Fake News And Media Literacy - 2017 COLLISION Conference Panel

00:27:50
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Po4nWugEwo

Summary

TLDRThis panel discussion delves into the pressing issue of fake news and media credibility, with panelists focusing on how deliberate misinformation contrasts with everyday reporting errors. They explore the impact of media biases and the dynamics of information consumption in an increasingly polarized society. The conversation highlights the urgent need for transparency in journalism, as well as the responsibility of both media and the public to confront misinformation. By acknowledging the challenges posed by fake news, the panelists advocate for a collaborative effort among journalists, platforms, consumers, and businesses to foster a more informed society and protect democratic values against the detrimental effects of fake news.

Takeaways

  • 📰 Fake news is a deliberate attempt to deceive and is a real problem.
  • 🔍 Distinguishing between intentional fake news and factual errors is crucial.
  • 📱 Social media amplifies biases and misinformation through its algorithms.
  • 🤝 Transparency and clarity in journalism are vital for credibility.
  • 🗣️ Consumers must actively engage in discerning credible sources from misleading ones.
  • 🛠️ Collaborative efforts are needed among journalists, platforms, and the public to combat misinformation.
  • 📉 The decline of local media contributes to a lack of accountability and trust.
  • ⚖️ The balance between free speech and regulating harmful misinformation is a complex issue.
  • 💡 Projects that contextualize news can aid in understanding different perspectives.
  • 🔗 Supporting credible journalism is critical for maintaining a healthy democracy.

Timeline

  • 00:00:00 - 00:05:00

    The discussion begins with the importance of media credibility, particularly in the context of 'fake news', which has become a prevalent topic in contemporary discourse. The speakers, including media experts, aim to examine the dimensions of fake news, its existence, and the influence it wields in shaping public perception. They emphasize that fake news is defined as fundamentally false stories intended to deceive, contrasting it with legitimate reporting mistakes that come from good intentions.

  • 00:05:00 - 00:10:00

    The conversation highlights the challenge of distinguishing between intentional fake news and routine journalistic errors. The speakers note that media bias, especially in a polarized political climate, complicates how individuals receive news. The emergence of digital platforms such as social media and search engines has created echo chambers, which reinforce personal biases regarding news consumption.

  • 00:10:00 - 00:15:00

    Differentiating between opinion and factual reporting has become blurred, raising concerns about the credibility of media sources. The role of journalists has shifted, and there's an increasing demand for transparency regarding both the intentions of reporters and their affiliations. As individuals seek out news that aligns with their beliefs, the media landscape has become increasingly polarized, leading to a rise in biased reporting and fake news.

  • 00:15:00 - 00:20:00

    The larger context reveals that public distrust in news media has escalated over decades, further exacerbated by the rise of digital misinformation. Fake news acts as a catalyst for partisanship and political division, with serious ramifications for democratic processes. Efforts to combat fake news through awareness and the promotion of trustworthy journalism are presented as urgent at this time.

  • 00:20:00 - 00:27:50

    Finally, the dialogue addresses how stakeholders in journalism, including content creators and distributors, can navigate the complexities of misleading information without infringing upon free speech. The calls for cooperative efforts among individuals, corporations, and media outlets are underscored, alongside the importance of restoring credibility and trust in journalism amid the challenges posed by fake news and the pressure on journalistic integrity.

Show more

Mind Map

Video Q&A

  • What is the definition of fake news according to the panelists?

    Fake news is defined as fundamentally false stories written with the intent to deceive, often with propaganda purposes or driven by profit.

  • What is the difference between intentional fake news and factual reporting errors?

    Intentional fake news is deliberately misleading, while factual reporting errors are unintentional mistakes journalists make.

  • How do biases in media affect public perception?

    Biases can reinforce personal beliefs and create an echo chamber, making it hard to distinguish objective reporting from opinion.

  • What role do social media platforms play in the spread of fake news?

    Social media platforms can amplify fake news due to algorithms that favor sensationalism and engagement over accuracy.

  • What are potential solutions to combat fake news?

    Solutions include improving media literacy among the public, enhancing transparency from journalists, and promoting diverse viewpoints.

  • How does local media relate to the issue of fake news?

    The decline of local media creates gaps in accountability, leading to increased distrust and reliance on potentially inaccurate sources.

  • What responsibilities do consumers have regarding fake news?

    Consumers are encouraged to critically evaluate sources, discuss misinformation respectfully with others, and support credible journalism.

  • How can journalism maintain credibility amid biases?

    Journalism should focus on accuracy while presenting diverse perspectives and avoid false equivalence between differing sides.

  • What impact does fake news have on democracy?

    Fake news can misinform the public, erode trust in institutions, and ultimately undermine democratic processes.

  • What initiatives are being taken to address misinformation?

    Projects like those from HuffPost aim to contextualize news within the broader conversation to help readers understand perspectives.

