00:00:03
[Music]
00:00:07
a
00:00:10
[Music]
00:00:13
you
00:00:21
so good and dark hello everyone
00:00:24
wonderful to be here this is a really
00:00:26
important opportunity to share with you
00:00:29
the latest state of science to pose one
00:00:34
of the questions that we've never had to
00:00:36
pose before in the scientific community
00:00:38
we've come to a point where we're
00:00:40
aggregating so much pressure on planet
00:00:43
Earth
00:00:44
that were forced to pose the following
00:00:45
question are we at risk of destabilizing
00:00:50
the whole planet are we at risk of
00:00:54
destabilizing the whole planet
00:00:56
now this originates not only from all
00:00:58
the evidence that we'll be trying to
00:00:59
present in a in a quick overview it also
00:01:02
has to do with the humble recognition
00:01:05
that in fact there is a philosophical
00:01:09
perspective on this which is that we as
00:01:11
humans are today the largest force of
00:01:15
change on planet Earth and we all depend
00:01:17
on this sliver thin layer of atmosphere
00:01:20
the ten kilometer column that gives all
00:01:25
life support for Humanity on earth and
00:01:29
up until very recently we have treated
00:01:32
this thin thin layer of the living
00:01:34
biosphere the atmosphere the climate
00:01:36
system as basically something we exploit
00:01:39
in one end we transform into human
00:01:42
wellbeing and we waste in the other end
00:01:45
using the planet as a waste bin and now
00:01:48
is the time to reconnect our future to
00:01:51
the planet to stand a chance for us to
00:01:54
have a thriving equitable future for
00:01:57
Humanity now the starting point of
00:01:59
course is a graph that you've all seen
00:02:01
which is essentially the exponential
00:02:05
rise of pressures from global warming
00:02:07
but I'll be taking a much much broader
00:02:09
perspective a planetary perspective on
00:02:11
our future now to summarize this talk
00:02:15
has actually a deep mindSHIFT
00:02:18
implication for how we guide our own
00:02:21
lives into the future and what I'll be
00:02:23
trying to present to you is the
00:02:26
unequivocal evidence with very low
00:02:29
scientific uncertainty that it's only in
00:02:32
the last 50 years
00:02:34
that we have changed conditions on earth
00:02:36
as they've been over the past 10,000
00:02:38
years when we last last the last ice age
00:02:42
so in only 50 years we've changed
00:02:45
conditions on earth as they've been for
00:02:46
the last 10,000 years now that is with a
00:02:51
very low degree of uncertainty and it's
00:02:53
a drama in itself but an even larger
00:02:56
drama and the big mind shift is that
00:02:59
what happens over the coming 50 years
00:03:01
with a high degree of likelihood will
00:03:04
determine the outcome for the coming ten
00:03:06
thousand years now I'm not so sure about
00:03:09
the age of a viewer average but I must
00:03:12
confess I'll raise my hand I give
00:03:14
testimony here today that I am part of
00:03:18
the culprits I've been part of this
00:03:20
journey over the last 50 years and if I
00:03:23
can keep my health up I hope to be part
00:03:25
of a significant portion of the coming
00:03:28
decades into this journey this means
00:03:30
that we are on a knife's edge it is us
00:03:33
in this generation who are now
00:03:35
responsible it is our generation to be
00:03:38
responsible for the transformations to
00:03:41
give all future generations on earth a
00:03:43
chance to thrive on planet Earth we
00:03:47
caused it we are to solve it and that is
00:03:50
what science today shows that is why
00:03:53
there's such a tremendous uprising not
00:03:56
only the scientific community but also
00:03:58
wider of stakeholders across the world
00:04:01
recognizing that we stood at a
00:04:03
saturation point but also a turbulence
00:04:06
point in terms of need for change now
00:04:09
this change is generally expressed only
00:04:12
in this curve which is a really
00:04:14
important one this is the hockey stick
00:04:15
of observations of temperature rise on
00:04:17
earth as you see here it is the last
00:04:20
four years
00:04:21
now clearly concluded to be the warmest
00:04:25
years on record since we started
00:04:27
observations since the Industrial
00:04:29
Revolution we have raised temperatures
00:04:32
with one degree Celsius actually one
00:04:33
point one degree Celsius since the
00:04:36
pre-industrial times in the late 19th
00:04:38
century and the key message to me is not
00:04:42
just a 1 degree Celsius warming
00:04:45
is that we've reached the warmest
00:04:47
temperature on earth since the last ice
00:04:49
age we're bumping the biophysical
00:04:52
ceiling of the maximum temperature on
00:04:55
earth since we left the last ice age
00:04:57
this is the reality we're now at a point
00:05:00
of a new juncture of change but it's not
00:05:03
only about climate change yesterday
00:05:05
the Intergovernmental Panel on
00:05:07
biodiversity and ecosystem services the
00:05:09
sister of the IPCC the United Nations
00:05:11
Scientific into governmental Panel
00:05:13
climate change released its second
00:05:16
global assessment concluding
00:05:18
unequivocally that we've reached the
00:05:20
sixth mass extinction of species on
00:05:22
earth the first mass extinction caused
00:05:25
by another species us one of these six
00:05:29
by the way was the loss of dinosaurs
00:05:31
some 60 million years ago we are at risk
00:05:35
of now losing species so fast that we
00:05:38
cannot exclude having collapse of
00:05:40
ecosystems and undermining fundamental
00:05:43
functions in our life-support systems
00:05:46
such as producing food now this has to
00:05:49
be connected with the fact that at one
00:05:52
degree Celsius warming we're starting to
00:05:54
see something that we have started to
00:05:57
recognize but now is happening at a
00:05:59
level where we can start talking of
00:06:02
invoices being sent back from mother
00:06:05
earth into the economy at a scale we
00:06:07
haven't seen before actually I will
00:06:10
stipulate as an hypothesis that 2018 may
00:06:13
go down in history as the first year
00:06:16
ever that mother earth started sending
00:06:17
invoices back across the whole planet
00:06:19
and it started off with the heat waves
00:06:22
in Canada with record temperatures
00:06:25
measured in Africa fifty one point two
00:06:27
degrees Celsius warming the warmest
00:06:29
temperature on earth the forest fires in
00:06:31
California which were passed twice with
00:06:33
devastating social and economic costs
00:06:36
the hurricane Michael which was
00:06:38
amplified very likely by global warming
00:06:40
we had tremendous death tolls with the
00:06:43
flooding the Philippines the flood is in
00:06:45
Kerala in South India we had the heat
00:06:47
waves and floods in Japan killing more
00:06:50
than 200 people we then had the
00:06:52
tremendous spectrum of minus 50 degrees
00:06:55
Celsius in Chicago just two months ago
00:06:57
and plus 50 degree
00:06:58
in Queensland and then we have the
00:07:01
latest the cyclones hitting Mozambique
00:07:03
and Zimbabwe
00:07:04
edye with a tremendous social cost never
00:07:08
observed before at this level we're
00:07:10
starting to see an uncomfortable
00:07:12
frequency of extreme events hitting at
00:07:15
one degree Celsius warming now this is
00:07:18
sinking in it's clearly sinking in we
00:07:21
have a Pew Institute that quite recently
00:07:25
released the report showing once again
00:07:27
