Seri Kuliah Online Posmodern: Michel Foucault

00:35:48
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b-N7gkLs6lw

Resumo

TLDRSelles videos, mis uurib Michel Foucaulti mõtteid, käsitletakse teadmiste ja võimu vahelist suhet, tehes viiteid Francis Baconile. Foucault väidab, et teadmine ei ole objektiivne tõde, vaid vähemuses oleva grupi poolt luuakse ja rakendatakse enamusest üle. Video tutvustab ajaloolisi näiteid, et rõhutada, kuidas võim ja normatiivsus muutuvad ajas ning kuidas institutsioonid kujundavad ühiskondlikke väärtusi ja tõekspidamisi. Foucaulti genealoogia kontseptsioon aitab paljastada, kuidas teadmised ja võim on omavahel seotud ning kuidas individuaalne käitumine allub peenetekerim vegvadele, mis loovad teaduse ja sotsiaalse normatiivsuse alused.

Conclusões

  • 📚 Teadmised ja võim on omavahel tihedalt seotud.
  • 🧠 Foucault nimetab teadmisi konstruktsiooniks, mida kasutatakse ühiskonna kontrollimiseks.
  • ⚖️ Ajalugu kirjutavad võitjad, mistõttu tõde on sageli väevõimetu.
  • 🔍 Genealoogia meetod paljastab võimu ja teadmisredikamaid.
  • 🕵️‍♂️ Panopticonsil on võimu väljendamise ja kontrollimise mehhanism.
  • 📅 Ajaloos on teadmine ja normaalsus pidevas muutumises.
  • 🙏 Foucault kutsub üles individuaalsele kriitilisele mõtlemisele.
  • 💬 Diskursus mängib tähtsat rolli ühiskondlike väärtuste kujundamisel.
  • 🚦 Seadused ja normid võivad alandada indiviidi autonoomiat.
  • 🏛️ Institutsioonid, mida me usume, loovad ja piiravad meie arusaamu.

Linha do tempo

  • 00:00:00 - 00:05:00

    Fuuko, surrounded by lanterns, introduces the concept that knowledge is power, attributed to both Francis Bacon and Michel Foucault. They explore the relationship between knowledge and absolute truth, questioning what knowledge means without the concept of absolute truth.

  • 00:05:00 - 00:10:00

    The narrative stresses that knowledge is often constructed by a minority and used to impose truths on the majority, emphasizing that the victors in history shape narratives that define what is considered normal or abnormal.

  • 00:10:00 - 00:15:00

    Foucault provides examples from history, such as Queen Victoria's reign, which imposed new norms around sexuality, and the conflicting perceptions of figures like Marat during the French Revolution based on who holds power.

  • 00:15:00 - 00:20:00

    Foucault's method called genealogy is introduced, aiming to trace historical narratives to reveal current power dynamics, challenging the notions of normalcy through historical context.

  • 00:20:00 - 00:25:00

    The discourse continues by examining how power manifests in various professions, like psychiatry or law, pointing out the monopolization of knowledge and its implications for societal norms and individual agency.

  • 00:25:00 - 00:30:00

    Foucault defines 'episteme' as the underlying structures of knowledge that shift over time, illustrating how knowledge is fluid rather than static, with truth being contextual to different historical periods.

  • 00:30:00 - 00:35:48

    The discussion concludes with the concept of the Panopticon, highlighting how modern society experiences a pervasive sense of oversight and control, reinforcing the subtle yet powerful nature of power in contemporary life.

Mostrar mais

Mapa mental

Vídeo de perguntas e respostas

  • Who is Michelle Foucault?

    Michel Foucault was a French philosopher and social theorist known for his critical studies of social institutions and the relationship between power and knowledge.

  • What is the main idea of the video?

    The video examines the connection between knowledge and power, and how societal norms are constructed and maintained by a minority.

  • What does the term 'genealogy' refer to in this context?

    In this context, genealogy refers to Foucault's method of analyzing the historical emergence and transformation of knowledge, power, and social norms.

  • How does Foucault's view differ from traditional views of knowledge?

    Foucault argues that knowledge is not an objective truth but rather a construct created by those in power to control the majority.

  • What examples does Foucault use to illustrate his points?

    He discusses historical figures like Francis Bacon, Queen Victoria, and examples from modern society to show how power influences perceptions of truth and normalcy.

