ANC distances itself from drunk SABC employee. SABC too.

00:21:50
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f05uOh1xPGQ

Resumo

TLDRIn a recent incident, an SABC employee's disruptive behavior on an SAA flight from Cape Town to Durban, while intoxicated, has become a viral topic on social media platforms. Before boarding, the employee consumed alcohol in the slow lounge, which led to unruly and belligerent conduct during the flight, including assaults on FlySafair staff. This incident has sparked discussions on whether an employer can discipline an employee for off-duty conduct. Legal precedents, such as the Edcon and Horn cases, establish that an employer can take disciplinary action if off-duty behavior causes reputational damage or impacts the relationship between the employer and employee. The SABC issued a statement condemning the employee's actions and mentioning a potential disciplinary process. The ANC also denounced the behavior. This incident highlights issues related to alcohol consumption near the New Year and societal entitlement among connected individuals. The video explores these themes and suggests that responsible behavior is critical during festive celebrations.

Conclusões

  • 📹 An SABC employee's unruly behavior on a flight went viral.
  • ✈️ The incident occurred on an SAA flight from Cape Town to Durban.
  • 👩‍✈️ The employee assaulted FlySafair staff during the incident.
  • 📜 Legal precedents allow disciplinary actions for off-duty conduct affecting reputations.
  • 📣 The SABC and ANC condemned the employee's actions.
  • 🍸 Alcohol consumption before flight contributed to the incident.
  • 💼 Off-duty behavior affecting employment relationships can lead to dismissal.
  • 📱 Social media plays a role in spreading and examining these events.
  • ⚖️ Previous cases illustrate permissible employer interventions for non-workplace behavior.
  • 🎉 Responsible behavior is emphasized, especially during festive times.
  • 👀 Public and organizations responded critically to the employee's actions.
  • 🗞️ Media coverage and social media amplified the incident's visibility.

Linha do tempo

  • 00:00:00 - 00:05:00

    An SABC employee was involved in a controversial incident on a flight, where her unruly and belligerent behavior, linked to alcohol consumption before and during the flight, was widely shared on social media platforms like TikTok and Twitter. She verbally and physically assaulted FlySafair employees, mentioning that as an SABC employee, the incident would be reported in a manner unfavorable to the airline. Her identity was revealed by online users, further spurring discussions about the legalities of disciplinary actions for off-duty conduct.

  • 00:05:00 - 00:10:00

    The video discussion revolves around the possibility of disciplinary action for the SABC employee, referencing two legal cases about off-duty conduct leading to dismissals. One, involving an Edcon employee, revolved around racist comments made on social media during leave, resulting in dismissal due to reputational risk. Another case involved a physical altercation outside work premises, where the company justified dismissal to manage reputational risk, underlining that off-duty actions affecting the employment relationship can lead to disciplinary actions.

  • 00:10:00 - 00:15:00

    The general rule is that employers cannot discipline for off-duty conduct, except where it impacts the employer-employee relationship or reputational risk, as seen in legal precedents. Employers can act if misconduct damages trust, poses a reputational risk, or is linked to use of racist or derogatory language. This extends to off-duty behavior or actions online, if it affects the employment relationship. Policies related to ethics and online behavior can serve as grounds for discipline, as articulated by relevant legal cases.

  • 00:15:00 - 00:21:50

    The speaker emphasizes issues related to abuse of power and privilege, often by connected individuals using status to justify unreasonable behavior. In this specific context, the unruly behavior of the SABC employee underscores broader societal issues, including alcohol abuse and the misuse of political connections. There is a call for responsibility and integrity, especially during festive seasons, urging viewers to exercise restraint and uphold mutual respect in all interactions.

Mostrar mais

Mapa mental

Vídeo de perguntas e respostas

  • What happened to the SABC employee on the flight?

    The SABC employee was unruly and belligerent on a flight after drinking, and she assaulted flight staff.

  • Can an employee be fired for actions taken off-duty?

    Yes, if the conduct damages employer relationships or poses a reputational risk, disciplinary action can be justified.

  • What legal principles apply to off-duty conduct?

