re:publica 2019 – Johan Rockström: Safe Future for Humanity on Earth

00:58:02
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZmZ3Hp7rPo4

Ringkasan

TLDRThe speaker raises the existential question of whether humanity is risking the destabilization of the entire planet due to our current trajectory of environmental degradation. By placing unprecedented pressure on the Earth's systems, primarily through climate change and biodiversity loss, we may be approaching critical tipping points that irrevocably alter natural stability. Reflecting on the past 50 years, which have seen dramatic shifts relative to the previous 10,000 years, the urgency for humanity to alter its course is paramount. Especially highlighted is the necessity for sustainable development within planetary boundaries—vital environmental limits which maintain Earth's health. Present-day decisions and actions will determine the ecological and environmental conditions for thousands of generations to come. Constructive pathways, including emission reductions leveraging existing technology and innovative entrepreneurship, are essential. Broad societal engagement, especially with younger generations, needs to grow. The window for action, while still open, is shrinking rapidly.

Takeaways

  • 🌍 Humanity is the largest force of change on Earth today.
  • 🌡️ We are at risk of destabilizing the entire planet due to climate change and biodiversity loss.
  • 📈 Recent 50 years have drastically changed Earth's conditions compared to the last 10,000 years.
  • 🚨 The next decades are crucial for determining future conditions on Earth.
  • 💡 Transformative action within planetary boundaries is needed for sustainability.
  • 🏞️ The Holocene is our stable state necessary for modern civilization.
  • 😭 We are witnessing the sixth mass extinction caused by humans.
  • 🌿 Sustainable development requires decoupling growth from environmental impact.
  • 🌐 Business leaders rank climate changes as major risks to the global economy.
  • 🧠 We must shift perspectives and prioritize sustainable actions now.

Garis waktu

  • 00:00:00 - 00:05:00

    The speaker begins by asking a crucial question: Are humans at risk of destabilizing the planet due to their actions? The talk emphasizes humanity's role as the largest force of change on Earth, reliant on a very thin atmosphere for survival. Historically, humanity has exploited natural resources as if they were limitless. Now, there's an urgent need to reconnect to the planet to ensure a sustainable future. A critical graph is introduced showing the exponential rise in global warming pressures. The talk aims to highlight the dramatic changes in Earth's conditions over the last 50 years and their implications for the future.

  • 00:05:00 - 00:10:00

    The speaker presents evidence of the current ecological crisis, including the sixth mass extinction event caused by humans, unlike previous natural extinctions like the dinosaurs. At 1°C warming, significant extreme weather events have begun, suggesting that Mother Earth is warning humanity with severe consequences. Public awareness is rising, as reflected in global surveys. The youth, especially in Germany, are increasingly mobilizing for climate action. Business leaders also recognize climate change and biodiversity loss as significant economic threats. Humanity is entering a new geological epoch, the Anthropocene, where humans dominate Earth's changes.

  • 00:10:00 - 00:15:00

    The speaker highlights the various parameters showing dramatic changes since the mid-20th century, nicknamed the 'Great Acceleration,' which show exponential growth in adverse environmental impacts. These include greenhouse gas emissions, deforestation, and biodiversity loss. The Earth's system appears to be losing resilience under the weight of human pressures. In this new epoch, our dependence on a stable Earth becomes crucial, but humanity is potentially exiting the 'Garden of Eden,' or the Holocene, the only state known to support modern civilization.

  • 00:15:00 - 00:20:00

    The talk introduces the concept of tipping points and nonlinear changes in Earth's systems, which can lead to abrupt and irreversible shifts in climate and ecosystems. The speaker discusses tipping elements like permafrost and ice sheets, which can trigger cascading effects. The 'Hothouse Earth' paper suggests that even by limiting our warming to 2°C, we could trigger these tipping points, making it crucial for us to turn away from current trajectories and avoid flipping into potentially unmanageable global warming scenarios.

  • 00:20:00 - 00:25:00

    The continuation of business as usual significantly risks pushing the planet into a climatic state unseen for millions of years. The speaker emphasizes that this would require immediate global action to stabilize Earth's systems. Such transformation involves maintaining Earth's climate within what we know as the Holocene. New studies point to our influence reaching beyond anything seen in the last 3 million years, stressing the profound responsibility humanity now holds in managing the planetary system. Solutions must embrace a holistic transformation to ecosystems and energy systems.

  • 00:25:00 - 00:30:00

    The speaker argues for a new framework for assessing future planetary health by identifying key systems that regulate Earth's stability and defining a safe operating space for these. This involves more than just climate change, extending to oceans, land, biodiversity, and more – maintaining them within their 'planetary boundaries.' The speaker warns that currently, four boundaries have been exceeded. Despite this, Earth's resilience offers us a buffer, a chance to retract from these dangerous zones if acted upon urgently with proper stewardship.

  • 00:30:00 - 00:35:00

    The speaker discusses the importance of political, social, and economic innovation to meet set climate targets, like halving emissions by 2030. Current efforts, including renewable energy development such as solar and wind, exhibit a potential exponential uptake. Nonetheless, political leadership and systemic incentives need alignment with these efforts. The challenge lies in connecting innovative ideas with investment capital and policy frameworks, emphasizing that transformation requires multi-sector partnerships to embrace the dynamic shift in societal demands towards sustainability.

  • 00:35:00 - 00:40:00

    The transition toward sustainable development requires not only technological advancements but also radical systemic change involving all societal sectors. The speaker presents research showing that even developed countries fall short in environmental sustainability while attempting to achieve social and economic goals. This paradox requires redefining sustainable development: combining equity and prosperity within the planet's ecological boundaries. A significant mindset change is necessary to view human progress not as opposition to environmental health but as fundamentally interconnected.

  • 00:40:00 - 00:45:00

    The speaker advocates redefining sustainable development to bridge human well-being and environmental health, proposing a transformative shift in global policy to achieve this union. He calls for halving carbon emissions every decade, urging disruption over gradual change. The speaker suggests a reevaluation of the UN's Sustainable Development Goals to prioritize planetary systems as the foundations for human socio-economic aspirations, integrating them into a holistic framework for long-term global sustainability to maintain the Earth's stability.

  • 00:45:00 - 00:50:00

    The urgency of acting within the small remaining window to prevent irreversible environmental damage is undeniable. Science demands we put sustainable development goals within planetary boundaries to ensure a thriving future. The speaker highlights the small world's interdependence on the planet; humanity's actions are tightly linked to planetary health. The UN's goals offer a blueprint, but strategies must align with hardness and immediacy due to past failures. Emphasizing global cooperation and multi-level governance, the speaker insists this is the time for bold, integrated actions.

  • 00:50:00 - 00:58:02

    In the Q&A, themes of innovation and action for sustainable development arise. An entrepreneur expresses challenges in gaining attention for clean-tech innovations, highlighting a gap between potential solutions and investment opportunities. Another audience member shares climate-related despair due to perceived inaction, yet the speaker encourages transformation of such despair into proactive engagement, emphasizing increasing momentum in climate solutions. Political action is crucial, yet hampered by current leaders' inability or unwillingness to prioritize sustainability against immediate comforts.

Tampilkan lebih banyak

Peta Pikiran

Video Tanya Jawab

  • What is the main risk discussed in the presentation?

    The speaker emphasizes that humanity is at risk of destabilizing the entire planet due to environmental pressures and stresses the importance of maintaining the Earth's stable state for future generations.

  • What is the call to action for humanity?

    The speaker suggests that humanity must act now to reconnect with the planet in order to secure a thriving, equitable future for all.

  • What is the Anthropocene?

    The Anthropocene is the current geological era where humans are the dominant force of change on Earth.

  • How have recent changes on Earth differed from the past 10,000 years?

    The speaker presents evidence that shows drastic and rapid changes on Earth in the last 50 years compared to the previous 10,000 years of stability.

  • Why is the next decade crucial for environmental action?

    The speaker suggests that failing to act within the next decade could set in motion irreversible changes leading to further global warming and ecological disasters.

  • What are some of the tipping elements discussed?

    Key tipping elements include the Greenland ice sheet, permafrost, Arctic ice, and ecosystem changes that could lead to irreversible climate impacts.

  • What are planetary boundaries?

    Planetary boundaries are environmental limits within which humanity can safely operate to maintain Earth's stable conditions.

  • What solutions are proposed to address environmental challenges?

    To meet sustainable development goals within planetary boundaries, humanity needs to decouple economic growth from environmental degradation and significantly reduce carbon emissions.

  • What do business assessments say about climate risks?

    Current business and economic assessments identify climate change and biodiversity loss as major risks to global economies, prompting a need for climate action.

  • How can we encourage wider acceptance and implementation of sustainable practices?

    Scientists and innovators must work together to create a narrative that shows sustainable pathways as attractive and beneficial while also advocating for necessary policy changes.

