What was the reason for the retired police officer's arrest?

He was arrested for tweeting about the threat of anti-Semitism in Britain.

How many police officers were involved in the arrest?

Six police officers were involved in the arrest.

What did the police search for in the retired officer's home?

They searched for books and materials they deemed 'very Brexity'.

What does Douglas Murray criticize about the police?

He criticizes the police for focusing on 'thought policing' instead of solving actual crimes.

What is Kier Starmer's stance on immigration?

Kier Starmer has made statements about controlling immigration but has a record of opposing measures to enforce it.

What is the media's role in covering Biden's cognitive decline?

The media has been accused of covering up Biden's cognitive issues and failing to report on them adequately.

What is the broader theme discussed in the video?

The video discusses leftist censorship, double standards in policing, and the manipulation of language in political discourse.

What does the retired officer's bookshelf symbolize?

It symbolizes a commitment to truth over ideology.

What is the significance of the term 'non-crime hate incident'?

It refers to incidents where individuals are investigated for expressing opinions that are deemed offensive, even if no crime has been committed.

What does the video suggest about the future of free speech?

It suggests that the battle for free speech is ongoing and that truth will ultimately prevail over censorship.

'We Have 8 Months Left' - Douglas Murray's Most URGENT Warning Yet

00:47:56

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GsfT0vSt1gs

Summary

TLDRThe video discusses the arrest of a 71-year-old retired police officer in the UK for tweeting about anti-Semitism, highlighting issues of police priorities and censorship. Douglas Murray critiques the police for focusing on 'thought policing' while neglecting actual crimes, pointing out that Kent Police has solved zero burglaries in certain areas. The conversation also addresses Kier Starmer's contradictory stance on immigration and the media's role in covering up President Biden's cognitive decline. The overarching theme is the left's censorship and manipulation of language, with a call to resist these tactics and uphold the truth.

Takeaways

🚨 A retired officer was arrested for tweeting about anti-Semitism.
📚 Police searched his bookshelf for 'Brexity' materials.
👮‍♂️ Douglas Murray criticizes police for failing to solve real crimes.
🗣️ The discussion highlights leftist censorship and double standards.
🇬🇧 Kier Starmer's immigration stance is seen as hypocritical.
📰 Media has been accused of covering up Biden's cognitive decline.
⚖️ The video emphasizes the importance of free speech and truth.
💬 Language manipulation is a tactic used to suppress dissent.
🔍 The retired officer's case reflects broader societal issues.
✊ The call to action is to resist censorship and uphold free speech.

Timeline

00:00:00 - 00:05:00
A 71-year-old retired police officer was arrested in his home by six officers for tweeting about anti-semitism, highlighting issues of censorship and police overreach in the UK. Douglas Murray discusses the absurdity of police actions, which included searching the officer's bookshelf for 'Brexity' materials, while actual crimes remain unsolved.
00:05:00 - 00:10:00
Murray expresses disbelief at the state of British policing, noting that the Kent police force has failed to solve any burglaries in certain areas. He criticizes the police for prioritizing thought policing over actual crime prevention, suggesting a correlation between their inability to address crime and their focus on political correctness.
00:10:00 - 00:15:00
The conversation shifts to UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who has made controversial statements on immigration that echo right-wing sentiments. Murray questions whether Starmer's rhetoric will lead to police scrutiny, highlighting the double standards in how political speech is treated based on ideology.
00:15:00 - 00:20:00
Murray argues that Starmer's immigration comments are insincere, pointing out that the current government has failed to control illegal immigration despite their claims. He emphasizes the disconnect between political promises and actual policy actions, suggesting that Starmer's statements are mere political tactics.
00:20:00 - 00:25:00
The discussion turns to the American media's failure to report on President Biden's cognitive decline, with Murray asserting that many journalists covered up the truth for years. He criticizes the media for their lack of accountability and the erosion of public trust in journalism due to this deception.
00:25:00 - 00:30:00
Murray highlights the broader implications of media malpractice, suggesting that the failure to report on Biden's condition has national security implications and undermines democratic governance. He calls out the hypocrisy of journalists who now profit from writing about issues they previously ignored.
00:30:00 - 00:35:00
The conversation addresses the systematic censorship and surveillance of dissenting opinions in both the UK and the US, with examples of individuals facing police action for expressing politically incorrect views. This reflects a broader trend of prioritizing ideological conformity over public safety.
00:35:00 - 00:40:00
Murray discusses the manipulation of language by the left, where terms like 'hate speech' and 'violence' are redefined to suppress dissent. He argues that this linguistic corruption is a deliberate strategy to control public discourse and stifle opposition.
00:40:00 - 00:47:56
The final segment emphasizes the importance of courage in speaking the truth against censorship. Murray asserts that the retired policeman's arrest is part of a larger pattern of leftist tactics aimed at silencing dissent, but ultimately, truth will prevail over ideology. He encourages viewers to resist censorship and support free speech.

Mind Map

Video Q&A

What was the reason for the retired police officer's arrest?
He was arrested for tweeting about the threat of anti-Semitism in Britain.
How many police officers were involved in the arrest?
Six police officers were involved in the arrest.
What did the police search for in the retired officer's home?
They searched for books and materials they deemed 'very Brexity'.
What does Douglas Murray criticize about the police?
He criticizes the police for focusing on 'thought policing' instead of solving actual crimes.
What is Kier Starmer's stance on immigration?
Kier Starmer has made statements about controlling immigration but has a record of opposing measures to enforce it.
What is the media's role in covering Biden's cognitive decline?
The media has been accused of covering up Biden's cognitive issues and failing to report on them adequately.
What is the broader theme discussed in the video?
The video discusses leftist censorship, double standards in policing, and the manipulation of language in political discourse.
What does the retired officer's bookshelf symbolize?
It symbolizes a commitment to truth over ideology.
What is the significance of the term 'non-crime hate incident'?
It refers to incidents where individuals are investigated for expressing opinions that are deemed offensive, even if no crime has been committed.
What does the video suggest about the future of free speech?
It suggests that the battle for free speech is ongoing and that truth will ultimately prevail over censorship.

View more video summaries

Get instant access to free YouTube video summaries powered by AI!

Subtitles

Auto Scroll:

00:00:00
Shock video. 71-year-old ex- cop
00:00:02
handcuffed in his home by six officers
00:00:05
for an anti-semitism tweet. Police
00:00:07
searched his bookshelf for very Brexity
00:00:09
things while ignoring actual crimes.
00:00:12
Douglas Murray exposes the truth they're
00:00:14
desperately trying to silence. Now to
00:00:17
another case of censorship and and
00:00:19
frankly madness in the UK where a
00:00:22
retired policeman was arrested and
00:00:25
handcuffed in his own home by six police
00:00:27
officers. six officers from Kent Police,
00:00:31
the same force he served for around a
00:00:33
decade. And his crime, well, he tweeted
00:00:36
something warning about the threat of
00:00:38
anti-semitism in Britain. As the
00:00:41
Telegraph reports, police body cam
00:00:44
camera footage captured officers
00:00:45
scrutinizing the 71-year-old's
00:00:47
collection of books by authors such as
00:00:49
Douglas Murray and issues of the
00:00:52
spectator pointing to what they
00:00:54
described as, and I quote, very Brexity
00:00:58
things, Douglas, what is going on in
00:01:01
your motherland?
00:01:03
Uh, it's it's it's pretty amazing. You
00:01:05
know, Rita, like you, I sort of think I
00:01:08
can't be shocked uh by the denigration
00:01:10
of the British police and the British
00:01:12
state. And then here, you know, you wake
00:01:14
up one morning and discover that police
00:01:16
have gone into a man's house and are
00:01:19
rumaging through his bookshelves and
00:01:21
accusing him of effectively wrong think.
00:01:24
Uh the man that they uh briefly
00:01:26
handcuffed and then took down to the
00:01:28
police station for hours of questioning
00:01:31
had obviously extremely good taste in
00:01:34
reading material. Uh he not only had my
00:01:36
international bestseller, The War in the
00:01:38
West, he had copies of the Spectator
00:01:40
magazine. This means that this is one ex
00:01:43
policeman at any rate uh who's
00:01:45
definitely thinking about the right
00:01:47
things and reading the right things.
00:01:49
What an extraordinary thing it is uh
00:01:51
that people in Britain have to live in a
00:01:53
society where that would happen. And I
00:01:55
can tell you something, Rita, like you,
00:01:57
if the police went into people's houses
00:02:00
and rummage through their bookcases and
00:02:03
found uh copies of some uh uh badly
00:02:06
selling left-wing magazine and some uh
00:02:10
left-wing author's uh latest book. Uh I
00:02:14
would be insensed by that as well. the
00:02:16
police have absolutely no darn right to
00:02:19
do this sort of thing from any political
00:02:21
direction. But but you know, of course
00:02:24
they think they can in this occasion.
00:02:26
There's one thing that does need to be
00:02:27
said on this read and I said this in the
00:02:29
spectator the magazine that the police
00:02:31
in Britain don't want you to read
00:02:33
apparently uh despite it being Britain's
00:02:35
uh bestselling and oldest weekly uh
00:02:37
magazine. Uh there's something has to be
00:02:40
said. Kent police who had the audacity
00:02:42
to do this have solved in areas over
00:02:45
which they have uh control zero
00:02:48
burglaries. I'll do that again. Zero
00:02:51
burglaries in areas where there have
00:02:53
been hundreds of home breakins. Kent
00:02:57
police have managed to solve none of
00:03:00
those crimes. Not one. So maybe there is
00:03:03
a correlation, isn't there, between a
00:03:06
police force that cannot police crime
00:03:09
and a police force that would like to go
00:03:11
to go around to a retired police
00:03:13
officer's house and rumage through his
00:03:15
bookcases and articles relating to his
00:03:18
late daughter's uh death in a
00:03:20
hit-and-run accident that was never
00:03:21
solved. Maybe maybe they do that stuff
00:03:25
because they can't do their job. And
00:03:28
that's the connection that I would like
00:03:30
to see more people call out. Uh uh not
00:03:33
just this thought policing, but the fact
00:03:35
that the thought policing or the wouldbe
00:03:38
thought policing is done by police
00:03:40
forces that seem to have no ability to
00:03:42
do actual policing.
00:03:47
Absolutely. Uh and and that is a
00:03:49
widespread issue in Britain, isn't it?
00:03:51
the failure of the police force to solve
00:03:54
crimes, real crimes like breakins and
00:03:58
acts of violence. Yes. Uh meanwhile,
00:04:00
we've got K Star, the prime minister.
00:04:03
Well, he's in danger of being arrested
00:04:04
with some of the commentary he's been
00:04:06
tweeting. Uh Douglas, uh extraordinary
00:04:10
stuff. He seems to be morphing into
00:04:11
Donald Trump if his work on X is to be
00:04:15
believed. In the past couple of weeks,
00:04:16
he's posted about coming for illegal
00:04:19
immigrants. He said he'll put Britain
00:04:21
first and end the reliance to cheap
00:04:24
overseas labor that's taking jobs from
00:04:26
Brits. He posted if you want to live in
00:04:29
the UK, you should speak English. That's
00:04:32
common sense. Bravo. Uh he also said
00:04:35
settlement in the UK is a privilege.
00:04:37
It's uh that has to be earned. It's not
00:04:39
a right. And he also said this about
00:04:42
strong borders, that the Tories lost
00:04:45
control of our borders and let net
00:04:47
migration sore to record levels,
00:04:49
undercutting hardworking Brits. I won't
00:04:52
stand for it, Douglas. Uh, is the prime
00:04:55
minister going to get a visit from the
00:04:57
constabularary for these sorts of
00:04:59
non-rime hate incidents? Because that is
00:05:02
a real thing in Britain. I'm frankly a
00:05:05
little bit surprised by how he's become
00:05:08
some right-wing reactionary.
00:05:12
Well, of course, if anyone else had said
00:05:14
this, if I'd have said this or you'd
00:05:15
have said this, Rita, uh um I'm sure
00:05:18
Kiss Armor and his police force would
00:05:19
take a different view. Uh but of course,
00:05:21
I don't believe a word of it. Uh first
00:05:24
of all, it's perfectly true the last
00:05:26
conservative government lost control of
00:05:28
the borders. Absolutely true. It's also
00:05:30
true though that Karma has lost control
00:05:32
of the borders. Um almost a thousand
00:05:35
people came in a couple of days ago on
00:05:36
one day alone uh uh on the illegal just
00:05:39
on the illegal crossings across the
00:05:41
channel on on boats uh organized by
00:05:44
criminal gangs. Uh when he says that
00:05:47
that that that it's it's not a right to
00:05:50
land in Britain and just stay, he's
00:05:53
right. I it it's just something anyone
00:05:55
can do. However, it's just something
00:05:57
that nobody in his government or his
00:05:59
border force are doing anything to stop.
00:06:02
Uh they behave as though it's impossible
00:06:05
to stop tens of thousands of people
00:06:08
arriving just across the channel every
00:06:10
year illegally, let alone the hundreds
00:06:13
of thousands of other people who arrive
00:06:14
in the UK every year legally and
00:06:17
illegally and get net migration up to
00:06:20
almost a million in in in uh uh the last
00:06:23
couple of years. Um but just just as I
00:06:25
say this is the most cynical cynical
00:06:27
tactic and I at any rate don't believe a
00:06:30
word of what Karma says. I have heard
00:06:33
politician after politician labor and
00:06:36
conservative say this for decades. They
00:06:39
always say the same pabulum. They say
00:06:42
when they feel like they might need to
00:06:44
just sort of enforce the base of it.
00:06:46
They say these things like I think that
00:06:49
people should speak English if they come
00:06:51
to England. And everyone's meant to say,
00:06:53
"My gosh, what an amazing breakthrough."
00:06:55
It doesn't matter, Adan, if you're
00:06:57
losing your country all the time because
00:07:00