this covers 29 countries in the world
00:07:28
showing once again that roughly 60 to
00:07:31
70% of populations across the world are
00:07:33
really concerned about climate change
00:07:35
and wants climate action this is
00:07:38
supported also by Yale University
00:07:40
support by opinion polls in Europe
00:07:42
showing that interestingly below the
00:07:45
kind of vibrations of different signals
00:07:50
from media underlying its citizens are
00:07:52
really concerned I would even argue that
00:07:55
this is so well anchored today among
00:07:57
particularly younger generations that
00:08:00
what we see in terms of the youth
00:08:02
movement and the rising of school kids
00:08:05
with the Friday's for the future where I
00:08:07
would argue that Germany is really the
00:08:08
ground zero in the world I mean no place
00:08:11
on the planet are so many youth
00:08:13
gathering as in Berlin on the Fridays
00:08:17
for the future which is a signal that
00:08:19
something is really happening in the
00:08:20
world and that this is not a coincidence
00:08:22
it is an accumulation over a decade of
00:08:25
recognizing increasingly that we are
00:08:28
posing risks on planet Earth this is
00:08:32
also something that we're now seeing in
00:08:33
business you've certainly seen the World
00:08:35
Economic Forum and its annual Global
00:08:37
Risk report they interview over 2000
00:08:40
business leaders around the world and on
00:08:42
the x-axis here you have the likelihood
00:08:43
of disasters impacting the economy and
00:08:46
on the y-axis is the impact risk on
00:08:49
business and economy and up on the right
00:08:51
hand corner we have you know the the
00:08:54
high impact high likelihood impacts on
00:08:57
the economy and if you look carefully
00:08:59
business leaders assess that climate
00:09:02
change biodiversity crisis our
00:09:05
unwillingness to really deal with
00:09:06
climate change are the biggest threats
00:09:09
to the economy today
00:09:10
so this is the reality where we are and
00:09:13
that is a shaking world where now we're
00:09:17
starting to see science connecting with
00:09:19
insights and willingness to change
00:09:21
now however we come to this well I would
00:09:23
argue that the most important message of
00:09:25
society of science was when we for a few
00:09:29
years ago were able to welcome humanity
00:09:32
to the Anthropocene anthros for us
00:09:34
humans and rose from the greek we've now
00:09:36
turned into our own geological epoch we
00:09:41
have become the dominant driver of
00:09:42
change on earth we surpass in amplitude
00:09:46
and frequency what the natural
00:09:48
variability has taken us through the
00:09:50
billions of years through volcanic
00:09:52
eruptions earthquakes and our change in
00:09:54
position to the Sun all this Stills
00:09:56
occurs but we have now dominating it
00:09:59
become a bigger force now is this
00:10:01
suggestion which I would argue is the
00:10:03
most important message we have from
00:10:05
science humanity based on models or
00:10:08
hypotheses no it is based on
00:10:11
observations it's based on the hockey
00:10:13
sticks you see on this graph published
00:10:15
for the first time in 2007 updated since
00:10:18
then each x-axis here is from 1750 until
00:10:22
today they show parameters like carbon
00:10:26
dioxide released their first ation
00:10:28
acidification unification land
00:10:30
degradation any parameter you may wish
00:10:33
to pick that matters for us as humans so
00:10:37
the same pattern very limited change
00:10:39
incremental change up until the
00:10:42
mid-1950s and then you see this
00:10:45
breakpoint and the massive exponential
00:10:48
rise of pressure from the mid-1950s this
00:10:52
is ten years after the Second World War
00:10:54
we're three billion people on earth and
00:10:57
it seems like that's the point where we
00:10:59
put on the high gear of the industrial
00:11:01
metabolism of the modern globalized
00:11:04
world as we know it and off we go in
00:11:07
this exponential rise and we reach a
00:11:10
point not perhaps more than 15-20 years
00:11:13
ago when we start seeing the signs of
00:11:16
saturation of kolaks of ecosystems of
00:11:20
passing 350 ppm in carbon dioxide
00:11:24
accelerated ice-melt collapse the coral
00:11:27
reefs unification of Lake systems vast
00:11:30
scales of land degradation the Earth's
00:11:33
system seems to now be at a point where
00:11:36
doesn't have the resilience or capacity
00:11:38
to take more unsustainable pressure from
00:11:42
humanity so welcome to the Anthropocene
00:11:44
is inside number one inside number two
00:11:48
is what makes me most nervous because if
00:11:51
we're putting all this pressure on earth
00:11:52
the question is what are we leaving what
00:11:55
do we depend on what state of the planet
00:11:57
do we depend on for our human well-being
00:12:01
as seven-point-six soon to be ten
00:12:04
billion people on earth well that is the
00:12:08
drama it's so dramatic that I even put
00:12:11
it as a question are we leaving the
00:12:13
Garden of Eden do we have scientific
00:12:16
evidence of what is the precious desired
00:12:19
state of the planet I will argue that
00:12:21
unequivocally the answer is yes and I'll
00:12:24
just give you one piece of evidence and
00:12:25
I hope I convinced you on this which is
00:12:27
data from Greenland this is the ice core
00:12:31
from Greenland on the x-axis you have
00:12:33
the last 100,000 years it's by the way a
00:12:36
very good choice of time because we've
00:12:38
been modern humans on earth roughly
00:12:39
80,000 years so we have during this
00:12:42
whole period had the same ability for
00:12:44
our intellectual and physical
00:12:47
development of civil societies as we
00:12:49
know it now on the y-axis here is very
00:12:52
temperature variability and as you can
00:12:54
see already from the graph this was a
00:12:56
bumpy ride indeed for Humanity in fact
00:12:59
we had tremendous variability so plus
00:13:01
minus 10 degree Celsius this is data
00:13:03
from Greenland over just a decade it
00:13:05
could go up and down we had a rough time
00:13:07
we were hunters and gatherers we were a
00:13:10
few million people on earth we had to
00:13:13
put it simple a rough time until we
00:13:17
leave this ice age period this hundred
00:13:20
thousand years of deep variable ice age
00:13:23
and enter this extraordinarily stable
00:13:27
integrational phase that we learnt in
00:13:29
school to call the Holocene this is the
00:13:32
integrational stage that has enabled us
00:13:35
to develop modern civilization
00:13:37
as we know it how could that be well
00:13:40
what do we do when we enter the Holocene
00:13:42
well essentially the first thing we do
00:13:44
just 2,000 years into the Holocene is we
00:13:47
do the most important invention of all
00:13:49
and I must excuse myself at this
00:13:51
innovation event here at the república
00:13:53
it was not the digital revolution or the
00:13:56
iPhone or vast vast computer
00:13:58
capabilities No
00:14:00
the most important invention of all time
00:14:02
for us humans is when we invented
00:14:06
agriculture we started to domesticate
00:14:10
animals and plants we went from being
00:14:12
hunters and gatherers to become
00:14:13
small-scale Sedan through farmers and
00:14:16
the trick is and why this is so
00:14:18
significant is that we know today that
00:14:21
this happened roughly at the same time
00:14:23
on all continents on earth at a time
00:14:28
