How can schools make grading more equitable and effective? With Joe Feldman

00:45:10
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ln0ZNx3Bnbw

الملخص

TLDRIn this podcast episode, Joe Feldman discusses the history and needed evolution of grading systems in schools, focusing on the shortcomings of traditional methods that have remained unchanged for over 100 years. Grading, often perceived as stressful and inequitable, is examined through Feldman's lens, advocating for ethical, just, and motivational practices. Feldman highlights the importance of accuracy, bias resistance, and intrinsic student motivation in grading. Historical insights reveal that many past grading practices were to sort students during the industrial revolution. Traditional scales like 0-100 are criticized for mathematical unsoundness and fostering stress without accurately depicting student learning. Feldman stresses the necessity for schools to shift toward more reflective and equitable systems, suggesting smaller grading scales (like 0-4) and discussing the potential role of AI in refining education. Educational leaders are encouraged to foundationally change grading practices through discussions, starting with understanding and consensus among teachers and administration.

الوجبات الجاهزة

  • 📚 Current grading practices are outdated and based on industrial-era needs.
  • 🔍 Equitable grading focuses on accuracy, bias resistance, and intrinsic motivation.
  • ⚖️ Traditional grading methods often include biases, impacting student fairness.
  • 🎯 Using a 0-4 scale may provide a clearer assessment of student understanding.
  • 🚫 Homework and extrinsic incentives should not dominate grading standards.
  • 🗣️ Conversations and consensus are essential for implementing grading reforms.
  • 📈 AI can assist in creating more transparent and equitable grading systems.
  • 🔄 Moving away from legacy systems requires patience, education, and agreement.
  • 💡 Intrinsic motivation is a better driver of student success than points.
  • 🕵️‍♂️ Teachers can start by aligning on why grading reform matters for progression.

الجدول الزمني

  • 00:00:00 - 00:05:00

    In the podcast, Joe Feldman discusses the effects of including everything in student grades, which enhances stress and creates environments where students can't relax. He highlights the history of grading, explaining that much of the current practices have not evolved in the past century. Feldman emphasizes the need to rethink grading systems to better suit today's educational goals.

  • 00:05:00 - 00:10:00

    Joe Feldman outlines his background as a former teacher and administrator and how his experiences led him to research grading practices. Noticing inconsistencies and a lack of understanding among educators about grading, he embarked on studying it extensively, culminating in his book "Grading for Equity."

  • 00:10:00 - 00:15:00

    Feldman describes grading as a deeply personal and controversial subject for teachers, acting as one of the last bastions of autonomy and professional judgment in their roles. This leads to a reluctance to discuss or change grading practices, which are often not addressed in teacher training, leaving teachers without a common language or support system to engage in these conversations.

  • 00:15:00 - 00:20:00

    Feldman explains the difference between grading and assessing, stating that grading is the formal reporting of student progress towards learning goals, while assessing is a method to determine where students are in their learning journey. He advocates for transparency and consistency and how tools like Todle are aiding in more equitable grading systems.

  • 00:20:00 - 00:25:00

    Feldman connects historical grading systems to the present by revealing their origins during the Industrial Revolution, showing that the purpose was to efficiently sort students into tracks using a grading system. The practices were deterministic and lacked contemporary beliefs in individual potential and the importance of intrinsic motivation, leading to outdated practices in the current educational system.

  • 00:25:00 - 00:30:00

    The conversation delves into traditional grading's effects, showcasing a dichotomy where students obsess over grades or disengage entirely due to demoralization. Feldman underscores that when everything counts towards a grade, it creates unnecessary stress and discourages students from taking risks or relaxing, thus stifling genuine learning and exploration.

  • 00:30:00 - 00:35:00

    Feldman introduces "Equitable Grading," focusing on three pillars: accuracy, bias resistance, and motivation. He suggests moving away from a 0-100 scale to a simpler 0-4 scale for better accuracy and reliability. This shift intends to create grading systems that resist biases and enhance student intrinsic motivation and self-regulation.

  • 00:35:00 - 00:40:00

    When discussing how to implement changes, Feldman warns against quick policy changes and stresses the importance of building teacher capacity and understanding. He advocates for creating a culture of dialogue and education among educators, starting with leaders and gradually involving willing teachers through ongoing discussions and trials.

  • 00:40:00 - 00:45:10

    Finally, Feldman envisions the future of grading systems where transparency replaces bias, and artificial intelligence could play a role in feedback and standardization. He emphasizes that grades should be trustworthy measures of student learning, advocating for more meaningful assessments that accurately reflect a student's readiness and capabilities.

اعرض المزيد

الخريطة الذهنية

فيديو أسئلة وأجوبة

  • Who is Joe Feldman?

    Joe Feldman is a former high school English and American history teacher, department chair, assistant principal, principal, and district administrator. He has researched grading and authored a book on equitable grading practices.

  • What are the three pillars of equitable grading according to Joe Feldman?

    The three pillars are: grades should accurately describe student learning, grading should be bias-resistant, and it should motivate students intrinsically.

  • Why is traditional grading considered problematic?

    Traditional grading methods, like the 0-100 scale, can be mathematically unsound, induce unnecessary stress, and fail to provide an accurate representation of a student's learning and abilities.

  • What historical reasons have contributed to current grading practices?

    Grading practices were influenced by industrial revolution needs, aiming to efficiently sort students for workforce roles using ABCDF scales and introducing behaviorism into education systems.

  • Why is it difficult for teachers to change traditional grading methods?

    Grading is often one of the few areas where teachers feel they have autonomy. Many have not received formal training in grading, making them hesitant to adjust practices that are deeply rooted in history.

  • How can grading practices demotivate students?

    Incorporating all mistakes in final grades or relying on points can demotivate students by not reflecting their true learning journey, focusing on points rather than understanding.

  • What role does AI play in future grading practices?

    AI can help create transparent grading systems by generating proficiency scales and providing quick feedback to students, potentially reducing biases and enhancing learning assessment.

  • What changes does Feldman suggest for grading scales?

    He suggests shifting away from the 0-100 scale to a simpler scale like 0-4, which increases interrater reliability and better reflects student understanding.

  • How do inequitable grading practices impact historically underserved students?

    Inequitable practices can disproportionately punish students of color and lower-income backgrounds by imposing behaviors and requirements that do not accommodate diverse learning styles or external circumstances.

  • What should school leaders focus on when initiating grading reforms?

    School leaders should prioritize education and dialogue with all stakeholders, creating a shared understanding of the need for reform and building consensus on new grading practices.

