Grant Wiggins - Understanding by Design (1 of 2)

00:10:52
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4isSHf3SBuQ

Resumo

TLDRGrant Wiggins verduidelik dat Understanding by Design (UBD) 'n raamwerk is vir die beplanning van onderwys, en nie 'n onderrigfilosofie of metode nie. Dit is ontwerp om onderwysers te help om hul onderrig meer doelgerig en effektief te maak, maar verseker nie noodwendig beter onderwys nie. Wiggins benadruk die belangrikheid van langtermyn-doelwitte, soos kritiese en kreatiewe denke, en hoe hierdie beplanning help om leer en onderrig beter te balanseer. Hy reik voorbeelde oor hoe korttermyn-planne dikwels nie in lyn is met langtermyn-doelwitte nie. Hy gebruik 'n metafoor van sokker om die noodsaaklikheid van strategiese denke uit te beeld en beklemtoon die belangrikheid daarvan om studente self-assesserings te laat doen om beter langtermyn-doelwitte te bereik. Die bespreking sluit af met 'n oefening oor hoe hierdie langtermyn-doelwitte prakties in onderrigplanne geintegreer kan word.

Conclusões

  • 🎯 UBD is 'n raamwerk vir onderrigbeplanning, nie 'n onderrigmetode nie.
  • 📈 Langtermyn-doelwitte is belangrik om doelgerigte en effektiewe onderrig te verseker.
  • 🔍 Kritiese en kreatiewe denke moet gereeld geoefen word.
  • 🏫 Self-assessering help studente om langtermyn-doelwitte te bereik.
  • ⚽ Sokker metafore illustreer die belang van strategiese denke by leer.
  • 🤝 'Backward Design' verseker 'n balans tussen inhoud en prestasie.
  • 📊 Verkeerde benadering kan kritiese vooruitgang beperk, selfs in goeie skole.
  • 🧠 Onderwysers moet ook pedagogiese vaardighede ontwikkel.
  • 📝 'Think. Pair. Share.' oefeninge bevorder klasinteraksie.
  • 🔄 Beplanning moet aanpasbaar bly vir nuwe insigte en aanpassings.

Linha do tempo

  • 00:00:00 - 00:10:52

    'n Voorbeeld van die behoefte aan strategie is 'n self-evaluasieproses wat wys hoe leerders sukkel om hul doelwitte te verstaan en daarteen te meet. Kritiese en kreatiewe denke moet so sigbaar wees in die beplanningsproses dat leerlinge dit kan self-assesseer. Met behulp van 'n voorbeeld uit sokkeronderrig, word die belangrikheid van strategiese denke en langer termyn beplanning beklemtoon. 'n Opdrag word gegee om 'n mission statement vir onderrigdoeleindes te skryf en na te dink oor hoe 'n terugwaartse ontwerp benadering gebruik kan word om assesseringskriteria en onderrigmetodes te bepaal wat bydra tot die bereiking van die gestelde langtermyn doelwitte.

Mapa mental

Mind Map

Perguntas frequentes

  • Wat is UBD?

    UBD, oftewel 'Understanding by Design', is 'n beplaningsraamwerk wat onderwysers help om doelgerig en effektief te onderrig.

  • Hoe beïnvloed 'n goeie plan onderrigkwaliteit?

    Volgens Wiggins beteken 'n goeie plan nie noodwendig dat 'n onderwyser goeie onderrig sal lewer nie; pedagogiese vaardighede is ook belangrik.

  • Wat is die langtermyn-doelwitte van die UBD?

    Die langtermyn-doelwitte sluit die ontwikkeling van kritiese en kreatiewe denke en selfstandige, pro-aktiewe en nadenkende mense in.

  • Hoe kan studente se kritiese en kreatiewe denke bevorder word volgens UBD?

    Deur weekliks te fokus op die kritiese en kreatiewe gebruik van die inhoud, volgens die 'Backward Design' benadering.

  • Wat is die belangrikheid van self-assessering vir studente?

    Self-assessering help studente om beter bewus te wees van hulle langtermyn-doelwitte en hulle eie vordering daarteen.

