00:00:00
Hello guys and gals, me Mutaharin. You
00:00:02
know, the best part about YouTube is
00:00:03
just having the ability to speak your
00:00:05
mind, and that's kind of how I do my
00:00:06
channel. All right, so as you all know,
00:00:08
I really care about game preservation
00:00:10
and everything. And for the first time,
00:00:11
I've actually seen uh the gaming
00:00:13
industry kind of scared. You know when
00:00:15
you're paying like big lawyers like the
00:00:17
the lawyers that earn a big chunk of
00:00:18
money every year to lobby for people.
00:00:20
You know when they're actually doing
00:00:22
their job and writing these five pages
00:00:25
basically spreading misinformation about
00:00:27
the actual stop killing games movement
00:00:30
like preserving our video games. You
00:00:32
know you're doing something right when
00:00:33
you're pissing these guys off. So I'm
00:00:35
going to jump into this real quick. This
00:00:37
is Video Games Europe. Uh one of the
00:00:39
larger lobbying firms for I guess video
00:00:41
games in general. Right now, if you look
00:00:43
at the board for this, all right, it's
00:00:45
filled with people from Warner Brothers,
00:00:47
filled with people from Epic Games,
00:00:48
Electronic Arts, Activision, Nintendo of
00:00:51
Europe, Microsoft, Embracer. Yeah. Some
00:00:53
of the biggest names in video games,
00:00:55
okay? Like the people that basically are
00:00:58
are running the AAA gaming industry, you
00:01:00
know, some of the people that make the
00:01:02
biggest life service dog water games
00:01:05
that uh you know, we're basically trying
00:01:06
to protect from dying. Okay? There's a
00:01:08
lot of games that come out and uh a lot
00:01:10
of times, you know, instead of, you
00:01:12
know, writing the words rental on the
00:01:14
game store, these guys just say you buy
00:01:15
a copy and uh you know, at any point
00:01:18
down the road, they can just yink that
00:01:19
away from you. Okay? Now, if you're
00:01:21
somebody that is okay with that, well,
00:01:25
you my friend are the shiniest cuck in
00:01:27
the room is all I'm going to say. Okay.
00:01:30
So, anyways, uh because Stop Killing
00:01:32
Games got like a bunch of attention
00:01:34
towards it. Uh these guys wrote a
00:01:36
massive pager. Okay. Now, one of the
00:01:38
things that I want to kind of start
00:01:40
before we one of the things I want to
00:01:42
show you is like how bad things can be
00:01:44
in the gaming industry. So, this is from
00:01:46
Ubisoft. This is clause 8 termination.
00:01:49
Okay. So, you know that end user license
00:01:50
agreement? You know that you know that
00:01:52
giant legal ease they give you anytime
00:01:54
you fire up a modern game? Oh, you got
00:01:56
to read through 80 pages of this legal
00:01:58
document before you press you. You
00:02:00
bought the game for 80 bucks, okay? 60
00:02:02
bucks, 70 bucks, whatever. Okay, you
00:02:04
came home, you put that disc in, you
00:02:06
installed it, you fire up the game, and
00:02:07
it gives you this whole reading
00:02:09
material. [ __ ] I'm trying to have fun.
00:02:10
I ain't trying to do [ __ ] homework.
00:02:12
You probably press accept without
00:02:14
reading. It's okay. A lot of us do. But
00:02:17
in some of those EULAs, they write
00:02:19
things like termination. This EULA is
00:02:21
effective from the earlier of the from
00:02:23
the earlier of the date you purchase,
00:02:25
download, or use any product until
00:02:28
terminated according to its terms. you
00:02:30
and Ubisoft may terminate this EULA at
00:02:33
any time for any reason. So again, if
00:02:35
Ubisoft is like, "Yeah, we don't we
00:02:37
don't want we don't want this agreement
00:02:38
to be functional." It's gone. It's over.
00:02:40
It's they can do it. So, one of the
00:02:43
things that's really funny is this EULA
00:02:45
will terminate automatically if you fail
00:02:46
to comply with any of the terms and
00:02:48
conditions. Upon termination for any
00:02:50
reason, you must immediately uninstall
00:02:52
the product. Okay? So, you downloaded a
00:02:54
game that you bought and they terminated
00:02:56
the EUA, you better delete it, okay?
