7. The Studio Era
概要
TLDRThe lecture explores the transition from silent films to sound films, marking the golden age of Hollywood from 1927 to the 1950s. It discusses the emergence of a mass production system and the star system, emphasizing the importance of both aesthetic and anthropological perspectives in film analysis. The lecturer highlights screwball comedy as a significant genre that combines fast-paced dialogue and physical humor, often featuring strong female characters and addressing themes of class and gender dynamics. The impact of the production code on filmmaking and the economic factors influencing Hollywood's production practices are also examined, along with the concept of an aesthetic of connection that emphasizes familiarity in film narratives.
収穫
- 🎬 Transition from silent to sound films marked a new era in Hollywood.
- 💰 The golden age of Hollywood saw a mass production system emerge.
- ⭐ The star system created recognizable figures that influenced audience engagement.
- 🎭 Screwball comedy combined fast-paced dialogue with physical humor.
- 👩🎤 Strong female characters became central in screwball comedies.
- 📜 The production code imposed self-censorship on filmmakers.
- 💡 Aesthetic of connection emphasizes familiarity in film narratives.
- 📊 Economic factors encouraged repetition and familiarity in films.
- 🌍 Films reflect cultural values and societal changes.
- 🎉 Screwball comedies provided escapist entertainment during the Depression.
タイムライン
- 00:00:00 - 00:05:00
The video begins with an introduction to the transition from silent films to sound films, emphasizing the importance of both aesthetic and anthropological perspectives in understanding cinema. The speaker, David Thorburn, expresses hope that students will find value in silent films as they progress through the course, and outlines the significance of the sound era in Hollywood's history, marking it as a golden age of cinema.
- 00:05:00 - 00:10:00
Thorburn discusses the emergence of sound films and the establishment of a mass production system in Hollywood, highlighting the industry's investment in transitioning to sound. He notes the rapid obsolescence of silent films and introduces 'The Jazz Singer' as a pivotal moment in film history, illustrating the industry's quick adaptation to new technology and audience expectations.
- 00:10:00 - 00:15:00
The speaker emphasizes the dominance of movies as America's primary entertainment form during the sound era, citing statistics that show a significant portion of the population regularly attended films. He reflects on the relationship between the audience and the films produced, noting the rise of the star system and the importance of recognizable actors in attracting viewers.
- 00:15:00 - 00:20:00
Thorburn explains the concept of genre in film, describing how audiences develop expectations based on familiar categories. He argues that the Hollywood system's reliance on stars and genres is a reflection of its mass production nature, which seeks to provide audiences with recognizable and familiar experiences to encourage repeat viewings.
- 00:20:00 - 00:25:00
The discussion shifts to the evolution of film as an art form, with Thorburn arguing that the Hollywood system, despite its commercial origins, has produced complex narratives and artistic achievements. He introduces the idea of a 'popular literacy' that emerges as audiences become more knowledgeable about film conventions and genres.
- 00:25:00 - 00:30:00
Thorburn identifies three distinct strains of comedy in Hollywood during the 1930s and 1940s: anarchic comedy, worldly comedy, and screwball comedy. He briefly describes anarchic comedy's subversive nature and worldly comedy's more open attitude toward sexuality, setting the stage for a deeper exploration of screwball comedy as a significant genre.
- 00:30:00 - 00:35:00
The speaker defines screwball comedy as a unique blend of fast-paced dialogue and slapstick humor, emerging during the Great Depression. He highlights its irreverent humor and the portrayal of eccentric, high-born characters, often critiquing the upper class while maintaining a lighthearted tone.
- 00:35:00 - 00:40:00
Thorburn discusses the representation of women in screwball comedies, noting the emergence of strong female characters who challenge traditional gender roles. He emphasizes the genre's portrayal of marriage as a partnership of equals, reflecting changing societal values during the 1930s.
- 00:40:00 - 00:45:00
The speaker acknowledges the underlying themes of class conflict and sexual dynamics present in screwball comedies, suggesting that these films both entertain and comment on the social issues of their time. He prepares to illustrate these principles through clips from two screwball comedies, 'The Lady Eve' and 'Ball of Fire.'
- 00:45:00 - 00:50:00
Thorburn presents a clip from 'The Lady Eve,' showcasing Barbara Stanwyck's character as a con artist. He highlights the intelligence and wit in the dialogue, emphasizing the character's control over the scene and the subtext of gender dynamics.
- 00:50:00 - 00:55:37
The second clip from 'Ball of Fire' features Gary Cooper and Barbara Stanwyck, illustrating the comedic interplay between the characters. Thorburn points out the cleverness of the dialogue and the subtext of sexual tension, demonstrating how screwball comedies navigate censorship while maintaining a rich narrative.
マインドマップ
ビデオQ&A
What is the focus of the lecture?
The lecture focuses on the transition from silent films to sound films and the characteristics of the golden age of Hollywood.
What are the two perspectives discussed in analyzing films?
The two perspectives are aesthetic (artistic qualities) and anthropological (cultural context and societal values).
What is screwball comedy?
Screwball comedy is a genre characterized by fast-paced dialogue, physical humor, and often features strong female characters.
How did the advent of sound films impact Hollywood?
The advent of sound films led to a mass production system and the establishment of a star system, significantly changing the film industry.
What themes are often explored in screwball comedies?
Screwball comedies often explore themes of class conflict and gender dynamics, portraying women as strong and independent.
What is the significance of the star system in Hollywood?
The star system created recognizable figures whose names became synonymous with films, influencing audience attendance and engagement.
How did the production code affect Hollywood films?
The production code imposed self-censorship on filmmakers, leading to creative ways to suggest themes without explicit content.
What is the aesthetic of connection?
The aesthetic of connection emphasizes familiarity and the relationships between different texts and performances in film.
What role did economic factors play in Hollywood's film production?
Economic factors encouraged repetition and familiarity in films, allowing studios to save money and ensure audience engagement.
How did screwball comedies reflect societal changes during the Depression?
Screwball comedies reflected societal changes by addressing the anxieties of the Depression while providing escapist entertainment.
ビデオをもっと見る
Doctor reveals undisclosed risks of COVID-19 vaccine
Navigating the World's BIGGEST Port in Freezing Temperatures - Shanghai LIFE AT SEA
ISMUBA AL ISLAM TENTANG FIQIH QURBAN
La Naturaleza de La Republica Dominicana
Social Intelligence: The Art of Reading and Responding to People (Audiobook)
The most prepared entrepreneur to ever enter the Den 🐉 Dragons' Den 🔥 BBC
- 00:00:00The following content is provided under a Creative
- 00:00:02Commons license.
- 00:00:04Your support will help MIT OpenCourseWare
- 00:00:06continue to offer high quality educational resources for free.
- 00:00:10To make a donation or view additional materials
- 00:00:13from hundreds of MIT courses, visit MIT OpenCourseWare
- 00:00:17at ocw.mit.edu.
- 00:00:25DAVID THORBURN: Welcome people.
- 00:00:27I'm glad to see you this afternoon.
- 00:00:30We finally make our transition to sound film.
- 00:00:33I hope that you endured the silent era with good spirits.
- 00:00:37I think you'll find, as the semester goes on,
- 00:00:40that even some of the silent films you found less
- 00:00:43compelling when you began will resonate for you
- 00:00:46and become more valuable.
- 00:00:47And my expectation is that some of you
- 00:00:49will decide, after the fact, that Keaton and Chaplain,
- 00:00:53and perhaps even for some of you Murnau, presented you
- 00:00:56with films that were at least as memorable as the most
- 00:00:59memorable sound films.
- 00:01:02But we now move into a segment of the course
- 00:01:04in which every object has more than merely artifactual a art
- 00:01:07value, although the artifactual value of these remarkable films
- 00:01:11is very great.
- 00:01:12And as I indicated earlier in the semester,
- 00:01:16my hope is to toggle back and forth in some ways,
- 00:01:19in each of our conversations about these films
- 00:01:23on our syllabus.
- 00:01:25To toggle back and forth between what
- 00:01:28we might think of as an aesthetic perspective, talking
- 00:01:32about the qualities in these texts that
- 00:01:34make them artful, memorable, long lasting, worth
- 00:01:39something even beyond the eras in which they
- 00:01:41were created on the one side.
- 00:01:43And then on the other side, more an anthropological kind
- 00:01:46of perspective rather than an aesthetic one.
- 00:01:48What do these texts tell us about the culture
- 00:01:50from which they come?
- 00:01:52In what ways do the social, and moral,
- 00:01:54and political mythologies of the society
- 00:01:57find complex articulation in these texts?
