Money, Power and Wall Street, Part One (full documentary) | FRONTLINE
概要
TLDRThis episode of Frontline delves into the financial crisis of 2008, exploring its roots in Wall Street's risky financial practices and innovations. The investigation highlights key financial instruments like credit default swaps and synthetic CDOs, which allowed banks to engage in excessive risk-taking without adequate oversight. It portrays how JP Morgan pioneered these instruments, initially to stabilize risk, but leading to a banking system that was unprepared for the cascading failures. The episode covers the public's anger epitomized by the Occupy Wall Street movement, which protested against the perceived bailout of banks at the expense of the average citizen. The show also traces the impact of deregulation, which left the derivatives market largely unchecked, accelerating the crisis when the housing market finally collapsed. Despite clear signals, many top bankers believed erroneously that housing prices would continue to rise, exacerbating the issue until the eventual economic fallout.
収穫
- 💡Key role of credit default swaps in financial crisis.
- 🏦 JPMorgan's role in creating complex financial instruments.
- 📉 Collapse of the housing market due to risky financial practices.
- 🚫 Public perception of unfairness in bailout policies.
- 📚 Lack of understanding about financial risks by regulators.
- 🌍 Global impact of the US financial crisis.
- 💰 Effects of deregulation on banks' risk exposure.
- 📈 Misbelief in perpetual rise of housing prices.
- 📊 Private, unregulated market for derivatives fueled crisis.
- 👥 Occupy Wall Street's response highlighted public outrage.
タイムライン
- 00:00:00 - 00:05:00
Introduction: The opening sets the stage for a deep exploration of the financial crisis, highlighting critical aspects like Wall Street's bailout and the neglect of Main Street. It demonstrates the far-reaching impact of Wall Street decisions, framing the economic collapse as a complex intertwining of reckless banking practices and regulatory failures.
- 00:05:00 - 00:10:00
Wall Street's Power: Wall Street is portrayed as a cornerstone of the American economy, characterized by immense influence and a significant role in the financial crisis. The narrative points to the disparity between Wall Street's recovery and Main Street's ongoing struggles, underscoring the demand for accountability and reform from movements like Occupy Wall Street.
- 00:10:00 - 00:15:00
Complexity and Confusion: This section highlights the complexity of financial instruments like derivatives and CDOs, which contributed to the crisis. It showcases the lack of understanding among regulators and banking officials about the risks involved, emphasizing the unprecedented and confusing nature of the financial mechanisms at work.
- 00:15:00 - 00:20:00
Origins of Derivatives: The development of credit default swaps (CDSs) is traced back to innovative meetings by young JP Morgan bankers. This innovation aimed to mitigate risk but inadvertently led to widespread and unregulated derivatives trading, transforming industry practices and focusing on profit over safety.
- 00:20:00 - 00:25:00
Risk and Regulation: The intent behind derivatives was to spread and manage risk, yet their unregulated nature became a focal point of controversy. Attempts to regulate these products were met with opposition. The section delves into the political and industrial battles over transparency and regulation, highlighting influential figures like Brooksley Born.
- 00:25:00 - 00:30:00
Deregulation Consequences: Deregulation in the banking sector enabled the unchecked growth of derivative markets, ultimately worsening the financial crisis. The narrative connects deregulation with the burst of the housing bubble, demonstrating how regulatory oversights allowed banks to take excessive risks and threaten economic stability.
- 00:30:00 - 00:35:00
Subprime Mortgage Boom: Wall Street's pursuit of high-yield, high-risk products fostered an investment frenzy in subprime mortgages. While lucrative for banks, this enthusiasm ultimately led to predatory lending practices and an unsustainable housing boom, causing distress when the market collapsed.
- 00:35:00 - 00:40:00
Bubble Burst: As the housing market declined, the banks' irresponsible practices were exposed. The story follows the cascading effects of declining housing prices, leading to financial turmoil. Unprepared and overwhelmed, banks faced massive losses, partially due to overleveraged positions and systemic risk mismanagement.
- 00:40:00 - 00:45:00
Wall Street Bets: The final chapters examine how banks, notably Goldman Sachs, maneuvered to profit amidst the downfall, even at clients' expense. It exposes the inherent conflicts within financial institutions, leading to profound ethical questions about corporate responsibility and client interests.
- 00:45:00 - 00:53:18
Fallout: The conclusion portrays the aftermath of the crisis, marked by widespread economic damage and recovery struggles across affected regions. It illustrates the lasting harm inflicted on communities and highlights the failings of financial institutions to mitigate and foresee the impacts of their risk-laden strategies.
マインドマップ
ビデオQ&A
What event is primarily being investigated in this episode?
The 2008 financial crisis and its origins.
Who does FRONTLINE suggest is responsible for the financial crisis?
Wall Street banks, due to risky financial practices.
What financial instrument played a key role in the crisis?
Credit default swaps and synthetic CDOs.
How did Occupy Wall Street respond to the financial crisis?
They held demonstrations to hold bankers accountable.
What was the public's perception of the economic recovery post-crisis?
Wall Street was seen as bailed out while Main Street suffered.
What role did JP Morgan play in the crisis?
They innovated credit default swaps, allowing banks to reduce capital reserves.
What was the impact of deregulation on banks?
It allowed excessive risk-taking with little oversight.
How did subprime mortgages contribute to the crisis?
They were bundled into risky CDOs, leading to widespread defaults.
Did regulators understand the risk in financial innovations like derivatives?
No, many regulators and credit agencies failed to grasp the risks.
What was a common belief among bankers regarding housing prices?
They believed housing prices would never fall, leading to flawed risk assessments.
ビデオをもっと見る
AI for Business: #1 Introduction to AI (types, how it works, and use-cases)
Elements of Music
🎵 Pythagorean tuning
The Corruption That's Happening Is Deeper Than You Know | Fred Kreuger
everything you need to know about keio pearl pt.2 (very realistic + watch it before you apply)
5 Steps to Start Making $10,000/Month Writing Online
- 00:00:04>> Tonight on FRONTLINE Episode One of a special four-hour investigation.
- 00:00:10>> You created the mess we're in and now you're saying sorry?
- 00:00:16>> Inside the financial crisis...
- 00:00:20>> Wall Street got bailed out and Main Street didn't.
- 00:00:22>> How did we get here?
- 00:00:26>> Other banks were taking these ideas and applying them in ways that they'd never expected.
- 00:00:29>> Once the seed was planted there wasn't any stopping it.
- 00:00:33>> We never imagined they were just taking the risk and it came right back like a boomerang
- 00:00:37it turned into a Frankenstein monster.
- 00:00:40>> Money, Power and Wall Street: Episode One.
- 00:00:41Tonight on FRONTLINE.
- 00:00:44>> Every day, tens of thousands of workers make their way to Wall Street.
- 00:01:07They work for banks, brokerages, hedge funds, insurance companies and mortgage lenders.
- 00:01:15It is the largest single sector of the American economy, an industry that is almost double
- 00:01:22the size of America's manufacturing sector, a business with enormous power and global
- 00:01:32reach.