View more video summaries

Get instant access to free YouTube video summaries powered by AI!
Subtitles
en
Auto Scroll:
  • 00:00:00
    [Music]
  • 00:00:00
    all
  • 00:00:00
    [Music]
  • 00:00:03
    right hey everyone how is everyone doing
  • 00:00:07
    today lots of excited any anyone else go
  • 00:00:09
    to the maple leaf last night see rebirth
  • 00:00:13
    good to be in New Orleans all right all
  • 00:00:15
    right guys uh so right now the question
  • 00:00:18
    of media credibility is more important
  • 00:00:20
    than ever fake news and the topic of
  • 00:00:22
    fake news seems to be something that we
  • 00:00:24
    can't escape we can't get away from we
  • 00:00:26
    hear it quite often from the current
  • 00:00:28
    Administration in the US specifically
  • 00:00:30
    Donald Trump and so we have two media
  • 00:00:33
    Heavy Hitters here to kind of discuss
  • 00:00:35
    the issue and what the potential
  • 00:00:38
    solutions could be if fake news is a
  • 00:00:40
    problem so John I'm going to start with
  • 00:00:42
    you give me your opinion on fake news
  • 00:00:45
    because there is a little bit of a
  • 00:00:46
    division among Americans as to whether
  • 00:00:49
    or not fake news is really a thing does
  • 00:00:51
    it really exist or is it just an excuse
  • 00:00:53
    used by politicians to minimize negative
  • 00:00:56
    news coverage well it first of all fake
  • 00:00:58
    news is a real problem there's no
  • 00:01:00
    question but I think we need to define
  • 00:01:02
    the terms really clearly because it is
  • 00:01:04
    not what some folks would like to sell
  • 00:01:06
    it as fake news I Define as
  • 00:01:08
    fundamentally false stories that are
  • 00:01:10
    written with the intent to deceive right
  • 00:01:13
    they may have a propagandas
  • 00:01:14
    propagandistic purpose sometimes they
  • 00:01:16
    may be just fueled by profit um but this
  • 00:01:19
    is something that has become epidemic uh
  • 00:01:22
    it's it's calculated misinformation what
  • 00:01:24
    fake news is not is what president Trump
  • 00:01:27
    and the White House crew are trying to
  • 00:01:28
    sell which is any news that might be
  • 00:01:31
    critical of them news that offends you
  • 00:01:33
    somehow personally or politically um
  • 00:01:36
    that's an orwellian attempt to blur
  • 00:01:38
    basic distinctions between fact and
  • 00:01:40
    fiction between truth and lies uh that's
  • 00:01:43
    incredibly dangerous to start muddying
  • 00:01:44
    the waters uh but that is it explicit
  • 00:01:47
    intent and I think that's just a measure
  • 00:01:49
    of how serious the times we're in right
  • 00:01:51
    now are that that's something we're
  • 00:01:53
    debating with push back an agenda-driven
  • 00:01:55
    push back from the White House so Jared
  • 00:01:59
    there seems to be a little bit of an
  • 00:02:01
    issue um deciphering the difference
  • 00:02:03
    between the type of fake news that John
  • 00:02:05
    just perfectly laid out and you know
  • 00:02:08
    news reports that might be wrong on some
  • 00:02:11
    of the facts right and everyone in the
  • 00:02:13
    media at some point in their careers
  • 00:02:15
    makes a mistake they get a fact wrong
  • 00:02:18
    they report it and the right thing is to
  • 00:02:19
    retract it right and so how do we get
  • 00:02:23
    the American people to understand the
  • 00:02:25
    difference between intentional fake news
  • 00:02:28
    and reporting that has the best
  • 00:02:30
    intentions but maybe got some of the
  • 00:02:31
    facts wrong I think part of it is
  • 00:02:34
    actually that word intention because I
  • 00:02:36
    think where we have arrived at is at a
  • 00:02:40
    point where there's a line between bias
  • 00:02:42
    in the media and fake and I think in a
  • 00:02:46
    world that's becoming increasingly more
  • 00:02:48
    polarized politically this concept of
  • 00:02:50
    bias is is what's polluting the
  • 00:02:53
    conversation and if you think about it
  • 00:02:55
    how do we as people actually access the
  • 00:02:57
    news and the information that we consume
  • 00:02:59
    consum on a daily basis and as the world
  • 00:03:02
    has shifted to digital and within
  • 00:03:04
    digital to mobile the two dominant
  • 00:03:06
    platforms where people access news is
  • 00:03:09
    really through search and through social
  • 00:03:11
    and when you're in search you are
  • 00:03:13
    explicitly seeking something I have an
  • 00:03:16
    intention of what I'm looking for and
  • 00:03:18
    somebody delivers what I'm looking for
  • 00:03:20
    so my own personal biases get reinforced
  • 00:03:23
    in what I'm looking for if you think
  • 00:03:25
    about social the very concept of social
  • 00:03:28
    is what do all the people in my network
  • 00:03:31
    consume and is that relevant to me and
  • 00:03:34
    that kind of reaffirms biases that I may
  • 00:03:37
    have like maybe I'm friends with people
  • 00:03:39
    who don't have any common interest or
  • 00:03:41
    thought processes I do but most people
  • 00:03:44
    actually are friends with people who are
  • 00:03:45
    more similar to them than not so you
  • 00:03:47
    have this self-reinforcing issue in
  • 00:03:49
    terms of how we consume it and so the
  • 00:03:52
    platforms who are behind this are
  • 00:03:54
    working very hard at trying to sort of
  • 00:03:56
    solve that issue of bias at the platform
  • 00:03:58
    level on the same token as Publishers of
  • 00:04:01
    content um there are either explicit or
  • 00:04:04
