Trump’s former trade chief on how tariffs affect the economy, why he says the U.S. needs them

00:13:32
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KwUG2bOHqFA

Resumo

TLDRRobert Lighthizer, a key figure in Trump's trade policy, argues for imposing high tariffs on imports from Mexico, Canada, and particularly China to correct trade imbalances and protect American jobs. He sees China as a major threat, advocating for 'strategic decoupling' to reduce economic dependency. Despite claims that tariffs benefit the US economy, critics warn that such policies could hurt consumers by raising prices and could lead to job losses in sectors reliant on imported goods. The discussion also touches on the historical use of tariffs in the US, illustrating the complex relationship between tariffs, trade wars, and economic health.

Conclusões

  • 📈 Lighthizer advocates for high tariffs to protect US jobs.
  • 🚨 Trump imposed tariffs citing national security threats.
  • 💰 Tariffs could increase consumer prices by around $200/month.
  • 🔄 Strategic decoupling involves reducing economic ties with China.
  • ⚖️ Tariffs can create jobs in some sectors but kill jobs in others.
  • 📉 US manufacturing jobs have significantly decreased since 2000.
  • 🌎 Tariffs have historically led to trade wars and economic instability.
  • 🔍 Economists largely agree tariffs are paid by US consumers, not foreign nations.
  • 💼 The auto industry experienced severe job losses due to plant closures.
  • ⚠️ Concerns rise over retaliatory tariffs escalating into a broader trade war.

Linha do tempo

  • 00:00:00 - 00:05:00

    Robert Lighthizer, the former US trade negotiator for President Trump, advocates for tariffs as a means to balance trade and address China's trade dominance, which he views as an existential threat. Trump recently declared an emergency, imposing significant tariffs on Mexico, Canada, and China to combat the flow of fentanyl and shift the focus towards strategic decoupling from China. Lighthizer proposes that the US need to disentangle its economy and technology from China, aiming for balanced trade where both countries trade equally, while addressing espionage and other aggressive strategies from China that threaten US prosperity.

  • 00:05:00 - 00:13:32

    Amidst tariffs, there are concerns regarding their economic impact on American consumers and jobs. While Trump argues that tariffs serve as a foreign tax, economists suggest that the tax burden ultimately falls on US importers and consumers. Research indicates that high tariffs can elevate consumer prices and potentially lead to job losses in sectors reliant on imported goods. The debate around tariffs highlights a fragile middle-class labor market, raising fears of trade wars, retaliation from Canada and Mexico, and long-term implications for public trust in government effectiveness to improve economic conditions.

Mapa mental

Vídeo de perguntas e respostas

  • Who is Robert Lighthizer?

    Robert Lighthizer was the top US trade negotiator in Trump's first administration and is an advocate for tariffs on imports.

  • What tariffs did President Trump impose?

    Trump imposed a 25% tariff on Mexico and Canada and 10% on China.

  • Why did Trump impose these tariffs?

    The tariffs were imposed to combat the flow of fentanyl and address trade imbalances.

  • What is strategic decoupling according to Lighthizer?

    Strategic decoupling involves reducing economic ties with China through tariffs and limiting US investments in China.

  • What are the potential impacts of tariffs on American consumers?

    Tariffs could raise prices for consumers, potentially costing an average household around $200 a month.

  • Do tariffs create or kill jobs?

    While some sectors may see job gains, tariffs can also lead to job losses in other sectors.

  • What was the historical context of tariffs in the US?

    Tariffs have been used by US presidents throughout history, but they deepened the Great Depression in the 1930s.

  • What is the stance of economists on Trump's tariffs?

    Many economists argue that tariffs are ultimately paid by US importers and lead to increased consumer prices.

  • How has the US manufacturing sector changed?

    The US has lost a significant number of manufacturing jobs since the year 2000, with many lost to imports.

  • What is the fear regarding tariffs leading to a trade war?

    There are worries that retaliatory tariffs from countries like Canada and Mexico could trigger a broader trade war, impacting the economy.