عرض المزيد من ملخصات الفيديو

احصل على وصول فوري إلى ملخصات فيديو YouTube المجانية المدعومة بالذكاء الاصطناعي!
الترجمات
en
التمرير التلقائي:
  • 00:00:00
    when everything's included in the grade
  • 00:00:01
    it adds to stress and it creates places
  • 00:00:03
    where students can't relax this
  • 00:00:06
    conversation is so interesting because
  • 00:00:07
    we talk about the history of grading and
  • 00:00:10
    how a lot of the practices that are
  • 00:00:11
    happening in our schools haven't really
  • 00:00:13
    changed in the last 100 years welcome to
  • 00:00:15
    toddle School leaders project on today's
  • 00:00:17
    episode of the podcast I welcome Joe
  • 00:00:19
    Feldman who literally wrote the book
  • 00:00:21
    unequitable grading Joe talks about the
  • 00:00:23
    three pillars of Equitable grading and
  • 00:00:25
    we dig into what the idea of the future
  • 00:00:27
    of grading and assessment might look
  • 00:00:29
    like in schools you're not going to want
  • 00:00:31
    to miss a single second so let's jump
  • 00:00:33
    right into this conversation Joe felin
  • 00:00:35
    I'm so excited to have you here on the
  • 00:00:36
    school leaders project thanks so much
  • 00:00:38
    for joining us oh thanks for the
  • 00:00:39
    invitation so I'd love for you to set
  • 00:00:41
    the stage a little bit for our audience
  • 00:00:43
    who are you tell us about your book tell
  • 00:00:45
    us about the work that you're most
  • 00:00:46
    passionate about yeah so um I'm Joe I'm
  • 00:00:49
    a former high school English and
  • 00:00:50
    American history teacher uh I was a
  • 00:00:52
    English department chair assistant
  • 00:00:54
    principal principal of a couple
  • 00:00:55
    different high schools um I worked in
  • 00:00:57
    the central office in uh Northern
  • 00:01:00
    California school district as well as in
  • 00:01:01
    New York City and after I finished those
  • 00:01:05
    jobs I wanted to try something different
  • 00:01:07
    so I started researching an aspect of my
  • 00:01:10
    work that had just nagged at me uh which
  • 00:01:12
    was grading I didn't feel like I really
  • 00:01:15
    understood it as a teacher um as an
  • 00:01:18
    administrator at the site level I saw
  • 00:01:21
    teachers doing lots of different things
  • 00:01:23
    um and just couldn't really figure out
  • 00:01:25
    why they were doing different things and
  • 00:01:27
    how to help them uh as a district
  • 00:01:29
    administ administrator I saw it even on
  • 00:01:31
    a more widespread basis and and the more
  • 00:01:33
    people I spoke with the more people told
  • 00:01:35
    me that I wasn't crazy that this is that
  • 00:01:37
    grading was a really um kind of Tangled
  • 00:01:41
    knot kind of a subject uh and so I
  • 00:01:44
    started researching grading and its
  • 00:01:46
    history in this country and found that
  • 00:01:48
    it's really just a fascinating history
  • 00:01:50
    and in many ways we're continuing to use
  • 00:01:52
    the same grading practices as a hundred
  • 00:01:54
    years ago and so I looked at what is the
  • 00:01:57
    current understanding of grading and Rel
  • 00:02:00
    fields of um adolescent development and
  • 00:02:03
    motivation Theory and culturally
  • 00:02:06
    sustaining pedagogy and tried to um look
  • 00:02:09
    at what would be ways to improve the
  • 00:02:12
    ways that we grade uh and started
  • 00:02:14
    partnering with a couple schools and
  • 00:02:16
    districts um and did that for about four
  • 00:02:20
    years and then wrote the book um grading
  • 00:02:23
    for Equity based on what I had learned
  • 00:02:26
    from that work in schools and districts
  • 00:02:28
    and in classrooms love that I think you
  • 00:02:30
    hit the nail on the head that it's
  • 00:02:32
    something we all clearly do in schools
  • 00:02:34
    but it feels almost taboo or it feels so
  • 00:02:36
    valuated or uncomfortable sometimes to
  • 00:02:38
    talk about why do you think that is like
  • 00:02:40
    why is it so hard to talk about grading
  • 00:02:43
    well I think that um there's this weird
  • 00:02:46
    uh irony that's going on where um
  • 00:02:50
    teachers feel like with with all the
  • 00:02:52
    mandates placed on them and all the
  • 00:02:53
    expectations and roles they have to play
  • 00:02:56
    um that grading is one of their last
  • 00:02:59
    Island of autonomy it's where they can
  • 00:03:01
    bring their full professional judgment
  • 00:03:03
    and identity to this aspect of their
  • 00:03:05
    practice and they are in the best
  • 00:03:07
    position to decide where H how to report
  • 00:03:10
    what students know and can do um and so
  • 00:03:13
    I think that's a very protected area and
  • 00:03:16
    to start opening up that conversation oh
  • 00:03:19
    and it's very private you know I think
  • 00:03:21
    every teacher feels like it's Unique to
  • 00:03:23
    them and they've spent the work to do it
  • 00:03:26
    and you know one of the ironies is that
  • 00:03:28
    they've had no training in how to do
  • 00:03:30
    this this really important part of their
  • 00:03:32
    work um it's not in graduate programs or
  • 00:03:34
    anything like that so there's no
  • 00:03:37
    practice that we have as Educators with
  • 00:03:39
    talking about it with each other there's
  • 00:03:41
    no common language there's no common
  • 00:03:43
    research base um there's there's no real
  • 00:03:46
    um support to talk about it and when an
  • 00:03:48
    administrator comes and talks to it or
  • 00:03:50
    tries to lead a conversation there's
  • 00:03:52
    lots of power dynamics that can be felt
  • 00:03:55
    um you know around like a protection of
  • 00:03:58
    autonomy or um you know wanting to make
  • 00:04:01
    sure that my authority isn't compromised
  • 00:04:04
    and my judgment isn't questioned and and
  • 00:04:07
    it and I think grading also gets into
  • 00:04:09
    aspects of teacher identity you know who
  • 00:04:11
    am I in a classroom and what is my
  • 00:04:13
    relationship and role you know with my
  • 00:04:16
    students and so I think it's just kind
  • 00:04:18
    of fraught unfortunately with a lot of
  • 00:04:21
    Deep Emotions and and d and challenges
  • 00:04:25
    and so what I wanted to do is help
  • 00:04:26
    normalize conversations about grading
  • 00:04:28
    it's we should should be talking about
  • 00:04:30
    it as much as we talk about assessment
  • 00:04:32
    or curriculum design or you know all the
  • 00:04:35
    other aspects of our classroom and we
  • 00:04:37
    should be doing it with each other might
  • 00:04:39
    you clarify that the difference between
  • 00:04:41
    assessing and Grading yeah so um grading
  • 00:04:45
    as I think about it is the formal
  • 00:04:48
    reporting of where students are in their
  • 00:04:51
    learning progression toward meeting
  • 00:04:53
    certain course outcomes um okay and you
  • 00:04:57
    know that can be done when I say formal
  • 00:04:59
    know it doesn't have to be like the
  • 00:05:01
    transcript it could be you know saying
  • 00:05:03
    to students you know this is where you
  • 00:05:05
    are right now um and kind of getting
  • 00:05:07
    into more of a feedback sort of area uh
  • 00:05:10
    whereas assessing is really the the
  • 00:05:13
    method by which you ascertain where
  • 00:05:16
    students are in their learning question
  • 00:05:17
    because I think people get confused and
  • 00:05:20
    start you know using words in lots of
  • 00:05:22
    different ways and so and and I don't
  • 00:05:23
    even think grading is necessarily like
  • 00:05:25
    the a through f scale it could be any
  • 00:05:27
    way that you formally report students
  • 00:05:30
    are in they're learning and does it have
  • 00:05:31
    to accompany like assigning a value so
  • 00:05:33
    it doesn't have to be an ABC or D but
  • 00:05:35
    there's some Mastery or failure or is
  • 00:05:38
    there some like that's the the act of
  • 00:05:40
    grading is assigning it some kind of a
  • 00:05:42
    value yeah I think um it's essentially
  • 00:05:46
    naming where the student is in their
  • 00:05:48
    learning progression you know if I'm
  • 00:05:50
    trying to be able to you know make 10
  • 00:05:54
    free throws in a row how many have I
  • 00:05:56
    made so far where you know what's my
  • 00:05:59
    biggest sort of Gap in doing it the the
  • 00:06:02
    number that I need to make or you know
  • 00:06:03
    if I'm trying to you know demonstrate
  • 00:06:05
    that I understand the Pythagorean
  • 00:06:06
    theorem where am I in my learning
  • 00:06:09
