00:00:11
[Music]
00:00:23
Miller
00:00:58
w
00:01:28
for
00:01:56
[Music]
00:01:58
for
00:02:14
[Music]
00:02:28
for for
00:02:36
[Music]
00:03:16
[Music]
00:03:28
yeah GPS one okay so to backtrack a
00:03:32
little bit real quick to catch everyone
00:03:34
up so we have the sagn effect linearized
00:03:37
now the the old way that they um
00:03:41
describe the effects of this you know
00:03:42
the snic effect is through mathematics
00:03:44
and they equate the effect due to uh
00:03:47
angular rotation so the equation that
00:03:49
they use is Delta tal 4 Omega a / c^2
00:03:54
and what they do here is that your delta
00:03:56
T is going to be your time interval
00:03:58
which produce which is basically saying
00:04:00
the Fring shift produced by this
00:04:01
circular rotation is equal to four * the
00:04:04
rotation of the device Omega stands for
00:04:07
uh angular rotation air a stands for the
00:04:10
area of the device meaning that the
00:04:12
length of the the path the length of
00:04:14
that light has to travel within the
00:04:16
device so if you have a you know a
00:04:19
classic sagn device like this or
00:04:21
something it's going to be this entire
00:04:23
length that light has to travel in the
00:04:24
device that's going to be your area so
00:04:27
and if in in the case of a uh uh what's
00:04:30
it called a fiber optic driver or
00:04:31
something like that where you have a
00:04:33
fiber optic cable it's going to be the
00:04:34
length of that cable so if your Cable's
00:04:35
1,000 met your area is a th000 meters so
00:04:39
what Wang and this is how they so what
00:04:42
was that 1913 s sagn did his inter or
00:04:45
yeah 1913 sagn did his interferometry
00:04:48
experiment and from there everyone
00:04:51
assumed that it was you know due to the
00:04:54
angular rotation of the device and
00:04:56
that's the way they equated it because u
00:04:58
m sorley they were saying was a null
00:05:00
result and that the speed of light was
00:05:01
the same so they were like stuck in that
00:05:04
Paradigm right they were in the middle
00:05:05
of trying to do that to reify uh Earth's
00:05:08
orbital velocity and make make you know
00:05:10
make that appear on the up and up but
00:05:12
then your boy sagnet came around came
00:05:14
around with essentially the exact same
00:05:16
experiment as the Nicholson Morley
00:05:18
experiment but it's just a rotating
00:05:19
device while it's running instead of
00:05:21
rotating it and then um taking a
00:05:23
measurement and then rotating it again
00:05:25
stopping it getting it fixed then taking
00:05:26
a measurement and then changing it so
00:05:28
this is just constantly rotating what
00:05:30
sagn did so they so they wrapped it up
00:05:32
in the Paradigm of like well because
00:05:34
it's a rotating device it's a
00:05:35
non-inertial frame so it doesn't fall
00:05:37
under the special relativistic Paradigm
00:05:40
where the speed of light has to be
00:05:41
constant blah blah blah right so they
00:05:43
came up with this like special case
00:05:44
scenario for it and then and then in uh
00:05:48
1918 Paul LaVine came along and made a
00:05:51
special metric tensor to just to
00:05:54
describe um the conservation of angular
00:05:57
momentum on a smaller scale because
00:05:59
Einstein science field equations are not
00:06:00
able to uh to account for that on the
00:06:03
smaller scale right unless you
00:06:05
specifically have a metric for it like
00:06:07
your boy Paul Lavine made up and uh not
00:06:09
not even to get into the
00:06:11
mathematical side of that where the
00:06:13
metric that he derived is a first order
00:06:16
intrinsic invariant differential which
00:06:18
is the equivalent of like a mathematic
00:06:20
logical fallacy but to but to not even
00:06:22
get into that just assume that's on the
00:06:24
up and up the way that they try to
00:06:26
explain it through general relativity in
00:06:27
this metric is that they say that due to
00:06:29
the rotation of the device that it's
00:06:31
creating like little pockets of uh time
00:06:33
dilation and length contraction um so
00:06:36
that because the device is rotating they
00:06:37
can't get enough contraction in one in
00:06:40
one area like they can with Nicholson
00:06:41
Morley because it's constantly changing
00:06:43
so with this new metric they're able to
00:06:46
mathematically extrapolate that there's
00:06:48
a continual effect due to the rotation
00:06:50
blah blah blah there's link contraction
00:06:52
within the device because it's rotating
00:06:54
so they've solidified the SAG neck
00:06:57
effect as being due to angular rotation
00:07:00
so they they save themselves the
00:07:01
embarrassment of having to explain why
00:07:03
Nelson morle is a null result and while
00:07:05
sagn device is a uh produces a friend
00:07:09
shift pattern showing a varying speed of
00:07:11
light right now so they went with this
00:07:13
for years this was like the last 100
00:07:15
years of physics they've been going off
00:07:16
of this uh circular or uh attributing
00:07:21
the snic effect to angular rotation so
00:07:24
in 2004 Wang comes along and he does an
00:07:27
experiment with a fi optic gyro and
00:07:30
