Theory of Architecture | #1 - Timothy Brittain-Catlin

The conversation begins with an introduction to Timothy Burton Catlin, a reader in architecture at the University of Kent, whose studies focus on neo-gothic architecture. They discuss the transition from pre-Gothic Revival to Gothic Revival and the series of events that led to this architectural shift.

Discussion moves towards comparing Gothic and Palladian architecture, suggesting that Gothic architecture emerges from function rather than imposed theory. Questions arise about the philosophical, political, or theoretical changes that influenced the Gothic Revival.

The Palace of Westminster is highlighted as a place that resonates with Gothic architecture's processional feeling. The discussion suggests that architectural detailing plays a significant role in the experience of these spaces.

The topic shifts to the role of architects during the Gothic Revival, questioning whether the architect faced marginalization before this period. It explores the egotistical stereotype of architects during the Gothic Revival, particularly focusing on specific figures like Pugin.

A conversation about Gothic architecture's adaptability takes place, mentioning its prominence in public buildings due to higher budgets. There's a discussion about why Gothic Revival didn't permeate domestic architecture like Georgian did.

There is a contradiction noted between the vertical focus of Gothic architecture, suited for religious buildings, and the horizontal nature of domestic architecture. Discussion then includes whether prominent figures in the Gothic Revival were pioneers or building on existing ideas.

The Gothic Revival's decline is discussed, followed by a look at modernism's endurance. There's an exploration of architectural theory's current state and speculation about its future direction.

A reflection on why classicism has a cult following concludes that its symmetrical ideal appeals to a utopian vision incompatible with the Gothic philosophy, which is more emergent.

The adaptability of Gothic architecture is noted, contrasting with classicism's rigidity. The conversation touches on political affiliations with architectural styles and the lack of discourse about architectural motivations in education and practice.

Conversations on architectural theory in educational settings highlight a belated appreciation for theory, often only realized during postgraduate study. The discussion turns to government efforts in shaping architectural practice.

The discussion continues on the influence of the 'build beautiful' ideology and public sensitivity to it, recalled from the 1980s incidents involving Prince Charles. There are also insights into the potential effects on architectural practices and reactions.

Talks about provocation in architecture reference recent cases like Essex House, discussing the deliberate deviation from norms and the role of context in modern architecture's evolution.

The focus is on median architectural outputs, acknowledging that media visibility of high-profile buildings doesn't represent the majority. There's an emphasis on improving general quality across average designs.

There's a proposal to communicate architectural ideas in literary terms rather than technical exhibitions, using emerging tech like VR. The government calls for future conservation areas challenge architects to create lasting value.

The question of how to create valued conservation areas in the future arises, with reflections on the role of polarizing architecture in community value understanding.

A critique on divisions within architectural styles, such as high Victorian and mid-twentieth-century architectures, brings into discussion the need for critical, theoretical debate in current architecture.

Speculation on new pattern books or urban designs revives the debate around style adaptability. Connections to the land in urban housing are explored, questioning the translation value to contemporary contexts.

The government's new commission intends to foster public interest in architecture, aiming to increase acceptance of proposed buildings by emphasizing their aesthetic appeal. The broader implications for housing and planning are discussed, highlighting local authority roles.

The historical quality in architecture by entrepreneurs is examined, linking to current practices affected by policies like design/build contracts and value engineering.

The role of design guidelines and regulations in maintaining architectural quality is debated, contemplating where the responsibility should lie: state, local authorities, or architects themselves.