Election cancellations for 6 million in England can be overturned. This is how.

00:18:23
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gqxV0EzA0ho

Summary

TLDRThe speaker criticizes the UK government's recent cancellation of local elections scheduled for May 1, 2025, in nine areas, calling it an anti-democratic act. They highlight that the Heritage Party is contesting this decision, claiming a lack of public consultation and clarity regarding future authority structures. The speaker outlines the legal framework allowing for potential challenges to this decision, urging citizens to advocate for their democratic rights by contacting MPs. They express concern about the implications of such cancellations on democracy, weaving in broader themes of governance and representation.

Takeaways

  • 🗳️ The UK government has canceled local elections set for May 2025.
  • 🏛️ The areas affected include Sussex, Essex, and Hampshire, totaling around six million voters.
  • 📜 The Heritage Party is challenging this decision through legal means.
  • 🔍 There has been a lack of public consultation regarding future local governance.
  • 💼 Citizens are encouraged to write to MPs to protest the election cancellations.
  • ⚖️ Judicial review is a potential avenue to challenge the cancellation legally.
  • 📆 There’s a 40-day timeline for Parliament to address this statutory order.
  • 💡 Other political parties express concern but are distracted by internal conflicts.
  • 📣 The speaker urges re-engagement in democratic processes.
  • 🔗 More details about this issue can be found on Meline's Substack.

Timeline

  • 00:00:00 - 00:05:00

    The speaker expresses outrage over the UK government's cancellation of local elections set for May 1, 2025, affecting nine areas. They highlight concerns about the lack of democratic process and transparency in this decision, framing it as a violation of democracy which impacts approximately six million people. The Heritage Party's response, led by General Secretary Meline Hunt, includes challenges to the legality of this cancellation through Freedom of Information requests and communications with government officials.

  • 00:05:00 - 00:10:00

    The government claims their authority under the Local Government Act to cancel elections, citing past precedents involving local government restructurings. However, the speaker points out the absence of public consultation or clear plans regarding the new local structures. There are fears that local councils may not exist by the time of the rescheduled elections, sparking discussions about the potential for judicial reviews to challenge the cancellation legally.

  • 00:10:00 - 00:18:23

    The speaker encourages citizens to write to their MPs to oppose the statutory instrument that canceled the elections. They explain the parliamentary procedure for challenging such decisions and express frustration at the lack of action from other political parties. Finally, they advocate for restoring these elections in the affected areas and emphasize the broader trend of governments canceling elections to stifle opposition, calling for continued civic engagement and activism.

Mind Map

Video Q&A

  • What elections were canceled by the UK government?

    Elections scheduled for May 1, 2025, in nine local Council areas were canceled.

  • Which areas are affected by the election cancellations?

    The affected areas include Sussex, Essex, Hampshire, the Isle of Wight, Norfolk, Suffolk, North Yorkshire, and West Sussex.

  • What is the Heritage Party's stance on the cancellation?

    The Heritage Party is challenging the legality of the election cancellations and advocating for democracy.

  • What legal avenues exist to challenge the election cancellation?

    A judicial review may be sought, and MPs or Lords can introduce a motion against the statutory order that canceled the elections.

  • How can citizens respond to the election cancellations?

    Citizens are encouraged to write to their MPs to express their concerns and push for a motion to reinstate the elections.

  • What is the timeline for challenging the cancellation?

    There is a 40-day period from February 11, 2025, to introduce a challenge in Parliament.

  • What implications does this cancellation have on democracy?

    The speaker argues it undermines democratic processes and voter representation.

  • What previous instances were mentioned related to changing election schedules?

    Examples include changes in Buckinghamshire, Dorset, and Northamptonshire due to local government restructuring.

  • What is the general reaction from other political parties?

    Other parties, including Reform, express concern but seem preoccupied with internal conflicts.

  • Where can more information about this issue be found?

    Further details and correspondence from the Heritage Party can be found on Meline's Substack.

