Einstein's General Theory of Relativity | Lecture 1
Summary
TLDRIn this lecture by Leonard Susskind, he focuses on gravity, predominantly Newtonian gravity, discussing its unique nature compared to other forces like electrical forces. He begins with an introduction to Newton's laws of motion, emphasizing the role of inertial frames where F = MA holds true and explains how the mass is a key factor in the gravitational equation. Susskind covers the concept of an equivalence principle, highlighting that the force of gravity is proportional to mass, making gravitational acceleration independent of an object's mass. He explains how Galileo's experiments demonstrated that different masses fall at the same rate, leading to insights into gravitational fields and tidal forces. The lecture expands on Newton's theorem, which aids in simplifying gravitational calculations by treating spherically symmetrical objects as point masses. He talks about tidal forces and their effects, such as how the Earth's oceans form tides due to the Moon's pull. Additionally, Susskind introduces concepts like the gravitational field, divergence, and Gauss's theorem, which relate the divergence of a vector field in a region to the flow across its boundary, underscoring their application to gravitational studies. Gauss's theorem is articulated as a key mathematical tool in gravitational theories, demonstrating how it facilitates understanding of universal gravitation in a comprehensive manner.
Takeaways
- 🌌 Newtonian gravity provides a foundation for understanding gravitational forces and is a precursor to general relativity.
- 🛠️ Understanding Newton's laws helps frame gravitational interactions mathematically as F = MA in inertial frames.
- đź“Š Gravitational force is unique as it is proportional to mass, differentiating it from other forces like electric forces.
- ⚖️ Equivalence principle shows the independence of gravitational motion from the mass of an object.
- 🌍 Tidal forces cause deformations due to varying gravitational pull—important in understanding phenomena like tides.
- 🔎 Newton's theorem simplifies gravitational calculations involving spherically symmetric objects acting as point masses.
- 🌗 Effects of the Moon's gravity on Earth exhibit tidal influences, stretching oceanic bodies.
- đź“š Gauss's theorem connects a vector field's divergence with the flow across its boundary, crucial for gravitational analysis.
- 🔬 Gravitational fields describe the acceleration experienced at any point due to surrounding masses.
- 🌪️ Vector fields and divergence play fundamental roles in understanding fluid flows and gravitational phenomena.
Timeline
- 00:00:00 - 00:05:00
Leonard Susskind introduces the concept of gravity, highlighting its unique association with the geometric properties of space and time through the general theory of relativity. However, in this lecture, the focus is on Newtonian gravity, which serves as a foundational theory for understanding gravity's further complexities.
- 00:05:00 - 00:10:00
Susskind starts with Newton's Laws of Motion, particularly emphasizing F=ma (force equals mass times acceleration) in an inertial frame of reference. He explains the concepts of vector quantities in physics and the conservation of mass in Newtonian physics.
- 00:10:00 - 00:15:00
The lecturer elaborates on the vectorial nature of physical quantities and explains that acceleration is the second derivative of position, commonly known as velocity when involving first derivatives. He underscores this with Newton's Laws of Motion.
- 00:15:00 - 00:20:00
Galileo's perspective on gravitational motion in a flat Earth approximation (where gravity is constant everywhere) is explored. This leads to the understanding that gravitational forces on an object are proportional to its mass, contrary to electrical forces, for example.
- 00:20:00 - 00:25:00
A further discussion on Galileo's experimental insights reveals the principle that in the absence of air resistance, objects will fall at the same rate under gravity, regardless of mass, illustrating a precursor to the equivalence principle.
- 00:25:00 - 00:30:00
The equivalence principle is elaborated on, emphasizing that in free fall, the effects of gravity on an object are indistinguishable from being in space. Leonard Susskind emphasizes this undetectability with various thought experiments.
- 00:30:00 - 00:35:00
The topic shifts to distinguishing mechanical effects in gravity, noting that the presence of a homogeneous gravitational field cannot be detected by mechanical means alone. Instead, external reference points or instruments are needed.
- 00:35:00 - 00:40:00
Susskind reiterates the independence of gravitational and electrostatic forces by exemplifying the lack of an equivalent universal force law for the latter, unlike gravity's mass-proportional force law.
- 00:40:00 - 00:45:00
Newton's law of universal gravitation is mathematically discussed, stressing the inverse square law for gravitational force. The smallness of the gravitational constant illustrates why gravity seems weak compared to other fundamental forces.
- 00:45:00 - 00:50:00
Susskind addresses common misconceptions about gravity's strength by illustrating its relative weakness compared to electrostatic or magnetic forces, reinforcing the importance of the universal attraction inherent in gravity.
- 00:50:00 - 00:55:00
The mathematical form of Newton’s law involving multiple masses and forces is introduced. The lecturer explains how gravitational forces aggregate in systems and how this leads to the derivation of the gravitational field concept.
- 00:55:00 - 01:00:00
A detailed explanation of how gravitational forces are summed across multiple interacting objects is provided, emphasizing that gravitational acceleration is independent of the test particle’s mass.
- 01:00:00 - 01:05:00
Susskind delves into the nature of tidal forces as a result of non-uniform gravitational fields and their effects on objects, using vivid analogies of stretching and compressing to explain astronomical interactions.
- 01:05:00 - 01:10:00
The discussion highlights real-world applications, addressing how gravitational fields impact stress and strain on bodies. This includes speculating on historical calculations such as lunar tides caused by gravitational interactions.
- 01:10:00 - 01:15:00
Through the concept of a gravitational field, the nature of gravitational interactions is explored further, illustrating how test particles can help visualize the field's effects and influence on different masses.
- 01:15:00 - 01:20:00
The mathematical framework for analyzing gravitational fields using Gauss's theorem is introduced. This involves divergence in vector fields, essential for understanding field spread and gravitational potential.
- 01:20:00 - 01:25:00
The concept of divergence is clarified through fluid dynamics analogies, helping illustrate how field lines and matter interact through divergence or convergence principles.
- 01:25:00 - 01:30:00
Susskind explains Gauss's theorem, which relates the behavior of vector fields over volumes to their behavior on surfaces, bridging mathematical theory with gravitational field computations.
- 01:30:00 - 01:38:28
Finally, Newton's gravitational field theory's practical implications are considered, including the spherically symmetric mass distribution concept, which simplifies exact calculations of gravitational forces.
Mind Map
Video Q&A
What is Newton's first law?
Newton's first law states that an object will remain at rest or move in uniform motion in a straight line unless acted upon by a force.
How is gravitational force different from electrical force?
Gravitational force is always attractive and proportional to mass, whereas electrical force can be attractive or repulsive and is proportional to the charge, not the mass.
What happens when two objects with different masses fall in the Earth's gravitational field?
They fall at the same rate, independent of their mass, due to the equivalence principle.
What is the equivalence principle in simple terms?
The equivalence principle states that gravitational motion is independent of an object's mass, implying all objects fall the same way in a gravitational field.
What are tidal forces?
Tidal forces arise when different parts of an object in a gravitational field experience different gravitational attractions, causing stretching or squeezing.
What is the significance of Newton's theorem regarding gravity?
Newton's theorem implies that outside of a spherically symmetric object, gravity behaves as if all the mass were concentrated at its center.
How do tidal forces relate to the Moon and Earth?
Tidal forces cause the Earth's oceans to stretch, creating tides due to the gravitational pull of the Moon.
How did Newton arrive at his gravitational law?
Newton derived his gravitational law by using Kepler's laws of planetary motion, guessing the inverse square law to match observed celestial mechanics.
What does Gauss's theorem state?
Gauss's theorem relates the divergence of a vector field within a volume to the flow across its surface, crucially applying to gravitational fields.
What is the gravitational field?
The gravitational field represents the acceleration experienced by a test particle at any point in space due to the mass distribution around it.
View more video summaries
Apple Vision Pro Unboxing!