- 00:01:33It is the industry that led America and the world into its worst economic crisis since
- 00:01:39the Great Depression.
- 00:01:51The banks say they exist to create wealth, holding in trust our collective worth, promising
- 00:01:58to invest the trillions of dollars that stream in from businesses, pension funds and savings
- 00:02:03accounts that belong to all of us.
- 00:02:12One morning in the fall of 2011, bankers arriving in Lower Manhattan were caught by surprise.
- 00:02:18>> This is what democracy looks like!
- 00:02:19We got sold out, banks got bailed out!
- 00:02:20>> On the sidewalk!
- 00:02:21You must go on the sidewalk!
- 00:02:24>> The recession had destroyed $11 trillion of Americans' net worth.
- 00:02:29A recovery seemed far off.
- 00:02:32Occupy Wall Street wanted bankers held responsible.
- 00:02:37>> Most Americans think, and with good reason, that Wall Street got bailed out and Main Street
- 00:02:42didn't.
- 00:02:43We have very high unemployment.
- 00:02:46We lost 8.5 million jobs in the recession.
- 00:02:50People's houses aren't worth what they paid for them.
- 00:02:52A lot of them don't have jobs.
- 00:02:53Their kids are graduating from college and are moving back in.
- 00:02:56>> This is what democracy looks like!
- 00:02:59>> It is pretty clear, actually, that there was massive illegality going on.
- 00:03:05And if somebody with subpoena power was intent on prosecuting that, I don't think there's
- 00:03:11really much doubt that they would be quite successful in criminal prosecutions.
- 00:03:15>> We are the 99 percent!
- 00:03:18We are the 99 percent!
- 00:03:21>> In a matter of weeks, Occupy demonstrations spread to scores of cities across America
- 00:03:27and the world, calling for radical changes in the banking system.
- 00:03:36Bankers responded by saying that the answer is to move on and get back to business.
- 00:03:40>> Some of our companies made a series of bad mistakes, and— and— and— and we
- 00:03:46all paid for them, including— and— and— and it lead to the economic crisis.
- 00:03:50>> But what makes people upset is that — I mean, what— you know, a lot of the people
- 00:03:55that are on the streets demonstrating, Occupy Wall Street — is that the economy hasn't
- 00:04:00recovered but banks have.
- 00:04:02>> If you want a strong economy, you have to have financial services companies that
- 00:04:05are safe and sound and able to lend and able to finance their— their customers.
- 00:04:10Now, if you want to have a recession, then go ahead and— and— and hammer the banks,
- 00:04:14and you know, make sure that they're— that they fail because then you'll have another
- 00:04:18recession.
- 00:04:19>> Do you understand why they're angry?
- 00:04:22Do you have any comment?
- 00:04:24Mr. Blankfein, can we ask you a question, sir?
- 00:04:26Can you give the American people an accounting of how you spent their money?
- 00:04:29And do you understand why it is they're are angry at bankers?
- 00:04:32Do you have any regrets about the way you spent the taxpayers' money?
- 00:04:39>> Since the meltdown of 2008, there have been dozens of hearings.
- 00:04:44>> —and we regret that people have lost money.
- 00:04:48And whatever we did, whatever the standards of the time were, it didn't work out well.
- 00:04:54>> I would like to ask your opinion of the role that over-the-counter derivatives played—
- 00:04:59>> Many questions have been asked—
- 00:05:01>> —in contributing to the financial crisis.
- 00:05:04>> —but there have been few satisfying answers.
- 00:05:07>> What goes on at Wall Street and exactly what caused the crisis and how did we get
- 00:05:10where we are— it's difficult to understand even for professionals.
- 00:05:14>> I'm not sure I understand that point.
- 00:05:15Maybe you could elaborate.
- 00:05:16>> Well, I think that it's— in many ways, is very simple.
- 00:05:19I think our regulators and the industry have to focus on complexity.
- 00:05:23>> But at the end of the day, people usually have a pretty good ability to tell when something's
- 00:05:28wrong.
- 00:05:29>> Somehow, we just missed, you know, that home prices don't go up forever.
- 00:05:34>> What is a synthetic CDO?
- 00:05:37>> A CDO is a pool of assets—
- 00:05:42>> I think finance may have gotten too complicated for anyone to understand—
- 00:05:47>> —that are pooled together and then can be sliced.
- 00:05:51In a synthetic, you pool reference securities that are indexed to specific more pools of
- 00:05:58mortgage.
- 00:05:59>> —and that the managers of these large financial institutions in some ways have been
- 00:06:03given an impossible task, that they won't be able to comprehend what it is their institutions
- 00:06:09are doing.
- 00:06:10And that is really, really scary.
- 00:06:12>> You created the mess we're in, and now you're saying, "Sorry.
- 00:06:17Trust us."
- 00:06:18You created CDOs.
- 00:06:19You created credit default swaps that never existed a few years ago.
- 00:06:23Who was the brilliant person who came and said, "Let's do credit default swaps?"
- 00:06:29Find him!
- 00:06:30Fire him!
- 00:06:34>> It's hard to pinpoint the origins of America's financial crisis, but one weekend at this
- 00:06:42resort in Boca Raton, Florida, is a good place to start.
- 00:06:48Assembled here in June 1994 were a group of young bankers from JP Morgan.
- 00:06:54At the time, it all seemed innocent enough.
- 00:06:58>> Boca Raton was a gathering of people that were part of the Global Derivative Group at
- 00:07:05JP Morgan, in part as a celebration, in part as an opportunity to relax, but perhaps much
- 00:07:10more importantly, as an opportunity to get creative, innovative people together in a
- 00:07:17room to discuss a whole variety of different topics.
- 00:07:21..And since they were young, mostly in their 20s, and since there was plenty of money floating
- 00:07:26around and they were full of high spirits, they did what any young bunch of kids would
- 00:07:30do and they got drunk.
- 00:07:32They had parties.
- 00:07:33They threw each other in pools.
- 00:07:35You know, this is the normal stuff that happens at conferences.
- 00:07:38>> Yes, I went into the pool fully clothed, as did— as did my boss.
- 00:07:44Some people drank, some people didn't.
- 00:07:46And I'm happy to say that, like, most people stayed reasonably sober.
- 00:07:50>> They played hard.
- 00:07:52But they also worked hard.
- 00:07:54They were striving to address an age-old problem in banking, how to reduce risk.
- 00:08:03The first journalist to tell the full story was Gillian Tett.
- 00:08:07>> They began to look for ways to enable financial institutions to pass risk between
- 00:08:13them.
- 00:08:14One way to do that was to sell loans.
- 00:08:16Another way, though, was to separate out the risk of a loan going bad from the loan itself.
- 00:08:23And out of that came this drive to develop credit default swaps.
- 00:08:31>> Credit default swaps, a kind of derivative that insures a loan against default.
- 00:08:38Traditionally, derivatives were a way to bet on the future value of something.
- 00:08:43For hundreds of years, farmers have traded derivatives to protect themselves against
- 00:08:47fluctuating crop prices.