View more video summaries

Get instant access to free YouTube video summaries powered by AI!
Subtitles
en
Auto Scroll:
  • 00:00:00
    hello everyone now one of the worst
  • 00:00:02
    things that this labor government this
  • 00:00:04
    sta regime has done and has done many
  • 00:00:07
    terrible things but this is to cancel
  • 00:00:10
    the elections that were due to take
  • 00:00:12
    place in England on the 1st of May 2025
  • 00:00:16
    in nine local Council County areas and
  • 00:00:22
    those Authority areas are here I'm just
  • 00:00:26
    going to put them up on the screen es
  • 00:00:28
    sosex Essex Hampshire the is of white
  • 00:00:31
    Norfolk suffk s thork and West Sussex
  • 00:00:34
    now I think by now you probably know
  • 00:00:37
    that because this is well known it's
  • 00:00:40
    well established it's an absolute
  • 00:00:42
    outrage and it is this government
  • 00:00:44
    cancelling elections which should happen
  • 00:00:47
    and it is anti-democratic from a
  • 00:00:50
    government that continually protest
  • 00:00:52
    there for freedom and democracy where
  • 00:00:54
    they're taking democracy away from
  • 00:00:56
    approximately six million people the
  • 00:00:59
    thing is
  • 00:01:00
    though the Heritage party has been
  • 00:01:03
    challenging this and our fantastic
  • 00:01:06
    General Secretary meline hunt has been
  • 00:01:08
    writing letters and uh requesting
  • 00:01:12
    information through Freedom of
  • 00:01:14
    Information requests and writing to even
  • 00:01:16
    the government Barrister who is trying
  • 00:01:19
    to defend this decision in order to make
  • 00:01:23
    a challenge as to the legality of this
  • 00:01:26
    election
  • 00:01:27
    cancellation and the government has
  • 00:01:29
    written back and it's very very
  • 00:01:32
    interesting uh what they've said now
  • 00:01:34
    meline on behalf of the Heritage party
  • 00:01:37
    wrote to the government on the 6th of
  • 00:01:40
    February um requesting information
  • 00:01:43
    within the normal 14-day period but they
  • 00:01:46
    said well we can't answer within 14 days
  • 00:01:48
    we can answer within about six not six
  • 00:01:51
    weeks four weeks so they responded
  • 00:01:54
    actually finally on the 6th of
  • 00:01:57
    March and uh there's some very
  • 00:02:00
    interesting things in the letter which I
  • 00:02:02
    will just go through here not that one
  • 00:02:04
    sorry I'm going to remove that
  • 00:02:08
    um one of the first things they said in
  • 00:02:11
    the letter was just to to set the scene
  • 00:02:13
    and say that what happened was the
  • 00:02:16
    Secretary of State um for local
  • 00:02:20
    authorities um sorry made the local
  • 00:02:24
    authorities uh changes to years of
  • 00:02:26
    ordinary elections England order 2025
  • 00:02:29
    which was laid before Parliament on the
  • 00:02:32
    11th of February and came into force on
  • 00:02:34
    the 4th of March now the 11th of
  • 00:02:36
    February is an important day to remember
  • 00:02:39
    for um just a few minutes
  • 00:02:42
    time
  • 00:02:44
    and they went on to say well the local
  • 00:02:47
    government act includes Powers available
  • 00:02:51
    to the Secretary of State to alter
  • 00:02:54
    elections uh to by order the scheme of
  • 00:02:57
    Elections to local authorities and the
  • 00:02:59
    years in which elections are held so
  • 00:03:02
    this power has been in law under the
  • 00:03:08
    local author Local Government Act 2000
  • 00:03:11
    uh since the year 2000 and then they say
  • 00:03:14
    well this has been used before in a
  • 00:03:16
    number of cases in 2018 in some
  • 00:03:20
    districts in buckinghamshire and Dorset
  • 00:03:22
    there was some local government
  • 00:03:24
    rearrangement there uh Northampton share
  • 00:03:27
    which was in financial collapse so the
  • 00:03:30
    the county uh was you know was no longer
  • 00:03:34
    viable so they changed the structure of
  • 00:03:36
    government in Northampton sh in 2018 as
  • 00:03:39
    well and also then they say Cumbria
  • 00:03:41
    North Yorkshire and Somerset in 2021 the
  • 00:03:45
    thing with these is that apart from
  • 00:03:48
    Northampton Shire which was in financial
  • 00:03:50
    collapse the other places there were
  • 00:03:53
    already consultations and discussions