- 00:02:01So those are the two sort of perspectives
- 00:02:05between which we oscillate.
- 00:02:08We now turn to the kind of film that
- 00:02:11emerges after the advent of sound in 1927.
- 00:02:15And we can say that the period, roughly between 1927,
- 00:02:211928-- when the first sound films began
- 00:02:25to be made-- and the era into the 1950s,
- 00:02:30briefly after the advent of television, that era is often
- 00:02:34thought of as-- often called by some film historians
- 00:02:38the golden age of Hollywood.
- 00:02:40And it was in some respects, maybe in many respects,
- 00:02:42a golden age.
- 00:02:44It was certainly a golden age in terms
- 00:02:46of the size and loyalty of the audience for American movies.
- 00:02:51And I'll come back to that in a moment.
- 00:02:53What happened of course in the sound era
- 00:02:56was that an industry emerged.
- 00:02:59A more neutral term for the golden age of Hollywood
- 00:03:01might just be the studio era.
- 00:03:04Because what happened in the sound era
- 00:03:06was a fortification and extension
- 00:03:08of the system that had already emerged,
- 00:03:10and which we've discussed-- and which David Cook catalogs very
- 00:03:14fully in the required reading-- a fortification, an extension
- 00:03:19of the system that had emerged in the silent era.
- 00:03:22The mass production system that was already
- 00:03:24in place in the silent era was perfected and extended.
- 00:03:28The principle of the specialization of labor
- 00:03:30became even more complex and effectively deployed
- 00:03:37in the production of motion pictures.
- 00:03:39And in this period, in the period between 1928 and 1930
- 00:03:43for example, Hollywood spent what
- 00:03:45was then a tremendous amount of money-- $500 million--
- 00:03:49in gearing up for the transition to sound.
- 00:03:54It was almost as if silent films became obsolete
- 00:03:58almost instantly.
- 00:03:59Almost instantly.
- 00:04:01And the famous line from-- what's
- 00:04:06the title of the first sound film?
- 00:04:10The Jazz Singer.
- 00:04:11Who's the star?
- 00:04:12The theater singer Al Jolson, right.
- 00:04:17And there isn't very much dialogue in that film,
- 00:04:19although there are some 8 interpolated songs.
- 00:04:21There's very little synchronous dialogue, but there's a little.
- 00:04:24And one of the most famous lines-- maybe
- 00:04:28the most famous line in the film-- comes at a certain point
- 00:04:32where someone says "You ain't heard nothing yet",
- 00:04:35and the implication is you ain't seen nothing yet either.
- 00:04:39And it is certainly the case that within three years
- 00:04:43there were no sound films really being made.
- 00:04:47As I've suggested earlier, a comic and still illuminating
- 00:04:50perspective on this process of Hollywood adjusting
- 00:04:54to the advent of the new technology of sound
- 00:04:56is dramatized for us in the wonderful musical
- 00:04:59we're going to see in a few weeks, Singing In The Rain.
- 00:05:03So in this era then, after the advent of sound,
- 00:05:07the movies become America's dominant entertainment form.
- 00:05:11And in the period between 1930 and 1945,
- 00:05:147,500 films are made by the Hollywood production
- 00:05:18system, approximately-- almost exactly in fact--
- 00:05:21500 films a year.
- 00:05:23Think about the confidence that this production system
- 00:05:28needed to have in its capacity to get a return on the number
- 00:05:33of films that it turned out.
- 00:05:34And think about what it meant that the entire society was now
- 00:05:38geared toward this mass form of entertainment.
- 00:05:41We can get some measure of the tremendous popularity
- 00:05:43of the movies, the centrality that the movies assumed
- 00:05:47by the end of the silent era and into the sound era,
- 00:05:50if we think of some numbers.
- 00:05:52In 1938, for example, what we might
- 00:05:54think of as the central, the height, the apex of the studio
- 00:05:59system, of the sound era, there were
- 00:06:02a total of 80 million admissions per week
- 00:06:05in the American movies.
- 00:06:06That comes to something like 67% of the population.
- 00:06:10Now I'm sure some people were going to the movies
- 00:06:12more than once a week, so it isn't literally
- 00:06:14as if 70% of the population was attending
- 00:06:17the movies every week, but it's something close to that.
- 00:06:19Far more than half the population
- 00:06:22had an intimate, weekly, habitual relationship
- 00:06:26to the movies.
- 00:06:27And the form that the Hollywood system took on
- 00:06:30was surely, in part, a reflection
- 00:06:32of this increasingly intimate and knowledgeable connection
- 00:06:37between a mass audience and the kinds
- 00:06:39of movies, the kinds of stories that Hollywood was pumping out.
- 00:06:45Can you think, for example, why the broad attributes
- 00:06:51of the system that I've already described, can you
- 00:06:53think about why those broad attributes would encourage
- 00:06:56the development of what we would call a system based on stars,
- 00:07:01in which, movie stars, the names of particular actresses
- 00:07:04and actresses become so well known that their names carry
- 00:07:08the film.
- 00:07:08And people go to the movies to see
- 00:07:10Gable, or Colbert, or whatever famous performer, famous actor.
- 00:07:15And there were dozens of such films,
- 00:07:17in a tiering system in which there
- 00:07:18were great stars at the top, B level stars below them,
- 00:07:22C level actors and actresses below them.
- 00:07:25And the border between those were somewhat permeable.
- 00:07:29And an extraordinary number of people in the society
- 00:07:33were familiar not only with these stars
- 00:07:38and the particular films they had made, and would follow them
- 00:07:40from film to film, but were all so familiar
- 00:07:43with what was a partly mythological and fictional
- 00:07:46story about their private lives that the Hollywood publicity
- 00:07:50system kept pumping out about the stars and performers.
- 00:07:53And what was essentially created was a kind
- 00:07:56of mythological system in which the stars were literally--
- 00:07:59for the audience-- characters or creatures who are literally
- 00:08:02larger than life.
- 00:08:03And something, some vestigial form of that star system
- 00:08:07still survives today in the great celebrity stars, rock
- 00:08:10stars, and some of the great movie stars of today,
- 00:08:13but it's on very different scale.
- 00:08:15And the number of such recognizable figures
- 00:08:17is much smaller today than it was
- 00:08:20in the heyday of the Hollywood era,
- 00:08:21when there were dozens and dozens of actors and actresses
- 00:08:24whose entire careers were known intimately by the audience
- 00:08:28and whose work from film to film was something
- 00:08:31that particular members of the audience
- 00:08:32would follow religiously, would follow as if they were members
- 00:08:38of a kind of fan club.
- 00:08:42And then the second aspect of the star system
- 00:08:44was-- coupled to it and linked to it-- was what
- 00:08:47we might call a genre system.
- 00:08:49What's a genre?
- 00:08:51A category or a kind of story.
- 00:08:54So the elegy is a poetic genre, and the western
- 00:08:57is a narrative genre.
- 00:08:59And as soon as we mention western, or elegy,
- 00:09:02or situation comedy-- to talk about a dominant television
- 00:09:05genre-- as soon as we say that, a set of expectations
- 00:09:08immediately enters our mind, right?
- 00:09:10We know that there are certain features that westerns have.
- 00:09:13We immediately know when we hear the word
- 00:09:15western what historical era the story is set in.
- 00:09:18We know what the costumes will be like.
- 00:09:20We can predict what kinds of animals
- 00:09:22we're likely to see in the film.
- 00:09:23We can even, if we know the western genre well,
- 00:09:26we could even predict pretty accurately what kind of story
- 00:09:30we're likely to be told, and what the rhythms or trajectory
- 00:09:34of that story might be.
- 00:09:35Not because we know the particular western,
- 00:09:38but because we know the category.
- 00:09:40And every western that calls itself a western
- 00:09:42is in some sense in conversation with every previous western.
- 00:09:47What we're talking about here, in part,
- 00:09:48is a new form of literacy.
- 00:09:50Or at least not exactly a new form,
- 00:09:52but a central form of literacy.
- 00:09:54A form of literacy that emerges in popular art
- 00:09:57when a mass audience becomes more and more
- 00:09:59knowledgeable about the conventions, and operations,
- 00:10:02and formulas on which the system depends.
- 00:10:06By the middle of the 1930s, virtually the whole history
- 00:10:09of the silent era and all the new genres that
- 00:10:12were elaborated and fulfilling themselves in the sound era,
- 00:10:16were now intimately known by segments, if not
- 00:10:19the entire American audience.