00:02:58
because you signed this EULA and destroy
00:03:01
all copies of the product in your
00:03:03
possession. So, let's say you bought a
00:03:05
physical disc of a game called Driver
00:03:06
San Francisco, right? A game they don't
00:03:08
even sell anymore. And for some reason,
00:03:10
they terminated the EULA. I imagine they
00:03:13
would have. Okay. If they if they
00:03:14
stopped the game from being sold, I'm
00:03:16
pretty sure they could terminate the
00:03:17
EULA at any moment. You will have to
00:03:20
take a goddamn hammer and smash that
00:03:23
disc in a million pieces if if this is
00:03:25
to be right. Now, obviously, I don't
00:03:27
agree with this terms of service and
00:03:28
just because you sign something that is
00:03:30
so blatantly wrong shouldn't make it
00:03:32
legal. Okay? If the EULA said that they
00:03:35
could terminate this EULA and they could
00:03:37
send somebody to shove a dick in their
00:03:39
dick in your ass, okay, is that a
00:03:41
legally binding EULA? Would that be
00:03:43
would that fly in a court of law?
00:03:45
Counselor, I would ask probably not. So,
00:03:48
just because you sign something doesn't
00:03:50
make it okay. Now, of course, this was
00:03:52
uh, you know, a document from, you know,
00:03:54
January 2023, so it ain't exactly new,
00:03:57
but uh, you know, generally speaking,
00:03:59
this kind of like legal ease is in a lot
00:04:01
of EULAS. And, uh, I'll be honest with
00:04:04
you, chief, it ain't good. So, anyways,
00:04:07
these guys finally decided to have a
00:04:09
statement on stop killing games. All
00:04:11
right, they finally decided, you know,
00:04:13
enough is enough. Let's let's talk about
00:04:15
it. Let's have let's have a little chat
00:04:17
about it. All right, so anyways, I
00:04:19
wanted to read this. So, we appreciate
00:04:20
the passion of our community. However,
00:04:23
the decision to discontinue online
00:04:25
services is multifaceted, never taken
00:04:28
lightly, and must be an option for
00:04:30
companies when an online experience is
00:04:32
just no longer commercially viable. We
00:04:34
understand that it can be disappointing
00:04:36
for players, but when it does happen,
00:04:39
the industry ensures that players are
00:04:41
given fair notice of the prospective
00:04:43
changes in compliance. Just because you
00:04:46
tell me you're going to [ __ ] me in the
00:04:48
ass on a specific date and time does not
00:04:51
mean I agree to being [ __ ] in the ass.
00:04:53
All right. It should just be that easy.
00:04:56
I don't understand the argument here. We
00:04:58
don't like the laws. That's why we want
00:05:00
the laws changed. I don't understand how
00:05:02
this is a difficult concept. And yes,
00:05:05
you know, just because it's not
00:05:06
commercially viable, that's
00:05:07
understandable. Okay. That's why we want
00:05:09
an endof life plan to be thought of. So
00:05:11
when the game is gone, you can shut down
00:05:14
the game. you can sunset the product so
00:05:17
people can play what they bought and
00:05:18
then we don't have to ask the big
00:05:20
companies to spend an extra or two bucks
00:05:22
to get these games up and running. We
00:05:24
might be able to do it ourselves. So, we
00:05:26
talk about it. Private servers are not
00:05:28
always a viable alternative option for
00:05:30
players as the protections we put in
00:05:32
place to secure data, remove illegal
00:05:34
content, and combat unsafe community
00:05:37
content wouldn't exist and would leave
00:05:39
right holders liable. Again, it's just
00:05:40
another blatant lie. Nowhere in the
00:05:42
initiative is anybody putting any of
00:05:44
these companies liable for what happens
00:05:46
on an off-platform private server. And
00:05:49
there's still plenty of protections.