Lihat lebih banyak ringkasan video

Dapatkan akses instan ke ringkasan video YouTube gratis yang didukung oleh AI!
Teks
en
Gulir Otomatis:
  • 00:00:03
    [Music]
  • 00:00:07
    a
  • 00:00:10
    [Music]
  • 00:00:13
    you
  • 00:00:21
    so good and dark hello everyone
  • 00:00:24
    wonderful to be here this is a really
  • 00:00:26
    important opportunity to share with you
  • 00:00:29
    the latest state of science to pose one
  • 00:00:34
    of the questions that we've never had to
  • 00:00:36
    pose before in the scientific community
  • 00:00:38
    we've come to a point where we're
  • 00:00:40
    aggregating so much pressure on planet
  • 00:00:43
    Earth
  • 00:00:44
    that were forced to pose the following
  • 00:00:45
    question are we at risk of destabilizing
  • 00:00:50
    the whole planet are we at risk of
  • 00:00:54
    destabilizing the whole planet
  • 00:00:56
    now this originates not only from all
  • 00:00:58
    the evidence that we'll be trying to
  • 00:00:59
    present in a in a quick overview it also
  • 00:01:02
    has to do with the humble recognition
  • 00:01:05
    that in fact there is a philosophical
  • 00:01:09
    perspective on this which is that we as
  • 00:01:11
    humans are today the largest force of
  • 00:01:15
    change on planet Earth and we all depend
  • 00:01:17
    on this sliver thin layer of atmosphere
  • 00:01:20
    the ten kilometer column that gives all
  • 00:01:25
    life support for Humanity on earth and
  • 00:01:29
    up until very recently we have treated
  • 00:01:32
    this thin thin layer of the living
  • 00:01:34
    biosphere the atmosphere the climate
  • 00:01:36
    system as basically something we exploit
  • 00:01:39
    in one end we transform into human
  • 00:01:42
    wellbeing and we waste in the other end
  • 00:01:45
    using the planet as a waste bin and now
  • 00:01:48
    is the time to reconnect our future to
  • 00:01:51
    the planet to stand a chance for us to
  • 00:01:54
    have a thriving equitable future for
  • 00:01:57
    Humanity now the starting point of
  • 00:01:59
    course is a graph that you've all seen
  • 00:02:01
    which is essentially the exponential
  • 00:02:05
    rise of pressures from global warming
  • 00:02:07
    but I'll be taking a much much broader
  • 00:02:09
    perspective a planetary perspective on
  • 00:02:11
    our future now to summarize this talk
  • 00:02:15
    has actually a deep mindSHIFT
  • 00:02:18
    implication for how we guide our own
  • 00:02:21
    lives into the future and what I'll be
  • 00:02:23
    trying to present to you is the
  • 00:02:26
    unequivocal evidence with very low
  • 00:02:29
    scientific uncertainty that it's only in
  • 00:02:32
    the last 50 years
  • 00:02:34
    that we have changed conditions on earth
  • 00:02:36
    as they've been over the past 10,000
  • 00:02:38
    years when we last last the last ice age
  • 00:02:42
    so in only 50 years we've changed
  • 00:02:45
    conditions on earth as they've been for
  • 00:02:46
    the last 10,000 years now that is with a
  • 00:02:51
    very low degree of uncertainty and it's
  • 00:02:53
    a drama in itself but an even larger
  • 00:02:56
    drama and the big mind shift is that
  • 00:02:59
    what happens over the coming 50 years
  • 00:03:01
    with a high degree of likelihood will
  • 00:03:04
    determine the outcome for the coming ten
  • 00:03:06
    thousand years now I'm not so sure about
  • 00:03:09
    the age of a viewer average but I must
  • 00:03:12
    confess I'll raise my hand I give
  • 00:03:14
    testimony here today that I am part of
  • 00:03:18
    the culprits I've been part of this
  • 00:03:20
    journey over the last 50 years and if I
  • 00:03:23
    can keep my health up I hope to be part
  • 00:03:25
    of a significant portion of the coming
  • 00:03:28
    decades into this journey this means
  • 00:03:30
    that we are on a knife's edge it is us
  • 00:03:33
    in this generation who are now
  • 00:03:35
    responsible it is our generation to be
  • 00:03:38
    responsible for the transformations to
  • 00:03:41
    give all future generations on earth a
  • 00:03:43
    chance to thrive on planet Earth we
  • 00:03:47
    caused it we are to solve it and that is
  • 00:03:50
    what science today shows that is why
  • 00:03:53
    there's such a tremendous uprising not
  • 00:03:56
    only the scientific community but also
  • 00:03:58
    wider of stakeholders across the world
  • 00:04:01
    recognizing that we stood at a
  • 00:04:03
    saturation point but also a turbulence
  • 00:04:06
    point in terms of need for change now
  • 00:04:09
    this change is generally expressed only
  • 00:04:12
    in this curve which is a really
  • 00:04:14
    important one this is the hockey stick
  • 00:04:15
    of observations of temperature rise on
  • 00:04:17
    earth as you see here it is the last
  • 00:04:20
    four years
  • 00:04:21
    now clearly concluded to be the warmest
  • 00:04:25
    years on record since we started
  • 00:04:27
    observations since the Industrial
  • 00:04:29
    Revolution we have raised temperatures
  • 00:04:32
    with one degree Celsius actually one
  • 00:04:33
    point one degree Celsius since the
  • 00:04:36
    pre-industrial times in the late 19th
  • 00:04:38
    century and the key message to me is not
  • 00:04:42
    just a 1 degree Celsius warming
  • 00:04:45
    is that we've reached the warmest
  • 00:04:47
    temperature on earth since the last ice
  • 00:04:49
    age we're bumping the biophysical
  • 00:04:52
    ceiling of the maximum temperature on
  • 00:04:55
    earth since we left the last ice age
  • 00:04:57
    this is the reality we're now at a point
  • 00:05:00
    of a new juncture of change but it's not
  • 00:05:03
    only about climate change yesterday
  • 00:05:05
    the Intergovernmental Panel on
  • 00:05:07
    biodiversity and ecosystem services the
  • 00:05:09
    sister of the IPCC the United Nations
  • 00:05:11
    Scientific into governmental Panel
  • 00:05:13
    climate change released its second
  • 00:05:16
    global assessment concluding
  • 00:05:18
    unequivocally that we've reached the
  • 00:05:20
    sixth mass extinction of species on
  • 00:05:22
    earth the first mass extinction caused
  • 00:05:25
    by another species us one of these six
  • 00:05:29
    by the way was the loss of dinosaurs
  • 00:05:31
    some 60 million years ago we are at risk
  • 00:05:35
    of now losing species so fast that we
  • 00:05:38
    cannot exclude having collapse of
  • 00:05:40
    ecosystems and undermining fundamental
  • 00:05:43
    functions in our life-support systems
  • 00:05:46
    such as producing food now this has to
  • 00:05:49
    be connected with the fact that at one
  • 00:05:52
    degree Celsius warming we're starting to
  • 00:05:54
    see something that we have started to
  • 00:05:57
    recognize but now is happening at a
  • 00:05:59
    level where we can start talking of
  • 00:06:02
    invoices being sent back from mother
  • 00:06:05
    earth into the economy at a scale we
  • 00:06:07
    haven't seen before actually I will
  • 00:06:10
    stipulate as an hypothesis that 2018 may
  • 00:06:13
    go down in history as the first year
  • 00:06:16
    ever that mother earth started sending
  • 00:06:17
    invoices back across the whole planet
  • 00:06:19
    and it started off with the heat waves
  • 00:06:22
    in Canada with record temperatures
  • 00:06:25
    measured in Africa fifty one point two
  • 00:06:27
    degrees Celsius warming the warmest
  • 00:06:29
    temperature on earth the forest fires in
  • 00:06:31
    California which were passed twice with
  • 00:06:33
    devastating social and economic costs
  • 00:06:36
    the hurricane Michael which was
  • 00:06:38
    amplified very likely by global warming
  • 00:06:40
    we had tremendous death tolls with the
  • 00:06:43
    flooding the Philippines the flood is in
  • 00:06:45
    Kerala in South India we had the heat
  • 00:06:47
    waves and floods in Japan killing more
  • 00:06:50
    than 200 people we then had the
  • 00:06:52
    tremendous spectrum of minus 50 degrees
  • 00:06:55
    Celsius in Chicago just two months ago
  • 00:06:57
    and plus 50 degree
  • 00:06:58
    in Queensland and then we have the
  • 00:07:01
    latest the cyclones hitting Mozambique
  • 00:07:03
    and Zimbabwe
  • 00:07:04
    edye with a tremendous social cost never
  • 00:07:08
    observed before at this level we're
  • 00:07:10
    starting to see an uncomfortable
  • 00:07:12
    frequency of extreme events hitting at
  • 00:07:15
    one degree Celsius warming now this is
  • 00:07:18
    sinking in it's clearly sinking in we
  • 00:07:21
    have a Pew Institute that quite recently
  • 00:07:25
    released the report showing once again
  • 00:07:27
    this covers 29 countries in the world
  • 00:07:28
    showing once again that roughly 60 to
  • 00:07:31
    70% of populations across the world are
  • 00:07:33
    really concerned about climate change
  • 00:07:35
    and wants climate action this is
  • 00:07:38
    supported also by Yale University
  • 00:07:40
    support by opinion polls in Europe
  • 00:07:42
    showing that interestingly below the
  • 00:07:45
    kind of vibrations of different signals
  • 00:07:50
    from media underlying its citizens are
  • 00:07:52
    really concerned I would even argue that
  • 00:07:55
    this is so well anchored today among
  • 00:07:57
    particularly younger generations that
  • 00:08:00
    what we see in terms of the youth
  • 00:08:02
    movement and the rising of school kids
  • 00:08:05
    with the Friday's for the future where I
  • 00:08:07
    would argue that Germany is really the
  • 00:08:08
    ground zero in the world I mean no place
  • 00:08:11
    on the planet are so many youth
  • 00:08:13
    gathering as in Berlin on the Fridays
  • 00:08:17
    for the future which is a signal that
  • 00:08:19