  • 00:03:57
    going on for a very long long time
  • 00:04:00
    before that for example in Somerset they
  • 00:04:03
    postponed the elections from 2021 to
  • 00:04:06
    2022 but there were already
  • 00:04:09
    consultations going on as to what would
  • 00:04:11
    happen in Somerset from 2018 so they'd
  • 00:04:14
    already had three years of discussions
  • 00:04:16
    about what was going to happen in
  • 00:04:18
    Somerset they postponed the elections
  • 00:04:20
    for a year but they knew what was going
  • 00:04:22
    to happen afterwards or was pretty
  • 00:04:24
    certain what was going to happen
  • 00:04:26
    afterwards anyway in terms of
  • 00:04:28
    restructuring the local government now
  • 00:04:30
    the thing the difference between then
  • 00:04:33
    those examples that they've just given
  • 00:04:34
    and now is that they've just suddenly
  • 00:04:38
    said we're going to cancel elections in
  • 00:04:40
    these nine areas um but there's been no
  • 00:04:44
    discussion as to what's going to take
  • 00:04:46
    place the the government's Minister
  • 00:04:49
    Angela Raina has just been saying well
  • 00:04:51
    we're going to have unitary authorities
  • 00:04:53
    here but they don't know what the uni
  • 00:04:56
    authorities are going to be are they
  • 00:04:57
    going to be councils are they going to
  • 00:04:59
    be districts are they going to be uh a
  • 00:05:02
    mix of the two larger districts are they
  • 00:05:04
    going to get rid of the councils and
  • 00:05:06
    have four or five unitary authorities
  • 00:05:09
    within each Council or are they going to
  • 00:05:10
    just have the county as the unitary
  • 00:05:13
    Authority no one knows no one's been
  • 00:05:16
    consulted in the public at all they've
  • 00:05:18
    had some you know very very uh
  • 00:05:21
    rudimentary consultations with
  • 00:05:24
    counselors and a lot of them we
  • 00:05:26
    understand are acting out of their own
  • 00:05:28
    self-interest because some of them think
  • 00:05:30
    well we're County councilors we'll go
  • 00:05:32
    along with this because we're going to
  • 00:05:34
    be in control of more and then we'll get
  • 00:05:37
    a larger stien and more power and
  • 00:05:39
    particularly the leaders of the councils
  • 00:05:41
    who actually believe that they're going
  • 00:05:43
    to be these new mayors they're going to
  • 00:05:46
    have to have a position as the new
  • 00:05:47
    Regional mayors of the council and
  • 00:05:50
    they're going to be able to employ lots
  • 00:05:51
    of staff so a lot of people are angling
  • 00:05:55
    to get a job and a position and finance
  • 00:05:57
    and a salary in whatever comes
  • 00:06:00
    afterwards not acting in the interests
  • 00:06:02
    of the people and providing the best
  • 00:06:04
    public services to um the people who are
  • 00:06:07
    going to be affected by these changes in
  • 00:06:10
    the council areas where they have
  • 00:06:12
    postponed as they say but actually
  • 00:06:15
    cancelled the elections because we don't
  • 00:06:17
    know what's going to come afterwards if
  • 00:06:19
    these uh local County authorities are
  • 00:06:22
    even going to exist afterwards anyway
  • 00:06:26
    section 87 just to to show you this
  • 00:06:29
    actually is um a law this is section 87
  • 00:06:32
    of the Local Government Act 2000 it does
  • 00:06:36
    actually say here the Secretary of State
  • 00:06:38
    May by order make provision uh which
  • 00:06:41
    changes the years in which the ordinary
  • 00:06:43
    elections of councils of any specified
  • 00:06:46
    local Authority are to be held but which
  • 00:06:48
    does not change the scheme which
  • 00:06:50
    prevails bar for the ordinary elections
  • 00:06:53
    of those councilors the thing is if they
  • 00:06:55
    they're replacing the councils you know
  • 00:06:57
    you could argue that the scheme is going
  • 00:06:59
    to change you know if they're going from
  • 00:07:03
    um you having thirds and halves
  • 00:07:08
    elections every year apart from one two
  • 00:07:10
    elections every four years but um you
  • 00:07:12
    know that's a moot
  • 00:07:14
    point um the order that's been made as
  • 00:07:17
    you can see it here it's the local
  • 00:07:19
    authorities changes to years of ordinary
  • 00:07:22
    elections England order 2025 and it