Ver mais resumos de vídeos

Obtenha acesso instantâneo a resumos gratuitos de vídeos do YouTube com tecnologia de IA!
Legendas
en
Rolagem automática:
  • 00:00:17
    GRANT WIGGINS: UBD is not a philosophy of teaching,
  • 00:00:22
    it's not an approach to teaching,
  • 00:00:25
    it's a planning framework.
  • 00:00:28
    And it's really important to keep this in mind
  • 00:00:30
    that what you're trying to do is make it more likely by design
  • 00:00:35
    that when you teach, you are more goal-focused, more effective.
  • 00:00:39
    You could be a bad teacher with a good plan.
  • 00:00:42
    In other words, we're not saying that a good plan makes you
  • 00:00:44
    a better teacher necessarily.
  • 00:00:46
    You have to learn pedagogical moves,
  • 00:00:48
    you have to learn to be as facile and skilled with how
  • 00:00:52
    to pay attention to group dynamics.
  • 00:00:53
    UBD doesn't help you with that, but it
  • 00:00:56
    does prepare you to think short term, long term, what
  • 00:01:00
    are we trying to accomplish.
  • 00:01:02
    And it's like the famous line from Pasteur,
  • 00:01:04
    "chance favors the prepared mind."
  • 00:01:06
    You're totally prepared for teachable moments
  • 00:01:10
    not in the sense of, oh, well that's a cool student comment.
  • 00:01:13
    Let's just run with that for five days.
  • 00:01:15
    That's not serendipity.
  • 00:01:17
    That's letting the students write the curriculum,
  • 00:01:21
    and that's not what I'm talking about.
  • 00:01:23
    I'm talking about being so prepared about where
  • 00:01:25
    you want to end up that you hear a potential student
  • 00:01:28
    comment as a fantastic entry point
  • 00:01:31
    to go where you want to end up.
  • 00:01:32
    In other words, it's your job to know where we want to end up.
  • 00:01:36
    I don't think we make any apologies about that.
  • 00:01:38
    But part of where we want to end up
  • 00:01:41
    is building autonomous, proactive, thoughtful people,
  • 00:01:46
    not just march through some stuff
  • 00:01:48
    causing some typical learning.
  • 00:01:50
    So we're trying to keep long-term goals in view.
  • 00:01:55
    We're trying to get the blend of content and performance.
  • 00:01:58
    Notice I didn't say process, content and performance,
  • 00:02:01
    because that's the ultimate goal.
  • 00:02:03
    The student performs as in the soccer situation--
  • 00:02:05
    on their own, effectively, fluidly,
  • 00:02:08
    drawing from their repertoire.
  • 00:02:10
    And this also tends to better engage people
  • 00:02:12
    as I think you already know.
  • 00:02:14
    What we see over and over again is
  • 00:02:17
    that there is a misalignment between short-term plans
  • 00:02:21
    and actions and long-term goals.
  • 00:02:25
    Here's a simple example.
  • 00:02:27
    We value something called critical and creative thinking.
  • 00:02:30
    It's in every program's goal statement.
  • 00:02:33
    It's in many school's mission statement.
  • 00:02:35
    It's clearly something we care about.
  • 00:02:38
    But it is possible to get straight A's
  • 00:02:40
    at every school in America without critical and creative thinking.
  • 00:02:45
    As long as you're smart, compliant, do your work,
  • 00:02:49
    are thorough, you're going to get straight
  • 00:02:53
    In almost every school in America.
  • 00:02:56
    So a very basic backward design premise then
  • 00:02:58
    if critical and creative thinking
  • 00:03:02
    is the goal long term, using content critically
  • 00:03:06
    and creatively, to say it a different way, then when
  • 00:03:09
    we go to a plan, we have to make sure week in and week out
  • 00:03:12
    that we're focusing on critical and creative use of content.
  • 00:03:16
    Otherwise, we're not going to get it.
  • 00:03:18
    And this is, I think, the fatal mistake of prep schools.
  • 00:03:21
    They think because we're smart, because we're
  • 00:03:24
    motivated, because we hire really
  • 00:03:26
    intelligent, well-educated people,
  • 00:03:28
    that this is just going to happen.
  • 00:03:30
    Sobering story, but this is a true story.
  • 00:03:34