    latent biases in terms of journalistic
  • 00:04:07
    Enterprises and um you know some media
  • 00:04:10
    organizations skew more conservatives
  • 00:04:12
    some skew more liberals some skew more
  • 00:04:14
    for Millennials some skew for different
  • 00:04:17
    demographics and and I think um it's
  • 00:04:20
    it's okay to have a point of view on the
  • 00:04:23
    world and in fact consumers want to um
  • 00:04:25
    and people want to know that the people
  • 00:04:28
    are delivering the information have a
  • 00:04:29
    point of view I think in that regard
  • 00:04:32
    it's really really important for
  • 00:04:33
    publication and for the writers to be
  • 00:04:36
    very transparent about where they're
  • 00:04:37
    coming from what their intentions are
  • 00:04:39
    and what their backgrounds are it's why
  • 00:04:41
    a lot of um the best journalistic
  • 00:04:43
    Enterprises make the bios of the
  • 00:04:46
    authors's really front and center so you
  • 00:04:48
    can really as a as a person understand
  • 00:04:51
    where they're coming from and I think um
  • 00:04:54
    having that knowledge is is is really
  • 00:04:56
    really important U of course people get
  • 00:04:59
    stuff wrong and um whether you're an
  • 00:05:01
    athlete which we just heard about or
  • 00:05:03
    whether uh you're a journalist you may
  • 00:05:05
    not get the facts right all the time but
  • 00:05:08
    then it's up to the um the writer and
  • 00:05:10
    the News organization to correct that um
  • 00:05:13
    so I think when you put those two things
  • 00:05:15
    together it's why people are um not so
  • 00:05:19
    much because of fake news although that
  • 00:05:20
    doesn't help but also this concept of
  • 00:05:22
    bias um on both the platform layer and
  • 00:05:25
    the publication layer so I love that you
  • 00:05:27
    brought that up because when I was in
  • 00:05:29
    journalism School the biggest no no once
  • 00:05:31
    you're out there on the field is sharing
  • 00:05:32
    your opinion and I remember one of my
  • 00:05:34
    favorite journalism professors telling
  • 00:05:35
    me do not ever share your opinion until
  • 00:05:38
    you pay your dues and you are credible
  • 00:05:40
    enough to be an op-ed writer or
  • 00:05:41
    something like that but the media
  • 00:05:43
    landscape is changing and it's changing
  • 00:05:44
    rapidly people do want a point of view
  • 00:05:47
    and John you know you published a book
  • 00:05:48
    about Wing nuts and I I I found it
  • 00:05:51
    fascinating because we do have a very
  • 00:05:53
    polarized political system right now and
  • 00:05:57
    at first I was under the assumption that
  • 00:05:59
    hey hey maybe it's because of some of
  • 00:06:01
    the media players and the shock jocks
  • 00:06:03
    like Rush Limba that are playing a role
  • 00:06:05
    in polarizing people but it seems like
  • 00:06:07
    there is a hunger for biased media
  • 00:06:10
    people as as you just mentioned Jared
  • 00:06:13
    are looking for information that
  • 00:06:14
    reinforces their preconceived notions
  • 00:06:17
    right and I think that that has kind of
  • 00:06:19
    created a system that allows something
  • 00:06:21
    like fake news to thrive what do you
  • 00:06:23
    think about that well I I think there
  • 00:06:25
    there are a lot of sort of macro dnamic
  • 00:06:28
    that have gotten us to this Point
  • 00:06:30
    partisan news and polarization of of of
  • 00:06:34
    society and and
  • 00:06:58
    hyperarticulation in Congress this idea
  • 00:07:00
    of us against them it undercuts sort of
  • 00:07:02
    the essential idea behind democracy
  • 00:07:05
    which is an assumption of Goodwill among
  • 00:07:07
    fellow citizens um and I think a lot of
  • 00:07:09
    the technological Trends uh that that
  • 00:07:11
    jar described I think are driving it too
  • 00:07:13
    because part of what fake news is um
  • 00:07:15
    it's it's sort of conf confirmation bias
  • 00:07:17
    meets clickbait um and and it sort of
  • 00:07:20
    takes that DNA of of partisan news and
  • 00:07:23
    it it it it sends it into the absurd but
  • 00:07:26
    it becomes incredibly toxic incredibly
  • 00:07:28
    Radioactive so I I look I think the
  • 00:07:31
    larger lack of trust in news media has
  • 00:07:33
    been increasing for unfortunately
  • 00:07:35
    decades it predates social media it
  • 00:07:37
    predates fake news but that's that's the
  • 00:07:39
    foundation of it and so at The Daily
  • 00:07:41
    Beast for example we try very hard to be
  • 00:07:43
    nonpartisan but not neutral what does
  • 00:07:44
    that mean it means we will hit both
  • 00:07:46
    sides as appropriate that we have
  • 00:07:48
    columnists who range liberal to
  • 00:07:49
    libertarian that we try to be
  • 00:07:50
    transparent we try to be edgy but but
  • 00:07:53
    you know you always balance the attitude
  • 00:07:54
    with accuracy what we don't do and what
  • 00:07:56
    I I think is incredibly dangerous is um
  • 00:07:59
    this sort of on the one hand on the
  • 00:08:01
    other uh myth of moral equivalence on
  • 00:08:03
    every issue because once you start
  • 00:08:06
    buying into that then that itself
  • 00:08:08
    becomes muddying about the line between
  • 00:08:10
    truth and lies fact and fiction and
  • 00:08:12
    that's something we as journalists need
  • 00:08:13
    to be pushing back on we need to be
  • 00:08:15
    Unapologetic about pushing a fact-based
  • 00:08:17
    debate and be transparent about opinions
  • 00:08:20
    and and and uh perspectives when they
  • 00:08:21
