00:00:00
If this doesn't derail this Labour party
00:00:02
and put enormous pressure on Kia Starama
00:00:04
to do something about it, I don't know
00:00:06
what will. What follows is quite
00:00:09
possibly the most disgusting exchange I
00:00:13
have ever heard from a member of
00:00:15
parliament. And not just a member of
00:00:17
parliament, but from the leader of the
00:00:19
House of Commons, Lucy Pal. Now, I will
00:00:23
have to jump around a little bit for the
00:00:25
first few seconds of this video because
00:00:27
YouTube algorithm doesn't like certain
00:00:29
phrases within the first few seconds or
00:00:31
so. So, I will jump around to say I do
00:00:34
like publishing to the YouTube platform,
00:00:36
but I do respect that within the first
00:00:38
30 seconds or so, it doesn't like
00:00:39
certain phrases being used. That said,
00:00:42
we should be over 30 seconds or so by
00:00:44
now. So, this exchange was uh flagged up
00:00:47
to me when Rupert Low and uh Robert
00:00:51
Generick commented on this and it was a
00:00:55
clip from the any questions
00:00:59
segment and I will play it to you.
00:01:02
There's there's no other way to get this
00:01:04
across to you than to play it to you and
00:01:07
then I'll show you her response on it
00:01:09
and you can let me know what you think
00:01:10
in the comments below. I've already told
00:01:13
you what I think about it.
00:01:14
Listen to this.
00:01:18
I I I don't know whe you saw the
00:01:20
documentary on Channel 4 about rape
00:01:22
gangs over We want to We want to blow
00:01:24
that little trumpet now, do we? Yeah.
00:01:26
There there is a real issue. Let's get
00:01:28
that dog whistle out, shall we? Where
00:01:32
can you believe that? Now, if you're not
00:01:36
familiar with the term, uh, forgive me
00:01:38
with great respect. If you're not
00:01:39
familiar with the term dog whistle is
00:01:42
something that they say to endear
00:01:45
themselves to the electorate which is
00:01:47
not likely to garner a lot of opposition
00:01:49
from uh the opposing parties but it's
00:01:52
likely to garner some support from their
00:01:54
their voters and their electorate. So,
00:01:57
just to
00:01:59
clarify, she is saying that bringing up
00:02:02
this
00:02:03
issue that you've heard them talk about
00:02:05
here is a dog whistle. Listen to that
00:02:09
again. I I I couldn't quite believe what
00:02:12
I heard when I first heard it. I had to
00:02:14
play it again. I'm playing it for you
00:02:15
now again so you can hear it again. Then
00:02:17
I had to check the comments and then I
00:02:19
had to check whether she'd responded to
00:02:20
it, addressed it because she got
00:02:22
absolutely slated in the comments
00:02:25
underneath this. So let's listen to it
00:02:28
again. So there's no ambiguity, crystal
00:02:30
clear, word for word what she said.
00:02:32
Listen to this.
00:02:35
I I I don't know whe you saw the
00:02:37
documentary on Channel 4 about rape
00:02:40
gangs over. Oh, we want to we want to
00:02:41
blow that little trumpet now, do we?
00:02:43
Yeah. There there is a real issue. Let's
00:02:46
get that dog whistle out, shall we?
00:02:48
Where count? Look. Now, she did respond
00:02:51
to that. Her post is here and she says
00:02:55
as follows. Let me zoom in a little bit
00:02:57
so you can read a little bit more
00:02:58
clearly. You can see exactly what she
00:03:00
said and let me know what you think
00:03:02
about it in the comments below. She
00:03:03
said, "In the heat of a discussion on
00:03:05
any questions, I would like to clarify
00:03:08
that I regard the issues of
00:03:11
exploitation and grooming with the
00:03:13
utmost seriousness.
00:03:16
I'm sorry if this was unclear. I was
00:03:19
challenging the political point scoring
00:03:20
around it, not the issue itself. She
00:03:22
says, "As a constituency MP, I've dealt
00:03:25
with horrendous cases. This government's
00:03:26
acting to get to the truth, blahy blah."
00:03:29
Now, quite frankly, to even say that she
00:03:33
was challenging it as political point
00:03:35
scoring is in and of itself political
00:03:38
point scoring. It is quite possibly the
00:03:40
most disgusting, disgraceful, and
00:03:43
disrespectful comments I have ever heard
00:03:46
from an MP ever. And I've we've
00:03:49
obviously heard a lot of things from a
00:03:50
lot of people. This I I I really I am
00:03:54
stuck for words, which is unusual for
00:03:55
me. I'm absolutely stuck for words. But
00:03:58
let me know what you think below. Now,
00:04:00
she obviously got absolutely slated in
00:04:04
the comment thread on X here and in the
00:04:06
response to her own, which I'll come
00:04:08
back to in a minute. Uh, really
00:04:11
exceptionally poor from Pal. This she
00:04:14
should absolutely resign. This is a
00:04:16
disgraceful position for her to hold and
00:04:18
so disrespectful to the thousands of
00:04:20
victims of these grooming gangs. Shame
00:04:22
on her. Lucy, you stand at the helm of
00:04:24
Britain's House of Commons. Yet you spit
00:04:27
on the cries of Britain's daughters,
00:04:29
dismissing their torment as dog
00:04:31
whistles, while predators prowl
00:04:34
unchecked. You are not a leader. You are
00:04:36
the polished mouthpiece of cowardice,
00:04:39
shielding yourself behind party lines
00:04:41
while British girls are sacrificed on
00:04:42
the altar of political correctness. You
00:04:44
owe this nation more than an apology.
