My Take on the Drone Situation

00:03:42
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZK4HFxzsjgo

Résumé

TLDRThis video highlights the frequent misidentification of drones in the sky due to lack of detailed information like date, time, and location. Often, what are believed to be drones are actually planes, planets, or stars. Several instances in New Jersey have shown such errors in identification. Advanced tools and details are necessary to correctly identify these objects. Government statements and investigations have indicated no national security threats from these sightings, as many are legal manned aircraft or natural objects misidentified. The video calls for providing detailed evidence if one believes they have sighted a genuine drone, as misinformation and social hysteria contribute to false reports.

A retenir

  • ✈️ Many alleged drone sightings are actually planes.
  • 🛰️ Misreported drones can be satellites or celestial bodies.
  • 📅 Detailed information like date and time is crucial for identification.
  • 🌟 Stars and planets are often mistaken for drones at night.
  • 🔍 Using flight radar tools can help identify objects in the sky.
  • 🚁 Some misidentified drones are helicopters.
  • 🛬 Normal air traffic can appear stationary and be mistaken for drones.
  • 🚨 Government reviews found no national security threat from reported sightings.
  • 📽️ Providing detailed evidence may reveal true identities of aerial objects.
  • 😲 Many sightings are due to social hysteria rather than real drones.

Chronologie

  • 00:00:00 - 00:03:42

    The narrative emphasizes that while drones are real and pose potential security concerns, many recent large drone sightings, particularly in New Jersey, have been misidentified. The process of identification often involves considering the object's shape, lighting, and using tools like Flight Rader 24 to verify actual aircraft in the area. In cases where 'details' (date, time, and location) are available, the sightings are mostly proven to not be drones, but common aircraft or celestial bodies like Venus and Starlink satellites. Authorities, including the DHS and FBI, affirm no national security threat has emerge,due to large drones, and most sighting reports relate to lawful manned aircraft. The situation is described as 'social contagion' or 'collective delusion', with the media often making inaccurate drone claims, which are typically debunked. Despite the lack of evidence, calls for action persist, but are based on misidentifications and exaggerations, with no credible findings of spy or military drones.

Carte mentale

Vidéo Q&R

  • What often causes the misidentification of drones?

    Misidentifications often occur due to lack of detailed information about the objects observed in the sky.

  • What tools can be used to identify objects in the sky?

    Tools like flight radar websites and knowledge of star and planet locations can help in identifying objects in the sky.

  • Why are large drone sightings often misidentified?

    Due to lack of details, such as date, time, and location, large drones are often mistaken for planes or celestial bodies.

  • What is the common misidentification mentioned in New Jersey?

    In New Jersey, many large drone sightings were actually misidentified planes or celestial objects.

  • How can one contribute to accurately identifying drones?

    Providing detailed information such as the exact date, time, location, and direction can help in accurate identification.

  • What did the DHS and FBI say about drone sightings in New Jersey?

    They stated that no evidence suggests these drone sightings pose a national security threat, and many reports are just manned aircraft operating legally.

  • What is a major cause of societal fear regarding drones?

    Massive hysteria and social contagion often fuel unwarranted concerns about drones.

  • How are drones related to national security concerns?

    Although drones are real security concerns, many sightings are simply misidentifications.

  • What assurances are there about the reported drone sightings?

    Upon reviewing imagery, many reported drone sightings were actually manned aircraft operating lawfully.

  • What should one do if they think they have evidence of a real drone?

    Post the video with detailed information like date, time, location, and direction, for verification.