The Worst Product I've Ever Reviewed... For Now
Mercedes-Benz Vans Strategy Update – Full Press Conference
Cómo crear un plan de MARKETING para tu EMPRENDIMIENTO con Titto Gálvez
The Campaign Against UNRWA w/ Chris Gunness | Connections #92
Documental 2024: FilosofĂa Budista - Siddhartha Gautama, Nagarjuna, y Dogen
- 00:00:07[music playing] This program is brought to you by Stanford
- 00:00:09University. Please visit us at Stanford.edu.
- 00:00:13Leonard Susskind: Gravity.
- 00:00:17Gravity is a rather special force.
- 00:00:19It's unusual.
- 00:00:21It has difference in electrical forces, magnetic forces, and
- 00:00:25it's connected in some way with geometric properties of
- 00:00:28space, space and time.
- 00:00:30But-- and that connection is, of course, the general theory
- 00:00:35of relativity.
- 00:00:37Before we start, tonight for the most part we will not be
- 00:00:42dealing with the general theory of relativity.
- 00:00:44We will be dealing with gravity in its oldest and simplest
- 00:00:50mathematical form.
- 00:00:51Well, perhaps not the oldest and simplest but Newtonian
- 00:00:58gravity.
- 00:00:59And going a little beyond what Newton, certainly nothing
- 00:01:03that Newton would not have recognized or couldn't have
- 00:01:06grasped-- Newton could grasp anything-- but some ways of
- 00:01:10thinking about it which would not be found in Newton's
- 00:01:15actual work.
- 00:01:16But still Newtonian gravity.
- 00:01:19Newtonian gravity is set up in a way that is useful for
- 00:01:23going on to the general theory.
- 00:01:26Okay.
- 00:01:27Let's, uh, begin with Newton's equations.
- 00:01:34The first equation, of course, is F equals MA.
- 00:01:39Force is equal to mass times acceleration.
- 00:01:42Let's assume that we have a reference, a frame of reference
- 00:01:46that means a set of coordinates and that was a set of
- 00:01:48clocks, and that frame of reference is what is called an
- 00:01:52inertial frame of reference.
- 00:01:54An inertial frame of reference simply means one which if
- 00:01:58there are no objects around to exert forces on a particular-
- 00:02:03- let's call it a test object.
- 00:02:05A test object is just some object, a small particle or
- 00:02:08anything else, that we use to test out the various fields--
- 00:02:15force fields, that might be acting on it.
- 00:02:18An inertial frame is one which, when there are no objects
- 00:02:21around to exert forces, that object will move with uniform
- 00:02:28motion with no acceleration.
- 00:02:30That's the idea of an inertial frame of reference.
- 00:02:33And so if you're in an inertial frame of reference and you
- 00:02:36have a pen and you just let it go, it stays there.
- 00:02:40It doesn't move.
- 00:02:41If you give it a push, it will move off with uniform
- 00:02:44velocity.
- 00:02:46That's the idea of an inertial frame of reference and in an
- 00:02:49inertial frame of reference the basic Newtonian equation
- 00:02:57number one-- I always forget which law is which.
- 00:03:01There's Newton's first law, second law, and third law.
- 00:03:05I never can remember which is which.
- 00:03:07But they're all pretty much summarized by F equals mass
- 00:03:13times acceleration.
- 00:03:15This is a vector equation.
- 00:03:17I expect people to know what a vector is.
- 00:03:19Uh, a three-vector equation.
- 00:03:22We'll come later to four-vectors where when space and time
- 00:03:26are united into space-time.
- 00:03:28But for the moment, space is space, and time is time.
- 00:03:31And vector means a thing which is a pointer in a direction
- 00:03:36of space, it has a magnitude, and it has components.
- 00:03:40So, component by component, the X component of the force is
- 00:03:45equal to the mass of the object times the X component of
- 00:03:48acceleration, Y component Z component and so forth.
- 00:03:52In order to indicate a vector acceleration and so forth I'll
- 00:03:56try to remember to put an arrow over vectors.
- 00:04:01The mass is not a vector.
- 00:04:03The mass is simply a number.
- 00:04:04Every particle has a mass, every object has a mass.
- 00:04:08And in Newtonian physics the mass is conserved.
- 00:04:12It cannot change.
- 00:04:14Now, of course, the mass of this cup of coffee here can
- 00:04:18change.
- 00:04:21It's lighter now but it only changes because mass
- 00:04:24transported from one place to another.
- 00:04:28So, you can change the mass of an object by whacking off a
- 00:04:30piece of it but if you don't change the number of particles,
- 00:04:34change the number of molecules and so forth, then the mass
- 00:04:38is a conserved, unchanging quantity.
- 00:04:40So, that's first equation.
- 00:04:43Now, let me write that in another form.
- 00:04:47The other form we imagine we have a coordinate system, an X,
- 00:04:51a Y, and a Z.
- 00:04:53I don't have enough dimensions on the blackboard to draw Z.
- 00:04:55It doesn't matter.
- 00:04:56X, Y, and Z.
- 00:05:00Sometimes we just call them X one, X two, and X three.
- 00:05:04I guess I could draw it in.
- 00:05:05X three is over here someplace.
- 00:05:07X, Y, and Z.
- 00:05:09And a particle has a position which means it has a set of
- 00:05:14three coordinates.
- 00:05:16Sometimes we will summarize the collection of the three
- 00:05:20coordinates X one, X two, and X three exactly.
- 00:05:24X one, and X two, and X three are components of a vector.
- 00:05:31They are components of the position vector of the particle.
- 00:05:35The position vector of the particle I will often call either
- 00:05:40small r or large R depending on the particular context.
- 00:05:47R stands for radius but the radius simply means the distance
- 00:05:53between the point and the origin for example.
- 00:05:56We're really talking now about a thing with three
- 00:05:58components, X, Y, and Z, and it's the radial vector, the
- 00:06:02radial vector.
- 00:06:04This is the same thing as the components of the vector R.
- 00:06:10All right.
- 00:06:13The acceleration is a vector that's made up out of a time
- 00:06:19derivatives of X, Y, and X, or X one, X two, and X three.
- 00:06:24So, for each component-- for each component, one, two, or
- 00:06:30three, the acceleration-- which let me indicate, let's just
- 00:06:35call it A.
- 00:06:37The acceleration is just equal-- the components of it are
- 00:06:42equal to the second derivatives of the coordinates with
- 00:06:47respect to time.
- 00:06:50That's what acceleration is.
- 00:06:53The first derivative of position is called velocity.
- 00:06:56Okay.
- 00:06:57We can take this thing component by component.
- 00:07:05X one, X two, and X three.
- 00:07:07The first derivative is velocity.
- 00:07:08The second derivative is acceleration.
- 00:07:12We can write this in vector notation.
- 00:07:13I won't bother but we all know what we mean.
- 00:07:17I hope we all know what we mean by acceleration and
- 00:07:20velocity.
- 00:07:21And so, Newton's equations are then summarized-- not
- 00:07:23summarized but rewritten-- as the force on an object,
- 00:07:29whatever it is, component by component, is equal to the mass
- 00:07:35times the second derivative of the component of position.
- 00:07:40So, that's the summery of-- I think it's Newton's first and
- 00:07:43second law.
- 00:07:44I can never remember which they are.
- 00:07:45Newton's first law, of course, is simply the statement that
- 00:07:51if there are no forces then there's no acceleration.
- 00:07:56That's Newton's first law.
- 00:07:57Equal and opposite.
- 00:08:01Right.
- 00:08:03And so this summarizes both the first and second law.
- 00:08:07I never understood why there was a first and second law.
- 00:08:09It seemed to me that it was one law, F equals MA.
- 00:08:10All right.
- 00:08:11Now, let's begin even previous to Newton with Galilean
- 00:08:20gravity.
- 00:08:22Gravity how Galileo understood it.
- 00:08:24Actually, I'm not sure how much of these mathematics Galileo
- 00:08:28did or didn't understand.
- 00:08:29Uh, he certainly knew what acceleration was.
