Shooting Below Native ISO - Good Idea or Bad?

00:14:20
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rLG_zlshlSA

الملخص

TLDRThe video provides an in-depth examination of shooting at ISOs lower than the base or native ISO setting on Sony cameras. It distinguishes how these adjustments impact dynamic range and photography quality. Specifically, while noise levels are diminished when using lower ISOs, dynamic range—measured in stops—is also reduced, limiting the camera's ability to capture the full range of light in a scene. Cameras like Sony's can shoot at pseudo-extended ISO settings, indicated by lines above and below the ISO numbers, unlike some brands that revert to auto-ISO when lowering past the native threshold. The video also covers practical tips for checking clipping points using Zebras and compares noise levels at various ISO settings, noting how these adjustments impact exposure results. The creator highlights that reducing ISO does not retrieve highlight details and emphasizes using caution when making such adjustments in filming projects. Despite some perceived drawbacks, understanding how to balance these variables can result in cleaner images with less noise, notably in controlled shooting environments.

الوجبات الجاهزة

  • 📷 Lowering ISO below native reduces dynamic range.
  • 📊 Native ISO for Sony in log is typically 640.
  • 🔍 Zebras can help find ISO clipping points.
  • 🔄 Lower ISO does not recover highlights.
  • 📉 Noise is reduced with lower than native ISO.
  • 📋 Dynamic range is traded off for less noise.
  • 👀 Retains fewer stops with reduced ISO.
  • 🎛️ Noise comparison between ISO 400 and 4000.
  • 🅱️ Base ISOs can be pseudo-extended on Sony.
  • 🎥 Useful tool for controlled environments.

الجدول الزمني

  • 00:00:00 - 00:05:00

    The video discusses the concept of shooting at ISOs lower than the camera's base or native ISO in log settings, specifically in Sony cameras. The speaker explains the availability of pseudo-extended ISOs on Sony cameras, identified by lines above and below the ISO values, and how not all camera brands allow choosing these lower ISOs. Using an a7S III, the native ISO in log is 640, but lower ISOs like 500, 400, 320, and others are available. By shooting at these lower ISOs, while dynamic range is sacrificed, noise level is reduced. The speaker provides a detailed analysis using Xyla 21 charts to illustrate how dynamic range decreases as ISO is lowered from 640, concluding that the camera sees fewer clean stops as ISO decreases. Moreover, clipping points in the camera also change, impacting how Zebras on cameras need to be adjusted when different ISOs are set. When ISO is lowered, highlights are not recovered as they would be when moving from a higher native ISO to a lower one, affecting overall exposure.

  • 00:05:00 - 00:14:20

    The practical application of lower-than-native ISOs is discussed, emphasizing managing clipping and noise in varying shooting scenarios. As demonstrated, lowering the ISO below native does not bring back clipped highlights, but rather adjusts the whole scene's exposure, reducing the noise but at the cost of dynamic range. Shooting at various ISOs affects the noise pattern with lower ISOs like 200 showing much less noise compared to higher ISOs, such as 800. The results are verified using Imatest results, which show the trade-offs between clean stops and noise levels across different ISOs. The video concludes with advice on using lower ISOs effectively, highlighting that understanding the trade-offs can improve workflows, especially in controlled settings where dynamic range demands are less stringent. The narrator emphasizes the importance of knowing the camera's limits and applying these settings in real-world scenarios, reassuring viewers that although dynamic range is compromised, low ISO shooting remains a viable option in many situations.

الخريطة الذهنية

فيديو أسئلة وأجوبة

  • What happens when you shoot at a lower ISO than the native ISO on Sony cameras?

    Shooting at a lower ISO than the native ISO decreases the dynamic range but also reduces noise levels.

  • How can I tell if my camera supports lower than native ISOs?

    Sony cameras and some others show lines above and below the ISO numbers that can go below the native ISO, indicating support for these options.

  • Do all cameras allow shooting at lower ISO than their native setting?

