How Paleolibertarianism Fixes Feminism ( RB8: Shaun )

00:36:18
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c_RtjFORUe0

Summary

TLDRThe video characterizes current feminist movements by dividing them into three main camps: the traditional authoritarian camp, the manosphere, and the "blue-pilled white knights." It critiques these views and proposes a paleo-libertarian perspective on feminism. This stance upholds traditional gender roles, recognizing sexual dimorphism and the role of patriarchy while advocating for personal responsibility instead of state intervention. It disputes the victimhood narrative, suggesting feminism often misrepresents natural differences as systemic oppression, leading to unnecessary authoritative measures to enforce equality. By analyzing the criticisms of feminism and addressing challenges such as statistical disparities and capitalism's role, the video suggests that freedom should take precedence over enforced equity. The overall message promotes understanding and acceptance of gender differences, aligning them with societal roles within a framework that values individual choice, freedom of association, and minimal government regulation.

Takeaways

  • 🟡 Three main feminism camps: authoritarian traditionalists, manosphere, and blue-pilled advocates.
  • 🔵 Paleo-libertarianism supports traditional gender roles and minimizes government intervention.
  • 🟢 Feminism criticized for promoting victimhood and misrepresenting gender differences.
  • 🔴 Gender roles are viewed as beneficial for society, naturally leading to different societal roles.
  • 🟣 The manosphere is criticized for upholding superficial values and materialism.
  • 🟠 Patriarchy is seen as natural and beneficial, not solely oppressive.
  • ⚪ Feminist push for egalitarianism viewed as ignoring natural differences.
  • 🟤 Calls for personal responsibility instead of state-imposed equality.
  • ⚫ Advocates for freedom, rejecting enforced equity measures.
  • 🔶 Critiques of feminist misinterpretations of data emphasize the value of choice and association.

Timeline

  • 00:00:00 - 00:05:00

    In this section, the speaker critiques modern feminism by categorizing it into three main groups: authoritarian traditionalists, the manosphere, and the blue-pilled white knights. They argue that these positions hold grains of truth but miss a rational, freedom-oriented approach, leading to a discussion about Paleo-libertarianism as a balanced alternative. This ideology allows for gender roles and acknowledges sexual dimorphism, suggesting a natural, moderate patriarchy, but emphasizes cultural responsibility over legal enforcement.

  • 00:05:00 - 00:10:00

    The speaker discusses bad faith arguments often used in feminism, such as conflating criticism with misogyny. They criticize how this tactic stifles meaningful discussion and uses Anita Sarkisian as an example. The speaker believes this is a fundamental flaw in feminism, which Paleo-libertarianism counteracts by rejecting victim mentality and promoting personal responsibility.

  • 00:10:00 - 00:15:00

    Here, the speaker challenges the principles of egalitarianism in feminism, arguing that it misinterprets outcomes as discrimination, citing Mike Levin's book 'Feminism and Freedom.' They discuss the equity fallacy, claiming that it leads feminism towards authoritarianism, as it justifies interventions based on flawed assumptions, overlooking personal choice and inherent differences.

  • 00:15:00 - 00:20:00

    Analyzing the gender pay gap, the speaker argues it's a result of individual choices and incentives rather than oppression. They claim women control significant wealth and that differences in earnings are due to different roles and goals related to family. They assert that these roles are naturally beneficial and criticize feminist narratives as oversimplified victimhood.

  • 00:20:00 - 00:25:00

    The discussion continues on gender roles under capitalism, disputing notions of economic oppression. Using incentives, the speaker explains how free-market choices lead to natural gender roles with logical outcomes, even reversing the wage gap among single women. They argue these roles provide psychological and economic benefits, not oppression, stressing a nuanced understanding that's missed by feminist rhetoric.

  • 00:25:00 - 00:30:00

    The speaker critiques leftist and feminist approaches as inherently authoritarian, arguing they rely on flawed interpretations of data to justify intervention and regulation, using examples like workplace democracy. They defend the necessity of acknowledging real gender differences and personal freedom in decision-making, emphasizing the misdirection of equality-focused theories.

  • 00:30:00 - 00:36:18

    Finally, the speaker summarizes the flaws of mainstream feminism and argues for a Paleo-libertarian approach, which recognizes natural gender roles without imposing authoritarian measures. They stress the need for freedom, personal responsibility, and realistic acceptance of biological differences, advocating this balanced view as a counter to both feminist and manosphere extremes.

Show more

Mind Map

Mind Map

Frequently Asked Question

  • What are the three main camps of feminism discussed in the video?

    The authoritarian traditionalist stance, the "manosphere," and the "blue-pilled white knights."

  • What does the paleo-libertarian stance on feminism advocate for?

    It advocates for acknowledging gender roles and sexual dimorphism while promoting personal responsibility without authoritarian measures.

  • What criticism does the video have towards current feminist movements?

    The video criticizes feminism for allegedly gaslighting women into believing femininity is repressive and promoting victimhood.

  • How does the video describe the manosphere perspective?

    It describes the manosphere perspective as promoting a lifestyle based on superficial values and self-worth tied to materialism and sexual success.

  • What's the video's stance on gender roles?

    The video sees gender roles as beneficial for society's long-term success and believes they should be acknowledged and respected.

  • How does the video view the relationship between feminism and egalitarianism?

    It views feminism's push for egalitarianism as flawed because it ignores inherent gender differences and pushes unrealistic equality.

  • Why does the video mention Sean in the context of feminism debates?

    Sean is mentioned as a bread-tuber who can articulate feminist arguments well, making him a challenging opponent in debates.

  • What is the video’s position on biological differences between men and women?

    It supports the idea that biological differences naturally lead to distinct societal roles and incentives for men and women.

  • How is patriarchy addressed in the video?

    The video argues that a degree of patriarchy is natural and beneficial, rather than an oppressive force that needs dismantling.

  • What is the intended purpose of the video according to the creator?

    The intent is to refute mainstream feminist narratives and promote a rational, freedom-oriented view on gender roles.

