The Origins and Rise of the Slavs | Dr. Florin Curta

01:13:32
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3lBSm87304Q

Resumen

TLDRIn this episode of 'The Study of Antiquity and the Middle Ages,' Nick Barksdale welcomes Dr. Florin Curta to delve into the fascinating history of the Slavic peoples. Dr. Curta, an expert in medieval history and archaeology, discusses the origins, language, and cultural influences of the Slavs, challenging traditional migration theories by proposing alternative linguistic pathways like koine. The conversation explores early descriptions by Byzantine authors, revealing biases that shaped historical narratives. Dr. Curta addresses archaeological findings and the linguistic spread of Slavic languages, suggesting they were more influenced by geographical and political interactions than by mass migrations. The discussion also touches on how Slavic culture has evolved, highlighting its impact and legacy in modern Eastern Europe, evident in language and cultural identity. Dr. Curta emphasizes the complex interplay between different cultures and languages as key to understanding the Slavic past.

Para llevar

  • 🎀 Introduction of Dr. Florin Curta by host Nick Barksdale, discussing Slavic history.
  • πŸ“œ Examination of the Slavs' historical and linguistic origins by Dr. Curta.
  • πŸ—ΊοΈ Discussion on the debated geographical origins of the Slavs.
  • πŸ“š Insights into the biases of early sources recording Slavic history.
  • 🏺 Examination of archaeological evidence linked to Slavic cultural identity.
  • πŸ—£οΈ Exploration of the spread of Slavic languages through non-migratory theories.
  • πŸ” Investigation into the historical narratives constructed by external observers.
  • 🌍 Analysis of Slavic cultural influence and interactions with neighboring cultures.
  • 🧬 Challenges and limitations of using DNA studies to trace Slavic origins.
  • πŸ• The enduring cultural and linguistic legacy of the Slavs in Eastern Europe.

CronologΓ­a

  • 00:00:00 - 00:05:00

    The host, Nick Barksdale, introduces his guest, Dr. Florin Curta, who specializes in the history of the Slavic peoples. Dr. Curta briefly shares his academic background, highlighting his studies and publications, particularly focusing on the origins of the Slavs.

  • 00:05:00 - 00:10:00

    Dr. Curta discusses his role at the University of Florida and his contributions to the study of Eastern Europe and Byzantine history. He emphasizes his efforts to promote Eastern European scholars and young academics in the field.

  • 00:10:00 - 00:15:00

    As the discussion turns to the term 'Slav', Dr. Curta highlights its historical emergence in Greek and Latin sources. He points out the absence of evidence that ancient populations self-identified as 'Slavs', suggesting the term was externally applied.

  • 00:15:00 - 00:20:00

    Dr. Curta clarifies the complexity of identifying Slavs, noting the lack of archaeological indicators directly tied to the Slavs. He emphasizes the constructed nature of associating ethnicity with material culture in archaeology.

  • 00:20:00 - 00:25:00

    Dr. Curta refutes the notion of a singular pre-Slavic identity, challenging ancient historical accounts linking early groups in Eastern Europe to the Slavs. He critiques the tendency to retroactively assign modern national identities to ancient peoples.

  • 00:25:00 - 00:30:00

    The dialogue examines theories on the Slavic homeland, highlighting linguistic studies suggesting an origin near the Pripyat River in Ukraine and Belarus. Dr. Curta critiques archaeological assumptions and migration models based on these theories.

  • 00:30:00 - 00:35:00

    Addressing the linguistic spread of Slavic languages, Dr. Curta argues against migration as the primary mechanism. He suggests social and political interactions facilitated the spread, with non-migratory processes like lingua franca playing a significant role.

  • 00:35:00 - 00:40:00

    Dr. Curta notes Slavic culture's limited spread primarily due to its non-codified nature and discusses the influence of surrounding cultures. He highlights cross-cultural exchanges affecting language, societal structures, and material culture.

  • 00:40:00 - 00:45:00

    The segment covers the ancient ethnic terminology for Slavs and their lack of an internally-generated origin myth. Dr. Curta compares this with external labels such as 'Wends' and mentions the varied historical stories crafted by later Slavic groups.

  • 00:45:00 - 00:50:00

    Dr. Curta addresses the intricate and sometimes flawed role of DNA evidence in tracing Slavic origins. He critiques modern tendencies to correlate contemporary populations with ancient ones, highlighting the limitations of genetic diachronic studies.

  • 00:50:00 - 00:55:00

    External sources, predominantly Byzantine authors, described Slavs through a military lens. Procopius and others documented their warfare styles and cultural perceptions, displaying a general bias originating from geographic and climatic theories.

  • 00:55:00 - 01:00:00

    Frankish and papal sources also depicted Slavs as military threats or geographic entities. Accounts from these sources were often limited to interactions or conflicts, portraying a biased viewpoint reflecting contemporary geopolitical concerns.

  • 01:00:00 - 01:05:00

    The religious beliefs of Slavs pre-Christianity were predominantly animistic, per both textual and archaeological evidence. However, descriptions by Greek and later Christian sources were often interpreted through their theological lens, misrepresenting native myths.

  • 01:05:00 - 01:13:32

    Dr. Curta concludes by emphasizing the legacy of Slavic languages and the cultural identity fostered through the liturgical and literary creations like Old Church Slavonic. This has left a lasting impact on the cultural history and identity of modern Slavic nations.

Ver mΓ‘s

Mapa mental

Mind Map

Preguntas frecuentes

  • Who is the guest on the show hosted by Nick Barksdale?

    The guest is Dr. Florin Curta.

  • What is the main topic of discussion in the episode?

    The history and origins of Slavic peoples.

  • What is Dr. Florin Curta's area of expertise?

    Medieval history and archaeology, with a focus on Slavic peoples.

  • What language theory does Dr. Curta discuss about the Slavs?

    The spread of Slavic languages through mechanisms other than migration, such as koine and contact linguistics.

  • How does Dr. Curta view early descriptions of Slavs by Byzantine authors?

    As potentially biased and influenced by their own cultural perspectives.

  • What significant point does Dr. Curta make regarding archaeological evidence of Slavic culture?

    The evidence often contradicts the theory of a large-scale migration from the Slavic homeland.

  • What explanation does Dr. Curta give for the origins of Slavic languages?

    They likely emerged through interactions among Balto-Slavic, Iranian, and Thracian languages rather than from a single migration.

  • What challenges are faced in using DNA to study Slavic origins?

    Limitations due to cremation practices and the complexity of reading DNA without clear historical timelines.

  • What is a key takeaway from Dr. Curta's discussion about Slavic cultural influence?

    Slavic culture and language were influenced by neighboring cultures and also left an enduring legacy in Eastern Europe.

  • How does the legacy of Slavic peoples extend into modern times according to Dr. Curta?

    Through linguistic contributions and influences on national identities and cultures in Eastern Europe.

