always going to be the
- 00:04:13same how do we
- 00:04:14move from one part of the hurdle to the
- 00:04:15other how do we move from the beginning
- 00:04:16to the end
- 00:04:18so when you look at husserl when you
- 00:04:20look at this this uh
- 00:04:21cartesian continental tradition keep
- 00:04:23that in mind they're starting out with a
- 00:04:25in with the internal facts of human
- 00:04:26consciousness and generating the world
- 00:04:28from that
- 00:04:29okay so it's a different problematic a
- 00:04:31different starting point and that's what
- 00:04:33you
- 00:04:33keep in mind when you look at hussurl
- 00:04:36now corresponding to this
- 00:04:40way of developing a philosophy is
- 00:04:43the hope of getting certain knowledge
- 00:04:45like descartes descartes's whole project
- 00:04:47of radical skepticism was to develop a
- 00:04:49knowledge that was foundational and
- 00:04:50completely certain
- 00:04:51who cyril is trying to do the same thing
- 00:04:52he's a sort of neo-cartesian
- 00:04:54and much of his work when you actually
- 00:04:56start to read the stuff that he's
- 00:04:57published because
- 00:04:58um although he produced a tremendous
- 00:05:00amount of writing
- 00:05:01most of what he produced was not
- 00:05:03published in his lifetime and he was in
- 00:05:05a voluminous writing produced almost
- 00:05:0645 000 pages of work and it tends to be
- 00:05:10very repetitive it is methodological for
- 00:05:12the most part and particularly
- 00:05:13programmatic in other words what his
- 00:05:16writings are about
- 00:05:17is how we engage in a method which he
- 00:05:19calls phenomenology
- 00:05:20which will allow us to discern these
- 00:05:22eternal essences
- 00:05:24that exist within the human psyche and
- 00:05:26once we identify these essences then we
- 00:05:27will know ourselves
- 00:05:28and once we know ourselves clearly and
- 00:05:30in a way that can't be doubted that
- 00:05:32can't be called into question
- 00:05:34then and only then can we construct all
- 00:05:35the other elements of knowledge
- 00:05:37so what he wants is what he described as
- 00:05:39philosophy is a rigorous science
- 00:05:41which is a very radical sort of an idea
- 00:05:43i mean by the 20th century i think very
- 00:05:44few thinkers are willing to say that
- 00:05:46philosophy is not only a rigorous
- 00:05:47science but it's the foundation the the
- 00:05:49or knowledge of all other possible
- 00:05:51cognition so this is a long
- 00:05:55it's it's a play that tries to go for
- 00:05:56all the marbles he's trying to win
- 00:05:58the big philosophical game and if he
- 00:06:00fails to do that and i think that he
- 00:06:02does
- 00:06:02and i think that his project is a
- 00:06:03failure i think that we have to admire
- 00:06:05the sort of
- 00:06:06nobility which tries to take on a huge
- 00:06:08intellectual project like that
- 00:06:09in many respects because visceral
- 00:06:11himself as a man rather than as a
- 00:06:12philosopher was a kind of a saintly
- 00:06:14individual
- 00:06:15he was conspicuous for his dedication
- 00:06:17and his devotion and his moral
- 00:06:18seriousness to philosophy
- 00:06:20i would almost be tempted to compare him
- 00:06:22to sort of a don quixote of philosophy
- 00:06:25we all laugh at the results or of don
- 00:06:27quixote's misadventures because well
- 00:06:29they're silly and he misunderstands the
- 00:06:30way the world works but on the other
- 00:06:32hand
- 00:06:32no one laughs at don quixote's
- 00:06:33intentions they are intrinsically noble
- 00:06:36and we
- 00:06:38we cannot we have no choice but to
- 00:06:39admire that i kind of feel that way
- 00:06:41about husserl
- 00:06:42i think that the project well not only
- 00:06:44does it not complete itself it nearly
- 00:06:45never completely gets started and it's
- 00:06:48probably impossible to do
- 00:06:49but i sort of admire the idea of
- 00:06:52unifying all of knowledge
- 00:06:53it is a sort of quest for the holy grail
- 00:06:56and even if we never find it there is
- 00:06:57something excellent about the quest
- 00:06:59so and i say this initially in my
- 00:07:01treatment for soil because i'm going to
- 00:07:02be kind of hard on him a little later on
- 00:07:04so without being too hard i think that
- 00:07:06we should give
- 00:07:07him a little bit of slack because he's
- 00:07:08trying to do something that if it's not
- 00:07:11impossible is certainly
- 00:07:12exceedingly difficult much more
- 00:07:15ambitious than the local
- 00:07:16small individual project projects
- 00:07:19characteristic of the anglo-american
- 00:07:21tradition now
- 00:07:23first off he starts out with the idea of
- 00:07:24certainty and intuition in other words
- 00:07:26if we're going to examine ourselves in a
- 00:07:28phenomenological way if we're going to
- 00:07:29pursue this method of phenomenology
- 00:07:33we're going to have to find out well
- 00:07:36what the standard or what the procedure
- 00:07:37for knowing things is i mean what
- 00:07:39phenomenology involves as a method
- 00:07:41what it investigates and how it
- 00:07:43investigates it those are always all
- 00:07:44going to be informed and since this is a
- 00:07:46methodological project
- 00:07:48right it makes sense to to talk about
- 00:07:50how we do this as opposed to what we
- 00:07:52as opposed to what we do and the big one
- 00:07:54of the big issues here is the question
- 00:07:56of intuition
- 00:07:57now i guess perhaps when you hear me use
- 00:08:00a word like intuition
- 00:08:02particularly because we live in
- 00:08:02contemporary america we are in the
- 00:08:04thrall of the anglo-american tradition
- 00:08:07you perhaps think that i should put that
- 00:08:08on italics because intuition is a kind
- 00:08:10of fishy kind of mushy
- 00:08:12kind of messy sort of a category and i
- 00:08:14want to start out suggesting that that's
- 00:08:15not the case
- 00:08:16and that in fact it might be true some
- 00:08:18of the time but i can imagine intuitions
- 00:08:20and i'm going to help you imagine some
- 00:08:21intuitions
- 00:08:22which are not only not controversial but
- 00:08:24they're not mushy and they're really not
- 00:08:25doubtable
- 00:08:26here's some ideas let me ask you some
- 00:08:27questions i have a studio audience here
- 00:08:29which is live and it kind of helps me
- 00:08:30out
- 00:08:31um i'd like your information or your
- 00:08:33answers to these questions first of all
- 00:08:34do i have a headache you don't know
- 00:08:37and how about do i hope someday to be
- 00:08:39elected president
- 00:08:41you don't know do i like spinach you
- 00:08:43don't know
- 00:08:44my point is is that i can answer these
- 00:08:46questions even though you can't i know
- 00:08:48if i have a headache or not
- 00:08:50and what would somebody else external to
- 00:08:51me presume to tell me that no i don't
- 00:08:53have a headache
- 00:08:54you're going to correct me on that
- 00:08:55matter no of course it's silly
- 00:08:57right well may i suggest that my
- 00:08:59knowledge of my headache is a direct
- 00:09:00intuition of my
- 00:09:02experience my psychic state right and i
- 00:09:05don't need anybody else to help me out
- 00:09:06here and if you if you doubt that you
- 00:09:09say no mike you don't have a headache
- 00:09:10what am i supposed to do do some math
- 00:09:12and show you that i do or should we go
- 00:09:14to the lab and will i do some
- 00:09:15experiments and show you that i have a
- 00:09:16headache