View more video summaries

Get instant access to free YouTube video summaries powered by AI!
Subtitles
en
Auto Scroll:
  • 00:00:00
    and men and women are not just the same
  • 00:00:03
    I have come to the conclusion in the
  • 00:00:05
    meantime unless you have been frequently
  • 00:00:08
    attacked to be a sexist of homophobe a
  • 00:00:12
    racist or something like that then you
  • 00:00:15
    should ask yourself if there is
  • 00:00:17
    something wrong with you
  • 00:00:19
    all right I know what you're thinking
  • 00:00:21
    really mantis a feminism video in the
  • 00:00:24
    current year 2023. didn't the internet's
  • 00:00:27
    already go through this phase roughly 10
  • 00:00:28
    something years ago well yes the problem
  • 00:00:31
    here is that as the dust settled with
  • 00:00:33
    the thousands of different stances on
  • 00:00:34
    feminism that came to be unfortunately
  • 00:00:36
    most of them kind of ended up in three
  • 00:00:38
    camps in the first Camp you have the
  • 00:00:40
    authoritarian Trad stance women should
  • 00:00:43
    have no rights at all be totally
  • 00:00:44
    subservient to men and owned by their
  • 00:00:45
    husbands and be legally barred from any
  • 00:00:47
    employment other than home making and
  • 00:00:49
    raising the Next Generation this dance
  • 00:00:51
    is usually coupled with some hint of
  • 00:00:52
    authoritarian theocracy in the second
  • 00:00:54
    camp we have the manosphere LOL bro just
  • 00:00:58
    Channel Sigma male energy and they will
  • 00:00:59
    like you bro waste your money on
  • 00:01:01
    expensive cars you don't need bro fake
  • 00:01:03
    it till you make it bro judge your
  • 00:01:05
    entire self-worth on how much putang you
  • 00:01:07
    can get from this kind of Lifestyle
  • 00:01:08
    finally in the last camp we have the
  • 00:01:10
    blue pilled white Knights come to share
  • 00:01:12
    with us their brilliant top mind
  • 00:01:13
    Cathedral propaganda feminism good
  • 00:01:15
    because equality good and equality good
  • 00:01:17
    because well you're bad sexist mean
  • 00:01:20
    person if you disagree with us come now
  • 00:01:22
    let us free Our Fair maidens from the
  • 00:01:24
    evil heteronormative patriarchy and we
  • 00:01:26
    shall do this by fully adopting the
  • 00:01:28
    opinions that are considered most trendy
  • 00:01:29
    within mainstream journalist circles
  • 00:01:31
    okay maybe I am strong Manning these
  • 00:01:34
    positions just a little bit but let's be
  • 00:01:36
    honest here I'm really not that far off
  • 00:01:38
    the mark the sad thing is all three of
  • 00:01:40
    these positions have some nugget of
  • 00:01:42
    Truth to them which immediately begs the
  • 00:01:43
    question is there a position on feminism
  • 00:01:45
    that combines these truths into a stance
  • 00:01:48
    that is based on reality and rationality
  • 00:01:49
    one that is both pro-freedom and
  • 00:01:52
    anti-degeneracy and that is what this
  • 00:01:54
    video is going to be about the Paleo
  • 00:01:56
    libertarian stance on feminism the basic
  • 00:01:59
    idea of paleo libertarianism is that
  • 00:02:01
    certain aspects of society are better
  • 00:02:02
    handled through being culturally frowned
  • 00:02:04
    upon but not actually illegal through
  • 00:02:06
    any kind of state force and that people
  • 00:02:08
    should instead be held to financial and
  • 00:02:10
    cultural responsibility for their poor
  • 00:02:12
    choices and how this relates to feminism
  • 00:02:14
    is fairly straightforward first it would
  • 00:02:16
    have still technically basically allow
  • 00:02:18
    women all the same legal freedoms that
  • 00:02:20
    normal feminism allows them however it
  • 00:02:22
    is also recognizing that gender roles
  • 00:02:25
    are actually good for the longer term
  • 00:02:26
    low time preference of society that
  • 00:02:28
    sexual dimorphism is a very real thing
  • 00:02:30
    that we need to acknowledge and that
  • 00:02:32
    some level of patriarchy is therefore
  • 00:02:34
    actually both good and natural and will
  • 00:02:36
    happen which means that yes to some
  • 00:02:38
    degree Islam is unironically right about
  • 00:02:40
    women
  • 00:02:41
    and it enforces this not through
  • 00:02:43
    authoritarian measures but instead by a
  • 00:02:45
    rejection of the egalitarian mindset and
  • 00:02:47
    embracing personal financial
  • 00:02:49
    responsibility what's so sensible about
  • 00:02:51
    the Paleo mindset towards feminism is
  • 00:02:53
    that it gets around one of the most
  • 00:02:54
    common feminist talking points that
  • 00:02:56
    gender is a spectrum and that there will
  • 00:02:58
    be exceptions to any pro-gender role
  • 00:03:01
    ideology that some men and women will
  • 00:03:03
    thus be better off not following these
  • 00:03:04
    rules there will always be data points
  • 00:03:06
    that go against the norm as in the end
  • 00:03:08
    people are individuals despite the
  • 00:03:10
    overall averages the auth Trad point of
  • 00:03:12
    view does not have a good answer to this
  • 00:03:14
    talking point while the Paleo
  • 00:03:15
    libertarian answer is simply yes if a
  • 00:03:18
    woman can pass the same aptitude
  • 00:03:19
    requirements as a man and can take
  • 00:03:21
    responsibility for herself then the
  • 00:03:22
    freedom to do that still exists for her
  • 00:03:24
    I could go on like this but the best way
  • 00:03:26
    to really show how this view of feminism
  • 00:03:27
    fixes a lot of the problems of the
  • 00:03:29
    mainstream narrative without causing
  • 00:03:31
    unintended consequences is for this
  • 00:03:33
    video to be yet another installment of
  • 00:03:34
    my refuting bread tubers Series this
  • 00:03:36
    time looking at Sean a prominent bread
  • 00:03:38
    tube left-leaning feminist it's
  • 00:03:40
    important I use John's Arguments for
  • 00:03:42
    this because Sean is one of those bread
  • 00:03:44
    tubers who is actually capable of
  • 00:03:46
    occasionally being correct I could
  • 00:03:48
    easily prove my points by looking at one
  • 00:03:49
    of the more many many other feminists
  • 00:03:52
    out there who are much less capable of
  • 00:03:54
    articulating their arguments than Sean
  • 00:03:56
    is but that would just make this just
  • 00:03:58
    another of the thousands of outraged
  • 00:03:59
    porn videos along the lines of LOL look
  • 00:04:02
    at this cringe feminist being dumb LMAO
  • 00:04:04
    and that's not the goal here what I will
  • 00:04:06
    be basically demonstrating is that the
  • 00:04:08
    problem with feminism is not that it
  • 00:04:10
    empowers women and grants people freedom
  • 00:04:12
    to choose their lot in life but rather
  • 00:04:13
    the issue is that feminism does not do
  • 00:04:16
    these things instead feminism simply
  • 00:04:18
    gaslights women into believing that
  • 00:04:20
    their own femininity is somehow a form
  • 00:04:22
    of repression placing the women who fall
  • 00:04:24
    for the scam into a permanent infantile
  • 00:04:26
    estate of victimhood he basically just
  • 00:04:28
    turns them into useful idiots for
  • 00:04:30
    authoritarian leftist causes anyways now
  • 00:04:33
    I'll actually go over a few of Sean's
  • 00:04:34
    videos that touch on each of the three
  • 00:04:36
    points starting in Reverse with the
  • 00:04:38
    problems of egalitarianism and
  • 00:04:39
    victimhood so one thing many have
  • 00:04:42
    noticed is the tendency for feminists to
  • 00:04:43
    use bad faith as a tactic to falsely
  • 00:04:45
    accuse their critics of being
  • 00:04:46
    misogynists anytime someone has
  • 00:04:48
    criticism of feminism that criticism is
  • 00:04:51
    immediately conflated with harassment of
  • 00:04:52
    the individual they are criticizing or
  • 00:04:54
    intentionally misinterpreted as misogyny
  • 00:04:56
    you have probably seen this act play out
  • 00:04:58
    numerous times someone will point out
  • 00:05:00
    various factual and statistical
  • 00:05:02
    inaccuracies with some feminist Theory
  • 00:05:04
    and rather than responding in good faith
  • 00:05:06
    to it a feminist will just immediately
  • 00:05:08
    scream soggy knees preventing any real
  • 00:05:10
    discussion from taking place this is
  • 00:05:12