    No, not all cameras allow it. Some cameras automatically switch to auto-ISO when you try to set it lower than the native ISO.

  • Does lowering the ISO below its native value recover highlights?

    No, lowering the ISO below the native value does not recover highlights. Only shooting higher than the native ISO can recover highlight details.

  • What effect does lowering the ISO have on noise levels?

    Lowering the ISO below the native level reduces noise, making the image cleaner.

  • How does lowering ISO below native affect dynamic range?

    It reduces the dynamic range, decreasing the number of stops the camera can effectively see.

  • What's a practical scenario for lowering ISO below native?

    In controlled settings where dynamic range is less critical, lowering ISO reduces noise and doesn't significantly impact image quality.

  • Are there specific steps to determine ISO clipping points using Zebras?

    Yes, you can determine clipping points by adjusting Zebras settings on the camera to find where they start to show on a bright reference point.

  • How does the noise level compare between ISO 400 and extreme overexposed ISO 4000?

    ISO 400 has slightly more noise compared to ISO 4000 which is overexposed and then corrected.

  • Is it ever beneficial to shoot at ISO 160 on a Sony camera?

    Yes, it reduces noise considerably, although it also reduces the dynamic range available.

عرض المزيد من ملخصات الفيديو

احصل على وصول فوري إلى ملخصات فيديو YouTube المجانية المدعومة بالذكاء الاصطناعي!
الترجمات
en
التمرير التلقائي:
  • 00:00:00
    I got a quick video for you today.
  • 00:00:01
    I wanted to talk about shooting at ISOs lower
  • 00:00:04
    than the base or native ISO in log
  • 00:00:07
    on cameras that allow you to do that, like the Sony cameras
  • 00:00:09
    and I think there's other brands that do as well
  • 00:00:11
    but some brands don't.
  • 00:00:12
    Some brands, when you try to go below the base
  • 00:00:15
    say it's ISO 800, it just switches to auto
  • 00:00:18
    and you can't choose the lower sort of pseudo extended ISOs.
  • 00:00:23
    On the Sony cameras, you can tell
  • 00:00:24
    because these are the ones with the lines
  • 00:00:26
    on the top and the bottom here, let me show you.
  • 00:00:28
    So here I've got an a7S III and if we go into ISO
  • 00:00:31
    then we can see that the native ISO in log is 640
  • 00:00:36
    and we can increase that up to
  • 00:00:38
    well quite high on an a7S III.
  • 00:00:40
    But you'll notice that there's also a few ISOs
  • 00:00:42
    below 640, 500, 400, 320, 250, 200, and 160 that basically
  • 00:00:47
    two stops below that all have lines above and below.
  • 00:00:51
    And these are the ISOs that we're talking about.
  • 00:00:53
    Like I said, not all cameras even let you choose these.
  • 00:00:55
    So what happens if you were to shoot
  • 00:00:56
    at 400 or 200 or something like that?
  • 00:00:59
    So first off, I just have some Xyla 21 charts
  • 00:01:01
    because I wanted to test the dynamic range
  • 00:01:03
    because generally when you shoot in those lower
  • 00:01:06
    than native ISOs, you are giving up dynamic range.
  • 00:01:09
    So I wanted to see exactly how much
  • 00:01:11
    but before I give you the scores,
  • 00:01:13
    take a look here on the waveform.
  • 00:01:15
    So at 640 we can see that it's clipped right here
  • 00:01:19
    and then how many stops we get moving down
  • 00:01:20
    and then we can see the noise floor.
  • 00:01:22
    And this is gonna be important as well.
  • 00:01:24
    And I want you to look at these lower stops here
  • 00:01:26
    as we go through.
  • 00:01:27
    So if we switch to ISO 400, which is now one of the