- 00:08:51It is this type of derivative that has been traded on the Commodities Exchange in Chicago,
- 00:08:56along with the futures of fuels, currencies and precious metals.
- 00:09:02In Boca Raton, the JP Morgan team realized that they could use credit derivatives to
- 00:09:07trade their loan risks.
- 00:09:10>> Bankers borrowed one set of ideas that had been developed in the commodities market
- 00:09:15and applied it to loans for the first time.
- 00:09:17This idea was essentially created under the banner of making the financial system safer.
- 00:09:25>> The first big credit default swap was engineered by Blythe Masters and involved Exxon.
- 00:09:31>> Exxon was the client at the bank, and we had credit exposure associated with that
- 00:09:36relationship.
- 00:09:37>> The Exxon Valdez spewed almost 11 million gallons of oil into Prince William Sound.
- 00:09:43>> In the wake of the Exxon Valdez oil spill and a rash of lawsuits, Exxon took out a multi-billion
- 00:09:52dollar letter of credit with JP Morgan.
- 00:09:56>> A letter of credit creates credit risk.
- 00:09:58If Exxon were to fail on their obligations, then JP Morgan would have to step in and make
- 00:10:03good on those obligations on their behalf.
- 00:10:05There was a large amount of exposure, and there was a significant amount of risk associated
- 00:10:10with that.
- 00:10:11>> And that risk is a big drain on a bank.
- 00:10:16>> Every time a bank makes a loan, under banking regulations, they're required to set aside
- 00:10:23certain reserves of capital for the loan.
- 00:10:25So JP Morgan, when they made the loan to Exxon, would have had to set aside some capital.
- 00:10:31>> JP Morgan has to hold a certain capital relative to the size of that loan in the event
- 00:10:36the loan is not paid off at 100 percent as you expect.
- 00:10:39Well, of course, if you don't have to do that and you're a bank, you— you'd prefer not
- 00:10:44to do that.
- 00:10:45>> Because then you can finance more freely?
- 00:10:47You can take on more debt?
- 00:10:49>> Right.
- 00:10:51>> So Masters started looking at who could take on their loan risk and free up JP Morgan's
- 00:10:56capital.
- 00:10:57She found a taker in London, the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, the
- 00:11:05EBRD.
- 00:11:06>> EBRD would receive compensation from JP Morgan for taking on or assuming credit risk,
- 00:11:12and felt that that was a good risk/reward proposition.
- 00:11:16And so risk was essentially dispersed.
- 00:11:18And why did JP Morgan do that?
- 00:11:21Because we wanted to free up our capacity to do more business.
- 00:11:25>> This was a major financial innovation.
- 00:11:28Credit derivatives made it possible for a bank to skirt capital requirements.
- 00:11:33>> And that's what actually happened, is the amount of capital that banks had to hold got
- 00:11:37less.
- 00:11:38And so banks became able to create more and more credit.
- 00:11:41They could make more loans.
- 00:11:43>> The Exxon deal was just the beginning, demonstrating that risk could be off-loaded
- 00:11:48and capital freed up.
- 00:11:50JP Morgan had struck gold.
- 00:11:53In 1998, they decided to ramp up their credit derivatives operation.
- 00:11:57That year, another young banker joined the team, Terri Duhon.
- 00:12:02>> Part of my job was to come in as a trader and to build a credit derivative trading book,
- 00:12:07including all the risk management around the more exotic products.
- 00:12:10That was what I was brought in to do.
- 00:12:14>> Previously JP Morgan had written credit swaps on single companies like Exxon.
- 00:12:18Duhon was asked to write swaps on bundles of debt.
- 00:12:23>> The idea was, "Let's put together a portfolio of credit risk, a portfolio of names."
- 00:12:28>> Her first trade was a credit default swap on 306 corporate names on JP Morgan's books.
- 00:12:37>> And that list of 306 entities, they were very highly rated.
- 00:12:41They had very low credit risk.
- 00:12:43>> And the credit default swap was ensuring JP Morgan against default by those 306 entities—
- 00:12:49>> That's correct.
- 00:12:50>> —many of them Fortune 500 companies or other—
- 00:12:52>> It would have been— it would have been your— some of your most well known household
- 00:12:56names.
- 00:12:57And so we were giving investors an opportunity to, in effect, invest in our loan portfolio.
- 00:13:05>> JP Morgan did a lot of work, did a lot of due diligence to assemble this portfolio
- 00:13:09of loans.
- 00:13:10And you can get it in one easy bite-sized piece.
- 00:13:14>> And the bank facilitated this by slicing up the portfolio into different risk levels,
- 00:13:20or tranches.
- 00:13:22Investors could choose how much risk they were willing to take.
- 00:13:26>> Different investors wanted different levels of risk.
- 00:13:28There were some investors that wanted to earn a big return on really risky stuff, and there
- 00:13:33were some investors that wanted to earn a little return on stuff that wasn't risky at
- 00:13:37all.
- 00:13:38>> From there, the bank looked to expand their business even further.
- 00:13:42>> So along comes this idea.
- 00:13:44What if we could create a market where people were able to buy and sell freely, independently
- 00:13:49of the companies themselves, the risk associated with lending to those companies?
- 00:13:54>> And so they began selling derivatives that were simply bets on any and all portfolios,
- 00:14:00whether the bank owned them or not.
- 00:14:05These products came to be known as synthetic collateralized debt obligations, synthetic
- 00:14:10CDOs.
- 00:14:13>> There were investors who were able to invest in some entities that they had not had access
- 00:14:18to before.
- 00:14:19>> By buying a credit default swap.
- 00:14:21>> By investing in a credit default swap because it was a name that they hadn't previously
- 00:14:24had access to.
- 00:14:25So there was a lot of— a lot of very positive reinforcement of the market.
- 00:14:31And it just grew.
- 00:14:32It grew very naturally.
- 00:14:34Once the seed was planted, there wasn't any stopping it.
- 00:14:38>> It was the beginning of an unfettered brave new world of banking.
- 00:14:43>> This was pretty new stuff.
- 00:14:46>> This was— [laughs] This was incredibly new stuff.
- 00:14:49It was amazing.
- 00:14:50It was clearly a product that was in need.
- 00:14:53We had identified a need.
- 00:14:56>> Most of the members of the global derivatives group at JP Morgan were in their 20s, including
- 00:15:01Masters and Duhon.
- 00:15:03But with the creation of the credit default swap market, they had made banking history.
- 00:15:09>> What in the long run this all meant was that credit, which is a vital part of the
- 00:15:14lifeblood of any economy, the global economy, became a more readily available asset.
- 00:15:21And the thinking was that that would be an unambiguously positive thing.
- 00:15:28Credit helps drive growth, helps companies deploy capital, helps employment, et cetera.
- 00:15:33It wasn't any longer just an idea in a room in Florida, it was the creation of an entire
- 00:15:42marketplace.
- 00:15:47>> Risk could now be easily traded.
- 00:15:49It fueled a worldwide credit boom.
- 00:15:56Soon other banks got excited about the money to be made writing credit derivatives.
