Matthew Pines on the Geopolitical and National Security Implications of Cryptocurrency Adoption

00:58:09
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pTz0RrXEo5A

Résumé

TLDRIn this episode of Macro Musings, host David Beckworth engages with Matthew Pines to explore the critical intersection of cryptocurrencies and national security. Pines, who navigates between the fields of finance and national security, offers an insightful perspective on the geopolitical implications of digital assets, particularly Bitcoin. He highlights China’s deliberate strategy to augment its geopolitical influence via network power, and contrasts it with the US's historical, organic growth of network capabilities. A key focus is the strategic advantage Bitcoin could provide to the US, not only in bolstering its financial networks but also in countering China's ambitions. The idea of a strategic Bitcoin reserve is discussed, noting Senator Cynthia Lummis's proposal for such a reserve as a national asset to enhance security. The conversation extends to broader geopolitical dynamics, defense budgets, and the burgeoning attention on Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP) within national security discourse. Pines argues for a more deliberate integration of private fintech innovations like Bitcoin into national security strategies to maintain US network dominance. This episode offers a profound look into the potential financial and strategic benefits of cryptocurrencies amid great power competition.

A retenir

  • 🏛️ Cryptocurrencies are increasingly linked to national security discussions.
  • 🇨🇳 China is intentionally building networks for geopolitical competition.
  • 💼 Bitcoin can offer strategic advantages for the US in global finance.
  • 💡 Senator Lummis has proposed a strategic Bitcoin reserve for the US.
  • 📊 US defense budget has inefficiencies and strategic concerns.
  • 🔍 National Defense Authorization Act discusses UFOs in current policy.
  • 🌐 Stablecoins might enhance US dollar dominance globally.
  • 📈 The US has historically relied on organically developed networks.
  • 🧭 There's a need for more strategic thinking on fintech innovation.
  • 🔌 National Security increasingly involves network power dynamics.

Chronologie

  • 00:00:00 - 00:05:00

    The podcast episode opens with the introduction of the host, David Beckworth, who welcomes Matthew Pines as the guest. Pines is described as a director at Sentinel One and an expert in national security issues, particularly in relation to cryptocurrencies. The discussion aims to explore the linkages between national security and finance, highlighting crypto's role.

  • 00:05:00 - 00:10:00

    Matthew Pines shares his career journey from studying physics and philosophy to delving into national security and economics. He worked at the National Science Foundation and with startups conducting war games for the government. Pines transitioned to advising on geopolitical and cyber security risks, leveraging his expertise in national security and finance.

  • 00:10:00 - 00:15:00

    Pines emphasizes the importance of understanding the broader historical and geopolitical context in which financial policies are made. He argues that during periods of instability, traditional economic frameworks may fail, requiring policymakers to consider new solutions. His work bridges the gap between national security and finance, particularly during geopolitical shifts.

  • 00:15:00 - 00:20:00

    The discussion highlights the changing nature of defense expenditures and the strategic objectives guiding US military capabilities. Pines discusses the gap between strategic military goals and actual defense funding, noting political and economic constraints. He argues for a reassessment of military spending in light of evolving geopolitical threats.

  • 00:20:00 - 00:25:00

    Pines explains China's strategic approach to building its network power through digital infrastructure and settlements systems like CIPS, positioning itself to reduce US influence in financial networks. He argues that China's efforts can undermine US financial coercive power, prompting the need for alternative strategies, including cryptocurrency utilization.

  • 00:25:00 - 00:30:00

    The conversation turns to how the US can leverage cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and stablecoins to enhance its own network power in the face of Chinese competition. Pines suggests embracing cryptocurrencies as strategic assets can extend dollar influence globally and counter China's techno-authoritarian expansion, thus complementing US national interests.

  • 00:30:00 - 00:35:00

    Pines presents the idea of using Bitcoin and dollar-pegged stablecoins to extend the reach of the US dollar, particularly in under-banked regions. He argues stablecoins can augment dollar demand abroad while aligning with US interests in promoting financial inclusion and liberal values, thereby countering China’s influence via digital currency networks.

  • 00:35:00 - 00:40:00

    The dialogue covers the potential strategic benefits of establishing a US strategic Bitcoin reserve. Pines discusses proposals from political figures like Trump and Lummis, highlighting that holding Bitcoin could act as a financial contingency against geopolitical shocks or domestic fiscal pressures, enhancing economic stability and strategic signaling.

  • 00:40:00 - 00:45:00

    Pines warns about the risks of a large-scale US Bitcoin reserve potentially undermining the US dollar. He stresses the need for balanced strategic planning to avoid destabilizing the financial system. The exploration of Bitcoin as a reserve requires careful consideration of how it complements the dollar without posing existential threats to existing monetary frameworks.

  • 00:45:00 - 00:50:00

    The latter part discusses Pines' insights into the National Defense Authorization Act and the potential importance of issues such as unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAPs) in national security considerations. The podcast explores how these non-mainstream topics could impact strategic defense policies and broader geopolitical dynamics in unexpected ways.

  • 00:50:00 - 00:58:09

    The episode concludes with a call to reconceptualize the role of crypto networks in national strategy. Pines emphasizes the importance of forward-thinking policy that integrates financial, technological, and defense sectors to maintain US strategic dominance. The guest also hints at future disclosures in national security domains that could influence economic resilience.

Afficher plus

Carte mentale

Mind Map

Questions fréquemment posées

  • Who is the guest on today's episode of Macro Musings?

    The guest is Matthew Pines, director of intelligence for Sentinel One Strategic Advisory Group.

  • What is the main topic of discussion?

    The discussion focuses on the linkages between cryptocurrencies, particularly Bitcoin, and national security.

  • What is Matthew Pines' professional background?

    He has a background in intelligence, having worked in national security, and has written on cryptocurrencies' implications for national security.

  • How does China approach network power compared to the US?

    China is intentionally building networks for geopolitical influence, while the US has organically developed networks due to historical dominance.

  • What are the potential advantages of Bitcoin for U.S. national security?

    Bitcoin could improve the US's strategic positioning, create demand for stablecoins, and counter China's network expansion.

  • What recent legislation pertains to cryptocurrency and national security?

    The idea of a strategic Bitcoin reserve has been discussed, notably by Senator Lummis with her Bitcoin Act proposal.

  • How does Matthew Pines propose the US should view cryptocurrencies?

    He suggests the US should consider them as strategic assets to enhance its network dominance.

  • What is the National Defense Authorization Act?

    It is the annual must-pass legislation that authorizes the budget and policies for the U.S. Department of Defense.

  • What unusual topic is becoming noteworthy in National Defense Authorization Act discussions?

    Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP) or UFOs have been gaining attention in defense discussions.

  • How does Matthew Pines view the current US defense budget?

    He believes there is inefficiency and potential underfunding in U.S. defense budget allocations.

