How 5 Companies Are Keeping The World At War

00:11:47
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lDB3L23UMCQ

Zusammenfassung

TLDRThe video explores the US military-industrial complex, detailing how defense contractors profit from wars and influence US foreign policy. Despite the US not winning most conflicts since 1945, defense companies thrive, with nearly a trillion in sales in 2023. Military aid often mandates the purchase of American weapons, benefiting these contractors. The consolidation of defense firms has led to immense power, with lobbying efforts ensuring continued military spending. The video critiques this cycle of profit and calls for public awareness and action against the military-industrial complex.

Mitbringsel

  • 💰 US defense companies profit immensely from wars.
  • 📉 The US has not won most wars since 1945.
  • 🛡️ Military aid often requires purchasing American weapons.
  • 📈 Defense contractors' stocks surged during conflicts.
  • 🔄 The cycle of war and profit is ongoing.
  • 🏛️ Lobbying plays a crucial role in maintaining military spending.
  • 🌍 The US supplies nearly 50% of global arms.
  • ⚔️ Consolidation of defense firms has increased their power.
  • 📜 Eisenhower warned about the military-industrial complex.
  • ✊ Public awareness is essential to counter this influence.

Zeitleiste

  • 00:00:00 - 00:05:00

    The video discusses the cyclical nature of U.S. military interventions, highlighting the profitability of defense contractors despite the U.S. not winning most wars since 1945. It emphasizes how the military-industrial complex shapes U.S. foreign policy, with defense companies profiting from military aid and arms sales, particularly in conflicts like those in Gaza and Ukraine. The narrative suggests that the U.S. government, rather than promoting peace, is a leading force of instability, with defense contractors benefiting from ongoing conflicts.

  • 00:05:00 - 00:11:47

    The video traces the consolidation of the defense industry back to the 1990s, where mergers led to the dominance of five major companies. It critiques the military-industrial complex for perpetuating wars for profit, highlighting the lack of accountability in defense spending and the influence of lobbyists on Congress. The speaker calls for public awareness and international solidarity to counter the power of the military-industrial complex, echoing Eisenhower's warning about its influence on U.S. policy.

Mind Map

Video-Fragen und Antworten

  • What is the military-industrial complex?

    The military-industrial complex refers to the relationship between the military and defense contractors, where the latter profits from military spending and conflicts.

  • How much profit did US defense companies make in 2023?

    In 2023, US defense companies made almost a trillion in sales, with $765 billion coming from government contracts.

  • What role do defense contractors play in US foreign policy?

    Defense contractors significantly influence how wars are framed and the purpose of military actions, often prioritizing profit over winning conflicts.

  • How does US military aid benefit defense contractors?

    Much of the military aid sent abroad is used to purchase American weapons, effectively serving as corporate welfare for defense contractors.

  • What are the top five US defense companies?

    The top five US defense companies are Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, Boeing, Northrop Grumman, and General Dynamics.

  • What was Eisenhower's warning about the military-industrial complex?

    Eisenhower warned about the potential for the military-industrial complex to gain unwarranted influence over government policy.

  • How does the US compare to other countries in arms supply?

    The US supplies nearly 50% of all weapons globally, dominating the military-industrial landscape.

  • What is the impact of US defense spending on global conflicts?

    US defense spending often fuels conflicts around the world, as defense contractors profit from wars and military aid.

  • What is the relationship between the military and defense contractors?

    There is a direct pipeline between the military and defense contractors, with many former military officials taking positions in these companies.

  • How can the public counter the military-industrial complex?

    An informed and engaged public can challenge the military-industrial complex's influence on US policy.

