00:00:00
hello everybody now the labor government
00:00:02
is on its way to creating even more of a
00:00:06
police state in the United Kingdom with
00:00:10
another piece of dreadful Draconian
00:00:13
legislation which is couched in terms
00:00:16
that makes it sound like they're on your
00:00:18
side when clearly they're not now this
00:00:21
is the crime and policing bill which
00:00:24
they have just introduced to Parliament
00:00:27
this week and the worst thing about it
00:00:30
is that it is going to allow police for
00:00:32
the first time to enter anyone's home
00:00:36
without a warrant if they suspect that
00:00:40
there is an El electronic item uh like a
00:00:45
mobile phone or something with an
00:00:47
electro geotagging system on it uh that
00:00:51
has been stolen and that is in your home
00:00:54
now if you think that the police are
00:00:56
going to use this just for locating
00:00:59
stolen phones then I have some magic
00:01:01
beans to sell you because what's
00:01:04
happened here in the country over the
00:01:07
last 25 or 30 years is that successive
00:01:12
governments have allowed criminality to
00:01:16
prosper and flourish all over the
00:01:19
country particularly in our large
00:01:22
metropolitan areas but now it's
00:01:24
spreading out around to to smaller towns
00:01:27
and cities as well and this is all due
00:01:29
due to migrant crime or mostly it's due
00:01:32
to migrant crime but of course the MPS
00:01:35
the reporters on the mainstream media
00:01:38
the police the judges the magistrates
00:01:41
will never admit that in fact they will
00:01:43
try to suppress anyone who suggests that
00:01:47
the increase in criminality that we've
00:01:49
had in the UK over the last 30 years is
00:01:52
anything to do with mass rapid
00:01:55
immigration and many many people coming
00:01:58
into the country who intent is not
00:02:01
benevolent but their intent is nefarious
00:02:05
and much of it is Criminal this has gone
00:02:07
on it's fested and it's a classic
00:02:10
problem reaction solution scenario
00:02:13
they've created the problem by allowing
00:02:16
migrant crime to go through the roof and
00:02:19
especially it has done over the last
00:02:21
five years and now when you hear the
00:02:24
mainstream media talking about the uh
00:02:28
crime and policing bill
00:02:30
and what they are couching it in terms
00:02:34
of is that there's an epidemic of phone
00:02:37
snatching and epidemic of bag snatching
00:02:40
an epidemic of shoplifting oh my
00:02:42
goodness we need to do something about
00:02:44
this well yes we do the governments and
00:02:47
the police and the judges in this
00:02:49
country should have done something about
00:02:50
it 30 years ago but they're now creating
00:02:54
uh a reaction which is being propagated
00:02:58
in the mainstream media telling you
00:03:00
there's all these Dreadful things going
00:03:01
on everybody knows that this country is
00:03:04
not as safe as it used to be in the 90s
00:03:07
this country was known as one of the
00:03:09
safest countries in the world and London
00:03:11
was known as one of the nicest safest
00:03:14
most Pleasant metropolitan areas in the
00:03:16
world to live in 30 years on here we are
00:03:19
in 2025 it is the exact opposite it's
00:03:22
it's Dreadful hellhole of crime this has
00:03:25
been allowed to fester and now they're
00:03:27
bringing in the solution we need police
00:03:31
to be able to go into someone's home
00:03:34
without a
00:03:35
warrant now this is very very dangerous
00:03:38
because we have in this country the
00:03:40
saying an englishman's home is his
00:03:43
castle okay and that applies to welshmen
00:03:45
Scotsman and Irishmen as well and I'm
00:03:47
sure that all around the world you have
00:03:50
that understanding your home is sacran
00:03:53
no one should violate the borders and
00:03:55
the boundaries of your home
00:03:57
unless it's perhaps uh an officer of the
00:04:00
law who has a warrant from a judge from
00:04:03
the court to give them very good reason
00:04:06
to go into your home um and and search
00:04:10
for something to investigate a crime
00:04:13
this has been the understanding that
00:04:15
we've had for centuries and now this is
00:04:20
going to be broken by the crime and
00:04:23
policing bill that says well this is a
00:04:25
problem that's been created and now we
00:04:27
need to give the police to go the powers
00:04:29
to go into someone's home as they wish
00:04:32
without a warrant if they suspect that
00:04:36
there is a stolen mobile phone or a
00:04:39
stolen piece of electronic equipment
00:04:41
which is geotax and they can go in and
00:04:45
search your home but it's worse than
00:04:47
that actually let me look at the actual
00:04:50
wording of the bill here so this is in
00:04:54
section
00:04:56