    something is really happening in the
  • 00:08:20
    world and that this is not a coincidence
  • 00:08:22
    it is an accumulation over a decade of
  • 00:08:25
    recognizing increasingly that we are
  • 00:08:28
    posing risks on planet Earth this is
  • 00:08:32
    also something that we're now seeing in
  • 00:08:33
    business you've certainly seen the World
  • 00:08:35
    Economic Forum and its annual Global
  • 00:08:37
    Risk report they interview over 2000
  • 00:08:40
    business leaders around the world and on
  • 00:08:42
    the x-axis here you have the likelihood
  • 00:08:43
    of disasters impacting the economy and
  • 00:08:46
    on the y-axis is the impact risk on
  • 00:08:49
    business and economy and up on the right
  • 00:08:51
    hand corner we have you know the the
  • 00:08:54
    high impact high likelihood impacts on
  • 00:08:57
    the economy and if you look carefully
  • 00:08:59
    business leaders assess that climate
  • 00:09:02
    change biodiversity crisis our
  • 00:09:05
    unwillingness to really deal with
  • 00:09:06
    climate change are the biggest threats
  • 00:09:09
    to the economy today
  • 00:09:10
    so this is the reality where we are and
  • 00:09:13
    that is a shaking world where now we're
  • 00:09:17
    starting to see science connecting with
  • 00:09:19
    insights and willingness to change
  • 00:09:21
    now however we come to this well I would
  • 00:09:23
    argue that the most important message of
  • 00:09:25
    society of science was when we for a few
  • 00:09:29
    years ago were able to welcome humanity
  • 00:09:32
    to the Anthropocene anthros for us
  • 00:09:34
    humans and rose from the greek we've now
  • 00:09:36
    turned into our own geological epoch we
  • 00:09:41
    have become the dominant driver of
  • 00:09:42
    change on earth we surpass in amplitude
  • 00:09:46
    and frequency what the natural
  • 00:09:48
    variability has taken us through the
  • 00:09:50
    billions of years through volcanic
  • 00:09:52
    eruptions earthquakes and our change in
  • 00:09:54
    position to the Sun all this Stills
  • 00:09:56
    occurs but we have now dominating it
  • 00:09:59
    become a bigger force now is this
  • 00:10:01
    suggestion which I would argue is the
  • 00:10:03
    most important message we have from
  • 00:10:05
    science humanity based on models or
  • 00:10:08
    hypotheses no it is based on
  • 00:10:11
    observations it's based on the hockey
  • 00:10:13
    sticks you see on this graph published
  • 00:10:15
    for the first time in 2007 updated since
  • 00:10:18
    then each x-axis here is from 1750 until
  • 00:10:22
    today they show parameters like carbon
  • 00:10:26
    dioxide released their first ation
  • 00:10:28
    acidification unification land
  • 00:10:30
    degradation any parameter you may wish
  • 00:10:33
    to pick that matters for us as humans so
  • 00:10:37
    the same pattern very limited change
  • 00:10:39
    incremental change up until the
  • 00:10:42
    mid-1950s and then you see this
  • 00:10:45
    breakpoint and the massive exponential
  • 00:10:48
    rise of pressure from the mid-1950s this
  • 00:10:52
    is ten years after the Second World War
  • 00:10:54
    we're three billion people on earth and
  • 00:10:57
    it seems like that's the point where we
  • 00:10:59
    put on the high gear of the industrial
  • 00:11:01
    metabolism of the modern globalized
  • 00:11:04
    world as we know it and off we go in
  • 00:11:07
    this exponential rise and we reach a
  • 00:11:10
    point not perhaps more than 15-20 years
  • 00:11:13
    ago when we start seeing the signs of
  • 00:11:16
    saturation of kolaks of ecosystems of
  • 00:11:20
    passing 350 ppm in carbon dioxide
  • 00:11:24
    accelerated ice-melt collapse the coral
  • 00:11:27
    reefs unification of Lake systems vast
  • 00:11:30
    scales of land degradation the Earth's
  • 00:11:33
    system seems to now be at a point where
  • 00:11:36
    doesn't have the resilience or capacity
  • 00:11:38
    to take more unsustainable pressure from
  • 00:11:42
    humanity so welcome to the Anthropocene
  • 00:11:44
    is inside number one inside number two
  • 00:11:48
    is what makes me most nervous because if
  • 00:11:51
    we're putting all this pressure on earth
  • 00:11:52
    the question is what are we leaving what
  • 00:11:55
    do we depend on what state of the planet
  • 00:11:57
    do we depend on for our human well-being
  • 00:12:01
    as seven-point-six soon to be ten
  • 00:12:04
    billion people on earth well that is the
  • 00:12:08
    drama it's so dramatic that I even put
  • 00:12:11
    it as a question are we leaving the
  • 00:12:13
    Garden of Eden do we have scientific
  • 00:12:16
    evidence of what is the precious desired
  • 00:12:19
    state of the planet I will argue that
  • 00:12:21
    unequivocally the answer is yes and I'll
  • 00:12:24
    just give you one piece of evidence and
  • 00:12:25
    I hope I convinced you on this which is
  • 00:12:27
    data from Greenland this is the ice core
  • 00:12:31
    from Greenland on the x-axis you have
  • 00:12:33
    the last 100,000 years it's by the way a
  • 00:12:36
    very good choice of time because we've
  • 00:12:38
    been modern humans on earth roughly
  • 00:12:39
    80,000 years so we have during this
  • 00:12:42
    whole period had the same ability for
  • 00:12:44
    our intellectual and physical
  • 00:12:47
    development of civil societies as we
  • 00:12:49
    know it now on the y-axis here is very
  • 00:12:52
    temperature variability and as you can
  • 00:12:54
    see already from the graph this was a
  • 00:12:56
    bumpy ride indeed for Humanity in fact
  • 00:12:59
    we had tremendous variability so plus
  • 00:13:01
    minus 10 degree Celsius this is data
  • 00:13:03
    from Greenland over just a decade it
  • 00:13:05
    could go up and down we had a rough time
  • 00:13:07
    we were hunters and gatherers we were a
  • 00:13:10
    few million people on earth we had to
  • 00:13:13
    put it simple a rough time until we
  • 00:13:17
    leave this ice age period this hundred
  • 00:13:20
    thousand years of deep variable ice age
  • 00:13:23
    and enter this extraordinarily stable
  • 00:13:27
    integrational phase that we learnt in
  • 00:13:29
    school to call the Holocene this is the
  • 00:13:32
    integrational stage that has enabled us
  • 00:13:35
    to develop modern civilization
  • 00:13:37
    as we know it how could that be well
  • 00:13:40
    what do we do when we enter the Holocene
  • 00:13:42
    well essentially the first thing we do
  • 00:13:44
    just 2,000 years into the Holocene is we
  • 00:13:47
    do the most important invention of all
  • 00:13:49
    and I must excuse myself at this
  • 00:13:51
    innovation event here at the república
  • 00:13:53
    it was not the digital revolution or the
  • 00:13:56
    iPhone or vast vast computer
  • 00:13:58
    capabilities No
  • 00:14:00
    the most important invention of all time
  • 00:14:02
    for us humans is when we invented
  • 00:14:06
    agriculture we started to domesticate
  • 00:14:10
    animals and plants we went from being
  • 00:14:12
    hunters and gatherers to become
  • 00:14:13
    small-scale Sedan through farmers and
  • 00:14:16
    the trick is and why this is so
  • 00:14:18
    significant is that we know today that
  • 00:14:21
    this happened roughly at the same time
  • 00:14:23
    on all continents on earth at a time
  • 00:14:28
    when we could invent rice and maize and
  • 00:14:31
    corn and wheat on different continents
  • 00:14:34
    and last time I checked we didn't have a
  • 00:14:37
    mobile phone to call each other say well
  • 00:14:40
    I came up with this great idea
  • 00:14:41
    you plant a seed and it can grow and we
  • 00:14:44
    can domesticate animals and plants oh no
  • 00:14:46
    we know today that the reason why this
  • 00:14:48
    occurred simultaneously across
  • 00:14:50
    continents was simply that the rainy
  • 00:14:53
    seasons became so stable temperatures
  • 00:14:56
    came and went so stable that we knew
  • 00:15:00
    when spring came and we knew when autumn
  • 00:15:02
    arrived we could simply be reassured
  • 00:15:05
    that the investments the risks of
  • 00:15:08
    investing in planting seed was worth it
  • 00:15:11
    and off we went and established
  • 00:15:13
    societies as we know it differentiated
  • 00:15:16
    technologies enable ourselves to invent
  • 00:15:18
    ourselves all the way to the modern
  • 00:15:20
    societies as we know today so the
  • 00:15:23
    conclusion is as simple as it is
  • 00:15:25
    dramatic the Holocene is the only state
  • 00:15:29
    of the planet we know for certain can
  • 00:15:31
    support the modern world as we know it
  • 00:15:34
    we have lived outside of the Holocene we
  • 00:15:37
    can be hunters and gatherers in the
  • 00:15:39
    caves of a glacial or completely
  • 00:15:42
    different planet but if we want to take
  • 00:15:44
    an ethical responsibility for the world
  • 00:15:46
    as we know it and our
  • 00:15:48
    co-citizens on earth then the holocene
  • 00:15:50
    is our Garden of Eden inside number two
  • 00:15:54
    inside number three is that if we punch
  • 00:15:57
    the planet so hard as we're now doing in
  • 00:15:59
    Anthropocene the question is how does
  • 00:16:00
    she respond well when she is resilient
  • 00:16:04
    and can buffer and really take and
  • 00:16:06
    dampen our stress nothing really happens
  • 00:16:09
    incremental change is actually the way
  • 00:16:11
    that rules the world in fact we believe
  • 00:16:14
    so strongly in this that that's how
  • 00:16:15
    we've developed our economic system our
  • 00:16:17
    governance system just assuming that
  • 00:16:19
    everything is predictable linear and
  • 00:16:21
    incremental that's by the way the only