- 00:10:23So to come back to my question, why
- 00:10:24would a system that emphasized the repetition of stars
- 00:10:28and the repetition of genres across experiences
- 00:10:32be a particularly appropriate or useful one for the kind
- 00:10:36of system I've described?
- 00:10:38What's the answer?
- 00:10:39If it's a mass production system.
- 00:10:45The alternative would be, to clarify my question, why would
- 00:10:48we not have a system in which every movie was
- 00:10:50a unique experience?
- 00:10:52Did not make gestures toward a whole class of other stories
- 00:10:56to which it belongs in, which it wants the audience
- 00:10:58to compare it.
- 00:11:00Or that a series of stars would emerge,
- 00:11:01so that every time you see a Clark Gable
- 00:11:03movie, or a Claudette Colbert movie,
- 00:11:05or a Barbara Stanwyck movie, you associate those performances
- 00:11:11in those films with all the earlier performances
- 00:11:14in which you've see-- why does that system work?
- 00:11:16What's the answer?
- 00:11:17All right.
- 00:11:18That's right.
- 00:11:19Because it familiar, you know what to expect.
- 00:11:21It's a branding.
- 00:11:23And in fact, if you think about it,
- 00:11:24if you want people to shell out money every single week,
- 00:11:27you can understand why the notion that they should
- 00:11:29be getting something familiar might work, might be important.
- 00:11:32It's possible that you could get people
- 00:11:34to spend all of a significant amount of money,
- 00:11:37or at least a small amount of money--
- 00:11:38in the early days admissions we're not
- 00:11:40that expensive-- for one experience,
- 00:11:45but if you expect them to do it week after week after week,
- 00:11:49it's natural that you would expect
- 00:11:51that the system that would develop
- 00:11:53would offer the audience certain familiar landmarks.
- 00:11:58In other words, the answer-- and I
- 00:11:59think it's a very good answer-- the answer is
- 00:12:01that a mass production system lends itself
- 00:12:03to principles of repetition and economies of scale.
- 00:12:08What's an obvious thing, if you're a studio
- 00:12:10and you make a lot of Westerns, how can you save money?
- 00:12:13Do you have to hire the horses every time?
- 00:12:16Maybe you have your own stable.
- 00:12:17Not only that, maybe if you have a scene of a stampede,
- 00:12:20you could use it in more than one movie,
- 00:12:22you don't have to film it again.
- 00:12:23And in fact, a lot of early Westerns
- 00:12:25have stock footage that were put in.
- 00:12:27They would film a tremendously exciting cattle stampede
- 00:12:31and they would use it in four or five different movies that
- 00:12:34needed stampedes.
- 00:12:35The same with the sets.
- 00:12:36They don't have to tear down the Western town
- 00:12:38and rebuild it for every movie.
- 00:12:40So in other words, one could say that there
- 00:12:42are economic incentives that encourage this system.
- 00:12:46But this is another example of that magnificent paradox
- 00:12:49that I spoke to you about earlier
- 00:12:51in the term, the paradox that the crassest of alliances
- 00:12:54between commerce and technology should
- 00:12:56be the enabling conditions of a narrative art.
- 00:12:59Why?
- 00:13:00Because even though the origins of these strategies
- 00:13:04may very well have been totally commercial, as they
- 00:13:07begin to elaborate themselves, they inevitably
- 00:13:09become more complex.
- 00:13:10The audiences begin to generate expectations.
- 00:13:13The people who are repeating themselves
- 00:13:14begin to repeat themselves with variation.
- 00:13:17Even if they never intended to get better,
- 00:13:19they would get better.
- 00:13:20And of course some of them are excellent professionals
- 00:13:23and they do want to do a better and better job.
- 00:13:25So what happens is the system begins to refine itself,
- 00:13:28even if it begins in the crassest of intentions.
- 00:13:32Figure out a way to save money and make as much money
- 00:13:34as we can, by giving the audience
- 00:13:36the same thing again and again.
- 00:13:37If the audience would buy the same story over and over again,
- 00:13:41no doubt Hollywood would give it to them.
- 00:13:43But of course, they have to introduce variations just
- 00:13:46to make a living.
- 00:13:47Just to make people come back.
- 00:13:48And then as these variations begin to elaborate themselves,
- 00:13:52something complex and rich begins to emerge.
- 00:13:55And this knowledge that the audience has
- 00:13:57becomes what we might call a form of literacy,
- 00:14:00a form of popular literacy.
- 00:14:02So there's much more one could say about this,
- 00:14:05and I'm being very abrupt and overly brief
- 00:14:11about the way this system elaborated.
- 00:14:13Suffice it to say that there emerged in this era
- 00:14:18a series of recognizable separate categories of movie
- 00:14:21making.
- 00:14:21Westerns, gangster films, various forms of comedy,
- 00:14:29various forms of social realism, certain forms
- 00:14:32of historical spectacle.
- 00:14:34And other smaller genres like the newspaper picture, which
- 00:14:39is a kind of smaller sub genre.
- 00:14:41We're going to see one example of that tonight.
- 00:14:43And so that what I'm trying to do
- 00:14:45over the next couple of weeks, and especially in this week,
- 00:14:47is trying to demonstrate these principles in small,
- 00:14:51by talking today especially about certain aspects
- 00:14:55of screwball comedy.
- 00:14:56And by placing that particular central Hollywood
- 00:14:59genre in the larger context of this manufacturing system,
- 00:15:04this mythological system that we've been describing.
- 00:15:07One way of explaining what I'm trying to get out
- 00:15:11when I talk about these stars and genres,
- 00:15:13and the purely commercial origins
- 00:15:16of what becomes a rich set of narrative expectations,
- 00:15:20is to say that what I'm really implicitly dealing with
- 00:15:24is a problem.
- 00:15:25It will seem less of a problem to your generation
- 00:15:27than it did to generations earlier.
- 00:15:29But it took a long time before the American Society
- 00:15:33began to recognize that the movies were a signature art
- 00:15:36form of American society, and that if American society was
- 00:15:40going to be remembered for its artistic achievements
- 00:15:43in the 20th century, the movies were going
- 00:15:45to be one of the prime instances of its artistic identity
- 00:15:51as a society.
- 00:15:53It took a long time for Americans to recognize this.
- 00:15:55In fact, the Europeans recognized it
- 00:15:57before the Americans did.
- 00:15:58And one of the fundamental reasons for that
- 00:16:00is that our ideas about what art is
- 00:16:02were inherited notions that came essentially
- 00:16:06from the traditions of romanticism and modernism,
- 00:16:09which lead tremendous emphasis on pure originality.
- 00:16:12On the idea that the work of art has to be sui generis,
- 00:16:15unique to itself.
- 00:16:16That it has to grow out only of the individual genius
- 00:16:19of the artist.
- 00:16:20Well, this notion of art is actually a very time-bound one.
- 00:16:23It's not really a universal notion of art at all.
- 00:16:26The notion of art that I want to suggest to you
- 00:16:28was a more populist one.
- 00:16:30It goes back to Homer and to the various forms of Epic
- 00:16:34Performance, and this notion of artisan
- 00:16:36work-- a communal one, in which the artist is
- 00:16:39a singer or a speaker to the main parts of the community,
- 00:16:42to the whole of the community, or to a large part
- 00:16:44of the community.
- 00:16:45And in order to do that kind of singing,
- 00:16:47to do that kind of address, the singer, the poet,
- 00:16:51the storyteller needs to use the categories and the story forms,
- 00:16:56and the language that is known by the majority
- 00:17:00of the community.
- 00:17:04The aesthetic for this kind of art
- 00:17:06is an aesthetic of familiarity, in which meaning
- 00:17:11and significance is generated not
- 00:17:14by a shock of total recognition of everything
- 00:17:17in the text being new or innovative, but by something
- 00:17:20else.
- 00:17:20By the fact that certain very familiar strategies
- 00:17:23are suddenly very, very slightly.
- 00:17:25And it's the slight variation from the familiar
- 00:17:28that generates the significance.
- 00:17:31And I'm going to try to demonstrate these principles.
- 00:17:34In fact, all of the clips and films
- 00:17:36that you're going to see over the next few weeks--
- 00:17:39and especially in today's viewing and lectures--
- 00:17:42are embodiments or instances of this principle,
- 00:17:46as I hope you will see.
- 00:17:47What we're talking about here, to borrow
- 00:17:49a phrase from the film scholar Leo Brody, whose
- 00:17:52essay An Aesthetics of Connection
- 00:17:55is required reading in the course,
- 00:17:57we might say that what we're trying to identify here
- 00:18:00is an aesthetics of connection, in which the links
- 00:18:04and connections amongst different texts
- 00:18:06or amongst different performances, are emphasized.