  • 00:01:33
    lower than base ones, we can see that what happened was
  • 00:01:37
    the clipping point, the maximum point went down a notch.
  • 00:01:42
    And with that, if you look at this sort of fuzzy line
  • 00:01:45
    at the bottom here, the noise also went down.
  • 00:01:48
    It's not as noisy anymore.
  • 00:01:51
    And if we compare to an extreme example
  • 00:01:52
    which is this one over here at ISO 160,
  • 00:01:54
    we can see that the noise is very, very thin now
  • 00:01:57
    compared to the 640 and 160,
  • 00:01:59
    much, much thinner amount of noise.
  • 00:02:03
    But the way that the stops are kind of peeking up
  • 00:02:06
    we can see that it sort of stops here
  • 00:02:07
    and we can't see anything past this.
  • 00:02:08
    But if we go to this one
  • 00:02:11
    there are remnants, they're very noisy,
  • 00:02:13
    but there are remnants of stops that move past this.
  • 00:02:15
    So any stops that are more mixed into that noise floor
  • 00:02:18
    are going to kind of disappear.
  • 00:02:19
    And if we look at the Imatest results
  • 00:02:22
    so the actual scores from these, we can see this.
  • 00:02:25
    So if we start here and we look at ISO 640
  • 00:02:27
    and then we look over at this section here
  • 00:02:29
    where it says slope-based DR,
  • 00:02:31
    this number 14.6 is the total amount of stops
  • 00:02:34
    that it can see regardless of noise.
  • 00:02:37
    And then as we go down
  • 00:02:38
    these are varying qualities based on the signal to noise ratio.
  • 00:02:41
    So usually we look at something like medium
  • 00:02:43
    which is a signal to noise ratio of two.
  • 00:02:45
    12.6 is telling us we get 12.6 clean stops
  • 00:02:48
    but the camera can see 14.6 total.
  • 00:02:50
    But if we were to move down to ISO 400 here,
  • 00:02:52
    by the way this plus 88,
  • 00:02:54
    that's the clipping point in camera.
  • 00:02:55
    If you were to set your Zebras
  • 00:02:57
    to what level to be the maximum white now
  • 00:03:01
    based on that new lower ISO,
  • 00:03:03
    that's what it'll be is plus 88.
  • 00:03:05
    I'll show you in the camera in a minute
  • 00:03:07
    once we're done here.
  • 00:03:08
    So now the total dynamic range,
  • 00:03:10
    the total amount of stops it can see
  • 00:03:12
    drop to 14 from 14.6.
  • 00:03:15
    But the medium and low scores, they stayed the same
  • 00:03:18
    at 12.6 for clean and 13.6 for, you know, pretty clean.
  • 00:03:23
    If we moved to ISO 200 though,
  • 00:03:25
    which now has a plus 79 for maximum clipping point,
  • 00:03:29
    the total amount of stops we can see drops to 13.2
  • 00:03:34
    which also is affecting the low now.
  • 00:03:35
    It's not affecting the medium,
  • 00:03:37
    it says it went up a little bit,
  • 00:03:38
    but just it's probably margin of error.
  • 00:03:40
    But the low is now being limited by that
  • 00:03:42
    which means the stops that were sort of noisy before
  • 00:03:45
    but not as clean as medium.
  • 00:03:48
    Those used to be 13.6 all the way through.
  • 00:03:50
    But now we can only see 13.2 of them
  • 00:03:52
    because there's only 13.2 stops total.
  • 00:03:55
    But we still get our 12 and a half ish in the medium.
  • 00:03:58
    And then finally, if we move all the way down to ISO 160
  • 00:04:00
    which is the lowest we can set the ISO,
  • 00:04:02
    the total amount of stops that you get to work with period
  • 00:04:05
    is 12.8 which means that the low is also 12.8
  • 00:04:09
    and the medium, again, could be up to 12.8 maximum.
  • 00:04:12
    And what's interesting is that they're all the same now
  • 00:04:14