when we could invent rice and maize and
00:14:31
corn and wheat on different continents
00:14:34
and last time I checked we didn't have a
00:14:37
mobile phone to call each other say well
00:14:40
I came up with this great idea
00:14:41
you plant a seed and it can grow and we
00:14:44
can domesticate animals and plants oh no
00:14:46
we know today that the reason why this
00:14:48
occurred simultaneously across
00:14:50
continents was simply that the rainy
00:14:53
seasons became so stable temperatures
00:14:56
came and went so stable that we knew
00:15:00
when spring came and we knew when autumn
00:15:02
arrived we could simply be reassured
00:15:05
that the investments the risks of
00:15:08
investing in planting seed was worth it
00:15:11
and off we went and established
00:15:13
societies as we know it differentiated
00:15:16
technologies enable ourselves to invent
00:15:18
ourselves all the way to the modern
00:15:20
societies as we know today so the
00:15:23
conclusion is as simple as it is
00:15:25
dramatic the Holocene is the only state
00:15:29
of the planet we know for certain can
00:15:31
support the modern world as we know it
00:15:34
we have lived outside of the Holocene we
00:15:37
can be hunters and gatherers in the
00:15:39
caves of a glacial or completely
00:15:42
different planet but if we want to take
00:15:44
an ethical responsibility for the world
00:15:46
as we know it and our
00:15:48
co-citizens on earth then the holocene
00:15:50
is our Garden of Eden inside number two
00:15:54
inside number three is that if we punch
00:15:57
the planet so hard as we're now doing in
00:15:59
Anthropocene the question is how does
00:16:00
she respond well when she is resilient
00:16:04
and can buffer and really take and
00:16:06
dampen our stress nothing really happens
00:16:09
incremental change is actually the way
00:16:11
that rules the world in fact we believe
00:16:14
so strongly in this that that's how
00:16:15
we've developed our economic system our
00:16:17
governance system just assuming that
00:16:19
everything is predictable linear and
00:16:21
incremental that's by the way the only
00:16:24
reason why we can have discount rates
00:16:25
for example the assumption that things
00:16:27
change linearly but science shows over
00:16:31
30 years of advancement that is
00:16:33
completely to reverse that
00:16:35
nonlinearities tipping points sudden
00:16:38
surprise is part of normality during
00:16:41
long long periods of time we can
00:16:43
unsustainably release greenhouse gases
00:16:45
cut down forests over fish oceans and
00:16:48
the system just buffers and reduces
00:16:51
impacts up to a certain point a small
00:16:53
incremental change and the system can
00:16:56
cross a tipping point and irreversibly
00:16:59
change conditions and undermine and
00:17:01
potentially amplify warming undermining
00:17:04
our abilities to the future now we have
00:17:07
so much evidence of this today we have
00:17:09
here summarize for example the tipping
00:17:11
elements that we know have multiple
00:17:13
stable state and that can't cross
00:17:15
tipping points for example permafrost
00:17:17
Arctic winter sea ice that can flip over
00:17:20
from stability to instability
00:17:22
reinforcing warming the forest systems
00:17:25
and coral reef systems that can flip
00:17:26
over from hard coral systems to soft
00:17:29
algae system the rainforest system the
00:17:31
jet stream the fundamental systems that
00:17:34
regulate the entire planet in this
00:17:37
interconnected earth system that is all
00:17:40
dependent on stability in a Holocene
00:17:43
state in fact we have even gone one step
00:17:47
further recognizing that these systems
00:17:49
are so interconnected that we can today
00:17:51
talk of tipping elements being connected
00:17:54
in what we call cascades where if we
00:17:57
cross a tipping point for example
00:17:59
irreversibly causing the Greenland ice
00:18:02
sheet to start melting irreversibly
00:18:03
losing methane from thawing permafrost
00:18:06
that could bump us up one level of
00:18:09
temperature the latest paper that we
00:18:12
published a year ago the hothouse earth
00:18:15
paper that by the way last year led to
00:18:17
the word of the year here in Germany
00:18:20
High's site was a very careful
00:18:23
assessment but we said if we continue
00:18:25
burning fossil fuels up to two degrees
00:18:27
Celsius warming what is the response of
00:18:30
the earth system if we cross tipping
00:18:32
elements our careful assessment is that
00:18:34
that could bump us up another 2.1 0.3 to
00:18:38
0.4 degree celsius to 2.4 maximum which
00:18:41
could then release crossing tipping
00:18:43
points and other systems and lead to a
00:18:45
cascade that could take us across the
00:18:46
threshold towards a hothouse earth a
00:18:49
high site now this is now summarized so
00:18:53
well in science that we were for the
00:18:55
first time a year back able to
00:18:57
communicate to the climate negotiators
00:18:59
in in Bonn the first time and then in
00:19:02
Katowice that now we know that based on
00:19:06
this curve which I just showed you
00:19:07
earlier which is this desired pathway of
00:19:10
perhaps you don't see it so well this is
00:19:12
the last 20,000 years we leave the last
00:19:15
ice age and we enter the Garden of Eden
00:19:17
the plus minus 1 degrees Celsius
00:19:19
12,000 years as you see in this line
00:19:21
here here you have the Paris agreement
00:19:24
which is to stay well below 2 an aim for
00:19:28
1.5 degrees Celsius which is actually
00:19:30
outside of the Holocene range which is
00:19:33
something to remember here is where
00:19:35
we're following today where we're
00:19:37
rushing on a path that can take us to 4
00:19:40
degrees Celsius warming by end of this
00:19:41
century but here's the key message we
00:19:44
can now scientifically add to this the
00:19:46
risk of crossing tipping points and what
00:19:48
you see here in the red to yellow
00:19:51
columns is the scientific uncertainty
00:19:53
because we don't know exactly at what
00:19:55
temperatures in the y-axis we risk
00:19:57
pushing systems across irreversible
00:20:00
thresholds but look at this square here
00:20:03
which is the square with scientific
00:20:06
evidence that we are ready in the Paris
00:20:08
range are at risk of tipping to crossing
00:20:11
tipping points and look
00:20:13
coral reefs the entire uncertainty range
00:20:17
lies within the Paris range what does
00:20:20
this mean well it means that from the
00:20:22
knowledge we have today we are very
00:20:25
likely to lose all tropical coral reefs
00:20:28
even if we are able to stay below two
00:20:31
degrees Celsius warming so we have the
00:20:34
first planetary victim already at the
00:20:38
situation we are at today because we're
00:20:40
rushing towards a point where it's very
00:20:42
difficult to stay well below 2 and avoid
00:20:46
the risk of losing all tropical coral
00:20:49
reefs but you see that alpine glaciers
00:20:51
Arctic summer sea ice and even Greenland
00:20:53
despite the uncertainty range here is at
00:20:56
risk of crossing a threshold to
00:20:58
irreversible melting already at 2
00:21:00
degrees Celsius warming to the furthest
00:21:02
left we have the West Antarctic ice
00:21:03
shelf another 6 to 7 metre sea level
00:21:06
rise that is also at risk of crossing a
00:21:08
tipping point irreversibly melting at
00:21:10
low temperatures now this does not mean
00:21:13
that the planet would fall over a kind
00:21:16