    exist right and I think that's a really
  • 00:08:23
    important point because one of the
  • 00:08:25
    biggest issues uh in the media was that
  • 00:08:28
    journalists were confusing the
  • 00:08:30
    importance of objectivity with
  • 00:08:32
    neutrality right and so they treated
  • 00:08:34
    both sides as if they're completely
  • 00:08:36
    equal they're both saying one thing or
  • 00:08:38
    the other and then it's up to you to
  • 00:08:40
    decide who's telling the truth and again
  • 00:08:42
    I think that that played a role in
  • 00:08:43
    people getting really frustrated with
  • 00:08:46
    establishment Media or traditional media
  • 00:08:48
    and then they turned to some more
  • 00:08:50
    obscure independent sources so all these
  • 00:08:52
    little things did play a role in my
  • 00:08:54
    opinion as to how fake news emerged and
  • 00:08:57
    how it became so influential yeah so
  • 00:09:00
    let's talk a little bit about how
  • 00:09:01
    influential it really is because I think
  • 00:09:03
    there are some disagreements as to how
  • 00:09:06
    much of an impact uh how many
  • 00:09:08
    ramifications we've experienced as a
  • 00:09:09
    result of misleading or fake news um so
  • 00:09:12
    do you want to jump in sure I I mean you
  • 00:09:15
    know look this became epidemic in a
  • 00:09:18
    relatively short period of time which is
  • 00:09:20
    one of the reasons why I think we were
  • 00:09:21
    ill equipped to deal with it um I mean
  • 00:09:24
    misinformation campaigns the purchasing
  • 00:09:26
    of bots to try to uh depress turnout or
  • 00:09:29
    confuse people as two facts um that's
  • 00:09:32
    something that we have seen um you know
  • 00:09:35
    unfortunately primarily in other
  • 00:09:36
    democracies more so than our own um and
  • 00:09:39
    I think you know one of the many factors
  • 00:09:41
    that led to this perfect storm that had
  • 00:09:43
    an impact on the election um was sort of
  • 00:09:46
    you know Facebook kind of pulling the
  • 00:09:47
    goalie when it came to some of the
  • 00:09:49
    people who were individually curating
  • 00:09:50
    articles out of concern that there was
  • 00:09:52
    individual bias and all of a sudden Flo
  • 00:09:55
    what flowed in was a massive amount of
  • 00:09:57
    fake news that people weren't uh
  • 00:09:59
    prepared on the platforms to try to
  • 00:10:02
    adjudicate so we know fake news was
  • 00:10:04
    getting shared uh more often than real
  • 00:10:07
    news in those closing uh critical
  • 00:10:09
    closing months and weeks of the election
  • 00:10:11
    and and I'll say that you know there's a
  • 00:10:12
    brand new Kennedy uh School of
  • 00:10:14
    government report about the rise of fake
  • 00:10:16
    news that I recommend uh people are
  • 00:10:17
    trying to fix this on different fronts
  • 00:10:19
    Jimmy Wales uh uh uh Wikipedia is trying
  • 00:10:21
    to launch an initiative um and and I
  • 00:10:24
    think we all need to take it seriously
  • 00:10:25
    but it really it it happens so quickly
  • 00:10:28
    that it overwhelmed a lot of the the
  • 00:10:30
    people who'd normally be there to uh
  • 00:10:33
    adjudicate it and and that's one of the
  • 00:10:35
    reasons given the election results were
  • 00:10:37
    so tight you can't pinpoint one thing
  • 00:10:39
    but um it can have a demonstrably uh a
  • 00:10:43
    demonstrable effect on our democracy and
  • 00:10:45
    it's happening in the French election
  • 00:10:46
    right now so yes it's real the Dynamics
  • 00:10:50
    um we need to understand and then we
  • 00:10:51
    need to aggressively confront them as
  • 00:10:53
    journalists as businesses as advertisers
  • 00:10:56
    as academics like we all need to have a
  • 00:10:59
    mult front push on this right now
  • 00:11:01
    because it's impacting our democracy in
  • 00:11:02
    real time Jared what stood out to you
  • 00:11:05
    the most in regard to fake news during
  • 00:11:07
    this past election was there something
  • 00:11:08
    that that spread that had a like a
  • 00:11:11
    serious impact that you were concerned
  • 00:11:13
    about well one thing um to consider is
  • 00:11:18
    whether it's this election or other
  • 00:11:19
    elections and even in this conversation
  • 00:11:22
    of um fake news and legitimate news is
  • 00:11:25
    the number of people in this country and
  • 00:11:27
    around the world who we like to refer to
  • 00:11:30
    as unused or under newsed which is
  • 00:11:33
    people who are actually not who don't
  • 00:11:35
    feel part of the system at all they're
  • 00:11:37
    like both disenfranchised from a voting
  • 00:11:40
    perspective but also disenfranchised
  • 00:11:42
    from like the powers and structures of
  • 00:11:45
    like the society around them that's a
  • 00:11:48
    really big population and I think um one
  • 00:11:51
    of the opportunities in front of all of
  • 00:11:54
    us is to figure out a way in which we
  • 00:11:56
    can actually help um like a broader
  • 00:11:59
    group of society gain access to like the
  • 00:12:02
    power structures of society and I think
  • 00:12:04
    if we can really like tackle that as a
  • 00:12:06
    problem collectively as journalism and
  • 00:12:08
    as uh citizens that can go a long way
  • 00:12:11
    towards democracy I will say also um on
  • 00:12:14
    this topic of fake news I get
  • 00:12:16
    uncomfortable when we talk about fake
  • 00:12:18
    news almost as its own construct because
  • 00:12:22
    um I find it dangerous and it's
  • 00:12:24
    dangerous not sort of um within the