    which makes me think that it's kind of calibrated probably
  • 00:04:16
    so that when you set the ISO as low as possible
  • 00:04:19
    that it's gonna give you only the stops
  • 00:04:23
    that have a signal noise ratio of two, like the clean stops,
  • 00:04:26
    which is what the medium is showing here.
  • 00:04:28
    So you can just sort of trim off the
  • 00:04:32
    extra noisy ones, reduce the noise,
  • 00:04:34
    and get rid of those stops if you want,
  • 00:04:35
    by lowering the ISO down.
  • 00:04:37
    And the lowest clipping point for ISO 160 is plus 76.
  • 00:04:41
    Let me show you what that means in the camera
  • 00:04:42
    if say you use zebras to expose on these Sony cameras.
  • 00:04:45
    Okay, so as you can see in the bottom of the frame there
  • 00:04:48
    it's ISO 640 and if we go into our zebras
  • 00:04:51
    where it says lower limit 94 plus
  • 00:04:53
    that is the correct clipping point
  • 00:04:55
    for S-Log three, each gamma is different,
  • 00:04:58
    and you can always tell which one it is
  • 00:05:00
    by just moving up and down.
  • 00:05:02
    If you have your zebras set too high like this
  • 00:05:05
    the zebras won't show up.
  • 00:05:06
    So you can bring 'em down one at a time
  • 00:05:08
    make sure you're pointing at something that's clipped
  • 00:05:09
    like pointing at a bright light or something
  • 00:05:11
    and you bring it down one at a time
  • 00:05:13
    and as soon as you get the 94 plus the zebras will appear.
  • 00:05:15
    So that's how you can sort of
  • 00:05:16
    find out what the clipping point is
  • 00:05:18
    for the gamma that you're on.
  • 00:05:19
    What's the highest number that the zebras
  • 00:05:21
    will appear on and if they disappear going up one,
  • 00:05:24
    bring it back, that's the clipping point.
  • 00:05:25
    But if we had this set to, so say we go in here,
  • 00:05:28
    and we lower ISO down to 500 for example,
  • 00:05:31
    there's a quick and easy way to remember this.
  • 00:05:34
    As you go over to this
  • 00:05:35
    you have to drop it by three points.
  • 00:05:38
    Each one-third stop of ISO
  • 00:05:40
    requires you to lower your maximum clipping point
  • 00:05:43
    in your zebras by three points.
  • 00:05:45
    So then now it would be like this 92 would not show zebras
  • 00:05:48
    and then 91 the zebras would magically come back
  • 00:05:51
    when you were at ISO 500.
  • 00:05:53
    If we lower the ISO down to 400, same thing, it's a pattern.
  • 00:05:56
    We're gonna go over here, here now 88,
  • 00:05:58
    If we lower the ISO down to 320,
  • 00:06:01
    again, same thing 85.
  • 00:06:04
    If we lower the ISO to 250.
  • 00:06:07
    And again, if you have a camera that starts
  • 00:06:09
    at a different base ISO, a Sony camera that is,
  • 00:06:12
    so say it's 800, the same principles apply.
  • 00:06:15
    It's just that you're gonna start ticking down
  • 00:06:17
    from 800 and you'll still end up at the same bottom point
  • 00:06:21
    but your bottom will now be ISO 200 instead of 160.
  • 00:06:23
    Okay, so now let's take all this information
  • 00:06:25
    and apply it to an actual scene so we can see how
  • 00:06:27
    it works when you're actually shooting something.
  • 00:06:29
    So in this clip here, the area right here
  • 00:06:32
    that I'm pointing at with my finger,
  • 00:06:33
    this zone right here is clipped,
  • 00:06:36
    it has zebras on it when I shot it, but over here is fine.
  • 00:06:38
    The rest of the building just right there.
  • 00:06:39
    And if we look at the waveform
  • 00:06:41
    we can see what I'm talking about.
  • 00:06:43
