The Charter of Rights and Freedoms — what rights do you have?

00:20:45
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S_pbjse8Tx8

概要

TLDRThis video explores the practical aspects of the Canadian Constitution and Charter of Rights, shifting from a previous discussion about the theoretical concept of rights. Beginning with the definition and function of a constitution, the video follows Canada's constitutional history from the British North America Act of 1867 through to the Constitution Act of 1982. This Act established the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, a pivotal document outlining fundamental rights like freedom of expression and religion, and rights to life, liberty, and security. The video delves into complexities like the absence of a single written document (as in the UK) and the notion of the Constitution being a "living document." It also discusses the 1982 repatriation of the Canadian Constitution from the UK, spearheaded by Pierre Elliot Trudeau, thus giving Canada complete legal autonomy. Significant focus is given to the notwithstanding clause (Section 33 of the Charter), which allows federal and provincial bodies to override certain rights temporarily—a power used provincially, notably by Quebec for language laws. The presenter also touches on contemporary issues, like the balance of rights during crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic. The video concludes with the promise of future topics, such as the ongoing interpretation of constitutional documents.

収穫

  • 📜 A constitution is a foundational document outlining the laws and governance of a state.
  • 🇨🇦 Canada's Constitution includes the British North America Act (1867) and the Constitution Act (1982).
  • 📜 The Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees Canadians fundamental rights.
  • ⚖️ The notwithstanding clause allows rights to be overridden by governments temporarily.
  • 🇬🇧 Canada maintained ties to the British monarchy even after having its own Constitution.
  • 🔄 A "living document" concept allows the Constitution to adapt over time.
  • 🕊️ Fundamental rights include freedom of expression, religion, and association.
  • 📜 Legal rights ensure liberty and security are protected.
  • 🇨🇦 Repatriation in 1982 was crucial for Canadian constitutional independence.
  • ⚖️ Understanding rights during crises is essential, such as with COVID-19 restrictions.

タイムライン

  • 00:00:00 - 00:05:00

    The video starts with a recap of the previous discussion about the philosophical concept of rights. The speaker now aims to focus on the practical aspect by exploring the Canadian Constitution, understanding what a constitution is, and how it forms the foundation for rights and governance. The American and Canadian constitutions are contrasted, with Canada's evolving from various legal documents and British influence, notably starting with the 1867 BNA Act, unlike the single American document of 1776.

  • 00:05:00 - 00:10:00

    The discussion continues with the developments leading to Canada's self-governance. After the Statute of Westminster in 1931, Canada still lacked a consolidated constitution, relying on several documents and British legal precedents. It wasn't until 1982, under Pierre Elliot Trudeau, that Canada repatriated its constitution, making it independent from Britain. This transition included adopting the Constitution Act 1982 and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, centralizing and clarifying legal rights in Canada.

  • 00:10:00 - 00:15:00

    The video delves into specific sections of Canada's Charter, emphasizing the rights and limits it establishes. There's a detailed discussion on limitations justified for maintaining legal order and the impact of these during crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic. The importance of rights like freedom of speech, association, and legal protections are highlighted along with the challenges posed when circumstances demand curtailing some of these rights for public good.

  • 00:15:00 - 00:20:45

    Focus shifts to the 'notwithstanding clause,' a unique feature allowing Canadian governments to override certain rights temporarily. While rarely used, it's been invoked by provinces like Quebec. This clause illustrates the balance and flexibility within the Charter to address local needs while maintaining overall legal principles. The video concludes on the importance of understanding the Charter's evolving application and hints at future discussions on interpreting such fundamental documents within modern contexts.

もっと見る

マインドマップ

Mind Map

よくある質問

  • What is a constitution?

    A constitution is a set of foundational laws and principles on how a state is governed, detailing rights and government operations.

  • How did Canada get its Constitution?

    Canada's Constitution began with the British North America Act in 1867 and became independent with the Constitution Act of 1982.

  • What is the Charter of Rights and Freedoms?

    The Charter, part of Canada's Constitution since 1982, guarantees fundamental freedoms and rights to Canadian citizens.

  • What are some fundamental rights outlined in the Canadian Charter?

    Rights include freedom of conscience and religion, thought, expression, and association, as well as legal rights like the right to life and security.

  • What is the notwithstanding clause?

    Section 33 of the Canadian Charter allows federal or provincial legislatures to override certain Charter rights temporarily.

  • Has the notwithstanding clause been used in Canada?

    Yes, it has been used by provinces, notably Quebec for language laws, but never at the federal level.