of a disaster escarpment the day after
00:21:19
we cross a tipping point but what it
00:21:20
means and what my key message to you
00:21:23
here today is that what we do over the
00:21:26
next decade is the point very likely the
00:21:31
point when we determine whether or not
00:21:32
we press the on button for a journey
00:21:35
that would irreversibly take us towards
00:21:38
these outcomes that it's now we can
00:21:41
change directions to avoid coming too
00:21:43
close to these danger points because
00:21:46
once we press the on button the
00:21:48
Greenland ice sheet would irreversibly
00:21:49
melt it would probably take 2 or 3
00:21:51
hundred years but it would be
00:21:53
irreversible we would committing all
00:21:55
future generation to that trajectory a
00:21:57
few months after the highs I'd paper
00:22:00
this paper came out which in my mind
00:22:02
really homes in the the final conclusion
00:22:06
how important it is to recognize the
00:22:08
need to now become stewards of the whole
00:22:10
planet what you see here is a timeline
00:22:13
from the future in the year 2100 all the
00:22:17
way back here is 1 million years 3
00:22:19
million years here's 60 million years
00:22:21
back and on the y-axis you have average
00:22:23
temperature on earth now the drama is
00:22:27
here you have the Garden of Eden right
00:22:29
here and what you see in this line is
00:22:33
that if we continue business as usual
00:22:34
and reach four degrees Celsius by end of
00:22:37
this century we are winding back the
00:22:40
climate clock you know well behind the
00:22:44
Holocene but even beyond 1 million years
00:22:47
actually beyond 3/5 we are winding back
00:22:50
the clock - as far as we know today -
00:22:53
the conditions on earth as they were
00:22:55
some 10 to 20 million years ago that's
00:22:59
what's happening in a blink of time the
00:23:01
industry evolution of 200 years so this
00:23:04
is the drama we are now really in the
00:23:08
Anthropocene fiddling with the whole
00:23:11
system just a few months back colleagues
00:23:14
at the Potsdam Institute reinforced this
00:23:16
even further in what I would argue
00:23:17
almost like the most humble recognition
00:23:20
of why we have to take care of the
00:23:21
planet showing that over the last 3
00:23:23
million years this is 3 million years on
00:23:25
the x-axis here you have average
00:23:27
temperature on earth this line here is 2
00:23:30
degrees so with the best possible
00:23:33
analysis and modeling we've done today
00:23:35
we can say that for the last 3 million
00:23:38
years which is called the Pleistocene
00:23:40
era which is the era when the planner
00:23:42
has been configured roughly with the
00:23:44
same continental configuration as we
00:23:46
know it today we have not been beyond 2
00:23:49
degrees just shows us how much it
00:23:52
matters that we today act so what does
00:23:54
this mean then solution why so let me
00:23:56
just try to take this then to - a new
00:23:59
framework for for the future now the
00:24:03
conclusion then becomes the following
00:24:04
that if we are in the Anthropocene if we
00:24:06
are at risk of causing tipping points
00:24:09
and if we depend on the Garden of Eden
00:24:11
as a Holocene of course if you sum this
00:24:13
together the conclusion is that we need
00:24:15
to now ask two questions what are the
00:24:18
environmental systems that regulates the
00:24:21
state of the planet and what can science
00:24:23
say on defining a safe operating space
00:24:26
for us to be able to stay in the
00:24:29
Holocene to avoid that the Anthropocene
00:24:32
pushes us irreversibly away from a
00:24:34
manageable state on earth that becomes
00:24:37
the planetary boundary framework and the
00:24:40
planet bounded frame
00:24:41
defines the nine systems that we as
00:24:43
scientists have shown now quite clearly
00:24:46
regulates the state of the planet which
00:24:48
is not only climate it's also the oceans
00:24:50
the stratospheric ozone layer its land
00:24:52
water nutrients and biodiversity
00:24:56
chemicals and aerosols nine big systems
00:24:59
that as far as we know if we can keep
00:25:02
them within the green safe operating
00:25:04
space you see on this graph quantify for
00:25:06
seven of the nine we have a good chance
00:25:09
of having a chance a good future for
00:25:12
Humanity as you see here in yellow in
00:25:15
red we are actually transgressing four
00:25:17
of the nine boundaries climate land
00:25:20
nutrients and biodiversity so we are in
00:25:22
a danger point but science also is clear
00:25:25
the window is still open to take
00:25:27
ourselves back because the planet is so
00:25:29
remarkably resilient that we still can
00:25:32
see good abilities to actually help us
00:25:35
buffer a journey back that is at least a
00:25:38
manageable state for the planet but we
00:25:40
have some warning signs that this
00:25:41
science is correct one of them is the
00:25:43
jet stream the jet stream which is the
00:25:46
high latitude high speed wind patterns
00:25:50
that regulates high and low pressure
00:25:52
weather systems in the northern
00:25:53
hemisphere which is showing increasingly
00:25:56
patterns of losing its harmonious
00:26:00
configuration due to actually the rapid
00:26:03
melt of ice and the Arctic which
00:26:05
releases large levels of heat and slows
00:26:09
down this whole system which has led to
00:26:12
conclusions that the jet stream is
00:26:13
increasingly becoming weird which could
00:26:15
explain which we've seen in several
00:26:17
scientific papers now the explanations
00:26:20
behind extreme heat waves and and cold
00:26:22
periods in Canada the u.s. the Nordics
00:26:26
part of the northern hemisphere
00:26:28
depending on these weather systems we
00:26:31
have also increasing evidence that the
00:26:33
ocean planetary boundary is fundamental
00:26:35
with a slowing down of the ocean
00:26:38
conveyor belt that kind of transports
00:26:41
energy through the planet and that this
00:26:44
slowdown of the conveyor belt is at risk
00:26:47
of also impacting the livability in
00:26:50
parts of the northern hemisphere not
00:26:51
least my own home can't
00:26:52
Sweden because of a slowdown in the Gulf
00:26:55
Stream and that this is now established
00:26:57
in the latest science not least led by
00:26:59
the Potsdam Institute so we see signals
00:27:01
that we are actually seeing these cracks
00:27:03
in the ability of the planet to remain
00:27:06
stable and what really makes me nervous
00:27:08
is that we've always thought that the
00:27:10
Arctic is the most sensitive system and
00:27:12
the untargeted is so stable but
00:27:14
increasingly science shows that the West
00:27:15
Antarctic ice shelf is probably more
00:27:17
vulnerable than we previously thought so
00:27:20
there are so much so many pieces of
00:27:23
evidence that we really need to take
00:27:25
care of the system and as you know I
00:27:28
rated one degree Celsius warming we are
00:27:30
on a path where we're even sea level
00:27:31
rise is now through satellite data
00:27:34
proving to become a point where we are
00:27:37
20 centimeter sea level rise now and we
00:27:39
are on a journey towards at least one
00:27:42
meter sea level rise by the end of this
00:27:43
century if we do not cross thresholds
00:27:46
and move too fast in a direction that
00:27:48
can take us beyond a point a
00:27:50
manageability for large parts of coastal
00:27:52
nations in the world so that's the story
00:27:55
that's the diagnostic let me then spend