  • 00:12:27
    construct of what um fake news is it's
  • 00:12:31
    the effect of what fake news could be on
  • 00:12:35
    the role of media and free discourse in
  • 00:12:38
    society if you think about this not from
  • 00:12:41
    a journalism point of view or from a
  • 00:12:43
    Content point of view but in every
  • 00:12:45
    democracy around the world like um
  • 00:12:48
    legislator have gotten together to say
  • 00:12:50
    there's got to be rules and restrictions
  • 00:12:53
    on who actually controls and owns the
  • 00:12:56
    media like there's always been
  • 00:12:58
    restrictions like if the government
  • 00:13:00
    controls the media then you know what
  • 00:13:02
    the outcome of the media is going to be
  • 00:13:04
    if only large corporations control it
  • 00:13:06
    and consolidate power you may be locking
  • 00:13:10
    in um the control um of discourse in a
  • 00:13:14
    very very Consolidated point of view
  • 00:13:15
    wouldn't you argue that that's been an
  • 00:13:17
    ongoing problem with media in the US
  • 00:13:20
    yeah it it's been a problem but here
  • 00:13:22
    here's the opportunity like one of the
  • 00:13:23
    great things about Twitter one of the
  • 00:13:25
    great things about social media it's now
  • 00:13:28
    so easy to publish content it's now
  • 00:13:32
    never been like more accessible to
  • 00:13:34
    consume content and it's amidst the fact
  • 00:13:37
    that um we have these extraordinary
  • 00:13:40
    platforms where conversations can take
  • 00:13:42
    place that the lines between sort of
  • 00:13:44
    like serious well-reported journalism
  • 00:13:47
    and just like opinion can get blurred
  • 00:13:50
    and I think um it's for that reason that
  • 00:13:53
    um uh Publications like what we're doing
  • 00:13:55
    at HuffPost what John is doing um in his
  • 00:13:58
    organization
  • 00:13:59
    all of us are spending a lot of time
  • 00:14:02
    making very deep investments in our core
  • 00:14:05
    identity as a brand it's like it has to
  • 00:14:08
    matter like it it's no coincidence that
  • 00:14:10
    the New York Times is taking commercials
  • 00:14:12
    out for the first time ever it's no
  • 00:14:14
    coincidence that all of us are saying
  • 00:14:16
    like who are we why are we relevant why
  • 00:14:19
    do we matter because when you get to
  • 00:14:21
    know who we are and what role we want to
  • 00:14:23
    play in society then you can make a
  • 00:14:25
    decision whether this is an entity you
  • 00:14:27
    want to get behind or this is an entity
  • 00:14:29
    you don't want to get behind and this is
  • 00:14:30
    really important because remember
  • 00:14:32
    conventional wisdom 3 four years ago at
  • 00:14:33
    the dawn of sort of the rise of social
  • 00:14:35
    media was the brands don't matter
  • 00:14:37
    anymore news Brands don't matter people
  • 00:14:38
    don't care what they click on they're
  • 00:14:40
    clicking on individual stories we know
  • 00:14:42
    now that actually people do pay
  • 00:14:43
    attention who's disseminating the
  • 00:14:45
    information and guess what they should
  • 00:14:48
    um and and I think that's one of the
  • 00:14:49
    reasons why you're seeing sort of a
  • 00:14:50
    trump bump in subscriptions people are
  • 00:14:52
    also getting hip to the fact that guess
  • 00:14:54
    what quality journalism isn't free and
  • 00:14:56
    we're going to need to have a
  • 00:14:57
    diversified Revenue strategy to actually
  • 00:14:59
    just make sure the business model of
  • 00:15:00
    Journalism gets fixed because that's
  • 00:15:02
    actually really important to the
  • 00:15:03
    maintenance of democracy as well and in
  • 00:15:06
    a macro sense you know you I I always
  • 00:15:08
    beli that you know American people are
  • 00:15:10
    smart but not necessarily informed and
  • 00:15:12
    one of the things that has driven I
  • 00:15:14
    think a um the divisions in our country
  • 00:15:16
    is the death of local media um you know
  • 00:15:19
    we have watched you know local paper
  • 00:15:20
    after local paper get killed pretty soon
  • 00:15:22
    we'll have a first state that doesn't
  • 00:15:24
    have a local paper and yes citizen
  • 00:15:25
    journalists can supplement that a little
  • 00:15:27
    bit but it's really hard to hold state
  • 00:15:28
    legislators accountable and guess what
  • 00:15:31
    those are usually hot beds of corruption
  • 00:15:32
    spoiler alert and so the more all of a
  • 00:15:34
    sudden that folks don't have local media
  • 00:15:36
    looking out for them the more they're
  • 00:15:38
    likely to feel a sense of you're
  • 00:15:40
    parachuting in and doing anthropological
  • 00:15:41
    studies of my my town uh you know
  • 00:15:44
    Washington Post or New York Times or
  • 00:15:45
    whatever and that builds a sense of
  • 00:15:48
    distrust even where there maybe should
  • 00:15:50
    not be distrust so that's why it's got
  • 00:15:52
    to be a a a a a multifaceted push back
  • 00:15:55
    and this is all happening at a time not
  • 00:15:57
    just accusations of fake news from the
  • 00:15:58
    federal government but you know Ryan's
  • 00:16:00
    prus the chief of staff saying uh this
  • 00:16:02
    past weekend that the White House has
  • 00:16:03
    looked at cracking down on Lial laws you
  • 00:16:06
    know there yes there are constitutional
  • 00:16:07
    structures that protect us you know the
  • 00:16:09
    Constitution doesn't mention political
  • 00:16:11
    parties it does mention the Press uh but
  • 00:16:13