  • 00:16:24
    reason why we can have discount rates
  • 00:16:25
    for example the assumption that things
  • 00:16:27
    change linearly but science shows over
  • 00:16:31
    30 years of advancement that is
  • 00:16:33
    completely to reverse that
  • 00:16:35
    nonlinearities tipping points sudden
  • 00:16:38
    surprise is part of normality during
  • 00:16:41
    long long periods of time we can
  • 00:16:43
    unsustainably release greenhouse gases
  • 00:16:45
    cut down forests over fish oceans and
  • 00:16:48
    the system just buffers and reduces
  • 00:16:51
    impacts up to a certain point a small
  • 00:16:53
    incremental change and the system can
  • 00:16:56
    cross a tipping point and irreversibly
  • 00:16:59
    change conditions and undermine and
  • 00:17:01
    potentially amplify warming undermining
  • 00:17:04
    our abilities to the future now we have
  • 00:17:07
    so much evidence of this today we have
  • 00:17:09
    here summarize for example the tipping
  • 00:17:11
    elements that we know have multiple
  • 00:17:13
    stable state and that can't cross
  • 00:17:15
    tipping points for example permafrost
  • 00:17:17
    Arctic winter sea ice that can flip over
  • 00:17:20
    from stability to instability
  • 00:17:22
    reinforcing warming the forest systems
  • 00:17:25
    and coral reef systems that can flip
  • 00:17:26
    over from hard coral systems to soft
  • 00:17:29
    algae system the rainforest system the
  • 00:17:31
    jet stream the fundamental systems that
  • 00:17:34
    regulate the entire planet in this
  • 00:17:37
    interconnected earth system that is all
  • 00:17:40
    dependent on stability in a Holocene
  • 00:17:43
    state in fact we have even gone one step
  • 00:17:47
    further recognizing that these systems
  • 00:17:49
    are so interconnected that we can today
  • 00:17:51
    talk of tipping elements being connected
  • 00:17:54
    in what we call cascades where if we
  • 00:17:57
    cross a tipping point for example
  • 00:17:59
    irreversibly causing the Greenland ice
  • 00:18:02
    sheet to start melting irreversibly
  • 00:18:03
    losing methane from thawing permafrost
  • 00:18:06
    that could bump us up one level of
  • 00:18:09
    temperature the latest paper that we
  • 00:18:12
    published a year ago the hothouse earth
  • 00:18:15
    paper that by the way last year led to
  • 00:18:17
    the word of the year here in Germany
  • 00:18:20
    High's site was a very careful
  • 00:18:23
    assessment but we said if we continue
  • 00:18:25
    burning fossil fuels up to two degrees
  • 00:18:27
    Celsius warming what is the response of
  • 00:18:30
    the earth system if we cross tipping
  • 00:18:32
    elements our careful assessment is that
  • 00:18:34
    that could bump us up another 2.1 0.3 to
  • 00:18:38
    0.4 degree celsius to 2.4 maximum which
  • 00:18:41
    could then release crossing tipping
  • 00:18:43
    points and other systems and lead to a
  • 00:18:45
    cascade that could take us across the
  • 00:18:46
    threshold towards a hothouse earth a
  • 00:18:49
    high site now this is now summarized so
  • 00:18:53
    well in science that we were for the
  • 00:18:55
    first time a year back able to
  • 00:18:57
    communicate to the climate negotiators
  • 00:18:59
    in in Bonn the first time and then in
  • 00:19:02
    Katowice that now we know that based on
  • 00:19:06
    this curve which I just showed you
  • 00:19:07
    earlier which is this desired pathway of
  • 00:19:10
    perhaps you don't see it so well this is
  • 00:19:12
    the last 20,000 years we leave the last
  • 00:19:15
    ice age and we enter the Garden of Eden
  • 00:19:17
    the plus minus 1 degrees Celsius
  • 00:19:19
    12,000 years as you see in this line
  • 00:19:21
    here here you have the Paris agreement
  • 00:19:24
    which is to stay well below 2 an aim for
  • 00:19:28
    1.5 degrees Celsius which is actually
  • 00:19:30
    outside of the Holocene range which is
  • 00:19:33
    something to remember here is where
  • 00:19:35
    we're following today where we're
  • 00:19:37
    rushing on a path that can take us to 4
  • 00:19:40
    degrees Celsius warming by end of this
  • 00:19:41
    century but here's the key message we
  • 00:19:44
    can now scientifically add to this the
  • 00:19:46
    risk of crossing tipping points and what
  • 00:19:48
    you see here in the red to yellow
  • 00:19:51
    columns is the scientific uncertainty
  • 00:19:53
    because we don't know exactly at what
  • 00:19:55
    temperatures in the y-axis we risk
  • 00:19:57
    pushing systems across irreversible
  • 00:20:00
    thresholds but look at this square here
  • 00:20:03
    which is the square with scientific
  • 00:20:06
    evidence that we are ready in the Paris
  • 00:20:08
    range are at risk of tipping to crossing
  • 00:20:11
    tipping points and look
  • 00:20:13
    coral reefs the entire uncertainty range
  • 00:20:17
    lies within the Paris range what does
  • 00:20:20
    this mean well it means that from the
  • 00:20:22
    knowledge we have today we are very
  • 00:20:25
    likely to lose all tropical coral reefs
  • 00:20:28
    even if we are able to stay below two
  • 00:20:31
    degrees Celsius warming so we have the
  • 00:20:34
    first planetary victim already at the
  • 00:20:38
    situation we are at today because we're
  • 00:20:40
    rushing towards a point where it's very
  • 00:20:42
    difficult to stay well below 2 and avoid
  • 00:20:46
    the risk of losing all tropical coral
  • 00:20:49
    reefs but you see that alpine glaciers
  • 00:20:51
    Arctic summer sea ice and even Greenland
  • 00:20:53
    despite the uncertainty range here is at
  • 00:20:56
    risk of crossing a threshold to
  • 00:20:58
    irreversible melting already at 2
  • 00:21:00
    degrees Celsius warming to the furthest
  • 00:21:02
    left we have the West Antarctic ice
  • 00:21:03
    shelf another 6 to 7 metre sea level
  • 00:21:06
    rise that is also at risk of crossing a
  • 00:21:08
    tipping point irreversibly melting at
  • 00:21:10
    low temperatures now this does not mean
  • 00:21:13
    that the planet would fall over a kind
  • 00:21:16
    of a disaster escarpment the day after
  • 00:21:19
    we cross a tipping point but what it
  • 00:21:20
    means and what my key message to you
  • 00:21:23
    here today is that what we do over the
  • 00:21:26
    next decade is the point very likely the
  • 00:21:31
    point when we determine whether or not
  • 00:21:32
    we press the on button for a journey
  • 00:21:35
    that would irreversibly take us towards
  • 00:21:38
    these outcomes that it's now we can
  • 00:21:41
    change directions to avoid coming too
  • 00:21:43
    close to these danger points because
  • 00:21:46
    once we press the on button the
  • 00:21:48
    Greenland ice sheet would irreversibly
  • 00:21:49
    melt it would probably take 2 or 3
  • 00:21:51
    hundred years but it would be
  • 00:21:53
    irreversible we would committing all
  • 00:21:55
    future generation to that trajectory a
  • 00:21:57
    few months after the highs I'd paper
  • 00:22:00
    this paper came out which in my mind
  • 00:22:02
    really homes in the the final conclusion
  • 00:22:06
    how important it is to recognize the
  • 00:22:08
    need to now become stewards of the whole
  • 00:22:10
    planet what you see here is a timeline
  • 00:22:13
    from the future in the year 2100 all the
  • 00:22:17
    way back here is 1 million years 3
  • 00:22:19
    million years here's 60 million years
  • 00:22:21
    back and on the y-axis you have average
  • 00:22:23
    temperature on earth now the drama is
  • 00:22:27
    here you have the Garden of Eden right
  • 00:22:29
    here and what you see in this line is
  • 00:22:33
    that if we continue business as usual
  • 00:22:34
    and reach four degrees Celsius by end of
  • 00:22:37
    this century we are winding back the
  • 00:22:40
    climate clock you know well behind the
  • 00:22:44
    Holocene but even beyond 1 million years
  • 00:22:47
    actually beyond 3/5 we are winding back
  • 00:22:50
    the clock - as far as we know today -
  • 00:22:53
    the conditions on earth as they were
  • 00:22:55
    some 10 to 20 million years ago that's
  • 00:22:59
    what's happening in a blink of time the
  • 00:23:01
    industry evolution of 200 years so this
  • 00:23:04
    is the drama we are now really in the
  • 00:23:08
    Anthropocene fiddling with the whole
  • 00:23:11
    system just a few months back colleagues
  • 00:23:14
    at the Potsdam Institute reinforced this
  • 00:23:16
    even further in what I would argue
  • 00:23:17
    almost like the most humble recognition
  • 00:23:20
    of why we have to take care of the
  • 00:23:21
    planet showing that over the last 3
  • 00:23:23
    million years this is 3 million years on
  • 00:23:25
    the x-axis here you have average
  • 00:23:27
    temperature on earth this line here is 2
  • 00:23:30
    degrees so with the best possible
  • 00:23:33
    analysis and modeling we've done today
  • 00:23:35
    we can say that for the last 3 million
  • 00:23:38
    years which is called the Pleistocene
  • 00:23:40
    era which is the era when the planner
  • 00:23:42
    has been configured roughly with the
  • 00:23:44
    same continental configuration as we
  • 00:23:46
    know it today we have not been beyond 2
  • 00:23:49
    degrees just shows us how much it
  • 00:23:52
    matters that we today act so what does
  • 00:23:54
    this mean then solution why so let me
  • 00:23:56
    just try to take this then to - a new
  • 00:23:59
    framework for for the future now the
  • 00:24:03
    conclusion then becomes the following
  • 00:24:04
    that if we are in the Anthropocene if we
  • 00:24:06
    are at risk of causing tipping points
  • 00:24:09
    and if we depend on the Garden of Eden
  • 00:24:11