Weitere Video-Zusammenfassungen anzeigen

Erhalten Sie sofortigen Zugang zu kostenlosen YouTube-Videozusammenfassungen, die von AI unterstützt werden!
Untertitel
en
Automatisches Blättern:
  • 00:00:00
    Look, you've seen it before. The US
  • 00:00:02
    invades, the US withdraws. I mean,
  • 00:00:04
    remember Afghanistan? That war was an
  • 00:00:06
    absolute disaster. But it was a jackpot
  • 00:00:10
    for US defense contractors. And now,
  • 00:00:12
    with the wars in Gaza and Ukraine,
  • 00:00:14
    they're making even more. Despite having
  • 00:00:17
    hardly any US troops on the ground, war
  • 00:00:19
    profiteeers always win, regardless of
  • 00:00:22
    the outcome. Even though America's
  • 00:00:24
    global influence is waning, its war
  • 00:00:27
    machine keeps growing stronger and
  • 00:00:29
    stronger. Look what is written here.
  • 00:00:32
    USA. These are the American weapons
  • 00:00:35
    behind me. In this video, we'll unpack
  • 00:00:38
    how American defense giants helped build
  • 00:00:40
    the modern military-industrial complex
  • 00:00:42
    and why their model is so profitable, no
  • 00:00:45
    matter how many lives are lost.
  • 00:00:47
    [Music]
  • 00:00:55
    The US hasn't won most of the wars it's
  • 00:00:57
    fought since 1945. It keeps ending up in
  • 00:00:59
    a stalemate or being defeated entirely.
  • 00:01:02
    And yet, one group always comes out
  • 00:01:04
    ahead. The US defense industry. Given
  • 00:01:07
    how much profit is on the line, US
  • 00:01:09
    defense companies play a heavy hand in
  • 00:01:11
    how these wars and their purpose are
  • 00:01:13
    framed. What we do saves lives. It
  • 00:01:17
    protects peace and democracy throughout
  • 00:01:19
    the world. This couldn't be further from
  • 00:01:21
    the truth. The United States government
  • 00:01:23
    is the leading force of instability,
  • 00:01:26
    violence, and environmental destruction.
  • 00:01:28
    Abby Martin is an investigative
  • 00:01:30
    journalist and the creator of the Empire
  • 00:01:32
    Files, an independent media outlet that
  • 00:01:34
    dissects the inner workings of US
  • 00:01:36
    empire. Her reporting engages with the
  • 00:01:38
    hard truth. War is a business and
  • 00:01:41
    business is booming. The
  • 00:01:42
    military-industrial complex plays the
  • 00:01:45
    center role in shaping American foreign
  • 00:01:47
    policy. It is the shaper of US foreign
  • 00:01:51
    policy. And this business model works.
  • 00:01:53
    In 2023, US defense companies made
  • 00:01:56
    almost a trillion in sales with a record
  • 00:01:58
    $765 billion of that coming directly
  • 00:02:02
    from government contracts. Here's one
  • 00:02:04
    way that money ends up in their hands.
  • 00:02:06
    When the US votes to send military aid
  • 00:02:08
    abroad, like to Israel or Ukraine, most
  • 00:02:11
    of that money goes to American arms
  • 00:02:13
    makers. Whether it gets used to fund new
  • 00:02:15
    weapons or restocking those sent from US
  • 00:02:18
    reserves, it basically serves as a form
  • 00:02:20
    of corporate welfare for defense
  • 00:02:21
    contractors. It fuels the conflicts. I
  • 00:02:24
    mean, you look at Gaza and Ukraine.
  • 00:02:26
    Rathon, Loheed, Martin, Boeing, all of
  • 00:02:28
    their stocks exploded. Their profits
  • 00:02:31
    were massive in 2023 and 2024. Why?
  • 00:02:36
    Because these horrific, catastrophic
  • 00:02:38
    wars,
  • 00:02:40
    their shareholders had huge returns on
  • 00:02:42
    those wars. It's true. In the year
  • 00:02:44
    following Russia's initial invasion of