93 of the crime and policing Bill
00:04:59
actually it's a huge long bill that has
00:05:03
137 sections and is
00:05:06
3177 pages long and this is the trouble
00:05:09
with bills these days that go before
00:05:11
parliament in the old days you look at
00:05:13
bills or you legislation they used to be
00:05:17
quite short you know they would be two
00:05:19
or three pages long this is 3177 pages
00:05:22
long and it covers you know essentially
00:05:25
it's like 137 different laws all put
00:05:29
into one bill and they're going to pass
00:05:31
them all together um so this is section
00:05:35
93 which amends section 26 of the Theft
00:05:40
Act
00:05:42
1968 um it's titled electronically
00:05:45
tagged stolen goods search without
00:05:48
warrant a constable whose rank is at
00:05:50
least out of Inspector May authorize a
00:05:53
constable to enter specified PR premises
00:05:56
search the specified premises for
00:05:58
specified items
00:06:00
um authorization can only be given if
00:06:03
there are reasonable grounds to believe
00:06:05
that the specified items are stolen
00:06:07
goods they're on the the specified
00:06:09
premises Etc um okay next thing and this
00:06:14
just goes on in that section and there
00:06:16
is electronic T tracking data indicating
00:06:19
the specified items are or have at some
00:06:22
time since they are believed to have
00:06:23
been stolen been on the specified pre
00:06:26
premises so this sounds like okay
00:06:29
they're they're actually helping you out
00:06:31
here because there is a big problem with
00:06:34
phones being stolen there's now
00:06:36
electronic tracking and so the this is
00:06:38
being presented to people um by saying
00:06:43
that uh you know we need this in order
00:06:47
to help people whose phones have been
00:06:49
stolen okay it sounds good but it's
00:06:52
changing fundamentally changing the
00:06:55
relationship between the police the
00:06:57
state and individuals and violating the
00:07:01
idea that an englishman's home is his
00:07:03
castle you cannot go and search
00:07:07
someone's home or enter someone's home
00:07:10
as a police officer unless you have a
00:07:12
warrant from the court and it says of
00:07:16
course say the next thing an
00:07:17
authorization this is from an inspector
00:07:20
to a run of the mill police Constable
00:07:23
may be given orally or in writing so
00:07:26
they don't even need a written note from
00:07:29
their Superior officer to be able to go
00:07:31
and search a home they can just turn up
00:07:34
on your doorstep and say we're going to
00:07:36
search your home without a warrant
00:07:38
because we suspect there's something in
00:07:39
your house which is stolen I don't have
00:07:42
any written authorization I've got oral
00:07:45
authorization and I'm just coming to
00:07:47
inspect your home and search your home
00:07:51
now if you think that isn't bad enough
00:07:54
it goes on and it's even worse um so
00:08:00
wear a constables lawfully on the
00:08:01
premises you know Etc they they it's
00:08:04
it's the section applies instead of
00:08:07
section 19 of the police and criminal
00:08:09
Evidence Act so this is um talking about
00:08:13
seizure of the items which they suspect
00:08:17
have been stolen but it says the
00:08:19
Constable May seize anything which is on
00:08:23
the specified premises whether or not it
00:08:26
is a specified item if the con has
00:08:29
reasonable grounds to believe it's
00:08:32
stolen goods or it's necessary to seize
00:08:34
it in order to prevent it being
00:08:36
concealed lost damaged altered or
00:08:38
destroyed so
00:08:42
essentially excuse me a constable or a
00:08:45
police Constable or police officer can
00:08:48
come to your home without a warrant and
00:08:50
seese anything not just a stolen phone
00:08:54
which is what it's being presented to
00:08:56
you as but they can seize anything on
00:08:59
your property and take it away and then
00:09:02
you may have a very large problem
00:09:07
getting that back if actually uh it's
00:09:10
not stolen goods and you didn't have
00:09:11
stolen goods on your property and uh and
00:09:15
they've just seized your electronic
00:09:17
devices or other things in your home and
00:09:20
it'll take you months and sometimes
00:09:23
years to get that back I mean a friend
00:09:25
of mine I won't mention her name um but
00:09:29
this was a well-known case she's a media
00:09:32
uh reporter a journalist and she had her
00:09:36
electronic devices seized from her home
00:09:39
uh in the south of England and it took
00:09:41
over a year to get them back uh and that
00:09:44
caused
00:09:45
Untold uh misery and suffering and
00:09:48
inconvenience to her and her kids and
00:09:50
her family uh so this is really really
00:09:54
bad here that this is giving the police
00:09:57
