This ≠ That

00:03:45
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gxSUqr3ouYA

الملخص

TLDRThe video highlights the dangers of overvaluing correlations, showing how variables like Nicolas Cage movie releases and swimming pool drownings can misleadingly appear related due to coincidences. It explains that correlation does not imply causation using examples like hormone replacement therapy and nightlight use in children. These examples illustrate 'lurking variables,' where an unseen factor affects both studied variables. The video discloses a deliberately flawed chocolate weight loss study to demonstrate how media may sensationalize science. However, correlation remains vital in scientific research when causative experiments are infeasible. The video encourages critical evaluation of scientific findings and the significance of peer-review processes in research.

الوجبات الجاهزة

  • 📉 Correlation does not imply causation - they can mislead if not analyzed properly.
  • 🧐 Lurking variables can affect both correlated factors without a direct cause-and-effect.
  • 🥼 Proper scientific analysis is crucial for distinguishing real causation from correlation.
  • 🔬 Peer review is essential to validate scientific studies and prevent sensationalism.
  • ⚠️ Be cautious of media representation of scientific results—they can be misleading.
  • 📊 Small sample sizes can produce statistically significant but misleading results.
  • 🍫 The chocolate weight loss study showcased the pitfalls of exploiting correlations.
  • 💡 Correlations still play a critical role in science when causation cannot be directly tested.
  • 📚 Misinterpretation of statistical data is a common issue in popular science reporting.
  • 🔍 Analyzing causative relationships requires meticulous observation and testing.

الجدول الزمني

  • 00:00:00 - 00:03:45

    The video begins by discussing strange correlations, such as a 66.6% correlation between the number of Nicolas Cage films released and the number of drownings in pools, a 99.26% correlation between divorce rates in Maine and the per capita consumption of margarine, and a 99.79% correlation between spending on Science, Space, and Technology and suicides by specific methods. The video emphasizes that correlation does not imply causation, citing logical fallacies seen in media claims that people who have more sex make more money, without evidence of causal links. It warns that some correlations, like cheese consumption related to bed sheet tangling deaths, offer no real causative relationships.

الخريطة الذهنية

Mind Map

الأسئلة الشائعة

  • What is a spurious correlation?

    A spurious correlation is a situation where two variables appear to be related to each other but are actually not, often due to an unseen third factor.

  • Why does correlation not imply causation?

    Because two variables moving together does not mean that one causes the other; there can be other factors at play or the correlation can be coincidental.

  • What was the real reason behind the decreased heart disease in women taking hormone replacement therapy?

    Women in the study had a higher socio-economic status, which included better diet and exercise regimes, and not the therapy itself.

  • How can small sample sizes affect scientific outcomes?

    With smaller sample sizes and many variables, it’s easier to find statistically significant outcomes by chance.

  • What was the purpose of the chocolate weight loss study?

    It was designed to show how science reporting can be manipulated and results misrepresented in media.

  • What is a lurking variable?

    A lurking variable is a hidden factor that may cause both variables to show a correlation without one causing the other.

  • Why should correlation not be dismissed entirely in science?

    Because correlation is often the best available evidence when comprehensive causative studies can't be conducted, and it helps guide further scientific inquiry.

  • How can scientists avoid being misled by correlations?

    By looking for lurking variables, using large and random samples, and validating findings through peer-review or further testing.