  • What is the panopticon concept?

    The panopticon is a design for a prison by Jeremy Bentham that allows a guard to observe all prisoners without them knowing whether they are being watched, symbolizing modern surveillance and control.

  • What role does discourse play according to Foucault?

    Discourse shapes the way knowledge is perceived and maintained in society, impacting social norms and the power structures within.

  • How does Foucault define 'normalcy'?

    Normalcy is shaped by societal power structures that dictate acceptable behavior, often defined by those in positions of authority.

  • What is the relationship between knowledge and power according to Foucault?

    Knowledge is a form of power used to exert control and define social norms, while power shapes and constructs knowledge.

  • What implications does Foucault's theory have for individual autonomy?

    Foucault's theory suggests that individuals may be unaware of how institutions shape their perceptions and behaviors, potentially limiting their autonomy.

Ver mais resumos de vídeos

Obtenha acesso instantâneo a resumos gratuitos de vídeos do YouTube com tecnologia de IA!
Legendas
en
Rolagem automática:
  • 00:00:00
    On this occasion we will study Michelle's thoughts
  • 00:00:07
    Hi you can see
  • 00:00:10
    This is Fuuko at her desk surrounded by books
  • 00:00:15
    and on the top right there are lanterns from China why
  • 00:00:20
    Chinese lanterns can be found on the fuuko's desk
  • 00:00:24
    later we will find out about that
  • 00:00:29
    Now there is one sentence Fuuko that is very famous, namely
  • 00:00:33
    knowledge is
  • 00:00:35
    power
  • 00:00:37
    Fuuko is not the first person to come up with this sentence
  • 00:00:43
    long before that the father of modern science was Francis Bacon
  • 00:00:49
    also had said the same thing but we will
  • 00:00:54
    see how
  • 00:00:56
    sentence of knowledge is the power that Francis Bacon and Michelle Fuuko have
  • 00:01:03
    the interpretation
  • 00:01:05
    Hi. Well, the first thing we need to ponder is
  • 00:01:10
    Hi What is meant by absolute truth
  • 00:01:14
    and what is more important is whether we have that absolute truth
  • 00:01:22
    If the concept of absolute truth is removed then what is the meaning of knowledge
  • 00:01:30
    The meaning was like this all this time
  • 00:01:34
    Hi supporters of absolute truth or the cool term axiom
  • 00:01:40
    the undeniable truth is knowledge
  • 00:01:44
    Hi So.
  • 00:01:46
    during this time of knowledge
  • 00:01:48
    already used to
  • 00:01:50
    sustain or claim something that is perceived as
  • 00:01:55
    absolute truth But if we put away
  • 00:02:00
    Hi meaning or
  • 00:02:02
    understanding of absolute truth then what is the meaning of knowledge
  • 00:02:08
    while all this time this knowledge has been used to support or claim absolute truth
  • 00:02:16
    well what is knowledge
  • 00:02:19
    Knowledge is something a group of people collects and decides to be true
  • 00:02:27
    used by a powerful minority to impose
  • 00:02:32
    their notion of what is true in the majority of So.
  • 00:02:36
    actually
  • 00:02:38
    who's the culminating party
  • 00:02:40
    constructing that knowledge is a minority party
  • 00:02:45
    and the result of this construction
  • 00:02:49
    Often or in fact it is imposed on a larger group
  • 00:02:57
    Hi Ho through that knowledge
  • 00:03:00
    then
  • 00:03:01
    he can be an instrument to determine the truth
  • 00:03:06
    Hi so
  • 00:03:08
    knowledge is nothing but power
  • 00:03:13
    Hi Suppose this
  • 00:03:16
    In the historical narrative there is an adage that says
  • 00:03:22
    history was written by the victors and it is true
  • 00:03:26
    Who is in power can freely write the course of history
  • 00:03:31
    when
  • 00:03:33
    Hitler came to power if he could make historical narratives
  • 00:03:37
    about Jews being very bad and it was accepted by German society at that time
  • 00:03:44
    so that
  • 00:03:46
    this power then gives birth to the truth
  • 00:03:53
    Hi
  • 00:03:54
    it further determines what is normal and abnormal what is wrong and right
  • 00:04:00
    who sin and is not sinful and who is mad and who does not disappear
  • 00:04:06
    eh Fuku separates this in his work on the history of sexuality