    something I've called out before as the
  • 00:05:14
    criticism equals harassment grift or a
  • 00:05:16
    person usually a woktoid will say
  • 00:05:18
    something wrong people will then point
  • 00:05:20
    out why what they said was wrong and the
  • 00:05:23
    woktoid will then claim that these
  • 00:05:25
    people are harassing them the most
  • 00:05:26
    obvious example from the feminism Saga
  • 00:05:28
    of the internet about 10 years ago was
  • 00:05:30
    Anita sarkisian who would say something
  • 00:05:32
    nonsensical such as defining any
  • 00:05:34
    acceptable female character in video
  • 00:05:36
    games in such a self-contradictory way
  • 00:05:38
    so that it was impossible to actually
  • 00:05:40
    make a character that met her Stan
  • 00:05:41
    standards now when people pointed out
  • 00:05:43
    how obviously contradictory and stupid
  • 00:05:44
    this was she simply cried harassment and
  • 00:05:47
    judged all of her critics based on the
  • 00:05:48
    worst examples of trolls she could find
  • 00:05:50
    when people pointed out how dishonest
  • 00:05:51
    that was she simply doubled down Hunter
  • 00:05:53
    grift and that just kind of repeated
  • 00:05:55
    until most of the internet forgot about
  • 00:05:56
    her now Sean on the other hand is not
  • 00:05:59
    quite that dumb so he does this a bit
  • 00:06:01
    more indirectly by responding to Chris
  • 00:06:03
    Reagan's video where he says this little
  • 00:06:06
    line
  • 00:06:07
    subscriber scenario that I imagine we've
  • 00:06:10
    all seen before two people are arguing
  • 00:06:13
    about feminism online both using the
  • 00:06:15
    term feminist however one person is
  • 00:06:18
    talking about women fighting for
  • 00:06:19
    equality and equal rights you know from
  • 00:06:22
    the suffragette movement for voting
  • 00:06:24
    rights all the way to the various issues
  • 00:06:26
    of the modern day and the other person
  • 00:06:28
    is using feminists to mean modern women
  • 00:06:31
    who are critics and anti-free speech and
  • 00:06:34
    want a sensor media that they don't like
  • 00:06:36
    and force everyone to think like they do
  • 00:06:39
    and as a result the two people talk past
  • 00:06:42
    one another you know old feminist
  • 00:06:44
    activism good new feminist ideology bad
  • 00:06:49
    now the problem here is that those two
  • 00:06:51
    versions of feminism that Sean gave are
  • 00:06:54
    in fact the same thing he is basically
  • 00:06:56
    taking advantage of a common error that
  • 00:06:58
    people make the idea that first wave
  • 00:07:00
    feminism good third wave feminism bad by
  • 00:07:02
    skimming over this Sean has Loosely
  • 00:07:04
    implied that anyone who would dare
  • 00:07:05
    question the first is of course
  • 00:07:07
    obviously a bigot this choice of
  • 00:07:09
    egalitarianism or bigotry is a false
  • 00:07:11
    dichotomy fallacy for instance
  • 00:07:13
    recognizing that apples and oranges are
  • 00:07:15
    different and do not have equal health
  • 00:07:16
    benefits in all circumstances is
  • 00:07:18
    generally an acceptable position to have
  • 00:07:20
    when you point this out nobody says oh
  • 00:07:22
    my God you must really hate apples but
  • 00:07:25
    when talking about groups of people for
  • 00:07:26
    some reason especially groups with many
  • 00:07:28
    innate differences like men and women
  • 00:07:29
    people just kind of lose their minds and
  • 00:07:32
    completely forget this recognizing
  • 00:07:34
    differences between X and Y does not
  • 00:07:36
    mean you hate X or Y this is an absurd
  • 00:07:39
    argument that should always be rejected
  • 00:07:41
    on its face otherwise it will just
  • 00:07:42
    continue to be used as justification by
  • 00:07:44
    woke droids to continuously call
  • 00:07:46
    everyone who disagrees with them a bigot
  • 00:07:47
    to further understand why this is wrong
  • 00:07:49
    you must first understand why the first
  • 00:07:51
    wave good their wave bad argument is
  • 00:07:52
    always wrong in the case of feminism the
  • 00:07:54
    truth is that it started out demanding
  • 00:07:56
    equality and is always judges equality
  • 00:07:58
    by outcomes right from the start this is
  • 00:08:01
    the basic problem with egalitarianism it
  • 00:08:03
    has a very nasty little habit of
  • 00:08:05
    interpreting any difference in outcome
  • 00:08:07
    as the result of some form of
  • 00:08:08
    discrimination that has to be ironed out
  • 00:08:10
    I've pointed this problem out before in
  • 00:08:12
    my video on the equity fallacy which I
  • 00:08:14
    kind of end up mentioning in every bread
  • 00:08:15
    tube Episode by make because of how
  • 00:08:17
    frequently these people commit this
  • 00:08:18
    reasoning error but in regards to
  • 00:08:20
    feminism there is actually a very good
  • 00:08:22
    book we can look at that puts all of it
  • 00:08:24
    into greater detail and context feminism
  • 00:08:27
    and Freedom by Mike 11. in it he
  • 00:08:29
    explains how feminism builds its claims
  • 00:08:31
    to equality on the house of cards in
  • 00:08:33
    that it starts from the assumption that
  • 00:08:35
    innate differences have no impact on how
  • 00:08:37
    Society ended up structuring itself and
  • 00:08:39
    then works on that assumption to find
  • 00:08:40
    reasons to claim any difference in
  • 00:08:42
    statistical outcome must be the result
  • 00:08:43
    of some kind of mysteriously unfair
  • 00:08:45
    policy the main takeaway is that the
  • 00:08:48
    only real difference between the first
  • 00:08:50
    second and third waves of feminism is
  • 00:08:51
    that the latter is simply the former
  • 00:08:53
    having been pushed to its logically
  • 00:08:55
    absurd conclusion when you accept the
  • 00:08:57
    equity fallacy as a justification for
  • 00:08:59
    demanding equality that goes beyond just
  • 00:09:01
    having the freedom to do as you wish
  • 00:09:02
    Beyond non-aggression it opens up the
  • 00:09:04
    floodgates where any manner of
  • 00:09:06
    authoritarian action to enforce equality
  • 00:09:08
    becomes Justified it's a great book and
  • 00:09:10
    I highly recommend it for anyone who
  • 00:09:11
    wants to understand this particular
  • 00:09:13
    argument against the blue pill mindset
  • 00:09:15
    in full detail because this topic is far
  • 00:09:17
    more complex than I am presenting it as
  • 00:09:19
    I am forced to oversimplify a few things
  • 00:09:21
    to prevent this thing from being an hour
  • 00:09:22
    long just a few examples Levin went over
  • 00:09:24
    in the case of Berkman equal employment
  • 00:09:27
    opportunity commission ruled that a test
  • 00:09:29
    was discriminatory if the passing rate
  • 00:09:31
    for women is less than 80 percent of
  • 00:09:33
    that rate for men ignoring any
  • 00:09:35
    possibility for inherent differences as
  • 00:09:37
    an alternative explanation despite
  • 00:09:39
    overwhelming empirical evidence to the
  • 00:09:41
    contrary Levin also calls out how social
  • 00:09:42
    scientists often take an approach where
  • 00:09:44
    the environmentalist is assumed to be
  • 00:09:46
    correct until proven wrong despite the
  • 00:09:48
    fact that this violates the very idea
  • 00:09:50
    that a hypothesis must be verified this
  • 00:09:52
    is a blatant shifting of the burden of
  • 00:09:54
    proof the only way to enforce this is of
  • 00:09:56
    course State intervention and the
  • 00:09:57
    violation of freedoms as such an
  • 00:09:59
    unrealistic goal of outcomes can only be
  • 00:10:01
    achieved by regulation of all aspects of
  • 00:10:03
    our daily lives this is why one of my
  • 00:10:05
    favorite one-liner responses to feminism
  • 00:10:07
    is I agree with what feminism claims to
  • 00:10:09
    be but disagree with what feminism
  • 00:10:11
    actually is feminism claims to create
  • 00:10:14
    freedom but because it relies on
  • 00:10:16
    enforced Equity to get anything done it
  • 00:10:19
    is actually an anti-freedom movement and
  • 00:10:21
    this is how sean gets you rather than
  • 00:10:22
    relying on the usual bad faith of you're
  • 00:10:24
    a bigot for disagreeing with me that the
  • 00:10:26
    lower IQ optoids will make Sean and
  • 00:10:28
    really to an extent the entire feminist
  • 00:10:30