  • 00:07:25
    actually says there they're postponing
  • 00:07:27
    the elections for one year the the
  • 00:07:29
    elections that would have been held in
  • 00:07:31
    2025 are going to be held in 2026 but we
  • 00:07:34
    don't know that that's the thing we
  • 00:07:37
    don't actually know this because there
  • 00:07:39
    hasn't been any consultation as to
  • 00:07:41
    whether these councils are actually
  • 00:07:43
    going to have even exist in 2026 to have
  • 00:07:47
    elections or or not or even if the
  • 00:07:51
    changes to the local government are
  • 00:07:52
    going to be ready by 2026 because there
  • 00:07:55
    hasn't been any consultation with the
  • 00:07:57
    public whatsoever as to what public
  • 00:07:59
    wants so if there were to be a judicial
  • 00:08:03
    review and that could happen then you
  • 00:08:07
    may be able to challenge this order on
  • 00:08:10
    the basis that we don't know whether
  • 00:08:12
    these councils are still going to exist
  • 00:08:14
    and there's been absolutely no
  • 00:08:16
    discussion and consultation as to what
  • 00:08:19
    will replace them so we don't know if
  • 00:08:22
    the local government reorganization that
  • 00:08:25
    Angela Raina wants will actually be
  • 00:08:27
    complete in time to hold
  • 00:08:30
    elections in whatever new or unitary
  • 00:08:32
    Authority she said she wants by 2026
  • 00:08:35
    because the discussions and
  • 00:08:37
    consultations may not have finished by
  • 00:08:39
    then so then you may have to have
  • 00:08:42
    another delay in elections until 2027 or
  • 00:08:46
    2028 which would really um make a
  • 00:08:49
    mockery of democracy I mean I don't
  • 00:08:51
    think that this order should should
  • 00:08:52
    stand if there were a judicial review um
  • 00:08:56
    on the basis that they don't actually
  • 00:08:57
    know what they're going to to replace
  • 00:09:00
    these councils with because it's all
  • 00:09:02
    chaotic and up in the air and just being
  • 00:09:04
    done essentially on a whim without any
  • 00:09:07
    plan whatsoever it's being rushed
  • 00:09:09
    through without any plan or any thought
  • 00:09:11
    for local people um the trouble with
  • 00:09:14
    judicial reviews of course is that
  • 00:09:16
    they're very expensive to do I think
  • 00:09:18
    they cost at least
  • 00:09:20
    £5,000 um you know I don't have the
  • 00:09:22
    money to actually enact a judicial
  • 00:09:25
    review but you would think you know
  • 00:09:26
    people who try to speak out of about
  • 00:09:29
    this who've got a bit more money might
  • 00:09:31
    actually you know challenge this with a
  • 00:09:33
    judicial review there's still time
  • 00:09:36
    because the nomination period for the
  • 00:09:39
    2025 elections uh doesn't begin
  • 00:09:42
    officially until the 26th of March or
  • 00:09:45
    thereabouts and closes on the 2nd of
  • 00:09:48
    April so you could have a judicial
  • 00:09:51
    review um before the election process
  • 00:09:55
    begins the other thing about this that
  • 00:09:57
    they wrote which is very interesting
  • 00:09:59
    interesting is that they said well this
  • 00:10:02
    order has been
  • 00:10:04
    laid under a statutory instrument so the
  • 00:10:07
    Local Government Act 2000 allows Angela
  • 00:10:11
    Raina who's the Secretary of State to
  • 00:10:12
    make an order that I just showed you
  • 00:10:15
    which is a statutory instrument a piece
  • 00:10:16
    of secondary legislation and the
  • 00:10:19
    statutory instrument is subject to the
  • 00:10:22
    negative procedure and as it is there is
  • 00:10:24
    a 40-day period in which the order can
  • 00:10:27
    be prayed against in in
  • 00:10:30
    Parliament so remember I said Remember
  • 00:10:33
    the 11th of February which is when the
  • 00:10:35
    order was was laid uh and it came into
  • 00:10:39
    effect on the 4th of March so there are
  • 00:10:42
    40 days and this is a 40 sitting days
  • 00:10:46
    with a five day sitting week in
  • 00:10:48
    Parliament that actually gives you eight
  • 00:10:50
    weeks to challenge the order so an MP or
  • 00:10:56
    a lord can challenge this order
  • 00:11:00
    and seek a motion with a vote in
  • 00:11:03
    Parliament and if the vote has more
  • 00:11:07
    votes against it then for it then the
  • 00:11:09