- 00:18:08In which the familiar is a central element
- 00:18:12in artistic experience.
- 00:18:13Most people love to recognize the familiar.
- 00:18:16It is not the case that art always
- 00:18:18must continually surprise you.
- 00:18:20In fact, art that is constantly surprising,
- 00:18:23that makes no assumptions that you can share,
- 00:18:25or that allude to or refer to earlier
- 00:18:30forms of the experience, probably such a text
- 00:18:34doesn't even exist.
- 00:18:36Even if the allusion or reference to ancestors
- 00:18:39is one of antagonism in which the text is saying
- 00:18:42look how different I am from my ancestors,
- 00:18:44it still needs its ancestors in some way.
- 00:18:46So the notion that a text can be entirely creatively original
- 00:18:51is itself a kind of modernist and romantic fallacy.
- 00:18:55In any case, the artistic principles
- 00:18:57on which the Hollywood film is based
- 00:18:58are artistic principles we could identify
- 00:19:01as populist or democratic.
- 00:19:03Democratist.
- 00:19:05And they're based on the idea that the familiar and the
- 00:19:07every day can be transmuted into something
- 00:19:10more complex by good performances, by good writing,
- 00:19:13by the creation of a compelling story.
- 00:19:16And that meaning is created not by a single unique creative
- 00:19:21act, but essentially by a conversation
- 00:19:24on communal process, in which a particular perception
- 00:19:27or sense of the world is juxtaposed against older
- 00:19:30instances of the same thing.
- 00:19:32And by comparison, one learns something about where one
- 00:19:36is in the particular new text.
- 00:19:39An Aesthetic of Connection.
- 00:19:41It's one measure of the complexity
- 00:19:44and social centrality of the movies in the 1930s, '40s,
- 00:19:48and early '50s, that we can find in the system
- 00:19:52three separate kinds of comedy.
- 00:19:55It's a measure of its maturity, by not just one
- 00:19:57but three fairly robust separate strains of comedy.
- 00:20:01And this even excludes musical comedy, the musical film,
- 00:20:04which could be said to be even yet a fourth strain.
- 00:20:08Not just one form then, but three.
- 00:20:10And the form of comedy we're focusing on today
- 00:20:13is screwball comedy, but I want to say
- 00:20:14a word about the other two strains
- 00:20:16to give you at least some sense of where we're coming from.
- 00:20:19The first significant strain that I
- 00:20:24would like to mention to you is what I call anarchic comedy.
- 00:20:30It mobilizes something that's elemental.
- 00:20:33An elemental impulse in many comedies and maybe in the comic
- 00:20:37impulse itself at some very deep level,
- 00:20:40which is an impulse toward anarchic destruction.
- 00:20:43There's always, hidden in comedy, at least
- 00:20:45a kind of skepticism or suspicion
- 00:20:48or hostility toward the established
- 00:20:50and the respectable.
- 00:20:53And one form that that can take in comedies
- 00:20:56is a kind of systematic anarchy, in which
- 00:21:00the large respected structures of a culture
- 00:21:06are systematically-- or sometimes unsystematically--
- 00:21:09disabled or dismembered.
- 00:21:12And over and over again, in the comedies of the Marx brothers,
- 00:21:15something like this happens.
- 00:21:18I won't mention titles, but there
- 00:21:21are a number of titles-- I think I mentioned one of them
- 00:21:25last week or the week before-- A Night at the Opera,
- 00:21:29which concludes with the entire set of the opera falling apart,
- 00:21:33breaking down.
- 00:21:34And that kind of destructive-- there's
- 00:21:36another film that the Marx brothers
- 00:21:38made in which they are on a football team,
- 00:21:42and we see one of the things that Groucho does in that film
- 00:21:45is he gets the ball and he runs the wrong way.
- 00:21:48And he scores a touchdown for the other team,
- 00:21:50but then he keeps running, and he starts
- 00:21:51running out of the stadium.
- 00:21:53It was a sense that, the rules of this games are silly,
- 00:21:56let's ignore them.
- 00:21:57And so this sense of the dissolution of boundaries
- 00:22:01and the anarchic chaos that follows from the breaking
- 00:22:05down of established categories and edifices
- 00:22:09is part of the pleasure of these Marx brothers' comedy.
- 00:22:12And it even extends, in some way,
- 00:22:14to a kind of deconstructive attitude toward language
- 00:22:17itself.
- 00:22:18And many times the dialogue in a Marx brothers film
- 00:22:21will go nowhere, it will be able end up making no sense.
- 00:22:26So even language itself is reduced
- 00:22:27to a kind of anarchic nonsense at times,
- 00:22:30in the Marx brothers films.
- 00:22:34An even cruder version of this would be in The Three Stooges.
- 00:22:38The Three Stooges are a version of this kind
- 00:22:40of anarchic comedy.
- 00:22:41And there's a final version I should mention,
- 00:22:43a rather distinguished one in it's own way, films
- 00:22:46that are associated with the actor W.C. Fields,
- 00:22:50a gravelly voiced comedian who often portrayed
- 00:22:53people who were half drunk and were
- 00:22:55very hostile toward children, very anti-sentimental.
- 00:22:58He would kick children, or spit at them,
- 00:23:01act as if children were smelly, annoying things who
- 00:23:03should get out of his way so we could keep drinking his scotch,
- 00:23:07that sort of thing.
- 00:23:08So there was both an anarchic and a kind
- 00:23:09of subversive element to this kind of comedy.
- 00:23:12A second strain of comedy, even more powerful and artistically
- 00:23:16more valuable.
- 00:23:17A very, very interesting one, which
- 00:23:19continues to be influential.
- 00:23:23Films from this tradition have been remade recently
- 00:23:26in American cinema.
- 00:23:30And this is the strain of comedy we would call worldly,
- 00:23:34that other scholars have called, it's not my label.
- 00:23:37And one thing that the label intends to acknowledge
- 00:23:40is that many of these directors in this tradition
- 00:23:43were Europeans.
- 00:23:44And they brought a European attitude, especially
- 00:23:47toward sexuality.
- 00:23:49They were much more amused than shocked by sexual shenanigans.
- 00:23:53So one measure of worldly comedy was
- 00:23:56it had a more generous and a less puritanical
- 00:23:59attitude toward infidelity, toward the body itself,
- 00:24:03toward sexual allusion, and sexual by-play.
- 00:24:06They still were not explicit by today's standards.
- 00:24:09You didn't see nudity in these films.
- 00:24:10But they were more open about the fact
- 00:24:12that men and women actually engage in that behavior,
- 00:24:16and even sometimes take pleasure in it.
- 00:24:19An acknowledgment that was more difficult for non-worldly films
- 00:24:23to make.
- 00:24:24And the central director of this tradition,
- 00:24:25although there were others, was Ernst Lubitsch.
- 00:24:28I put his name up on the board there.
- 00:24:30His dates are 1892 to 1947, and he made a series of films,
- 00:24:35especially in the '30s through the early '40s, that
- 00:24:38are still regarded as classics of this kind of worldly comedy.
- 00:24:42Trouble In Paradise, Design For Living,
- 00:24:45a film called Ninotchka in 1939.
- 00:24:48A film called To Be or Not To Be in 1942, an immensely bold film
- 00:24:54in which Jack Benny the comedian plays an actor who impersonates
- 00:24:59Hitler.
- 00:25:00The film is set in Berlin, and he actually plays as a double
- 00:25:04of Hitler.
- 00:25:05A very bold film, on a par-- and intellectually,
- 00:25:10I think, and artistically an even more powerful film
- 00:25:14than Chaplin's The Great Dictator,
- 00:25:15although it shares the same ambition.
- 00:25:20And these worldly comedies often told infidelity stories,
- 00:25:27or stories, as I've suggested, that took
- 00:25:31a much more benign and amused attitude
- 00:25:34toward our sexual crimes and misdemeanors.
- 00:25:40Both these strains of comedy are robust and deeply popular
- 00:25:44in the era.
- 00:25:45But the form of comedy that I want us to focus on,
- 00:25:48that we're centering on in this week, is the most important
- 00:25:53of all of these strains of comedy,
- 00:25:55it's what has come to be called screwball comedy.
- 00:25:58And let me say a few things about screwball comedy
- 00:26:01as a category, describe it a little bit,
- 00:26:05and then I want to show you two clips that
- 00:26:07are intended to illustrate many of the principles I'm
- 00:26:10trying to articulate here.
- 00:26:12And we'll come back to this idea of star and genre
- 00:26:14in these clips as well because those elements are also
- 00:26:19at issue or embedded in what I want you to look at.