the powers to do this do you think this
00:10:00
is not going to be abused no no way come
00:10:03
on if you if you think that then um you
00:10:07
know you're really too trusting of the
00:10:09
government and the police and and the
00:10:11
the state and uh you're far too gullible
00:10:14
to believe that this is being done in
00:10:16
your best interest look the police
00:10:18
already have the power to go in and
00:10:20
search homes with a warrant um if they
00:10:25
suspect you of uh having done criminal
00:10:28
activity and and they can still catch
00:10:30
criminals if they want to with a warrant
00:10:33
the thing is they're not bothered too
00:10:35
much about catching ordinary you know
00:10:38
run-of-the-mill criminals who are are
00:10:41
guilty of theft or criminal damage or
00:10:44
burglary these kind of things they are
00:10:48
absolutely obsessed with catching people
00:10:51
who have said something on social media
00:10:54
that they don't like whether it's lawful
00:10:56
or not and you know there's a lot of
00:10:58
things which now been declared unlawful
00:11:01
or illegal which actually should fall
00:11:04
within the remit of free speech because
00:11:06
of this buring edifice of hate and hate
00:11:09
speech and stirring up hatred and all
00:11:11
this kind of stuff that um successive
00:11:14
governments have pursued and uh now you
00:11:17
have the situation where someone like
00:11:20
Lucy connley who's been put in prison
00:11:23
for over two and a half years for a
00:11:25
social media post which was just
00:11:27
expressing an opinion okay not very nice
00:11:29
opinion of course but just an opinion
00:11:32
which was up posted on X for two hours
00:11:35
and taken down and she gets more time in
00:11:38
prison than an ex labor MP who actually
00:11:42
physically assaulted someone punched
00:11:43
them in the face and knocked them to the
00:11:45
ground it's just got 10 weeks in prison
00:11:48
or people who've got pictures of
00:11:50
children on their phone like the BBC
00:11:52
presenters you Edwards and so on who
00:11:55
haven't got any prison time at all we've
00:11:57
got clear two-tier Justice in in this
00:11:59
country and this is going to make it
00:12:02
worse because the people who are going
00:12:04
to be targeted by this I fear are not
00:12:07
actual criminals but they're people that
00:12:10
uh will
00:12:12
be set up by some order by an inspector
00:12:17
to say oh I don't like what this person
00:12:20
said go and search their home just in
00:12:23
case there is a stolen electronic device
00:12:26
in their home the police can turn up
00:12:28
without a warrant go into your home
00:12:30
search it and seize any devices that
00:12:33
they want whether or not you're actually
00:12:35
guilty or not like it sounds good but my
00:12:38
fear is in the police state where people
00:12:41
are obsessed with
00:12:43
um uh hassling and causing actual fear
00:12:47
harm distress and and harassment to
00:12:51
people who are
00:12:52
designated far right not that anyone is
00:12:55
far right in this country but that's
00:12:57
just what the powers would be smear
00:12:59
people as this this is going to be used
00:13:02
against people um who should not
00:13:06
be investigated by the police at all so
00:13:10
this is very very dangerous and that's
00:13:12
just one of the sections in the bill
00:13:14
that's probably one of the worst
00:13:15
sections in the bill but the other very
00:13:18
controversial thing is that uh the labor
00:13:21
government wants to bring back asbos in
00:13:25
turn they're calling them respect orders
00:13:28
now
00:13:29
asbos as you probably know became a
00:13:31
massive joke in this country they were
00:13:33
introduced by Tony Blair in 1998 and
00:13:37
their the antisocial Behavior orders and
00:13:39
they became almost a badge of honor to
00:13:43
kids who did something wrong go around
00:13:45
saying I got an asbo you know I've been
00:13:47
to court the judge has said I can't go
00:13:49
here or I can't talk to this person or I
00:13:51
have to go on an anger management course
00:13:53
and they just do it and have a big laugh
00:13:55
about it so you know kids or whatever or
00:13:59
young people maybe well not necessarily
00:14:02
young people anyone who is behaving in
00:14:06
an antisocial
00:14:07
manner that they don't want
00:14:10
to give a proper criminal sentence to
00:14:13
they just want to give him a slap on the
00:14:15
wrist they give him an asbo and uh so
00:14:19
and this is meant
00:14:21
to um put restrictions on people like
00:14:25
bail conditions for people who haven't
00:14:29
being convicted of a criminal offense so
00:14:33
they haven't been taken to court and
00:14:36
charged with the crime but yet the court
00:14:40
or a judge or a magistrate in the court
00:14:43
has actually put a penalty on someone