    An employer may discipline for off-duty actions if they affect the employment relationship or reputational risk.

  • What was the company's response to the SABC employee's actions?

    The SABC condemned the behavior and stated they would follow internal procedures to address the issue.

  • Is drinking on a plane a legal issue for passengers?

    Drinking to the extent of causing disturbance and assaulting others can lead to legal consequences.

  • What was the ANC's reaction to the SABC employee's behavior?

    The ANC condemned the behavior and distanced themselves from the employee's actions.

  • What other cases were discussed related to off-duty conduct?

    The Edcon and Horn cases were discussed, both involving off-duty conduct leading to dismissals.

  • Why is alcohol mentioned as an issue in the video?

    Alcohol is cited as a factor leading to problematic behavior, especially during festive seasons.

  • What societal issue is indirectly highlighted through these events?

    The entitlement and arrogance sometimes shown by connected individuals and misuse of their status.

  • What should employees consider about social media use?

    Social media profiles linked to employers can lead to disciplinary action if content is damaging.

Ver mais resumos de vídeos

Obtenha acesso instantâneo a resumos gratuitos de vídeos do YouTube com tecnologia de IA!
Legendas
en
Rolagem automática:
  • 00:00:00
    welcome to another episode of the
  • 00:00:01
    dissection an sabc employee has gone
  • 00:00:04
    viral for poor conduct on a flight the
  • 00:00:08
    employee was drinking alcohol at the
  • 00:00:10
    slow lounge with her partner prior to
  • 00:00:13
    the flight she then went on to board and
  • 00:00:16
    fly SAA flight from Cape Town to Durban
  • 00:00:21
    during the flight the sabc employee
  • 00:00:24
    became unruly and belligerent to say the
  • 00:00:27
    very least this is um
  • 00:00:30
    a series of events which has been
  • 00:00:32
    captured widely on various social media
  • 00:00:35
    platforms Tik Tok Twitter as well as
  • 00:00:39
    other platforms such as Facebook to say
  • 00:00:42
    she was unruly and belligerent is saying
  • 00:00:45
    the least of it in the most diplomatic
  • 00:00:47
    terms so in the process of this unruly
  • 00:00:52
    and belligerent Behavior fly Safir
  • 00:00:55
    employees were assaulted fly sa Fair
  • 00:00:59
    employees were insulted by the sabc
  • 00:01:02
    employee in her drunk trate the sabc
  • 00:01:06
    employee spoke about how this series of
  • 00:01:09
    events would be covered by the sabc
  • 00:01:12
    inferring in some way that this series
  • 00:01:14
    of events would be covered in a way
  • 00:01:16
    which would be
  • 00:01:17
    unfavorable to the fly SFA employees and
  • 00:01:22
    the airline and maybe even the other
  • 00:01:24
    passengers who were on the flight trying
  • 00:01:26
    to restain restrain her and chide her in
  • 00:01:29
    that particular series of drunken trades
  • 00:01:33
    the sabc employee also made reference to
  • 00:01:36
    how they were a member of the ANC in GR
  • 00:01:39
    in good standing they said I'm ancb TCH
  • 00:01:43
    right and that's what they made
  • 00:01:44
    reference to the identity of the sabc
  • 00:01:48
    employee was determined people who knew
  • 00:01:51
    this person went and found her on
  • 00:01:54
    LinkedIn and actually saw that he or she
  • 00:01:57
    was she was directly uh you know related
  • 00:02:00
    in terms of employment wise with the
  • 00:02:02
    sabc and this particular individual has
  • 00:02:05
    been an sabc employee in that particular
  • 00:02:08
    role for 4 months right so it's a recent
  • 00:02:11
    job they have a long history working in
  • 00:02:14
    uh Marketing in public relations and
  • 00:02:16
    other fields of that nature but at the
  • 00:02:18
    sabc they've only been there for 4
  • 00:02:20
    months so social media users have been
  • 00:02:24
