Hsu Untied interview with Jake Kling, Partner at Wachtell Lipton

00:14:49
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ItDuDoQbseY

Summary

TLDRRichard Shu interviews Jake Cing, highlighting his transition from a unique undergraduate major in mathematical economics to a successful career in law. Jake was drawn to math due to his father's influence and had a notable academic journey at Brown University, gaining insights through courses like real analysis. A pivotal summer internship at Merrill Lynch led him to discover a passion for legal work, especially concerning corporate law and hostile takeovers. Despite his math-centric background, Jake found parallels between the precision required in both math and law. Now a partner at a law firm, he engages his mathematical skills in legal contexts, particularly in mergers and acquisitions. The conversation also touches on personal aspects, such as his family life and limited hobbies due to his young children, illustrating a well-rounded and thoughtful career path.

Takeaways

  • 🎓 Jake Cing majored in mathematical economics, blending math and economics.
  • 🔄 Transitioned from finance interest to a legal career after an internship.
  • 📚 Fascinated by a real analysis course, paralleling legal analytical precision.
  • 👔 Utilizes mathematical skills in corporate law for complex legal drafting.
  • 👨‍⚖️ Finds parallels between mathematical proofs and legal logic.
  • 🤝 Worked at Merrill Lynch focusing on legal aspects of hostile takeovers.
  • 🏫 Attended Brown University, renowned for its flexible curriculum.
  • 👶 Balancing career with family life, raising young twins.
  • 🎯 Precision is key in both math and legal professions.
  • 🗣 Supported by his corporate lawyer father throughout his career choices.

Timeline

  • 00:00:00 - 00:05:00

    Richard Shu interviews Jake Cing, a partner at Wtel Lipon, discussing Jake's unique undergraduate degree in mathematical economics. The degree combined elements of math and economics, with Jake explaining how his interest in math started young, inspired by his father who pursued a PhD in math before switching to law. Jake attended Brown University, taking advantage of its flexible curriculum to explore subjects he was passionate about, such as microeconomics and advanced calculus. He pursued classes up to real analysis, which, although challenging, fascinated him and drew parallels with the analytical rigor found in law.

  • 00:05:00 - 00:14:49

    Jake discusses his decision to pursue a career in law after realizing, during a finance internship at Merrill Lynch, that his interest lay more in the legal aspects of finance. This led him to take the LSAT and apply to law school soon after college. Although Jake’s initial career goal was unclear, he found law appealing due to its precision and logical structure akin to mathematics, which offered him a smoother transition into and success in corporate law and M&A. Despite his father's influence as a corporate lawyer, Jake made independent career choices, and values the supportive role his father played. Though no longer much engaged in mathematical pursuits, Jake appreciates how his background provides a substantial advantage in his legal practice.

Mind Map

Video Q&A

  • What was Jake Cing's undergraduate major?

    Jake Cing majored in mathematical economics, a hybrid of math and economics.

  • How did Jake decide to pursue law school?

    Jake decided to pursue law school after a summer internship where he found more legal interest in finance work, including evaluating hostile takeover defenses.

  • Did Jake write a thesis in college?

    No, Jake did not write a thesis in college.

  • How did Jake's father influence his career decisions?

    Jake's father, a corporate lawyer, provided support and insight, encouraging him to explore different career paths.

  • What connection does Jake see between math and law?

    Jake finds that both math and law require precision, logical structuring, and analytical rigor.

  • What advanced math courses did Jake take?

    Jake took linear algebra, differential equations, and a real analysis course which was proof-based.

  • Why did Jake enjoy the course on real analysis?

    Jake appreciated the rigorous, logical system, which paralleled legal practice in its focus on proof and analytical precision.

  • What hobbies does Jake currently pursue?

    Currently, Jake mostly spends time with his family, including his young twins, given his busy schedule.

  • Does Jake apply math in his law career?

    Yes, Jake uses mathematical skills in corporate law, particularly in drafting complex contractual agreements and handling financial issues.

  • What did Jake enjoy about his internship at Merrill Lynch?

    Jake enjoyed working on a legal-focused project around hostile takeover defenses, which sparked his interest in law.