you don't enforce your borders. This is
00:07:03
abs I don't even know if Karma has seen
00:07:06
these tweets. I'm sure he doesn't write
00:07:08
them. His own home secretary and foreign
00:07:10
secretary and others have distanced
00:07:12
themselves from the language he's used
00:07:14
himself. But it's just language games,
00:07:17
Rita. That's all it is. It's language
00:07:19
games. They don't do anything. Not in
00:07:22
the real world. Thousands of people will
00:07:24
continue to break into Britain every
00:07:27
week illegally. And in the meantime,
00:07:30
what do we have? Karma, the brave
00:07:34
tweeter. Well, as you say, Rita, it's
00:07:36
lucky that he's prime minister and not,
00:07:38
for instance, a white workingclass uh
00:07:41
mother in the north of England or
00:07:43
otherwise he'd be having his collar felt
00:07:45
this evening.
00:07:48
Absolutely. Douglas, before you go,
00:07:50
you've written a superb piece for the
00:07:52
Telegraph about America's leftist media
00:07:55
paying a price for their role in
00:07:57
covering up Joe Biden's incapacity. It's
00:08:00
been obvious incapacity for some years.
00:08:03
You argue the fact that so many serious
00:08:06
journalists denied what was obvious to
00:08:09
all of us explains why trust in their
00:08:12
reporting has collapsed.
00:08:15
Is the damage too steep to fix or can
00:08:19
they restore their
00:08:21
credibility? Uh well, you know, the
00:08:24
interesting thing uh with the American
00:08:26
uh media class is that so much of it
00:08:29
just covered this up for years, not just
00:08:32
the past four years, for many years with
00:08:35
Joe Biden, even before the 2020
00:08:36
election. They were all rooting for him
00:08:39
and so they covered things over for him.
00:08:41
And now they all say that they're brave
00:08:44
uh truth warriors for uh writing books
00:08:46
about it. Now um they claim things like
00:08:49
you know well um uh uh you know there
00:08:52
was a sort of cover up from the White
00:08:54
House about the extent to which Joe
00:08:56
Biden was mentally incapacitated. There
00:08:59
wasn't just a cover up from the White
00:09:00
House or Jill
00:09:02
Biden. There was a cover up by much of
00:09:05
the American media. But not all just as
00:09:08
not all the media was to blame for this.
00:09:10
There is sure there is a fall-off in
00:09:12
public trust in America as elsewhere in
00:09:15
the media because of a concerted cover
00:09:17
up like that. But you know, Rita, if if
00:09:20
uh those that same political and media
00:09:22
class had read the New York Post, they'd
00:09:25
have been able to know about this oh 5
00:09:28
years before they themselves agreed and
00:09:30
broke the story. If they'd have watched
00:09:32
you, Rita, and me, Rita, on Sky
00:09:36
Australia talking in recent years,
00:09:38
they'd have seen that we knew something
00:09:41
was up. We identified something was up.
00:09:44
You and I weren't silent uh when uh Joe
00:09:47
Biden was claiming that he just spoken
00:09:50
uh to dead world leaders uh or was
00:09:54
wandering off stage and off script in
00:09:56
ways that were weird even for Biden. So
00:09:59
no, it's not everyone who ignored this,
00:10:03
but that it really it really is quite
00:10:05
hard to stomach uh to see the very
00:10:08
journalists uh who spent years covering
00:10:11
up Biden's cognitive decline uh now
00:10:14
writing books saying, "Oh, it turns out
00:10:17
that Biden in 2024 wasn't peak Biden
00:10:21
after all." And how could we have known?
00:10:24
There were no signs, nothing to tell us.
00:10:29
Yeah, when it doesn't matter, suddenly
00:10:31
they've got the breaking news. And it's
00:10:33
been fascinating to see the reception
00:10:35
they're getting from other leftist media
00:10:37
who are treating all this as if it's
00:10:40
some revelation when the rest of the
00:10:42
country uh has known this as we have
00:10:45
discussed it for years. Douglas Murray,
00:10:47
always a pleasure to speak with you.
00:10:48
Thanks for your time. Thank you. As I
00:10:51
listen to this interview between Douglas
00:10:53
Murray and the Australian journalist,
00:10:55
I'm struck by how perfectly it captures
00:10:57
the utter madness gripping Britain and
00:10:59
America today. The leftist
00:11:02
establishment's blatant double
00:11:04
standards, censorship, and deception
00:11:06
deserve the strongest possible
00:11:08
condemnation. While Murray makes
00:11:10
excellent points, I believe we need to
00:11:12
go much deeper to fully expose the scale
00:11:14
of this leftist hypocrisy.
00:11:17
Let me expand on what they discussed
00:11:19
with additional facts and arguments that
00:11:21
completely destroy the leftist
00:11:23
narrative. The arrest of a 71-year-old
00:11:26
retired police officer for a tweet about
00:11:28
anti-semitism reveals what I consider
00:11:31
the true face of leftist tolerance. Six
00:11:34
police officers, six handcuffed this
00:11:37
elderly man in his own home while
00:11:39
scrutinizing his bookshelf for very
00:11:41
Brexity things like Douglas Murray's
00:11:43
books and the Spectator magazine. This
00:11:46
isn't policing. This is political
00:11:48
persecution, plain and simple. What
00:11:51
infuriates me is that Murray doesn't
00:11:53
mention how these non-rime hate
00:11:55
incidents have exploded across Britain
00:11:57
under leftist influence. Over 120,000
00:12:00
such incidents were recorded between
00:12:02
2014 2019 alone. People are having
00:12:06
permanent records created for simply
00:12:08
expressing opinions.
00:12:10
The College of Policing guidelines that
00:12:12
enable this madness were written under
00:12:14
labor government influence and have been
00:12:17
enthusiastically implemented by
00:12:19
left-leaning police leadership. I find
00:12:22
it particularly telling that the Kent
00:12:23
police that arrested this man have a
00:12:26
special hate crime unit with dozens of
00:12:29
officers dedicated to monitoring social
00:12:31
media and investigating offensive
00:12:33
speech.
00:12:35
Yet, as Murray correctly points out,
00:12:37
they've solved zero burglaries in
00:12:39
certain areas. This is a deliberate
00:12:41
choice about priorities, not a lack of
00:12:44
resources. What I believe Murray should
00:12:46
have emphasized more strongly is that
00:12:48
Britain now has the lowest criminal
00:12:50
prosecution rate in decades. Only 5.5%
00:12:54
of crimes in England and Wales now
00:12:56
result in someone being charged, down
00:12:58
from 16% in 2014. Violent crime has
00:13:02
doubled in many areas while police focus
00:13:04
on hunting down tweets. When I analyze
00:13:07
the data, I can see this collapse in
00:13:09
real policing coincides exactly with the
00:13:11
rise of progressive policing
00:13:13
priorities. The leftist agenda is clear
00:13:16
to me. Create a police force that
00:13:18
protects their ideology, not the public.
00:13:21
They want police monitoring your
00:13:22
thoughts while ignoring actual
00:13:24
criminals. Consider these additional
00:13:26
facts that make my blood boil. In
00:13:29
London, the Metropolitan Police now has
00:13:31
over 900 officers dedicated to diversity
00:13:34
and inclusion roles, while knife crime
00:13:37
soarses to record levels. British police
00:13:39
departments spend over 66 million pounds
00:13:42
annually on diversity training while
00:13:44
cutting neighborhood policing by 32%
00:13:47
since
00:13:48
2015. Police forces openly advertise for
00:13:51
recruits who are woke and progressive.
00:13:54
While lowering physical fitness
00:13:56
standards to meet diversity quotas,
00:13:58
officers received promotions for meeting
00:14:00
diversity targets, not for solving
00:14:02
crimes. In 2022, 64% of senior
00:14:06
promotions went to officers who had led
00:14:08
diversity initiatives.
00:14:10
