Amber Thurman Should Be Alive. Georgia’s Abortion Law Killed Her | Doctor Reacts

00:20:16
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k7wuPkxtQ3o

Resumen

TLDRIn this video, the discussion centers around the consequences of restrictive abortion laws in the United States that have led to preventable maternal deaths. It highlights specific cases, notably that of Amber Thurman in Georgia, to demonstrate the impact of these laws. Amber, a single mother, faced significant barriers to obtaining an abortion due to Georgia's strict regulations. She traveled out of state to North Carolina for a procedure but faced complications afterward. Due to fear of legal consequences and potential prosecution, she hesitated to seek immediate medical care when complications arose, resulting in her untimely death. The video critiques the legislative measures that complicate doctors' decisions in life-threatening situations, emphasizing the chilling effect on medical professionals due to legal ambiguities. It calls for a reconsideration of these laws, underscoring the dire consequences they bear on women's health and lives.

Para llevar

  • 🕊️ Highlighting tragic consequences of restrictive abortion laws.
  • ⚖️ Legal ambiguities complicating life-saving medical decisions.
  • 👩‍⚕️ Fear among medical professionals due to legal risks.
  • 🚫 Denial of abortion leading to preventable deaths.
  • 🚑 Delayed medical care due to fear of prosecution.
  • 🌍 Need for policy reconsideration on reproductive rights.
  • 🩺 Importance of maternal mortality reviews.
  • 🔍 Review of real-life cases and systemic issues.
  • 💔 The human cost of withholding medical procedures.
  • 🗣️ Urging dialogue on legislative impacts on healthcare.

Cronología

  • 00:00:00 - 00:05:00

    The video begins with a discussion on the tragic and predictable consequences of the overturn of Roe v. Wade, focusing on cases of maternal deaths that were preventable if not for restrictive abortion laws. These cases are reported by unbiased maternal mortality review committees in Georgia and Texas. The committees analyze maternal deaths to identify preventability and provide recommendations for improving maternal outcomes. The presenter emphasizes the importance of discussing these cases to prevent future tragedies and introduces the story of a woman named Amber Thurman, whose death is linked to Georgia's restrictive abortion laws.

  • 00:05:00 - 00:10:00

    Amber Thurman's case is detailed: she was a young, single mother in Georgia who sought an abortion after becoming pregnant again. However, due to Georgia's six-week abortion ban, she was unable to access care in-state and attempted to obtain an abortion in North Carolina. Due to delays and high demand at out-of-state clinics, she opted for a medical termination instead of a surgical one. After taking medication, she experienced severe complications but hesitated to seek medical help due to fears of legal repercussions and stigma, as the medication was obtained out-of-state.

  • 00:10:00 - 00:15:00

    Amber eventually experienced severe symptoms and was admitted to an emergency department but faced delays in receiving appropriate care. Her condition worsened significantly overnight. The medical team was hesitant to perform necessary procedures due to the new legal environment restricting abortion-related care, showcasing the medical and legal complexities imposed by such laws. Despite eventually proceeding with surgery, Amber's condition had deteriorated irreversibly, leading to her death during the emergency operation. The tragic outcome sparks discussions on the implications of restrictive abortion legislation.

  • 00:15:00 - 00:20:16

    The video concludes with a critique of Georgia's House Bill 481 and similar restrictive abortion laws. The presenter argues these laws create dangerous situations by complicating medical decisions and delaying necessary care. They question how lawmakers define medical emergencies and the line between necessary and unnecessary medical care under such laws. The emotional impact is highlighted with commentary from Amber's family, emphasizing personal loss and the broader societal implications. The plea is for greater awareness and reconsideration of such legislation to prevent future preventable deaths.

Ver más

Mapa mental

Mind Map

Vídeo de preguntas y respuestas

  • What was the main issue highlighted in the discussion?

    The discussion highlights the preventable maternal deaths in states with restrictive abortion laws, using real-life cases to illustrate the consequences.

  • Who was Amber Thurman?

    Amber Thurman was a single mother in Georgia who faced complications after seeking an abortion due to the state's restrictive laws, ultimately leading to her death.

  • Why did Amber hesitate to seek medical care?

    Amber hesitated to seek care because of legal fears, as her procedure was initiated out of state and could be considered illegal in Georgia.

  • What do the maternal mortality review committees do?

