They Want To Ban VPNs Now...

00:16:42
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ArXk6zdawVE

概要

TLDRThe video addresses the growing issue of internet censorship, particularly in the UK with the implementation of the Online Safety Act. It discusses the removal of certain video games from platforms like Steam and the introduction of age verification measures by Xbox. The speaker expresses concern over the potential crackdown on VPNs, which are often used to bypass censorship. The video emphasizes the importance of internet freedom and warns that over-censorship can lead to a slippery slope affecting free speech. The speaker also highlights the public's response to the Online Safety Act, including a petition for its repeal, and discusses the implications of similar laws potentially spreading to other countries.

収穫

  • 🚫 Censorship is on the rise, affecting various online platforms.
  • 🎮 Games like Mouthwashing and Vile Exumed have been removed for being mature.
  • 🔍 The UK's Online Safety Act imposes strict regulations on online content.
  • 🛡️ VPNs are targeted as a means to bypass censorship.
  • 📜 Public backlash against the Online Safety Act includes a petition with 362,000 signatures.
  • ⚖️ Over-censorship can harm marginalized communities and free speech.
  • 🌐 Tor offers anonymity for users in oppressive regimes.
  • 📈 VPN usage surged in response to new censorship laws.
  • 🔒 Not all VPNs guarantee privacy; users must choose wisely.
  • 🌍 Similar laws may emerge in other countries, affecting global internet freedom.

タイムライン

  • 00:00:00 - 00:05:00

    The speaker discusses the increasing censorship on the internet, highlighting recent actions by platforms like Steam and Xbox to remove or restrict access to certain games and content. They express concern over the UK government's Online Safety Act, which they believe will further limit freedom online, particularly through measures like age verification and potential crackdowns on VPNs.

  • 00:05:00 - 00:10:00

    The speaker elaborates on the implications of the Online Safety Act, noting that it could lead to widespread censorship and the requirement for government ID to access various online content. They mention a petition against the act that has garnered significant support, indicating public discontent. The speaker warns that similar laws could emerge in other countries, including the US, and emphasizes the dangers of censorship affecting marginalized communities.

  • 00:10:00 - 00:16:42

    The discussion shifts to the technical aspects of VPNs and their importance for privacy and circumventing censorship. The speaker explains how VPNs work and the potential for governments to target them. They also mention the use of the Tor network as a last resort for internet freedom, particularly for individuals in oppressive regimes. The speaker concludes by urging viewers to be aware of the ongoing threats to online freedom and the potential for similar laws to spread globally.

マインドマップ

ビデオQ&A

  • What is the Online Safety Act?

    The Online Safety Act is a law passed in the UK aimed at regulating online content to protect users, particularly children, from harmful material.

  • Why are VPNs being targeted?

    VPNs are being targeted because they allow users to bypass regional restrictions and censorship imposed by laws like the Online Safety Act.

  • What are the implications of the Online Safety Act?

    The Act could lead to increased censorship of online content, requiring users to provide identification to access certain materials.

  • How can VPNs help users?

    VPNs can help users maintain privacy and access content that may be restricted in their region.

  • What is the concern with over-censorship?

    Over-censorship can suppress free speech and disproportionately affect marginalized communities.

  • What is the role of Offcom in the Online Safety Act?

    Offcom is the regulatory body overseeing the implementation of the Online Safety Act in the UK.

  • What is the potential future of VPNs in the UK?

    There are concerns that the government may attempt to ban or heavily regulate consumer-grade VPNs to enforce the Online Safety Act.

  • What is Tor and how is it related to internet freedom?

    Tor is a browser that provides anonymity and is used by individuals in oppressive regimes to access information without censorship.

  • How has public response been to the Online Safety Act?

    There has been significant public backlash, with a petition to repeal the Act gathering over 362,000 signatures.

  • What are the risks of using VPNs?

    Using VPNs can still expose users to tracking if they do not choose a reputable service, as some VPNs may share data with governments.