- 00:08:32He measured it.
- 00:08:33I don't know that he had the-- he certainly didn't have
- 00:08:37calculus but he knew what acceleration was.
- 00:08:40So, what Galileo studied was the motion of objects in the
- 00:08:45gravitational field of the earth in the approximation that
- 00:08:50the earth is flat.
- 00:08:51Now, Galileo knew that the earth wasn't flat but he studied
- 00:08:55gravity in the approximation where you never moved very far
- 00:09:00from the surface of the earth.
- 00:09:01And if you don't move very far from the surface of the
- 00:09:03earth, you might as well take the surface of the earth to be
- 00:09:05flat and the significance of that is two-fold.
- 00:09:10First of all, the direction of gravitational forces is the
- 00:09:13same everywheres.
- 00:09:15This is not true, of course, if the earth is curved then
- 00:09:19gravity will point toward the center.
- 00:09:21But the flat space approximation, gravity points down.
- 00:09:26Down everywheres always in the same direction.
- 00:09:29And second of all, perhaps a little less obvious but
- 00:09:32nevertheless true, the approximation where the earth is
- 00:09:36infinite and flat, goes on and on forever, infinite and
- 00:09:40flat, the gravitational force doesn't depend on how high you
- 00:09:44are.
- 00:09:45Same gravitational force here as here.
- 00:09:47The implication of that is that the acceleration of gravity,
- 00:09:53the force apart from the mass of an object, the acceleration
- 00:09:58on an object is independent of where you put it.
- 00:10:02And so Galileo either did or didn't realize-- again, I don't
- 00:10:13know exactly what Galileo did or didn't know.
- 00:10:15But what he said was the equivalent of saying that the force
- 00:10:19of an object in the flat space approximation is very simple.
- 00:10:25It, first of all, has only one component, pointing downward.
- 00:10:30If we take the upward sense of things to be positive, then
- 00:10:36we would say that the force is-- let's just say that the
- 00:10:39component of the force in the X two direction, the vertical
- 00:10:45direction, is equal to minus-- the minus simply means that
- 00:10:49the force is downward-- and it's proportional to the mass of
- 00:10:54the object times a constant called the gravitational
- 00:10:59acceleration.
- 00:11:01Now, the fact that it's constant everywheres, in other
- 00:11:09words, mass times G does vary from place to place.
- 00:11:12That's this fact that gravity doesn't depend on where you
- 00:11:15are in flat space approximation.
- 00:11:17But the fact that the force is proportional to the mass of
- 00:11:21an object, that is not obvious.
- 00:11:23In fact, for most forces, it is not true.
- 00:11:27For electric forces, the force is proportional to the
- 00:11:31electric charge, not to the mass.
- 00:11:35And so gravitational forces are at a special the strength of
- 00:11:39the gravitational force of an object is proportional to its
- 00:11:42mass.
- 00:11:43That characterizes gravity almost completely.
- 00:11:48That's the special thing about gravity.
- 00:11:50The force is proportional itself to the mass.
- 00:11:53Well, if we combine F equals MA with the force law-- this is
- 00:11:58the law of force-- then what we find is that mass times
- 00:12:04acceleration D second X, now this is the vertical component,
- 00:12:11by DT squared is equal to minus-- that is the minus-- MG
- 00:12:18period.
- 00:12:19That's it.
- 00:12:19Now, the interesting thing that happens in gravity is that
- 00:12:24the mass cancels out from both sides.
- 00:12:27That is what's special about gravity.
- 00:12:29The mass cancels out from both sides.
- 00:12:35And the consequence of that is that the motion of the
- 00:12:38object, its acceleration, doesn't depend on the mass--
- 00:12:42doesn't depend on anything about the particle.
- 00:12:44The particle, object-- I'll use the word particle.
- 00:12:49I don't necessarily mean a point small particle, a baseball
- 00:12:53is a particle, an eraser is a particle, a piece of chalk is
- 00:12:58a particle.
- 00:13:00That the motion of an object doesn't depend on the mass of
- 00:13:05the object or anything else.
- 00:13:07The result of that is if you take two objects of quite
- 00:13:10different mass and you drop them, they fall exactly the same
- 00:13:14way.
- 00:13:17Galileo did that experiment.
- 00:13:18I don't know whether he really threw something off the
- 00:13:22Leaning Tower of Pisa or not.
- 00:13:23It's not important.
- 00:13:26He did balls down an inclined plane.
- 00:13:30I don't know whether he actually did or didn't.
- 00:13:32I know the myth is that he didn't.
- 00:13:35I find it very difficult to believe that he didn't.
- 00:13:39I've been in Pisa.
- 00:13:40Last week I was in Pisa and I took a look at the Leaning
- 00:13:43Tower of Pisa.
- 00:13:44Galileo was born and lived in Pisa.
- 00:13:47He was interested in gravity.
- 00:13:49How it would be possible that he wouldn't think of dropping
- 00:13:52something off the Leaning Tower is beyond my comprehension.
- 00:13:57You look at that tower and say, "That tower is good for one
- 00:13:59thing: Dropping things off. "
- 00:14:03>>
- 00:14:03[laughing] Leonard Susskind: Now, I don't know.
- 00:14:03Maybe the doge or whoever they called the guy at the time
- 00:14:06said, no, no Galileo.
- 00:14:07You can't drop things from the tower.
- 00:14:09You'll kill somebody.
- 00:14:10So, maybe he didn't.
- 00:14:12He must have surely thought of it.
- 00:14:14All right.
- 00:14:15So, the result, had he done it, and had he not had to worry
- 00:14:20about such spurious effects as air resistance would be that
- 00:14:25a cannon ball and a feather would fall in exactly the same
- 00:14:29way, independent of the mass, and the equation would just
- 00:14:35say, the acceleration would first of all be downward, that's
- 00:14:38the minus sign, and equal to this constant G.
- 00:14:41Excuse me.
- 00:14:42Now, G as a number, it's 10 meters per second per second at
- 00:14:55the surface of the earth.
- 00:14:57At the surface of the moon it's something smaller.
- 00:15:00On the surface of Jupiter it's something larger.
- 00:15:04So, it does depend on the mass of the planet but the
- 00:15:08acceleration doesn't depend on the mass of the object you're
- 00:15:11dropping.
- 00:15:12It depends on the mass of the object you're dropping it onto
- 00:15:15but not the mass of the object stopping it.
- 00:15:18That fact, that gravitational motion, is completely
- 00:15:23independent of mass is called or it's the simplest version
- 00:15:27of something that's called the equivalence principle.
- 00:15:31Why it's called the equivalence principle we'll come to
- 00:15:32later.
- 00:15:33What's equivalent to what.
- 00:15:35At this stage we can just say gravity is equivalent between
- 00:15:40all different objects independent of their mass.
- 00:15:42But that is not exactly what is equivalence/inequivalence
- 00:15:45principle was all about.
- 00:15:46All right.
- 00:15:48That has a consequence.
- 00:15:49An interesting consequence.
- 00:15:52Supposing I take some object which is made up out of
- 00:15:57something which is very unrigid.
- 00:16:02Just a collection of point masses.
- 00:16:05Maybe let's even say they're not even exerting any forces on
- 00:16:11each other.
- 00:16:12It's a cloud, a very diffuse cloud of particles and we watch
- 00:16:22it fall.
- 00:16:23Now, let's suppose we start each particle from rest, not all
- 00:16:28at the same height, and we let them all fall.
- 00:16:32Some particles are heavy, some particles are light, some of
- 00:16:36them may be big, some of them may be small.
- 00:16:39How does the whole thing fall? And the answer is, all of the
- 00:16:42particles fall at exactly the same rate.
- 00:16:46The consequence of it is that the shape of this object
- 00:16:49doesn't deform as it falls.
- 00:16:51It stays absolutely unchanged.
- 00:16:56The relationship between the neighboring parts are
- 00:17:00unchanged.