    Well-known prep school in the top 10 or 20
  • 00:03:37
    of prep schools in the country, they say,
  • 00:03:40
    we're really interested in this pedagogical effectiveness stuff.
  • 00:03:44
    And the guy in question is a really fantastic educator
  • 00:03:48
    who's done a lot of work in the wider world.
  • 00:03:51
    And so he's really interested in the question
  • 00:03:53
    of value added at this school.
  • 00:03:55
    So they contract with ETS, pre-assess 9th grade,
  • 00:04:01
    assess 12th grade, critical thinking test, no gain.
  • 00:04:08
    No gain.
  • 00:04:10
    We admit them smart, we graduate them smart,
  • 00:04:13
    we pat ourselves on the back, and we
  • 00:04:16
    start teaching all over again.
  • 00:04:19
    The value added thing is huge.
  • 00:04:22
    You can't just pat yourself on the back
  • 00:04:24
    because you admit smart people when they do good things.
  • 00:04:29
    You guys have a higher calling than that.
  • 00:04:32
    So we want to focus on these long-term goals
  • 00:04:35
    and we want to embed them in our short-term plans.
  • 00:04:38
    And the more you start to think this way,
  • 00:04:39
    the more you'll realize you're not doing it.
  • 00:04:41
    Again, I saw this on the soccer field.
  • 00:04:44
    I saw that we were not developing
  • 00:04:45
    any strategic thinking.
  • 00:04:48
    One day I was in a scrimmage, and I'm
  • 00:04:51
    looking at the scrimmage.
  • 00:04:52
    I'm there in the middle of the field reffing it.
  • 00:04:54
    I'm watching people and I'm saying,
  • 00:04:56
    there's a lot of aimless running around here.
  • 00:05:00
    So the ball's over here, what are you doing
  • 00:05:03
    and why are you doing it?
  • 00:05:09
    I don't know, I don't know.
  • 00:05:10
    So I said, all right, new rule.
  • 00:05:12
    We are going to do freeze tag.
  • 00:05:13
    If I don't like your answer, the ball goes over the other side.
  • 00:05:16
    I'm always going to have somebody on offense.
  • 00:05:18
    And for like two weeks there was no good answer.
  • 00:05:22
    And of course, I realize that's my fault.
  • 00:05:24
    There's no strategic thinking.
  • 00:05:26
    My daughter is an elite soccer player.
  • 00:05:28
    She's a senior at the George School.
  • 00:05:31
    She's in North Carolina tournament right now.
  • 00:05:33
    She doesn't have a good strategic thinking,
  • 00:05:36
    because she's had all these elite coaches that tell
  • 00:05:39
    you what to do all the time.
  • 00:05:42
    She had a coach though who doesn't coach at George School
  • 00:05:44
    anymore.
  • 00:05:45
    He's a retired Princeton coach who did it for $1 a year--
  • 00:05:49
    one of those great gigs.
  • 00:05:51
    He did the coolest thing at halftime.
  • 00:05:53
    So you know, they get in the circle
  • 00:05:55
    that you always do at halftime.
  • 00:05:57
    So, he said, what's working?
  • 00:06:02
    What's working for us?
  • 00:06:05
    Again, same thing-- for a couple of weeks, they couldn't answer.
  • 00:06:09
    We're winning.
  • 00:06:11
    Yeah, I know that.
  • 00:06:11
    What's working on the field?
  • 00:06:14
    What's not working for us?
  • 00:06:15
    What do we need to work on in the second half?
  • 00:06:17
    In other words, Socratic questions
  • 00:06:19
    was all he did at halftime.
  • 00:06:21
    But the coolest question is, what's working for them?
  • 00:06:25
    What do we have to stop?
  • 00:06:29
    She was a different player. So were her teammates.
  • 00:06:34
    So there is this tendency in even really good programs
  • 00:06:39
    in schools to not help kids gain proactive control
  • 00:06:45
    of the situation and have a long term view.
  • 00:06:48
    Simple test-- all of you are teaching now.
  • 00:06:51
    Ask kids to self-assess right now-- now's a good time,
  • 00:06:54
    January--
  • 00:06:55
    against your goals for the year.
  • 00:06:59
    What is her goal for the year?
  • 00:07:03
    I mean, that's what's going to happen.
  • 00:07:04
    And they're going to cherry pick some random little things,
  • 00:07:08
    and you're going to be depressed.
  • 00:07:09
    But that's a good experience.