  • What does it mean for the Constitution to be a "living document"?

    It refers to the idea that the Constitution can evolve with society, allowing interpretations to adapt to modern contexts.

  • What impact did the 1982 Constitution have on Canada?

    It consolidated Canadian law under a single document, reinforcing legal and human rights distinct from British influence.

  • Why mention the British monarchy in the context of Canada's Constitution?

    Canada still maintains ties to the British monarchy, despite having its own Constitution, which can influence discussions on sovereignty.

  • How are rights balanced in times of crisis according to the Charter?

    The Charter allows for rights limitations under reasonable and justified circumstances in a democratic society, such as during public health crises.

ビデオをもっと見る

AIを活用したYouTubeの無料動画要約に即アクセス!
字幕
en
オートスクロール:
  • 00:00:06
    so in my last video I spoke about the
  • 00:00:10
    concept of rights I wanted to keep it
  • 00:00:12
    more theoretical and have that
  • 00:00:14
    discussion really be about the idea of
  • 00:00:16
    what is right where do these ideas come
  • 00:00:18
    from now in the feedback some of you
  • 00:00:20
    asked me to talk about the actual
  • 00:00:21
    constitution of Canada and where our
  • 00:00:24
    rights here come from as opposed to more
  • 00:00:26
    of the philosophical or theoretical idea
  • 00:00:28
    which I still want to explore a bit more
  • 00:00:30
    but in this video I think will tackle
  • 00:00:32
    some of the more practical things so
  • 00:00:34
    let's start right at the beginning we're
  • 00:00:35
    going to jump right in so first of all
  • 00:00:37
    we have to address what is a
  • 00:00:40
    constitution where our rights come from
  • 00:00:42
    you guys have heard words of like the
  • 00:00:44
    Charter I spoke last time about the
  • 00:00:46
    Charter being repatriated so what does
  • 00:00:48
    that kind of thing mean and we'll
  • 00:00:50
    explore all these ideas but first the
  • 00:00:51
    definitions so the definition of a
  • 00:00:54
    constitution a lot of people tend to
  • 00:00:56
    think I think about the American
  • 00:00:58
    Constitution they might understand the
  • 00:01:01
    Charter or know what the Charter is but
  • 00:01:03
    not necessarily understand it as sort of
  • 00:01:05
    a constitution it's really a part of the
  • 00:01:07
    canvass constitutional laws but the
  • 00:01:10
    Constitution itself is an important idea
  • 00:01:12
    that we need to understand and so a
  • 00:01:14
    constitution in its most basic sense is
  • 00:01:16
    a set of principles or laws these are
  • 00:01:19
    sort of the underlying foundational laws
  • 00:01:21
    that a nation or state would have and
  • 00:01:24
    this basically talks about how the state
  • 00:01:26
    is going to be governed it can have
  • 00:01:28
    about the rights or the requirements it
  • 00:01:30
    can talk about when the government has
  • 00:01:31
    to meet so for example how often the
  • 00:01:33
    Parliament or the legislature or the
  • 00:01:35
    Congress what needs to sit so these are
  • 00:01:39
    the basic laws that a country would have
  • 00:01:41
    now interestingly enough you would say
  • 00:01:43
    okay well you know I guess every country
  • 00:01:45
    has a constitution if you look at for
  • 00:01:47
    example the United Kingdom so you can
  • 00:01:49
    see right here the United Kingdom
  • 00:01:50
    because of its age and historical
  • 00:01:53
    precedence does not actually have a
  • 00:01:54
    single document like the Americans so
  • 00:01:57
    the Americans in 77 1776 declare
  • 00:02:00
    independence there's the Declaration of
  • 00:02:01
    Independence and the later on there's
  • 00:02:03
    the Constitution of the United States
  • 00:02:04
    and all the amendments and you guys I'm
  • 00:02:05
    sure familiar with the 1st and 2nd
  • 00:02:07
    amendment at the very least if not maybe
  • 00:02:09
    some of the other ones but the
  • 00:02:12
    Constitution can
  • 00:02:13
    a single written document or it could be
  • 00:02:16
    a group of documents and this is
  • 00:02:18
    actually what Canada had so if we go to
  • 00:02:20
    these guys these are the founding
  • 00:02:22
    fathers of the country at the time when
  • 00:02:25
    Canada was created as an a singular
  • 00:02:28
    entity made up of the original four
  • 00:02:30
    provinces there was an act in the