- 00:26:27Maybe I should've mentioned, if you
- 00:26:29were curious about the later incarnations of worldly comedy,
- 00:26:35I meant to mention that for example in 1998,
- 00:26:38Nora Ephron made a film called You've Got Mail.
- 00:26:40How many of you have seen it?
- 00:26:41At least a couple.
- 00:26:42That's a remake of one of Lubitsch's films.
- 00:26:45And in fact, the Lubitsch film, A Shop Around The Corner,
- 00:26:48is a much more wonderful film.
- 00:26:51And it's a measure, I think, in part
- 00:26:54of the power and authority of Lubitsch's imagination
- 00:26:56and the elegance of his comedies that they
- 00:26:59continue to inspire imitation in that way.
- 00:27:03What screwball comedy is, in some ways, a distinctive,
- 00:27:08a signature form of American movies.
- 00:27:11It's a unique equation of Hollywood in the depression
- 00:27:14years.
- 00:27:15It's derived in part from Broadway farces of the 1920's,
- 00:27:19and also from the slap stick physical comedy
- 00:27:23of the silent era.
- 00:27:24It's a kind of marriage or hybrid.
- 00:27:26And remember-- we've already said
- 00:27:28this but let me remind you-- one measure of a mature medium
- 00:27:31or of a medium that's coming into maturity-- an expressive
- 00:27:34medium, a communications medium-- one
- 00:27:36measure of its maturity or of its emerging maturity
- 00:27:39is that forms that used to be thought to be separate, marry.
- 00:27:43Become hybridized.
- 00:27:46One of the things I was suggesting about Chaplin's work
- 00:27:48is it suggests a new maturity in the film,
- 00:27:50in the cinema as an institution because it's
- 00:27:54marrying comedy and melodrama, because Chaplin
- 00:27:57bring seriousness into comedy.
- 00:27:59He slows it down, it's not merely just slapstick anymore,
- 00:28:02it's also psychologically resonant.
- 00:28:05Not only can it make you laugh, it can move you.
- 00:28:08That marriage or hybridization of two essentially
- 00:28:11separate forms-- melodrama, comedy--
- 00:28:14makes for a richer film.
- 00:28:16I'm saying the same kind of thing about this particular
- 00:28:19form of comedy, this merging of ancestor forms,
- 00:28:25of the slapstick comedy of the silent era--
- 00:28:29and of course the slapstick comedy of the silent era has
- 00:28:31its ancestors in stage slapstick--
- 00:28:34and fast dialogue and witty repartee that was especially
- 00:28:39characteristic of a series of Broadway farces,
- 00:28:43made in 19-teens and the 1920's.
- 00:28:49But the particular historical moment
- 00:28:51in which this form emerges is also
- 00:28:54a shaping factor in the kind of comedy
- 00:28:57and the subject matter of these comedies.
- 00:29:00The key qualities of screwball comedy
- 00:29:01were a kind of irreverent humor, something
- 00:29:05of the anarchic subversive skepticism
- 00:29:08that's characteristic of many comic perspectives,
- 00:29:11coupled with very fast paced vernacular dialogue.
- 00:29:15One way to think about screwball comedy
- 00:29:16is to say it's one of the first forms,
- 00:29:18along with singing movies, movies that
- 00:29:21have singing in-- I don't want to call the musicals yet
- 00:29:24because sometimes they weren't fully musicals,
- 00:29:26although musicals do emerge at a very
- 00:29:27early time-- but any movie that had singing in it,
- 00:29:30like some westerns.
- 00:29:30Early western's had singing in it.
- 00:29:32Why?
- 00:29:32Because sound had just come in, it was a novelty.
- 00:29:36The screwball comedy is one of the forms
- 00:29:38that exploits sound in a really expressive and powerful way,
- 00:29:42compelling way, because it's full of dialogue.
- 00:29:45It's full of witty, rapid dialogue, most often arguments
- 00:29:49or conflicts or quarrels between men and women,
- 00:29:52dramatizing certain kinds of conflicts of gender
- 00:29:56in the course of the film.
- 00:29:59So, key qualities.
- 00:30:00Irreverent humor, a kind of vernacular fast-paced dialogue,
- 00:30:04a fast physical pace as well, full of slapstick.
- 00:30:08So a physical quick pace and a verbal quick pace
- 00:30:11that are often in competition with each other to see which
- 00:30:15can be more irreverent and quick and fast and abrupt.
- 00:30:19Eccentric, often high born characters, who are made fun of
- 00:30:24and mocked.
- 00:30:24A lot of the screwball comedy deals
- 00:30:26with the upper social orders, but they're
- 00:30:28seen as clownish or foolish in some way.
- 00:30:30And in many screwball comedies, the wealthy characters
- 00:30:33need to be rescued by their servants.
- 00:30:36It's a very modest form of class warfare,
- 00:30:40in which-- again, remember it's the American capitalist system
- 00:30:46that's making these stories, so we're not
- 00:30:47going to have a Marxist comedy that
- 00:30:51says that the government should be overthrown by violence--
- 00:30:54but the comedy is constrained in certain ways, what
- 00:30:59the story's able to say, what the films are able to say.
- 00:31:02This is a matter to which I'll return tonight and talk
- 00:31:04a little bit more fully about the ideological and political
- 00:31:09limits that are imposed on the Hollywood system
- 00:31:13because it has to appeal to everyone.
- 00:31:15I think what I have to say will clarify these questions in ways
- 00:31:19that you'll find very helpful.
- 00:31:22But for now, let's stick with screwball comedy itself.
- 00:31:26These high born characters then, they're
- 00:31:28criticized and seen as clownish, but they're never
- 00:31:30seen as morally evil in the way that a Marxist
- 00:31:33or a social historian might regard them.
- 00:31:40The stories are often very deeply improbable ones
- 00:31:43that are set among the irresponsible wealthy,
- 00:31:46the irresponsibly wealthy people.
- 00:31:49Often the aristocrats are very spoiled and hard drinking.
- 00:31:55In one of the most famous of these, a film made in 1937
- 00:31:58titled My Man Godfrey, directed by Gregory La Cava, Carole
- 00:32:03Lombard and William Powell, two of the central
- 00:32:06to screwball comedy performers, are the stars.
- 00:32:11And there is a scene in a shantytown by the river,
- 00:32:17in which the poor are located.
- 00:32:20And the film seems to make some sort
- 00:32:23of an acknowledgement of the fact that the poor are here.
- 00:32:26It's acknowledging the horrors of the Depression.
- 00:32:28But it solves the horrors of the Depression in the end
- 00:32:31by having the wealthy people build a nightclub on the river
- 00:32:34banks to create employment for all the unemployed.
- 00:32:38And it's a very imposed-- and rather foolish in some sense--
- 00:32:41happy ending.
- 00:32:42So that film acknowledges more fully
- 00:32:46than some screwball comedies the actual existence
- 00:32:48of shanty towns and places where homeless people, or people who
- 00:32:52have to live under canvas live.
- 00:32:55Many screwball comedies didn't even go that far,
- 00:32:58but it solves the social problem in a characteristically
- 00:33:02mythological and magical, socially incredible way.
- 00:33:06Another aspect of these films is that they foregrounded women,
- 00:33:10and this is a very important aspect of it.
- 00:33:12This is partly a function of the fact that in the 1920s,
- 00:33:15the era of the flappers, a new kind of sexually
- 00:33:18liberated woman begins to appear.
- 00:33:22Some of that is an outgrowth of the fact that,
- 00:33:24during the First World War when so many American men were
- 00:33:30in uniform, women got new jobs and were able to work,
- 00:33:35enter the workforce for the first time.
- 00:33:37And that created moments of freedom
- 00:33:39for women that had never existed in American society before.
- 00:33:43And some of that is reflected in screwball comedy,
- 00:33:45and in other films as well, but especially in the screwball
- 00:33:48comedies of the era.
- 00:33:49So it foregrounds women.
- 00:33:51And it shows women who often have a great deal more energy
- 00:33:54and freedom than the females in other films of the era.
- 00:33:59Very often in these films, marriage
- 00:34:02is seen for the first time as a partnership of equals.
- 00:34:05And as you'll see in It Happened One Night, that's
- 00:34:07the ideal of marriage that's dramatized in that film,
- 00:34:10one of the two screwball comedies
- 00:34:12we'll be looking at this evening.
- 00:34:15So these films also reflected the social disorientation
- 00:34:19of the '30s, the uncertain values that were represented
- 00:34:24during the Depression.
