Statistical Learning: 2.1 Introduction to Regression Models

00:11:42
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ox0cKk7h4o0

Résumé

TLDRThe video explores statistical learning and modeling, particularly in the context of analyzing sales data from a marketing campaign based on advertising expenditures across TV, radio, and newspapers. It introduces linear regression to summarize the relationship between sales and advertising spend, emphasizing the importance of understanding the joint influence of multiple predictors. The notation used in modeling is explained, with 'y' representing sales and 'x' representing advertising inputs. The regression function is defined as the conditional expectation of sales given specific advertising spends, and the video discusses the challenges of estimating this function accurately. Nearest neighbor averaging is introduced as a method for estimating the regression function when data points are sparse, highlighting the need for flexible approaches in statistical modeling.

A retenir

  • 📊 Sales data analysis is crucial for understanding marketing effectiveness.
  • 📈 Linear regression helps summarize relationships between variables.
  • 🔍 The regression function predicts average outcomes based on inputs.
  • 📉 Errors in predictions can be broken down into reducible and irreducible components.
  • 🧮 Nearest neighbor averaging is a useful method for estimating functions with sparse data.
  • 📏 The choice of neighborhood size in averaging affects prediction accuracy.
  • 🔄 Understanding joint relationships among predictors is essential for effective modeling.
  • 📊 As dimensions increase, traditional methods may face challenges.

Chronologie

  • 00:00:00 - 00:05:00

    The discussion begins with an overview of statistical learning and models, focusing on how to analyze sales figures from a marketing campaign based on expenditures on TV, radio, and newspaper ads. The speaker introduces the concept of modeling sales as a function of these three predictors, denoting sales as 'y' and the ad expenditures as 'x1', 'x2', and 'x3'. The goal is to understand the joint relationship between these variables and how they collectively influence sales, leading to the formulation of a model that includes an error term to account for discrepancies in predictions.

  • 00:05:00 - 00:11:42

    The speaker elaborates on the ideal function 'f' that predicts 'y' based on 'x'. This function is defined as the conditional expectation of 'y' given specific values of 'x', which can be visualized through a regression function. The discussion highlights the challenge of estimating 'f' accurately due to the presence of noise and variability in the data. To address this, the concept of local averaging or nearest neighbor estimation is introduced, allowing for the computation of conditional expectations by averaging values in a neighborhood around a target point, thus providing a flexible approach to modeling.

Carte mentale

Vidéo Q&R

  • What is the main focus of the video?

    The video focuses on statistical learning and modeling, particularly in analyzing sales data from a marketing campaign.

  • What is the purpose of linear regression in this context?

    Linear regression is used to summarize the relationship between sales and advertising expenditures across different media.

  • What does the notation 'y = f(x) + error' represent?

    This notation represents the model where 'y' is the response variable (sales), 'f(x)' is the function of predictors (advertising spend), and 'error' captures discrepancies.

  • What is the regression function?

    The regression function provides the conditional expectation of 'y' given specific values of 'x', essentially predicting average sales for given advertising spends.

  • What is nearest neighbor averaging?

    Nearest neighbor averaging is a method used to estimate the regression function by averaging the values of 'y' in a neighborhood around a target point 'x'.

  • What are the two components of prediction error discussed?

    The two components are the irreducible error (variance of the errors) and the reducible error (difference between the estimated function and the true function).

  • Why is it difficult to compute conditional expectation exactly?

    It is difficult because there may not be enough data points at a specific value of 'x' to compute the average.

  • What happens as the dimensions of the data increase?

    The video suggests that nearest neighbor averaging may not always work effectively as dimensions increase, indicating a need for alternative methods.