ビデオをもっと見る

AIを活用したYouTubeの無料動画要約に即アクセス!
字幕
en
オートスクロール:
  • 00:00:00
    Hello guys and gals, meahar and ladies
  • 00:00:03
    and gentlemen, we have got to talk about
  • 00:00:05
    this crazy censorship problem that we
  • 00:00:08
    are dealing with now. The last uh I want
  • 00:00:10
    to say like several days, weeks, it
  • 00:00:13
    almost feels like there's a concerted
  • 00:00:15
    effort with every single large entity
  • 00:00:17
    trying to censor everything they can on
  • 00:00:19
    the internet. We've seen Steam to take
  • 00:00:22
    away a bunch of Gooner games, which
  • 00:00:24
    granted, you know, were on the fringe
  • 00:00:26
    end of people caring, but then you start
  • 00:00:28
    to see it. no dlisting a bunch of games,
  • 00:00:30
    even one of the most popular games,
  • 00:00:32
    Mouthwashing, because it dared to be a
  • 00:00:35
    little bit more mature of a video game.
  • 00:00:37
    And speaking of other horror games,
  • 00:00:39
    games like Vile Exumed, a horror title
  • 00:00:41
    that focuses on parasocial relationships
  • 00:00:44
    and some very, very wild real things
  • 00:00:46
    people have to deal with simply because
  • 00:00:48
    it's mature, ends up getting removed
  • 00:00:51
    entirely off of Steam. So, that's wild.
  • 00:00:55
    And in other things, Xbox has also
  • 00:00:57
    thrown in age verification to social
  • 00:01:00
    services. So yeah, it's uh it seems as
  • 00:01:03
    if using a uh verifying yourself through
  • 00:01:07
    facial recognition or showing
  • 00:01:08
    identification is mostly going to be a
  • 00:01:10
    thing in parts of the world now. But of
  • 00:01:13
    course, we've also seen in the last
  • 00:01:15
    couple days uh the United Kingdom has
  • 00:01:18
    passed the online safety act. And uh you
  • 00:01:21
    know, I think it doesn't end there,
  • 00:01:22
    ladies and gentlemen. And I really do
  • 00:01:24
    think that the next stage in this is
  • 00:01:26
    VPNs, okay? Trying to take down the
  • 00:01:29
    little amount of freedom that human
  • 00:01:30
    beings get to have in the world. So I
  • 00:01:33
    want to kind of keep this pretty much as
  • 00:01:35
    like uh brief and sort of focused as I
  • 00:01:37
    can. So a couple years ago, the actual
  • 00:01:40
    organization, Offcom, for instance,
  • 00:01:42
    which would be, you know, overseeing the
  • 00:01:43
    regulations of this current online
  • 00:01:46
    safety act. In 2022, the government over
  • 00:01:49
    here urged that the government would
  • 00:01:50
    consider a crackdown on VPNs. Okay, so
  • 00:01:53
    this is before this law had actually
  • 00:01:55
    passed. Now, why would they talk about
  • 00:01:57
    VPNs? For anybody that doesn't know what
  • 00:01:59
    a VPN is, a VPN is kind of like an
  • 00:02:01
    encrypted tunnel that you can basically
  • 00:02:03
    use to obfuscate where you are on the
  • 00:02:06
    internet, right? So, for instance, being
  • 00:02:08
    in Canada, I can use a VPN and connect
  • 00:02:10
    myself to the United States. And in
  • 00:02:13
    theory, for most of the websites that
  • 00:02:15
    I'm visiting, they'll probably think
  • 00:02:16
    that I'm from a United States IP. Now,
  • 00:02:19
    it's not entirely as clear-cut and
  • 00:02:21
    simple, but we'll get into it. So,
  • 00:02:23
    according to uh, you know, the people
  • 00:02:24
    researching this, they're commonly used
  • 00:02:26
    to bypass regional locks on content,
  • 00:02:28
    obviously. And of course, one of the
  • 00:02:31
    actual MPs in this situation said there
  • 00:02:33
    are vital problems in the bill, and the
  • 00:02:35
    real threat is the use of virtual
  • 00:02:37
    private networks. VPNs could undermine
  • 00:02:40
    the effectiveness of these measures. So,
  • 00:02:43
    basically, they wanted to kind of have
  • 00:02:46
    another sort of clause. So, one clause
  • 00:02:48
    that was brought in would require the
  • 00:02:50
    Secretary of State to publish within 6
  • 00:02:53
    months of this bill's passage a report