- 00:16:05Paul LeBlanc was a derivative salesman at Morgan Stanley who remembers the pressure
- 00:16:12to get more deals done.
- 00:16:15>> The volume of transactions was just exploding.
- 00:16:17I mean, I used to know all the statistics because they used to talk about it every meeting,
- 00:16:22how this is a growing market and you have to get your customers involved.
- 00:16:27They can make money.
- 00:16:28We can make money.
- 00:16:31It was a massively important sector for us to focus on, derivatives.
- 00:16:36>> And importantly, it was a private market, unregulated, and out of view.
- 00:16:42>> —the Dow up just about two and three quarters of—
- 00:16:44>> See, unlike an exchange-traded market where all the banks can see all the positions, there's
- 00:16:49no public market for these derivatives.
- 00:16:51You can't look in the newspaper and get a price for them.
- 00:16:54These are all private off-exchange markets.
- 00:16:56And nobody else in the market knows what's going on.
- 00:17:00>> And because this market was opaque, the spreads — the difference between what banks
- 00:17:05could charge for derivatives and what it cost to provide them — could be huge.
- 00:17:11>> How much were these things making for the bankers that were selling them?
- 00:17:15>> The spreads on derivatives are several times larger than on comparable cash securities,
- 00:17:20just as a general rule.
- 00:17:21And that's why the banks trade them.
- 00:17:23>> Cash securities being those that are— >> Equities, bonds—
- 00:17:26>> Well, paint some picture of that and the kind of money that people were making.
- 00:17:30>> The best reference that you could give is that if you look at, say, the spread that
- 00:17:34a bank might earn doing an IPO for FaceBook, they're going to maybe make 1 percent to bring
- 00:17:40out that IPO, a very hot IPO.
- 00:17:44If you were doing the same size deal in a derivative security, you might make 10 times
- 00:17:49the fee.
- 00:17:52>> And the basic business that they created was immensely profitable.
- 00:17:56But there's a problem with all of this.
- 00:18:00Most people in finance assume risk can be eliminated, but all you can do is to move
- 00:18:05it around from one party to another party.
- 00:18:15>> There was growing concern in Washington.
- 00:18:18>> We are moving towards greater risk.
- 00:18:21We must do something to address the regulation of hedge funds and especially derivatives
- 00:18:26in this country, $33 trillion, a substantial amount of it held by the 25 largest banks
- 00:18:32in this country, a substantial amount being traded in proprietary accounts of those banks.
- 00:18:37That kind of risk overhanging the financial institutions of this country one day, with
- 00:18:42a thud, will wake everyone up.
- 00:18:47>> Proposals circulated to rein in the banks and to regulate derivatives.
- 00:18:52>> What are you trying to protect?
- 00:18:55>> We're trying to protect the money of the American public, which is at risk in these
- 00:19:00markets.
- 00:19:01>> The head of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Brooksley Born, led the charge.
- 00:19:05>> Certainly, we are the regulator which has been given the authority to oversee the major
- 00:19:14derivatives markets— >> Brooksley Born was absolutely right because
- 00:19:19what she said is if you don't have transparency and regulation of derivatives, the risk is
- 00:19:23going to build up and they're going to lead to a financial crisis that's going to cause
- 00:19:27massive taxpayer bailouts.
- 00:19:29>> The banks lobbied hard for no derivative regulation.
- 00:19:33>> The banks didn't want anyone to know how much risk they were taking on.
- 00:19:37They didn't want to have to quantify it on their balance sheet.
- 00:19:39They wanted to be able to push it off and hide it.
- 00:19:41And that was why they lobbied so hard to make sure that swaps and derivatives would be treated
- 00:19:46differently from other kinds of financial products.
- 00:19:50>> Others wanted them to be regulated like insurance.
- 00:19:54>> One of the most heavily regulated products in the country are insurance products, for
- 00:19:59all the obvious reasons.
- 00:20:00If you're going to— if you're going to write insurance, you have to have enough money to
- 00:20:04pay off that insurance.
- 00:20:05>> But if you write a credit default swap, you don't have to have that same amount of
- 00:20:08money on hand.
- 00:20:09>> Or anything else, including, importantly, no disclosure.
- 00:20:13>> So you're saying it's a kind of under-the-table insurance agreement that avoids regulation.
- 00:20:18>> It's an insurance product designed not to be regulated as an insurance product and
- 00:20:22designed to avoid regulation at all.
- 00:20:24And one thing we do know is that when a product of any type is designed with minimal regulation,
- 00:20:30capital and activity moves into that area and it expands dramatically.
- 00:20:36>> Regulation of derivatives transactions that are privately negotiated by professionals
- 00:20:42is unnecessary.
- 00:20:44>> The chairman of the Fed, Alan Greenspan, sided with the banks.
- 00:20:48>> Alan Greenspan was coming from a very libertarian tradition.
- 00:20:54Keep your hands off everything.
- 00:20:56The markets will sort themselves out.
- 00:20:58And if there's a problem, then we'll clean up afterwards.
- 00:21:02And now that— that really was the way the Federal Reserve operated under— under his
- 00:21:06leadership for almost 20 years.
- 00:21:13>> On Capitol Hill, supporters of bank deregulation made urgent, stark pleas.
- 00:21:19>> The future of America's dominance as the financial center of the world is at stake.
- 00:21:24>> Before them was legislation to lift restrictions on how banks could do business.
- 00:21:29>> If we didn't pass this bill, we could find London or Frankfurt or Shanghai becoming the
- 00:21:35financial capital of the world.
- 00:21:37>> This bill is going to make America more competitive on the world market, and that's
- 00:21:42important.
- 00:21:43>> And legislation to prevent oversight of credit derivatives.
- 00:21:46>> —high-paying jobs not just on Wall Street in New York City, but it affects every business
- 00:21:54in America and it benefits every consumer in America.
- 00:21:58And we do it by repealing Glass-Steagall.
- 00:22:00>> It's the most important example of our efforts here in Washington to maximize the
- 00:22:07possibilities of the new information age global economy.
- 00:22:16>> In the end, banks would get larger and derivatives would remain in the shadows.
- 00:22:22>> The derivatives market went into darkness, almost no transparency and no regulation.
- 00:22:28And what you see is this explosion in the growth of derivatives in the United States
- 00:22:34and throughout the world.
- 00:22:35>> The banks had won the day.
- 00:22:41Credit default swaps would now be introduced to new markets.
- 00:22:48>> The next application of this same technology was to portfolios of consumer credit risk,
- 00:22:54and in particular.
- 00:22:55mortgage-related credit risk.
- 00:22:58>> And the higher the risk, the better.
- 00:23:03>> What everyone is trying to create is something that has a high rating and a high yield.
- 00:23:12That's the holy grail, that's the goal, is to mix together assets in some way so that
- 00:23:18you come out with a AAA, and a big return.
- 00:23:24>> And so Wall Street discovered the rewards of funding the American dream.
- 00:23:32Just as they had bundled corporate loans, bankers now bundled mortgages.