Voir plus de résumés vidéo

Accédez instantanément à des résumés vidéo gratuits sur YouTube grâce à l'IA !
Sous-titres
en
Défilement automatique:
  • 00:00:02
    welcome to macro musings where each week
  • 00:00:04
    we pull back the curtain and take a
  • 00:00:06
    closer look at the most important
  • 00:00:08
    macroeconomic issues of the past present
  • 00:00:11
    and future I am your host David
  • 00:00:13
    beckworth a senior research fellow at
  • 00:00:15
    the marqueta center at George Mason
  • 00:00:17
    University and I'm glad you decided to
  • 00:00:20
    join
  • 00:00:24
    us our guest today is Matthew Pines Matt
  • 00:00:27
    is the director of intelligence for
  • 00:00:29
    Sentinel one strategic Advisory Group
  • 00:00:32
    and a veteran of the National Security
  • 00:00:33
    World Matthew is also the author of
  • 00:00:36
    several papers on cryptocurrencies and
  • 00:00:38
    their implications for National Security
  • 00:00:41
    including a recent one titled great
  • 00:00:43
    power Network competition and Bitcoin
  • 00:00:46
    Matthew joins us today to discuss these
  • 00:00:48
    linkages Matthew welcome to the show
  • 00:00:50
    thanks for having me well it's a great
  • 00:00:52
    time to have someone like you on the
  • 00:00:53
    show there's a lot of crypto issues in
  • 00:00:55
    the news we have a presidential election
  • 00:00:58
    when one of the candidates claims to be
  • 00:01:00
    the going to be the president for crypto
  • 00:01:02
    industry we also have talks of stable
  • 00:01:05
    coins lots of things happening in that
  • 00:01:07
    space so I'm delighted to have you on
  • 00:01:10
    Matt you covered this in your work but
  • 00:01:12
    you are also a part of a national
  • 00:01:14
    security world that I'm not very
  • 00:01:16
    familiar with and you kind of bridge the
  • 00:01:19
    gap between those two and I think that's
  • 00:01:20
    our connection we've met before and that
  • 00:01:22
    connection is because I'm more in the
  • 00:01:24
    finance world you're in the National
  • 00:01:26
    Security world and and the linkages
  • 00:01:28
    between National Security and finance
  • 00:01:29
    come together together and we have
  • 00:01:30
    become acquaintances because of that
  • 00:01:32
    tell us about your career and your
  • 00:01:34
    journey into that space yeah I'll give
  • 00:01:36
    you the Abridged version so as an
  • 00:01:37
    undergrad at Hopkins I studied physics
  • 00:01:39
    and philosophy I thought I was going to
  • 00:01:40
    become an academic did a hard pivot
  • 00:01:42
    after realizing working in the lab eight
  • 00:01:44
    hours a day wasn't for me I went over to
  • 00:01:47
    the lond School of economics and did a
  • 00:01:48
    masters in public policy and philosophy
  • 00:01:50
    again kind of stall figure out what I
  • 00:01:52
    want to do with my life I came back to
  • 00:01:53
    DC I got a fellowship at the National
  • 00:01:55
    Science Foundation actually where I was
  • 00:01:56
    a science assistant helping manage the
  • 00:01:59
    grant programs w for all of Economics
  • 00:02:00
    discipline but also decision risk
  • 00:02:02
    management sciences and the science of
  • 00:02:03
    organizations programs so worked for two
  • 00:02:06
    years there kind of helping to convene
  • 00:02:07
    those panels review and kind of support
  • 00:02:09
    the program officers make those grants
  • 00:02:11
    that was kind of a feeder program to do
  • 00:02:13
    phds in economics or or related field
  • 00:02:16
    but I again kind of like sort of tapped
  • 00:02:17
    out of going into Academia I got my
  • 00:02:20
    start in nity W essentially working as a
  • 00:02:23
    analyst for a startup that was doing war
  • 00:02:25
    games for the US government and so there
  • 00:02:27
    we we were essentially you know
  • 00:02:29
    simulating whether it's on a tabletop
  • 00:02:31
    level sort of discussion or full scale
  • 00:02:33
    you know thousands of people around the
  • 00:02:34
    country all sorts of Bad Case scenarios
  • 00:02:36
    and so that's kind of got my start in
  • 00:02:37
    sort of government work in the
  • 00:02:39
    classified and and security space and
  • 00:02:41
    throughout that portion of my career I
  • 00:02:42
    really focused on helping the government
  • 00:02:44
    evaluate essentially worst case
  • 00:02:46
    scenarios so that was either you know in
  • 00:02:49
    these types of simulations sort of
  • 00:02:50
    exercises war games or more sort of
  • 00:02:52
    analytic assessment sort of program
  • 00:02:54
    evaluations of our national continuity
  • 00:02:56
    programs and our programs to understand
  • 00:02:58
    how prepared the country is for all
  • 00:03:00
    hazards both natural disasters as well
  • 00:03:02
    as you know the range of sort of
  • 00:03:03
    man-made contingencies so that's kind of
  • 00:03:05
    where I kind of jumped from Project to
  • 00:03:07
    project Consulting for a number of
  • 00:03:08
    different government agencies FEMA naal
  • 00:03:10
    Security Council parts of the
  • 00:03:11
    intelligence Community defense
  • 00:03:12
    department kind of understanding a lot
  • 00:03:14
    of different problems I transitioned
  • 00:03:16
    from doing government Consulting a few
  • 00:03:17
    years ago to lead the intelligence
  • 00:03:19
    practice within another small
  • 00:03:21
    consultancy that was focused on advising
  • 00:03:23
    multinationals critical technology
  • 00:03:25
    companies on the intersection of
  • 00:03:26
    geopolitical and cyber security risk so
  • 00:03:29
    I joined the Stamos group founded by
  • 00:03:30
    Chris Krebs and Alex Stamos former
  • 00:03:32
    assist director former Chief secret
  • 00:03:34
    officer for Facebook and Yahoo and our
  • 00:03:36
    clients of course were facing kind of a
  • 00:03:38
    change in Global Order where sort of
  • 00:03:40
    premises of globalization of free trade
  • 00:03:43
    of kind of international relations were
  • 00:03:45
    being upset and so there was a acute
  • 00:03:47
    demand from SE Sues and boards to
  • 00:03:49
    understand how to navigate these fields
  • 00:03:51
    and so we are our core expertise was
  • 00:03:52
    kind of cyber security but I sort of
  • 00:03:54
    brought some of the geopolitical
  • 00:03:55
    dimension to integrate with that but
  • 00:03:57
    also um advise multinationals and kind
  • 00:03:58
    of how to how to navigate that so that's
  • 00:04:00
    what I've been doing for the last
  • 00:04:00
    several years now that firm was acquired
  • 00:04:02
    by a large cyber security company called
  • 00:04:04
    Sentinel one and so I've been there ever
  • 00:04:05
    since as the Director of intelligence
  • 00:04:07
    for Pinnacle one which is the rebranded
  • 00:04:09
    kreb Stamos group within the cyber
  • 00:04:11
    security business so that's kind of the
  • 00:04:12
    tldr I have had a parallel track in sort
  • 00:04:14
    of the Bitcoin policy space so I'm a
  • 00:04:16
    national security fellow for the Bitcoin
  • 00:04:17
    policy Institute I've been with them for
  • 00:04:19
    about four and a half years and there
  • 00:04:21
    I've been sort of writing and thinking
  • 00:04:22
    about and helping you know engage with
  • 00:04:23
    policy makers on the intersection
  • 00:04:25
    between Bitcoin digital assets more
  • 00:04:27
    broadly National Security and
  • 00:04:28
    geopolitics very fascinating since
  • 00:04:31
    you're in that space I want to ask a
  • 00:04:33
    question since I had a guest on recently
  • 00:04:35
    from the Atlantic Council I believe Josh
  • 00:04:37
    lipsky and he talked about this gap
  • 00:04:41
    between people on my side who are into
  • 00:04:43
    Finance International econ issues we
  • 00:04:46
    think about dollar dominance a lot and
  • 00:04:48
    then people on the other side think
  • 00:04:49
    about National Security issues and these
  • 00:04:51
    issues are connected but we often don't
  • 00:04:53
    see the other side's perspective do you
  • 00:04:55
    also see that that kind of that missing
  • 00:04:57
    middle part there I do I think think
  • 00:04:59
    when you're in the trenches when you're
  • 00:05:01
    kind of a technocrat when you're an
  • 00:05:02
    expert in a particular policy field you
  • 00:05:04
    tend to you know rightly so sort of
  • 00:05:06
    focus on the the immediate details of
  • 00:05:09
    policy debates informing whatever sort
  • 00:05:11
    of the political mandate is of whoever's
  • 00:05:13
    in power and sort of driving the
  • 00:05:14
    internal policy discussion inside
  • 00:05:16
    different different administrative
  • 00:05:17
    bureaucracies from my perspective you
  • 00:05:19
    know I look at a broader sweep of
  • 00:05:21
    History you know you know there are
  • 00:05:22
    different regimes there's sort of stable
  • 00:05:24
    regimes where that sort of policy
  • 00:05:26
    discourse and policy apparatus is very
  • 00:05:28
    finely tuned and to help you navigate
  • 00:05:30
    kind of the the day-to-day volatility
  • 00:05:32
    the year-to-year volatility in sort of
  • 00:05:34
    macroeconomic and and political and
  • 00:05:36
    economic conditions and then there are
  • 00:05:37
    regimes where there's increasing inst
  • 00:05:39
    stability increasing fragility and
  • 00:05:41
    National decision makers are confronting
  • 00:05:43
    conditions that they don't have a
  • 00:05:45
    template for and where the probability
  • 00:05:47
    of sort of more radical disruptions to
  • 00:05:50
    assumptions behind the current monetary
  • 00:05:52
    geopolitical framework become unsettled
  • 00:05:55
    and that's where you can see in history
  • 00:05:57
    like big changes made right so big
  • 00:05:59
    Summits big Accords that radically
  • 00:06:01
    change the structure of the monetary
  • 00:06:02
    system and those to first order you know
  • 00:06:05
    in the you know over a generational time
  • 00:06:07
    scale are Downstream of geopolitics
  • 00:06:09
    right and so you know when you hit those
  • 00:06:10
    inflection moments when you hit those
  • 00:06:12
    points where National interest and
  • 00:06:13
    strategic competition start to overweigh
  • 00:06:16
    the sort of traditional economic and
  • 00:06:18
    policy prerogatives then you can see
  • 00:06:20
    things coming in from outside those
  • 00:06:22
    traditional policy debates that can
  • 00:06:24
    affect how you think about those
  • 00:06:25
    questions yeah it's easy for me to think
  • 00:06:27
    about monetary policy the federal Reser
  • 00:06:29
    erve very domestically maybe even
  • 00:06:31
    internationally but I don't think about
  • 00:06:33
    it often in terms of National Security
  • 00:06:36
    uh a while back we had Paul Tucker on
  • 00:06:38
    the show and he told this story which is
  • 00:06:39
    in a book we talked about where when the
  • 00:06:41
    currency swap lines were announced 2008
  • 00:06:44
    also 2020 I believe it was India was not
  • 00:06:47
    included and he thought that was a
  • 00:06:48
    mistake he goes you should have
  • 00:06:49
    consulted the state department when you
  • 00:06:51
    made this list of who's going to get the
  • 00:06:52
    currency swap lines and I hadn't
  • 00:06:54
    processed it along those Dimensions now
  • 00:06:56
    the paper we're going to discuss today
  • 00:06:57
    you do that you look at the linkages
  • 00:06:59
    between you know dollar dominance
  • 00:07:01
    National Security crypto world and all
  • 00:07:03
    those issues so I appreciate you
  • 00:07:05
    bridging this Gap in fact that's what we
  • 00:07:06
    do at mercades our motto here is
  • 00:07:08
    Bridging the Gap between academic ideas
  • 00:07:10
    real world policy problems and so you're
  • 00:07:12
    doing that very well so glad to have you
  • 00:07:14
    on the program now before we jump into
  • 00:07:16
    your paper I want to get there but
  • 00:07:18
    before we do that since you're in the
  • 00:07:20
    National Security space I just want to
  • 00:07:22
    maybe step back and talk about the US
  • 00:07:25
    Government funding expenditures applied
  • 00:07:27
    toward defense so my understanding it's
  • 00:07:29
    around 4% of of GDP around a trillion
  • 00:07:33
    dollars if you look at like a a chart
  • 00:07:36
    historically it's come down quite a bit
  • 00:07:38
    I mean obviously way down from World War
  • 00:07:39
    II but even relative to say the 1980s
  • 00:07:41
    Ronald Reagan's buildup of Defense it's
  • 00:07:43
    come down quite a bit even the uh
  • 00:07:47
    interest on debt now I believe is the
  • 00:07:48
    same or higher levels than what we put
  • 00:07:50
    towards defense expenditures from your
  • 00:07:53
    assessment is is that too little or or
  • 00:07:55
    were we doing it about right so the way
  • 00:07:57
    the US government approaches its defense
  • 00:07:59
    planning is it sets out kind of its
  • 00:08:01
    strategic objectives for its military
  • 00:08:03
    strategy and we have had for a long time
  • 00:08:06
    kind of a two- war strategy that we feel
  • 00:08:08
    like we need to have the military
  • 00:08:09
    capabilities to fight and win at least
  • 00:08:11
    in one theater while holding one other
  • 00:08:13
    theater of conflict with the near
  • 00:08:14
    adversary and so that's kind of like the
  • 00:08:16
    top level kind of strategic guidance is
  • 00:08:18
    like we need to be able to essentially
  • 00:08:19
    hold Russia while while fighting China
  • 00:08:21
    right and then maybe a contingency here
  • 00:08:23
    there that's like a very top level sort