  • 00:02:55
    on the effect of VPN use on Offcom's
  • 00:02:58
    abilities to enforce the requirements.
  • 00:03:01
    Now, I can already tell you, you don't
  • 00:03:03
    have to go fast forward 6 months from
  • 00:03:04
    now. I'll tell you the absolute case
  • 00:03:08
    where VPNs are affecting this is
  • 00:03:10
    probably guaranteed. For instance,
  • 00:03:12
    ProtonVPN, one of the uh you know uh
  • 00:03:15
    freeVPN options people have to sort of
  • 00:03:18
    bypass a lot of these shitty UK laws
  • 00:03:21
    that have passed. Uh this saw a surge of
  • 00:03:23
    like a thousand%. Okay, so overnight
  • 00:03:27
    people in the United Kingdom were
  • 00:03:28
    suddenly googling, how the [ __ ] do I get
  • 00:03:30
    this VPN thing and how do I use it to
  • 00:03:32
    get past a lot of these blocks? So if
  • 00:03:35
    you go to ProtonVPN, their free option
  • 00:03:37
    is like obviously 100% free. You can
  • 00:03:40
    secure one of your devices, you get
  • 00:03:41
    medium VPN speeds. But if you scroll
  • 00:03:44
    down a little bit, you'll start to
  • 00:03:45
    notice that the option people really
  • 00:03:47
    want to get onto is probably the f $5
  • 00:03:49
    and 49month option. And that's because
  • 00:03:52
    you can actually do things like
  • 00:03:53
    streaming videos, which I imagine people
  • 00:03:55
    want to stream certain videos that they
  • 00:03:57
    can't because, you know, uh the the
  • 00:04:01
    government says no. And of course, uh
  • 00:04:03
    unless of course you provide your
  • 00:04:05
    identification, which hopefully that
  • 00:04:07
    doesn't get hacked down the road. I
  • 00:04:08
    mean, everyone can hope. And then, of
  • 00:04:10
    course, if you want to do things like
  • 00:04:11
    Bit Torrent, basically they've blocked
  • 00:04:13
    everything from the free option that
  • 00:04:16
    people would absolutely probably want to
  • 00:04:18
    use. So, you probably want to get the
  • 00:04:20
    paid situation. Now, the reason why the
  • 00:04:22
    VPNs are going to be targeted is because
  • 00:04:24
    this is probably the easiest way for any
  • 00:04:27
    of you guys to bypass any of these
  • 00:04:29
    online safety acts. So again, the people
  • 00:04:32
    of the United Kingdom made a petition
  • 00:04:34
    which again has gotten 362,000
  • 00:04:37
    signatures called repeal the online
  • 00:04:40
    safety act. So the law goes into effect.
  • 00:04:42
    And by the way, this law has been cooked
  • 00:04:44
    up for a while. Goes into effect. People
  • 00:04:46
    are like, "Oh my god, this actually is
  • 00:04:48
    more sensorious than I thought." You
  • 00:04:50
    know, this is getting rid of basically
  • 00:04:52
    all forms of free and open internets,
  • 00:04:54
    right? You know, you can't look at
  • 00:04:56
    things like protest footage. You can't
  • 00:04:58
    share, you know, things on the internet
  • 00:05:00
    because they might be harmful or
  • 00:05:02
    damaging to children, right? You'll have
  • 00:05:03
    to provide government ID to actually
  • 00:05:06
    view a lot of things in the world that
  • 00:05:08
    should not be censored. If you live in a
  • 00:05:10
    free society, you should be able to
  • 00:05:12
    basically see whatever you want without
  • 00:05:14
    the government basically putting in as
  • 00:05:16
    much friction as they can between you
  • 00:05:18
    and the truth. So, of course, the
  • 00:05:20
    government responded to all of these
  • 00:05:22
    signatures, which they're they're not a
  • 00:05:23
    small amount of signatures, by the way.
  • 00:05:25
    Even campaigns like stop killing games
  • 00:05:27
    have not blown up as fast as something
  • 00:05:30
    like online safety act and the repealing
  • 00:05:32
    of it. So the government says uh by the
  • 00:05:34
    way the government has no plans no plans
  • 00:05:38
    to repeal the online safety act and
  • 00:05:40
    they're actually working closely with
  • 00:05:42
    offcom to implement this [ __ ] as quickly