    order will become null and void from the
  • 00:11:13
    parliament's website this sort of
  • 00:11:16
    explains the procedure a negative
  • 00:11:18
    procedure it's a type of parliamentary
  • 00:11:20
    procedure that applies to statutary
  • 00:11:22
    instruments Etc um a statutory
  • 00:11:25
    instrument laid under negative procedure
  • 00:11:27
    becomes lore on the day the minister
  • 00:11:29
    signs it so I believe that was the 4th
  • 00:11:32
    of March but it actually came into force
  • 00:11:34
    in law and automatically remains law
  • 00:11:37
    unless a motion or prayer to reject it
  • 00:11:39
    is agreed by either house within 40
  • 00:11:42
    sitting days so either the commons or
  • 00:11:46
    the
  • 00:11:48
    Lords can reject this order to cancel
  • 00:11:53
    the elections and all it would need for
  • 00:11:55
    a motion to happen is one MP or one Lord
  • 00:12:00
    in either house to pray against the
  • 00:12:04
    order or to introduce a motion either to
  • 00:12:07
    the commons or the Lords um asking for
  • 00:12:11
    it to be
  • 00:12:13
    um made null and void this is from
  • 00:12:16
    parliament's website as well talking
  • 00:12:18
    about a prayer motion against a
  • 00:12:20
    statutory instrument uh a prayer motion
  • 00:12:22
    can be used by members of either house
  • 00:12:24
    to object to a statutary instrument a
  • 00:12:27
    motion to seek the over turn or emotion
  • 00:12:30
    sorry seeking to overturn a negative
  • 00:12:33
    instrument will include the wording that
  • 00:12:35
    a humble address be presented to his
  • 00:12:37
    majesty praying that the instrument be
  • 00:12:41
    annuled
  • 00:12:43
    so um what someone can do then an MP or
  • 00:12:47
    a lord is introduce a motion against
  • 00:12:50
    this statutory instrument that cancels
  • 00:12:52
    the elections and if there are more
  • 00:12:55
    Lords if it's in the House of Lords or
  • 00:12:57
    more MPS in the house of commment
  • 00:13:00
    against the order than for it then it
  • 00:13:02
    falls and the elections will have to go
  • 00:13:04
    ahead because the secondary legislation
  • 00:13:07
    that Angela Raina laid will be declared
  • 00:13:10
    null and void if this happens within 40
  • 00:13:13
    days of the 11th of Fe February and thus
  • 00:13:17
    MPS and Lords have the power
  • 00:13:19
    collectively to overturn the
  • 00:13:21
    cancellation of the elections now I
  • 00:13:23
    haven't heard anyone talking about this
  • 00:13:27
    at all um and that there is a
  • 00:13:29
    possibility to overturn this in
  • 00:13:32
    Parliament and you know you have other
  • 00:13:35
    parties after the Heritage party such as
  • 00:13:38
    reform they say oh this is terrible the
  • 00:13:41
    elections are being cancelled it affects
  • 00:13:43
    us well it affects all the Challenger
  • 00:13:45
    parties it's very clear that the reason
  • 00:13:47
    that they're doing this is because they
  • 00:13:50
    don't want any Challenger parties to to
  • 00:13:52
    make ground and get counselors in this
  • 00:13:56
    year's elections the Heritage party is
  • 00:13:58
    very very affected by this because we
  • 00:14:01
    had a lot of candidates in the areas
  • 00:14:04
    where the elections have been cancelled
  • 00:14:05
    like Sussex and Su and Hampshire and
  • 00:14:08
    Essex for example uh we we still do have
  • 00:14:11
    a lot of candidates in Kent and Devon
  • 00:14:13
    and other places but we had a lot in
  • 00:14:15
    those areas where the elections are
  • 00:14:17
    being cancelled a reform have said the
  • 00:14:19
    same but they seem to be more interested
  • 00:14:21
    in fighting each other now they've
  • 00:14:23
    collapsed into you know fighting like
  • 00:14:27
    rats in a sack that they're not really
  • 00:14:29
    focused on the game but it's not the
  • 00:14:32
    game but they're not focused on the
  • 00:14:33
    political process even though they're
  • 00:14:35
    they're saying that they are so it's
  • 00:14:37
    taken the Heritage party it's taken uh
  • 00:14:40
    our general secretary meline to write uh
  • 00:14:42
    and get this information from the
  • 00:14:44
    government I mean if you know the
  • 00:14:46
    Parliamentary process very well yeah you
  • 00:14:48
    you would know all about statutory
  • 00:14:51
    instruments and things but in how it