    asking an important question one that is
  • 00:02:27
    very relevant considering how we're
  • 00:02:30
    going into New Year's um Eve
  • 00:02:32
    celebrations and people are going to be
  • 00:02:34
    drinking they're going to be traveling
  • 00:02:36
    and you need to be aware of where does
  • 00:02:38
    the law stand in relation to you and
  • 00:02:41
    your employee they've been asking
  • 00:02:43
    whether you can be fired for conduct
  • 00:02:45
    that happened off duty off off your um
  • 00:02:50
    employer premises during
  • 00:02:53
    leave in this video I'm going to provide
  • 00:02:56
    an answer that will help you um many of
  • 00:02:59
    you may not know if you're watching and
  • 00:03:01
    haven't been following me recently um or
  • 00:03:04
    you've started following me recently
  • 00:03:05
    rather I actually studied and completed
  • 00:03:08
    a law degree and LLB degree at vdz
  • 00:03:10
    University so I'll give you a short
  • 00:03:12
    summary about what the law says on this
  • 00:03:15
    particular question but before I discuss
  • 00:03:17
    that issue it's important to note that
  • 00:03:20
    the sabc has already issued a statement
  • 00:03:22
    on this particular issue and their
  • 00:03:24
    statement reads as
  • 00:03:26
    follows the sabc condemns staff members
  • 00:03:29
    conduct on a flight the South African
  • 00:03:32
    Broadcasting Corporation has noted with
  • 00:03:34
    concern audiovisual material circulating
  • 00:03:37
    on various social media platforms
  • 00:03:40
    featuring a staff member traveling on a
  • 00:03:42
    South African Airline the sabc regrets
  • 00:03:45
    this incident and as and always
  • 00:03:47
    encourages staff members to uphold sabc
  • 00:03:51
    values of respect and integrity in all
  • 00:03:53
    their interactions in the video clip the
  • 00:03:56
    staff member mentions the sabc and
  • 00:03:59
    states that this incident will be
  • 00:04:00
    broadcast on sabc news we would like to
  • 00:04:03
    reiterate that sabc news is Guided by
  • 00:04:07
    the editorial code and maintains it its
  • 00:04:10
    editorial Independence and the decisions
  • 00:04:13
    pertaining to all news items are made in
  • 00:04:15
    The Newsroom and are not influenced by
  • 00:04:17
    non-editorial staff members the sabc
  • 00:04:20
    will use the relevant channels in line
  • 00:04:23
    with its internal procedures to engage
  • 00:04:25
    the staff member this statement is what
  • 00:04:28
    has made people question whether or not
  • 00:04:31
    the sabc can actually dismiss this
  • 00:04:33
    individual and whether or not you can be
  • 00:04:35
    dismissed for individual that did not
  • 00:04:37
    happened on the employee premises and
  • 00:04:39
    also that happened while you were on
  • 00:04:41
    leave and that did not necessarily
  • 00:04:44
    happen as you were executing any role as
  • 00:04:47
    an employee of the company so there are
  • 00:04:49
    two cases that I want to bring to your
  • 00:04:51
    attention which have basically resolved
  • 00:04:55
    this question the first one is the edcon
  • 00:04:58
    case and this uh pertains to events that
  • 00:05:01
    happened also in December in 2015 so
  • 00:05:05
    miss kesa was employed and this is a
  • 00:05:08
    summary of the fact by edcon as a
  • 00:05:10
    specialist buyer of ladies wear and this
  • 00:05:13
    was a senior position in December of
  • 00:05:15
    2015 you may recall December of 2015 was
  • 00:05:19
    after a variety
  • 00:05:21
    ofc Shenanigans if you will Zuma had
  • 00:05:24
    fired uh ministers and rehired ministers
  • 00:05:27
    they had been cabinet reshuffles zumas
  • 00:05:30
    fall was trending as a hashtag and this
  • 00:05:34
    all had been escalating and percolating
  • 00:05:36
    in the discourse so in December of
  • 00:05:39
    2015 December by the way seems to be a
  • 00:05:42
    feature in some of the incidences which