Ver mΓ‘s resΓΊmenes de vΓ­deos

ObtΓ©n acceso instantΓ‘neo a resΓΊmenes gratuitos de vΓ­deos de YouTube gracias a la IA.
SubtΓ­tulos
en
Desplazamiento automΓ‘tico:
  • 00:00:41
    ladies and gentlemen
  • 00:00:43
    welcome to the study of antiquity and
  • 00:00:46
    the middle ages as always i'm your host
  • 00:00:49
    nick barksdale and today we are joined
  • 00:00:52
    by
  • 00:00:52
    a very special guest some of my
  • 00:00:55
    subscribers
  • 00:00:57
    had told me about a professor that i had
  • 00:00:59
    to have on my show
  • 00:01:01
    and so i looked him up his credentials
  • 00:01:04
    and his
  • 00:01:04
    area of work and focus is amazing and i
  • 00:01:07
    knew
  • 00:01:08
    we had to have him on this channel and
  • 00:01:11
    so i reached out
  • 00:01:12
    he has been so kind and courteous and he
  • 00:01:14
    has even given us some of his time here
  • 00:01:16
    today
  • 00:01:17
    ladies and gentlemen i introduce dr
  • 00:01:20
    florin curta
  • 00:01:21
    dr curta thank you so much for coming on
  • 00:01:23
    the show today thank you for having me
  • 00:01:25
    and it's a pleasure
  • 00:01:26
    i mean i've never used the channel of
  • 00:01:28
    communication like this so
  • 00:01:30
    uh bear with me i'll try my best today's
  • 00:01:32
    episode
  • 00:01:33
    is going to be fascinating and it's
  • 00:01:36
    going to dive into a subject that many
  • 00:01:38
    of you love including myself
  • 00:01:40
    and it's not just the history of the
  • 00:01:43
    slavic peoples
  • 00:01:44
    but we're going to go a little bit
  • 00:01:45
    further back and focus on their origins
  • 00:01:49
    but before we begin dr kurta
  • 00:01:52
    for my subscribers who may not be
  • 00:01:54
    familiar with you and your work
  • 00:01:56
    would you tell us a little bit about
  • 00:01:57
    yourself today so
  • 00:01:59
    um i have a phd in history from western
  • 00:02:02
    michigan uni
  • 00:02:03
    university and two mas one in history
  • 00:02:07
    from the same university and the other
  • 00:02:08
    one in medieval studies from cornell
  • 00:02:10
    university
  • 00:02:12
    um i arrived here at the university of
  • 00:02:14
    florida the campus
  • 00:02:16
    uh the quad on the campus of which you
  • 00:02:18
    see right behind me
  • 00:02:19
    um in 1999 so i've been teaching
  • 00:02:23
    here for 20 plus um
  • 00:02:26
    it's um it has been a uh
  • 00:02:30
    i mean i i my dissertation was on the
  • 00:02:33
    early slugs but it has been a
  • 00:02:35
    journey in the sense that although i
  • 00:02:36
    came with certain ideas about
  • 00:02:38
    research in mind my students challenged
  • 00:02:40
    me to go
  • 00:02:41
    way beyond that the first book which was
  • 00:02:44
    the
  • 00:02:44
    citation i just mentioned was published
  • 00:02:46
    in 2001 under the title
  • 00:02:48
    uh the making of the slavs and that got
  • 00:02:51
    the
  • 00:02:52
    herbert baxter adams prize of the um
  • 00:02:56
    american historical association in 2003.
  • 00:02:59
    i then published a number of books
  • 00:03:02
    let's say uh on a more
  • 00:03:06
    broader regional basis uh 2006 south
  • 00:03:10
    eastern europe um recently 2019
  • 00:03:13
    a companion with brill on the whole of
  • 00:03:15
    eastern europe
  • 00:03:16
    two volumes i published
  • 00:03:20
    this year actually although the um the
  • 00:03:23
    book came out
  • 00:03:24
    later last year a sequel so to speak to
  • 00:03:27
    the first book on the slavs
  • 00:03:29
    called slavs in the making you see the
  • 00:03:32
    first book
  • 00:03:32
    actually got um its focus was more on
  • 00:03:35
    the
  • 00:03:36
    um lower danube region now at the border
  • 00:03:39
    between romania and balk and bulgaria
  • 00:03:41
    the further to the north
  • 00:03:42
    into ukraine and the eastern part of
  • 00:03:44
    romania the republic of moldova
  • 00:03:46
    but not not too far to the north so a
  • 00:03:49
    lot of the people that actually
  • 00:03:50
    wrote reviews or talked to me want to
  • 00:03:53
    know what
  • 00:03:54
    do i have to say about those uh regions
  • 00:03:57
    father from the from the danube and
  • 00:03:59
    father from the raider of the
  • 00:04:00
    of the byzantine sources early byzantine
  • 00:04:02
    sources so the second book
  • 00:04:03
    which as i said uh was published this
  • 00:04:05
    year by roblich
  • 00:04:07
    came out as a response to that as also
  • 00:04:09
    as a response to
  • 00:04:11
    critiques about the
  • 00:04:14
    the way in which i dealt with the
  • 00:04:16
    problems of language maybe we're going
  • 00:04:18
    to have the upward the opportunity to uh
  • 00:04:19
    discuss more of those issues problem of
  • 00:04:22
    sources and how
  • 00:04:23
    how a historian who has to wear many
  • 00:04:25
    hats
  • 00:04:26
    uh can deal with those different kinds
  • 00:04:29
    of
  • 00:04:30
    evidence so i i'm a professor of uh
  • 00:04:33
    medieval history and archaeology at the
  • 00:04:34
    university of florida
  • 00:04:36
    i am also the co-editor of two series
  • 00:04:38
    one at brielle
  • 00:04:40
    very successful on um east central and
  • 00:04:42
    eastern europe in the middle ages 450 to
  • 00:04:44
    1450.
  • 00:04:46
    we just published volume number 75
  • 00:04:49
    so it's it's very very successful very
  • 00:04:52
    large source it
  • 00:04:53
    has two purposes number one to actually
  • 00:04:55
    bring scholars from the
  • 00:04:57
    region uh who do not necessarily or
  • 00:04:59
    always write in
  • 00:05:00
    english to the focus uh to the attention
  • 00:05:03
    of the
  • 00:05:04
    um english-speaking audience either in
  • 00:05:07
    america or in
  • 00:05:08
    in england and
  • 00:05:11
    promote on the same stage a number of
  • 00:05:13
    young scholars
  • 00:05:14
    primarily from america who have dealt
  • 00:05:17
    with topics
  • 00:05:18
    related to geographically
  • 00:05:19
    chronologically with eastern europe in
  • 00:05:21
    the middle ages the other series of
  • 00:05:23
    which have been the co-editor is that
  • 00:05:25
    um milan it's the
  • 00:05:28
    uh series as a new trends in the
  • 00:05:32
    byzantine history so it's actually
  • 00:05:35
    a a a series focused only on byzantine
  • 00:05:38
    history whereas the other one is general
  • 00:05:41
    for the entire region
  • 00:05:42
    and to my subscribers before we dive in
  • 00:05:45
    at the end of this episode don't forget
  • 00:05:47
    check out the links in the video
  • 00:05:49
    description below it's going to take you
  • 00:05:51
    to a variety
  • 00:05:53
    of sources to where you can really dive
  • 00:05:55
    in and take advantage
  • 00:05:56
    of all the awesome work dr curta has
  • 00:05:59
    done
  • 00:06:00
    and what he is currently working on i
  • 00:06:02
    can't recommend it enough
  • 00:06:03
    give him all of your support and now
  • 00:06:06
    we're gonna go for it when you hear the
  • 00:06:08
    term
  • 00:06:08
    slav and especially in reference to late
  • 00:06:11
    antiquity
  • 00:06:12
    and the early middle ages based on your
  • 00:06:15
    knowledge and your research and even
  • 00:06:17
    your imagination
  • 00:06:18
    what comes to your mind actually the
  • 00:06:21
    word
  • 00:06:21
    slav as we have it um is a late
  • 00:06:25
    formation now the earliest uh
  • 00:06:27
    term that came in the sources is clavin
  • 00:06:30
    actually in greeks
  • 00:06:31
    and slav or slavos is a
  • 00:06:34
    contraction of that that is attested a
  • 00:06:37
    little later both
  • 00:06:38
    first in greek of course and then in
  • 00:06:40
    latin so
  • 00:06:41
    uh the first thing that i think of when
  • 00:06:44
    i hear this word is
  • 00:06:45
    the history of the words you know there
  • 00:06:47
    is what what
  • 00:06:49
    caused that name to pop up in the
  • 00:06:51
    sources and
  • 00:06:52
    when did it and under what circumstances
  • 00:06:55
    um there is a very interesting um
  • 00:06:59
    angle to this problem the naming that is
  • 00:07:02
    namely
  • 00:07:02
    that um we don't have any evidence that
  • 00:07:06
    any particular group of
  • 00:07:07
    people in other words uh uh
  • 00:07:09
    territorially
  • 00:07:11
    defined precisely right within a certain
  • 00:07:13
    region at a certain moment in time
  • 00:07:15
    call themselves by that name
  • 00:07:17
    linguistically speaking
  • 00:07:18
    uh the word is clearly not a greek
  • 00:07:20
    origin at least because that
  • 00:07:22
    those two consonants s and l next to
  • 00:07:25
    each other
  • 00:07:26
    are very non-greek which is why uh in
  • 00:07:28
    greek as well as in latin
  • 00:07:30
    uh between the two consonants there's a
  • 00:07:32
    c or k as it were
  • 00:07:33
    right so sklavenoi uh schlavi right
  • 00:07:37
    um that's because in greek it would have
  • 00:07:39
    been almost impossible to pronounce the
  • 00:07:41
    sla
  • 00:07:41
    right that's not that's not a sound that
  • 00:07:43
    sounds from familiar to a greek
  • 00:07:45
    so that that seems to be a good
  • 00:07:47
    indication that the name itself is
  • 00:07:49
    um when people do this or native origin
  • 00:07:52
    exactly
  • 00:07:52
    what it meant in whatever the language
  • 00:07:54
    from which it was taken
  • 00:07:56
    it's a huge debate some argue that it
  • 00:07:59
    can it came from
  • 00:08:01
    slavic from a slavic language and it is
  • 00:08:03
    connected to the word slava
  • 00:08:05
    glory so those are the glorious ones if
  • 00:08:08
    you want
  • 00:08:08
    others claim that in fact the origin is
  • 00:08:10
    the word slova which means
  • 00:08:12
    word so in other words this is the
  • 00:08:13
    people that speak this language as
  • 00:08:15
    opposed to the other one
  • 00:08:16
    there's a there's there's a very
  • 00:08:18
    interesting theory here namely that
  • 00:08:20
    um in in slavic language specifically in
  • 00:08:23
    the east slavic dialects of the middle
  • 00:08:25
    ages much later times
  • 00:08:27
    the speakers of germanic languages
  • 00:08:30
    specifically germans
  • 00:08:31
    uh were called nienze which actually
  • 00:08:33
    means dummies
  • 00:08:34
    you know there is those are the people
  • 00:08:36
    who speak a language you cannot
  • 00:08:37
    understand
  • 00:08:37
    a phenomenon very similar to what caused
  • 00:08:40
    the greeks the ancient greeks to call
  • 00:08:43
    persians and others
  • 00:08:44
    barbarians uh varvari actually
  • 00:08:47
    means in greek those that mobility you
  • 00:08:50
    cannot understand what they're saying
  • 00:08:51
    in other words it's not a language that
  • 00:08:54
    we people
  • 00:08:55
    you know we the no not the king group
  • 00:08:57
    use
  • 00:08:58
    the problem with this theory um about
  • 00:09:01
    names is that actually
  • 00:09:02
    it's there's no way no no shirt of
  • 00:09:04
    evidence this is just just just as a
  • 00:09:06
    credible hypothesis as any other however
  • 00:09:09
    at much later times
  • 00:09:10
    right so beginning roughly with the high
  • 00:09:13
    middle ages late middle ages and even
  • 00:09:15
    early modern period certain groups
  • 00:09:17
    within this vast area in eastern europe
  • 00:09:20
    uh
  • 00:09:20
    inhabited by people uh speaking slavic
  • 00:09:22
    languages
  • 00:09:24
    took that name and some of them remained
  • 00:09:25
    to this day or even were even given to
  • 00:09:27
    the territories in which those
  • 00:09:28
    those people live both slovenia and
  • 00:09:31
    slovakia
  • 00:09:32
    are called so on the basis of this word
  • 00:09:35
    a few people know that in the
  • 00:09:37
    uh middle ages as late as the 13th
  • 00:09:40
    century
  • 00:09:41
    way up in in the north in the
  • 00:09:43
    northwestern part of present-day russia
  • 00:09:45
    in the area of the town of novgorod
  • 00:09:48
    another group
  • 00:09:48
    slovenes uh leave there so there's a
  • 00:09:51
    there's a tendency to see
  • 00:09:53
    uh the name itself being applied to
  • 00:09:57
    groups that were right on the boundary
  • 00:09:59
    between the slavic speaking area and
  • 00:10:01
    some other area right in other words
  • 00:10:04
    an area in which speakers of some other
  • 00:10:05
    languages lived
  • 00:10:07
    um in in the case of slovenia and
  • 00:10:09
    slovakia clearly with the
  • 00:10:11
    with the germanic or in the case of
  • 00:10:13
    slovakia with
  • 00:10:15
    hungarian speakers it's very interesting
  • 00:10:17
    in the middle
  • 00:10:18
    right so let's say in bulgaria in the
  • 00:10:21
    balkans or in
  • 00:10:22
    in ukraine uh those are not names that
  • 00:10:25
    were i mean
  • 00:10:26
    most of the names that we know from the
  • 00:10:27
    russian primary chronicles tribes right
  • 00:10:29
    have nothing to do with the worst love
  • 00:10:31
    and in fact the author of the russian
  • 00:10:33
    primary use of chronicle uses the word
  • 00:10:35
    as an umbrella term
  • 00:10:36
    so to to to end up my
  • 00:10:39
    answer to your question what i think of
  • 00:10:42
    uh based on my
  • 00:10:43
    knowledge and research is equal is an
  • 00:10:45
    umbrella term
  • 00:10:46
    not unlike what one might think of the
  • 00:10:49