  • 00:08:25
    of framework and then of course the
  • 00:08:27
    defense department is also given kind of
  • 00:08:29
    Topline budget guidance and says well
  • 00:08:31
    this is basically the pot of money we
  • 00:08:32
    have to work with you know what do you
  • 00:08:34
    think that a portion looks like across
  • 00:08:36
    the different services and so there's a
  • 00:08:38
    pretty big gap between tracing what we
  • 00:08:41
    actually think we want the military to
  • 00:08:42
    do and what we actually are funding it
  • 00:08:44
    to do and so bad yeah 850 billion was I
  • 00:08:46
    think in the fy2 National Defense
  • 00:08:48
    authorization act Roger wicker who's the
  • 00:08:50
    ranking member of the armed services
  • 00:08:51
    committee has come out with a proposal
  • 00:08:53
    that he wants to you know reach a target
  • 00:08:55
    of 5% of GDP and he makes sort of a
  • 00:08:57
    similar argument that if we're in
  • 00:08:59
    essentially an environment of increasing
  • 00:09:01
    you know geopolitical competition if
  • 00:09:03
    there is a threat of of great power war
  • 00:09:04
    on the horizon then the sort of the
  • 00:09:07
    operating assumptions behind how much we
  • 00:09:09
    abortion to defense should be more
  • 00:09:10
    conasur with kind of our Cold War era
  • 00:09:12
    maybe not the peak of Cold War and say
  • 00:09:14
    9% of GDP in the in the 60s but you know
  • 00:09:17
    maybe going back to that sort of Reagan
  • 00:09:19
    Era sort of steady state I don't have
  • 00:09:21
    like a particular like number that I
  • 00:09:23
    would say if you talk to a lot of folks
  • 00:09:24
    inside the defense budget Community
  • 00:09:26
    which of course is whole cottage
  • 00:09:28
    industry inside inside DC
  • 00:09:30
    they'll say there's kind of a mix of one
  • 00:09:32
    there's just immense inefficiency in the
  • 00:09:34
    way that we currently execute these
  • 00:09:36
    large government expenditures and
  • 00:09:38
    there's lots of questions about whether
  • 00:09:40
    we should be first trying to prioritize
  • 00:09:42
    how we're apportioning the budget for
  • 00:09:44
    example the army during the global war
  • 00:09:46
    and Terror got a massive sort of
  • 00:09:47
    relative upweight in terms of how much
  • 00:09:49
    that that budget it received to you know
  • 00:09:51
    it was on the ground fighting in Iraq
  • 00:09:52
    and Afghanistan where I say the Air
  • 00:09:54
    Force and the Navy got kind of
  • 00:09:56
    proportionally less I think a lot of
  • 00:09:58
    folks that are looking at the more
  • 00:09:59
    likely sort of contingency scenarios
  • 00:10:01
    where defense resources would be would
  • 00:10:03
    be stressed are in in Conflict scenarios
  • 00:10:05
    with China and those are principally
  • 00:10:07
    going to be fought in Space by the Air
  • 00:10:09
    Force and by the Navy but you haven't
  • 00:10:10
    really seen a kind of a Readjustment in
  • 00:10:12
    kind of the proportions received by
  • 00:10:14
    those service branches as opposed of the
  • 00:10:15
    army and this is of course a classic
  • 00:10:17
    political economy question and so we're
  • 00:10:19
    kind of stuck with kind of the current
  • 00:10:20
    budgetary process and in general like if
  • 00:10:23
    you say we're going to be more efficient
  • 00:10:24
    that doesn't actually help you inside
  • 00:10:25
    the Pentagon because there's always
  • 00:10:26
    different rice bows that people want to
  • 00:10:28
    protect and a lot of politics involved
  • 00:10:30
    and so at the end of day everyone just
  • 00:10:30
    asked for more I would say increasingly
  • 00:10:32
    in the last year or two it's been
  • 00:10:34
    grumbling for a while I mean AD Admiral
  • 00:10:36
    Mullen in particular said this a while
  • 00:10:37
    ago but it's become more of kind of like
  • 00:10:39
    a standard part of the discourse is just
  • 00:10:42
    recognizing that there isn't necessarily
  • 00:10:43
    going to be a whole lot more money
  • 00:10:44
    coming that the fiscal constraints are
  • 00:10:46
    real and that I mean there was a you
  • 00:10:48
    know part of the debt limit agreement
  • 00:10:50
    last year was there only be a 1% Topline
  • 00:10:52
    increase for the defense budget of
  • 00:10:53
    course there they created a whole
  • 00:10:55
    emergency supplemental package to sort
  • 00:10:57
    of get around that and of course that's
  • 00:10:59
    the way they always do this sort of
  • 00:11:00
    stuff but that 1% kind of Top Line is of
  • 00:11:02
    course below you know what inflation has
  • 00:11:04
    been over the past year and I know some
  • 00:11:06
    folks that are you know involved in kind
  • 00:11:07
    of the trenches of planning for how do
  • 00:11:09
    we expand our defense industrial
  • 00:11:10
    capacity and that are you know
  • 00:11:12
    responsible for laying out what how
  • 00:11:13
    would we actually make these Munitions
  • 00:11:15
    right how do we make the 155 mm shells
  • 00:11:16
    how do we make the sm2 sm6 missiles at a
  • 00:11:18
    scale and at a rate that you know we
  • 00:11:21
    need to meet what we see as increasingly
  • 00:11:22
    stressed you know conflict scenarios and
  • 00:11:25
    you know what they're telling me is
  • 00:11:26
    essentially the just the basic unit cost
  • 00:11:28
    to produce standard missile has gone up
  • 00:11:31
    30 to 50% in the past two years and they
  • 00:11:33
    expect that to continue over the next
  • 00:11:34
    one or two years and so if your budget
  • 00:11:35
    doesn't change you're going to be buying
  • 00:11:37
    a lot less of the same stuff at the same
  • 00:11:39
    time that people look at these scenarios
  • 00:11:40
    and realize we're going to need a lot
  • 00:11:42
    more defense industrial capacity that's
  • 00:11:44
    doesn't seem to be coming online quickly
  • 00:11:45
    enough okay well we'll Circle back to
  • 00:11:47
    this whole process near the end of the
  • 00:11:49
    show I want to come back and talk a
  • 00:11:50
    little bit more about what I believe is
  • 00:11:52
    called the National Defense
  • 00:11:53
    authorization act and how that works but
  • 00:11:55
    I want to get into your paper and your
  • 00:11:58
    paper is part of a book book that's
  • 00:11:59
    titled National Security in the digital
  • 00:12:01
    age Bitcoin as a tool for modern
  • 00:12:03
    statecraft and again your specific
  • 00:12:05
    contribution your your paper in the
  • 00:12:07
    book's titled great power Network
  • 00:12:09
    competition and Bitcoin so maybe begin
  • 00:12:12
    with kind of an executive summary of of
  • 00:12:14
    your chapter and then we'll we'll kind
  • 00:12:16
    of dive into the details yes so I wrote
  • 00:12:18
    this to try to bring you know a slightly
  • 00:12:20
    different perspective on the traditional
  • 00:12:21
    topic of analysis when it comes to
  • 00:12:23
    bitcoin National Security which has been
  • 00:12:25
    you know mostly focused on its
  • 00:12:27
    intersection with sanctions evasion with
  • 00:12:29
    sort of illicit Finance with obviously
  • 00:12:31
    big sort of criminal sort of drug
  • 00:12:32
    markets and most of the folks in the
  • 00:12:34
    government that have digital asset
  • 00:12:35
    experience with the folks that were sort
  • 00:12:36
    of tasked with you know standing up
  • 00:12:38
    those sorts of units and and analyses
  • 00:12:40
    and sort of law enforcement and
  • 00:12:41
    intelligence activities early on in
  • 00:12:43
    bitcoin's history so they're you know
  • 00:12:44
    Frontline experience with it has been
  • 00:12:47
    bad guys using it to to do bad things
  • 00:12:49
    therefore it must be a bad thing that's
  • 00:12:50
    kind of the basic syllogism that has
  • 00:12:52
    been implanted in the minds of a lot of
  • 00:12:54
    National Security officials a lot of
  • 00:12:55
    sort of senior leadership it just
  • 00:12:56
    becomes kind of just an unquestioned
  • 00:12:58
    assumption and while you know certainly
  • 00:13:00
    that has been a part of the of bitcoin's
  • 00:13:01
    History I want to take a more
  • 00:13:03
    forward-looking view a much more sort of
  • 00:13:05
    maybe outside the box view to think
  • 00:13:06
    about well where is Bitcoin today what
  • 00:13:08
    could it look like in five or 10 years
  • 00:13:10
    and what would intelligent informed us
  • 00:13:13
    strategic approach look like if it was
  • 00:13:15
    trying to maximize potential advantages
  • 00:13:17
    and minimize potential risks and so
  • 00:13:18
    that's why I kind of wrote this this
  • 00:13:20
    paper to sort of situate Bitcoin digital
  • 00:13:22
    assets more generally with what I see as
  • 00:13:24
    kind of the unfolding and like core
  • 00:13:26
    Dynamic facing us and challenging us
  • 00:13:29
    power in the next 5 to 10 years and
  • 00:13:30
    that's why I sort of focused it on
  • 00:13:31
    network power because I think
  • 00:13:33
    increasingly you know everyone
  • 00:13:34
    recognizes this is sort of the the
  • 00:13:36
    fundamental premise of modern power is
  • 00:13:38
    Network Power right both power over
  • 00:13:40
    monetary networks power over you know
  • 00:13:42
    digital and Telecommunications networks
  • 00:13:44
    power over trade networks subc cable
  • 00:13:45
    networks satellite and terrestrial
  • 00:13:47
    communication systems like cultural
  • 00:13:49
    networks of diffusion of ideas this is
  • 00:13:51
    how a globalized civilization is now
  • 00:13:53
    functioning in the modern era and so you
  • 00:13:56
    know you want to look at to what extent
  • 00:13:57
    is US poised to
  • 00:13:59
    win that Network Power competition
  • 00:14:01
    versus its principal adversary China
  • 00:14:03
    which has a strategy of trying to win
  • 00:14:05
    that Network Power competition and so I
  • 00:14:06
    got kind of go through essentially and
  • 00:14:08
    and make an argument on different
  • 00:14:09
    different layers that you know
  • 00:14:11
    especially on the financial Dimension
  • 00:14:13
    the current monetary system the sort of
  • 00:14:14
    structure of correspondent banking that
  • 00:14:16
    has sort of emerged over the past you
  • 00:14:18
    know 80 years or so has accured certain
  • 00:14:20
    advantages and those advantages may have
  • 00:14:22
    waned and now maybe resulting in
  • 00:14:24
    disadvantages for the US government and
  • 00:14:26
    so I kind of laid it out in sort of
  • 00:14:27
    three main sections essentially what are
  • 00:14:29
    the Strategic advantages or
  • 00:14:30
    disadvantages to the United States from
  • 00:14:31
    its current monetary Network dominance
  • 00:14:34
    and then the second section is how is
  • 00:14:35
    China approaching from a position of
  • 00:14:37
    relative weakness trying to grow it its
  • 00:14:39
    endogenous National strength how is it
  • 00:14:40
    trying to sort of block the ability of
  • 00:14:42
    the US from constraining it via its
  • 00:14:45
    power over existing networks while also
  • 00:14:46
    building its own to kind of act as a
  • 00:14:48
    failover or redundant capacity for its
  • 00:14:50
    own monetary Network Ambitions and then
  • 00:14:53
    where does Bitcoin fit into that role
  • 00:14:54
    right so that's kind of the basic kind
  • 00:14:55
    of framework but I try to I try to pack
  • 00:14:57
    a lot in I like it I I like the Network
  • 00:14:59
    framing as someone who's an economist
  • 00:15:01
    Network effects it really resonates with
  • 00:15:03
    me but I but everything about this was
  • 00:15:04
    was I think clever because communication
  • 00:15:07
    networks monetary networks cultural
  • 00:15:10
    networks as you mentioned they're all
  • 00:15:12
    very important and the dominance that we
  • 00:15:14
    have now as as you know in your paper
  • 00:15:16
    allow us to both have surveillance on
  • 00:15:19
    our competitors but also these choke
  • 00:15:21
    points so networks are they're great for
  • 00:15:23
    efficiency but they're also great from
  • 00:15:25
    the state perspective in terms of
  • 00:15:26
    surveillance and also choke points when
  • 00:15:29
    necessary let's talk about some of the
  • 00:15:31
    challenges that you bring up in the
  • 00:15:32
    paper with our current Network approach
  • 00:15:36
    and I want to read a a quote from your
  • 00:15:38
    your paper you and you're talking about
  • 00:15:41
    the use of Financial statecraft and
  • 00:15:42
    sanctions which we've talked about in
  • 00:15:44
    the show before there's talk of overuse
  • 00:15:46
    of it and you you put it very clearly
  • 00:15:48
    here you say but like a sword overuse
  • 00:15:51
    its blade has grown dull as the go-to
  • 00:15:54
    bloodless instrument of international
  • 00:15:56
    coercive force it has given us a
  • 00:15:58
    security officials a misplaced
  • 00:16:00
    confidence in the ability to achieve
  • 00:16:03
    action at a distance without blowback
  • 00:16:05
    that is no longer the case these tools
  • 00:16:08
    won't suffice for great power
  • 00:16:10
    competition expand on that yeah I mean I
  • 00:16:12
    think you've had some great guests on
  • 00:16:13
    the show kind of walk through the
  • 00:16:15
    history of of financial sanctions as a
  • 00:16:17
    as a tool of us statecraft and we sort
  • 00:16:19
    of Pat ourselves on the back after 9911
  • 00:16:21
    when we stood up these new capabilities
  • 00:16:23
    within Treasury and we had some big wins
  • 00:16:25
    sanctioning Gaddafi's money and then
  • 00:16:27