    progression the school leaders project
  • 00:06:11
    is brought to you by toddle you're
  • 00:06:12
    all-in-one teaching and learning
  • 00:06:13
    platform made for teachers and by
  • 00:06:15
    teachers if you're interested in more
  • 00:06:17
    Equitable grading and switching towards
  • 00:06:19
    more competency or portfolio based style
  • 00:06:22
    grading todal really supports you
  • 00:06:24
    because it breaks down your curriculum
  • 00:06:26
    and it helps us to tell the learning
  • 00:06:28
    story to see the picture of what's
  • 00:06:30
    happening in our grade books and what's
  • 00:06:31
    really happening in our classrooms so if
  • 00:06:34
    you want to learn more about toddle and
  • 00:06:35
    how it can support your grading practice
  • 00:06:37
    find out at total app.com that makes a
  • 00:06:40
    lot of sense and I think that also hits
  • 00:06:41
    a nail in the head of of a potential
  • 00:06:44
    frustration in class rooms is that we
  • 00:06:46
    often don't have a clear Benchmark of
  • 00:06:48
    what success looks like and what those
  • 00:06:50
    tiers of progression of success looks
  • 00:06:52
    like so somebody says justify why this
  • 00:06:55
    is a b or a c or whatever scale you're
  • 00:06:58
    using and there's those Flags go up well
  • 00:07:00
    I just know because there's not that
  • 00:07:02
    shared like you said shared language
  • 00:07:04
    shared culture shared vernacular you
  • 00:07:07
    touched a little bit earlier on kind of
  • 00:07:09
    how the history of grading has led to a
  • 00:07:11
    lot of the the cultural aspects of
  • 00:07:14
    grading that we see now might you give
  • 00:07:16
    us a little bit of kind of like the The
  • 00:07:17
    Flash history of what we should know
  • 00:07:19
    about where grading comes from yeah I
  • 00:07:21
    mean the the ways that we grade now are
  • 00:07:24
    really almost identical to how we graded
  • 00:07:27
    a 100 years ago so this is this type of
  • 00:07:29
    grading um and when I say this type you
  • 00:07:31
    know the idea that you have a through f
  • 00:07:35
    um that you're using points to quantify
  • 00:07:39
    those ideas was really um from the
  • 00:07:41
    Industrial Revolution uh during the
  • 00:07:43
    Industrial Revolution we were um really
  • 00:07:46
    preoccupied with becoming a more
  • 00:07:48
    efficient country um we were trying to
  • 00:07:51
    compete with Europe and so we needed to
  • 00:07:54
    figure out how we were going to cultur
  • 00:07:56
    assimilate you know all these folks from
  • 00:07:58
    rural areas and from and the people from
  • 00:08:01
    overseas to be ready to work in
  • 00:08:03
    factories and so we needed to sort them
  • 00:08:06
    um and the letter system the ABCD F was
  • 00:08:09
    in large part so that we could put
  • 00:08:12
    students into academic tracks because we
  • 00:08:14
    didn't want to waste resources on Lower
  • 00:08:16
    tracks right so we were trying to get
  • 00:08:18
    efficient with who are going to be the
  • 00:08:20
    bosses and who are going to be the
  • 00:08:21
    workers and the abcdf enabled us to
  • 00:08:24
    easily label students so that we knew
  • 00:08:28
    what trajectory they were going to be on
  • 00:08:30
    um we also yeah we were also really
  • 00:08:34
    fascinated it's just so deterministic
  • 00:08:36
    you know like this is who you are and
  • 00:08:38
    this is who you will become absolutely
  • 00:08:40
    absolutely and we were also really um
  • 00:08:43
    interested in as I was saying a curating
  • 00:08:45
    and assimilating all the folks from
  • 00:08:47
    overseas that were um immigrating to the
  • 00:08:49
    country and and um you know just trying
  • 00:08:52
    to sort of establish who would be good
  • 00:08:54
    workers and so we used um behaviorism to
  • 00:08:58
    really affect effect behavior of
  • 00:09:00
    students right behaviorism is the idea
  • 00:09:02
    that you can most effectively motivate
  • 00:09:05
    through positive and negative extrinsic
  • 00:09:07
    reinforcement right rats in a cage with
  • 00:09:09
    the pellet or the electricity on the on
  • 00:09:11
    the cage and so we adopted a lot of
  • 00:09:14
    those practices in the ways that we
  • 00:09:16
    thought about um students so the whole
  • 00:09:19
    point system managing them using points
  • 00:09:21
    as an incentive strategy was all really
  • 00:09:25
    from a hundred years ago and because
  • 00:09:28
    we've teachers have never had access to
  • 00:09:29
    the research and they've never really
  • 00:09:32
    been taught how to grade most of us as
  • 00:09:35
    Educators just replicate how we were
  • 00:09:37
    graded and we just continue to use the
  • 00:09:39
    same strategies the same techniques even
  • 00:09:43
    though there's no research to support it
  • 00:09:45
    in fact the research all points against
  • 00:09:46
    what most teachers do something that
  • 00:09:48
    comes to my mind here and this is a a
  • 00:09:50
    theme or a trend that I feel across
  • 00:09:53
    educational movements like whether it's
  • 00:09:54
    No Child Left Behind or this industrial
  • 00:09:57
    revolution of education is that like
  • 00:10:00
    it came from a goodish place of
  • 00:10:03
    intention the level the goal was to you
  • 00:10:05
    know try to help people assimilate and
  • 00:10:07
    and to to prepare them for what was
  • 00:10:10
    success at that time and I think what we
  • 00:10:12
    need to remember as teachers is that
  • 00:10:14
    just because it was created that time
  • 00:10:15
    with good intentions doesn't mean that
  • 00:10:17
    those intentions serve us now and like
  • 00:10:20
    those are the questions we need to be
  • 00:10:21
    asking is is what is the function what
  • 00:10:23
    is the endgame now and are my practices
  • 00:10:25
    still in alignment with
  • 00:10:27
    that yeah I I'm I'm a little less
  • 00:10:30
    generous than you I'm a little more
  • 00:10:32
    equiv um you know I think we were you
  • 00:10:36
    know you had folks like Dewey and folks
  • 00:10:38
    who were really thinking about like how
  • 00:10:40
    can we really like build an educated
  • 00:10:41
    citizenship and then we had other folks
  • 00:10:43
    who were like we need workers we need
  • 00:10:46
    workers and we had other folks who were
  • 00:10:48
    like let's educate all kids and other
  • 00:10:50
    folks who were like nah we don't want to
  • 00:10:52
    educate all kids that's not really
  • 00:10:54
    important to us I think the biggest
  • 00:10:56
    thing is really to your point is that
  • 00:10:58
    things are different now like we have
  • 00:10:59
    different belief systems right we we
  • 00:11:02
    believe all kids can learn right and we
  • 00:11:05
    create standards that we believe just
  • 00:11:08
    about every kid can hit right and we
  • 00:11:11
    also believe that they should get to
  • 00:11:12
    decide what they want to do with their
  • 00:11:13
    lives right we don't want to sort of
  • 00:11:15
    lock them into a particular academic
  • 00:11:17
    track that they can never
  • 00:11:20
    escape and we also know that intrinsic
  • 00:11:23
    motivation is a much better motivator
  • 00:11:25
    extrinsic motivation is actually a
  • 00:11:26
    pretty bad motivator um yeah
  • 00:11:30
    so you know we've got to think about
  • 00:11:32
    what we want in our schools and what
  • 00:11:34
    what the research says about effective
  • 00:11:35
    teaching and learning and apply those to
  • 00:11:38
    every aspect of our practice including
  • 00:11:40
    grading I love that oh progress um might
  • 00:11:46
    you speak a little bit to the
  • 00:11:47
    traditional grading system and when you
  • 00:11:49
    see it happening in
  • 00:11:50
    schools what is the effect on not only
  • 00:11:53
    student performance but just kind of on
  • 00:11:55
    the culture of a school when we're using
  • 00:11:58
    those outdated practices
  • 00:12:01
    um well I mean it's one that probably
  • 00:12:04
    most of us are very familiar with
  • 00:12:05
    because we were in those schools so it's
  • 00:12:08
    where teachers use a lot of points
  • 00:12:11
    there's the points are the primary sort
  • 00:12:13
    of uh you know language of learning um
  • 00:12:19
    kids talk about points teachers talk
  • 00:12:21
    about points um you know I think that's
  • 00:12:24
    and and it can be really stressful for
  • 00:12:27
    students um at both ends of the sort of
  • 00:12:31
    ends of the success sort of trajectory
  • 00:12:34
    right the students who are you know
