Il discorso dell'economista Jeffrey Sachs al Parlamento Europeo con i sottotitoli in italiano

00:49:53
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PBfgiq7n848

Summary

TLDRIl discorso offre un'analisi critica della politica estera americana, evidenziando come l'espansione della NATO e le guerre in Medio Oriente e in Ucraina siano state influenzate da decisioni unilaterali degli Stati Uniti. L'oratore, con una lunga esperienza in affari internazionali, sottolinea l'importanza di una politica estera europea autonoma e critica l'assenza di una voce unitaria in Europa. Propone che l'Europa dovrebbe negoziare direttamente con la Russia e sviluppare una politica estera che non sia dominata dagli interessi americani. Inoltre, l'oratore mette in discussione l'approccio ostile degli Stati Uniti verso la Cina e la situazione in Medio Oriente, suggerendo che una soluzione a due stati è necessaria per la pace.

Takeaways

  • 🗣️ L'oratore ha una lunga esperienza in affari internazionali.
  • 🌍 Critica l'approccio unilaterale degli Stati Uniti nella politica estera.
  • 🇪🇺 Sottolinea l'importanza di una politica estera europea autonoma.
  • 🤝 Propone negoziati diretti tra Europa e Russia.
  • 📉 L'espansione della NATO è vista come una strategia americana per dominare.
  • ⚔️ La crisi in Ucraina è influenzata dall'interferenza americana.
  • 🕊️ Sostiene la necessità di una soluzione a due stati in Medio Oriente.
  • 💡 La Cina è vista come un successo economico, non un nemico.
  • 📜 La diplomazia è essenziale per risolvere i conflitti.
  • 🔍 L'oratore critica l'influenza di Netanyahu sulla politica estera americana.

Timeline

  • 00:00:00 - 00:05:00

    L'oratore esprime gratitudine per l'opportunità di discutere in un periodo complesso e pericoloso, condividendo la sua esperienza come consigliere di vari governi e la sua conoscenza diretta degli eventi in Europa negli ultimi 36 anni, inclusi i conflitti in Ucraina e in altre regioni.

  • 00:05:00 - 00:10:00

    L'oratore sottolinea che gli Stati Uniti hanno guidato e causato conflitti in diverse regioni del mondo, affermando che la politica estera americana ha ignorato le preoccupazioni e le opinioni degli altri paesi, portando a conseguenze negative per l'Europa.

  • 00:10:00 - 00:15:00

    Si evidenzia che l'Europa ha perso la sua voce nella politica estera, diventando un alleato degli Stati Uniti senza una chiara identità o interessi propri, con l'eccezione di alcune disaccordi significativi come la guerra in Iraq del 2003.

  • 00:15:00 - 00:20:00

    L'oratore discute l'espansione della NATO dopo la fine della Guerra Fredda, affermando che gli Stati Uniti hanno ignorato gli impegni presi con Gorbaciov di non espandere la NATO verso est, e che questa espansione ha portato a tensioni con la Russia.

  • 00:20:00 - 00:25:00

    Si menziona il libro di Zbigniew Brzezinski, 'The Grand Chessboard', che descrive l'espansione della NATO e dell'Europa come un progetto strategico degli Stati Uniti, e si critica la visione americana che sottovaluta la reazione della Russia a tali mosse.

  • 00:25:00 - 00:30:00

    L'oratore critica la continuità della politica estera americana attraverso diverse amministrazioni, sostenendo che gli Stati Uniti hanno cercato di circondare la Russia e negarle accesso a territori strategici, come il Mar Nero.

  • 00:30:00 - 00:35:00

    Si discute l'atteggiamento degli Stati Uniti nei confronti della Russia e la mancanza di diplomazia, evidenziando che le decisioni americane sono state basate su una visione unilaterale e non cooperativa, portando a conflitti e malintesi.

  • 00:35:00 - 00:40:00

    L'oratore racconta la sua esperienza durante la crisi ucraina del 2014, affermando che gli Stati Uniti hanno attivamente cercato di rovesciare il governo di Yanukovich e che la rivoluzione di Maidan è stata in parte finanziata dagli Stati Uniti.

  • 00:40:00 - 00:49:53

    Infine, l'oratore esprime la necessità di una politica estera europea indipendente, che riconosca la realtà della situazione russa e promuova il dialogo, piuttosto che seguire ciecamente la politica americana, per evitare ulteriori conflitti e perdite di vite umane.

Show more

Mind Map

Video Q&A

  • Qual è il tema principale del discorso?

    Il discorso analizza la politica estera americana e le sue conseguenze, in particolare l'espansione della NATO e le crisi in Ucraina e Medio Oriente.

  • Chi è l'oratore e qual è la sua esperienza?

    L'oratore ha servito come consigliere per vari governi e ha una lunga esperienza nel monitorare eventi geopolitici.

  • Qual è la critica principale all'America?

    La critica principale è che gli Stati Uniti hanno adottato una politica estera unilaterale, ignorando le preoccupazioni e le esigenze degli altri paesi.

  • Cosa si suggerisce per l'Europa?

    Si suggerisce che l'Europa sviluppi una politica estera autonoma e negozi direttamente con la Russia.

  • Qual è il ruolo di NATO secondo l'oratore?

    L'oratore sostiene che l'espansione della NATO è stata una strategia americana per circondare la Russia e mantenere il dominio globale.

  • Cosa si dice riguardo alla crisi in Ucraina?

    Si afferma che la crisi in Ucraina è stata in parte causata dall'interferenza americana e dalla mancanza di una politica di neutralità da parte dell'Ucraina.

  • Qual è la posizione dell'oratore su Trump?

    L'oratore suggerisce che Trump potrebbe essere più incline a negoziare la fine della guerra in Ucraina rispetto ad altri leader.

  • Cosa si dice riguardo alla situazione in Medio Oriente?

    Si critica l'influenza di Netanyahu sulla politica estera americana e si sottolinea la necessità di una soluzione a due stati per la pace.

  • Qual è la visione dell'oratore sulla Cina?

    L'oratore considera la Cina non un nemico, ma un successo economico, e critica l'approccio ostile degli Stati Uniti nei suoi confronti.

  • Qual è l'importanza della diplomazia secondo l'oratore?

    L'oratore sottolinea che la diplomazia è essenziale per risolvere i conflitti e che l'approccio unilaterale degli Stati Uniti è controproducente.