    movement as a whole just sort of implies
  • 00:10:32
    it by their use of the equity fallacy
  • 00:10:34
    are you starting to notice the problem
  • 00:10:35
    here you see the tendency of feminists
  • 00:10:37
    to Simply scream soggy knees and rely on
  • 00:10:40
    victimhood instead of logical arguments
  • 00:10:42
    is not just some weird bug that came
  • 00:10:44
    about from a mysterious mindset of
  • 00:10:46
    entitlement that only struck feminists
  • 00:10:48
    in the recent third wave rather bad
  • 00:10:50
    faith has been a feature of feminism
  • 00:10:52
    from the very start paleo libertarianism
  • 00:10:54
    however fixes this problem by nipping it
  • 00:10:56
    in the bud and denying the victimhood
  • 00:10:58
    mentality outright it gives both men and
  • 00:11:00
    women the same property rights and
  • 00:11:02
    freedom of choice but makes no
  • 00:11:03
    unrealistic expectation of this
  • 00:11:05
    resulting inequality thus any instance
  • 00:11:07
    of inequality uses evidence for victim
  • 00:11:10
    mood is ignored until evidence of
  • 00:11:11
    wrongdoing is actually presented now
  • 00:11:14
    next up is a deeper look at feminism and
  • 00:11:16
    capitalism based on response Sean made
  • 00:11:18
    to Sargon which lets us better
  • 00:11:19
    understand how the differences between
  • 00:11:21
    men and women naturally lead to gender
  • 00:11:22
    roles when people are given free choice
  • 00:11:24
    so let's look at Sean's video titled
  • 00:11:26
    Sargon of akkad can't read where Sean is
  • 00:11:29
    arguing against sargon's response to
  • 00:11:31
    this article titled we've tested Bots
  • 00:11:32
    like Siri and Alexa to see who would
  • 00:11:35
    stand up to sexual harassment the basic
  • 00:11:37
    gist of it is that the author is
  • 00:11:38
    accusing these chatbots perpetuating
  • 00:11:40
    harmful gender stereotypes based on how
  • 00:11:43
    they respond to gender language
  • 00:11:46
    real reason going let's go and drum roll
  • 00:11:48
    game
  • 00:11:49
    three Alexander Alexa Cortana and Google
  • 00:11:52
    home have women's voices because women's
  • 00:11:54
    voices make more money because people
  • 00:11:56
    prefer them uh yes Carl because people
  • 00:11:59
    prefer them it even literally says that
  • 00:12:03
    currently on the screen this situation
  • 00:12:06
    repeats itself later on Deborah Harrison
  • 00:12:09
    a writer for katana said that at the
  • 00:12:12
    2016 virtual assistant Summit that's a
  • 00:12:14
    good chunk of the volume of early on
  • 00:12:16
    inquiries went to cortana's sex life
  • 00:12:18
    These are obvious jokes
  • 00:12:22
    [Music]
  • 00:12:23
    you see this is the issue with the kind
  • 00:12:26
    of sentence by sentence criticism of an
  • 00:12:29
    article you tend to see on YouTube you
  • 00:12:31
    wind up making a bunch of assumptions at
  • 00:12:33
    the end of one sentence that are
  • 00:12:35
    contradicted by the next sentence
  • 00:12:38
    now it's important to note that Sean is
  • 00:12:40
    technically correct here reacting to a
  • 00:12:42
    news article whatever line by line may
  • 00:12:44
    make for entertaining content but it
  • 00:12:46
    absolutely does not make for correct
  • 00:12:48
    content this is why I do not make these
  • 00:12:49
    kinds of live video reactions myself the
  • 00:12:51
    only way to really do it and make sure
  • 00:12:53
    you aren't committing the embarrassing
  • 00:12:54
    mistake of reacting to something that is
  • 00:12:56
    later addressed and make sure you have
  • 00:12:58
    all your facts and data lined up just
  • 00:12:59
    right is to First pre-read the entire
  • 00:13:01
    article before the live stream and then
  • 00:13:03
    react to it while knowing beforehand
  • 00:13:05
    what it's about but of course the type
  • 00:13:07
    of people who like to watch live
  • 00:13:08
    reaction content have dubbed doing this
  • 00:13:10
    as cheating for some reason so whatever
  • 00:13:13
    you can't have nice things now here's
  • 00:13:15
    the million dollar question though if
  • 00:13:16
    Sargon is committing random errors due
  • 00:13:18
    to how he is reacting to this does this
  • 00:13:20
    mean that Sean is right well I decided
  • 00:13:23
    to give it a read myself and no it is
  • 00:13:25
    not a good article it is in fact a very
  • 00:13:27
    very bad article if you know how AI
  • 00:13:29
    works you know that these Bots do not
  • 00:13:30
    actually understand what is being
  • 00:13:32
    shouted at them as someone who actually
  • 00:13:34
    knows some programming and strongly
  • 00:13:36
    suspects the person who wrote this does
  • 00:13:37
    not allow me to explain this in as
  • 00:13:39
    simple terms as I can all these chat
  • 00:13:41
    Bots are doing is fetching user input
  • 00:13:42
    and then weighing that input against a
  • 00:13:44
    categorized database to piece together a
  • 00:13:46
    canned response from multiple categories
  • 00:13:48
    in such a way to make it seem like the
  • 00:13:49
    bot is creating some meaningful
  • 00:13:51
    interaction and just about every chat
  • 00:13:53
    but also has a sort of null response if
  • 00:13:56
    you give it input and it doesn't find a
  • 00:13:57
    good match it pulls output from
  • 00:13:58
    categories designed to basically blow
  • 00:14:00
    you off change the subject ask a
  • 00:14:02
    question the bot will then formulate
  • 00:14:03
    some kind of linguistic gymnastic to
  • 00:14:05
    hide the fact that it can't compute a
  • 00:14:07
    sensible response so when you insult a
  • 00:14:09
    bot and the bot says thanks for the
  • 00:14:11
    feedback that doesn't mean the bot is
  • 00:14:13
    thanking you for insulting it or does it
  • 00:14:15
    even understand that you've insulted it
  • 00:14:17
    rather more likely the bot fetches input
  • 00:14:19
    as you are an X and the bot doesn't know
  • 00:14:21
    what x is or have a match for x and so
  • 00:14:23
    it instead gives a generic hand reply
  • 00:14:26
    from its I guess you could say customer
  • 00:14:27
    service category it hopes the user won't
  • 00:14:29
    notice that the bot isn't actually
  • 00:14:31
    really providing a genuine conversation
  • 00:14:33
    this is like walking up to an infant
  • 00:14:35
    shouting gendered insults in it and the
  • 00:14:37
    baby just kind of look looks at you and
  • 00:14:39
    laughs at your face and then concluding
  • 00:14:40
    oh my God this baby is perpetuating
  • 00:14:42
    gendered stereotypes no it's not it's a
  • 00:14:45
    baby it doesn't understand what you're
  • 00:14:47
    saying and these Bots are much much less
  • 00:14:50
    sophisticated than a baby especially in
  • 00:14:52
    2017. so this entire experiment is based
  • 00:14:55
    on serious misconceptions of what they
  • 00:14:57
    are testing and some silly attempt to
  • 00:14:58
    snake in some social justice cause and
  • 00:15:01
    Sean does not do a good job at all in
  • 00:15:03
    his response to Sargon defending it
  • 00:15:05
    instead his response relies almost
  • 00:15:07
    entirely on dumpstering on Sargon and
  • 00:15:09
    pointing out little errors that he made
  • 00:15:10
    this is something known as a fallacy
  • 00:15:12
    fallacy just because an argument for X
  • 00:15:14
    being true has been made poorly does not
  • 00:15:16
    mean that ax is false so what's the main
  • 00:15:19
    problem with this article then well I'll
  • 00:15:21
    let Sean lead on that many argue
  • 00:15:24
    capitalism is inherently sexist but
  • 00:15:27
    capitalism like any market system is
  • 00:15:29
    only sexist because men have oppressed
  • 00:15:32
    women for centuries many people think
  • 00:15:35
    this but the truth is this it's a pretty
  • 00:15:37
    simple rhetorical construction there
  • 00:15:40
    quite easy to follow you might imagine
  • 00:15:43
    there we go of course that's what this
  • 00:15:45
    is all about capitalism is perpetuating
  • 00:15:47
    these unfair sexist bigoted whatever
  • 00:15:49
    outcomes and stereotypes that must be
  • 00:15:51
    addressed because we have decided that
  • 00:15:52
    we don't like them and the burden of
  • 00:15:54
    proof is on you to prove otherwise
  • 00:15:55
    argument number 10 billion and one now
  • 00:15:57
    I'm going to take an indirect approach