- 00:34:25The fear, in some sense, that the culture was breaking down
- 00:34:29or that the fabric of society was tearing in some ways.
- 00:34:33And so these films were ironically
- 00:34:36simultaneously escapist, because they were screwball comedies
- 00:34:39and they did zany things, and they often
- 00:34:42had ridiculous or improbable plots and improbable
- 00:34:44characters, and yet at the same time
- 00:34:47the anxiety that they also dramatize,
- 00:34:49the anxiety of things falling apart, of the center not
- 00:34:52holding, of a kind danger to the established
- 00:35:01structures and belief systems of the society, underlay
- 00:35:05even the most apparently escapist of these films.
- 00:35:09So there's a subtext of strong women,
- 00:35:12of quarreling and manipulative men.
- 00:35:16And especially, of course, one of the things
- 00:35:18this dramatized for us were intelligent
- 00:35:21and witty women, like Katharine Hepburn
- 00:35:23in Bringing Up Baby, or Claudette
- 00:35:26Colbert in the film you're going to see tonight,
- 00:35:28It Happened One Night, or Rosalind Russell,
- 00:35:32in the second screwball comedy you're going to see tonight,
- 00:35:37His Girl Friday.
- 00:35:40And then finally, implicit in what I've been saying
- 00:35:44is that there are implicit in these stories,
- 00:35:47sometimes rising to the surface, sometimes
- 00:35:49just beneath the surface, but there
- 00:35:51are as a kind of hint or anxiety,
- 00:35:53are what we might call first some form of class conflict.
- 00:35:56Some sense that the class structure of the United States
- 00:35:59is a problem, that the Depression is
- 00:36:00causing difficulties.
- 00:36:02And second, a form of sexual warfare,
- 00:36:04in which the inequality between men and women,
- 00:36:07and the unequal relations that men and women have
- 00:36:10in the society are put in question, are quarreled with.
- 00:36:14In some sense, even mocked.
- 00:36:16And in many of these films, the actress is the dominant figure
- 00:36:19and the male character is the secondary figure.
- 00:36:22And even in some of the films where the male characters are
- 00:36:24even more powerful, the best one can say is that they're equals.
- 00:36:29And that in itself, regardless of what the plot does,
- 00:36:31was in some sense, not exactly revolutionary,
- 00:36:33but transformative.
- 00:36:35Potentially transformative.
- 00:36:36Well, what I want to do with the time I have left
- 00:36:38is show you two clips, and they're
- 00:36:40intended to dramatize many of the principles
- 00:36:43I've been talking about.
- 00:36:44So let me rehearse them very quickly to you.
- 00:36:46I'm going to show you two clips from two separate screwball
- 00:36:52comedies.
- 00:36:52One, directed by Preston Sturges in 1941, called The Lady Eve.
- 00:36:57A second, directed by Howard Hawks,
- 00:36:59the director of the second film we're
- 00:37:01going to see tonight, Ball of Fire.
- 00:37:03Hawks is probably, of all the directors, the one most
- 00:37:06identified with screwball comedy,
- 00:37:07although as you'll see tonight when I talk a bit more
- 00:37:10about him, he was a master of other genres as well.
- 00:37:13But the reason I want you look at these two clips
- 00:37:15is-- I have multiple reasons.
- 00:37:19It's the multiplicity principle in criticism.
- 00:37:22What I want you to recognize as you're looking at this,
- 00:37:25is first the power of the star system.
- 00:37:28Because here's Barbara Stanwyck.
- 00:37:29At this point in her career, she's
- 00:37:31one of the dominant female stars in the society, one
- 00:37:36of the biggest moneymakers in the society.
- 00:37:38And here we see her in two films that are in the same genre.
- 00:37:42Two different versions of screwball comedy.
- 00:37:45As you're watching, think about the way
- 00:37:48in which the persona that she established,
- 00:37:51the kind of character she stood for in film to film,
- 00:37:54is both stable but also changing.
- 00:37:58That is to say, the pleasure you take
- 00:38:00in watching the two different versions of Stanwyck
- 00:38:03is an embodiment of the principle I was talking about
- 00:38:07before, when I said that we need an aesthetic of connection.
- 00:38:10We need to recognize that it's the familiar,
- 00:38:12rather than the completely strange and new,
- 00:38:15that can generate profound, complex sentence
- 00:38:18of artistic achievement.
- 00:38:21Because the Stanwyck we see in these two films
- 00:38:24is in many ways a radically different character,
- 00:38:26but we can also see certain continuities
- 00:38:28across her characters.
- 00:38:29And we can take pleasure both in what is the same about her,
- 00:38:33but even more we can take pleasure in the variations
- 00:38:36she's working on this persona.
- 00:38:38So one of things that is embedded here
- 00:38:41is a notion of acting that emerges in the studio era that
- 00:38:47establishes American acting as something
- 00:38:50different from the classical British theory of what
- 00:38:52an actor is.
- 00:38:54The classical British theory of what an actor is
- 00:38:56is that the actor submerges herself in her role
- 00:38:59and becomes indistinguishable from the role.
- 00:39:01And that you shouldn't even be able to recognize
- 00:39:03the actor from role to role.
- 00:39:04The American system that emerges from Hollywood and from movies
- 00:39:09is an opposite one, in which you are not
- 00:39:11only are you supposed to recognize the actor,
- 00:39:13you're supposed to take pleasure in the way
- 00:39:15the actor-- it's not really Barbara
- 00:39:17Stanwyck but the character that Stanwyck plays, the persona
- 00:39:20Stanwyck established is in film after film after film,
- 00:39:24how does that persona evolve?
- 00:39:27Change in nuances, when that persona is presented
- 00:39:31with different sets of questions,
- 00:39:32different sets of problems.
- 00:39:33And what you can feel-- and this isn't
- 00:39:35just true of the actresses of course,
- 00:39:37it's even truer for the male stars who had more freedom,
- 00:39:40there were more rules available to them.
- 00:39:42So people who are interested in Clark Gable or Humphrey Bogart
- 00:39:45could watch these actors across a range of films, each time
- 00:39:50not getting the same experience, but watching
- 00:39:52a variation on the persona that the actor was setting up.
- 00:39:56So a new idea of acting, a different conception
- 00:39:59of what an actors job might be and of how the audience might
- 00:40:04have a kind of literacy in performance
- 00:40:06that would enhance and complicate
- 00:40:08their sense of any individual performance,
- 00:40:10emerges in this era as well.
- 00:40:12And the Stanwyck clips demonstrate that.
- 00:40:15The second thing I want you to see,
- 00:40:16again, same principle, having to do with screwball
- 00:40:19comedy itself.
- 00:40:20Here are two different screwball comedies,
- 00:40:22look at the differences in tone.
- 00:40:24They belong to the same genre, we
- 00:40:25can feel how much they belong to the same category,
- 00:40:28but also how much variation there is between them.
- 00:40:31So the point is, it isn't a simple form of repetition
- 00:40:34at all.
- 00:40:34It's a form of very complex elaboration and complication,
- 00:40:39in which the relation between one text in the category
- 00:40:42and another text is far more complex, artistically
- 00:40:45satisfying, and rich than we might
- 00:40:47imagine if we described this system in too abstract a way.
- 00:40:53So here's the first scene from The Lady Eve.
- 00:40:55And let me set the scene.
- 00:40:57In this scene, Barbara Stanwyck plays a con lady.
- 00:41:01She's on a ship loaded with wealthy aristocrats,
- 00:41:06wealthy American businessmen, and she and her partner
- 00:41:09are trying to goal them out of money.
- 00:41:11And she's sitting at dinner trying
- 00:41:13to pick out a guy that is going to become her mark,
- 00:41:16played by the great American comic and serious actor
- 00:41:20Henry Fonda.
- 00:41:20[VIDEO PLAYBACK]
- 00:41:32DAVID THORBURN: He's very wealthy.
- 00:41:34Everybody knows he's very wealthy.
- 00:41:36He's the son of a beer magnate, an ale magnate.
- 00:41:40He's sitting down in the dining hall of this cruise ship.
- 00:41:43And all the fortune hunting women
- 00:41:49who are there wanting to marry rich men are staring at him.
- 00:42:04-Not good enough.
- 00:42:05-What did you say?
- 00:42:06-I said they're not good enough for him.
- 00:42:08Every Jane is giving him the thermometer,
- 00:42:10and he feels they're just a waste of time.
- 00:42:12He's returning to his book, he's deeply immersed in it.
- 00:42:16He sees no one except-- watch his head turn
- 00:42:18when that kid goes by.
- 00:42:20Won't do you any good, dear.