View more video summaries

Get instant access to free YouTube video summaries powered by AI!
Subtitles
en
Auto Scroll:
  • 00:00:00
    michael thank you so much and thanks to
  • 00:00:03
    thanks to all of you for the chance to
  • 00:00:06
    be together and to think together this
  • 00:00:09
    is indeed a a complicated and
  • 00:00:12
    fastchanging time and a and and a very
  • 00:00:15
    dangerous one so we really need clarity
  • 00:00:19
    of thought i was an adviser to the
  • 00:00:22
    Polish government in
  • 00:00:24
    1989 uh to uh President Gorbachev in
  • 00:00:29
    1990 and 911 to President Yelen in 1991
  • 00:00:35
    to
  • 00:00:36
    1993 to President KMA of Ukraine in
  • 00:00:40
    1993 94 I've watched the events very
  • 00:00:45
    close up for 36 years uh after the
  • 00:00:50
    Maidan I was uh asked by the new
  • 00:00:54
    government to come to Kiev and I was
  • 00:00:56
    taken around the Maidan and I learned a
  • 00:00:59
    lot of things uh
  • 00:01:01
    firsthand i I've been in touch with
  • 00:01:04
    Russian leaders for more than 30
  • 00:01:07
    years i know the American political
  • 00:01:11
    leadership
  • 00:01:12
    uh close up uh our previous uh secretary
  • 00:01:18
    of treasury was my macroeconomics
  • 00:01:20
    teacher uh 51 years ago uh or just to
  • 00:01:24
    give you an idea so we were very close
  • 00:01:28
    friends for a half century i know all of
  • 00:01:32
    these people i just want to say this
  • 00:01:34
    because what I want to explain in my
  • 00:01:37
    point of view is not uh secondhand it's
  • 00:01:40
    not ideology it's what I've seen with my
  • 00:01:43
    own eyes and experienced during this
  • 00:01:48
    period in my understanding of the events
  • 00:01:52
    that have befallen Europe in many
  • 00:01:56
    contexts
  • 00:01:58
    uh and I'll include not only the uh
  • 00:02:02
    Ukraine crisis uh but uh Serbia
  • 00:02:08
    1999 the wars in the Middle East
  • 00:02:11
    including
  • 00:02:13
    Iraq Syria uh the wars in Africa
  • 00:02:17
    including Sudan Somalia uh
  • 00:02:22
    Libya these are to a very significant
  • 00:02:26
    extent that would surprise you perhaps
  • 00:02:30
    uh and would be
  • 00:02:33
    denounced about what I'm about to say
  • 00:02:36
    these are wars that the United States
  • 00:02:39
    led and caused the United States came to
  • 00:02:42
    the
  • 00:02:44
    view especially in 1990 911 and then
  • 00:02:48
    with the end of the Soviet Union that
  • 00:02:51
    the US now ran the
  • 00:02:55
    world and that the US did not have to
  • 00:02:58
    heed
  • 00:03:00
    anybody's views red lines concerns
  • 00:03:04
    security
  • 00:03:05
    viewpoints or any international
  • 00:03:09
    obligations s or any UN framework i'm
  • 00:03:14
    sorry to put it so plainly but I do want
  • 00:03:19
    you to
  • 00:03:21
    understand I tried very hard in
  • 00:03:26
    1991 to get help for Gorbachev who I
  • 00:03:29
    think was the greatest statesman of our
  • 00:03:32
    modern time
  • 00:03:34
    i recently read the uh archived memo of
  • 00:03:39
    the National Security Council discussion
  • 00:03:41
    of my proposal how they
  • 00:03:45
    completely dismissed it and laughed it
  • 00:03:47
    off the table when I said that the
  • 00:03:51
    United States should help the Soviet
  • 00:03:53
    Union in financial
  • 00:03:55
    stabilization and in making its reforms
  • 00:03:59
    and the memo documents including some of
  • 00:04:03
    my former colleagues at Harvard in
  • 00:04:05
    particular saying we will do the
  • 00:04:08
    minimum that we will do to prevent
  • 00:04:11
    disaster but the minimum it's not our
  • 00:04:14
    job to help quite the contrary it's not
  • 00:04:17
    our interest to
  • 00:04:19
    help when the Soviet Union ended in
  • 00:04:24
    1991 the view became even more
  • 00:04:29
    exaggerated and I can name chapter and
  • 00:04:32
    verse but the view was we run the
  • 00:04:36
    show cheney Wolawitz and many other
  • 00:04:40
    names that you will have come to
  • 00:04:44
    know literally believed this is now a US
  • 00:04:48
    world and we will do as we want we will
  • 00:04:53
    clean up from the former Soviet Union we
  • 00:04:57
    will take out any remaining allies
  • 00:05:01
    countries like Iraq Syria and so forth
  • 00:05:04
    will
  • 00:05:05
    go
  • 00:05:07
    and we've been experiencing this foreign
  • 00:05:10
    policy for
  • 00:05:13
    now essentially 33
  • 00:05:17
    years europe has paid a heavy price for
  • 00:05:21
    this because Europe has not had any
  • 00:05:23
    foreign policy during this period that I
  • 00:05:26
    can figure out
  • 00:05:28
    no voice no unity no clarity no European
  • 00:05:33
    interests only American loyalty
  • 00:05:39
    there were moments where there were
  • 00:05:41
    disagreements and very uh I think uh
  • 00:05:44
    wonderful disagreements especially in
  • 00:05:48
    the last time of significance was 2003
  • 00:05:51
    in the Iraq war when France and Germany
  • 00:05:55
    said we don't support the United States
  • 00:05:58
    going around the UN security council for
  • 00:06:01
    this war that war by the way was
  • 00:06:04
    directly concocted by
  • 00:06:07
    Netanyahu and his colleagues in the US
  • 00:06:12
    uh
  • 00:06:13
    Pentagon i'm not saying that it was a
  • 00:06:16
    link or mutuality i'm saying it was a
  • 00:06:20
    direct
  • 00:06:21
    war that was a war carried out for
  • 00:06:24
    Israel it was a war that Paul Wolawitz
  • 00:06:27
    and Douglas Feith coordinated with
  • 00:06:31
    Netanyahu and that was the last time
  • 00:06:34
    that Europe had a
  • 00:06:38
    voice and I spoke with European leaders
  • 00:06:41
    then and they were very clear and it was
  • 00:06:45
    uh quite wonderful
  • 00:06:50
    europe lost its voice entirely after
  • 00:06:53
    that but especially in
  • 00:06:56
    2008 now what happened after 1991 to get
  • 00:07:01
    to 2008 is that the United States
  • 00:07:05
    decided that unipolarity meant that NATO
  • 00:07:09
    would
  • 00:07:10
    enlarge somewhere from Brussels to
  • 00:07:13
    Vladivosto step by step there would be
  • 00:07:16
    no end to eastward enlargement of
  • 00:07:20