  • 00:05:44
    and effectively as possible to enable
  • 00:05:46
    the UK users to benefit from its
  • 00:05:50
    protections. Now you might be like well
  • 00:05:52
    Muda why are you so into this? you're
  • 00:05:55
    not from the United Kingdom, you're
  • 00:05:56
    good, homie. And that's true. But to
  • 00:05:59
    give you an idea, one law that I've seen
  • 00:06:02
    people talk about, which I discussed
  • 00:06:03
    about a year ago, was the Kids Online
  • 00:06:05
    Safety Act. And to give you an idea, if
  • 00:06:07
    you think that laws like this that are
  • 00:06:10
    already successful in one part of the
  • 00:06:12
    world, aren't just going to start
  • 00:06:13
    passing all over the world, you would be
  • 00:06:17
    shocked. Okay, simple as that. So
  • 00:06:19
    anyways, the United States has a version
  • 00:06:21
    called the Kids Online Safety and
  • 00:06:23
    Privacy Act or COSPA or I guess commonly
  • 00:06:26
    known as CASA which basically you know
  • 00:06:29
    if you really read the fine print of the
  • 00:06:31
    laws and again organizations like the
  • 00:06:33
    EFF have kind of really talked about it
  • 00:06:36
    is that it will actually cause systems
  • 00:06:38
    to over censor their actual thing. It'll
  • 00:06:41
    cause systems to almost you know get rid
  • 00:06:44
    of things that you know marginalized
  • 00:06:46
    communities ultimately do need. Okay. If
  • 00:06:48
    you think that censorship works in just
  • 00:06:50
    one direction, you are severely
  • 00:06:52
    mistaken. As long as you give people the
  • 00:06:54
    power to censor one thing, they will
  • 00:06:57
    immediately everyone will start using
  • 00:06:58
    this weapon to get rid of as much speech
  • 00:07:00
    that they don't agree with off the
  • 00:07:02
    internet. Okay, that's as simple as it
  • 00:07:04
    is. Okay, censorship is bad. And it's
  • 00:07:07
    bad because if you fight to have
  • 00:07:09
    something censored, those same people
  • 00:07:11
    can fight to have whatever you
  • 00:07:12
    appreciate censored as well. Simple as
  • 00:07:14
    that. Now, according to some individuals
  • 00:07:17
    who've been uh dealing with this shitty
  • 00:07:19
    online safety act, apparently some
  • 00:07:21
    platforms have been so easy that users
  • 00:07:23
    have been taking photos from Death
  • 00:07:25
    Stranding 2 and using the highquality
  • 00:07:29
    facial uh you know, graphics on this
  • 00:07:31
    game and and AI have been apparently
  • 00:07:34
    falling for it. Now, I haven't verified
  • 00:07:35
    this for myself. I have tried to make a
  • 00:07:37
    new PlayStation account and use AI
  • 00:07:39
    images to bypass it, but a lot of these
  • 00:07:42
    systems are actually starting to beat
  • 00:07:43
    that. But never forget that ingenuity of
  • 00:07:46
    people will always supersede whatever
  • 00:07:48
    government restriction gets thrown in.
  • 00:07:50
    Now, even when the government of the
  • 00:07:52
    United Kingdom is kind of called out on
  • 00:07:54
    this on national television, this is
  • 00:07:56
    kind of the interesting thing you had to
  • 00:07:57
    hear.
  • 00:07:59
    >> Mr. President, you have a successful
  • 00:08:00
    social media site. There are new powers
  • 00:08:03
    here to censor your site, statemandated
  • 00:08:07
    my site
  • 00:08:07
    >> to censor your site and Twitter and
  • 00:08:09
    Facebook. I mean, truth, is that okay? I
  • 00:08:12
    don't think he's going to censor my site
  • 00:08:13
    because I say only good things. Will you
  • 00:08:15
    please uncensor my site?
  • 00:08:17
    >> Yeah, we're not we're not censoring
  • 00:08:18
    anyone. Um we've got some measures which
  • 00:08:21
    are there to protect children in
  • 00:08:22
    particular from sites like um suicide um
  • 00:08:26
    sites. We've had too many uh cases in
  • 00:08:28
    the United Kingdom of um young children
  • 00:08:31
    taking their own lives. And when you
  • 00:08:33
    look through their social media, they've