    word kels
  • 00:10:50
    when hearing it that is excellent yeah
  • 00:10:52
    the whole time you were talking about
  • 00:10:53
    that i kept thinking about that exact
  • 00:10:55
    thing you know we use the term celtic
  • 00:10:57
    or even you know like native american it
  • 00:10:59
    encompasses absolutely
  • 00:11:00
    so many different peoples probably
  • 00:11:03
    probably the better
  • 00:11:04
    even better parallel is what is
  • 00:11:08
    called today hispanic right in america
  • 00:11:11
    specifically
  • 00:11:12
    which is an exonym that means a name
  • 00:11:14
    given from the outside
  • 00:11:16
    i don't know if anyone who is called a
  • 00:11:18
    hispanic from the outside calling him or
  • 00:11:20
    herself hispanic on a normal basis
  • 00:11:22
    because those people among themselves
  • 00:11:24
    will always be peruvians colombians
  • 00:11:26
    ecuadorian whatever
  • 00:11:27
    right in other words they'll tend to go
  • 00:11:29
    to the identity that is local
  • 00:11:32
    if they will take the hispanic identity
  • 00:11:33
    it will always be in relationship some
  • 00:11:35
    kind of relationship to the state
  • 00:11:37
    funding rights you know group
  • 00:11:41
    identity larger than ecuadorians
  • 00:11:44
    or whatever very similar in the case of
  • 00:11:47
    the slavs it was most likely a name
  • 00:11:48
    given from the outside
  • 00:11:50
    probably based on some word or some
  • 00:11:52
    local name but
  • 00:11:53
    clearly that went uh out and it was used
  • 00:11:56
    as an umbrella term for people who
  • 00:11:57
    otherwise identified themselves
  • 00:11:59
    very locally as derevlians or severians
  • 00:12:03
    or radhimichi or tiversi or
  • 00:12:05
    you know whatever other tribal names
  • 00:12:06
    they were there so they were they were
  • 00:12:08
    slavs from the outside not from the
  • 00:12:09
    inside so to speak when it comes to
  • 00:12:11
    defining
  • 00:12:12
    slavs from a historical context or even
  • 00:12:16
    an archaeological one
  • 00:12:18
    one of my patrons and subscriber alex
  • 00:12:20
    had asked
  • 00:12:21
    how are we able to actually tell let me
  • 00:12:24
    let me draw a distinction first all
  • 00:12:25
    right since see there were two angles
  • 00:12:27
    from which
  • 00:12:28
    he asked this question he he mentioned
  • 00:12:30
    historical context archaeological
  • 00:12:32
    context
  • 00:12:32
    you can tell from a historical context
  • 00:12:34
    to the extent that you have written
  • 00:12:36
    sources
  • 00:12:36
    now there there are there are at least
  • 00:12:39
    two problems
  • 00:12:40
    right number one uh most of the
  • 00:12:44
    early sources that we have about the
  • 00:12:45
    early slabs are not written by
  • 00:12:47
    themselves
  • 00:12:47
    right so you really have to wait quite
  • 00:12:50
    long depending upon the angle you want
  • 00:12:53
    to take here
  • 00:12:54
    uh you can think of the 10th century uh
  • 00:12:57
    le tre the royal court in preslav in
  • 00:13:00
    bulgaria writing under the rule of
  • 00:13:02
    simeon the great
  • 00:13:04
    writing as it were translating from
  • 00:13:06
    greek into orchard slavonic right
  • 00:13:08
    and as they were writing that they did
  • 00:13:10
    mention slavs right they did not they
  • 00:13:12
    never mentioned it
  • 00:13:13
    in um they had in mind as
  • 00:13:16
    a linguistic group in other words to
  • 00:13:18
    them slavs were those who spoke
  • 00:13:20
    what we now call orchards right uh or
  • 00:13:23
    you can wait for the 12th century 12th
  • 00:13:25
    century for the last reduction of the
  • 00:13:27
    russian primary chronicle
  • 00:13:29
    and there of course the slavs are you
  • 00:13:31
    know at the beginning and there's even a
  • 00:13:32
    story it's the only maybe not the only
  • 00:13:34
    but the first story that we have
  • 00:13:36
    about where the slabs came from what's
  • 00:13:39
    the origin and so on so forth
  • 00:13:40
    and again it's very interesting that uh
  • 00:13:43
    the author
  • 00:13:44
    or the authors i should say of the
  • 00:13:46
    russian primary chronicle
  • 00:13:48
    did not think of the slavs as a unique
  • 00:13:50
    group they or or initially they thought
  • 00:13:52
    of it as a as a
  • 00:13:53
    as a group they then split into
  • 00:13:54
    different tribes right
  • 00:13:56
    um so it's very difficult to pinpoint
  • 00:13:59
    exactly
  • 00:14:00
    what specific authors meant by slavs
  • 00:14:03
    it seems to me if you are um serious
  • 00:14:06
    about actually looking at the
  • 00:14:07
    the the primary sources of the region
  • 00:14:09
    sources it's always
  • 00:14:11
    a a moving target and there are reasons
  • 00:14:14
    for that obviously namely that there is
  • 00:14:16
    a certain distance between the object
  • 00:14:18
    described and the author
  • 00:14:19
    most of those authors do not go in the
  • 00:14:21
    field to interview people hey
  • 00:14:23
    are you a slav can you tell me something
  • 00:14:25
    about yourself there's no such thing
  • 00:14:26
    right most of them were writing from the
  • 00:14:29
    comfort of their
  • 00:14:30
    of their chairs uh somewhere in
  • 00:14:31
    constantinople like procopius and
  • 00:14:34
    giordanes or in a monastery near kiev
  • 00:14:36
    like uh
  • 00:14:37
    the authors of the russian primary
  • 00:14:38
    economic condition i mentioned to you
  • 00:14:40
    uh so they would never uh either close
  • 00:14:44
    either in geographic
  • 00:14:45
    or in most of the time especially later
  • 00:14:47
    sources
  • 00:14:48
    in chronological terms now with
  • 00:14:50
    archaeology
  • 00:14:51
    we run into relating to problem two but
  • 00:14:53
    of different nature
  • 00:14:54
    we're running into a theoretical problem
  • 00:14:56
    regardless of
  • 00:14:58
    what ethnic group we're talking about
  • 00:14:59
    here slavs franks
  • 00:15:01
    celts vikings you name it there is no
  • 00:15:04
    such thing
  • 00:15:05
    no object no pottery no fibula no
  • 00:15:08
    bracelet
  • 00:15:09
    made in slavia right so there is no
  • 00:15:11
    description like that so
  • 00:15:13
    uh the link between a certain ethnicity
  • 00:15:16
    and material culture
  • 00:15:17
    is always a construct of modern scholars
  • 00:15:20
    modern archaeologists right
  • 00:15:21
    to the extent i don't want to discuss
  • 00:15:23
    right now that it is a valid
  • 00:15:25
    question some some archaeologists even
  • 00:15:27
    deny that the
  • 00:15:28
    ethnicity existed as we know it now in
  • 00:15:31
    the middle ages i'm not one of those
  • 00:15:32
    people
  • 00:15:32
    right but i i would i would warn a
  • 00:15:35
    against the quick
  • 00:15:36
    uh equivalence between any uh objects of
  • 00:15:39
    material culture
  • 00:15:41
    and a specific ethnic group that we
  • 00:15:43
    nowadays create
  • 00:15:45
    and most likely people in the past too
  • 00:15:47
    create ethnic boundaries via material
  • 00:15:49
    cultures always a function of a certain
  • 00:15:52
    political context specific circumstances
  • 00:15:55
    at the specific moment in time and place
  • 00:15:59
    so if i may summarize this um
  • 00:16:02
    the the um definition of slavs
  • 00:16:05
    will always depend upon the context in
  • 00:16:07
    other words
  • 00:16:08
    i don't i cannot give you an
  • 00:16:10
    encyclopedia slash dictionary
  • 00:16:12
    definition slavs means that one two
  • 00:16:15
    three four right meanings
  • 00:16:16
    uh there's a multiplicity of meanings
  • 00:16:18
    precisely because the
  • 00:16:20
    word was used in a rather vague way
  • 00:16:23
    initially and then different authors
  • 00:16:25
    different moments in time
  • 00:16:26
    applied it to their specific purposes so
  • 00:16:29
    you you collect
  • 00:16:31
    all that information and try to put them
  • 00:16:32
    on top of the other
  • 00:16:34
    there's not much overlap one comes i
  • 00:16:36
    mean the the tendency ever since the
  • 00:16:38
    19th century would say well they all
  • 00:16:40
    were aware that those people were
  • 00:16:41
    different because they spoke a different
  • 00:16:43
    language they recalled slug
  • 00:16:45
    the reality is that until the 9th
  • 00:16:48
    century we have
  • 00:16:49
    absolutely no idea what was the language
  • 00:16:50
    that those because people spoke
  • 00:16:52
    and by the way ultra slavonic is not a
  • 00:16:54
    language in which
  • 00:16:56
    somebody would go to the market to buy
  • 00:16:58
    bread you know ask for buying a bread or
  • 00:17:00
    something
  • 00:17:00
    it's an artificial language created i
  • 00:17:03
    mean really
  • 00:17:04
    invented by one man we know the name of
  • 00:17:06
    that man constantine otherwise known as
  • 00:17:08
    saints
  • 00:17:08
    serum right um who
  • 00:17:11
    use the most likely that's a theory too
  • 00:17:14
    use the dialect spoken
  • 00:17:15
    uh in the hinterland of the city of
  • 00:17:18
    thessaloniki in northern greece right
  • 00:17:19
    to create this artificial language into
  • 00:17:22
    which he translated the liturgical books
  • 00:17:24
    uh in order to spread the word of god to
  • 00:17:27
    people in moravia
  • 00:17:29
    which is the eastern part of present-day
  • 00:17:31
    czech republic the same language
  • 00:17:33
    was then used to uh
  • 00:17:36
    convert the chris to christianity to the
  • 00:17:38
    society in bruce
  • 00:17:39
    now that itself implies that people in
  • 00:17:43
    both moravia and ruse understood that
  • 00:17:45
    language does it mean that their
  • 00:17:47
    languages
  • 00:17:48
    their respective language they were
  • 00:17:50
    speaking when they were going to the
  • 00:17:51
    market to buy their bread were similar
  • 00:17:53
    i would not go there there is no basis
  • 00:17:56
    for that in other words we don't have
  • 00:17:57
    any other evidence
  • 00:17:58
    written of what those languages were so
  • 00:18:02
    all inferences based on language
  • 00:18:05
    are based on material that survives much
  • 00:18:07
    much much later times
  • 00:18:09
    so jumping over centuries it's always a
  • 00:18:11
    pretty risky business no historian is
  • 00:18:13
    happy doing that alex had also asked
  • 00:18:16
    when it comes to the slavs who were they
  • 00:18:20
    before they were slavs there were no
  • 00:18:22
    [Β __Β ] before the slavs
  • 00:18:23
    in other words it's almost like saying
  • 00:18:26
    um
  • 00:18:27
    where were the americans before they
  • 00:18:29
    became american
  • 00:18:30
    all right let me to give you an example
  • 00:18:32
    and obviously people would say well i
  • 00:18:33
    mean most of the
  • 00:18:34
    settlers came from england but
  • 00:18:38
    with those who embarked in england
  • 00:18:39
    already american
  • 00:18:41
    i i got that right and
  • 00:18:44
    is is there an equivalent yeah let me
  • 00:18:47
    let me let me
  • 00:18:48
    let me explain my parallel here
  • 00:18:52
    that there was somebody before
  • 00:18:55
    the slavs are first mentioned in the
  • 00:18:57
    religious sources in the same area
  • 00:18:59
    living there's no doubt right there's no
  • 00:19:02
    point to and it would be absurd to deny
  • 00:19:03
    that
  • 00:19:05
    but we don't know how those people call
  • 00:19:07
    themselves
  • 00:19:09
    attempts have been made and i will show
  • 00:19:10
    you probably some images earlier on
  • 00:19:13
    of um attempts are made to actually uh
  • 00:19:16
    link the um vanity mentioned by tacitus
  • 00:19:20
    so you know roman historian or even
  • 00:19:24
    uh some of the people mentioned by
  • 00:19:26
    herodotus
  • 00:19:27
    right so fifth century bc right
  • 00:19:31
    to to the slavs to me
  • 00:19:34
    i mean as a good as a good historian you
  • 00:19:36
    have to be to exercise your critical
  • 00:19:38
    skills and examine any
  • 00:19:39
    hypothesis on the basis of the evidence
  • 00:19:41
    that is there both tacitus
  • 00:19:43
    and herodotus in my opinion had no
  • 00:19:48
    clue or no no inclination no
  • 00:19:51
    desire to actually satisfy the
  • 00:19:54
    um aspirations nationalist aspirations
  • 00:19:57
    of people in the 19th century
  • 00:19:59
    when those claims were made so the only
  • 00:20:02
    reason for
  • 00:20:02
    pushing the antiquity of the slavs
  • 00:20:04
    before the 6th century their first
  • 00:20:06
    mention in the regional sources
  • 00:20:08
    is simply because there sounds like a
  • 00:20:10
    competition who's the oldest
  • 00:20:11
    in europe and that very early on
  • 00:20:14
    was linked to claim to territory and
  • 00:20:17
    influence in other words to political
  • 00:20:19
    power but a historian is not supposed to
  • 00:20:21
    do that
  • 00:20:22
    and as a in fact i would go as far as to
  • 00:20:25
    say like if
  • 00:20:26
    if a historian's job is any
  • 00:20:29
    that could be describing a few words is
  • 00:20:31
    to actually destroy
  • 00:20:32
    illusions the illusion
  • 00:20:35
    of pushing those loves back into history
  • 00:20:38
    is just like
  • 00:20:39
    you know as i mentioned i mean there is
  • 00:20:41
    no point of linking americans to the
  • 00:20:44
    english men or women who left england