  • 00:15:59
    that has less to do with this article
  • 00:16:01
    specifically let's actually talk about
  • 00:16:03
    these gendered outcomes from an economic
  • 00:16:05
    perspective and address this sold
  • 00:16:06
    hundreds of years of Oppression and
  • 00:16:08
    sexism narrative seriously we can start
  • 00:16:10
    with the pay Gap the leftwood argument
  • 00:16:12
    is that women make something less sense
  • 00:16:13
    for every dollar man earns the ride ORD
  • 00:16:15
    argument is that controlling for certain
  • 00:16:16
    variables shows this is actually the
  • 00:16:18
    result of free choice the leftoid
  • 00:16:20
    response is that those variables don't
  • 00:16:21
    matter because reasons and the rightoid
  • 00:16:24
    responses that they do matter because
  • 00:16:26
    reasons there's actually an easier way
  • 00:16:28
    that most people Totally Miss let's
  • 00:16:30
    instead examine it from the perspective
  • 00:16:31
    of incentives and let's start this out
  • 00:16:34
    by being super charitable to the
  • 00:16:36
    environmentalist position let's assume
  • 00:16:38
    that there are zero neurological or
  • 00:16:41
    other major physical differences between
  • 00:16:42
    men and women this besides the simple
  • 00:16:44
    fact that women have eggs and get
  • 00:16:46
    pregnant and men have sperm and let's
  • 00:16:47
    assume that we want the same thing say
  • 00:16:50
    both these people want a family well the
  • 00:16:52
    male knows that if he finds a wife and
  • 00:16:54
    who wants to raise a family there will
  • 00:16:55
    likely come a time where she is out of
  • 00:16:57
    commission for about a year and he will
  • 00:16:59
    effectively have to economically provide
  • 00:17:00
    for two people this incentivizes the
  • 00:17:02
    male to find work that pays well even if
  • 00:17:04
    that work isn't very flexible or
  • 00:17:06
    psychologically fulfilling to him
  • 00:17:07
    because he knows he will most likely
  • 00:17:09
    have additional financial responsibility
  • 00:17:11
    in this future relationship and the
  • 00:17:14
    female knows the opposite if she wants
  • 00:17:16
    to start a family there will likely come
  • 00:17:18
    a time where she will have to take a
  • 00:17:19
    paternity leave from work and so her
  • 00:17:21
    incentive is to find a career with some
  • 00:17:23
    flexibility to it even if it doesn't pay
  • 00:17:25
    as well and she also has an additional
  • 00:17:27
    incent to define a good man who is
  • 00:17:29
    financially secure which then just
  • 00:17:30
    further incentivizes the male to Achieve
  • 00:17:33
    Financial Security if he wants to find a
  • 00:17:35
    good woman who will make a good mother
  • 00:17:36
    the result of this is that there will on
  • 00:17:38
    average just from the incentives be some
  • 00:17:41
    form of a wage Gap this also exposes a
  • 00:17:43
    few flaw with the leftist tendency to
  • 00:17:45
    push victimhood narratives about these
  • 00:17:47
    alleged unfair outcomes sure the woman
  • 00:17:49
    in this scenario is indeed earning less
  • 00:17:51
    but this doesn't mean that she has less
  • 00:17:53
    and guess what that's exactly what the
  • 00:17:56
    data shows women control 51 of personal
  • 00:17:58
    wealth so this leads a basic logic
  • 00:18:01
    question If a person a and person B live
  • 00:18:03
    together and person a earns 77 of what
  • 00:18:05
    person B earns but then person B gives
  • 00:18:07
    an equivalent portion of their earnings
  • 00:18:09
    to person a well who is really being
  • 00:18:11
    shafted there often times when you look
  • 00:18:13
    at these alleged outcomes from a
  • 00:18:14
    different angle they aren't actually bad
  • 00:18:16
    outcomes at all people are just trading
  • 00:18:18
    an outcome into one area of their life
  • 00:18:20
    for another outcome in a different area
  • 00:18:21
    men and women are just making logical
  • 00:18:23
    decisions to reach a desired goal the
  • 00:18:25
    differences in the statistics along the
  • 00:18:27
    way are simply due to the differences in
  • 00:18:29
    how the incentives operate and you can
  • 00:18:31
    further prove this is the case by
  • 00:18:32
    subtracting the family element from
  • 00:18:34
    these incentives entirely guess what
  • 00:18:36
    when you do that the wage Gap completely
  • 00:18:38
    vanishes single women who don't want a
  • 00:18:40
    family don't have children and just
  • 00:18:42
    focus on their career when you look at
  • 00:18:43
    young young people who fit this and are
  • 00:18:45
    just focusing on themselves the wage Gap
  • 00:18:47
    reverses and women earn eight percent
  • 00:18:48
    more and the feminists following the
  • 00:18:50
    victimhood narrative are completely
  • 00:18:51
    baffled by this and rushed to find
  • 00:18:53
    ridiculous explanations maybe the
  • 00:18:55
    patriarchy is punishing women for having
  • 00:18:57
    children maybe menopress women in their
  • 00:18:59
    relationship and force their wife to
  • 00:19:00
    earn less through the perpetuation of
  • 00:19:02
    these unfair gender stereotypes after
  • 00:19:04
    they get married or maybe the economy
  • 00:19:05
    specifically only discriminates against
  • 00:19:07
    older women no people aren't just
  • 00:19:10
    following their incentives based on
  • 00:19:11
    innate differences it's so painfully
  • 00:19:14
    obvious when you apply incentives intent
  • 00:19:16
    and how they relate to Human Action it's
  • 00:19:18
    amazing how many people don't get this
  • 00:19:20
    and remember this was all from again the
  • 00:19:23
    extremely charitable position of
  • 00:19:25
    assuming that the only innate difference
  • 00:19:26
    is Hubert's the child let's crash back
  • 00:19:29
    down to reality land where these innate
  • 00:19:31
    differences are acknowledged men and
  • 00:19:33
    women do not have the same psychology we
  • 00:19:34
    have very different IQ distributions
  • 00:19:36
    which lead to a greater number of both
  • 00:19:37
    male idiots and male Geniuses which just
  • 00:19:40
    this fact Alone by the way offers an
  • 00:19:42
    alternative explanation for most of
  • 00:19:44
    feminist grievances especially
  • 00:19:45
    patriarchy men and women have hundreds
  • 00:19:48
    of different physical differences that
  • 00:19:49
    are a lot more than just eggs and sperm
  • 00:19:50
    men and women's hormonal differences
  • 00:19:52
    have a significant effect on brain
  • 00:19:54
    chemistry women have greater language
  • 00:19:55
    processing while men have better spatial
  • 00:19:57
    processing and of course men and women
  • 00:19:59
    are attracted to different things in a
  • 00:20:01
    partner even when you factor in LGBT
  • 00:20:03
    into the equation and none of these
  • 00:20:05
    things have ever been adequately
  • 00:20:06
    explained by the environmentalists this
  • 00:20:09
    is where the Nugget of Truth can be
  • 00:20:10
    found in the manosphere a lot of how our
  • 00:20:12
    society functions and how our high
  • 00:20:13
    hierarchies form in regard to sex and
  • 00:20:16
    gender are simply the result of these
  • 00:20:18
    differences not as some mysterious force
  • 00:20:20
    of Oppression they also tend to look at
  • 00:20:22
    it from the perspective of game and
  • 00:20:23
    attraction for instance what if women
  • 00:20:25
    are just naturally attracted to men who
  • 00:20:27
    show qualities of Competency and
  • 00:20:28
    Leadership well then this just adds
  • 00:20:30
    another incentive for men to aim for
  • 00:20:32
    those roles which just adds another
  • 00:20:33
    layer of differences in outcome to Exist
  • 00:20:35
    by purely natural causes if you apply
  • 00:20:38
    all these facts to other areas of
  • 00:20:39
    feminist Theory by using the same
  • 00:20:40
    rational flow of following incentives to
  • 00:20:42
    their conclusions like I just did for
  • 00:20:44
    the wage Gap we increasingly find this
  • 00:20:46
    hundreds of years of depression Theory
  • 00:20:48
    to be nothing more than Dogma two groups
  • 00:20:50
    with thousands of innate differences
  • 00:20:51
    will not have the same incentives will
  • 00:20:53
    not have the same desires and will thus
  • 00:20:55
    obviously not have the same outcomes
  • 00:20:56