  • 00:12:36
    really super consumed with getting an a
  • 00:12:39
    all the time and they feel the pressure
  • 00:12:41
    and they um have oftentimes a fixed
  • 00:12:43
    mindset around who they are and what
  • 00:12:46
    mistakes might mean um and then students
  • 00:12:48
    at the other end who just generally
  • 00:12:51
    haven't been very successful in schools
  • 00:12:53
    and so they just keep seeing the same
  • 00:12:55
    thing at low points and they just can
  • 00:12:57
    never claw their way out
  • 00:12:59
    um out of a a zero to 100 scale that's
  • 00:13:03
    very demoralizing it is really
  • 00:13:05
    architecturally sort of built to
  • 00:13:08
    disproportionately punish students um so
  • 00:13:11
    there's a lot of stress and a lot of
  • 00:13:13
    talking about points um and I think that
  • 00:13:17
    there's a lot of ways in which um that
  • 00:13:20
    creates classrooms that are performance
  • 00:13:22
    spaces that you know if I go into a
  • 00:13:24
    class and I know that every day I will
  • 00:13:27
    get up to Five Points points based on
  • 00:13:30
    whether I have my materials or whether I
  • 00:13:32
    raise my hand or whether I come in on
  • 00:13:34
    time um and every discussion is included
  • 00:13:39
    in the grade and you know every T every
  • 00:13:41
    time there's classwork is included in
  • 00:13:43
    the grade when everything's included in
  • 00:13:44
    the grade it it adds to stress and it
  • 00:13:46
    creates places where students can't
  • 00:13:48
    relax and they can't have an off day
  • 00:13:51
    because everything counts um so I think
  • 00:13:54
    those are kind of two sort of cultural
  • 00:13:57
    ways and sort of atmospheric ways that
  • 00:13:59
    the ways that we we grade changes how
  • 00:14:02
    schools are in ways that we don't want
  • 00:14:04
    them to
  • 00:14:05
    be right because you extrapolate that
  • 00:14:07
    you think 10 years down the road and I
  • 00:14:09
    was one of those kids I was I loved the
  • 00:14:11
    tests and I loved you know being the top
  • 00:14:14
    performer but what does that do for your
  • 00:14:16
    sense of purpose and value
  • 00:14:19
    and identity when those things are no
  • 00:14:21
    longer there and and what does life look
  • 00:14:23
    like and how do you motivate it's we
  • 00:14:25
    leave our kids with this really big gap
  • 00:14:28
    of purpose I think when when we create
  • 00:14:30
    those kinds of
  • 00:14:31
    cultures and you know unfortunately kids
  • 00:14:34
    come into schools not talking like that
  • 00:14:36
    right when you go into kindergarten
  • 00:14:37
    classrooms first grade classrooms kids
  • 00:14:39
    are just into learning and they're they
  • 00:14:41
    make mistakes and everybody knows it and
  • 00:14:43
    they keep trying and um you know it's
  • 00:14:46
    not until really like third fourth grade
  • 00:14:49
    Upper Elementary where teachers start
  • 00:14:51
    talking about points and managing
  • 00:14:54
    Behavior through points and and that's
  • 00:14:56
    where it all starts um and I think think
  • 00:14:59
    one of the things teachers find when
  • 00:15:00
    they change how they grade to grade more
  • 00:15:02
    equitably is they find that students
  • 00:15:04
    actually haven't
  • 00:15:06
    forgotten what it means to be
  • 00:15:08
    intrinsically motivated to learn and to
  • 00:15:10
    be comfortable making mistakes and like
  • 00:15:13
    all the and to stop talking about points
  • 00:15:15
    all the time they they actually can
  • 00:15:17
    remember that and come back to that with
  • 00:15:19
    teachers help I like that might you talk
  • 00:15:22
    about some of those shifts I feel like I
  • 00:15:24
    kind of got ahead of us here of talking
  • 00:15:25
    about the culture of of both but could
  • 00:15:28
    you talk about some of the shifts that
  • 00:15:29
    lead us from this more traditional
  • 00:15:31
    approach towards a more Equitable
  • 00:15:33
    approach to
  • 00:15:34
    grading yeah so people are like well
  • 00:15:37
    what is this then you talked what is
  • 00:15:39
    it yeah um so Equitable grading is it
  • 00:15:42
    really has three pillars it's where
  • 00:15:44
    grades accurately describe where
  • 00:15:47
    students are in they're learning it
  • 00:15:49
    they're bias resistant so grading
  • 00:15:51
    counteracts some of the institutional
  • 00:15:53
    biases and prevents our own implicit
  • 00:15:56
    biases from infecting the grade
  • 00:15:59
    and then it's where grades are
  • 00:16:01
    motivational they build students
  • 00:16:02
    intrinsic motivation and their sense of
  • 00:16:05
    efficacy and self-regulation skills so
  • 00:16:08
    there's a whole lot in those three
  • 00:16:10
    pillars um you know I think one kind of
  • 00:16:15
    I'll sort of take a them one at a time a
  • 00:16:17
    little bit so around accuracy you know
  • 00:16:19
    there's I mentioned the 0o to 100 scale
  • 00:16:22
    and it's really helping us as teachers
  • 00:16:25
    better understand why the the
  • 00:16:28
    architecture of that that scale makes it
  • 00:16:29
    so mathematically unsound um to use um
  • 00:16:33
    and what are alternatives to using that
  • 00:16:35
    I'm not I don't I'm not you know saying
  • 00:16:38
    we shouldn't use numbers to describe
  • 00:16:39
    where students are or we shouldn't you
  • 00:16:41
    know have ways of um defining it in
  • 00:16:44
    gradations but there's a lot of problems
  • 00:16:46
    with the 0o to 100 scale um and we can
  • 00:16:49
    make that better using zero to four or
  • 00:16:52
    1: four um for example then there's the
  • 00:16:55
    bias resistance so in many ways
  • 00:16:57
    traditional grading
  • 00:16:59
    um
  • 00:17:01
    incorporates um things outside of
  • 00:17:03
    students's control into the grade these
  • 00:17:05
    are sort of the institutional biases so
  • 00:17:08
    you know students whose um families are
  • 00:17:10
    of lower income um you know they're less
  • 00:17:13
    likely to be able to do some of the
  • 00:17:16
    things that are traditionally included
  • 00:17:17
    in grading like extra credit assignment
  • 00:17:20
    like you know you go to the movie based
  • 00:17:22
    on the book or you you know bring in
  • 00:17:25
    cupcakes for the potluck we have at the
  • 00:17:27
    end of The Learning
  • 00:17:29
    or you know things like that that
  • 00:17:31
    require resources you know time money
  • 00:17:34
    supervision something like that um so
  • 00:17:36
    it's making sure those things aren't
  • 00:17:38
    included in the grade um as well as
  • 00:17:41
    implicit biases you know a lot of times
  • 00:17:43
    teachers will um ask students to behave
  • 00:17:46
    in certain ways whether it's you know
  • 00:17:48
    you need to sit quietly in your seat or
  • 00:17:51
    um you need to take notes um a
  • 00:17:54
    particular way um which really doesn't
  • 00:17:57
    and often times what a teacher is doing
  • 00:17:59
    is their um creates this they create an
  • 00:18:02
    archetype of what they look like when
  • 00:18:04
    they're learning effectively and compare
  • 00:18:07
    students to that and reward them if they
  • 00:18:08
    match and punish them if they don't
  • 00:18:10
    match even though there's a whole
  • 00:18:12
    universe of ways that people learn um
  • 00:18:15
    and and can be uh and then the final is
  • 00:18:18
    around motivation you know a lot of
  • 00:18:20
    times we do things in our grades that
  • 00:18:22
    demotivate students um and we can be
  • 00:18:26
    more motivational by for example um
  • 00:18:29
    looking at where students are in the end
  • 00:18:31
    of their learning rather than sort of
  • 00:18:33
    include every mistake they make along
  • 00:18:35
    the way because if you include when
  • 00:18:37
    students make mistakes and that in in
  • 00:18:39
    the grade um it's going to demotivate
  • 00:18:41
    them and instead if you said yeah make
  • 00:18:43
    mistakes those mistakes aren't going to
  • 00:18:45
    be included in the grade only how you
  • 00:18:47
    are at the end you keep students engaged
  • 00:18:49
    and motivated to keep learning and keep
  • 00:18:51
    taking risks in their learning so that
  • 00:18:54
    was like a super uh big overview you see
  • 00:18:58
    me here just like scribbling like a
  • 00:19:00
    crazy person I have so many questions
  • 00:19:01
    for
  • 00:19:02
    you well there is a whole book on this
  • 00:19:04
    there is a whole book okay
  • 00:19:07
    [Laughter]
  • 00:19:10