    NATO this would be the US unipolar world
  • 00:07:25
    if you played the game of risk as a
  • 00:07:27
    child like I did this is the US idea to
  • 00:07:32
    have the peace on every part of the
  • 00:07:35
    board any place without a US military
  • 00:07:38
    base is an enemy
  • 00:07:41
    basically neutrality is a dirty word in
  • 00:07:44
    the US political
  • 00:07:46
    lexicon perhaps the dirtiest word at
  • 00:07:49
    least if you're an enemy we know you're
  • 00:07:51
    an enemy uh if you are neutral you're
  • 00:07:55
    subversive because then you're really
  • 00:07:57
    against us because you're not telling us
  • 00:08:00
    you're pretending to be neutral
  • 00:08:04
    so this was the mindset and the decision
  • 00:08:06
    was taken formally in
  • 00:08:09
    1994 when President Clinton signed off
  • 00:08:12
    on NATO enlargement to the east you will
  • 00:08:16
    recall that in February 7th
  • 00:08:22
    1991 Hans Dietra Genture and James Baker
  • 00:08:25
    III spoke with Gorbachev
  • 00:08:29
    genture gave a press conference
  • 00:08:31
    afterwards where he explained "NATO will
  • 00:08:34
    not move eastward we will not take
  • 00:08:38
    advantage of the dissolution of the
  • 00:08:42
    Warsaw pact." And understand that was in
  • 00:08:46
    a jeritical
  • 00:08:48
    context not a casual context this was
  • 00:08:51
    the end of World War II being negotiated
  • 00:08:55
    for German
  • 00:08:57
    reunification and an agreement was made
  • 00:09:01
    that NATO will not move one inch
  • 00:09:04
    eastward and it was explicit and it is
  • 00:09:07
    in countless documents and just look up
  • 00:09:10
    national security archive of George
  • 00:09:13
    Washington University and you can get
  • 00:09:15
    dozens of documents it's a website
  • 00:09:18
    called what Gorbachov heard about NATO
  • 00:09:22
    take a look because everything you're
  • 00:09:24
    told by the US is a lie about this but
  • 00:09:28
    the archives are perfectly
  • 00:09:31
    clear so the decision was taken in
  • 00:09:35
    1994 to expand NATO all the way to
  • 00:09:40
    Ukraine this is a project this is not
  • 00:09:44
    one administration or another this is a
  • 00:09:47
    US government project that started more
  • 00:09:50
    than 30 years
  • 00:09:57
    ago in
  • 00:09:59
    1997 Ziggnu Bjinski wrote the grand
  • 00:10:04
    chessboard that is not just musings of
  • 00:10:07
    Mr bjinski that is the presentation of
  • 00:10:10
    the decisions of the United States
  • 00:10:13
    government explained to the public which
  • 00:10:16
    is how these books
  • 00:10:19
    work and the book describes the eastward
  • 00:10:23
    enlargement of Europe and of NATO as
  • 00:10:27
    simultaneous
  • 00:10:29
    events and there's a good chapter in
  • 00:10:31
    that book that says what will Russia do
  • 00:10:37
    as Europe and NATO expand
  • 00:10:41
    eastward and I knew Zig Bjinski
  • 00:10:45
    personally he was very nice to me uh I
  • 00:10:48
    was advising Poland he was a big help he
  • 00:10:52
    was a very nice and smart man and he got
  • 00:10:54
    everything
  • 00:10:57
    wrong so in 1997 he wrote in detail why
  • 00:11:02
    Russia could do nothing but exceed to
  • 00:11:06
    the eastward expansion of NATO and
  • 00:11:08
    Europe in fact he says the eastward
  • 00:11:11
    expansion of Europe and not just Europe
  • 00:11:13
    but NATO this was a plan a
  • 00:11:18
    project and he explains how Russia will
  • 00:11:21
    never align with
  • 00:11:23
    China
  • 00:11:25
    unthinkable russia will never align with
  • 00:11:29
    Iran russia has no vocation other than
  • 00:11:32
    the European vocation so as Europe moves
  • 00:11:36
    east there's nothing Russia can do about
  • 00:11:38
    it
  • 00:11:39
    so says yet another American
  • 00:11:43
    strategist is it any question why we're
  • 00:11:46
    in war all the
  • 00:11:48
    time because one thing about America is
  • 00:11:52
    we always know what our counterparts are
  • 00:11:54
    going to do and we always get it wrong
  • 00:11:58
    and one reason we always get it wrong is
  • 00:12:01
    that in game theory that the American
  • 00:12:04
    strategists play you don't actually talk
  • 00:12:07
    to the other side you just know what the
  • 00:12:11
    other side's strategy is that's it's
  • 00:12:13
    wonderful it saves so much
  • 00:12:16
    time you don't need any diplomacy
  • 00:12:23
    so this project began and we had a
  • 00:12:27
    continuity of government for 30 years
  • 00:12:31
    until maybe yesterday
  • 00:12:37
    perhaps 30 years of a project ukraine
  • 00:12:41
    and Georgia were the keys to the project
  • 00:12:46
    why
  • 00:12:47
    because America learned everything it
  • 00:12:50
    knows from the
  • 00:12:52
    British and so we
  • 00:12:54
    are the wannabe British
  • 00:12:58
    Empire and what the British Empire
  • 00:13:01
    understood in
  • 00:13:03
    1853 Mr palmer Lord Palmerston excuse
  • 00:13:07
    me is that you surround Russia in the
  • 00:13:11
    Black Sea and you deny Russia access to
  • 00:13:15
    the Eastern
  • 00:13:17
    Mediterranean and all you're watching is
  • 00:13:21
    an American project to do that in the
  • 00:13:24
    21st century
  • 00:13:28
    the idea
  • 00:13:29
    was that there would be
  • 00:13:32
    Ukraine Romania Bulgaria Turkey and
  • 00:13:37
    Georgia as the Black Sea
  • 00:13:41
    literal that would deprive Russia of any
  • 00:13:46
    international status by
  • 00:13:49
    blocking the Black Sea and essentially
  • 00:13:53
    by neutralizing Russia as more than a
  • 00:13:57
    local
  • 00:13:58
    power bjinski is completely clear about
  • 00:14:01
    this and before Bjinsky there was
  • 00:14:05
    Mckinder and who owns the island of the
  • 00:14:08
    world owns the world so this project
  • 00:14:12
    goes back a long time i think it goes
  • 00:14:14
    back basically to
  • 00:14:18
    Palmerston in 19 and again I've lived
  • 00:14:23
    through every administration i've known
  • 00:14:25
    these presidents i've known their
  • 00:14:28
    teams nothing changed much from Clinton
  • 00:14:31
    to Bush to Obama to Trump won to
  • 00:14:36
    Biden maybe they got worse step by
