Scott Galloway: 'We've essentially become a kleptocracy that would make Putin blush'

00:11:40
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P1tEU_xFW3I

摘要

TLDRIn this video, Scott Galloway discusses the current political and economic landscape in the U.S., characterizing it as a kleptocracy under the Trump administration. He highlights the significant wealth increase of the Trump family amidst economic struggles faced by the average American. Galloway emphasizes the plight of young men, who feel overlooked by the Democratic Party, and how this demographic shift has influenced recent elections. He warns of the negative impacts of tariffs on consumer prices and the overall economy, predicting a decline in American wealth and a potential stagnation for households reliant on the stock market.

心得

  • 📈 Galloway critiques the current U.S. political climate as a kleptocracy.
  • 💰 The Trump family has significantly increased their wealth since the inauguration.
  • 👨‍💼 Young men feel neglected by the Democratic Party, influencing their voting behavior.
  • 📉 Tariffs are expected to raise consumer prices and shrink the economy.
  • 🔍 Galloway emphasizes the struggles of young men in America.
  • ⚖️ He argues that the Democratic Party has ignored the plight of young men.
  • 📊 Economic policies under Trump may lead to a decline in American wealth.
  • 🗳️ Voter anxiety drives support for controversial candidates.
  • 📉 Galloway warns of potential stagnation in household wealth dependent on the stock market.
  • 💬 'Permission to have feelings' resonates with Galloway's audience.

时间轴

  • 00:00:00 - 00:05:00

    The discussion begins with an introduction to Scott Galloway, who is recognized for his insights into the current political and economic climate. He highlights the shift in voter sentiment, particularly among young men and certain demographic groups, towards the Republican Party, driven by economic anxiety and a sense of disconnection from the Democratic Party's focus. Galloway argues that the current administration's policies have led to a kleptocracy, where corruption is rampant and the wealth gap is widening, particularly benefiting the Trump family and their associates.

  • 00:05:00 - 00:11:40

    Galloway elaborates on the economic implications of recent policies, emphasizing that tariffs and government actions are likely to increase consumer prices and shrink the economy. He points out that the American economy is experiencing a reversal of capital flows, with institutional investors showing less interest in American markets. This decline in investment could lead to stagnation or a decrease in wealth for many households, particularly those reliant on the stock market, creating a challenging economic environment for the average consumer.

思维导图

视频问答

  • Who is Scott Galloway?

    Scott Galloway is a business analyst, author, entrepreneur, and professor known for his data-driven insights on economics and society.

  • What does Galloway say about the current political climate?

    He describes it as a kleptocracy, where corruption is rampant and the wealth gap is widening.

  • How does Galloway view the impact of tariffs?

    He believes tariffs will increase prices for consumers and shrink the economy.

  • What demographic does Galloway focus on in his analysis?

    He focuses on young men, arguing they feel neglected and are struggling more than previous generations.

  • What is the significance of the 'manosphere' in Galloway's discussion?

    He highlights the influence of the manosphere on political dynamics and how it appeals to disaffected young men.

  • What does Galloway suggest about the future of American wealth?

    He warns that American wealth is likely to decline due to current economic policies and market conditions.

  • How does Galloway connect economic issues to political outcomes?

    He argues that economic anxiety drives voters towards candidates who promise change, even if they are controversial.

  • What does Galloway say about the Democratic Party's focus?

    He criticizes the party for ignoring the plight of young men, which he believes has contributed to their electoral losses.

  • What is the potential consequence of the current economic policies according to Galloway?

    He predicts a stagnation or decline in wealth for many households dependent on the stock market.

  • What does Galloway mean by 'permission to have feelings'?

    He suggests that his analysis provides men with a space to express their frustrations and concerns.