- 00:09:16can you see why that project is silly
- 00:09:18and we wouldn't gesture something
- 00:09:20external to my experience of the world
- 00:09:22in order to validate the proposition
- 00:09:23that i have a headache
- 00:09:25intuition then perhaps is not so gooey
- 00:09:27as we might imagine there are certain
- 00:09:29things
- 00:09:30which we validate just by gesturing at
- 00:09:33our experience of them
- 00:09:34in that respect oddly enough
- 00:09:36phenomenology husserl's method
- 00:09:38and empiricism the method of somebody
- 00:09:39like david hume
- 00:09:41even though they are so different in
- 00:09:42many respects share a common property is
- 00:09:44that they're all ultimately based on our
- 00:09:45experience
- 00:09:46hume's phenomenalism his empiricism is
- 00:09:49based on our
- 00:09:50on our experience of the external world
- 00:09:52observing it
- 00:09:54husserl's phenomenology alternatively is
- 00:09:56based on our experience of the internal
- 00:09:58world
- 00:09:59and it reduces only to that and there's
- 00:10:01nothing further that we can gesture at
- 00:10:04so on the one hand i would recommend
- 00:10:06that you
- 00:10:07look at this with a certain degree of
- 00:10:08skepticism in other words
- 00:10:10intuition can be a very fishy category
- 00:10:12it can be nebulous
- 00:10:13and it can be a simple refusal to give
- 00:10:15reasons for what you believe
- 00:10:17and usually the refusal to give a reason
- 00:10:19philosophically for what you believe
- 00:10:20is a way of saying that you don't have a
- 00:10:22reason for what you believe but my point
- 00:10:24is that that's not always the case if
- 00:10:25you think about the idea of intuition
- 00:10:27in terms of questions like do i have a
- 00:10:28headache i believe you will realize that
- 00:10:30i'm the only one who knows that and that
- 00:10:32it's not absurd or meaningless for me to
- 00:10:33say that i have a headache
- 00:10:35all right so i'm just trying to
- 00:10:36establish the idea of intuition as not
- 00:10:38being intrinsically preposterous
- 00:10:40all right now churceurl was a student of
- 00:10:44brentano which is an interesting fact
- 00:10:46because freud was also one of brentano's
- 00:10:47students
- 00:10:48and from brentano apparently a very
- 00:10:49influential teacher
- 00:10:51he borrowed as freud did the idea of
- 00:10:53intentionality
- 00:10:54and that's revolves around the
- 00:10:56proposition that the
- 00:10:58facts of mental life of our psychic life
- 00:11:00are irreducible
- 00:11:01in other words we can't talk about love
- 00:11:03and hate and hope and guilt and lust
- 00:11:05in terms of chemicals freud liked the
- 00:11:07idea that ultimately we could reduce one
- 00:11:09to the other but
- 00:11:10in practice he treated it as a sort of
- 00:11:12autonomous inquiry into the mind
- 00:11:14well something analogous is happening
- 00:11:17when we look at hussurl
- 00:11:18he believes that the facts of mental
- 00:11:20life are irreducible and they're real
- 00:11:23and not only are they irreducible and
- 00:11:24real but they come first in other words
- 00:11:26what hussuro wants to do is like that is
- 00:11:28like the project of descartes
- 00:11:30he wants to construct the self first and
- 00:11:32out of that build nature
- 00:11:34rather than say the uh the empiricist
- 00:11:36project of constructing nature first and
- 00:11:37then
- 00:11:38later on constructing the self so the
- 00:11:40self comes first and how do you find out
- 00:11:42about yourself
- 00:11:43intuition right and the reason why it's
- 00:11:45important for me to establish intuition
- 00:11:46is because elsewhere this seems like a
- 00:11:48tremendously nebulous and sort of
- 00:11:49baggy activity but in fact it
- 00:11:52potentially could be
- 00:11:53more precise than one might immediately
- 00:11:55imagine
- 00:11:59now what's the problem josuril wants to
- 00:12:01solve
- 00:12:02well in one of his most accessible books
- 00:12:04and if you intend to read husserl which
- 00:12:06can be quite trying
- 00:12:07i would recommend you try a philosophy
- 00:12:10in the crisis of european man it's one
- 00:12:12of his last works it's written in 30
- 00:12:13it's published in 36 it's written in the
- 00:12:1430s
- 00:12:15and he dies in 38 and
- 00:12:19the reason why that's a good
- 00:12:20introduction to husserl is because it's
- 00:12:22easier to figure out what husserl is
- 00:12:23against
- 00:12:24than it is to figure out who searles is
- 00:12:25for and what he's against are things
- 00:12:28like
- 00:12:28historicism relativism psychologism
- 00:12:32scientism and what he's gesturing at
- 00:12:35here is the whole
- 00:12:36tendency of thought since the
- 00:12:39enlightenment
- 00:12:39which tends to move away from
- 00:12:41theological or more precisely
- 00:12:42metaphysical structures
- 00:12:44towards an emphasis on the empirical
- 00:12:45external world
- 00:12:47perhaps this is a homage to the rise of
- 00:12:49modern natural science but hussurl says
- 00:12:51that the rise of modern natural science
- 00:12:53has misled us
- 00:12:54has caused us to misunderstand the world
- 00:12:56around us
- 00:12:57and has put philosophy on the wrong
- 00:12:59footing the result of this
- 00:13:00has been an impoverishment of our
- 00:13:02culture in some ways i would say that
- 00:13:04husserl's concerns are fundamentally
- 00:13:07cultural
- 00:13:07he's putting together this epistle this
- 00:13:09epistemological project
- 00:13:11in order to rescue us from the
- 00:13:13degeneration into a sort of pure
- 00:13:15materialism
- 00:13:16what cyril thinks at least visceral
- 00:13:18self-conception is
- 00:13:19that what he's doing is renewing and
- 00:13:22reviving
- 00:13:23the platonic and aristotelian tradition
- 00:13:25of greek rationalism
- 00:13:26where our logos our rationality applies
- 00:13:28to the whole domain of human experience
- 00:13:31let us juxtapose that to the tradition
- 00:13:34of scientism that we see in mark and
- 00:13:35avenarius and
- 00:13:36all those positivistic germans um there
- 00:13:39he calls that the
- 00:13:40the tradition of democritus those of you
- 00:13:41who know the pr the uh
- 00:13:43the greek philosopher democratise will
- 00:13:44know that he reduced the world to adams
- 00:13:46in the void
- 00:13:47well in some ways that's what modern
- 00:13:48scientific project has done and who
- 00:13:50cyril says that is a wrong turn we have
- 00:13:52moved down an intellectual cul-de-sac
- 00:13:53there
- 00:13:54so what he's trying to say is that we
- 00:13:56must go back to ourselves it's very
- 00:13:57interesting to know about the things in
- 00:13:59the world external to us
- 00:14:00but the real important thing is for us
- 00:14:01to know ourselves and once we know
- 00:14:03ourselves then we will be able to
- 00:14:04construct
- 00:14:05our ex our knowledge of the external
- 00:14:06world on an individual foundation
- 00:14:08but if we start with the external world
- 00:14:10and its contingency and its messiness
- 00:14:12and its lack of certainty all our other
- 00:14:15intellectual activities
- 00:14:16including our knowledge of ourself is
- 00:14:17going to reflect that same contingency
- 00:14:19and uncertainty
- 00:14:20so while the project may not be entirely
- 00:14:22successful the
- 00:14:23the problem that he's formulating is in
- 00:14:26fact reasonable and serious and ought to
- 00:14:27be taken
- 00:14:28with great care so we're going to move
