The WordPress Drama: $B Companies vs. Open Source

00:25:14
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LgFA0G34Keg

Resumo

TLDRThe video discusses the intricate saga involving WordPress, its co-founder Matt Mullenweg, and WP Engine, a major hosting provider. It's a tale of open-source ethics clashing with commercial interests. Matt Mullenweg started WordPress in 2003, which now supports over 40% of websites. He also founded Automattic, a profitable company capitalizing on WordPress' success. The dispute centers on WP Engine's use of WordPress while contributing minimally to its development, as per Matt, who argues their practices confuse people into thinking they're an official part of WordPress. Tensions heightened when Automattic blocked WP Engine’s updates and accused them of trademark violations. The WordPress Foundation, ostensibly independent but closely tied to Matt’s interests, oversees the WordPress trademark, though Automattic retains commercial rights. Legal battles ensued, with a court initially siding with WP Engine. This saga raises questions about control and ethos within the open-source community and whether financial interests compromise the integrity of foundational open-source principles. The community remains divided, with some backing Matt's stand on open source and others skeptical of his dual roles as a guardian of open source and a businessman seeking revenue from it.

Conclusões

  • 🧑‍💻 Matt Mullenweg co-founded WordPress, significantly impacting web development.
  • ⚖️ The dispute between WordPress and WP Engine involves complex legal and ethical dimensions.
  • 💼 Automattic, founded by Mullenweg, benefits from WordPress while questioning WP Engine's contributions.
  • 🔍 WP Engine profited massively from WordPress but allegedly contributed little back, sparking controversy.
  • 💰 Legal battles over branding and contribution highlight tensions in open-source monetization.
  • 🔗 Complexities around WordPress trademarks intertwine business and open-source values.
  • 🕵️‍♂️ The narrative involves accusations of exploiting WordPress branding for profit without due contribution.
  • 🔒 The WordPress Foundation holds the trademark but Automattic retains commercial rights.
  • 📝 A court ruling favored WP Engine in a trademark dispute, highlighting the ongoing battle.
  • 🤔 The saga questions the balance between profiting from and contributing to open-source projects.

Linha do tempo

  • 00:00:00 - 00:05:00

    The video begins by introducing the main topic: a major conflict involving WordPress, one of the most dominant forces in website creation, controlling 40% of the market. It sets the stage for discussing how WordPress, initially an open source CMS, evolved from a simple blogging software. The narrator emphasizes the depth of research done to cover this story, aiming to chronicle an impactful event in open-source history.

  • 00:05:00 - 00:10:00

    Matt Mullenweg, co-founder of WordPress and owner of Automattic, is introduced as a central figure. His journey from forking a discontinued blogging software to establishing WordPress is outlined. Automattic, his company, benefits largely from WordPress, similar to WP Engine, a major hosting provider making profits from WordPress-based services. WP Engine, backed by Silver Lake, profits from WordPress but allegedly contributes minimally to its development, sparking controversy.

  • 00:10:00 - 00:15:00

    Tensions rise when Matt Mullenweg publicly criticizes WP Engine for profiting from WordPress while making minimal contributions to its development. He accuses WP Engine of misleadingly branding themselves as WordPress affiliates and calls for them to pay licensing fees. The WordPress trademark, owned by the WordPress foundation, complicates matters as Automattic maintains exclusive commercial use rights, causing a potential conflict of interest for Matt.

  • 00:15:00 - 00:20:00

    Matt Mullenweg takes action against WP Engine by sending a cease and desist letter demanding substantial licensing fees. WP Engine rejects these demands, interpreting them as an exploitative maneuver by Automattic. This legal battle escalates, leading to significant consequences, including blocked plugin updates on wordpress.org and WP Engine’s customers facing potential security risks. The conflict stirs division within the WordPress community.

  • 00:20:00 - 00:25:14

    The fallout from the conflict is substantial: a California court's preliminary injunction favors WP Engine, reflecting negatively on Automattic. The narrator highlights the tension between open source ideals and financial ambitions, questioning Matt’s dual roles in the ecosystem. The ongoing drama underscores the complexity of open-source governance, where personal, organizational, and community interests intertwine, leaving the community awaiting further legal resolutions.

Mostrar mais

Mapa mental

Vídeo de perguntas e respostas

  • Who is Matt Mullenweg?

    Matt Mullenweg is the co-founder of WordPress, a popular open-source content management system.

  • What is WordPress?

    WordPress is a PHP-based open-source content management system initially created for blogging, now powering a large portion of the internet.

  • What does WP Engine do?

    WP Engine is a hosting provider specializing in WordPress, offering services tailored to WordPress users.

  • What sparked the tension between Matt Mullenweg and WP Engine?

    The tensions arose due to WP Engine's profiting from WordPress without allegedly giving back to its development, and trademark disputes initiated by Matt Mullenweg.

  • What role does Automattic play in the WordPress community?

    Automattic, founded by Matt Mullenweg, profits from WordPress through various services and holds an exclusive license for the WordPress trademark commercially.

  • What is the WordPress Foundation?

    The WordPress Foundation, founded by Matt, owns the WordPress trademark aimed at ensuring open-source ethos and protecting the WordPress brand.

  • How did Matt Mullenweg react to WP Engine's business practices?