- 00:23:36>> You would buy these big pools of mortgages, and these credit default swaps enabled you
- 00:23:43to bundle all this stuff together, bring it in-house, in order to get it ready to put
- 00:23:47through the sausage-making machine and create these securities.
- 00:23:54>> Bankers spread their investing dollars across the country, but especially in states
- 00:23:59seeing historic levels of population growth, places like Florida, Nevada, California, and
- 00:24:07here, in Georgia.
- 00:24:08>> Well, Atlanta was one of the hottest markets in the country, the Atlanta region.
- 00:24:15>> Roy Barnes is the former governor of Georgia.
- 00:24:17>> Georgia was the fourth fastest growing state at the turn of this last century, and
- 00:24:24the fastest growing state east of the Mississippi.
- 00:24:27So it was a hot market to start with.
- 00:24:31>> Elected in 1998, Barnes is renowned for having taken on Wall Street over subprime
- 00:24:36lending, a market the Street had traditionally avoided.
- 00:24:40>> And in the ‘80s, there was no place for subprime.
- 00:24:45Nobody wanted it.
- 00:24:46The banks wouldn't buy it because there was a higher risk.
- 00:24:50>> What really changed the appetite for subprime mortgages was you could securitize them.
- 00:24:57And you could sell it on Wall Street.
- 00:24:59They do it in tranches, and then they wrap it up so they could be packaged together and
- 00:25:12have an overall higher yield.
- 00:25:14>> Nearly half of all new single-family home construction is in the South, now more than
- 00:25:2150,000 a month.
- 00:25:22>> And of course, Moody's says AAA.
- 00:25:33So it was just a feeding frenzy.
- 00:25:35I mean, it was just an absolute feeding frenzy for subprime mortgages.
- 00:25:41>> With the economy strong, home buyers are willing and able to spend double what they
- 00:25:45did just two decades ago.
- 00:25:48>> And you could just about drive by a bank, and they'd throw a loan paper in your car
- 00:25:53as you passed by.
- 00:25:55It became very loose.
- 00:25:57Became very loose.
- 00:26:00>> But what big banks on Wall Street did not or would not see was what was happening on
- 00:26:05the ground around the U.S., a wave of lending abuses.
- 00:26:13>> The Wild West experience in home mortgages was well under way.
- 00:26:18>> Forty one year old Hessiemay Hector, mother of three, agreed to a second mortgage at 27.5
- 00:26:25percent.
- 00:26:26>> We were creating mortgages that we had never seen before.
- 00:26:30And they were being created faster and faster.
- 00:26:32>> The interest rate on these loans was as high as 42 percent.
- 00:26:37>> We saw borrowers given loans that were greater than the value of their home.
- 00:26:43Home buyers were getting loans that had no income.
- 00:26:46>> When you have a high interest rate, then you have high points.
- 00:26:49Then you have pre-payment penalties, when you have balloon payments, when you have adjustable-rate
- 00:26:54mortgages and when you layer those bad practices on top of a high interest rate, it becomes
- 00:27:01predatory.
- 00:27:03>> Housing advocates around the country took on predatory lenders.
- 00:27:08But one of the fiercest fights was here in Georgia, over what was called the Georgia
- 00:27:18Fair Lending Act.
- 00:27:20>> It's up right now on the House floor, a governor's bill to crack down on—
- 00:27:23>> The mortgage lenders and the banks struck back.
- 00:27:25>> None of these people have a clue of what's going on!
- 00:27:28Nobody here understands the business, and they didn't let us speak!
- 00:27:32>> You would have thought I had recommended that we repeal the plan of Salvation.
- 00:27:40Why were they so opposed to it?
- 00:27:43Money.
- 00:27:44Money. >> This bill will cripple the mortgage business!
- 00:27:48It's going to cripple real estate sales!
- 00:27:49It's going to absolutely devastate the home market in Georgia, I can guarantee you!
- 00:27:54>> There were threats that the residents in Georgia wouldn't be able to get mortgages
- 00:27:57anymore because investors would not buy the mortgages in Georgia.
- 00:28:01And if that were true, no bank would create a mortgage in Georgia.
- 00:28:06>> Georgia now has the toughest predatory lending law in the nation—
- 00:28:11>> Despite the efforts of the mortgage lobby, the bill passed.
- 00:28:15Fearing similar bills in other states, the lobby helped to unseat Barnes, and rescind
- 00:28:20the law.
- 00:28:21>> Right after the Governor Barnes's defeat in November, one of the top legislative priorities
- 00:28:26for the new governor and the new legislature was to gut the Georgia Fair Lending Act.
- 00:28:31I think it was about two weeks into the new legislative session, and it was gutted.
- 00:28:36>> No let-up in the housing boom, which is good for the economy.
- 00:28:42Homes were selling last month at a record clip, the main reason, low mortgage rates—
- 00:28:46>> The big banks continued to package and sell more mortgage portfolios.
- 00:28:52And more and more of these CDOs contained high-risk subprime debt.
- 00:28:58To keep the rating agencies on board, more credit default swaps were sold.
- 00:29:04>> Let's say I have a pool of mortgages.
- 00:29:06I have a thousand mortgages from California, and I want to package these up.
- 00:29:10But I decide, "Well, some of these mortgages may be subprime, and I want to buy a little
- 00:29:15bit of credit default insurance."
- 00:29:18>> And by doing that, you improve the profile- >> In theory, yes.
- 00:29:21>> —of your CDO- >> That's right.
- 00:29:22>> —so that you can sell it better.
- 00:29:23>> And I can go get a rating for it, too.
- 00:29:25I could go to Moody's and say, "Look, I have laid off 2 percent of the risk on this portfolio.
- 00:29:30Shouldn't I get a better rating than if I just sold the pool as it was?"
- 00:29:34>> So you take a lot of crap- >> That's right.
- 00:29:36>> —a lot of mortgages that are- >> Hideous crap. [laughs]
- 00:29:38>> —people are not going to pay— right.
- 00:29:40OK.
- 00:29:41But you insure it, and the credit agency says, "Hey, that's a good idea."
- 00:29:45>> Yes.
- 00:29:46Yes.
- 00:29:47>> New home sales jumped 13 percent over a year ago, while existing home sales rose 4.5
- 00:29:53percent, setting a new record— >> The team at JP Morgan was also dabbling
- 00:29:57in mortgage debt, but they weren't sure it made good sense.
- 00:30:03>> We traded mortgages.
- 00:30:04We had some mortgages on our books.
- 00:30:06We certainly understood the mortgage-backed security market.
- 00:30:12But we had a lot of trouble getting comfortable with that risk.
- 00:30:20The big hang-up for us was data.
- 00:30:24We had years and years of historical data about how corporates performed during business
- 00:30:30cycles.
- 00:30:31But we didn't have that much data about how retail mortgages performed during different
- 00:30:36business cycles.
- 00:30:39>> We knew how much money people said they were making.
- 00:30:42We saw that UBS and Merrill Lynch had securitized products earnings that were growing faster
- 00:30:47than ours.