00:27:58
the last 10 minutes just to say how can
00:28:00
we translate this interaction how can we
00:28:03
avoid situations like this where we move
00:28:05
from the Holocene into unmanageable sea
00:28:08
level rise of 10 meters plus in the
00:28:11
world which would put so many billions
00:28:13
of people under really really
00:28:15
devastating conditions now to match this
00:28:18
challenge together with Christiana
00:28:20
Figueres who's led us in the successful
00:28:23
Paris negotiations and her mission 2020
00:28:26
2020 about bending the global curve of
00:28:28
emissions no late to the next year to
00:28:31
follow the scientific necessities we
00:28:33
presented the global climate action
00:28:35
summit in San Francisco last year for
00:28:38
the first time an assessment of whether
00:28:41
it is possible to follow the IPCC 1.5
00:28:44
degrees Celsius reports conclusion
00:28:46
mainly that we need to cut emissions by
00:28:48
half by 2030 to follow a pathway that
00:28:52
can take us towards 1.5 degrees Celsius
00:28:55
warming now that was a challenge but it
00:29:00
was also inspired by some
00:29:03
really frustrating outcomes we've seen
00:29:05
over the inability to recognize
00:29:08
disruptive innovation exponential change
00:29:11
particularly in in the entrepreneurial
00:29:15
sector you may have seen this graph this
00:29:17
is kind of a classic today with the
00:29:19
world's International Energy Agency
00:29:22
doing its World Energy Outlook each each
00:29:26
here on photovoltaics in the world and
00:29:29
what you see here is on each flat line
00:29:32
their efforts of projecting what's the
00:29:35
best possible projections on
00:29:37
developments on solar voltaics and you
00:29:40
can see that each year they simply
00:29:42
underestimate and the black line is the
00:29:43
actual observed installations of
00:29:46
photovoltaics which means that
00:29:48
predicting nonlinear change is very
00:29:51
difficult when you are still in an
00:29:52
incremental linear mode and that the
00:29:54
world is nonlinear also on the solution
00:29:57
side not only on the risk side so we
00:30:00
took the latest evidence on solar
00:30:02
voltaics and wind and could show that we
00:30:05
are today on an exponential journey what
00:30:07
you see here is from 2000 to 2013 the
00:30:11
first 15 years here is actually
00:30:13
observations and on the y-axis you have
00:30:16
installation of electricity globally and
00:30:20
its percentage in the global electricity
00:30:23
mix at the world scale now this looks
00:30:26
very limited and insignificant which is
00:30:30
correct is from 0.8% to 2.8 percent in
00:30:33
15 years but it follows an exponential
00:30:35
path it actually doubles every 4.5 years
00:30:39
now for those of you who remember your
00:30:42
high school mathematics or perhaps are
00:30:44
involved in Exponential's with today as
00:30:47
I'm sure many of you are know that if
00:30:49
you follow a path like this it may
00:30:51
appear very limited in the beginning but
00:30:53
if you project this to the future and in
00:30:55
this line here we took a conservative
00:30:57
assessment of also what's realistic we
00:31:00
see that this is an exponential curve
00:31:02
that would actually by 2030 take us to a
00:31:05
point where 50 percent 5 0 percent of
00:31:08
electricity in the world would come from
00:31:10
solar and wind
00:31:11
business as usual even in a conservative
00:31:15
assessment now same goes for other
00:31:18
parameters which actually surprised even
00:31:20
us to the left here you have the number
00:31:22
of countries in the world that by 2010
00:31:25
and projected to 2020 have decoupled
00:31:27
economic growth from greenhouse gas
00:31:29
emissions 2010 as was 49 countries 2020
00:31:34
is projected be 53 countries and these
00:31:36
are not just the Nordics of the world
00:31:38
these are representing 40 percent of
00:31:40
global emissions now 50 countries is
00:31:44
quite interesting because as you know
00:31:46
better than than I do when you're
00:31:47
introducing innovation on the market the
00:31:50
valley of death is crossed when you
00:31:52
reach something like a 15 percent
00:31:53
penetration of the market and can really
00:31:56
start scaling your new ideas well what
00:31:59
if the same goes for alliances of
00:32:02
nations changing 50 countries happens to
00:32:06
be roughly 25% of the countries in the
00:32:08
world we have roughly 196 countries in
00:32:12
the world now what of this large enough
00:32:16
minority starts tipping over the
00:32:19
majority towards an inevitable journey
00:32:21
towards decarbonisation and we can see
00:32:24
evidence of similar types of change on
00:32:26
the right hand side here which is the
00:32:27
number of countries that have adopted a
00:32:30
price on carbon we fight over this all
00:32:32
the time we see difficulties in adopting
00:32:35
a global price on carbon there's so much
00:32:37
scientific support and my dear colleague
00:32:40
co-director the Paulson Institute
00:32:41
professor Ottman Hofer shows clearly
00:32:44
that a price on carbon is an absolute
00:32:46
prerequisite to be able to scale and
00:32:48
exponentially decarbonize the world's
00:32:51
energy system but it's so difficult to
00:32:53
get political support but imagine we
00:32:55
have 50 countries today that have
00:32:58
adopted a price on carbon
00:32:59
again we're approaching this 25 percent
00:33:02
point of a large enough minority showing
00:33:06
that a price on carbon actually makes
00:33:08
sense
00:33:08
also for sustainable economic
00:33:11
development we went through sector by
00:33:13
sector showing that with current
00:33:15
technologies we can actually cut
00:33:17
emissions by half by 2030 with with
00:33:20
practices that we have today
00:33:22
it requires policies
00:33:24
and require investments but it can be
00:33:26
done now the question is are we moving
00:33:29
in the right direction unfortunately the
00:33:31
answer is is really the punch in the
00:33:34
stomach and and I think we need that as
00:33:37
a closing remark here so this is a
00:33:39
fantastic paper from dear colleagues at
00:33:44
at Leeds University in the UK for the
00:33:47
first time taking the planets are
00:33:48
bounded framework and checking how
00:33:50
countries are doing and what you see
00:33:51
here on the x-axis is the number of
00:33:53
planetary boundaries that are
00:33:54
transgressed so the further to the right
00:33:56
the worse we're doing that the more of
00:33:59
the boundaries we are moving out of the
00:34:01
safe operating space and on the y-axis
00:34:03
you here you have on the list different
00:34:06
human development indexes showing
00:34:10
aspirational goals that we all value so
00:34:13
much longevity Human Development Index
00:34:16
economic growth kids in school health
00:34:20
indicators so the further up you are the
00:34:22
better we are at delivery on sustainable
00:34:25
development goals so where do we want to
00:34:27
be well we want to be up in this
00:34:29
left-hand corner where we are on the
00:34:31
safe operating space achieving good
00:34:33
social economic development I cannot see
00:34:36
one country up there that the dots here
00:34:38
are the countries in the world the rich
00:34:40
country of the world are in this upper
00:34:43
right hand corner that's where we have
00:34:44
Germany that's where we have Sweden so
00:34:46
today unfortunately we're still in a
00:34:48
mode where we're delivering on social
