Gottlob Frege - On Sense and Reference
الملخص
TLDRThe video discusses Frege's groundbreaking 1892 paper on sense and reference, which introduced the idea that linguistic terms have both a sense (mode of presentation) and a reference (the object they denote). It illustrates these concepts through examples like Jay-Z and Shawn Carter, explaining how identity statements can be informative and empirical. Frege's theory addresses limitations in previous theories, particularly Mill's, by establishing a distinction between sense and reference, allowing for a more nuanced understanding of language and meaning. The video also touches on the implications of compositionality and the truth value of sentences in Frege's framework.
الوجبات الجاهزة
- 📜 Frege's paper revolutionized the philosophy of language.
- 🔍 Sense refers to the mode of presentation of a term.
- 📌 Reference is the actual object a term denotes.
- 💡 Identity statements can be informative and empirical.
- 🧠 Cognitive value indicates the informative content of a statement.
- 🔄 Compositionality means the meaning of a sentence is built from its parts.
- 🌌 The telescope analogy illustrates the relationship between reference, sense, and conception.
- ⚖️ Truth value is the reference of a declarative sentence.
- ❓ A name can have a sense without a reference (empty names).
- 🔗 Frege's theory distinguishes between sense and reference, unlike Mill's.
الجدول الزمني
- 00:00:00 - 00:05:00
The video discusses Fraga's 1892 paper on sense and reference, highlighting the complexity of linguistic terms which possess both a sense (meaning) and a reference (the object they denote). The speaker introduces a puzzle that Fraga addresses, using an example of a conversation between a woman named Ellen and Jay-Z, illustrating how she learns an empirical fact about him despite already knowing the name Jay-Z.
- 00:05:00 - 00:10:00
The speaker contrasts Fraga's theory with John Stuart Mill's 1881 theory, which posits that names only refer to objects without additional meaning. Mill's theory fails to explain why identity statements can be informative, as it treats names as interchangeable without acknowledging the cognitive value of learning that Shawn Carter is Jay-Z.
- 00:10:00 - 00:15:00
Fraga's solution involves introducing a third layer of meaning, the 'sense', which is distinct from both the name and the reference. The sense relates to how the object is presented or characterized, allowing for informative statements that convey empirical knowledge rather than just linguistic facts.
- 00:15:00 - 00:20:00
Using the example of the morning star and the evening star, the speaker illustrates how two names can refer to the same object (Venus) but have different senses. This distinction allows for informative statements that reveal new knowledge about the world, which neither Mill's nor Fraga's earlier theories could adequately explain.
- 00:20:00 - 00:25:00
Fraga's theory posits that names have both a reference (the object) and a sense (the mode of presentation). He emphasizes that sense is a public property shared among speakers, distinguishing it from private mental conceptions. This public nature of sense allows for shared understanding of terms across different individuals.
- 00:25:00 - 00:34:06
The video concludes with Fraga's exploration of the sense and reference of whole sentences, arguing that the reference of a declarative sentence is its truth value. This is supported by the principle of compositionality, which states that the meaning of a sentence is derived from the meanings of its parts, leading to the conclusion that truth value remains constant when substituting co-referring terms.
الخريطة الذهنية
فيديو أسئلة وأجوبة
What is the main idea of Frege's paper on sense and reference?
Frege's paper introduces the concepts of sense and reference, explaining that linguistic terms have both a mode of presentation (sense) and an object they denote (reference).
How does Frege's theory differ from Mill's theory of names?
Mill's theory states that names only refer to objects, while Frege's theory distinguishes between sense and reference, allowing for informative identity statements.
What are sense and reference?
Sense is the mode of presentation of a term, while reference is the actual object the term denotes.
Can a name have a sense without a reference?
Yes, a name can be meaningful and have a sense without referring to any actual object, as in the case of empty names.
What is an example of an informative identity statement?
An example is 'Shawn Carter is Jay-Z,' which can provide new empirical information to someone who knows both names.
What does Frege mean by 'cognitive value'?
Cognitive value refers to the informative content of a statement, which can provide new knowledge.
How does Frege's theory apply to whole sentences?
Frege argues that the sense of a whole sentence is its proposition, while the reference is its truth value.
What is compositionality in language?
Compositionality is the principle that the meaning of a whole sentence is derived from the meanings of its individual parts.
What is the telescope analogy used by Frege?
The telescope analogy compares the reference (the object) to the moon, the sense (the mode of presentation) to the image in the telescope, and the conception to the image on the observer's retina.
Why is the truth value important in Frege's theory?
The truth value of a sentence is its reference, and it remains unchanged when co-referring terms are substituted.