  • 00:04:14
    Before the century
  • 00:04:17
    17th
  • 00:04:19
    Before Queen Victoria came to power in England
  • 00:04:22
    people can freely discuss sexual themes
  • 00:04:28
    people are free too
  • 00:04:32
    Revealing her private sexual life was tipped in public but once Queen Victoria came to power
  • 00:04:41
    conversation with sexual nuance is considered as taboo, especially abnormal
  • 00:04:51
    Conversations that reveal life
  • 00:04:53
    bisexuality in public is considered abnormal
  • 00:04:58
    so that
  • 00:05:00
    power of Queen Victoria's people then
  • 00:05:04
    clearly as if he could determine which one
  • 00:05:09
    wrong which one is right and which is normal and which is not
  • 00:05:15
    including those who sin and not sin and those who are crazy and
  • 00:05:19
    not crazy
  • 00:05:23
    Hi another example too
  • 00:05:26
    in the French Revolution
  • 00:05:28
    there is a nobleman named
  • 00:05:31
    make
  • 00:05:32
    Widya
  • 00:05:34
    For the nobility
  • 00:05:36
    French Mak Weduse is considered a lunatic
  • 00:05:40
    an abnormal person because
  • 00:05:42
    he is an obscene writer he writes
  • 00:05:47
    novel works
  • 00:05:51
    Sexual overtones
  • 00:05:53
    but for the French people Mac with the set is
  • 00:05:57
    Hero of the French Revolution
  • 00:05:59
    why because he defended the people he defended the French Revolution in 1789
  • 00:06:06
    Well
  • 00:06:07
    that means Is the figure of this Dooset McQueen a crazy person or is he a hero
  • 00:06:14
    it is determined by who is in charge. Who determines
  • 00:06:20
    if in terms
  • 00:06:22
    dialectic B files that burger sees the same thing at different sides and different times
  • 00:06:28
    it will produce
  • 00:06:30
    different explanations
  • 00:06:36
    M. Fuq then Sparked
  • 00:06:39
    a method called
  • 00:06:42
    genealogy yes
  • 00:06:44
    more precisely a genealogy of power
  • 00:06:48
    earlier the film philosopher Fredry also sparked
  • 00:06:52
    kinesiology method
  • 00:06:54
    It is just
  • 00:06:55
    Nietzsche's genealogy method is more often associated with
  • 00:07:00
    morality or referred to as
  • 00:07:03
    genealogy moral if mitsel
  • 00:07:07
    trying to trace the course of history
  • 00:07:11
    to reveal the current moral order through genealogy
  • 00:07:16
    then Fuuko through genealogy tries to trace
  • 00:07:21
    Hi the course of history and historical order from time to time
  • 00:07:26
    so that
  • 00:07:27
    displays
  • 00:07:28
    the current form of power
  • 00:07:32
    That is why for many people geneology is a method of delegitimizing
  • 00:07:40
    Current power
  • 00:07:43
    And through methods
  • 00:07:45
    genealogy This law concludes that normal and abnormal
  • 00:07:49
    cannot be defined
  • 00:07:53
    Well this has to do with personal life f *** uh
  • 00:07:59
    During Fuku's lecture
  • 00:08:05
    Being a gloomy person is very sad and he can't enjoy
  • 00:08:11
    on campus days. In fact, he also had the intention of committing suicide
  • 00:08:18
    but finally he realized the cause of
  • 00:08:21
    has sadness and gloom
  • 00:08:23
    this is because she loves her friend of the same sex she loves another man
  • 00:08:31
    finally
  • 00:08:32
    Father beat Fuku to his psychiatrist
  • 00:08:36
    when
  • 00:08:38
    in
  • 00:08:39
    interrogation
  • 00:08:40
    investigated
  • 00:08:42
    by the psychiater that psychiater concluded
  • 00:08:46
    that Fuku is not normally a taboo tribe because he loves
  • 00:08:52
    Same-sex Nah from here suddenly sued
  • 00:08:58
    Hi how can you say that I'm not normal or abnormal
  • 00:09:04
    Meanwhile, in the ancient Greek era, our honorable father of science was like
  • 00:09:11
    socrates Plato Aristotle all were gay all were men to same-sex love
  • 00:09:19
    Then why in the past life was said to be temporarily normal
  • 00:09:23
    now it is said to be abnormal Well here it is
  • 00:09:27
    genealogy method
  • 00:09:29
    which seeks to unveil the present order of power
  • 00:09:34
    through history from time to time Why
  • 00:09:39
    the power that could now display his form like this was Immortal there
  • 00:09:46
    Well related too
  • 00:09:48