  • 00:07:12
    That's a really good experience.
  • 00:07:14
    It's the kid who has the meet the goals.
  • 00:07:17
    It's the kid that has to understand
  • 00:07:19
    via transparency and reinforcement
  • 00:07:21
    the long-term goals.
  • 00:07:23
    So critical and creative thinking,
  • 00:07:24
    to go back to our example, is a goal,
  • 00:07:27
    then that should be so obvious that the kids will self-assess
  • 00:07:30
    against critical and creative thinking.
  • 00:07:35
    Let's try it as a quick and dirty exercise.
  • 00:07:38
    Think. Pair. Share.
  • 00:07:40
    If you had to write a one-sentence mission statement
  • 00:07:44
    for your course, what would it be?
  • 00:07:50
    Jot some thoughts, try it out on the person next to you.
  • 00:07:53
    One-sentence mission statement.
  • 00:07:56
    What is the point of my course?
  • 00:07:58
    And I'm using the word course to cover everything
  • 00:08:01
    from pre-K to graduate school, from soccer to physics.
  • 00:08:09
    If you are an elementary person,
  • 00:08:11
    you could think of course in either one of two ways.
  • 00:08:14
    You could say what's the point of what
  • 00:08:15
    I do with first graders, or what's
  • 00:08:18
    the point of the language arts strand? Or the social studies strand.
  • 00:08:22
    So you can go either way since you have so many duties.
  • 00:08:29
    Let me ask you to pause for a minute
  • 00:08:33
    and let's do a little bit of backward design thinking,
  • 00:08:39
    Then this is the basic logic of backward design.
  • 00:08:41
    We'll say more about it later, and many of you know this.
  • 00:08:44
    If that's the goal, what follows?
  • 00:08:47
    If that's the long-term goal, what follows?
  • 00:08:50
    What follows for assessment?
  • 00:08:52
    What follows for instruction?
  • 00:08:56
    Go back to your conversations and just together
  • 00:08:59
    play out casually and informally,
  • 00:09:02
    at this point, the answers to those questions
  • 00:09:05
    as they occur to you.
  • 00:09:05
    If that's the goal, what should we be assessing?
  • 00:09:09
    And by assessing, I do not mean grading,
  • 00:09:11
    I mean assessing just like you would do as a soccer coach.
  • 00:09:14
    You don't give a grade as a varsity--
  • 00:09:16
    well, maybe in some schools you do.
  • 00:09:17
    I never did.
  • 00:09:19
    But you're assessing, you're judging
  • 00:09:21
    how we're doing against the goal, you're coaching,
  • 00:09:26
    you're giving information about how we're doing against the goal.
  • 00:09:28
    So what should we assess?
  • 00:09:31
    And what should we be doing instructionally?
  • 00:09:34
    Or, what should occur in the classroom?
  • 00:09:37
    And let me tell you one quick story before we do it.
  • 00:09:39
    When I asked this question, and a fourth-grade teacher pulled
  • 00:09:42
    me over and she said, well, there's two parts to my answer.
  • 00:09:46
    I want students to be good readers,
  • 00:09:48
    but more importantly, I want them to love to read.
  • 00:09:52
    I said, let's just focus on the love to read.
  • 00:09:55
    We know something about how to make good readers,
  • 00:09:58
    but focus for me on love to read.
  • 00:10:01
    What would be evidence that they love to read?
  • 00:10:05
    And what do you have to do instructionally
  • 00:10:07
    to make it more likely that they love to read?
  • 00:10:12
    And I said, be careful.
  • 00:10:14
    Requiring them to do everything isn't likely to cause it,
  • 00:10:20
    in fact, it may undercut it.
  • 00:10:21
    We know this about boys.
  • 00:10:25
    So, that's the caution.
  • 00:10:27
    If that's your goal, what's the assessment?
  • 00:10:31
    What needs to happen instructionally
  • 00:10:33
    to support and head toward your goal?
  • 00:10:36
    Somebody go first, do it together,
  • 00:10:38
    and somebody go second, do it together.
  • 00:10:40
    5, 10 minutes.
Etiquetas
  • Understanding by Design
  • onderrigbeplanning
  • kritiese denke
  • onderwyseffektiwiteit
  • langtermyn-doelwitte
  • pedagogie
  • self-assessering
  • strategiese beplanning
  • leeruitkomste
  • teachable moments