    going after terrorism and then obviously
  • 00:16:29
    with jcpa really you know using as a
  • 00:16:31
    course of strategic lever over Iran and
  • 00:16:33
    then we came into the Russia invasion
  • 00:16:36
    and we sort of you know brought it to a
  • 00:16:37
    whole another level you know there was a
  • 00:16:38
    lot of I think cheerleading at the
  • 00:16:41
    possibility that we were going to turn
  • 00:16:42
    the rubble into rubble and I think we
  • 00:16:44
    realized you know in the lessons from
  • 00:16:46
    that episode that you know sanctions
  • 00:16:48
    against a great power like Russia you
  • 00:16:50
    know just as a a matter of like material
  • 00:16:52
    capabilities aren't going to replace
  • 00:16:54
    other instruments of US national
  • 00:16:56
    strategic and coercive force and I think
  • 00:16:59
    were kind of lulled into a sense that we
  • 00:17:00
    could just kind of use this hegemonic
  • 00:17:02
    power to kind of get our way and I think
  • 00:17:05
    we sort of saw where its limits hit and
  • 00:17:07
    B essentially with with the Russia
  • 00:17:09
    sanctions that they were effectively
  • 00:17:10
    able to you know absorb the blow it
  • 00:17:13
    added frictions it certainly as ground
  • 00:17:15
    some of their their war machine made a
  • 00:17:16
    little bit more difficult but we're
  • 00:17:18
    facing an environment geopolitically
  • 00:17:19
    where Russia is in an alignment with its
  • 00:17:22
    adversaries on the Eurasian continent
  • 00:17:24
    including Iran China North Korea that
  • 00:17:26
    have large industrial capacity that have
  • 00:17:29
    large technological capacities and have
  • 00:17:31
    an interest in ensuring Russia can
  • 00:17:33
    sustain its its war and we are not
  • 00:17:36
    willing to sanction maybe not capable of
  • 00:17:37
    sanctioning those actors sufficiently to
  • 00:17:39
    deter those activities and so when we
  • 00:17:41
    reach that point of kind of strategic
  • 00:17:43
    Reckoning we have to think about okay
  • 00:17:44
    well what is our plan B you know we've
  • 00:17:47
    been using tools of of sanctions for the
  • 00:17:50
    last 20 years as a very effective way of
  • 00:17:51
    imposing pain imposing costs try to
  • 00:17:53
    change decision- making but now we're
  • 00:17:55
    see seeing an environment where it just
  • 00:17:57
    manifestly has failed those decisions
  • 00:17:59
    haven't been deterred those leaders
  • 00:18:01
    haven't been turned to a different
  • 00:18:02
    course of action so that's kind of like
  • 00:18:04
    my basic point is like we should just
  • 00:18:06
    like reassess well how are we actually
  • 00:18:08
    going to deter China Russia Iran North
  • 00:18:10
    Korea if the sanctions don't seem to be
  • 00:18:12
    sufficient so when you look to China
  • 00:18:15
    which is the competitor in this paper
  • 00:18:18
    are they more intentional about this
  • 00:18:20
    whole network approach are they thinking
  • 00:18:22
    explicitly we need to build this network
  • 00:18:24
    that Network whereas in the US we've
  • 00:18:26
    been blessed with the network because
  • 00:18:28
    we've been the leader of the world are
  • 00:18:30
    we kind of like kind of happy go-lucky
  • 00:18:32
    oh shucks at works and less intentional
  • 00:18:36
    about it is that is that kind of the
  • 00:18:37
    problem you see I mean the US's kind of
  • 00:18:40
    network monetary power dominance has
  • 00:18:42
    really evolved kind of organically right
  • 00:18:44
    to the point where we had kind of this
  • 00:18:45
    network of correspondent banking
  • 00:18:46
    relationships that sort of sprouted up
  • 00:18:48
    in centers of global trade Finance you
  • 00:18:50
    know created sort of offshore euro
  • 00:18:51
    dollar markets that you know generated
  • 00:18:53
    this flywheel of sort of you know dollar
  • 00:18:54
    Surplus recycling to us assets and it
  • 00:18:57
    sort of created this obviously course
  • 00:18:58
    responded with the the sort of hyper
  • 00:19:00
    growth of American military power in the
  • 00:19:01
    20th and the 21st century and and when
  • 00:19:04
    they were able to kind of use that
  • 00:19:05
    existing kind of hierarchical
  • 00:19:06
    correspondent banking system to then
  • 00:19:08
    exert this financial sort of power
  • 00:19:10
    statecraft China of course doesn't have
  • 00:19:11
    that you know 8ye history of trying to
  • 00:19:13
    internationalize its currency or to try
  • 00:19:15
    to you know create sort of novel
  • 00:19:17
    entrepose of trade finance that they can
  • 00:19:19
    sort of use as a locust to you know
  • 00:19:21
    reach a larger geopolitical and economic
  • 00:19:22
    ambition so it has had to find a maybe
  • 00:19:24
    an asymmetric strategy because to first
  • 00:19:26
    order it does not want to be constrained
  • 00:19:28
    and defitely by this existing kind of
  • 00:19:30
    Matrix of sort of G7 capital and and
  • 00:19:33
    dollar based settlement and clearing
  • 00:19:34
    systems and so it's trying to find like
  • 00:19:37
    a different strategy right a more modern
  • 00:19:38
    digital strategy to both block the
  • 00:19:41
    ability of the US institutions but also
  • 00:19:43
    you know G7 kind of aligned States from
  • 00:19:45
    constraining it in different scenarios
  • 00:19:48
    and so it you know wants to have
  • 00:19:49
    essentially these failover networks
  • 00:19:51
    right so in particular one that that
  • 00:19:52
    they've invested a lot in has been has
  • 00:19:55
    been sips which is kind of their version
  • 00:19:57
    of Swift but it kind of combines both
  • 00:19:59
    kind of messaging as well as settlement
  • 00:20:00
    activities and while it doesn't
  • 00:20:02
    necessarily exist to fully replace Swift
  • 00:20:04
    in fact most of their transactions still
  • 00:20:06
    take place over Swifts and most of those
  • 00:20:08
    still get most of those dollar
  • 00:20:09
    transactions still get cleared through
  • 00:20:10
    chips in the US it serves as a as a
  • 00:20:13
    capable redundant failover that
  • 00:20:15
    mitigates the deterrent threat from the
  • 00:20:17
    United States because if there was a
  • 00:20:18
    contingency where we were in a an
  • 00:20:21
    escalation environment over Taiwan or
  • 00:20:23
    full full-blown conflict we wanted to
  • 00:20:25
    you know apply similar sanction regime
  • 00:20:26
    as we've done for Russia they would have
  • 00:20:28
    the ability to still settle their terms
  • 00:20:30
    of trade with their main Partners
  • 00:20:32
    especially in the Middle East and
  • 00:20:33
    throughout Asia and and and Eurasia and
  • 00:20:36
    in increasingly it seems like also
  • 00:20:37
    Europe right and so the existence of
  • 00:20:40
    those of that sort of failover network
  • 00:20:43
    does you know materially diminish the
  • 00:20:45
    deterrent threat of us sanctions and so
  • 00:20:47
    that's been their strategy sort of first
  • 00:20:48
    to block and then build these sort of
  • 00:20:50
    redundant failover just in case
  • 00:20:53
    settlement and clearing systems but they
  • 00:20:55
    have a larger strategic objective to
  • 00:20:57
    expand right and so this block build
  • 00:20:58
    expand kind of sequence is sort of a
  • 00:21:00
    common strategic Motif that you see
  • 00:21:02
    played out across all their different
  • 00:21:04
    activities you know rash DOI who is the
  • 00:21:05
    National Security Council director for
  • 00:21:07
    China a few years ago wrote this book
  • 00:21:08
    and he basically unpacked that thesis in
  • 00:21:10
    immense detail and sourced it to their
  • 00:21:12
    party statements about this is the
  • 00:21:13
    strategy essentially a longterm plan how
  • 00:21:16
    do they grow to a position of national
  • 00:21:17
    strength where they're a great power
  • 00:21:19
    peer you know on the world stage the
  • 00:21:20
    United States this is the sequence that
  • 00:21:22
    they need to go about whether it's in
  • 00:21:23
    the military domain whether it's in the
  • 00:21:24
    economic domain whether it's in the
  • 00:21:26
    financial domain and this is the the the
  • 00:21:28
    the plan that they've that they've
  • 00:21:29
    executed so it sounds like they are
  • 00:21:32
    being intentional they're thinking this
  • 00:21:34
    through and you have to when you're
  • 00:21:35
    behind when you're the smaller kid on
  • 00:21:37
    the street you got to be more
  • 00:21:38
    intentional how you walk where you go
  • 00:21:40
    just in case the bully sees you or the
  • 00:21:42
    big kid on the Block sees you but it
  • 00:21:44
    also means then that it's easy for the
  • 00:21:46
    United States to become complacent to
  • 00:21:49
    not think what you're doing in this
  • 00:21:51
    paper is trying to help the us see all
  • 00:21:53
    its possibilities including crypto and
  • 00:21:56
    using the private sector as a tool to
  • 00:21:58
    continue this dominant Network effect
  • 00:22:01
    right yeah exactly it's like we we have
  • 00:22:03
    to you know one in in my experience it's
  • 00:22:06
    always think about what different worst
  • 00:22:08
    case scenarios right not just assuming
  • 00:22:09
    that that your plan a is always going to
  • 00:22:11
    work and then if your plan a is just
  • 00:22:13
    going to double down on the treasury
  • 00:22:14
    market you know maybe have to patch it
  • 00:22:16
    together with Central clearing and you
  • 00:22:17
    know addition of more repo facilities
  • 00:22:19
    and you know increasing Capital
  • 00:22:21
    requirements Basel 4 you know it seems
  • 00:22:23
    like this is a sequence that is going to
  • 00:22:25
    play out it's obviously the primary
  • 00:22:27
    sequence that we would expect policers
  • 00:22:28
    to choose is you know we want to have
  • 00:22:30
    our to we want to just keep the same
  • 00:22:32
    party going that we've always you know
  • 00:22:34
    able to dance to but we just want to do
  • 00:22:36
    minor technocratic tweaks along the
  • 00:22:37
    margins and make you know little
  • 00:22:38
    bargaining trade-offs with different
  • 00:22:39
    centers of political power and that's
  • 00:22:41
    fine like that's plan a right but
  • 00:22:43
    National Security officials never just
  • 00:22:44
    think the plan a is going to work right
  • 00:22:46
    you have to think what's Plan B what's
  • 00:22:47
    plan C what if the adversary actually
  • 00:22:48
    does succeed in their objectives what if
  • 00:22:50
    your plan a fails but you've put all
  • 00:22:52
    your chips on it then then you're not in
  • 00:22:53
    a great strategic position that's
  • 00:22:55
    basically what I'm sort of calling for
  • 00:22:56
    is thinking about what does the plan be
  • 00:22:58
    what does the plan C what are these
  • 00:22:59
    Alternatives that are maybe right now
  • 00:23:00
    relatively low cost they don't require a
  • 00:23:02
    whole lot of analytic or even you know
  • 00:23:04
    strategic Capital to invest in but that
  • 00:23:06
    could pay off if our plan a doesn't
  • 00:23:08
    succeed yeah so people in your space the
  • 00:23:10
    National Security space they think about
  • 00:23:12
    multiple options right they have to I
  • 00:23:14
    guess out of necessity out of training
  • 00:23:16
    out of the fact they could be fighting a
  • 00:23:17
    war where people in my world Central
  • 00:23:19
    Banking world they're very like oh let's
  • 00:23:22
    just tweak this parameter that parameter
  • 00:23:24
    so we get inflation on track and we need
  • 00:23:26
    to be doing more is what you're saying
  • 00:23:27
    we think about the longterm stability of
  • 00:23:30
    the networks yeah and Paul Tucker I mean
  • 00:23:33
    a great book right Global Discord I read
  • 00:23:35
    that with extreme interest and he makes
  • 00:23:37
    this exact point that you know central
  • 00:23:38
    banks are increasingly geopolitical and
  • 00:23:40
    therefore they shouldn't be surprised if
  • 00:23:42
    all of a sudden you know do political
  • 00:23:44
    prerogatives start to supervene on their
  • 00:23:46
    on their policy objectives and of course
  • 00:23:48
    this has been refracted in various
  • 00:23:50
    guises and US policy and political
  • 00:23:52
    discourse of you know fiscal dominance
  • 00:23:54
    or the independence of the FED but I see
  • 00:23:56
    this is a structural Trend where when
  • 00:23:57
    the chips down the you know the chairman
  • 00:24:00
    of the fed you know answers to the
  • 00:24:02
    commanderin-chief
  • 00:24:03
    and just you have to bake that in right
  • 00:24:06
    that was what happened World War II they
  • 00:24:08
    they they they pegged the price of
  • 00:24:09
    treasuries they bought up the debt they
  • 00:24:12
    supported the war effort so they became
  • 00:24:14
    a tool for National Security and I think
  • 00:24:16
    you've had a recent guest on not just
  • 00:24:17
    you know the FED but the treasury right
  • 00:24:19
    and usually see these forces play out in
  • 00:24:21
    our political economy in ways that you
  • 00:24:23
    know if you're looking for symptoms of
  • 00:24:25
    this conditions starting to develop
  • 00:24:26
    whether you call it fiscal dominance
  • 00:24:27
    whether you call it of geopolitical
  • 00:24:29
    supervenience on monetary policy you
  • 00:24:31
    would start to see it manifest in
  • 00:24:33
    portions of our bureaucratic apparatus
  • 00:24:35
    that are say more exposed to the
  • 00:24:37
    prerogatives of the White House right
  • 00:24:38