View more video summaries

Get instant access to free YouTube video summaries powered by AI!
Subtitles
en
Auto Scroll:
  • 00:00:00
    [Music]
  • 00:00:07
    okay good afternoon this is Richard Shu
  • 00:00:10
    host of Shu untied today I'm very
  • 00:00:12
    pleased and thrilled to have with me as
  • 00:00:14
    my guest Jake cing who's a partner at
  • 00:00:16
    wtel lipon Jake welcome to the program
  • 00:00:20
    thanks Richard thanks for having me now
  • 00:00:22
    Jake you definitely have one of the more
  • 00:00:24
    unusual undergraduate degrees I have
  • 00:00:26
    come across and so I want to ask you it
  • 00:00:28
    was a looks like a ree in mathematical
  • 00:00:31
    econ but it sounds like it's probably
  • 00:00:32
    mostly math tell me a little bit about
  • 00:00:35
    why you chose that major and and so
  • 00:00:38
    forth yeah sure it's um sort of a hybrid
  • 00:00:42
    between math and you about half math
  • 00:00:44
    half
  • 00:00:46
    economics um when I was growing up I
  • 00:00:49
    always liked math in high school um my
  • 00:00:52
    dad actually was going for a PhD in math
  • 00:00:56
    and ended up dropping out to become a
  • 00:00:58
    corporate lawyer so so I followed a
  • 00:01:00
    similar path um but I was never as as
  • 00:01:04
    hardcore as he was he would be like
  • 00:01:06
    reading math textbooks on on the beach
  • 00:01:08
    on vacations when I was a kid uh I went
  • 00:01:11
    to I went to Brown where you know it's
  • 00:01:14
    sort of like make your own adventure um
  • 00:01:18
    there's not a lot of course requirements
  • 00:01:20
    so that that created flexibility to take
  • 00:01:23
    what you were interested in uh and when
  • 00:01:25
    I was a freshman I took class in
  • 00:01:29
    microeconomics
  • 00:01:30
    uh which I found fascinating and I took
  • 00:01:33
    um I think it was an advanced Calculus
  • 00:01:36
    class which you know that was sort of
  • 00:01:38
    similar to what I've been studying um in
  • 00:01:40
    high school and I discovered this vager
  • 00:01:43
    that was out there that was sort of half
  • 00:01:45
    math uh half economics and uh and and I
  • 00:01:50
    ended up pursuing it it it was a great
  • 00:01:53
    it was a great mix of both yeah well how
  • 00:01:55
    far did your math side of the classes go
  • 00:01:58
    how advanced did you get
  • 00:02:00
    yeah uh it's a good question Advanced
  • 00:02:03
    enough to know it was time to stop um I
  • 00:02:08
    I took um I took linear algebra I took
  • 00:02:12
    differential equations a couple
  • 00:02:14
    statistics and econometric classes and
  • 00:02:17
    then I took um this class real analysis
  • 00:02:21
    which um which was um kind basically
  • 00:02:26
    sort of the first really hardcore pure
  • 00:02:29
    math class where it's just proof based
  • 00:02:31
    yeah and you're essentially proving the
  • 00:02:34
    the theorems that are the Bedrock of
  • 00:02:36
    calculus yeah and and I found that class
  • 00:02:41
    fascinating uh it I did come away with
  • 00:02:44
    it thinking that was as far as I could
  • 00:02:46
    as I could uh continue in pure math but
  • 00:02:50
    it it it also actually in an odd way
  • 00:02:52
    turned me on to um the law in some ways
  • 00:02:57
    because it was a very analytic LLY
  • 00:03:00
    rigorous um course it was probably the
  • 00:03:02
    hardest class I've ever taken in you
  • 00:03:04
    know any level of Education including
  • 00:03:06
    law school you had to prove everything
  • 00:03:09
    you took nothing for granted um and in
  • 00:03:12
    some ways that that there's some
  • 00:03:15
    similarities to um to sort of The
  • 00:03:18
    Logical system that the law that the law
  • 00:03:21
    strives to be um and so I found that to
  • 00:03:24
    be a fascinating class that's that's as
  • 00:03:27
    far as I took math and then on the
  • 00:03:29
    economics side it was um I I took a lot
  • 00:03:32
    of Economics classes they tended to be
  • 00:03:34
    the more kind of quantitative or math
  • 00:03:38
    oriented um classes so a lot of game
  • 00:03:41
    theory a lot of advanced microeconomics
  • 00:03:44
    econometrics TCH CL type classes I take