    how some people are said to be heroes and some are said to be crazy
  • 00:09:54
    uh had time to say often Anta
  • 00:09:58
    the hero and the madman are separated by one thing
  • 00:10:02
    Hi on the one
  • 00:10:04
    Hi, the statue is made and the other one lives behind bars
  • 00:10:14
    There are several concrete examples of the power of knowledge
  • 00:10:20
    Professions like for example
  • 00:10:24
    Psychiatrist
  • 00:10:26
    Lecturer, doctor, engineer or technocrat, lawyer
  • 00:10:31
    editors, traders, religious leaders, shamans and others, meaning that a series of professions above are vulnerable to causes
  • 00:10:40
    the occurrence of monopoly
  • 00:10:41
    knowledge
  • 00:10:43
    Psychiatrist, for example, as if only psychiatrists have it
  • 00:10:47
    full rights to be able to define whether this person is normal or abnormal
  • 00:10:53
    or as if only he has the full right to
  • 00:10:59
    Saying that this person has mental illness while others are not hai
  • 00:11:05
    uh you can imagine when you were diagnosed
  • 00:11:10
    or said by psychiatrists
  • 00:11:13
    abnormal or
  • 00:11:15
    mental illness while you yourself feel you are normal
  • 00:11:20
    Well
  • 00:11:21
    fuuko wanted
  • 00:11:24
    want in order
  • 00:11:26
    That individual can challenge the powers of knowledge like this
  • 00:11:34
    The lecturer also, for example, why is it as if only a lecturer can determine which Miswa's writing is good and which is not
  • 00:11:42
    as if only a lecturer can determine which student research is good and which is bad
  • 00:11:48
    as if only a lecturer can determine which thesis is brilliant and which thesis is rubbish, for example
  • 00:11:56
    the power of knowledge from a lecturer
  • 00:11:59
    which in fact is often abused
  • 00:12:04
    Hello Doctor, for example
  • 00:12:07
    As if only a doctor has the right to determine that you are a healthy person or unhealthy, for example you
  • 00:12:16
    Want to apply for a job
  • 00:12:19
    Hi there, one of the conditions must be included
  • 00:12:23
    physical health certificate
  • 00:12:25
    well, as if only a doctor has the right to determine whether your body is healthy or not
  • 00:12:32
    But have you ever thought that for example the doctor was the parent of your ex who didn't like you
  • 00:12:39
    which is actually you healthy then made unhealthy huh
  • 00:12:44
    or also a real lecturer
  • 00:12:48
    Your thesis proposal is good, but because the lecturer doesn't like you for some emotional reason in the end
  • 00:12:56
    your proposal was never formulated
  • 00:12:58
    and as if he did have full power for it on
  • 00:13:02
    not necessarily your proposal is bad as it says it could be a personal matter
  • 00:13:09
    Engineers seem to be the only engineers who can determine which buildings are good and which are bad
  • 00:13:18
    Hi, strong building design, not strong and so on. Likewise with lawyers or judges who seem
  • 00:13:27
    uh who can determine right or wrong are them
  • 00:13:33
    In the world of literacy has become
  • 00:13:37
    Hi general grazia if the author often conflicts with the editor
  • 00:13:43
    so this editor seems like he can look like a lecturer yes he can
  • 00:13:51
    determine which writing is good and bad he has full power to escape
  • 00:13:56
    which manuscripts can be published and not published
  • 00:14:01
    Meanwhile, your manuscript may be worthy of publication just because the editor doesn't like you
  • 00:14:08
    your manuscript is deliberately not published things like this might happen
  • 00:14:12
    often without us even knowing it
  • 00:14:17
    And so on, the power of knowledge in professions
  • 00:14:23
    This in Fuuko's perspective is vulnerable
  • 00:14:27
    not only causes a monopoly on knowledge but also
  • 00:14:31
    manipulation
  • 00:14:33
    But it also leaves other people who come in contact with it vulnerable to exploitation and the like
  • 00:14:44
    Well next time we will examine the concept of fuuko which is quite central, namely episteme
  • 00:14:55
    The episteme comes from ancient Greek
  • 00:14:59
    the f *** uh myself
  • 00:15:03
    Defines an episteme as the total set of relations that are interconnected and exist within a certain period of time
  • 00:15:14