- 00:17:01There are no stresses or strains which tend to deform the
- 00:17:06object.
- 00:17:07So even if the object were held together but some sort of
- 00:17:10struts or whatever, there would be no forces on those struts
- 00:17:15because everything falls together.
- 00:17:17Okay? The consequence of that is that falling in the
- 00:17:22gravitational field is undetectable.
- 00:17:25You can't tell that you're falling in a gravitational field
- 00:17:28by-- when I say you can't tell, certainly you can tell the
- 00:17:33difference between free fall and standing on the earth.
- 00:17:36All right? That's not the point.
- 00:17:39The point is that you can't tell by looking at your
- 00:17:42neighbors or anything else that there's a force being
- 00:17:45exerted on you and that that force that's being exerted on
- 00:17:48you is pulling downward.
- 00:17:50You might as well, for all practical purposes, be infinitely
- 00:17:54far from the earth with no gravity at all and just sitting
- 00:17:59there because as far as you can tell there's no tendency for
- 00:18:04the gravitational field to deform this object or anything
- 00:18:07else.
- 00:18:08You cannot tell the difference between being in free space
- 00:18:12infinitely far from anything with no forces and falling
- 00:18:16freely in a gravitational field.
- 00:18:20That's another statement of the equivalence principle.
- 00:18:22>> You say not mechanically detectable? Leonard Susskind:
- 00:18:25Well, in fact, not detectable, period.
- 00:18:26But so far not mechanically detectable.
- 00:18:29>> Well, would it be optically detectable? Leonard Susskind:
- 00:18:29No.
- 00:18:30No.
- 00:18:30For example, these particles could be equipped with lasers.
- 00:18:42Lasers and optical detectors of some sort.
- 00:18:45What's that? Oh, you could certainly tell if you were
- 00:18:48standing on the floor here you could definitely tell that
- 00:18:50there was something falling toward you.
- 00:18:52But the question is, from within this object by itself,
- 00:18:56without looking at the floor, without knowing that the floor
- 00:18:58was-- >> Something that wasn't moving.
- 00:18:58Leonard Susskind: Well, you can't tell whether you're
- 00:19:02falling and it's, uh-- yeah.
- 00:19:07If there was something that was not falling it would only be
- 00:19:12because there was some other force on it like a beam or a
- 00:19:17tower of some sort holding it up.
- 00:19:19Why? Because this object, if there are no other forces on
- 00:19:23it, only the gravitational forces, it will fall at the same
- 00:19:28rate as this.
- 00:19:29All right.
- 00:19:30So, that's another expression of the equivalence principle,
- 00:19:33that you cannot tell the difference between being in free
- 00:19:37space far from any gravitating object versus being in a
- 00:19:43gravitational field.
- 00:19:44Now, we're gonna modify this.
- 00:19:45This, of course, is not quite true in a real gravitational
- 00:19:48field, but in this flat space approximation where everything
- 00:19:54pulls together, you cannot tell that there's a gravitational
- 00:19:57field.
- 00:19:58At least, you cannot tell the difference-- not without
- 00:20:01seeing the floor in any case.
- 00:20:03The self-contained object here does not experience anything
- 00:20:07different than it would experience far from any gravitating
- 00:20:11object standing still.
- 00:20:12Or in uniform motion.
- 00:20:16>> Another question.
- 00:20:16Leonard Susskind: What's that? Yeah.
- 00:20:16>> We can tell where we're accelerating.
- 00:20:20Leonard Susskind: No, you can't tell when you're
- 00:20:23accelerating.
- 00:20:24>> Well, you can-- you can't feel-- isn't that because you
- 00:20:25can tell there's no connection between objects? Leonard
- 00:20:26Susskind: Okay.
- 00:20:31Here's what you can tell.
- 00:20:33If you go up to the top of a high building and you close
- 00:20:36your eyes, and you step off, and go into free fall, you will
- 00:20:40feel exactly the same-- you will feel weird.
- 00:20:42I mean, that's not the way you usually feel because your
- 00:20:46stomach will come up and do some funny things.
- 00:20:50You know, you might lose it.
- 00:20:53But the point is, you would feel exactly the same discomfort
- 00:20:58in outer space far from any gravitating object just standing
- 00:21:02still.
- 00:21:03You'll feel exactly the same peculiar feelings.
- 00:21:07Okay? What are those peculiar feelings due to? They're not
- 00:21:11due to falling.
- 00:21:12They're due to not fall-- well. . .
- 00:21:16[laughing] they're due to the fact that when you stand on
- 00:21:18the earth here, there are forces on the bottom of your feet
- 00:21:20which keep you from falling and if the earth suddenly
- 00:21:25disappeared from under my feet, sure enough, my feet would
- 00:21:28feel funny because they're used to having that force exerted
- 00:21:31on their bottoms.
- 00:21:32You get it.
- 00:21:33I hope.
- 00:21:36So, the fact that you feel funny in free fall, uh, is
- 00:21:40because you're not used to free fall.
- 00:21:41It doesn't matter whether you're infinitely far from any
- 00:21:45gravitating objects standing still or freely falling in the
- 00:21:49presence of a gravitational field.
- 00:21:51Now, as I said, this will have to be modified in a little
- 00:21:54bit.
- 00:21:56There are such things as tidal forces.
- 00:21:59Those tidal forces are due to the fact that the earth is
- 00:22:03curved and that the gravitational field is not the same in--
- 00:22:07the same direction in every point, and that it varies with
- 00:22:11height.
- 00:22:12That's due to the finiteness of the earth.
- 00:22:16But, in the flat space of the-- in the flat earth
- 00:22:19approximation where the earth is infinitely big pulling
- 00:22:23uniformly, uh, there is no other effect of gravity that is
- 00:22:30any different than being in free space.
- 00:22:33Okay.
- 00:22:34Again, that's known as the equivalent principle.
- 00:22:40Now, let's go on beyond the flat space or the flat earth
- 00:22:45approximation and move on to Newton's theory of gravity.
- 00:22:54Newton's theory of gravity says every object in the universe
- 00:23:02exerts a gravitational force on every other object in the
- 00:23:05universe.
- 00:23:06Let's start with just two of them.
- 00:23:10Equal and opposite.
- 00:23:13Attractive.
- 00:23:14Attractive means that the direction of the force on one
- 00:23:17object is toward the other one.
- 00:23:21Equal and opposite forces and the magnitude of the force--
- 00:23:26the magnitude of the force of one object on another.
- 00:23:30Let's characterize them by a mass.
- 00:23:34Let's call this one little m.
- 00:23:37Think of it as a lighter mass and this one, which we can
- 00:23:41imagine as a heavier object, we'll call it big M.
- 00:23:42All right.
- 00:23:43Newton's law of force is that the force is proportional to
- 00:23:52the product of the masses.
- 00:23:55Making either mass heavier will increase the force.
- 00:24:00The product of the masses, big M times little m, inversely
- 00:24:06proportional to the square of the distance between them.
- 00:24:12Let's call that R squared.
- 00:24:12Let's call the distance between them R.
- 00:24:20And there's a numerical constant.
- 00:24:22This law by itself could not possibly be right.
- 00:24:26It's not dimensionally consistent.
- 00:24:28The-- if you work out the dimensions of force, mass, mass
- 00:24:34and R, it's not dimensionally consistent.
- 00:24:37There has to be a constant in there.
- 00:24:40And that numerical constant is called capital G, Newton's
- 00:24:44constant.
- 00:24:45And it's very small.
- 00:24:47It's a very small constant.
- 00:24:51I'll write down what it is.
- 00:24:54G is equal to six or 6. 7, roughly, times ten to the minus
- 00:25:0111th, which is a small number.
- 00:25:04So, on the face of it, it seems that gravity is a very weak
- 00:25:06force.
- 00:25:07Umm, you might not think that gravity is such a weak force,
- 00:25:13but to convince yourself it's a weak force there's an
- 00:25:16experiment that you can do.