    They review all maternal deaths to assess causes and determine preventability, providing crucial insights into systemic issues.

  • How does the video view restrictive legislation?

    The video argues that restrictive abortion legislation creates unnecessary risks and complications for both patients and healthcare providers.

  • What impact do these laws have on healthcare providers?

    These laws create legal ambiguity that makes medical professionals wary of performing necessary life-saving procedures.

  • What is the significance of Amber's case?

    Amber's case exemplifies the fatal consequences of legislative restrictions on abortion, emphasizing the need for policy revision.

  • Why is the discussion of these cases important?

    Discussing these cases is essential for understanding the real impact of restrictive laws on women's health and advocating for change.

  • What is the main critique of the legislative measures?

    The main critique is that these laws create an unsafe environment for women and complicate medical decision-making, leading to preventable deaths.

  • What should be reconsidered according to the video?

    The video calls for a reconsideration of restrictive abortion laws to prevent further tragic and preventable deaths of women.

Ver más resúmenes de vídeos

Obtén acceso instantáneo a resúmenes gratuitos de vídeos de YouTube gracias a la IA.
Subtítulos
en
Desplazamiento automático:
  • 00:00:00
    today we're diving into discussions
  • 00:00:02
    about some of the incredibly tragic but
  • 00:00:04
    very predictable consequences of the
  • 00:00:07
    overturn of Roy Wade these are four
  • 00:00:09
    lives that we have now known to have
  • 00:00:12
    been lost having been deemed probably
  • 00:00:14
    preventable in the absence of the now
  • 00:00:17
    quite restrictive abortion access
  • 00:00:20
    legislation in many states these are not
  • 00:00:22
    hypothetical they're real stories and
  • 00:00:25
    they come from maternal mortality review
  • 00:00:28
    committees in Georgia and Texas meaning
  • 00:00:31
    these aren't biased although again
  • 00:00:33
    everybody has bias they aren't made
  • 00:00:35
    political a maternal mortality Review
  • 00:00:37
    Committee reviews every maternal death
  • 00:00:39
    in the US and makes an assessment as to
  • 00:00:42
    where things potentially went wrong and
  • 00:00:44
    this is a standard that's happening with
  • 00:00:46
    all maternal deaths not just those that
  • 00:00:48
    have happened since the overturn or
  • 00:00:50
    those thought to be related to it they
  • 00:00:51
    aren't generally released to the public
  • 00:00:53
    but prua has managed to release four of
  • 00:00:57
    these reviews and we're going to talk
  • 00:00:59
    about what happened in their situation
  • 00:01:01
    where the laws created the environment
  • 00:01:04
    for these things to happen and why it's
  • 00:01:07
    important for us to continue to review
  • 00:01:09
    these and discuss them you will
  • 00:01:12
    inevitably start hearing about this more
  • 00:01:14
    because these committees are reviewing
  • 00:01:16
    cases from a couple of years ago at this
  • 00:01:18
    point because it takes a lot of time to
  • 00:01:20
    get to the point of having all the
  • 00:01:22
    information to review and actually
  • 00:01:23
    reviewing it you will notice if you are
  • 00:01:25
    familiar with this topic or any of the
  • 00:01:27
    discussions around it that the cases
  • 00:01:29
    will be early similar to Savita halap
  • 00:01:32
    panavar who was a 31-year-old dentist in
  • 00:01:35
    Ireland who died after their abortion
  • 00:01:37
    laws became quite restrictive and her
  • 00:01:39
    story ended up being the push that they
  • 00:01:42
    needed to overturn their very
  • 00:01:44
    restrictive laws unfortunately we
  • 00:01:46
    haven't seen quite that same response to
  • 00:01:48
    these quite the opposite in a lot of
  • 00:01:51
    circles actually but I think it's
  • 00:01:52
    important for us to go through them
  • 00:01:55
    understand them and most importantly not
  • 00:01:57
    to forget these women who should be here
  • 00:02:00
    and are mothers who left behind children
  • 00:02:03
    and daughters who left behind families