عرض المزيد من ملخصات الفيديو

احصل على وصول فوري إلى ملخصات فيديو YouTube المجانية المدعومة بالذكاء الاصطناعي!
الترجمات
en
التمرير التلقائي:
  • 00:00:00
    have you ever wondered how related the
  • 00:00:01
    number of people that drown in pools
  • 00:00:03
    each year is to how many Nicolas Cage
  • 00:00:05
    films are released at the same year
  • 00:00:07
    turns out there is a 66.6% correlation
  • 00:00:10
    between the two or how about the fact
  • 00:00:11
    that there's a ninety-nine point two six
  • 00:00:13
    percent correlation between the divorce
  • 00:00:15
    rate in Maine and the per capita
  • 00:00:17
    consumption of margarine or a ninety
  • 00:00:19
    nine point seven nine percent
  • 00:00:20
    correlation between spending on Science
  • 00:00:22
    Space and Technology and the number of
  • 00:00:25
    suicides by hanging strangulation and
  • 00:00:27
    suffocation just because there is a
  • 00:00:29
    correlation between two variables
  • 00:00:30
    doesn't mean that one causes the other
  • 00:00:32
    this assumption is a logical fallacy and
  • 00:00:35
    yet were drawn to headlines like people
  • 00:00:37
    who have more sex make the most money
  • 00:00:39
    unfortunately this does not always equal
  • 00:00:41
    that even though it may look like it
  • 00:00:44
    cheese consumption probably isn't
  • 00:00:46
    related to how many people died tangled
  • 00:00:48
    in their bed sheets but sometimes it
  • 00:00:50
    isn't so obvious numerous studies found
  • 00:00:52
    that menopausal woman taking hormone
  • 00:00:54
    replacement therapy had a lower than
  • 00:00:56
    average incidence of heart disease
  • 00:00:57
    leading doctors to believe that hormone
  • 00:00:59
    replacement could protect against heart
  • 00:01:01
    disease however when women underwent
  • 00:01:03
    randomized control trials they found
  • 00:01:05
    that hormone replacement therapy
  • 00:01:07
    actually increased the risk of heart
  • 00:01:09
    disease when the original data was
  • 00:01:10
    finally reanalyzed it was found that
  • 00:01:12
    women who took the therapy were of a
  • 00:01:14
    higher socio-economic group with a
  • 00:01:16
    better diet and exercise regime this was
  • 00:01:18
    the real cause behind decreased risk of
  • 00:01:20
    heart disease
  • 00:01:21
    another case found that those who used
  • 00:01:23
    nightlights as a kid were more likely to
  • 00:01:25
    develop myopia but there's actually a
  • 00:01:27
    strong link between parental myopia and
  • 00:01:29
    the development of child myopia so in
  • 00:01:31
    reality myopic parents were simply more
  • 00:01:33
    likely to leave a light on in their
  • 00:01:35
    child's bedroom these are examples of a
  • 00:01:37
    lurking variable where a does not cause
  • 00:01:39
    B but rather C causes them both it's a
  • 00:01:42
    little like taking people who have lung
  • 00:01:43
    cancer and thinking hey they're all
  • 00:01:46
    carrying lighters in their pockets so
  • 00:01:48
    lighters must cause cancer while not
  • 00:01:50
    realizing that smoking is the
  • 00:01:51
    confounding variable and scientists work
  • 00:01:54
    hard in their studies to try and avoid
  • 00:01:55
    this but it gets worse when popular
  • 00:01:57
    media takes advantage of these
  • 00:01:59
    potentially coincidental correlations
  • 00:02:01
    and one study about the chocolate weight
  • 00:02:03
    loss connection was actually designed as
  • 00:02:05
    a way to expose how science reporting
  • 00:02:06
    can be
  • 00:02:07
    sation alized a science writer with a
  • 00:02:09
    PhD in microbiology ran a real clinical
  • 00:02:11
    trial where participants were assigned
  • 00:02:13
    to three groups a low-carb diet a
  • 00:02:15
    low-carb diet plus a one point five
  • 00:02:17
    ounce
  • 00:02:17
    chocolate bar and a group that maintains
  • 00:02:19
    their regular diet at the end of three
  • 00:02:21
    weeks the chocolate group did lose the
  • 00:02:23
    most weight but the journalist
  • 00:02:25
    consciously used terrible science he
  • 00:02:27
    used 15 participants and measured 18
  • 00:02:29
    different measurements including weight
  • 00:02:31
    loss cholesterol sleep quality blood
  • 00:02:33
    pressure well-being etc and when you use
  • 00:02:36
    a small group of people and measure a
  • 00:02:37
    large number of things you're pretty
  • 00:02:39
    much guaranteed to get a statistically
  • 00:02:41
    significant result which veritasium has
  • 00:02:44
    an amazing video on here if you want to
  • 00:02:46
    check out the result could have easily
  • 00:02:47
    been something different such as
  • 00:02:49
    chocolate correlates to lower blood
  • 00:02:50
    pressure if this study had been peer
  • 00:02:52
    reviewed by other researchers it would
  • 00:02:54
    have been called out so instead he
  • 00:02:56
    submitted it to a journal for a fee of
  • 00:02:57
    600 euros making up a fake institution
  • 00:03:00
    named the Institute of diet and health
  • 00:03:02
    he then sent out a press release to
  • 00:03:04
    dozens of media publications and very
  • 00:03:07
    quickly getting slim buy chocolate was
  • 00:03:09
    front-page news with that in mind
  • 00:03:11
    however we can't dismiss correlation
  • 00:03:13
    entirely correlative evidence is an
  • 00:03:15
    essential part of science double-blind
  • 00:03:17
    studies are not always possible or
  • 00:03:19
    ethical to run often leaving correlation
  • 00:03:21
    as the best evidence available when
  • 00:03:23
    every possible causative relationship is
  • 00:03:25
    systematically explored correlation can
  • 00:03:27
    be used as a powerful tool for assessing
  • 00:03:29
    cause-and-effect relationships and
  • 00:03:30
    progressing science even further
  • 00:03:32
    big thanks to Tyler vegan for providing
  • 00:03:34
    his charts on these interesting
  • 00:03:35
    correlations you can check out his
  • 00:03:36
    website or his book spurious
  • 00:03:38
    correlations for more peculiar examples
  • 00:03:40
    and subscribe for more weekly science
  • 00:03:42
    videos every Thursday
الوسوم
  • Correlation
  • Causation
  • Logical Fallacy
  • Science Reporting
  • Hormone Therapy
  • Myopia
  • Lurking Variables
  • Peer Review
  • Scientific Method
  • Spurious Correlations