查看更多视频摘要

即时访问由人工智能支持的免费 YouTube 视频摘要！
字幕
en
自动滚动:
  • 00:00:00
    >> THAT DAY. WE'RE SEEING IN WASHINGTON.
  • 00:00:02
    >> THAT DAY. >> HI AGAIN EVERYBODY. IT'S NOW
  • 00:00:04
    >> HI AGAIN EVERYBODY. IT'S NOW 5:00 IN NEW YORK. IF YOU WENT TO
  • 00:00:06
    5:00 IN NEW YORK. IF YOU WENT TO A LAB AND YOU SET OUT TO CREATE
  • 00:00:08
    A LAB AND YOU SET OUT TO CREATE THE PERFECT GUEST TO ADDRESS
  • 00:00:10
    THE PERFECT GUEST TO ADDRESS EVERYTHING THAT IS HAPPENING
  • 00:00:11
    EVERYTHING THAT IS HAPPENING RIGHT NOW IN OUR POLITITICS AND
  • 00:00:13
    RIGHT NOW IN OUR POLITICS AND OUR ECONOMY AND IN OUR SOCIETY,
  • 00:00:15
    OUR ECONOMY AND IN OUR SOCIETY, YOU WOULD COME UP WITH OUR NEXT
  • 00:00:17
    YOU WOULD COME UP WITH OUR NEXT GUEST. THE STAGE IN AMERICAN
  • 00:00:20
    GUEST. THE STAGE IN AMERICAN ELECTION IN WHICH THE COUNTRY
  • 00:00:22
    ELECTION IN WHICH THE COUNTRY THREW IN WITH A CONVICTED FELON,
  • 00:00:24
    THREW IN WITH A CONVICTED FELON, BECAUSE ECONOMIC ANXIETY AND THE
  • 00:00:25
    BECAUSE ECONOMIC ANXIETY AND THE HIGH COST OF EVERYTHING TURNED
  • 00:00:27
    HIGH COST OF EVERYTHING TURNED THEM AWAY FROM THE INCUMBENT
  • 00:00:28
    THEM AWAY FROM THE INCUMBENT PARTY AND TOWARD A TV
  • 00:00:31
    PARTY AND TOWARD A TV BUSINESSMAN, A MEDIA CLIMATE IN
  • 00:00:33
    BUSINESSMAN, A MEDIA CLIMATE IN WHICH THE MANOSPHERE IS
  • 00:00:35
    WHICH THE MANOSPHERE IS INFLUENCE HAD TO BE UNDERSTOOD
  • 00:00:36
    INFLUENCE HAD TO BE UNDERSTOOD AND RESPECTED AND COVERED. AND A
  • 00:00:39
    AND RESPECTED AND COVERED. AND A NEW PRESIDENTIAL ADMINISTRATION,
  • 00:00:40
    NEW PRESIDENTIAL ADMINISTRATION, WHERE A WAG THE DOG STYLE ONE
  • 00:00:43
    WHERE A WAG THE DOG STYLE ONE MAN TARIFF PALOOZA HAS ALMOST
  • 00:00:46
    MAN TARIFF PALOOZA HAS ALMOST INSTANTLY DESTABILIZED THE
  • 00:00:47
    INSTANTLY DESTABILIZED THE GLOBAL SUPPLY CHAIN AND ECONOMIC
  • 00:00:50
    GLOBAL SUPPLY CHAIN AND ECONOMIC PICTURE. ENTER SCOTT GALLOWAY
  • 00:00:52
    PICTURE. ENTER SCOTT GALLOWAY NEW YORK TIMES HAS CALLED
  • 00:00:54
    NEW YORK TIMES HAS CALLED GALLOWAY THE HOWARD STERN OF THE
  • 00:00:56
    GALLOWAY THE HOWARD STERN OF THE BUSINESS WORLD, SERVING UP A
  • 00:00:57
    BUSINESS WORLD, SERVING UP A HEADY COCKTAIL OF DATA DRIVEN
  • 00:00:59
    HEADY COCKTAIL OF DATA DRIVEN ANALYSIS THAT APPEALS TO HIS
  • 00:01:01
    ANALYSIS THAT APPEALS TO HIS CORE AUDIENCE OF MEN A AND GIVES
  • 00:01:03
    CORE AUDIENCE OF MEN AND GIVES THEM SOMETHING THEY'RE NOT
  • 00:01:04
    THEM SOMETHING THEY'RE NOT GETTTTING ELSEWHERE. QUOTE,
  • 00:01:05
    GETTING ELSEWHERE. QUOTE, PERMISSION T TO HAVE FEELINGS.
  • 00:01:07
    PERMISSION TO HAVE FEELINGS. GALLOWAY STANDS ALONE IN HIS
  • 00:01:09
    GALLOWAY STANDS ALONE IN HIS ABILITY TO CRACK THE CODE OF THE
  • 00:01:11
    ABILITY TO CRACK THE CODE OF THE MANOSPHERE AND NOT JUST
  • 00:01:12
    MANOSPHERE AND NOT JUST UNDERSTAND THAT WORLD, BUTUT REH
  • 00:01:14
    UNDERSTAND THAT WORLD, BUT REACH THROUGH TO THEM. HIS B BEST
  • 00:01:15
    THROUGH TO THEM. HIS BEST SELLING BOOKS AND PODCASTS. HE'S
  • 00:01:16
    SELLING BOOKS AND PODCASTS. HE'S AN AUTHOR, AN ENTREPRENEUR,
  • 00:01:18
    AN AUTHOR, AN ENTREPRENEUR, PROFESSOR AND HOST MANY HIT
  • 00:01:21
    PROFESSOR AND HOST MANY HIT PODCASTS, FROM THE PROFESSOR G
  • 00:01:22
    PODCASTS, FROM THE PROFESSOR G POD TO PIVOT WITH KARA SWISHER
  • 00:01:24
    POD TO PIVOT WITH KARA SWISHER AND RAGING MODERATES WITH FOX'S
  • 00:01:26
    AND RAGING MODERATES WITH FOX'S JESSICA TARLOV. MOST RECENTLY,
  • 00:01:29
    JESSICA TARLOV. MOST RECENTLY, GALLOWAY IS A HARDLINE CRITIC OF
  • 00:01:31
    GALLOWAY IS A HARDLINE CRITIC OF PLATFORMING STEVE BANNON,
  • 00:01:33
    PLATFORMING STEVE BANNON, CANCELING AN APPEARANCE ON BILL
  • 00:01:34
    CANCELING AN APPEARANCE ON BILL MAHER, WHO HE LIKES VERY MUCUCH.
  • 00:01:36
    MAHER, WHO HE LIKES VERY MUCH. STILL, HE CANCELED AN APPEARANCE
  • 00:01:37
    STILL, HE CANCELED AN APPEARANCE ON HIS PROGRAM BECAUSE, GALLOWAY
  • 00:01:39
    ON HIS PROGRAM BECAUSE, GALLOWAY PUT IT, HE COULDN'T IN ANY WAY
  • 00:01:41
    PUT IT, HE COULDN'T IN ANY WAY NORMALIZE, ASSOCIATE OR
  • 00:01:43
    NORMALIZE, ASSOCIATE OR LEGITIMIZE STEVE BANNON. IT'S