    Matt accused WP Engine of benefiting from WordPress without contribution, issued a cease-and-desist, and blocked WP Engine's updates on wordpress.org.

  • What legal actions have been taken in this dispute?

    Automattic sent a cease-and-desist letter demanding WP Engine to pay licensing fees, leading to legal battles over access to WordPress resources.

  • What was the court's initial decision?

    The court issued a preliminary injunction ordering wordpress.org to restore WP Engine's access, siding with WP Engine against Automattic.

  • How did the WordPress community react to the dispute?

    The community is divided, with some supporting Matt’s defense of open source and others worried about the implications of his business tactics.

Ver mais resumos de vídeos

Obtenha acesso instantâneo a resumos gratuitos de vídeos do YouTube com tecnologia de IA!
Legendas
en
Rolagem automática:
  • 00:00:00
    This is a story about the man who has control
  • 00:00:02
    over 40% of all websites.
  • 00:00:04
    A story about the war between two multi-billion dollar companies.
  • 00:00:08
    A story about the crossroads at which the concept of
  • 00:00:10
    open source might currently find itself.
  • 00:00:13
    This is a story about, and I never thought I'd
  • 00:00:15
    make a video about this, WordPress.
  • 00:00:17
    Because WordPress isn't exactly what I immediately associate with
  • 00:00:20
    modern web development, enterprise programming, a PHP blog software.
  • 00:00:25
    If you know, you know. But something happened in the
  • 00:00:27
    WordPress community, a wild story.
  • 00:00:29
    So it's definitely worth taking a closer look.
  • 00:00:31
    And to be honest, at first I thought I'd just
  • 00:00:33
    read two of three articles on a topic and summarise
  • 00:00:35
    them in a video.
  • 00:00:36
    Easy.
  • 00:00:37
    But in the end, I read over 20 news articles,
  • 00:00:39
    countless blog posts, waded through pages of legal documents, watched
  • 00:00:43
    hours of interviews with the people involved, read leaked chat
  • 00:00:45
    messages, basically researched tons of information from various sources.
  • 00:00:49
    Because this is truly an incredible story about money, software
  • 00:00:53
    and the internet, one that will likely be remembered as
  • 00:00:56
    a milestone in the history of open source.
  • 00:00:58
    And that's the story I want to share with you
  • 00:00:59
    here.
  • 00:01:00
    So, grab some popcorn, a coffee, or a tea, and
  • 00:01:03
    sit back, let's get started.
  • 00:01:09
    Let's first take a look at the key players in
  • 00:01:10
    this story.
  • 00:01:12
    At the center is a man who is now 40
  • 00:01:14
    years old named Matt Mullenweg.
  • 00:01:19
    Matt, a web developer, created a fork of the blogging
  • 00:01:21
    software b2/cafelog back in 2003 at the age of 19 after
  • 00:01:25
    its development had been discontinued.
  • 00:01:28
    Matt wrote about this in a blog at the time.
  • 00:01:30
    He was able to create a fork because b2/cafelog was
  • 00:01:33
    GPL-licensed.
  • 00:01:33
    This license allows for the free modification and redistribution of
  • 00:01:37
    software, even for commercial purposes.
  • 00:01:39
    Provided that any software derived from it is also GPL-licensed.
  • 00:01:43
    It's one of the most well known and widely used
  • 00:01:46
    license families in the free end open source world.
  • 00:01:48
    And this project that Matt Mullenweg started back in 2003
  • 00:01:51
    together with another person, you've probably guessed it by now:
  • 00:01:55
    This became WordPress.
  • 00:01:56
    Matt is therefore one of the co-founders of WordPress, and
  • 00:02:00
    to this day, more than 20 years later, he's still
  • 00:02:02
    actively involved in the open source project.
  • 00:02:04
    But he also owns a company, Automattic.
  • 00:02:07
    This software company owns platforms like Tumblr, but primarily makes
  • 00:02:11
    money through services related to WordPress.
  • 00:02:14
    We'll get to that later.
  • 00:02:17
    WordPress, what is WordPress?
  • 00:02:18
    Well, even my wife who knows nothing about software development,
  • 00:02:21
    is familiar with the term.
  • 00:02:23
    Still, for the sake of completeness: WordPress started as a blogging software,
  • 00:02:27
    and has evolved into a fully fledged CMS.
  • 00:02:30
    It's written in PHP and has developed a massive ecosystem
  • 00:02:33
    of plugins, themes, hosting providers and a huge community around
  • 00:02:37
    it.
  • 00:02:37
    WordPress became so successful that by 2023 over 43% of
  • 00:02:41
    the top 10 million websites in the world where built
  • 00:02:44
    with WordPress.
  • 00:02:45
    Mindblowing.
  • 00:02:46
    This makes WordPress the most important CMS we have.
  • 00:02:50
    A PHP based blogging software that today forms the backbone of
  • 00:02:54
    the internet.
  • 00:02:55
    And WordPress remains under the GPL license, meaning the codebase
  • 00:02:58
    is freely usable, modifiable, and can be used to create
  • 00:03:01
    commercial projects.
  • 00:03:03