  • 00:03:47
    it you didn't write any thesis or
  • 00:03:49
    anything like that or any any thesis in
  • 00:03:50
    college I didn't write I don't think I
  • 00:03:52
    wrote one in college um yeah I wrote
  • 00:03:55
    papers in law school but but yeah not in
  • 00:03:58
    college yeah well when did you make the
  • 00:04:00
    cut over to law school or when did you
  • 00:04:02
    decide that you want to go to law
  • 00:04:04
    school yeah it's a it's a good question
  • 00:04:07
    I was um I think it was probably the
  • 00:04:12
    summer after my um junior year of
  • 00:04:16
    college I I spent a summer so I was I
  • 00:04:20
    was interested in math and
  • 00:04:22
    economics um and and but I was also
  • 00:04:25
    interested in the law I took a class uh
  • 00:04:28
    on Law and E economics at Brown and uh
  • 00:04:32
    and I found that fascinating it was
  • 00:04:35
    learning about how the law could impact
  • 00:04:39
    economic ordering Financial transactions
  • 00:04:42
    study things like the co theorem and
  • 00:04:45
    which
  • 00:04:47
    which the theory under the co theorem is
  • 00:04:51
    that in a there are no transaction costs
  • 00:04:54
    or externalities than um than the the
  • 00:04:57
    distribution of legal rights
  • 00:05:00
    um is irrelevant you know to that the
  • 00:05:03
    parties will bargain for the ultimate or
  • 00:05:05
    whatever is the fishing outcome then you
  • 00:05:08
    look at you know how um that may not
  • 00:05:11
    hold and there are transaction costs and
  • 00:05:13
    so the law does in fact affect um
  • 00:05:16
    economic efficiency so that got Meed in
  • 00:05:18
    the law but but I I spent a summer um
  • 00:05:22
    trying out a job in finance and I worked
  • 00:05:25
    at at um what was then Merl Lynch in
  • 00:05:27
    their m&a group uh in Investment Banking
  • 00:05:31
    and it was a great job I had a ton of
  • 00:05:34
    fun the most interesting thing that I
  • 00:05:37
    did though was a defensive profile for a
  • 00:05:40
    for a company that was we were
  • 00:05:41
    evaluating the context of a possible
  • 00:05:44
    hostile takeover offer and I found that
  • 00:05:47
    what I was doing was really more legal
  • 00:05:50
    work than it was kind of traditional
  • 00:05:52
    Finance or Investment Banking work it
  • 00:05:54
    was analyzing the company's Charter and
  • 00:05:57
    bylaws looking at their take take over
  • 00:06:00
    to defenses mapping out sequentially how
  • 00:06:04
    a how a hostile approach might proceed
  • 00:06:06
    and and what the what the responses
  • 00:06:10
    could be to different Avenues of attack
  • 00:06:13
    um so that that project really turned me
  • 00:06:16
    on to um to to law school and then I and
  • 00:06:20
    then I took the elad and decided to go
  • 00:06:22
    to law school right out of college so
  • 00:06:25
    before you made that decision what was
  • 00:06:26
    your career what was your career goal or
  • 00:06:28
    did you have one before
  • 00:06:30
    that I I think at that point I was
  • 00:06:32
    probably too young to really have a have
  • 00:06:35
    a specific career goal in mind but you
  • 00:06:38
    know I I thought um I thought Investment
  • 00:06:41
    Banking would be interesting that you
  • 00:06:43
    know again I'd like Finance I like
  • 00:06:45
    Corporate Finance in college um it
  • 00:06:48
    appealed to sort of the mathematical and
  • 00:06:51
    and economic side of my
  • 00:06:54
    education um
  • 00:06:56
    and that's probably the path that I
  • 00:06:59
    would have gone down had I not had I not
  • 00:07:01
    gone to college uh to law school but uh
  • 00:07:05
    but again after that summer experience I
  • 00:07:07
    sort of decided law school was um was
  • 00:07:10
    the right choice for me did your dad
  • 00:07:12
    help you in that decision did you
  • 00:07:14
    consult with him at all since he I asse
  • 00:07:15
    he had been a corporate lawyer at this
  • 00:07:17
    point in his career yeah yeah he was at
  • 00:07:19
    that point still practicing he's retired
  • 00:07:21
    now but um yeah I did and and he was
  • 00:07:24
    very
  • 00:07:26
    um he's always been very um Sur