- 00:25:18Weak in comparison to other forces.
- 00:25:20I've done this for classes and you can do it yourself.
- 00:25:26Just take an object hanging by a string and two experiments.
- 00:25:34The first experiment, take a little object here and
- 00:25:38electrically charge it.
- 00:25:39You electrically charge it by rubbing it on your shirt.
- 00:25:43That doesn't put much charge on it but it charges it up
- 00:25:46enough to feel some electrostatic force.
- 00:25:50Then take another object of exactly the same kind, rub it on
- 00:25:54your shirt, and put it over here.
- 00:25:56What happens? They repel.
- 00:25:59And the fact that they repel means that this will shift.
- 00:26:05And you'll see it shift.
- 00:26:07Take another example.
- 00:26:09Take your little ball there to be iron and put a magnet next
- 00:26:13to it.
- 00:26:17Again, you'll see quite an easily detectable deflection of
- 00:26:24the-- of the string holding it.
- 00:26:26All right? Next, take a 10,000-pound weight and put it over
- 00:26:34here.
- 00:26:38Guess what happens? Undetectable.
- 00:26:40You cannot see anything happen.
- 00:26:42The gravitational force is much, much weaker than most other
- 00:26:48kinds of forces and that's due to-- not due to.
- 00:26:52Not due to that.
- 00:26:53The fact that it's so weak is encapsulated in this small
- 00:26:58number here.
- 00:27:00Another way to say it is if you take two masses, each of 1
- 00:27:04kilometer-- not 1 kilometer.
- 00:27:051 kilogram.
- 00:27:07A kilogram is a good healthy mass, a nice chunk of iron.
- 00:27:09MM and you separate them from 1 meter, then the force
- 00:27:15between them is just G and it's 6. 7 times ten to the minus
- 00:27:2011th, if you do it with the units being Newton's.
- 00:27:24Very weak force.
- 00:27:25But, weak as it is, we feel it rather strenuously.
- 00:27:30We feel it strongly because the earth is so darn heavy.
- 00:27:35So, the heaviness of the earth makes up for the smallness of
- 00:27:37G and so we wake up in the morning feeling like we don't
- 00:27:45wanna get out of bed because gravity is holding us down.
- 00:27:51>>
- 00:27:51[laughing] Leonard Susskind: Yeah? >> Umm, so that force is
- 00:27:52measuring the force between-- from the large one to the
- 00:27:57small one or both? Leonard Susskind: Both.
- 00:27:56Both.
- 00:27:57They're equal and opposite.
- 00:28:00Equal and opposite.
- 00:28:01That's the rule.
- 00:28:02That's Newton's third law.
- 00:28:05The forces are equal and opposite.
- 00:28:08So, the force on the large one due to the small one is the
- 00:28:10same as the force of the small one on the large one.
- 00:28:16But it is proportional to the product of the masses.
- 00:28:19So, the meaning of that is I'm not-- I'm heavier than I'd
- 00:28:24like to be but I'm not very heavy.
- 00:28:25I'm certainly not heavy enough to deflect the hanging weight
- 00:28:30significantly.
- 00:28:32But I do exert a force on the earth which is exactly equal
- 00:28:36and opposite to the force that the very heavy earth exerts
- 00:28:38on me.
- 00:28:39Okay.
- 00:28:43Why does the earth accel-- if I drop from a certain height,
- 00:28:50I accelerate down.
- 00:28:52The earth hardly accelerates at all, even though the forces
- 00:28:56are equal.
- 00:28:57Why is it that the earth-- if the forces are equal, my force
- 00:29:02on the earth and the earth's force on me are equal, why is
- 00:29:06it that the earth accelerates so little and I accelerate so
- 00:29:09much? Yeah.
- 00:29:12Because the acceleration involves two things.
- 00:29:14It involves the force and the mass.
- 00:29:17The bigger the mass, the less the acceleration for the
- 00:29:20force.
- 00:29:21So, the earth doesn't accelerate-- yeah, question.
- 00:29:23>> How did Newton arrive at that equation for the
- 00:29:31gravitational force? Leonard Susskind: I think it was
- 00:29:32largely a guess.
- 00:29:33But it was an educated guess.
- 00:29:35And, umm, what was the key-- it was large-- no, no.
- 00:29:46It was from Kepler's laws.
- 00:29:47It was from Kepler's laws.
- 00:29:49He worked out, roughly speaking-- I don't know what he did.
- 00:29:53He was secretive and he didn't really tell people what he
- 00:29:56did.
- 00:29:57But, umm, the piece of knowledge that he had was Kepler's
- 00:30:02laws of motion-- planetary motion-- and my guess is that he
- 00:30:06just wrote down a general force and realized that he would
- 00:30:10get Kepler's laws of motion for the inverse square law.
- 00:30:14Umm, I don't believe he had any understand lying theoretical
- 00:30:20reason to believe in the inverse square law.
- 00:30:25>> Edmund Halley actually asked him, uh, what kind of force
- 00:30:29law do you need for conic section orbits and he had almost
- 00:30:30performed the calculations a year before.
- 00:30:33Leonard Susskind: Yeah.
- 00:30:35>> So, yeah.
- 00:30:39Leonard Susskind: Actually, I don't think-- yeah.
- 00:30:40>> I think the question-- he asked the question for inverse
- 00:30:41square laws and I think that Newton already knew the
- 00:30:43solution was an ellipse.
- 00:30:48Leonard Susskind: No.
- 00:30:49It wasn't the ellipse that was there.
- 00:30:52The orbits might have been circular.
- 00:30:54It was the fact that the period varies as the three halfs
- 00:30:57power of the radius.
- 00:30:58All right? The period of motion is the circular motion has
- 00:31:06an acceleration toward the center.
- 00:31:08Any motion of the circle is accelerated toward the center.
- 00:31:11If you know the period and the radius, then you know the
- 00:31:14acceleration toward the center.
- 00:31:16Okay? We could write the-- what's the word? Anybody know
- 00:31:22what-- if I know the angular frequency of going around in an
- 00:31:28orbit that's called omega.
- 00:31:30Anybody know the-- and it's basically just the inverse
- 00:31:34period.
- 00:31:35Okay? Omega is roughly the inverse period number of cycles
- 00:31:39per second.
- 00:31:41What is the acceleration of a thing moving in a circular
- 00:31:43orbit.
- 00:31:44Anybody remember? >> Omega squared R.
- 00:31:47Leonard Susskind: Omega squared R.
- 00:31:50That's the acceleration.
- 00:31:53Now, supposing he sets that equal to some unknown force law
- 00:31:57F of R and then divides by R.
- 00:32:04Then he finds omega as a function of the radius of the
- 00:32:12orbit.
- 00:32:15Well, let's do it for the real case.
- 00:32:16For the real case, inverse square law, F of R is one of R
- 00:32:19squared so this would be one of R cubed and in that form it
- 00:32:26is Kepler's second law? I don't even remember which one it
- 00:32:30is.
- 00:32:31It's the law that says that the frequency or the period, the
- 00:32:34square of the period, is proportional to the cube of the
- 00:32:37radius.
- 00:32:38That was the law of Kepler.
- 00:32:40So, from Kepler's laws he easily could-- or that one law, he
- 00:32:44could easily reduce that the force was proportional to one
- 00:32:49of R squared.
- 00:32:50I think that's probably historically what he did.
- 00:32:53Then, on top of that he realized that if you department have
- 00:32:57a perfectly circular law orbit then the inverse square law
- 00:33:02was the unique law which would give elliptical orbits.
- 00:33:10So, it's a two-step thing.
- 00:33:16>> What happens when the two objects are touching? Do you
- 00:33:17measure it from the-- Leonard Susskind: Of course, there are
- 00:33:19other forces on them.
- 00:33:20If two objects are touching, there are all sorts of forces
- 00:33:25between them that are not just gravitational.