    And WordPress is indeed commercially used by many many companies.
  • 00:03:07
    One of those companies is WP Engine.
  • 00:03:13
    WP Engine is a US-based hosting provider, but it hosts
  • 00:03:15
    only one software: WordPress.
  • 00:03:17
    That's why it's called WP Engine with WP standing for
  • 00:03:20
    WordPress.
  • 00:03:21
    A fact, that will become very important later.
  • 00:03:23
    Founded in 2010, WP Engine serves over 150 million customers,
  • 00:03:27
    including large enterprises.
  • 00:03:29
    Their pitch: build, host, and manage websites powered by WordPress.
  • 00:03:32
    It's a smart move.
  • 00:03:33
    If you're already planning to create a WordPress site, you
  • 00:03:36
    might choose this provider over a traditional host and
  • 00:03:39
    benefit from features like automatic updates, tailored tools, scalability, expert support
  • 00:03:44
    and optimized performance.
  • 00:03:46
    All designed specifically for WordPress.
  • 00:03:48
    But all that comes with a price, plans start at
  • 00:03:50
    $25 per month, which is quite steep.
  • 00:03:53
    Prices may vary globally, but in Europe, you can usually
  • 00:03:56
    get web hosting for a significantly less.
  • 00:03:58
    And this pricing is already kind of part of the
  • 00:04:01
    dispute, part of the WordPress drama.
  • 00:04:03
    WP Engine makes a lot of money off WordPress.
  • 00:04:06
    They've been so successful that in early 2018, private equity
  • 00:04:10
    firm Silver Lake invested 250 million in the company.
  • 00:04:13
    Silver Lake is a US-based private equity firm focused on
  • 00:04:16
    tech investments.
  • 00:04:18
    A bit of research into Silver Lake shows that many
  • 00:04:20
    of their investments are strongly driven by profit maximization.
  • 00:04:24
    For example in 2010, they invested in the Open Source
  • 00:04:26
    Software Company talend, which develops data management systems and pushed
  • 00:04:30
    aggressive growth strategies.
  • 00:04:32
    In 2017, they acquired shares in Unity, the famous game
  • 00:04:35
    engine.
  • 00:04:36
    And a few years later, Unity came under heavy criticism
  • 00:04:39
    for a sudden and significant price increase for its services.
  • 00:04:43
    A scandal in the community that ultimately led to Unity's CEO
  • 00:04:46
    stepping down.
  • 00:04:47
    It raises the question: how much influence did Silver Lake
  • 00:04:50
    have on these business decisions?
  • 00:04:52
    And in Germany, Silver Lake is also infamous for
  • 00:04:55
    acquiring and dismantling Software AG,
  • 00:04:57
    once the second largest software provider in the country.
  • 00:05:00
    They sold off individual business units to maximize profits.
  • 00:05:04
    So, Silver Lake like many private equity firms focuses heavily
  • 00:05:08
    on profit maximization and in 2018, they entered WP Engine.
  • 00:05:12
    A company whose business model is built on an open
  • 00:05:15
    source blogging platform, WordPress.
  • 00:05:17
    Now one could argue, fine.
  • 00:05:18
    Open Source allows for commercial use.
  • 00:05:20
    And many others make money this way.
  • 00:05:22
    Even WordPress co-founder Matt Mullenweg does so with his own
  • 00:05:25
    company.
  • 00:05:26
    Automattic.
  • 00:05:29
    Automatic is the company founded by Matt.
  • 00:05:32
    The two Ts in the name, they're a nod to "Matt".
  • 00:05:34
    Automattic makes the majority of its revenue, around half according
  • 00:05:37
    to Matt in an interview, from WordPress, particularly through hosting
  • 00:05:40
    services.
  • 00:05:41
    But they also profit from other products.
  • 00:05:43
    For example, WooCommerce, the most popular e-commerce system for WordPress
  • 00:05:47
    is developed by Automattic.
  • 00:05:49
    And Automattic is certainly no small company.
  • 00:05:52
    Back in 2021, it was valued at 7.5 billion.
  • 00:05:55
    A major player in the industry.
  • 00:05:57
    So, the key players in this drama are Matt Mullenweg,
  • 00:06:00
    the father of the open source WordPress project, his company
  • 00:06:03
    Automattic, which uses WordPress as its core business and WP
  • 00:06:06
    Engine, a competitor of Automattic.
  • 00:06:09
    And now the question is, what happened?
  • 00:06:14
    At the end of September, Matt Mullenweg published a blog
  • 00:06:15
    post on wordpress.org that cost quite a stir.
  • 00:06:19
    But before diving into the content of the post, let's
  • 00:06:22
    clarify, what is wordpress.org?
  • 00:06:24
    Wordpress.org is essentially the official website for WordPress, the open
  • 00:06:28
    source project.
  • 00:06:29
    It's the site referenced in Wikipedia entries and serves
  • 00:06:32
    as the central hub for everything related to WordPress.
  • 00:06:35
    And, according to an interview with Matt, this domain is personally owned
  • 00:06:39
    and managed by him.
  • 00:06:40
    This detail feels important to the story because, in
  • 00:06:43
    my view, it blurs the lines between the open source
  • 00:06:45
    WordPress project and Matt as a private individual.
  • 00:06:48
    For instance, at the bottom of wordpress.org, there's a link