  • 00:01:45
    LEGITIMIZE STEVE BANNON. IT'S WHERE WE START THE HOUR WITH THE
  • 00:01:48
    WHERE WE START THE HOUR WITH THE AFOREMENTIONED SCOTT GALLOWAY.
  • 00:01:49
    AFOREMENTIONED SCOTT GALALLOWAY. THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR BEING
  • 00:01:51
    THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR BEING HERE.
  • 00:01:52
    HERE. >> THANKS.
  • 00:01:53
    >> T THANKS. >> I'M REALLY ENJOYING.
  • 00:01:54
    >> I'M REALLY ENJOYING. >> THE.
  • 00:01:55
    >> THE. >> SHOW SO FAR.
  • 00:01:56
    >> NICOLE. >> WHAT DO YOU MAKE E OF THIS
  • 00:01:58
    >> WHAT DO YOU MAKE OF THIS MOMENT THAT WE'RE IN WHERE WE
  • 00:02:00
    MOMENT THAT WE'RE IN WHERE WE COME ON THE AIR? WE'VE BEEN
  • 00:02:02
    COME ON THE AIR? WE'VE BEEN COVERING THE ECONOMY. NOT
  • 00:02:05
    COVERING THE ECONOMY. NOT NECESSARILY BECAUSE I KNOW A TON
  • 00:02:06
    NECESSARILY BECAUSE I KNOW A TON ABOUT IT, BUT I KNOW THAT AS A
  • 00:02:09
    ABOUT IT, BUT I KNOW THAT AS A POLITICAL ISSUE, THERE WAS
  • 00:02:10
    POLITICAL ISSUE, THERERE WAS NOTHING MORE SALIENT. AND DONALD
  • 00:02:12
    NOTHING MORE SALIENT. AND DODOND TRUMP, FOR ALL THE PROMISES TO
  • 00:02:13
    TRUMP, FOR ALL THE PROMISES TO BREAK TO THE WHOLE COUNTRYRY, BT
  • 00:02:14
    BREAK TO THE WHOLE COUNTRY, BUT ESPECIALLY HIS VOTERS, TO BREAEK
  • 00:02:16
    ESPECIALLY HIS VOTERS, TO BREAK HIS PROMISES AROUND THE ECONOMY,
  • 00:02:18
    HIS PROMISES AROUND THE ECONOMY, FEELS PRETTY SEISMIC, NOT JUST
  • 00:02:20
    FEELS PRETTY SEISMIC, NOT JUST POLITICALLY, BUT IN, IN IN TERMS
  • 00:02:22
    POLITICALLY, BUT IN, IN IN TERMS OF SOMETHING THAT AFFECTS JUST
  • 00:02:24
    OF SOMETHING THAT AFFECTS JUST ABOUT EVERYBODY. WHAT WHAT ARE
  • 00:02:25
    ABOUT EVERYBODY. WHAT WHAT ARE YOUR THOUGHTS ABOUT WHERE WE
  • 00:02:27
    YOUR THOUGHTS ABOUT WHERE WE FIND OURSELVES?
  • 00:02:30
    FIND OURSELVES? >> I THINK.
  • 00:02:31
    >> I THINK. >> WE'RE ESSENENTIALLY HAVE BECE
  • 00:02:32
    >> WE'RE ESSENTIALLY HAVE BECOME A.
  • 00:02:33
    A. >> KLEPTOCRACY.
  • 00:02:34
    >> KLEPTOCRACYCY. >> THAT WOULD MAKE PUTIN BLUSH.
  • 00:02:35
    >> THAT WOULD MAKE PUTIN BLUSH. I MEAN, KEEP IN N MIND, IN THE
  • 00:02:37
    I MEAN, KEEP IN MIND, IN THE THREE MONTHS SINCE THE
  • 00:02:39
    THREE MONTHS SINCE THE INAUGURATION, THE TRUMP FAMILY.
  • 00:02:40
    INAUGURATION, THE TRUMP FAMILY. HAS BECOME.
  • 00:02:43
    HAS BECOME. >> $3 BILLION WEALTHIER.
  • 00:02:44
    >> $3 BILLION WEALTHIER. >> SO THAT'S.
  • 00:02:45
    >> SO THAT'S. >> $1 BILLION A MOMONTH.
  • 00:02:46
    >> $1 BILLION A MONTH. >> AND TO BE FAIR, IT'T'S BEEN A
  • 00:02:47
    >> AND TO BE FAIR, IT'S BEEN A SLOW CREEP OF CORRUPTION.
  • 00:02:49
    SLOW CREEP OF CORRUPTION. >> THERE'S BEEN.
  • 00:02:50
    >> THERE'S BEEN. >> SPECIAL INTEREST.
  • 00:02:51
    >> GROUPS. >> AND SINCE CITITIZENS UNITED.
  • 00:02:52
    >> AND SINCE CITIZENS UNITED. >>>> THEY'VE JUST.
  • 00:02:53
    >> THEY'VE JUST. >> GONE CRCRAZY.
  • 00:02:54
    >> GONONE CRAZY. >> YOU HAVE.
  • 00:02:55
    >>>> YOU HAVE. >> AMERICAN CITIZENS PAYING
  • 00:02:56
    >> AMERICAN CITIZENS PAYING EIGHT TIMES THE PRPRICE FOR HUMA
  • 00:02:57
    EIGHT TIMES THE PRICE FOR HUMIRA AND OZEMPIC THAT OTHER COUNTNTRS
  • 00:02:59
    AND OZEMPIC THAT OTHER COUNTRIES PAY, EVEN THOUGH MANY OF THESE
  • 00:03:01
    PAY, EVEN THOUGH MANY OF THESE DRUGS WE'VE INVENTEDED HERE
  • 00:03:03
    DRUGS WE'VE INVENTED HERE MANUFACTURE AND DISTRIBUTE. SO
  • 00:03:05
    MANUFACTURE AND DISTRIBUTE. SO THERE'S BEEN A WEAPONIZATION OF
  • 00:03:08
    THERE'S BEEN A WEAPONIZATION OF GOVERNMENT FOR A WHILE, AND
  • 00:03:09
    GOVERNMENT FOR A WHILE, AND THERE ARE EVEN MANY
  • 00:03:11
    THERE ARE EVEN MANY CONGRESSPEOPLE, INCLUDING
  • 00:03:13
    CONGRESSPEOPLE, INCLUDING SPEAKER PELOSI, WHO HAVE ENGNGAD
  • 00:03:15
    SPEAKER PELOSI, WHO HAVE ENGAGED IN INSIDER TRADING. BUT THIS IS
  • 00:03:16
    IN INSIDER TRADING. BUT THIS IS ON A WHOLE NEW SCALE. THE
  • 00:03:19
    ON A WHOLE NEW SCALE. THE DEMOCRATS AND OTHER REPUBLICANS
  • 00:03:20
    DEMOCRATS AND OTHER REPUBLICANS HAVE BEEN ENGAGAGING IN CORRUPTN
  • 00:03:22
    HAVE BEEN ENGAGING IN CORRUPTION FOR TENS OR HUNDREDS OF