عرض المزيد من ملخصات الفيديو
- 00:00:00this guy dolab Fraga published this
- 00:00:02paper Uber Zin un on sense and reference
- 00:00:06in 1892 and it is the most important
- 00:00:10paper in the history of the philosophy
- 00:00:12of language it is very complicated but
- 00:00:14I'm going to
- 00:00:15explain it
- 00:00:18now frager realizes that linguistic
- 00:00:21terms words have to have two levels of
- 00:00:23meaning they each have to have a sense
- 00:00:25and a reference I'm going to explain
- 00:00:27exactly what those are but first we need
- 00:00:30to see the puzzle that forces fragga
- 00:00:32into this position to illustrate this
- 00:00:34puzzle I'm going to have you watch like
- 00:00:36a viral
- 00:00:38[Music]
- 00:00:46videoy my name is j what's your name huh
- 00:00:49Ellen what do you do
- 00:00:53Ellen did you just do performance I'm on
- 00:00:56my way to the performance in Brooklyn at
- 00:00:57the new Brooklyn Arena oh
- 00:01:07oh
- 00:01:12JZ okay that was fun the noteworthy
- 00:01:15thing about this interaction is that the
- 00:01:16woman her name is Ellen she already
- 00:01:20knows the meaning of the name Jay-Z so
- 00:01:23it's not like what happens is that the
- 00:01:25guy tells her oh there's this name Jay-Z
- 00:01:28and the name refers to me it's my name
- 00:01:31that's not what happens no no she's
- 00:01:32familiar with the name she knows the
- 00:01:34meaning of Jay-Z but she still learns
- 00:01:38something at the end of the video when
- 00:01:40he tells her that he is
- 00:01:43Jay-Z so there's like two possibilities
- 00:01:46she could learn something linguistic
- 00:01:48about the name or she could learn
- 00:01:50something empirical empirical just means
- 00:01:52knowable by observation or experience
- 00:01:55another term for this is a posteriori
- 00:01:58and the point of this story is just that
- 00:02:00what this woman learns at the end of the
- 00:02:02conversation is not linguistic she's not
- 00:02:05learning anything about the meaning of
- 00:02:07the name JayZ she already knew that name
- 00:02:09she's learning an empirical fact a fact
- 00:02:12about the world which is oh this guy
- 00:02:14that I've been sitting next to he is
- 00:02:18Jay-Z consider these two sentences Shawn
- 00:02:22Carter is Shawn Carter and Shawn Carter
- 00:02:26is Jay-Z that's Jay-Z's uh government
- 00:02:29name his his regular name Shan Carter
- 00:02:32that's his name sentences of this type
- 00:02:34are called identity statements because
- 00:02:36they say that two things are one thing
- 00:02:39two things are identical they're the
- 00:02:40very same thing imagine in the case of
- 00:02:43Ellen and Jay-Z on the subway imagine
- 00:02:46that she knew him by the name Shawn
- 00:02:48Carter like maybe he got on the train
- 00:02:50and they introduced themselves to each
- 00:02:52other and he introduced himself as Shawn
- 00:02:54Carter that's his name she knows who sha
- 00:02:56Carter is and she also knows that
- 00:02:59there's this this musician this rapper
- 00:03:01named Jay-Z maybe she's seen pictures of
- 00:03:03him she knows who Jay-Z is but she
- 00:03:05hasn't yet put it together in her mind
- 00:03:08that this guy right next to her Shawn
- 00:03:10Carter is Jay-Z if that's the case then
- 00:03:14sentence number two can be informative
- 00:03:17to her it has as Fraga says cognitive
- 00:03:20value you can really learn something
- 00:03:23from sentence number two this woman
- 00:03:24Ellen can really learn something by
- 00:03:28discovering or being told that Sean
- 00:03:29Carter is
- 00:03:31Jay-Z so I'm writing here that sentence
- 00:03:342 is informative it can teach her
- 00:03:35something in the way that sentence one
- 00:03:37never could Shan Carter is Shan Carter
- 00:03:40yes of course as long as these two names
- 00:03:43here and here are being used in the same
- 00:03:45sense to mean the same thing well then
- 00:03:47one is totally banale and uninformative
- 00:03:49whereas two can be
- 00:03:52informative but sentence 2 can also be
- 00:03:55empirical in the sense that the
- 00:03:56information that you get from sentence 2
- 00:03:58can be in some cases not about language
- 00:04:02not about the meanings of the words but
- 00:04:04it can be something that has to be
- 00:04:05discovered through going out into the
- 00:04:07world and existing and and discovering
- 00:04:09things like namely oh this guy sitting
- 00:04:11next to me he's a famous rapper that's
- 00:04:13the point of this example in the middle
- 00:04:15of the train ride Ellen knows all the
- 00:04:18linguistic facts she knows what this
- 00:04:21name Shan Carter means she knows who it
- 00:04:24refers to it refers to this guy sitting
- 00:04:25next to me she also is familiar with and
- 00:04:28understands the name Jay-Z knows oh
- 00:04:30that's the name for this famous musician
- 00:04:31maybe she can name a whole bunch of
- 00:04:33facts about Jay-Z she can know all the
- 00:04:35linguistic facts but still there's that
- 00:04:37moment at the end of the train ride
- 00:04:39where she learns something like sentence
- 00:04:412 she learns that this guy Shan Carter
- 00:04:44is Jay-Z and so what she learns can't be
- 00:04:47linguistic because she already knew the
- 00:04:48linguistic stuff it has to be some
- 00:04:51empirical fact about the real world some
- 00:04:53observable experiential fact now we're
- 00:04:56ready to State the puzzle how can we
- 00:04:58have a theory of language language a
- 00:04:59theory of names that explains these two
- 00:05:03features of sentence number two that it
- 00:05:05can be informative and that more
- 00:05:07specifically the kind of information
- 00:05:08that it can give can be empirical
- 00:05:11information the reason this is a puzzle
- 00:05:13is that there was this other theory of
- 00:05:16names published in 1881 by John Stewart
- 00:05:20Mill and according to Mills Theory the