    Joe could you just dig a little bit more
  • 00:19:12
    into the zero to 100 because I this is
  • 00:19:15
    probably a fallacy of thinking on my
  • 00:19:17
    part but I guess when I hear 0er to 100
  • 00:19:19
    I think oh I can be more accurate
  • 00:19:20
    because kid is exactly a 78 versus a one
  • 00:19:23
    through four then I'm just jumping into
  • 00:19:25
    this you're just a three so how is it
  • 00:19:27
    more accurate to to move towards a
  • 00:19:29
    smaller
  • 00:19:30
    scale um okay so
  • 00:19:34
    I'm with
  • 00:19:36
    you you're not the first person to ask
  • 00:19:39
    let's first talk about interr
  • 00:19:41
    reliability I'm gonna get a little
  • 00:19:43
    statistical on you so when you have
  • 00:19:47
    multiple gradations right from zero to
  • 00:19:50
    100 and you ask and you ask two teachers
  • 00:19:53
    to look at a piece of student work the
  • 00:19:55
    more gradations you have the more likely
  • 00:19:58
    that those teach ERS will not agree on
  • 00:20:00
    where those those that student is right
  • 00:20:03
    because they have so many choices to
  • 00:20:05
    make in them um the fewer gradations the
  • 00:20:08
    more likely that teachers will match on
  • 00:20:10
    those right it's like if I asked people
  • 00:20:12
    to um estimate the width of the room and
  • 00:20:15
    I told them to do it in inches they're
  • 00:20:18
    going to be a lot more variance in their
  • 00:20:20
    answers than if I say measure it in
  • 00:20:21
    yards estimated in yards right they'll
  • 00:20:24
    be a lot more likely to be so there's a
  • 00:20:27
    value in having teachers having a
  • 00:20:30
    student's work be get the same grade
  • 00:20:33
    regardless of which teacher is looking
  • 00:20:35
    at it and the fewer gradations the more
  • 00:20:38
    likely you will have that consistency so
  • 00:20:40
    there's a real value in having fewer
  • 00:20:41
    rather than
  • 00:20:43
    more the so it's
  • 00:20:46
    random yeah I mean it's not random from
  • 00:20:49
    the teachers point of view right they're
  • 00:20:50
    trying to be super precise right but the
  • 00:20:53
    problem is that they're going to be much
  • 00:20:54
    more likely to be different from each
  • 00:20:56
    other which is much more confusing than
  • 00:20:58
    to the
  • 00:21:00
    student that's where the bias comes in
  • 00:21:02
    like that implicit of like oh well like
  • 00:21:04
    I was actually looking to see that your
  • 00:21:05
    handwriting was neat and that's what
  • 00:21:07
    pushed you to a 72 instead of a 79 and
  • 00:21:09
    the other teacher's like I don't care
  • 00:21:10
    about
  • 00:21:11
    handwriting yeah and that could have I
  • 00:21:14
    mean and that's also got to be figured
  • 00:21:16
    out like what do we include and not in
  • 00:21:17
    the grade and what constitutes right
  • 00:21:19
    that's that gets into calibration like
  • 00:21:21
    well what is a three what is a b what is
  • 00:21:23
    a C+ right um you're hitting you're
  • 00:21:26
    getting it all the complexity this um
  • 00:21:29
    the second reason is that it's a little
  • 00:21:31
    artificial right so if I said you know
  • 00:21:35
    uh to an English teacher tell me the
  • 00:21:37
    difference between a student who is at a
  • 00:21:40
    84 and a student who's at an 85 what's
  • 00:21:43
    the difference between those two
  • 00:21:44
    students in their writing skills right
  • 00:21:46
    one brought the cupcak Jo well well or
  • 00:21:49
    one is higher than the one is one point
  • 00:21:51
    higher than the other that that's the
  • 00:21:53
    best right um so I think that it's a
  • 00:21:56
    little artificial to believe
  • 00:21:59
    that you can really make those
  • 00:22:01
    gradations in it even you know Math
  • 00:22:03
    teachers or science teachers or
  • 00:22:05
    something that has you know I had 100
  • 00:22:07
    points and you got 86 of them you didn't
  • 00:22:09
    get 85 you got 86 right you still it's
  • 00:22:12
    still artificial because you have made
  • 00:22:15
    questions what you wanted to make them
  • 00:22:17
    and you have scored them in the way that
  • 00:22:19
    you wanted them to be so in 86 in
  • 00:22:22
    algebra two can mean anything regardless
  • 00:22:26
    you know depending on which teacher you
  • 00:22:27
    have for it when you have fewer
  • 00:22:30
    gradations you could say a b c DF right
  • 00:22:34
    let's just say in or you know one to
  • 00:22:36
    four which is the same thing I could say
  • 00:22:39
    okay I'm teaching the Pythagorean
  • 00:22:40
    theorem right what is a level
  • 00:22:43
    understanding the Pythagorean theorem
  • 00:22:45
    what's B level understanding what's C
  • 00:22:46
    Level understanding What's d level
  • 00:22:48
    understanding and then if I want I can
  • 00:22:50
    do pluses and minuses because maybe
  • 00:22:52
    there's a little bit of variance in
  • 00:22:54
    there but then we can come to agreements
  • 00:22:57
    as Math teachers right we can look at a
  • 00:22:59
    bunch of student work we can understand
  • 00:23:02
    that these are B level so now when a
  • 00:23:05
    student does a piece of work on them on
  • 00:23:07
    the Pythagorean theorem I don't have to
  • 00:23:09
    say you're eight out of 24 or 16 out of
  • 00:23:12
    90 or whatever I can look at it and be
  • 00:23:14
    you know the totality of what you've
  • 00:23:16
    just shown me shows me that you're at a
  • 00:23:18
    B level understanding and it's so much
  • 00:23:21
    simpler um you know it's it's so much
  • 00:23:25
    clear and simple and it's very similar
  • 00:23:27
    to what students have in elementary
  • 00:23:29
    school and it's the GPA scale so that's
  • 00:23:31
    a snap um the the other problem around
  • 00:23:35
    the 0100 scale is around the
  • 00:23:37
    mathematical and soundus is when because
  • 00:23:39
    we have a scale in which we have twoth
  • 00:23:42
    thirds of it um that describe gradations
  • 00:23:45
    of failure right from zero to high
  • 00:23:50
    60s is basically subpar performance
  • 00:23:54
    right and we're saying we as your
  • 00:23:56
    Educators we think that it's you know
  • 00:23:58
    really important that we distinguish a
  • 00:24:00
    19 from a 26 to a 28 to a 31 from a 32
  • 00:24:04
    like we have all these levels of
  • 00:24:06
    describing failure failure and then we
  • 00:24:08
    have about a third of the scale to
  • 00:24:10
    describing success or competence right
  • 00:24:12
    so that's weird right off the bat right
  • 00:24:14
    that doesn't send a great message to
  • 00:24:16
    students and when you've got a scale
  • 00:24:19
    that's designed like that when you get
  • 00:24:21
    low scores it it has exerts a
  • 00:24:24
    gravitational pull on everything else
  • 00:24:27
    right we teachers know that kid gets a
  • 00:24:29
    zero that's an atomic zero right that
  • 00:24:32
    will just pull down the grades
  • 00:24:35
    disproportionately because we're using a
  • 00:24:38
    scale that has this kind of architecture
  • 00:24:39
    there's nothing sacrosanct about 0 to
  • 00:24:41
    100 nobody uses 0 to 100 outside
  • 00:24:44
    education at all right anytime you have
  • 00:24:46
    to demonstrate competency bar exam
  • 00:24:49
    medical boards nursing architecture
  • 00:24:53
    nothing driver's license nobody uses 0
  • 00:24:55
    to 100 scale right they have a cut SC
  • 00:24:58
    score or cut number and that's it right
  • 00:25:01
    there's just no reason for us to use
  • 00:25:04
    that anymore that's really cool and one
  • 00:25:07
    thing I and I'm not sure if you noticed
  • 00:25:08
    this in even in your language when you
  • 00:25:10
    switch from talking to 0 to 100 to 1 to
  • 00:25:13
    four all of what you described of
  • 00:25:15
    Student Success became understanding
  • 00:25:17
    language you know instead of I think we
  • 00:25:19
    can get so pulled down into the
  • 00:25:20
    nitty-gritties of like skills and
  • 00:25:22
    acquisition of knowledge and these
  • 00:25:23
    nitty-gritty things but when you zoom
  • 00:25:25
    into those compet or zoom out into
  • 00:25:27
    competencies it becomes these higher
  • 00:25:28
    level what will students understand what
  • 00:25:31
    will they take away and we turn our
  • 00:25:33
    minds then towards transfer as opposed
  • 00:25:35
    to just like myopically focused on
  • 00:25:37
    success now which is really
  • 00:25:39
    cool I like that would you say that
  • 00:25:41
    that's the biggest shift like moving
  • 00:25:43
    away from the zero to 100 is like the