  • 00:08:34
    been accessing um uh sites which talk
  • 00:08:38
    about suicide and um you know uh
  • 00:08:41
    encouraging if you like children down
  • 00:08:43
    that road. And
  • 00:08:44
    >> so immediately they bring up this like
  • 00:08:46
    let's protect the kids stuff. So again I
  • 00:08:49
    hear something new. We got to protect
  • 00:08:51
    these kids from accessing these really
  • 00:08:53
    spooky like you know suicide websites
  • 00:08:55
    right? And again, if you go to any
  • 00:08:56
    social media service and you just type
  • 00:08:58
    in the words like suicide, for instance,
  • 00:09:00
    you know, every social media platform or
  • 00:09:02
    any search engine will automatically
  • 00:09:04
    throw you a bunch of lifelines. In fact,
  • 00:09:07
    just by me mentioning that word, I'm
  • 00:09:09
    sure you're going to see a little
  • 00:09:10
    community note on this video just
  • 00:09:12
    underneath the title and description
  • 00:09:13
    that says, "Hey, if you're, you know, in
  • 00:09:15
    trouble, please seek some attention."
  • 00:09:17
    And that's just because the system kicks
  • 00:09:18
    in because it's such a serious topic
  • 00:09:21
    that absolutely, you know, any search
  • 00:09:23
    engine system is going to try to find a
  • 00:09:25
    way for anybody feeling that way to get
  • 00:09:26
    their help. So again, it's not the
  • 00:09:29
    government that needs to jump in and
  • 00:09:30
    provide assistance. A lot of these
  • 00:09:32
    social media services, a lot of these
  • 00:09:33
    search engines already provide that
  • 00:09:35
    stuff just because it it actually is in
  • 00:09:38
    this case the overwhelmingly uh moral
  • 00:09:40
    thing to have done. But let's say that
  • 00:09:43
    yes, he is right. kids are accessing
  • 00:09:45
    crazy forums in other parts of the
  • 00:09:47
    world, right? Crazy forums that probably
  • 00:09:49
    aren't hosted in areas that the United
  • 00:09:51
    Kingdom has any jurisdiction in. You
  • 00:09:53
    know, I don't know how effective their
  • 00:09:55
    control of the internet is going to be
  • 00:09:57
    because the internet is for the most
  • 00:09:58
    part a decentralized platform. And
  • 00:10:01
    that's one of the reasons why their
  • 00:10:02
    hunting of VPNs is going to be a waste
  • 00:10:05
    of time. Now, I want to just walk you
  • 00:10:07
    through the technology for a VPN real
  • 00:10:09
    quickly as well. Uh there are some
  • 00:10:11
    people that have said they can't ban
  • 00:10:12
    VPNs. mood. They can't even try to
  • 00:10:14
    remember, don't ever expect any
  • 00:10:16
    government to not pass a law that is
  • 00:10:18
    ultimately stupid. Do you actually think
  • 00:10:20
    like anybody with do do you think do you
  • 00:10:23
    think they put any thought into these
  • 00:10:24
    laws before they pass them? I would
  • 00:10:26
    wager probably not. But the thing is,
  • 00:10:29
    yes, it is true, right? VPNs are kind of
  • 00:10:31
    a necessary thing. For instance, if you
  • 00:10:33
    work in governments, I'm pretty sure the
  • 00:10:35
    uh you know, I think his name is Kier
  • 00:10:38
    Stormer. Kier Starmer, he probably
  • 00:10:40
    absolutely needs to use a VPN to access
  • 00:10:43
    some pretty uh, you know, government
  • 00:10:44
    networks, right? Some pretty uh, you
  • 00:10:46
    know, secure government networks, if you
  • 00:10:47
    will. If you work at a big company, if
  • 00:10:49
    you work anywhere really, you'll
  • 00:10:51
    probably need a VPN to access an
  • 00:10:53
    internal network. And it's not super
  • 00:10:55
    duper complicated. For instance, this is
  • 00:10:57
    WireGuard, and you can create right now
  • 00:10:59
    a fast VPN tunnel into your own house.
  • 00:11:02
    Something that I actually do when I need
  • 00:11:04
    to connect into my home network from
  • 00:11:06
    outside the house. So, for instance, if
  • 00:11:08
    I want to access things like the
  • 00:11:10
    Raspberry Pi that runs a whole bunch of