  • 00:02:05
    who have loved ones that are mourning
  • 00:02:07
    and are victims of blanket abortion
  • 00:02:11
    legislation first person we're going to
  • 00:02:13
    talk about today is Amber Thurman Amber
  • 00:02:16
    was a mother in Georgia who had a
  • 00:02:18
    six-year-old and her death has been
  • 00:02:20
    reviewed by the Georgia maternal
  • 00:02:22
    mortality Review Committee they look at
  • 00:02:24
    all the deaths in Georgia that happen
  • 00:02:26
    pregnancy related or during pregnancy
  • 00:02:29
    and they try to go over them basically
  • 00:02:33
    any death that occurs during pregnancy
  • 00:02:35
    or I think it's within a year of the
  • 00:02:37
    pregnancy ending so the Georgia maternal
  • 00:02:39
    mortality Review Committee determines
  • 00:02:41
    pregnancy relatedness causes of death
  • 00:02:43
    contributing factors and then they make
  • 00:02:44
    recommendations on how to improve
  • 00:02:46
    maternal outcomes this is a very
  • 00:02:47
    important review process and we do it
  • 00:02:49
    for a lot of things in medicine and I
  • 00:02:52
    think the fact that Most states have
  • 00:02:53
    these review committees particularly for
  • 00:02:56
    maternal mortality is important both in
  • 00:02:59
    General Health understanding but also to
  • 00:03:01
    understand that when we're talking about
  • 00:03:03
    these this isn't just oh someone picked
  • 00:03:06
    apart this medical situation it's a
  • 00:03:09
    standardized process with a lot of
  • 00:03:12
    expert involvement and a always
  • 00:03:15
    similarly structured process to go back
  • 00:03:18
    and decide this is definitely
  • 00:03:21
    preventable not preventable probably
  • 00:03:23
    preventable Etc so the Review Committee
  • 00:03:26
    assigns a factor of preventability to
  • 00:03:29
    every matal death that's their whole job
  • 00:03:31
    in the summer of 2022 Amber Thurman was
  • 00:03:33
    28 years old she's a single mother and
  • 00:03:35
    she had a six-year-old little boy she
  • 00:03:37
    was a medical assistant and she really
  • 00:03:39
    wanted to go to nursing school she had
  • 00:03:42
    recently moved out of her family's home
  • 00:03:44
    and into her own apartment was getting
  • 00:03:46
    on her feet and really getting her
  • 00:03:48
    footing as a single mom anybody who's
  • 00:03:51
    been a young mother especially a single
  • 00:03:53
    mother knows it is very hard to get your
  • 00:03:55
    footing and it's just adds another layer
  • 00:03:58
    of tragic to me that she was finally
  • 00:04:00
    doing that and starting to be able to
  • 00:04:03
    follow her dreams because of that and
  • 00:04:05
    how hard it had been for her to get back
  • 00:04:08
    on her feet move out get her own
  • 00:04:10
    apartment be the single mother that she
  • 00:04:12
    wanted to be and by all accounts her
  • 00:04:14
    friends and family have said she was a
  • 00:04:16
    wonderful mother she found out she was
  • 00:04:18
    pregnant and when she found out she was
  • 00:04:20
    pregnant she decided to prioritize her
  • 00:04:24
    current life and her young son I think
  • 00:04:26
    it's important that we stop here and
  • 00:04:28
    talk about the turnover way study just
  • 00:04:30
    quickly that says people who are seeking
  • 00:04:33
    abortion and this is based on lots of
  • 00:04:35
    data this isn't something I'm just
  • 00:04:37
    making up its database people seeking
  • 00:04:39
    abortion who are turned away have an
  • 00:04:41
    increased risk of poor outcomes for
  • 00:04:44
    their currently living children poorer
  • 00:04:47
    socioeconomic status for them and their
  • 00:04:49
    children moving forward more likely to
  • 00:04:51
    stay in abusive relationships and are
  • 00:04:54
    just overall going to experience
  • 00:04:56
    children who are less healthy and less
  • 00:04:59
    well off when compared to people in
  • 00:05:01
    their similar situations who were
  • 00:05:03
    seeking abortion and weren't turned away
  • 00:05:04
    so she made a decision that was
  • 00:05:06
    prioritizing for her her life and the
  • 00:05:09
    life of her young son unfortunately
  • 00:05:11