Ver mais resumos de vídeos

Obtenha acesso instantâneo a resumos gratuitos de vídeos do YouTube com tecnologia de IA!
Legendas
en
Rolagem automática:
  • 00:00:01
    you don't know Robert lighthiser but his
  • 00:00:04
    influence with President Trump could
  • 00:00:06
    change America's economy lighthiser was
  • 00:00:09
    the top us trade negotiator in the first
  • 00:00:12
    Trump Administration and he's an
  • 00:00:14
    evangelist for tariffs taxes on imported
  • 00:00:18
    goods yesterday the president declared
  • 00:00:20
    an emergency and imposed unusually high
  • 00:00:25
    25% tariffs on Mexico and Canada and 10%
  • 00:00:29
    on China to coer them to stop the flow
  • 00:00:33
    of the deadly drug fenel that's unusual
  • 00:00:36
    because tariffs are normally used to
  • 00:00:39
    balance trade and in ligh heiser's
  • 00:00:41
    opinion America has little Choice he
  • 00:00:44
    says China's 3:1 dominance in trade is a
  • 00:00:48
    threat to our way of
  • 00:00:51
    life the story will continue in a
  • 00:00:57
    moment China to me is a an existential
  • 00:01:02
    threat to the United States it is a a
  • 00:01:06
    very very competent adversary China
  • 00:01:09
    views itself as number one in the world
  • 00:01:12
    and wants to be that way they view us as
  • 00:01:14
    in the way they have the biggest army in
  • 00:01:16
    the world and they're growing it the
  • 00:01:17
    biggest Navy in the world and they're
  • 00:01:19
    growing it they're spying on us they're
  • 00:01:21
    taking our technology they've been
  • 00:01:22
    waging an economic war against the
  • 00:01:24
    United States and winning that war for
  • 00:01:28
    at least the last three decades so your
  • 00:01:31
    tariff regime for China would be what I
  • 00:01:34
    believe in strategic decoupling I'm not
  • 00:01:37
    saying no economic relationship with
  • 00:01:39
    China that's not my position at all I
  • 00:01:41
    think you want balanced trade and how do
  • 00:01:44
    you get balanced trade you're going to
  • 00:01:46
    get balance Trad by having large tariffs
  • 00:01:48
    on most of what they send to us what's
  • 00:01:51
    large you know the president has floated
  • 00:01:53
    numbers 50 60% but I think there are big
  • 00:01:56
    numbers like that wait a minute you're
  • 00:01:57
    talking about decoupling from China what
  • 00:02:00
    would that look like so it is strategic
  • 00:02:02
    decoupling so we would still have trade
  • 00:02:04
    so I would say we sell you 150 billion
  • 00:02:08
    we buy 150 billion from you no more we
  • 00:02:11
    don't allow investments in China except
  • 00:02:13
    in circumstances where we believe that's
  • 00:02:15
    in the interest of the United States we
  • 00:02:17
    don't allow inbound investment so we
  • 00:02:19
    begin to disentangle we disentangle our
  • 00:02:22
    technology you can ask yourself what is
  • 00:02:24
    China's policy towards us it is exactly
  • 00:02:28
    a mere image of what I just said said so
  • 00:02:31
    what I'm suggesting we do to China is
  • 00:02:33
    what they do to us Ronald Reagan gave
  • 00:02:36
    the young trade lawyer his first White
  • 00:02:38
    House job and 77-year-old Bob ligh
  • 00:02:42
    Heiser has been advising Republicans
  • 00:02:44
    since in Trump's first term liser was in
  • 00:02:48
    charge of negotiating trade agreements
  • 00:02:51
    in Trump 2.0 he's an unofficial advisor
  • 00:02:54
    but a passionate one we noticed when he
  • 00:02:57
    apologized for chewing up time
  • 00:03:00
    just because I I talk too much so it is
  • 00:03:02
    60 minutes after all and we don't get
  • 00:03:05
    all of it it's not 60 days is that what
  • 00:03:07
    you're thinking it's not days but
  • 00:03:10
    centuries that tariffs have been debated
  • 00:03:13