  • 00:14:40
    step biden was the worst in my view uh
  • 00:14:45
    maybe also because he was not compass
  • 00:14:48
    menus for the last couple of years and I
  • 00:14:51
    say that seriously not as a snarky
  • 00:14:55
    remark the American political system is
  • 00:14:57
    a system of image it's a system of media
  • 00:15:01
    manipulation every day it is a PR system
  • 00:15:06
    and so you could have a president that
  • 00:15:08
    basically doesn't function and have that
  • 00:15:11
    in power for two years and actually have
  • 00:15:15
    that president run for reelection and
  • 00:15:18
    one damn thing is he had to stand on a
  • 00:15:20
    stage for 90 minutes by himself and that
  • 00:15:23
    was the end of it had it not been that
  • 00:15:26
    mistake he would have gone on to have
  • 00:15:28
    his candidacy whether he was sleeping
  • 00:15:31
    after 400 p.m in the afternoon or
  • 00:15:33
    not so this is actually the reality
  • 00:15:38
    everybody goes along with it it's
  • 00:15:40
    impolite to say anything that I'm saying
  • 00:15:44
    because we don't speak the truth about
  • 00:15:46
    almost anything in this world right
  • 00:15:49
    now so this project went on from the
  • 00:15:53
    1990s bombing Bgrade 78 straight days in
  • 00:15:58
    1999 was part of this
  • 00:16:01
    project splitting apart the country when
  • 00:16:04
    borders are sacrosanked aren't they
  • 00:16:06
    indeed except for Kosovo
  • 00:16:09
    that's fine because borders are
  • 00:16:12
    sacrosanked except when America changes
  • 00:16:16
    them sudan was another related
  • 00:16:20
    project the South Sudan rebellion did
  • 00:16:24
    that just happen because South Sudin
  • 00:16:27
    rebelled or can I give you the CIA
  • 00:16:31
    playbook to please
  • 00:16:33
    understand as grown-ups what this is
  • 00:16:36
    about
  • 00:16:39
    military events are costly they require
  • 00:16:43
    equipment
  • 00:16:45
    training base camps
  • 00:16:48
    intelligence finance that comes from big
  • 00:16:52
    powers that doesn't come from local
  • 00:16:58
    insurrections south Sudan did not defeat
  • 00:17:00
    North Sudan or
  • 00:17:03
    Sudan in a tribal battle
  • 00:17:07
    it was a US
  • 00:17:09
    project i would go often to Nairobi and
  • 00:17:14
    meet US military or senators or others
  • 00:17:18
    with deep interests in Sudan's
  • 00:17:22
    politics this was part of the game of
  • 00:17:26
    unipolarity
  • 00:17:28
    so the NATO enlargement as you know
  • 00:17:30
    started in 1999 with Hungary Poland and
  • 00:17:34
    the Czech
  • 00:17:35
    Republic and Russia was extremely
  • 00:17:37
    unhappy about it but these were
  • 00:17:40
    countries still far from the border and
  • 00:17:44
    Russia
  • 00:17:45
    protested but of course to no avail then
  • 00:17:49
    George Bush Jr came in when 9/11
  • 00:17:53
    occurred president Putin pledged all
  • 00:17:56
    support and then the US uh decided in
  • 00:18:02
    September
  • 00:18:05
    20th
  • 00:18:07
    2001 that it would launch seven wars in
  • 00:18:11
    five years and you can listen to General
  • 00:18:15
    Wesley Clark online talk about that he
  • 00:18:18
    was NATO Supreme Commander in 1999
  • 00:18:22
    he went to the Pentagon on September
  • 00:18:24
    20th 2001 he was handed the paper
  • 00:18:28
    explaining seven wars these by the way
  • 00:18:31
    were Netanyahu's wars the idea was
  • 00:18:35
    partly to clean up old Soviet allies and
  • 00:18:38
    partly to take out supporters of Hamas
  • 00:18:42
    and
  • 00:18:42
    Hezbollah because Netanyahu's idea was
  • 00:18:46
    there will be one state thank you only
  • 00:18:49
    one state it will be Israel israel will
  • 00:18:52
    control all of the territory and anyone
  • 00:18:55
    that objects we will overthrow not we
  • 00:18:59
    exactly our friend the United States
  • 00:19:02
    that's US policy until this
  • 00:19:06
    morning we don't know whether it will
  • 00:19:08
    change now the only wrinkle is that
  • 00:19:11
    maybe the US will own Gaza instead of
  • 00:19:14
    Israel owning Gaza
  • 00:19:17
    but the idea has been around at least
  • 00:19:20
    for 25
  • 00:19:22
    years it actually goes back to a
  • 00:19:25
    document called clean break that
  • 00:19:28
    Netanyahu and his American political
  • 00:19:30
    team put together in 1996 to end the
  • 00:19:35
    idea of the two-state solution you can
  • 00:19:38
    also find it
  • 00:19:40
    online so these are projects these are
  • 00:19:42
    long-term events these aren't is it
  • 00:19:45
    Clinton is it Bush is it
  • 00:19:49
    Obama that's the boring way to look at
  • 00:19:51
    American politics as the dayto-day game
  • 00:19:55
    but that's not what American politics
  • 00:19:58
    is so the next round of NATO enlargement
  • 00:20:01
    came in 2004 with seven more
  • 00:20:05
    countries the three Baltic states
  • 00:20:08
    Romania Bulgaria Slovenia and Slovakia
  • 00:20:13
    at this point Russia was pretty damn
  • 00:20:17
    upset this was a complete violation of
  • 00:20:20
    the post war
  • 00:20:23
    agreed with German
  • 00:20:26
    reunification essentially it was
  • 00:20:29
    a it it was a fundamental trick or
  • 00:20:33
    defection of the US from a cooperative
  • 00:20:36
    arrangement is what it amounted to
  • 00:20:39
    because they believe in uniolarity
  • 00:20:45
    so as everybody recalls because we just
  • 00:20:47
    had the Munich Security Conference last
  • 00:20:49
    week in 2007 President Putin said "Stop
  • 00:20:53
    enough enough stop
  • 00:20:57
    now." And of course what that meant was
  • 00:21:00
    in 2008 the United States jammed down
  • 00:21:02
    Europe's throat enlargement of NATO to
  • 00:21:05
    Ukraine and to Georgia this is a
  • 00:21:07
    long-term
  • 00:21:09
    project i listened to Mr sakashi in New
  • 00:21:13
    York in May of 2008 and I walked out
  • 00:21:18
    called Sonia and said "This man's
  • 00:21:20
    crazy." And a month later a war broke
  • 00:21:23
    out because the United States told this
  • 00:21:27
    guy "We save Georgia." And he stands at
  • 00:21:31
    the Council on Foreign Relations says
  • 00:21:33
    "Georgia's in the center of Europe."