  • 00:02:46
    Ukraine, the stock price for General
  • 00:02:48
    Dynamics rose nearly 34%.
  • 00:02:52
    One year after the Hamasled attacks on
  • 00:02:54
    Israel, Loheed Martin saw an increase of
  • 00:02:56
    over 54%.
  • 00:02:58
    And of course, the other top contractors
  • 00:03:00
    benefited in their own ways, too. These
  • 00:03:02
    companies aren't just making money,
  • 00:03:04
    they're becoming too powerful to stop.
  • 00:03:06
    President Eisenhower famously predicted
  • 00:03:08
    this problem back in the 1960s. In fact,
  • 00:03:11
    he coined the term military-industrial
  • 00:03:13
    complex during his final speech as
  • 00:03:15
    president. We must car guard against the
  • 00:03:19
    acquisition of unwarranted influence,
  • 00:03:21
    whether sought or unsought by the
  • 00:03:24
    military industrial complex.
  • 00:03:27
    the potential for the disastrous rise of
  • 00:03:29
    misplaced power exists and will persist.
  • 00:03:32
    He was right. Today, just five US
  • 00:03:35
    companies dominate the entire global
  • 00:03:37
    defense industry. Loheed Martin, Rathon,
  • 00:03:40
    Boeing, Northrup Grumman, and General
  • 00:03:43
    Dynamics. Well, the United States is the
  • 00:03:45
    global arms supplier. The US supplies
  • 00:03:49
    almost 50% of all the weapons on the
  • 00:03:51
    planet. There is no other country that
  • 00:03:54
    parallels the military power and
  • 00:03:57
    entrenchment of this kind of
  • 00:03:58
    military-industrial complex other than
  • 00:04:00
    the US Empire. And that kind of
  • 00:04:03
    dominance doesn't just mean influence.
  • 00:04:05
    It means they profit from nearly every
  • 00:04:07
    major conflict on Earth. And that's no
  • 00:04:10
    accident. It's by design. Take NATO for
  • 00:04:13
    example. Back in the 1990s, US defense
  • 00:04:16
    contractors lobbyed hard to expand NATO.
  • 00:04:19
    Not just for security reasons, but also
  • 00:04:21
    to open up new markets for their
  • 00:04:22
    business. Whenever a new member state
  • 00:04:24
    joined NATO, they were required to
  • 00:04:26
    modernize their militaries, usually by
  • 00:04:28
    buying American weapons. And it worked.
  • 00:04:31
    Today, the US supplies about 2/3 of
  • 00:04:33
    NATO's weapons. Just take Ukraine for
  • 00:04:35
    example. Since the war in Ukraine began,
  • 00:04:38
    demand has surged. In 2024 alone, US
  • 00:04:41
    military equipment sales to foreign
  • 00:04:43
    governments has jumped 29%.
  • 00:04:46
    Hitting a record $319 billion. The US
  • 00:04:49
    military gives billions of dollars in
  • 00:04:51
    military aid to countries like Egypt and
  • 00:04:54
    Israel and Ukraine and Uganda. But it
  • 00:04:58
    comes with conditions. This so-called
  • 00:05:00
    aid from the US government often
  • 00:05:02
    requires countries to spend that money
  • 00:05:04
    on US weapons, no matter who the aid is
  • 00:05:06
    for. In fact, when US weapons are used
  • 00:05:09
    in places like Gaza and the West Bank,
  • 00:05:11
    it's usually the US government that's
  • 00:05:13
    paying for them. Seeing the Palestinians
  • 00:05:15
    in Gaza
  • 00:05:17
    scavenge and dig through the rubble and
  • 00:05:21
    finding bombs that are made from Rathon
  • 00:05:23
    and Boeing.
  • 00:05:49
    It's sick. The blood is on our hands. I
  • 00:05:52
    don't know how we can ever recover. I
  • 00:05:53
    don't know how humanity can ever recover
  • 00:05:56
    from what we've collectively allowed to
  • 00:05:57
    happen in Gaza. And for people to say,
  • 00:06:00
    "Oh, it's just far away. We have nothing
