Here's Why We're Not Using Floorp Browser!

00:03:58
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E6nWS0zK4_Y

Summary

TLDRIn hierdie gesprek bespreek die sprekers die nuwe Firefox Blaz-browser, Florp, en hul skeptisisme rakende onlangs verskynende digitale projekte. Hulle beklemtoon die herhalende natuur van nuwe toepassings en blaaiers wat soms nie volhou nie. Met verwysing na vroeëre projekte soos Thorium, wat probleme ondervind het, is hulle versigtig om nie te vinnig oor nuwe tegnologieë te oordeel nie. Hulle verkies om 'n geduldige benadering te volg om te verseker dat hulle nie verkeerde aanbevelings doen nie. Die belangrikheid van 'n geskiedenis en 'n betroubare span is veral belangrik in hul evaluering van nuwe oplossings.

Takeaways

  • 🦊 Florp is 'n nuwe blaaiertoepassing wat nou bespreek word.
  • 🔍 Die sprekers is versigtig oor die aanbeveling van nuwe projekte.
  • ⏳ Hulle glo aan die belangrikheid van 'n langer geskiedenis tydens evaluasie.
  • 📉 Thorium word as 'n voorbeeld gebruik van 'n project wat teleurgestel het.
  • 📬 Hulle ontvang gereeld nuus oor nuwe projekte.
  • 🛡️ 'n Kritiese benadering is belangrik om gebruikers te beskerm.
  • ⏰ Die tydsduur wat 'n project bestaan, is 'n belangrike maatstaf.
  • ⚖️ Hulle poog om 'n gebalanseerde oorsig te bied van voor- en nadele.
  • ✔️ Geduldige evaluasie kan help om verkeerde aanbevelings te voorkom.

Timeline

  • 00:00:00 - 00:03:58

    Luka vra of hulle die nuutste Firefox Blaz-bladsy, genaamd Florp, gaan dek. Henry erken hy is nie baie geïnteresseerd nie, maar sal dit tog oorweeg. Hy verduidelik dat hy gereeld e-posse ontvang oor soortgelyke projekte en dikwels is daar nie genoeg waarde om dit ernstig te neem nie. Hy verwys na 'n vorige geval met Thorium wat nie suksesvol was nie, en dat hulle nie op nuwes moet spring sonder deeglike ondersoek nie, wat hoekom hulle stadig is om nuwe projekte te dek. Henry noem ook die belangrikheid van 'n projek se geskiedenis en sukses, wat Florp nie het nie omdat dit relatief nuut is. Hy beklemtoon dat dit beter is om krities te wees en die tekortkominge van 'n diens aan te dui, eerder as om net die voordele te noem.

Mind Map

Video Q&A

  • Wat is die Florp-browser?

    Florp is 'n nuwe webblaaier wat deur gebruikers bespreek word, maar die sprekers is skepties oor die volhoubaarheid daarvan.

  • Waarom is die sprekers versigtig om oor nuwe projekte te praat?

    Hulle was in die verlede teleurgesteld oor projekte soos Thorium, wat gou probleme ondervind het na aanvanklike lof.

  • Wat gebruik die sprekers as maatstaf vir die evaluering van 'n nuwe projek?

    Hulle kyk na die geskiedenis, personeel en hoe lank die projek al aan die gang is.

  • Waarom neem hulle nie vinnige besluite oor nuwe blaaiers nie?

    Omdat hulle 'n goeie rekord wil hê en nie wil aanbevelings maak wat later verkeerd blyk te wees.