  • 00:25:45
    biggest easiest shift a school can just
  • 00:25:48
    like do right off the back and like make
  • 00:25:50
    their school more
  • 00:25:51
    Equitable I know I'm not gonna say that
  • 00:25:54
    because because it's um it's very
  • 00:25:57
    tempting for the reason you just
  • 00:25:59
    described oh what a snap
  • 00:26:05
    I piece of cake it is really difficult
  • 00:26:10
    because again like I think
  • 00:26:14
    teachers I think it's a common error
  • 00:26:16
    actually of um school and District
  • 00:26:19
    leaders is where they see this glaring
  • 00:26:21
    problem and it seems like a no-brainer
  • 00:26:24
    like why wouldn't you change it knowing
  • 00:26:27
    what you know right so they're like all
  • 00:26:29
    right I'll make a policy that'll solve
  • 00:26:30
    it and what it does is it doesn't really
  • 00:26:33
    acknowledge the the need for us to build
  • 00:26:37
    the capacity in our teachers to
  • 00:26:39
    understand the why they actually this is
  • 00:26:42
    these are not technical changes these
  • 00:26:43
    are adaptive ones and ones that are
  • 00:26:45
    based on deep Theory and ideas and
  • 00:26:50
    teachers can all get there because they
  • 00:26:52
    can learn why it's bad and why it harms
  • 00:26:55
    students and why it isn't helpful for
  • 00:26:56
    them and how it can actually improve
  • 00:26:58
    improve their practice they can learn
  • 00:26:59
    those things I mean we work with
  • 00:27:00
    teachers and help them and once they
  • 00:27:03
    work it through they have to think well
  • 00:27:06
    what do I do about if I have a minimum
  • 00:27:07
    50 do I like and a kid doesn't hand
  • 00:27:10
    something in what do I do do I make it a
  • 00:27:12
    50 I don't like that and do I do
  • 00:27:14
    something different or if I have a zero
  • 00:27:15
    to four or one to four you know now I
  • 00:27:18
    don't have as many choices and like how
  • 00:27:20
    do I explain this to te to parents and
  • 00:27:22
    what about the software like I have a
  • 00:27:24
    grading software that doesn't allow me
  • 00:27:26
    to put in one or two three four it only
  • 00:27:28
    has percentages what do I do about that
  • 00:27:30
    like there's just and then parents have
  • 00:27:32
    to be educated wait a minute why is
  • 00:27:34
    where's my kids percentage I thought
  • 00:27:37
    they were always going to get a
  • 00:27:38
    percentage what have you done why are
  • 00:27:39
    you messing with my kid so there's
  • 00:27:42
    there's so many complexities around
  • 00:27:44
    there and it requires really um
  • 00:27:47
    deliberate
  • 00:27:48
    education um and just dialogue to help
  • 00:27:52
    engage all the constituents that you
  • 00:27:55
    serve around why
  • 00:27:58
    the why of this and why improving
  • 00:28:01
    grading to be more fair and accurate is
  • 00:28:03
    really a lever for larger instructional
  • 00:28:06
    change it's not like this tiny little
  • 00:28:08
    bow on the end of the at the end of the
  • 00:28:10
    present like this will re help everybody
  • 00:28:13
    in the system better understand what
  • 00:28:15
    we're here for and what we're trying to
  • 00:28:17
    communicate and expect of our students
  • 00:28:20
    so just as Leaders we're not looking for
  • 00:28:22
    the product we're not looking for the
  • 00:28:24
    final quick fix we're looking to make
  • 00:28:26
    space and time for these valuable
  • 00:28:28
    discussions and for that
  • 00:28:30
    thinking because you could like you said
  • 00:28:32
    you could just come in and mandate
  • 00:28:33
    something but then the culture isn't
  • 00:28:35
    going to change and that's what we're
  • 00:28:36
    after as school leaders is a systemic
  • 00:28:38
    and cultural change yep and you're
  • 00:28:40
    really touching on this pressure point
  • 00:28:42
    of teachers if you start changing how
  • 00:28:44
    they grade because as I said like they
  • 00:28:46
    protect this space they are the
  • 00:28:48
    authority so you know do this at your
  • 00:28:51
    own risk leaders we've seen it I mean
  • 00:28:54
    I'm a former leader and I get it I get
  • 00:28:55
    you want to solve the problem um but
  • 00:28:57
    we've just seen too many times the
  • 00:28:59
    administrators get ahead of the teachers
  • 00:29:01
    too far ahead of them and that's when
  • 00:29:03
    the problems start happening so where do
  • 00:29:05
    you begin Joe like because it's a
  • 00:29:07
    sensitive topic it's a topic that takes
  • 00:29:09
    a lot of time and shift in practice and
  • 00:29:12
    unen trenching and grained habits so if
  • 00:29:16
    you were a school leader recognizing in
  • 00:29:18
    this chat like oh dang I think my
  • 00:29:19
    grading is a little bit more on the
  • 00:29:21
    biased side what's that first leaping
  • 00:29:23
    spot for you you start with educating
  • 00:29:25
    the people around you and coming on to a
  • 00:29:27
    getting to a common um ground with the
  • 00:29:31
    other leaders in your school or in your
  • 00:29:34
    District so that you all can agree that
  • 00:29:38
    this is something to prioritize and
  • 00:29:41
    there's a some urgency around it and it
  • 00:29:44
    actually until we do this we will never
  • 00:29:48
    get to our our the outcomes we want I
  • 00:29:50
    mean we we can have the most amazing
  • 00:29:53
    curriculum and incredible you know
  • 00:29:56
    multimodal assessment Strate strategies
  • 00:29:59
    and culturally sustaining pedagogy and
  • 00:30:01
    diverse curriculum and all kind Hands-On
  • 00:30:04
    learning and it can all get undermined
  • 00:30:07
    if we house it all within our
  • 00:30:09
    traditional grading system and I think
  • 00:30:12
    if leaders can get on the same page
  • 00:30:14
    about that why um that's step one and
  • 00:30:18
    you know they'll take time they'll spend
  • 00:30:20
    you know a semester reading the book or
  • 00:30:22
    we'll do just workshops for leaders and
  • 00:30:24
    that includes board members right and
  • 00:30:27
    maybe it's teachers union leadership as
  • 00:30:29
    well or Department chairs right we all
  • 00:30:31
    got to like agree that this is something
  • 00:30:34
    worth our time and worth our energy um
  • 00:30:38
    and then I think the next step that we
  • 00:30:39
    found most effective is where you start
  • 00:30:41
    with finding a set of teachers who are
  • 00:30:46
    interested um have the social capital
  • 00:30:49
    have capacity in terms of time or
  • 00:30:52
    experience or or stiens or something who
  • 00:30:56
    can actually go deep into this work can
  • 00:30:58
    start trying the different practices um
  • 00:31:00
    that's the primary way that we partner
  • 00:31:03
    with schools and districts is to work
  • 00:31:04
    with a cohort of teachers over a couple
  • 00:31:07
    years to build their capacity to help be
  • 00:31:10
    resources for colleagues and to generate
  • 00:31:12
    an Evidence base for the district that
  • 00:31:15
    says look this isn't just in this book
  • 00:31:18
    like when we stopped doing X great
  • 00:31:21
    things happened when I changed to a one
  • 00:31:23
    to four scale when I stopped including
  • 00:31:25
    homework in the grade which I haven't
  • 00:31:26
    talked about or when and I you know
  • 00:31:29
    stopped including extra credit and I did
  • 00:31:31
    this and I used rubrics and all these
  • 00:31:32
    kinds of things amazing things happened
  • 00:31:36
    and that's what I think is so important
  • 00:31:38
    for a district to generate and to have
  • 00:31:41
    in order to help to then start moving it
  • 00:31:44
    throughout the system that ultimately
  • 00:31:46
    leads to policy change well and what a
  • 00:31:48
    beautiful space to Center the discussion
  • 00:31:50
    on because I think it can easily all of
  • 00:31:52
    these discussions around assessment and
  • 00:31:54
    what's worth assessing can just feel so
  • 00:31:56
    big and overwhelming but but grading is
  • 00:31:59
    almost this like this Touchstone that we
  • 00:32:00
    can all come back
  • 00:32:02
    to and I think that if you were to make
  • 00:32:04
    those shifts in the in the grading
  • 00:32:06
    itself that it would trickle into those
  • 00:32:08
    other aspects of of assessment and
  • 00:32:10
    culture and
  • 00:32:11
    beliefs yeah I mean one of the one of
  • 00:32:13
    the kind of great things about talking
  • 00:32:15
    about grading is everybody everybody has
  • 00:32:17
    an opinion and they're they all feel
  • 00:32:19