    and of course you've had you know active
  • 00:24:40
    treasure issuance you know debates about
  • 00:24:42
    well why are we actually issuing so many
  • 00:24:44
    bills relative to coupons when we don't
  • 00:24:46
    have to make up for the debt sealing
  • 00:24:48
    kind of you know TGA build we actually
  • 00:24:50
    are now just continually just you know
  • 00:24:52
    issuing more bills right why are we
  • 00:24:54
    doing that right it if functional QE is
  • 00:24:56
    it to stabilize political conditions you
  • 00:24:58
    know in a contested election and or is
  • 00:25:00
    it a reckoning of the fact that we just
  • 00:25:02
    can't allow you know kind of Market
  • 00:25:04
    perception to understand that the
  • 00:25:07
    long-term yield of the US Treasury
  • 00:25:09
    Market is highly fragile and that we
  • 00:25:11
    don't want it to go above a certain
  • 00:25:12
    level right then effectively this is
  • 00:25:14
    yield curve control but very indirectly
  • 00:25:16
    very obliquely and without acknowledging
  • 00:25:18
    it right and this is ultimately the
  • 00:25:20
    history of of large indebted sovs is you
  • 00:25:23
    know they want to control the price of
  • 00:25:24
    their borrowing and they look around for
  • 00:25:26
    any balance sheet or any or instrument
  • 00:25:27
    of power that they'll that they can
  • 00:25:29
    wield to ensure that they don't have to
  • 00:25:31
    pay a market price for their debt that's
  • 00:25:33
    what history tells you so I don't know
  • 00:25:34
    why why any why now would be different
  • 00:25:36
    right you have to make an argument why
  • 00:25:37
    now would be a special case where we're
  • 00:25:39
    going to resist those forces okay one
  • 00:25:42
    last thing on the National Security
  • 00:25:43
    space before we move into your proposals
  • 00:25:45
    for for Bitcoin and and the use of
  • 00:25:48
    crypto private crypto space for national
  • 00:25:50
    security purposes but you seem like
  • 00:25:53
    someone who is well read on things that
  • 00:25:55
    I normally cover on this podcast I know
  • 00:25:58
    you listen to the podcast you just
  • 00:25:59
    mentioned you read Paul Tucker are other
  • 00:26:02
    people in your space as actively engaged
  • 00:26:05
    in these issues because you are Bridging
  • 00:26:07
    the Gap right and and I I guess my
  • 00:26:09
    question is do people sit around in in
  • 00:26:11
    the Pentagon thinking man I wish the FED
  • 00:26:12
    would talk more about or think more
  • 00:26:14
    about X Y and Z when it comes to
  • 00:26:16
    National Security issues because their
  • 00:26:17
    decisions are impacting how you know we
  • 00:26:20
    play out these these War Games how we
  • 00:26:21
    play Out World War III scenarios Etc
  • 00:26:25
    there's pockets of folks inside the CIA
  • 00:26:27
    in particular that obviously has deep
  • 00:26:29
    expertise and does these assessments
  • 00:26:31
    there's someone I know who's in there
  • 00:26:32
    who's you know written about kind of the
  • 00:26:34
    the sanctions risk in terms of changing
  • 00:26:37
    uh Reserve manager Behavior preferences
  • 00:26:39
    for different assets including Bitcoin
  • 00:26:42
    and so there's there's pockets of people
  • 00:26:44
    that look at this I think at the say the
  • 00:26:47
    political level right the SCS is in
  • 00:26:49
    leadership I think ironically probably
  • 00:26:51
    the biggest wakeup call was the svb
  • 00:26:53
    failure last year which was you know
  • 00:26:55
    this major bank that you know banked a
  • 00:26:57
    huge number of defense Tech startups
  • 00:26:59
    deep Tech startups and the the major
  • 00:27:00
    sort of invogue wave of kind of Defense
  • 00:27:03
    Tech Innovation how are we going to kind
  • 00:27:04
    of get out of the the Strategic sort of
  • 00:27:07
    sclerosis we have from our existing
  • 00:27:09
    defense primes while meeting kind of the
  • 00:27:10
    the pacing threat from China oh we'll we
  • 00:27:12
    we'll do the move fast and break thing
  • 00:27:14
    Silicon Valley you know we'll get paler
  • 00:27:16
    we'll get SpaceX we'll get andil the
  • 00:27:18
    whole cottage industry of kind of the
  • 00:27:19
    Segundo Valley in you know kind of 20
  • 00:27:22
    somethings wanting to build drones and
  • 00:27:23
    Ai and and space capabilities but most
  • 00:27:26
    of those startups were banked by this
  • 00:27:27
    one bank that all of a sudden had a run
  • 00:27:30
    in two days and the Pentagon had um
  • 00:27:32
    defense Innovation unit and had office
  • 00:27:33
    of strategic Capital that they've stood
  • 00:27:35
    up in the past few years specifically to
  • 00:27:37
    kind of nurture and develop this this
  • 00:27:38
    ecosystem that they feel is like going
  • 00:27:40
    to be their asymmetric you know plan to
  • 00:27:42
    kind of jumpstart the capabilities that
  • 00:27:44
    they need to to fight and win at least
  • 00:27:45
    deter a conflict in the South China Sea
  • 00:27:47
    or over over Taiwan and all of a sudden
  • 00:27:50
    they fa this this panic and they were
  • 00:27:52
    scrambling that weekend to figure out
  • 00:27:53
    how they could maybe change contracts
  • 00:27:55
    frontload payments or even use existing
  • 00:27:57
    res ources in say the office of
  • 00:27:59
    strategic Capital to try to bail some of
  • 00:28:00
    those firms out but that was like a
  • 00:28:02
    downstream you know kind of the the
  • 00:28:03
    health and maturity aspects of those
  • 00:28:05
    Bank portfolios kind of got upside down
  • 00:28:07
    and there was of all all of a sudden of
  • 00:28:09
    course the ability to sort of wire money
  • 00:28:10
    on a second note so you had you know1
  • 00:28:12
    to150 billion doar basically flee the
  • 00:28:14
    bank in like 48 hours and Venture
  • 00:28:16
    Capital just like lost their minds and
  • 00:28:18
    so this intersection between minary
  • 00:28:20
    policy kind of QT wind down the effect
  • 00:28:23
    on the regional banking system
  • 00:28:25
    intersection with defense technology and
  • 00:28:26
    our strategic objective was never really
  • 00:28:29
    pulled together until that until you had
  • 00:28:30
    a panic moment right now I don't know if
  • 00:28:32
    they've come up with a plan but I think
  • 00:28:34
    now that the now now leadership
  • 00:28:35
    understands oh this is a new thing right
  • 00:28:37
    and it also turned out that there was a
  • 00:28:38
    huge number of say unsecured Chinese
  • 00:28:41
    deposits in those banks that were also
  • 00:28:42
    bailed out um really I did not know that
  • 00:28:44
    yeah you know we become the money
  • 00:28:46
    laundering capital of the world right
  • 00:28:47
    most of our our financial insurance real
  • 00:28:50
    estate and Technology sector exist to
  • 00:28:52
    create scarce and desirable assets to
  • 00:28:54
    absorb foreign dollar surpluses and so
  • 00:28:56
    we need to keep those flowing in in
  • 00:28:58
    order to keep the basic architecture of
  • 00:28:59
    the global so uh I I view this as the
  • 00:29:01
    safe asset provided to the world you're
  • 00:29:03
    redefining this as a money launderer to
  • 00:29:05
    the world I mean tomato tomato right I
  • 00:29:07
    mean it's basic it's what we're doing
  • 00:29:09
    that's a very sobering interpretation of
  • 00:29:11
    the safe asset provider to the world or
  • 00:29:13
    the banker to the world I mean if you
  • 00:29:14
    talk to any sort of major venture
  • 00:29:15
    capitalist right their job is to
  • 00:29:17
    basically create pools of money from
  • 00:29:19
    Mostly foreigners you know and
  • 00:29:20
    increasingly right politically
  • 00:29:22
    disfavored to go after Chinese money or
  • 00:29:23
    Russian money but Saudi Emira other you
  • 00:29:26
    know Qatari sovere wealth funds or the
  • 00:29:28
    rich individuals they exist to create
  • 00:29:30
    pools of capital and then funnel you
  • 00:29:32
    know with that money and then funnel
  • 00:29:33
    that into scarce
  • 00:29:34
    assets okay well that's a whole new take
  • 00:29:37
    on that I'll have to process that and
  • 00:29:39
    we'll come back have some more
  • 00:29:40
    discussion later all right let's talk
  • 00:29:42
    about your proposal least you're
  • 00:29:44
    thinking on how like Bitcoin or crypto
  • 00:29:47
    stable coins how could they
  • 00:29:50
    enhance the dollar dominance the network
  • 00:29:52
    effects the US currently has in terms of
  • 00:29:54
    advantages over other nations yeah so I
  • 00:29:56
    think in terms of a few different kind
  • 00:29:58
    of tiers of analysis right the more sort
  • 00:30:00
    of basic tier is Bitcoin and
  • 00:30:02
    dollar-based stable coins right now are
  • 00:30:04
    a very large market right so the
  • 00:30:05
    question is this not going away how do
  • 00:30:07
    you position yourself strategically in a
  • 00:30:09
    way that maximizes the benefits while
  • 00:30:10
    minimizing the risks and there are kind
  • 00:30:13
    of you know immediate you know benefits
  • 00:30:15
    from having stable coins continue to
  • 00:30:17
    grow and dollarize parts of the world
  • 00:30:19
    that haven't been dollarized thus far
  • 00:30:21
    because you networks of correspondent
  • 00:30:22
    Banks or admittances or you know the The
  • 00:30:25
    Hop of of payment systems are just so
  • 00:30:27
    expensive that there's just like an
  • 00:30:29
    endogenous demand to use a dollar to pay
  • 00:30:31
    for the dollar around the world and that
  • 00:30:33
    the existing system doesn't really
  • 00:30:34
    enable that very effectively it's very
  • 00:30:36
    expensive and there's you know folks
  • 00:30:38
    inside Argentina folks inside Niger
  • 00:30:40
    folks inside Egypt that want to hold
  • 00:30:41
    dollars that can't and it's better for
  • 00:30:43
    the United States if they hold dollars
  • 00:30:44
    and if those stable coins grow and are
  • 00:30:46
    fully reserved there's like an
  • 00:30:47
    endogenous demand for more dollar debt
  • 00:30:49
    especially more bills if we're going to
  • 00:30:50
    be pushing out more bills right that's a
  • 00:30:52
    more like tactical question I'm not sure
  • 00:30:53
    that's like a strategic game changer but
  • 00:30:55
    it's like hey that's like a net positive
  • 00:30:57
    thing the more dollar based stable coins
  • 00:30:59
    there are essentially it's crypto Euro
  • 00:31:00
    dollars essentially helping spread the
  • 00:31:02
    dollar and if they're properly you know
  • 00:31:03
    reserved and well regulated that can be
  • 00:31:05
    you know another source of demand for
  • 00:31:06
    our debt and there's a Synergy sort of
  • 00:31:08
    fly will between the demand for Bitcoin
  • 00:31:10
    the demand for dollar Bitcoin rails and
  • 00:31:13
    the and the stable coin market so those
  • 00:31:14
    sort of things have sort of emerged and
  • 00:31:16
    evolved in tandem around the world to
  • 00:31:18
    the extent that that sort of flywheel
  • 00:31:19
    continues going it leads to sort of
  • 00:31:21
    positive externalities for for the US
  • 00:31:23
    fiscal position like again not
  • 00:31:24
    strategically gamechanging but an
  • 00:31:26
    important positive sort of attribute the
  • 00:31:28
    Strategic kind of overlay with China and
  • 00:31:30
    you know that's like the watch word in
  • 00:31:32
    you know DC is like China competition
  • 00:31:34
    right how do we counter China's
  • 00:31:35
    Ambitions and they have this you know
  • 00:31:36
    strategy you know the digital Silk Road
  • 00:31:38
    kind of a counterpart to the Belt Road
  • 00:31:40
    initiative but focused on sort of
  • 00:31:42
    creating a digital Network ecosystem
  • 00:31:45
    especially in the global South but also
  • 00:31:46
    interpenetrating the middle east and
  • 00:31:48
    south Asia where they're trying to
  • 00:31:49
    export kind of their techno
  • 00:31:51
    authoritarian governance model right
  • 00:31:53
    where they're trying to sign people up
  • 00:31:54
    for you know a kind of a full techno
  • 00:31:56
    authoritarian stack built on Chinese
  • 00:31:58
    information communication technology
  • 00:32:00
    that includes the digital Yuan or
  • 00:32:02
    crossbridge cbdc platforms like project
  • 00:32:04
    mbridge that you know have imbued within
  • 00:32:07
    them the kind of surveillance and
  • 00:32:09
    control you know authoritarian ethos
  • 00:32:11
    that China has and there's like willing
  • 00:32:13
    subscribers to that techno
  • 00:32:14
    authoritarianism as a service model
  • 00:32:16
    throughout Africa throughout the Middle
  • 00:32:17
    East throughout Asia throughout EUR Asia
  • 00:32:19
    even maybe in Europe increasingly and
  • 00:32:21
    that is a you know from Us's kind of
  • 00:32:23
    standpoint of you know the global system
  • 00:32:26
    you know that is a major threat right
  • 00:32:27
    not only do you have countries
  • 00:32:29
    potentially signing on for a techno
  • 00:32:31
    authoritarianism that you know runs
  • 00:32:33
    counter to our liberal values but it
  • 00:32:34
    also ens snares those governments and
  • 00:32:37
    their National populations into a fully
  • 00:32:39
    surveilled fully controlled stack that
  • 00:32:41
    our adversary has sort of roote access
  • 00:32:43
    to and so to the extent that one we
  • 00:32:45
    don't have like a compelling alternative
  • 00:32:47
    that is going around and really you know
  • 00:32:48
    competing element for element within
  • 00:32:50