    What does this mean?
  • 00:15:16
    It means that every era has its construction
  • 00:15:20
    itself or the law says each period has a regime
  • 00:15:26
    the truth itself
  • 00:15:29
    As mentioned earlier in the ancient Greek era, being gay was not taboo
  • 00:15:35
    but in today's era it has become taboo
  • 00:15:39
    it is because of existence
  • 00:15:41
    episteme the total set of interconnected relations
  • 00:15:44
    and exist within a certain time
  • 00:15:48
    In the era
  • 00:15:51
    The Spartans of the ancient Greek warriors
  • 00:15:55
    Those Spartan soldiers guys
  • 00:15:58
    for the reason when they mix with women or have sex with women
  • 00:16:05
    they believe
  • 00:16:07
    their strength was no longer pure
  • 00:16:11
    Hi so they are
  • 00:16:13
    tend to relate to the same sex but in this era
  • 00:16:17
    Becomes
  • 00:16:19
    gay or oriented
  • 00:16:22
    Same-sex is considered taboo and abnormal
  • 00:16:26
    but according to the book it is due to episteme
  • 00:16:31
    Because each period has its own poison of truth
  • 00:16:37
    So that knowledge is actually a discourse or discourse that can be debated over and over again
  • 00:16:45
    that knowledge is something that is never final
  • 00:16:49
    if knowledge is something that is never final then truth is also because of truth
  • 00:16:57
    always sustained by
  • 00:16:59
    knowledge to legitimize
  • 00:17:02
    According to law, every domain cannot be separated from discourse or discourse
  • 00:17:11
    Hi, what is discourse
  • 00:17:13
    the broad understanding of discourse is something that is written or said or communicated using signs
  • 00:17:21
    and have implications for a broader realm
  • 00:17:24
    If I may, Simplify the discourse is an idea that is constantly being communicated
  • 00:17:32
    But Fuuko defines discourse specifically
  • 00:17:37
    According to the law
  • 00:17:39
    discourse are writings in a field of technical knowledge. Yes, these are specialized fields
  • 00:17:46
    have special or technical knowledge and have special or technical vocabulary
  • 00:17:55
    For example, the medical world has special terms that are often not understood by ordinary people
  • 00:18:04
    Am
  • 00:18:06
    There are terms of anesthesia and so in the legal world there are also technical terms such as
  • 00:18:13
    free Doi like inkrah and so on that ordinary people do not understand
  • 00:18:19
    in Sociology there are also terms like
  • 00:18:23
    alienation dialectic
  • 00:18:25
    in the world of engineering there is a term
  • 00:18:29
    trajectory and so on. Well that is a finished discourse
  • 00:18:35
    Writings in the field of technical knowledge that have their own specialization
  • 00:18:42
    So that's why
  • 00:18:46
    Suppose
  • 00:18:47
    we as ordinary people who take care of taxes, for example, are often confused with terms
  • 00:18:53
    accounting
  • 00:18:54
    taxation terms
  • 00:18:56
    if we are already confused with these terms we can only automatically
  • 00:19:00
    obey the system we can obey those who
  • 00:19:05
    understand more about that
  • 00:19:07
    we who are legal laymen are confused with legal terms when we are caught in legal problems and we end up
  • 00:19:14
    can only depend entirely on lawyers on legal counsel
  • 00:19:22
    The law further says technical specialists are always working to shape their fields and
  • 00:19:29
    dominant ideas
  • 00:19:32
    these technical fields increasingly have power over humans
  • 00:19:37
    Also these discourses build the structure of our society. Well, for example
  • 00:19:41
    discourse about insanity produced by psychologists or other experts
  • 00:19:48
    The discourse on Gilani, like it or not, also contains a discourse on normalization if then crazy can be defined
  • 00:19:55
    there must be
  • 00:19:57
    normalcy or sanity which can also
  • 00:20:00
    defined and
  • 00:20:02
    Hi
  • 00:20:03
    technical terms from these specialized fields
  • 00:20:08
    increasingly influencing society at large
  • 00:20:15
    An example is the taxonomic system
  • 00:20:20
    The western animal taxonomic system
  • 00:20:24
    classified in
  • 00:20:26
    criteria such as vertebrate or unicellular animals or not. And others the like
