How Jean-Jacques Rousseau Ruined The Western Philosophy of Liberty

00:04:12
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vk3ro4VrOf4

概要

TLDRThe discussion examines the philosophical split between unconstrained and constrained vision in understanding societal issues. Referencing Rousseau, it highlights how institutions can contribute to humanity's struggles. The argument contrasts liberal welfare policies with historical legacies, particularly the impact of slavery on African Americans versus other societal issues. This analysis encourages a deeper investigation into the assumptions we hold about social reforms and the role of evidence in shaping our understanding of progress and inequality.

収穫

  • 🔍 Rousseau's quote highlights institutional constraints on freedom.
  • ⚖️ Unconstrained vision seeks institutional reform for societal issues.
  • 📊 Constrained vision emphasizes long-term empirical evidence.
  • 🚨 The discussion critiques prevailing liberal welfare policies.
  • 🎓 Tom Sowell advocates for a serious evidence-based approach.
  • 📚 Recognizing assumptions behind social theories is crucial.
  • 🌍 Social disparities are often deeply rooted in reality, not just history.
  • ⚠️ Life challenges reflect complex societal issues, not merely legacies of the past.

タイムライン

  • 00:00:00 - 00:04:12

    The discussion centers around Jean-Jacques Rousseau's idea that while man is born free, societal institutions impose constraints that lead to negative outcomes. The speaker emphasizes that good occurs naturally, while bad originates from these institutions. They highlight that equal opportunity is an illusion; inequalities are pervasive, even in wealthy nations, like the poorest mountain communities in the U.S. The constrained vision posits that solutions are not straightforward, as these issues are rooted in deeper realities, challenging the belief that laws can easily rectify them. The speaker’s book presents both the unconstrained and constrained visions without favoring one, instead encouraging an understanding of the assumptions behind each perspective. They cite a rebuttal of Nicholas Kristoff’s view linking racial gaps to the legacy of slavery, arguing instead to consider the effects of the liberal welfare state. The conversation reflects on the hard realities of life and the importance of evidence in understanding socio-economic gaps, illustrating a commitment to serious inquiry and challenging assumptions.

マインドマップ

ビデオQ&A

  • What does Rousseau mean by 'man is born free, but everywhere in chains'?

    Rousseau suggests that while humans are inherently free, societal institutions impose constraints that limit this freedom.

  • What is the difference between unconstrained and constrained vision?

    Unconstrained vision believes that societal problems can be rectified by reforming institutions, whereas constrained vision recognizes that some issues are deeply rooted in human nature and reality.

  • How does this conversation critique the liberal welfare state?

    It questions the efficacy of the liberal welfare state by comparing its impact on Black communities to the long-term effects of slavery.

  • What evidence does Tom Sowell use to argue his point?

    Sowell emphasizes the need for serious evidence by comparing the status of Black Americans a century after slavery with their situation following decades of welfare policies.

  • Why does the speaker see Tom Sowell as a man of constrained vision?

    Sowell consistently focuses on empirical evidence and acknowledges inherent societal challenges, characteristic of constrained vision.