    as a Holocene of course if you sum this
  • 00:24:13
    together the conclusion is that we need
  • 00:24:15
    to now ask two questions what are the
  • 00:24:18
    environmental systems that regulates the
  • 00:24:21
    state of the planet and what can science
  • 00:24:23
    say on defining a safe operating space
  • 00:24:26
    for us to be able to stay in the
  • 00:24:29
    Holocene to avoid that the Anthropocene
  • 00:24:32
    pushes us irreversibly away from a
  • 00:24:34
    manageable state on earth that becomes
  • 00:24:37
    the planetary boundary framework and the
  • 00:24:40
    planet bounded frame
  • 00:24:41
    defines the nine systems that we as
  • 00:24:43
    scientists have shown now quite clearly
  • 00:24:46
    regulates the state of the planet which
  • 00:24:48
    is not only climate it's also the oceans
  • 00:24:50
    the stratospheric ozone layer its land
  • 00:24:52
    water nutrients and biodiversity
  • 00:24:56
    chemicals and aerosols nine big systems
  • 00:24:59
    that as far as we know if we can keep
  • 00:25:02
    them within the green safe operating
  • 00:25:04
    space you see on this graph quantify for
  • 00:25:06
    seven of the nine we have a good chance
  • 00:25:09
    of having a chance a good future for
  • 00:25:12
    Humanity as you see here in yellow in
  • 00:25:15
    red we are actually transgressing four
  • 00:25:17
    of the nine boundaries climate land
  • 00:25:20
    nutrients and biodiversity so we are in
  • 00:25:22
    a danger point but science also is clear
  • 00:25:25
    the window is still open to take
  • 00:25:27
    ourselves back because the planet is so
  • 00:25:29
    remarkably resilient that we still can
  • 00:25:32
    see good abilities to actually help us
  • 00:25:35
    buffer a journey back that is at least a
  • 00:25:38
    manageable state for the planet but we
  • 00:25:40
    have some warning signs that this
  • 00:25:41
    science is correct one of them is the
  • 00:25:43
    jet stream the jet stream which is the
  • 00:25:46
    high latitude high speed wind patterns
  • 00:25:50
    that regulates high and low pressure
  • 00:25:52
    weather systems in the northern
  • 00:25:53
    hemisphere which is showing increasingly
  • 00:25:56
    patterns of losing its harmonious
  • 00:26:00
    configuration due to actually the rapid
  • 00:26:03
    melt of ice and the Arctic which
  • 00:26:05
    releases large levels of heat and slows
  • 00:26:09
    down this whole system which has led to
  • 00:26:12
    conclusions that the jet stream is
  • 00:26:13
    increasingly becoming weird which could
  • 00:26:15
    explain which we've seen in several
  • 00:26:17
    scientific papers now the explanations
  • 00:26:20
    behind extreme heat waves and and cold
  • 00:26:22
    periods in Canada the u.s. the Nordics
  • 00:26:26
    part of the northern hemisphere
  • 00:26:28
    depending on these weather systems we
  • 00:26:31
    have also increasing evidence that the
  • 00:26:33
    ocean planetary boundary is fundamental
  • 00:26:35
    with a slowing down of the ocean
  • 00:26:38
    conveyor belt that kind of transports
  • 00:26:41
    energy through the planet and that this
  • 00:26:44
    slowdown of the conveyor belt is at risk
  • 00:26:47
    of also impacting the livability in
  • 00:26:50
    parts of the northern hemisphere not
  • 00:26:51
    least my own home can't
  • 00:26:52
    Sweden because of a slowdown in the Gulf
  • 00:26:55
    Stream and that this is now established
  • 00:26:57
    in the latest science not least led by
  • 00:26:59
    the Potsdam Institute so we see signals
  • 00:27:01
    that we are actually seeing these cracks
  • 00:27:03
    in the ability of the planet to remain
  • 00:27:06
    stable and what really makes me nervous
  • 00:27:08
    is that we've always thought that the
  • 00:27:10
    Arctic is the most sensitive system and
  • 00:27:12
    the untargeted is so stable but
  • 00:27:14
    increasingly science shows that the West
  • 00:27:15
    Antarctic ice shelf is probably more
  • 00:27:17
    vulnerable than we previously thought so
  • 00:27:20
    there are so much so many pieces of
  • 00:27:23
    evidence that we really need to take
  • 00:27:25
    care of the system and as you know I
  • 00:27:28
    rated one degree Celsius warming we are
  • 00:27:30
    on a path where we're even sea level
  • 00:27:31
    rise is now through satellite data
  • 00:27:34
    proving to become a point where we are
  • 00:27:37
    20 centimeter sea level rise now and we
  • 00:27:39
    are on a journey towards at least one
  • 00:27:42
    meter sea level rise by the end of this
  • 00:27:43
    century if we do not cross thresholds
  • 00:27:46
    and move too fast in a direction that
  • 00:27:48
    can take us beyond a point a
  • 00:27:50
    manageability for large parts of coastal
  • 00:27:52
    nations in the world so that's the story
  • 00:27:55
    that's the diagnostic let me then spend
  • 00:27:58
    the last 10 minutes just to say how can
  • 00:28:00
    we translate this interaction how can we
  • 00:28:03
    avoid situations like this where we move
  • 00:28:05
    from the Holocene into unmanageable sea
  • 00:28:08
    level rise of 10 meters plus in the
  • 00:28:11
    world which would put so many billions
  • 00:28:13
    of people under really really
  • 00:28:15
    devastating conditions now to match this
  • 00:28:18
    challenge together with Christiana
  • 00:28:20
    Figueres who's led us in the successful
  • 00:28:23
    Paris negotiations and her mission 2020
  • 00:28:26
    2020 about bending the global curve of
  • 00:28:28
    emissions no late to the next year to
  • 00:28:31
    follow the scientific necessities we
  • 00:28:33
    presented the global climate action
  • 00:28:35
    summit in San Francisco last year for
  • 00:28:38
    the first time an assessment of whether
  • 00:28:41
    it is possible to follow the IPCC 1.5
  • 00:28:44
    degrees Celsius reports conclusion
  • 00:28:46
    mainly that we need to cut emissions by
  • 00:28:48
    half by 2030 to follow a pathway that
  • 00:28:52
    can take us towards 1.5 degrees Celsius
  • 00:28:55
    warming now that was a challenge but it
  • 00:29:00
    was also inspired by some
  • 00:29:03
    really frustrating outcomes we've seen
  • 00:29:05
    over the inability to recognize
  • 00:29:08
    disruptive innovation exponential change
  • 00:29:11
    particularly in in the entrepreneurial
  • 00:29:15
    sector you may have seen this graph this
  • 00:29:17
    is kind of a classic today with the
  • 00:29:19
    world's International Energy Agency
  • 00:29:22
    doing its World Energy Outlook each each
  • 00:29:26
    here on photovoltaics in the world and
  • 00:29:29
    what you see here is on each flat line
  • 00:29:32
    their efforts of projecting what's the
  • 00:29:35
    best possible projections on
  • 00:29:37
    developments on solar voltaics and you
  • 00:29:40
    can see that each year they simply
  • 00:29:42
    underestimate and the black line is the
  • 00:29:43
    actual observed installations of
  • 00:29:46
    photovoltaics which means that
  • 00:29:48
    predicting nonlinear change is very
  • 00:29:51
    difficult when you are still in an
  • 00:29:52
    incremental linear mode and that the
  • 00:29:54
    world is nonlinear also on the solution
  • 00:29:57
    side not only on the risk side so we
  • 00:30:00
    took the latest evidence on solar
  • 00:30:02
    voltaics and wind and could show that we
  • 00:30:05
    are today on an exponential journey what
  • 00:30:07
    you see here is from 2000 to 2013 the
  • 00:30:11
    first 15 years here is actually
  • 00:30:13
    observations and on the y-axis you have
  • 00:30:16
    installation of electricity globally and
  • 00:30:20
    its percentage in the global electricity
  • 00:30:23
    mix at the world scale now this looks
  • 00:30:26
    very limited and insignificant which is
  • 00:30:30
    correct is from 0.8% to 2.8 percent in
  • 00:30:33
    15 years but it follows an exponential
  • 00:30:35
    path it actually doubles every 4.5 years
  • 00:30:39
    now for those of you who remember your
  • 00:30:42
    high school mathematics or perhaps are
  • 00:30:44
    involved in Exponential's with today as
  • 00:30:47
    I'm sure many of you are know that if
  • 00:30:49
    you follow a path like this it may
  • 00:30:51
    appear very limited in the beginning but
  • 00:30:53
    if you project this to the future and in
  • 00:30:55
    this line here we took a conservative
  • 00:30:57
    assessment of also what's realistic we
  • 00:31:00
    see that this is an exponential curve
  • 00:31:02
    that would actually by 2030 take us to a
  • 00:31:05
    point where 50 percent 5 0 percent of
  • 00:31:08
    electricity in the world would come from
  • 00:31:10
    solar and wind
  • 00:31:11
    business as usual even in a conservative
  • 00:31:15
    assessment now same goes for other
  • 00:31:18
    parameters which actually surprised even
  • 00:31:20
    us to the left here you have the number
  • 00:31:22
    of countries in the world that by 2010
  • 00:31:25
    and projected to 2020 have decoupled
  • 00:31:27
    economic growth from greenhouse gas
  • 00:31:29
    emissions 2010 as was 49 countries 2020
  • 00:31:34
    is projected be 53 countries and these
  • 00:31:36
    are not just the Nordics of the world
  • 00:31:38
    these are representing 40 percent of
  • 00:31:40
    global emissions now 50 countries is
  • 00:31:44
    quite interesting because as you know
  • 00:31:46
    better than than I do when you're
  • 00:31:47
    introducing innovation on the market the
  • 00:31:50
    valley of death is crossed when you
  • 00:31:52
    reach something like a 15 percent
  • 00:31:53
    penetration of the market and can really
  • 00:31:56
    start scaling your new ideas well what
  • 00:31:59
    if the same goes for alliances of
  • 00:32:02