  • 00:21:36
    Well it ain't ladies and gentlemen it's
  • 00:21:39
    not in the center of Europe
  • 00:21:42
    and the most recent events are not
  • 00:21:44
    helpful for Georgia for its safety and
  • 00:21:47
    your MPs going there or MEPs going there
  • 00:21:51
    and European politicians that gets
  • 00:21:53
    Georgia destroyed that doesn't save
  • 00:21:55
    Georgia that gets Georgia
  • 00:21:58
    destroyed completely destroyed in 2008
  • 00:22:03
    as everybody knows our former CIA
  • 00:22:07
    director William Burns sent a long
  • 00:22:09
    message back to Condisa Rice net means
  • 00:22:12
    net about expansion this we know from
  • 00:22:16
    Julian Assange because believe me not
  • 00:22:19
    one word is told to the American people
  • 00:22:22
    about anything or to you or by any of
  • 00:22:26
    your newspapers these days
  • 00:22:28
    so we have Julian Assange to thank but
  • 00:22:31
    we can read the memo in
  • 00:22:33
    detail as you know Victor Yanukovich was
  • 00:22:37
    elected in 2010 on the platform of
  • 00:22:41
    neutrality russia had no
  • 00:22:45
    territorial interests or designs in
  • 00:22:48
    Ukraine at all i know I was there during
  • 00:22:52
    these pe these years what Russia was
  • 00:22:56
    negotiating was a 25-year lease to 20
  • 00:23:01
    42 for Savasto naval base that's
  • 00:23:05
    it not for Crimea not for the Donbas
  • 00:23:09
    nothing like
  • 00:23:11
    that this idea that Putin is
  • 00:23:14
    reconstructing the Russian Empire this
  • 00:23:18
    is childish propaganda excuse me if
  • 00:23:22
    anyone knows the daytoday and
  • 00:23:25
    year-to-year history this is childish
  • 00:23:29
    stuff childish stuff seems to work
  • 00:23:31
    better than adult
  • 00:23:33
    stuff so no designs at all the United
  • 00:23:38
    States decided this man must be
  • 00:23:42
    overthrown it's called a regime change
  • 00:23:44
    operation
  • 00:23:46
    there have been about a hundred of them
  • 00:23:48
    by the United States many in your
  • 00:23:52
    countries and many all over the
  • 00:23:55
    world that's what the CIA does for a
  • 00:24:00
    living okay please know it it's a very
  • 00:24:04
    unusual kind of foreign policy
  • 00:24:07
    but in America if you don't like the
  • 00:24:11
    other side you don't negotiate with them
  • 00:24:14
    you try to overthrow
  • 00:24:17
    them preferably
  • 00:24:20
    covertly if it doesn't work covertly you
  • 00:24:23
    do it
  • 00:24:25
    overtly you always say "It's not our
  • 00:24:27
    fault they're the aggressor they're the
  • 00:24:30
    other side they're Hitler." That comes
  • 00:24:33
    up every two or three years whether it's
  • 00:24:35
    Saddam Hussein whether it's Assad
  • 00:24:38
    whether it's Putin that's very
  • 00:24:40
    convenient that's the only foreign
  • 00:24:42
    policy explanation the American people
  • 00:24:45
    are ever given
  • 00:24:48
    anywhere well we're facing Munich 1938
  • 00:24:52
    well we're facing Munich 1938 can't talk
  • 00:24:55
    to the other side they're evil
  • 00:24:57
    implacable foes
  • 00:25:00
    that's the only model of foreign policy
  • 00:25:03
    we ever hear from our mass media and the
  • 00:25:07
    mass media repeats it entirely because
  • 00:25:10
    it's completely suborned by the US
  • 00:25:14
    government
  • 00:25:15
    now in
  • 00:25:18
    2014 the
  • 00:25:20
    US worked actively to overthrow
  • 00:25:23
    Yanukovich
  • 00:25:26
    everybody knows the phone call
  • 00:25:27
    intercepted by my Columbia University
  • 00:25:30
    colleague Victoria
  • 00:25:32
    Nuland and the US Ambassador Peter
  • 00:25:36
    Pat you don't get better evidence the
  • 00:25:40
    Russians intercepted her call and they
  • 00:25:42
    put it on the internet listen to it it's
  • 00:25:45
    fascinating i know all these
  • 00:25:48
    people by the way by doing that they all
  • 00:25:51
    got promoted in the Biden administration
  • 00:25:56
    that's the job now when the Maidan
  • 00:25:59
    occurred I was called immediately oh
  • 00:26:04
    Professor Saxs the new Ukrainian prime
  • 00:26:07
    minister would like to see you to talk
  • 00:26:09
    about the economic
  • 00:26:11
    crisis because I'm pretty good at
  • 00:26:14
    that and so I flew to
  • 00:26:18
    Kiev and I was walked around the
  • 00:26:21
    Maidan and I was told how the US paid
  • 00:26:25
    the money for all the people around the
  • 00:26:28
    Maidan
  • 00:26:30
    spontaneous revolution of
  • 00:26:33
    dignity ladies and gentlemen
  • 00:26:37
    please where do all these media outlets
  • 00:26:40
    come from where does all this
  • 00:26:42
    organization come from where do all
  • 00:26:44
    these buses come from where do all these
  • 00:26:47
    people called in come from are you
  • 00:26:49
    kidding this is organized
  • 00:26:55
    effort
  • 00:26:57
    and it's not a
  • 00:26:59
    secret except to citizens of Europe and
  • 00:27:03
    the United States everyone else
  • 00:27:05
    understands it quite clearly
  • 00:27:09
    then came
  • 00:27:12
    Minsk and especially Minsk 2 which by
  • 00:27:16
    the way was modeled on South Turoleian
  • 00:27:20
    autonomy and the Belgians could have
  • 00:27:23
    related to mitzu very well it said there
  • 00:27:27
    should be autonomy for the
  • 00:27:30
    Russianspeaking regions in the east of
  • 00:27:33
    Ukraine
  • 00:27:35
    it was supported unanimously by the UN
  • 00:27:38
    Security
  • 00:27:39
    Council the United
  • 00:27:42
    States and Ukraine decided it was not to
  • 00:27:45
    be
  • 00:27:47
    enforced germany and France which were
  • 00:27:50
    the guaranurs of the Normandy
  • 00:27:53
    process let it go
  • 00:27:56
    and it was absolutely another direct
  • 00:28:01
    American unipolar action with Europe as
  • 00:28:05
    usual playing
  • 00:28:08
    completely useless subsidiary role even
  • 00:28:11
    though it was a guarantor of the
  • 00:28:15
    agreement trump one raised the armaments
  • 00:28:20
    there were many thousands of deaths in
  • 00:28:24
    the shelling by Ukraine in the
  • 00:28:26
    Donbas there was no Minsk 2
  • 00:28:30
    agreement and then Biden came into
  • 00:28:33