    Georgia's 6-e abortion ban had gone into
  • 00:05:13
    effect on July 20th which was right
  • 00:05:15
    around the time that she found out that
  • 00:05:17
    she was pregnant I also think it's
  • 00:05:19
    important to add in here that six we
  • 00:05:21
    abortion bands are effectively complete
  • 00:05:23
    bands incredibly difficult to find out
  • 00:05:26
    your pregnant make a decision get in
  • 00:05:27
    with someone and access abortion care
  • 00:05:29
    and that 6 week time frame nearly
  • 00:05:31
    impossible most would say so she
  • 00:05:33
    attempted because she was already
  • 00:05:35
    outside of the time frame of 6 weeks she
  • 00:05:38
    decided that she would look for an
  • 00:05:40
    abortion out of state importantly
  • 00:05:41
    something that when all of this happened
  • 00:05:44
    everybody said just go out of state
  • 00:05:46
    right we're not ban an abortion just go
  • 00:05:48
    out of state not something that is
  • 00:05:50
    possible for a great majority of people
  • 00:05:52
    but for Amber it was so she decided that
  • 00:05:55
    at week 9 she would go to North Carolina
  • 00:05:58
    and seek a surgical termination with the
  • 00:06:00
    DNC she ended up going on the 13th of
  • 00:06:03
    August she woke up at 4:00 a.m. to make
  • 00:06:05
    that drive undoubtedly having to take
  • 00:06:08
    off work secure child care for her very
  • 00:06:10
    young son and find someone to accompany
  • 00:06:12
    her unfortunately she hit serious
  • 00:06:14
    traffic on the way and the clinic
  • 00:06:16
    because they had been completely
  • 00:06:18
    inundated with people coming from out of
  • 00:06:20
    state where there are more strict
  • 00:06:21
    abortion restrictions was incredibly
  • 00:06:23
    busy and not going to be able to see her
  • 00:06:26
    because she was going to be more than 15
  • 00:06:28
    minutes late due to that traffic she was
  • 00:06:29
    offered a medical termination with myth
  • 00:06:32
    prone and MAA prol still a very
  • 00:06:35
    acceptable manner of termination at 9
  • 00:06:38
    weeks 94% of terminations in the United
  • 00:06:41
    States happen below 13 weeks most of
  • 00:06:43
    those being medically induced meaning
  • 00:06:45
    take a pill out a miscarriage so Clinic
  • 00:06:48
    employee offered her that counsel her on
  • 00:06:50
    it and she decided that she would take
  • 00:06:52
    the medication she took the first half
  • 00:06:55
    of that pill regimen on that day the
  • 00:06:57
    13th of August which would be the myth
  • 00:06:58
    of pistone and she took the next
  • 00:07:01
    medication which would be the
  • 00:07:02
    misoprostol the following day she
  • 00:07:04
    experienced what would be typical
  • 00:07:06
    symptoms after she took the medication
  • 00:07:08
    so she started having some cramping and
  • 00:07:10
    then she started having some pain
  • 00:07:12
    typically you expect the pain and
  • 00:07:14
    cramping to be a range of severity for
  • 00:07:16
    some people not that bad for some people
  • 00:07:18
    really awful but in all cases it should
  • 00:07:20
    be rather short-lived once you start
  • 00:07:22
    having pretty significant cramping and
  • 00:07:25
    bleeding it should go away fairly
  • 00:07:27
    quickly once the now medically induced
  • 00:07:30
    miscarriage has completed but she wasn't
  • 00:07:32
    experiencing that she was having pain it
  • 00:07:34
    was going on and on and she was bleeding
  • 00:07:37
    heavily soaking through more than a pad
  • 00:07:39
    an hour which is quite heavy especially
  • 00:07:41
    if it's going on for many hours so the
  • 00:07:44
    night of the 18th of August she has not
  • 00:07:47
    sought medical care for what would I
  • 00:07:49
    would imagine have been included in her
  • 00:07:52
    list of things that is not normal and
  • 00:07:54
    you should seek care why would she not
  • 00:07:56
    do that I think we can all come up with
  • 00:07:58
    a whole host of reasons that she would
  • 00:08:00
    choose not to but the biggest factors
  • 00:08:02
    for me in regards to this case are I
  • 00:08:05
    went across state lines to get
  • 00:08:06
    medication that my state says should not