    every US president has used them but in
  • 00:03:16
    the 1930s tariffs deepened the Great
  • 00:03:19
    Depression and after World War II
  • 00:03:21
    America led a broken world to W free
  • 00:03:24
    trade us manufacturing jobs were stable
  • 00:03:28
    until around the year 2000 then in 10
  • 00:03:32
    years a third of manufacturing jobs were
  • 00:03:35
    lost nearly 6 million there was a modest
  • 00:03:39
    rebound under Obama Trump and Biden that
  • 00:03:43
    dip is covid but fewer than one and a
  • 00:03:46
    half million jobs are back you don't
  • 00:03:49
    know how much you love going to work
  • 00:03:50
    until you can't go there anymore Stacy
  • 00:03:53
    dah Michelle Lopez and Matt Franson are
  • 00:03:57
    among 12200 workers laid off in
  • 00:04:00
    2023 when the badier Illinois auto
  • 00:04:03
    assembly plant shut
  • 00:04:05
    down this is my
  • 00:04:08
    home and when they told me that we were
  • 00:04:11
    done it
  • 00:04:13
    hurt it really
  • 00:04:16
    did we've got a community of 24,000
  • 00:04:20
    people and uh there's probably not a
  • 00:04:22
    street you can't you can go down that
  • 00:04:25
    somebody's not tied to this plant um
  • 00:04:28
    we've been here since 19 65 it's a good
  • 00:04:32
    job provides a great living and uh we
  • 00:04:36
    would just like to see it come back come
  • 00:04:39
    back from Mexico in 2016 car maker
  • 00:04:43
    stellantis moved one of Bader's Jeep
  • 00:04:45
    models South of the Border in 2023 beler
  • 00:04:50
    closed we've lost Electronics we've lost
  • 00:04:52
    textiles we've lost chemicals in a large
  • 00:04:55
    way we invented the semiconductor now we
  • 00:04:57
    make 8% of semiconductors of the world
  • 00:05:00
    and none of the really high tech ones
  • 00:05:02
    more than half of the car sold in
  • 00:05:03
    America are now Imports Mexico Canada
  • 00:05:07
    and China are America's largest trading
  • 00:05:10
    partners but China Bob ligh Heiser says
  • 00:05:13
    has an enormous Advantage because of the
  • 00:05:16
    trade imbalance and Chinese Espionage
  • 00:05:20
    stealing us Trade Secrets you add it all
  • 00:05:24
    up you can get to around a trillion
  • 00:05:26
    dollars a year of of wealth
  • 00:05:30
    from the United States being transferred
  • 00:05:32
    to a geopolitical adversary it's insane
  • 00:05:36
    and it's working and then you ask
  • 00:05:38
    yourself as a national security issue
  • 00:05:40
    how do you fight a war if God help us we
  • 00:05:43
    ever have a war with China when they're
  • 00:05:45
    now four times more likely to be able to
  • 00:05:49
    to produce what is needed in a war but
  • 00:05:51
    isn't trade one of the ways we avoid a
  • 00:05:54
    hot War the way you prevent Wars is by
  • 00:05:57
    having the strongest biggest best army
  • 00:06:00
    biggest best Navy uh best economy in the
  • 00:06:04
    world best technology you do those
  • 00:06:06
    things the Allies come to you they see
  • 00:06:09
    you as the future already China's
  • 00:06:12
    manufacturing sector is bigger than that
  • 00:06:14
    of the United States Germany and Japan
  • 00:06:17
    combined isn't China too big to snub we
  • 00:06:21
    should never have that attitude there
  • 00:06:23
    are things we can do the genius of
  • 00:06:25
    America combined with our allies we can
  • 00:06:29
    turn this around but what do we need we
  • 00:06:31
    need to change the relationship with
  • 00:06:33
    them we need tariffs in my judgment we
  • 00:06:36
    need subsidies in certain areas and we
  • 00:06:38
    need an economic policy and a military
  • 00:06:41
    strategic policy that rises up to the
  • 00:06:43
    challenge everyone will prosper every
  • 00:06:46
    family will thrive on the campaign Trump