- 00:14:31against
- 00:14:32uh the general tendency of western
- 00:14:34culture since the breakup of the middle
- 00:14:36ages
- 00:14:37there is a decidedly scholastic element
- 00:14:39to husserl's work as well
- 00:14:41and infinite working out of carefully
- 00:14:43constructed logical
- 00:14:44oppositions in a sort of tautological
- 00:14:47way
- 00:14:48the construction of elaborate
- 00:14:49tautologies is perhaps one of the
- 00:14:50characteristic philosophical problems of
- 00:14:52mathematicians who eventually become
- 00:14:54philosophers what were they doing when
- 00:14:56in their training constructing
- 00:14:57tautologies and working out the
- 00:14:58implications of definitions
- 00:14:59well that's what husserl's whole project
- 00:15:01is is that he moves from the domain of
- 00:15:03space
- 00:15:04or quantity to the whole domain of human
- 00:15:08experience
- 00:15:09so a noble and exciting project let's
- 00:15:12dive into it and see if we can make some
- 00:15:14sort of sense out of it
- 00:15:16husserl is worried right when he's
- 00:15:17writing philosophy and the crisis of
- 00:15:19european man let's think about his
- 00:15:21context
- 00:15:23he was a professor at the university of
- 00:15:24freiburg until 1933
- 00:15:26when he was dismissed from his post
- 00:15:28because he was a jew right national
- 00:15:29socialism comes in and he gets replaced
- 00:15:31by one of his students martin heidegger
- 00:15:34and at that time it seems clear enough
- 00:15:36to husserl that western culture is
- 00:15:38collapsing one of the results
- 00:15:40of this democratian tradition as opposed
- 00:15:42to the
- 00:15:43revive platonic aristotelian tradition
- 00:15:46is that the fact value distinction
- 00:15:48emerges
- 00:15:49we get various kinds of relativisms we
- 00:15:51get various kinds of will to power
- 00:15:53philosophies all of these according to
- 00:15:55husserl are a sign of cultural
- 00:15:56degeneration
- 00:15:57and the source of this cultural
- 00:15:59degeneration is our lack of knowledge of
- 00:16:01ourselves and the
- 00:16:01world around us so what he's trying to
- 00:16:03do is sort of
- 00:16:05like ajax i don't know if you know the
- 00:16:07the iliad but ajax preventing
- 00:16:09the trojans from burning the greek ships
- 00:16:11he stands there and will not move
- 00:16:13and there is something tremendously
- 00:16:14heroic about it even though he may be
- 00:16:16fighting phantom
- 00:16:17battles all right he thinks at least
- 00:16:20that what he's doing
- 00:16:21is absolutely essential to the project
- 00:16:22of our culture
- 00:16:24and the problem that we're going to find
- 00:16:26one of the problems we're going to find
- 00:16:27in this procedure of looking into
- 00:16:28ourselves is that it could easily become
- 00:16:30frivolous or arbitrary in other words
- 00:16:32once i look into myself i suppose i
- 00:16:34could tell you the immediate
- 00:16:36contents of my experience but the
- 00:16:39problem is that that would be arbitrary
- 00:16:40and completely subjective that's not
- 00:16:42going to give us an ultimate foundation
- 00:16:43so we have to do something with our
- 00:16:45looking into ourselves with our turning
- 00:16:46inward and what her sorrow wants to do
- 00:16:49is use a method for examining the
- 00:16:52contents of our psyche and that method
- 00:16:54will be called phenomenology
- 00:16:55what he will do is something called the
- 00:16:56epoche which which is a
- 00:16:59translation of the idea of suspension
- 00:17:02like descartes
- 00:17:03when he says i'm going to doubt the
- 00:17:04whole external world what sorrow wants
- 00:17:06to do is first of all
- 00:17:07suspend the whole external world now
- 00:17:09it's not that he just believes in it in
- 00:17:11other words he's not being skeptical of
- 00:17:12the existence of tables and chairs the
- 00:17:14way descartes did in the discourse on
- 00:17:15method
- 00:17:16he's not denying their existence he's
- 00:17:17just saying that the whole external
- 00:17:18world is irrelevant
- 00:17:20bracketed right in a strict mathematical
- 00:17:22sense of bracketing a problem because
- 00:17:24remember he had his training as a
- 00:17:25mathematician so we're going to bracket
- 00:17:27the problem of the external world
- 00:17:28and leave out all that stuff all right
- 00:17:31and bracketing the external world means
- 00:17:32that we're going to
- 00:17:33leave out a great deal of human
- 00:17:34experience for example
- 00:17:36um this will leave out things like uh
- 00:17:39cause and effect relationships why
- 00:17:41because as yume points out
- 00:17:42we don't see cause and effect in the
- 00:17:43world we just see one thing happening
- 00:17:45after another
- 00:17:46all scientific theorems will be left out
- 00:17:48mathematical deductions will be left out
- 00:17:50we're going to be left with the pure raw
- 00:17:52data of being a human being
- 00:17:54and what swirl thinks is that there's
- 00:17:56something common to all of us
- 00:17:58that we're going to discern there you
- 00:17:59might think of it as something like this
- 00:18:01um you know what uh what it is to sift
- 00:18:03out sand to look for something hidden in
- 00:18:04this in sand
- 00:18:05what he's trying to do is sift out the
- 00:18:07contents of human experience
- 00:18:09and find out the stuff that doesn't pass
- 00:18:11through the mesh of phenomenology
- 00:18:12what gets help what we hold on to there
- 00:18:14will be what sorel calls an essence
- 00:18:17some invariable necessary quality
- 00:18:20to human experience and when we collect
- 00:18:22these essences together
- 00:18:24and reduce them still further i think
- 00:18:27what we will get is some common ore
- 00:18:28stuff of the human psyche
- 00:18:30okay um also think of the idea of
- 00:18:32reduction reduction is a funny word
- 00:18:34um from latin it means to lead back
- 00:18:37we're going to be led back to our
- 00:18:39original
- 00:18:40kind of primal consciousness another way
- 00:18:42of thinking of reduction would be the
- 00:18:43idea of boiling down
- 00:18:44imagine the consciousness is a big whale
- 00:18:46and you've got to put it in a pot and
- 00:18:47boil away all the stuff that's
- 00:18:48irrelevant so that you can get to
- 00:18:50something that's essential and
- 00:18:51structural and permanent there
- 00:18:52and this longing for something essential
- 00:18:54and structural and permanent
- 00:18:56can't you hear the ghost of plato here
- 00:18:59right and it's a typical it's the
- 00:19:00typical intellectual move of somebody
- 00:19:02that's been trained in mathematics
- 00:19:04all right and this has had a tremendous
- 00:19:06influence on
- 00:19:08the subsequent development of
- 00:19:09continental philosophy particularly
- 00:19:10people like heidegger
- 00:19:13now in the process of developing this
- 00:19:15presuppositionless philosophy
- 00:19:17what we're going to find out is
- 00:19:18something like the shape
- 00:19:20of the ego's transparent cage
- 00:19:24like kant he's going to tell us what the
- 00:19:26necessary limitations
- 00:19:28of our experience are and once he's done
- 00:19:31that he will think that he has done it
- 00:19:32permanently for all of time in the way
- 00:19:34that any mathematician would
- 00:19:39now the problem is to find some certain
- 00:19:42knowledge with which to combat
- 00:19:43historicism that we get in delta
- 00:19:46or scientism that we get the positivists
- 00:19:48or various kinds of relativism