The Crown Prosecution Service has
00:14:12
publicly stated that certain hate speech
00:14:15
takes priority over property crimes with
00:14:17
their 2021 guidelines explicitly ranking
00:14:20
online hate. Above burglary and theft,
00:14:24
police training now includes mandatory
00:14:26
unconscious bias courses that teach
00:14:29
officers to question their instincts
00:14:31
about suspicious behavior if it might
00:14:33
involve protected minority groups.
00:14:36
Between 2018 2023, British police
00:14:39
investigated over 230,000 non-rime hate
00:14:43
incidents, while 1.2 million burglaries
00:14:46
went unsolved. The police monitoring of
00:14:48
social media has expanded to include
00:14:50
keywords related to anti-woke
00:14:52
sentiments, gender critical views, and
00:14:55
nationalist opinions. This retired
00:14:57
officer's crime was speaking about
00:14:59
anti-semitism, something the left claims
00:15:01
to oppose. But I'm outraged by the truth
00:15:04
they don't want you to know. Leftist
00:15:06
anti-semitism has exploded across
00:15:08
Britain. Since October 7th, there have
00:15:11
been over 4,000 anti-semitic incidents
00:15:13
in the UK, a
00:15:15
1,350% increase. Yet, how many arrests?
00:15:19
A tiny fraction compared to people
00:15:20
arrested for criticizing Islam or
00:15:22
transgender ideology. I find the
00:15:24
hypocrisy breathtaking. When pro
00:15:27
Palestinian protesters chant from the
00:15:29
river to the sea, an open call for
00:15:31
Israel's destruction, the police protect
00:15:34
them. When Hamas supporters march
00:15:36
through London, the police escort them.
00:15:38
But tweet something warning about
00:15:40
anti-semitism and six officers raid your
00:15:43
home. When I examine the case files of
00:15:45
those investigated for hate speech, the
00:15:48
pattern becomes unmistakable. A
00:15:50
50-year-old mother in Liverpool was
00:15:52
questioned for 7 hours after posting
00:15:54
that only women have cervixes. A
00:15:56
15-year-old boy in Manchester received a
00:15:58
home visit from police for sharing a
00:16:00
mcritical off transgender athletes. An
00:16:03
elderly Christian preacher was arrested
00:16:04
for quoting Bible verses about
00:16:07
homosexuality. University professor was
00:16:09
investigated for saying immigration
00:16:11
should be discussed openly. A Scottish
00:16:13
woman was charged with a hate crime for
00:16:15
posting feminist stickers saying women
00:16:17
don't have penises. Yet during the same
00:16:20
period, pro- Hamas protesters calling
00:16:22
for jihad faced no consequences.
00:16:25
Activists who distributed maps of
00:16:27
Jewish-owned businesses faced no police
00:16:29
action. Leftist academics who called for
00:16:32
the elimination of Israel remained
00:16:34
untouched. Protesters who burned the
00:16:36
British flag receive police
00:16:38
protection. I believe this selective
00:16:40
enforcement reveals the true agenda.
00:16:43
It's not about preventing hate or
00:16:44
protecting minorities. It's about
00:16:46
enforcing leftist orthodoxy through
00:16:49
state power. The message is clear.
00:16:51
challenge leftist ideology and the
00:16:53
police will come for you. Support it and
00:16:56
you can do virtually anything without
00:16:59
consequence. What Murray doesn't mention
00:17:01
and what I find deeply disturbing is how
00:17:03
extensively the British government
00:17:05
monitors citizens online activity. This
00:17:08
goes far beyond occasional arrests for
00:17:10
tweets. Consider these chilling facts.
00:17:12
Under the Investigatory Powers Act,
00:17:15
pushed by leftist politicians, UK
00:17:17
authorities can legally monitor all
00:17:19
online activity without individual
00:17:22
warrants. The online safety bill,
00:17:24
championed by Labor, requires platforms
00:17:26
to proactively monitor and remove legal
00:17:28
but harmful content, a deliberately
00:17:31
vague category. Government funded
00:17:33
counter disinformation units actively
00:17:36
flag content contradicting official
00:17:38
narratives for removal. The
00:17:40
counterterrorism internet referral unit
00:17:42
has expanded its mission from targeting
00:17:44
terrorist content to monitoring
00:17:46
extremist adjacent speech, including
00:17:49
criticism of immigration or gender
00:17:52
ideology. Police departments maintain
00:17:54
databases of individuals who have
00:17:56
expressed concerning views online, even
00:17:59
when those views break no laws. Schools
00:18:02
are required to report children who
00:18:03
express problematic political opinions
00:18:05
to anti-extremism programs.
00:18:09
When I connect these dots, I see not
00:18:11
random overreach, but a systematic
00:18:13
effort to criminalize disscent. The
00:18:16
retired policeman's arrest wasn't an
00:18:18
anomaly. It was the system working
00:18:20
exactly as designed. The left claims to
00:18:23
oppose authoritarianism, yet they've
00:18:25
created a surveillance apparatus that
00:18:26
would make the Stacey envious. They've
00:18:29
simply replaced monitoring for communist
00:18:31
disscent with monitoring for wrong think
00:18:34
on their pet issues.
00:18:36
Murray correctly identifies Starmer's
00:18:38
immigration comments as empty rhetoric,
00:18:40
but I believe he doesn't go far enough
00:18:42
in exposing Starmer's total hypocrisy on
00:18:45
this issue. Let's look at Starmer's
00:18:48
actual record on immigration that makes
00:18:50
me question his integrity. As director
00:18:52
of public prosecutions 2008 to 2013,
00:18:56
Starmer issued guidelines making it
00:18:58
harder to prosecute immigration
00:18:59
offenders with specific directives to
00:19:02
avoid prosecuting cases that might
00:19:04
generate adverse publicity around
00:19:06
immigration
00:19:08
enforcement. As Labor leader, Starmer
00:19:11
voted against the Nationality and
00:19:12
Borders bill 26 times, opposing every
00:19:15
measure designed to combat illegal
00:19:17
immigration. He opposed every single
00:19:20
measure to control illegal immigration
00:19:22
proposed by the previous government,
00:19:24
describing enforcement efforts as cruel
00:19:26
and
00:19:27
inhumane. Starmer called the Rwanda
00:19:30
deportation plan immoral and unworkable
00:19:33
and canceled it immediately upon taking
00:19:35
office with no alternative plan to deter
00:19:38
illegal channel crossings. In his first
00:19:41
week as prime minister, Starmer removed
00:19:43
caps on work and family visas, opening
00:19:45
the floodgates to unlimited migration in
00:19:48
these categories. He appointed James
00:19:50
Cleverly as home secretary, a man who
00:19:53
previously called immigration controls
00:19:55
economically illiterate and lobbied for
00:19:57
looser visa requirements.
00:20:00
Under Starmer's leadership, Labour MPs
00:20:02
have described immigration enforcement
00:20:04
as hostile and racist. With 84% of Labor
00:20:08
MPs belonging to parliamentary groups
00:20:10
advocating for weaker borders, Starmer
00:20:13
personally opposed the previous
00:20:14
government's attempts to deport foreign
00:20:16
criminals, calling them
00:20:19
disproportionate. During his campaign
00:20:21
for labor leadership, Starmer promised
00:20:23
to maintain free movement with the EU if
00:20:26
elected. He has repeatedly described
00:20:28
Britain's immigration system as too
00:20:31
harsh rather than too
00:20:33
lenient. These are not the actions of
00:20:36
someone who genuinely wants to control
00:20:38
immigration. I'm particularly disturbed
00:20:41
that Murray mentions the recent arrivals
00:20:42
of nearly 1,000 illegal migrants in a
00:20:45
single day without noting that Starmer
00:20:48
has deliberately reduced Border Patrol
00:20:50
vessel deployments in the English
00:20:52
Channel by 30% since taking office.
00:20:55
How can I believe he wants to stop
00:20:57