- 00:05:22meaning of a proper name like Shawn
- 00:05:25Carter or Jay-Z the meaning of a name
- 00:05:27like that is nothing more than the
- 00:05:29object named and Mill's Theory sounds
- 00:05:32really good when you read that paper
- 00:05:33that he published in 1881 but then you
- 00:05:35run into cases like this and he can't
- 00:05:37handle this according to Mill the name
- 00:05:39Shan Carter and the name Jay-Z mean
- 00:05:42exactly the same thing and so sentence
- 00:05:44one and sentence two are no different
- 00:05:46Mill is unable to explain why a sentence
- 00:05:48like two can be genuinely Illuminating
- 00:05:51informative why it can have some
- 00:05:53cognitive value in a way that a sentence
- 00:05:55like one doesn't because after all on
- 00:05:56Mills Theory the meaning of these
- 00:05:59letters right here is just the dude and
- 00:06:01the meaning of these letters right here
- 00:06:03is the exact same dude so it's just this
- 00:06:05dude is this dude yeah duh just like in
- 00:06:09this case this dude is this dude there's
- 00:06:11no difference now there's an alternative
- 00:06:13to Mills theory that can explain how
- 00:06:16sentence two can be Illuminating
- 00:06:19informative um in a way that sentence
- 00:06:21one can't and that theory translates
- 00:06:24sentence 2 as a sentence about language
- 00:06:28itself
- 00:06:30on this theory sentence two is really
- 00:06:32just shorthand for something like
- 00:06:34sentence two star the name Shan Carter
- 00:06:37and the name Jay-Z denote the same
- 00:06:40person if this is what two means then it
- 00:06:43makes sense why two is informative in a
- 00:06:46way that one isn't one would be
- 00:06:47translated correspondingly as something
- 00:06:49like the name Shawn Carter and the name
- 00:06:51Shawn Carter denote the same person
- 00:06:54that's obvious but this is not obvious
- 00:06:56like this is a fact that you might not
- 00:06:58know and this theory that translates
- 00:07:01identity statements like this into sort
- 00:07:03of linguistic statements like this that
- 00:07:05theory is actually fraga's old Theory
- 00:07:08from the B Griff shrift which he
- 00:07:10published in 1879 but 13 years went by
- 00:07:14between
- 00:07:151879 and 1892 when he published on sense
- 00:07:19and reference and during those 13 years
- 00:07:21Fraga realized that this Theory the
- 00:07:23theory that translates identity
- 00:07:25statements into linguistically
- 00:07:26statements like this that theory wasn't
- 00:07:29good and the reason is that statements
- 00:07:31like number two here can be informative
- 00:07:34not just informative but empirically
- 00:07:36informative the idea is simply that when
- 00:07:38Ellen had this moment of realization on
- 00:07:41the subway she wasn't realizing
- 00:07:43something about the meanings of these
- 00:07:44terms she was realizing something about
- 00:07:47the world around her and Fraga gets this
- 00:07:49he understands all this stuff about
- 00:07:50Ellen and Jay-Z and so what he does in
- 00:07:53on sense and reference is he tosses out
- 00:07:55his old Theory and he gives a new theory
- 00:07:57of sentences like that and and it turns
- 00:07:59out to be not just a theory of identity
- 00:08:02statements like this but of all of
- 00:08:05language very quickly I'm going to
- 00:08:07illustrate this again with fraga's own
- 00:08:09example which involves the morning star
- 00:08:11and the evening star to understand this
- 00:08:13you're going to need some astronomical
- 00:08:15background information so here it is if
- 00:08:17you look at the Sunrise Just Before
- 00:08:20Sunrise right near where the sun is
- 00:08:23about to rise you can see a very bright
- 00:08:25star sometimes and the name of that star
- 00:08:28is the morning star and then also just
- 00:08:31after Sunset right near where the sun
- 00:08:34just set sometimes you can see this
- 00:08:36other bright star and that star is
- 00:08:39called the evening star okay those are
- 00:08:41stars and people have known about these
- 00:08:43stars for a long time and they name the
- 00:08:45stars because we name things but then at
- 00:08:47some point someone discovered that these
- 00:08:49two stars were the exact same thing and
- 00:08:52they're not even Stars it turns out they
- 00:08:54are the planet Venus so what you've got
- 00:08:57are sort of trivial s sentences like the
- 00:09:00Morning Star is the Morning Star yeah du
- 00:09:03and then you've got possibly very
- 00:09:05informative noteworthy sentences like
- 00:09:08the Morning Star is the evening star so
- 00:09:11just like in the case of this sentence
- 00:09:12two this sentence two can be informative
- 00:09:15and the kind of information that this
- 00:09:16sentence carries is not linguistic
- 00:09:18information but empirical astronomical
- 00:09:22information someone can be in a
- 00:09:24situation where they know the meaning of
- 00:09:26this name or this phrase or whatever the
- 00:09:27Morning Star they know which it is they
- 00:09:29can even point to it they can even say
- 00:09:31that one's the morning star that's the
- 00:09:33object denoted by the name or the
- 00:09:36description the morning star and they
- 00:09:38can do the same thing let's suppose for
- 00:09:40the evening star they know what this
- 00:09:41phrase means and they can point to it so
- 00:09:43they know what is denoted by all of
- 00:09:45these terms but what they don't know is
- 00:09:47that these two objects are one object
- 00:09:50and so when you tell someone the Morning
- 00:09:52Star is the evening star you can be
- 00:09:55telling them something that they didn't
- 00:09:56know already and not something
- 00:09:58linguistic at all and Mill's theory of
- 00:10:00names and fraga's old theory of names
- 00:10:03that translates identity statements into
- 00:10:06you know these linguistic statements or
- 00:10:08whatever neither of those theories can