    The rest of it is just below the line.
  • 00:06:45
    And then this bit right here is clipped.
  • 00:06:47
    If you were to try to shoot this building, let's say,
  • 00:06:50
    and this is at ISO 800,
  • 00:06:52
    and then you brought it down to ISO 400,
  • 00:06:56
    what's gonna happen?
  • 00:06:57
    Are you still gonna be clipped here
  • 00:06:58
    or all of a sudden you're not gonna be clipped?
  • 00:06:59
    Because if you moved from say ISO 1600 to 800
  • 00:07:03
    you would no longer be clipping that section.
  • 00:07:05
    But are you still clipping it
  • 00:07:07
    if you move down from ISO 800 to 400?
  • 00:07:09
    The answer is yes, you are.
  • 00:07:12
    However, the clipping point is now lowered
  • 00:07:14
    like we talked about, you don't recover any highlights.
  • 00:07:16
    And I think that's important
  • 00:07:17
    for you to remember is if you turn down the ISO
  • 00:07:20
    below a native ISO, you don't recover highlights.
  • 00:07:23
    You would if you were shooting higher than native
  • 00:07:26
    if you went from 600 to 800
  • 00:07:28
    you would bring some highlight information back
  • 00:07:30
    but not if you go from 800 down to 400.
  • 00:07:32
    All that's happening is
  • 00:07:34
    the whole scene is being pushed down.
  • 00:07:36
    So what would be the reason for actually doing this?
  • 00:07:37
    Well, if you were to monitor this shot
  • 00:07:40
    or grade it or you knew what your intention was in post
  • 00:07:43
    you can see that the ISO 200,
  • 00:07:47
    once I apply the standard Sony Rec 709 LUT
  • 00:07:50
    is now really nicely exposed.
  • 00:07:52
    Again, the spot is still gonna be clipped,
  • 00:07:54
    it's not gonna change anything but the scene
  • 00:07:58
    as it was seen on the day, like as it should be,
  • 00:08:00
    as it should be shown.
  • 00:08:01
    But as you can see, the ISO 400 and the ISO 800
  • 00:08:04
    are overexposed now with the LUT applied
  • 00:08:06
    and they don't look good at all.
  • 00:08:07
    So you have to go in and you have to apply an offset
  • 00:08:09
    manually before the LUT to reduce them to equal exposures.
  • 00:08:15
    And when you do that, now the shots are
  • 00:08:18
    pretty much the same.
  • 00:08:19
    So what if instead we expose for middle gray perfectly.
  • 00:08:24
    What's happening to the stops at the top and the bottom?
  • 00:08:27
    I showed you the dynamic range if we expose to the right
  • 00:08:29
    and see how many we can see into the shadows,
  • 00:08:31
    what happens if we expose perfectly in the middle?
  • 00:08:33
    So if we look here, this is ISO 800 and I exposed
  • 00:08:36
    for middle gray to be the middle of the chart.
  • 00:08:38
    And then we can see when it clips off to the left,
  • 00:08:42
    like at what stop it clips, and what happens in the shadows.
  • 00:08:45
    And so let's take a look at the waveform there.
  • 00:08:47
    We can see that there's four stops
  • 00:08:49
    on the brighter side that are clipped
  • 00:08:52
    and then we can see the rest of the shape
  • 00:08:53
    and how it curves down. But if we look at ISO 400
  • 00:08:58
    now there's an extra stop that's clipped.
  • 00:09:01
    So bringing it down ISO 400, like I said,
  • 00:09:02
    doesn't preserve any highlights.
  • 00:09:04
    If you expose to the middle
  • 00:09:06
    those building shots were also exposed to the right.
  • 00:09:08
    So keep that in mind, okay?
  • 00:09:09
    But now we're exposed to the middle.
  • 00:09:10
    So when you exposed to the right
  • 00:09:12
    you don't bring any more highlights back.
  • 00:09:13
    If you expose to the middle and you bring down the ISO