  • 00:08:09
    be loud and is illegal here at the
  • 00:08:11
    gestational age that I'm at am I going
  • 00:08:13
    to be prosecuted for doing something
  • 00:08:16
    that is illegal here but was legal where
  • 00:08:18
    I had it given to me am I going to be
  • 00:08:20
    given treatment or treated differently
  • 00:08:22
    or refuse treatment all of these things
  • 00:08:25
    must be going through her head on the
  • 00:08:26
    evening of August 18th she vomited blood
  • 00:08:29
    and she had a snle event meaning she
  • 00:08:31
    passed out or lost Consciousness at home
  • 00:08:33
    luckily she was accompanied by her
  • 00:08:35
    boyfriend and he called an ambulance
  • 00:08:37
    which came and arrived at their house
  • 00:08:39
    about 6:51 p.m. at 9:38 she was finally
  • 00:08:43
    assessed by doctors at that point she
  • 00:08:45
    was reporting that her abdomen was very
  • 00:08:47
    tender that she had a foul smelling
  • 00:08:50
    discharge and the ultrasound showed that
  • 00:08:52
    there was still some retained products
  • 00:08:54
    of conception or tissue in the uterus
  • 00:08:56
    she also had a very low white blood cell
  • 00:08:58
    count so they started started her on IV
  • 00:09:00
    antibiotics and an IV drip and the
  • 00:09:03
    obstetrician at that time suggested a
  • 00:09:05
    DNC the next day this is absolutely the
  • 00:09:08
    right answer when someone has had a
  • 00:09:10
    miscarriage or an abortion that is
  • 00:09:12
    incomplete and presents with fow
  • 00:09:14
    smelling discharge generally being
  • 00:09:17
    unwell a ultrasound showing there's
  • 00:09:19
    retained products and they're very
  • 00:09:22
    tender on their tummy the answer to that
  • 00:09:24
    is DNC there's no other answer
  • 00:09:27
    antibiotics might Bridge you to that
  • 00:09:29
    point but she needs a DNC I'll pause
  • 00:09:31
    here for a second because there's
  • 00:09:33
    question in the chat that I think's
  • 00:09:34
    relevant it took her 3 hours to be
  • 00:09:36
    seeing question mark I don't think this
  • 00:09:37
    is necessarily outrageous she was
  • 00:09:40
    probably taken to the emergency
  • 00:09:42
    department at that point she had been
  • 00:09:44
    stabilized by the people in the
  • 00:09:47
    ambulance so whether she was in the
  • 00:09:49
    waiting room or in a room waiting to be
  • 00:09:51
    seen likely what happened is she got an
  • 00:09:53
    iv in the ambulance regain Consciousness
  • 00:09:56
    they initiated doing some lab work and
  • 00:09:59
    discussions with her they probably went
  • 00:10:00
    ahead and started some IV fluids and
  • 00:10:02
    then the time it takes you know get to
  • 00:10:04
    the hospital settled in a room IV Place
  • 00:10:06
    nurses do the intake and you're not a
  • 00:10:08
    patient who's actively dying at this
  • 00:10:10
    point she was sick but she wasn't on the
  • 00:10:12
    edge or brink of death as we will know
  • 00:10:15
    because it's quite some time before she
  • 00:10:16
    gets there that is probably quite
  • 00:10:19
    reasonable for someone coming in like
  • 00:10:20
    this you have to think that the other
  • 00:10:22
    things that the hospitals taken care of
  • 00:10:23
    include major car accidents you know
  • 00:10:25
    people who have lost limbs traumatically
  • 00:10:28
    I don't know that that that the part
  • 00:10:29
    that strikes me as unreasonable at least
  • 00:10:31
    in my medical opinion from looking at
  • 00:10:33
    the very limited information that I have
  • 00:10:34
    in front of me so they put on
  • 00:10:36
    antibiotics plan was nothing to eat or
  • 00:10:38
    drink after midnight we should do a DNC
  • 00:10:41
    in the morning which is using suction to
  • 00:10:43
    clean out the uterus remove the probably
  • 00:10:46
    infected retained tissue at 5:15 a.m.
  • 00:10:48
    she had had 5 lers of fluid I cannot
  • 00:10:51
    express to you how much fluid that is I
  • 00:10:53
    it's wild to me that they gave her that
  • 00:10:55
    much to me that says that she probably
  • 00:10:57
    had very low blood pressure which is in
  • 00:10:59
    keeping with her now being in septic
  • 00:11:01