  • 00:06:52
    to ma.tt, Matt's personal blog that we saw earlier.
  • 00:06:56
    And there's also link to wordpress.com.
  • 00:06:58
    And wordpress.com on the other hand is owned by Automattic.
  • 00:07:02
    It's where Matt sells professional WordPress services.
  • 00:07:05
    This creates a clear overlap of interest between the official
  • 00:07:08
    website of the WordPress project and Matt's commercial endeavors.
  • 00:07:12
    And it was on wordpress.org in the blog section that
  • 00:07:15
    Matt published a rant on September 21.
  • 00:07:18
    It has to be said and repeated.
  • 00:07:21
    WP Engine is not WordPress.
  • 00:07:22
    My own mother was confused and thought WP Engine was
  • 00:07:26
    an official thing.
  • 00:07:27
    Their branding, marketing, advertising and entire promise to customers is
  • 00:07:31
    that they are giving you WordPress, but they're not.
  • 00:07:34
    And they're profiting off of the confusion.
  • 00:07:36
    WP Engine needs a trademark license to continue their business.
  • 00:07:40
    I spoke yesterday at WordCamp about how Lee Wittlinger at
  • 00:07:43
    Silver Lake, a private equity firm with 102 billion assets
  • 00:07:46
    under management can hollow out an open source community.
  • 00:07:50
    To summarize, they do about half a billion in revenue
  • 00:07:53
    on top of WordPress and contribute back 40 hours a
  • 00:07:56
    week.
  • 00:07:56
    Automattic is a similar size and contributes back 3,915 hours
  • 00:08:02
    a week.
  • 00:08:03
    So Silver Lake, as we discussed earlier, invested heavily in WP
  • 00:08:06
    Engine.
  • 00:08:06
    And now Matt says: OK, WP Engine makes a lot of
  • 00:08:08
    money off WordPress but contributes very little to its development
  • 00:08:12
    only 40 hours per week. Another company, Automattic, his company,
  • 00:08:17
    let's not forget, does a lot more. Allegedly investing 100
  • 00:08:21
    times that amount.
  • 00:08:22
    And at first glance, it's a morally valid argument.
  • 00:08:24
    Companies can use WordPress, but it's problematic if they only
  • 00:08:28
    take and don't give back.
  • 00:08:29
    Assuming that's all true.
  • 00:08:30
    WP Engine, for instance, claims they contribute significantly more overall.
  • 00:08:34
    Still, one could argue, Automattic sets a better example in
  • 00:08:37
    this regard.
  • 00:08:38
    What I find particularly interesting though is that Matt accuses
  • 00:08:41
    WP Engine of giving the impression that they are WordPress.
  • 00:08:45
    But from my perspective as an outsider, I find wordpress.com
  • 00:08:48
    far more confusing than WP Engine.
  • 00:08:50
    Before researching this story, I often stumble across wordpress.com and
  • 00:08:54
    couldn't fully grasp whether it was official or not
  • 00:08:57
    and Matt raises this very point.
  • 00:08:59
    WP Engine needs a trademark license.
  • 00:09:02
    This debate centers on who is allowed to associate themselves
  • 00:09:05
    with the WordPress name and who isn't.
  • 00:09:09
    It turns out there is a way to acquire rights
  • 00:09:10
    or licenses for the WordPress project, but who owns the
  • 00:09:14
    WordPress trademark?
  • 00:09:16
    A quick research reveals that the trademark is owned by
  • 00:09:20
    the WordPress foundation.
  • 00:09:21
    What is the WordPress foundation?
  • 00:09:23
    The WordPress foundation is a charitable organization founded by Matt
  • 00:09:26
    Mullenweg to further the mission of the WordPress Open Source
  • 00:09:28
    project to democratize publishing through Open Source, GPL software.
  • 00:09:33
    All right, so a foundation. Sounds good at first glance,
  • 00:09:36
    it's an entity you can donate to if you want
  • 00:09:38
    to support the Open Source WordPress project.
  • 00:09:40
    They even offer a scolarship program.
  • 00:09:42
    On their website, you'll also find the trademark policy, which
  • 00:09:45
    states: The WordPress foundation owns and oversees the trademarks for
  • 00:09:49
    the names and logos of WordPress as well as a
  • 00:09:51
    few other WordPress related brands.
  • 00:09:54
    But it gets more interesting further down: If you would
  • 00:09:56
    like to use the WordPress trademark commercially, please contact Automattic.
  • 00:10:01
    They have the exclusive license.
  • 00:10:03
    A bit complicated,
  • 00:10:04
    Matt Mullenweg himself agrees as he mentioned
  • 00:10:07
    in a recent interview with Tech Crunch.
  • 00:10:08
    I will link to that below in the video description.
  • 00:10:11
    Because originally, the WordPress trademark belonged to Automattic, but in
  • 00:10:14
    2010, they transferred it to the WordPress foundation, however, Automattic
  • 00:10:18
    retained the exclusive license for commercial use.
  • 00:10:22
    So this was a positive move in principle, Matt's company
  • 00:10:25
    handling over a well-known trademark to a foundation.
  • 00:10:27
    According to statements at the time, it was because Matt
  • 00:10:30
    wasn't sure if he'd always remain the CEO of Automattic
  • 00:10:34
    and he wants the main banner, WordPress, to be protected
