00:00:01
well a warm welcome to this talk now
00:00:02
I've just got off a rather long video
00:00:04
call with Dr David speaker the renowned
00:00:07
Canadian virologist and analytical
00:00:11
scientist and I'm going to run through
00:00:12
the main findings of what uh we talked
00:00:15
about and then you can watch the video
00:00:17
in detail if you want all the Nuance so
00:00:21
just a quick sketch really through what
00:00:23
is uh we talked about on the video now
00:00:26
uh Dr speak has analyzed 32 vials of uh
00:00:30
RNA vaccine so far and is found DNA
00:00:34
contamination in all of those virs that
00:00:38
is analyzed from different countries and
00:00:40
in the fisa vaccine is found something
00:00:42
called SV Simeon virus 40 enhancer and
00:00:46
promoter more on what that does in a
00:00:48
minute but basically it means that the
00:00:51
DNA from the contamination can get into
00:00:54
the nucleus of the cell and into the DNA
00:00:58
of the host cell
00:01:01
the DNA is found is residual plasmid DNA
00:01:04
from postprocess impurity so this DNA
00:01:09
from eoli bacteria the sort of colon
00:01:11
sort of bacteria you've got in your
00:01:13
colon this impurity should all be taken
00:01:16
out but it's not the manufacturing
00:01:18
process has left it in in fisa and in
00:01:21
even larger amounts in the madna
00:01:23
vaccines from the eoli because viruses
00:01:26
of course can't grow on their own they
00:01:28
can't make their own energy so the got
00:01:30
to be cultivated in some sort of cell
00:01:32
culture and the cell culture used in the
00:01:34
man manufacturing processes is eoli that
00:01:37
they're the sorts of cells the bacterial
00:01:39
cells that the virus is brewed up in
00:01:43
there's free broken up DNA so the the
00:01:47
DNA is partly broken up so it's it's the
00:01:50
Eco EOL lies they're broken up in the
00:01:53
DNA and the RNA comes out the RNA is
00:01:55
what the manufacturers want of course
00:01:57
but there's also DNA comes out as well
00:01:59
DNA fragments come out but the thing is
00:02:02
this DNA is packaged into the lipid
00:02:03
nanop particles so the DNA that's not
00:02:07
supposed to be there is packaged into to
00:02:09
the lipid nanop particles with the RNA
00:02:13
and that means it's systemically
00:02:15
distributed around the body because
00:02:16
these lipid nanop particles go
00:02:18
everywhere that means the DNA from the
00:02:21
postprocessing impurity goes to the
00:02:24
cells potentially all around the body
00:02:27
and that basically the fact that it goes
00:02:29
into the lipid nanoparticles guarantees
00:02:31
that the DNA fragments get into cells
00:02:34
now the limits of DNA contamination that
00:02:36
allowed in vaccines were really
00:02:38
formulated before the lipid nanop
00:02:41
particle technique was developed so
00:02:43
small amounts of DNA going into youron
00:02:45
won't do too much harm but when the that
00:02:48
DNA is in lipid nanop particles and it
00:02:50
goes everywhere it's a carrier mechanism
00:02:52
to take it around the body is systemic
00:02:56
biodistribution and also that means that
00:02:58
the lipid nanoparticle ensures the entry
00:03:01
of the DNA contaminant into the body
00:03:03
cells so it really is quite uh quite a
00:03:07
problem with guaranteed systemic
00:03:10
distribution um now work from
00:03:14
1999 a shown that three to 10 copies of
00:03:18
these DNA fragments this SV fragment
00:03:21
particularly 3 to 10 copies getting into
00:03:25
a cell can facilitate transport of that
00:03:28
DNA contamination into the cell nucleus
00:03:32
as long as the cell is not dividing if
00:03:34
the cell's in what we call the
00:03:36
interface uh when there's no active cell
00:03:38
division going on so only three to 10
00:03:41
copies of DNA contamination can cause
00:03:45
that contamination to go from the blood
00:03:48
from the lipid nanop particles where the
00:03:50
blood takes it to the cell into the
00:03:52
cytool the cytoplasm of the cell and 3
00:03:55
to 10 copies means it can go into the
00:03:57
nucleus of the cell and once it's in the
00:03:59
nucleus of the cell what have we got in
00:04:01
the nucleus nucleus of the cell we've
00:04:03
got our own DNA our own deoxy
00:04:05
ribonucleic acid and it can be
00:04:07
incorporated into that when the foreign
00:04:11
DNA gets into our own DNA that is a
00:04:13
change in our DNA and when you have a
00:04:16
change in the DNA or a change in the
00:04:17
genetic material that is defined as a
00:04:22
mutation a mutations can lead to