00:05:50
You're telling me if Ubisoft shuts shuts
00:05:54
down a a big MMO game like The Crew, and
00:05:56
then the next day somebody takes it,
00:05:58
private servers it up, and turns The
00:06:00
Crew into like, you know, hey guys,
00:06:02
here's like a they just put like
00:06:04
swastikas all over that [ __ ] You know
00:06:06
what I mean? They just they they just
00:06:07
put the most unsafe game imaginable. All
00:06:10
right. They they they they they they
00:06:12
operate the most unhinged server out
00:06:14
there. There's all the cra there's all
00:06:16
crazy types of grooming going on. All
00:06:18
illegal [ __ ] You're telling me that
00:06:20
Ubisoft doesn't have any legal
00:06:22
protections to fight against a server
00:06:24
owner? What? They can't hit them with a
00:06:26
DMCA? They can't hit them with a
00:06:28
copyright strike? You're telling me they
00:06:30
can't hit them with a little legal
00:06:32
action? The industry is not, you know,
00:06:33
above that. This is not an industry that
00:06:36
shies away from legally attacking bad
00:06:38
people. All right. There's plenty of
00:06:39
companies that have chased. Look at what
00:06:41
happened with Club Penguin and its
00:06:42
[ __ ] up servers. There was grooming,
00:06:45
diddlin, everything going on there. You
00:06:47
know what it took Disney? It just took
00:06:48
their legal team a few weeks and all you
00:06:51
know those servers were effectively
00:06:53
gone. Okay, that it's not like they
00:06:55
can't do anything. So, what they said
00:06:57
was these uh pro proposals would curtail
00:07:00
developer choice by making these games
00:07:03
prohibitively expensive to create
00:07:06
because they say some of those titles
00:07:07
are actually designed from the ground
00:07:09
up. Yeah, I get it. It would make live
00:07:11
services a little bit difficult. And you
00:07:13
know what? I'm going to say it like it
00:07:15
is good.
00:07:17
Wow. You know, guys, if you pass these
00:07:20
laws, it might make those predatory live
00:07:22
service games a little bit too difficult
00:07:25
to make. Yeah. Good. All right. Wow.
00:07:28
What a what a shot. You know, the thing
00:07:29
that most people in the gaming industry
00:07:31
have been complaining about, and the
00:07:33
only people that play these live service
00:07:35
experiences are like crazy normies that
00:07:37
are okay with swiping their credit card
00:07:38
non-stop into a game. This is actually
00:07:42
good. Imagine you're like a sports game
00:07:44
player. You probably are the most to
00:07:45
complain about this, okay? After like a
00:07:47
year or two when they remove server
00:07:48
support for your video game, all of a
00:07:50
sudden the sports game you bought is
00:07:52
effectively an actual brick for the most
00:07:55
part. Okay? This is just a way for you
00:07:57
to actually keep the game that you
00:07:58
bought. No game deserves to die. Even
00:08:01
though I don't give a [ __ ] about any of
00:08:03
these live service experiences, I still
00:08:05
don't want them to die. I'm sure lots of
00:08:08
people care. Okay, you know that game we
00:08:10
talked about, Anthem? Yeah, it's a pile
00:08:11
of [ __ ] I agree it's a pile of dog
00:08:14
water putrid [ __ ] but at least people
00:08:16
should have the option to play that dog
00:08:18
water crap, I would imagine. Anyways
00:08:21
though, they wrote this like five pager
00:08:23
right over here where they talked about
00:08:24
this a little bit more. So anyways, they
00:08:27
said this document explains the reasons
00:08:29
why a video game company may decide to
00:08:31
discontinue its functionalities. So
00:08:34
online video games are interactive
00:08:35
entertainment unlike a book, a film and
00:08:37
online video game is not static. Online
00:08:39
video games are interactive
00:08:40
entertainment that combine numerous
00:08:42
elements of artistic yada yada yada.
00:08:44
Online games evolve over time after
00:08:46
their initial release, providing
00:08:48
consumers with regular new content,
00:08:50
experiences, patches, and updates. This
00:08:52
is highly valued by players and is
00:08:54
required to compete in the market. It
00:08:56
involves significant ongoing development
00:08:58
expenditures over years, sometimes
00:09:01
decades. Video game companies put
00:09:03
significant investment into creating and
00:09:05
developing the best interactive exper
00:09:07
entertainment. The right to decide how,
00:09:10
when, and for how long to make an online
00:09:12
video game service available to players
00:09:14
is vital in justifying this cost and
00:09:16
fostering continued technical
00:09:18
innovation. As rights holder and
00:09:21
economic entities, video game companies
00:09:23
must remain free to decide when an
00:09:25
online game is no longer viable. Well,
00:09:28
okay, fine. That's great. You know what
00:09:30
I'm asking? either have end of life
00:09:33
planned or just tell people that, hey,
00:09:35
we released this game in January 2026.