    but this is this is really urgent on
  • 00:16:16
    every front and we've got to analyze how
  • 00:16:18
    we got here and start pushing back
  • 00:16:19
    across the board people supporting
  • 00:16:21
    quality journalism locally or nationally
  • 00:16:24
    advertisers and corporate citizens
  • 00:16:26
    consciously whitelisting quality
  • 00:16:27
    journalism those are all going to be
  • 00:16:29
    pieces of the puzzle yeah in that regard
  • 00:16:32
    actually there's further challenges
  • 00:16:35
    because as John alluded to but just to
  • 00:16:37
    be explicit about it when you factor in
  • 00:16:39
    the business models that are driving
  • 00:16:42
    journalism um you know that adds an
  • 00:16:45
    extra level of pressure in terms of how
  • 00:16:47
    do journalistic Enterprise deliver their
  • 00:16:50
    best quality work and specifically if
  • 00:16:53
    you're ad supported as a business model
  • 00:16:55
    we're also living um in a day and age
  • 00:16:57
    where Brands um
  • 00:16:59
    really care a lot about um where they're
  • 00:17:02
    Associated what content they're being
  • 00:17:04
    placed against and um and so you know
  • 00:17:08
    maintaining the Integrity of the
  • 00:17:11
    journalism but also sort of getting um
  • 00:17:14
    Brands to feel comfortable of getting
  • 00:17:16
    behind um the actual business model you
  • 00:17:19
    know we're seeing some pressure there
  • 00:17:20
    across the industry and there there's a
  • 00:17:22
    catch 22 there that's really important
  • 00:17:23
    for folks to understand on the one hand
  • 00:17:26
    um you know people are reading news more
  • 00:17:28
    often often than ever before right and
  • 00:17:30
    and if you're an Advertiser you want to
  • 00:17:32
    reach you know educated influential uh
  • 00:17:35
    readers quality news creates quality
  • 00:17:38
    readership that should be a good
  • 00:17:39
    transaction of value right but what uh
  • 00:17:42
    what very tempting for Brands to say
  • 00:17:44
    that hard news is unsafe because the the
  • 00:17:47
    environment is so polarized um that if
  • 00:17:50
    it's if it's politics or if it's dealing
  • 00:17:52
    with real world threats like terrorism
  • 00:17:54
    or anything else that that negativity
  • 00:17:56
    could be brand unsafe and if folks start
  • 00:17:59
    taking that decision guess what we will
  • 00:18:02
    start getting uh more focus on
  • 00:18:04
    entertainment uh news and sports news um
  • 00:18:08
    and less hard news that itself is also
  • 00:18:11
    dangerous for democracy because at some
  • 00:18:12
    point it becomes bread in circuses like
  • 00:18:14
    the Romans had to deal with it's
  • 00:18:15
    something to distract people to give the
  • 00:18:17
    illusion of news without the reality of
  • 00:18:19
    news so that's a real danger we need to
  • 00:18:21
    deal with as well yeah that's a huge
  • 00:18:22
    problem and I mean we can honestly host
  • 00:18:24
    an hourlong panel on that and that alone
  • 00:18:26
    and it's not just something that you're
  • 00:18:28
    seeing in you know uh traditional Media
  • 00:18:31
    or print media cable news it's something
  • 00:18:33
    that we're experiencing in digital news
  • 00:18:35
    as well you know I host The Young Turks
  • 00:18:37
    independent news source and now all of a
  • 00:18:40
    sudden advertisers are pulling out of
  • 00:18:42
    YouTube because of the previous model
  • 00:18:45
    that allowed their ads to to you know do
  • 00:18:48
    either pre-roll or post-roll on hate
  • 00:18:51
    speech and so now now they've gone in a
  • 00:18:53
    completely different you know Direction
  • 00:18:55
    where they're like we don't want to be
  • 00:18:56
    on any political content we don't want
  • 00:18:57
    to be on any type of sexual content even
  • 00:19:00
    if it's just sex education and so there
  • 00:19:02
    are legitimate sources out there that
  • 00:19:04
    are trying to make a living independent
  • 00:19:06
    independently I should say um that are
  • 00:19:08
    getting hit by the emergence of fake
  • 00:19:10
    news the emergence of hate speech the
  • 00:19:12
    polarization that we're experiencing in
  • 00:19:14
    politics right now it's uh it's honestly
  • 00:19:16
    a nightmare it's really difficult to
  • 00:19:18
    adapt to that but what are the answers
  • 00:19:20
    because you mentioned white listing and
  • 00:19:22
    so right now there's you know this
  • 00:19:24
    pressure on Silicon Valley CEOs uh Mark
  • 00:19:28
    Zuckerberg he has a moral obligation to
  • 00:19:30
    do something about fake news and the
  • 00:19:33
    question is what does he do how do you
  • 00:19:37
    mitigate this issue or solve this issue
  • 00:19:39
    without you know creeping into First
  • 00:19:42
    Amendment you know violation territory
  • 00:19:45
    right that's what I'm most concerned
  • 00:19:47
    about so Jared I'm going to let you take
  • 00:19:49
    this one sure so um I think one thing to
  • 00:19:52
    point out and I I do think there's an
  • 00:19:54
    obligation um of all the stakeholders in
  • 00:19:57
    the industry to actually like solve this
  • 00:19:59
    problem because I think underlying it is
  • 00:20:01
    what John um has eloquently articulated
  • 00:20:04
    is like we believe in a world where
  • 00:20:05
    there should be free speech and there
  • 00:20:07
    should be an outlet for discourse so if
  • 00:20:09
    that's like the table Stakes assumption
  • 00:20:11
    we we all need to get together whether
  • 00:20:13
    whether you're Facebook Google or us at
  • 00:20:15