00:34:51
economic human wellbeing at the expense
00:34:53
of the planet she is paying and we need
00:34:57
to transition rapidly up to this
00:34:59
equitable sustainable left-hand corner
00:35:02
where we see no countries today so how
00:35:05
can we do that well I think the mind
00:35:07
shift is required that humanity's future
00:35:09
is at stake and we now need to redefine
00:35:12
sustainable development
00:35:14
I would redefine sustainable development
00:35:16
for the first time linking people and
00:35:19
planet we are no longer in incremental
00:35:22
mode this is the transformative moment
00:35:24
we need to now exponentially and in a
00:35:27
disruptive way move along a path that
00:35:30
can cut emissions by half every decade
00:35:33
that's the carbon law inspired by
00:35:36
Moore's law by the way
00:35:37
and I would define sustainable
00:35:38
development in the 21st century deepened
00:35:41
in Anthropocene as prosperity and equity
00:35:44
within planetary boundaries we need
00:35:47
equity and prosperity for people on a
00:35:50
stable planet and perhaps as a closing
00:35:53
closing remark what could help is
00:35:55
something that helps me at least
00:35:57
personally which is to recognize that up
00:36:00
until recently we were still a
00:36:03
relatively small world on a big planet
00:36:05
this is why I would not accuse climate
00:36:08
sceptics too much I wouldn't accuse too
00:36:10
much conventional economists and and all
00:36:12
those who live still and this belief
00:36:14
that we can just continue linearly to
00:36:16
exploit here and waste there they still
00:36:19
live in this old paradigm that the
00:36:21
planet is so big it can cope it can
00:36:24
simply deal with our unsustainable
00:36:27
pressures and simply deliver free
00:36:29
subsidy to our economic development but
00:36:32
no science is now clear we have quite
00:36:35
recently flipped over and today we are
00:36:39
the big world on a small planet the
00:36:42
planet is very small and we are the big
00:36:45
world and we've saturated those system
00:36:47
and we have to take care of the whole
00:36:49
system and the sustainable development
00:36:51
goals the framework that was adopted by
00:36:53
the General Assembly in 2015 is the
00:36:56
first framework the only framework we
00:36:58
have to succeed in that direction
00:37:00
there's 17 aspirational goals that for
00:37:02
the first time integrates people and
00:37:05
planet the problems dear friends is that
00:37:08
this aspiring agenda is still handled
00:37:11
largely you know I would call it like
00:37:13
like a Swedish smeargle board basically
00:37:16
countries just pick their little
00:37:19
favorites among these 17 goals I would
00:37:22
say that today there's a scientific
00:37:24
support to reconfigure these 17 goals
00:37:27
into what I call the wedding cake the
00:37:30
wedding cake is that we have four goals
00:37:32
that are non-negotiable that are the
00:37:35
planetary boundaries goals six for water
00:37:37
go 13 14 15 for oceans biodiversity and
00:37:42
climate they are the planet they are the
00:37:46
guardrails
00:37:47
they provide the non-negotiable
00:37:49
scientific platform
00:37:50
for our ability to have aspirational
00:37:53
goals for society to be disruptive to be
00:37:56
innovative to be equitable to really
00:37:58
have a good future for Humanity within
00:38:01
the safe operating space for Humanity
00:38:04
so my scientific message to leave you
00:38:06
with is simply this one put the
00:38:09
sustainable development goals inside the
00:38:11
planetary boundaries and I think we have
00:38:14
a chance to transform into that window
00:38:16
that is still open but it's only open
00:38:18
for a limited time so it's wonderful to
00:38:22
have this opportunity to exchange with
00:38:23
you and to kind of contribute towards a
00:38:26
dialogue and a momentum towards a
00:38:28
sustainable future for Humanity on earth
00:38:30
thank you so much
00:38:32
[Applause]
00:38:41
[Music]
00:38:43
[Applause]
00:38:56
and right now we have a little time for
00:39:00
questions if you have any questions
00:39:02
raise your hand yeah hi thank you that
00:39:09
was a really great talk
00:39:10
um I'm a social entrepreneur we're
00:39:13
producing solar generators 200 watt 12
00:39:16
volt from actually panels who normally
00:39:18
would get this discarded and this for
00:39:21
rural electrification for example you
00:39:23
just said that there's a lack of
00:39:25
acknowledging disruptive enterpreneur
00:39:28
ideas and I feel like I feel like I feel
00:39:30
that actually quite a bit because people
00:39:32
like oh yeah that's a great idea but
00:39:34
does that actually really bring enough
00:39:36
profit um do you have a tip for an
00:39:40
entrepreneur who is actually really
00:39:42
aligned with a sustainable development
00:39:43
cost how to reach like the next level
00:39:47
how can we be heard by the people who
00:39:50
are always saying the private sector has
00:39:51
to do something no I'm like I'm doing
00:39:53
something but so if no one is listening
00:39:56
well actually I think that many in the
00:39:59
audience here are much better placed to
00:40:01
answer that question I mean I would of
00:40:03
course encourage you to just push your
00:40:07
passion for the ideas you have but I
00:40:09
think that and then probably many of you
00:40:12
are in the room as well I mean that I I
00:40:14
see I get knocks on my door all the time
00:40:18
with you know private equity fund
00:40:23
managers or philanthropists and
00:40:26
different actors that are now trying to
00:40:29
put really that the mouth behind the
00:40:33
action on investing into new ventures
00:40:36
and I think that the challenge today is
00:40:38
to match good ideas as yours with with
00:40:41
investment capital and I think we we see
00:40:45
increasingly that there's a there's a
00:40:47
mismatch on how to connect the
00:40:49
investment the money with the ideas and
00:40:53
I think that's why these kind of
00:40:56
platforms were publicly are absolutely
00:40:57
fundamental but definitely I think
00:41:00
there's also something emerging
00:41:02
increasingly which is partnerships
00:41:05
between science policy and business
00:41:08
that can also unleash some some of these
00:41:10
new ventures because in in the past that
00:41:13
was always like science policy and then
00:41:15
policy detecting business but now
00:41:18
increasing I think we see partnerships
00:41:20
between the three and I think that can
00:41:22
also you know potentially help in
00:41:25
opening doors for new ideas as well but
00:41:27
it's of course a challenge I see that
00:41:32
are there any more questions
00:41:37
hi thank you very much and I feel after
00:41:41
so many years of bad news I have like a
00:41:43
deep climate change depression and I
00:41:47
just like I don't know ten years just
00:41:50
healed so short can you detect make me
00:41:54
be a little bit less climate change
00:41:56
depressed hmm yeah well say it's a two
00:42:03
to two answers that the first one is
00:42:06
that I will I respect climate depression
00:42:10
I would though quite strongly try to
00:42:15
urge you not to be depressed I would
00:42:17
rather you to be angry to be honest I
00:42:21
think it's I think it's it's
00:42:29
and I really mean it I mean it's it's
00:42:31
time for us I think to to use the the
00:42:36
fear and and and the sense of you know
00:42:39
of emotional reaction and and depression
00:42:41