illegal crossings when he's removing the
00:20:59
resources needed to intercept the
00:21:01
boats? Starmer's tweets about putting
00:21:04
Britain first and making immigrants
00:21:06
speak English are nothing but a cynical
00:21:08
political ploy. When I analyze his
00:21:11
actual policies, I see they do the exact
00:21:14
opposite of what he
00:21:16
tweets. Consider these additional facts
00:21:19
that make me question the media's
00:21:20
failure to hold him accountable.
00:21:22
Starmer's labor manifesto included a
00:21:25
commitment to abolish all immigration
00:21:27
detention centers, which would make
00:21:29
deportation of illegal immigrants
00:21:31
virtually impossible. He has appointed
00:21:34
immigration lawyers who specialized in
00:21:36
blocking deportations to key government
00:21:38
positions, including three former
00:21:40
immigration attorneys who built careers
00:21:42
preventing removals.
00:21:44
Labor councils across Britain have
00:21:46
declared themselves sanctuary
00:21:48
cities that refused to cooperate with
00:21:51
immigration enforcement. With Starmer's
00:21:53
explicit blessing, Starmer has removed
00:21:56
the target to reduce net migration that
00:21:58
even the previous government maintained,
00:22:00
refusing to commit to any specific
00:22:02
number.
00:22:04
He has expanded the list of shortage
00:22:06
occupations exempt from immigration
00:22:08
controls to include almost every job
00:22:10
category, including retail workers,
00:22:13
restaurant staff, and warehouse
00:22:15
personnel. His government has secretly
00:22:18
instructed border officials to process
00:22:20
rather than deter illegal arrivals with
00:22:23
internal memos directing staff to focus
00:22:25
on humanitarian reception rather than
00:22:28
enforcement. Starmer's administration
00:22:30
has cut funding for immigration
00:22:32
enforcement by 18% while increasing
00:22:35
spending on migrant accommodation by
00:22:38
340%. His government has extended the
00:22:40
deadline for EU citizens to apply for
00:22:42
settled status, effectively legalizing
00:22:45
thousands who had been in the country
00:22:47
illegally. Labor has opened negotiations
00:22:49
with the EU to create new pathways for
00:22:52
migration between Britain and Europe.
00:22:55
Since taking office, deportation flights
00:22:57
have decreased by 64% compared to the
00:23:00
previous government. I find the most
00:23:02
revealing fact to be this. During his
00:23:04
campaign, Starmer promised to maintain
00:23:06
the strictest immigration controls in
00:23:09
decades. Within weeks of taking office,
00:23:12
he abandoned these promises. Now faced
00:23:14
with rising poll numbers for Reform UK,
00:23:17
he suddenly pretends to care about
00:23:18
borders again. This isn't policy, it's
00:23:21
panic. When I examine the timing of
00:23:24
Starmer's sudden tough talk on
00:23:25
immigration, I see it correlates exactly
00:23:28
with Reform UK rising to 18% in the
00:23:31
polls. His words aren't a reflection of
00:23:34
conviction, but of political
00:23:36
calculation. This pattern of saying one
00:23:38
thing while doing another defines
00:23:40
Starmer's entire approach to governance.
00:23:43
What neither Murray nor the interviewer
00:23:45
addresses is the massive demographic
00:23:47
transformation occurring in Britain
00:23:49
under policies Starmer supports. I
00:23:52
believe the British people deserve to
00:23:53
know these facts. Net migration to the
00:23:56
UK reached a record 764,000 in 2023,
00:24:00
adding a population equivalent to a
00:24:02
major city each year. At current rates,
00:24:05
the UK population will grow by over 6
00:24:08
million in the next decade, requiring
00:24:10
2.6 million new homes. 13% of births in
00:24:14
England and Wales are now to mothers
00:24:15
born outside the UK, rising to over 50%
00:24:18
in major cities. In London, British-born
00:24:21
citizens are already a minority at just
00:24:23
45% of the population. In over 1,600
00:24:27
primary schools across Britain, English
00:24:30
is now a minority language. Demographic
00:24:33
projections show that if current trends
00:24:35
continue, the native British will become
00:24:37
a minority nationwide by
00:24:39
2066. The cost of providing public
00:24:42
services to this growing population
00:24:44
requires an additional 35 billion pounds
00:24:47
in government spending annually. I
00:24:49
believe Starmer knows these facts
00:24:51
perfectly well. His tweets about
00:24:54
becoming an island of strangers
00:24:56
acknowledge the concerns many British
00:24:58
people have about the scale and pace of
00:25:00
demographic change. Yet his policies
00:25:03
accelerate rather than address these
00:25:05
concerns. When I look at the areas most
00:25:08
affected by mass immigration, I see
00:25:10
they're rarely the wealthy neighborhoods
00:25:12
where politicians and media figures
00:25:14
live. The impact falls
00:25:16
disproportionately on workingclass
00:25:18
communities. traditionally Labour's
00:25:20
base, who find their schools, hospitals,
00:25:23
and housing increasingly
00:25:25
strained. This disconnect between
00:25:27
rhetoric and reality, between who makes
00:25:29
immigration policy and who lives with
00:25:31
its consequences, explains why trust in
00:25:34
politicians like Starmer has collapsed.
00:25:37
People can see with their own eyes that
00:25:39
the reality on the ground contradicts
00:25:41
the polished statements on television.
00:25:44
Murray's comments on the American
00:25:45
media's cover up of Biden's cognitive
00:25:47
decline are accurate, but I believe they
00:25:50
don't capture the full scale of this
00:25:52
betrayal of journalistic
00:25:55
ethics. Let's be absolutely clear. The
00:25:57
American mainstream media didn't just
00:26:00
ignore Biden's decline, they actively
00:26:02
conspired to hide it from the American
00:26:05
people. This wasn't negligence. It was
00:26:07
deliberate deception that undermines the
00:26:10
very foundation of democratic
00:26:11
governance. Consider these damning facts
00:26:14
that make my jaw drop. In December 2019,
00:26:18
over 50 medical professionals publicly
00:26:21
expressed concerns about Biden's
00:26:22
cognitive health. The media ignored them
00:26:25
completely with CNN refusing to even
00:26:28
report on their statement. During the
00:26:30
2020 campaign, Biden had lid days, no
00:26:33
public appearances over 40% of the time.
00:26:36
The media called it a strategic choice
00:26:38
rather than questioning his stamina. The
00:26:41
New York Times, Washington Post, and CNN
00:26:44
all dismissed videos of Biden's confused
00:26:46
moments as selectively edited or
00:26:48
right-wing conspiracy theories, with the
00:26:51
Washington Post running 11 separate fact
00:26:53
checks, defending Biden's mental acuity.
00:26:57
MSNBC ran segments claiming that
00:26:59
questioning Biden's mental fitness was
00:27:01
agist and Russian
00:27:03
disinformation, with one host calling it
00:27:05
a lie from the Trump campaign. Biden's
00:27:08
team refused to release any cognitive
00:27:10
test results. Yet, the media never
00:27:12
demanded them as they did for Trump, who
00:27:14
took and passed the Montreal Cognitive
00:27:17
Assessment. Journalists who raised
00:27:19
concerns about Biden's mental state were
00:27:21
blacklisted from major publications,
00:27:24
with several reporters confirming they
00:27:26
were told the topic was off limits.
00:27:28
During the 2020 campaign, Biden's
00:27:31
staffers would cut his microphone when
00:27:33
he began to ramble incoherently, a
00:27:36
practice the press corps observed but
00:27:38
didn't
00:27:39
report. White House press briefings
00:27:41
under Biden averaged just 16 minutes of
00:27:44
actual presidential speaking time,
00:27:46
compared to over an hour under previous