00:04:24
malignant
00:04:27
change so integration would mean M ation
00:04:30
we know that that can happen now cells
00:04:33
in culture exposed to uh to the uh to
00:04:36
the um the lipid nanop particles
00:04:38
contaminated with the DNA so human cells
00:04:42
have been cultured exposed to this
00:04:46
contaminated uh
00:04:49
vaccine the RNA vaccine with the lipid
00:04:51
nanop particles and uh when the DN the
00:04:55
host DNA of those cells has been
00:04:58
analyzed um it's been found that the DNA
00:05:02
from the the DNA that's contaminating
00:05:04
the vaccine does get into the
00:05:06
chromosomes of the human
00:05:08
cells this has been demonstrated in cell
00:05:10
culture it's not been demonstrated in
00:05:13
whole people but there again governments
00:05:15
aren't looking for
00:05:17
that so let me just explain that a bit
00:05:20
again so so they've made cultures of
00:05:22
human cells so you have you have a
00:05:25
culture of human cells growing in in a
00:05:26
dish or something you then add the uh
00:05:30
vaccine the MRNA vaccine which contains
00:05:34
the DNA
00:05:35
contamination you then let that Brew for
00:05:38
a period of time you let it incubate for
00:05:40
a period of time then you take the DNA
00:05:42
from the host cells human cells in
00:05:45
culture you take that DNA and the DNA
00:05:50
that contaminated the um the RNA the DNA
00:05:56
the contaminate that was in the lipid
00:05:57
nanop particles does get back into the
00:06:00
DNA of the host cells this has been
00:06:04
demonstrated so we know this happens in
00:06:08
cultures in tissue cultures now what we
00:06:10
need to do of course is uh take people
00:06:13
for example who have long vaccine injury
00:06:14
take their C do a complete genomic
00:06:17
analysis and it will be a relatively
00:06:18
simple matter to demonstrate whether
00:06:21
this foreign DNA was in their cells or
00:06:23
not but that work is not being done um
00:06:26
if you want to know why that work is not
00:06:28
being done oh I don't know ask ask a
00:06:31
politician they they might know why it's
00:06:33
not being
00:06:35
done so uh and the chromosomes that have
00:06:38
been uh contaminated for want of a
00:06:40
better word the chromosomes are made of
00:06:43
the DNA and some U some additional
00:06:46
proteins called histone proteins and
00:06:49
chromosomes 9 and 12 have been
00:06:51
demonstrated to have been contaminated
00:06:54
with the DNA from the contamination from
00:06:58
the lipid nanop particles in the
00:07:00
socalled RNA vaccines which I guess we
00:07:02
must now called RNA stroke
00:07:05
DNA
00:07:07
vaccines and
00:07:10
um can um I've got a note here cancer
00:07:14
tumors
00:07:16
uh a a year post vaccine so basically
00:07:20
there can be a delay before Cancer's
00:07:22
form I think is what I mean from that
00:07:23
note so the mutation's been proved in an
00:07:26
enco Gene now an enco Gene is a gene
00:07:29
which can stimulate um can stimulate
00:07:32
mitosis and of course cancer is an outof
00:07:35
control M mitosis so we know that at
00:07:39
least one enco gene one potential cancer
00:07:41
causing Gene in in in in chromosome 9 or
00:07:44
12 can have been altered by this DNA so
00:07:47
the theoretical risk is clear um and and
00:07:51
to me that theoretical risk is enough to
00:07:53
stop these RNA DNA contaminated vaccines
00:07:56
until we know one heck of a lot more
00:07:58
about it but we know enough to stop it
00:07:59
now uh unequivocally in in my
00:08:02
view Health Canada has said there's no
00:08:05
increased risk of
00:08:06
cancers um and they also said at first
00:08:09
that the fiser vaccine does not contain
00:08:11
sv40 but they were wrong it
00:08:14
does uh they later said that although
00:08:16
the sv40 is present so a bit of
00:08:18
backpedaling there from Health Canada uh
00:08:21
that the sv40 the the sv40 is the the
00:08:25
contamination sequence one of the
00:08:27
contamination sequences of DNA that can
00:08:29
get back into the nuclear material of
00:08:32
the cell and cause mutation uh Health
00:08:35
Canada says that's got no functional
00:08:36
role so first of all they said it's not
00:08:38
there then they said oh oh you know what
00:08:40
it is there then they said but don't
00:08:42
worry about it it doesn't do
00:08:44
anything uh but then Health Canada asked
00:08:47
fisa about the residual fragment so
00:08:49
having Health Canada declared that it
00:08:51
does nothing they then wrote to fisa uh
00:08:54