    that stack whether it's you know the
  • 00:32:52
    sort of cloud infrastructure whether
  • 00:32:53
    it's sort of the huway 5G whether it's
  • 00:32:55
    cell phones whether it's ZT surveillance
  • 00:32:58
    AI all the way up through the digital
  • 00:32:59
    currency electronic payment platform and
  • 00:33:01
    and the crossbridge cbdcs we don't have
  • 00:33:03
    like a you know natural competitor
  • 00:33:05
    that's like you know that is helping to
  • 00:33:07
    win over some of those governments
  • 00:33:08
    whereas Dollar by stable coins and
  • 00:33:10
    Bitcoin is is naturally being adopted
  • 00:33:12
    around the world and sort of as a more
  • 00:33:14
    organic bottomup development in terms of
  • 00:33:16
    bringing essentially a reserve asset for
  • 00:33:18
    the people in the hands of populations
  • 00:33:20
    that they're maybe more corrupt
  • 00:33:22
    kleptocratic and authoritarian inclined
  • 00:33:24
    governments would rather not have have
  • 00:33:26
    them hold and so to the extent that we
  • 00:33:29
    want to counter China's Ambitions to ins
  • 00:33:30
    snare those countries and to the extent
  • 00:33:32
    we also want to encourage the you know
  • 00:33:33
    proliferation of liberal values and
  • 00:33:36
    individual autonomy the the growth of
  • 00:33:38
    Bitcoin dollar Bas stable coins around
  • 00:33:39
    the world is in in both in our sort of
  • 00:33:41
    values interest as well as in our
  • 00:33:42
    strategic interest and so that's kind of
  • 00:33:44
    like the the tldr very fascinating so
  • 00:33:47
    again China's been very intentional
  • 00:33:49
    trying to grow its networks around the
  • 00:33:51
    world digital currency these crossb
  • 00:33:54
    payment system embridge that you
  • 00:33:55
    mentioned so your sugesting China would
  • 00:33:58
    use a not not only for like payments
  • 00:34:01
    efficiency but also to to spy on on
  • 00:34:03
    these collaborators other nations I've
  • 00:34:06
    read an article recently you know why we
  • 00:34:08
    shouldn't use cbdc like well who do you
  • 00:34:10
    want spying from abroad into potentially
  • 00:34:13
    you know breaking in and spying into the
  • 00:34:15
    transactions so you're suggesting that
  • 00:34:17
    China could use this to monitor other
  • 00:34:19
    countries closely and we would lose that
  • 00:34:21
    that edge I mean project emage maybe
  • 00:34:23
    itself isn't going to be fully
  • 00:34:24
    compromised from sort of its back end
  • 00:34:26
    although you know that remains to to be
  • 00:34:27
    seen on on its implementation but there
  • 00:34:29
    have been cases you know all Republic of
  • 00:34:31
    where China has offered you know cyber
  • 00:34:33
    security assistance and part of the
  • 00:34:35
    package deal when they offer say their
  • 00:34:37
    cloud service providers or whether it's
  • 00:34:38
    Huawei or the spread of their mobile
  • 00:34:40
    payments infrastructure like alipay we
  • 00:34:41
    chat around the world those are
  • 00:34:43
    basically like P focus on the digital
  • 00:34:45
    uan but really alipay and WeChat are the
  • 00:34:48
    digitals uan right like that was the
  • 00:34:49
    whole Tech kind of Crackdown was that
  • 00:34:52
    these were massive payment platforms
  • 00:34:53
    that were expanding rapidly in in China
  • 00:34:56
    the central government didn't have one
  • 00:34:57
    ibility or control over and they wanted
  • 00:34:59
    to get visibility and control over those
  • 00:35:01
    digital payment platforms and they did
  • 00:35:03
    that's why also you haven't seen as much
  • 00:35:04
    pressure from the Chinese government to
  • 00:35:05
    like spread the digital uan is because
  • 00:35:07
    they basically got it through these
  • 00:35:09
    platforms right that's essentially gives
  • 00:35:10
    them the same capability and those are
  • 00:35:12
    extremely popular around the world right
  • 00:35:14
    and not just for individuals but for
  • 00:35:16
    e-commerce right so you can imagine this
  • 00:35:17
    whole you know surveilled infrastructure
  • 00:35:20
    that is you know plugged into Chinese
  • 00:35:22
    information communication technology
  • 00:35:23
    providers and you know there's National
  • 00:35:25
    Security laws where all those all those
  • 00:35:27
    compan had to provide that information
  • 00:35:29
    and so that's just baked into the to the
  • 00:35:31
    operating model that is so interesting
  • 00:35:33
    so China is really expanding its reach
  • 00:35:37
    through all these mediums here this
  • 00:35:39
    technology these networks we really
  • 00:35:41
    don't have any kind of intentional you
  • 00:35:44
    know thought out plan to counter that
  • 00:35:47
    but we do have something organically
  • 00:35:49
    emerging around the world that could
  • 00:35:50
    take that role and that's the crypto
  • 00:35:53
    space the crypto assets that that exist
  • 00:35:55
    stable coins and you you mentioned in
  • 00:35:57
    your paper
  • 00:35:58
    Randy corl former Vice chair and a
  • 00:36:00
    regular listener to the podcast thank
  • 00:36:01
    you Randy also past guest I should say
  • 00:36:03
    as well he had a speech he talked about
  • 00:36:05
    how stable coins could expand the reach
  • 00:36:08
    of the dollar as well as serve I think
  • 00:36:10
    the bigger Point you're making here as a
  • 00:36:12
    a national security purpose so why not
  • 00:36:14
    run with it in other words don't view
  • 00:36:17
    stable coins and and crypto as a threat
  • 00:36:20
    view it as an opportunity right yeah I
  • 00:36:23
    think you've seen this history play out
  • 00:36:24
    with the euro dollar market throughout
  • 00:36:26
    the history of the 20 yeah leev has you
  • 00:36:29
    know done a great history of the euro
  • 00:36:30
    dollar system and sort of you know
  • 00:36:32
    explicated the sort of the tensions that
  • 00:36:34
    that has generated inside the fed and
  • 00:36:37
    also you know other central banks about
  • 00:36:38
    to what extent do we want to let this
  • 00:36:40
    flourish and proliferate to the what
  • 00:36:42
    extent do we need to like keep it under
  • 00:36:44
    control right and so I think that's
  • 00:36:45
    basically the same tension is right to
  • 00:36:46
    what extent do we want to kind of have
  • 00:36:48
    this natural phenomenon play out that
  • 00:36:50
    could you know increase you know the
  • 00:36:52
    risk of say sanctions evasion criminal
  • 00:36:54
    use obviously my day-to-day is cyber
  • 00:36:56
    security so like digital currencies are
  • 00:36:58
    the preferred medium of exchange and to
  • 00:37:00
    a certain extent story value
  • 00:37:01
    increasingly not of cyber criminals
  • 00:37:04
    ransomwares right it's you know usually
  • 00:37:06
    they want to get paid and they then they
  • 00:37:07
    want to cash out right that's the whole
  • 00:37:09
    point is they want to like try to find
  • 00:37:10
    you know these unregulated offshore
  • 00:37:12
    exchanges where they can take their ill
  • 00:37:14
    gotten crypto gains and cash them out
  • 00:37:15
    into dollars or hard currency somewhere
  • 00:37:17
    and so there's a game of cat and mouse
  • 00:37:18
    that's going to keep playing the same
  • 00:37:20
    sort of thing happened with Euro dollars
  • 00:37:21
    right there was you know it was a wild
  • 00:37:23
    west for anyone to basically you know
  • 00:37:26
    play all sorts of shady games but but
  • 00:37:27
    over the course of the 20th century
  • 00:37:29
    would you say the US government net
  • 00:37:30
    gained more from having those offshore
  • 00:37:32
    dollar nodes proliferate and expand even
  • 00:37:34
    if it came out of significant cost in
  • 00:37:36
    terms of criminal or or sort of money
  • 00:37:38
    laundering use I think most historian
  • 00:37:40
    would say it was basically that was what
  • 00:37:42
    gave us the powers we're using today
  • 00:37:43
    absolutely so Matt let's talk about then
  • 00:37:46
    proposals that are out there that could
  • 00:37:49
    strengthen this potential Network effect
  • 00:37:52
    for the US government for National
  • 00:37:53
    Security and I want to jump to something
  • 00:37:55
    president Trump endorsed recently in
  • 00:37:58
    Nashville there was been a call a
  • 00:38:00
    senator from Wyoming for a strategic
  • 00:38:02
    Bitcoin Reserve now were you at that
  • 00:38:04
    conference I was yeah it seemed pretty
  • 00:38:07
    high energy he I mean Trump was well
  • 00:38:10
    received there and it's understandable
  • 00:38:12
    because I mean the the the current
  • 00:38:13
    Administration has not been as friendly
  • 00:38:15
    or at least has been inconsistent in how
  • 00:38:17
    it approaches crypto but let's let's
  • 00:38:19
    start with Trump and we'll come back to
  • 00:38:20
    to Biden tell me about this strategic
  • 00:38:23
    Bitcoin Reserve what is your
  • 00:38:24
    understanding of of how it would work
  • 00:38:26
    one mhm and then two tell a story of how
  • 00:38:30
    it would complement what you're arguing
  • 00:38:31
    in this paper yeah I think this is
  • 00:38:33
    certainly a new policy idea you know it
  • 00:38:35
    came as I think more as like a meme and
  • 00:38:37
    is now fleshed out into like some
  • 00:38:39
    serious ideas and so like in keeping
  • 00:38:40
    with my larger focus is like I take it
  • 00:38:42
    as a serious policy proposal I think
  • 00:38:44
    it's worthy of serious analysis and so
  • 00:38:46
    you know at least in Trump's speech he
  • 00:38:47
    just sort of was very very vague in
  • 00:38:49
    terms of creating a stockpile and not
  • 00:38:52
    wanting to sell the existing Bitcoin
  • 00:38:53
    that's held by the US government which
  • 00:38:54
    is about 200,000 that has been seized
  • 00:38:56
    from Criminal prosecutions and you know
  • 00:38:59
    that's basically the minimum policy
  • 00:39:01
    proposal from Trump Senator lumus has
  • 00:39:02
    introduced the Bitcoin act which is
  • 00:39:04
    essentially a much more discreet
  • 00:39:06
    proposal is maybe worth unpacking
  • 00:39:08
    because she makes a very clear case you
  • 00:39:10
    know in her in her legislation that the
  • 00:39:12
    US government should essentially
  • 00:39:13
    diversify its its Reserve assets Bitcoin
  • 00:39:16
    is a novel Reserve asset that should
  • 00:39:18
    sort of make up some part of its overall
  • 00:39:20
    asset mix and that she sets a target of
  • 00:39:23
    1 million Bitcoin so going from our
  • 00:39:24
    current 200,000 over a 5-year plan to
  • 00:39:27
    purchase you know a total of 1 million
  • 00:39:29
    Bitcoin that would be custody
  • 00:39:31
    essentially you know in geographically
  • 00:39:32
    distributed hard wallets like she you
  • 00:39:34
    know specifies the specific security
  • 00:39:36
    requirements for those for those
  • 00:39:37
    Holdings the way that she would fund
  • 00:39:39
    that purchase program would be to
  • 00:39:41
    revalue essentially gold certificates
  • 00:39:44
    that are are held by the FED that are
  • 00:39:46
    you know had not been marked to Market
  • 00:39:47
    and so she basically proposes remarking
  • 00:39:50
    those gold certificates to the present
  • 00:39:51
    value unleashing you know tens of
  • 00:39:53
    billions of dollars in liquidity
  • 00:39:54
    depending on the price of of gold and
  • 00:39:56
    using that you know that those new
  • 00:39:58
    Assets in the treasury general account
  • 00:39:59
    to go out and just purchase Bitcoin on
  • 00:40:02
    on the market that's basically the
  • 00:40:03
    mechanics of her proposal she has a few
  • 00:40:05
    other things in there about preserving
  • 00:40:06
    the right for self- custody using the
  • 00:40:08
    novel features of Bitcoin that you can
  • 00:40:10
    do you know essentially cryptographic
  • 00:40:11
    proof of reserves right so unlike audits
  • 00:40:14
    of say gold under Liberty Street this
  • 00:40:15
    would just be like you know open
  • 00:40:17
    verification of us government's Bitcoin
  • 00:40:19
    Holdings using its proof of reserves
  • 00:40:20
    capability so that's the basic mechanics
  • 00:40:23
    I think the argument that has been given
  • 00:40:26
    I would maybe give a version of this
  • 00:40:27
    argument I haven't really thought enough
  • 00:40:29
    to like fully endorse this argument but
  • 00:40:31
    I'm like pretty close but like I'm you
  • 00:40:33
    know I'm playing with it right and so I
  • 00:40:34
    think the two main arguments for such
  • 00:40:36
    strategic Bitcoin Reserve would be one
  • 00:40:38
    is more like a essentially a signaling
  • 00:40:40
    benefit right like in keeping with my
  • 00:40:42
    broader thrust of the Strategic benefits
  • 00:40:43
    of Bitcoin US Government establishing a
  • 00:40:46
    strategic Bitcoin reserve of sort of any
  • 00:40:47
    di Minimus size sends a positive sort of
  • 00:40:50
    enduring signal of support for Bitcoin
  • 00:40:53
    in the US right so that we can attract
  • 00:40:56
    more Bitcoin to United States right more
  • 00:40:58
    more people feel safe and comfortable
  • 00:40:59
    holding Bitcoin in the United States
  • 00:41:00
    with us custodians more Bitcoin
  • 00:41:02
    businesses sort of financial integration
  • 00:41:04
    can can continue here as opposed to you
  • 00:41:06
    know Dubai or Abu Dhabi or Singapore or
  • 00:41:09
    Hong Kong so like to the extent that you
  • 00:41:11
    send a positive signal you sort of
  • 00:41:13
    attract the marginal unit of Bitcoin and
  • 00:41:15