- 00:19:50and the way we're going to do that is by
- 00:19:52boiling down with this epoche
- 00:19:55and in the first case what we'll do is
- 00:19:57we will have a sort of purified
- 00:19:59subjectivity we will boil it down until
- 00:20:01we get to the
- 00:20:01essential constructs from which human
- 00:20:04minds are made
- 00:20:05and the result will be that authentic
- 00:20:07reality will be disclosed we're going to
- 00:20:09suspend our belief in the external world
- 00:20:10and just examine what's left over
- 00:20:12and what's left over after we perform
- 00:20:14this kind of a an activity of reduction
- 00:20:17will be uh these essences that are
- 00:20:21permanent and eternal
- 00:20:22and he will know then the structure of
- 00:20:24the human mind and these will always be
- 00:20:26they will always have a certain
- 00:20:27similar similar set of characteristics
- 00:20:30and
- 00:20:31phenomenological statements will result
- 00:20:33from this phenomenological
- 00:20:34phenomenological examination of the
- 00:20:36internal contents of our psyche
- 00:20:38and the key thing here is that it's not
- 00:20:40empirical in the sense that i can
- 00:20:42observe that and have it be an empirical
- 00:20:44activity it will be
- 00:20:46descriptive but it won't describe
- 00:20:47anything out there it's going to
- 00:20:48describe exclusively the stuff that's in
- 00:20:50here
- 00:20:51all right so it's going to be a
- 00:20:52descriptive theory of the
- 00:20:54intro cosm all right and what he's
- 00:20:57looking for is absolute certainty
- 00:20:59without presuppositions and it will
- 00:21:01always be about
- 00:21:02internal intentional actions what he's
- 00:21:05trying to do here
- 00:21:06is derive a priori statements and what
- 00:21:09remember
- 00:21:09if you remember kant what an a priori
- 00:21:11statement is it has at least two
- 00:21:12qualities
- 00:21:13one it's non-empirical and two it's
- 00:21:15necessarily true
- 00:21:17so what he wants to find is to generate
- 00:21:18after looking into his own psyche in
- 00:21:20this phenomenological way
- 00:21:21sifting out the contingent and the
- 00:21:23arbitrary and the irrelevant
- 00:21:25is a priori certain truths about what it
- 00:21:27means to be a human being
- 00:21:29can't do boralus once again now the
- 00:21:32problem
- 00:21:33you might want to say that after this
- 00:21:34reduction what we're getting
- 00:21:36is something like immediate direct
- 00:21:38apprehension of what the scholastic is
- 00:21:40called universals
- 00:21:42right we're looking directly into the
- 00:21:44self and since the self constructs and
- 00:21:45projects the world
- 00:21:46we're going to do is cogitate ourselves
- 00:21:48and bootstrap ourselves into some
- 00:21:50permanent reality now there are many
- 00:21:53difficulties with this
- 00:21:54um some of them we should look at
- 00:21:57directly first of all there are very few
- 00:21:58examples in historical's work of
- 00:22:00actually doing this
- 00:22:01one of the problems with phenomenology
- 00:22:03the nebulous bag equality about it
- 00:22:05is that he says that the first thing we
- 00:22:07have to do is figure out what the
- 00:22:08phenomenological method is
- 00:22:10and the way we develop the
- 00:22:11phenomenological method is to use
- 00:22:13phenomenology on itself
- 00:22:15to inspect yourself so there's something
- 00:22:16kind of fishy going on here
- 00:22:18in order to find out what a phenomenon
- 00:22:20is remember in greek phenomenon is that
- 00:22:21which is disclosed
- 00:22:23that which is apparent and directly
- 00:22:24known well in order to find out what a
- 00:22:26phenomenon is one of the things we're
- 00:22:28going to do is reduce the idea of the
- 00:22:29phenomenon
- 00:22:30to find out what that essentially is and
- 00:22:31from there we'll be able to move
- 00:22:32directly on
- 00:22:33so it's a method that hopes to pull
- 00:22:35itself up by its bootstraps and i have
- 00:22:36some problems logically with this
- 00:22:38activity
- 00:22:39let me give you some examples to kind of
- 00:22:41flesh this out make this a little bit
- 00:22:42easier to concretely think about
- 00:22:45and uh husserl himself was generating
- 00:22:48things like
- 00:22:49investigations of phenomenon but also
- 00:22:51ideas like number
- 00:22:52meaning truth pure abstractions
- 00:22:55that he believes are common to all
- 00:22:58cognitive beings
- 00:22:59and in every case we end up with some
- 00:23:02sort of a circle
- 00:23:03what he calls the epistemological circle
- 00:23:04and other times the methodological
- 00:23:06circle
- 00:23:06the reasoning always ends up being
- 00:23:08circle but of course if you're going to
- 00:23:10restrict yourself to the domain of
- 00:23:11internality
- 00:23:12what else could you be doing but talking
- 00:23:14about circular things in a circular way
- 00:23:16where is there to go it's almost not
- 00:23:18even a circle it's something like a
- 00:23:19point
- 00:23:20it doesn't it almost lacks that interior
- 00:23:22quality um
- 00:23:23and his method or the method that he
- 00:23:25uses more often than any other because
- 00:23:27it's very difficult to figure out
- 00:23:28exactly what this amounts to
- 00:23:30is what he calls free imaginative
- 00:23:32variation let's see what that's like
- 00:23:34that's how we search for essences and
- 00:23:36what we're going to do is think of
- 00:23:38something let's take a human being
- 00:23:40that's something i'm going to do a
- 00:23:40phenomenological reduction i'm going to
- 00:23:42think about that problem now
- 00:23:43cogitating with me all right all right
- 00:23:45let's give this a shot
- 00:23:47um what we're going to do is attribute
- 00:23:49predicates to this thing
- 00:23:50human being and then add and subtract
- 00:23:52them in our imagination
- 00:23:54and see which of them which of these
- 00:23:56predicates we believe we can dispense
- 00:23:57with and which we believe we cannot
- 00:23:59dispense with
- 00:24:00we will and then we'll make two
- 00:24:01categories the ones we can dispense with
- 00:24:03which are the contingent things we're
- 00:24:04trying to get rid of that's the sand
- 00:24:06we're sifting away and the things we
- 00:24:07can't dispense with which is which are
- 00:24:08the essences and that's what we're
- 00:24:10looking for
- 00:24:10let me give you an example is it true
- 00:24:13that we
- 00:24:14we necessarily have to attach the
- 00:24:15following predicate to the human mind
- 00:24:17that the human mind is
- 00:24:18good at math is that true of every human
- 00:24:20mind no i
- 00:24:22i'm bad at math i mean i know for a fact
- 00:24:24that it's not true of every human eye
- 00:24:25i'm no good at math
- 00:24:26let's try another one the human mind
- 00:24:27forgets birthdays
- 00:24:29well that's a predicate but some of you
- 00:24:31might remember birthdays
- 00:24:32how about this one the human mind is
- 00:24:34self-conscious
- 00:24:36do you think you could dispense with
- 00:24:37that no i mean it's built right into the
- 00:24:40idea of what we mean by being a human
- 00:24:42mind
- 00:24:43all right so what we're doing here is
- 00:24:45attributing
- 00:24:46a great number of predicates one of the
- 00:24:48great problems here is it seems to me
- 00:24:49there are an infinite number of
- 00:24:49predicates and we're never going to get
- 00:24:50uh we're never
- 00:24:51going to finish the first thing we try
- 00:24:52and reduce much less do all the other