  • 00:06:02
    to do with it." couldn't be further from
  • 00:06:04
    the truth. It's a USIsraeli genocide and
  • 00:06:08
    it's pushed and propped up by US defense
  • 00:06:12
    contractors
  • 00:06:13
    and they profit off every bullet and
  • 00:06:16
    every bomb that's dropped on those
  • 00:06:18
    babies. And that pipeline of profit has
  • 00:06:21
    been in place for decades. Since 1948,
  • 00:06:24
    the US has sent over $300 billion in
  • 00:06:27
    foreign aid to Israel, more than any
  • 00:06:28
    other country. Most of that comes in the
  • 00:06:31
    form of annual grants that Israel has to
  • 00:06:33
    spend on American weapons. For example,
  • 00:06:36
    Israel's Iron Dome missile defense
  • 00:06:37
    system has been a gold mine for
  • 00:06:39
    companies like Rathon that produce its
  • 00:06:41
    parts. And when tensions escalate again,
  • 00:06:44
    Congress fasttracks more funding to
  • 00:06:46
    Israel. And the cycle continues. So this
  • 00:06:48
    aid is basically a subsidy to American
  • 00:06:50
    defense contractors. Israel's attacks on
  • 00:06:53
    Gaza and the US backing that enables
  • 00:06:55
    them are continuing with no real end in
  • 00:06:58
    sight. And that means an open-ended
  • 00:07:00
    stream of profit for the US corporations
  • 00:07:02
    that are supplying the Israeli military.
  • 00:07:05
    And this isn't a one-off. Gaza is just
  • 00:07:07
    the latest example. Since 2001, the US
  • 00:07:10
    has spent $14 trillion on war. Nearly
  • 00:07:14
    half of that went to private defense
  • 00:07:16
    contractors. During this period of time,
  • 00:07:18
    Afghanistan became the longest war in US
  • 00:07:20
    history and a business model of endless
  • 00:07:23
    profit for the defense industry.
  • 00:07:37
    But to really understand how these five
  • 00:07:39
    defense companies ended up with all the
  • 00:07:41
    leverage, we have to go back to the
  • 00:07:43
    1990s. Two years ago, I began planning
  • 00:07:46
    cuts in military spending that reflected
  • 00:07:48
    the changes of the new era. But now this
  • 00:07:52
    year with imperial communism gone, that
  • 00:07:56
    process can be accelerated. When the
  • 00:07:58
    Cold War was ending, the US government
  • 00:08:00
    expected its defense budget to shrink.
  • 00:08:02
    It decided to encourage the 51 existing
  • 00:08:05
    defense contractors to merge, signaling
  • 00:08:07
    that only a handful of firms would
  • 00:08:09
    survive the new era. So in 1993, the
  • 00:08:12
    Pentagon invited top defense executives
  • 00:08:14
    to a dinner that would later be dubbed
  • 00:08:16
    as the Last Supper. What followed was a
  • 00:08:18
    wave of mergers that gave rise to
  • 00:08:20
    today's big five. But that consolidation
  • 00:08:23
    came at a cost. With so few players left
  • 00:08:25
    in the game, these companies now wield
  • 00:08:27
    immense power. The military-industrial
  • 00:08:29
    complex doesn't care about winning wars.
  • 00:08:31
    The US doesn't care about winning the
  • 00:08:33
    Afghanistan war. They just wanted to
  • 00:08:35
    keep it going. And they got what they
  • 00:08:37
    wanted. Even after the withdrawal from
  • 00:08:39
    Afghanistan, the defense budget didn't
  • 00:08:41
    shrink. In fact, it's grown nearly 14%
  • 00:08:44
    in the 3 years after the war ended. It's
  • 00:08:47
    because the defense contractors always
  • 00:08:49
    win. There always needs to be another
  • 00:08:52
    threat on the horizon. Communism,
  • 00:08:55
    terrorism, environmentalism,
  • 00:08:58