00:14:46
even though they haven't been charged
00:14:48
with a crime and this is very dangerous
00:14:50
again because we have the understanding
00:14:52
in England under common law that you can
00:14:55
only be punished if you've committed a
00:14:58
crime crime that has caused harm injury
00:15:02
loss or damage to another living man or
00:15:04
living woman that's the fundamental
00:15:07
principle of common law so asbos here
00:15:11
brought people before the courts and put
00:15:15
restrictions on them and conditions of
00:15:17
on them even though they haven't
00:15:19
committed a crime and that's what's
00:15:22
really dangerous about it now in
00:15:25
2014 the Tory libdem Co ition that was
00:15:29
in power at that time actually did one
00:15:32
thing that was actually good was they
00:15:34
got rid of asbos and they placed them
00:15:36
replaced them with criminal Behavior
00:15:37
orders which did similar the similar
00:15:40
thing but they said you have to have
00:15:43
been convicted of a crime first so the
00:15:46
criminal Behavior orders were for people
00:15:49
who had know been found to have
00:15:52
committed a
00:15:53
crime but it wasn't a serious crime
00:15:56
where there was criminal damage or
00:15:59
theft or anything like that it was
00:16:01
people making lots of noise or people
00:16:03
aggressively begging in the streets
00:16:06
something like that and they so they're
00:16:08
convicted of a crime and um you know
00:16:12
criminal damage Etc vandalism is another
00:16:14
thing now to be honest I think if you if
00:16:16
you vandalize something you should be
00:16:17
given a proper sentence not just a a
00:16:20
criminal Behavior order so this is
00:16:22
something that that gives you you know
00:16:25
it's like probation essentially they
00:16:27
they give you conditions you have to do
00:16:29
this and you're not allowed to do that
00:16:31
and if you breach those conditions then
00:16:33
you go to jail um okay whether you know
00:16:37
that's the right thing or not I don't
00:16:39
know but it was only applied to people
00:16:41
who had actually been convicted of a
00:16:44
crime rather than people who hadn't been
00:16:46
convicted of a crime so these respect
00:16:49
orders um are now uh amending the
00:16:53
antisocial Behavior crime and policing
00:16:55
act 2014 which brought in criminal
00:16:57
Behavior orders and adding to them again
00:17:00
respect orders which are like asbos so
00:17:04
now again you can get a respect order
00:17:07
that will require you to do certain
00:17:09
things like go to a course or prohibit
00:17:13
you from doing certain things on an
00:17:15
individual basis such as not going to a
00:17:18
certain place or not associating with
00:17:20
certain people even if you haven't being
00:17:23
convicted of a crime and I think that is
00:17:25
really wrong and that's fundamentally
00:17:27
repugnant to Common law because you
00:17:30
should only be punished if you like or
00:17:33
given conditions or an order to do
00:17:36
something if you have been convicted of
00:17:37
a crime not if you haven't and that's
00:17:41
the the danger of it so as you know it
00:17:43
says the the court may give a respect
00:17:45
order to anyone aged 18 or over um
00:17:49
whoops where are we going here I'll just
00:17:51
put the next slide up um if the court is
00:17:55
satisfied that the respondents has
00:17:57
engaged in or threatens to engage in
00:17:59
antisocial Behavior so you know this is
00:18:03
a thing what is antisocial Behavior now
00:18:05
no one likes antisocial Behavior but the
00:18:08
court should only be able to do this if
00:18:10
someone is engaged in criminal behavior
00:18:12
and has been convicted of a crime that's
00:18:15
the difference and that's what is very
00:18:17
dangerous about this because again it
00:18:20
creates a a police state if you like and
00:18:24
uh the police can then accuse you of
00:18:26
engaging in antisocial Behavior go to
00:18:29
the court and get your behavior
00:18:31
restricted you can argue that okay that
00:18:34
this is necessary to uh make life more
00:18:39
pleasant and I'm not against that but
00:18:41
it's got to be done in the right way and
00:18:43
again going back to what I said at the
00:18:45
beginning a lot of the antisocial
00:18:47
behavior that we see which is associated
00:18:49
with drugs gangs and things like that
00:18:52
comes from migrant crime there's no
00:18:55
getting away from that and we've had 30
00:18:57
years of success Ive
00:18:59
governments
00:19:02
facilitating Mass
00:19:04
immigration uh and many of the people
00:19:06
coming to the country have Criminal
00:19:08
Intent they're not doing anything to
00:19:10
stop the flow of migrants coming to the
00:19:14
country who may commit crime there's
00:19:16
still 50,000 a year plus coming across