so Health Canada know that these uh the
00:08:57
these uh this contaminating SV 40
00:09:00
potential cancer causing sequence is
00:09:03
there and then uh Health Canada was
00:09:06
asked like a freedom of information
00:09:08
request Health Canada was asked for this
00:09:10
information from fisa but it came back
00:09:14
redacted why why would they want to hide
00:09:17
the scientific information Health Canada
00:09:20
why would they want to do that now uh uh
00:09:24
Dr speaker uses a technique called
00:09:27
fluorometry uh now this basic Bally
00:09:29
attaches a fluorescent molecule to the
00:09:32
DNA and then that means when the DNA is
00:09:34
present you can see it with your
00:09:36
microscope it fluoresces and you can you
00:09:38
can actually see it it's giving off
00:09:40
light now this is a good technique this
00:09:42
fluorometry is a good technique to give
00:09:44
quantitative analysis of all of the DNA
00:09:47
so it analyzes all of the DNA that's
00:09:49
present it's a better technique than
00:09:51
quantitative PCR because it's analyzing
00:09:53
all of the DNA and labeling with this
00:09:56
fluorescent uh marker or of the DNA
00:10:00
that's
00:10:01
present and um is found that in some uh
00:10:04
DNA in some some RNA uh vaccines some
00:10:09
RNA vaccines there is 10 trillion copies
00:10:12
of this DNA sequence uh per
00:10:17
dose now I was taken a back by
00:10:21
this Dr speaker has found that some the
00:10:25
Mna one particularly can contain up to
00:10:29
10 million uh copies of DNA fragment per
00:10:34
dose and we've just said that 3 to 10
00:10:37
copies of sv40 DNA fragment is enough to
00:10:41
facilitate transport into the person's
00:10:44
own DNA into the cellular nuclear DNA so
00:10:48
3 to 10 copies per cell and up to 10
00:10:52
trillion copies so that means that
00:10:56
potentially 1 trillion that's a th000
00:10:58
billion body cell could be transfected
00:11:01
with foreign DNA and and that just I was
00:11:05
taken back by that so
00:11:08
um so 10 trillion copies of DNA
00:11:13
contamination potentially present per
00:11:16
dose 3 to 10 copies enough to cause
00:11:19
incorporation of
00:11:21
sv40 um DNA contamination into the
00:11:25
nuclear Genome of the cell thereby by
00:11:29
causing a mutation which has been
00:11:32
identified in cell cultures in
00:11:34
chromosomes 9 and 12 including an enco
00:11:38
Gene that can potentially cause
00:11:41
cancer 10 trillion copies per dose or up
00:11:44
to that um so the DNA is likely to go
00:11:49
into the nucleus now I then asked if
00:11:51
there's any possibility of germ cell
00:11:54
contamination uh so in other words in
00:11:57
the ovaries and testes you've got cells
00:11:58
which are given rise to the next uh
00:12:01
generation of sperm and over which gives
00:12:04
rise to the next uh generation of human
00:12:06
being now the key thing here is if
00:12:08
there's
00:12:10
contamination if there's contamination
00:12:12
in a germ
00:12:14
cell that can cause a mutation in the
00:12:17
germ cell and that genetic mistake if
00:12:19
you like that mutation can be passed on
00:12:20
to the next
00:12:21
Generation therefore you could get
00:12:24
potentially genetic information to make
00:12:26
Spike protein passed on to the Next
00:12:30
Generation theoretical possibility
00:12:32
doesn't happen does it happen we don't
00:12:34
know no one's bothered testing I would
00:12:36
have thought that should be number one
00:12:37
priority for governments around the
00:12:39
world and authorizing agencies around
00:12:40
the world but as far as uh Dr speaker is
00:12:43
concerned he doesn't know that it's been
00:12:45
done so I think we can probably assume
00:12:48
that it hasn't been done
00:12:50
unless it's been done and we haven't
00:12:52
been told about it maybe that's what's
00:12:53
in all these black bits that are marked
00:12:55
out in these redacted papers maybe that
00:12:58
information is for clever people not for
00:13:00
Hoy pooy like you and me and Dr David
00:13:03
speaker um but of course we don't know
00:13:05
we're speculating
00:13:07
because we don't know if the work's been
00:13:09
done or not but a theoretical
00:13:12
possibility but let's hope not he says
00:13:14
um that we don't want ongoing Spike
00:13:16
production in the Next
00:13:18
Generation but of course this can
00:13:20
explain long covid so long covid could
00:13:23
be explained by the fact that the DNA
00:13:26
information to make the spike protein
00:13:28
for example as got into the nucleus of
00:13:30