    shock and she had had quite a bit of
  • 00:11:04
    bleeding I would suspect she was noted
  • 00:11:07
    in the chart to have rapid breathing to
  • 00:11:10
    have risk of bleeding out to have low
  • 00:11:12
    blood pressure all of these things are
  • 00:11:14
    alarming this person is incredibly sick
  • 00:11:17
    medical staff then in the notes says
  • 00:11:19
    that they are thinking she should have a
  • 00:11:22
    DNC but is wary because of the newly
  • 00:11:25
    criminalized DNC procedure so instead
  • 00:11:27
    they increased her antibiotics did some
  • 00:11:29
    testing for various infections and put
  • 00:11:32
    her on something called leevo fed she
  • 00:11:34
    was very very sick at this point and
  • 00:11:36
    unstable at 6:45 they took her to the
  • 00:11:39
    ICU reasonably so anybody on Leva fed
  • 00:11:42
    should not be on the main unit or in the
  • 00:11:44
    emergency department if they've been
  • 00:11:45
    there for a while and she was still
  • 00:11:47
    having blood pressure drops at that
  • 00:11:49
    point so at 7:15 the staff then again in
  • 00:11:52
    the notes appears to discuss DNC however
  • 00:11:55
    by 9:15 Amber's organs started to show
  • 00:11:57
    signs of failure I don't know exactly
  • 00:11:59
    what this means but it likely means if I
  • 00:12:01
    had to guess she was starting to go into
  • 00:12:04
    some kind of renal failure or acute
  • 00:12:06
    kidney injury and her kidneys probably
  • 00:12:08
    were not working as well as they had
  • 00:12:09
    before there can be a lot of different
  • 00:12:11
    things that are end organ damage related
  • 00:12:14
    to sepsis but usually the kidneys are
  • 00:12:16
    the first affected by noon that day uh
  • 00:12:19
    the intensive care doctor was saying to
  • 00:12:21
    the OM or obig group hey uh she's still
  • 00:12:24
    deteriorating what are we doing and by
  • 00:12:26
    2: p.m. she was finally taken to the
  • 00:12:27
    operating room in my opinion this should
  • 00:12:29
    have been done way earlier but I don't
  • 00:12:32
    blame the doctors and I will go over in
  • 00:12:34
    just a moment why that is not the
  • 00:12:36
    appropriate response to reviewing this
  • 00:12:39
    by then the situation was so dire that
  • 00:12:41
    doctors started with an open abdominal
  • 00:12:43
    surgery they found that her Bell needed
  • 00:12:45
    to be removed but it was too risky to
  • 00:12:47
    continue operating because there was not
  • 00:12:49
    enough blood flowing to the area a
  • 00:12:51
    possible complication from the blood
  • 00:12:52
    pressure medication the Obi performed a
  • 00:12:54
    DNC but immediately needed to continue
  • 00:12:57
    with the hysterectomy I cannot express
  • 00:12:59
    you how incredibly sick they had let her
  • 00:13:03
    become before going to the operating
  • 00:13:04
    room during the course of this surgery
  • 00:13:06
    her heart stopped she went into cardiac
  • 00:13:08
    arrest and asy meaning she had no
  • 00:13:10
    heartbeat and they were unable to revive
  • 00:13:13
    her now let's move on to discussing how
  • 00:13:16
    this relates to the six we law as with
  • 00:13:18
    any attempt to legislate something that
  • 00:13:21
    is a very much needed life-saving Health
  • 00:13:24
    procedure for a lot of people the
  • 00:13:27
    wording of the law in Georgia like many
  • 00:13:29
    others in this country leaves a lot to
  • 00:13:32
    be desired on top of that it is
  • 00:13:34
    impossible when you are the person in
  • 00:13:36
    charge of deciding when someone is sick
  • 00:13:38
    enough to qualify for the exception that
  • 00:13:41
    their life is in danger to distinguish
  • 00:13:44
    if I do this procedure now and the
  • 00:13:46
    patient is fine am I going to be sitting
  • 00:13:49
    in front of a jury of my peers who is
  • 00:13:51
    questioning whether I actually did an
  • 00:13:53
    unnecessary abortion procedure with
  • 00:13:56
    their evidence being see the patient is
  • 00:13:58
    alive and she's fine or am I going to be
  • 00:14:01
    in a situation that these doctors are in
  • 00:14:03
    which is completely unfair for both the
  • 00:14:06
    doctors and obviously more so for Amber