  • 00:20:48
    evidently there is a link between the
  • 00:20:50
    two evidently there were people in as i
  • 00:20:52
    mentioned
  • 00:20:52
    that there's no denying but there's no
  • 00:20:54
    point
  • 00:20:55
    in believing that the identity that we
  • 00:20:58
    call slavic
  • 00:20:58
    came frozen in times fully fledged from
  • 00:21:01
    let's say bronze age all the way to the
  • 00:21:03
    modern age there's no such thing that
  • 00:21:04
    would be my history
  • 00:21:06
    change what do we know about where
  • 00:21:09
    they actually came from originally as
  • 00:21:12
    you can tell
  • 00:21:13
    the maps that one can find on wikipedia
  • 00:21:17
    or other um avenues
  • 00:21:20
    you know to would get quick information
  • 00:21:23
    seem to rely on a theory according to
  • 00:21:26
    which
  • 00:21:27
    the uh homeland of the slavs the area
  • 00:21:29
    from which they came from as you
  • 00:21:31
    mentioned earlier on
  • 00:21:32
    would be along or on both sides of a
  • 00:21:35
    river shown here on my map here this is
  • 00:21:38
    the one just underneath the word slabs
  • 00:21:39
    on this map is the river pipette
  • 00:21:42
    which is right at the border between uh
  • 00:21:44
    present-day ukraine and belarus the
  • 00:21:46
    northern border of bella of a
  • 00:21:48
    ukraine um it's just a you know as an
  • 00:21:52
    aside
  • 00:21:52
    this is the area where chernobyl is
  • 00:21:55
    that's where the accident uh
  • 00:21:56
    to place which another side
  • 00:22:00
    means that not too many excavations will
  • 00:22:02
    take place in that area for like
  • 00:22:04
    2 000 years from now
  • 00:22:07
    if you think of the radioactivity in the
  • 00:22:09
    india anyway
  • 00:22:11
    how did we come up with this in other
  • 00:22:12
    words uh let me explain
  • 00:22:15
    why this area of all the regions in
  • 00:22:17
    europe
  • 00:22:18
    or in fact eurasia was cho why why was
  • 00:22:21
    this area chosen as the
  • 00:22:23
    as the the source of the slavs um
  • 00:22:26
    if you if you are examining uh closely
  • 00:22:29
    what's going on
  • 00:22:29
    it's not archaeological evidence nor
  • 00:22:33
    indeed uh written sources because this
  • 00:22:35
    area was this is the danube right this
  • 00:22:37
    is where the
  • 00:22:37
    byzantine empire was just way too far to
  • 00:22:40
    the north
  • 00:22:41
    was outside the radar of i doubt that
  • 00:22:43
    anybody in constantinople knew about
  • 00:22:45
    what the pipet river is where it is and
  • 00:22:48
    who lived there
  • 00:22:50
    and they most likely didn't care either
  • 00:22:53
    so what is what is the evidence the
  • 00:22:55
    evidence is
  • 00:22:56
    linguistic it's a it's a long story to
  • 00:22:59
    be told
  • 00:23:00
    but for the purpose of of the answer to
  • 00:23:02
    this question
  • 00:23:03
    it is uh on the basis of the examination
  • 00:23:07
    of
  • 00:23:08
    modern slavic languages that this
  • 00:23:11
    epicenter if i may use that word of
  • 00:23:14
    the slavic language the spread of the
  • 00:23:17
    slavic languages was chosen
  • 00:23:18
    now the problem with linguistic evidence
  • 00:23:20
    is that it cannot be
  • 00:23:22
    dated with any degree of accuracy in the
  • 00:23:25
    absence of written sources
  • 00:23:27
    in that freeze so to so to speak those
  • 00:23:30
    linguistic phenomena like
  • 00:23:31
    phonetic changes uh new lexiems
  • 00:23:34
    and so on and so forth so there is no
  • 00:23:36
    way to tell actually
  • 00:23:38
    when this happened uh if it needs this
  • 00:23:40
    was the the
  • 00:23:41
    the first um the first home end of the
  • 00:23:43
    slavs
  • 00:23:44
    uh on the basis of language alone one
  • 00:23:46
    cannot tell this is where archaeologists
  • 00:23:48
    jumped in all right
  • 00:23:50
    so because they were the their thinking
  • 00:23:53
    was influenced
  • 00:23:54
    already by the theories in linguistic
  • 00:23:56
    and historical linguistics they started
  • 00:23:58
    from the premise that it must be here
  • 00:24:00
    that the first
  • 00:24:01
    uh uh culture of the slavs
  • 00:24:05
    and in the sense of archaeological
  • 00:24:06
    culture of the slavs must be found
  • 00:24:08
    and as you can tell the arrows will show
  • 00:24:10
    how they spread later on into different
  • 00:24:12
    areas
  • 00:24:13
    leaving aside the fact that this
  • 00:24:15
    actually looks more like a
  • 00:24:17
    staff uh map of the a map of the general
  • 00:24:20
    staff of an army or you know something
  • 00:24:21
    like that than
  • 00:24:23
    an archaeological thing by the way um a
  • 00:24:25
    soviet historian
  • 00:24:26
    nikolai de javin uh did say that that
  • 00:24:29
    in fact uh those uh those arrows would
  • 00:24:32
    describe
  • 00:24:33
    both the expansion of the red army
  • 00:24:36
    during and after
  • 00:24:37
    world war ii and that of the slavs right
  • 00:24:39
    but going back to what i was saying
  • 00:24:41
    a very serious examination of the um
  • 00:24:45
    evidence that we have will show that in
  • 00:24:47
    fact
  • 00:24:48
    the earliest assemblages the earliest
  • 00:24:52
    signs of material culture right in an
  • 00:24:55
    area
  • 00:24:56
    that we know from the written sources
  • 00:24:58
    was inhabited by the slavs
  • 00:25:00
    is here at the danube at the end of the
  • 00:25:02
    arrow not at the beginning of the era
  • 00:25:05
    moreover the archaeological assemblages
  • 00:25:08
    in this area
  • 00:25:09
    are earlier by at least 100 years than
  • 00:25:14
    anything
  • 00:25:14
    here in the presumed homeland
  • 00:25:18
    that's contrary to the idea of a
  • 00:25:20
    migration obviously
  • 00:25:22
    right and there are no signs of a big
  • 00:25:24
    population
  • 00:25:25
    leaving this area leaving it empty as it
  • 00:25:28
    were and moving into all those areas on
  • 00:25:30
    the contrary
  • 00:25:31
    as we move from the 5th to the 6th to
  • 00:25:33
    the 7th century this area here
  • 00:25:35
    actually increases in population which
  • 00:25:37
    again is against the model
  • 00:25:38
    of a migration from the outside so
  • 00:25:41
    direct answer to your question where
  • 00:25:43
    were the earliest laws
  • 00:25:45
    if one is serious about doing this
  • 00:25:48
    proper way the nearest slavs are those
  • 00:25:49
    of the damage here
  • 00:25:50
    right lower danube right here at the end
  • 00:25:53
    of the arrow because this is the area
  • 00:25:55
    where in fact the the early byzantine
  • 00:25:58
    sources
  • 00:25:58
    learned about those people did they live
  • 00:26:00
    there from the from the very beginning
  • 00:26:02
    that's one hypothesis did they come from
  • 00:26:06
    the outside that's another hypothesis
  • 00:26:07
    you know there was the one that is shown
  • 00:26:09
    here on the on those maps
  • 00:26:11
    not only there is no evidence
  • 00:26:13
    historically slash archaeologically
  • 00:26:15
    speaking for the homeland of the
  • 00:26:16
    of the slavs being here at the border
  • 00:26:19
    between present-day ukraine and
  • 00:26:21
    berlus but there is no evidence of
  • 00:26:23
    migration
  • 00:26:24
    either now we can make maybe we're going
  • 00:26:27
    to have the oppo the opportunity to see
  • 00:26:29
    there is evidence of raids of the slavs
  • 00:26:31
    across the
  • 00:26:32
    danube into the balkans but at every
  • 00:26:35
    single
  • 00:26:35
    event like that mentioned in the sources
  • 00:26:37
    the authors
  • 00:26:39
    uh giving us the stories tell us that
  • 00:26:40
    the slavins went back home
  • 00:26:42
    meaning in the lands north of the of the
  • 00:26:44
    lord they did not settle there
  • 00:26:46
    in order for the earliest evidence of
  • 00:26:48
    settlement in the balkans to arrive you
  • 00:26:50
    have to wait
  • 00:26:51
    for the first half of the seventh
  • 00:26:52
    century so 200 years after
  • 00:26:55
    the presumed migration boy they moved
  • 00:26:57
    slow if they moved at all
  • 00:26:59
    so what's the alternative in my second
  • 00:27:02
    book and i mentioned in the introduction
  • 00:27:04
    there
  • 00:27:04
    i argued that for languages to spread
  • 00:27:07
    because
  • 00:27:08
    remember the initial argument that
  • 00:27:11
    resulted in the location of the
  • 00:27:13
    homeland here uh was linguistic in its
  • 00:27:16
    nature right
  • 00:27:17
    so returning to that type category of
  • 00:27:19
    sources
  • 00:27:21
    the only way to explain the spread
  • 00:27:24
    of the slavic languages is not migration
  • 00:27:28
    let me explain at no point in history
  • 00:27:31
    and no point on planet earth
  • 00:27:33
    a group of people moving over large
  • 00:27:35
    distances like this
  • 00:27:37
    will preserve intact the language
  • 00:27:42
    in their homeland over 300 years
  • 00:27:46
    remember what i said that the ultra
  • 00:27:48
    slavonic
  • 00:27:49
    created artificially by saint syria on
  • 00:27:52
    the basis of
  • 00:27:53
    a dialect in the uh hinterland of
  • 00:27:55
    thessaloniki here
  • 00:27:56
    was used to convert the moravians
  • 00:28:00
    first in the 9th century and then in the
  • 00:28:02
    10th century to convert
  • 00:28:04
    the ruse here right supposedly that
  • 00:28:07
    is an indication that the dialects in
  • 00:28:10
    all this area
  • 00:28:11
    were the same it's impossible if
  • 00:28:14
    one starts from the assumption of
  • 00:28:16
    migration and it's quite
  • 00:28:18
    clear why because in in the process of
  • 00:28:21
    migration
  • 00:28:22
    the migrants get in touch with other
  • 00:28:24
    people speaking other languages
  • 00:28:26
    and they're not blocking themselves
  • 00:28:28
    they're not isolating themselves they
  • 00:28:29
    borrow
  • 00:28:30
    expressions sounds words and so on
  • 00:28:33
    i dare you to claim that the english
  • 00:28:36
    spoken in oklahoma is the same one that
  • 00:28:39
    is spoken in yorkshire
  • 00:28:40
    england or in australia right
  • 00:28:44
    and you you see what i'm saying right so
  • 00:28:46
    there is no way
  • 00:28:47
    so what other mechanisms are for
  • 00:28:50
    the linguistic spread that explains the
  • 00:28:52
    modern dis distribution of
  • 00:28:54
    uh slavic languages which led to the
  • 00:28:57
    uh this theory of where it starts uh
  • 00:29:02
    one of one of the phenomena that has
  • 00:29:03
    been studied by linguists
  • 00:29:05
    recently is what is known as koine
  • 00:29:08
    the term is greek and it refers to a uh
  • 00:29:12
    a a phenomenon where languages that are
  • 00:29:16
    not necessarily different from each
  • 00:29:19
    other but they are from the same family
  • 00:29:21
    merge to create a line of communication
  • 00:29:25
    that actually
  • 00:29:26
    enables people from different languages
  • 00:29:28
    to communicate among each other
  • 00:29:30
    linguists clearly say that slavic is
  • 00:29:32
    very close to the baltic languages
  • 00:29:34
    like lithuania and latvia nowadays right
  • 00:29:37
    there's also a very strong iranian
  • 00:29:39
    influence
  • 00:29:40
    and finally there's a strong um dacian
  • 00:29:44
    you know slash thracian origin so
  • 00:29:47
    summary the intersection of all those
  • 00:29:49
    languages
  • 00:29:50
    probably a little further south from the
  • 00:29:52
    prepared region here
  • 00:29:54
    here's where the slavic language may
  • 00:29:57
    have come into being
  • 00:29:59
    but that's not slavic people you see it
  • 00:30:02
    it's quite possible that
  • 00:30:03
    the language spreads without people
  • 00:30:06
    moving
  • 00:30:06
    my patron alex lindgren had also asked
  • 00:30:10
    how did slavic culture and even language
  • 00:30:14
    come to spread across eastern europe the
  • 00:30:17
    slavic
  • 00:30:18
    what archaeologists call slavic cultures
  • 00:30:20
    did not actually spread much
  • 00:30:22
    there has been a tendency to see a
  • 00:30:25
    slavic culture defined by
  • 00:30:26
    specific elements found in
  • 00:30:30
    archaeological assemblages
  • 00:30:31
    some have gone for a typical house
  • 00:30:33
    usually sunken into the floor by about
  • 00:30:36
    50 cent
  • 00:30:37
    centimeters for purposes of insulation
  • 00:30:40
    it's warmer it's easier to warm out in
  • 00:30:42
    the winter and it's obviously cooler in
  • 00:30:43
    the summer right
  • 00:30:45
    so those people lived underground so to
  • 00:30:46
    speak but for the purpose of living well
  • 00:30:49
    um and you know a lot of people jumped
  • 00:30:51
    and said well see how
  • 00:30:52
    you can find this type of car of houses
  • 00:30:54
    only in eastern europe in the areas
  • 00:30:56
    that uh are known to have been inhabited
  • 00:30:59
    by the slavs actually that's not true
  • 00:31:01
    um anglo-saxon archaeologists discovered
  • 00:31:04
    uh
  • 00:31:04
    uh in england a number of uh they're
  • 00:31:07
    called sunken feature
  • 00:31:08
    buildings that's the technical for it um
  • 00:31:11
    at mocking
  • 00:31:12
    for example a well-known and published
  • 00:31:14
    settlement
  • 00:31:15
    i i doubt that there were any slabs
  • 00:31:16
    living in the area there