  • 00:06:49
    proposed historic tariffs 10 to 20% on
  • 00:06:53
    All Imports 25% on Mexico and Canada 60%
  • 00:06:58
    on China
  • 00:07:00
    he said America would grow wealthy
  • 00:07:03
    collecting taxes from overseas a tariff
  • 00:07:07
    is a tax on a foreign country that's the
  • 00:07:09
    way it is whether you like it or not a
  • 00:07:11
    lot of people like to say oh it's a tax
  • 00:07:12
    on us no no no it's a tax on a foreign
  • 00:07:17
    country it's a tax on a country that's
  • 00:07:20
    ripping us off and stealing our jobs but
  • 00:07:23
    most any importer or Economist will tell
  • 00:07:26
    you the president is mistaken
  • 00:07:29
    tariffs are not a tax on a foreign
  • 00:07:32
    country the tax is paid by the Importer
  • 00:07:36
    in the United States for example Walmart
  • 00:07:40
    imports goods from China and when those
  • 00:07:42
    goods cross into the United States
  • 00:07:44
    Walmart pays the Tariff if Walmart
  • 00:07:48
    decides to pass the cost to Consumers
  • 00:07:50
    then you paid the Tariff not China so if
  • 00:07:54
    you go to Walmart if you go to Target
  • 00:07:56
    you're going to see higher prices for
  • 00:07:57
    imported goods and IST Mary lovelyy
  • 00:08:00
    studied Trump's proposals for the
  • 00:08:03
    Peterson Institute for international
  • 00:08:05
    economics a leader in non-partisan
  • 00:08:08
    research the argument is made that if
  • 00:08:11
    tariffs are imposed American consumers
  • 00:08:14
    will buy less of the foreign Goods more
  • 00:08:17
    domestically produced goods and that's a
  • 00:08:20
    great thing for consumers and for jobs
  • 00:08:23
    well it's a great thing for consumers if
  • 00:08:25
    you don't care about how much they are
  • 00:08:27
    able to buy because the prices of
  • 00:08:29
    everything they buy will go up will they
  • 00:08:31
    substitute toward domestic Goods let's
  • 00:08:33
    just take that to start yes to some
  • 00:08:35
    extent they will but the prices of those
  • 00:08:37
    domestic Goods will also rise because
  • 00:08:39
    they no longer have to compete with
  • 00:08:41
    imported goods lovely's research
  • 00:08:43
    estimates the tariffs Trump talks about
  • 00:08:46
    would cost an average household around
  • 00:08:49
    $200 a month Footwear toys HomeGoods
  • 00:08:55
    certain types of Machinery certain
  • 00:08:57
    active ingredients in Pharmaceuticals
  • 00:08:59
    certain types of chemicals we're still
  • 00:09:01
    very dependent in certain categories but
  • 00:09:04
    worse lovely says tariffs can kill jobs
  • 00:09:09
    she points to Trump's first-term tariffs
  • 00:09:11
    on imported steel as intended steel
  • 00:09:15
    prices Rose us Mills were protected but
  • 00:09:19
    the higher prices hurt steel buyers like
  • 00:09:22
    car makers economists estimate that the
  • 00:09:25
    tariffs created 1,000 jobs in steel but
  • 00:09:29
    but cost 75,000 jobs Among Us companies
  • 00:09:33
    overall this idea that it creates jobs
  • 00:09:36
    yes in a few places for a few people but
  • 00:09:39
    for the majority of us it's more
  • 00:09:41
    pressure on employers it's more pressure
  • 00:09:43
    on our wages it's more pressure on our
  • 00:09:46
    jobs and obviously more pressure on our
  • 00:09:49
    wallets when we go to the cash register
  • 00:09:52
    the argument is made that when you
  • 00:09:54
    increase the cost of parts and supplies
  • 00:09:57
    coming into the country you're hurting
  • 00:09:59
    Apple you're hurting Ford you're hurting
  • 00:10:02
    American companies will these very
  • 00:10:05
    highly paid CEOs have to figure out how
  • 00:10:09
    to how to make a profit uh in a new
  • 00:10:11
    environment one that helps workers and
  • 00:10:13
    helps Innovation and and it's more