- 00:10:10explain these facts about this sentence
- 00:10:13and this sentence that they are
- 00:10:15informative and that the kind of
- 00:10:16information that they can give is often
- 00:10:19empirical okay so that's the puzzle
- 00:10:21that's the problem and what frga does is
- 00:10:24he solves this problem by introducing an
- 00:10:27additional layer of meaning and that
- 00:10:30that sort of additional middle layer of
- 00:10:32the meaning of a term is the sense it is
- 00:10:35natural now to think of there being
- 00:10:37connected with a sign a name combination
- 00:10:39of words letter besides that to which
- 00:10:41the sign refers which may be called the
- 00:10:43reference of the sign also what I would
- 00:10:45like to call the sense of the sign
- 00:10:47wherein the mode of presentation is
- 00:10:50contained okay so frag is talking about
- 00:10:52three different
- 00:10:54things the first thing is the name or
- 00:10:57the sign and then then of course there's
- 00:11:00the thing that the name picks out or
- 00:11:02refers to the referent which in this
- 00:11:05case the referent is the guy the actual
- 00:11:07person
- 00:11:08Jay-Z but in addition to the referent
- 00:11:11Fraga is saying that there's this other
- 00:11:13middle level of meaning which he calls
- 00:11:16the
- 00:11:17sense and it's really not clear at this
- 00:11:20point in the paper what the sense of a
- 00:11:22name or of any expression is but it has
- 00:11:25something to do with a mode of
- 00:11:26presentation so I have to explain what
- 00:11:28that is are you familiar with the
- 00:11:30concept of a mcmansion that's like a
- 00:11:32poorly constructed ugly home with too
- 00:11:34many roof lines or whatever imagine one
- 00:11:37of these ugly houses and in the front of
- 00:11:39the house there's like fancy stonework
- 00:11:41or bricks or columns or something like
- 00:11:44that but in the back of the house it's
- 00:11:46just plastic siding so you can imagine a
- 00:11:48case where you've seen this house from
- 00:11:50the front that's one way of viewing the
- 00:11:53house one literal angle or perspective
- 00:11:56from which you can view the house you
- 00:11:58might also Al see the house from the
- 00:12:00back that's a different perspective a
- 00:12:02different mode of presentation of the
- 00:12:04house a different way that the house
- 00:12:06could be presented to you and you can
- 00:12:08know the house in both of these ways
- 00:12:11without actually knowing that they're
- 00:12:12the same house and then it might be
- 00:12:14informative to you to find out oh look
- 00:12:16at that that's the same one house that's
- 00:12:18what fra is getting at with this idea of
- 00:12:19a mode of presentation there are two
- 00:12:21different ways of knowing Shawn Carter
- 00:12:24you could know him as The Kid From
- 00:12:27Brooklyn or whatever or you could know
- 00:12:30him as Jay-Z the Mogul the billionaire
- 00:12:34rapper or whatever I don't know if he
- 00:12:35has a billion dollars but close to a
- 00:12:37billion or a little more I I think the
- 00:12:40simplest way although this is a little
- 00:12:42contentious to think of the sense or
- 00:12:44mode of presentation of a name or phrase
- 00:12:48is to think of it as a description you
- 00:12:50could describe this guy as a billionaire
- 00:12:54music mogul or you could describe him as
- 00:12:58a middle aged man who was born in
- 00:13:00Brooklyn and still lives most of the
- 00:13:02time in the greater New York area those
- 00:13:03are two different ways of presenting or
- 00:13:07characterizing this guy Shan Carter or
- 00:13:10Jay-Z fraga's point is this a name or
- 00:13:13for that matter any other linguistic
- 00:13:16term a name has not only this level of
- 00:13:20meaning which is the object named but
- 00:13:23also the way that that object is
- 00:13:25characterized or presented by the sign
- 00:13:29by the name Fraga himself actually
- 00:13:31explains this though with a somewhat
- 00:13:33abstract mathematical example that might
- 00:13:35not have been obvious from just reading
- 00:13:37the text so I'm going to read it and
- 00:13:39then explain exactly what he means let a
- 00:13:42b c be the lines connecting the vertices
- 00:13:44of a triangle with the midpoints of the
- 00:13:46opposite sides okay so there's no actual
- 00:13:49diagram in the published paper but I
- 00:13:53created this diagram you see that inside
- 00:13:55of this triangle there are three lines
- 00:13:56there's the vertical line which is
- 00:13:58called a and then there's this other
- 00:14:00line that's line B and then line C is
- 00:14:03the is the third line going from the
- 00:14:04lower right to the upper left and the
- 00:14:06important thing to notice is that all
- 00:14:08three of these lines intersect they
- 00:14:10cross each other or meet at the very
- 00:14:12same point in the middle the point of
- 00:14:14intersection of A and B is then the same
- 00:14:16as the point of intersection of B and C
- 00:14:19so there's just one point here in the
- 00:14:21middle of this diagram but fra mentions
- 00:14:23at least two different ways of
- 00:14:25describing that exact same point the
- 00:14:27place where lines a A and B intersect or
- 00:14:30you could describe the very same point
- 00:14:32as the place where lines B and C
- 00:14:34intersect so we have different
- 00:14:36designations for the same point and
- 00:14:38these names point of intersection of A
- 00:14:40and B point of intersection of B and C
- 00:14:43likewise indicate the mode of
- 00:14:45presentation so these two different
- 00:14:46names for the one point the point of
- 00:14:49intersection of A and B and the point of
- 00:14:52intersection of c and d these two names
- 00:14:54they pick out the same point but they
- 00:14:56present that point in different ways
- 00:14:58ways they involve different modes of