- 00:42:21He's a bookworm, but swing them anyway.
- 00:42:23Oh, now how about this one?
- 00:42:25How would you like that hanging on your Christmas tree?
- 00:42:28Oh, you wouldn't?
- 00:42:28Well, what is your weakness brother?
- 00:42:32DAVID THORBURN: So Stanwyck has become
- 00:42:33the narrator of this scene.
- 00:42:36But see what intelligence she shows, what knowledge.
- 00:42:42-Look at that girl over to his left.
- 00:42:45Look over to your left, bookworm.
- 00:42:47There's a girl pining for you.
- 00:42:49A little further.
- 00:42:50Just a little further.
- 00:42:52There.
- 00:42:53Wasn't that worth looking for?
- 00:42:54See those nice store teeth, all beaming at you.
- 00:42:56Well, she recognises you.
- 00:42:58She up, she's down, she can't make up her mind.
- 00:43:00She's up again.
- 00:43:00DAVID THORBURN: I hope you see how brilliant this
- 00:43:02is because look in her hand here,
- 00:43:04we're looking at this through the mirror
- 00:43:05as she's narrating it to us.
- 00:43:06-Went to manual training school with in Louisville?
- 00:43:08Oh, you're not?
- 00:43:09Well, you certainly look exactly like him,
- 00:43:11it's certainly a remarkable resemblance.
- 00:43:13But if you're not going to ask me to sit down,
- 00:43:14I suppose you're not going to ask me to sit down.
- 00:43:16I'm very sorry, I certainly hope I
- 00:43:18haven't caused you any embarrassment, you so-and-so.
- 00:43:22I wonder if my tie's on straight.
- 00:43:24I certainly upset them, don't I?
- 00:43:26Now who else is after me.
- 00:43:28Ah, the lady champion wrestler.
- 00:43:30Wouldn't she make a houseful?
- 00:43:32Oh, you don't like her either?
- 00:43:33Well, what are going to do about it?
- 00:43:35Oh, you just can't stand it anymore.
- 00:43:36You're leaving, these women don't give you
- 00:43:38a moment's peace, do they?
- 00:43:39Well, go ahead.
- 00:43:40Go sulk in your cabin.
- 00:43:41Go soak your head and see if I care.
- 00:43:47-Very sorry, sir.
- 00:43:59-Why don't you look where you're going?
- 00:44:01-Why don't I look?
- 00:44:01-Look what you did to my shoe, you knocked the heel off.
- 00:44:03-Oh, I did?
- 00:44:04Well, I'm certainly sorry.
- 00:44:05-You did, and you can just take me right down to my cabin
- 00:44:07for another pair of slippers.
- 00:44:08-Oh, well certainly.
- 00:44:09It's the least I can do.
- 00:44:10By the way, my name's Pike.
- 00:44:11-Oh, everybody knows that.
- 00:44:12Nobody's talking about anything else.
- 00:44:13This is my father Colonel Harrington.
- 00:44:14My name is Gene, it's really Eugenia.
- 00:44:16Come on.
- 00:44:17[END PLAYBACK]
- 00:44:19DAVID THORBURN: I hope you recognize
- 00:44:21the tremendous intelligence and wit that
- 00:44:24was embedded in that dialogue.
- 00:44:25That was a little too low.
- 00:44:26What is revealed about that character,
- 00:44:28dramatized about that character, in that opening scene,
- 00:44:31tells us almost everything we need to know about her.
- 00:44:33Not everything, but almost everything.
- 00:44:36And you can feel the energy, the wit.
- 00:44:38And of course, who's in control of that scene?
- 00:44:41Not the man, but the woman.
- 00:44:43Now let's look at another scene from Howard Hawks
- 00:44:47film, Ball of Fire.
- 00:44:49The basic situation is Gary Cooper, the man in the middle
- 00:44:52here, this fellow Gary Cooper is the head
- 00:44:55of a consortium of scholars who are compiling
- 00:44:58a dictionary of the English language,
- 00:45:00with special emphasis on colloquial or slang English.
- 00:45:05And earlier in the film, Gary Cooper went to a nightclub.
- 00:45:10And he saw the Barbara Stanwyck character, who is actually
- 00:45:12the mistress of a mob boss, do a song and dance number.
- 00:45:18He spoke to her, he interviewed her,
- 00:45:19and he became very excited by what she represented.
- 00:45:22By the linguistic resources, the verbal realities
- 00:45:26of the American language that he'd been oblivious to.
- 00:45:30And he wants her to contribute to his project.
- 00:45:32She's not interested.
- 00:45:34When she shows up at the lair of the men of the scholars,
- 00:45:39when she invades the nest of scholars,
- 00:45:44she does it because-- although you don't know that
- 00:45:46from seeing this clip, but viewers of the film
- 00:45:49would know it-- because she's really on the run.
- 00:45:51She's afraid that her boyfriend, the mob boss,
- 00:45:54is going to bump her off.
- 00:45:55So she needs to hide out.
- 00:45:57And that's really why she's come here.
- 00:45:58All right.
- 00:45:59So here is this scene from Ball of Fire.
- 00:46:02[VIDEO PLAYBACK]
- 00:46:03-Have I missed anything?
- 00:46:04-No, I was just about to explain.
- 00:46:06You see the word puss means face.
- 00:46:09As for instance, sour puss, pickle puss.
- 00:46:12Sugar puss implies a certain sweetness in her appearance.
- 00:46:16-Never mind the etymology, was she--
- 00:46:18-Was she blonde or brunette?
- 00:46:19-Yes, which?
- 00:46:21-That I don't know, I didn't notice.
- 00:46:22But her vocabulary, even an ordinary conversation--
- 00:46:25-Oh, you spoke to her?
- 00:46:26-Yes.
- 00:46:27In her dressing room--
- 00:46:27-In her dressing room?
- 00:46:28-Backstage?
- 00:46:29-Yes.
- 00:46:31Unfortunately, she disclaimed any interest in our project,
- 00:46:36in words so bizarre they made my mouth water.
- 00:46:39Shove in your clutch, for instance.
- 00:46:40-It's amazing.
- 00:46:42-Potts, could you tell us, what was it like backstage?
- 00:46:44-Very vivacious, I imagine.
- 00:46:45-Perhaps ballerinas giggling up and down iron stair cases?
- 00:46:52-Possibly wearing tights?
- 00:46:55DAVID THORBURN: I hope you're picking up
- 00:46:57the subtext that these old men are revealing.
- 00:47:03-It's getting a bit late gentlemen.
- 00:47:05Perhaps we had better get to bed.
- 00:47:16-Someday I'll tell you my experiences
- 00:47:18with a young actress named Lillian Russel.
- 00:47:20-Did you know her?
- 00:47:22-I stood in the snow four hours to get--
- 00:47:24-Is that our doorbell?
- 00:47:26But it's 12:25!
- 00:47:27-Oh, must be the statistics on San Salvador saltpeter.
- 00:47:32I asked for it to be sent--
- 00:47:33DAVID THORBURN: Did anyone pick up on the joke there?
- 00:47:36Why is there a joke in reference to saltpeter?
- 00:47:39It's used in the army to keep men from getting too horny.
- 00:47:43It damps down your sexual energies,
- 00:47:45and he's writing an article about saltpeter.
- 00:47:55-Hi-DE-ho!
- 00:47:58Don't tell me I'm too late for class.
- 00:48:00-Oh my goodness gracious me.
- 00:48:03-What is that?
- 00:48:04DAVID THORBURN: I don't know what scholar came up
- 00:48:06with this brilliant description, but there's
- 00:48:09a kind of convention now among Capra's fans,
- 00:48:13and fans of this movie, to refer to this scene as the Snow White
- 00:48:17and Seven Dwarfs scene.
- 00:48:21-Those are my colleagues.
- 00:48:22-Oh!
- 00:48:24-I must apologize for their lack of costume.
- 00:48:26-Oh, that's all right professor.
- 00:48:28-I haven't got my tie on.
- 00:48:29-Oh, you know once I watched my big brother shave.
- 00:48:34-Would you come in?
- 00:48:36-Why not?
- 00:48:37-Frankly, your coming here was the last thing I expected.
- 00:48:41Your no was so explicit.
- 00:48:42-Well, I got thinking it over, and I
- 00:48:44said to myself, who am I to give science the brush?
- 00:48:46-And I take it you've reconsidered?
- 00:48:48-Yeah, that's the big idea.
- 00:48:52-Oh dear, oh dear.
- 00:48:54-Look out.
- 00:48:57-That was Professor Oddly.
- 00:48:59-Anymore of them around?