  • 00:31:19
    so it's it's a feature that is not
  • 00:31:21
    ethnically specific that's what i mean
  • 00:31:23
    others jump to saying well uh ugly
  • 00:31:26
    handmade
  • 00:31:27
    pottery with no decoration whatsoever
  • 00:31:29
    the so-called prague type
  • 00:31:30
    so-called because the first the first uh
  • 00:31:33
    discoveries were made in the
  • 00:31:35
    in the in in outskirts of the city of
  • 00:31:37
    prague in the
  • 00:31:38
    in at that time czechoslovakia and were
  • 00:31:41
    published by
  • 00:31:42
    a czech archaeologist of ukrainian
  • 00:31:44
    origin it won
  • 00:31:45
    borkowski during the war kis is the
  • 00:31:48
    first book to have made that claim that
  • 00:31:50
    the specific type of pottery is
  • 00:31:52
    ethnically
  • 00:31:53
    uh attributable to the slops
  • 00:31:57
    the problem of course is that handmade
  • 00:31:58
    pottery is not
  • 00:32:00
    made with the purpose of mine to send a
  • 00:32:02
    signal hey i'm slav
  • 00:32:04
    it's made with the purpose of actually
  • 00:32:06
    doing some practical stuff
  • 00:32:08
    holding the milk cooking the soup
  • 00:32:10
    whatever
  • 00:32:11
    right and needless to say the
  • 00:32:13
    proportions and size of
  • 00:32:14
    all those uh pots were were found in
  • 00:32:17
    other cultures as well
  • 00:32:18
    uh now um the the uh
  • 00:32:22
    the culture then itself is not specific
  • 00:32:26
    to only one side
  • 00:32:27
    in other words clearly there are
  • 00:32:29
    similarities between sites that the
  • 00:32:30
    distance from each other within an
  • 00:32:32
    area let's say of the size of uh
  • 00:32:35
    probably half of the state of florida
  • 00:32:36
    that's that
  • 00:32:37
    those are modes of thinking that
  • 00:32:39
    archaeologists in america
  • 00:32:40
    use using the same way right
  • 00:32:43
    [Music]
  • 00:32:44
    what what is what is the area of the
  • 00:32:46
    timokuan culture
  • 00:32:48
    in north central florida right so you
  • 00:32:50
    can delineate it by
  • 00:32:51
    mapping on putting on a map all the
  • 00:32:53
    fines known so far and you
  • 00:32:55
    sort of draw the line between let me see
  • 00:32:56
    this is the area of the team of the
  • 00:32:58
    timoths
  • 00:32:59
    it's hard to believe that people that
  • 00:33:01
    actually share the same material culture
  • 00:33:03
    actually are of the same ethnic identity
  • 00:33:05
    for the reasons i mentioned earlier on
  • 00:33:07
    right so once again my material culture
  • 00:33:10
    could spread
  • 00:33:11
    to people who are not necessarily of the
  • 00:33:12
    same ethnic but not even speaking the
  • 00:33:14
    same language
  • 00:33:15
    right nike shoes are in many places
  • 00:33:19
    on this planet right they're not
  • 00:33:21
    inhabited by people who speak english
  • 00:33:23
    much less being american
  • 00:33:25
    right so uh the the the connection
  • 00:33:28
    between the two is different now with
  • 00:33:30
    language however this language
  • 00:33:32
    linguistic spread the issues are a lot
  • 00:33:34
    more complicated right
  • 00:33:36
    one of the phenomena that the linguists
  • 00:33:38
    have pointed to
  • 00:33:39
    is the so-called lingua franca that's a
  • 00:33:42
    phenomenon
  • 00:33:43
    specific to the middle ages when a
  • 00:33:45
    number of uh
  • 00:33:46
    italian merchants in the city states
  • 00:33:49
    like general venice and so on
  • 00:33:50
    that got in touch around the
  • 00:33:52
    mediterranean sea with
  • 00:33:54
    groups of people with whom they were
  • 00:33:55
    trading speaking other languages created
  • 00:33:58
    a language like snehiro so to speak
  • 00:34:00
    which was not italian was not arabic was
  • 00:34:02
    not this was not that
  • 00:34:03
    it had a basis as a basis of sort of
  • 00:34:05
    like a foundation of a romance language
  • 00:34:08
    italian or something like that but it
  • 00:34:10
    had so many added features that in fact
  • 00:34:12
    it was a completely
  • 00:34:13
    novel language and it helped community
  • 00:34:16
    communication for the purpose of trade
  • 00:34:18
    right um i don't think that's the case
  • 00:34:21
    with slavic what i explained to you
  • 00:34:23
    earlier on is rather koine
  • 00:34:25
    you see it's not something that was
  • 00:34:26
    imposed from the outside for the purpose
  • 00:34:28
    of trade
  • 00:34:29
    clearly slavi did not come into the area
  • 00:34:32
    where trade would have been
  • 00:34:34
    big on the country was rather remote
  • 00:34:37
    nor was it imposed by an empire or an
  • 00:34:40
    economic or
  • 00:34:41
    an economic power that wanted to
  • 00:34:45
    rule or govern the area one could make
  • 00:34:47
    the case however that the koine once
  • 00:34:50
    formed let's
  • 00:34:50
    let's play we don't know for sure those
  • 00:34:52
    are those those are my
  • 00:34:54
    ideas my not my hypothesis they were
  • 00:34:56
    proposed by others but
  • 00:34:57
    i adopted them but just as good as yours
  • 00:35:00
    or anybody else's
  • 00:35:01
    let's say coin was already formed the
  • 00:35:03
    slavic coin was reformed by 500
  • 00:35:05
    right within a a century after that
  • 00:35:08
    the area that we're talking about here
  • 00:35:10
    is dominated by a great political power
  • 00:35:12
    that of the others we're not speaker of
  • 00:35:15
    slavic
  • 00:35:16
    right however move another 200 years
  • 00:35:19
    later 800 around 800 there is evidence
  • 00:35:22
    that the others
  • 00:35:23
    speak slavic does it mean that they have
  • 00:35:26
    adopted
  • 00:35:28
    the koine in the same way or probably
  • 00:35:31
    the koinet had now become
  • 00:35:33
    within the avocado a lingua franca like
  • 00:35:35
    described earlier on
  • 00:35:37
    there are arguments in favor of both
  • 00:35:39
    ideas but
  • 00:35:41
    you can see how we moved away from the
  • 00:35:43
    model of
  • 00:35:44
    linguistics spread by means of people
  • 00:35:46
    moving
  • 00:35:47
    we're talking here about political
  • 00:35:50
    economic
  • 00:35:50
    and social ways by which a language
  • 00:35:54
    spreads and as we leave off finding out
  • 00:35:56
    that very interesting
  • 00:35:58
    information on the avar speaking slavic
  • 00:36:01
    that leads me to ask my next question
  • 00:36:04
    alex had also
  • 00:36:05
    asked when it comes to the slavic
  • 00:36:06
    peoples and slavic culture
  • 00:36:08
    was it influenced by anyone around them
  • 00:36:14
    there is no culture or any people that
  • 00:36:16
    lives in isolation
  • 00:36:18
    and definitely this is the case with the
  • 00:36:19
    slavs as well
  • 00:36:21
    the earliest influences that we know of
  • 00:36:24
    even before we can begin to play
  • 00:36:27
    with even before we have the first
  • 00:36:29
    written sources so begin to actually
  • 00:36:31
    try to figure out okay they place the
  • 00:36:33
    slots here
  • 00:36:35
    what material culture has been found in
  • 00:36:36
    the area can we attribute it to the
  • 00:36:38
    solids
  • 00:36:41
    before even doing that there are clear
  • 00:36:43
    evidence in the language
  • 00:36:45
    right or in the languages should i say
  • 00:36:47
    of multiple inferences
  • 00:36:48
    i mentioned already a very strong i
  • 00:36:51
    don't know if it's
  • 00:36:52
    called an influences did some some
  • 00:36:54
    history some linguists who believe that
  • 00:36:56
    it was actually a single language
  • 00:36:57
    balto slavic that's split into two
  • 00:37:00
    baltic on one hand and slavic on the
  • 00:37:02
    other
  • 00:37:03
    there's very very strong connection
  • 00:37:05
    there very strong connection
  • 00:37:06
    um there is some there is some germanic
  • 00:37:10
    influence right uh even the name of the
  • 00:37:12
    danube
  • 00:37:13
    in slavic is of germanic origin i mean
  • 00:37:15
    the slavs learn
  • 00:37:17
    about the name of the river from the
  • 00:37:19
    from speakers of a germanic language
  • 00:37:22
    there are very strong influences iranian
  • 00:37:26
    right from iranian languages you know
  • 00:37:28
    exactly who
  • 00:37:29
    i mean say iran i don't mean persians
  • 00:37:32
    necessary
  • 00:37:33
    could be a population in the plants such
  • 00:37:35
    as the sarnations
  • 00:37:36
    for example we know spoken language
  • 00:37:40
    um there is there is some influence from
  • 00:37:42
    turkic languages
  • 00:37:43
    probably from the others or hanzo i mean
  • 00:37:46
    it
  • 00:37:46
    it's very difficult to pinpoint where
  • 00:37:48
    those influences came from in specific
  • 00:37:50
    people that's what i mean
  • 00:37:51
    and also to date them at what point in
  • 00:37:53
    time they came in
  • 00:37:54
    but um it's very interesting uh
  • 00:37:57
    there's a there's a very uh new i should
  • 00:38:00
    say
  • 00:38:00
    trend in linguistics right now it's
  • 00:38:02
    called contact linguistic what happens
  • 00:38:04
    when two languages come in contact with
  • 00:38:06
    each other
  • 00:38:06
    and the tendency has been to actually
  • 00:38:09
    look at what words were borrowed in what
  • 00:38:11
    language
  • 00:38:11
    right so just draw lists of words but
  • 00:38:14
    the contact situation is could be a lot
  • 00:38:17
    more
  • 00:38:18
    interesting from a social point of view
  • 00:38:19
    hence the new discipline in linguistic
  • 00:38:21
    social linguistic think for example of
  • 00:38:24
    spanglish
  • 00:38:25
    in america right which is usually
  • 00:38:28
    perceived from the outside by speakers
  • 00:38:30
    of english only as a sort of like a
  • 00:38:32
    weird phenomenon some would go as far as
  • 00:38:35
    to say that the
  • 00:38:35
    speakers of spanglish do not know proper
  • 00:38:38
    english
  • 00:38:40
    nothing could be further from truth in
  • 00:38:42
    fact
  • 00:38:43
    those are speakers of two languages
  • 00:38:45
    which map
  • 00:38:46
    structures from one language onto the
  • 00:38:48
    other to create
  • 00:38:50
    often an almost secret language to
  • 00:38:52
    communicate only within the group
  • 00:38:55
    so that outsiders will not understand
  • 00:38:56
    what they're saying you recognize some
  • 00:38:58
    words in english
  • 00:38:59
    but the rest of them is gibberish you
  • 00:39:01
    don't have a clue
  • 00:39:03
    right so uh in many respects i think
  • 00:39:06
    that's exactly what happened with slavic
  • 00:39:08
    borrowing words from one language to
  • 00:39:10
    adapt them to slavic
  • 00:39:13
    with maybe not different different
  • 00:39:14
    meanings but for different circum
  • 00:39:16
    circumstances it has been
  • 00:39:18
    shown for example that uh the contact
  • 00:39:21
    with germanic
  • 00:39:22
    uh seems to indicate uh very heavy
  • 00:39:25
    lexical borrowings so of all the areas
  • 00:39:28
    of the language
  • 00:39:29
    the slavs took from the germanic the
  • 00:39:32
    speakers from germanic words
  • 00:39:34
    there is evidence of contact i forgot to
  • 00:39:36
    mention these disabilities of contact
  • 00:39:37
    between slavic and romans languages
  • 00:39:40
    more exactly the romance language is
  • 00:39:42
    spoken in the area of the lower danube
  • 00:39:44
    the ancestors were presently
  • 00:39:45
    romanian okay the influence there
  • 00:39:48
    is grammatical morphological not so many
  • 00:39:52
    words
  • 00:39:52
    structures right you know the way
  • 00:39:56
    you you construct the phrase the cases
  • 00:39:58
    of the nouns and and you know things
  • 00:40:00
    like that
  • 00:40:01
    that would imply a very close
  • 00:40:05
    connection and you know contexts and on
  • 00:40:07
    an equal basis but very
  • 00:40:08
    close quarters think of getting your
  • 00:40:11
    wife from one group and marrying to the
  • 00:40:13
    other that kind of stuff
  • 00:40:14
    whereas the lexical borrowings from
  • 00:40:16
    germanic imply
  • 00:40:18
    a contact that was uh socially inferior
  • 00:40:22
    superior
  • 00:40:23
    right exactly how that
  • 00:40:26
    played out in history i don't know your
  • 00:40:29
    imagination is just as good as mine but
  • 00:40:31
    linguists say that when only lexines are
  • 00:40:34
    borrowed that's
  • 00:40:35
    uh that's an indication of the language
  • 00:40:37
    from which they are borrowed
  • 00:40:38
    is the language of the people who are
  • 00:40:40
    the masters
  • 00:40:42
    so they're socially and politically
  • 00:40:44
    superior
  • 00:40:46
    right um so that the the you know the
  • 00:40:48
    only the languages will tell you that
  • 00:40:50
    there are a number of issues there now
  • 00:40:52
    in material culture plenty of evidence
  • 00:40:55
    right
  • 00:40:56
    um very interesting although the sources
  • 00:41:00
    tell us that the slavs
  • 00:41:01
    usually fought on foot right
  • 00:41:05
    in the area where the slavs are placed
  • 00:41:07
    by the written sources there are
  • 00:41:08
    quite a bit of indications that they
  • 00:41:11
    raised horses
  • 00:41:12
    and they probably fought on horseback um
  • 00:41:16
    where could that influence come from
  • 00:41:18
    step people
  • 00:41:19
    most likely others um there is