  • 00:03:23
    FOR TENS OR HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS. THIS IS NOW
  • 00:03:25
    THOUSANDS. THIS IS NOW CORRUPTION FOR BILLIONS. AND
  • 00:03:27
    CORRUPTION FOR BILLIONS. AND WHILE YOU COULD ARGUE THAT
  • 00:03:28
    WHILE YOU COULD ARGUE THAT AMERICAN BUSINESS HAS BEEN FOR
  • 00:03:30
    AMERICAN BUSINESS HAS BEEN FOR SALE, IF YOU W WILL, OR AMERICA
  • 00:03:31
    SALE, IF YOU WILL, OR AMERICA HAS BEEN FOR SALALE, NOW THE WHE
  • 00:03:33
    HAS BEEN FOR SALE, NOW THE WHOLE WORLD'S FOR SALE. I THINK THE
  • 00:03:34
    WORLD'S FOR SALE. I THINK THE TRUMP COIN REPEPRESENTS A NEW
  • 00:03:35
    TRUMP COIN REPRESENTS A NEW LEVEL OF GRIFT, THE LIKEKES OF
  • 00:03:36
    LEVEL OF GRIFT, THE LIKES OF WHICH WE HAVEN'T S SEEN.
  • 00:03:38
    WHICH WE HAVEN'T SEEN. ESSENTIALLY, THE P PRESIDENT IS
  • 00:03:39
    ESSENTIALLY, THE PRESIDENT IS OPEN TO SWSWISS BANKING ACCOUNT
  • 00:03:41
    OPEN TO SWISS BANKING ACCOUNT THAT ANYBODY CAN PUT MONEY INTO,
  • 00:03:42
    THAT ANYBODY CAN PUT MONEYEY IN, COMMUNICATE WHY THEY ARE PUTTING
  • 00:03:44
    COMMUNUNICATE WHY THEY ARE PUTTG MONEY INTO IT TO THE PRESIDENT,
  • 00:03:45
    MONEY INTO IT TO THE PRESIDENT, AND D THEN THE PRESIDENT CAN TAE
  • 00:03:46
    AND THEN THE PRESIDEDENT CAN TAE ACTIONS AND WE DON'T KNOW
  • 00:03:48
    ACTIONS AND WE DON'T KNONOW WHATEVER HAPPENED. AND I BELIEVE
  • 00:03:49
    WHATEVER HAPPENED. AND I BELIEVE IT'S PROBABLY ALREREADY HAPPENE.
  • 00:03:50
    IT'S PROBABLY ALREADY HAPPENED. AND THTHE QUESTION I WOULD PUT
  • 00:03:53
    AND THE QUESTION I WOULD PUT FORWARD IS, IF YOU'RE VLADIMIR
  • 00:03:54
    FORWARD IS, IF YOU'RE VLADIMIMIR PUTIN AND YOU'RE LOSING, YOU'RE
  • 00:03:56
    PUTIN ANAND YOU'RE LOSING, YOU'E SPENDING A HALF $1 BILLION A DAY
  • 00:03:57
    SPENDING A HALF $1 BILLION A DAY ON A FAILED WAR IN UKRAINE.
  • 00:03:58
    ON A FAILED WAR IN UKRAINE. WOULDN'T Y YOU BE STUPID NOT TO
  • 00:03:59
    WOULDN'T YOU BE STUPID NOT TO SOMEHOW COMMUNICATE E TO THE
  • 00:04:01
    SOMEHOW COMMUNICATE TO THE PRESIDENT THAT YOU'RE WILLLLINGO
  • 00:04:02
    PRESIDENT THAT YOU'R'RE WILLINGO MAKE HIM THE WEALTHIEST MAN IN
  • 00:04:04
    MAKE HIM THE WEALTHIEST MAN IN THE WORLD IN EXCHANGE FOFOR MAYE
  • 00:04:05
    THE WORLD IN EXCHANGE FOR MAYBE STOPPING ARMS S SHIPMENTS OR
  • 00:04:07
    STOPPING ARMS SHIPMENTS OR INTELLIGENCE TO UKRAINE? I
  • 00:04:08
    INTELLIGENCE TO UKRAINE? I THINK, YOU KNOW, PEOPLE SAY,
  • 00:04:09
    THINK, YOU KNOW, PEOPLE SAY, WELL, THAT'S A CONSPIRACY
  • 00:04:11
    WELL, THAT'S A CONSPIRACY THEORY. I WOULD ARGUGUE THAT'S
  • 00:04:12
    THEORY. I WOULD ARGUE THAT'S JUST BASASIC LOGIC. I THINK PUTN
  • 00:04:13
    JUST BASIC LOGIC. I THINK PUTIN WOULD BE S STUPID NOT TO DO THAT
  • 00:04:15
    WOULD BE STUPID NOT TO DO THAT RIGHT NOW. AND I THINK
  • 00:04:17
    RIGHT NOW. AND I THINK POTENTIALLY THAT OR SMALLER
  • 00:04:18
    POTENTIALLY THAT OR SMALLER INSTANCES OF THAT T ARE HAPPENIG
  • 00:04:20
    INSTANCES OF THAT ARE HAPPENING ALL OVER THE WORLD RIGHT NOW.
  • 00:04:21
    ALL OVER THE WORLD RIGHT NOW. AND THE E PROBLEM IS WE DON'T EN
  • 00:04:23
    AND THE PROBLEM IS WE DON'T EVEN KNOW ABOUT IT. I THINK THIS
  • 00:04:24
    KNOW ABOUT IT. I THINK THIS LEVEL OF CORRUPTION IS LIKE AN
  • 00:04:26
    LEVEL OF CORRUPTION IS LIKE AN ICEBERG. I THINK THE MAJORITY OF
  • 00:04:27
    ICEBERG. I THINK THE MAJORITY OF US, MAJORITY OF IT IS TAKING
  • 00:04:30
    US, MAJORITY OF IT IS TAKING PLACE BELOW THE SURFACE. SO
  • 00:04:31
    PLACE BELOW THE SURFACE. SO WE'RE IN A A KLEPTOCRACY AT THIS
  • 00:04:32
    WE'RE IN A KLELEPTOCRACY AT THIS MOMENT.
  • 00:04:33
    MOMENT. >> HOW DIDID WE GET HERE?
  • 00:04:35
    >> HOW DID WE GET HERE? >> I THINK WELL, OKAY. SO IF YOU
  • 00:04:37
    >> I THINK WELL, OKAY. SO IF YOU GO BACK, I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT
  • 00:04:39
    GO BACK, I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT TO ASK, HOW DID A
  • 00:04:40
    TO ASK, HOW DID A INSURRECTIONIST GET T ELECTED? D
  • 00:04:43
    INSURRECTIONIST GET ELECTED? AND THIS ELECTION? NICOLE WAS
  • 00:04:44
    THIS ELECTION? NICOLE WAS SUPPOSED TO BE A REFERENDUM M ON
  • 00:04:46