    deeply invested in it right once you
  • 00:32:21
    start talking about grading people are
  • 00:32:22
    like it's about me this is this is
  • 00:32:25
    really important to me because I've
  • 00:32:26
    spent a lot of my time figuring this out
  • 00:32:28
    and I know that I haven't based it on
  • 00:32:30
    anything except what I experienced so
  • 00:32:33
    I'm engaged and even though it's about
  • 00:32:35
    grading it really is not just about
  • 00:32:37
    grading because once to your very Point
  • 00:32:40
    once you start talking about these
  • 00:32:41
    things and opening them up you start
  • 00:32:43
    opening up other discussions around
  • 00:32:45
    assessment and how do we give feedback
  • 00:32:48
    to students and how do we help engage
  • 00:32:51
    them if not through points every day for
  • 00:32:54
    every activity right it starts opening
  • 00:32:56
    up all these other discussions that are
  • 00:32:58
    really valuable um and should be had and
  • 00:33:00
    this is a this is a vehicle to get to
  • 00:33:03
    those kinds of
  • 00:33:04
    questions it reminds me of doing like a
  • 00:33:06
    home renovation project you're like I'm
  • 00:33:08
    just gonna change This little light
  • 00:33:09
    fixture and then you take it off and the
  • 00:33:11
    Box of Lies unveils
  • 00:33:14
    itself Joe we've spent a lot of the
  • 00:33:17
    conversation looking backwards you know
  • 00:33:19
    at grading and an assessment and I'm
  • 00:33:22
    curious because I'm guessing in your
  • 00:33:23
    work you've gotten to be in some cool
  • 00:33:26
    spaces where you're seeing the fure
  • 00:33:27
    future now so what are you excited about
  • 00:33:31
    in the future of grading like what
  • 00:33:32
    really Sparks you either things you've
  • 00:33:34
    seen or things that you hope to see in
  • 00:33:36
    the next few
  • 00:33:37
    years I think that
  • 00:33:39
    um you know 10 years ago when I first
  • 00:33:43
    started doing this work there weren't a
  • 00:33:45
    lot of people talking about it um there
  • 00:33:47
    was a group you know standards-based
  • 00:33:49
    grading was there and people were
  • 00:33:51
    talking about it and they you know
  • 00:33:52
    Mastery grading I mean there there were
  • 00:33:54
    there was kind of language out there but
  • 00:33:56
    I think particularly as I said because
  • 00:33:58
    of the pandemic it really accelerated
  • 00:33:59
    people's interest in it and so I think
  • 00:34:02
    there's a lot more people talking about
  • 00:34:03
    it and which I think makes it a lot
  • 00:34:05
    easier for schools and districts to
  • 00:34:08
    start having the conversations too and
  • 00:34:09
    they don't feel so alone in it um I
  • 00:34:13
    think it's really cool that um College
  • 00:34:16
    uh and University faculty are talking
  • 00:34:18
    about it too um even you know I've been
  • 00:34:21
    having conversations with folks um in
  • 00:34:25
    the college admissions world yes um and
  • 00:34:28
    they are very aware that teachers grade
  • 00:34:32
    in all kinds of different ways and
  • 00:34:34
    aren't necessarily very trustworthy
  • 00:34:37
    oftentimes and they you know we we we
  • 00:34:41
    sort of see this pendulum of um the SAT
  • 00:34:44
    and ACT standardized testing come back
  • 00:34:47
    where it's now starting to be required
  • 00:34:49
    in more College admissions processes
  • 00:34:51
    even though it kind of went away from
  • 00:34:53
    the pandemic it's now coming back and I
  • 00:34:56
    think part of it is because when
  • 00:34:58
    teachers grading is so variable and
  • 00:35:01
    we're seeing some evidence that suggest
  • 00:35:03
    there's greater grade inflation from
  • 00:35:05
    grades than there had been that
  • 00:35:08
    admissions folks need to rely on
  • 00:35:11
    something some Metric right so they can
  • 00:35:13
    trust the um the grade and I think if
  • 00:35:18
    and and they will say if we know that
  • 00:35:21
    the grade represents a student's level
  • 00:35:22
    of understanding of the course content
  • 00:35:25
    that would be so helpful but right now
  • 00:35:28
    the grade is like this um this uh
  • 00:35:31
    Omnibus grade is what um it's been
  • 00:35:34
    called where the ideaas it includes how
  • 00:35:37
    they did on homework and did they raise
  • 00:35:38
    their hand and how they do on the test
  • 00:35:39
    and how they do on this unit and did
  • 00:35:41
    they come on time and did they hand it
  • 00:35:43
    in on time like all those things get
  • 00:35:45
    compressed and collapsed into the grade
  • 00:35:47
    so it could mean anything right a
  • 00:35:49
    student could be uh could have a b
  • 00:35:51
    because they know the content super well
  • 00:35:54
    but they always came in late and every
  • 00:35:55
    assignment was late or they could have a
  • 00:35:57
    be because they didn't know the content
  • 00:35:59
    so well but they were wonderful they
  • 00:36:02
    were just an angel and they did all the
  • 00:36:04
    extra credit stuff and so and they just
  • 00:36:07
    really connected with the teacher and
  • 00:36:08
    that kid has to be and so as long as
  • 00:36:10
    that's the case I think we teachers are
  • 00:36:13
    really inviting and Licensing the
  • 00:36:17
    standardized testing world to do its
  • 00:36:19
    thing um you know I don't love
  • 00:36:21
    standardized test a lot of teachers
  • 00:36:22
    don't like standardized test but we're
  • 00:36:24
    letting it happen I think and and this
  • 00:36:26
    is actually an opportunity to to build
  • 00:36:29
    our credibility build our
  • 00:36:30
    professionalism and and build trust I
  • 00:36:33
    think in in the grade because we
  • 00:36:35
    teachers are in the best position to
  • 00:36:37
    describe students Readiness for the next
  • 00:36:39
    level not a test but until we can really
  • 00:36:43
    work out this this 100 year old problem
  • 00:36:46
    and I think we're getting better at it
  • 00:36:47
    until we work our way through it um or I
  • 00:36:50
    think and when we work our way through
  • 00:36:52
    it I think we'll really be um able to
  • 00:36:54
    push back against standardized testing
  • 00:36:56
    um and really establish ourselves um in
  • 00:36:59
    the professionalism that um we deserve
  • 00:37:02
    frankly so everybody's talking about AI
  • 00:37:04
    right now um I think that AI can
  • 00:37:08
    actually will help push Equitable
  • 00:37:10
    grading in a couple ways one I think
  • 00:37:13
    that um well one of the really big
  • 00:37:17
    aspects of the motivational pillar is to
  • 00:37:19
    make grading transparent um make the
  • 00:37:21
    expectations transparent right so if I'm
  • 00:37:24
    I'm going to go back to my Pythagorean
  • 00:37:25
    theorem if I expect you to know the
  • 00:37:26
    Pythagorean theorem I'm going to tell
  • 00:37:28
    you what level of understanding you have
  • 00:37:30
    to demonstrate that that would describe
  • 00:37:34
    your understanding as an A B C D right I
  • 00:37:36
    just it's a rubric it's a proficiency
  • 00:37:38
    scale and AI is can be really helpful in
  • 00:37:42
    generating proficiency scales right you
  • 00:37:44
    could say you know here's an here's an
  • 00:37:47
    example of an A B C DF or here's three
  • 00:37:50
    examples of each and here are the
  • 00:37:52
    criteria create a rubric right right and
  • 00:37:55
    I and then you could even have students
  • 00:37:58
    submit um uh samples of the work and
  • 00:38:01
    then have ai tell where they fit on the
  • 00:38:04
    rubric right and I think you could get
  • 00:38:06
    immediate feedback yeah immediate
  • 00:38:08
    feedback around fixed standards fixed
  • 00:38:10
    outcomes that would at least help to
  • 00:38:13
    mitigate biases would um have feedback
  • 00:38:17
    more quickly and we know how important
  • 00:38:19
    it is to have quick feedback you know I
  • 00:38:21
    don't know that I would use that for
  • 00:38:22
    summative assessment and kind of final
  • 00:38:25
    judgments um of teachers but I think
  • 00:38:28
    that in itself could be a huge driver in
  • 00:38:32
    in getting this this work to get um to
  • 00:38:34
    move a little faster
  • 00:38:37
    um yeah I think that I think there's
  • 00:38:40
    something
  • 00:38:41
    there the thing I hear from teachers are
  • 00:38:44
    a big like a bulk against AI being used
  • 00:38:47
    in that way is they're like okay so the
  • 00:38:49
    AI is going to create the assignment and
  • 00:38:51
    the student's going to use AI to