    um huff post um and uh but one thing to
  • 00:20:19
    note is that um you know as a
  • 00:20:22
    distributor Distributors who've got
  • 00:20:25
    power always play this role in terms of
  • 00:20:28
    of what is being shown and what is not
  • 00:20:30
    being shown that's no different than
  • 00:20:32
    like at any point in the history of
  • 00:20:35
    media where there's been a few Outlets
  • 00:20:38
    that have the vast majority of people on
  • 00:20:40
    those outlets and they determine what
  • 00:20:43
    gets shown and and and so there is
  • 00:20:46
    always this level of editing and um
  • 00:20:49
    that's taking place because there's only
  • 00:20:50
    so much uh time and so much outlet and
  • 00:20:53
    they're making decisions like one can
  • 00:20:57
    make a decision don't put news cont
  • 00:20:58
    content and put some other content like
  • 00:21:00
    games which is what Facebook used to do
  • 00:21:03
    so I I think um there is this obligation
  • 00:21:06
    but I think we shouldn't kid ourselves
  • 00:21:07
    in the sense that um uh this kind of
  • 00:21:11
    like uh uh um uh editorial thing has not
  • 00:21:15
    been part of the equation it's always
  • 00:21:17
    been um part of the equation as far as I
  • 00:21:20
    can tell it's it's scary to you know
  • 00:21:23
    name someone as the Arbiter of who
  • 00:21:26
    decides like which new source is
  • 00:21:29
    credible which is fake which has bad
  • 00:21:30
    intentions you never want to put that
  • 00:21:32
    much power in the hands of one person
  • 00:21:34
    especially when it comes to an outlet
  • 00:21:36
    like Facebook and look Facebook is
  • 00:21:37
    exploring lots of different options it's
  • 00:21:38
    not like they're going to have Mark
  • 00:21:40
    Zuckerberg look at all these sources and
  • 00:21:41
    make the decision um but I do worry a
  • 00:21:44
    little bit about whitelisting as well
  • 00:21:46
    because whitelisting certainly does
  • 00:21:49
    benefit media Outlets that have been
  • 00:21:52
    around for a while that have been
  • 00:21:53
    established but what about upand
  • 00:21:55
    cominging news outlets that have the
  • 00:21:57
    best intentions how do we answer
  • 00:21:58
    question I think it requires a degree of
  • 00:22:00
    flexibility and transparency um and and
  • 00:22:03
    that you know we're always going to have
  • 00:22:05
    who will watch The Watchmen kind of
  • 00:22:06
    problem but one of the ways to address
  • 00:22:08
    that is to really take advantage of the
  • 00:22:10
    democratization of information and make
  • 00:22:12
    sure that people can petition to get in
  • 00:22:14
    that who what the parameters are is is
  • 00:22:16
    clearly constructed and it's not simply
  • 00:22:18
    a black box that doesn't allow anybody
  • 00:22:21
    um entry no ability to petition that's
  • 00:22:23
    that's a dangerous scenario but but I
  • 00:22:25
    think also the The Little D
  • 00:22:27
    democratization media selling we need to
  • 00:22:28
    take advantage of you know we can't wait
  • 00:22:30
    for one person to come save us whether
  • 00:22:31
    it's the president of United States or
  • 00:22:32
    Mark Zuckerberg you know the thing about
  • 00:22:35
    being a democracy is ultimately we the
  • 00:22:37
    people are the back stop it requires
  • 00:22:39
    vigorous citizenship and you vote with
  • 00:22:41
    your eyeballs and your wallet every day
  • 00:22:43
    and and to actually take some of the
  • 00:22:45
    action like sleeping Giants did uh with
  • 00:22:47
    Breitbart which was enormously effective
  • 00:22:50
    um and again it's not about politics per
  • 00:22:53
    se right it's it's simply that if
  • 00:22:55
    advertisers want to support a
  • 00:22:56
    conservative Outlet maybe they should
  • 00:22:57
    support advertise it with say National
  • 00:23:00
    Review or the Weekly Standard and and
  • 00:23:02
    not people you know who are are
  • 00:23:03
    intentionally trying to inflame
  • 00:23:05
    divisions uh you know and and have you
  • 00:23:08
    know black crime tags on on their
  • 00:23:09
    stories as one example with Breitbart um
  • 00:23:13
    Mash notes to the Confederate flag or
  • 00:23:14
    any example you want to take um at least
  • 00:23:17
    then it's a it's a it's an exercise of
  • 00:23:19
    the democratic impulse what I think the
  • 00:23:21
    the larger point is that corporate
  • 00:23:24
    citizens consumers businesses we all
  • 00:23:27
    need to recognize that we have an
  • 00:23:29
    obligation to be part of the solution
  • 00:23:30
    here and it's not going to be pure and
  • 00:23:32
    it's not going to be simple but I just
  • 00:23:34
    wrote a book about George Washington's
  • 00:23:35
    farewell address and one of the points
  • 00:23:37
    he was making is that enlightened
  • 00:23:39
    opinion is necessary to a self-governing
  • 00:23:41
    society enlightened opinion I mean this
  • 00:23:43
    is basic to democracy and if you want to
  • 00:23:46
    pull all the way out one of the
  • 00:23:48
    challenges we're seeing to to Liberal
  • 00:23:50
    democracy as a concept is people uh
  • 00:23:53
    countries who are trying to weaken faith
  • 00:23:54
    in Liberal institutions like the Press
  • 00:23:57
    like the Integrity of democracy and that
  • 00:23:59
    that's a strategy on their part so we
  • 00:24:02
    really have to you know have a rally
  • 00:24:04
    around the flag push back on that as
  • 00:24:06
    Citizens as businesses here's something
  • 00:24:08
    cool um and related to your um
  • 00:24:11