  • 00:09:16
    you actually have fewer highlights
  • 00:09:18
    to work with because of the fact that
  • 00:09:20
    the maximum clipping point is moving down on you.
  • 00:09:23
    So again, ISO 800 we can get this stop.
  • 00:09:27
    ISO 400, that stop is gone.
  • 00:09:29
    The rest of the curve that you'll notice is pretty similar.
  • 00:09:33
    And I'd say it maintains that here just we lose this stop.
  • 00:09:36
    But in exchange, again, go back to 800
  • 00:09:39
    look how thick the noise is.
  • 00:09:40
    You can see right here and at 400, a lot less noise.
  • 00:09:43
    So we're basically trading off this stop
  • 00:09:46
    for less noise. And at ISO 200, we lose another stop yet again.
  • 00:09:50
    So now we have six stops that are clipped
  • 00:09:53
    but the noise becomes even less so.
  • 00:09:56
    But the curve here remains the same throughout each of them.
  • 00:10:01
    So what does that mean then if we shoot a scene
  • 00:10:03
    exposed to the middle that has different values in it.
  • 00:10:06
    So here as you can see, this is my scene
  • 00:10:09
    shot at ISO 800 and I exposed to middle grey to 41%,
  • 00:10:14
    which is the buy the book way to expose S-Log3.
  • 00:10:17
    And if we move to ISO 400
  • 00:10:19
    very little is changing and there's a reason for that.
  • 00:10:22
    Those extreme stops
  • 00:10:24
    that are getting clipped in the Xyla 21 test,
  • 00:10:27
    they don't really show up here because remember
  • 00:10:30
    we still get 12 and a half stops to work with.
  • 00:10:34
    The noise is the biggest difference.
  • 00:10:36
    Let's go to ISO 800 and
  • 00:10:38
    we'll zoom in right over here.
  • 00:10:39
    This is usually hard to show on YouTube
  • 00:10:41
    so I'm gonna punch into a crazy percentage.
  • 00:10:44
    So we're like 400% or 500% now.
  • 00:10:46
    Do you see the sort of pattern here?
  • 00:10:47
    Watch as I click to ISO 400 and then ISO 200,
  • 00:10:50
    you see how there's less of it.
  • 00:10:51
    And obviously if we play a little bit
  • 00:10:53
    versus play a little bit over here,
  • 00:10:55
    this is the regular noise level,
  • 00:10:56
    this is ISO 800, this is
  • 00:10:59
    the native ISO and then 400 and then 200.
  • 00:11:03
    So 200 is a very, very low noise,
  • 00:11:05
    much lower than 800 and it's actually lower than the noise
  • 00:11:09
    if you do the typical overexposed and bring it down trick
  • 00:11:13
    which I thought was the most interesting.
  • 00:11:15
    So here is two shots,
  • 00:11:18
    this is ISO 400,
  • 00:11:20
    and just use a LUT and you grade it a little bit
  • 00:11:22
    and then this is ISO 4,000,
  • 00:11:24
    which is way, way, way overexposed like maximum over exposure
  • 00:11:28
    and then brought down and then graded that way.
  • 00:11:31
    So same deal, we're gonna zoom in over here,
  • 00:11:33
    really, really, really far zoomed in.
  • 00:11:35
    So this is ISO 4,000.
  • 00:11:37
    It's very, very clean.
  • 00:11:39
    And then ISO 400 is slightly worse, but it was
  • 00:11:42
    the closest comparative I could find was sort of one stop
  • 00:11:46
    below the native is similar
  • 00:11:47
    to massively overexposing.
  • 00:11:49
    Flip back and forth you can see that the 400 slightly worse
  • 00:11:52
    but the 200, two stops below native is slightly better
  • 00:11:56
    than the 4,000 ISO extreme over exposure.
  • 00:11:59
    So I thought that was interesting.
  • 00:12:00
    Now, if we try to wrap all this up and conclude with
  • 00:12:03
    what do I do with this information then practically?
  • 00:12:05
    Basically just know the limits, know what you're doing.