  • 00:20:34
    So Fuuko was surprised when he discovered the Chinese taxonomy system in the kingdom era
  • 00:20:41
    which is very different from the current Western taxonomic system
  • 00:20:46
    in the old kingdom era
  • 00:20:49
    in China
  • 00:20:51
    My animals are divided into the animal kingdom
  • 00:20:55
    Iwan was a commoner, an exalted animal as well as a hunted animal and this was very different from
  • 00:21:01
    current Western taxonomy or modern taxonomy
  • 00:21:05
    for scientists now
  • 00:21:06
    Chinese taxonomy is considered ridiculously unscientific and irrational because it violates our principles and order of modern scientific order
  • 00:21:14
    but in fact it shows the limitations of our own thinking to be this way
  • 00:21:20
    if then we can't really accept the old taxonomic system
  • 00:21:26
    the limitations of our own minds why can't we accept it
  • 00:21:30
    meaning that we have been created by an institution to accept one taxonomic system and reject other systems
  • 00:21:39
    Hey, another example of why we can't accept the Sunda Empire narrative
  • 00:21:45
    for us, the Sunda Empire is absurd and ridiculous
  • 00:21:51
    well actually when we reject the Sundanese Empire narrative itself shows
  • 00:21:57
    limitations of our episteme to accept it Because from elementary to high school we are taught
  • 00:22:04
    These kingdoms are Majapahit
  • 00:22:07
    Singosari and others there is no such thing as the Sunda Empire kingdom
  • 00:22:12
    So we are unconsciously created by institutions
  • 00:22:18
    because we are created by institutions we unconsciously reject things that are not taught
  • 00:22:26
    or not socialized by the institutions that created us
  • 00:22:30
    Well that's why we come back to behind one
  • 00:22:33
    Postmodern epistemology is the loss of subject and consciousness or
  • 00:22:39
    its the individual means
  • 00:22:41
    man is actually now created by institutions But he does not realize that he was created
  • 00:22:48
    I also take for example my students who have graduated who say that
  • 00:22:54
    After graduating from sociology, how come it seems like I can't get anything, well, he doesn't realize that
  • 00:23:03
    actually
  • 00:23:04
    His mindset is sociological
  • 00:23:08
    because the socialization is very subtle from time to time
  • 00:23:13
    gradually people become unaware that he's been printed
  • 00:23:19
    And the same student who said that
  • 00:23:23
    Hi it turns out he has a pretend mindset
  • 00:23:26
    very good relativism
  • 00:23:28
    in seeing what is right what is wrong what is accepted and rejected by society he is more careful to justify
  • 00:23:36
    he is more receptive to differences
  • 00:23:39
    multiculturalism pluralism
  • 00:23:42
    But he didn't realize that he was actually created by an institution
  • 00:23:49
    Then how does that power perpetuate itself?
  • 00:23:56
    However, according to the law, power must be spread
  • 00:24:03
    Initially
  • 00:24:05
    power is centralized held by the king and the royal elite but because
  • 00:24:14
    This centralized power created opposition and rebellion from the people
  • 00:24:20
    So then this power must spread to sublimes, not to become concentrated
  • 00:24:29
    so how not to be opposed?
  • 00:24:34
    Then drafted laws regulating the rights and obligations of the people and the King
  • 00:24:43
    Sad
  • 00:24:45
    The existence of this law actually
  • 00:24:48
    make power spread more and more
  • 00:24:53
    sublime
  • 00:24:54
    which in practice actually
  • 00:25:00
    The law is yes
  • 00:25:01
    mostly still pointy downward blunt upwards actually
  • 00:25:07
    but then a constitution is made to appear
  • 00:25:11
    power is not centralized even though power is still centralized
  • 00:25:17
    With the making of a constitution, power enters the social body of society
  • 00:25:25
    Uh
  • 00:25:27
    Suppose this is an easy example
  • 00:25:31
    Until now you didn't kill that person because you understood that killing is
  • 00:25:37
    barbaric acts or because you fear being punished for killing someone
  • 00:25:42
    yes
  • 00:25:44
    Until now you have not been corrupt because you know Corruption is a despicable act or because you are afraid
  • 00:25:53