- 00:24:54reductions that are going to be
- 00:24:55necessary to
- 00:24:56engage in this project but what at least
- 00:24:58this is an instantiation of what the guy
- 00:25:00is trying to do
- 00:25:01to separate the necessary from the
- 00:25:02unnecessary or the inessential from the
- 00:25:04essential predicates and once you have
- 00:25:06the whole list of essential predicates
- 00:25:07of a thing
- 00:25:08now you know what it is and then you get
- 00:25:10these things that are defined now
- 00:25:11as their essences right just the
- 00:25:13essential predicates and then we start
- 00:25:14to
- 00:25:14boil that down again and you keep on
- 00:25:16boiling until you get to
- 00:25:18complete disclosure of what it means to
- 00:25:19be a human being
- 00:25:21i think this is a pretty fishy way of
- 00:25:23doing this
- 00:25:24i think the idea of trying to find out
- 00:25:26what it's like to be a human being
- 00:25:27inwardly is an interesting thought the
- 00:25:30difficulty is is that in practice it's
- 00:25:31awfully hard to talk about these things
- 00:25:34now here's the first difficulty truth
- 00:25:36conditions
- 00:25:38how do we know which of these predicates
- 00:25:40are the essential ones
- 00:25:42help me out here i can imagine some
- 00:25:45which it seems fairly clear
- 00:25:46uh triangles have to have the property
- 00:25:48of having three sides i can believe that
- 00:25:50i mean that's not too controversial but
- 00:25:52i can imagine cases where it wouldn't be
- 00:25:54clear even among phenomenologists
- 00:25:57and there were there might be a lack of
- 00:25:58agreement and i'm not quite sure how we
- 00:26:00go about finding that out
- 00:26:01and even if and if i just look at it
- 00:26:03from my own perspective you know leave
- 00:26:04out the
- 00:26:05the social interaction between
- 00:26:06phenomenologists i look at it in my case
- 00:26:08and i say all right so i've decided that
- 00:26:10one of the essential predicates of human
- 00:26:12being
- 00:26:12is the fact that it is self-conscious
- 00:26:14that's just fine now suppose i'm
- 00:26:15uncertain about that
- 00:26:16well i guess i can't be uncertain about
- 00:26:18it because i found out by introspection
- 00:26:20and i'm certain of all the things that i
- 00:26:21introspect
- 00:26:22so i guess i can't be uncertain about
- 00:26:24that but suppose i talk to one of my
- 00:26:25students and i say
- 00:26:26kid one of the essential properties of
- 00:26:28the human mind is that it's
- 00:26:29self-conscious
- 00:26:30suppose he says professor how do you
- 00:26:32know
- 00:26:34and what is it to pound the table and
- 00:26:35say look don't ask me how i know
- 00:26:37i looked inside myself and i know that's
- 00:26:39not a very satisfactory answer and you
- 00:26:41get the sense that
- 00:26:42there's no real way to gesture at this
- 00:26:44the difficulty that we're going
- 00:26:45to find is something like this i can say
- 00:26:46look i'll do it right now i intuited
- 00:26:48this yesterday
- 00:26:49i looked inside myself and i found out
- 00:26:50that one of the essential properties of
- 00:26:52a human being is
- 00:26:53that it should be self-conscious and if
- 00:26:55you don't believe me i'm going to do it
- 00:26:56now i'm going to sit here and
- 00:26:57introspect and yeah i'm definitely right
- 00:26:59i've done the phenomenological reduction
- 00:27:00i've bracketed the world and take my
- 00:27:02word for it
- 00:27:02this is really the case now we would
- 00:27:04like this to be a universal logical
- 00:27:06procedure we would like this to be
- 00:27:07univocal
- 00:27:08my sense is that in practice it is not
- 00:27:10problem number one
- 00:27:11uh what it reminds me one of the things
- 00:27:13that sort of ruins husserl for a man
- 00:27:15is if you have been exposed to ludwig
- 00:27:17wittgenstein before you do husserl
- 00:27:20because wittgenstein's work is a
- 00:27:22wonderful way of dissolving these kind
- 00:27:24of problems in other words the king
- 00:27:25says he doesn't want to talk about
- 00:27:26whether this is true or false look the
- 00:27:28whole problem is misconceived
- 00:27:30and that's the real difficulty we have
- 00:27:31here and let's think about that what the
- 00:27:33criticism of this is going to be
- 00:27:34what cyril thinks he's doing when he
- 00:27:36finds out what the essence of a human
- 00:27:37being is
- 00:27:38he thinks he's finding out something
- 00:27:39about the universal structure of the
- 00:27:40human mind
- 00:27:41and that all people have to think that
- 00:27:43because these words these terms like
- 00:27:45human being
- 00:27:45correspond to natural kinds in the world
- 00:27:48and the natural kinds of the world
- 00:27:49correspond to natural
- 00:27:50categories in the in human cognition my
- 00:27:53point is that's probably not true
- 00:27:56wittgenstein would help will help us out
- 00:27:58here wittgenstein says
- 00:27:59i want to leave i want to lead the fly
- 00:28:01out of the fly bottle
- 00:28:03husserl is a guy walking around or like
- 00:28:06a fly walking around inside the fly
- 00:28:07bottle
- 00:28:08unable to get out here's the problem
- 00:28:10instead of
- 00:28:11essences being a quality intrinsic to
- 00:28:13the human mind wittgenstein will point
- 00:28:15out that essences are equality intrinsic
- 00:28:16to a particular language
- 00:28:18so that's when you find out that uh
- 00:28:20self-consciousness is a necessary
- 00:28:21predicate for essence
- 00:28:22you're not finding out the the some
- 00:28:25quality about the human mind
- 00:28:26intrinsically
- 00:28:27which corresponds to essence what you're
- 00:28:29finding out is about the way we
- 00:28:30we use the word essence in the english
- 00:28:32language all right
- 00:28:33so wittgenstein by dissolving this could
- 00:28:35have saved i mean if you've just been
- 00:28:36born if they want a generation apart you
- 00:28:38know there's if they can try to come a
- 00:28:39generation before
- 00:28:40instead of hostile coming a generation
- 00:28:42before he could have saved the guy an
- 00:28:43awful lot of handwriting
- 00:28:45like he said look the whole idea is
- 00:28:46wrong there's no such thing as an
- 00:28:48essence and what you're trying to do
- 00:28:50what you're doing is reifying language
- 00:28:51and treating it as a model of the psyche
- 00:28:53and that's just wrong
- 00:28:55right there was a wonderful i mean think
- 00:28:56about my
- 00:28:58hypothetical situation with my student
- 00:29:00where i said look i intuited this
- 00:29:01yesterday i did the phenomenological
- 00:29:02reduction i'm going to do it now and
- 00:29:04believe me this will confirm what i said
- 00:29:05yesterday that that
- 00:29:07the essence of huma of consciousness of
- 00:29:09human being is consciousness
- 00:29:11this is a lot like what victinshine said
- 00:29:13when he said look suppose you bought a
- 00:29:14newspaper and you had some doubt
- 00:29:15as to what the story meant or of the
- 00:29:17truth of a given story on page one
- 00:29:19how would you find out if the story was
- 00:29:21true well there are different ways you
- 00:29:22might do that but one way that you
- 00:29:23wouldn't do that
- 00:29:24is to go out and buy another copy of the
- 00:29:26same paper
- 00:29:27right now you see the point so when i
- 00:29:29when i say look i'm going to intuit this
- 00:29:30again for you what i'm doing is i'm
- 00:29:32buying another copy of the same paper