Voir plus de résumés vidéo

Accédez instantanément à des résumés vidéo gratuits sur YouTube grâce à l'IA !
Sous-titres
en
Défilement automatique:
  • 00:00:00
    okay we're going to talk about
  • 00:00:02
    statistical learning and and models now
  • 00:00:05
    i'm going to tell you
  • 00:00:06
    what what models are good for how we use
  • 00:00:09
    them and what are some of the issues
  • 00:00:11
    involved
  • 00:00:12
    okay so we see three plots in front of
  • 00:00:14
    us
  • 00:00:15
    these are sales figures from a marketing
  • 00:00:18
    campaign
  • 00:00:19
    as a function of amount
  • 00:00:21
    spent on tv ads radio ads and newspaper
  • 00:00:24
    ads
  • 00:00:25
    and you can see the
  • 00:00:27
    at least in the first two is a somewhat
  • 00:00:30
    of a trend
  • 00:00:31
    and in fact we've we've summarized the
  • 00:00:33
    trend by a
  • 00:00:35
    little linear regression line in each
  • 00:00:38
    and so we see that there's some
  • 00:00:40
    relationship the first two again look
  • 00:00:43
    uh stronger than than the third
  • 00:00:46
    now in a situation like this we
  • 00:00:48
    typically like to know
  • 00:00:50
    the joint relationship
  • 00:00:51
    between
  • 00:00:53
    the response sales and all three of
  • 00:00:56
    these together
  • 00:00:57
    you know we want to understand how they
  • 00:01:00
    operate together to influence sales
  • 00:01:03
    so you can think of that as as
  • 00:01:06
    wanting to
  • 00:01:07
    model sales as a as a function
  • 00:01:11
    of tv radio and newspaper all jointly
  • 00:01:14
    together so how do we do that
  • 00:01:18
    so before we we get into the details
  • 00:01:22
    let's set up some notation so yes sales
  • 00:01:25
    is the response or the target that we
  • 00:01:27
    wish to predict or model
  • 00:01:29
    and
  • 00:01:30
    we usually refer to it as as y we use
  • 00:01:33
    the letter y to refer to it
  • 00:01:35
    tv is a is one of the features or inputs
  • 00:01:38
    or predictors and we'll call it x1
  • 00:01:41
    likewise
  • 00:01:42
    radio
  • 00:01:43
    is x2 and so on
  • 00:01:45
    so in this case we've got three
  • 00:01:46
    predictors and we can refer to them
  • 00:01:48
    collectively by a vector
  • 00:01:51
    as
  • 00:01:52
    x equal to with three components x1 x2
  • 00:01:54
    and x3 and vectors we generally think of
  • 00:01:57
    as column vectors
  • 00:01:59
    and so that's a little bit of notation
  • 00:02:01
    and so now in this more compact notation
  • 00:02:04
    we can write our model as
  • 00:02:06
    y equals function of x
  • 00:02:10
    plus error
  • 00:02:11
    okay and this error
  • 00:02:14
    um is just a catch all to it captures
  • 00:02:17
    the measurement errors maybe in y and
  • 00:02:19
    other discrepancies our function of x is
  • 00:02:21
    never going to model y perfectly so
  • 00:02:23
    there's going to be a lot of things we
  • 00:02:25
    can't capture with the function and
  • 00:02:27
    that's caught up in the error
  • 00:02:29
    and again
  • 00:02:30
    f of x here
  • 00:02:32
    is now a function of this vector x which
  • 00:02:34
    has these three arguments
  • 00:02:37
    three components
  • 00:02:40
    so what is what is the function f of x
  • 00:02:42
    good for
  • 00:02:43
    so with a good f we can make predictions
  • 00:02:45
    of y at new points x equals little x so
  • 00:02:49
    this notation capital x equals little x
  • 00:02:51
    you know capital x we think is the
  • 00:02:53
    variable having these three components
  • 00:02:56
    and little x is an instance also with
  • 00:02:58
    three components
  • 00:03:00
    particular values
  • 00:03:02
    for
  • 00:03:03
    newspaper radio and tv
  • 00:03:06
    with the model we can understand which
  • 00:03:08
    components of x in general it'll have p
  • 00:03:10
    components if there's p predictors are
  • 00:03:13
    important explaining why and which are
  • 00:03:15
    relevant
  • 00:03:16
    for example if if we model an income as
  • 00:03:18
    a function of demographic variables
  • 00:03:21
    seniority and years of education might
  • 00:03:23
    have a big impact on income but marital
  • 00:03:25
    status typically does not and we'd like
  • 00:03:27
    our model to be able to tell us that
  • 00:03:30
    and depending on the complexity of f we
  • 00:03:32
    may be able to understand how each
  • 00:03:33
    component xj affects y in in what
  • 00:03:36
    particular fashion it affects y
  • 00:03:39
    so models have have many uses and those
  • 00:03:41
    are amongst them
  • 00:03:44
    okay well what is this function f and is
  • 00:03:47
    there an ideal f
  • 00:03:49
    so
  • 00:03:50
    in the plot
  • 00:03:52
    we've got a large sample of points from
  • 00:03:55
    a population there's just a single x in