  • 00:02:32
    British Parliament known as the British
  • 00:02:34
    North American North America act the BNA
  • 00:02:37
    act this was in 1867 and this is
  • 00:02:41
    commonly referred to today as the
  • 00:02:43
    Constitution Act 1867 but this is really
  • 00:02:46
    the founding document that says okay you
  • 00:02:48
    guys are gonna be a confederation this
  • 00:02:50
    is gonna be a new New Commonwealth
  • 00:02:51
    country that is gonna be called Canada
  • 00:02:54
    it's made up of these four provinces the
  • 00:02:55
    four original provinces and so this is
  • 00:02:59
    sort of the first attempt at a
  • 00:03:01
    constitution so at this point in 1867
  • 00:03:04
    we're still not like the Americans with
  • 00:03:07
    a singular document Constitution because
  • 00:03:10
    we have what's called British common law
  • 00:03:11
    and that's again similar to what's going
  • 00:03:13
    on actually in the UK where sets of laws
  • 00:03:16
    sets of a legal precedent all combine to
  • 00:03:19
    sort of make up our Constitution now
  • 00:03:22
    this continues all the way until 1931
  • 00:03:26
    which in which the statute of
  • 00:03:28
    Westminster which is another law that
  • 00:03:31
    was passed in in the UK that basically
  • 00:03:33
    said that certain parts of the
  • 00:03:36
    Commonwealth would be given self-rule
  • 00:03:38
    they would be given the ability to to
  • 00:03:41
    self govern and so this this act sort of
  • 00:03:45
    made up an additional part of Canada's
  • 00:03:47
    rights now interestingly enough because
  • 00:03:51
    we did not have our own constitution and
  • 00:03:52
    because we were so tied into Britain as
  • 00:03:55
    we still are in many ways today the
  • 00:03:57
    Queen is the official head of state the
  • 00:03:58
    governor-general as her representative
  • 00:03:59
    is the official head of state on paper
  • 00:04:02
    as much as the Prime Minister might
  • 00:04:05
    actually be the de facto head of state
  • 00:04:06
    which is the in reality head of state
  • 00:04:08
    but the the way that our Constitution
  • 00:04:12
    was set up and the way that our laws
  • 00:04:13
    were set up the Supreme Court of Canada
  • 00:04:16
    actually was not even the highest court
  • 00:04:19
    in the in the country the highest court
  • 00:04:22
    in the country was actually something
  • 00:04:23
    called the Judicial Committee of the
  • 00:04:25
    Privy Council
  • 00:04:27
    and that's in the UK so you could appeal
  • 00:04:29
    your you could appeal everything all the
  • 00:04:31
    way to the Supreme Court but then you
  • 00:04:32
    didn't like the Supreme Court decision
  • 00:04:33
    so you could appeal to what's called the
  • 00:04:35
    J CPC the Judicial Committee of the
  • 00:04:39
    Privy Council and so that's where the
  • 00:04:40
    final final decisions would be made now
  • 00:04:43
    why is this relevant to the Constitution
  • 00:04:46
    or why is this relevant to everything
  • 00:04:47
    before we even get into the Charter so
  • 00:04:50
    first of all again the Constitution sets
  • 00:04:52
    up basic laws it sets out your rights
  • 00:04:53
    and freedoms so prior to 1982 you have
  • 00:04:57
    your rights contained in a number of
  • 00:04:59
    different places you would have the
  • 00:05:02
    Canadian Bill of Rights 1960 and the
  • 00:05:05
    Canadian Human Rights Act 1977 but
  • 00:05:08
    because of the fact that none of these
  • 00:05:10
    is actually in a constitutional document
  • 00:05:12
    it creates a bit of difficulty for the
  • 00:05:16
    judiciary so for the courts to try and
  • 00:05:18
    figure out which one of the Rights how
  • 00:05:21
    how the government is going to apply or
  • 00:05:23
    what happens if your rights are violated
  • 00:05:24
    because some of the governance documents
  • 00:05:27
    and some of the rights documents are all
  • 00:05:28
    different places and so the court really
  • 00:05:31
    has to sort of figure it out and again
  • 00:05:33
    in the UK to use the UK example because
  • 00:05:35
    they don't have a written constitution
  • 00:05:36
    that on one hand might be difficult but
  • 00:05:39
    they have centuries of British common
  • 00:05:41
    law and precedent where court cases have
  • 00:05:43
    been decided and how government is going
  • 00:05:46
    to respect or uphold human rights so
  • 00:05:49