    office and again I know all these people
  • 00:28:37
    i used to be a member of the Democratic
  • 00:28:39
    Party i now am strictly sworn to be a
  • 00:28:45
    member of no
  • 00:28:47
    party because both are the same
  • 00:28:51
    anyway and because this is I the
  • 00:28:54
    Democrats became complete wararm mongers
  • 00:28:56
    over time and there not was not one
  • 00:29:00
    voice about peace just like most of your
  • 00:29:04
    parliamentarians the same
  • 00:29:08
    way so at the end of
  • 00:29:14
    1991 Putin put on the table a last
  • 00:29:18
    effort in two security agreement drafts
  • 00:29:22
    one with Europe and one with the United
  • 00:29:24
    States the US put on the table December
  • 00:29:27
    15th n uh
  • 00:29:30
    2021 i had an hour call with Jake
  • 00:29:33
    Sullivan in the White House begging
  • 00:29:37
    "Jake avoid the
  • 00:29:39
    war you can avoid the war all you have
  • 00:29:43
    to do is say NATO will not enlarge to
  • 00:29:48
    Ukraine." And he said to me "Oh NATO's
  • 00:29:52
    not going to enlarge to Ukraine don't
  • 00:29:54
    worry about it." I said "Jake say it
  • 00:29:57
    publicly." No no no we can't say it
  • 00:29:59
    publicly
  • 00:30:01
    said "Jake you're going to have a war
  • 00:30:04
    over something that isn't even going to
  • 00:30:07
    happen." He said "Don't worry Jeff there
  • 00:30:09
    will be no
  • 00:30:12
    war." These are not very bright
  • 00:30:15
    people i'm telling you if I can give you
  • 00:30:19
    my honest view they're not very bright
  • 00:30:21
    people and I've dealt with them for more
  • 00:30:24
    than 40
  • 00:30:25
    years they talk to themselves they don't
  • 00:30:28
    talk to anybody else they play game
  • 00:30:31
    theory in non-ooperative game theory you
  • 00:30:34
    don't talk to the other side you just
  • 00:30:37
    make your
  • 00:30:38
    strategy this is the essence of game
  • 00:30:44
    theory it's not negotiation theory it's
  • 00:30:48
    not peacemaking
  • 00:30:50
    theory it is unilateral
  • 00:30:53
    non-ooperative theory if you know formal
  • 00:30:56
    game theory that's what they play it
  • 00:30:59
    started at the Rand Corporation that's
  • 00:31:01
    what they still play in 2019 there's a
  • 00:31:04
    paper by Rand how do we extend Russia do
  • 00:31:08
    you know they wrote a paper which Biden
  • 00:31:11
    followed how do we annoy
  • 00:31:14
    Russia that's literally the strategy how
  • 00:31:17
    do we annoy Russia we're trying to
  • 00:31:20
    provoke it trying to make it break apart
  • 00:31:23
    maybe have regime change maybe have
  • 00:31:25
    unrest maybe have economic crisis
  • 00:31:28
    that's what you call your
  • 00:31:31
    ally are you
  • 00:31:37
    kidding so I had a long and
  • 00:31:41
    frustrating phone call with
  • 00:31:44
    Sullivan i was standing out in the
  • 00:31:46
    freezing cold i happened to be h trying
  • 00:31:49
    to have a ski
  • 00:31:51
    day and there I was jake don't have the
  • 00:31:55
    war
  • 00:31:56
    oh there'll be no war
  • 00:31:59
    jeff we know a lot of what happened the
  • 00:32:02
    next month which is that they refuse to
  • 00:32:06
    negotiate the stupidest idea of NATO is
  • 00:32:10
    the so-called open door
  • 00:32:13
    policy are you kidding nato reserves the
  • 00:32:17
    right to go where it wants without any
  • 00:32:20
    neighbor having any say whatsoever
  • 00:32:24
    well I tell the Mexicans and the
  • 00:32:27
    Canadians don't try
  • 00:32:29
    it you
  • 00:32:31
    know Trump may want to take over Canada
  • 00:32:34
    so Canada could say to China why don't
  • 00:32:37
    you build a military base uh in uh in in
  • 00:32:41
    Ontario i wouldn't advise
  • 00:32:44
    it and the United States would not say
  • 00:32:47
    well it's an open door that's their
  • 00:32:50
    business i mean they can do what they
  • 00:32:52
    want that's not our
  • 00:32:54
    business but grown-ups in Europe repeat
  • 00:32:58
    this in Europe in your commission your
  • 00:33:03
    high
  • 00:33:05
    representative this is nonsense stuff
  • 00:33:07
    this is not even baby
  • 00:33:12
    geopolitics this is just not thinking at
  • 00:33:15
    all so the war started what was Putin's
  • 00:33:20
    intention in the war
  • 00:33:22
    i can tell you what his intention was it
  • 00:33:26
    was to force Zalinski to
  • 00:33:29
    negotiate
  • 00:33:32
    neutrality and that happened within 7
  • 00:33:36
    days of the start of the
  • 00:33:39
    invasion you should understand this not
  • 00:33:42
    the propaganda that's written about this
  • 00:33:44
    oh that they failed and he was going to
  • 00:33:46
    take over Ukraine
  • 00:33:49
    come on ladies and gentlemen understand
  • 00:33:52
    something
  • 00:33:54
    basic the idea was to keep NATO and what
  • 00:33:58
    is NATO it's the United
  • 00:34:00
    States off of Russia's
  • 00:34:04
    border no more no
  • 00:34:06
    less i should
  • 00:34:09
    add one very important point
  • 00:34:13
    why are they so interested first because
  • 00:34:17
    if China or Russia decided to have a
  • 00:34:20
    military base on the Rio Grand or in uh
  • 00:34:25
    the Canadian border not only would the
  • 00:34:27
    United States freak out we'd have war
  • 00:34:29
    within about 10
  • 00:34:32
    minutes but because the United States
  • 00:34:35
    unilaterally abandoned the
  • 00:34:37
    anti-bballistic missile treaty in 2002
  • 00:34:40
    and ended the nuclear arms control
  • 00:34:43
    framework by doing
  • 00:34:45
    So and this is extremely important to
  • 00:34:49
    understand the nuclear arms control
  • 00:34:52
    framework is based on trying to block a
  • 00:34:56
    first
  • 00:34:57
    strike the ABM treaty was a critical
  • 00:35:00
    component of that the US unilaterally
  • 00:35:03
    walked out of the ABM treaty in
  • 00:35:05
    2002 it blew a Russian gasket so
  • 00:35:09
    everything I've been describing is in
  • 00:35:11
    the context of the destruction of the
  • 00:35:13
    nuclear framework as well and starting
  • 00:35:16
    in 2010 the US put in Aegis missile
  • 00:35:19
    systems in Poland and then in
  • 00:35:24
    Romania and Russia doesn't like that and