    Imprisoned when it was discovered this corruption was a different dual
  • 00:25:58
    then you don't kill people for fear of being punished
  • 00:26:03
    threatened with such articles
  • 00:26:06
    you are not corrupt because you are afraid of being punished with the threat of articles such as these means that power has sublimated
  • 00:26:14
    spread and enter your social body
  • 00:26:17
    Hi
  • 00:26:18
    porn
  • 00:26:19
    So you are made
  • 00:26:21
    submit in a manner
  • 00:26:25
    It's invisible like that
  • 00:26:31
    Next
  • 00:26:33
    the method of power undergoes a transformation
  • 00:26:36
    it is no longer guaranteed by rights but by technique
  • 00:26:41
    he didn't go through the law but
  • 00:26:45
    normalization
  • 00:26:46
    He is not by punishment but control
  • 00:26:51
    Hi, so after the emergence of this law there are further implications, namely
  • 00:26:59
    Power which increasingly sublimates if
  • 00:27:02
    Earlier, the power to concentrate in the King was made by law of power to spread
  • 00:27:09
    with the practice of the later powers
  • 00:27:13
    to become more and more
  • 00:27:15
    sublime is not only diffuse but sublime and
  • 00:27:19
    the more sublime the form of power is, the harder it is to end up resisting
  • 00:27:24
    comes the management
  • 00:27:26
    normalization management control management
  • 00:27:30
    there is a definition of a good citizen as if you don't do this and that
  • 00:27:35
    You are a bad citizen if you follow the rules of the country to do these things. You are a good citizen
  • 00:27:44
    The terms bio politics and biopower have also emerged
  • 00:27:48
    This new form of power is far more subtle and it is much easier to ignore it but much more difficult to resist
  • 00:27:58
    Hi if
  • 00:28:00
    power is focused on one party and will be very easy to fight
  • 00:28:05
    but once this power spreads and sublimes it will be difficult to resist
  • 00:28:10
    unclear then who 8
  • 00:28:16
    Now, power also manifests in discipline, so that is discipline
  • 00:28:22
    the most refined form of power
  • 00:28:27
    What is bodily discipline
  • 00:28:31
    Body discipline is a precise control mechanism over the body
  • 00:28:35
    through discipline the body is trained to become a skilled body
  • 00:28:39
    but also constantly tested and corrected so that skill dexterity and
  • 00:28:45
    readiness This ends up becoming a mechanism that simply goes into operation within the body itself
  • 00:28:52
    discipline while improving
  • 00:28:54
    skills of strength and utilization of the body but also mastering and placing the body into a relationship of submission to power
  • 00:29:03
    discipline on the one hand enlarges the power of the body in terms of usability economics
  • 00:29:08
    but on the other hand it diminishes its power in political terms
  • 00:29:14
    Hi, a simple example is please watch a movie
  • 00:29:19
    modern times of Charlie Chaplin
  • 00:29:22
    there Charlie Chaplin acted as a factory worker and
  • 00:29:27
    as a factory worker he was subjected to bodily discipline
  • 00:29:31
    He every day does the same job so
  • 00:29:35
    this body automatically does the job
  • 00:29:39
    being constantly trained
  • 00:29:41
    on the one hand it the better off he becomes
  • 00:29:45
    skilled labor or factory workers, yes, he becomes faster
  • 00:29:49
    get the job done now, the better in terms of economic use
  • 00:29:55
    but
  • 00:29:57
    with him can only be like that he is not
  • 00:30:00
    He has other skills, he doesn't have any other positions in other places, he doesn't have the power in terminology
  • 00:30:09
    political
  • 00:30:10
    When this factory closed, he was confused about what to do because of the only order he had
  • 00:30:16
    tighten the bolts in the film so this is what is meant by
  • 00:30:21
    discipline of the body so on the one hand it functions economically but on the other hand it is
  • 00:30:28
    reduce the political capacity or political power of individuals
  • 00:30:34
    An example of bodily discipline is the boxing factory worker, the bodybuilding athlete. So you can see How
  • 00:30:41
    bodybuilding athlete boxers do it
  • 00:30:45
    strictly trying to shape his body. Now that is bodily discipline