    they have a lot of that history and
  • 00:05:51
    that's why for them it's a bit easier to
  • 00:05:56
    to to figure things out so back to
  • 00:05:59
    Confederation and back to the founding
  • 00:06:02
    fathers so again we have a number of
  • 00:06:04
    different documents then comes Pierre
  • 00:06:07
    Elliot Trudeau so in the elder Trudeau
  • 00:06:09
    and he decides that Canada is going to
  • 00:06:13
    have to have its own constitution so
  • 00:06:15
    we're gonna have to what's called
  • 00:06:17
    repatriate our constitution again unlike
  • 00:06:19
    the Americans who started off as British
  • 00:06:21
    colony in much as we did they decided to
  • 00:06:24
    break away declare independence so they
  • 00:06:26
    have a declaration of independence and
  • 00:06:27
    then they have the Constitution with us
  • 00:06:29
    because we stayed part of the
  • 00:06:31
    Commonwealth we stayed part of the
  • 00:06:33
    British Empire we never had that so we
  • 00:06:35
    had to repatriate so pay Trading
  • 00:06:37
    repatriating bring our Constitution back
  • 00:06:39
    home as
  • 00:06:40
    commonly referred to so we had to bring
  • 00:06:43
    that back home and that was done in 82
  • 00:06:47
    so that is what is called the
  • 00:06:49
    Constitution Act 80
  • 00:06:50
    that's where the Charter was adopted so
  • 00:06:52
    here you can see this is the
  • 00:06:54
    Constitution Act 1982 and this is also
  • 00:06:57
    the Charter but it's got many many
  • 00:07:00
    sections and there's a lot of things
  • 00:07:02
    about how you apply it and where the the
  • 00:07:06
    rights and responsibilities come from
  • 00:07:07
    what is the role you can see I was
  • 00:07:10
    looking up some principles here so this
  • 00:07:12
    is the big Constitution Act 1982 and
  • 00:07:14
    again this is when Canada officially
  • 00:07:17
    gets its own constitution so this is now
  • 00:07:20
    the highest document the highest legal
  • 00:07:23
    document in the country and so we can
  • 00:07:25
    use this to understand how we're going
  • 00:07:26
    to apply all the rights how we're going
  • 00:07:29
    to understand different rights and how
  • 00:07:30
    we're going to balance rights between
  • 00:07:33
    individuals and operations of the state
  • 00:07:35
    so this is all the document and I do
  • 00:07:37
    want to go through some of the Charter
  • 00:07:39
    just to talk about some of the issues
  • 00:07:40
    because again because of the coronavirus
  • 00:07:42
    crisis many people have questions what
  • 00:07:44
    right does the government have to make
  • 00:07:46
    these decisions these sometimes
  • 00:07:48
    arbitrary seeming decisions what right
  • 00:07:50
    does the government have and what are my
  • 00:07:51
    rights and how are these two things
  • 00:07:52
    balanced but just before there you can
  • 00:07:55
    see here here's a nice video of this is
  • 00:07:57
    1982 when the Queen came to actually
  • 00:08:00
    sign the Charter so she signed it
  • 00:08:03
    which again begs all kinds of
  • 00:08:04
    interesting questions about the sort of
  • 00:08:07
    Independence of Canada again we're still
  • 00:08:08
    very tied to the British monarchy and I
  • 00:08:10
    think you know there's some people who
  • 00:08:11
    have some issues with that some people
  • 00:08:13
    who have don't something do not have
  • 00:08:15
    issues with that for me it really all
  • 00:08:17
    depends on I guess the the de facto
  • 00:08:19
    state of affairs which means the in
  • 00:08:21
    reality state of affairs there's a lot
  • 00:08:23
    to be said for tradition and there's a
  • 00:08:25
    lot to be said for institutions
  • 00:08:26
    especially very old institutions so
  • 00:08:28
    shouldn't necessarily throw them out
  • 00:08:30
    immediately and really you know it all
  • 00:08:33
    depends on the how things are in
  • 00:08:34
    practice right in in Canada we have a
  • 00:08:37
    lot of ties to the British monarchy but
  • 00:08:39
    we're not necessarily on an everyday
  • 00:08:41
    day-to-day basis we're not really run by
  • 00:08:43
    the British monarchy or by the British
  • 00:08:45
    Parliament so you know again there's a
  • 00:08:47
    lot to parse out there I think maybe
  • 00:08:49
    that's the topic for another video
  • 00:08:50
    regardless I just wanted to pull up this
  • 00:08:52
    this cool video
  • 00:08:54