- 00:15:01presentation of that same point and
- 00:15:04hence the statement contains true
- 00:15:05knowledge what he means by that is just
- 00:15:07that because these two different names
- 00:15:10for that one point have different modes
- 00:15:12of
- 00:15:13presentation that sentence the sentence
- 00:15:16that the point of intersection of A and
- 00:15:18B is the same as the point of
- 00:15:20intersection of B and C that sentence
- 00:15:24like sentence two here can contain real
- 00:15:26genuine information true knowledge as
- 00:15:29fragga calls it in our example
- 00:15:31accordingly the reference of the
- 00:15:33Expressions the point of intersection of
- 00:15:34A and B and the point of intersection of
- 00:15:37B and C would be the same but not their
- 00:15:39senses right so these two names have the
- 00:15:42same reference but different senses
- 00:15:46different ways of presenting that
- 00:15:48reference that's exactly what's going on
- 00:15:49with Shawn Carter and Jay-Z These two
- 00:15:52names they refer to the same guy they
- 00:15:55have the same reference but they have
- 00:15:57different senses they present him in
- 00:15:59different ways and it's the same way
- 00:16:02with the example of the morning star and
- 00:16:03the evening star the reference of
- 00:16:05Evening Star would be the same as that
- 00:16:07of Morning Star but not the sense so
- 00:16:10those two names the morning star and the
- 00:16:12evening star they have the same
- 00:16:14reference which happens to be Venus but
- 00:16:16they present that reference differently
- 00:16:19they make reference to Venus via
- 00:16:22different senses and this Theory this
- 00:16:25theory that says that for all the
- 00:16:27linguistic signs there are two levels of
- 00:16:29meaning the level of sense and the level
- 00:16:31of reference this Theory can explain
- 00:16:34both of these facts about identity
- 00:16:37statements like too it can explain why
- 00:16:39these sentences are informative and it
- 00:16:41can explain why that information can be
- 00:16:43non-linguistic and empirical it's
- 00:16:45possible for one to already know the
- 00:16:47linguistic information one knows the
- 00:16:50sense of Shawn Carter the meaning and
- 00:16:53one knows the sense of the term or name
- 00:16:56Jay-Z but then one can find out
- 00:17:00oh these two terms that I already know
- 00:17:03the meaning to they refer to the very
- 00:17:05same guy that is how fragga solves the
- 00:17:07puzzle oh but there's more there's like
- 00:17:09way more the regular connection between
- 00:17:11a sign its sense and its reference is of
- 00:17:14such a kind that to the sign there
- 00:17:16corresponds a definite sense and to that
- 00:17:18in turn a definite reference the point
- 00:17:20frga is making there is just that in the
- 00:17:23normal case for one name there is one
- 00:17:26sense and then one reference one to one
- 00:17:29to one while to a given reference an
- 00:17:32object there does not belong only a
- 00:17:34single sign but if instead we start with
- 00:17:36the object the reference there might be
- 00:17:39more than one name for that object right
- 00:17:41there might be Jay-Z and Shan Carter and
- 00:17:44HOV that's another one I think the same
- 00:17:47sense has different expressions in
- 00:17:48different languages or even in the same
- 00:17:50language okay this is an additional
- 00:17:52point but fra thinks that the same sense
- 00:17:56can be the meaning of different terms it
- 00:17:58might be I'm sort of playing a little
- 00:18:01fast and loose here but it might be that
- 00:18:04Jay-Z and hve HOV I'm pretty sure that's
- 00:18:07how it's spelled those are two different
- 00:18:09names but maybe they present him in the
- 00:18:12same way so they have the same sense two
- 00:18:14different names same sense same
- 00:18:16reference that's also possible fraa
- 00:18:18thinks and then there's the case of what
- 00:18:20are today commonly called empty names
- 00:18:23these are names that are meaningful but
- 00:18:26they don't refer to anything it may
- 00:18:28perhaps be granted that every
- 00:18:30grammatically well-formed expression
- 00:18:32representing a proper name always has a
- 00:18:34sense this just means that if a name is
- 00:18:37Meaningful it has a sense but this is
- 00:18:40not to say that to the sense there also
- 00:18:42corresponds a reference but just because
- 00:18:44a name is Meaningful and has a sense
- 00:18:47doesn't mean that there really is an
- 00:18:48object in the world that is referred to
- 00:18:51by that name uh frag is going to give us
- 00:18:54an example right now the words the
- 00:18:56celestial body most distant from the
- 00:18:58Earth have a sense but it is very
- 00:19:00doubtful if they also have a reference
- 00:19:02the phrase the celestial body most
- 00:19:04distant from the earth that's a
- 00:19:06perfectly meaningful label it's a
- 00:19:08definite description it has a meaning
- 00:19:10fragga just thinks and I think he's
- 00:19:11probably right that there is no object
- 00:19:14in space that is the one object that is
- 00:19:16the farthest away from the earth maybe
- 00:19:18because like space curves or I don't
- 00:19:21know but there's there might not be a
- 00:19:23thing out in the world that's referred
- 00:19:24to in that way but but nonetheless the
- 00:19:26name can be meaningful here's another
- 00:19:28thing that's very important to Fraga
- 00:19:30it's important that the sense of a term
- 00:19:34is public different people can mean the
- 00:19:36same thing by a term and so they have to
- 00:19:39be able to share the sense and for that
- 00:19:41reason the sense of a term the mode of
- 00:19:44presentation contained in the name blah
- 00:19:46blah blah all of that that's not the
- 00:19:48same as some private mental thing some
- 00:19:52conception or image in your mind it
- 00:19:54can't be that because that thing in your