00:27:50
administrations. After Biden's
00:27:52
disastrous June 2023 press conference,
00:27:55
where he confused Ukraine with Iraq
00:27:57
multiple times, CNN edited the mistakes
00:28:00
out of their highlight clips. The
00:28:02
Atlantic, New Yorker, and New York Times
00:28:05
all published lengthy profiles of Biden
00:28:07
in 2020 2022 that made no mention of his
00:28:10
obvious cognitive issues despite
00:28:12
reporters spending hours with him. What
00:28:15
makes this even worse is that these same
00:28:17
journalists who covered up Biden's
00:28:19
decline are now writing books about it
00:28:20
for profit. I'm disgusted that the
00:28:23
Washington Post's Bob Woodward, CNN's
00:28:25
Edward Isaac Dov, and NBC's Jonathan
00:28:28
Allen all ignored Biden's obvious
00:28:30
impairment for years only to now claim
00:28:33
they knew all along. I find the most
00:28:36
despicable example to be this. In 2020,
00:28:39
when Biden confused his wife for his
00:28:41
sister, forgot Obama's name, and claimed
00:28:44
he was running for the Senate, Atlantic
00:28:47
writer John Hendrickson wrote an article
00:28:49
claiming Biden's gaffs were due to his
00:28:51
stutter, not cognitive
00:28:53
decline. Now, Hendrickson admits he saw
00:28:56
signs of decline, but didn't report them
00:28:59
because he feared it would help Trump.
00:29:01
This cover up has devastating
00:29:03
consequences beyond just deceiving
00:29:05
voters that make me deeply concerned for
00:29:07
democratic governance. America's enemies
00:29:10
perceived weakness in the
00:29:11
commander-in-chief, emboldening Russia,
00:29:14
China, and Iran to take aggressive
00:29:16
actions they might otherwise have
00:29:19
avoided. Critical national security
00:29:21
decisions were potentially made by
00:29:23
someone not fully capable of
00:29:25
understanding them, putting American
00:29:27
lives and interests at risk. The
00:29:30
American people were robbed of their
00:29:31
right to know the true condition of
00:29:33
their president. A fundamental violation
00:29:35
of democratic principles. Democratic
00:29:38
institutions were undermined when
00:29:40
unelected staffers effectively ran the
00:29:42
executive branch without accountability
00:29:44
to
00:29:45
voters. Media credibility collapsed with
00:29:48
trust in mainstream outlets falling to
00:29:50
an all-time low of 32% by 2023, further
00:29:54
polarizing the American public. A
00:29:57
dangerous precedent was set where
00:29:58
political parties can run clearly
00:30:00
incapacitated candidates while expecting
00:30:03
the media to cover for them. When I
00:30:06
consider the scale of this deception,
00:30:08
I'm reminded of other historic media
00:30:10
failures. The uncritical reporting on
00:30:12
WMDs in Iraq, the dismissal of the
00:30:15
Hunter Biden laptop as Russian
00:30:17
disinformation, and the promotion of the
00:30:19
steel dossier as credible intelligence.
00:30:22
But the Biden cognitive decline coverup
00:30:24
surpasses them all in its brazeness and
00:30:27
duration. This wasn't just bad
00:30:29
journalism. It was an attack on
00:30:31
democracy itself. The fourth estate
00:30:34
abandoned its duty to inform the public
00:30:36
in service to leftist political goals.
00:30:39
When historians look back on this
00:30:41
period, I believe they will identify
00:30:43
this media malpractice as a turning
00:30:45
point in public trust of institutions.
00:30:48
What Murray doesn't address, and what I
00:30:50
find particularly alarming, is how big
00:30:52
tech companies actively participated in
00:30:54
suppressing information about Biden's
00:30:57
cognitive decline. Twitter, pre Elon
00:30:59
Musk, suspended over 2,000 accounts that
00:31:02
shared videos of Biden's confused
00:31:04
moments, claiming they violated
00:31:06
manipulation policies. Facebook reduced
00:31:08
the reach of pages that discussed
00:31:10
Biden's mental fitness by up to 80%,
00:31:13
according to internal documents.
00:31:15
YouTube demonetized channels that
00:31:17
question Biden's cognitive health,
00:31:20
labeling such content harmful
00:31:22
misinformation. Google search algorithms
00:31:24
were adjusted to prioritize positive
00:31:27
stories about Biden's mental acuity over
00:31:29
critical
00:31:30
ones. Medical professionals who raised
00:31:33
concerns about Biden's symptoms had
00:31:35
their LinkedIn accounts restricted or
00:31:37
suspended.
00:31:39
When I look at this coordination between
00:31:41
traditional media and tech platforms, I
00:31:43
see not individual decisions, but a
00:31:46
systematic effort to control what
00:31:48
Americans were allowed to know about
00:31:49
their president. This represents a
00:31:52
frightening evolution in information
00:31:53
control. From simply not reporting
00:31:56
information to actively preventing
00:31:58
citizens from sharing it with each
00:32:00
other, the success of this operation
00:32:02
should concern everyone, regardless of
00:32:04
political affiliation.
00:32:07
If the combined powers of traditional
00:32:08
media and tech platforms can hide a
00:32:10
president's obvious cognitive decline
00:32:12
for years, what else can they hide from
00:32:15
the
00:32:16
public? These three issues, arresting
00:32:19
citizens for wrong think, lying about
00:32:21
immigration policy, and covering up
00:32:23
Biden's decline, are all part of what I
00:32:26
recognize as the same pattern of leftist
00:32:28
censorship and
00:32:30
deception. The modern left operates on a
00:32:32
simple principle that I find deeply
00:32:34
disturbing. control the narrative at all
00:32:36
costs. Facts, truth, and reality are all
00:32:40
secondary to maintaining power and
00:32:41
pushing their agenda. Let me explain how
00:32:44
I believe this works. One, create a
00:32:46
narrative that serves their political
00:32:48
goals regardless of its relationship to
00:32:50
reality. Two, use institutional power to
00:32:54
enforce this narrative, media, academia,
00:32:56
government, tech
00:32:58
platforms. Three, silence anyone who
00:33:00
questions the narrative through
00:33:01
cancellation, censorship, or even
00:33:03
arrest. Four, deny obvious reality when
00:33:07
it contradicts their preferred
00:33:08
narrative, gaslighting the public. Five,
00:33:11
rewrite history when the narrative
00:33:12
finally collapses, claiming they knew
00:33:14
the truth all along. I see this pattern
00:33:17
everywhere, and it makes me question
00:33:19
everything the establishment presents as
00:33:22
fact. on COVID. The left declared
00:33:25
certain treatments misinformation
00:33:26
despite scientific evidence, banned
00:33:29
discussion of lab leak theories, and
00:33:31
silenced medical professionals who
00:33:33
disagreed with official narratives, only
00:33:35
to quietly admit later many of these
00:33:37
conspiracy theories had merit on
00:33:40
climate. They censor scientists who
00:33:43
question extreme predictions, ban debate
00:33:45
on the economics of green policies, and
00:33:48
demonize anyone who suggests adaptation
00:33:50
over radical economic transformation
00:33:53
while ignoring the failed predictions of
00:33:55
past climate models. on gender. They
00:33:58
fire professors who state biological
00:34:00
facts, ban books questioning gender
00:34:02
ideology, and prosecute parents who
00:34:05
refuse to affirm their children's gender
00:34:07
confusion while suppressing data on
00:34:09
dransitioner experiences and negative
00:34:11
medical outcomes. On crime, they
00:34:14
suppress statistics showing the failure
00:34:16
of progressive policies, redefine terms
00:34:19
to hide rising crime rates, and attack
00:34:22
police who speak out about the
00:34:23
consequences of defunding law
00:34:24
enforcement.
00:34:26
The retired policeman arrested for
00:34:28
tweeting about anti-semitism is just the