    nations changing 50 countries happens to
  • 00:32:06
    be roughly 25% of the countries in the
  • 00:32:08
    world we have roughly 196 countries in
  • 00:32:12
    the world now what of this large enough
  • 00:32:16
    minority starts tipping over the
  • 00:32:19
    majority towards an inevitable journey
  • 00:32:21
    towards decarbonisation and we can see
  • 00:32:24
    evidence of similar types of change on
  • 00:32:26
    the right hand side here which is the
  • 00:32:27
    number of countries that have adopted a
  • 00:32:30
    price on carbon we fight over this all
  • 00:32:32
    the time we see difficulties in adopting
  • 00:32:35
    a global price on carbon there's so much
  • 00:32:37
    scientific support and my dear colleague
  • 00:32:40
    co-director the Paulson Institute
  • 00:32:41
    professor Ottman Hofer shows clearly
  • 00:32:44
    that a price on carbon is an absolute
  • 00:32:46
    prerequisite to be able to scale and
  • 00:32:48
    exponentially decarbonize the world's
  • 00:32:51
    energy system but it's so difficult to
  • 00:32:53
    get political support but imagine we
  • 00:32:55
    have 50 countries today that have
  • 00:32:58
    adopted a price on carbon
  • 00:32:59
    again we're approaching this 25 percent
  • 00:33:02
    point of a large enough minority showing
  • 00:33:06
    that a price on carbon actually makes
  • 00:33:08
    sense
  • 00:33:08
    also for sustainable economic
  • 00:33:11
    development we went through sector by
  • 00:33:13
    sector showing that with current
  • 00:33:15
    technologies we can actually cut
  • 00:33:17
    emissions by half by 2030 with with
  • 00:33:20
    practices that we have today
  • 00:33:22
    it requires policies
  • 00:33:24
    and require investments but it can be
  • 00:33:26
    done now the question is are we moving
  • 00:33:29
    in the right direction unfortunately the
  • 00:33:31
    answer is is really the punch in the
  • 00:33:34
    stomach and and I think we need that as
  • 00:33:37
    a closing remark here so this is a
  • 00:33:39
    fantastic paper from dear colleagues at
  • 00:33:44
    at Leeds University in the UK for the
  • 00:33:47
    first time taking the planets are
  • 00:33:48
    bounded framework and checking how
  • 00:33:50
    countries are doing and what you see
  • 00:33:51
    here on the x-axis is the number of
  • 00:33:53
    planetary boundaries that are
  • 00:33:54
    transgressed so the further to the right
  • 00:33:56
    the worse we're doing that the more of
  • 00:33:59
    the boundaries we are moving out of the
  • 00:34:01
    safe operating space and on the y-axis
  • 00:34:03
    you here you have on the list different
  • 00:34:06
    human development indexes showing
  • 00:34:10
    aspirational goals that we all value so
  • 00:34:13
    much longevity Human Development Index
  • 00:34:16
    economic growth kids in school health
  • 00:34:20
    indicators so the further up you are the
  • 00:34:22
    better we are at delivery on sustainable
  • 00:34:25
    development goals so where do we want to
  • 00:34:27
    be well we want to be up in this
  • 00:34:29
    left-hand corner where we are on the
  • 00:34:31
    safe operating space achieving good
  • 00:34:33
    social economic development I cannot see
  • 00:34:36
    one country up there that the dots here
  • 00:34:38
    are the countries in the world the rich
  • 00:34:40
    country of the world are in this upper
  • 00:34:43
    right hand corner that's where we have
  • 00:34:44
    Germany that's where we have Sweden so
  • 00:34:46
    today unfortunately we're still in a
  • 00:34:48
    mode where we're delivering on social
  • 00:34:51
    economic human wellbeing at the expense
  • 00:34:53
    of the planet she is paying and we need
  • 00:34:57
    to transition rapidly up to this
  • 00:34:59
    equitable sustainable left-hand corner
  • 00:35:02
    where we see no countries today so how
  • 00:35:05
    can we do that well I think the mind
  • 00:35:07
    shift is required that humanity's future
  • 00:35:09
    is at stake and we now need to redefine
  • 00:35:12
    sustainable development
  • 00:35:14
    I would redefine sustainable development
  • 00:35:16
    for the first time linking people and
  • 00:35:19
    planet we are no longer in incremental
  • 00:35:22
    mode this is the transformative moment
  • 00:35:24
    we need to now exponentially and in a
  • 00:35:27
    disruptive way move along a path that
  • 00:35:30
    can cut emissions by half every decade
  • 00:35:33
    that's the carbon law inspired by
  • 00:35:36
    Moore's law by the way
  • 00:35:37
    and I would define sustainable
  • 00:35:38
    development in the 21st century deepened
  • 00:35:41
    in Anthropocene as prosperity and equity
  • 00:35:44
    within planetary boundaries we need
  • 00:35:47
    equity and prosperity for people on a
  • 00:35:50
    stable planet and perhaps as a closing
  • 00:35:53
    closing remark what could help is
  • 00:35:55
    something that helps me at least
  • 00:35:57
    personally which is to recognize that up
  • 00:36:00
    until recently we were still a
  • 00:36:03
    relatively small world on a big planet
  • 00:36:05
    this is why I would not accuse climate
  • 00:36:08
    sceptics too much I wouldn't accuse too
  • 00:36:10
    much conventional economists and and all
  • 00:36:12
    those who live still and this belief
  • 00:36:14
    that we can just continue linearly to
  • 00:36:16
    exploit here and waste there they still
  • 00:36:19
    live in this old paradigm that the
  • 00:36:21
    planet is so big it can cope it can
  • 00:36:24
    simply deal with our unsustainable
  • 00:36:27
    pressures and simply deliver free
  • 00:36:29
    subsidy to our economic development but
  • 00:36:32
    no science is now clear we have quite
  • 00:36:35
    recently flipped over and today we are
  • 00:36:39
    the big world on a small planet the
  • 00:36:42
    planet is very small and we are the big
  • 00:36:45
    world and we've saturated those system
  • 00:36:47
    and we have to take care of the whole
  • 00:36:49
    system and the sustainable development
  • 00:36:51
    goals the framework that was adopted by
  • 00:36:53
    the General Assembly in 2015 is the
  • 00:36:56
    first framework the only framework we
  • 00:36:58
    have to succeed in that direction
  • 00:37:00
    there's 17 aspirational goals that for
  • 00:37:02
    the first time integrates people and
  • 00:37:05
    planet the problems dear friends is that
  • 00:37:08
    this aspiring agenda is still handled
  • 00:37:11
    largely you know I would call it like
  • 00:37:13
    like a Swedish smeargle board basically
  • 00:37:16
    countries just pick their little
  • 00:37:19
    favorites among these 17 goals I would
  • 00:37:22
    say that today there's a scientific
  • 00:37:24
    support to reconfigure these 17 goals
  • 00:37:27
    into what I call the wedding cake the
  • 00:37:30
    wedding cake is that we have four goals
  • 00:37:32
    that are non-negotiable that are the
  • 00:37:35
    planetary boundaries goals six for water
  • 00:37:37
    go 13 14 15 for oceans biodiversity and
  • 00:37:42
    climate they are the planet they are the
  • 00:37:46
    guardrails
  • 00:37:47
    they provide the non-negotiable
  • 00:37:49
    scientific platform
  • 00:37:50
    for our ability to have aspirational
  • 00:37:53
    goals for society to be disruptive to be
  • 00:37:56
    innovative to be equitable to really
  • 00:37:58
    have a good future for Humanity within
  • 00:38:01
    the safe operating space for Humanity
  • 00:38:04
    so my scientific message to leave you
  • 00:38:06
    with is simply this one put the
  • 00:38:09
    sustainable development goals inside the
  • 00:38:11
    planetary boundaries and I think we have
  • 00:38:14
    a chance to transform into that window
  • 00:38:16
    that is still open but it's only open
  • 00:38:18
    for a limited time so it's wonderful to
  • 00:38:22
    have this opportunity to exchange with
  • 00:38:23
    you and to kind of contribute towards a
  • 00:38:26
    dialogue and a momentum towards a
  • 00:38:28
    sustainable future for Humanity on earth
  • 00:38:30
    thank you so much
  • 00:38:32
    [Applause]
  • 00:38:41
    [Music]
  • 00:38:43
    [Applause]
  • 00:38:56
    and right now we have a little time for
  • 00:39:00
    questions if you have any questions
  • 00:39:02
    raise your hand yeah hi thank you that
  • 00:39:09
    was a really great talk
  • 00:39:10
    um I'm a social entrepreneur we're
  • 00:39:13
    producing solar generators 200 watt 12
  • 00:39:16
    volt from actually panels who normally
  • 00:39:18
    would get this discarded and this for
  • 00:39:21
    rural electrification for example you
  • 00:39:23
    just said that there's a lack of
  • 00:39:25
    acknowledging disruptive enterpreneur
  • 00:39:28
    ideas and I feel like I feel like I feel
  • 00:39:30
    that actually quite a bit because people
  • 00:39:32
    like oh yeah that's a great idea but
  • 00:39:34
    does that actually really bring enough
  • 00:39:36
    profit um do you have a tip for an
  • 00:39:40
    entrepreneur who is actually really
  • 00:39:42
    aligned with a sustainable development
  • 00:39:43
    cost how to reach like the next level
  • 00:39:47
    how can we be heard by the people who
  • 00:39:50
    are always saying the private sector has
  • 00:39:51
    to do something no I'm like I'm doing
  • 00:39:53
    something but so if no one is listening
  • 00:39:56
    well actually I think that many in the
  • 00:39:59
    audience here are much better placed to
  • 00:40:01
    answer that question I mean I would of
  • 00:40:03
    course encourage you to just push your
  • 00:40:07
    passion for the ideas you have but I
  • 00:40:09
    think that and then probably many of you
  • 00:40:12
    are in the room as well I mean that I I
  • 00:40:14