  • 00:41:22
    in fact a clear source uh 7th century
  • 00:41:26
    uh chronicle attributed because we don't
  • 00:41:28
    know the real name of the author
  • 00:41:30
    in the 19th i think in the 19th century
  • 00:41:31
    the author was called fredegar but
  • 00:41:33
    that's not his real name right
  • 00:41:35
    the chronicle of frederick is put in
  • 00:41:36
    this way written from a frankish
  • 00:41:38
    perspective in latin
  • 00:41:40
    that tells a story about how the others
  • 00:41:43
    uh you know spend the winter in slavic
  • 00:41:47
    villages
  • 00:41:48
    sleeping with the wives and the
  • 00:41:49
    daughters of the
  • 00:41:51
    slavs right in other words clearly in a
  • 00:41:55
    situation of abuse
  • 00:41:56
    you know the others are the masters the
  • 00:41:58
    slavs are the inferior socially inferior
  • 00:42:00
    there
  • 00:42:01
    you know they they cannot actually
  • 00:42:03
    defend themselves for their
  • 00:42:04
    sexual abuse right and actually the
  • 00:42:06
    source says that the slavs are
  • 00:42:08
    uh subjected to other uh dues they pay
  • 00:42:11
    tribute to the hours
  • 00:42:13
    right and they are called before which
  • 00:42:15
    actually means that in a situation of
  • 00:42:17
    battle
  • 00:42:18
    the others would push them in the front
  • 00:42:19
    line to be the sort of like a cannon
  • 00:42:21
    fodder
  • 00:42:22
    here we have a clear situation like the
  • 00:42:24
    one i i i told you now
  • 00:42:25
    the question is it's there's no evidence
  • 00:42:28
    in the text i mentioned to you
  • 00:42:30
    but one would wonder what was the
  • 00:42:31
    language in which the others spoke
  • 00:42:33
    with those slavic women with which with
  • 00:42:36
    whom they slept
  • 00:42:37
    you said i'm saying i doubt that the
  • 00:42:39
    slavic women learned
  • 00:42:40
    of our language and it's a possibility
  • 00:42:43
    therefore that the influences
  • 00:42:44
    were both ways not just one in other
  • 00:42:46
    words there is evidence
  • 00:42:48
    of slavic influence upon germanic
  • 00:42:50
    languages and definitely there is
  • 00:42:51
    influence
  • 00:42:52
    of slavic uh languages upon romans
  • 00:42:54
    languages romanian is full of
  • 00:42:56
    slavic words and in a situation in which
  • 00:43:00
    uh as i mentioned to you borrowings
  • 00:43:03
    from one language to the other are
  • 00:43:04
    adapted to the needs romanians for
  • 00:43:06
    example
  • 00:43:06
    did very funny things with slavic laws
  • 00:43:09
    for example
  • 00:43:10
    uh the word for science in russian
  • 00:43:13
    there is a similar word in romanian no
  • 00:43:18
    that actually means dummy i guess that's
  • 00:43:20
    how you get when you study too much
  • 00:43:21
    science
  • 00:43:23
    that's interesting man that would suck
  • 00:43:25
    dude like you get your uh your hand your
  • 00:43:27
    family is basically
  • 00:43:29
    abused you can't do anything about it
  • 00:43:31
    and then on top of that
  • 00:43:32
    they make you the cannon fodder of their
  • 00:43:34
    army fredegar tells us that they
  • 00:43:36
    they they rose in rebellion and they
  • 00:43:39
    defeated the others and created the
  • 00:43:40
    state that's called the state of samoa
  • 00:43:42
    the first
  • 00:43:43
    known state in history slavic non-state
  • 00:43:45
    in history
  • 00:43:46
    the strait i told you was the
  • 00:43:48
    explanation of why they rose in
  • 00:43:49
    rebellion and more successful and so so
  • 00:43:51
    when it comes to all people
  • 00:43:53
    civilizations cultures
  • 00:43:55
    everyone loves an origin story that
  • 00:43:58
    explains
  • 00:43:59
    a lot of times often mythically where
  • 00:44:02
    they
  • 00:44:02
    came from and so alex and many others
  • 00:44:06
    had actually asked when i was polling
  • 00:44:07
    for questions
  • 00:44:09
    did they have their own origin stories
  • 00:44:11
    and if so
  • 00:44:12
    can you tell us a little bit about what
  • 00:44:14
    they were the only
  • 00:44:16
    the the earliest text in orchestra
  • 00:44:19
    that we have had no such story let's put
  • 00:44:21
    it this way so uh
  • 00:44:23
    the stuff created in the 9th century
  • 00:44:26
    second half for
  • 00:44:26
    last third of the 9th century and the
  • 00:44:28
    10th century in bulgaria
  • 00:44:30
    using that language although slavonic
  • 00:44:32
    invented by
  • 00:44:33
    constantino no such story as i mentioned
  • 00:44:36
    to you
  • 00:44:37
    the word is mentioned there only as
  • 00:44:40
    a group of people speaking able to speak
  • 00:44:43
    this language also slowly
  • 00:44:45
    uh to express their devotion to god okay
  • 00:44:49
    that was just said is an explanation for
  • 00:44:51
    why there is no
  • 00:44:52
    origin story early on because the
  • 00:44:54
    emphasis was on the language therefore
  • 00:44:56
    it didn't matter where you come from to
  • 00:44:58
    the extent that you speak the language
  • 00:45:00
    and you could be an avar for example
  • 00:45:02
    that you speak slavic
  • 00:45:04
    and you receive christianity via that
  • 00:45:06
    that makes you slap
  • 00:45:07
    all right so what the origin of the
  • 00:45:10
    group
  • 00:45:11
    such as speakers of the language is is
  • 00:45:14
    obviously
  • 00:45:15
    irrelevant here if you look for that
  • 00:45:18
    specific
  • 00:45:19
    uh origin story then the first one that
  • 00:45:21
    we have is in the russian primary
  • 00:45:23
    chronicle right now what that is is
  • 00:45:26
    i mean it would be a gross mistake to
  • 00:45:28
    call it a genuine
  • 00:45:30
    sugarcoaxy kind of stuff that the slavs
  • 00:45:32
    invented
  • 00:45:33
    because you just read it and you realize
  • 00:45:35
    that in fact what the author or authors
  • 00:45:38
    did was to link the slabs to biblical
  • 00:45:40
    history
  • 00:45:41
    they are the descendants of jaffet and
  • 00:45:43
    they are placed in human history coming
  • 00:45:45
    down like all the other peoples from the
  • 00:45:47
    tower of babel and
  • 00:45:48
    spread of languages and so forth right
  • 00:45:51
    and the purpose of the author of uh or
  • 00:45:54
    the authors of uh
  • 00:45:56
    those the first part of the russian
  • 00:45:58
    primary chronicle was not so much to
  • 00:45:59
    focus on the slavs but to explain
  • 00:46:02
    why you know coming from this biblical
  • 00:46:05
    history
  • 00:46:06
    they were unable to govern themselves
  • 00:46:08
    because the purpose of the author was to
  • 00:46:10
    say
  • 00:46:10
    look they they got so bad they could not
  • 00:46:14
    work together there with their neighbors
  • 00:46:16
    right with the truths and the others
  • 00:46:18
    that they had to invite the varangians
  • 00:46:20
    in
  • 00:46:22
    vikings and the the purpose of the
  • 00:46:26
    author is to actually explain
  • 00:46:27
    why the vikings became the rulers of
  • 00:46:28
    those people and eventually
  • 00:46:31
    changed their language and changed their
  • 00:46:32
    ways to become slavic
  • 00:46:34
    that in itself is an origin story but
  • 00:46:36
    not for the slavs for the rus
  • 00:46:38
    if you look for other slavic people for
  • 00:46:40
    example
  • 00:46:41
    uh in poland right uh there is no origin
  • 00:46:44
    story
  • 00:46:45
    for that there is no there is an origin
  • 00:46:47
    story for the dynasty ps dynasty they
  • 00:46:49
    ruled in the middle ages right
  • 00:46:51
    uh according to an anonym again we don't
  • 00:46:53
    know who the author was
  • 00:46:55
    conventionally known as galossan on he
  • 00:46:56
    was wrote in the early 12th century but
  • 00:46:58
    the same time a little later than the
  • 00:47:00
    uh last version last reduction of the
  • 00:47:02
    russian primary chronicle
  • 00:47:04
    uh piast was a peasant who received some
  • 00:47:08
    guests
  • 00:47:08
    that could not get hospitality at the
  • 00:47:10
    local duke's house so they came into
  • 00:47:12
    into the peasant house which is sure i
  • 00:47:14
    don't have much but sit on the table
  • 00:47:16
    so there's a desire to actually explain
  • 00:47:18
    the origin of the dynasty not of the
  • 00:47:19
    people
  • 00:47:21
    uh bohemia cosmos of prague again 12th
  • 00:47:24
    century
  • 00:47:25
    he again explains the origin of the
  • 00:47:27
    dynasty the jimmy slits
  • 00:47:28
    je muslim was a plowman once again uh
  • 00:47:31
    modest origin like in poland not no
  • 00:47:35
    no origin stories in bulgaria no origin
  • 00:47:37
    stories in serbia and i could go on and
  • 00:47:39
    on
  • 00:47:40
    as many of my subscribers know one of my
  • 00:47:42
    channel favorite topics usually involves
  • 00:47:45
    dna and how it helps explain a little
  • 00:47:48
    bit about the past
  • 00:47:49
    usually we focus on the ancient world
  • 00:47:52
    but this one may be a little bit later
  • 00:47:54
    and so i was wondering in the world of
  • 00:47:56
    dna studies
  • 00:47:58
    has it told us anything about them
  • 00:48:01
    there has been breakthroughs in the
  • 00:48:04
    discussion of migrations
  • 00:48:06
    right not so much with dna analysis as
  • 00:48:10
    with other forms of
  • 00:48:11
    what's called molecular anthropology
  • 00:48:13
    such as strontium or oxygen
  • 00:48:16
    isotope analysis on the teeth
  • 00:48:19
    that you know very simply could tell
  • 00:48:22
    what
  • 00:48:23
    where you drinking water as a kid right
  • 00:48:26
    and therefore because as a kid you grew
  • 00:48:29
    up in that area where you came from okay
  • 00:48:32
    with the groups of population discovered
  • 00:48:35
    by archaeologists right
  • 00:48:37
    that they or others call slavs there are
  • 00:48:40
    problems
  • 00:48:41
    one of which is that the dominant uh
  • 00:48:45
    burial right throughout the early middle
  • 00:48:47
    ages before christianization before
  • 00:48:49
    conversion to christianity
  • 00:48:51
    was cremation not in emotion
  • 00:48:55
    dna analysis on cremated remains is not
  • 00:48:57
    impossible but it's only now
  • 00:48:59
    that it's very difficult because of the
  • 00:49:01
    high temperatures or the messing up all
  • 00:49:03
    in some sort
  • 00:49:04
    right needless to say there are problems
  • 00:49:06
    of contamination
  • 00:49:07
    for in in cremation that are you know so
  • 00:49:10
    for the
  • 00:49:10
    procedural modes are much more
  • 00:49:12
    complicated issues that's one
  • 00:49:14
    two um even four
  • 00:49:17
    cases other than the slops right where
  • 00:49:20
    um
  • 00:49:21
    where uh dna has been used there are two
  • 00:49:25
    ways to do it
  • 00:49:26
    okay um and i'm not i don't know whether
  • 00:49:30
    you know you insisted upon this because
  • 00:49:31
    it's a very important thing
  • 00:49:33
    to understand what the analysis can do
  • 00:49:36
    and how it works
  • 00:49:38
    one can compare dna from a modern
  • 00:49:40
    population
  • 00:49:42
    of say bosnia right two uh dna extracted
  • 00:49:45
    from
  • 00:49:46
    skeletal materials from a cemetery dated
  • 00:49:49
    supposedly to the i don't know
  • 00:49:51
    10th century elements in the middle ages
  • 00:49:52
    okay so compare the dna of a medieval
  • 00:49:55
    population with the dna of a modern
  • 00:49:57
    population
  • 00:49:58
    look if they match wow i mean if if the
  • 00:50:01
    cemetery happens to be somewhere else
  • 00:50:02
    let's say in poland the match would mean
  • 00:50:04
    that there's a migration or you know
  • 00:50:06
    something like that
  • 00:50:07
    if there's none you know you know any
  • 00:50:09
    interpretation is possible
  • 00:50:11
    that's one way to do it modern too old
  • 00:50:13
    okay
  • 00:50:14
    much more interesting i would say at
  • 00:50:17
    least for me
  • 00:50:19
    way to do it is to compare dna from two
  • 00:50:22
    old populations
  • 00:50:24
    cemetery a and cemetery b or even within
  • 00:50:27
    the same cemetery
  • 00:50:28
    between individuals buried in different
  • 00:50:30
    parts of the cemetery
  • 00:50:31
    okay the latter away
  • 00:50:36
    is is very useful because it creates a
  • 00:50:38
    map
  • 00:50:39
    of the population in other words
  • 00:50:40
    unfortunately not that many samples
  • 00:50:43
    exist for the moment now there's no way
  • 00:50:45
    to
  • 00:50:46
    map the old population within a single
  • 00:50:49
    chronological segment
  • 00:50:50
    say the middle ages much less at the the
  • 00:50:53
    scale of a single century
  • 00:50:55
    i wish we were there because that would
  • 00:50:56
    be very interesting stuff
  • 00:50:58
    because let me put it this way it will
  • 00:51:01
    show
  • 00:51:02
    not necessarily where people come from
  • 00:51:04
    but
  • 00:51:05
    what their marital strategies were
  • 00:51:08
    there's been a phenomenal book published
  • 00:51:11
    on a subject
  • 00:51:12
    completely different from what we talked
  • 00:51:14
    about here history of florida where i'm
  • 00:51:16
    based
  • 00:51:17
    right you probably know that the
  • 00:51:20
    native american tribe in florida the the
  • 00:51:24
    american
  • 00:51:24
    neighborhood is the seminoles who did
  • 00:51:26