00:19:20
the English Channel illegally legal
00:19:22
migration is through the roof and not
00:19:24
everyone who comes legally is here to
00:19:27
start a business or to bring scarce
00:19:29
skills to the country I mean I'm not
00:19:31
against that not that there should be
00:19:33
any scarce skills because in a country
00:19:35
of 70 million if we do things right we
00:19:38
would be able to train enough of our own
00:19:40
people to become doctors and nurses and
00:19:43
engineers and plumbers and electricians
00:19:45
and Brick Layers and carpenters and all
00:19:47
the things that we need to be done that
00:19:49
are scarce okay at the moment we have a
00:19:52
situation where this is a problem and we
00:19:55
need people to be coming into the
00:19:56
country to do those kind of skill jobs
00:19:59
that shouldn't be the case but it is but
00:20:01
along with that there's a lot of people
00:20:03
coming who are going to work in Turkish
00:20:07
barber shops for example and um you all
00:20:10
know what that's about I don't need to
00:20:12
say anymore I don't think uh and until
00:20:15
we sort out the the roots of the problem
00:20:19
making a law
00:20:21
to bring back asbos in the form of
00:20:25
respect orders isn't going to make any
00:20:27
difference at all but particularly when
00:20:29
again you've got the people in positions
00:20:33
of power in police in the police forces
00:20:36
and the Judiciary who are saturated with
00:20:39
cultural Marxism and they won't give um
00:20:43
a sentence or probably won't give a
00:20:45
respect order to someone if they have a
00:20:48
protected characteristic under the
00:20:50
equality law um this is how it is so we
00:20:53
need to deal with the fundamentals of
00:20:55
the problem and deal with migrant crime
00:20:58
and Port migrant criminals and then uh a
00:21:02
lot of the antisocial behavior that we
00:21:04
see will disappear that's just the fact
00:21:06
of it you may not like it the lefties
00:21:09
I'm sure won't like it the labor
00:21:10
government I'm sure won't like me saying
00:21:12
that neither will the mainstream Media
00:21:15
or the cultural marxists in the police
00:21:18
forces but that's just the reality of
00:21:21
the situation so this bill here this
00:21:25
crime and policing bill is another
00:21:28
monster
00:21:29
and it's another thing that is going to
00:21:31
bring us closer to a totalitarian
00:21:35
tyranny and it's something that needs to
00:21:38
be resisted because it's
00:21:42
addressing artificial problems that have
00:21:44
been created through negligence or act
00:21:47
not just negligence but actually
00:21:49
actively people actively trying to make
00:21:53
the country worse so that they can bring
00:21:56
in this kind of totalitarian tyranny
00:21:59
into the country what a good crime and
00:22:02
policing bill would do would be
00:22:04
something that gives power back to the
00:22:06
people for example putting strict
00:22:10
conditions on or even prohibiting the
00:22:12
police being able to use facial
00:22:14
recognition technology in the public
00:22:18
space where people are being identified
00:22:22
without their knowledge let alone their
00:22:24
permission and that is something that is
00:22:27
really harmful to the relationship
00:22:29
between uh the people the citizens and
00:22:33
the state the state is now routinely
00:22:36
abusing people's privacy with facial
00:22:39
recognition technology and they're doing
00:22:41
it again under the aaces of we need to
00:22:44
do this to keep you safe um again
00:22:47
addressing a problem which they've
00:22:49
created themselves because they've
00:22:51
allowed uh criminality to fester for 30
00:22:55
years without doing anything about it
00:22:57
because
00:22:59
the police forces have become far too
00:23:02
politically correct uh and are not
00:23:04
focused on cutting real crime they're
00:23:07
focused on uh arresting people who who
00:23:11
have offended somebody who uh has uh
00:23:16
hurty
00:23:17
feelings so the whole thing is
00:23:20
uh really a big can of worms and uh it
00:23:24
needs to be um stopped and repealed just
00:23:29
like everything that this labor
00:23:31
government is doing and probably like
00:23:33
everything almost everything going back
00:23:35
to Tony Blair's time probably all needs
00:23:38
to be repealed apart from one or two
00:23:39
things but there we go anyway thank you
00:23:42
for listening everybody I hope this has
00:23:43
been useful and informative and uh gives
00:23:46
you a reason why you should be aware of
00:23:49
this new bill coming through Parliament
00:23:51
the crime and policing Act and why we
00:23:54
need to repeal it when the Heritage
00:23:58
party
00:23:59
gets into Power which we will do in 2029
00:24:03
with your help thanks everyone God bless
00:24:05
you all