00:04:46
You owe it your surrender, your
00:04:47
resignation, and your silence. Britain
00:04:50
does not need caretakers who cower. It
00:04:52
needs lions who protect their pride.
00:04:54
step down or be swept aside. The age of
00:04:56
the meek is over. Uh absolutely torn to
00:05:00
pieces in this comment thread here. You
00:05:03
can find it and go and read some more
00:05:05
yourself. But equally in the comments
00:05:07
responding to her own post here, Robert
00:05:10
Low at top of the thread here, when you
00:05:12
told people what you really thought,
00:05:14
they listened. Yes, it was absolutely
00:05:17
crystal clear what she thought there. In
00:05:20
my opinion, you understand from
00:05:22
listening to it, she treated that as
00:05:24
though it was just political point
00:05:26
scoring. I mean, she admitted as much
00:05:27
here. She said, "I was challenging the
00:05:28
political point scoring." She's still at
00:05:30
it. She is still saying that it was
00:05:32
political point scoring. She is still
00:05:35
saying in her supposed apology
00:05:37
clarification post here, she is still
00:05:40
saying that it was political point
00:05:42
scoring. She said word for word I was
00:05:45
challenging the political point scoring
00:05:47
around it, not the issue itself, but it
00:05:50
wasn't I mean I you can't hear the full
00:05:52
thing in the little clip that I've just
00:05:53
played you, but it was a discussion.
00:05:56
They were there to discuss, ask
00:05:58
questions, and that was her response.
00:06:01
Absolutely sarcastic, disrespectful, and
00:06:03
downright disgusting. And that wasn't
00:06:06
the only comment either. Dog whistle is
00:06:09
the word you used for someone raising
00:06:10
enormously significant and important
00:06:12
issue that you then directly try to
00:06:15
trivialize and caricature the person and
00:06:18
the point raised. The public sees this
00:06:20
contempt for what it is. Those gangs and
00:06:22
those complicit, not dog whistle. Basil
00:06:26
the great known for some controversial
00:06:27
posts but unclear. Listen to your own
00:06:30
words. I hope you don't resign. I hope
00:06:33
karma is forced to sack you. Appalling
00:06:35
beyond belief. And that raises a very
00:06:37
interesting point here. This is
00:06:40
absolutely the sort of thing that an MP
00:06:43
should be dismissed from the party for.
00:06:46
Is absolutely something that they should
00:06:48
be fired for. And again, a comment
00:06:50
pulling on this clarification. I'm sorry
00:06:53
if this was unclear is fundamentally
00:06:54
different to I'm sorry for what I said.
00:06:57
You're pinning the blame on people
00:06:58
misunderstanding you when your tone and
00:07:00
the content of what you said was quite
00:07:02
clear. Someone else. We all heard what
00:07:04
you said and it was very clear what you
00:07:05
think. Resign someone else. You must
00:07:07
think we are deaf or stupid or you're
00:07:10
unaware that radio is recorded. We heard
00:07:12
you loud and clear, including the
00:07:13
context. Your sneering dismissiveness
00:07:16
belittling the issue was a shameful
00:07:18
disgrace. It typifies Labour's attitude
00:07:20
to these gangs down the decades. Resign
00:07:24
someone else. You were crystal clear.
00:07:26
Your instinctive reaction was
00:07:28
dismissive, filled with contempt. I
00:07:30
suspect you were being more honest with
00:07:32
your words in that moment than you are
00:07:34
now in this post. And even as I sit here
00:07:35
now, you know, I was going to record
00:07:37
this now and send it out tomorrow
00:07:38
morning. Um, I'm changing my mind as we
00:07:41
speak. I think I might just p publish
00:07:42
this straight away, but even as I sit
00:07:44
here, I now see a letter from Rert Low.
00:07:46
Dear leader of the House, I'm writing to
00:07:48
express my deep concern at your recent
00:07:50
remarks during a media appearance in
00:07:52
which you responded to a question about
00:07:53
the rape gang scandal with the phrase,
00:07:56
"You want to blow that little trumpet
00:07:58
and let's get that dog whistle out."
00:08:00
Your comments are deeply, deeply
00:08:01
offensive. They diminish and mock the
00:08:03
genuine and justified outrage felt by
00:08:06
millions of British people. Your words
00:08:08
trivialize one of the most shameful
00:08:10
festering scandals in British history.
00:08:12
The industrial and torture of young
00:08:15
workingclass white girls by
00:08:17
predominantly Pakistani men in towns and
00:08:19
cities across the country. This was not
00:08:21
a conspiracy theory. It was a documented
00:08:23
systemic failure of the state to protect
00:08:25
vulnerable white girls. It continues
00:08:27
today. To reduce this issue to a dog
00:08:29
whistle is abhorrent and insulting. It
00:08:32
is not a trumpet to be blown. It is a
00:08:34
national disgrace that demands
00:08:36
accountability, not such pathetic
00:08:38
deflection. I urge you to do the right
00:08:40
thing. Issue an urgent public apology
00:08:42
for your remarks. Dismissing this
00:08:44
tragedy with such flippant language is
00:08:46
reprehensible. Now, as I said at the
00:08:47
outset of this video, if this doesn't
00:08:49
result in her resignation or Kia Starmer
00:08:52
sacking her for those comments, this
00:08:54
could absolutely be the thing that
00:08:56
derails this Labor party. As I say, let
00:08:59
me know what you think in the comments
00:09:00
below. Apologies for the late evening
00:09:02
video, but I had to put this out. Let me
00:09:04
know what you think. Please do subscribe
00:09:06
to my channel here for brutally honest.
00:09:07
I told you I would be brutally honest
00:09:09
about what I think. Do subscribe for
00:09:11
that. And thank you for watching.