00:34:31
latest victim of this censorship machine
00:34:33
that I believe threatens the very
00:34:34
foundation of free
00:34:36
society. But he won't be the last. When
00:34:40
I step back and look at the broader
00:34:41
pattern, I'm struck by how
00:34:43
systematically truth itself has become
00:34:45
the enemy of leftist
00:34:47
ideology. This isn't just political
00:34:49
disagreement. It's a fundamental divide
00:34:51
over whether objective reality should
00:34:53
constrain political narratives. Murray
00:34:56
touches on perhaps the most dangerous
00:34:58
aspect of all this, the creation of a
00:35:00
two-tier justice system where your
00:35:02
treatment depends entirely on your
00:35:05
politics. I find this development deeply
00:35:07
alarming for the future of democratic
00:35:09
governance. This is not hyperbole. It's
00:35:12
demonstrable fact that makes my blood
00:35:14
boil. Pro Palestinian protesters who
00:35:18
openly call for violence face no
00:35:20
consequences, while peaceful pro-Israel
00:35:22
demonstrators are arrested for
00:35:23
provocative behavior. In London alone,
00:35:26
374 pro-Israel protesters were detained
00:35:29
in 2023, compared to just 14 pro
00:35:32
Palestinian
00:35:34
protesters. Left-wing climate activists
00:35:36
who block highways get released without
00:35:38
charges, while a man who moved one such
00:35:41
protester was arrested for assault.
00:35:44
Extinction Rebellion caused over 50
00:35:46
million pounds in economic damage with
00:35:48
only 3% of activists receiving jail
00:35:50
time. Muslim rape gangs were ignored for
00:35:53
decades due to cultural sensitivity,
00:35:56
while a father who protested outside a
00:35:59
police station about his daughter's rape
00:36:00
was arrested for causing distress. The
00:36:03
Rtherham scandal alone saw 1,400 girls
00:36:07
victimized while police actively
00:36:09
suppressed reports. BLM protesters who
00:36:12
destroyed statues and attacked police
00:36:14
were called mostly peaceful while Brexit
00:36:17
supporters were investigated for hate
00:36:19
speech. During the 2020 riots,
00:36:22
prosecutors dropped charges against 73%
00:36:24
of BLM protesters while pursuing 92% of
00:36:28
cases against right-wing
00:36:31
demonstrators. Universities expel
00:36:33
students for questioning transgender
00:36:34
ideology while protecting professors who
00:36:37
call for violence against conservatives.
00:36:39
Over 200 academics have faced
00:36:41
disciplinary action for expressing
00:36:43
gender critical views. Politicians who
00:36:46
violate COVID lockdown rules faced no
00:36:49
consequences while ordinary citizens
00:36:51
were fined or arrested for identical
00:36:53
behaviors. In Britain, over 118,000
00:36:57
COVID fines were issued to citizens
00:36:59
while numerous politicians admitted to
00:37:01
breaking the same rules without
00:37:03
penalty. Starmer exemplifies this
00:37:05
hypocrisy perfectly. He can tweet
00:37:08
supposedly anti-immigrant rhetoric with
00:37:10
impunity while ordinary citizens making
00:37:12
similar statements face police
00:37:15
investigation. As Murray correctly
00:37:17
notes, if Starmer weren't prime
00:37:19
minister, his own tweets might result in
00:37:21
a police
00:37:22
visit. This two-tier system is what I
00:37:25
see as the foundation of leftist power.
00:37:28
They don't want equal application of
00:37:30
law. They want selective enforcement
00:37:32
that protects their allies and punishes
00:37:34
their opponents. I find it telling that
00:37:37
in countries where the left has
00:37:38
consolidated power, this selective
00:37:40
enforcement becomes increasingly
00:37:43
explicit. In Scotland, the Hate Crime
00:37:45
Act explicitly states that certain
00:37:47
groups receive special protection, while
00:37:50
hatred against others, particularly
00:37:52
women, is not covered. In Canada,
00:37:55
truckers protesting COVID mandates had
00:37:58
their bank accounts frozen without court
00:38:00
orders, while eotterrorists who attacked
00:38:02
natural gas infrastructure faced no
00:38:04
similar measures. This creates a society
00:38:07
where your rights depend not on
00:38:09
citizenship but on political alignment.
00:38:12
A fundamentally unstable arrangement
00:38:14
that undermines the rule of law itself.
00:38:17
Something neither Murray nor the
00:38:18
interviewer discusses, but which I
00:38:20
believe is central to understanding the
00:38:22
left's strategy is their deliberate
00:38:24
corruption of
00:38:26
language. Hate speech now includes
00:38:29
stating biological facts or questioning
00:38:31
immigration policy. Violence has been
00:38:34
redefined to include speech that causes
00:38:36
emotional discomfort. Diversity means
00:38:39
ideological conformity with left-wing
00:38:41
orthodoxy. Equality now means
00:38:44
preferential treatment for certain
00:38:45
groups. Democracy means rule by
00:38:48
unelected bureaucrats and judges when
00:38:50
elections produce the wrong
00:38:52
results. Misinformation means any facts
00:38:55
that contradict the approved
00:38:57
narrative. Justice means outcomes
00:38:59
determined by group identity rather than
00:39:01
individual actions. Tolerance means
00:39:04
celebrating all viewpoints except
00:39:06
traditional or conservative ones. I see
00:39:09
this manipulation of language as a
00:39:11
deliberate strategy to make opposition
00:39:13
to leftist ideology literally
00:39:15
unspeakable. If violence includes
00:39:18
speech, then speech can be regulated
00:39:19
like violence. If safety requires not
00:39:22
hearing challenging ideas, then
00:39:24
censorship becomes a safety measure.
00:39:26
This corruption of language makes honest
00:39:28
debate impossible. How can we discuss
00:39:31
immigration policy if any concerns about
00:39:33
numbers or integration are branded
00:39:35
xenophobia? How can we debate gender
00:39:38
issues if stating biological facts is
00:39:40
labeled
00:39:41
transphobia? The case of the retired
00:39:43
policeman illustrates this perfectly.
00:39:46
His tweet about anti-semitism was
00:39:48
transformed into a non-crime hate
00:39:50
incident through this manipulation of
00:39:52
language. Normal speech becomes hate
00:39:55
through definitional slate of hand. I
00:39:58
believe George Orwell understood this
00:39:59
strategy perfectly when he wrote,
00:40:02
"Political language is designed to make
00:40:04
lies sound truthful and murder
00:40:06
respectable and to give an appearance of
00:40:08
solidity to pure
00:40:10
wind." The left's war on language aims
00:40:13
to make their lies impossible to
00:40:14
contradict by changing the meaning of
00:40:17
words themselves.
00:40:19
While Murray and the interviewer focus
00:40:21
on Britain, I believe it's important to
00:40:23
recognize that this pattern of leftist
00:40:25
censorship, deception, and selective
00:40:28
enforcement is global. In Germany,
00:40:30
police raid homes over social media
00:40:33
posts criticizing immigration. In
00:40:35
Canada, the government freezes bank
00:40:37
accounts of political opponents without
00:40:39
judicial review. In Australia, pregnant
00:40:42
women are arrested for Facebook posts
00:40:44
opposing lockdowns. In New Zealand, the
00:40:47
government officially designates itself
00:40:49
as the single source of truth. In
00:40:51
France, elderly generals are prosecuted
00:40:53
for warning about civil war due to
00:40:55
failed integration. In Ireland, new hate
00:40:58
speech laws criminalize possession of
00:41:00
material that might incite hatred. In
00:41:03
the Netherlands, farmers protesting
00:41:04
climate policies face anti-terrorism
00:41:07
tactics.
00:41:08
I see this not as coincidence but as a
00:41:10
coordinated ideological movement what
00:41:13
some have called the globalist left
00:41:15
implementing similar policies across