  • 00:05:44
    we are discussing December January I
  • 00:05:47
    think it's because people are drinking a
  • 00:05:48
    lot of alcohol in December and um the
  • 00:05:52
    alcohol is having an influence so miss
  • 00:05:55
    kesa was angry about the political
  • 00:05:57
    developments in South Africa paining to
  • 00:06:00
    Jacob Zuma and thec she then went on to
  • 00:06:03
    her Facebook and she called the
  • 00:06:07
    politicians stupid monkeys and called Mr
  • 00:06:10
    Zuma a stupid man she said more but I'm
  • 00:06:13
    just giving you a summary of of what she
  • 00:06:15
    said she published that um on her
  • 00:06:18
    Facebook and at the time Miss kessa's uh
  • 00:06:22
    Facebook stated that she was employed by
  • 00:06:24
    edcon as a fashion buyer all of this
  • 00:06:27
    happened while she was on annual leave
  • 00:06:29
    and she used her own devices to make the
  • 00:06:32
    post in January a complaint was lodged
  • 00:06:35
    and the complaint was actually lodged
  • 00:06:37
    after the penny Sparrow upro which
  • 00:06:39
    related to her posts calling Africans
  • 00:06:42
    monkeys and saying a variety of racist
  • 00:06:44
    things so miss kessa's post also came to
  • 00:06:47
    the attention of social media users at
  • 00:06:50
    the time and the soetan newspaper then
  • 00:06:53
    published a story on the issue Miss kesa
  • 00:06:56
    was called into a disciplinary hearing
  • 00:06:58
    she was suspended charged with
  • 00:07:00
    misconduct she was then subsequently
  • 00:07:02
    found guilty and dismissed she then went
  • 00:07:05
    to the ccma the first stage which is
  • 00:07:08
    conciliation failed the second stage is
  • 00:07:10
    arbitration at the arbitration stage the
  • 00:07:13
    commissioner found that the dismissal
  • 00:07:16
    was substantively unfair and then the
  • 00:07:19
    issue and then she was actually given an
  • 00:07:21
    utation award of 12 months um maximum
  • 00:07:24
    compensation of her salary so it was a
  • 00:07:26
    12- month salary maximum compensation
  • 00:07:29
    she was was not happy and then she took
  • 00:07:30
    this issue on review to the labor court
  • 00:07:33
    for review the labor Court ruled against
  • 00:07:36
    miss kesa the issue that they focused on
  • 00:07:39
    was the issue of reputational risk the
  • 00:07:41
    court said that the commissioner
  • 00:07:43
    actually had made a reviewable error the
  • 00:07:45
    commissioner at the ccma had ruled that
  • 00:07:47
    the post that was made by Miss kesa did
  • 00:07:51
    not pertain to her work and that no
  • 00:07:53
    reasonable person would associate her
  • 00:07:55
    post with the employer and additionally
  • 00:07:58
    that there was no harm to edcon which
  • 00:08:00
    obviously you you guys you know Edgar
  • 00:08:01
    and other companies are under edcon um
  • 00:08:04
    that there was no harm that was proved
  • 00:08:06
    right so the court then ruled the labor
  • 00:08:09
    court that the action being done on
  • 00:08:12
    annual leave was not relevant and the
  • 00:08:15
    fact that the offending post also did
  • 00:08:17
    not mention edcon itself was not
  • 00:08:20
    relevant they deemed the post to have
  • 00:08:22
    been racist and that it actually did
  • 00:08:25
    pose a reputational risk to the employer
  • 00:08:28
    and that it was actually reasonable to
  • 00:08:31
    foresee that there were going to be
  • 00:08:33
    people who would make a link between um
  • 00:08:36
    Miss kesa and edcon because the person
  • 00:08:39
    who had lodged the original complaint
  • 00:08:42
    had some was somebody that had actually
  • 00:08:43
    made that link in and off itself so that
  • 00:08:46
    was the first case that you need to be
  • 00:08:47
    aware of the second case is the case of
  • 00:08:50
    horn Jac's horn versus Bessa and others
  • 00:08:55
    this case dealt with the conduct of a
  • 00:08:57