  • 00:12:08
    So can you lower the ISO
  • 00:12:09
    below the native and get away with it?
  • 00:12:12
    Yes, of course.
  • 00:12:13
    In fact, if you're shooting
  • 00:12:14
    in a controlled setting where you need
  • 00:12:16
    12 stops or fewer
  • 00:12:18
    it's not gonna be an issue, unless all your stops are,
  • 00:12:21
    you need to be way up in the clipping point
  • 00:12:22
    then you're gonna wanna expose to the right.
  • 00:12:24
    But if you expose neutrally and you and your whole scene
  • 00:12:28
    will fit in that five, six stops, above and below,
  • 00:12:31
    then it really doesn't matter.
  • 00:12:32
    You can just lower the ISO to get a darker image
  • 00:12:34
    and less noise and it works.
  • 00:12:36
    There is less noise in the image.
  • 00:12:38
    The trade off obviously is that for
  • 00:12:41
    each stop of noise that you reduce
  • 00:12:42
    you're losing a stop of highlights,
  • 00:12:43
    which kind of makes sense and it seems like a fair trade off
  • 00:12:45
    but you'll never lose more than the amount of clean stops
  • 00:12:49
    the camera can see anyway at a signal noise ratio of two,
  • 00:12:52
    which in the case of the
  • 00:12:53
    a7S III is that 12 and a half stops.
  • 00:12:56
    Which I think is kind of interesting that you'll never lose
  • 00:12:57
    more than the 12 and a half stops.
  • 00:12:59
    And then you'll just have to expose
  • 00:13:01
    with how much light you're letting into the camera
  • 00:13:04
    to light the scene the way that you want.
  • 00:13:06
    And like you saw in the case of the sky here
  • 00:13:09
    sometimes it can make your workflow a lot easier
  • 00:13:11
    because maybe you're monitoring and you're like,
  • 00:13:14
    oh, I didn't bring an ND or whatever,
  • 00:13:15
    okay, I'll just drop my ISO down to 200
  • 00:13:18
    and you've got the LUT applied
  • 00:13:19
    so you're proving the LUT,
  • 00:13:20
    you're like, yeah, looks good,
  • 00:13:21
    okay. I don't see any issues with that
  • 00:13:22
    because I'm not really worried about liking in my shot
  • 00:13:24
    with the sky and a building.
  • 00:13:25
    The shadows are slightly different in that corner
  • 00:13:28
    because maybe we're starting to encroach beyond
  • 00:13:32
    the 12 and a half stops and we're starting to see
  • 00:13:34
    some of the more noisy stops being allowed in there.
  • 00:13:36
    But that's the type of difference
  • 00:13:37
    that we're talking about here. Is this versus this.
  • 00:13:39
    Like, yes, you can see a slight difference in the shadows
  • 00:13:42
    but it is slight.
  • 00:13:44
    So basically I just think it's a tool you can use
  • 00:13:46
    and know when and how to use it.
  • 00:13:48
    And it's great to know that,
  • 00:13:49
    while yes, you are giving up dynamic range,
  • 00:13:52
    some of the old things I read of like,
  • 00:13:54
    "if you shoot below the native ISO, your camera's just--
  • 00:13:57
    throw it in the garbage basically." It's not that bad.
  • 00:13:59
    You are giving up dynamic range,
  • 00:14:01
    but you're never giving up more than what your
  • 00:14:03
    clean signal to noise ratio of two stops is going to be anyway.
  • 00:14:07
    And I think that's pretty good.
  • 00:14:10
    That's a good result.
  • 00:14:11
    So I don't know, do with this what you want.
  • 00:14:12
    I hope that it was helpful.
  • 00:14:15
    Yeah. (sighs)
  • 00:14:16
    Alright...
  • 00:14:18
    I'm done.
الوسوم
  • ISO
  • Sony cameras
  • dynamic range
  • noise reduction
  • native ISO
  • clipping points
  • log profiles
  • pixel noise
  • waveform
  • Zebras