  • 00:14:53
    works but it was very useful to get the
  • 00:14:55
    explanation and actually to see there
  • 00:14:58
    the government Barrister their own
  • 00:15:00
    Barrister for the Department of Housing
  • 00:15:03
    communities and local government
  • 00:15:05
    actually admitting that there is a way
  • 00:15:07
    to overturn this election cancellation
  • 00:15:10
    what they also go on to suggest in the
  • 00:15:12
    letter is that if you are concerned
  • 00:15:15
    about this and they're speaking to
  • 00:15:17
    Heritage party members here mainly but
  • 00:15:19
    this could apply to anybody who's
  • 00:15:21
    concerned about election cancellations
  • 00:15:23
    is right to your MPS um so that if there
  • 00:15:27
    is a motion uh against this order then
  • 00:15:30
    they can be in the chamber and vote
  • 00:15:32
    against it but I haven't heard any MP
  • 00:15:35
    from any party in Parliament uh actually
  • 00:15:38
    make any noise at all not a single
  • 00:15:43
    statement about the possibility of
  • 00:15:46
    getting these elections cancelled but
  • 00:15:48
    you know if people have spoken about it
  • 00:15:50
    and just you spoken about it on social
  • 00:15:53
    media there who are MPS and who are
  • 00:15:57
    Lords um
  • 00:15:59
    then they can actually take action uh so
  • 00:16:02
    it would be very interesting to see you
  • 00:16:05
    know the people who do have those
  • 00:16:06
    positions whether they will decide to uh
  • 00:16:10
    pre against this uh statutory instrument
  • 00:16:13
    and try to get our elections reinstated
  • 00:16:17
    and uncancelled because there has to be
  • 00:16:20
    done now um because if they leave it
  • 00:16:23
    after the the nomination periods begin
  • 00:16:27
    then obviously the the time t
  • 00:16:29
    uh will change and you can't have them
  • 00:16:32
    on the scheduled day and the government
  • 00:16:35
    gets its way the government which is
  • 00:16:36
    acting against democracy so we shall see
  • 00:16:39
    obviously if the Heritage party had an
  • 00:16:42
    MP we would have been on this straight
  • 00:16:44
    away uh we have been in in writing these
  • 00:16:47
    Freedom of Information requests and now
  • 00:16:49
    we know uh we wouldn't waste a second in
  • 00:16:51
    praying against this uh statutory
  • 00:16:55
    instrument whether anyone else does or
  • 00:16:57
    not I don't know but if you do
  • 00:16:59
    uh have concerns about this what I would
  • 00:17:02
    suggest is you write to your MPS and
  • 00:17:06
    tell them about this the letters which
  • 00:17:09
    uh We've written to the department uh
  • 00:17:13
    and the letters we've got back from the
  • 00:17:15
    Department barister are on meline
  • 00:17:18
    substack and I'll leave a link to that
  • 00:17:20
    uh in the um the social media platforms
  • 00:17:24
    where I can leave links and uh obviously
  • 00:17:28
    I'll put this on right think TV and uh
  • 00:17:31
    you can see the link there if you look
  • 00:17:33
    at this uh video watch it there and I
  • 00:17:36
    can put a little bit more written name
  • 00:17:38
    explanation about what's going on on uh
  • 00:17:41
    on right think. TV so have a look there
  • 00:17:44
    um if you can't see the the link to uh
  • 00:17:47
    meline substack on uh the channel you're
  • 00:17:50
    watching if you're watching on X or
  • 00:17:52
    something I can't put a lot of
  • 00:17:53
    characters but you can watch the video
  • 00:17:55
    anyway so thank you for listening let's
  • 00:17:58
    hope that we can can get these uh
  • 00:18:00
    elections reinstated in these nine areas
  • 00:18:02
    because it's absolutely outrageous that
  • 00:18:04
    governments now not just in the UK it's
  • 00:18:07
    happening in Romania it's happening in
  • 00:18:09
    other places um governments are
  • 00:18:11
    cancelling elections because they want
  • 00:18:13
    to keep out people who who are
  • 00:18:15
    challenging uh the globalist agendas and
  • 00:18:18
    we need to carry on doing that anyway
  • 00:18:19
    thank you for listening everyone and God
  • 00:18:21
    bless you all
Tags
  • UK government
  • elections
  • democracy
  • Heritage Party
  • local authorities
  • statutory instruments
  • judicial review
  • public consultation
  • political challenge
  • Freedom of Information