    senior system specialist geology ologist
  • 00:08:59
    who was working at kumbao he was an
  • 00:09:02
    middle management employee who was
  • 00:09:04
    earning 78,000 per month in 2018 so you
  • 00:09:07
    can imagine that's a significant amount
  • 00:09:09
    of money in January of 2018 Mr horn was
  • 00:09:14
    dismissed from work after there had been
  • 00:09:17
    a deliberation on a fight that had
  • 00:09:20
    occurred outside of the workplace Mr
  • 00:09:23
    horn assaulted a fellow mine worker
  • 00:09:25
    whose name no joke is hilarious lagula
  • 00:09:29
    on a public road on the 10th of January
  • 00:09:32
    this was basically a case of road rage
  • 00:09:35
    and historic beef right so what had
  • 00:09:38
    happened was another individual Mr mokan
  • 00:09:41
    was seen by Mr horn violating traffic
  • 00:09:44
    regulations at the Mind gate Mr horn
  • 00:09:46
    confronted Mr mokani and as he was
  • 00:09:49
    confronting Mr mwani telling him yeah
  • 00:09:52
    you people and whatever he was saying
  • 00:09:54
    what happened was Mr hilarious Lula
  • 00:09:57
    intervened he actually viewed that act
  • 00:09:59
    as racist and confronted Mr horn for
  • 00:10:03
    bullying then Mr horn shoved Mr Lula on
  • 00:10:06
    the ground and this was all witnessed by
  • 00:10:09
    a security guard who testified and added
  • 00:10:12
    information that in two prior occasions
  • 00:10:15
    he had separated these two individuals
  • 00:10:17
    Mr horn and Mr Lula this is why I'm
  • 00:10:19
    saying it was a case of road rage and
  • 00:10:21
    historic beef whatever was happening
  • 00:10:23
    between Mr horn and Lula was long
  • 00:10:25
    standing the mine dismissed horn and the
  • 00:10:28
    ccma upheld that dismissal the labor
  • 00:10:31
    Court upheld the ccma decision horn took
  • 00:10:35
    the matter to the appeals court he also
  • 00:10:37
    lost that matter so what are the general
  • 00:10:41
    legal principles that you need to know
  • 00:10:43
    to avoid becoming the viral sensation of
  • 00:10:45
    the week and the dismissed lover in
  • 00:10:48
    January you don't want to be a dismissed
  • 00:10:49
    lover in January January is a very hard
  • 00:10:52
    month being dismissed in January is just
  • 00:10:55
    that's not something that you need in
  • 00:10:56
    your life so what do you need to know
  • 00:10:58
    number one the general rule is that an
  • 00:11:00
    employer has no jurisdiction or
  • 00:11:03
    competency to discipline an employee for
  • 00:11:05
    conduct that is not workplace related
  • 00:11:08
    which occurs after working hours and
  • 00:11:11
    away from the workplace all right that's
  • 00:11:14
    the general rule and the Authority for
  • 00:11:15
    that rule is Niha versus uh the
  • 00:11:19
    department of Foreign Affairs and it's n
  • 00:11:21
    on behalf of bonds versus uh Department
  • 00:11:24
    of Foreign Affairs for law students who
  • 00:11:25
    may want to go and read those cases or
  • 00:11:27
    are just interested in reading them in
  • 00:11:29
    full you know because some of you guys
  • 00:11:30
    are low students some of you um are not
  • 00:11:33
    but you can still find these cases a
  • 00:11:35
    website where you can uh find these
  • 00:11:37
    cases easily so that's the general rule
  • 00:11:40
    an employee is bound by the terms of
  • 00:11:44
    their Employment contract and by the
  • 00:11:46
    various policies of the company for
  • 00:11:48
    example the internet policy social media
  • 00:11:50
    policy the company code of ethics these
  • 00:11:53
    policies typically apply to an to on
  • 00:11:56
    duty conduct and the use of company
  • 00:11:58
    equipment
  • 00:12:00
    however and this is important where
  • 00:12:03
    misconduct does not fall within the
  • 00:12:06
    express terms of a disciplinary code
  • 00:12:09
    such misconduct may still be of such a
  • 00:12:12