  • 00:10:37
    as a beacon for Open Source freedom.
  • 00:10:39
    But Automattic ensured they kept the exclusive right to
  • 00:10:42
    commercial use the WordPress trademark.
  • 00:10:44
    So but what exactly does "use the WordPress trademark commercially"
  • 00:10:48
    mean?
  • 00:10:49
    According to the trademark policy: All other WordPress related businesses
  • 00:10:52
    or projects can use the WordPress name and logo to
  • 00:10:55
    refer to and explain their services, but they cannot use
  • 00:10:58
    them as part of a product, project, service, domain name
  • 00:11:01
    or company name and they cannot use them in any
  • 00:11:03
    way that suggests an affiliation with or endorsement by the
  • 00:11:06
    WordPress foundation or the WordPress Open Source project.
  • 00:11:09
    For example, a consulting company can describe its business as
  • 00:11:13
    "123 Web Services offering WordPress consulting for small
  • 00:11:16
    businesses", but cannot call its business "The WordPress Consulting Company".
  • 00:11:20
    Okay, so it means you can make money with WordPress,
  • 00:11:23
    but you're not supposed to officially present yourself as WordPress.
  • 00:11:27
    So, does WP Engine do that? Sure, WP
  • 00:11:29
    is meant to stand for WordPress, but they don't actually
  • 00:11:32
    use the full term WordPress in their name.
  • 00:11:35
    But the trademark policy also mentions something about WP.
  • 00:11:39
    The abbreviation WP is not covered by the WordPress trademarks,
  • 00:11:43
    but please don't use it in a way that confuses
  • 00:11:45
    people. For example, many people think WP Engine is
  • 00:11:48
    WordPress Engine and officially associated with WordPress, which it's not.
  • 00:11:54
    They have never once even donated to the WordPress foundation
  • 00:11:57
    despite making billions of revenue on top of WordPress.
  • 00:12:00
    Okay, that's wild. They explicitly mention WP Engine here and
  • 00:12:04
    state that it violates the rules because it's supposedly confusing.
  • 00:12:08
    However, this wasn't always the case.
  • 00:12:11
    As of September 24, according to the Wayback Machine,
  • 00:12:15
    it still said: The abbreviation WP is not covered by
  • 00:12:18
    the WordPress trademarks and you're free to use it in
  • 00:12:21
    any way you see fit.
  • 00:12:22
    All right, so this is fascinating.
  • 00:12:24
    Matt publicly calls our WP Engine on wordpress.org urging
  • 00:12:28
    them to pay licensing fees and then just a few
  • 00:12:31
    days later, the trademark usage policy on the WordPress foundation's
  • 00:12:34
    website, which he co-founded and very still sits on the
  • 00:12:37
    board alongside two others, is updated to WP Engine's detriment.
  • 00:12:41
    That all said, I want to clarify, I'm not a
  • 00:12:43
    lawyer or a judge, WP Engine's public branding surely involves
  • 00:12:46
    more than just their company name, maybe they do
  • 00:12:49
    violate the trademark usage policy.
  • 00:12:50
    I don't know.
  • 00:12:51
    I also can't determine the legality of changing such a
  • 00:12:53
    policy and then expecting companies to pay up.
  • 00:12:56
    What I can do is to lay out some facts which
  • 00:12:59
    paint, in my view, a very intriguing picture of how
  • 00:13:02
    Matt operates across the platforms he controls.
  • 00:13:05
    So on wordpress.org, he not only demands money from WP
  • 00:13:09
    Engine for trademark violations but also labels than as "cancer
  • 00:13:13
    to WordPress" and he repeatedly uses a strangely specific example,
  • 00:13:17
    whether in interviews blog posts or elsewhere. Because WordPress has
  • 00:13:21
    a feature for revisions, meaning all changes to posts or
  • 00:13:24
    pages are tracked so that every modification remains accessible.
  • 00:13:28
    It's a safeguard against data loss.
  • 00:13:30
    Matt says: "WP Engine turns this off."
  • 00:13:34
    So, at least by default, this feature is disabled on
  • 00:13:38
    WP Engine and while it can be re-enabled it only
  • 00:13:41
    allows for the last three revisions, which is not aligned
  • 00:13:45
    with the WordPress standard.
  • 00:13:46
    He claims: What WP Engine gives you is not WordPress,
  • 00:13:49
    it's something that they've chopped up, hacked butchered to look
  • 00:13:52
    like WordPress but actually they're giving you a cheap knockoff
  • 00:13:55
    and charging you more for it.
  • 00:13:57
    And why?
  • 00:13:57
    Allegedly to save money, less data storage means lower costs.
  • 00:14:01
    Sounds logical, I guess, but does it ruin WordPress for users?
  • 00:14:06
    Well, that's debatable.
  • 00:14:08
    Beyond this blog post, Matt also takes more concrete action.
  • 00:14:10
    On September 23, his company Automattic sends a cease and
  • 00:14:14
    desist letter to WP Engine through its lawyers, citing violations
  • 00:14:18
    of our clients intellectual property rights.
  • 00:14:20
    They demand back payment of licensing fees, which can only
  • 00:14:23
    be calculated after reviewing WP Engine's detailed financial records, however,