  • 00:10:15
    American focused America first um the
  • 00:10:18
    answer is yeah they're going to have to
  • 00:10:20
    figure it out will they figure it out of
  • 00:10:21
    course they'll figure it out they're
  • 00:10:22
    going to learn how to make money one of
  • 00:10:24
    the ways they figure it out is by laying
  • 00:10:26
    people off well no you you see I don't
  • 00:10:28
    believe that's true too I
  • 00:10:30
    think to me the exact opposite will
  • 00:10:33
    happen you will see more production in
  • 00:10:35
    the United States you will see more jobs
  • 00:10:39
    better jobs more pressure upward
  • 00:10:42
    pressure on wages which is my objective
  • 00:10:44
    the way you paint it it seems like
  • 00:10:46
    tariffs are magic well I wouldn't say
  • 00:10:48
    magic so so remember the tariffs are
  • 00:10:51
    part of an economic policy the policy
  • 00:10:54
    has tax cuts it has it has spending cuts
  • 00:10:57
    it has energy production has regory
  • 00:10:59
    reduction and it has tariffs the
  • 00:11:02
    combination of that I think and tariffs
  • 00:11:04
    are an important part of it has the
  • 00:11:06
    potential to have this kind of
  • 00:11:08
    Renaissance we saw some of that
  • 00:11:10
    combination he talks about back in
  • 00:11:13
    badier where turbocharge tariffs have
  • 00:11:16
    been hitched to a big taxpayer
  • 00:11:19
    investment when you were putting that
  • 00:11:21
    t-shirt on Joe Biden did you think
  • 00:11:24
    that's it the plant's opening again in
  • 00:11:26
    2023 Matt fransen president of the UAW
  • 00:11:30
    Local welcomed President Biden to badier
  • 00:11:34
    with a union shirt I thought we were
  • 00:11:37
    well on our way you know baders always
  • 00:11:40
    fought for themselves and in this
  • 00:11:44
    scenario we
  • 00:11:48
    needed we needed everybody to fight for
  • 00:11:51
    us and they
  • 00:11:53
    did Biden did he increased Trump's
  • 00:11:57
    earlier 25% tariff on on Chinese cars to
  • 00:12:01
    100% for Chinese electric vehicles then
  • 00:12:05
    Biden gave car maker stantis a
  • 00:12:09
    $335 million Grant to convert badier to
  • 00:12:13
    electric cars we don't know how much
  • 00:12:15
    that helped but last month stellantis
  • 00:12:18
    said it would reopen in
  • 00:12:21
    2027 they need to realize that whether
  • 00:12:24
    you're Democrat Republican independent
  • 00:12:27
    we need to work on the middle class if
  • 00:12:29
    the middle class is strong that helps so
  • 00:12:32
    many different areas so it's not just
  • 00:12:34
    going to be the tariffs it's got to be
  • 00:12:36
    policy that's set for the middle
  • 00:12:39
    class but tariffs cut both ways Canada
  • 00:12:43
    and Mexico now say they will retaliate
  • 00:12:46
    against Trump's new tariffs with their
  • 00:12:48
    own tariffs on us Goods the opening
  • 00:12:51
    shots of a trade War the real fear that
  • 00:12:55
    I have is that we have real problems and
  • 00:12:59
    I'm afraid that tariffs have time and
  • 00:13:01
    time again proven to not deliver so in
  • 00:13:04
    the long run I'm afraid it will just
  • 00:13:06
    increase sinicism among the American
  • 00:13:08
    public about whether the government is
  • 00:13:10
    able to deliver and make their lives
  • 00:13:13
    better what are the chances that you're
  • 00:13:15
    wrong well once again we tried it the
  • 00:13:19
    other way Scott if we do this in 10
  • 00:13:22
    years it doesn't work we can go back and
  • 00:13:24
    always fail again the way we have in the
  • 00:13:26
    past
Etiquetas
  • Robert Lighthizer
  • Trade Policy
  • Tariffs
  • China
  • Economic Impact
  • Trade War
  • Manufacturing Jobs
  • Consumer Prices
  • Strategic Decoupling
  • Trump Administration