Voir plus de résumés vidéo

Accédez instantanément à des résumés vidéo gratuits sur YouTube grâce à l'IA !
Sous-titres
en
Défilement automatique:
  • 00:00:00
    drones are real they fly in the sky
  • 00:00:03
    sometimes at night sometimes they fly
  • 00:00:04
    over military bases and sometimes people
  • 00:00:06
    get arrested for doing that they are
  • 00:00:08
    small drones and big
  • 00:00:09
    drones but there's no good evidence that
  • 00:00:12
    any of the recent Spate of large drone
  • 00:00:14
    sightings in New Jersey are actually
  • 00:00:17
    large
  • 00:00:18
    drones with practice you can identify
  • 00:00:20
    lots of things in the sky sometimes you
  • 00:00:22
    use the shape of the object or its
  • 00:00:24
    lighting configuration sometimes you use
  • 00:00:26
    a site like flight Rader 24 or adsb
  • 00:00:28
    exchange to see what craft are in that
  • 00:00:30
    location or in that direction sometimes
  • 00:00:33
    you look at what stars and planets are
  • 00:00:35
    in the sky and sometimes you look up
  • 00:00:36
    satellites most of these need the date
  • 00:00:39
    time location and the direction the
  • 00:00:41
    camera is looking in date time and
  • 00:00:43
    location are the most important and I
  • 00:00:44
    often refer to these as the details
  • 00:00:48
    dtls in every single case where we have
  • 00:00:50
    the details and in many cases where we
  • 00:00:52
    do not we managed to identify what was
  • 00:00:54
    being looked at in every case it wasn't
  • 00:00:58
    a large drone this triangle drone was a
  • 00:01:01
    C130 this video of eight circling drones
  • 00:01:04
    was a bunch of planes circling in a
  • 00:01:06
    holding pattern this drone was a
  • 00:01:08
    helicopter this video of a mystery drone
  • 00:01:11
    shot by a professional photographer was
  • 00:01:13
    probably Venus out of focus those
  • 00:01:15
    reports from Pilots to air traffic
  • 00:01:17
    control over Oregon were starlink
  • 00:01:19
    satellites New Jersey senator Andy Kim
  • 00:01:22
    saw a lot of drones but he was looking
  • 00:01:23
    up planes something he later discovered
  • 00:01:26
    former Governor Larry Hogan saw drones
  • 00:01:28
    but he was looking at stars and planes
  • 00:01:31
    these stationary drones over the capital
  • 00:01:33
    were just normal incoming air traffic
  • 00:01:35
    far away so seeming not to move much but
  • 00:01:38
    they did move a reporter claimed to see
  • 00:01:40
    drones but he shows video of what were
  • 00:01:42
    obviously
  • 00:01:44
    plained I could go on but the point is
  • 00:01:47
    made every case where there's enough
  • 00:01:49
    information and especially with the
  • 00:01:51
    details the date the time and the
  • 00:01:52
    location what we see are not drones if
  • 00:01:56
    that reporter gave the details we could
  • 00:01:58
    see what aircraft he was looking at
  • 00:02:00
    the government is slow and the military
  • 00:02:02
    is both slow and cautious but they've
  • 00:02:04
    all started to come around with the DHS
  • 00:02:06
    and the FBI saying on December the 12th
  • 00:02:09
    we have no evidence at this time that
  • 00:02:10
    the reported drone sightings pose a
  • 00:02:12
    national security or Public Safety
  • 00:02:14
    threat or have a foreign Nexus upon
  • 00:02:16
    review of available imagery it appears
  • 00:02:19
    that many of the reported sightings are
  • 00:02:21
    actually manned aircraft operating
  • 00:02:22
    lawfully there are no reported or
  • 00:02:25
    confirmed drone sightings in any
  • 00:02:27
    restricted airspace is it just massive
  • 00:02:29
    hysteria social contagion a collective
  • 00:02:32
    delusion mostly yes remember the zero
  • 00:02:36
    evidence of any large drones in New
  • 00:02:38
    Jersey and dozens of confirmed
  • 00:02:41
    misidentifications drones are a real
  • 00:02:43
    thing and they represent real security
  • 00:02:46
    concerns China is probably using them to
  • 00:02:49
    spy on us but what we are seeing here is
  • 00:02:52
    really just a really large flap just
  • 00:02:55
    with drones instead of
  • 00:02:57
    UFOs eventually as no drones found it
  • 00:03:00
    will fade from the public Consciousness
  • 00:03:02
    but many diard Believers especially in
  • 00:03:04
    the UFO Community will never let it go
  • 00:03:07
    but there's nothing here there's no good
  • 00:03:09
    evidence and if you think you've got it
  • 00:03:11
    post your video with the details post
  • 00:03:13
    the exact date time location and the
  • 00:03:16
    direction you're facing and we'll check
  • 00:03:18
    to see if it's a plane a planet or a
  • 00:03:20
    satellite maybe we'll find a drone but
  • 00:03:22
    right now it seems to be all
  • 00:03:25
    misidentification these calls for Action
  • 00:03:27
    the calls for legislation the calls to
  • 00:03:29
    shoot down lights in the sky which are
  • 00:03:31
    probably passenger planes and the wild
  • 00:03:34
    theories about secret drones hunting
  • 00:03:36
    nuclear weapons all that has no basis in
  • 00:03:39
    reality
Tags
  • drones
  • misidentification
  • New Jersey
  • government
  • national security
  • military bases
  • social contagion
  • details
  • accuracy
  • legislation