- 00:19:56mind is private no one else can see your
- 00:20:00conception can can have it and so
- 00:20:02whatever private stuff is going on in
- 00:20:04there that can't be what Fraga means by
- 00:20:07sense the reference and sense of a sign
- 00:20:09are to be distinguished from the
- 00:20:11associated
- 00:20:16conception the associated conception is
- 00:20:19whatever shows up in someone's mind when
- 00:20:22they hear this name and frga is saying
- 00:20:24that is not the sense and that's not the
- 00:20:26reference that's some other thing this
- 00:20:29constitutes an essential distinction
- 00:20:31between the conception and the signs's
- 00:20:33sense which may be the common property
- 00:20:34of many and therefore is not part or a
- 00:20:37mode of the individual mind fraga's
- 00:20:39point there is simply that the sense of
- 00:20:41a term is common property it's something
- 00:20:44that multiple people can share and you
- 00:20:45can see why fra thinks this the sense is
- 00:20:49the meaning of the name and he wants two
- 00:20:51different people to mean the exact same
- 00:20:53thing if the meaning of a name was some
- 00:20:55private thing inside your own mind then
- 00:20:58you could never mean the exact same
- 00:21:00thing by a term as someone else this
- 00:21:02wasn't in the part of this paper that
- 00:21:04I've assigned but fra also thinks that
- 00:21:06the sense of a name or a term determines
- 00:21:10the reference that is why is this
- 00:21:12reference the reference of this name
- 00:21:14right why is Jay-Z the name of this guy
- 00:21:17oh well it's because there's some
- 00:21:19description there's some
- 00:21:20characterization there's some mode of
- 00:21:21presentation of this guy that's
- 00:21:23associated with the name and he meets
- 00:21:26that description he fits that mode of
- 00:21:28presentation Fraga thinks something like
- 00:21:31that also there's this famous telescope
- 00:21:33analogy that explains how all of these
- 00:21:35things are related and I'm going to use
- 00:21:37this in my picture of that
- 00:21:45uh that's a pretty good drawing let's
- 00:21:47read the quote and figure out what fra
- 00:21:49is saying somebody observes the moon
- 00:21:51through a telescope I compare the moon
- 00:21:53itself to the reference it is the object
- 00:21:55of the observation mediated by the real
- 00:21:57image image projected by the object
- 00:21:59glass in the interior of the telescope
- 00:22:01and by the retinal image of the Observer
- 00:22:04the former I compare to the sense the
- 00:22:06latter to the conception or experience
- 00:22:09okay so there's a person who's looking
- 00:22:11through a telescope and they see the
- 00:22:13moon and there's three things involved
- 00:22:15here there's the moon there's the image
- 00:22:19of the moon on the piece of glass inside
- 00:22:22the telescope and then there's the image
- 00:22:24on the inside of the person's eye on
- 00:22:27their retina that's like the back of the
- 00:22:29eye or something there's the image that
- 00:22:31is reflected inside their
- 00:22:35eyeball the Moon is analogous to the
- 00:22:38referent it's the object out there in
- 00:22:40the world the image on the inside of the
- 00:22:42telescope is analogous to the sense
- 00:22:45right because a sense is a public thing
- 00:22:48and different people could come and look
- 00:22:50through the telescope and they would see
- 00:22:51the very same image on the glass inside
- 00:22:54the telescope it's not the object out
- 00:22:56there but it's still something public
- 00:22:58that different people can interact with
- 00:22:59it's common property and then there's
- 00:23:01the image on a person's retina that is
- 00:23:05analogous to the conception the mental
- 00:23:07conception that's a totally private
- 00:23:08thing only you can see the images on the
- 00:23:11back of your retina no one else can come
- 00:23:13and look at those the purpose of this
- 00:23:15analogy is just to explain how all of
- 00:23:17these things the reference the sense and
- 00:23:19the conception are related to one
- 00:23:21another Fraga actually doesn't care
- 00:23:23about mental stuff like your Associated
- 00:23:25mental conception or experience or
- 00:23:27whatever this this is irrelevant really
- 00:23:29when he's talking about the meanings of
- 00:23:31terms he's just talking about the sense
- 00:23:33and the reference but he has to mention
- 00:23:35all of this stuff about conception just
- 00:23:38so that his readers don't accidentally
- 00:23:40or mistakenly think that when he talks
- 00:23:42about sense he's talking about some
- 00:23:44private mental thing he's clarifying
- 00:23:46that that's not what he's talking
- 00:23:48about okay now things get
- 00:23:51real up to this point we've only been
- 00:23:54talking about names or maybe subject
- 00:23:56Expressions whatever we weren't talking
- 00:23:58about whole sentences now fra is going
- 00:24:01to start talking about the sense and the
- 00:24:03reference of whole sentences like sha
- 00:24:06Carter is Rich or Jay-Z is
- 00:24:09Rich the thing you have to absolutely
- 00:24:12understand in order to understand what
- 00:24:13happens in this part of the paper is the
- 00:24:15idea of compositionality I have a whole
- 00:24:18other video explaining compositionality
- 00:24:20and if you haven't watched that you got
- 00:24:22to go watch it Link in the description
- 00:24:24but very briefly the idea is this the
- 00:24:27meaning of a whole sentence is composed
- 00:24:30of or built up out of the meanings of
- 00:24:33the individual parts so the meaning of
- 00:24:35this sentence JayZ is rich is made up
- 00:24:38out of the meaning of Jay-Z the meaning
- 00:24:41of is and the meaning of Rich you put
- 00:24:43those together there's some rules for
- 00:24:45that and you get the meaning of the
- 00:24:46whole sentence this is a fact about