  • 00:03:57
    this case and a response y and you can
  • 00:04:00
    see there's that's a scatter plot so we
  • 00:04:03
    see there's a lot of
  • 00:04:05
    point there's 2 000 points here let's
  • 00:04:07
    think of this as actually the whole
  • 00:04:08
    population or rather as a representation
  • 00:04:11
    of a
  • 00:04:12
    very large population
  • 00:04:16
    and so now let's think of what what a
  • 00:04:18
    good function f might be and let's say
  • 00:04:21
    not just the whole function but let's
  • 00:04:22
    think what value would we like f to have
  • 00:04:25
    at say the value of x equals 4 so at
  • 00:04:28
    this point over here right we want to
  • 00:04:30
    query x
  • 00:04:32
    f at all values of x but we wondering
  • 00:04:34
    what it should be at the value 4.
  • 00:04:36
    so you'll notice that at the x equals 4
  • 00:04:39
    there's many values of y but a function
  • 00:04:42
    can only take on one value
  • 00:04:45
    the function is going to deliver back
  • 00:04:46
    one value so what is a good value
  • 00:04:49
    well
  • 00:04:50
    one good value is to deliver back the
  • 00:04:53
    average values of those y's who have x
  • 00:04:55
    equal to 4.
  • 00:04:57
    and that we write in this sort of mathy
  • 00:04:59
    notation over here
  • 00:05:01
    it says
  • 00:05:02
    the function at the value 4 is the
  • 00:05:05
    expected value of y given x equals 4
  • 00:05:08
    and that expected value is a just a
  • 00:05:10
    fancy word for average it's actually a
  • 00:05:12
    conditional average given x equals four
  • 00:05:15
    since we can only deliver one value
  • 00:05:18
    of the function at x equals four
  • 00:05:21
    um the average seems like a good value
  • 00:05:25
    and if we do that at each value of x so
  • 00:05:27
    at every single value of x we deliver
  • 00:05:30
    back the average of the y's that have
  • 00:05:31
    that value of x so for example at x
  • 00:05:34
    equals 5
  • 00:05:36
    again we want to have the average value
  • 00:05:39
    in this little conditional slice here
  • 00:05:42
    that will trace out this little red
  • 00:05:43
    curve that we have here and that's
  • 00:05:45
    called the regression function so the
  • 00:05:47
    regression function gives you the
  • 00:05:49
    conditional expectation of y given x at
  • 00:05:52
    each value of x
  • 00:05:54
    so that in a sense is the ideal
  • 00:05:57
    function
  • 00:05:58
    for a for a population in this case of y
  • 00:06:01
    and a single x
  • 00:06:04
    so let's talk more about this regression
  • 00:06:06
    function it's also defined for a vector
  • 00:06:08
    x so if x has got three components for
  • 00:06:11
    example it's going to be the conditional
  • 00:06:14
    expectation of y given the three
  • 00:06:16
    particular instances of of the three
  • 00:06:19
    components of x
  • 00:06:21
    so so if you think about that
  • 00:06:24
    um let's think of of x as being two
  • 00:06:26
    dimensional because we can think in
  • 00:06:28
    three dimensions so let's say x lies
  • 00:06:32
    on the table
  • 00:06:34
    two-dimensional x and y stands up
  • 00:06:36
    vertically
  • 00:06:37
    so the idea is the same we want to we've
  • 00:06:40
    got a whole continuous cloud of of y's
  • 00:06:43
    and x's we go to a particular point x
  • 00:06:46
    with two coordinates x1 and x2 and we
  • 00:06:49
    say what's a good value for the function
  • 00:06:51
    at that point well we're just going to
  • 00:06:53
    go up in the slice and average the y's
  • 00:06:55
    above that point and we'll do that at
  • 00:06:58
    all points
  • 00:06:59
    in the plane
  • 00:07:00
    we said it's the ideal or optimal
  • 00:07:02
    predictor of y with regard
  • 00:07:05
    for the function and what that means is
  • 00:07:08
    actually it's it's with regard to a loss
  • 00:07:10
    function and what it means is that
  • 00:07:12
    particular choice of the function f of x
  • 00:07:15
    will minimize
  • 00:07:16
    the sum of squared errors right which we
  • 00:07:19
    write in this fashion
  • 00:07:21
    again expected value
  • 00:07:23
    of y minus
  • 00:07:25
    g of x over all functions g
  • 00:07:27
    at each point x right so it minimizes
  • 00:07:30
    the average
  • 00:07:32
    prediction errors
  • 00:07:36
    now
  • 00:07:37
    at each point x we're going to make
  • 00:07:39
    mistakes because
  • 00:07:40
    if we use this function to predict
  • 00:07:43
    why
  • 00:07:44
    because there's lots of y's at each
  • 00:07:46
    point x right and so
  • 00:07:48
    the errors that we make we call in this
  • 00:07:50
    case we call them epsilons and those are
  • 00:07:52
    the irreducible error
  • 00:07:54
    you might know the ideal function f but
  • 00:07:57