  • 00:14:09
    and her family where the patient dies
  • 00:14:12
    and now I'm in front of a jury of my
  • 00:14:14
    peers going actually you let her die
  • 00:14:16
    that's medical malpractice when does
  • 00:14:18
    that flip happen and the answer to that
  • 00:14:20
    is you can't tell me and I can't even
  • 00:14:22
    tell you and that's why this is not ever
  • 00:14:25
    going to be a situation where these laws
  • 00:14:27
    are effectively preventing all the
  • 00:14:28
    preventable deaths because when I'm
  • 00:14:30
    having to balance that and come up with
  • 00:14:31
    when does it flip without the benefit of
  • 00:14:34
    knowing in foresight if the patient
  • 00:14:36
    lives or dies that's an impossible
  • 00:14:37
    situation so yes most people will be
  • 00:14:40
    fine most young healthy people even in
  • 00:14:43
    this situation will be fine for every
  • 00:14:45
    Amber Thurman there are hundreds if not
  • 00:14:47
    thousands of people in her exact
  • 00:14:48
    situation who don't die but how many
  • 00:14:51
    people dying is acceptable when they had
  • 00:14:54
    a death that is almost certainly
  • 00:14:55
    preventable if not for these legislative
  • 00:14:58
    efforts to control reproductive
  • 00:14:59
    healthare and access DET
  • 00:15:03
    termination let's go specifically
  • 00:15:05
    through the Georgia House Bill though
  • 00:15:06
    the question then became is there
  • 00:15:08
    something in the wording of this bill
  • 00:15:10
    that related to this delay in care or
  • 00:15:13
    was this just medical malpractice first
  • 00:15:16
    off I will say all of these bills have
  • 00:15:18
    wording that leads to delayed care but
  • 00:15:20
    in this one specifically we can look at
  • 00:15:22
    it and I could tell you I could have
  • 00:15:24
    told you this would be a problem before
  • 00:15:26
    this happened so I have the bill pulled
  • 00:15:28
    up here this is is House Bill 481 from
  • 00:15:30
    Georgia this is where they talk about
  • 00:15:32
    what we're interested in here abortion
  • 00:15:35
    means the act of using prescribing or
  • 00:15:38
    administering any instrument substance
  • 00:15:41
    device or other means with a purpose to
  • 00:15:43
    terminate a pregnancy with knowledge
  • 00:15:45
    that termination will with reasonable
  • 00:15:48
    likelihood cause the death of an unborn
  • 00:15:50
    child provided however that any such act
  • 00:15:52
    shall not be considered an abortion if
  • 00:15:54
    the ACT is performed with the purpose of
  • 00:15:56
    so she had already taken the Myan miso
  • 00:16:00
    that she got out of state and now she's
  • 00:16:02
    in a situation where there is retained
  • 00:16:04
    tissue and she has a septic uterus
  • 00:16:07
    however they've defined here abortion as
  • 00:16:10
    being any instrument or device that
  • 00:16:12
    terminates a pregnancy she is still very
  • 00:16:16
    clearly pregnant it doesn't say there
  • 00:16:17
    has to be a heartbeat and in fact in the
  • 00:16:20
    next subsection a you can infer there
  • 00:16:23
    doesn't have to be a heartbeat so this
  • 00:16:25
    is where we see removing a dead unborn
  • 00:16:29
    child caused by spontaneous abortion do
  • 00:16:32
    we see the problem here spontaneous she
  • 00:16:35
    had admitted to having gone to North
  • 00:16:38
    Carolina taking myy and miso to
  • 00:16:40
    intentionally end this pregnancy
  • 00:16:41
    something that those doctors never would
  • 00:16:43
    have known if not for Amber just wanting
  • 00:16:45
    to get the best care she could and be
  • 00:16:48
    honest with her healthc care team the
  • 00:16:50
    outcome might have been different but
  • 00:16:51
    that's not on her she shouldn't have to
  • 00:16:53
    decide do I tell my Healthcare team the
  • 00:16:55
    whole truth or not this is ridiculous
  • 00:16:59
    they've said it can not be considered
  • 00:17:00
    abortion if it's removing a dead unborn
  • 00:17:02
    child by spontaneous abortion but this
  • 00:17:04
    is dead tissue not spontaneous abortion
  • 00:17:07
    they do have the medical emergency part
  • 00:17:10
    so technically this part would count but