- 00:29:33this doesn't tell us anything
- 00:29:34and this can't tell us anything i can
- 00:29:36buy an infinite number of copies of the
- 00:29:37same paper it's still not going to tell
- 00:29:38us anything
- 00:29:39see the difficulty here he's trapped
- 00:29:41within the intracosm and he can't figure
- 00:29:43out how to get out
- 00:29:44and neither can i if i follow this
- 00:29:46procedure now can you see why this is
- 00:29:47going to be an extremely nebulous kind
- 00:29:49of philosophy or it's going to be very
- 00:29:50hard to talk
- 00:29:52about how we move from my internal
- 00:29:55consciousness to certain facts of the
- 00:29:56psyche to yours
- 00:29:58the difficulty here is that when we turn
- 00:30:00inward and when we get an
- 00:30:02unmediated a symbolically unmediated
- 00:30:04knowledge of anything
- 00:30:05internal to my psyche the lack of
- 00:30:08those symbols that lack of mediation
- 00:30:10between me and these objects
- 00:30:12right means that it's real hard for me
- 00:30:13to talk about them later on
- 00:30:16right and that means that it comes very
- 00:30:18close to talking to yourself
- 00:30:21right and that is the opposite of what
- 00:30:23philosophy ought to be right
- 00:30:24in a way that's a betrayal of the
- 00:30:26platonic and aristotelian tradition
- 00:30:28the idea of logos demands that knowledge
- 00:30:29not just be rational but that it be
- 00:30:31communicable that's one of the canons of
- 00:30:33rationality and husserl
- 00:30:34comes up to the barriers of language
- 00:30:37which
- 00:30:38what wittenstein calls the limits of
- 00:30:39what can be said
- 00:30:41and he'd like to step over but he never
- 00:30:42quite manages to do it
- 00:30:44right so that's the kind of problem that
- 00:30:46comes up again and again and again
- 00:30:48now towards the end of his life um
- 00:30:52he developed uh the idea of the
- 00:30:54lebensville
- 00:30:55the life world and this turn
- 00:30:58is toward the imminence of human
- 00:31:00experience and human consciousness
- 00:31:02let me see if i can explain this idea
- 00:31:05what he wants to do is to look at the
- 00:31:07world as it
- 00:31:08appears to human beings as it is given
- 00:31:10in human experience
- 00:31:12as opposed to the impersonal abstract
- 00:31:15experience of the world that we get from
- 00:31:16our study of modern natural
- 00:31:18science right in other words science
- 00:31:20tells us for example the time goes on
- 00:31:22indefinitely
- 00:31:23human beings don't experience time like
- 00:31:25that they have a very limited span in
- 00:31:26the world
- 00:31:27right that's one of the big differences
- 00:31:28concrete time is human time my life
- 00:31:31abstract time is just t sub one t sub
- 00:31:33two t sub n goes on forever
- 00:31:35in other words science abstracts and to
- 00:31:37that extent somewhat falsifies
- 00:31:39the reality of human experience right um
- 00:31:41he spends a lot of time discussing
- 00:31:43his views on time and his views on
- 00:31:46internal time consciousness
- 00:31:47that's the kind of thing that
- 00:31:49phenomenology would be suited to if we
- 00:31:51could ever get something done out of it
- 00:31:52the difficulty is this cyril spends a
- 00:31:54lot of his time most of his career
- 00:31:56not actually doing phenomenology i mean
- 00:31:58applying this method but rather
- 00:32:00figuring out what this method is right
- 00:32:03and refining it and
- 00:32:04trying to explain how it is we're going
- 00:32:06to do something later on as soon as we
- 00:32:08figure out how to do it
- 00:32:09right and some at some it appears i mean
- 00:32:12from my reading of this which has been
- 00:32:14most unsatisfactory
- 00:32:16it has because i mean the the the
- 00:32:18philosophy itself is in many respects
- 00:32:19quite nebulous
- 00:32:20um the best understanding i could come
- 00:32:23away with is this
- 00:32:24that at some point in the end in the
- 00:32:25indefinite future we will find out
- 00:32:27precisely what this method is and i mean
- 00:32:28precisely mathematically cartesian
- 00:32:30in that sense and then after we find out
- 00:32:33precisely what the method is at some
- 00:32:34point in the indefinite future
- 00:32:35we will then actually be able to apply
- 00:32:37it to something and get some results
- 00:32:38at some indefinite point beyond that and
- 00:32:40then after that
- 00:32:42at some indefinite point after we've
- 00:32:43gotten all these essences and assembled
- 00:32:44them all in a lovely array
- 00:32:46then we'll have some idea of what
- 00:32:47exactly we can do with this
- 00:32:49i mean i'm told initially that the whole
- 00:32:51point of it is to give us an indubitable
- 00:32:52foundation to knowledge
- 00:32:54i would hope so but it seems like we
- 00:32:55have to act on faith to a great extent
- 00:32:58because
- 00:32:58it's very hard for him to communicate
- 00:33:00with uh to us directly
- 00:33:01what it is that we're supposed to do
- 00:33:02with this and how it is we're supposed
- 00:33:04to do it
- 00:33:04the best phenomenologists dispute
- 00:33:07questions like this
- 00:33:09a further problem that we're going to
- 00:33:10get out of this neo-cartesian kind of a
- 00:33:12project is the question of other minds
- 00:33:15descartes always had a problem i mean he
- 00:33:17didn't have any problem explaining how
- 00:33:18he knew he existed and what his
- 00:33:19existence was like
- 00:33:21but he always ran up against a sort of
- 00:33:22glass barrier when he tried to explain
- 00:33:24what grounds we have for believing in
- 00:33:26the reality of other people's psyche
- 00:33:27why is this not a kind of wilderness of
- 00:33:29objects and
- 00:33:31he thinks that there are other minds but
- 00:33:32he can't quite explain why or how and
- 00:33:34hosuro is doing something very much like
- 00:33:36that
- 00:33:36he says among among other things that we
- 00:33:38find out about
- 00:33:39human minds through something that is
- 00:33:42phenomenologically present to us
- 00:33:44empathy alas he doesn't have a
- 00:33:46satisfactory phenomenological analysis
- 00:33:48of empathy he kind of pounds the desk
- 00:33:50and insists that yes there are other
- 00:33:52minds yes we can know them and yes we do
- 00:33:53so through empathy and to be honest
- 00:33:55i think that that's kind of in a
- 00:33:57pre-philosophic kind of common sense way
- 00:33:58that's true
- 00:33:59i mean how else are you going to find
- 00:34:00out about other minds i don't know why
- 00:34:02we need a philosophy to tell us this
- 00:34:04right i don't know why we need this
- 00:34:06elaborate uh procedure
- 00:34:08in order to be able to affirm that right
- 00:34:10i don't think that he really made any
- 00:34:11progress along those lines
- 00:34:14here's the issue all right let's just
- 00:34:15drop back a little bit think about
- 00:34:17what the difficulty we have here is he
- 00:34:19wants to turn inward
- 00:34:21and he also wants to talk and the
- 00:34:24advantage of the anglo-american
- 00:34:25tradition is that by concentrating on
- 00:34:27external stuff
- 00:34:28on the public world it's relatively easy
- 00:34:30to say what you're talking about
- 00:34:32to refer directly to things in the world
- 00:34:34because they're public they're external
- 00:34:35they're here
- 00:34:36when i turn inward it's very hard to
- 00:34:38make these questions public
- 00:34:40and here's the difficulty the temptation