    Bitcoin businesses you know it doesn't
  • 00:41:17
    cost you a whole lot so like that's a
  • 00:41:18
    good you know positive thing the more
  • 00:41:20
    like I'd say hard sort of technical
  • 00:41:23
    benefit and this is more speculative is
  • 00:41:25
    as like an option value for the US sort
  • 00:41:27
    of fiscal position CU if you actually
  • 00:41:29
    were to acquire say million Bitcoin the
  • 00:41:31
    US government does also send this
  • 00:41:32
    positive signal the premise behind that
  • 00:41:34
    could be essentially maybe short
  • 00:41:36
    circuiting what would otherwise be the
  • 00:41:38
    risk of a sort of fiscal sort of spiral
  • 00:41:41
    in the next 5 or 10 20 years right that
  • 00:41:43
    if there is a risk that at some point
  • 00:41:45
    the market realizes that the US
  • 00:41:47
    government isn't necessarily going to be
  • 00:41:49
    good for it that monetizing Bitcoin
  • 00:41:51
    relative to say gold benefits us
  • 00:41:53
    relative to adversary so if we're going
  • 00:41:54
    down a path of say marginal maybe more
  • 00:41:57
    oblique debt monetization right to meet
  • 00:41:59
    geopolitical objectives to meet climate
  • 00:42:01
    objectives to meet social transfer
  • 00:42:02
    objectives that we're eventually going
  • 00:42:04
    to have to you know own up to the fact
  • 00:42:06
    that we're not going to make money good
  • 00:42:08
    all of these you know us promises that
  • 00:42:11
    there there's going to be haircuts
  • 00:42:12
    imposed somehow some way and that at
  • 00:42:14
    some point you know the cost of that
  • 00:42:16
    could become quite prohibitive and could
  • 00:42:18
    be a nonlinear jump right where that you
  • 00:42:20
    know set of common expectations flips
  • 00:42:22
    and you get essentially a run on the
  • 00:42:24
    treasury market right that' be
  • 00:42:26
    enormously dest iing very expensive
  • 00:42:28
    thing for the US government to endure if
  • 00:42:29
    there's like a lowcost option that you
  • 00:42:31
    can pay for now that essentially could
  • 00:42:34
    pay off you know 5 10 years down down
  • 00:42:35
    the line you know it's a risk weighted
  • 00:42:38
    calculation about is it worth paying say
  • 00:42:40
    5 10 20 50 billion dollar for that
  • 00:42:42
    option value now if it helps to fray a
  • 00:42:44
    multi- trillion dollar you know bout of
  • 00:42:46
    QE 10 years down the line okay like I
  • 00:42:49
    you need to do the math right but like
  • 00:42:50
    at least in theory I could see an
  • 00:42:52
    argument say that there's an option
  • 00:42:53
    value from holding Bitcoin I guess the
  • 00:42:55
    question would be would it be enough
  • 00:42:57
    to stem the Run would would it really
  • 00:43:00
    matter relative to the size of the the
  • 00:43:01
    debt which is you know 26 27 trillion
  • 00:43:05
    versus but any I I hear your point I
  • 00:43:07
    guess here's a tension I see in this
  • 00:43:09
    proposal so I I like what you're saying
  • 00:43:11
    in terms of the signaling enhancing the
  • 00:43:14
    network the the demand for for for
  • 00:43:17
    Bitcoin could it take Bitcoin to the
  • 00:43:20
    place where it becomes so powerful so
  • 00:43:25
    ubiquitous that it really doesn't help
  • 00:43:28
    the dollar maybe it displayes a dollar
  • 00:43:30
    you know yeah I mean your argument is no
  • 00:43:32
    they're compliments but they could
  • 00:43:34
    become substitutes should they it become
  • 00:43:36
    so successful I think you're putting I
  • 00:43:38
    mean this is exactly my anxiety with
  • 00:43:40
    kind of going too far too fast or just
  • 00:43:42
    yoloing in or just doing it as like a
  • 00:43:44
    meme right like you need to be extremely
  • 00:43:46
    deliberate if you're going to make a
  • 00:43:47
    strategic policy shift on something like
  • 00:43:49
    this you need to think it through you
  • 00:43:50
    need to go slow and you'd have sort of
  • 00:43:52
    off ramps in case you get to a point of
  • 00:43:54
    of instability because I think Josh
  • 00:43:55
    Hendrickson who's I think you've had him
  • 00:43:56
    on the Pod he's a colleague of mine at
  • 00:43:59
    the Bitcoin policy as as a fellow fellow
  • 00:44:01
    you know he's written about how you know
  • 00:44:02
    Fiat monies exist essentially you know
  • 00:44:04
    sort of bable equilibrium right where
  • 00:44:06
    everyone believes they're worth you know
  • 00:44:07
    something positive value or they're
  • 00:44:08
    worth nothing right and so if the
  • 00:44:10
    reserve issuer of that fiat currency
  • 00:44:12
    unit basically is telling sort of
  • 00:44:14
    signaling that it doesn't have a whole
  • 00:44:15
    lot of trust in its own it could sort of
  • 00:44:17
    it could stimulate you know the thing
  • 00:44:19
    it's very it's trying to prevent right
  • 00:44:21
    so I think you need to be very careful
  • 00:44:22
    about essentially as National decision
  • 00:44:24
    makers causing the run that you're
  • 00:44:25
    trying to prevent and I think that's a
  • 00:44:27
    matter of it's a matter of deliberation
  • 00:44:29
    it's a matter of policy execution
  • 00:44:30
    implementation and the size and scale of
  • 00:44:32
    such a reserve right and so that's where
  • 00:44:34
    if it was like four million Bitcoin or
  • 00:44:36
    six million Bitcoin now that that that's
  • 00:44:38
    a risk right is it if it if it was just
  • 00:44:39
    keep the 200,000 I don't think that's a
  • 00:44:41
    risk right so somewhere along that line
  • 00:44:44
    between 200,000 and 4 million Bitcoin
  • 00:44:46
    there probably is a risk that you could
  • 00:44:48
    stimulate the sort of negative feedback
  • 00:44:51
    loop that you're trying to prevent and
  • 00:44:52
    so that's where I I be careful yeah be
  • 00:44:54
    careful and that's why I don't come down
  • 00:44:56
    on a particular side or particular scope
  • 00:44:58
    in terms of how fast you would apply it
  • 00:45:00
    it's more just the basic idea of having
  • 00:45:02
    such a reserve is the premise that I
  • 00:45:04
    just want to like first analyze and then
  • 00:45:06
    if you think that's at least that's a
  • 00:45:07
    sound premise worth looking at well then
  • 00:45:09
    you can have the more deliberative
  • 00:45:11
    analysis of well then how big should it
  • 00:45:12
    be yeah so you want it big enough so
  • 00:45:15
    that Bitcoin grows and remains a
  • 00:45:18
    complement to the US dollar not a
  • 00:45:20
    substitute and where that magic
  • 00:45:21
    threshold is who knows at this point are
  • 00:45:24
    there any other proposals that would
  • 00:45:27
    want to see the US government pursue to
  • 00:45:30
    enhance this network effect I mean
  • 00:45:33
    there's like basic things but I I sort
  • 00:45:35
    of look around at our current approach
  • 00:45:37
    to International statecraft and economic
  • 00:45:39
    policymaking and I still see like basic
  • 00:45:40
    work to be done in terms of bringing
  • 00:45:42
    different arms and legs of our current
  • 00:45:43
    bureaucratic apparatus into a common
  • 00:45:46
    understanding of of of these of this
  • 00:45:47
    very topic right so I would first want
  • 00:45:49
    to just bring these different these
  • 00:45:51
    different capacities and and have a more
  • 00:45:54
    coherent and like thoughtful strategic
  • 00:45:55
    Dialogue on it before I say oh go out
  • 00:45:58
    and like do exp Z specific policy
  • 00:46:00
    implementation right get the National
  • 00:46:01
    Security apparatus with the economics
  • 00:46:03
    statecraft folks with our state
  • 00:46:04
    department folks with folks you know in
  • 00:46:06
    Wall Street and think about like how
  • 00:46:08
    this could actually work and just kind
  • 00:46:09
    of YOLO it I think you've covered on on
  • 00:46:11
    this on this discussion I think it's
  • 00:46:13
    been written about other places like
  • 00:46:15
    again Trump versus Harris you know
  • 00:46:17
    different policy progress will come into
  • 00:46:18
    play but I think it's been talked about
  • 00:46:20
    at Leen a trump Administration a pretty
  • 00:46:22
    radical shift in the structure of the
  • 00:46:24
    dollar system right the explicit
  • 00:46:26
    erection of Tech and tariff walls
  • 00:46:28
    essentially around our allies and
  • 00:46:29
    partners as essentially a non-economic
  • 00:46:32
    you know Mafia style tactic to sort of
  • 00:46:35
    force them to term out their debt right
  • 00:46:37
    so okay how do we basically weaken the
  • 00:46:39
    dollar at the same time we want to you
  • 00:46:41
    know Goose our exports and keep our
  • 00:46:43
    geopolitical and economic alliances
  • 00:46:45
    intact our cake and eat it too yeah we
  • 00:46:46
    basically were like okay we're going to
  • 00:46:48
    instead of devaluing the gold content of
  • 00:46:50
    you know a bar of gold or gold
  • 00:46:51
    certificate back in the 30s we're going
  • 00:46:52
    to devalue the duration content of
  • 00:46:54
    sovereign Reserve Holdings of Treasury
  • 00:46:56
    securities and we're going to use
  • 00:46:57
    geopolitical levers inducements and
  • 00:46:59
    threats to do that we could do that but
  • 00:47:01
    that would be extremely costly in terms
  • 00:47:03
    of you know diplomatic Capital we're
  • 00:47:04
    going to have to get the Japanese the
  • 00:47:06
    Taiwanese the South Koreans the Brits
  • 00:47:08
    the Germans that have you know their own
  • 00:47:10
    economic issues and demographic issues
  • 00:47:12
    and and security issues and we're going
  • 00:47:13
    to essentially cudle them into you know
  • 00:47:16
    whether it's swapping coupons for
  • 00:47:17
    Century bonds and that could work yeah
  • 00:47:20
    sounds like a hot mess yeah that's
  • 00:47:21
    essentially what what what sort of
  • 00:47:22
    Imperial systems do is right they
  • 00:47:24
    usually cannibalize the periphery to
  • 00:47:25
    keep the core alive and you can extend
  • 00:47:28
    and pretend for five or 10 years but
  • 00:47:29
    doesn't seem like an enduring basis yeah
  • 00:47:31
    so you're saying look let's let's maybe
  • 00:47:32
    focus on what we can do that's
  • 00:47:34
    productive given these organically
  • 00:47:37
    growing networks already in the crypto
  • 00:47:39
    world let's let's run with that let's
  • 00:47:40
    don't destroy what we have or canalize
  • 00:47:42
    what we have and and go from there all
  • 00:47:45
    right Matt and in time we have left I
  • 00:47:46
    want to Circle back to where we started
  • 00:47:48
    this conversation and that was with the
  • 00:47:50
    defense industry and you know we're here
  • 00:47:52
    at mercada Center we we follow things
  • 00:47:56
    that happen
  • 00:47:57
    in the policy world so we follow for
  • 00:47:59
    example closely bills that go before
  • 00:48:01
    Congress you know I I have followed the
  • 00:48:03
    omnus spending bills because sometimes
  • 00:48:05
    there's things in there that affect the
  • 00:48:06
    Federal Reserve you follow though the
  • 00:48:09
    National Defense authorization act so
  • 00:48:11
    tell us about that what is it yeah so
  • 00:48:13
    every year you know this is like one of
  • 00:48:15
    those must-pass bills the National
  • 00:48:16
    Defense authorization act and then it
  • 00:48:18
    sort of twin the intelligence
  • 00:48:19
    authorization act sometimes they even
  • 00:48:20
    get merged depending on the the policy
  • 00:48:22
    timeline into a single package but this
  • 00:48:24
    is essentially the authorization for for
  • 00:48:26
    all of our military and with our
  • 00:48:28
    intelligence program so it's you know it
  • 00:48:30
    comes out of the Senate arm Services
  • 00:48:31
    committee the house arm Services
  • 00:48:32
    committee um the intelligence acts come
  • 00:48:34
    out of the Senate s Comm intelligence
  • 00:48:35
    and the house permit SEL Comm
  • 00:48:36
    intelligence and these are you know the
  • 00:48:38
    defining bills that lay out kind of the
  • 00:48:40
    policy priorities and programs that will
  • 00:48:42
    be funded for the next fiscal year so I
  • 00:48:45
    pay a lot of attention a lot of the
  • 00:48:46
    policy comes out say on like restricting
  • 00:48:48
    Chinese information Communications
  • 00:48:50
    Technologies get introduced and add to
  • 00:48:52
    this bill stand up of studies around
  • 00:48:54
    cybercity vulnerabilities for us ports
  • 00:48:55
    or the Panama Canal are inserted here so
  • 00:48:58
    you get a window into what senior policy
  • 00:49:00
    makers that sit on those committees are
  • 00:49:02
    really worried about and are trying to
  • 00:49:03
    basically instruct the defense
  • 00:49:05
    department intelligence Community to do
  • 00:49:07
    in the next years like we really want
  • 00:49:08
    you to study the vulnerabilities of our
  • 00:49:11
    ports the vulnerabilities from you know
  • 00:49:12
    these different adversary capabilities
  • 00:49:14
    um we really want you to build a new
  • 00:49:16
    capability here and so I I I review
  • 00:49:19
    those every every time they come out you
  • 00:49:20
    know they they give a good clue as to
  • 00:49:22
    like what their priorities are and then
  • 00:49:23
    the last several years has been you know
  • 00:49:25
    a a new thing that has been introduced
  • 00:49:27
    to the National Defense authorization
  • 00:49:28
    act that has come in from kind of The
  • 00:49:30
    Fringe but is now like a very serious
  • 00:49:31
    topic inside DC and that's sort of this