View more video summaries

Get instant access to free YouTube video summaries powered by AI!
Subtitles
en
Auto Scroll:
  • 00:00:00
    Luka asks uh if we plan to cover uh the
  • 00:00:03
    somewhat new Firefox blaz browser florp
  • 00:00:06
    have you looked into this at all Henry
  • 00:00:07
    no I'm I'm just not super I just I'm not
  • 00:00:10
    interested and that's not because I I I
  • 00:00:12
    am still going to look into it for the
  • 00:00:14
    record but the reason I haven't already
  • 00:00:15
    looked into it is I'm not super
  • 00:00:17
    interested mainly because on RN the
  • 00:00:19
    context for people listening to this on
  • 00:00:20
    RN I get emails about like tons of
  • 00:00:22
    projects like this on a weekly basis and
  • 00:00:25
    so for me I'm kind of used to getting a
  • 00:00:27
    oh hey we have this new you know Fork of
  • 00:00:30
    this search engine or a fork of this
  • 00:00:31
    browser or a fork of this blah blah blah
  • 00:00:34
    and then we talk about and it's like
  • 00:00:35
    okay well this isn't like a good enough
  • 00:00:38
    Messengers as well this isn't a good
  • 00:00:39
    enough selling point that makes this a
  • 00:00:41
    huge deal in the long run um and I'm
  • 00:00:45
    going to look into florp for the record
  • 00:00:47
    I haven't but I think that it got a lot
  • 00:00:49
    of hype mainly because that CTT upload
  • 00:00:52
    and for context as to why we're very
  • 00:00:54
    cautious and we take a lot of time to
  • 00:00:56
    like look at Services um C CTT did a
  • 00:00:59
    similar video about thorium where he was
  • 00:01:01
    like this is awesome everyone should try
  • 00:01:03
    it and then you know they fell behind
  • 00:01:06
    months on security updates um there was
  • 00:01:08
    that weird like seesam issue I think
  • 00:01:11
    with thorium and then they posted like
  • 00:01:13
    furry stuff it was bizar and now like no
  • 00:01:16
    one's touching a 50 foot pole so yeah we
  • 00:01:20
    don't really like we don't like
  • 00:01:22
    instantly jump on new projects just
  • 00:01:23
    because they're getting a lot of
  • 00:01:24
    attention we kind of like wait things
  • 00:01:26
    out which is why typically we're slower
  • 00:01:28
    to like cover that kind of stuff too
  • 00:01:30
    um but you talked about this because you
  • 00:01:32
    just made a browser tier list video on
  • 00:01:35
    your personal Channel and you talked
  • 00:01:37
    about floor and you were like you kind
  • 00:01:40
    of mentioned this too how like I don't
  • 00:01:42
    know what's your take on it I guess all
  • 00:01:43
    the thorum stuff it's it's definitely a
  • 00:01:46
    case of like all of these browser forks
  • 00:01:48
    and new Messengers are projects that
  • 00:01:50
    come and go pretty frequently it feels
  • 00:01:53
    like and not a lot of them stick around
  • 00:01:55
    or are taken super seriously in the long
  • 00:01:57
    run and so one of the main things I
  • 00:02:00
    would always look for when looking at
  • 00:02:02
    these projects is like how long they've
  • 00:02:03
    been around how many people are working
  • 00:02:05
    on it um what's their track record and
  • 00:02:08
    florp has no track record because it is
  • 00:02:10
    somewhat new um as far as I know it just
  • 00:02:12
    came out like in the second half last
  • 00:02:14
    year if I remember correctly and that's
  • 00:02:16
    just a couple months of uh history that
  • 00:02:20
    we can't really base anything on so I
  • 00:02:21
    don't know really anything that's going
  • 00:02:24
    on with them I'm pulling up here on the
  • 00:02:26
    techler criteria which is we put like
  • 00:02:28
    lose criteria together for resources
  • 00:02:30
    page and one of them is pass the test of
  • 00:02:33
    time which is number eight and this
  • 00:02:36
    speaks to this because again if I if I
  • 00:02:38
    wasn't like in the in the digital right
  • 00:02:40
    space every single day then I probably
  • 00:02:42
    wouldn't know about like all the
  • 00:02:44
    projects that are constantly coming and
  • 00:02:46
    going but because we receive emails
  • 00:02:48
    every day about this kind of stuff like
  • 00:02:50
    we have to have this rule in place
  • 00:02:52
    because we we something I have to be and
  • 00:02:55
    we get criticized for having very
  • 00:02:56
    critical reviews but I think it's much
  • 00:02:58
    better to put out a critical review and
  • 00:03:00
    properly touch on like the issues of the
  • 00:03:02
    service as well in a review instead of
  • 00:03:04
    just touting like all the benefits of a
  • 00:03:06
    service if that makes sense so um that's
  • 00:03:08
    kind of what we're going for um and yeah
  • 00:03:11
    I think the the downside to that is we
  • 00:03:13
    can't be as quick and we can't make like
  • 00:03:14
    super timely content for new services
  • 00:03:16
    like this but I think it also means we
  • 00:03:18
    generally have a pretty good track
  • 00:03:19
    record and we try to avoid mistakes like
  • 00:03:21
    the thorium
  • 00:03:23
    mistake which yeah yeah like I don't I
  • 00:03:25
    don't I would feel so guilty if I put
  • 00:03:27
    out a video and it like caused literally
  • 00:03:29
    hundreds of thousands of people to like
  • 00:03:31
    start hopping on something and then it
  • 00:03:33
    turns out in 3 months it's like a
  • 00:03:34
    terrible thing to suggest to them so
  • 00:03:36
    freaks me out and again I'm not saying
  • 00:03:37
    that is flp it's just we're going to be
  • 00:03:39
    very patient with florp so again it
  • 00:03:41
    might be fantastic not like I'm not
  • 00:03:43
    hating on it I just want to wait and see
  • 00:03:45
    and be patient with my
  • 00:03:57
    assessment
Tags
  • Firefox
  • Blaz-browser
  • Florp
  • nuwe projekte
  • versigtigheid
  • Thorium
  • digitale technologie
  • evaluering
  • kritiese oorsig
  • betroubaarheid