ビデオをもっと見る

AIを活用したYouTubeの無料動画要約に即アクセス!
字幕
en
オートスクロール:
  • 00:00:00
    when again I'm quoting you when Rousseau
  • 00:00:02
    said that man is Born Free but
  • 00:00:04
    everywhere in Chains he expressed the
  • 00:00:06
    essence of the unconstrained Vision
  • 00:00:08
    which the in which the fundamental
  • 00:00:11
    problem is not nature or man but
  • 00:00:14
    institutions yes would you explain that
  • 00:00:16
    one well he has a notion that uh again
  • 00:00:19
    that that good things happen naturally
  • 00:00:22
    uh they're bad things is because
  • 00:00:24
    institutions including civilization
  • 00:00:26
    itself have have made these bad things
  • 00:00:29
    happen
  • 00:00:30
    and of course uh and I think that that's
  • 00:00:32
    really the uh the implicit assumption
  • 00:00:35
    behind a lot of things that are said on
  • 00:00:36
    the left today uh and what why in my
  • 00:00:40
    most recent book I go to a lot of
  • 00:00:41
    trouble to show that uh in nature uh
  • 00:00:45
    there's nothing resembling equal
  • 00:00:47
    opportunity that wherever you look
  • 00:00:49
    around the country around around the
  • 00:00:51
    world uh you find people who live up in
  • 00:00:54
    the mountains poor and backwards even in
  • 00:00:57
    the richest countries uh including the
  • 00:01:00
    United States I believe the the poorest
  • 00:01:03
    country in the United States the county
  • 00:01:04
    rather uh was in a Mountain Community uh
  • 00:01:09
    which was almost 100 White
  • 00:01:11
    somewhere in Appalachia West Virginia
  • 00:01:13
    yes
  • 00:01:16
    and that men in that in that county had
  • 00:01:19
    a life expectancy 10 years less than men
  • 00:01:24
    in a county in in Virginia
  • 00:01:27
    and the constrained the unconstrained
  • 00:01:30
    Vision says let's fix that we surely we
  • 00:01:32
    can pass a law that would improve that
  • 00:01:34
    and the constrained Vision says well now
  • 00:01:36
    wait a moment
  • 00:01:37
    if people who live in isolated pockets
  • 00:01:40
    and mountains are poor and backwards all
  • 00:01:43
    around the world and we see this pattern
  • 00:01:45
    over and over and over again maybe
  • 00:01:47
    there's something very deeply rooted in
  • 00:01:49
    reality about that that's hard for us to
  • 00:01:52
    get at correct yes all right
  • 00:01:55
    so in the book of conflict of visions
  • 00:01:59
    you're very dispassionate and very
  • 00:02:02
    analytical and you lay out the
  • 00:02:04
    unconstrained vision
  • 00:02:05
    and you lay out the constrained vision
  • 00:02:08
    and you don't really come out blazing
  • 00:02:12
    in favor of one or the other no yeah
  • 00:02:15
    that is not a book meant to commit to uh
  • 00:02:17
    a show when Visions is better than the
  • 00:02:20
    other it's there to show you what what
  • 00:02:22
    they are and what you're assuming if you
  • 00:02:24
    if you go One Direction or another okay
  • 00:02:27
    and it's to encourage people to
  • 00:02:28
    understand the implicit assumptions
  • 00:02:30
    behind all this without which you're
  • 00:02:33
    just a lot Loose Ends all right so
  • 00:02:38
    pondering all this I I noticed something
  • 00:02:41
    a column that you wrote this is a couple
  • 00:02:43
    years ago in which you rebutted Nicholas
  • 00:02:46
    Kristoff of the New York Times and
  • 00:02:48
    Kristoff
  • 00:02:49
    had ascribed the gaps between African
  • 00:02:52
    Americans and whites in America gaps in
  • 00:02:54
    wealth gaps in educational achieved the
  • 00:02:56
    usual gaps two and this is a quotation
  • 00:02:59
    from Christoph to the lingering effects
  • 00:03:01
    of slavery close quote Oh yeah and
  • 00:03:03
    here's Tom Soule
  • 00:03:05
    quote if we wanted to be serious about
  • 00:03:09
    evidence
  • 00:03:11
    we might compare where black stood a
  • 00:03:13
    hundred years after the end of slavery
  • 00:03:15
    with where they stood after 30 years of
  • 00:03:17
    the liberal welfare state in other words
  • 00:03:19
    we could compare hard evidence on the
  • 00:03:22
    legacy of slavery with hard evidence on
  • 00:03:25
    the legacy of liberals close quote and
  • 00:03:28
    so there it is life is hard you use the
  • 00:03:31
    word hard
  • 00:03:32
    you use the word serious you use
  • 00:03:34
    evidence Tom soul is a man of the
  • 00:03:38
    constrained Vision through and through
  • 00:03:39
    and through correct yes no no
  • 00:03:42
    yes you know part of a Vanishing breed I
  • 00:03:46
    might I so when so when you were a
  • 00:03:49
    Marxist the notion to explain that
  • 00:03:52
    because the Marxism well but no no yeah
  • 00:03:55
    so that's probably when I was a Marxist
  • 00:03:57
    I had the same intellectual standards
  • 00:03:59
    right and that that's what eventually
  • 00:04:01
    led me away from it oh I see in other
  • 00:04:04
    words I did I hadn't done all the
  • 00:04:06
    research I hadn't gone around the world
  • 00:04:08
    of looking for evidence yes yes okay
タグ
  • Rousseau
  • Unconstrained Vision
  • Constrained Vision
  • Social Institutions
  • Inequality
  • Tom Sowell
  • Welfare State
  • Empirical Evidence
  • Philosophical Debate
  • Historical Context