  • 00:14:27
    Automattic estimates, this could amount to around 8% of WP
  • 00:14:31
    Engine's 400 million annual revenue. Over 32 million in
  • 00:14:36
    lost yearly licensing income.
  • 00:14:38
    This is a hypothetical calculation as Automattic itself acknowledges but
  • 00:14:41
    it gives you a sense of the scale they're aiming
  • 00:14:44
    for.
  • 00:14:45
    In short: they're asking for a lot of money and they
  • 00:14:47
    give WP Engine until the third of October, 10 days,
  • 00:14:50
    to comply.
  • 00:14:50
    WP Engine doesn't take the long to respond. They reply immediately
  • 00:14:54
    and, unsurprisingly, they're not happy.
  • 00:14:56
    They refuse to pay and state, Mr.
  • 00:14:58
    Mullenweg’s covert demand that WP Engine hand over tens of
  • 00:15:02
    millions to his for-profit company Automattic, while publicly masquerading as
  • 00:15:06
    an altruistic protector of the WordPress community is disgraceful.
  • 00:15:11
    And I want to be clear:
  • 00:15:12
    I'm not here to take sides with Silver Lake, WP Engine,
  • 00:15:14
    multi-billion dollar companies or private equities, but this aspect is
  • 00:15:18
    undeniably essential.
  • 00:15:19
    On the one hand, this is a legal dispute between
  • 00:15:22
    two companies, on the other, it's about a massive open-source
  • 00:15:25
    project and Matt Mullenweg is undeniably a significant figure in
  • 00:15:29
    the open-source world.
  • 00:15:30
    Whatever, one thinks of the WordPress, Matt has created something
  • 00:15:33
    incredibly valuable for a lot of people. Something anyone can
  • 00:15:37
    use for free.
  • 00:15:40
    And Matt says many things that are absolutely correct in
  • 00:15:42
    my opinion.
  • 00:15:43
    On his personal blog on September 17, just days before
  • 00:15:46
    the post on wordpress.org, he wrote extensively about the importance
  • 00:15:50
    of open-source, that software can give you more freedom.
  • 00:15:53
    On September 20, at WoldCamp US, a WordPress conference,
  • 00:15:57
    he read this blog post aloud.
  • 00:15:59
    Freedom to hack.
  • 00:16:01
    Freedom to charge.
  • 00:16:01
    Freedom to break it.
  • 00:16:02
    Freedom to do things I disagree with.
  • 00:16:05
    Freedom to experiment.
  • 00:16:06
    Freedom to be yourself.
  • 00:16:07
    In it he emphasizes the importance of not just taking,
  • 00:16:10
    but also giving back.
  • 00:16:12
    If everyone only seeks to profit without contributing to an
  • 00:16:15
    open-source project, it will ultimately collapse and I completely agree
  • 00:16:19
    with that.
  • 00:16:20
    And of course, it's no coincidence that Matt gave this
  • 00:16:22
    speech shortly before Automattic went public with their demand for
  • 00:16:25
    money from WP Engine.
  • 00:16:26
    He doesn't hide his intentions either.
  • 00:16:28
    Speaking of WP Engine, Silver Lake and their Managing Director Lee Wittlinger,
  • 00:16:33
    he says: Silver like, doesn't give a dang about your
  • 00:16:36
    open-source ideals.
  • 00:16:37
    You can kind of see when there's like one person,
  • 00:16:39
    one thing behind all of this. And it's just like
  • 00:16:44
    a schoolyard bully.
  • 00:16:45
    You know, this is, I know this is spicy, this
  • 00:16:48
    is a lot to call out, but unfortunately this has
  • 00:16:51
    been going on since they bought WP Engine in 2018.
  • 00:16:54
    A "schoolyard bully" who's using their influence over WP
  • 00:16:57
    Engine solely to focus on profits while giving nothing back.
  • 00:17:01
    And, as Matt himself admits, this is a spicy topic.
  • 00:17:04
    It's particularly spicy because before this talk, there were some
  • 00:17:09
    chat messages Matt sent to representatives of WP Engine.
  • 00:17:12
    About the presentation he was preparing to give.
  • 00:17:15
    I have 14 slides so far, working title for the
  • 00:17:18
    talk: "How Private Equity can Hollow out and Destroy Open-Source
  • 00:17:22
    Communities, a Story in 4 Parts."
  • 00:17:24
    Matt kind of threatens WP Engine by stating that he
  • 00:17:27
    will speak poorly of them publicly at WordCamp and
  • 00:17:30
    demands negotiations.
  • 00:17:31
    Just called, should I run these slides or not?
  • 00:17:34
    Is next week a negotiation on the percent or is
  • 00:17:36
    it happening at all?
  • 00:17:38
    I'm not going to be able to walk it back.
  • 00:17:40
    I know that this is the nuclear option.
  • 00:17:42
    It sets us down a specific path.
  • 00:17:44
    And right before the talk, he sends another threat to
  • 00:17:47
    WP Engine.
  • 00:17:48
    I'm literally waiting for them to finish the raffle so
  • 00:17:50
    my talk can start.
  • 00:17:52
    I can make it just a Q&A about WordPress very
  • 00:17:54
    easily.
  • 00:17:55
    So if WP Engine had caved and agreed to pay,
  • 00:17:57
    Matt likely wouldn't have taken this issue public.
  • 00:18:00
    As we know now, WP Engine didn't back down.
  • 00:18:03
    By the way, these chat messages were published by WP
  • 00:18:06
    Engine through a legal filing.
  • 00:18:07
    Matt Mullenweg addressed these messages at least partially in the