    of course it doesn't make perfect
  • 00:07:59
    predictions at each point x so it has to
  • 00:08:01
    make some errors but on average it does
  • 00:08:03
    well
  • 00:08:09
    for any estimate
  • 00:08:10
    f hat of x and that's what we tend to do
  • 00:08:13
    we tend to put these little
  • 00:08:16
    hats
  • 00:08:19
    on estimators to show that they've been
  • 00:08:21
    estimated from data
  • 00:08:24
    and with so f hat of x is an estimate of
  • 00:08:27
    f of x
  • 00:08:29
    we can expand
  • 00:08:31
    the squared prediction error at x into
  • 00:08:33
    two pieces
  • 00:08:35
    there's the irreducible piece which is
  • 00:08:38
    just the variance of the errors
  • 00:08:41
    and there's the reducible piece which is
  • 00:08:43
    the difference between our estimate f
  • 00:08:45
    hat of x
  • 00:08:47
    and the true function f of x
  • 00:08:50
    okay
  • 00:08:51
    and that's a squared component so this
  • 00:08:54
    expected prediction error breaks up into
  • 00:08:56
    these two pieces
  • 00:08:58
    so that's important to bear in mind so
  • 00:09:00
    if we want to improve our model
  • 00:09:02
    it's this first piece the reducible
  • 00:09:04
    piece that we can improve by maybe
  • 00:09:06
    changing the way we estimate f of x
  • 00:09:10
    okay
  • 00:09:11
    so that's all nice this is a kind of as
  • 00:09:13
    up to now has been somewhat of a
  • 00:09:15
    theoretical exercise well how do we
  • 00:09:17
    estimate the function f
  • 00:09:20
    so the problem is we can't carry out
  • 00:09:22
    this recipe of conditional expectation
  • 00:09:24
    or conditional averaging exactly because
  • 00:09:27
    at any given x in our data set
  • 00:09:30
    we might not have
  • 00:09:32
    many points to average we might not have
  • 00:09:33
    any points to average in the figure i've
  • 00:09:38
    we've got a much smaller data set now
  • 00:09:39
    and we've still got the point x equals
  • 00:09:41
    four
  • 00:09:42
    and if you look there you'll see
  • 00:09:43
    carefully that the solid point is one
  • 00:09:45
    point i put on the plot the solid the
  • 00:09:48
    solid green point
  • 00:09:50
    there's actually no data points whose x
  • 00:09:53
    value is exactly four
  • 00:09:55
    so how can we compute the conditional
  • 00:09:57
    expectation or average
  • 00:10:00
    well what we can do is relax the idea of
  • 00:10:04
    at the point x
  • 00:10:06
    to
  • 00:10:07
    at in a neighborhood of the point x and
  • 00:10:09
    so that's what the notation here refers
  • 00:10:11
    to
  • 00:10:12
    n of x or script n of x
  • 00:10:15
    is a neighborhood of points defined in
  • 00:10:16
    some way around the target point which
  • 00:10:20
    is this x equals four year
  • 00:10:22
    and it keeps the spirit of conditional
  • 00:10:24
    expectation it's close to the target
  • 00:10:26
    point x
  • 00:10:27
    and if we make that neighborhood wide
  • 00:10:29
    enough we'll have enough points in the
  • 00:10:31
    neighborhood to average and we'll use
  • 00:10:33
    their average to estimate the
  • 00:10:35
    conditional expectation
  • 00:10:37
    so this is called nearest neighbor or
  • 00:10:39
    local averaging it's a very it's a very
  • 00:10:41
    clever idea it's not my idea it's been
  • 00:10:44
    invented long time ago and of course
  • 00:10:47
    you'll move this neighborhood you'll
  • 00:10:49
    slide this neighborhood along the x-axis
  • 00:10:52
    and and as you up as you compute the
  • 00:10:55
    averages as you slide in along it'll
  • 00:10:57
    trace out a curve
  • 00:10:58
    so that's actually a very good estimate
  • 00:11:00
    of the of the of the function f it's not
  • 00:11:03
    going to be perfect
  • 00:11:05
    because
  • 00:11:06
    the the the little window it has a
  • 00:11:08
    certain width
  • 00:11:09
    and and so some as we can see here some
  • 00:11:11
    points of the true f may be lower and
  • 00:11:14
    some points higher but on average it
  • 00:11:15
    does quite well
  • 00:11:17
    so we have a pretty powerful tool here
  • 00:11:18
    for estimating this conditional
  • 00:11:20
    expectation just relax the definition
  • 00:11:23
    and compute the
  • 00:11:24
    the nearest neighbor average and that
  • 00:11:27
    gives us a fairly flexible way of
  • 00:11:29
    fitting a function
  • 00:11:31
    we'll see
  • 00:11:32
    in
  • 00:11:33
    in the next section that this doesn't
  • 00:11:35
    always work especially as the dimensions
  • 00:11:37
    get larger and we'll have to have ways
  • 00:11:39
    of dealing with that
Tags
  • statistical learning
  • models
  • linear regression
  • sales analysis
  • advertising
  • conditional expectation
  • nearest neighbor averaging
  • prediction error
  • data analysis
  • marketing campaign