- 00:33:27Electrostatic forces, atomic forces, nuclear forces? So,
- 00:33:33you'll have to modify the whole story.
- 00:33:42>> As the distance approaches zero-- Leonard Susskind: Yeah.
- 00:33:43Then it breaks down.
- 00:33:44Then it breaks down.
- 00:33:45Yeah.
- 00:33:45Then it breaks down.
- 00:33:45When they get so close that other important forces come into
- 00:33:48play.
- 00:33:49The other important forces, for example, are the forces that
- 00:33:52are holding this object and preventing it from falling.
- 00:33:56These we usually call them contact forces but, in fact, what
- 00:33:59they really are is various kinds of electrostatic forces
- 00:34:04between the atoms and molecules on the table and the atoms
- 00:34:08and molecules in here.
- 00:34:10So, other kinds of forces.
- 00:34:11All right.
- 00:34:13Incidentally, let me just point out if we're talking about
- 00:34:20other kinds of force laws, for example, electrostatic force
- 00:34:23laws, then the force-- we still have F equals MA but the
- 00:34:29force law-- the force law will not be that the force is
- 00:34:37somehow proportional to the mass times something else but it
- 00:34:41could be the electric charge.
- 00:34:42If it's the electric charge, then electrically uncharged
- 00:34:47objects will have no forces on them and they won't
- 00:34:49accelerate.
- 00:34:50Electrically charged objects will accelerate in an electric
- 00:34:54field.
- 00:34:55So, electrical forces don't have this universal property
- 00:34:59that everything falls or everything moves in the same way.
- 00:35:02Uncharged particles move differently than charged particles
- 00:35:06with respect to electrostatic forces.
- 00:35:09They move the same way with respect to gravitational forces.
- 00:35:13And as repulsion and attraction, whereas gravitational
- 00:35:17forces are always attractive.
- 00:35:19Where is my gravitational force? I lost it.
- 00:35:23Yeah.
- 00:35:24Here it is.
- 00:35:27All right.
- 00:35:29So, that's Newtonian gravity between two objects.
- 00:35:38For simplicity let's just put one of them, the heavy one, at
- 00:35:41the origin of coordinates and study the motion of the light
- 00:35:44one then-- oh, incidentally, one usually puts-- let me
- 00:35:49refine this a little bit.
- 00:35:50As I've written it here, I haven't really expressed it as a
- 00:35:55vector equation.
- 00:35:56This is the magnitude of the force between two objects.
- 00:36:00Thought of as a vector equation, we have to provide a
- 00:36:07direction for the force.
- 00:36:09Vectors have directions.
- 00:36:11What direction is the force on this particle? Well, the
- 00:36:18answer is, it's along the radial direction itself.
- 00:36:24So, let's call the radial distance R, or the radial vector
- 00:36:31R, then the force on little m here is along the direction R.
- 00:36:41But it's also opposite to the direction of R.
- 00:36:44The radial vector, relative to the origin over here, points
- 00:36:48this way.
- 00:36:49On the other hand, the force points in the opposite
- 00:36:53direction.
- 00:36:54If we wanna make a real vector equation out of this, we
- 00:36:58first of all have to put a minus sign.
- 00:37:01That indicates that the force is opposite to the direction
- 00:37:04of the radial distance here, but we also have to put
- 00:37:07something in which tells us what direction the force is in.
- 00:37:12It's along the radial direction.
- 00:37:13But wait a minute.
- 00:37:14If I multiply it by R up here, I had better divide it by
- 00:37:21another factor of R downstairs to keep the magnitude
- 00:37:25unchanged.
- 00:37:26The magnitude of the force is one over R squared.
- 00:37:28If I were to just randomly come and multiply it by R, that
- 00:37:34would make the magnitude bigger by a factor of R, so I have
- 00:37:37to divide it by the magnitude of R.
- 00:37:43This is Newton's force law expressed in vector form.
- 00:37:57Now, let's imagine that we have a whole assembly of
- 00:38:00particles.
- 00:38:01A whole bunch of them.
- 00:38:06They're all exerting forces on one another.
- 00:38:16In pairs, they exert exactly the force that Newton wrote
- 00:38:22down.
- 00:38:23But what's the total force on a particle? Let's label these
- 00:38:27particles the first one, the second one, the third one, the
- 00:38:30fourth one, dot, dot, dot, dot, dot.
- 00:38:31This is the Ith one over here.
- 00:38:33So, I is the running index which labels which particle we're
- 00:38:38talking about.
- 00:38:41The force on the Ith particle, let's call it F sub I, and
- 00:38:47let's remember that it's a vector, it's equal to the sum--
- 00:38:51now, this is not an obvious fact that when you have two
- 00:38:58objects exerting a force on the third that the force is
- 00:39:02necessarily equal to the sum of the two forces, of the two
- 00:39:07objects.
- 00:39:08You know what I mean.
- 00:39:10But it is a fact anyway.
- 00:39:11Obvious or not obvious it is a fact.
- 00:39:13Gravity does work that way at least in the Newtonian
- 00:39:17approximation.
- 00:39:19With Einstein, it breaks down a little bit.
- 00:39:20But in Newtonian physics the force is the sum and so it's a
- 00:39:25sum of all the other particles.
- 00:39:28Let's write that J not equal to I.
- 00:39:32That means it's a sum over all not equal to I.
- 00:39:37So, the force from the first particle.
- 00:39:41It comes from the second particle, third particle, third
- 00:39:44particle, and so forth.
- 00:39:46Each individual force involves M sub I, the force of the Ith
- 00:39:51particle, times the four, times the mass of the Jth
- 00:39:55particle.
- 00:39:57Product of the masses divided by the square of the distance
- 00:40:02between them, let's call that RIJ squared.
- 00:40:09The distance between the Ith particle is I and J, the
- 00:40:12distance between the Ith particle and the Jth particle is
- 00:40:14RIJ.
- 00:40:17But then, just as we did before, we have to give it a
- 00:40:21direction.
- 00:40:22Put a minus sign here, that indicates that it's attractive,
- 00:40:27another RIJ upstairs, but that's a vector RIJ, and make this
- 00:40:32cubed downstairs.
- 00:40:34All right? So, that says that the force on the Ith particle
- 00:40:39is the sum of all the forces due to all the other ones of
- 00:40:44the product of their masses inverse square in the
- 00:40:48denominator, and the direction of each individual force on
- 00:40:53this particle is toward the other.
- 00:40:55All right? This is a vector sum.
- 00:40:58Yeah? Hmm? The minus indicates that it's attractive.
- 00:41:02Excellent.
- 00:41:03>> but you've got the vector going from I to J.
- 00:41:08Leonard Susskind: Oh.
- 00:41:09Let's see.
- 00:41:10That's the vector going from R to I to J.
- 00:41:22There is a question of the sign of this vector over here.
- 00:41:26So yeah.
- 00:41:27You're absolute-- yeah.
- 00:41:27I actually think it's-- yeah, you're right.
- 00:41:38You're absolutely right.
- 00:41:39The way I've written it there should not be a minus sign
- 00:41:41here.
- 00:41:44If I put RJI there, then there would be a minus sign.
- 00:41:48Right? So, you're right.
- 00:41:54But in any case every one of the forces is attractive and
- 00:42:00what we have to do is to add them up.
- 00:42:04We have to add them up as vectors and so there's some
- 00:42:06resulting vector, some resultant vector, which doesn't point
- 00:42:10toward any one of them in particular but points in some
- 00:42:14direction which is determined by the vector sum of all the
- 00:42:17others.
- 00:42:18All right in but the interesting fact is, if we combine
- 00:42:23this, this is the force on the Ith particle.
- 00:42:26If we combine it with Newton's equations-- let's combine it
- 00:42:29with Newton's F equals MA equations then this is F.
- 00:42:35This on the Ith particle, this is equal to the mass of the
- 00:42:49Ith particle times the acceleration of the Ith particle.
- 00:42:53Again, vector equations.