00:41:17
western democracies. The tactics,
00:41:20
language, and targets are remarkably
00:41:23
consistent despite different political
00:41:25
systems and cultural
00:41:26
contexts. This suggests to me that what
00:41:29
we're witnessing is not isolated
00:41:30
overreach but a fundamental
00:41:32
transformation in how power operates in
00:41:34
democratic societies.
00:41:37
Traditional limitations on government
00:41:38
power, constitutional rights, due
00:41:41
process, equal application of law are
00:41:44
being systematically undermined in
00:41:46
service to ideological goals. The left's
00:41:48
strategy depends on our silence and
00:41:50
compliance. They want you afraid to
00:41:52
speak, afraid to tweet, afraid to even
00:41:55
think certain thoughts. Their entire
00:41:58
system collapses when enough people
00:42:00
refuse to be intimidated. This is why I
00:42:02
believe they reacted with such hysteria
00:42:04
to Brexit, to Trump, to Elon Musk buying
00:42:07
Twitter. Each represented ordinary
00:42:10
people rejecting their control of the
00:42:12
narrative. It's why they're so desperate
00:42:14
to label alternative media as
00:42:17
disinformation and why they're pushing
00:42:19
for ever more censorship online. Douglas
00:42:22
Murray understands this, which is why he
00:42:24
continues to write books and speak out
00:42:26
despite constant attacks. The retired
00:42:29
policeman who was arrested understands
00:42:31
this too. He refused to delete his tweet
00:42:33
despite police pressure. When I analyze
00:42:36
effective resistance to leftist
00:42:37
censorship, I see certain
00:42:39
patterns. Speak truth regardless of
00:42:43
consequences. The moment you self
00:42:45
censor, they win. Build parallel
00:42:47
institutions. Create platforms,
00:42:50
organizations, and communities that
00:42:51
can't be controlled by leftist
00:42:53
gatekeepers. Document everything. Record
00:42:56
interactions with authorities. Save
00:42:58
evidence of censorship and make it
00:43:00
public. Use lawfare against them.
00:43:02
Challenge speech codes, hate speech
00:43:04
laws, and selective enforcement in
00:43:07
court. Support others who are targeted.
00:43:09
Don't let them isolate and pick off
00:43:11
denters one by one. Reject their
00:43:14
language. Don't use their manipulated
00:43:16
terminology or accept their
00:43:18
redefinitions. Mock their hypocrisy.
00:43:20
Humor and ridicule are powerful weapons
00:43:22
against authoritarian pretention. I
00:43:25
believe the battle is ultimately about
00:43:27
who controls the flow of information in
00:43:30
society. The left knows that their
00:43:33
policies fail whenever they're actually
00:43:35
implemented, which is why they must
00:43:37
control what people are allowed to say
00:43:38
about those failures. Look at Kier
00:43:41
Starmer's immigration tweets. He knows
00:43:43
his actual border policies are deeply
00:43:46
unpopular, so he must pretend to hold
00:43:48
the opposite position. The entire
00:43:50
leftist project depends on this kind of
00:43:53
deception.
00:43:54
Something I believe deserves more
00:43:56
attention is the psychological dimension
00:43:58
of leftist censorship. It operates not
00:44:01
just through external punishment but
00:44:03
through manipulating internal thought
00:44:05
processes. Induced
00:44:07
selfcensorship making people afraid to
00:44:09
express thoughts even in private.
00:44:12
Preference falsification forcing people
00:44:14
to publicly endorse views they privately
00:44:16
reject. Learned helplessness creating
00:44:19
the sense that resistance is futile.
00:44:21
Isolation, making dissenters feel alone
00:44:24
and abnormal. Gaslighting, denying
00:44:27
obvious realities until people doubt
00:44:29
their own
00:44:30
perceptions. Moral manipulation, making
00:44:33
people feel guilty for holding
00:44:34
non-leftist views. These tactics aim not
00:44:37
just to control speech, but to control
00:44:39
thought itself. When someone is arrested
00:44:42
for a tweet, the goal isn't just to
00:44:44
punish that person, but to make
00:44:45
thousands of others think twice before
00:44:47
expressing similar views.
00:44:50
I find it particularly insidious how the
00:44:52
left uses compassion and empathy,
00:44:54
normally positive traits, as weapons.
00:44:57
They frame disscent from their ideology
00:44:59
as harmful to vulnerable groups,
00:45:01
transforming political disagreement into
00:45:03
a moral
00:45:04
failing. This manipulates good people
00:45:07
into supporting censorship out of a
00:45:09
desire to protect others. The Kent
00:45:11
police may have arrested a 71-year-old
00:45:14
man for a tweet, but I firmly believe
00:45:16
they cannot arrest the truth. They can
00:45:19
examine his bookshelf and mock his very
00:45:21
Brexity reading material, but they
00:45:24
cannot change the reality that their own
00:45:26
policies have
00:45:27
failed. Kier Starmer may tweet about
00:45:30
strong borders while actually keeping
00:45:31
them wide open, but he cannot forever
00:45:34
hide the consequences of mass
00:45:36
uncontrolled immigration from the
00:45:38
British people.
00:45:39
The American media may have covered up
00:45:41
Biden's cognitive decline for years, but
00:45:44
they could not prevent the truth from
00:45:45
eventually becoming undeniable to
00:45:47
everyone. This is what I see as the
00:45:49
left's fundamental weakness. Reality
00:45:52
always wins in the end. Their narratives
00:45:56
always collapse under the weight of
00:45:57
their own
00:45:58
contradictions. Their censorship always
00:46:01
fails to suppress the truth forever. The
00:46:04
retired policeman Douglas Murray and all
00:46:06
who continue to speak truth despite
00:46:08
intimidation are the real heroes in this
00:46:10
story. They understand what I believe is
00:46:13
the fundamental truth of our time.
00:46:16
Freedom depends on courage. The courage
00:46:19
to say what is true even when powerful
00:46:21
forces try to silence you. When I look
00:46:24
at the left's police state tactics,
00:46:26
their immigration deception, and their
00:46:27
media manipulation, I don't see
00:46:29
strength. I see desperation.
00:46:32
They know their control is slipping.
00:46:34
They know people are waking up. And that
00:46:36
is what terrifies them most of all. The
00:46:39
ultimate paradox of leftist censorship
00:46:41
is that it reveals the weakness of their
00:46:43
ideas. If their worldview could
00:46:46
withstand scrutiny and debate, they
00:46:48
wouldn't need to silence
00:46:50
opposition. The fact that they resort to
00:46:52
censorship, deception, and intimidation
00:46:56
tells us everything we need to know
00:46:57
about the bankruptcy of their ideology.
00:46:59
As more people recognize this pattern
00:47:01
and refuse to be silenced, the power of
00:47:04
the censorship regime will crumble.
00:47:07
Truth doesn't need enforcement. It
00:47:08
simply needs to be spoken. And no matter
00:47:11
how many elderly men they arrest for
00:47:13
tweets, no matter how many bookshelves
00:47:16
they search for wrong think, they cannot
00:47:18
stop the tide of reality that ultimately
00:47:20
washes away all ideological sand
00:47:22
castles. In the end, the retired
00:47:25
policeman's bookshelf, filled with
00:47:27
Douglas Murray's books and copies of The
00:47:29
Spectator, represents not just good
00:47:31
taste in reading material, but a
00:47:33
fundamental commitment to truth over
00:47:35
ideology. And that ultimately is what
00:47:38
will prevail. The establishment fears
00:47:41
this message spreading. Smash that
00:47:44
subscribe button, hammer the like, and
00:47:46
activate notifications now to join the
00:47:48
resistance against thought police. Every
00:47:51
subscription is a blow against
00:47:53
censorship. Don't let them win.