    SUPPOSED TO BE A REFERENDUM ON WOMEN'S RIGHTS. AND IF YOU LOOK
  • 00:04:48
    WOMEN'S RIGHTS. AND IF YOU LOOK AT THE POLLING DATA, WOMEN'S
  • 00:04:50
    AT THE POLLING DATA, WOMEN'S RIGHTS DID NOT SHOW UP. WHAT
  • 00:04:52
    RIGHTS DID NOT SHOW UP. WHAT SHOWOWED UP WAS SOMETHING THAT T
  • 00:04:54
    SHOWED UP WAS SOMETHING THAT AT LEAST THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY HAD
  • 00:04:56
    LEAST THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY HAD TOTALLY IGNORED. AND THAT IS THE
  • 00:04:57
    TOTALLY IGNORED. AND THAT IS THE PLIGHT OF YOUNG MEN. AND I
  • 00:04:59
    PLIGHT OF YOUNG MEN. AND I REALIZE I SOUND LIKE A BROKEN
  • 00:05:01
    REALIZE I SOUND LIKE A BROKEN RECORD HERE, BUT I HAVE SOME
  • 00:05:03
    RECORD HERE, BUT I HAVE SOME DATA. IF YOU LOOK AT THE THREE
  • 00:05:05
    DATA. IF YOU LOOK AT THE THREE GROUPS THAT PIVOTED HARDEST FROM
  • 00:05:07
    GROUPS THAT PIVOTED HARDEST FROM FROM BLUE TO RED, FROM 2020 TO
  • 00:05:09
    FROM BLUE TO RED, FROM 2020 TO 2024, IT WAS LATINOS WHO DON'T
  • 00:05:11
    2024, IT WAS LATINOS WHO DON'T WANT TO BE IDENTIFIED AS A
  • 00:05:13
    WANT TO BE IDENTIFIED AS A GROUP. TWO, IT WAS PEOPLE UNDER
  • 00:05:14
    GROUP. TWO, IT WAS PEOPLE UNDER THE AGE OF 40 WHO, FOR THE FIRST
  • 00:05:17
    THE AGE OF 40 WHO, FOR THE FIRST TIME IN OUR NATION'S HISTORY,
  • 00:05:18
    TIME IN OUR NATION'S HISTORY, AREN'T DOING AS WELL AS THEIR
  • 00:05:19
    AREN'T DOING AS WELL AS THEIR PAPARENTS WERE AT 40, SPECIFICAY
  • 00:05:21
    PARENTS WERE AT 40, SPECIFICALLY YOUNG MEN WHO FEEL AS IF I
  • 00:05:22
    YOUNG MEN WHO FEEL AS IF I WOULDN'T SAY I'M MOVING TO THE
  • 00:05:24
    WOULDN'T SAY I'M MOVING TO THE REPUBLICAN PARTY, BUT FEEL LIKE
  • 00:05:26
    REPUBLICAN PARTY, BUT FEELEL LIE THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY HAS MOVED
  • 00:05:27
    THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY HAS M MOVED AWAY FROM THEM. AND THEN WOMEN
  • 00:05:28
    AWAY FROM THEM. AND THEN WOMEN AGES 45 TO 64. AND MY THESIS IS
  • 00:05:30
    AGES 45 TO 64. AND MY THESIS IS THAT'S THEIR MOTHERS. BECAUSE
  • 00:05:32
    THAT'S THEIR MOTHERS. BECAUSUSE WHEN YOUR SON IS IN THE BASEMENT
  • 00:05:33
    WHEN YOUR SON IS IN THE BASEMENT VAPING AND P PLAYING VIDEO GAME,
  • 00:05:35
    VAPING AND PLAYING VIDEO GAMES, YOU REALLY DON'T CARE ABOUT
  • 00:05:36
    TERRITORIAL SOVEREIGNTY IN UKRAINE OR TRANSGENDER RIGHTS.
  • 00:05:37
    UKRAINE OR TRANSGENDER RIGHTS. YOU JUST KNOW W YOUR SON IS DOIG
  • 00:05:39
    YOU JUST KNOW YOUR SON IS DOING ISN'T DOING WELL. AND THERE'S
  • 00:05:40
    ISN'T DOING WELL. AND THERE'S STILL A LOT OF WOMEN IN N AMERIA
  • 00:05:43
    STILL A LOT OF WOMEN IN AMERICA THAT WILL VOTE BASED ON WHAT
  • 00:05:45
    THAT WILL VOTE BASED ON WHAT THEY THINK IS BEST FOR THEIR
  • 00:05:46
    THEY THINK IS BEST FOROR THEIR SONS AND THEIR HUSBANDS. AND I
  • 00:05:47
    SONS AND THEIR HUSBANDS. AND I BELIEVE YOU WERE AT THTHE
  • 00:05:48
    BELIEVE YOU WERE AT THE DEMOMOCRATIC NATIONAL CONVENTIO.
  • 00:05:50
    DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COCONVENTIO. I WAS, AND WHAT I SAW WAS A
  • 00:05:51
    I WAS, AND WHAT I SAW WAS A PARADE OF SPECIAL INTEREST
  • 00:05:53
    PARADE OF SPECIAL INTEREST GROUPS THAT MENTNTIONED ALL THE
  • 00:05:55
    GROUPS THAT MENTIONED ALL THE VERY REAL STRUGGLES DIFFERENT
  • 00:05:57
    VERY REAL STRUGGLES DIFFERENT SPECIAL INTEREST GROUPS STILL
  • 00:05:58
    SPECIAL INTEREST GROUPS STILL FACE IN AMERERICA. BUT THERE
  • 00:06:00
    FACE IN AMERICA. BUT THERE WASN'T ONE MENTION OF THE
  • 00:06:01
    WASN'T ONE MENTION OF THE SPECIAL INTEREST GROUP THAT HAS
  • 00:06:03
    SPECIAL INTEREST GROUP THAT HAS FALLEN FURTHEST, FASTEST IN THE
  • 00:06:04
    FALLEN FURTHEST, FASTEST IN THE LAST 30 YEARS. A AND THAT'S YOUG
  • 00:06:06
    LAST 30 YEARS. AND THAT'S YOUNG MEN IN AMERICA W WHO I BELIEVE E
  • 00:06:07
    MEN IN AMERICA WHO I BELIEVE ARE PAYING THE PRICE F FOR THE UNFAR
  • 00:06:09
    PAYING THE PRICE FOR THE UNFAIR ADVANTAGE THAT MEN OF MY
  • 00:06:11
    ADVANTAGE THAT MEN OF MY GENERATION RECEIVED FOUR TIMES
  • 00:06:12
    GENERATION RECEIVED FOUR TIMES MORE LIKELY TO KILL THEMSELVES,
  • 00:06:14