- 00:34:42that the anglo-american tradition has is
- 00:34:44to just abolish the internal world
- 00:34:46remember i mean think of the uh of the
- 00:34:48idea that we get with locke and hume
- 00:34:49that the psyche is a kind of an empty
- 00:34:51box a tabula rasa
- 00:34:53and all these impressions get sent in
- 00:34:54and then we associate them you get that
- 00:34:56association of psychology
- 00:34:57and that's what the mind is it's a
- 00:34:58bundle of sensations that is an
- 00:35:01impoverished view of human experience
- 00:35:03i mean if you stop and think about it
- 00:35:04nobody nobody views the world and
- 00:35:05experiences the world as a bundle of
- 00:35:07sensations
- 00:35:08here's the difficulty if we follow the
- 00:35:09anglo-american tradition
- 00:35:11and we insist on the accuracy and
- 00:35:13precision of our speech
- 00:35:15all we're able to talk about is the
- 00:35:17external world
- 00:35:18their statements about what goes on
- 00:35:20inside in other words the anglo-american
- 00:35:22empiricists can't make the jump from the
- 00:35:23outside
- 00:35:23in and that's why the theory of the
- 00:35:26internal world is so impoverished
- 00:35:27and it doesn't really persuade anybody
- 00:35:30right
- 00:35:31it's in other words the anglo-american
- 00:35:32tradition is a theory of the things that
- 00:35:34are easy to talk about
- 00:35:37right the difficulty is is that there
- 00:35:39are more things
- 00:35:40on heaven and earth than are dreamt of
- 00:35:42in your philosophy i have an internal
- 00:35:44life i experience the world that way
- 00:35:46and although these things are difficult
- 00:35:47to talk about i feel the need
- 00:35:49to say something about them even if it
- 00:35:51is unclear and nebulous
- 00:35:53can you see then what the continental
- 00:35:55response to that is
- 00:35:56um what they're going to do is sacrifice
- 00:36:00precision
- 00:36:02in order to enlarge the domain of
- 00:36:03discourse
- 00:36:05it is possible to truncate the domain of
- 00:36:06discourse as the anglo-american
- 00:36:08tradition does
- 00:36:09and you get an increased resolution in
- 00:36:12in the precision of your speech
- 00:36:14but this resolution is costs a very high
- 00:36:16price you lose
- 00:36:17all of internal reality right you lose
- 00:36:20the internal world they deny there is an
- 00:36:21internal world
- 00:36:22what that sort of procedure will lead to
- 00:36:23is something like behavioral psychology
- 00:36:25pavlov and watson and skinner where
- 00:36:27there is no mind to talk about
- 00:36:29now here's the difficulty if you follow
- 00:36:32that sort of scientistic anglo-american
- 00:36:34path what you're going to get is a very
- 00:36:36elegant and precise
- 00:36:39set of verbal canons which account
- 00:36:42for the world around us but don't do a
- 00:36:44very good job of telling you about
- 00:36:46yourself
- 00:36:47and what husserl and the cartesians of
- 00:36:48various stripes will say is that you
- 00:36:50don't know yourself how you gonna know
- 00:36:51the world
- 00:36:52right what the oracle delphi says know
- 00:36:55thyself
- 00:36:56it's a precondition for knowledge on the
- 00:36:58other hand
- 00:36:59if you want to stay on the inside the
- 00:37:01difficulty is is that
- 00:37:03we are unable to get even the most basic
- 00:37:05or
- 00:37:06foundational gestures at this content
- 00:37:10across to other people i know very well
- 00:37:13about my
- 00:37:13internal mental states it's a i have a
- 00:37:15hard time getting them across to you
- 00:37:16much of ludwig wittgenstein's work was
- 00:37:18an attempt to bridge this gap
- 00:37:20but it's very very difficult and at
- 00:37:21least mysterious and
- 00:37:23startling formations what husserl did
- 00:37:27in kind of pounding on the desk in the
- 00:37:29in a kind of cartesian way
- 00:37:31is to construct the idea of
- 00:37:32intersubjectivity
- 00:37:34in other words the way in which these
- 00:37:36phenomenological psyches these
- 00:37:37transcendental egos communicate with
- 00:37:39each other
- 00:37:40is or or the matrix in which they
- 00:37:42communicate with each other
- 00:37:43is his idea of inter-subjectivity an
- 00:37:46idea which is never completely or
- 00:37:47clearly defined
- 00:37:48it allows us to form a sort of
- 00:37:50linguistic or verbal community with
- 00:37:52other minds
- 00:37:53and i mean i kind of naively believe
- 00:37:55that there is such a thing but he isn't
- 00:37:56able to give any very satisfactory
- 00:37:58account of it
- 00:37:58and the reason why is the structure i
- 00:38:00was generally i was gesturing at just a
- 00:38:02little while ago
- 00:38:03all these continental guys if you look
- 00:38:05at yourself it's hard to break out of
- 00:38:07this solid cystic circle if you start on
- 00:38:09the outside the problem is you can't get
- 00:38:10into your own mind
- 00:38:11and you started out as a mind there are
- 00:38:12problems with both sides
- 00:38:14what i'm trying to do here is something
- 00:38:16like this not to vindicate or justify
- 00:38:19husserl
- 00:38:19because i think that probably isn't
- 00:38:20going to work all right in many respects
- 00:38:22you may want to think that of husserl as
- 00:38:24being
- 00:38:24german romanticism cartesianized the
- 00:38:27lonely german the lonely
- 00:38:29ego of schiller or goethe right given a
- 00:38:32sort of mathematical cartesian
- 00:38:33formulation
- 00:38:34right and he insists in a kind of
- 00:38:36romantic way
- 00:38:38that i am a self i know i am conscious
- 00:38:40and look i can't doubt that it's just
- 00:38:41that's the fact of the matter i'm gonna
- 00:38:43on this rock i will build my church all
- 00:38:45right well
- 00:38:47i can see how you might have a certain
- 00:38:49desire to do that
- 00:38:51my problem is that we're always going to
- 00:38:53end up either talking to ourselves or
- 00:38:55constructing arbitrary commonsensical
- 00:38:57bridges
- 00:38:58from our philosophical solidism into the
- 00:38:59regular world of everyday praxis
- 00:39:02all right and that's built into the idea
- 00:39:04of this project that all the continental
- 00:39:06thinkers are involved with
- 00:39:08so what i'm asking for in some respects
- 00:39:10is that you cut the continental
- 00:39:11philosophers a little bit of slack
- 00:39:14because of the fact that the project
- 00:39:15they have undertaken is probably
- 00:39:17impossible
- 00:39:18i mean it may well be just impossible to
- 00:39:20talk about the internal facts of my
- 00:39:22psychic states or it is so with a great
- 00:39:25deal of difficulty and a great deal of
- 00:39:27cloudiness it is not
- 00:39:28any particular problem with hussurl or
- 00:39:30this or any specific philosopher
- 00:39:31it is built into that kind of project of
- 00:39:33making a bridging this gap between
- 00:39:35what's inside and what's outside
- 00:39:36but here's the down here's the
- 00:39:38alternative we can go to the
- 00:39:39anglo-american tradition i mean
- 00:39:40professor stalloff and i have this
- 00:39:41argument essentially all the time
- 00:39:44right because i mean neither one is
- 00:39:46completely satisfactory
- 00:39:47well if you start out with the external
- 00:39:49world you're never going to get a sense
- 00:39:50of yourself
- 00:39:51you're never going to talk about these
- 00:39:52internal facts and that means
- 00:39:54that you will have to impoverish the
- 00:39:57vocabulary
- 00:39:58of our experience in other words the