  • 00:38:52
    complete the assignment and then the AI
  • 00:38:54
    is going to assess the assignment like
  • 00:38:56
    that it becomes just this like a Loop do
  • 00:38:58
    you worry about that at all like I'm I
  • 00:39:00
    don't really worry about that that much
  • 00:39:01
    but do you worry about it or how do we
  • 00:39:03
    overcome that well I mean I think we've
  • 00:39:06
    got to think about you know when a
  • 00:39:08
    student is in front of us they have to
  • 00:39:11
    sub they have to do the work on their
  • 00:39:13
    own you know one of the one of the I
  • 00:39:16
    think one of the um reasons why teachers
  • 00:39:21
    fear AI is because there's no way that
  • 00:39:24
    they can effectively control whether or
  • 00:39:26
    not use it outside the classroom they
  • 00:39:29
    they can kind of inside but they can't
  • 00:39:31
    outside right so when they include here
  • 00:39:33
    we go when they include homework in the
  • 00:39:36
    grade they are building an incentive for
  • 00:39:39
    students to use whatever means they can
  • 00:39:41
    to complete the assignment in the most
  • 00:39:43
    effective way right right my tutor my
  • 00:39:46
    older brother my parent uh or AI right
  • 00:39:50
    because all I'm asked to do is do the
  • 00:39:52
    homework well enough so I get the
  • 00:39:55
    maximum number of points the homework is
  • 00:39:56
    essentially four for the teacher it's
  • 00:39:58
    not for me it's for the teacher I got to
  • 00:40:00
    show them that the best I can when
  • 00:40:02
    teachers stop including homework in the
  • 00:40:04
    grade and they say look it's for when
  • 00:40:06
    you go out and shoot when yeah it's for
  • 00:40:07
    you when you go out and shoot free
  • 00:40:09
    throws in the backyard nobody's counting
  • 00:40:11
    up your free throws and then bringing it
  • 00:40:12
    to the game so when I assign homework
  • 00:40:15
    it's practice you do it you want to use
  • 00:40:18
    AI I don't care you want to do it on
  • 00:40:20
    your own I don't care how do you learn
  • 00:40:21
    Best But ultimately it's there to help
  • 00:40:24
    you learn so when you have the
  • 00:40:26
    assessment in class that's going to see
  • 00:40:28
    where you are is just you so maybe I
  • 00:40:32
    even open it up and take a poll of
  • 00:40:34
    students who used AI last night who
  • 00:40:35
    didn't use it how use it yeah how' to go
  • 00:40:39
    then let's do a quiz and let's see like
  • 00:40:41
    the people who used AI did they do
  • 00:40:42
    better worse does it help you do better
  • 00:40:45
    how did you use it help us understand
  • 00:40:48
    exactly right and there might be kids
  • 00:40:50
    who used it and didn't do well oh let's
  • 00:40:51
    figure out what happened so it's not
  • 00:40:53
    like this magical ticket to like help
  • 00:40:55
    you do well you actually have to use in
  • 00:40:57
    particular ways or maybe you don't need
  • 00:40:59
    it but you do and that's okay right I
  • 00:41:01
    think all these ways of when you don't
  • 00:41:04
    include homework you open up these
  • 00:41:07
    really important metacognitive and and
  • 00:41:09
    other ways of thinking about learning to
  • 00:41:12
    build students capacity to know how they
  • 00:41:14
    learn best and what can make them
  • 00:41:16
    successful so then they go to college
  • 00:41:18
    where no one's you know dropping off
  • 00:41:20
    points if they come late or checking to
  • 00:41:23
    see where they did homework every day or
  • 00:41:24
    when they go in the professional world
  • 00:41:25
    right you didn't ask me Hey Joe how how
  • 00:41:28
    long did you prep for this interview
  • 00:41:30
    because you know I'm G to make it's
  • 00:41:31
    going to be better or worse depending on
  • 00:41:33
    how no if I do okay in this I know I
  • 00:41:37
    prepped enough if I don't do okay I
  • 00:41:38
    didn't prep enough or I didn't prep the
  • 00:41:40
    right way right that's how the real
  • 00:41:42
    professional World works and so we can
  • 00:41:44
    help equip our students to be able to be
  • 00:41:45
    successful in that world when we give
  • 00:41:47
    them the chance to do
  • 00:41:49
    it it's just I just love how it comes
  • 00:41:52
    back to this larger theme of just
  • 00:41:53
    removing punitive measures like so many
  • 00:41:56
    times we use use assessment and graded
  • 00:41:58
    grading as this punitive thing is like
  • 00:42:00
    you said like it's that points culture
  • 00:42:02
    and when we can shift
  • 00:42:04
    towards learning is something I'm
  • 00:42:06
    teaching you to do for yourself so that
  • 00:42:08
    you can go and be successful in the
  • 00:42:09
    world and this is a task I think would
  • 00:42:11
    be helpful for you to do because I've
  • 00:42:13
    know we noticed together that this is a
  • 00:42:15
    skill that you're working on how much
  • 00:42:17
    more meaningful of a conversation and a
  • 00:42:19
    task is that for a kid versus like you
  • 00:42:21
    know you're going to get more points if
  • 00:42:23
    you do this homework of course you're
  • 00:42:25
    going to use AI for that and I think
  • 00:42:27
    that is ultimately what AI does for work
  • 00:42:30
    now in schools is it challenges us to
  • 00:42:32
    ask how do we communicate the value of
  • 00:42:34
    this to our learners for themselves in
  • 00:42:36
    their lives now and Beyond school so
  • 00:42:40
    just get this beautiful thread there of
  • 00:42:43
    just purpose and and
  • 00:42:46
    intention yeah um there's this great
  • 00:42:48
    quote that um the PE
  • 00:42:51
    um the when you don't trust people you
  • 00:42:54
    try and control them more um and when
  • 00:42:57
    you control uh and when you trust people
  • 00:43:00
    more you try to control them
  • 00:43:02
    less um and I think there's really
  • 00:43:05
    something in that that um students are
  • 00:43:08
    really capable of pretty amazing things
  • 00:43:12
    and sometimes we as teachers spend a lot
  • 00:43:14
    of our time controlling their behavior
  • 00:43:16
    and really preventing ourselves from
  • 00:43:19
    seeing what students to do and certainly
  • 00:43:20
    prevent them from showing it and and
  • 00:43:22
    expressing it and growing in those areas
  • 00:43:25
    um and you know we I think particularly
  • 00:43:28
    have done that for historically
  • 00:43:30
    underserved folks you know students of
  • 00:43:31
    color black students latinx indigenous
  • 00:43:33
    students and and students of lower
  • 00:43:35
    income and have special needs I mean I
  • 00:43:37
    think we have really used grading to
  • 00:43:40
    punish those groups
  • 00:43:42
    disproportionately um because we have
  • 00:43:44
    particular ways that they should learn
  • 00:43:46
    or particular things you know agendas
  • 00:43:47
    that we're trying to or I shouldn't say
  • 00:43:49
    agendas it's really not that like
  • 00:43:50
    particular kind of ways of being that we
  • 00:43:53
    use grading to push students to or away
  • 00:43:56
    from from um and I think we can actually
  • 00:44:00
    like get Beyond a lot of that through
  • 00:44:02
    these ways you know we we we know that
  • 00:44:05
    we have these kinds of biases in our
  • 00:44:07
    grading like you know I I have students
  • 00:44:09
    write their name on the back of the
  • 00:44:10
    paper right because I know that if I see
  • 00:44:12
    their name I might you know grade them
  • 00:44:16
    differently and so I put have kids put
  • 00:44:18
    their names on the back of the paper and
  • 00:44:20
    I think that um you know this sort of
  • 00:44:23
    controlling the environment um and not
  • 00:44:27
    recognizing how I bring things into the
  • 00:44:29
    environment that that make it a more
  • 00:44:32
    controlling space I think is one that
  • 00:44:34
    that this kind of work helps interrogate
  • 00:44:36
    and open up o that is cool school
  • 00:44:40
    leaders and teachers I think if you come
  • 00:44:42
    away with one big question to to
  • 00:44:45
    continue pondering in this episode it's
  • 00:44:47
    it's what am I trying to control and who
  • 00:44:49
    is being served by that and how would
  • 00:44:52
    trust how would trust make everything
  • 00:44:54
    better Trust
  • 00:44:57
    a
  • 00:45:00
    [Music]
الوسوم
  • Grading practices
  • Education reform
  • Intrinsic motivation
  • 0-100 scale
  • Bias resistance
  • Student engagement
  • Educational history
  • School leadership
  • AI in education
  • Cultural impact