  • 00:17:13
    I will again refer you to at what point
  • 00:17:16
    does it start counting and why are we
  • 00:17:18
    putting people in a position to have to
  • 00:17:20
    question whether or not it would be
  • 00:17:22
    acceptable and at what point it goes
  • 00:17:23
    from not acceptable to acceptable I
  • 00:17:25
    think it's also incredibly important to
  • 00:17:28
    consider where the doctors were in the
  • 00:17:31
    world Georgia the current volatility
  • 00:17:34
    with regards to this topic the extreme
  • 00:17:38
    views of some people on this topic and
  • 00:17:40
    what you are up against as the
  • 00:17:42
    obstetrician I don't know what went
  • 00:17:44
    through the first or second or team of
  • 00:17:47
    obstetric doctor heads or what was going
  • 00:17:49
    on behind the scenes however even if
  • 00:17:52
    they had been completely on board with
  • 00:17:54
    immediately doing a DNC knowing it might
  • 00:17:57
    risk their license if someone came back
  • 00:17:58
    and said it's it's not actually
  • 00:18:00
    something that needed to be done even if
  • 00:18:01
    that was the case which I'm not saying
  • 00:18:02
    it was you are then up against who do I
  • 00:18:05
    need to help me get this patient to the
  • 00:18:07
    operating room I need an anesthetic
  • 00:18:10
    doctor so you've got to have them on
  • 00:18:11
    board because you can't do this with no
  • 00:18:13
    anesthetic I need operating room nurses
  • 00:18:16
    so their personal beliefs or fears of
  • 00:18:19
    what will happen are then also at play
  • 00:18:22
    and maybe they don't realize how dire
  • 00:18:25
    the situation is and you just can't find
  • 00:18:27
    anybody to help you and neiz your
  • 00:18:29
    patient or be their nurse for the
  • 00:18:31
    procedure you can't just do a DNC by
  • 00:18:34
    yourself this isn't just one person
  • 00:18:37
    making one decision and the gray area of
  • 00:18:40
    when it becomes unnecessary to necessary
  • 00:18:43
    medical emergency versus not is real
  • 00:18:45
    easy in hindsight but it's not the same
  • 00:18:48
    when you are sitting there in front of a
  • 00:18:50
    patient having to make those decisions
  • 00:18:52
    and get everybody else around you on
  • 00:18:53
    board with it sadly Amber Thurman's
  • 00:18:56
    mother has been on TV and interviews and
  • 00:19:00
    all of these things talking about this
  • 00:19:01
    and I it's absolutely heartbreaking to
  • 00:19:03
    imagine what her family and her young
  • 00:19:05
    son have gone through but she has been
  • 00:19:07
    quoted as saying that her daughter's
  • 00:19:09
    Last Words as she was being wheed into
  • 00:19:11
    surgery were promise me that you will
  • 00:19:13
    take care of my son and Monday the 16th
  • 00:19:17
    of September would have been Amber's
  • 00:19:19
    31st birthday this is very heavy so
  • 00:19:22
    please look after yourself all I ask is
  • 00:19:25
    that you be aware that this is real this
  • 00:19:27
    is happening and and although it is much
  • 00:19:30
    more likely that you would be fine and
  • 00:19:34
    you would not die as a result of not
  • 00:19:36
    being able to access it does not matter
  • 00:19:39
    how low that risk was if you end up
  • 00:19:43
    being the person who dies or it affects
  • 00:19:47
    your mother or sister or daughter or
  • 00:19:50
    family member the percentage rest didn't
  • 00:19:51
    matter and I will ask you to especially
  • 00:19:55
    if you support these blanket
  • 00:19:56
    legislations really give consideration
  • 00:19:58
    to how many probably preventable deaths
  • 00:20:01
    we need before we stop saying oh well
  • 00:20:04
    here they could have done this and that
  • 00:20:05
    one or this and that one or this and
  • 00:20:07
    that one how many people have to die
  • 00:20:09
    before we go probably what we could have
  • 00:20:11
    done is not made predictably deadly
  • 00:20:14
    blanket legislation on this
Etiquetas
  • abortion laws
  • maternal mortality
  • Georgia
  • Amber Thurman
  • legal complications
  • restrictive legislation
  • medical ethics
  • reproductive rights
  • women's health
  • preventable deaths