  • 00:07:29
    supportive but also not not pushing me
  • 00:07:33
    in any One Direction and I think he he
  • 00:07:36
    he wanted me to explore different career
  • 00:07:38
    paths and he obviously you know spent a
  • 00:07:41
    lot of time with investment bankers and
  • 00:07:44
    many of them are former lawyers
  • 00:07:46
    especially kind his generation that was
  • 00:07:48
    more common um career trajectory to go
  • 00:07:51
    from law to into Investment Banking um
  • 00:07:54
    so I think you know he he was
  • 00:07:57
    encouraging both the trying other things
  • 00:07:59
    and then when I ultimately decided that
  • 00:08:01
    law school um you know made sense he was
  • 00:08:04
    very supportive of that too did you ever
  • 00:08:06
    talk math with your
  • 00:08:08
    dad
  • 00:08:10
    um it's been a long time but uh he we I
  • 00:08:17
    I will I will confess to getting maybe a
  • 00:08:19
    little bit of help from him in that real
  • 00:08:21
    analysis class you know 20 years ago he
  • 00:08:24
    he was at a different level I mean he he
  • 00:08:27
    he has a masters in pure math he was
  • 00:08:29
    yeah he was doing a PhD before he
  • 00:08:32
    dropped out so you know he he was um
  • 00:08:36
    he's kind of like a math freak I was
  • 00:08:38
    just good at math but not exceptional
  • 00:08:42
    yeah um but yeah we would it's been a
  • 00:08:44
    long time but back in the day we we
  • 00:08:46
    would occasionally talk talk proofs yeah
  • 00:08:49
    that's pretty funny what just as the
  • 00:08:51
    side what was do you know what his PhD
  • 00:08:53
    was or what was his what was his field
  • 00:08:54
    of specialty yeah his specialty was uh
  • 00:08:58
    was algebra abstra
  • 00:09:00
    yeah yeah interesting now I think I read
  • 00:09:02
    on your bio you had one of the highest
  • 00:09:04
    gpas or something in your major in your
  • 00:09:06
    college is that is that what GPA was
  • 00:09:09
    that is that record still hold
  • 00:09:11
    today um yeah it was well I had I had a
  • 00:09:16
    4.0 GPA I don't think it's a record
  • 00:09:19
    because I think that other people it's a
  • 00:09:21
    shared record I guess so um so it yeah
  • 00:09:25
    it it probably hasn't been beaten
  • 00:09:27
    because it because
  • 00:09:29
    unless they introduced a different
  • 00:09:31
    grading system it couldn't be beaten but
  • 00:09:32
    I don't think I held it uniquely um and
  • 00:09:35
    you know it was brown so it it's kind of
  • 00:09:37
    like everything was a little wishy-washy
  • 00:09:40
    yeah there probably thousands of
  • 00:09:42
    people who hold it but uh no I like I
  • 00:09:46
    really like school I mean it it I like I
  • 00:09:50
    like law school too
  • 00:09:52
    um I've always just loved uh being a
  • 00:09:55
    student well compared to you know doing
  • 00:09:57
    math and econ what did did you find law
  • 00:09:59
    school you know easy different I mean
  • 00:10:02
    what was your something very easy to
  • 00:10:04
    adjust to or was it kind of difficult at
  • 00:10:06
    first yeah it
  • 00:10:10
    um I I didn't find it easy but but I I
  • 00:10:13
    would say I thought my training was
  • 00:10:17
    actually quite helpful maybe
  • 00:10:19
    counterintuitively for law school and I
  • 00:10:21
    also took history classes and political
  • 00:10:23
    science classes so it's you know I
  • 00:10:25
    didn't only take kind of quantitative
  • 00:10:28
    classes but um I I think there are
  • 00:10:31
    actually a lot of similarities between
  • 00:10:34
    between math and maybe even pure math
  • 00:10:37
    especially and the law and it's not a
  • 00:10:40
    Perfect Analogy by any means but there's
  • 00:10:43
    a
  • 00:10:44
    certain a few respects one just
  • 00:10:47
    Precision I mean Precision is critically
  • 00:10:49
    important in both math and the law right
  • 00:10:53
    in math you know if you you don't get
  • 00:10:57
    any credit in in higher math for getting
  • 00:10:59
    to the right answer if you miss a step
  • 00:11:01
    in the proof you have you really have to
  • 00:11:03
    hit you know your your reasoning and
  • 00:11:06