- 00:30:48And we asked ourselves the question, "What are we doing wrong?
- 00:30:51What are we missing?
- 00:30:52Have we not figured out how to lay off some of this risk?"
- 00:30:54And honestly, we couldn't figure it out.
- 00:30:56What we never imagined was that those other firms weren't doing anything at all.
- 00:31:00They were just taking the risk and sitting with it.
- 00:31:02>> Sales of new single family homes shot up— >> The first wave of JP Morgan bankers who
- 00:31:08had developed these original ideas in the 1990s, when they saw what was starting to
- 00:31:12happen — essentially, other banks were taking these ideas and applying them in ways that
- 00:31:18they had never expected — some of them began to get very worried.
- 00:31:24>> We were just about to say done on a transaction.
- 00:31:27We had a global phone call, and we were discussing the risk that we were about to do, and we
- 00:31:33had discussed it over and over and over.
- 00:31:34And finally, someone on that phone call said, "I'm nervous."
- 00:31:39>> Twice as many home buyers are getting adjustable mortgages—
- 00:31:42>> —a huge increase in new home sales— >> We almost had stopped thinking and stopped
- 00:31:46reassessing the risk as we went along.
- 00:31:48And suddenly, we found ourselves with a product that was vastly different from where we started.
- 00:31:55And every little tweak along the way, we had all said, "Oh, that's OK.
- 00:32:00That's OK.
- 00:32:01That's OK," until suddenly, we all looked up and said, "Hang on, it's not OK."
- 00:32:05>> The world is still living with a lot of big unresolved problems—
- 00:32:10>> Other banks were not so cautious.
- 00:32:12>> —storm clouds on the horizon— >> They aggressively sold subprime CDOs to
- 00:32:16customers all over the world.
- 00:32:19London became a second beachhead for their trading and sales operations.
- 00:32:23>> The stock market's on the rise and economic statistics—
- 00:32:27>> The City of London actually did yeomen's service in creating some of the nastier structures.
- 00:32:33They did this offshore.
- 00:32:34These were not SEC-registered deals.
- 00:32:36These were all private placements.
- 00:32:39So they were going through the legal loopholes.
- 00:32:43>> A group of state-run banks in Germany known as Landesbanks were among the biggest customers.
- 00:32:51Desiree Fixler, who worked at JP Morgan, says she was amazed by these banks' appetite for
- 00:32:57subprime mortgages.
- 00:32:59>> You knew that a core group of banks in Germany would buy anything.
- 00:33:03We strongly believed they were very naive.
- 00:33:05We were amazed that they would buy this.
- 00:33:09It was— I mean, every single person, every sales person, was envious of that particular
- 00:33:15sales person that was able to cover the Landesbanks and IKB because you were in one of the hottest
- 00:33:21seats globally.
- 00:33:22You were going to generate tremendous profit margin.
- 00:33:25They were big buyers.
- 00:33:27>> IKB was very convinced that they were one of the strongest banks in that area.
- 00:33:33They were running around, telling people how good they are in investing.
- 00:33:39>> Multinational Deutsche Bank did several deals with IKB.
- 00:33:43>> Did you think, at the time, that your products were helping IKB, that these were good things
- 00:33:48for them to buy?
- 00:33:49>> Yeah, absolutely.
- 00:33:50Otherwise, we wouldn't have manufactured these products and sold it to them.
- 00:33:54>> So you were bullish on subprime mortgages in the U.S.
- 00:33:59>> We were bullish on the mortgage market in general, and subprime, which was an element
- 00:34:05of it, we were not overly aggressive, but we were a part of that market.
- 00:34:09Absolutely.
- 00:34:10>> Americans are buying real estate in record numbers.
- 00:34:12That demand has given— >> By the end 2005, the total outstanding
- 00:34:17value of credit default swaps around the world was measured in trillions of dollars and was
- 00:34:23doubling every year.
- 00:34:24>> Existing home sales rose 4.5 percent, setting a new record.
- 00:34:29>> Did top management at JP Morgan understand credit derivatives?
- 00:34:33>> Yes, they did.
- 00:34:34Absolutely, they did.
- 00:34:36>> Did they at other banks?
- 00:34:37>> No, not all other banks.
- 00:34:39Certainly not.
- 00:34:40>> Did the regulators understand them?
- 00:34:41>> I don't think the regulators understood.
- 00:34:43I don't think the credit ratings agencies, the bankers or the regulators fully understood
- 00:34:50all of the kinds of credit instruments that we're talking about.
- 00:34:53>> In other words, some big banks simply didn't know what they had in terms of risk.
- 00:34:59>> Certainly, they didn't— they didn't know some of the forms of risk that they had.
- 00:35:02That's exactly right.
- 00:35:03>> Sales were higher than most regions, up more than 40 percent in the West and Northeast—
- 00:35:09>> Housing prices continued to soar.
- 00:35:12>> The average price of a new home grew slightly— >> Banks packaged more and more CDOs.
- 00:35:15Theoretically, there was no limit.
- 00:35:18An investor didn't need to own any actual mortgages.
- 00:35:23So-called synthetic CDOs allowed investors to bet many times over on someone else's portfolio
- 00:35:29of debt. >> It allowed participants— either buying
- 00:35:34or selling, so on either side of the market — to take their positions without being
- 00:35:40constrained by the size of the underlying market.
- 00:35:46>> In synthetic CDOs, all you had to do was make a side bet based on what would happen
- 00:35:51to this group of mortgages and have that be the basis of the CDO.
- 00:35:54The fact that someone had done it one time wouldn't stop you from doing it again and
- 00:36:00again and again.
- 00:36:02>> So how is that different than betting on the outcome of the Super Bowl?
- 00:36:06>> Or a horse race or a craps table.
- 00:36:09There's no different at all.
- 00:36:11It's just a pure bet by somebody who has no economic interest in what they're betting
- 00:36:15on.
- 00:36:16>> We're pretty confident that the housing market's not going to down at all.
- 00:36:19It's just going to go up.
- 00:36:20>> Within a decade, you have the most phenomenal machine anybody's ever seen.
- 00:36:25>> New homes are selling at the second highest rate on record—
- 00:36:29>> We are in a housing boom.
- 00:36:32It's strong right now.
- 00:36:33>> Profits soared 93 percent.
- 00:36:35>> —expected to dole out $36 million in bonuses this year.
- 00:36:43>> Everyone was high-fiving.
- 00:36:44It seemed to be brilliant.
- 00:36:46The combination of free markets, innovation and globalization appeared to have delivered
- 00:36:51this incredibly heady cocktail of tremendous growth.
- 00:36:55>> Top executives will earn as much as $20 million to $50 million—
- 00:36:58>> Between 2003 and 2006, Dick Kovacevich, CEO of Wells Fargo, remembers attending meetings
- 00:37:06with bankers and regulators.
- 00:37:09>> Oftentimes, what would happen at these meetings is— regulators would be there,
- 00:37:14like Chairman Bernanke, and there might be, I don't know, 30, 40 bankers.
- 00:37:19And they would often go around the room and say, "Well, what are you guys seeing out there?"