    show you a bit of that history in the
  • 00:08:55
    Canadian history so here back to the
  • 00:08:57
    Constitution Act 1982 so this is the
  • 00:09:00
    Charter and this part of the video if
  • 00:09:01
    you've been watching until now this part
  • 00:09:02
    of the video were actually gonna go
  • 00:09:03
    through some of the Charter and try and
  • 00:09:05
    talk about what that means so again here
  • 00:09:08
    is the Constitution Act 1982 this is now
  • 00:09:10
    the highest law of the land so right off
  • 00:09:13
    the bat whereas Canada is founded upon
  • 00:09:14
    principles that recognized the supremacy
  • 00:09:16
    of God and the rule of law in my last
  • 00:09:19
    video I spoke about sort of the natural
  • 00:09:21
    rights the god-given rights the
  • 00:09:22
    inalienable rights the fact the rights
  • 00:09:24
    that you have or that is believe you
  • 00:09:26
    have simply because you are a person and
  • 00:09:28
    then the rights that government has to
  • 00:09:30
    give to you these are the positive again
  • 00:09:31
    and negative rights the negative rights
  • 00:09:33
    leave me alone you don't need to do
  • 00:09:34
    anything so freedom speech just let me
  • 00:09:36
    say what I want positive rights you have
  • 00:09:38
    to give me something I have a right to
  • 00:09:39
    education and right to health or to
  • 00:09:41
    housing all these types of things so
  • 00:09:43
    again it's important I think that the
  • 00:09:46
    supremacy of God is in there because it
  • 00:09:47
    speaks to I guess the available and
  • 00:09:49
    natural rights of the person so we have
  • 00:09:53
    here that the Canadian Charter of Rights
  • 00:09:55
    guarantees rights of freedom said on a
  • 00:09:56
    subject only to reasonable limits
  • 00:09:58
    prescribed by law as and be demonstrably
  • 00:10:00
    justified in a free and democratic
  • 00:10:01
    society so here we go this is sort of
  • 00:10:05
    right off the bat I guess an interesting
  • 00:10:07
    one and this talks about the limits now
  • 00:10:10
    obviously you can think there might be
  • 00:10:12
    limits or when there would be a limit on
  • 00:10:13
    somebody's rights that's if they break a
  • 00:10:15
    law or if they're doing something
  • 00:10:17
    they're not supposed to be doing then
  • 00:10:18
    obviously their rights would have to be
  • 00:10:19
    violated because that prevents them from
  • 00:10:21
    fighting violating other people's rights
  • 00:10:23
    so again you commit a crime you're
  • 00:10:24
    arrested something you don't have the
  • 00:10:26
    right to go anywhere you don't have the
  • 00:10:28
    right to do a number of the things you
  • 00:10:29
    used to do you lost your free speech you
  • 00:10:31
    know you probably should still have the
  • 00:10:33
    right to remain free of unlawful search
  • 00:10:35
    and seizure which is in here but you
  • 00:10:37
    know you've lost a number of rights and
  • 00:10:39
    that is a justifiable that is very
  • 00:10:40
    justifiable because that's what it takes
  • 00:10:42
    to to keep a an orderly and lawful
  • 00:10:44
    society so right off the bat here is
  • 00:10:47
    sort of one of the founding principles
  • 00:10:48
    then we get to the actual freedoms so
  • 00:10:51
    this is a freedom of conscience and
  • 00:10:52
    religion freedom of thought belief
  • 00:10:53
    opinion expression freedom to press on
  • 00:10:55
    over there media and communication in a
  • 00:10:57
    peaceful assembly freedom of association
  • 00:10:59
    implied in this one interesting enough
  • 00:11:01
    is freedom to not associate so I can
  • 00:11:03
    choose to associate but I can also
  • 00:11:04
    choose not to associate some very
  • 00:11:06
    interesting legal cases there that
  • 00:11:07
    you'll talk about in another video so
  • 00:11:09
    these are the sort of the fundamental
  • 00:11:11
    freedoms then here's the democratic
  • 00:11:12
    rights talking about the right to vote
  • 00:11:13
    talking about in time of war you know
  • 00:11:17
    what must be done in the House of
  • 00:11:18
    Commons this one is especially
  • 00:11:20
    interesting interesting because the
  • 00:11:22
    coronavirus crisis is put to put to the
  • 00:11:24
    test some of these sort of democratic
  • 00:11:26
    principles there was quite an issue with
  • 00:11:29
    the house meeting or not meeting rather
  • 00:11:31