    your the progression of your logic has
  • 00:11:08
    to be um has to be perfect and you know
  • 00:11:12
    in the law every word matters um the
  • 00:11:16
    process for how you reach a result
  • 00:11:18
    matters you know in a in a negotiation
  • 00:11:22
    you know in um in drafting an agreement
  • 00:11:26
    U so I think the Precision is sort of is
  • 00:11:28
    common between the two
  • 00:11:30
    and and then just this this idea of sort
  • 00:11:33
    of being a logical system I mean you
  • 00:11:35
    know math is all about logic and uh and
  • 00:11:41
    the law strives to be a logical system I
  • 00:11:45
    mean it it breaks down and it and it
  • 00:11:47
    fails in its efforts but you know that
  • 00:11:50
    that is kind of what the law uh aspires
  • 00:11:53
    to and so I think that um just the
  • 00:11:57
    analytical rigor of the two you know I
  • 00:11:59
    think it I think sh a lot of
  • 00:12:02
    similarities in that um and so I think
  • 00:12:05
    the training was helpful obviously
  • 00:12:07
    there's a lot more reading in law school
  • 00:12:09
    than you know than in than in math and
  • 00:12:11
    economics classes so you kind of need to
  • 00:12:13
    get comfortable with with that volume of
  • 00:12:17
    you know of um reading words instead of
  • 00:12:20
    numbers and symbols yeah but uh but I
  • 00:12:22
    yeah it wasn't it was a pretty smooth
  • 00:12:24
    adjustment for me well you've obviously
  • 00:12:26
    had a very successful career as a lawyer
  • 00:12:28
    I take your you're pleased with your
  • 00:12:30
    career decision it was a good decision
  • 00:12:31
    to switch to
  • 00:12:32
    law uh I think it's been the right
  • 00:12:34
    decision for me um you know it's it's
  • 00:12:38
    been a great career so far and you know
  • 00:12:42
    I've got a long ways to go hopefully uh
  • 00:12:46
    but uh yeah and look it's not like I sit
  • 00:12:49
    here you know um accessing my old math
  • 00:12:53
    textbooks but but I do think that some
  • 00:12:56
    of those skills you know have proved
  • 00:12:59
    even directly relevant in my practice I
  • 00:13:01
    mean I do corporate law m&a and it's
  • 00:13:06
    it's not uncommon for you know it's not
  • 00:13:09
    real analysis but but for for
  • 00:13:12
    mathematical issues and financial issues
  • 00:13:15
    to come up in our transactions and
  • 00:13:18
    having some facility and fluency with
  • 00:13:21
    that I think has been very helpful
  • 00:13:23
    whether it's a purchase price adjustment
  • 00:13:25
    provision in a in a contract that can
  • 00:13:28
    get fairly complicated it usually
  • 00:13:30
    converting you know what what might be a
  • 00:13:33
    formula to words in a contract um you
  • 00:13:36
    know or a working capital dispute um you
  • 00:13:40
    know in in certain transactions so I
  • 00:13:43
    think having having that background has
  • 00:13:45
    been has been helpful to me yeah I was
  • 00:13:48
    going to say do you do anything else on
  • 00:13:49
    the side or any other hobbies that maybe
  • 00:13:51
    scratch that mathematical itch for
  • 00:13:53
    you not much to be honest with you
  • 00:13:56
    anymore I mean I um I have
  • 00:13:59
    I have two and a half-year-old twins so
  • 00:14:01
    most of my hobbies have have gone out
  • 00:14:04
    the door for for the last few years um
  • 00:14:07
    we uh I spend most of my free time
  • 00:14:10
    hanging out with them and my and my wife
  • 00:14:13
    yeah totally get it well Jake this has
  • 00:14:15
    been a fascinating conversation I really
  • 00:14:17
    appreciate you're taking the time as a
  • 00:14:18
    fellow science math guy myself it's
  • 00:14:21
    always interesting to hear a story about
  • 00:14:23
    somebody how how they go into law and uh
  • 00:14:25
    yours was especially interesting so
  • 00:14:27
    thank you so much absolutely thanks so
  • 00:14:29
    much for having me this is Richard Shu
  • 00:14:31
    and Jake cing thanks
  • 00:14:40
    [Music]
Tags
  • Richard Shu
  • Jake Cing
  • Mathematical Economics
  • Law School
  • Career Transition
  • Corporate Law
  • Merrill Lynch
  • Hostile Takeovers
  • Real Analysis
  • Analytical Skills