  • 00:18:11
    interview with Tech Crunch.
  • 00:18:12
    He confirmed certain phrases and didn't deny the messages overall,
  • 00:18:16
    so we can reasonably assume the messages are authentic.
  • 00:18:18
    But Matt points out that these messages are
  • 00:18:20
    of course only half the story.
  • 00:18:22
    Taken out of context.
  • 00:18:23
    No chat messages from WP Engine employees have been published.
  • 00:18:27
    He also claims this is just the tip of the
  • 00:18:29
    iceberg. According to him, Automattic and WP Engine had been
  • 00:18:32
    working on a deal for 18 months.
  • 00:18:34
    He feels strung along, deceived, and is now taking this
  • 00:18:37
    route.
  • 00:18:37
    WP Engine, unsurprisingly, sees things differently.
  • 00:18:40
    Take claim to invest millions in WordPress, develop plugins for
  • 00:18:43
    it and actively contribute to its core development.
  • 00:18:46
    They demand that the public accusations stop and refer to
  • 00:18:49
    the situation as extortion.
  • 00:18:50
    So this legal letter was sent on September 23.
  • 00:18:54
    They very next day, wordpress.org blocked WP Engine.
  • 00:18:59
    So if you have installed WordPress, you've likely also installed
  • 00:19:01
    plugins.
  • 00:19:02
    Wordpress.org provides automatic updates for these to end users, including
  • 00:19:07
    WP Engine's customers. At least until September 24. On that
  • 00:19:11
    day, Matt abruptly blocked WP Engine's access.
  • 00:19:13
    And this decision made waves, especially because it was seen
  • 00:19:17
    as potentially putting sites at risk.
  • 00:19:19
    Because the concern is clear: updates often address security vulnerabilities and
  • 00:19:23
    without them, users are at risk.
  • 00:19:25
    However, it's also debatable whether WP Engine has a legal
  • 00:19:28
    right to access wordpress.org in absence of contracts,
  • 00:19:31
    payments and other agreements.
  • 00:19:32
    Regardless of who's in the right, Matt's move created
  • 00:19:35
    tangible consequences.
  • 00:19:36
    An interesting twist is that WP Engine developed a very
  • 00:19:39
    popular WordPress plugin: Advanced Custom Fields or ACF.
  • 00:19:43
    Designed to simplify content creation in WordPress.
  • 00:19:46
    And this plugin isn't just used by WP Engine's customers,
  • 00:19:48
    but by many other WordPress users as well.
  • 00:19:50
    And it, too, was hosted on wordpress.org.
  • 00:19:54
    This meant the customers of WP Engine, the plugin creators,
  • 00:19:57
    could no longer receive updates for it.
  • 00:19:59
    And since ACF is widely used and reportedly had a
  • 00:20:02
    security vulnerability, Matt Mullenweg decided to fork the
  • 00:20:05
    project himself, renaming it "Secure Custom Fields".
  • 00:20:08
    And he justified his actions by citing the WordPress plugin
  • 00:20:11
    guidelines specifically paragraph 18, which states, he has the right
  • 00:20:15
    to make changes to a plugin, without developer consent, in
  • 00:20:18
    the interest of public safety.
  • 00:20:20
    So Matt essentially hijacks a very popular plugin from WP
  • 00:20:23
    Engine and decides to continue its development himself.
  • 00:20:26
    It's kind of funny in a way.
  • 00:20:28
    I mean, WP Engine leverages WordPress' licensing terms to their
  • 00:20:31
    advantage, so why shouldn't Matt use the plugin guidelines to his?
  • 00:20:37
    As you've likely gathered from my comments in this video,
  • 00:20:40
    this is a double-edged sword.
  • 00:20:41
    Matt Mullenweg's actions are dividing the WordPress community.
  • 00:20:44
    On Reddit, some have started discussing whether it's time to
  • 00:20:47
    fork WordPress to escape this publicly aired conflict.
  • 00:20:49
    Matt was once widely beloved within the community but now
  • 00:20:53
    there's a sense of uncertainty, both among individual contributors and
  • 00:20:56
    companies.
  • 00:20:56
    What exactly constitutes a trademark violation involving WordPress, what doesn't,
  • 00:21:01
    what services are permissible to offer.
  • 00:21:03
    It's unfortunate that there seems to be a blurring
  • 00:21:05
    of lines between Matt, the open source visionary, and Matt,
  • 00:21:09
    the business man. In the end, his company is simply
  • 00:21:11
    trying to secure a significant payout from another company.
  • 00:21:14
    Against the backdrop of this conflict, Matt offered all Automattic
  • 00:21:17
    employees an option:
  • 00:21:18
    If they disagree with the company's decisions, they could take
  • 00:21:21
    severance package of $30,000 or 6 months of salary,
  • 00:21:25
    whichever is higher.
  • 00:21:26
    Interestingly, 159 employees, about 8% of Automattic's workforce took him up
  • 00:21:31
    on the offer, and resigned.
  • 00:21:33
    Clearly, not everyone is on board with his actions.
  • 00:21:36
    Even among WordCamps, those WordPress conferences,
  • 00:21:38
    there's resistance. For example, WordCamp Sidney posted on X
  • 00:21:42
    that day were instructed by official channels not to allow
  • 00:21:45