    China. There always has to be a threat
  • 00:09:00
    to justify these mass expenditures. And
  • 00:09:03
    now we're looking at a trillion dollar
  • 00:09:06
    budget. Today, the US spends more on
  • 00:09:08
    defense than the next nine countries
  • 00:09:11
    combined. And every year the US defense
  • 00:09:13
    budget expands with very little public
  • 00:09:16
    scrutiny. Despite this massive price
  • 00:09:18
    tag, the defense department has actually
  • 00:09:20
    failed its financial audit 7 years in a
  • 00:09:23
    row. That means it hasn't even been able
  • 00:09:25
    to prove how most of its funds were
  • 00:09:27
    used. But the defense budget is just the
  • 00:09:29
    tip of the iceberg. In fact, these
  • 00:09:32
    weapons contractors spend so much money
  • 00:09:35
    and employ hundreds of lobbyists, 700 or
  • 00:09:39
    more per year. That's more than one
  • 00:09:41
    lobbyist per every member of Congress.
  • 00:09:44
    But it's not just that. In fact, 80% of
  • 00:09:47
    expert witnesses who testify to Congress
  • 00:09:49
    are actually paid by arms makers to
  • 00:09:52
    lobby on their behalf. All of this is a
  • 00:09:54
    joke. It's all a show. So, we, the
  • 00:09:58
    taxpayers, subsidize the defense
  • 00:10:01
    industry. The defense industry hires
  • 00:10:03
    lobbyists to go and perform on the hill
  • 00:10:06
    and pretend like they're independent
  • 00:10:08
    experts. And really, it's all just a big
  • 00:10:10
    game, isn't it? And the joke's on us.
  • 00:10:12
    They lobby Congress to keep wars going.
  • 00:10:15
    And then some of them even help run
  • 00:10:16
    these wars from inside the Pentagon
  • 00:10:18
    itself. There's a program inside the
  • 00:10:21
    military where hundreds of military
  • 00:10:23
    officers with very elite positions
  • 00:10:25
    actually go into defense contractor
  • 00:10:28
    businesses and get internships. They sit
  • 00:10:31
    there for months, sometimes more than a
  • 00:10:33
    year as active duty government
  • 00:10:36
    employees. Then they go back to the
  • 00:10:38
    government while still in active duty
  • 00:10:40
    military positions. It's a direct
  • 00:10:42
    pipeline from the government to the MIC.
  • 00:10:46
    Not to mention, former highlevel
  • 00:10:47
    military officials who retire often go
  • 00:10:50
    on and serve on the boards of the big
  • 00:10:51
    five. So yeah, the line between the US
  • 00:10:53
    military and for-profit defense
  • 00:10:55
    companies is becoming blurriier every
  • 00:10:58
    day. But the real cost comes to those
  • 00:11:00
    who live where the bombs fall. It is on
  • 00:11:03
    our shoulders. We are the children of
  • 00:11:05
    the empire and this is our government.
  • 00:11:07
    We are the only ones who can stop this.
  • 00:11:10
    It turns out Eisenhower's warning was
  • 00:11:12
    all too real. Only an alert and
  • 00:11:15
    knowledgeable population can counter the
  • 00:11:17
    military-industrial complex's power to
  • 00:11:19
    shape US policy. I truly believe that
  • 00:11:22
    the more of us wake up with an
  • 00:11:24
    internationalist perspective where we
  • 00:11:27
    can have solidarity for our brothers and
  • 00:11:29
    sisters, no matter where they live, no
  • 00:11:31
    matter what geographical barriers that
  • 00:11:34
    they're imposed by, we will be
  • 00:11:36
    unstoppable.
  • 00:11:42
    [Music]
Tags
  • military-industrial complex
  • US defense contractors
  • foreign policy
  • military aid
  • war profits
  • Eisenhower
  • arms sales
  • lobbying
  • global conflicts
  • public awareness