    Enlightenment concept one of the pro
  • 00:24:13
    products that we're working on a huff
  • 00:24:15
    post to get out your question is uh
  • 00:24:17
    really cool it's in a beta phase um we
  • 00:24:20
    call it flip side and essentially what
  • 00:24:22
    we do is for um articles that we publish
  • 00:24:25
    and that are published in the world what
  • 00:24:26
    we try and do is contextualize it within
  • 00:24:29
    the broader ecosystem of the issue and
  • 00:24:32
    what we've done is we've tried to look
  • 00:24:33
    at like Twitter's API and other social
  • 00:24:35
    apis and say for this topic where this
  • 00:24:38
    article is on the Spectrum relative to
  • 00:24:41
    where the world population on the social
  • 00:24:44
    medias are it like skews kind of left it
  • 00:24:47
    skews right it skews left of center the
  • 00:24:50
    majority of activity taking place in
  • 00:24:53
    social media as it relates to this
  • 00:24:54
    specific topic is over here and this
  • 00:24:56
    article is here so people can actually
  • 00:24:58
    sort of have a mind map and
  • 00:25:00
    conceptualize like hey this article's
  • 00:25:02
    here the world seems to be over here and
  • 00:25:04
    I can at least start
  • 00:25:06
    um uh having a perspective on where my
  • 00:25:10
    thought process is in relation to where
  • 00:25:12
    all the pockets of conversation around
  • 00:25:13
    the issue is so it it essentially Maps
  • 00:25:16
    the ideological component of of the
  • 00:25:19
    article written now and it's not pure
  • 00:25:21
    science like we we do take a lot of data
  • 00:25:23
    from social feeds but it requires some
  • 00:25:25
    editorial curation of like how you
  • 00:25:27
    actually get the map but it's like a
  • 00:25:28
    step in the direction of trying to give
  • 00:25:31
    people context for where issues are and
  • 00:25:34
    where your thoughts are in relationship
  • 00:25:35
    to those issues yeah and and and look
  • 00:25:37
    but there too getting the inputs right
  • 00:25:38
    are going to be important because you
  • 00:25:40
    know you know C conservatives are always
  • 00:25:42
    going to say The Daily Beast is liberal
  • 00:25:43
    no matter how many conservative
  • 00:25:44
    columnist we have and we consciously try
  • 00:25:46
    to balance and and some and Liberals are
  • 00:25:48
    going to say that it's conservative and
  • 00:25:50
    that and that's and that's that in my
  • 00:25:52
    view that probably means we're we're
  • 00:25:53
    we're doing it about right you know but
  • 00:25:56
    but um but but it's really to start
  • 00:25:58
    getting a sense of are you getting a
  • 00:26:00
    balanced news diet how can we
  • 00:26:01
    communicate to people so that they they
  • 00:26:03
    have a sense of you know am I just
  • 00:26:05
    getting self-reinforcing messages that
  • 00:26:07
    may have less and less to do with
  • 00:26:08
    reality and not over index you know just
  • 00:26:11
    cuz someone's drinking the Kool-Aid
  • 00:26:12
    doesn't mean we need to address the
  • 00:26:14
    definition of reality to meet halfway to
  • 00:26:17
    to to their their worldview I mean there
  • 00:26:19
    is such a thing as facts and we need to
  • 00:26:21
    assert that my favorite quote that I I I
  • 00:26:24
    cannot quote enough is Danel Patrick
  • 00:26:26
    moan Everyone's entitled of their own
  • 00:26:27
    opinion not their own facts and that's
  • 00:26:30
    an important part of what we have to do
  • 00:26:32
    as journalists right now um is really
  • 00:26:35
    aggressively Embrace that ideal without
  • 00:26:38
    apology uh and and to make sure that
  • 00:26:40
    we're we're being fair and to understand
  • 00:26:42
    that our credibility comes from our
  • 00:26:43
    ability to criticize from a position of
  • 00:26:45
    Independence but that um that we can't
  • 00:26:48
    let the Tail Wag the Dog in these
  • 00:26:50
    important Civic debates we got to play
  • 00:26:51
    our game well we're out of time
  • 00:26:53
    unfortunately and I don't want to get
  • 00:26:54
    beaten off the stage we got threatened
  • 00:26:56
    back there they threatened us earlier
  • 00:26:58
    did they did but you know I just want to
  • 00:26:59
    leave you all with this I know that this
  • 00:27:01
    is an incredibly smart audience and you
  • 00:27:03
    know you're Savvy you know how to tell
  • 00:27:05
    the difference between fake news and
  • 00:27:07
    real news but you know do your part you
  • 00:27:09
    know if you notice anyone in your
  • 00:27:10
    personal life that's sharing content
  • 00:27:13
    that's um intentionally misleading and
  • 00:27:15
    it's propaganda you know talk to them in
  • 00:27:17
    the nicest way possible don't confront
  • 00:27:19
    them because that doesn't work and let
  • 00:27:21
    them know hey you know this this doesn't
  • 00:27:23
    seem right here's another source that's
  • 00:27:25
    a little more credible here's what the
  • 00:27:26
    reality is of the story we're all
  • 00:27:28
    responsible for fighting back and
  • 00:27:30
    pushing back against what happened
  • 00:27:32
    during this past election and what
  • 00:27:34
    surely will continue to happen unless we
  • 00:27:36
    find ways to solve it that's right thank
  • 00:27:37
    you everyone thank you thank you thanks
  • 00:27:39
    for reading the beach
  • 00:27:40
    [Applause]
  • 00:27:48
    too
Tags
  • Fake News
  • Media Credibility
  • Misinformation
  • Journalism
  • Bias
  • Public Perception
  • Social Media
  • Democracy
  • Transparency
  • Local Media