    nature that the employee that that the
  • 00:12:15
    employer May nonetheless be entitled to
  • 00:12:18
    discipline its employee and you are also
  • 00:12:22
    prone to being disciplined even if that
  • 00:12:25
    conduct occurred of Duty of site on on
  • 00:12:29
    on social media for a variety of reasons
  • 00:12:32
    I'm going to discuss those you can be
  • 00:12:34
    dismissed and disciplined for destroying
  • 00:12:38
    or seriously damaging the relationship
  • 00:12:40
    between the employer and employee and
  • 00:12:43
    loss of trust is one of the reasons why
  • 00:12:46
    this destruction of the relationship can
  • 00:12:48
    be considered where money is involved if
  • 00:12:51
    you let's say commit fraud with your
  • 00:12:53
    boyfriend somewhere else the company
  • 00:12:55
    finds out about it they can still
  • 00:12:57
    dismiss you uh even if you didn't do
  • 00:12:59
    that at work right you can be dismissed
  • 00:13:03
    if the employer takes the view that that
  • 00:13:06
    particular dismissal is a sensible
  • 00:13:08
    operational response to risk management
  • 00:13:11
    if you want some authorities some case
  • 00:13:13
    law to support what I've just said one
  • 00:13:15
    of them is host limited versus chemical
  • 00:13:18
    workers industrial Union another is Doo
  • 00:13:21
    versus ccma and others and another is
  • 00:13:24
    Deb's Consolidated Minds versus ccma and
  • 00:13:28
    others
  • 00:13:29
    now when it comes to use of language
  • 00:13:33
    racist language problematic language
  • 00:13:36
    problematic Behavior you can actually be
  • 00:13:38
    dismissed whether you do that on duty or
  • 00:13:42
    off duty use of derogatory terms whether
  • 00:13:45
    off duty or on duty affect the
  • 00:13:47
    employment relationship uttering hate
  • 00:13:49
    speech off duty is viewed as manifesting
  • 00:13:53
    the Deep rooted bigotry and attitudes
  • 00:13:56
    that you have whether you're on or off
  • 00:13:58
    duty so you can be dismissed for that
  • 00:14:00
    right The Authority for this is constant
  • 00:14:03
    versus the South African local
  • 00:14:05
    government bargaining Council and
  • 00:14:08
    others even if your conduct is offsite
  • 00:14:13
    you now know from the horn case that if
  • 00:14:16
    you are fighting offsite etc etc you can
  • 00:14:19
    be disciplined by your company if a
  • 00:14:22
    business can establish a connection with
  • 00:14:26
    misconduct and its business they can
  • 00:14:29
    Institute disciplinary proceedings
  • 00:14:32
    regardless of whether that conduct
  • 00:14:34
    occurred online offsite right The
  • 00:14:36
    Authority for that is Crown chickens
  • 00:14:39
    versus scap and others so now you know
  • 00:14:42
    now you know better so be aware you can
  • 00:14:46
    be taken to a disciplinary hearing by
  • 00:14:48
    your employer for off-duty conduct and
  • 00:14:51
    for online conduct even if you didn't
  • 00:14:54
    mention them directly if it affects the
  • 00:14:57
    employer and the employee relationship
  • 00:14:59
    you can be taken for that disciplinary
  • 00:15:01
    conduct especially if that trust element
  • 00:15:03
    is um affected If it creates a
  • 00:15:06
    reputational risk for the company you
  • 00:15:08
    can be taken to that disciplinary
  • 00:15:10
    hearing if your social media profiles
  • 00:15:13
    are in any way associated with the
  • 00:15:15
    employer you don't have to mention them
  • 00:15:17
    in your post but um if you do then it's
  • 00:15:21
    far worse in this case if this sabc
  • 00:15:24
    employee were to ask for my legal advice
  • 00:15:26
    I would actually advise her to pray very
  • 00:15:29
    very hard and to apologize with the
  • 00:15:31
    highest levels of humility Jacob Zuma
  • 00:15:34
    levels of humility no one is more humble
  • 00:15:36
    than Jacob Zuma if Jacob Zuma wants to
  • 00:15:38