- 00:39:59problem with with um with hume or with
- 00:40:01any of these anglo-american peers i just
- 00:40:03don't experience the world like that
- 00:40:04and i think that's a very fair objection
- 00:40:07let me give you an example i'd have to
- 00:40:09make an analogy here and this would may
- 00:40:11perhaps make this whole difference
- 00:40:13between the anglo-americans and the
- 00:40:15continentals
- 00:40:16more apparent let's try the idea of
- 00:40:18going to a tailor and getting a suit of
- 00:40:19clothes
- 00:40:20okay it's a simple everyday thing go to
- 00:40:22a tailor
- 00:40:23and he measures you and you come back
- 00:40:25next week and you've got your suit of
- 00:40:26clothes
- 00:40:27and you put on the jacket and you find
- 00:40:28the jacket only has one arm
- 00:40:30the tailor says well if your jacket only
- 00:40:33has one arm your body is wrong
- 00:40:36and the customer might well say well no
- 00:40:38hold up let me get this straight now
- 00:40:40my body is wrong and your suit is right
- 00:40:42no that's not that's insane i mean
- 00:40:44that's not the idea here in other words
- 00:40:46my body starts out being right i'm sure
- 00:40:48that this is how i'm shaped
- 00:40:49and that if you only have one sleeve in
- 00:40:51your jacket change the jacket the jacket
- 00:40:53is wrong not my body
- 00:40:54and if the tailor says no that's so you
- 00:40:56know that's absurd of you you really
- 00:40:57have to remove that arm
- 00:40:59that's crazy i'm not removing my arm
- 00:41:00you're definitely putting in another arm
- 00:41:02to this jacket
- 00:41:03in other words do we change our body to
- 00:41:05suit our jacket or we change our jacket
- 00:41:06to suit our body
- 00:41:08now let me suggest that our body is the
- 00:41:09set of our experiences
- 00:41:11and that the jacket is the philosophical
- 00:41:13theory with which we account for them
- 00:41:15you really want to cut off your
- 00:41:16experience of cause and effect of good
- 00:41:18and evil
- 00:41:19of lust and rage and hatred and beauty
- 00:41:21um because you can't talk about them
- 00:41:22precisely
- 00:41:24or is this demand for philosophical
- 00:41:26precision
- 00:41:27taken to an unreasonable extreme in
- 00:41:30other words
- 00:41:30when uh when aj air force is it air that
- 00:41:33has the view that
- 00:41:34say more moral theory is non-cognitive
- 00:41:37right
- 00:41:38well i experience morals at least
- 00:41:39sometimes as being real and right and
- 00:41:41wrong
- 00:41:42if these anglo-american guys these real
- 00:41:44hard shell and piercers tell me that my
- 00:41:45experience is wrong
- 00:41:46it's like the tailor telling me my
- 00:41:47body's wrong don't tell me that i'm
- 00:41:49experiencing the world wrong no
- 00:41:50your theory is wrong and if it doesn't
- 00:41:52correspond to my experience then
- 00:41:54fix the theory don't tell me to fix my
- 00:41:55experience my experience comes first
- 00:41:58now can you see the strength of with
- 00:41:59sorel's point right this is a
- 00:42:02devastating
- 00:42:03sort of an argument and in my respect
- 00:42:04it's in my view it's actually true
- 00:42:06you know i think that husserl's attempt
- 00:42:08to find a way out of this labyrinth just
- 00:42:10doesn't work
- 00:42:10right he's spinning his wheels he's
- 00:42:12caught in a snow drift but
- 00:42:14the idea of telling to these scientific
- 00:42:16empirical rational logical guys
- 00:42:18that if your theory doesn't correspond
- 00:42:20to my experience
- 00:42:21your theory is wrong not my experience i
- 00:42:23think that's right on the money
- 00:42:24and i think that's the strong point of
- 00:42:26all continental philosophies they say
- 00:42:28i'm going to look at myself and the way
- 00:42:29i experience the world first and if your
- 00:42:31theory
- 00:42:31corresponds to that and accounts for
- 00:42:33that so so be it if it doesn't
- 00:42:35i am not going to say well look i'll
- 00:42:36stop giving i'll give up on beauty i'll
- 00:42:37give up on morality
- 00:42:39i'll give up on all my psychic states
- 00:42:41all my emotions because after all
- 00:42:42either i talk about them clearly or i
- 00:42:44don't talk about them at all no
- 00:42:46this demand for clarity has been taken
- 00:42:47to an unreasonable extreme
- 00:42:49it would be much better for us if we
- 00:42:51were to start with experience or
- 00:42:53uh as visceral's uh slogan was to the
- 00:42:55things themselves
- 00:42:57well modify that a bit let's start with
- 00:43:00experience
- 00:43:01let's make our slogan experience first
- 00:43:03me first
- 00:43:04and then i'll construct my world around
- 00:43:06that i'm not going to instruct myself
- 00:43:07around the world that's insane
- 00:43:09it's like it's like changing my body to
- 00:43:10suit my suit that's crazy
- 00:43:12this is the strong point of visceral and
- 00:43:14if it doesn't ultimately
- 00:43:16offer us intuition of the essence of
- 00:43:18being whatever it is that he's trying to
- 00:43:20do here
- 00:43:21if it doesn't offer us the ultimate
- 00:43:23structure
- 00:43:24of human cognition it does make an
- 00:43:27important point
- 00:43:28against the problem of western against
- 00:43:30the problem that western philosophy has
- 00:43:32drifted into
- 00:43:33it makes the point that i come first
- 00:43:36and that's what phenomenology is you
- 00:43:38know if you leave out all the verbiage
- 00:43:39and the elaborate intellectual apparatus
- 00:43:41that he constructs
- 00:43:42it all proceeds from the basic intuition
- 00:43:44that i my experience is right
- 00:43:46and any theory that tells me my
- 00:43:47experience is mistaken is
- 00:43:49fundamentally has a cart before the
- 00:43:52horse
- 00:43:53right and i think that's what holds
- 00:43:55together the whole
- 00:43:58tradition of continental philosophy in
- 00:43:59the 20th century this will be true for
- 00:44:01husserl but it's also gonna be true for
- 00:44:03heidegger
- 00:44:03it's gonna be true for bergson it's
- 00:44:05gonna be true for all these guys that
- 00:44:06start out
- 00:44:07looking at themselves right and
- 00:44:10if they get nebulous and fuzzy well
- 00:44:12that's just built into the problem
- 00:44:13think of another way another analogy
- 00:44:15that we can bring to this is that
- 00:44:17it's like singing the precision of
- 00:44:19addiction
- 00:44:21costs something the precision of our
- 00:44:23thinking and speech costs something
- 00:44:25we can loosen up the diction so it's not
- 00:44:27so precise what we're saying but we can
- 00:44:28gain in range
- 00:44:29we can hit the high notes intellectually
- 00:44:30and i think that talking about right and
- 00:44:32wrong and talking about beauty and
- 00:44:33talking about the really important
- 00:44:34things
- 00:44:34psychically those are the high notes of
- 00:44:36philosophy and the problem is that the
- 00:44:38appearances can't hit those notes
- 00:44:40they have better diction than i do but
- 00:44:42you can hit the high notes like this and
- 00:44:43this is what it's for
- 00:44:45and so for all the nebulous and dubious
- 00:44:47and perhaps even mystical qualities that
- 00:44:49we find in husserl
- 00:44:50this is a serious and worthwhile attempt
- 00:44:52to account for what it means to be
- 00:44:54an ego in the 20th century
- Edmund Husserl
- phenomenology
- 20th-century philosophy
- consciousness
- Cartesian philosophy
- science of sciences
- intellectual project
- continental philosophy