  • 00:49:33
    topic of unidentified anomalous
  • 00:49:35
    phenomena uaps you know prosaically
  • 00:49:38
    known as UFOs and this sounds like a
  • 00:49:40
    taboo kind of like snickering thing yeah
  • 00:49:42
    but like inside the Senate inside the
  • 00:49:44
    house inside the executive branch inside
  • 00:49:46
    the intelligence community and others
  • 00:49:48
    this has become an increasingly serious
  • 00:49:50
    topic and you've seen bills being
  • 00:49:52
    introduced and passed and made into law
  • 00:49:54
    from a whole sequence of National
  • 00:49:56
    Defense authorization acts really
  • 00:49:57
    starting in fy22 and then ratcheting up
  • 00:49:59
    year after year to place more scrutiny
  • 00:50:03
    and more reporting requirements on the
  • 00:50:04
    Pentagon in particular to come back to
  • 00:50:06
    Congress and answer some hard questions
  • 00:50:07
    on what exactly does the Pentagon know
  • 00:50:09
    about unidentified anomalous phenomenon
  • 00:50:11
    what are they doing to reduce the
  • 00:50:13
    internal stigma from Pilots so they can
  • 00:50:15
    get a better understanding of what's the
  • 00:50:16
    nature of this Potential Threat if it's
  • 00:50:18
    coming from foreign adversaries or if
  • 00:50:19
    it's coming from exotic origin
  • 00:50:21
    understand exactly what that looks like
  • 00:50:22
    and actually report back to them and
  • 00:50:24
    that's been a sequence that's been
  • 00:50:25
    playing out for the past few years
  • 00:50:27
    we sort of reached an inflection point
  • 00:50:28
    about 12 months ago with the National
  • 00:50:30
    Defense authorization act for
  • 00:50:32
    fy4 where a senior Senators including
  • 00:50:35
    the Senate Majority Leader Senator
  • 00:50:36
    Schumer with his main partner Senator
  • 00:50:38
    rounds introduced what they called the
  • 00:50:40
    unidentified anomalous phenomenon
  • 00:50:42
    disclosure act and they had bipartisan
  • 00:50:44
    co-sponsors from Jill brand Todd young
  • 00:50:46
    Martin heimrich Mar Rubio from the arm
  • 00:50:48
    services committies from the
  • 00:50:49
    intelligence communities and the
  • 00:50:51
    unidentified anous phenomenon disclosure
  • 00:50:52
    act mouthful the uapa is a quite
  • 00:50:55
    remarkable Bill like I read these things
  • 00:50:57
    and you know most of them are kind of
  • 00:50:58
    dry we're going to fund a new investment
  • 00:51:01
    program here we want you to do a study
  • 00:51:02
    on this they specifically laid out a
  • 00:51:04
    64-page bill with definitions of what
  • 00:51:06
    they call non-human intelligence they
  • 00:51:08
    Define Technologies of Unknown Origin
  • 00:51:10
    they Define unidentified Nom phenomena
  • 00:51:12
    as being non prosaically attributed
  • 00:51:15
    objects right so things that cannot be
  • 00:51:16
    attributed to foreign adversary programs
  • 00:51:18
    or debris or you know mological
  • 00:51:20
    phenomenon like explicitly saying we
  • 00:51:23
    have credible evidence and testimony
  • 00:51:24
    from a whole series of witnesses and
  • 00:51:25
    whistleblowers have come to the senate
  • 00:51:27
    in particular over the past few years
  • 00:51:29
    and have given you know a protected
  • 00:51:31
    disclosures of unreported potentially
  • 00:51:34
    illegal government programs that have
  • 00:51:35
    been in existence related to this topic
  • 00:51:37
    for decades and so this disclosure act
  • 00:51:40
    would create like an independent review
  • 00:51:42
    board modeled after the JFK records
  • 00:51:44
    review board assassination group to you
  • 00:51:47
    know get to the bottom of this right
  • 00:51:48
    what exactly is going on what are the
  • 00:51:50
    government records and or materials
  • 00:51:53
    associated with those records that might
  • 00:51:54
    be in possession of the US government or
  • 00:51:56
    private Aerospace contractors and make a
  • 00:51:59
    recommendation to the president on how
  • 00:52:01
    to disclose that information to the
  • 00:52:02
    public in a controlled disclosure
  • 00:52:04
    campaign plan and so this is this bill
  • 00:52:06
    was introduced in FY 24 it was passed
  • 00:52:08
    out of the Senate it was actually in the
  • 00:52:09
    Senate's version of the National Defense
  • 00:52:11
    authorization act and it went over to
  • 00:52:12
    the house the house didn't have a
  • 00:52:13
    version of that they met in conference
  • 00:52:15
    committee in December of last year and
  • 00:52:17
    most of the key Provisions that the
  • 00:52:19
    Senate wanted in were taken out and so
  • 00:52:21
    in particular the main provision was for
  • 00:52:22
    this independent review board that would
  • 00:52:24
    have powers of subpoena would have
  • 00:52:26
    powers of you know unilateral
  • 00:52:27
    declassification with only a
  • 00:52:28
    presidential veto and also powers of
  • 00:52:30
    eminent domain to take possession of any
  • 00:52:33
    Technologies of Unknown Origin and
  • 00:52:34
    biological materials in the possession
  • 00:52:36
    of any private entity and make you know
  • 00:52:38
    disposition determinations those pieces
  • 00:52:40
    were taken out what was kept in was a
  • 00:52:42
    establishment of UAP records collection
  • 00:52:44
    at the National Archives and that has
  • 00:52:46
    been you now is is coming into place
  • 00:52:48
    this year and it sort of is now a major
  • 00:52:51
    political issue coming into this fall
  • 00:52:53
    where it has been reintroduced by rounds
  • 00:52:56
    and Schumer they doubled down on it they
  • 00:52:58
    actually went to the senate floor after
  • 00:52:59
    they introduced it and said we're not
  • 00:53:01
    happy basically with the house taking
  • 00:53:03
    this out of the bill this independent
  • 00:53:05
    review board and we want to have further
  • 00:53:06
    disclosure for further transparency on
  • 00:53:08
    behalf of the American people and it's
  • 00:53:10
    being motivated by lots of different
  • 00:53:11
    things but you know there's a worry of
  • 00:53:13
    technological surprise from foreign
  • 00:53:14
    adversaries there a worry that you know
  • 00:53:16
    our scientific Paradigm has been
  • 00:53:17
    stagnated for the past 6 years and that
  • 00:53:20
    we need to have sort of more open
  • 00:53:21
    science and technological Discovery
  • 00:53:23
    based off of these programs and so this
  • 00:53:25
    is one of those things coming in from
  • 00:53:26
    the tales of the distribution you know I
  • 00:53:29
    thought about like what are things that
  • 00:53:30
    are not currently in the Overton window
  • 00:53:32
    of kind of policy discourse that if they
  • 00:53:34
    did materialize would be quite
  • 00:53:36
    disruptive to our current policy
  • 00:53:37
    Frameworks and this is probably the top
  • 00:53:39
    of that list and so I think I would
  • 00:53:41
    expect that this topic will continue to
  • 00:53:44
    increase in official salience over the
  • 00:53:46
    next few months and years there might
  • 00:53:48
    even be some quite dramatic things
  • 00:53:49
    happening this year on on this subject
  • 00:53:51
    as part of the political pressure to get
  • 00:53:53
    this disclosure Act passed and so yeah I
  • 00:53:56
    mean there's been you know folks looking
  • 00:53:58
    at this from lots of different angles
  • 00:53:59
    including folks from you know a
  • 00:54:01
    financial stability angle which has been
  • 00:54:03
    a major concern of how do you have
  • 00:54:04
    something like this you know emerge into
  • 00:54:06
    the public discourse in a way that
  • 00:54:08
    doesn't lead to you know panic panic or
  • 00:54:11
    disruption or major negative
  • 00:54:12
    externalities right and so the payment
  • 00:54:14
    system obviously is critical we wouldn't
  • 00:54:16
    want folks you know have loss of Faith
  • 00:54:19
    or the basic mechanisms of of our of our
  • 00:54:21
    of our payment system collapse and so
  • 00:54:23
    there's been some you know solid
  • 00:54:24
    research and papers now being produced
  • 00:54:26
    to try to prepare the ground for some of
  • 00:54:28
    this slow but it's going to happen wow
  • 00:54:32
    there's a lot there let me go back to
  • 00:54:33
    where we started on on this particular
  • 00:54:34
    point so the National Defense
  • 00:54:36
    authorization act you call it
  • 00:54:39
    ndaa you and other people like you you
  • 00:54:41
    look at those to see what's of Interest
  • 00:54:44
    what's what's kind of The Cutting issues
  • 00:54:46
    in terms of National Security issues and
  • 00:54:48
    what you're saying as you look across
  • 00:54:50
    that one that really stands out that's
  • 00:54:52
    different potentially important very
  • 00:54:55
    important is more disclosure on
  • 00:54:59
    uaps and it was in last year's Bill n
  • 00:55:02
    NDA didn't make it it's in this year's
  • 00:55:05
    is it going to be past this year do you
  • 00:55:06
    think that is right now the big question
  • 00:55:10
    right the Senate is pushing hard they
  • 00:55:11
    introduced basically The Identical bill
  • 00:55:13
    as a signal to the house that they're
  • 00:55:15
    still pushing in this direction it's
  • 00:55:18
    likely that it will be introduced as
  • 00:55:19
    part of a manager's package which is how
  • 00:55:21
    it was introduced last year essentially
  • 00:55:22
    by the leadership same way and then it
  • 00:55:24
    will be kicked over to the house again
  • 00:55:26
    and there'll be back back room
  • 00:55:27
    negotiations in conference committee
  • 00:55:29
    probably around November of December and
  • 00:55:31
    so it will be really in the hands of the
  • 00:55:32
    next president if this Bill gets gets
  • 00:55:34
    signed to make nominations to this
  • 00:55:36
    review board you know individuals of
  • 00:55:38
    national stature to make this to make
  • 00:55:40
    these determinations folks with National
  • 00:55:42
    Security backgrounds foreign policy
  • 00:55:43
    backgrounds sociologists economists
  • 00:55:46
    historians folks representing Civil
  • 00:55:48
    Society to try to you know bring all
  • 00:55:50
    different facets of National Power and
  • 00:55:51
    interest to bear on making these these
  • 00:55:53
    determinations on on how to selectively
  • 00:55:54
    disclose this information so I wouldn't
  • 00:55:56
    handicap the odds maybe 50/50 at whether
  • 00:55:58
    the full package gets gets through I'd
  • 00:56:01
    say regardless of the uapa right that's
  • 00:56:03
    the official policy kind of process like
  • 00:56:06
    trying to stand up an Institutional
  • 00:56:07
    framework for this issue but there are
  • 00:56:09
    other ways this could erupt into the
  • 00:56:10
    national conversation and it we have
  • 00:56:12
    geopolitical implications as well as you
  • 00:56:13
    could imagine so there's a lot tied up
  • 00:56:16
    in this um absolutely and I think you
  • 00:56:18
    know there's there's I've had
  • 00:56:19
    conversations with folks that are more
  • 00:56:20
    on the national security or intelligence
  • 00:56:22
    side on this and some of the attitude
  • 00:56:24
    has been you know we need to disclose
  • 00:56:27
    this you know it's a matter of you know
  • 00:56:29
    geopolitical or other sort of urgency
  • 00:56:32
    and that the private sector will just
  • 00:56:34
    have to like adapt that there I there
  • 00:56:36
    hasn't been as much rigorous thought as
  • 00:56:38
    to how to manage the financial stability
  • 00:56:40
    the overall economic implications of
  • 00:56:42
    this you know they're mostly National
  • 00:56:44
    Security folks they think in terms of
  • 00:56:45
    you know a military campaign phase one
  • 00:56:47
    phase two phase three and then this is a
  • 00:56:49
    phase two or phase three problem it's
  • 00:56:51
    not a phase one problem yeah and you
  • 00:56:52
    know because of the taboo because this
  • 00:56:54
    isn't necessarily inside the Overton
  • 00:56:55
    window there isn't serious policy
  • 00:56:57
    attention focused on it and that that
  • 00:56:59
    could be a problem well that is a very
  • 00:57:02
    interesting development and maybe we'll
  • 00:57:04
    have you back on should this Schumer
  • 00:57:07
    rounds Amendment actually become law and
  • 00:57:09
    we learn new things but we've had a
  • 00:57:10
    great conversation today on the role of
  • 00:57:13
    uh networks and the big rivalry between
  • 00:57:16
    China the US and the role that crypto
  • 00:57:19
    stable coins could play we need to view
  • 00:57:21
    it as an opportunity not as a threat Our
  • 00:57:24
    Guest today has been Matthew Pines Matt
  • 00:57:25
    thank you so much for coming on the
  • 00:57:26
    program thank you so
  • 00:57:29
    much macro musings is produced by the
  • 00:57:32
    marada center at George Mason University
  • 00:57:35
    Dive deeper into our research at
  • 00:57:37
    marcus.org
  • 00:57:39
    monetary policy you can subscribe to the
  • 00:57:42
    show on Apple podcast Spotify or your
  • 00:57:46
    favorite podcast app if you like this
  • 00:57:48
    podcast please consider giving us a
  • 00:57:50
    rating and leaving a review this helps
  • 00:57:52
    other thoughtful people like you find
  • 00:57:55
    the show find me on Twitter at David
  • 00:57:58
    beckworth and follow the show at
  • 00:58:01
    macro Mings
Tags
  • Cryptocurrency
  • Bitcoin
  • National Security
  • Network Power
  • US-China Relations
  • Defense Budget
  • Strategic Reserve
  • Stablecoins
  • UAP
  • Geopolitics