  • 00:11:12
    search engines and tools for my entire
  • 00:11:14
    home network, once I VPN into my actual
  • 00:11:18
    home, once I VPN to the uh WireGuard
  • 00:11:21
    system that I have hosted, I can
  • 00:11:23
    immediately just SSH into any network,
  • 00:11:26
    any device on my actual um home network.
  • 00:11:29
    So, right here, I've connected to that
  • 00:11:31
    Raspberry Pi. And from here, I can
  • 00:11:33
    modify things that affect my entire
  • 00:11:36
    network. Right? So for instance, I have
  • 00:11:38
    a Seir X andG like host where basically
  • 00:11:41
    uh you know my search engine is not
  • 00:11:43
    Google. I use Seir XNG and I have it in
  • 00:11:45
    a way at my home network so that anybody
  • 00:11:47
    who types in like CIR X andG uh into my
  • 00:11:50
    like home network will automatically
  • 00:11:52
    like go to my local instance. But we're
  • 00:11:55
    getting really technical here. So the
  • 00:11:56
    idea again you have to understand is
  • 00:11:58
    VPNs are something that everyone uses,
  • 00:12:00
    right? VPNs are something that you know
  • 00:12:03
    uh you can't just ban. But there's
  • 00:12:05
    nothing that stops like the government
  • 00:12:06
    here from saying, "Okay, uh, as long as
  • 00:12:09
    you're a in the government or as long as
  • 00:12:11
    you know your your your VPN is is is
  • 00:12:14
    part of a corporate entity or like a
  • 00:12:16
    business or a hospital or something,
  • 00:12:18
    that's an exception. But any company,
  • 00:12:20
    anybody that's providing a
  • 00:12:22
    consumer-grade VPN, that's a no no
  • 00:12:25
    because obviously those are going to be
  • 00:12:27
    used for circumventing the laws." Now
  • 00:12:30
    the other thing is people who are
  • 00:12:31
    purchasing VPNs that are under the five
  • 00:12:33
    eyes alliance meaning that you know even
  • 00:12:35
    if the United even if your VPN isn't
  • 00:12:37
    hosted say in the United Kingdom as long
  • 00:12:39
    as it's hosted in the United States or
  • 00:12:41
    even Canada and I think Australia to an
  • 00:12:44
    extent too these organizations will just
  • 00:12:47
    rapidly share information between each
  • 00:12:48
    other. So you're never really private as
  • 00:12:51
    long as you truly research what kind of
  • 00:12:53
    VPN you get into. Now the other thing is
  • 00:12:56
    VPNs are not the only thing that can be
  • 00:12:58
    used. uh to detect you, right? Like I
  • 00:13:00
    said in the last video, when it comes to
  • 00:13:02
    a lot of organizations tracking you, um
  • 00:13:05
    just because you have a VPN doesn't mean
  • 00:13:07
    that they're not looking at something
  • 00:13:08
    else. So, let's say that you're using
  • 00:13:09
    something like Google Chrome or a pretty
  • 00:13:12
    uh you know, insecure browser, something
  • 00:13:13
    that doesn't, you know, conceal a lot of
  • 00:13:15
    your browser fingerprints, you could
  • 00:13:18
    potentially have your information or
  • 00:13:21
    your location presented in another way
  • 00:13:23
    that isn't just your IP address. So, for
  • 00:13:25
    example, let's say that I uh VPN myself
  • 00:13:29
    to uh Los Angeles, right? A server in
  • 00:13:31
    Los Angeles. Now, if I connect to a
  • 00:13:33
    website and it checks my browser
  • 00:13:35
    fingerprint and my brow browser
  • 00:13:37
    fingerprint leaks out my time zone is
  • 00:13:40
    actually in Toronto, then immediately it
  • 00:13:43
    will say, "Okay, this makes no sense.
  • 00:13:44
    How is a guy whose browser fingerprint
  • 00:13:47
    matches that of a Torononian suddenly
  • 00:13:49
    connecting to us from Los Angeles?"
  • 00:13:52
    Probably is just a VPN. It's also the
  • 00:13:54
    reason why when you connect to, you
  • 00:13:56
    know, Netflix or something and you have
  • 00:13:58
    like a a VPN that is detected by
  • 00:14:01
    Netflix, they will often times identify
  • 00:14:03
    it and remove you from access or prevent
  • 00:14:06