    MORE LIKELY TO KILL THEMSELVES, THREE TIMES MORE LIKELY TO BE
  • 00:06:16
    THREE TIMES MORE LIKELY TO BE ADDICTED, 12 TIMES AS LIKELY TO
  • 00:06:17
    ADDICTED, 12 TIMES AS LIKELY TO BE INCARCERATED. I IF YOU GO TO
  • 00:06:19
    BE INCARCERATED. IF YOU GO TO THE DNC WEBSITE, IT EXPLICITLY
  • 00:06:22
    THE DNC WEBSITE, IT EXPLICITLY SAYS WHO WE SERVE, AND IT LISTS
  • 00:06:24
    SAYS WHO WE SERVE, AND IT LISTS 16 DEMOGRAPHIC GROUPS, RANGING
  • 00:06:26
    16 DEMOGRAPHIC GROUPS, RANGING FROM ASIAN PACIFIC ISLANDERS TO
  • 00:06:28
    FROM ASIAN PACIFIC ISLANDERS TO BLACK AMERICANS TO THE DISABLED
  • 00:06:29
    BLACK AMERICANS TO THE DISABLED TO VETERANS. I ADDED IT UP. IT'S
  • 00:06:31
    TO VETERANS. I ADDED IT UP. IT'S 74% OF THE POPULATION. BUT WHEN
  • 00:06:33
    74% OF THE POPULATION. BUT WHEN THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY EXPLICITLY
  • 00:06:35
    THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY EXPLICITLY SAYS IT'S ADVANTAGING 74% OF THE
  • 00:06:37
    SAYS IT'S ADVANTAGING 74% OF THE POPULATION, IT'S NOT ADVANTAGING
  • 00:06:39
    POPULATION, IT'S NOT ADVANTAGING THEM. IT'S DISADVANTAGING THE
  • 00:06:40
    THEM. IT'S DISADVANTAGING THE OTHER 26%. AND TRUMP, TO H HIS
  • 00:06:43
    OTHER 26%. AND TRUMP, TO HIS CREDIT AND HIS CAMPAIGN'S
  • 00:06:45
    CREDIT AND HIS CAMPAIGN'S CREDIT, FLEW RIGHT INTO THE
  • 00:06:47
    CREDIT, FLEW RIGHT INTO THE MANOSPHERE. JOE ROGAN PODCAST,
  • 00:06:50
    MANOSPHERE. JOE ROGAN PODCAST, CRYPTO ROCKETS. AND HE
  • 00:06:53
    CRYPTO ROCKETS. AND HE OVERWHELMINGLY WON A GROUP OF
  • 00:06:55
    OVERWHELMINGLY WON A GROUP OF VOTERS WHO TYPICALLY HAD EITHER
  • 00:06:56
    VOTERS WHO TYPICALLY HAD EITHER BEEN SPLIT OR WENT MORE TOWAWARS
  • 00:06:59
    BEEN SPLIT OR WENT MORE TOWARDS DEMOCRATS. SO, IN SUM, I THINK
  • 00:07:01
    DEMOCRATS. SO, IN SUM, I THINK THIS IS AMERICA. AND TO A
  • 00:07:03
    THIS IS AMERICA. AND TO A CERTAIN EXTENT, THE WEST GAGGING
  • 00:07:06
    CERTAIN EXTENT, THE WEST GAGGING ON A NOTION THAT YOUNG MEN ARE
  • 00:07:08
    ON A NOTION THAT YOUNG MEN ARE DOING REALLY POORLY AND THAT
  • 00:07:10
    DOING REALLY POORLY AND THAT THEY JUST WANT CHAOS. IF YOUR
  • 00:07:12
    THEY JUST WANT CHAOS. IF YOUR SON ISN'T DOING WELL, ALL YOU
  • 00:07:14
    SON ISN'T DOING WELL, ALL YOU WANT IS A CHANGE CANDIDATE, AND
  • 00:07:15
    WANT IS A CHANGE CANDIDATE, AND THE VICE PRESIDENT DID NOT
  • 00:07:17
    THE VICE PRESIDENT DID NOT REPRESENT CHANGE. I ACTUALLY
  • 00:07:18
    REPRESENT CHANGE. I ACTUALLY THINK STRUGGLING YOUNG MEN ANDNA
  • 00:07:20
    THINK STRUGGLING YOUNG MEN AND A LACK OF EMPATHY FOR THEM IS THE
  • 00:07:22
    LACK OF EMPATHY FOR THEM IS THE REASON THAT WE WERE WILLING TO
  • 00:07:23
    REASON THAT WE WERE WILLING TO ELECT AN INSURRECTIONIST.
  • 00:07:25
    ELECT AN INSURRECTIONIST. >> AN INSURRECTIONIST WHO JUST
  • 00:07:27
    >> AN INSURRECTIONIST WHO JUST DID MORE TO EMASCULATE MEN THAN
  • 00:07:30
    DID MORE TO EMASCULATE MEN THAN ANYONE IN HISTORY. THEY WILL NOW
  • 00:07:31
    ANYONE IN HISTORY. THEY WILL NOW HAVE LESS BUYING POWER. THEY
  • 00:07:33
    HAVE LESS BUYING POWER. THEY WILL NOW HAVE A HARDRDER TIME
  • 00:07:34
    WILL NOW HAVE A HARDER TIME PICKING UP THE TAB, OR DOING ANY
  • 00:07:37
    PICKING UP THE TAB, OR DOING ANY OF THE THINGS THAT TRADITIONALLY
  • 00:07:40
    OF THE THINGS THAT TRADITIONALLY OTHER, YOU KNOW, EITHER AS A
  • 00:07:43
    OTHER, YOU KNOW, EITHER AS A PROVIDER. AND I KNOW YOU'RE
  • 00:07:44
    PROVIDER. AND I KNOW YOU'RE RIGHT ANAND TALK A LOT ABOUT TH.
  • 00:07:47
    RIGHT AND TALK A LOT ABOUT THAT. BEING A PROVIDER AND A PROTECTOR
  • 00:07:48
    BEING A PROVIDER AND A PROTETECR IS OFTEN ASSOCIATED WITH BEING
  • 00:07:50
    IS OFTEN ASSOCIATED WITH BEING ABLE TO PAY FOFOR THINGS. I MEA,
  • 00:07:51
    ABLE TO PAY FOR THINGS. I MEAN, DONALD TRUMP JUST MADE
  • 00:07:52
    DONALD TRUMP JUST MADE EVERYTHING THAT WE BUYUY MORE
  • 00:07:54
    EVERYTHING THAT WE BUY MORE EXPENSIVE. AND BEING A SMALL
  • 00:07:56
    EXPENSIVE. AND BEING A SMALL BUSINESS OWNER MORE OUT OF REACH
  • 00:07:59
    BUSINESS OWNER MORE OUT OF REACH AND MORE DIFFICULT BY BY MAKING
  • 00:08:00