    and early on until we got some virtual
  • 00:11:33
    virtual parliamentary sittings able to
  • 00:11:36
    be done and so that again is very
  • 00:11:38
    interesting since it specifically
  • 00:11:40
    outlined what happens to do in what
  • 00:11:43
    should we do in a wartime where's this
  • 00:11:44
    one again there's a crisis of pandemic
  • 00:11:47
    you know probably not thought of when
  • 00:11:49
    the authors wrote this but again some
  • 00:11:52
    some parallels their mobility rights
  • 00:11:54
    talking about moving and in remaining
  • 00:11:55
    Canada moving to different provinces
  • 00:11:57
    these are the legal rights you have the
  • 00:12:00
    right to life liberty security the
  • 00:12:02
    person the right to be secure against
  • 00:12:05
    unreasonable search and seizure so I
  • 00:12:06
    spoke about that before the right to not
  • 00:12:09
    be arbitrarily detained or imprisoned
  • 00:12:10
    again some very important very
  • 00:12:11
    fundamental rights and in the legal
  • 00:12:15
    rights as opposed to sort of the
  • 00:12:17
    fundamental freedoms so right now the
  • 00:12:20
    government is not I don't think anyone
  • 00:12:22
    is arguing the government is violating
  • 00:12:23
    your freedom of conscience freedom of
  • 00:12:25
    religion I don't think they're talking
  • 00:12:27
    about some of these other rights you
  • 00:12:28
    know thought belief opinion peaceful
  • 00:12:31
    assembly maybe because you can't really
  • 00:12:33
    go anywhere freedom of association again
  • 00:12:36
    you can't really go anywhere so that
  • 00:12:37
    somewhat connected but the real one is
  • 00:12:40
    the legal rights the right to not be
  • 00:12:43
    arbitrarily detained the right to not be
  • 00:12:46
    in prison that's again you know
  • 00:12:47
    purporting with the with the stay home
  • 00:12:49
    orders with the property rights you can
  • 00:12:52
    go to your cottage you cannot go to your
  • 00:12:53
    cottage you know these these separate
  • 00:12:55
    rights and I think this is where people
  • 00:12:58
    are finding that question where have our
  • 00:13:00
    rights gone
  • 00:13:01
    what are happening to our rights and how
  • 00:13:03
    do we sort of make sense of all these
  • 00:13:05
    things because rights are I guess the
  • 00:13:09
    most basic fundamental block of building
  • 00:13:11
    a society the fact that everyone is
  • 00:13:15
    equal and has rights is something that's
  • 00:13:17
    not common throughout history because
  • 00:13:19
    throughout history you would have had
  • 00:13:20
    baby rulers
  • 00:13:21
    aristocrats the wealthy landowners you
  • 00:13:24
    know different categories of people
  • 00:13:25
    maybe different races different
  • 00:13:26
    categories of people they had different
  • 00:13:28
    rights than perhaps others you know so
  • 00:13:31
    you could have a slave or a indentured
  • 00:13:33
    servant or a bondsman we would have less
  • 00:13:35
    rights maybe no rights then you know
  • 00:13:39
    then different categories of people so
  • 00:13:41
    you know me everyone here everyone
  • 00:13:42
    everyone everyone that's really critical
  • 00:13:45
    and again that's part of the discussion
  • 00:13:47
    right now if well if everyone then how
  • 00:13:49
    are you how are you telling me this how
  • 00:13:50
    are you telling me to stay home how are
  • 00:13:51
    you telling me all these things because
  • 00:13:52
    everyone it's not just you know some
  • 00:13:54
    people so this is all part of that
  • 00:13:56
    discussion ongoing right now that I
  • 00:13:58
    think is important for us to look at the
  • 00:14:00
    most important part though that I think
  • 00:14:02
    most people do not know or understand
  • 00:14:04
    and I'm gonna have to control F to find
  • 00:14:05
    is the right here so this is the sorry
  • 00:14:10
    this is male and female that's them I'm
  • 00:14:12
    not the correct notwithstanding this is
  • 00:14:14
    a section 33 okay
  • 00:14:15
    section 33 now this is the I think most
  • 00:14:20
    misunderstood part of the charter of the
  • 00:14:23
    Canadian Constitution and I want to talk
  • 00:14:25
    about it because it doesn't really exist
  • 00:14:27
    in the same way in a lot of other
  • 00:14:28
    countries and this is what is called the
  • 00:14:30
    notwithstanding Clause so
  • 00:14:32