conveyor belts and he linearizes the
00:07:33
effect essentially right so he has a
00:07:34
instead of a um instead of a circular
00:07:38
sag neck device he has just a straight
00:07:41
line just a it's just straight he has a
00:07:43
conveyor belt he has it going back and
00:07:45
forth on the conveyor
00:07:47
belt and he takes he takes his
00:07:49
measurements and what do you know he
00:07:50
finds that the sagnik effect is not
00:07:52
dependent on angular rotation it's
00:07:54
directionally dependent so when the
00:07:56
propagation is going east to west or
00:07:58
west to east that's where you're getting
00:08:00
your variance and the math equation that
00:08:02
he used to extrapolate the results so
00:08:04
he's got this is from his equation here
00:08:06
so the linearized version is delta T
00:08:09
equals v2l over c^2 and if we you know
00:08:13
if we remember back so we got the FR
00:08:15
shift prediction friend shift prediction
00:08:17
two times four times so this is times
00:08:20
the rotational speed so velocity here so
00:08:23
rotational speed velocity same thing uh
00:08:25
just different variations of how they're
00:08:27
looking at it and then the length here
00:08:30
is equivalent to the area so the length
00:08:31
of the length of the device in the case
00:08:33
of the fiberoptic driver he was using
00:08:35
it's just the length of the cord um and
00:08:38
then divided by
00:08:39
c^2 uh and that accurately derives the U
00:08:44
the prediction for the sagnik effect and
00:08:46
what he noticed too was that when you
00:08:47
apply the same equation to a uh circular
00:08:51
sagn device it actually derives the same
00:08:53
exact prediction and through GPS what
00:08:57
was found um let's see if he mentions it
00:08:59
here want to see if I can get the quote
00:09:02
correct yeah right here so we found that
00:09:04
any segment of loop contributes to the
00:09:07
total phase difference between the
00:09:08
counterpropagating light beams the con
00:09:11
the contribution is proportional to the
00:09:13
product of the moving velocity and the
00:09:15
projection of the segment length uh
00:09:18
Delta L on the moving Direction so um
00:09:23
back in the GPS presentation where I was
00:09:39
here it is okay yeah so right here um
00:09:44
with GPS you know same situation with
00:09:46
the sagic effect preferred Direction and
00:09:48
all that we have the stationary receiver
00:09:51
at R1 or noted by R1 and we have a
00:09:53
moving receiver noted by R2 now when the
00:09:56
moving receivers um intersects with the
00:10:00
stationary receiver and a GPS signal is
00:10:02
sent from either a stationary uh ground
00:10:05
station or a moving satell or you know
00:10:06
moving satellite and space whatever is
00:10:08
transmitting the signals in motion
00:10:10
doesn't matter the um the distance
00:10:13
between them at the time that the signal
00:10:14
is sent is the same but the stationary
00:10:17
receiver gets the information first and
00:10:20
the um One In Motion gets it at a slight
00:10:23
delay and the delay is exactly
00:10:25
proportional to the Velocity in which
00:10:27
this guy is moving so uh what um so so
00:10:33
so and that and that's huge isn't it
00:10:35
that that that actually last thing you
00:10:36
said is huge right yeah that's a huge
00:10:39
aspect of it because the first postulate
00:10:42
of special relativity is that uh I'm
00:10:45
sorry the second postulate is that the
00:10:47
speed of light is the same to observers
00:10:49
regardless of their relative motion to
00:10:51
the light source so moving in either
00:10:54
direction shouldn't affect it so the
00:10:56
fact that um the fact that Wang
00:11:01
linearized it in that regard is an
00:11:03
absolute body bag because what should
00:11:04
have happened was it shouldn't have
00:11:06
produced a friend shift pattern if
00:11:07
Nicholson morle was truly a null result
00:11:09
and there was an invariant speed of
00:11:11
light then his linear liic effect
00:11:14
experiment should have reflected that as
00:11:16
well it should it shouldn't he got any
00:11:18
variance it should have been the same
00:11:19
there should be no fringe
00:11:31
so yeah 2004 ruong Wang experimentally
00:11:35
and mathematically destroyed special
00:11:39
relativity that nobody batted an eyelash
00:11:42
nobody gave him an award
00:11:44
nobody did a huge media press conference
00:11:47
saying that he was the new man or
00:11:49
anything like that like he didn't get a
00:11:50
Nobel Prize he doesn't have a bunch of
00:11:51
research grants wasn't on TV you know or
00:11:55
anything like that no like literally
00:11:57
nobody cared
00:11:59
th is this the same guy that I've seen
00:12:02
on YouTube from time to time no no no
00:12:06
okay no I don't I don't think hey fellas
00:12:09
what's
00:12:10
up I gotta go all right peace you take
00:12:13
care of yourself you have you have a
00:12:15
great wedes today my friend thanks for
00:12:17
doing this yeah no problem man yeah Al
00:12:21
Allen's taking us to a different level
00:12:23
that I don't know who's
00:12:28
there for
00:13:02
effect
00:13:55
effect
00:14:26
cosy
00:14:34
[Music]
00:14:44
Tik to Facebook
00:14:46
[Music]