- 00:37:22You know, "What's working?
- 00:37:23Are you concerned about housing," you know, trying to get input.
- 00:37:28And when they came to me, I would say, "This is toxic waste.
- 00:37:34We're building a bubble.
- 00:37:37We're not going to like the outcome.
- 00:37:39>> What did your fellow bankers say to you when you told them that you thought this stuff
- 00:37:42was toxic?
- 00:37:43>> Well, the ones that were in it said I was wrong and everything's fine.
- 00:37:49"We don't see any losses occurring in this."
- 00:37:54>> But we saw risk all over the place.
- 00:37:59>> There's a great set of adages on Wall Street about where risk will flow.
- 00:38:03And if you ask people, they're basically split between two camps.
- 00:38:06One says that risk will flow to the smartest person, the person who best understands it.
- 00:38:11And the other says that risk will flow to the dumbest person, the person who least understands
- 00:38:15it.
- 00:38:16And at least based on my experience and my understanding of what has been happening in
- 00:38:20the derivatives market, it's the latter.
- 00:38:23>> I was amazed at the interest on the part of investors to invest in a product that was
- 00:38:31highly complex and very risky on top of it.
- 00:38:35>> So let me get this straight.
- 00:38:36You were— you were first to the party.
- 00:38:38You developed this tranching of stuff— >> That's right.
- 00:38:42>> —and writing credit default swaps on it.
- 00:38:45But now everybody else has jumped into the game.
- 00:38:47>> Everybody wants to do it.
- 00:38:48>> But your team decided to stop.
- 00:38:51Why did so many others keep going, marching towards the cliff?
- 00:38:59>> The— I mean, there— I— look, very simply, there are certainly some— some investors,
- 00:39:07some banks, some borrowers who are a bit greedier than they should be.
- 00:39:11>> Goldman Sachs Lloyd Blankfein will take home $53 million.
- 00:39:14>> No one wanted the party to end.
- 00:39:16>> —pocket an estimated $40 million— >> Most banks believed housing prices would
- 00:39:20never go down, let alone crash.
- 00:39:24>> To imagine losses of that severity required very significant assumptions about the path
- 00:39:30of the economy which were just not in people's mind.
- 00:39:33So it required things like assuming that house prices in the United States fell by 25 percent.
- 00:39:39People weren't thinking that way.
- 00:39:40And as long as house prices never fell, then these risks would never come home to roost.
- 00:39:44And that ultimately was obviously very flawed logic.
- 00:39:50>> As interest rates rose early this year, home sales slowed.
- 00:39:53And after years of record appreciation— >> —businesses and individuals do, as well,
- 00:39:57and the cost of borrowing is going up.
- 00:39:59>> The unraveling began in late 2006.
- 00:40:03>> Big trouble for millions of American home owners—
- 00:40:06>> When housing prices started to drop, only a very few bankers could see the bubble they
- 00:40:11were trapped in.
- 00:40:12>> The housing market has turned some mortgages into time bombs.
- 00:40:16>> By 2007, 2008, all the smart money knew the game had ended, and all the banks tried
- 00:40:23to effectively repackage what they were stuck with as quickly as possible and get it off
- 00:40:29their books.
- 00:40:30But there was second parallel movement which was going on, which was all about, "How can
- 00:40:35we take advantage of it?"
- 00:40:37>> The Dow-Jones average seemed in freefall, ending the day down—
- 00:40:40>> One of the Wall Street banks that took advantage of a declining market was Goldman
- 00:40:44Sachs.
- 00:40:45According to a congressional investigation, the bank created a series of CDOs containing
- 00:40:51toxic subprime and then sold them to customers— >> We at Goldman Sachs distinguish ourselves
- 00:40:56by our ability to get things done on behalf of our clients—
- 00:41:00>> —while Goldman Sachs, using credit default swaps, bet against them.
- 00:41:04>> They bet against their own clients, so when the clients lost money, Goldman was making
- 00:41:10money.
- 00:41:11Goldman has a little slogan that the clients come first.
- 00:41:14No, they didn't.
- 00:41:15Not in these transactions.
- 00:41:17Goldman came first, second and third.
- 00:41:19They were really, I think, the only major bank which made money when the housing bubble
- 00:41:23burst.
- 00:41:25>> In a settlement with the SEC, Goldman admitted that some of their marketing materials did
- 00:41:30not disclose important information, but Goldman claimed that their investors were highly sophisticated
- 00:41:37institutions.
- 00:41:38>> Thirty-four subprime mortgage companies have gone bus—
- 00:41:41>> One customer was that German Landesbank, IKB.
- 00:41:43>> Analysts say anyone associated with the subprime market is going to pay the price.
- 00:41:49>> Even when there was a downturn in the markets, they were still buying.
- 00:41:52I mean, the market is telling them.
- 00:41:55It's on the screen.
- 00:41:56There are headlines everywhere, "Danger."
- 00:41:58But they still wanted to go ahead.
- 00:42:00>> Did you feel there was an obligation on your part to tell them that, "Look, wake up,
- 00:42:05the markets are going down.
- 00:42:06Maybe you should stop buying this crap?"
- 00:42:08>> Those discussions— the word "crap" wasn't used, but I mean, those discussions definitely
- 00:42:16happened.
- 00:42:17But they felt that this was just a temporary glitch in an overall bull market.
- 00:42:22"It will recover.
- 00:42:23It has to recover."
- 00:42:24>> In July 2007, the German bank, IKB, stuffed with subprime, was the first bank to fail.
- 00:42:35>> —hundreds of thousands of home owners are defaulting on their loans—
- 00:42:38>> It was only a matter of time before the crisis came back to Wall Street.
- 00:42:41>> —and that could hurt the value of homes nationwide by—
- 00:42:44>> We knew that the housing bubble had burst.
- 00:42:48But we'd been reassured that the problem had been contained.
- 00:42:52But by the beginning of 2008, it was becoming clear that this was a much, much bigger problem
- 00:42:58than anybody anticipated.
- 00:43:00>> There was a broad misperception of the risk in housing prices.
- 00:43:07The widespread view that we could have a regional decline in housing prices, but never a national
- 00:43:14decline in housing prices, proved to be horribly wrong.
- 00:43:18>> Last week was a difficult time in the mortgage business.
- 00:43:22There was talk about problems in funds— >> This was the most actively traded stock
- 00:43:28by far— >> In New York, banks were trying to unload
- 00:43:33what they could.
- 00:43:35But there was confusion.
- 00:43:36At CitiGroup, they were running in circles.
- 00:43:40>> One of the incredible things about CitiGroup, we now know, was although it was tossing these
- 00:43:44risks off its balance sheet, those risks came right back, almost like a boomerang.
- 00:43:48Without knowing it, they had set up one business to offload risk, and then completely reversed
- 00:43:56that business, taking those risks back onto its balance sheet.
- 00:44:01>> It was quite clear to me that a number of really quite large financial institutions
- 00:44:08had not had the kind of management information systems which allowed them even to know what
- 00:44:15all their risks were.