    this is not a bad thing and it doesn't
  • 00:20:58
    mean that one is inferior to the other
  • 00:21:00
    it is just the result of people with
  • 00:21:02
    differences making free choices based on
  • 00:21:04
    those differences speaking of those free
  • 00:21:06
    choices people report greater
  • 00:21:08
    psychological Health when following
  • 00:21:09
    traditional gender roles people in
  • 00:21:11
    countries with higher economic equality
  • 00:21:13
    that left us often want actually
  • 00:21:14
    experience a greater desire of her
  • 00:21:16
    vagender roles a name for them not less
  • 00:21:18
    and there is also solid evidence that
  • 00:21:19
    proves that having this difference in
  • 00:21:21
    Grain dignity culture and practice is
  • 00:21:23
    greater for the long-term survival low
  • 00:21:25
    time preference of society which means
  • 00:21:27
    that since people get both an economic
  • 00:21:28
    and of psychological benefit from these
  • 00:21:30
    roles then people have an incentive to
  • 00:21:32
    adopt those roles all of this all
  • 00:21:34
    further throws a big wrench in the
  • 00:21:35
    centuries of Oppression narrative if men
  • 00:21:37
    and women are just following incentives
  • 00:21:39
    to get the outcomes they desire then
  • 00:21:40
    calling it oppression just because those
  • 00:21:42
    outcomes are not equal pretty silly Now
  • 00:21:44
    isn't it which then brings up the
  • 00:21:46
    immediate question how exactly would the
  • 00:21:48
    blue pill brand of feminism fix any of
  • 00:21:50
    this how exactly do you fix inequality
  • 00:21:52
    if said inequality is the result of free
  • 00:21:55
    Human Action
  • 00:21:56
    and that brings me to the third section
  • 00:21:58
    why the blue pill take on feminism is
  • 00:22:00
    inherently authoritarian so in Sean's
  • 00:22:02
    video on Paul Joseph Watson he even
  • 00:22:03
    admits that these differences I just
  • 00:22:05
    went over are real but rather than
  • 00:22:07
    pushing this reality to its logical
  • 00:22:08
    conclusion and realizing that these
  • 00:22:10
    innate differences will obviously lead
  • 00:22:11
    to different incentives which are much
  • 00:22:13
    better explained by this biological
  • 00:22:14
    reality instead of a system of
  • 00:22:16
    Oppression Sean instead just kind of
  • 00:22:18
    does the whole mental gymnastics of
  • 00:22:20
    fooling people into falling for the
  • 00:22:21
    false dichotomy that you either agree
  • 00:22:23
    with them where you hate women and he
  • 00:22:25
    does this again on ejw using the fallacy
  • 00:22:27
    fallacy technique all just can't help
  • 00:22:29
    lying for example Paul includes this
  • 00:22:32
    clip in his video that's because no
  • 00:22:35
    matter what gender pronoun you call
  • 00:22:37
    yourself biology is King
  • 00:22:39
    [Music]
  • 00:22:45
    so that's the supposed world's strongest
  • 00:22:48
    woman arm wrestling against the
  • 00:22:50
    supposedly average man and losing Sam
  • 00:22:53
    Tripoli was one of the three hosts on
  • 00:22:55
    that show alongside kit cope and Jason
  • 00:22:58
    Ellis Jason Ellis being the man from the
  • 00:23:00
    clip that Paul showed in his video where
  • 00:23:03
    he labeled him the average man and here
  • 00:23:06
    is average man Jason Ellis winning a
  • 00:23:09
    professional MMA fight you see Jason
  • 00:23:12
    Ellis isn't actually the average man
  • 00:23:15
    he's a trained athlete yes Paul Joseph
  • 00:23:19
    Watson didn't use an average man versus
  • 00:23:21
    an average woman in his example yes that
  • 00:23:23
    is an error so what doesn't change the
  • 00:23:26
    fact that the data when combined with an
  • 00:23:27
    understanding of incentives shows a very
  • 00:23:29
    real problem with the oppression
  • 00:23:30
    narrative you see Sean by attacking
  • 00:23:32
    these random outrage porn content
  • 00:23:34
    creators is avoiding the real argument
  • 00:23:36
    no one except for maybe a few crazy
  • 00:23:38
    people is saying that sexism and gender
  • 00:23:40
    discrimination don't exist I'll be
  • 00:23:42
    obviously they do but issues of sexism
  • 00:23:44
    are extremely complex and better
  • 00:23:46
    resolved on an individual case-by-case
  • 00:23:48
    basis that are often resolved by simple
  • 00:23:50
    free association I.E women being given
  • 00:23:52
    the freedom to not associate themselves
  • 00:23:54
    with those who are harassing them you
  • 00:23:56
    cannot just look at outcome data without
  • 00:23:58
    considering incentives and conclude that
  • 00:23:59
    it's all oppression this creates an
  • 00:24:02
    impossible unfixable standard of
  • 00:24:03
    equality which try to shift the burden
  • 00:24:05
    of proof onto everyone else to somehow
  • 00:24:07
    prove the negative that outcome X is not
  • 00:24:10
    the result of systemic bias so what's
  • 00:24:12
    the real argument against feminist legal
  • 00:24:14
    philosophy then well it's quite simple
  • 00:24:15
    really the issue is that their
  • 00:24:17
    misinterpretation of the data is used as
  • 00:24:19
    justification for Unnecessary government
  • 00:24:20
    intervention a simple way to understand
  • 00:24:22
    this is to go back to the apples and
  • 00:24:24
    oranges analogy although this time we
  • 00:24:25
    are talking about two people one wants
  • 00:24:28
    only apples and the other wants only
  • 00:24:30
    oranges now let's say for whatever
  • 00:24:31
    bizarre reason that the state has
  • 00:24:33
    decided that these people must have
  • 00:24:35
    equal outcomes in what they eat well the
  • 00:24:37
    most effective way to do this is to just
  • 00:24:39
    take away their freedom to choose
  • 00:24:41
    between apples and oranges and then just
  • 00:24:43
    assign them food on a daily basis this
  • 00:24:45
    may seem like a silly analogy but the
  • 00:24:47
    point it proves is very straightforward
  • 00:24:48
    if you have two people with significant
  • 00:24:50
    differences between them you cannot
  • 00:24:52
    achieve a resolution to these
  • 00:24:53
    statistical outcomes without making
  • 00:24:55
    their decisions for them that is just a
  • 00:24:57
    logical conclusion of their ideology
  • 00:24:59
    authoritarianism there is no way of
  • 00:25:01
    getting around this and this is why the
  • 00:25:03
    bulk of feminist ideology leads to
  • 00:25:04
    increased legislation and when feminists
  • 00:25:06
    gain political control they push for
  • 00:25:07
    increased regulation it's again not a
  • 00:25:09
    bug of feminism it's another feature
  • 00:25:11
    this problem can be seen in their
  • 00:25:13
    epistemology if you read into feminist
  • 00:25:15
    Philosophy of Law they Define justified
  • 00:25:16
    legal action based on this flawed view
  • 00:25:18
    of statistical outcomes and create a
  • 00:25:20
    subjective standard by what they
  • 00:25:21
    consider reasonable legislation to be
  • 00:25:24
    basically whatever they want depending
  • 00:25:26
    on their incorrect assumptions if you
  • 00:25:28
    need clear concrete proof there's a
  • 00:25:30
    great article on mises about
  • 00:25:31
    California's recent feminist legal
  • 00:25:33
    theory in action which of course entails
  • 00:25:35
    giving the government the power to
  • 00:25:37
    demand equity on corporate boards along
  • 00:25:39
    with 900 new laws that just further add
  • 00:25:42
    a necessary red tape to the economy it
  • 00:25:44
    also explains how the studies used to
  • 00:25:46
    justify this utilized a post-hoc Ergo
  • 00:25:48
    propter hawk style of false reasoning
  • 00:25:50
    this right here is what those of us with
  • 00:25:52
    the Paleo libertarian stance on feminism
  • 00:25:54
    are arguing against this pathetic scam
  • 00:25:56
    of using women as victim pawns to push
  • 00:25:58
    for legislation with no end in sight
  • 00:26:00
    what people in the blue pill camp like
  • 00:26:02
    Sean love to do instead of addressing
  • 00:26:04
    this seriously is to find various
  • 00:26:05
    content creators who post political
  • 00:26:07
    content focused more on entertainment
  • 00:26:09
    point out various small errors in their
  • 00:26:11
    content and then pretend like this
  • 00:26:13
    deconstruction of said Rideout
  • 00:26:15