- 00:24:48language and Fraga takes it very
- 00:24:50seriously he thinks that
- 00:24:52compositionality is operating at both
- 00:24:54the level of sense and reference if
- 00:24:57terms if linguistic terms have sort of
- 00:24:59two levels of meaning they have the
- 00:25:01level of sense and the level of
- 00:25:03reference then those the sense bits are
- 00:25:06all going to add up together to give you
- 00:25:09the sense of a whole sentence and also
- 00:25:12all the references are going to add up
- 00:25:14together to give you the reference of a
- 00:25:16whole sentence so what he's trying to do
- 00:25:18in this part of the paper the middle of
- 00:25:20the paper is he's trying to figure out
- 00:25:22okay I've already basically said what
- 00:25:25the sense and reference of like a name
- 00:25:27is what's the sense and reference of a
- 00:25:29whole sentence and he's constrained in
- 00:25:32his answer to that question by
- 00:25:34compositionality the only thing that
- 00:25:36could be the sense of a sentence is
- 00:25:39something that could be made up out of
- 00:25:41the senses of those individual words or
- 00:25:43terms and the only thing that could be
- 00:25:45the reference of a whole sentence is
- 00:25:47something that could be made up out of
- 00:25:49the references of all the individual
- 00:25:51words or terms the first thing that
- 00:25:54Fraga considers as a possible sense or
- 00:25:57reference of a whole declarative
- 00:25:59sentence is what today we call a
- 00:26:01proposition frga doesn't call it a
- 00:26:03proposition he calls it a thought now
- 00:26:05that's confusing because normally when
- 00:26:07you think of thought you think of a
- 00:26:08private mental thing and that's not what
- 00:26:10FR is talking about here when he says
- 00:26:12thought he means the the publicly
- 00:26:15available meaning of a sentence is this
- 00:26:18thought now to be regarded as its sense
- 00:26:21or its referent so the question is is
- 00:26:23the proposition or the thought
- 00:26:25associated with a sentence is is that
- 00:26:28the sense of the sentence or the
- 00:26:29reference of the sentence let us assume
- 00:26:32for the time being that the sentence has
- 00:26:34a reference if we now replace one word
- 00:26:36of the sentence by another having the
- 00:26:38same reference but a different sense
- 00:26:40this can have no influence upon the
- 00:26:42reference of the sentence ah so Fraga
- 00:26:44has found a little test to tell whether
- 00:26:47the proposition or the thought or
- 00:26:49whatever is the sense of the sentence or
- 00:26:51the reference he realizes that there are
- 00:26:53these terms Shan Carter and Jay-Z which
- 00:26:56have different senses is but the same
- 00:26:58reference and so if you switch between
- 00:27:00the two if you swap out this this name
- 00:27:03Shawn Carter and you put in this name
- 00:27:06Jay-Z into the same sentence that's the
- 00:27:08difference between three and four if you
- 00:27:10swap them out because these two names
- 00:27:13have the same reference then switching
- 00:27:16between these two sentences should not
- 00:27:18change the reference of the whole
- 00:27:19sentence but it should change at least
- 00:27:22sometimes the sense of these sentences
- 00:27:24we're just switching out two terms we're
- 00:27:26going from a term with one sense to a
- 00:27:28term with a different sense so these two
- 00:27:30sentences should have different senses
- 00:27:33but because these two names have the
- 00:27:35same reference these two sentences
- 00:27:37should have the same reference frag is
- 00:27:39trying to figure out whether or not the
- 00:27:41proposition or the thought expressed by
- 00:27:44a sentence is the sense or the reference
- 00:27:47well there's this constraint these two
- 00:27:50sentences will have different senses but
- 00:27:54the same reference yet we can see that
- 00:27:57in such a case the thought changes Fagan
- 00:28:00notices that these two sentences Express
- 00:28:03different propositions they express
- 00:28:05different thoughts so the thought cannot
- 00:28:08be the reference of a name because the
- 00:28:11thought changes between these two but
- 00:28:12the reference can't change because this
- 00:28:15this name has the same reference as this
- 00:28:17name this has the same reference as this
- 00:28:19these are referentially the same so if
- 00:28:22something changes if the thought changes
- 00:28:23then the thought has to be the sense not
- 00:28:26the reference the thought of accordingly
- 00:28:28cannot be the referent of the sentence
- 00:28:30but must rather be considered as the
- 00:28:32sense okay so having figured out what
- 00:28:34the sense of a whole sentence is it's
- 00:28:36the proposition expressed by that
- 00:28:37sentence the next question is well
- 00:28:39what's the reference what is the
- 00:28:40reference of a declarative sentence like
- 00:28:43like this or like this sha Carter is
- 00:28:45Rich Jay-Z is Rich we know what these
- 00:28:47names refer to they refer to the guy
- 00:28:50what do the whole sentences refer to and
- 00:28:52once again when figuring this out frga
- 00:28:54is constrained by compositionality
- 00:28:56whatever this thing the reference is
- 00:28:58it's going to have to somehow be built
- 00:29:00up out of the references of all the
- 00:29:03individual parts and this gives Fraga an
- 00:29:06argument for why the reference of a
- 00:29:08declarative sentence like this is that
- 00:29:10sentence's truth value the truth value
- 00:29:14of a declarative sentence is just
- 00:29:15whether or not the sentence is true or
- 00:29:17false there's two possible truth values
- 00:29:19true is one of them false is the other
- 00:29:21you know this sentence Jay-Z is Rich
- 00:29:23that's true its truth value is true so
- 00:29:26fragga thinks
- 00:29:28that this whole sentence refers to truth