    you from watching the video. And it's
  • 00:14:08
    because it's a whack-a-ole game between
  • 00:14:10
    some of the biggest VPN companies and a
  • 00:14:12
    lot of these big tech companies in order
  • 00:14:14
    to identify who's an actual user and
  • 00:14:16
    who's a user that's connecting through a
  • 00:14:18
    VPN data center. Now, if you want to
  • 00:14:20
    bypass any form of that kind of browser
  • 00:14:23
    fingerprinting, there are options like
  • 00:14:25
    you can download Molvad browser, which I
  • 00:14:27
    think is probably the best privacy
  • 00:14:29
    focused browser for the Firefox side.
  • 00:14:32
    And if you're on Chrome, I think one of
  • 00:14:34
    the best options you can get is
  • 00:14:35
    something like Google or not Google, but
  • 00:14:37
    Brave browser. But even then, right,
  • 00:14:40
    like if these guys want to track you,
  • 00:14:41
    they ultimately can find a way. And I
  • 00:14:44
    think slowly but surely, if it's not
  • 00:14:45
    just a VPN ban coming in, it's even
  • 00:14:48
    further checks in order to prevent
  • 00:14:50
    people from accessing parts of the
  • 00:14:52
    internet, unless of course you give up
  • 00:14:54
    your personal information and and browse
  • 00:14:56
    the internet hopefully uncensored. Now,
  • 00:14:59
    of course, the thing is they probably
  • 00:15:01
    don't have a law right now in the drafts
  • 00:15:03
    for VPN blocking, but the thing is when
  • 00:15:05
    they do this test, when they do this
  • 00:15:07
    like research and see just how many
  • 00:15:08
    people are bypassing it, don't doubt the
  • 00:15:11
    fact that these people will try to make
  • 00:15:12
    VPNs illegal or try to make at least the
  • 00:15:15
    public facing consumption of it somewhat
  • 00:15:17
    of a problem. And that's where I guess
  • 00:15:19
    the last part of this video comes into
  • 00:15:21
    the real last bastion of true internet
  • 00:15:24
    freedom that you have is tour. So this
  • 00:15:27
    is the tour browser and of course I've
  • 00:15:29
    connected onto the tour network. Now
  • 00:15:31
    obviously people can say that the tour
  • 00:15:33
    network is used by you know people
  • 00:15:34
    committing illegal actions which is
  • 00:15:36
    true. There's a lot of illegal stuff
  • 00:15:38
    that happens on tour. In fact uh a
  • 00:15:40
    couple days ago I believe the uh US uh
  • 00:15:44
    Department of Justice actually took down
  • 00:15:46
    again more illegal uh pedto websites on
  • 00:15:50
    the on the dark web. And the thing is,
  • 00:15:52
    obviously for a platform that provides a
  • 00:15:55
    real unprecedented level of anonymity,
  • 00:15:57
    there's obviously people that use it for
  • 00:15:58
    illegal reasons, but there are also
  • 00:16:00
    legal reasons that people use something
  • 00:16:02
    like Torah for. For instance, let's say
  • 00:16:03
    you're a journalist. Let's say you're
  • 00:16:05
    somebody operating in place where, you
  • 00:16:07
    know, real censorship is a thing. And,
  • 00:16:09
    you know, criticizing the government or
  • 00:16:11
    sharing information could potentially
  • 00:16:12
    get you killed or imprisoned. Using
  • 00:16:15
    something like tour to conceal yourself
  • 00:16:17
    is probably the option that people uh
  • 00:16:19
    have. And that's ultimately the thing I
  • 00:16:21
    want to talk about here, ladies and
  • 00:16:23
    gentlemen. They want to get rid of VPNs.
  • 00:16:25
    They want to ban the last bit of freedom
  • 00:16:27
    people have. And if you think it stops
  • 00:16:29
    in the UK, the US is passing laws.
  • 00:16:32
    Canada might just pass laws. If it works
  • 00:16:34
    in one place, don't expect it not to
  • 00:16:36
    work somewhere else. If you like what
  • 00:16:38
    you saw, please like, comment, and
  • 00:16:39
    subscribe. Dislike if you dislike it. I
  • 00:16:41
    am out.
タグ
  • censorship
  • VPN
  • Online Safety Act
  • internet freedom
  • Steam
  • Xbox
  • Offcom
  • Tor
  • public response
  • digital privacy