00:09:38
Now, we we know that at some point in
00:09:41
January 2031, the game ain't viable.
00:09:43
We're going to yoink server support.
00:09:45
Well, maybe at that point, I might not
00:09:48
choose to buy your game. And I could
00:09:49
imagine tons of people if they went to a
00:09:51
[ __ ] store and you told them, "Here's
00:09:53
your game. You pay $80. Oh, by the way,
00:09:57
five, six years later, this is when it's
00:09:59
supposed to be taken off offline." And
00:10:01
the guy at the store is like, "Whoa,
00:10:02
wait, hold on. You're telling me I give
00:10:03
you money now and this is gone?" Yeah,
00:10:06
but you get to at least experience it
00:10:07
for a few years. I'm pretty sure that
00:10:09
guy might go look at another game and be
00:10:11
like, "Yeah, I'll buy that one instead.
00:10:13
You know, that one isn't going to die
00:10:14
after 6 years, right?"
00:10:17
Wow. You know, if game companies did
00:10:19
that, I could imagine the purchaser
00:10:20
might think twice. Even the most brain
00:10:23
dead buyer may think twice before buying
00:10:25
an actual product, right? So it will
00:10:27
have a chilling effect on game design
00:10:29
and act as a disincentive to make such
00:10:31
games available. In Europe, it is far
00:10:34
from a trivial modification or a simple
00:10:36
addition in a game development's phase.
00:10:38
It would ignore material material
00:10:40
reputational safety and security
00:10:42
concerns. Again, I'm asking you how is
00:10:45
thinking of, you know, sunsetting your
00:10:47
game and adding an offline mode, you
00:10:49
know, difficult? Some games do this from
00:10:51
the start. Some games don't. Again, if
00:10:54
the industry was regulated so that games
00:10:56
made after the laws were produced had to
00:10:59
actually think of end of life and not
00:11:01
sticking a dick in our ass at some point
00:11:03
without our consent. Okay, that is all
00:11:07
we're asking. This is an industry
00:11:08
without any consumer protections. Okay,
00:11:11
all we want is a little bit of consumer
00:11:13
protections. And the the industry is
00:11:14
scared because again, if this was
00:11:16
happening middle of nowhere [ __ ]
00:11:18
wouldn't count, okay? Because they don't
00:11:20
they don't care. But since this is
00:11:22
happening in like a third largest
00:11:23
economy economic zone in the world, oh
00:11:26
yeah, it's not like we can't sell our
00:11:27
games there. Well, let's say you're
00:11:30
designing a multiplayer game, right?
00:11:31
There's different server solutions. You
00:11:33
might be inclined to take a cheaper
00:11:35
server solution. But if you think that
00:11:37
these laws pass, there's going to be
00:11:39
people selling, you know, server plugins
00:11:41
that may choose to opt to create, you
00:11:43
know, more easily licensed products that
00:11:46
you could then use as alternatives.
00:11:47
Look, the industry loves making money.
00:11:49
they'll find a way to modify their
00:11:51
licenses as long as they can get more
00:11:53
green bats in their accounts. Simple as
00:11:56
that. Okay, that's what needs to happen.
00:11:58
The industry is scared shitless right
00:12:01
now because they actually have to
00:12:02
provide people with end of life plans
00:12:04
instead of killing a game. Okay, and
00:12:06
then telling them, "Hey, just buy it
00:12:08
sequel. Get the sequel. Buy buy the next
00:12:12
sequel that comes out." This is what we
00:12:13
call planned obsolescence. Simple as
00:12:15
that. So, here's what they talk about.