- 00:44:16>> That was astounding to you.
- 00:44:18>> It was astounding to me.
- 00:44:19>> The sort of origination of these subprime loans, the creation of the CDOs— that business
- 00:44:25is gone.
- 00:44:26>> And the reason why is all those credit default swaps—
- 00:44:27>> It would all come down to those credit default swaps.
- 00:44:31Would they pay off as they were designed to do?
- 00:44:33>> We have known for generations that banks are susceptible to runs.
- 00:44:40Banks can't function if everybody comes and wants their money at the same moment.
- 00:44:44>> —Merrill Lynch, devastated by losses— >> The failure of Lehman Brothers and the
- 00:44:47fire sale of Merrill lynch— >> —starting to take a closer look at AIG.
- 00:44:49The world's largest insurance company— >> This time, it would be a run on an insurance
- 00:44:53company.
- 00:44:54AIG was on the hook for $440 billion worth of credit default swaps.
- 00:44:59>> —credit default swaps— >> Remember, an insurance contract is only
- 00:45:04as good as the credit quality of the insurer.
- 00:45:06They have to pay you.
- 00:45:08And if they can't pay you for whatever reason, then this whole process of risk transfer breaks
- 00:45:13down.
- 00:45:14>> We need to stabilize this industry.
- 00:45:16It can spread throughout the economy.
- 00:45:18It could be a very, very dangerous— >> September 18th of 2008, when I have a conference
- 00:45:22of my CEOs, and CEOs traditionally don't read their Blackberries during meetings.
- 00:45:28But I kept looking around and noticing that a number of them were.
- 00:45:32And so I turned to one.
- 00:45:33We recessed.
- 00:45:34And I said, "You looked like the world was ended."
- 00:45:36And he said, "I think it has."
- 00:45:38>> —the enormity of the situation, like a financial nuclear holocaust.
- 00:45:41Some $400-odd billion of credit default swaps— >> —another government bailout, AIG securing
- 00:45:46an $85 billion— >> AIG could not conceivably have paid off
- 00:45:52all of those credit derivatives because it had misunderstood the risks and did not have
- 00:46:00what we'd call a balanced book or nearly enough capital to back their losses.
- 00:46:06>> Didn't everybody know that AIG was holding a lot of CDSs?
- 00:46:09>> No.
- 00:46:10There was no disclosure.
- 00:46:12That's the whole point They haven't reported this to anyone else.
- 00:46:20The other dealers have no idea what's going on.
- 00:46:24The other banks don't know.
- 00:46:26Nobody knows.
- 00:46:29The banks turned this market into their own private game.
- 00:46:33>> It was, in fact, a financial shell game where we were manipulating banking results
- 00:46:39by moving the risk out through one door, but bringing it back into the banking system by
- 00:46:45another door.
- 00:46:48The risk was not leaving the banking system, and everybody in the world was connected to
- 00:46:59these chains of risk.
- 00:47:02And if any part of that chain breaks down because they can't honor the contract, the
- 00:47:07entire system implodes.
- 00:47:20>> The idea dreamed up by a group of young JP Morgan bankers at a weekend retreat many
- 00:47:25years ago was supposed to reduce risk.
- 00:47:30>> Their original idea had been taken and it turned into a Frankenstein monster, which
- 00:47:35they never dreamt would become so big and spin out of control to that degree.
- 00:47:40>> It was a very scary time.
- 00:47:43We were in totally new territory.
- 00:47:46And the notion that Lehman Brothers could be filing for bankruptcy and AIG could be
- 00:47:50at risk of the same fate was absolutely unprecedented.
- 00:47:58And the implications— thinking through the implications of that for the health not just
- 00:48:03of the U.S. economy but the world were— I mean, it wasn't— it wasn't really conceivable
- 00:48:08to do that.
- 00:48:09I couldn't get my mind around it.
- 00:48:10I know others couldn't.
- 00:48:13>> We never saw it coming.
- 00:48:15We never saw that coming.
- 00:48:17And I was disappointed, hugely disappointed.
- 00:48:19I mean, I was part of a market that I believed was doing the right thing.
- 00:48:26And maybe I was idealistic, maybe I was young, maybe I— I didn't fully appreciate where
- 00:48:31we were going, but there was a whole system going on all the
- 00:48:35way from the borrower of the mortgage, all the way through to the investor.
- 00:48:39There's a whole system of people who maybe were turning a blind eye, maybe were, you
- 00:48:47know, just— I don't know.
- 00:48:49It's— it's frustrating to see, certainly.
- 00:48:53>> It shouldn't have happened.
- 00:48:59Most of our financial crisis in the past is due to some macroeconomic event— an oil
- 00:49:05disruption, war.
- 00:49:07This was caused by a few institutions, about 20, who, in my opinion, lost all credibility
- 00:49:18relative to managing their risk.
- 00:49:21And the sad thing is it should never have happened.
- 00:49:24The management should have stopped it before it got big.
- 00:49:27And people are suffering for something that should never have happened.
- 00:49:32>> Today, the fallout is felt mostly in places that had seen the highest growth, like Georgia.
- 00:49:43Ground zero of the subprime crisis— local neighborhoods, city streets.
- 00:49:51>> Cities throughout the United States are seeing a rise in vacant and abandoned properties.
- 00:49:59And that's where the neighbors feel it.
- 00:50:02As neighbors, we're concerned not so much with the complexities of the subprime mortgage
- 00:50:07market and derivatives.
- 00:50:09These things we will hardly ever understand.
- 00:50:12What we feel on the street is the fact that the house next to us is vacant, abandoned,
- 00:50:19partially burned.
- 00:50:20And we wonder how long it's going to be there, how long we pay the price for that abandonment.
- 00:50:26A neighborhood cannot survive long when it has a growing inventory of vacant, abandoned
- 00:50:33properties.
- 00:50:35>> Sometimes, no one even knows who owns the properties.
- 00:50:41>> It's hard to know who owns it because it's been sliced and diced so many ways by investors
- 00:50:46that it could be somebody in Ireland who owns it.
- 00:50:51You have these securitized pools, where investors own pieces of it.
- 00:50:57The investors are around the world, literally, and so it's just in no-person's land.
- 00:51:03It's a vacant property, mostly vandalized, and it just sits here and we can't do anything
- 00:51:08with it.
- 00:51:09And the reality is that that plays out across this neighborhood hundreds of times.
- 00:51:13>> That house has a loan that is somewhere lost in a huge financial vehicle
- 00:51:21put together by some young Turks on Wall Street.
- 00:51:26It's lost in that billion-dollar package because there's nobody assigned to look after it.
- 00:51:33And there are whole subdivisions like this, by
- 00:51:37the way, that are just lost in this great morass.
- 00:51:40And so it affects Main Street because Wall Street was too greedy.
- 00:51:46The greed of Wall Street broke Main Street.
- financial crisis
- Wall Street
- credit default swaps
- JP Morgan
- banking deregulation
- Occupy Wall Street
- subprime mortgages
- synthetic CDOs
- economic recovery
- housing market