    see I get knocks on my door all the time
  • 00:40:18
    with you know private equity fund
  • 00:40:23
    managers or philanthropists and
  • 00:40:26
    different actors that are now trying to
  • 00:40:29
    put really that the mouth behind the
  • 00:40:33
    action on investing into new ventures
  • 00:40:36
    and I think that the challenge today is
  • 00:40:38
    to match good ideas as yours with with
  • 00:40:41
    investment capital and I think we we see
  • 00:40:45
    increasingly that there's a there's a
  • 00:40:47
    mismatch on how to connect the
  • 00:40:49
    investment the money with the ideas and
  • 00:40:53
    I think that's why these kind of
  • 00:40:56
    platforms were publicly are absolutely
  • 00:40:57
    fundamental but definitely I think
  • 00:41:00
    there's also something emerging
  • 00:41:02
    increasingly which is partnerships
  • 00:41:05
    between science policy and business
  • 00:41:08
    that can also unleash some some of these
  • 00:41:10
    new ventures because in in the past that
  • 00:41:13
    was always like science policy and then
  • 00:41:15
    policy detecting business but now
  • 00:41:18
    increasing I think we see partnerships
  • 00:41:20
    between the three and I think that can
  • 00:41:22
    also you know potentially help in
  • 00:41:25
    opening doors for new ideas as well but
  • 00:41:27
    it's of course a challenge I see that
  • 00:41:32
    are there any more questions
  • 00:41:37
    hi thank you very much and I feel after
  • 00:41:41
    so many years of bad news I have like a
  • 00:41:43
    deep climate change depression and I
  • 00:41:47
    just like I don't know ten years just
  • 00:41:50
    healed so short can you detect make me
  • 00:41:54
    be a little bit less climate change
  • 00:41:56
    depressed hmm yeah well say it's a two
  • 00:42:03
    to two answers that the first one is
  • 00:42:06
    that I will I respect climate depression
  • 00:42:10
    I would though quite strongly try to
  • 00:42:15
    urge you not to be depressed I would
  • 00:42:17
    rather you to be angry to be honest I
  • 00:42:21
    think it's I think it's it's
  • 00:42:29
    and I really mean it I mean it's it's
  • 00:42:31
    time for us I think to to use the the
  • 00:42:36
    fear and and and the sense of you know
  • 00:42:39
    of emotional reaction and and depression
  • 00:42:41
    into into you know reaction and and I
  • 00:42:47
    would strongly encourage that actually
  • 00:42:50
    that's I mean I I respect it but I think
  • 00:42:52
    we now need need more kind of disruptive
  • 00:42:56
    behavior as well that's one secondly I
  • 00:42:58
    am personally convinced that putting all
  • 00:43:02
    the cards on the table is absolutely
  • 00:43:04
    necessary I mean however uncomfortable
  • 00:43:06
    it is we in the scientific community I
  • 00:43:09
    mean to be honest if there's a red
  • 00:43:11
    thread in science it is that we have
  • 00:43:13
    unwi have under predicted we have we
  • 00:43:15
    have actually underestimated the pace of
  • 00:43:17
    change that's a self-criticism of
  • 00:43:20
    science and it is important to recognize
  • 00:43:23
    that that now science is stepping out of
  • 00:43:26
    its comfort zone and and is because it's
  • 00:43:28
    it's becoming so nervous of all the
  • 00:43:30
    evidence we're seeing so so I would say
  • 00:43:33
    even from that perspective I I'd rather
  • 00:43:35
    you know if the house is burning we'd
  • 00:43:37
    rather report that it is burning then
  • 00:43:39
    kind of tend to always have this this
  • 00:43:43
    tendency of trying to be too too overly
  • 00:43:48
    careful in the way we present the data
  • 00:43:51
    and and quite frankly the reason why
  • 00:43:54
    there is reason to be deeply concerned
  • 00:43:56
    today is that when you lay the whole
  • 00:43:58
    puzzle on the table which is not only
  • 00:44:00
    about emission of greenhouse gases it's
  • 00:44:02
    not only temperature rise but it's also
  • 00:44:03
    what is happening with ecosystems and
  • 00:44:06
    biodiversity that's when you get the
  • 00:44:08
    whole picture so there's something
  • 00:44:10
    valuable I think with putting the cards
  • 00:44:13
    on the table the final point though
  • 00:44:16
    which I really give you have full full
  • 00:44:19
    credit for is that I think we as
  • 00:44:21
    scientists should not be allowed to just
  • 00:44:25
    give the negatives we should also be
  • 00:44:27
    forced always to say you know so what so
  • 00:44:29
    what do we do then and I realized I
  • 00:44:32
    spent very much time on the negatives
  • 00:44:35
    and not summertime on on the solutions
  • 00:44:37
    here but I think I hope at least I gave
  • 00:44:40
    you know a signal also that that we
  • 00:44:43
    start seeing there's turbulence on the
  • 00:44:45
    risk side but is also turbulence on the
  • 00:44:47
    solution side and that's why this is a
  • 00:44:49
    very exciting moment actually because
  • 00:44:51
    I've never experienced so much momentum
  • 00:44:54
    and willingness to move and I've never
  • 00:44:56
    seen so many solutions there's so much
  • 00:44:59
    energy in in in the whole climate agenda
  • 00:45:04
    looking twenty years thirty years back
  • 00:45:08
    so in that sense I think we have to
  • 00:45:11
    match the depressive side with the
  • 00:45:14
    solution side but I really thank your I
  • 00:45:16
    think your your testimony of what very
  • 00:45:19
    many feel I can also feel that sometimes
  • 00:45:23
    [Applause]
  • 00:45:23
    [Music]
  • 00:45:30
    question down the hall there thank you
  • 00:45:33
    for that on that very last point I mean
  • 00:45:35
    I've worked in clean energy for ten
  • 00:45:38
    years as specifically storage and system
  • 00:45:40
    integration and I was very heartening to
  • 00:45:42
    see your prediction of how wind and
  • 00:45:45
    solar would go up but also from my
  • 00:45:48
    experience in working in this space I
  • 00:45:50
    mean we for the last ten years
  • 00:45:51
    specifically in Germany we've had all
  • 00:45:53
    the technology and politicians always
  • 00:45:55
    say we didn't have the technology that's
  • 00:45:57
    not true we we have the technology and a
  • 00:46:00
    lot of it is digital by the way and but
  • 00:46:02
    we're not implementing it and we're not
  • 00:46:05
    doing it even though we a lot of her has
  • 00:46:07
    happened I agree in the last ten years
  • 00:46:09
    so so how do we get the politicians to
  • 00:46:12
    really start implementing the solutions
  • 00:46:15
    that already then that would even create
  • 00:46:17
    cheap energy but they're not being
  • 00:46:20
    implemented and you know just one
  • 00:46:23
    example we trade electricity in
  • 00:46:26
    15-minute intervals when each of us has
  • 00:46:28
    this in their pocket and we could be
  • 00:46:31
    directly using solar energy directly but
  • 00:46:35
    politicians are not willing to do that
  • 00:46:37
    hmm I think well you're putting your
  • 00:46:41
    finger on what is that the big challenge
  • 00:46:44
    we're facing which is that we have all
  • 00:46:46
    the evidence we need that we're facing
  • 00:46:48
    very big risks we have the solutions and
  • 00:46:52
    still we're not moving at scale and that
  • 00:46:54
    a large part of that is is that we don't
  • 00:46:58
    have the political leadership to unleash
  • 00:47:00
    to provide the incentives that can take
  • 00:47:02
    us in the right direction so so why is
  • 00:47:05
    that or why aren't we moving I think is
  • 00:47:07
    is the history and of the Holy Grail of
  • 00:47:09
    how we can solve this this challenge and
  • 00:47:12
    I think is well to begin with
  • 00:47:15
    unfortunately for us we are at a point
  • 00:47:18
    where we have a relatively speaking weak
  • 00:47:21
    political leadership in the world and I
  • 00:47:23
    think that's very unfortunate we don't
  • 00:47:26
    have I mean again I would look back at
  • 00:47:29
    your many perhaps being the exception
  • 00:47:32
    among all countries in the world you I
  • 00:47:33
    mean here you have Chancellor Angela
  • 00:47:35
    Merkel is is a strong leader I mean
  • 00:47:39
    she's struggling with domestic affairs
  • 00:47:42
    here but you have just gone through
  • 00:47:43
    the coal Commission you have discussions
  • 00:47:46
    on a climate climate law I think there's
  • 00:47:49
    there's opportunity here but if you look
  • 00:47:51
    at the European Union at large today it
  • 00:47:54
    is not showing the leadership we need to
  • 00:47:57
    match exactly your point we don't see it
  • 00:48:00
    in the u.s. we don't see it in China
  • 00:48:02
    despite the fact that they have the
  • 00:48:03
    opportunity for it so I think the only
  • 00:48:06
    chance we have today is that we start
  • 00:48:09
    seeing you know more civil movement
  • 00:48:12
    together with business that kind of
  • 00:48:14
    entrepreneurs and civil society really
  • 00:48:17
    showing the direction that that let's
  • 00:48:21
    say societies want to move and why this
  • 00:48:24
    can work I think is that the political
  • 00:48:27
    leadership is is today you know you
  • 00:48:31
    could turn around the weakness and
  • 00:48:32
    leadership into something positive
  • 00:48:33
    meaning that they're quite reactive and
  • 00:48:35
    therefore also following opinions very
  • 00:48:38
    carefully they're the kind of reactive
  • 00:48:40
    political leadership rather than the
  • 00:48:41
    kind of political leadership that you
  • 00:48:43
    would normally expect as as leading
  • 00:48:44
    properly so in that sense I think the
  • 00:48:47
    pressure points are really important so
  • 00:48:49