    switch on humility tabs yo it will flow
  • 00:15:41
    all the way in hamans scr I'm telling
  • 00:15:43
    you there will be no shortages the most
  • 00:15:45
    humble person when he wants to be Jacob
  • 00:15:47
    Zuma she will have to turn on her Jacob
  • 00:15:49
    Zuma humility um clock and and Taps
  • 00:15:53
    rather because the prospect of success
  • 00:15:56
    in a disciplinary hearing if the sabc
  • 00:15:59
    goes that direction are lower than my
  • 00:16:01
    prospects of remarrying
  • 00:16:03
    Rihanna remarrying I'm just joking we
  • 00:16:06
    were never married just rumors just
  • 00:16:08
    rumors whenever it was just just just uh
  • 00:16:11
    I'm kidding but her prospects are not
  • 00:16:13
    very high the ANC and your prospects
  • 00:16:16
    will also not be very high so just be
  • 00:16:18
    aware of that if ever you are in that
  • 00:16:20
    kind of a situation the ANC has also
  • 00:16:22
    issued a statement on this on this
  • 00:16:24
    particular issue and this is what their
  • 00:16:26
    statement says thec condemns unruly and
  • 00:16:29
    Unbecoming behavior on a domestic flight
  • 00:16:32
    the African National Congress has noted
  • 00:16:35
    with disgust and disdain the behavior of
  • 00:16:38
    a woman aboard a domestic flight who
  • 00:16:40
    acted in an unruly and Unbecoming manner
  • 00:16:43
    while invoking the name of thec as if to
  • 00:16:46
    justify her actions thec categorically
  • 00:16:50
    distances itself from such Behavior
  • 00:16:52
    which is contrary to the values and
  • 00:16:54
    principles of our movement regardless of
  • 00:16:57
    whether this individual is member of
  • 00:16:59
    thec we unequivocally state that no
  • 00:17:02
    person has the right to behave in such
  • 00:17:05
    an unacceptable Manner and certainly not
  • 00:17:07
    while misusing the good name of
  • 00:17:10
    thec we have initiated an investigation
  • 00:17:14
    into her membership status however even
  • 00:17:16
    if it is confirmed that she is a member
  • 00:17:19
    her conduct is inexcusable and deeply
  • 00:17:22
    embarrassing thec will not allow its
  • 00:17:24
    name to be dragged through the mud by
  • 00:17:27
    individuals who fail to all the dignity
  • 00:17:30
    and decorum expected of all South
  • 00:17:32
    Africans let alone members of our
  • 00:17:34
    organization thec remains committed to
  • 00:17:37
    maintaining the highest standards of
  • 00:17:39
    discipline and respect and we call on
  • 00:17:41
    all South Africans to act responsibly
  • 00:17:44
    and in a manner that promotes unity and
  • 00:17:47
    respect for one another that's what thec
  • 00:17:50
    has said so this lady through her
  • 00:17:53
    belligerent Behavior her arrogant
  • 00:17:56
    Behavior has caused both the South
  • 00:17:58
    African Broadcasting Corporation and the
  • 00:18:01
    sabc to issue statements against her
  • 00:18:04
    she's if if it was that Award mampara of
  • 00:18:07
    the week this is this is the one right
  • 00:18:09
    here this is the one this is how you
  • 00:18:11
    become um this particular
  • 00:18:14
    designation I want to finish off by
  • 00:18:16
    talking about the elephant in the
  • 00:18:18
    room two things one is that alcohol is
  • 00:18:23
    Wrecking havoc in homes and in
  • 00:18:26
    communities we see lots of violence and
  • 00:18:28
    problematic behavior in December and
  • 00:18:31
    it's in part because people are
  • 00:18:33
    participating in the drinking culture in
  • 00:18:35
    December in unmitigated levels and I
  • 00:18:39
    think that this is just yet another
  • 00:18:41
    example of that people are using alcohol
  • 00:18:43
    to self-medicate to suppress trauma and
  • 00:18:47
    it's manifesting in various ways
  • 00:18:50
    violence in homes violence in
  • 00:18:52
    communities and stupid decisions such as
  • 00:18:55
    these decisions that were made by this
  • 00:18:56