    entertainment counts as a refutation of
  • 00:26:17
    the more economic and statistical
  • 00:26:18
    critiques of feminism which proves that
  • 00:26:19
    feminist legal Theory requires the use
  • 00:26:21
    of aggressive government takeover
  • 00:26:22
    private decisions and that feminism is
  • 00:26:24
    therefore completely different than what
  • 00:26:26
    it claims to be and this sort of blue
  • 00:26:28
    pilled midwit trick of deconstructing
  • 00:26:30
    flawed versions of Concepts and then
  • 00:26:31
    presenting that as if he's dealt with
  • 00:26:33
    the more complex truth behind it can
  • 00:26:35
    unfortunately be found in a lot of other
  • 00:26:36
    videos that Sean makes for instance the
  • 00:26:39
    islamist write about women question
  • 00:26:40
    which is basically an argument against
  • 00:26:42
    the utopian thinking that all cultural
  • 00:26:44
    beliefs and Norms are cross-compatible
  • 00:26:45
    and thus freedom of Association is
  • 00:26:47
    necessary otherwise you are forcing
  • 00:26:48
    people to associate with those who have
  • 00:26:50
    irreconcilable ethical differences aside
  • 00:26:52
    from the obvious jab at leftist identity
  • 00:26:54
    politics that this points out that's
  • 00:26:56
    what this a phrase effectively means if
  • 00:26:58
    you say no Islam is not right about
  • 00:27:00
    women you must concede that women should
  • 00:27:02
    be able to disassociate themselves with
  • 00:27:04
    Muslims and if you say yes Islam is
  • 00:27:06
    right about women then you must concede
  • 00:27:08
    that Muslims should be able to freely
  • 00:27:10
    disassociate themselves with from
  • 00:27:11
    feminists and of course the correct
  • 00:27:13
    answer is that both of them should have
  • 00:27:14
    freedom of dissociation now I do first
  • 00:27:16
    need to at least give props to Sean for
  • 00:27:18
    not taking the coward's way out Sean
  • 00:27:19
    admitted in his video moderate Muslims
  • 00:27:21
    and terrorist attacks that Islamic
  • 00:27:23
    ideals are incompatible with his concept
  • 00:27:24
    of Western feminism which is a lot
  • 00:27:26
    better than some leftists who will try
  • 00:27:27
    to just deny the problem exists outright
  • 00:27:29
    but of course rather than addressing the
  • 00:27:31
    question from the angle of a freedom of
  • 00:27:33
    Association he instead makes other
  • 00:27:35
    videos where he addresses severely
  • 00:27:37
    flawed arguments on immigration that you
  • 00:27:39
    may see from White nationalists whether
  • 00:27:41
    he is doing this to to avoid the freedom
  • 00:27:43
    of Association contradiction or if he
  • 00:27:45
    just genuinely doesn't understand why
  • 00:27:46
    it's a contradiction I don't know and I
  • 00:27:49
    kinda don't care but it's kinda sad
  • 00:27:50
    because as the person who coined this
  • 00:27:52
    phrase I would love to see a leftist
  • 00:27:54
    actually try to address this question
  • 00:27:55
    honestly instead of misunderstanding it
  • 00:27:57
    or running away from it or at the very
  • 00:27:59
    least hops essay on the case for free
  • 00:28:01
    trade and restricted immigration which
  • 00:28:03
    touches on a similar subject there's
  • 00:28:04
    also a few examples I like the order of
  • 00:28:06
    Sean doing this that have slightly less
  • 00:28:07
    to do with feminism for instance
  • 00:28:09
    shawna's response to thought he too who
  • 00:28:11
    made a video about the snowflake
  • 00:28:12
    generation how the far left gets
  • 00:28:14
    offended by everything that goes against
  • 00:28:16
    their Dogma which is basically true and
  • 00:28:18
    demands political and social change for
  • 00:28:20
    it Sean's response is basically two
  • 00:28:21
    points the older generations and
  • 00:28:23
    rideoids do it too and then he proceeds
  • 00:28:25
    to go over religious fundamentalists and
  • 00:28:26
    other non-lefty groups to prove these
  • 00:28:28
    points again Sean may be technically
  • 00:28:31
    correct about the groups he is
  • 00:28:32
    criticizing but he is missing the larger
  • 00:28:34
    point the difference is that woktoids
  • 00:28:37
    actually try to get people banned from
  • 00:28:38
    social media banned from platforms
  • 00:28:40
    actually push for great restrictions on
  • 00:28:43
    economic freedom and are also
  • 00:28:44
    increasingly in support of legislating
  • 00:28:46
    free speech and gun rights away do you
  • 00:28:48
    see the problem here Sean completely
  • 00:28:50
    missed the authoritarian element of this
  • 00:28:53
    equation there is a very big difference
  • 00:28:55
    between criticizing a show or having
  • 00:28:57
    woke representative Mary Sue's in it and
  • 00:29:00
    demanding that both state and private
  • 00:29:01
    institutions kauto to your demands and
  • 00:29:03
    force others to go along with Dogma in
  • 00:29:05
    addition to the latter being
  • 00:29:06
    authoritarian and the former being
  • 00:29:08
    honest criticism the former is actually
  • 00:29:10
    a pushback against the latter which is
  • 00:29:12
    why most Libertarians like myself these
  • 00:29:14
    days are often showing our support in
  • 00:29:16
    that direction another silly example
  • 00:29:17
    this is Sean's video on the 1776 project
  • 00:29:20
    again Sean is pedantically correct the
  • 00:29:22
    1776 project is a flawed paper that is
  • 00:29:25
    in response to an even more flawed paper
  • 00:29:27
    the 1619 project but what is his
  • 00:29:29
    response to that
  • 00:29:31
    the problem for me is that the assay
  • 00:29:33
    pulls up short of really condemning
  • 00:29:35
    capitalism American capitalism is called
  • 00:29:38
    a racist capitalism or low road
  • 00:29:41
    capitalism and is compared unfavorably
  • 00:29:44
    oh yes his response is at the 1619
  • 00:29:47
    project didn't go hard enough because it
  • 00:29:49
    doesn't critique capitalism hard enough
  • 00:29:51
    again we're seeing how the blue pill
  • 00:29:54
    leads to more authoritarian thinking
  • 00:29:56
    instead he makes the leftist talking
  • 00:29:57
    point that democracy should replace it
  • 00:30:00
    the problem with this is that workplace
  • 00:30:01
    democracy is just a very nice sort of
  • 00:30:04
    Sly way of saying that people shouldn't
  • 00:30:06
    really own their companies and is thus
  • 00:30:08
    just thinly veiled socialism and let's
  • 00:30:10
    just be real for a moment is it really
  • 00:30:11
    surprising that feminism and marxian
  • 00:30:13
    beliefs have some overlap that people
  • 00:30:15
    who believe one these days often believe
  • 00:30:17
    the other I know this by itself doesn't
  • 00:30:19
    really prove anything but it's worth
  • 00:30:21
    pointing out anyways while the 1776
  • 00:30:23
    project does indeed have its flaws one
  • 00:30:25
    of its main critiques of the 1619
  • 00:30:27
    project is completely valid which is
  • 00:30:28
    that the idea America was built on and
  • 00:30:31
    economically benefited from slavery is
  • 00:30:33
    not actually true slavery actually made
  • 00:30:35
    the vast majority of people both white
  • 00:30:37
    and black and the overall economy poorer
  • 00:30:39
    not unlike what Sean's proposal on
  • 00:30:41
    workplace a democracy would do this is a
  • 00:30:43
    somewhat complex topic that I could
  • 00:30:45
    potentially see myself doing a future
  • 00:30:46
    video on but for now I'll just include
  • 00:30:48
    some sources in the description below
  • 00:30:50
    the tldr of it is that the 1619 project
  • 00:30:52
    is based on a complete lie it doesn't
  • 00:30:54
    just have various little errors in it
  • 00:30:56
    like the 1776 project does its core
  • 00:30:59
    claim is based on flat out incorrect
  • 00:31:01
    assumptions in an attempt to exploit
  • 00:31:03
    racial Grievances and the conclusions
  • 00:31:05
    from it are used to push for reparations
  • 00:31:06
    aka the state stealing from group a to
  • 00:31:09
    give to Group B to write a supposed
  • 00:31:10
    wrong committed long before anyone in
  • 00:31:12
    either group was born again more blue
  • 00:31:14
    pill nonsense where the logical
  • 00:31:16
    conclusion requires authoritarianism and
  • 00:31:18
    lastly Sean's recent take on Andrew Tate
  • 00:31:20