    not exist as
  • 00:51:27
    a tribe before contact with the whites
  • 00:51:30
    okay
  • 00:51:30
    so the native population of florida at
  • 00:51:33
    the moment of contact with the spaniards
  • 00:51:35
    it's
  • 00:51:35
    wiped out not by war but by the diseases
  • 00:51:38
    that the europeans
  • 00:51:39
    have brought long story short there's a
  • 00:51:41
    gap of population a demographic collapse
  • 00:51:45
    florida especially the northern and
  • 00:51:46
    central parts were empty of any
  • 00:51:48
    population
  • 00:51:49
    around the year 1600s that's when small
  • 00:51:52
    groups of people
  • 00:51:53
    moved from southern georgia right
  • 00:51:56
    usually from
  • 00:51:57
    i mean linguistically speaking linked to
  • 00:51:59
    groups of cree right
  • 00:52:00
    but mixed up with runaway slaves hence
  • 00:52:03
    the black seminoles right
  • 00:52:05
    and and all sorts of other groups right
  • 00:52:07
    those are isolated one group here one
  • 00:52:09
    group there and
  • 00:52:10
    so forth now nobody marries within the
  • 00:52:12
    same group for obvious reasons
  • 00:52:14
    so you need a wife from elsewhere right
  • 00:52:16
    now
  • 00:52:17
    most people think that marrying
  • 00:52:21
    marrying is dictated by um
  • 00:52:24
    the language the uh customs the culture
  • 00:52:27
    in other words
  • 00:52:28
    you take your wife who is similar to you
  • 00:52:30
    in culturally speaking
  • 00:52:32
    as a matter of fact chris stojanowski
  • 00:52:35
    wrote this book we did a phenomenal
  • 00:52:37
    study both archaeology and
  • 00:52:38
    molecular anthropology came to the
  • 00:52:41
    conclusion that as a matter of fact
  • 00:52:43
    it is marriages that created a seminal
  • 00:52:47
    identity it is by marrying
  • 00:52:50
    to outside groups that those groups
  • 00:52:52
    small groups began to coalesce
  • 00:52:54
    and formed what we know nowadays as the
  • 00:52:57
    seminoles
  • 00:52:59
    now that is where i wish
  • 00:53:02
    like i could give you an answer about
  • 00:53:04
    this laws but we are not there
  • 00:53:07
    the reason we're not there is that
  • 00:53:08
    because there is a there is a there's an
  • 00:53:10
    obsession
  • 00:53:11
    with comparing modern to
  • 00:53:14
    old dna and that to me
  • 00:53:18
    is a fundamental mistake
  • 00:53:21
    it may be fashionable it it gets five
  • 00:53:24
    minutes of attention on tv
  • 00:53:26
    it gets ancestry.com that kind of stuff
  • 00:53:29
    right
  • 00:53:30
    but uh it is based on a wrong assumption
  • 00:53:33
    there is no
  • 00:53:34
    ethnic dna there is no slavic dna
  • 00:53:37
    frankish dna romanian
  • 00:53:39
    and so there is no such thing ethnicity
  • 00:53:42
    is a cultural thing not a biological
  • 00:53:43
    thing
  • 00:53:44
    right moreover if you compare a modern
  • 00:53:48
    to an old ancient medieval dna
  • 00:53:51
    you're denying a history of a lot of
  • 00:53:54
    mixing
  • 00:53:56
    could have happened now clearly as i
  • 00:53:58
    mentioned earlier on
  • 00:53:59
    if uh the symmetry the modern population
  • 00:54:02
    dna does not match
  • 00:54:04
    or matches the sorry matches the dna of
  • 00:54:06
    the popular old
  • 00:54:07
    medieval population saying at a remote
  • 00:54:10
    location there
  • 00:54:11
    the immediate thing is oh migration but
  • 00:54:13
    there is no way to tell when that
  • 00:54:15
    migration happened
  • 00:54:16
    remember what i said about linguistic
  • 00:54:18
    facts they cannot be dated in the
  • 00:54:19
    absence of written sources the same
  • 00:54:20
    happens to haplogroups
  • 00:54:22
    there is no date on the habits the the
  • 00:54:25
    only dating
  • 00:54:26
    if you read the literature you will see
  • 00:54:28
    that most of the authors
  • 00:54:29
    trying to put those things in a
  • 00:54:31
    chronological order
  • 00:54:32
    when when they come to a time to a
  • 00:54:34
    timeline
  • 00:54:36
    they usually use sources from the
  • 00:54:37
    outside not from internally
  • 00:54:39
    they say okay this must have happened
  • 00:54:41
    when procopius was saying such and such
  • 00:54:43
    or when the material culture
  • 00:54:44
    archaeological culture such and such
  • 00:54:46
    spread in the territory in other words
  • 00:54:49
    they they bring
  • 00:54:50
    outside evidence to mix with this to
  • 00:54:52
    explain their own their own facts they
  • 00:54:53
    cannot date those things by themselves
  • 00:54:55
    and in themselves
  • 00:54:57
    and without that you there is no trust
  • 00:55:00
    i cannot trust information that is made
  • 00:55:02
    up in this way if you know what i'm
  • 00:55:03
    saying and now let's talk outside
  • 00:55:05
    sources
  • 00:55:06
    when it comes to people who would have
  • 00:55:09
    seen these people or
  • 00:55:10
    heard of them at least whether they be
  • 00:55:13
    byzantine or frankish
  • 00:55:15
    latin whoever what did they have to say
  • 00:55:19
    about the slavic peoples very good
  • 00:55:21
    question
  • 00:55:22
    uh the earliest uh author to write about
  • 00:55:26
    them is pro copious of caesarea
  • 00:55:30
    uh in the mid 6th century right
  • 00:55:33
    um there are others who claim that
  • 00:55:35
    jordanis is the first
  • 00:55:37
    other that uh pseudo uh
  • 00:55:40
    uh cesarios in a dialogue but you know
  • 00:55:43
    chronologically speaking pro corpus is
  • 00:55:45
    the first what was he interested in
  • 00:55:48
    warfare he wanted to understand them
  • 00:55:51
    as fighters because they caused problems
  • 00:55:54
    to the empire
  • 00:55:56
    but he like many educated byzantines at
  • 00:55:58
    that time believed
  • 00:56:00
    that the customs the way people behave
  • 00:56:02
    laws and so forth
  • 00:56:04
    was determined by the climb climate
  • 00:56:07
    we'll say nowadays
  • 00:56:08
    under which you leave he thought that
  • 00:56:10
    the world was divided into
  • 00:56:12
    slices right called climbs that's the
  • 00:56:14
    theory of climbs
  • 00:56:15
    tell me under what climb you leave and
  • 00:56:17
    i'm going to tell you uh
  • 00:56:19
    i'm going to predict what kind of
  • 00:56:20
    culture and what kind of behavior you
  • 00:56:22
    have
  • 00:56:22
    that's why the byzantines were scornful
  • 00:56:25
    towards people from the
  • 00:56:26
    north because they thought they were
  • 00:56:28
    coming from an area that did not have
  • 00:56:29
    much sun so therefore their brains were
  • 00:56:31
    mushy
  • 00:56:32
    they were very violent they were very
  • 00:56:33
    brave but they were stupid they could
  • 00:56:36
    not understand much that's what the
  • 00:56:37
    business thought
  • 00:56:38
    and that's why they also they also left
  • 00:56:40
    the area because being stupid and not
  • 00:56:42
    having much to do in the cold there
  • 00:56:44
    they they they have sex and they they
  • 00:56:46
    bred and you know lots of people
  • 00:56:48
    overpopulation you gotta get out that's
  • 00:56:50
    the theory
  • 00:56:51
    that giordano's pro corpus contemporary
  • 00:56:54
    used to explain the
  • 00:56:55
    migration of the gods right
  • 00:56:58
    so the slavs were the slums were in a
  • 00:57:00
    similar package so to speak
  • 00:57:02
    because most businesses were not
  • 00:57:03
    interested in specificity of those
  • 00:57:05
    people they're they're all the same you
  • 00:57:07
    know
  • 00:57:07
    all they're coming from the same area
  • 00:57:08
    because they looked look at them with
  • 00:57:10
    that sense of superiority
  • 00:57:12
    the civilized man the educated man
  • 00:57:15
    towards the end of the sixth century we
  • 00:57:17
    have a better example of this in a
  • 00:57:20
    treatise uh written again we don't know
  • 00:57:22
    the author
  • 00:57:23
    uh the title of the it's it's a manual
  • 00:57:26
    it's a manual called strategy
  • 00:57:28
    uh in which in greek it's translated
  • 00:57:31
    loosely military manual it's a manual
  • 00:57:33
    for
  • 00:57:33
    uh officers high-ranking officers in the
  • 00:57:36
    byzantine army
  • 00:57:37
    how to fight with different groups of
  • 00:57:39
    people
  • 00:57:40
    and there's a substantial chapter on the
  • 00:57:42
    slavs very interesting
  • 00:57:44
    most likely based on observations of
  • 00:57:46
    somebody who had
  • 00:57:47
    been in emperor morris's armies that
  • 00:57:50
    crossed the danube and
  • 00:57:51
    waged war within slavic territories
  • 00:57:53
    right there because it's full of details
  • 00:57:55
    that
  • 00:57:55
    it for us is fantastic for example he
  • 00:57:58
    says
  • 00:57:59
    those people are not hungry they have
  • 00:58:00
    plenty of food which they store
  • 00:58:02
    underground their wives sacrifice
  • 00:58:05
    themselves of their husband's death
  • 00:58:07
    satie like in india they are you know
  • 00:58:10
    when it
  • 00:58:11
    when they take prisoners they're not
  • 00:58:13
    treating them badly so don't don't be
  • 00:58:15
    afraid
  • 00:58:16
    you know some of those prisoners even
  • 00:58:17
    decide to stay among them
  • 00:58:19
    that's how nice they are treated as
  • 00:58:22
    prisoners there so
  • 00:58:23
    all those snippets of information they
  • 00:58:24
    give us there clearly all the examples
  • 00:58:26
    that i gave you
  • 00:58:27
    are from the point of view of a military
  • 00:58:29
    man i want to know about the enemy
  • 00:58:31
    details that will help me defeat him
  • 00:58:35
    right so there is no
  • 00:58:38
    those sources cannot answer questions
  • 00:58:40
    such as what was the language disposal
  • 00:58:42
    absolutely no interest in that
  • 00:58:44
    were they related uh by customs or
  • 00:58:47
    culture to other people
  • 00:58:49
    no interest in that absolutely there is
  • 00:58:51
    a classification that the
  • 00:58:52
    byzantine authors made the slavs are not
  • 00:58:55
    like the franks
  • 00:58:56
    why because to to the to
  • 00:58:59
    the byzantine mind the franks are
  • 00:59:01
    fighting in a certain way
  • 00:59:03
    and by the way the franks and the slavs
  • 00:59:04
    are not like the others the others are
  • 00:59:06
    different
  • 00:59:06
    too why because they fight on horseback
  • 00:59:09
    right so
  • 00:59:10
    different ways to approach this from a
  • 00:59:12
    military point of view
  • 00:59:14
    it is only late very late that you see
  • 00:59:17
    an interest in the slavs
  • 00:59:18
    as a linguistic group it's only late
  • 00:59:20
    that you see
  • 00:59:21
    when i say late after the 10th century
  • 00:59:24
    12 13 14th century sources begin to
  • 00:59:26
    actually
  • 00:59:27
    give us detail about language
  • 00:59:28
    differences between czechs and poles
  • 00:59:30
    russians ukrainians much much later and
  • 00:59:33
    so on so forth
  • 00:59:34
    but in the early times no i'm going to
  • 00:59:37
    ask an additional follow-up question
  • 00:59:38
    right now so we've covered you know
  • 00:59:40
    especially how the byzantines saw them
  • 00:59:42
    were there any similar views even if
  • 00:59:44
    just combat that was expressed by let's
  • 00:59:47
    say
  • 00:59:47
    sources in western europe yeah i
  • 00:59:50
    mentioned frederick earlier on
  • 00:59:52
    um in the process of so remember the
  • 00:59:55
    slavs revolted against the others right
  • 00:59:58
    he actually
  • 00:59:59
    calls the uh the sons born
  • 01:00:02
    out of the sex that the others had with
  • 01:00:04
    the slavic women
  • 01:00:05
    he calls them wends not slavs
  • 01:00:09
    and that seems to have been the the way
  • 01:00:11
    in which to this day
  • 01:00:12
    uh in germany uh in certain areas in
  • 01:00:15
    austria
  • 01:00:16
    in dialect that's the way to call the
  • 01:00:18
    slavic neighbors vendish
  • 01:00:20
    right wentz and he says that those ones
  • 01:00:23
    were extremely good military speaking so
  • 01:00:25
    much so that
  • 01:00:26
    king dagobah king of the franks sent an
  • 01:00:28
    army against samo their ruler
  • 01:00:30
    and was beaten so again he wants to
  • 01:00:34
    explain how was that possible unlike pro
  • 01:00:37
    copious and
  • 01:00:38
    starting manual there are no details
  • 01:00:40
    about wives and things like
  • 01:00:42
    that it's mostly about samoa right about
  • 01:00:45
    the ruler in other words the franks tend
  • 01:00:47
    to attribute any merits not to the
  • 01:00:49
    population
  • 01:00:49
    but to the head to the king to the ruler
  • 01:00:52
    to the chieftain
  • 01:00:55
    early sources in latin writing about the
  • 01:00:57
    slavs are also
  • 01:00:58
    some of the letters written by pope
  • 01:01:00
    gregory the great around year 600
  • 01:01:03
    and those are snippets in correspondence
  • 01:01:05
    between him as a pope and other bishops
  • 01:01:07
    right and he says oh by the way i heard
  • 01:01:09
    that the slavs invaded such and such so
  • 01:01:11
    those are not
  • 01:01:12
    clearly no information then again from a
  • 01:01:14
    military point of view but
  • 01:01:16
    mostly in terms of move away they're
  • 01:01:19
    coming that kind of stuff
  • 01:01:20
    finally uh there is uh evidence in later
  • 01:01:24
    centuries right