    notwithstanding Clause here I'll read it
  • 00:14:33
    up first let me talk about it Parliament
  • 00:14:35
    or legislature of a province may
  • 00:14:37
    expressly declare an act of Parliament
  • 00:14:39
    or of the legislature as the case may be
  • 00:14:41
    that any act or provision thereof shall
  • 00:14:43
    operate notwithstanding a provision so
  • 00:14:46
    you're not including a provision
  • 00:14:47
    including in section 2 or sections 7 to
  • 00:14:50
    15 so in section 2 this is up here this
  • 00:14:54
    is your fundamental freedoms or 7 to 15
  • 00:14:57
    the legal rights all the way down here
  • 00:14:59
    to 15 in quality rights okay so what
  • 00:15:02
    does that mean back to section 33 back
  • 00:15:04
    to the notwithstanding Clause so ok that
  • 00:15:06
    means that Parliament to the federal
  • 00:15:09
    parliament or a provincial legislature
  • 00:15:10
    can say can especially declare that an
  • 00:15:14
    act of Parliament or the legislature is
  • 00:15:18
    going to be in effect regardless of what
  • 00:15:21
    it says in section 2 or sections 7
  • 00:15:24
    through 15 so again so theoretically a
  • 00:15:27
    provincial government could pass a law
  • 00:15:29
    saying that you know you do not have
  • 00:15:32
    freedom of religion right there's only
  • 00:15:34
    going to be one
  • 00:15:35
    official religion or you do not have
  • 00:15:37
    freedom of association you do not have
  • 00:15:39
    the right going forward to be safe from
  • 00:15:43
    unlawful search and seizure so
  • 00:15:44
    theoretically a province could pass that
  • 00:15:47
    and therefore your rights as guaranteed
  • 00:15:49
    by the Charter are now not guaranteed
  • 00:15:52
    because section 33 the notwithstanding
  • 00:15:54
    Clause notwithstanding Clause has sort
  • 00:15:56
    of unguaranteed them in a particular
  • 00:15:59
    sense again this brings up a lot of
  • 00:16:01
    discussion of when is it valid when is
  • 00:16:03
    it a right that is permanent that it can
  • 00:16:05
    never be violated are there times when
  • 00:16:07
    it is appropriate to be violated this
  • 00:16:10
    section it is important to note has
  • 00:16:11
    never been used on the federal level so
  • 00:16:14
    the House of Commons has never actually
  • 00:16:16
    had to use the notwithstanding Clause
  • 00:16:18
    but provinces have used the
  • 00:16:21
    notwithstanding Clause and the most
  • 00:16:23
    famous example is Quebec with some of
  • 00:16:25
    the language laws to pull up a link here
  • 00:16:27
    I'll try and pull it up in a second but
  • 00:16:29
    some of the language laws in Quebec then
  • 00:16:32
    those ones you get around the the
  • 00:16:36
    Charter because there's a
  • 00:16:38
    notwithstanding notwithstanding Clause
  • 00:16:41
    that's being invoked and therefore they
  • 00:16:44
    can just get away and say okay well you
  • 00:16:46
    know we understand that we understand
  • 00:16:48
    that you know it says these rights here
  • 00:16:50
    and you know we believe in these lights
  • 00:16:52
    however the you know notwithstanding
  • 00:16:55
    because of special issues in Quebec
  • 00:16:59
    special dynamics in Quebec so therefore
  • 00:17:01
    we believe that this particular right is
  • 00:17:03
    it's more important to enforce another
  • 00:17:05
    right which is language rights and
  • 00:17:07
    French language rights as opposed to
  • 00:17:09
    this right of people so it's important
  • 00:17:12
    to look at these rights and the
  • 00:17:13
    notwithstanding Clause in one context
  • 00:17:16
    that it can be used to differentiate
  • 00:17:17
    between rights or perhaps reorder the
  • 00:17:20
    rights in different tiers so you might
  • 00:17:22
    say okay well you have two competing
  • 00:17:23
    rights but we are gonna now reorder them
  • 00:17:26
    so it doesn't necessarily have to be we
  • 00:17:28
    don't think you have freedom of religion
  • 00:17:29
    we don't think you have freedom of
  • 00:17:30
    conscience doesn't necessarily have to
  • 00:17:32
    be that it could be simply a reordering
  • 00:17:34
    a reordering of all different rights
  • 00:17:39
    different i'ts that are competing and so
  • 00:17:41
    that is something that I think is
  • 00:17:43
    something we need to keep in mind but
  • 00:17:45
    regardless the fact that there is a
  • 00:17:46
    section 33 that is
  • 00:17:48