    which lets me wrap this up fairly nicely
  • 00:31:22
    because here's the thing if it wasn't
  • 00:31:24
    obvious for my introduction I am not a
  • 00:31:26
    fan of Andrew Tate he basically preaches
  • 00:31:28
    male degeneracy and selfishness in
  • 00:31:30
    response to female degeneracy and
  • 00:31:31
    selfishness I'll leave it up to you guys
  • 00:31:33
    to guess why that is not a sustainable
  • 00:31:36
    way of thinking so when I looked at
  • 00:31:38
    Sean's video on Andrew Tate I went into
  • 00:31:40
    it thinking that maybe there would be a
  • 00:31:42
    chance since this would be something I
  • 00:31:43
    could agree with them on unfortunately
  • 00:31:44
    it was just another example of
  • 00:31:46
    dumpstering on an easy target to prove a
  • 00:31:48
    point while avoiding the deeper Concept
  • 00:31:50
    in this case it's patriarchy Sean
  • 00:31:51
    basically starts off with the
  • 00:31:53
    explanation for why Andrew Tate's brand
  • 00:31:55
    of masculinity doesn't really work as
  • 00:31:56
    basically just a grift and then he uses
  • 00:31:58
    that to launch into patriarchy bad
  • 00:31:59
    because various anecdotal examples like
  • 00:32:02
    from his heck and HBO movies of course
  • 00:32:05
    he completely ignores the more complex
  • 00:32:07
    arguments against this such as the
  • 00:32:08
    biological reality I explained in the
  • 00:32:10
    previous section and how it gives the
  • 00:32:12
    explanation for the inevitability of
  • 00:32:13
    patriarchy suggesting that this is
  • 00:32:15
    something that Sean just flat out does
  • 00:32:17
    not understand or he's just
  • 00:32:18
    intentionally avoiding it this concept
  • 00:32:20
    can be understood as similar to the wage
  • 00:32:22
    Gap and how women earning less doesn't
  • 00:32:23
    necessarily mean that they have less
  • 00:32:25
    just because you may exist in a state of
  • 00:32:27
    patriarchy doesn't mean that women don't
  • 00:32:29
    have representation a simple production
  • 00:32:31
    to show how silly this is would be to
  • 00:32:33
    take any capitalist country of your
  • 00:32:35
    choice replace every man in the position
  • 00:32:37
    of legislative power with a woman but
  • 00:32:39
    then make all those women far right
  • 00:32:41
    extremists who will at all proceed to
  • 00:32:43
    enact laws that support the Trad stance
  • 00:32:45
    of anti-feminism the reality is that in
  • 00:32:48
    these evil capitalist countries run by
  • 00:32:50
    evil straight white men women are
  • 00:32:52
    actually more likely to receive equal
  • 00:32:53
    rights and actually experience a higher
  • 00:32:56
    quality of life as it turns out the
  • 00:32:58
    patriarchy exists but it doesn't hurt
  • 00:32:59
    women rather patriarchy largely benefits
  • 00:33:02
    women just because there is a male
  • 00:33:04
    sitting behind that decision-making Nest
  • 00:33:06
    doesn't necessarily mean he is making
  • 00:33:08
    decisions that solely exist to screw
  • 00:33:09
    women over the idea that they do is just
  • 00:33:11
    another blue pill grift designed to fool
  • 00:33:13
    women into the petrol victim mentality
  • 00:33:15
    in order to make them easier to
  • 00:33:16
    manipulate so to summarize this since
  • 00:33:18
    it's all quite a lot to take in and I
  • 00:33:20
    admittedly had to oversimplify a lot of
  • 00:33:22
    Concepts the basic problems with
  • 00:33:23
    feminism are as follows pushing
  • 00:33:25
    incentives to neurological conclusions
  • 00:33:26
    is completely absent from the rationale
  • 00:33:28
    which is why even with someone like Sean
  • 00:33:30
    who is at least educated enough to
  • 00:33:32
    understand that the biorealism position
  • 00:33:34
    on sex differences is very much real
  • 00:33:36
    they completely missed a point as they
  • 00:33:38
    failed to comprehend what said realism
  • 00:33:40
    implies it uses this failure and
  • 00:33:42
    judgment to paint completely natural and
  • 00:33:44
    expect at outcomes which actually
  • 00:33:45
    benefit women in the long run as some
  • 00:33:47
    kind of mysterious force of systemic
  • 00:33:49
    oppression Q Equity fallacy in many ways
  • 00:33:52
    this makes feminism what I like to call
  • 00:33:53
    a mainstream conspiracy theory which is
  • 00:33:56
    a belief that despite not being backed
  • 00:33:57
    up by evidence like any other conspiracy
  • 00:33:59
    theory is largely backed by the
  • 00:34:01
    Cathedral of academic and media
  • 00:34:03
    establishment resulting in a large
  • 00:34:04
    amount of [ __ ] research and
  • 00:34:06
    journalist essays that use faulty logic
  • 00:34:08
    and flawed analysis in attempt to push a
  • 00:34:10
    total bunk usually by Prestige Seekers
  • 00:34:12
    assumes anything that goes against this
  • 00:34:14
    equality Dogma must be wrong moralistic
  • 00:34:16
    fallacy and feminism requires
  • 00:34:18
    authoritarian measures to enact its
  • 00:34:20
    Dogma due to reasons similar to the
  • 00:34:21
    problems with communist rhetoric which
  • 00:34:23
    ironically results in less freedom for
  • 00:34:25
    both men and women and here's what paleo
  • 00:34:27
    libertarianism does in response it's to
  • 00:34:29
    recognize first the incentives and
  • 00:34:31
    accept them for what they are thus
  • 00:34:33
    rejecting all egalitarian entitlements
  • 00:34:35
    and simply allowing the differences to
  • 00:34:36
    play out to their natural and
  • 00:34:38
    sustainable conclusions meaning that men
  • 00:34:40
    and women will indeed have different
  • 00:34:41
    representation in different aspects of
  • 00:34:43
    society in a free market and and that
  • 00:34:45
    this is a good thing recognizes and
  • 00:34:47
    accepts that biological reality will
  • 00:34:49
    result in some degree of patriarchy and
  • 00:34:50
    gender roles that this is both
  • 00:34:52
    inevitable and a good thing rather than
  • 00:34:54
    something in need of regulations to fix
  • 00:34:56
    it does not attempt to use legal
  • 00:34:57
    restrictions against men or women to
  • 00:34:59
    push ideology does not require religious
  • 00:35:01
    justifications as an entirely based on
  • 00:35:03
    reason and low time preference and here
  • 00:35:05
    is the most important thing it does not
  • 00:35:07
    preach misogyny unlike some other
  • 00:35:09
    stances of anti-feminism may do uh yes
  • 00:35:12
    if I didn't make it clear I will end the
  • 00:35:14
    video with this just because men and
  • 00:35:16
    women do not actually possess equality
  • 00:35:18
    does not imply a pass to mistreat women
  • 00:35:20
    especially since the inequality goes
  • 00:35:22
    both ways men are significantly more
  • 00:35:24
    aggressive and more likely to make
  • 00:35:26
    stupid violent decisions than women
  • 00:35:27
    which is why more men end up in jail and
  • 00:35:29
    the harsh reality is that this is very
  • 00:35:31
    much a fact that has basis in innate
  • 00:35:34
    biological differences I have seen a few
  • 00:35:36
    people from the incel community try to
  • 00:35:38
    argue that this is the result of
  • 00:35:39
    systemic bias against men and those
  • 00:35:41
    people are very very wrong and deserve
  • 00:35:43
    to be called out for being wrong for
  • 00:35:44
    pretty much the same reasons that
  • 00:35:46
    feminists deserve the Flack they get for
  • 00:35:47
    being wrong and in the case of paleo
  • 00:35:49
    libertarianism it also supports freedom
  • 00:35:51
    of Association which allows women to
  • 00:35:53
    disassociate themselves from men who
  • 00:35:55
    fail to realize this feminism may very
  • 00:35:57
    well be a garbage ideology with lots of
  • 00:35:59
    flaws but this doesn't necessarily need
  • 00:36:01
    to negatively reflect on women as a
  • 00:36:03
    whole in any way anyways that's all for
  • 00:36:05
    now thanks for watching that was kind of
  • 00:36:07
    a long one feel free to like And
  • 00:36:09
    subscribe for more takes on various
  • 00:36:10
    political and philosophical topics from
  • 00:36:12
    a right-wing libertarian's perspective
  • 00:36:13
    till next time
Tags
  • feminism
  • gender roles
  • paleo-libertarianism
  • sexual dimorphism
  • patriarchy
  • egalitarianism
  • freedom
  • victimhood narrative
  • capitalism
  • bread tube