    AND MORE DIFFICULT BY BY MAKING IT HARDER TO BRING THINGS IN.
  • 00:08:02
    IT HARDER TO BRING THINGS IN. HOW DO YOU COMMUNICATE THE
  • 00:08:05
    HOW DO YOU COMMUNICATE THE REALITY? I MEAN, AND I AGREE
  • 00:08:06
    REALITY? I MEAN, AND I AGREE WITH YOU. I MEAN, WE T THREW IN
  • 00:08:08
    WITH YOU. I MEAN, WE THREW IN WITH A WITH A FELON BECAUSE
  • 00:08:09
    WITH A WITH A FELON BECAUSE THINGS WERERE TOO EXPENSIVE AND
  • 00:08:11
    THINGS WERE TOO EXPENSIVE AND NOW EVERYTHING'S ABOUT TO GET
  • 00:08:12
    NOW EVERYTHING'S ABOUT TO GET EVEN MORE EXPENSIVE. HOW DO YOYU
  • 00:08:14
    EVEN MORE EXPENSIVE. HOW DO YOU SOLVE FOR THAT?
  • 00:08:17
    SOLVE FOR THAT? >> IT'S A GREAT QUESTION. I WANT
  • 00:08:18
    >> IT'S A GREAT QUESTION. I WANT TO AGREE. I THINK THE REPUBLICAN
  • 00:08:20
    TO AGREE. I THINK THE REPUBLICAN PARTY HAS PROBABLY BEEN THE BEST
  • 00:08:21
    PARTY HAS PROBABLY BEEN THE BEST MARKETERERS IN THE WORLD. IT'S T
  • 00:08:23
    MARKETERS IN THE WORLD. IT'S NOT EASY FOR A PARTY THAT LARGELY
  • 00:08:25
    EASY FOR A PARTY THAT LARGELY REPRESENTS THE INTERESTS OF THE
  • 00:08:26
    REPRESENTS THE INTERESTS OF THE TOP 1% TO CONVININCE THE BOTTOM9
  • 00:08:29
    TOP 1% TO CONVINCE THE BOTTOM 99 THAT THEY REPRESENT THEIR
  • 00:08:30
    THAT THEY REPRESENT T THEIR INTERESTS. AND IF YOU LOOK AT
  • 00:08:31
    INTERESTS. AND IF YOU LOOK AT THE CUTS BEING MADE TO THE
  • 00:08:32
    THE CUTS BEING MADE TO THE GOVERNMENT, THTHEY
  • 00:08:33
    GOVERNMENT, THEY DISPROPORTIONATELY AFFECT RED
  • 00:08:34
    DISPROPORTIONATELY AFFECT RED STATES. SO THEHE ABILITY TO BE
  • 00:08:37
    STATES. SO THE ABILITY TO BE ELECTED BY A POPULACE WHO WILL
  • 00:08:41
    ELECTED BY A POPULACE WHO WILL DISPROPORTIONATELY REGISTER THE
  • 00:08:42
    DISPROPORTIONATELY REGISTER THE DOWNSIDE OF THESE POLICIES IS AN
  • 00:08:44
    DOWNSIDE OF THESE POLICIES IS AN INCREDIBLE MARKETING TRICK. AND
  • 00:08:46
    INCREDIBLE MARKETING TRICK. AND YOU'RE ABSOLUTELY RIGHT.
  • 00:08:48
    YOU'RE ABSOLUTELY RIGHT. EVERYTHING IS ABOUT TO GET
  • 00:08:50
    EVERYTHING IS ABOUT TO GET PROBABLY MORE EXPENSIVE FOR
  • 00:08:51
    PROBABLY MORE EXPENSIVE FOR EVERYDAY CONSUMERS. A TARIFF
  • 00:08:55
    EVERYDAY CONSUMERS. A TARIFF INCREASES THE PRICE OF GOODS
  • 00:08:56
    INCREASES THE PRICE OF GOODS COMING IN. 88% OF TOYS COME FROM
  • 00:08:59
    COMING IN. 88% OF TOYS COME FROM CHINA. IF IT'S 145% TARIFF, 90%
  • 00:09:02
    CHINA. IF IT'S 145% TARIFF, 90% OF HOUSEHOLDS ARE BUDGET
  • 00:09:03
    OF HOUSEHOLDS ARE BUDGET CONSTRAINT. THAT MEANSNS LITERAY
  • 00:09:05
    CONSTRAINT. THAT MEANS LITERALLY A THIRD OR HALF AS MANY TOYS
  • 00:09:06
    A THIRD OR HALF AS MANY TOYS UNDER THE CHRISTMAS TREE. AND
  • 00:09:08
    UNDER THE CHRISTMAS TREE. AND THEN THE MARKET FOR OUR PRODUCTS
  • 00:09:10
    THEN THE MARKET FOR OUR PRODUCTS OVERSEAS DECLINES BECAUSE THERE
  • 00:09:11
    OVERSEAS DECLINES BECAUSE THERE WILL BE RECIPROCAL TARIFFS.
  • 00:09:13
    WILL BE RECIPROCAL TARIFFS. THESE COMPANIES COUNTRIES AREN'T
  • 00:09:14
    THESE COMPANIES COUNTRIES AREN'T EVERY COUNTRY THAT'S BEEN BEEN
  • 00:09:16
    EVERY COUNTRY THAT'S BEEN BEEN LEVIED WITH A TARIFF HAS
  • 00:09:18
    LEVIED WITH A TARIFF HAS RESPONDED WITH RECIPROCAL
  • 00:09:20
    RESPONDED WITH RECIPIPROCAL TARIFFS. SO OUR MARKET FOR OUR
  • 00:09:21
    TARIFFS. SO OUR MARKRKET FOR OUR PRODUCTS GOES DOWN. SO WHAT DO
  • 00:09:22
    PRODUCTS GOEOES DOWN. SO WHAT DO YOU HAVE. YOU HAVE AN ECONOMY
  • 00:09:24
    YOU HAVE. YOU HAVE AN ECONOMY THAT SHRINKS. IN ADDITION WHAT'S
  • 00:09:27
    THAT SHRINKS. IN ADDITION WHAT'S EVEN PROBABLY MORE DAMAGING IS
  • 00:09:30
    EVEN PROBABLY MORE DAMAGING IS THAT THE AMERICAN ECONOMY AND
  • 00:09:32
    THAT THE AMERICAN ECONOMY AND STOCK MARKET TRADES AT A P E
  • 00:09:34
    STOCK MARKET TRADES AT A P E MULTIPLE OF 26, MEANING FOR
  • 00:09:36
    MULTIPLE OF 26, MEANING FOR EVERY DOLLAR OF PROFITS OUR
  • 00:09:38
    EVERY DOLLAR OF PROFITS OUR AMAZING COMPANIES PRODUCE, WE
  • 00:09:39
    AMAZING COMPANIES PRODUCE, WE GET $26 IN WEALTH COMING INTNTO
  • 00:09:42
    GET $26 IN WEALTH COMING INTO THE SHAREHOLDERS OF THOSE
  • 00:09:43
    THE SHAREHOLDERS OF THOSE AMERICAN COMPANINIES. AND THE