- 00:42:56Now, the sum here is over all the other particles.
- 00:43:02We're focusing on number I.
- 00:43:03I, the mass of the Ith particle will cancel out of this
- 00:43:09equation.
- 00:43:10I don't wanna throw it away but let's just circle it and now
- 00:43:18We notice that the acceleration of the Ith particle does not
- 00:43:22depend on its mass again.
- 00:43:24Once again, because the mass occurs on both sides of the
- 00:43:28equation it can be canceled out, and the motion of the Ith
- 00:43:31particle does not depend on the mass of the Ith particle.
- 00:43:35It depends on the masses of all the other ones.
- 00:43:37All the other ones come in, but the mass of the Ith particle
- 00:43:42cancels the equation.
- 00:43:44So, what that means is if we had a whole bunch of particles
- 00:43:47here and we added one more over here, its motion would not
- 00:43:54depend on the mass of that particle.
- 00:43:56It depends on the mass of all the other ones but it doesn't
- 00:43:59depend on the mass of the Ith particle here.
- 00:44:02Okay? Again, equivalence principle that the motion of a
- 00:44:08particle doesn't depend on its mass.
- 00:44:10And again if we had a whole bunch of particles here, if they
- 00:44:14were close enough together, they would all move in the same
- 00:44:18way.
- 00:44:21Before I discuss any more mathematics, let's just discuss
- 00:44:27tidal forces, what tidal forces are.
- 00:44:29>> Can I ask one question? Leonard Susskind: Yeah.
- 00:44:29>> Once you set this whole thing into motion dynamically.
- 00:44:35Leonard Susskind: Yeah.
- 00:44:37>> We have all different masses and each particle is gonna
- 00:44:39be effected by each one? Leonard Susskind: Yes.
- 00:44:39Yes.
- 00:44:40>> Every particle in there is going to experience a uniform
- 00:44:50acceleration? Leonard Susskind: No, no, no.
- 00:44:52The acceleration is not uniform.
- 00:44:56The acceleration will get larger when it gets closer to one
- 00:45:00of the particles.
- 00:45:07It won't be uniform anymore.
- 00:45:09It won't be uniform now because the force is not independent
- 00:45:13of where you are.
- 00:45:15Now the force depends on where you are relative to the
- 00:45:18objects that are exerting the force.
- 00:45:20It was only in the flat earth approximation where the force
- 00:45:24didn't depend on where you were.
- 00:45:25Okay? Now, the force varies so it's larger where you're far
- 00:45:32away-- sorry.
- 00:45:34It's smaller when you're far away, it's smaller when you're
- 00:45:37in close.
- 00:45:38Okay? >> But is it going to be changing in a-- it changes in
- 00:45:47a vector form with each individual particle.
- 00:45:52Each one of them is changing position.
- 00:45:53Leonard Susskind: Yeah.
- 00:45:55>> So, is the dynamics that every one of them is going
- 00:45:59towards the center of gravity of the entire-- Leonard
- 00:46:00Susskind: Not necessarily.
- 00:46:01I mean, they could be flying apart from each other but they
- 00:46:05will be accelerating toward each other.
- 00:46:07Okay? If I throw this eraser in the air with greater than
- 00:46:11the escape velocity, it's not going to turn around and fall
- 00:46:13back down.
- 00:46:14>> Well, the question is, is the acceleration a uniform
- 00:46:21acceleration or is it changing in dynamics? Leonard
- 00:46:22Susskind: Changing with what? With respect to what? Time?
- 00:46:23Oh.
- 00:46:25It changes with respect to time because the object moves
- 00:46:28farther and farther away.
- 00:46:32>> In the two-mass system-- Leonard Susskind: Mm hmm.
- 00:46:32>> I call that a uniform acceleration.
- 00:46:33Leonard Susskind: Uniform with respect to what? >> It's not
- 00:46:42uniform.
- 00:46:43The radius is changing and it's inversed cubically radiused.
- 00:46:44Leonard Susskind: Inverse squared.
- 00:46:45>> Inverse squared.
- 00:46:45Leonard Susskind: Let's take the earth.
- 00:46:55Here's the earth, and we drop a small mass from far away.
- 00:46:59As that mass moves in, its acceleration increases.
- 00:47:03Why does its acceleration increase in its acceleration
- 00:47:05increases because the radial distance gets smaller.
- 00:47:09So, in that sense it's not.
- 00:47:11All right.
- 00:47:13Now, once the gravitational force depends on distance then
- 00:47:19it's not really quite true that you don't feel anything in a
- 00:47:24gravitational field.
- 00:47:25You feel something that's to some extent different than you
- 00:47:29would feel in free space without any gravitational field.
- 00:47:35The reason is more or less obvious.
- 00:47:39Here you are-- here's the earth.
- 00:47:44Now, you, or me, or whoever it is, happens to be extremely
- 00:47:49tall.
- 00:47:56Couple of thousand miles tall.
- 00:47:59Well, this person's feet are being pulled by the
- 00:48:03gravitational field more than his head.
- 00:48:06Or another way of saying the same thing is if let's imagine
- 00:48:10that the person is very loosely held together.
- 00:48:13>>
- 00:48:13[laughing] Leonard Susskind: He's more or less a gas of-- we
- 00:48:18are pretty loosely held together.
- 00:48:19At least I am.
- 00:48:20Right.
- 00:48:20All right.
- 00:48:24The acceleration on the lower portions of his body are
- 00:48:29larger than the accelerations on the upper part of his body.
- 00:48:33So it's quite clear what happens to him.
- 00:48:35You get stretched.
- 00:48:36He doesn't get a sense of falling as such.
- 00:48:40He gets a sense of stretching, being stretched.
- 00:48:43Feet being pulled away from his head.
- 00:48:46At the same time, let's-- all right.
- 00:48:49So let's change his shape a little bit.
- 00:49:01I just spent a week-- two weeks in Italy and my shape
- 00:49:04changes whenever I go to Italy.
- 00:49:05It tends to get more horizontal.
- 00:49:07My head is here, my feet are here, and now I'm this way.
- 00:49:12Still loosely put together.
- 00:49:14All right? Now what? Well, not only does the force depend on
- 00:49:20the distance but it also depends on the direction.
- 00:49:23The force on my left end over here is this way.
- 00:49:29The force on my right end over here is this way.
- 00:49:33The force on the top of my head is down but it's weaker than
- 00:49:37the force on my feet.
- 00:49:39So there are two effects.
- 00:49:41One effect is to stretch me vertically.
- 00:49:45It's because my head is not being pulled as hard as my feet.
- 00:49:48But the other effect is to be squished horizontally by the
- 00:49:53fact that the forces on the left end of me are pointing
- 00:49:57slightly to the right and the forces to the right end of me
- 00:50:00are pointing slightly to the left.
- 00:50:02So a loosely knit person like this falling in free fall near
- 00:50:08a real planet or a real gravitational object which has a
- 00:50:12real Newtonian gravitational field around it will experience
- 00:50:17a distortion-- will experience a degree of distortion and a
- 00:50:22feeling of being stretched vertically, being compressed
- 00:50:26horizontally, but if the object is small enough-- what does
- 00:50:35small enough mean? Let's suppose the object that's falling
- 00:50:38is small enough.
- 00:50:40If it's small enough, then the gradient of the gravitational
- 00:50:44field across the size of the object will be negligible and
- 00:50:49so all parts of it will experience the same gravitational
- 00:50:52acceleration.
- 00:50:53All right.
- 00:50:54So tidal forces-- these are tidal forces.
- 00:50:57These forces which tend to tear things apart vertically and
- 00:50:59squish them this way.
- 00:51:00Tidal forces.
- 00:51:02Tidal forces are forces which are real.
- 00:51:07You feel them.
- 00:51:08I mean-- yeah? >> Do you recall if Newton calculated lunar
- 00:51:09tides? Leonard Susskind: Oh, I think he did.
- 00:51:13He certainly knew the cause of the tides.