the cell the uh once that genetic
00:13:33
information is in the nucleus of the
00:13:35
cell that can undergo a process called a
00:13:37
transcription forming messenger RNA that
00:13:39
can then go to the ribosomes of the cell
00:13:42
a process called translation where it
00:13:44
will make the spike protein now David
00:13:48
speaker at the moment David is working
00:13:50
on a test to test for the presence of
00:13:53
ongoing production of Spike protein and
00:13:56
he's is developing a test that will will
00:13:59
test for the presence of Spike protein
00:14:01
in blood and in urine so vital work
00:14:05
being done there then if someone had
00:14:07
long Co we could just test the blood
00:14:09
test the urine and say you know what
00:14:10
you've got ongoing Spike protein and
00:14:13
that would tell us potentially what is
00:14:16
causing their symptoms whatever it's
00:14:20
causing or not causing it shouldn't be
00:14:21
there it's an
00:14:22
abnormality and must be accounted
00:14:26
for so modified now the other thing is
00:14:30
that the RNA that's used is modified one
00:14:32
of the bases is modified and that makes
00:14:35
the RNA last for longer so we've got
00:14:36
this potential problem of the DNA
00:14:38
contamination but we've also got the
00:14:40
problem of this modified DNA now I asked
00:14:43
him how long the uh sorry modified RNA
00:14:46
so I asked him how long the RNA would
00:14:48
last for potentially inside the
00:14:49
cytoplasm of the cell to give rise to
00:14:51
say an abnormal Spike roin cuz I would
00:14:54
have thought it wouldn't be long but he
00:14:55
said it could be several months and I
00:14:57
was surprised but it's said this is
00:14:59
because it's modified one of the bases
00:15:01
is modified to make it live for longer
00:15:03
to make it last longer so people with
00:15:05
long Co that are having high levels of
00:15:07
Spike protein for long periods of
00:15:09
time at least for several months could
00:15:12
be explained by the fact that the
00:15:13
modified RNA is hanging around inside
00:15:16
the cell cytoplasm it could also be
00:15:18
explained by the fact that the
00:15:20
DNA from the uh from the DNA
00:15:24
contamination in the vaccines that DNA
00:15:26
has got into the cytool of the cell and
00:15:28
back into the nuclear material of the
00:15:30
cell and is actually become part of the
00:15:33
cell in his ongoing processes of uh
00:15:36
transcription and translation are
00:15:38
continuing to produce it and that could
00:15:40
potentially go on forever because it's
00:15:42
become part of the cell's DNA it's quite
00:15:44
a frightening
00:15:45
Prospect he also pointed out the
00:15:48
possibility fra for frame shifting now
00:15:50
the way this works is the genetic code
00:15:52
is read so three bases relate to one
00:15:55
amino acid and then the next amino acid
00:15:57
and the next amino acid till end up with
00:15:59
a long string of amino acids then they
00:16:01
they then fold into uh into more complex
00:16:04
structures uh quite amazing process
00:16:06
protein folding to give rise to
00:16:08
threedimensional structures which are
00:16:09
the functional proteins of the body but
00:16:12
if if that is moved along one then the
00:16:15
code can uh the code will will still
00:16:19
code for the same amino acid but if it's
00:16:21
moved along one it could be coding for a
00:16:23
different amino acid so we need three
00:16:26
bases what's called a codon to code for
00:16:28
one Amino acid but if that shifted along
00:16:30
one then you'll get three different
00:16:32
bases and that could code for a
00:16:33
different amino acid so what this means
00:16:35
is we'll get a range of proteins being
00:16:37
produced so I asked David about this and
00:16:39
he says yes this is true and this Frame
00:16:42
shifting could result in the production
00:16:44
of short protein sequences are part of
00:16:47
the spike protein or medium uh length
00:16:51
Pro proteins of part of the spike
00:16:53
protein or long lengths of the protein
00:16:55
causing Spike protein so in aent we've
00:16:57
got a polyclonal
00:16:59
ongoing potential production of Spike
00:17:01
protein and that could uh cause ongoing
00:17:04
inflammation which could account for
00:17:05
some of the problems that we're seeing
00:17:08
in patients with long Co there could be
00:17:10
many other causes of course but that's
00:17:12
potentially one of them that's
00:17:14
theoretically a
00:17:16
possibility and also um I learned a lot
00:17:19
during this talk um he says there's