  • 00:35:27
    one of the issues on the table in
  • 00:35:30
    December and January December 2021
  • 00:35:33
    January 2022 was does the United States
  • 00:35:36
    claim the right to put missile systems
  • 00:35:38
    in
  • 00:35:39
    Ukraine and Blinken told Lavrov in
  • 00:35:43
    January 2022 the United States reserves
  • 00:35:47
    the right to put middle missile systems
  • 00:35:49
    wherever it wants
  • 00:35:53
    that's
  • 00:35:54
    your puditive
  • 00:35:57
    ally and now let's put intermediate
  • 00:36:00
    missile systems back in Germany the
  • 00:36:03
    United States walked out of the INF
  • 00:36:05
    treaty unilaterally in 2019 there is no
  • 00:36:08
    nuclear arms framework right now
  • 00:36:15
    none when Zilinski said in seven days
  • 00:36:19
    let's negotiate
  • 00:36:21
    i know the details of
  • 00:36:23
    this
  • 00:36:26
    exquisitly because I've talked to all
  • 00:36:29
    the parties in
  • 00:36:31
    detail within a couple of weeks there
  • 00:36:34
    was a document
  • 00:36:36
    exchanged that President Putin had
  • 00:36:39
    approved that Lavrov had presented that
  • 00:36:42
    was being managed by the Turkish
  • 00:36:44
    mediators i flew to Anchora to listen in
  • 00:36:49
    detail to what the mediators were
  • 00:36:53
    doing ukraine walked away unilaterally
  • 00:36:57
    from a near
  • 00:37:00
    agreement why because the United States
  • 00:37:04
    told them to because the
  • 00:37:07
    UK added icing to the cake by having
  • 00:37:13
    Bojo go in early
  • 00:37:16
    April to Ukraine and explain and he has
  • 00:37:20
    recently and if your security is in the
  • 00:37:23
    hands of Boris Johnson God help us
  • 00:37:26
    all keith Starmer turns out to be even
  • 00:37:30
    worse it's unimaginable but it is true
  • 00:37:37
    boris Johnson has explained and you can
  • 00:37:40
    look it
  • 00:37:42
    up on the website that what's at stake
  • 00:37:45
    here is western
  • 00:37:48
    hegemony not Ukraine Western hegemony
  • 00:37:54
    michael and I met at the Vatican with a
  • 00:37:57
    group in the spring of
  • 00:38:00
    2022 where we wrote a document
  • 00:38:04
    explaining nothing good can come out of
  • 00:38:06
    this war for Ukraine negotiate now
  • 00:38:09
    because anything that takes time will
  • 00:38:11
    mean massive amounts of deaths risk of
  • 00:38:14
    nuclear escalation and likely loss of
  • 00:38:19
    the war
  • 00:38:21
    i want to change one word from what we
  • 00:38:23
    wrote then nothing was wrong in that
  • 00:38:27
    document and since that document since
  • 00:38:30
    the US talked the negotiators away from
  • 00:38:32
    the
  • 00:38:33
    table about a million Ukrainians have
  • 00:38:36
    died or been severely
  • 00:38:40
    wounded and the American senators who
  • 00:38:43
    are as nasty and cynical and corrupt as
  • 00:38:48
    imaginable say this is wonderful
  • 00:38:51
    expenditure of our money because no
  • 00:38:53
    Americans are
  • 00:38:54
    dying it's the pure proxy war one of our
  • 00:38:58
    senators nearby me uh
  • 00:39:02
    Blumenthal says this out
  • 00:39:04
    loud mitt Romney says this out loud it's
  • 00:39:08
    best money America can spend no
  • 00:39:11
    Americans are
  • 00:39:13
    dying it's
  • 00:39:16
    unreal now just to bring us up to
  • 00:39:21
    yesterday this failed this project
  • 00:39:25
    failed the idea of the project was that
  • 00:39:28
    Russia would fold its
  • 00:39:30
    hand the idea all along was Russia can't
  • 00:39:34
    resist as Ziggnu Bjinski explained in
  • 00:39:39
    1997 the Americans thought we have the
  • 00:39:42
    upper
  • 00:39:43
    hand we're going to win because we're
  • 00:39:46
    going to bluff them they're not really
  • 00:39:48
    going to fight they're not really going
  • 00:39:50
    to
  • 00:39:52
    mobilize the nuclear option of cutting
  • 00:39:55
    them out of
  • 00:39:56
    Swift that's going to do them in the
  • 00:40:00
    economic sanctions that's going to do
  • 00:40:03
    them in
  • 00:40:05
    the Himars that's going to do them in
  • 00:40:08
    the Attackums the
  • 00:40:12
    F-16s honestly I've listened to this for
  • 00:40:15
    70 years i've listened to it as
  • 00:40:19
    semiunderstanding I'd say for about 56
  • 00:40:23
    years they speak nonsense every day my
  • 00:40:28
    country my
  • 00:40:30
    government this is so familiar to me
  • 00:40:34
    completely familiar i begged the
  • 00:40:36
    Ukrainians and I had a track record with
  • 00:40:38
    the Ukrainians i advised the Ukrainians
  • 00:40:41
    i'm not anti- Ukrainian i'm pro-
  • 00:40:42
    Ukrainian completely i said "Save your
  • 00:40:45
    lives save your sovereignty save your
  • 00:40:48
    territory be neutral don't listen to the
  • 00:40:51
    Americans."
  • 00:40:53
    I repeated to them the famous adage of
  • 00:40:56
    Henry Kissinger that to be an enemy of
  • 00:40:59
    the United States is dangerous but to be
  • 00:41:02
    a friend is
  • 00:41:04
    fatal okay so let me repeat that for
  • 00:41:07
    Europe to be an enemy of the United
  • 00:41:10
    States is dangerous but to be a friend
  • 00:41:12
    is
  • 00:41:15
    fatal so let me now finalize a few words
  • 00:41:20
    about Trump
  • 00:41:26
    trump does not want the losing
  • 00:41:30
    hand this is
  • 00:41:33
    why it is more likely than not this war
  • 00:41:36
    will
  • 00:41:37
    end because Trump and President Putin
  • 00:41:41
    will agree to end the
  • 00:41:43
    war if Europe does all its great
  • 00:41:49
    wararmongering it doesn't matter the war
  • 00:41:51
    is
  • 00:41:53
    ending so get it out of your
  • 00:41:57
    system please tell your
  • 00:41:59
    colleagues it's
  • 00:42:02
    over and it's over because Trump doesn't
  • 00:42:06
    want to carry a
  • 00:42:08
    loser that's it it's not some great
  • 00:42:12
    morality he doesn't want to carry a
  • 00:42:15
    loser this is a
  • 00:42:17
    loser the one that will be saved by the
  • 00:42:20
    negotiations taking place right now is
  • 00:42:24
    Ukraine second is Europe your stock
  • 00:42:27
    markets rising in recent days by the
  • 00:42:30
    horrible news of negotiations i know