- 00:49:00-I hope not.
- 00:49:03-Hey, who decorated this place?
- 00:49:05The mug that shot Lincoln?
- 00:49:07-This is our work room.
- 00:49:09The living quarters are upstairs.
- 00:49:11-Whee, that's a lot of books.
- 00:49:12All of them different?
- 00:49:14-I trust.
- 00:49:15May I have your coat?
- 00:49:16-Yeah, thanks.
- 00:49:23Oh, Greek philosophy.
- 00:49:24I've got a set like this with a radio inside.
- 00:49:27-Are you sure you don't want your coat?
- 00:49:29-No, I'm fine.
- 00:49:30Except I've got a run in this stocking.
- 00:49:33Well how do we start, professor?
- 00:49:34You see, this is the first time anybody
- 00:49:36has moved in on my brain Have you
- 00:49:38got some kind of a machine, an x-ray or a vacuum cleaner maybe
- 00:49:41that's out the words you want?
- 00:49:43What's your method, professor?
- 00:49:44-Well, it's quite simple.
- 00:49:46If you'll be here tomorrow morning, not later than 9:30--
- 00:49:48-Tomorrow morning?
- 00:49:49-Well, yes.
- 00:49:50I've arranged a roundtable discussion
- 00:49:52with a few people of various backgrounds.
- 00:49:55-You, you don't think we could begin the begin right now?
- 00:49:59-Well, it's nearly one o'clock Miss--
- 00:50:02-Oh, fool professor.
- 00:50:03Let's get ourselves a couple of drinks, light the fire maybe,
- 00:50:05and you can start working on me right way.
- 00:50:07-I wouldn't think of imposing upon you at this hour.
- 00:50:10-Listen, I figured I'm working all night.
- 00:50:13-Any hasty, random discussion would
- 00:50:15be of no scientific value.
- 00:50:16You see, I have to have my notes thoroughly prepared
- 00:50:19for the seminar tomorrow.
- 00:50:21-OK.
- 00:50:22Where do I sleep?
- 00:50:24-I don't know, where do you live?
- 00:50:26-Up on riverside, but I'm going to sleep here.
- 00:50:28-Here?
- 00:50:29Oh, you don't understand Ms. O'Shea.
- 00:50:31We're all bachelors, with the exception of Professor Oddly
- 00:50:34who is a widower.
- 00:50:35Why, no woman ever-- even Ms Bragg,
- 00:50:38who takes care of our needs-- goes home every night at 7:30.
- 00:50:42-If you want me tomorrow morning at 9:30--
- 00:50:44-Oh, I do Ms. O'Shea.
- 00:50:46But even the most free-thinking people must respect the--
- 00:50:53-All right.
- 00:50:54Feel that.
- 00:50:55Go on, feel that foot.
- 00:50:59OK, tootsie bell, what do you say?
- 00:51:02-It's cold.
- 00:51:02-It's cold and it's wet.
- 00:51:05Now, come here.
- 00:51:09Come here.
- 00:51:13Closer.
- 00:51:16Closer.
- 00:51:18Oh, come on, give.
- 00:51:20Hello kids.
- 00:51:21Look down my throat.
- 00:51:23Go on, look down.
- 00:51:25All right. [MUMBLING]
- 00:51:27-I don't know what to look for.
- 00:51:28-There is possibly a slight rosiness
- 00:51:31in the laryngeal region.
- 00:51:33-Slight rosiness?
- 00:51:34It is as red as the Daily Worker and just as sore.
- 00:51:37Who are you?
- 00:51:37DAVID THORBURN: The Daily Worker.
- 00:51:39Red as the Daily Worker.
- 00:51:40Did you get that?
- 00:51:42No?
- 00:51:42The Daily Worker is a communist newspaper,
- 00:51:45so when she says "it's as red as The Daily Worker,
- 00:51:47she's making a rather witty joke, especially
- 00:51:49for a gunman's maul.
- 00:51:51-Oh.
- 00:51:52-Professor Robinson, Law.
- 00:51:54Professor--
- 00:51:55-Ah, ah, ah.
- 00:51:56Not so fast.
- 00:51:56Just let it creep up on me.
- 00:51:58I'll get to know them.
- 00:52:00Come here physiology, for all I know I've got a fever.
- 00:52:02Feel.
- 00:52:03-It's possible.
- 00:52:04-Certainly.
- 00:52:04And he wants to throw me out on my tin.
- 00:52:07There'll be no 9:30 for me if you make me go out in the rain
- 00:52:09now.
- 00:52:10-Naturally not.
- 00:52:11-With the streets cold, and the subway hot and full of germs?
- 00:52:13-Oh.
- 00:52:14I'm a pushover for streptococcus.
- 00:52:16Can I have this now, kid?
- 00:52:20-We'll call you a taxi, and furnish you
- 00:52:21with woolen socks and warm slippers.
- 00:52:24-Really, I don't understand you Potts.
- 00:52:25Why take chance with valuable material?
- 00:52:28-Think of your article, Potts.
- 00:52:29-See.
- 00:52:30They get the point.
- 00:52:31-If I might venture a suggestion,
- 00:52:33why couldn't the young lady sleep in my room?
- 00:52:37-Professor Peagram!
- 00:52:39-I can bunk in with Professor Robinson,
- 00:52:41I sometimes do when there's an electric storm.
- 00:52:43-Yes, he's afraid of thunder.
- 00:52:45-Well then, it's all settled.
- 00:52:47Well, I guess I'll turn in.
- 00:52:49Can I have my coat?
- 00:52:52-Thank you.
- 00:52:54Hi-DE-ho, fella!
- 00:52:57-I'll show you to my room.
- 00:52:58-Yes, we all will.
- 00:52:59-I know where my own room is, thank you,
- 00:53:00without any help from you.
- 00:53:02-I'll find it, don't bother.
- 00:53:04Just rough out the directions.
- 00:53:05-The top of the stairs, and the third door on the left.
- 00:53:08-Gentlemen.
- 00:53:09Just a moment, please.
- 00:53:10Gentlemen, this is all highly irregular.
- 00:53:11What if this should come to the attention of the foundation?
- 00:53:14And what about Ms. Bragg tomorrow?
- 00:53:15-What are you talking about?
- 00:53:16This is research, isn't it?
- 00:53:18-Yes.
- 00:53:19-Certainly.
- 00:53:19Who was that guy that learned so much
- 00:53:20from watching an apple drop?
- 00:53:22-Isaac Newton, 1642 to 1727, the law of gravity.
- 00:53:27Yeah, that's him.
- 00:53:29And I want you to look at me as another apple, Professor Potts.
- 00:53:34Just another apple.
- 00:53:44[END PLAYBACK]
- 00:53:46DAVID THORBURN: All right.
- 00:53:47So you can get an idea not only for how richly comic
- 00:53:50these films can be, but also how rich the subtext,
- 00:53:54the sexual subtext can become.
- 00:53:57Even though, of course, as you all
- 00:53:58should know if you've been reading Cook,
- 00:54:01there was a production code in force after 1934,
- 00:54:05and there were all kinds of very elaborate rules imposed
- 00:54:08on American movies.
- 00:54:09A form of self censorship because the movies feared
- 00:54:13censorship from the government, so they came up
- 00:54:14with their own system.
- 00:54:16And until sometime in the, I guess
- 00:54:17it was the 1960's, the code held and it had all kinds
- 00:54:23of ridiculous elements in it.
- 00:54:25One of the primary ones that people always laugh about,
- 00:54:27rightly I think, is that if it showed a woman on a bed,
- 00:54:30at least one of her feet had to be on the floor.
- 00:54:33You couldn't show a woman lying with both feet on the bed,
- 00:54:35it was too suggestive.
- 00:54:37But you can see how clever filmmakers
- 00:54:39and powerful performers were able to make
- 00:54:41a mockery of those kinds of constraints,
- 00:54:44because subtle and complex and witty films are
- 00:54:49able to do many, many things that
- 00:54:51are in a suggestive way, that keep them from crossing
- 00:54:54the boundaries set up by the censors,
- 00:54:57but nonetheless have a powerful energy and sexuality.
- 00:55:03So the similarities between those two scenes,
- 00:55:08but also the differences between them,
- 00:55:10tell you something about the way in which
- 00:55:13the aesthetic of connection, this aesthetic of familiarity,
- 00:55:17this popular aesthetic operated in Hollywood movies.
- Hollywood
- Screwball Comedy
- Film Analysis
- Cultural Reflection
- Star System
- Mass Production
- Aesthetic Perspective
- Anthropological Perspective
- Production Code
- Gender Dynamics