00:17:22
possibilities for double stranded RNA
00:17:24
I'd never heard of that but he says is
00:17:26
Poss possibilities for that occurring so
00:17:29
I accept it and he also said there's
00:17:31
possibilities for DNA RNA forming
00:17:34
complexes together again I've never
00:17:35
heard of that but um strange stuff but
00:17:38
doesn't sound good it's not normal as I
00:17:41
understand it and uh therefore we should
00:17:43
uh put a monitori on RNA vaccines until
00:17:47
we get this science
00:17:49
clarified uh safety for the vaccines has
00:17:52
not been shown but we do know that they
00:17:55
cause
00:17:56
harm uh he pointed out that fisa did use
00:17:59
a gene therapy plasmid to develop as
00:18:02
part of the vaccine development he uh
00:18:05
David speaker congratulated Port
00:18:08
Headland Council uh for raising the
00:18:11
alarm about this and we talked about
00:18:13
this uh in in the last video with uh
00:18:16
with Russell Broadbent um the Australian
00:18:19
Member of Parliament so Port Headland
00:18:21
has alerted its uh doctors in its
00:18:24
jurisdiction uh to this risk has so the
00:18:27
doctors should be talking to their
00:18:28
patient about this that means the
00:18:30
patients can give informed consent and
00:18:32
also Port Hedland council is
00:18:33
communicating with I think it was the
00:18:35
550 other councils in Australia to alert
00:18:38
them to the danger so good courage
00:18:42
demonstrated by Port Hedland Council we
00:18:45
then talked about genomic analysis that
00:18:48
the fact that we could be looking at the
00:18:51
DNA so um people that have been
00:18:53
vaccinated especially those suffering
00:18:54
from vaccine damage it would be a
00:18:56
relatively simple matter we could take
00:18:59
uh some tissue or even potentially some
00:19:01
blood do a full genomic analysis on that
00:19:03
and identify if this
00:19:06
pathological protein sorry this
00:19:09
pathological DNA from the DNA
00:19:11
contamination in the vaccines has in
00:19:13
fact been incorporated into living human
00:19:15
cells I asked why this hasn't been done
00:19:18
and uh basically the answer is
00:19:20
governments don't seem interested in
00:19:21
doing this sort of
00:19:25
research I would have thought it should
00:19:26
be their top priority but what what what
00:19:28
do I know about
00:19:30
it right government's Spike protein test
00:19:35
would work out the uh the the the
00:19:38
government governments aren't doing this
00:19:40
but David's working on a test to look
00:19:41
for the for the spike protein so so
00:19:44
David's test is not looking for the DNA
00:19:46
contamination that that needs a genomic
00:19:48
analysis test but David is working on a
00:19:51
test that will test for the product of
00:19:54
the abnormal Gene that's now been
00:19:55
incorporated into our DNA and is
00:19:57
resulting in the produ of abnormal Spike
00:19:59
protein in the blood and urine if indeed
00:20:01
it is there that's what his test will
00:20:03
show so um absolutely brilliant that he
00:20:07
doing that but that should be combined
00:20:08
with research on full Gene sequences
00:20:10
from living human beings or indeed from
00:20:14
postmortem
00:20:15
material from dead human beings
00:20:19
um who may have died in circumstances
00:20:21
which are unclear but that is currently
00:20:25
not being done according to the best of
00:20:26
his knowledge or my
00:20:29
knowledge and also quite incredible that
00:20:32
David is not financially supported to do
00:20:34
this work so there will be a link to
00:20:36
support his work below the video and
00:20:39
then we just closed he's also starting
00:20:42
to do some work on the Replicon vacine
00:20:44
launched in Japan which uh is
00:20:47
frightening for him and for me but I
00:20:49
don't know much about it so I'm not
00:20:50
going to talk about it now but that will
00:20:51
be the subject of future videos when
00:20:54
will human beings realize it's time to
00:20:56
stop tinkering with things they don't
00:21:01
understand and when will human beings
00:21:03
learn that making money is not the top
00:21:07
priority of human
00:21:09
existence let's now listen to the full
00:21:12
interview uh with uh with David I'll put
00:21:15
I'm actually I might put this on as a
00:21:16
separate video but we'll put both up uh
00:21:19
but quite alarming things to think about
00:21:22
really uh so on to David now and thank
00:21:25
you uh David speaker for the work done
00:21:28
and for taking part in this interview