  • 00:42:34
    this has been met with the sheer horror
  • 00:42:37
    in these
  • 00:42:38
    chambers but this is the best
  • 00:42:41
    news that you could get
  • 00:42:44
    now I
  • 00:42:46
    encouraged they don't listen to me but I
  • 00:42:50
    tried to reach out to some of the
  • 00:42:52
    European leaders most don't want to hear
  • 00:42:55
    anything from me at
  • 00:42:57
    all but I
  • 00:42:59
    said don't go to
  • 00:43:02
    Kiev go to
  • 00:43:05
    Moscow discuss with your
  • 00:43:07
    counterparts are you kidding you're
  • 00:43:10
    Europe your $450 million people your 20
  • 00:43:14
    trillion dollar
  • 00:43:16
    economy you should be the main economic
  • 00:43:21
    trading partner of Russia its natural
  • 00:43:26
    links by the way if anyone would like to
  • 00:43:29
    discuss how the US blew up Nordstream
  • 00:43:32
    I'd be happy to talk about that
  • 00:43:39
    so the Trump administration is
  • 00:43:43
    imperialist at
  • 00:43:46
    heart it is a great
  • 00:43:50
    powers dominate the
  • 00:43:52
    world it is we will do what we want when
  • 00:43:56
    we can
  • 00:43:58
    we will be better than a
  • 00:44:02
    scineesscent Biden and we'll cut our
  • 00:44:06
    losses where we have
  • 00:44:08
    to there are several war zones in the
  • 00:44:11
    world the Middle East being another we
  • 00:44:14
    don't know what will happen with that
  • 00:44:16
    again if Europe had a proper policy you
  • 00:44:21
    could stop that war i'll explain how
  • 00:44:26
    but war with China is also a possibility
  • 00:44:32
    so I'm not saying that we're at the new
  • 00:44:35
    age of
  • 00:44:36
    peace but we are in a
  • 00:44:41
    uh very uh different kind of politics
  • 00:44:45
    right now
  • 00:44:47
    and Europe should have a foreign
  • 00:44:50
    policy and not just a foreign policy of
  • 00:44:53
    rousophobia a foreign policy that is a
  • 00:44:56
    realistic foreign policy that
  • 00:44:58
    understands Russia's situation that
  • 00:45:00
    understands Europe's situation that
  • 00:45:03
    understands what America is and what it
  • 00:45:05
    stands
  • 00:45:06
    for that tries
  • 00:45:08
    to avoid Europe being invaded by the
  • 00:45:12
    United
  • 00:45:13
    States because it's not impossible that
  • 00:45:17
    America will just land troops in Danish
  • 00:45:21
    territory i'm not joking
  • 00:45:25
    and I don't think they're joking and
  • 00:45:27
    Europe needs a foreign policy a real one
  • 00:45:32
    not a yes we'll bargain with Mr trump
  • 00:45:36
    and meet him
  • 00:45:38
    halfway you know what that will be like
  • 00:45:42
    give me a call
  • 00:45:46
    afterwards please don't have American
  • 00:45:49
    officials as head of Europe have
  • 00:45:52
    European
  • 00:45:54
    officials
  • 00:45:56
    please have a European foreign
  • 00:45:59
    policy you're going to be living with
  • 00:46:01
    Russia for a long
  • 00:46:03
    time so please negotiate with
  • 00:46:06
    Russia there are real security issues on
  • 00:46:09
    the
  • 00:46:11
    table but the bombast and the
  • 00:46:15
    rousophobia is not serving your security
  • 00:46:18
    at all it's not serving Ukraine security
  • 00:46:21
    at all it contributed to a million
  • 00:46:24
    casualties in Ukraine from this
  • 00:46:27
    idiotic American adventure that you
  • 00:46:31
    signed on to and then became the lead
  • 00:46:33
    cheerleaders
  • 00:46:35
    of solves
  • 00:46:40
    nothing on the Middle East by the
  • 00:46:43
    way the
  • 00:46:45
    US completely handed over foreign policy
  • 00:46:48
    to Netanyahu 30 years ago the Israel
  • 00:46:53
    lobby dominates American politics just
  • 00:46:57
    have no doubt about it i could explain
  • 00:47:00
    for hours how it works it's very
  • 00:47:04
    dangerous
  • 00:47:06
    i'm hoping that Trump will not destroy
  • 00:47:09
    his
  • 00:47:10
    administration and worse the Palestinian
  • 00:47:12
    people because of Netanyahu who I regard
  • 00:47:16
    as a war criminal
  • 00:47:19
    uh properly indicted by the
  • 00:47:23
    IC and that needs to be told no more
  • 00:47:28
    that there will be a state of Palestine
  • 00:47:31
    on the borders of the 4th of June
  • 00:47:33
    1967 according to international law as
  • 00:47:36
    the only way for peace it's the only way
  • 00:47:41
    for Europe to have peace on your borders
  • 00:47:45
    with the Middle East is the two-state
  • 00:47:48
    solution there is only one obstacle to
  • 00:47:51
    it by the way and that is the veto of
  • 00:47:54
    the United States and the UN Security
  • 00:47:56
    Council so if you want to have some
  • 00:47:59
    influence tell the United States "Drop
  • 00:48:02
    the
  • 00:48:03
    veto you are together with 180 countries
  • 00:48:07
    in the world the only ones that oppose a
  • 00:48:12
    Palestinian state
  • 00:48:14
    are the United States Israel
  • 00:48:18
    Micronia Nau
  • 00:48:21
    Palao Papa New
  • 00:48:24
    Guinea Mr
  • 00:48:27
    malay and
  • 00:48:30
    Paraguay so this is a place where Europe
  • 00:48:33
    could have a big
  • 00:48:35
    influence europe has gone silent about
  • 00:48:38
    the JCPOA and
  • 00:48:40
    Iran netanyahu's greatest dream in life
  • 00:48:44
    is a war between the United States and
  • 00:48:47
    Iran he's not given up and it's not
  • 00:48:50
    impossible that that would come
  • 00:48:52
    also and that's because the US in this
  • 00:48:57
    regard does not have an independent
  • 00:48:59
    foreign policy it is run by Israel it's
  • 00:49:03
    tragic it's amazing by the
  • 00:49:07
    way and it could end trump may say that
  • 00:49:12
    he wants foreign policy back maybe i'm
  • 00:49:16
    hoping that it's the case finally let me
  • 00:49:18
    just say with respect to China China is
  • 00:49:21
    not an enemy china is just a success
  • 00:49:25
    story that's why it is viewed by the
  • 00:49:29
    United States as an enemy because China
  • 00:49:32
    is a bigger economy than the United
  • 00:49:36
    States that's all
  • 00:49:40
    [Applause]
Tags
  • politica estera
  • NATO
  • Ucraina
  • Medio Oriente
  • diplomazia
  • Trump
  • Cina
  • espansione
  • Russia
  • Europa