    individual drinking in the slow Lounge
  • 00:18:58
    drink on the plane insisting on more
  • 00:19:01
    alcohol she was inebriated to a point
  • 00:19:04
    where all of these decisions all of
  • 00:19:06
    these things were going to happen you
  • 00:19:09
    can't just be drinking all day every day
  • 00:19:12
    it affects your physique it affects your
  • 00:19:15
    mentality it affects your behavior and
  • 00:19:17
    we need to have a conversation about
  • 00:19:19
    this you know there's that guy who goes
  • 00:19:21
    around taking people to rehab for
  • 00:19:24
    taking but I think we need to also have
  • 00:19:26
    a conversation about legalized sanitized
  • 00:19:28
    and alcohol is that it's a big business
  • 00:19:31
    big Advertiser on TV stations but we
  • 00:19:34
    also need to be honest about this that's
  • 00:19:35
    the first elephant in the room the
  • 00:19:37
    second elephant in the room is
  • 00:19:40
    this that the children of powerful
  • 00:19:43
    politicians or connected people really
  • 00:19:45
    do believe that everyone else is an NPC
  • 00:19:48
    an unplayable character if you don't
  • 00:19:50
    know what an NPC is and that we in their
  • 00:19:52
    video game they have an attitude of
  • 00:19:55
    arrogance and they think that they're
  • 00:19:56
    better than everyone and it manifests s
  • 00:19:59
    quite frequently in
  • 00:20:01
    society this whole I AMC I'm ANC this
  • 00:20:05
    and this it it's not only something that
  • 00:20:07
    was drawn by this drunk lady or is an
  • 00:20:09
    isolated incident but it's something
  • 00:20:11
    that happens quite frequently in
  • 00:20:12
    different ways people who want to know
  • 00:20:15
    want to show you who they are this whole
  • 00:20:17
    do you know who my father is do you know
  • 00:20:18
    who my father is it's quite a frequent
  • 00:20:21
    thing and we need to be honest about
  • 00:20:22
    that and it's something that we need to
  • 00:20:25
    call out whenever we see
  • 00:20:27
    it we all
  • 00:20:30
    equal and in as much as we're not really
  • 00:20:32
    because we sometimes see that some
  • 00:20:34
    people when they are found with cash
  • 00:20:36
    cash contant going to Limpopo they will
  • 00:20:39
    be arrested with that money not to
  • 00:20:41
    Limpopo to mosm but other people when
  • 00:20:43
    they fine with cash
  • 00:20:44
    constant they are not arrested we're
  • 00:20:46
    told that no the transaction was not
  • 00:20:49
    perfected this man does not sell Buffalo
  • 00:20:52
    etc etc but that's a story for another
  • 00:20:54
    day but in as much as we know that they
  • 00:20:57
    are inconsistency and hypocrisies and
  • 00:21:00
    we're not
  • 00:21:01
    naive who still should be able to call
  • 00:21:04
    out people when they try to play that
  • 00:21:06
    who's my daddy
  • 00:21:08
    card who's my daddy do you know who my
  • 00:21:11
    father
  • 00:21:13
    is we need to be honest about that it's
  • 00:21:15
    something that is actually one of the
  • 00:21:17
    things the the precursors that creates
  • 00:21:20
    corrupt conduct because those
  • 00:21:22
    individuals feel entitled to more than
  • 00:21:24
    everybody else anyway what do you guys
  • 00:21:26
    think about this whole sabc situ
  • 00:21:28
    sitation have you seen this lady's
  • 00:21:30
    Behavior are you aware of what she's
  • 00:21:32
    been doing have you been asking the
  • 00:21:33
    question have I answered your question
  • 00:21:35
    behave be
  • 00:21:37
    responsible New Year's Eve celebrations
  • 00:21:40
    let's go into 2025 together and let's
  • 00:21:43
    continue in 2025 together be responsible
  • 00:21:46
    till the next one guys peace
Etiquetas
  • SABC
  • unruly conduct
  • off-duty behavior
  • disciplinary actions
  • alcohol consumption
  • social media
  • employer responsibility
  • legal precedents
  • employee conduct
  • reputational risk