00:12:17
an obligation on video game companies to
00:12:19
provide only a limited type of end-of-
00:12:21
life plan is disproportionate. So, they
00:12:24
talk about things like reduced or no
00:12:26
player protection. Again, requiring
00:12:27
games to run on private servers would
00:12:29
result in the inability for game
00:12:30
companies to continue to protect players
00:12:32
from illegal or harmful content or
00:12:34
conduct. This is also kind of [ __ ]
00:12:36
in a way if you think about it. One good
00:12:38
example is like Valve with Team Fortress
00:12:40
2. You remember when that game like had
00:12:42
its server problems like years ago where
00:12:44
like on the official servers it was just
00:12:45
AI bots written the whole time and in
00:12:48
some cases you would have to go to the
00:12:49
private servers because the community
00:12:51
would actually make the uh protections
00:12:53
available so that you could play a game
00:12:55
safer. Dude, a great example is Call of
00:12:57
Duty. Okay, World War II just got put on
00:13:00
Game Pass. They had to remove it from
00:13:01
Game Pass because they had an RCE
00:13:03
exploit in the game. I was talking to my
00:13:06
brother who was playing Black Ops 3, you
00:13:08
know, another game that has like an RCE
00:13:10
running inside it. Through a community
00:13:12
patch, he was able to play the game in a
00:13:14
safer manner than official servers. So,
00:13:16
this argument doesn't even [ __ ] hold
00:13:18
any weight once I realize there are
00:13:21
actual examples of the biggest companies
00:13:23
in the industry actually not keeping
00:13:25
player safety in mind, even during
00:13:28
official support of the servers. Okay,
00:13:30
so get out of here with that [ __ ]
00:13:32
impact on companies significant
00:13:34
engineering and architectural
00:13:35
challenges. Allowing players to run
00:13:37
private servers would present
00:13:38
significant engineering challenges for
00:13:40
many games due to the way in which such
00:13:42
online features are integrated with
00:13:44
other proprietary systems. Again, I get
00:13:47
it. It sucks for you, right, to think of
00:13:49
an end of life plan, but I care more
00:13:52
about the player protections. I don't
00:13:54
care about this industry where the
00:13:56
budgets for games keep going higher and
00:13:58
they care more about replacing an
00:14:00
employee with AI down the road than
00:14:01
anything. Okay, figure out your budgets,
00:14:04
but we're keeping the actual consumer
00:14:06
protections because I care more about
00:14:08
game preservation than the [ __ ] like
00:14:10
bottom line for some of these like big
00:14:12
executives and their bonuses. Okay,
00:14:14
simple as that. So, reputational harm,
00:14:16
allowing players to run private servers
00:14:18
with online interaction, possibly
00:14:20
results in players using those games in
00:14:22
ways that don't align with the company's
00:14:24
brand values. Again, you have plenty of
00:14:27
legal avenues to shut down private
00:14:29
servers of video games to protect your
00:14:31
reputational arm, and I have no issue
00:14:33
with that. If there are servers that are
00:14:35
advocating illegal material, like we
00:14:37
talked about with Club Penguin, I don't
00:14:39
care if Disney shuts it down. In fact, I
00:14:41
expect them to shut things down like
00:14:43
that. So, erosion of intellectual
00:14:45
property rights, mandating game
00:14:47
companies to keep their online games
00:14:48
operable post official support would
00:14:51
undermine the rights and autonomy in
00:14:53
deciding how this IP is utilized. There
00:14:55
is a vital interest in maintaining
00:14:57
effective copyright protection,
00:14:58
including protection against
00:14:59
circumvention of technologies that
00:15:01
control access to copyrighted video game
00:15:03
software. Again, nobody is asking
00:15:06
companies to maintain these video games.
00:15:08
releasing a server binary doesn't
00:15:11
necessarily have to coincide with you
00:15:12
giving up your actual, you know,
00:15:15
intellectual property rights. This is
00:15:16
where they're actually just lying. Okay,
00:15:18
there are plenty of good examples of
00:15:20
official bit companies releasing server
00:15:22
binaries like Valve for instance, where
00:15:24
people can take those binaries, host
00:15:26
their own private servers, sometimes
00:15:28
intermingling it with official servers
00:15:30
through the client there. This isn't a
00:15:32
big problem. Again, I'm kind of a little
00:15:34
bit all over the place with this kind of
00:15:36
video, but I'm just kind of responding
00:15:37
to some of the [ __ ] that they've offered
00:15:39
here because I find this to be just
00:15:41
laughable. Such a requirement could lead
00:15:43
to community supported versions of games
00:15:45
competing with official versions. In how
00:15:48
in what way is that actually being asked
00:15:50
for? We're talking about end of life.