    for example I think again I'm coming
  • 00:48:51
    back to the Friday's Fridays for climate
  • 00:48:55
    the the the whole youth movement I think
  • 00:48:57
    as you may know that has been matched by
  • 00:49:00
    the science for the future which is
  • 00:49:03
    quite extraordinary actually that over
  • 00:49:05
    20,000 German scientists signed on a
  • 00:49:09
    letter giving its full scientific
  • 00:49:11
    support for the youth movement which is
  • 00:49:13
    unprecedented I mean that scientists
  • 00:49:15
    would would would actually lend its its
  • 00:49:18
    its support in that sense now will that
  • 00:49:22
    be enough it's a big question because of
  • 00:49:26
    the of the limited time we have but I
  • 00:49:28
    think the only we have to play all the
  • 00:49:30
    cards at this point and I think we
  • 00:49:33
    simply need to give constructive
  • 00:49:36
    pressure on the political system
  • 00:49:46
    whether questionnaire from the front row
  • 00:49:49
    so how many of you have come by plane so
  • 00:49:53
    the idea is Mike my absolute conviction
  • 00:49:56
    I'm a lieutenant that there is no
  • 00:49:59
    reduction of the climate change without
  • 00:50:01
    sacrifice of some comfort so here are
  • 00:50:05
    many many people who cheer up for
  • 00:50:07
    Friday's for future and greater and are
  • 00:50:11
    really concerned about the climate but
  • 00:50:13
    nobody wants to sacrifice sacrifice
  • 00:50:15
    anything hmm
  • 00:50:17
    yeah no so here you know I kind of it's
  • 00:50:27
    a very important issue you bring up here
  • 00:50:29
    and let me kind of give a little bit of
  • 00:50:33
    a deeper reflection on that actually
  • 00:50:35
    which is may come across as not
  • 00:50:39
    automatically the most comfortable
  • 00:50:42
    conclusion I I agree with you and there
  • 00:50:46
    is a big lifestyle changes required for
  • 00:50:49
    us to succeed in a transformation to a
  • 00:50:51
    sustainable future at the same time one
  • 00:50:55
    has to recognize that we have been
  • 00:50:57
    struggling yeah I mean I've been part of
  • 00:51:00
    the environmental movement as perhaps
  • 00:51:01
    many of you for the last you know 30
  • 00:51:04
    years and the environmental movement
  • 00:51:06
    have been struggling since since Rachel
  • 00:51:09
    Carson and the Silent Spring in 1962 and
  • 00:51:12
    and largely failing and it has failed to
  • 00:51:17
    a large extent because the environmental
  • 00:51:19
    movement has been pushing so hard on on
  • 00:51:22
    environmental values in a such a good
  • 00:51:24
    way but it has therefore also reached
  • 00:51:26
    only a a minority of the citizens in any
  • 00:51:31
    given society because as long as the
  • 00:51:34
    story has always been that it's about
  • 00:51:35
    protecting nature we humans are bad and
  • 00:51:38
    the only solution is to sacrifice the
  • 00:51:40
    only solution is to give up and to move
  • 00:51:43
    away from from what is perceived at
  • 00:51:46
    least wrongly in many cases but
  • 00:51:48
    perceived at least to be let's say a
  • 00:51:50
    modern way of life that has a tendency
  • 00:51:53
    in countries like Germany and Sweden
  • 00:51:55
    which I would argue are are at the
  • 00:51:57
    forefront of
  • 00:51:58
    success in the environmental movement it
  • 00:52:01
    kind of hits a ceiling at 15% of the
  • 00:52:03
    populations you don't you don't reach
  • 00:52:06
    outside of the educated quite well you
  • 00:52:11
    know aware and an unreasonably income
  • 00:52:14
    level part of society but now we are at
  • 00:52:18
    a situation where the entire societies
  • 00:52:21
    have to become sustainable we have to
  • 00:52:22
    have hundred percent decarbonisation and
  • 00:52:25
    we have to have hundred percent
  • 00:52:26
    sustainable societies across the whole
  • 00:52:29
    value chains and in every secretary in
  • 00:52:31
    society so how can you get you know the
  • 00:52:34
    world to transport itself in a
  • 00:52:38
    sustainable way I think that the that
  • 00:52:41
    the solutions is therefore not to go out
  • 00:52:44
    and simply say stop flying I mean that
  • 00:52:47
    that would be like the only message
  • 00:52:49
    because I think that that just just
  • 00:52:51
    creates a deeper rift between the aware
  • 00:52:55
    environmental movement and everyone who
  • 00:52:57
    just says oh no I'm not gonna I'm not
  • 00:52:59
    gonna sacrifice that and therefore I
  • 00:53:01
    rather put my head in the sand and and
  • 00:53:04
    create my own little fake news story of
  • 00:53:07
    something that will somehow make this
  • 00:53:10
    not happen so therefore I think the
  • 00:53:13
    solution for us to succeed to really
  • 00:53:15
    have even the in does indifferent
  • 00:53:17
    majority to surf along with us is to you
  • 00:53:22
    know show that sustainability is the
  • 00:53:24
    entry point for a better life that we
  • 00:53:26
    can achieve better quality of life not
  • 00:53:30
    just through by consuming and and
  • 00:53:32
    unnecessarily flying when we don't need
  • 00:53:34
    to yeah of course of course
  • 00:53:37
    as in all forms of excessive consumption
  • 00:53:43
    right and and we know by the way as
  • 00:53:45
    you've seen the graph certainly that
  • 00:53:47
    increased consumption just makes human
  • 00:53:49
    wellbeing better up to a certain point
  • 00:53:51
    after that we don't get happier and we
  • 00:53:53
    certainly don't get healthier and we
  • 00:53:55
    just go kind of gradually downhill so we
  • 00:53:58
    have to start really I think changing
  • 00:54:00
    the story to show the sustainability is
  • 00:54:02
    is to be cool it is the healthy it is
  • 00:54:05
    the better it is that the more
  • 00:54:07
    attractive path is the more modern
  • 00:54:09
    pathways
  • 00:54:10
    the Tesla future and and that is a
  • 00:54:13
    difference it's a different tack of how
  • 00:54:16
    to take this story along and I agree
  • 00:54:18
    with you that you know at the early
  • 00:54:21
    stages it must mean changing also
  • 00:54:24
    behavior in the way in how much we use
  • 00:54:27
    cars and how much we consume and how
  • 00:54:28
    much we we fly but I think we would help
  • 00:54:32
    the world if we start telling the story
  • 00:54:35
    of how attractive sustainability is not
  • 00:54:37
    a sacrifice story and and that that's a
  • 00:54:40
    change and I think coming back to the
  • 00:54:42
    the question of the the fellow here
  • 00:54:44
    earlier on on solar will take the good
  • 00:54:47
    news is of course that we're starting to
  • 00:54:48
    see that we can accomplish that that we
  • 00:54:50
    have I don't know if you know this but
  • 00:54:53
    but I mean Harley Davidson in August
  • 00:54:57
    2019 is going to go electric I mean
  • 00:55:02
    isn't that kind of just the biggest
  • 00:55:03
    shock of the world I mean here you have
  • 00:55:06
    the die-hard oil loving petrol noise
  • 00:55:10
    boom running motorcyclists and then
  • 00:55:14
    harley-davidson is going electric it's
  • 00:55:16
    launching life wire it will continue to
  • 00:55:19
    produce of course also combustion engine
  • 00:55:21
    based but why is it doing this it's
  • 00:55:24
    doing this because it sees that a whole
  • 00:55:25
    new generation of young people is not so
  • 00:55:28
    attractive of these big combustion oil
  • 00:55:33
    run gasoline typed transport it is
  • 00:55:38
    cooler and and more advanced to go
  • 00:55:41
    electric and just into the future so
  • 00:55:45
    there's there's something happening here
  • 00:55:47
    which I think has to do with the new
  • 00:55:48
    story and and and I think you're the
  • 00:55:50
    best ones to tell it by the way so the
  • 00:55:53
    thing we have time for thank you very
  • 00:55:55
    much
  • 00:55:55
    this day for one very small question is
  • 00:56:00
    is it a short one okay give it a try
  • 00:56:04
    yeah I wanted to ask you because you
  • 00:56:08
    were talking about Freddy's for futures
  • 00:56:10
    early on what we as the younger
  • 00:56:13
    generation should or parents or teachers
  • 00:56:18
    when they say why don't you just go out
  • 00:56:20
    there and demonstrate for it out of
  • 00:56:22
    school because we were doing it in
  • 00:56:25
    school time I for my for me I know why
  • 00:56:30
    because otherwise the people or the
  • 00:56:33
    politicians wouldn't listen but what do
  • 00:56:36
    I have to tell my parents so they
  • 00:56:40
    support me in doing it do you have the
  • 00:56:43
    answer for that so so your question is
  • 00:56:54
    should I on stage and care encourage you
  • 00:56:56
    not to go to school so so and actually
  • 00:57:02
    my my answer is quite simple
  • 00:57:04
    you've done your homework it's time for
  • 00:57:07
    the adults to do their homework and and
  • 00:57:14
    I would say that you you've done it so
  • 00:57:18
    well that if that costs you a Friday
  • 00:57:22
    afternoon every second week that's fine
  • 00:57:24
    you'll be so well prepared for the
  • 00:57:26
    future that that will bypass the elder
  • 00:57:29
    generation in terms of intellectual
  • 00:57:31
    accomplishments I I'm all for what what
  • 00:57:34
    you're doing and we need more of it
  • 00:57:36
    thank you very much for their efforts
  • 00:57:42
    thank you very much thank you
  • 00:57:45
    [Applause]
  • 00:57:56
    [Music]
Tags
  • Climate Change
  • Environmental Impact
  • Anthropocene
  • Sustainability
  • Planetary Boundaries
  • Global Warming
  • Biodiversity Loss
  • Tipping Points
  • Future Generations
  • Ecological Stability