    WP Engine as a sponsor. They expressed disappointment over this
  • 00:21:49
    decision.
  • 00:21:49
    And another now deleted tweet from them stated: They, WP
  • 00:21:53
    Engine, have given so much to support the Aussie WP community
  • 00:21:56
    over the past 10 years.
  • 00:21:58
    It's not just about contributing dev back to core.
  • 00:22:00
    In the open source world, there's a term:
  • 00:22:02
    Benevolent dictator for life.
  • 00:22:04
    It refers to someone who, despite a large community contributing
  • 00:22:07
    to a project, ultimately has the final say, allowing them
  • 00:22:10
    to push things forward and defend the project's core values.
  • 00:22:13
    And Matt can certainly be described this way.
  • 00:22:16
    In fact, David Heinemeier Hansson, creator of the Ruby on Rails framework
  • 00:22:19
    and a prominent figure in open source, referred to him
  • 00:22:22
    as such in a blog post on October 13.
  • 00:22:25
    And David doesn't necessarily take Matt's side, but he does
  • 00:22:28
    make a striking point.
  • 00:22:29
    Using an open source project like WordPress as leverage
  • 00:22:32
    in this contract dispute and weaponizing its plugin registry
  • 00:22:36
    is an endangerment of an open source peace that has reigned
  • 00:22:39
    decades, with peace-time dividends for all.
  • 00:22:42
    And he also says something that deeply resonates with me
  • 00:22:45
    after researching this story: Please don't make me cheer for
  • 00:22:48
    a private-equity operator like Silver Lake, Matt.
  • 00:22:51
    Yes, exactly.
  • 00:22:53
    So now we wait for the courts to decide.
  • 00:22:55
    And we already have an initial ruling. In early
  • 00:22:57
    December, a California district court issued a preliminary injunction requiring
  • 00:23:01
    wordpress.org to restore WP Engine's access to
  • 00:23:04
    resources and plugins.
  • 00:23:06
    The court sided with WP Engine, suggesting that Automattic's actions
  • 00:23:10
    were harmful to their business.
  • 00:23:12
    And it noted that Automattic targeted WP Engine specifically while
  • 00:23:15
    ignoring other competitors.
  • 00:23:17
    Automattic has announced its intention to appeal this decision. However,
  • 00:23:20
    as mentioned, this is only a preliminary ruling.
  • 00:23:23
    It remains in effect until a final judgment is reached,
  • 00:23:26
    which could take years.
  • 00:23:30
    All in all, I have very mixed feelings about this
  • 00:23:30
    topic. Like most software developers, I benefit immensely from open
  • 00:23:35
    source.
  • 00:23:35
    Having someone with influence stand up publicly to defend open
  • 00:23:39
    source against corporations is, in principle, a good thing.
  • 00:23:42
    The future of open source is undeniably challenging.
  • 00:23:44
    Major companies like Microsoft, Amazon, etc.
  • 00:23:47
    also heavily rely on open source software.
  • 00:23:49
    However, for example, through cloud usage, they often obscure the
  • 00:23:52
    modifications they make to the software, making access to these
  • 00:23:56
    changes difficult.
  • 00:23:57
    But under the licensees like GPL, this access should be
  • 00:24:00
    guaranteed.
  • 00:24:01
    Companies make billions from open source and benefit from it.
  • 00:24:04
    And that's fine to some extent, but the projects themselves
  • 00:24:07
    shouldn't suffer because of it.
  • 00:24:09
    But at the same time, Matt clearly has financial interests.
  • 00:24:12
    His company wants money from another company.
  • 00:24:14
    A lot of money.
  • 00:24:15
    8% of revenue.
  • 00:24:16
    No other company has to pay that much, as
  • 00:24:18
    he openly admits in another interview and even threatens more.
  • 00:24:22
    I put your link to the interview and a lot
  • 00:24:24
    of other sources I used in the video description.
  • 00:24:26
    He's within his rights, perhaps, but the various roles Matt plays,
  • 00:24:29
    a private individual, co-founder of WordPress, board member of the
  • 00:24:33
    WordPress Foundation and CEO of Automattic, start to blur.
  • 00:24:36
    Furthermore, Matt once had shares in WP Engine, which
  • 00:24:39
    he had to sell to Silver Lake.
  • 00:24:41
    So it all leaves a bitter taste.
  • 00:24:43
    Matt is undeniably leveraging his power, not just against WP
  • 00:24:46
    Engine, but also in one of humanity's greatest ongoing debates.
  • 00:24:50
    Recently, he added a checkbox to the login window on
  • 00:24:52
    wordpress.org which users must agree to before logging in.
  • 00:24:58
    I'll cover this spicy topic in another video.
  • 00:25:01
    But I'd love to hear your thoughts, whether on pineapple
  • 00:25:03
    on pizza or on the WordPress drama.
  • 00:25:05
    Share your opinions in the comments.
  • 00:25:07
    Let me know what you think about the story and
  • 00:25:09
    if you've enjoyed the video, I'd also greatly appreciate a
  • 00:25:11
    like or a subscription.
  • 00:25:12
    See you next time.
Etiquetas
  • WordPress
  • Open Source
  • Matt Mullenweg
  • WP Engine
  • Automattic
  • Trademark
  • Legal Dispute
  • Web Development
  • Community
  • Ethics