00:15:52
End of life meaning that you, the
00:15:54
company, has found it to be commercially
00:15:55
inviable. So now you're gutting the
00:15:57
game. And so basically the player base
00:16:00
that remains can host servers at their
00:16:02
own cost. Okay. Do you honestly think
00:16:04
that we're asking you in this initiative
00:16:06
to release the game binary to release
00:16:09
like a a server support for a game at
00:16:12
the same time you've officially released
00:16:13
it? That would be [ __ ] stupid. We're
00:16:16
just asking imagine like just a great
00:16:18
example. Okay, let's say Grand Theft
00:16:19
Auto 6 drops, right? And uh you know
00:16:21
they have to abide by keeping their game
00:16:23
alive. Would you would you honestly
00:16:25
expect Rockstar to keep like you know
00:16:27
GTA Online 2 like server hosting
00:16:29
binaries uh you know during the time
00:16:32
they're officially hosting? No. You
00:16:33
expect them to release it like 10 15
00:16:35
years when they want to kill online 2.
00:16:38
Then they can hand those out and then
00:16:39
the remaining player base can still run
00:16:41
around Vice City doing their online
00:16:44
[ __ ] Okay. In what way even even if you
00:16:46
look at active games like even if you
00:16:48
look at things like 5M or something,
00:16:50
right? How how much of an impact does 5M
00:16:53
even do on actual GT online? I wish I
00:16:56
wish the industry would provide that
00:16:57
metric as well if they're going to make
00:16:59
a long drawn out list like this. So they
00:17:01
talk about importance of consumer
00:17:03
protection laws where they kind of talk
00:17:06
about notwithstanding all video games
00:17:08
offered to players in the EU are subject
00:17:10
to those in consumer protection laws.
00:17:12
Games are licensed to the consumer in
00:17:14
accordance with the toos. These set out
00:17:16
terms upon which consumers may access
00:17:18
and play such games and the situations
00:17:21
in which such rights may be terminated.
00:17:23
So for instance right here uh when they
00:17:26
talk about transparency, players must be
00:17:27
given reasonable prior notice. How about
00:17:30
just give us from the beginning, right?
00:17:31
How about you tell us right there? Don't
00:17:33
I'm not asking you to tell me hey down a
00:17:36
year from now we're going to be turning
00:17:37
out the turning off the game. I at least
00:17:40
want an end of life plan so when you do
00:17:41
turn off the game we can still [ __ ]
00:17:43
play it. When we talk about things like
00:17:45
reimbursement, yes, what about people
00:17:47
that have spent hundreds of dollars in
00:17:49
microtransactions
00:17:50
a in their favorite online game? Okay,
00:17:52
are they going to lose their skins? Are
00:17:53
going to lose their [ __ ] Is that okay?
00:17:55
Is it okay to just take the money,
00:17:57
basically run off with it, and basically
00:17:59
take away a player's purchase? I mean,
00:18:01
nothing about this [ __ ] is fair. Nothing
00:18:03
about any of this is fair.
00:18:06
And everything that this industry has
00:18:08
talked about is trying to misrepresent
00:18:10
this initiative and just take away from
00:18:12
the fact that all gamers want. Okay. All
00:18:14
people want is that the software they
00:18:16
buy isn't completely gutted and useless
00:18:19
uh down the road. And I think that's a
00:18:21
fair compromise to ask for. So yeah, I
00:18:23
know that I've kind of been all over the
00:18:25
place with this video, but I just needed
00:18:26
to get my thoughts out because as soon
00:18:28
as I read this, a big smile came on my
00:18:31
face, okay? because I got to see actual
00:18:34
real proper misrepresentation from a
00:18:36
actual lobbying firm that is, you know,
00:18:39
boarded by some of the biggest players
00:18:41
in the AAA gaming space. For the first
00:18:43
time, I've actually seen the AAA gaming
00:18:45
industry scared because gamers are
00:18:47
actually structuring and asking for real
00:18:50
reform when it comes to the [ __ ] they
00:18:52
buy. Like, god damn. But hey, you know
00:18:55
what? Maybe I'm wrong. And I love the
00:18:57
discourse. Let me know if I'm wrong in
00:18:59
the comment section below or let me know
00:19:00
if I'm right. Okay, keep this discourse
00:19:03
running because if it's anything that's
00:19:05
super important about my love for
00:19:06
gaming, it's keeping it alive in any
00:19:09
way, shape, or form. I'm always on the
00:19:11
side of preservation, never on the side
00:19:13
of the big corporate entity in this
00:19:14
case. So, yeah, let me know what you
00:19:17
think in the comments section below.
00:19:18
Anyways, I'm out.