    is different than I think a lot of other
  • 00:17:51
    countries where they have a straight
  • 00:17:53
    section that talks about how we're going
  • 00:17:55
    to deal with this is very important on
  • 00:17:59
    one hand but again this all ties into
  • 00:18:02
    the fact that you have to have and I
  • 00:18:05
    mentioned in previous video you have to
  • 00:18:06
    have a society who's willing to uphold
  • 00:18:08
    your rights and in our society in our
  • 00:18:12
    you know in the times of we're living
  • 00:18:13
    and it's the government that is
  • 00:18:15
    upholding your right so in a certain
  • 00:18:17
    sense the government is giving your
  • 00:18:20
    rights and I'm gonna you know you what
  • 00:18:21
    marks the government is giving you your
  • 00:18:23
    rights because ultimately it doesn't
  • 00:18:24
    matter if the rights are inalienable and
  • 00:18:26
    their god-given because the government
  • 00:18:28
    society at large is upholding those
  • 00:18:31
    rights for you
  • 00:18:32
    but then again here we're talking about
  • 00:18:34
    the way how to deal with those rights
  • 00:18:36
    and so the Charter as a document again
  • 00:18:40
    is super important because not only did
  • 00:18:43
    it finally bring together as in 1982 did
  • 00:18:46
    it finally bring together the laws of
  • 00:18:49
    the land in Canada under one document
  • 00:18:51
    which makes it much easier and sort of
  • 00:18:54
    more important it codifies them as the
  • 00:18:56
    basic law of this country but it's
  • 00:18:58
    important because right now a lot of the
  • 00:19:00
    discussion should revolve around the
  • 00:19:04
    Constitution around the Charter and
  • 00:19:06
    around our right because we can't talk
  • 00:19:08
    about rights unless we all understand
  • 00:19:11
    rights in the same way and that's what
  • 00:19:12
    this document is trying to do now I do
  • 00:19:15
    want to set up for the next for the next
  • 00:19:17
    video and I want to talk about you may
  • 00:19:20
    have heard this concept of the
  • 00:19:21
    Constitution or the Charter is a living
  • 00:19:23
    breathing document you may have heared
  • 00:19:27
    from her from the US people talking
  • 00:19:29
    about the Constitution literally or are
  • 00:19:31
    reading into it different things so I
  • 00:19:33
    want to talk about that and that's a bit
  • 00:19:34
    of a complex issue and that's how we
  • 00:19:36
    understand the Charter going forward how
  • 00:19:38
    do you read this document I mean this
  • 00:19:40
    was written in 1982 so much more recent
  • 00:19:42
    but if you're talking about other
  • 00:19:43
    documents how do you read them if
  • 00:19:46
    they're two three four hundred years old
  • 00:19:48
    or in the case of British krama how do
  • 00:19:49
    you read that if this is like eight
  • 00:19:51
    hundred years old right so something
  • 00:19:53
    about to talk about for another video
  • 00:19:54
    but other than that I really hope that
  • 00:19:56
    everyone found this video somewhat
  • 00:19:58
    useful and if you have any questions
  • 00:20:00
    about the Constitution I'd love to be
  • 00:20:01
    able to try and explore that to get
  • 00:20:03
    with you and you know keep posted
  • 00:20:05
    subscribe to our YouTube channel here at
  • 00:20:07
    true north I know a lot of the tune of
  • 00:20:10
    contributors my colleagues are talking
  • 00:20:11
    about a lot of very very important
  • 00:20:13
    things there's a lot of discussions
  • 00:20:14
    going on right now some of them many of
  • 00:20:17
    them have especially been speaking about
  • 00:20:18
    gun rights which is super super
  • 00:20:20
    important and I might even talk about
  • 00:20:21
    that depending on where we are sort of
  • 00:20:23
    in a week or so but so definitely
  • 00:20:26
    subscribe stay tuned like our social
  • 00:20:28
    media pages and follow us so you can
  • 00:20:30
    stay up to date on the latest
  • 00:20:31
    information other than that have a great
  • 00:20:34
    day wash your hands stay safe and I'm
  • 00:20:36
    Sam Ashkenazi for TrueNorth
  • 00:20:38
    thanks so much and hope you enjoyed
タグ
  • Canadian Constitution
  • Charter of Rights
  • notwithstanding clause
  • legal history
  • Pierre Elliott Trudeau
  • Canada's independence
  • constitutional law
  • human rights
  • British North America Act
  • Constitution Act 1982