  • 01:01:25
    of an interest in the slavs we have to
  • 01:01:27
    wait for the ninth century for a
  • 01:01:28
    catalogue of slavic tribes
  • 01:01:31
    with a number of towns meaning
  • 01:01:33
    fortresses
  • 01:01:34
    a catalogue that was probably drafted
  • 01:01:36
    involved in bavaria
  • 01:01:38
    in the 9th century there's also like an
  • 01:01:40
    area to
  • 01:01:41
    for future expansion right so if we go
  • 01:01:44
    into
  • 01:01:45
    area x how many how many tribes do we
  • 01:01:48
    do we expect to see there five and how
  • 01:01:50
    many fortresses now there's how many
  • 01:01:52
    fortresses we have to
  • 01:01:53
    besiege conquer and so forth but that
  • 01:01:56
    again is nine centuries very late
  • 01:01:57
    in many cases many throughout history
  • 01:02:00
    culture society civilizations
  • 01:02:03
    are usually very spiritual religiously
  • 01:02:05
    connected
  • 01:02:06
    what do we know about the religions of
  • 01:02:09
    the slavic peoples before christianity
  • 01:02:12
    excellent question we know a bit
  • 01:02:16
    but again those informations are
  • 01:02:18
    problematic pro procopius mentioned that
  • 01:02:20
    they have a
  • 01:02:21
    god of the of the thunder right
  • 01:02:24
    to whom they sacrifice cattle um they
  • 01:02:27
    also worship
  • 01:02:28
    divinities of the waters like you know
  • 01:02:31
    spirits of the waters your lakes and
  • 01:02:33
    rivers and things like that
  • 01:02:35
    um the problem with that uh it's not
  • 01:02:37
    much information but the problem with
  • 01:02:39
    that is that it looks suspiciously like
  • 01:02:41
    a an attempt to map onto the slavs
  • 01:02:44
    a mode of thinking that is basically
  • 01:02:46
    greek in other words
  • 01:02:48
    he thinks of the slavs oh they have a
  • 01:02:50
    god like the ancient greeks
  • 01:02:52
    right zeus the god of the thunder
  • 01:02:56
    he does not see the slavic religion as
  • 01:02:59
    it is he translates it so to speak for
  • 01:03:01
    his audience
  • 01:03:02
    who cannot understand what the slavs are
  • 01:03:05
    doing unless you explain them in the
  • 01:03:06
    terms of the books that they read
  • 01:03:08
    right which are about ancient greece
  • 01:03:10
    very similar phenomenon
  • 01:03:12
    later much later on in the 10th and 11th
  • 01:03:14
    century in the northern part of europe
  • 01:03:16
    in the area of present-day northern
  • 01:03:18
    germany and poland where there is a an
  • 01:03:20
    attempt by the
  • 01:03:20
    uh saxon uh expansion
  • 01:03:24
    german right holy german empire moving
  • 01:03:26
    eastwards right
  • 01:03:27
    to convert those people all of whom
  • 01:03:28
    spoke slavic and we have some very
  • 01:03:30
    interesting accounts
  • 01:03:31
    tomorrow uh uh
  • 01:03:35
    helmholtz of bozo uh
  • 01:03:38
    a number of other other all of whom when
  • 01:03:41
    they described for example a temple
  • 01:03:44
    which certainly existed on the island of
  • 01:03:46
    rugen of
  • 01:03:47
    the german coast in the baltic sea they
  • 01:03:50
    describe it in the terms
  • 01:03:51
    of a greek ancient greek temple
  • 01:03:55
    what can you do with that information i
  • 01:03:56
    mean not much right
  • 01:03:58
    now from an archaeological point of view
  • 01:04:00
    we know however a few things for example
  • 01:04:03
    there is clear evidence there's a very
  • 01:04:05
    good book coming out of kiev of all
  • 01:04:06
    places on magic
  • 01:04:08
    in early slavic religion which is based
  • 01:04:11
    exclusively on on archaeology right
  • 01:04:13
    uh under the hearth under the
  • 01:04:16
    uh oven of any house there's a little
  • 01:04:19
    pot
  • 01:04:21
    with some seeds inside always millet
  • 01:04:24
    always minute right um
  • 01:04:28
    there is a an animal or two under the
  • 01:04:30
    foundation or
  • 01:04:31
    not foundation so no foundation right
  • 01:04:33
    underneath so the before you
  • 01:04:35
    dig up the whole the pit for the house
  • 01:04:38
    there's another pit underneath one of
  • 01:04:39
    the walls where an animal is
  • 01:04:41
    this skeleton of a little animal is
  • 01:04:43
    deposed there so there may be a
  • 01:04:45
    sacrificial
  • 01:04:46
    of some kind um you know and as
  • 01:04:49
    you know on a number of sites there are
  • 01:04:51
    small statues made of clay
  • 01:04:53
    some of them in the form of an animal
  • 01:04:55
    like a cow or a horse
  • 01:04:57
    some of them in the form of humans that
  • 01:04:59
    were found
  • 01:05:01
    what exactly their role is we don't know
  • 01:05:05
    there are a number of hordes that have
  • 01:05:07
    been found
  • 01:05:08
    especially in the middle uh the upper
  • 01:05:10
    area are presented in ukraine
  • 01:05:11
    south and north of kiev on both sides of
  • 01:05:13
    the you know
  • 01:05:14
    uh left bank and right banking ukraine
  • 01:05:17
    uh
  • 01:05:18
    that contain uh small plaques made of
  • 01:05:20
    metal
  • 01:05:21
    in the form of dancing man right so
  • 01:05:23
    these men you know with their hands
  • 01:05:25
    up like this and you know with this leg
  • 01:05:27
    spread
  • 01:05:28
    probably dancing what is the
  • 01:05:29
    significance of that
  • 01:05:31
    it's difficult to tell in other words
  • 01:05:34
    the evidence uh that we have the one
  • 01:05:37
    not the written one which has problems
  • 01:05:38
    but the evidence seems to point out to
  • 01:05:41
    i guess the word that i would use here
  • 01:05:43
    is animistic
  • 01:05:44
    right so in other words there are
  • 01:05:46
    spirits everywhere there's no
  • 01:05:48
    systematized religion don't think of it
  • 01:05:51
    as a
  • 01:05:51
    like christianity with the central god
  • 01:05:53
    with institutions priests and so on
  • 01:05:54
    and so forth the earliest we hear about
  • 01:05:57
    slavic priests in the pre-christian era
  • 01:06:00
    is the 10th century so it's late
  • 01:06:03
    and it's most likely as a reaction to
  • 01:06:05
    what they were so they were seeing in
  • 01:06:07
    christianity another
  • 01:06:08
    imitating that right not genuinely
  • 01:06:11
    such and as we approach the end of this
  • 01:06:13
    episode i want to talk about legacy
  • 01:06:16
    from the time that they appear
  • 01:06:19
    and they create their societies they
  • 01:06:22
    stratify
  • 01:06:22
    so on and so forth what legacy do they
  • 01:06:25
    create
  • 01:06:26
    that'll stretch on from the middle ages
  • 01:06:29
    even to today
  • 01:06:30
    the most important one is the language
  • 01:06:32
    and let me explain it's not just the
  • 01:06:35
    surviving slavic languages
  • 01:06:38
    that thing that constantine serial
  • 01:06:41
    central did in the 860s
  • 01:06:45
    in the in the 60s of the 9th century was
  • 01:06:48
    an
  • 01:06:48
    enormously influential thing
  • 01:06:52
    uh because it created a language not
  • 01:06:55
    only for
  • 01:06:56
    those people to express their devotion
  • 01:06:57
    to god liturgical books and whatnot
  • 01:07:00
    but it created a premise for a for an
  • 01:07:02
    original
  • 01:07:03
    an absolute extraordinary different
  • 01:07:06
    culture of europe
  • 01:07:09
    so uh in the middle ages uh from a
  • 01:07:12
    cultural point of view uh
  • 01:07:14
    those people express themselves not just
  • 01:07:16
    in a different language but express
  • 01:07:17
    ideas that's very specific
  • 01:07:19
    there is no parallel for example for
  • 01:07:21
    harabras uh
  • 01:07:22
    on the ladders and treaties on defending
  • 01:07:25
    the
  • 01:07:26
    glycolytic alphabet you don't you don't
  • 01:07:28
    get any
  • 01:07:29
    any anybody writing a defense of the
  • 01:07:32
    latin alphabet in the west
  • 01:07:34
    similarly you don't get a sermon on law
  • 01:07:37
    and grace
  • 01:07:38
    in which i guess you get a number of
  • 01:07:41
    sermons on contrasting the
  • 01:07:42
    new the old to the new testament and
  • 01:07:45
    grace
  • 01:07:46
    but you know in the process of doing
  • 01:07:48
    that future metropolitan of kiev
  • 01:07:50
    hilarion plays the ruse in history
  • 01:07:54
    right so he used that to sort of create
  • 01:07:56
    the path for the ruse to enter
  • 01:07:58
    biblical history i already mentioned the
  • 01:08:00
    authors of the russian primary chronicle
  • 01:08:02
    doing exactly the same to place the
  • 01:08:04
    slavs
  • 01:08:04
    in history so all in all this actually
  • 01:08:07
    created
  • 01:08:07
    an extraordinary um extraordinary rich
  • 01:08:11
    and diverse environment right
  • 01:08:15
    um i mentioned glad golitic the alphabet
  • 01:08:18
    that kharabra defended in the 10th
  • 01:08:20
    century with his on the letters
  • 01:08:22
    that alphabet survived well into the
  • 01:08:23
    16th century in croatia of all places
  • 01:08:26
    there is a croatian
  • 01:08:27
    glagolitism now croatians were catholic
  • 01:08:31
    and they had to fight for the
  • 01:08:33
    preservation of the of the right to
  • 01:08:35
    preserve that language
  • 01:08:36
    to to serve in the church and to write
  • 01:08:39
    that language with that alphabet
  • 01:08:41
    when pope of the pope of the pope uh
  • 01:08:45
    forbade them to do so and in the era
  • 01:08:48
    of uh rise to nationalism in the 19th
  • 01:08:51
    century that played an enormous role
  • 01:08:53
    to them uh defining themselves as a star
  • 01:08:57
    um in bulgaria for example uh the
  • 01:09:00
    uh the this extraordinary effort of
  • 01:09:03
    translations
  • 01:09:04
    in the 10th century took place at the
  • 01:09:05
    royal court of press lab on the cement
  • 01:09:08
    and the use of bulgaria of ultra
  • 01:09:10
    slavonic for expressing a number of
  • 01:09:12
    fight of ideas
  • 01:09:13
    fertilized generation after in others at
  • 01:09:16
    every single moment in the history of
  • 01:09:17
    literature and general culture
  • 01:09:19
    in bulgaria they look back at the 10th
  • 01:09:22
    century as a sort of like a point of
  • 01:09:23
    view
  • 01:09:24
    of inspiration of to where to go from um
  • 01:09:27
    there is even music in those bands in
  • 01:09:30
    those in those countries that actually
  • 01:09:32
    you know model their music so to speak
  • 01:09:35
    or use themes inspired by the middle
  • 01:09:38
    ages uh
  • 01:09:39
    especially this creation of slavic of
  • 01:09:41
    slavic culture
  • 01:09:42
    um in the catholic countries that you
  • 01:09:44
    used in the slavic catholic countries
  • 01:09:46
    that used
  • 01:09:47
    the landing alpha pollen bohemia
  • 01:09:51
    croatia i already mentioned but in
  • 01:09:53
    poland for example one of the most
  • 01:09:54
    interesting aspect
  • 01:09:56
    you mentioned legacy right
  • 01:09:59
    one of the most interesting aspects of
  • 01:10:01
    this is the
  • 01:10:02
    uh the uh the fact that christianity
  • 01:10:05
    actually
  • 01:10:06
    won in poland so late like even by the
  • 01:10:08
    13th century
  • 01:10:09
    parts of poland especially the northeast
  • 01:10:11
    were not christianized yet
  • 01:10:12
    right so in the 19th century um
  • 01:10:15
    any effort to rediscover an identity
  • 01:10:18
    that was national meant at the same time
  • 01:10:21
    trying to see what's underneath the
  • 01:10:23
    catholic layer
  • 01:10:24
    what's underneath the uh because
  • 01:10:26
    christianity
  • 01:10:27
    overlapped was superposed over something
  • 01:10:29
    that apparently
  • 01:10:30
    survived um in bohemia right
  • 01:10:33
    the uh the the story of jerusalem the
  • 01:10:36
    plowman and so forth is perceived as a
  • 01:10:38
    purely
  • 01:10:38
    uh uh should i say slavic stuff
  • 01:10:41
    and you know that created the mindset
  • 01:10:44
    right we slabs are not
  • 01:10:45
    aristocrats and so we're down to earth
  • 01:10:47
    people plumbing you know
  • 01:10:48
    in other words it's it's it created a
  • 01:10:50
    mindset the model of of casting yourself
  • 01:10:53
    in the world socially speaking as
  • 01:10:55
    somebody who actually has
  • 01:10:57
    modest roots but can accomplish
  • 01:10:59
    extraordinary feats
  • 01:11:01
    ladies and gentlemen thank you for
  • 01:11:02
    joining us tonight at the study of
  • 01:11:04
    antiquity in the middle ages as we were
  • 01:11:06
    joined by a phenomenal guest
  • 01:11:09
    dr curtis who led us through a wonderful
  • 01:11:12
    story spanning hundreds of years
  • 01:11:15
    and it's fascinating i cannot thank him
  • 01:11:18
    enough and honestly again
  • 01:11:20
    check out the links in the video
  • 01:11:22
    description below support his work
  • 01:11:25
    and really take advantage of the awesome
  • 01:11:28
    mind
  • 01:11:28
    that he has that helps me and you better
  • 01:11:32
    understand the subjects
  • 01:11:33
    that we all love dr kurta thank you so
  • 01:11:36
    much for coming on the show today
  • 01:11:38
    thank you for having me it was a
  • 01:11:41
    [Music]
  • 01:11:52
    pleasure
  • 01:13:31
    you
Etiquetas
  • Slavs
  • Medieval History
  • Archaeology
  • Slavic Languages
  • Cultural Influence
  • Byzantine Descriptions
  • Linguistic Theory
  • Migration
  • Eastern Europe
  • Historical Origin