  • 00:30:50
    the more his body is good the more he is often a bodybuilding champion however
  • 00:30:56
    on the other side
  • 00:30:58
    ability only to be a bodybuilder or bodybuilder
  • 00:31:03
    politically, his political power is getting smaller but economically he is getting bigger
  • 00:31:09
    hello hello I once took the example of a badminton link and it's Line and if we see
  • 00:31:15
    playing badminton is like a robot so it is as if he has been training every part of his body to
  • 00:31:21
    chasing satelkok eh
  • 00:31:24
    and his body moved efficiently to catch up
  • 00:31:28
    satelkok is very efficient, now this is the result of our already disciplined body
  • 00:31:34
    years even a dozen years by the team and
  • 00:31:37
    On the one hand, he increasingly wins badminton, he becomes a badminton legend
  • 00:31:44
    On the other hand, politically, he only has the ability as a badminton athlete
  • 00:31:52
    Next are members of the military and police. Well if we look at the agencies
  • 00:31:58
    the bodies of the good members of the military and police are actually bodies belonging to the state because
  • 00:32:05
    their bodies are shaped by the state to run
  • 00:32:09
    Here
  • 00:32:10
    interests of the state defense and security functions
  • 00:32:13
    Even those who are also on a diet exercise body discipline
  • 00:32:19
    Making food according to the dose and so on, exercise is discipline for the body
  • 00:32:26
    actually the person who is on a diet is the Oni game controlled by a discourse but
  • 00:32:31
    Often he doesn't realize yes. I just want to be thin. But he is
  • 00:32:37
    forgot to think critically Why do you want to be skinny Oh it turns out that because there is that construction
  • 00:32:43
    the fat is not good
  • 00:32:47
    that fat
  • 00:32:48
    many diseases and so on. Well that is it
  • 00:32:52
    even ourselves when we work in the service sector for example
  • 00:32:57
    how should we relate to our customers? Welcome. Happy shopping again. It is body discipline
  • 00:33:04
    the longer we work there, the more trained our bodies are, the more flexible Hi, but on the other hand, our ability is just that
  • 00:33:13
    when it becomes difficult to change professions we end up becoming dependent on it
  • 00:33:19
    that profession
  • 00:33:21
    Hi
  • 00:33:22
    Well
  • 00:33:25
    The final thought we will examine
  • 00:33:28
    here is a question
  • 00:33:30
    panopticon as a finished control mechanism
  • 00:33:34
    modern society actually
  • 00:33:37
    Experiencing very tight control by the state but modern society is not aware of it
  • 00:33:46
    Hi, like how was the power made subliminal
  • 00:33:53
    The Panopticon itself is a form of prison building initiated by Jeremy Bentham
  • 00:34:01
    The shape is a guard tower that can watch over prisoners from all over
  • 00:34:06
    like the picture on the right this is a panopticon eh
  • 00:34:15
    Hey those prisoners will feel like they're always being watched
  • 00:34:20
    Though not necessarily
  • 00:34:21
    the supervisor in the panopticon has not yet supervised this. This is why the panopticon is total control
  • 00:34:29
    total surveillance
  • 00:34:31
    I am sad
  • 00:34:33
    Hi, even though Panopticon doesn't necessarily supervise it, but other people always feel that they are being watched, always feel anxious
  • 00:34:42
    And this is one of the power mechanisms of today's panopticon control mechanisms such as CCTV
  • 00:34:49
    then the police post, now this is the correct police post, the glass is black
  • 00:34:54
    If we are on the road, we see a police post suddenly orderly driving right?
  • 00:35:00
    but it is not certain that the police are actually inside the substation
  • 00:35:04
    the police
  • 00:35:05
    well this is the correct panopticon
  • 00:35:08
    The panopticon must make other people feel that they are always being watched even though He is not
  • 00:35:13
    oversee Chan this is part of the power instrument or instrument control as soon as it first hits
  • 00:35:23
    Hi Ho, we can continue the discussion in the comments column, thank you
Etiquetas
  • teadmised
  • võim
  • Foucault
  • genealoogia
  • diskursus
  • normaalsus
  • ajalugu
  • filosoofia
  • sotsiaalteooriad
  • tõde