into into you know reaction and and I
00:42:47
would strongly encourage that actually
00:42:50
that's I mean I I respect it but I think
00:42:52
we now need need more kind of disruptive
00:42:56
behavior as well that's one secondly I
00:42:58
am personally convinced that putting all
00:43:02
the cards on the table is absolutely
00:43:04
necessary I mean however uncomfortable
00:43:06
it is we in the scientific community I
00:43:09
mean to be honest if there's a red
00:43:11
thread in science it is that we have
00:43:13
unwi have under predicted we have we
00:43:15
have actually underestimated the pace of
00:43:17
change that's a self-criticism of
00:43:20
science and it is important to recognize
00:43:23
that that now science is stepping out of
00:43:26
its comfort zone and and is because it's
00:43:28
it's becoming so nervous of all the
00:43:30
evidence we're seeing so so I would say
00:43:33
even from that perspective I I'd rather
00:43:35
you know if the house is burning we'd
00:43:37
rather report that it is burning then
00:43:39
kind of tend to always have this this
00:43:43
tendency of trying to be too too overly
00:43:48
careful in the way we present the data
00:43:51
and and quite frankly the reason why
00:43:54
there is reason to be deeply concerned
00:43:56
today is that when you lay the whole
00:43:58
puzzle on the table which is not only
00:44:00
about emission of greenhouse gases it's
00:44:02
not only temperature rise but it's also
00:44:03
what is happening with ecosystems and
00:44:06
biodiversity that's when you get the
00:44:08
whole picture so there's something
00:44:10
valuable I think with putting the cards
00:44:13
on the table the final point though
00:44:16
which I really give you have full full
00:44:19
credit for is that I think we as
00:44:21
scientists should not be allowed to just
00:44:25
give the negatives we should also be
00:44:27
forced always to say you know so what so
00:44:29
what do we do then and I realized I
00:44:32
spent very much time on the negatives
00:44:35
and not summertime on on the solutions
00:44:37
here but I think I hope at least I gave
00:44:40
you know a signal also that that we
00:44:43
start seeing there's turbulence on the
00:44:45
risk side but is also turbulence on the
00:44:47
solution side and that's why this is a
00:44:49
very exciting moment actually because
00:44:51
I've never experienced so much momentum
00:44:54
and willingness to move and I've never
00:44:56
seen so many solutions there's so much
00:44:59
energy in in in the whole climate agenda
00:45:04
looking twenty years thirty years back
00:45:08
so in that sense I think we have to
00:45:11
match the depressive side with the
00:45:14
solution side but I really thank your I
00:45:16
think your your testimony of what very
00:45:19
many feel I can also feel that sometimes
00:45:23
[Applause]
00:45:23
[Music]
00:45:30
question down the hall there thank you
00:45:33
for that on that very last point I mean
00:45:35
I've worked in clean energy for ten
00:45:38
years as specifically storage and system
00:45:40
integration and I was very heartening to
00:45:42
see your prediction of how wind and
00:45:45
solar would go up but also from my
00:45:48
experience in working in this space I
00:45:50
mean we for the last ten years
00:45:51
specifically in Germany we've had all
00:45:53
the technology and politicians always
00:45:55
say we didn't have the technology that's
00:45:57
not true we we have the technology and a
00:46:00
lot of it is digital by the way and but
00:46:02
we're not implementing it and we're not
00:46:05
doing it even though we a lot of her has
00:46:07
happened I agree in the last ten years
00:46:09
so so how do we get the politicians to
00:46:12
really start implementing the solutions
00:46:15
that already then that would even create
00:46:17
cheap energy but they're not being
00:46:20
implemented and you know just one
00:46:23
example we trade electricity in
00:46:26
15-minute intervals when each of us has
00:46:28
this in their pocket and we could be
00:46:31
directly using solar energy directly but
00:46:35
politicians are not willing to do that
00:46:37
hmm I think well you're putting your
00:46:41
finger on what is that the big challenge
00:46:44
we're facing which is that we have all
00:46:46
the evidence we need that we're facing
00:46:48
very big risks we have the solutions and
00:46:52
still we're not moving at scale and that
00:46:54
a large part of that is is that we don't
00:46:58
have the political leadership to unleash
00:47:00
to provide the incentives that can take
00:47:02
us in the right direction so so why is
00:47:05
that or why aren't we moving I think is
00:47:07
is the history and of the Holy Grail of
00:47:09
how we can solve this this challenge and
00:47:12
I think is well to begin with
00:47:15
unfortunately for us we are at a point
00:47:18
where we have a relatively speaking weak
00:47:21
political leadership in the world and I
00:47:23
think that's very unfortunate we don't
00:47:26
have I mean again I would look back at
00:47:29
your many perhaps being the exception
00:47:32
among all countries in the world you I
00:47:33
mean here you have Chancellor Angela
00:47:35
Merkel is is a strong leader I mean
00:47:39
she's struggling with domestic affairs
00:47:42
here but you have just gone through
00:47:43
the coal Commission you have discussions
00:47:46
on a climate climate law I think there's
00:47:49
there's opportunity here but if you look
00:47:51
at the European Union at large today it
00:47:54
is not showing the leadership we need to
00:47:57
match exactly your point we don't see it
00:48:00
in the u.s. we don't see it in China
00:48:02
despite the fact that they have the
00:48:03
opportunity for it so I think the only
00:48:06
chance we have today is that we start
00:48:09
seeing you know more civil movement
00:48:12
together with business that kind of
00:48:14
entrepreneurs and civil society really
00:48:17
showing the direction that that let's
00:48:21
say societies want to move and why this
00:48:24
can work I think is that the political
00:48:27
leadership is is today you know you
00:48:31
could turn around the weakness and
00:48:32
leadership into something positive
00:48:33
meaning that they're quite reactive and
00:48:35
therefore also following opinions very
00:48:38
carefully they're the kind of reactive
00:48:40
political leadership rather than the
00:48:41
kind of political leadership that you
00:48:43
would normally expect as as leading
00:48:44
properly so in that sense I think the
00:48:47
pressure points are really important so
00:48:49
for example I think again I'm coming
00:48:51
back to the Friday's Fridays for climate
00:48:55
the the the whole youth movement I think
00:48:57
as you may know that has been matched by
00:49:00
the science for the future which is
00:49:03
quite extraordinary actually that over
00:49:05
20,000 German scientists signed on a
00:49:09
letter giving its full scientific
00:49:11
support for the youth movement which is
00:49:13
unprecedented I mean that scientists
00:49:15
would would would actually lend its its
00:49:18
its support in that sense now will that
00:49:22
be enough it's a big question because of
00:49:26
the of the limited time we have but I
00:49:28
think the only we have to play all the
00:49:30
cards at this point and I think we
00:49:33
simply need to give constructive
00:49:36
pressure on the political system
00:49:46
whether questionnaire from the front row
00:49:49
so how many of you have come by plane so