  • 00:09:44
    AMERICAN COMPANIES. AND THE REASON FOR THAT IS A VARIETY OF
  • 00:09:46
    REASON FOR THAT IS A VARIETY OF THINGS, RANGING FROM THE FACT
  • 00:09:47
    THINGS, RANGING FROM THE FACT THAT AMERICA'S MORE RISK
  • 00:09:49
    THAT AMERICA'S MORE RISK AGGRESSIVE, WE HAVAVE MORE RISK
  • 00:09:50
    AGGRESSIVE, WE HAVE MORE RISK CAPITAL, WE HAVE GREAT
  • 00:09:51
    CAPITAL, WE HAVE GREAT UNIVERSITIES, WE HAVE ININCREDIE
  • 00:09:54
    UNIVERSITIES, WE HAVE INCREDIBLE TECHNOLOGY, BUT ALSO WE HAVE
  • 00:09:57
    TECHNOLOGY, BUT ALSO WE HAVE CONSISTENCY, AND WE HAVE RULE OF
  • 00:09:58
    CONSISTENCY, AND WE HAVE RULE OF LAW. AND THOSE TWO THINGS IN
  • 00:10:00
    LAW. AND THOSE TWO THINGS IN JUST 100 DAYS HAVE BEEN THROWN
  • 00:10:01
    JUST 100 DAYS HAVE BEEN THROWN OUT THE WINDOW. AND AS A RESULT,
  • 00:10:03
    OUT THE WINDOW. AND AS A RESULT, YOU'RE SEEING A VIRTUALLY THE
  • 00:10:06
    YOU'RE SEEING A VIRTUALLY THE FLOWS OF CAPITAL, BOTH HUMAN AND
  • 00:10:07
    FLOWS OF CAPITAL, BOTH HUMAN AND FINANCIAL, INTO THE US THAT HAVE
  • 00:10:09
    FINANCIAL, INTO THE US THAT HAVE BENEFITED US TREMENDOUSLY IN
  • 00:10:11
    BENEFITED US TREMENDOUSLY IN TERMS OF LOW INTEREST RATES AND
  • 00:10:13
    TERMS OF LOW INTEREST RATES AND AGAIN, GREATER REWARD FOR THAT
  • 00:10:14
    AGAIN, GREATER REWARD FOR THAT SAME PROFIT, THAT SAME DOLLAR OF
  • 00:10:16
    SAME PROFIT, THAT SAME DOLLAR OF EARNINGS. THOSE RIVERS HAVE
  • 00:10:18
    EARNINGS. THOSE RIVERS HAVE REVERSED FLOWS. AND FOR THE
  • 00:10:20
    REVERSED FLOWS. AND FOR THE FIRST TIME IN 30 YEARS, WE HAVE
  • 00:10:22
    FIRST TIME IN 30 YEARS, WE HAVE THE GREATEST INFLOW OF CAPITAL
  • 00:10:24
    THE GREATEST INFLOW OF CAPITAL INTO EUROPEAN INDEX FUNDS AND
  • 00:10:26
    INTO EUROPEAN INDEX FUNDS AND INTEREST IN INVESTING IN AMERICA
  • 00:10:28
    INTEREST IN INVESTING IN AMERICA FROM INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS IS
  • 00:10:30
    FROM INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS IS AT A 40 YEAR LOW, MEANING THE
  • 00:10:33
    AT A 40 YEAR LOW, MEANING THE COST OF OUR DEBT, OR TO BORROW
  • 00:10:34
    COST OF OUR DEBT, OR TO BORROW MONEY ABROAD, AND THE VALUE IN
  • 00:10:36
    MONEY ABROAD, AND THE VALUE IN THE WEALTH CREATED BY OUR
  • 00:10:38
    THE WEALTH CREATED BY OUR COMPANIES WILL DECLINE. SO NOT
  • 00:10:40
    COMPANIES WILL DECLINE. SO NOT ONLY ARE THINGS GOING TO GET
  • 00:10:42
    ONLY ARE THINGS GOING TO GET MORE EXPENSIVE, BUT OUR WEALTH
  • 00:10:44
    MORE EXPENSIVE, BUT OUR WEALTH IS DECREASING AT A PRETTY DECENT
  • 00:10:46
    IS DECREASING AT A PRETTY DECENT CLIP. WE GET $26 OF WEALTH FOR
  • 00:10:49
    CLIP. WE GET $26 OF WEALTH FOR EVERY DOLLAR IN EARNINGS. JAPAN
  • 00:10:51
    EVERY DOLLAR IN EARNINGS. JAPAN GETS 18, GERMANY 22, CHINA 14. I
  • 00:10:54
    GETS 18, GERMANY 22, CHINA 14. I THINK YOU'RE ABOUT TO SEE THOSE
  • 00:10:56
    THINK YOU'RE ABOUT TO SEE THOSE THINGS REVERSE. WHAT DOES THAT
  • 00:10:58
    THINGS REVERSE. WHAT DOES THAT MEAN? IF YOUR COMPANY IS DOING
  • 00:10:59
    MEAN? IF YOUR COMPANY IS DOING REALLY WELL, IT COULD DOUBUBLE S
  • 00:11:01
    REALLY WELL, IT COULD DOUBLE ITS EARNINGS IN THE NEXT 4 OR 5
  • 00:11:03
    EARNINGS IN THE NEXT 4 OR 5 YEARS. BUT IF WE EXPERIENCE THAT
  • 00:11:04
    YEARS. BUT IF WE EXPERIENCE THAT TYPE OF MULTIPLE CONTRACTION,
  • 00:11:06
    TYPE OF MULTIPLE CONTRACTION, THE STOCK PRICE IN THE LONG TERM
  • 00:11:08
    THE STOCK PRICE IN THE LONG TERM WEALTH OF A LOT OF CONSUMERS AND
  • 00:11:10
    WEALTH OF A LOT OF CONSUMERS AND HOUSEHOLDS THAT ARE DIRECTLY OR
  • 00:11:11
    HOUSEHOLDS THAT ARE DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY DEPENDENT UPOPON THE
  • 00:11:13
    INDIRECTLY DEPENDENT UPON THE STOCK MARKET, WE'LL SEE THTHEIR
  • 00:11:14
    STOCK MARKET, WE'LL SEE THEIR WEALTH BE STAGNANT OR GO DOWN.
  • 00:11:16
    WEALTH BE STAGNANT OR GO DOWN. THIS IS KIND OF THE WORST OF ALL
  • 00:11:18
    THIS IS KIND OF THE WORST OF ALL WORLDS. AN INCREASE IN THE PRICE
标签
  • Scott Galloway
  • Kleptocracy
  • Trump Administration
  • Economic Anxiety
  • Young Men
  • Democratic Party
  • Tariffs
  • Wealth Inequality
  • Political Climate
  • Manosphere