- 00:29:32or the true that's what it refers to
- 00:29:35okay weird but he has an argument for
- 00:29:37why he thinks this has to be the case
- 00:29:39the reference of a whole declarative
- 00:29:41sentence has to be composed up out of
- 00:29:43the references of the individual Parts
- 00:29:45therefore any change in the reference of
- 00:29:48any of the individual Parts must result
- 00:29:50in a change in the reference of the
- 00:29:52whole sentence and whenever there is not
- 00:29:54a change in the reference of the
- 00:29:56individual parts like when switching
- 00:29:58between three and four the references of
- 00:30:00all of these parts this name this this
- 00:30:02this name this this the references of
- 00:30:04all this stays the same when you switch
- 00:30:06from 3 to four so the reference of these
- 00:30:09whole sentences has to stay the same
- 00:30:11therefore whatever the references of
- 00:30:13these declarative sentences are they
- 00:30:15have to be the same these two sentences
- 00:30:17have to have the same reference because
- 00:30:19all of their parts have the same
- 00:30:21reference because Shawn Carter and Jay-Z
- 00:30:23are two different names with the same
- 00:30:25reference these two names are what's
- 00:30:27called co-referring terms co-referring
- 00:30:30terms co-referring terms they refer to
- 00:30:33the same thing and so this test that
- 00:30:35frga has come up with is oh well if you
- 00:30:37swap out one term for another term
- 00:30:41that's co-referring right if you go from
- 00:30:43sentence three to sentence four if you
- 00:30:45do this swap you have to always preserve
- 00:30:49the reference of the whole sentence so
- 00:30:51then the question for Fraga is very
- 00:30:52simple what is something about these
- 00:30:54sentences that always stays the same
- 00:30:57whenever you swap out co-referring terms
- 00:31:00whenever you go from a sentence like
- 00:31:01three to a sentence like four what stays
- 00:31:04the same every time well it's not the
- 00:31:06thought it's not the cognitive value the
- 00:31:09thought changes that's the sense and
- 00:31:11that changes it's the truth value
- 00:31:13whenever you swap in a different name
- 00:31:15for this guy the resulting sentence will
- 00:31:18always have the same truth value as
- 00:31:21these
- 00:31:22two and there it is hve hve is Rich
- 00:31:26that's true as well this is true this is
- 00:31:28true and this is true you're never going
- 00:31:30to be able to get a sentence that just
- 00:31:32switches in a co-referring term here and
- 00:31:34all of a sudden that sentence is false
- 00:31:36whereas all of these remain true you're
- 00:31:38never going to get that because the
- 00:31:39truth value always stays the same when
- 00:31:42you swap in co-referring terms and that
- 00:31:44is fr's argument for why the truth value
- 00:31:46of a declarative sentence is the
- 00:31:48reference of that sentence and the same
- 00:31:50would hold if these sentences were false
- 00:31:53right if instead of saying sha Carter is
- 00:31:55Rich this sentence said sha Carter is
- 00:31:58enshrined in the Country Music Hall of
- 00:32:00Fame well then three would be false but
- 00:32:03then the same sentence where you swap in
- 00:32:04Jay-Z that would also be false hve would
- 00:32:07also be false any sentence that is false
- 00:32:10of Shawn Carter is also false of Jay-Z
- 00:32:12is also false of hve swapping out these
- 00:32:15names with different senses but the same
- 00:32:17reference changes the thought or
- 00:32:19proposition but never changes the truth
- 00:32:22value at least that's true in the case
- 00:32:24of simple sentences like this more
- 00:32:26complex sentences with like quotations
- 00:32:28and things like that this won't work but
- 00:32:30we're not going to worry about that now
- 00:32:31let's just read fraga's argument for
- 00:32:34this conclusion if our supposition that
- 00:32:36the reference of a sentence is its truth
- 00:32:38value is correct the latter that is the
- 00:32:40truth value must remain unchanged when a
- 00:32:42part of the sentence is replaced by an
- 00:32:44expression having the same reference and
- 00:32:47this is in fact the case right cool
- 00:32:49that's just what we were saying liit
- 00:32:51explains
- 00:32:53adbi Muto substitut P Salva veritate
- 00:32:58that's my best shot pronouncing the
- 00:32:59Latin it means equal are those which for
- 00:33:02each other mutually substituted can be
- 00:33:05saving the truth and what that means in
- 00:33:07comprehensible English is just that what
- 00:33:09it is to say that two things are the
- 00:33:10same thing is that every sentence that's
- 00:33:13true of one is true of the other what
- 00:33:15else but the truth value could be found
- 00:33:17that belongs quite generally to every
- 00:33:19sentence concerned with the reference of
- 00:33:21its components and remains unchanged by
- 00:33:23substitutions of the kind in question
- 00:33:25frga is asking what could it that stays
- 00:33:28the same when you keep doing this
- 00:33:29substituting other than the truth value
- 00:33:31and the implied answer to this question
- 00:33:33though he doesn't say it in the paper
- 00:33:34the implied answer is nothing there's
- 00:33:36nothing other than the truth value that
- 00:33:38that fits this role and therefore the
- 00:33:40truth value of a declarative sentence
- 00:33:42has to be its reference okay those are
- 00:33:45all the major claims in the paper
- 00:33:46there's a whole bunch of other weird
- 00:33:47grammatical stuff in the second half of
- 00:33:49the paper but no one ever talks about
- 00:33:51that and I'm not assigning that to my
- 00:33:53students so this video is
- 00:33:55done
- Frege
- sense
- reference
- philosophy of language
- identity statements
- cognitive value
- compositionality
- truth value
- empirical information
- linguistic terms