00:49:53
the idea is Mike my absolute conviction
00:49:56
I'm a lieutenant that there is no
00:49:59
reduction of the climate change without
00:50:01
sacrifice of some comfort so here are
00:50:05
many many people who cheer up for
00:50:07
Friday's for future and greater and are
00:50:11
really concerned about the climate but
00:50:13
nobody wants to sacrifice sacrifice
00:50:15
anything hmm
00:50:17
yeah no so here you know I kind of it's
00:50:27
a very important issue you bring up here
00:50:29
and let me kind of give a little bit of
00:50:33
a deeper reflection on that actually
00:50:35
which is may come across as not
00:50:39
automatically the most comfortable
00:50:42
conclusion I I agree with you and there
00:50:46
is a big lifestyle changes required for
00:50:49
us to succeed in a transformation to a
00:50:51
sustainable future at the same time one
00:50:55
has to recognize that we have been
00:50:57
struggling yeah I mean I've been part of
00:51:00
the environmental movement as perhaps
00:51:01
many of you for the last you know 30
00:51:04
years and the environmental movement
00:51:06
have been struggling since since Rachel
00:51:09
Carson and the Silent Spring in 1962 and
00:51:12
and largely failing and it has failed to
00:51:17
a large extent because the environmental
00:51:19
movement has been pushing so hard on on
00:51:22
environmental values in a such a good
00:51:24
way but it has therefore also reached
00:51:26
only a a minority of the citizens in any
00:51:31
given society because as long as the
00:51:34
story has always been that it's about
00:51:35
protecting nature we humans are bad and
00:51:38
the only solution is to sacrifice the
00:51:40
only solution is to give up and to move
00:51:43
away from from what is perceived at
00:51:46
least wrongly in many cases but
00:51:48
perceived at least to be let's say a
00:51:50
modern way of life that has a tendency
00:51:53
in countries like Germany and Sweden
00:51:55
which I would argue are are at the
00:51:57
forefront of
00:51:58
success in the environmental movement it
00:52:01
kind of hits a ceiling at 15% of the
00:52:03
populations you don't you don't reach
00:52:06
outside of the educated quite well you
00:52:11
know aware and an unreasonably income
00:52:14
level part of society but now we are at
00:52:18
a situation where the entire societies
00:52:21
have to become sustainable we have to
00:52:22
have hundred percent decarbonisation and
00:52:25
we have to have hundred percent
00:52:26
sustainable societies across the whole
00:52:29
value chains and in every secretary in
00:52:31
society so how can you get you know the
00:52:34
world to transport itself in a
00:52:38
sustainable way I think that the that
00:52:41
the solutions is therefore not to go out
00:52:44
and simply say stop flying I mean that
00:52:47
that would be like the only message
00:52:49
because I think that that just just
00:52:51
creates a deeper rift between the aware
00:52:55
environmental movement and everyone who
00:52:57
just says oh no I'm not gonna I'm not
00:52:59
gonna sacrifice that and therefore I
00:53:01
rather put my head in the sand and and
00:53:04
create my own little fake news story of
00:53:07
something that will somehow make this
00:53:10
not happen so therefore I think the
00:53:13
solution for us to succeed to really
00:53:15
have even the in does indifferent
00:53:17
majority to surf along with us is to you
00:53:22
know show that sustainability is the
00:53:24
entry point for a better life that we
00:53:26
can achieve better quality of life not
00:53:30
just through by consuming and and
00:53:32
unnecessarily flying when we don't need
00:53:34
to yeah of course of course
00:53:37
as in all forms of excessive consumption
00:53:43
right and and we know by the way as
00:53:45
you've seen the graph certainly that
00:53:47
increased consumption just makes human
00:53:49
wellbeing better up to a certain point
00:53:51
after that we don't get happier and we
00:53:53
certainly don't get healthier and we
00:53:55
just go kind of gradually downhill so we
00:53:58
have to start really I think changing
00:54:00
the story to show the sustainability is
00:54:02
is to be cool it is the healthy it is
00:54:05
the better it is that the more
00:54:07
attractive path is the more modern
00:54:09
pathways
00:54:10
the Tesla future and and that is a
00:54:13
difference it's a different tack of how
00:54:16
to take this story along and I agree
00:54:18
with you that you know at the early
00:54:21
stages it must mean changing also
00:54:24
behavior in the way in how much we use
00:54:27
cars and how much we consume and how
00:54:28
much we we fly but I think we would help
00:54:32
the world if we start telling the story
00:54:35
of how attractive sustainability is not
00:54:37
a sacrifice story and and that that's a
00:54:40
change and I think coming back to the
00:54:42
the question of the the fellow here
00:54:44
earlier on on solar will take the good
00:54:47
news is of course that we're starting to
00:54:48
see that we can accomplish that that we
00:54:50
have I don't know if you know this but
00:54:53
but I mean Harley Davidson in August
00:54:57
2019 is going to go electric I mean
00:55:02
isn't that kind of just the biggest
00:55:03
shock of the world I mean here you have
00:55:06
the die-hard oil loving petrol noise
00:55:10
boom running motorcyclists and then
00:55:14
harley-davidson is going electric it's
00:55:16
launching life wire it will continue to
00:55:19
produce of course also combustion engine
00:55:21
based but why is it doing this it's
00:55:24
doing this because it sees that a whole
00:55:25
new generation of young people is not so
00:55:28
attractive of these big combustion oil
00:55:33
run gasoline typed transport it is
00:55:38
cooler and and more advanced to go
00:55:41
electric and just into the future so
00:55:45
there's there's something happening here
00:55:47
which I think has to do with the new
00:55:48
story and and and I think you're the
00:55:50
best ones to tell it by the way so the
00:55:53
thing we have time for thank you very
00:55:55
much
00:55:55
this day for one very small question is
00:56:00
is it a short one okay give it a try
00:56:04
yeah I wanted to ask you because you
00:56:08
were talking about Freddy's for futures
00:56:10
early on what we as the younger
00:56:13
generation should or parents or teachers
00:56:18
when they say why don't you just go out
00:56:20
there and demonstrate for it out of
00:56:22
school because we were doing it in
00:56:25
school time I for my for me I know why
00:56:30
because otherwise the people or the
00:56:33
politicians wouldn't listen but what do
00:56:36
I have to tell my parents so they
00:56:40
support me in doing it do you have the
00:56:43
answer for that so so your question is
00:56:54
should I on stage and care encourage you
00:56:56
not to go to school so so and actually
00:57:02
my my answer is quite simple
00:57:04
you've done your homework it's time for
00:57:07
the adults to do their homework and and
00:57:14
I would say that you you've done it so
00:57:18
well that if that costs you a Friday
00:57:22
afternoon every second week that's fine
00:57:24
you'll be so well prepared for the
00:57:26
future that that will bypass the elder
00:57:29
generation in terms of intellectual
00:57:31
accomplishments I I'm all for what what
00:57:34
you're doing and we need more of it
00:57:36
thank you very much for their efforts
00:57:42
thank you very much thank you
00:57:45
[Applause]
00:57:56
[Music]