- 00:51:15Yeah.
- 00:51:17I don't know to what extent he calculated.
- 00:51:19What do you mean calculated the-- >> As in this kind of a
- 00:51:24system with the moon and the sun.
- 00:51:24Leonard Susskind: Well, I doubt that he was capable-- I'm
- 00:51:26not sure whether he estimated the height of the deformation
- 00:51:29of the oceans or not.
- 00:51:33But I think he did understand this much about tides.
- 00:51:36Okay.
- 00:51:37So, that's what's called tidal force.
- 00:51:40And remember, tidal force has this effect of stretching and
- 00:51:49in particular if we take the earth -- just to tell you why
- 00:51:54it's called tidal forces of course is because it has to do
- 00:51:56with tides.
- 00:51:57I'm sure you all know the story.
- 00:51:58But if this is the moon down here, then the moon exerting
- 00:52:03forces on the earth exerts tidal forces on the earth, which
- 00:52:06means to some extent it tends to stretch it this way and
- 00:52:09squash it this way.
- 00:52:10Well, the earth is pretty rigid so it doesn't form very much
- 00:52:14due to the moon.
- 00:52:18But what's not rigid is the layer of water around it and so
- 00:52:22the layer of water tends to get stretched and squeezed and
- 00:52:26so it gets deformed into a deformed shell of water with a
- 00:52:34bump on this side and a bump on that side.
- 00:52:35All right.
- 00:52:36I'm not gonna go any more deeply into that than I'm sure
- 00:52:39you've all seen.
- 00:52:41Okay.
- 00:52:42But let's define now what we mean by the gravitational
- 00:52:45field.
- 00:52:51The gravitational field is abstracted from this formula.
- 00:52:58We have a bunch of particles-- >> question.
- 00:52:59Leonard Susskind: Yeah? >> Don't you have to use some sort
- 00:53:06of coordinate geometry so that when you have the poor guy in
- 00:53:11the middle's being pulled by all the other guys on the side.
- 00:53:15Leonard Susskind: I'm not explaining it right.
- 00:53:32>> it's always negative, is that what you're saying? Leonard
- 00:53:32Susskind: No.
- 00:53:33It's always attractive.
- 00:53:33All right.
- 00:53:33So you have-- >> What about the other guys that are pulling
- 00:53:39upon him from different directions? Leonard Susskind: Let's
- 00:53:40suppose it's somebody over here and we're talking about the
- 00:53:40force on this person over here.
- 00:53:42Obviously there's one force pushing this way and another
- 00:53:45force pushing that way.
- 00:53:47Okay? No.
- 00:53:51They're all opposite to the direction of the object which is
- 00:53:55pulling on him.
- 00:53:56All right? That's how this mind of science says.
- 00:53:57>> well, you kind of retracted the minus sign at the front
- 00:54:02and reversed the JI.
- 00:54:10So it's the direction-- Leonard Susskind: We can get rid of
- 00:54:14the minus sign in the front there by switching this RJ.
- 00:54:19RIJ and RJI are opposite to each other.
- 00:54:22One of them is the vector between I and J.
- 00:54:27I and J.
- 00:54:28And the other is the vector to J and I, so they're equal and
- 00:54:30opposite to each other.
- 00:54:33The minus sign there.
- 00:54:35Look, as far as the minus sign goes, all that it means is
- 00:54:41every one of these particles is pulling on this particle
- 00:54:44toward it as opposed to pushing away from it.
- 00:54:47It's just a convention which keeps track of attraction
- 00:54:51instead of repulsion.
- 00:54:53>> yeah.
- 00:54:54For the Ith mass-- if that's the right word.
- 00:54:55Leonard Susskind: Yeah.
- 00:54:57>> If you look at it as kind of an ensemble wouldn't there
- 00:54:59be a nonlinear component to it was the I guy, the Ith guy,
- 00:55:04the Jth guy, then with you compute the Jth guy-- you know
- 00:55:11what I mean? Leonard Susskind: When you take into account
- 00:55:11the motion.
- 00:55:12Now, what this formula is for is supposing you know the
- 00:55:15positions of all the others.
- 00:55:17You know that.
- 00:55:18All right? Then what is the force on one additional one in
- 00:55:23but you're perfectly right.
- 00:55:24Once you let the system evolve, then each one will cause a
- 00:55:31change in motion of the other one and so it because a
- 00:55:33complicated as you say nonlinear mess.
- 00:55:36But this formula is a formula for if you knew the position
- 00:55:42and location of every particle, this would be the force.
- 00:55:45Okay? Something.
- 00:55:47You need to solve the equations to know how the particles
- 00:55:50move.
- 00:55:51But if you know where they are, then this is the force on
- 00:55:55the Ith particle.
- 00:55:56All right.
- 00:55:59Let's come to the idea of the gravitational field.
- 00:56:03The gravitational field is in some ways similar to the
- 00:56:05electric field of an electric charge.
- 00:56:11It's the combined effect of all the masses everywheres.
- 00:56:25And the way you define it is as follows: You imagine one
- 00:56:29more particle, one more particle.
- 00:56:32You can take it to be a very light particle so it doesn't
- 00:56:35influence the motion of the others.
- 00:56:37Add one more particle.
- 00:56:41In your imagination.
- 00:56:42You don't really have to add it.
- 00:56:42In your imagination.
- 00:56:43And what the force on it is.
- 00:56:46The force is the sum of the force due to all the others.
- 00:56:52It is proportional.
- 00:56:53Each term is proportional to the mass of this extra
- 00:56:57particle.
- 00:56:58This extra particle which may be imaginary is called a test
- 00:57:03particle.
- 00:57:04It's a thing that you're imagining testing out the
- 00:57:06gravitational field with.
- 00:57:08You take a light little particle, and you put it here, and
- 00:57:10you see how it accelerates.
- 00:57:13Knowing how it accelerates tells you how much force is on
- 00:57:16it.
- 00:57:17In fact, it just tells you how it accelerates.
- 00:57:21And you can go around and imagine putting it in different
- 00:57:24places and mapping out the force field that's on that
- 00:57:29particle.
- 00:57:30Or the acceleration field since we already know that the
- 00:57:35force is proportional to the mass.
- 00:57:39Then we can just concentrate on the acceleration.
- 00:57:42The acceleration all particles will have the same
- 00:57:45acceleration independent of the mass.
- 00:57:48So we don't even have to know what the mass of the particle
- 00:57:49is.
- 00:57:50We put something over there, a little bit of dust, and we
- 00:57:53see how it accelerates.
- 00:57:54Acceleration is a vector and so we map out in space the
- 00:58:00acceleration of a particle at every point in space, either
- 00:58:05imaginary or real particle, and that gives us a vector field
- 00:58:10at every point in space.
- 00:58:12Every point in space there is a gravitational field of
- 00:58:17acceleration.
- 00:58:18It can be thought of as the acceleration.
- 00:58:21You don't have to think of it as force.
- 00:58:22Acceleration.
- 00:58:24The acceleration of a point mass located at that position.
- 00:58:28It's a vector that has a direction, it has a magnitude, and
- 00:58:34it's a function of position.
- 00:58:37So, we just give it a name.
- 00:58:41The acceleration due to all the gravitating objects is a
- 00:58:47vector and it depends on position.
- 00:58:51Your X means location.
- 00:58:54It means all of the components of position X, Y, and Z, and
- 00:58:58it depends on all the other masses in the problem.
- 00:59:06That is what's called the gravitational field.
- 00:59:11It's very similar to the electric field except the electric
- 00:59:14field is force per unit charge.
- 00:59:18It's the force of an object divided by the charge on the
- 00:59:21object.
- 00:59:22The gravitational field is the force on the object divided
- 00:59:25by the mass on the object.
- 00:59:27Since the force is proportional to the mass the acceleration
- 00:59:33field did you want depend on which kind of particle we're
- 00:59:34talking about.
- 00:59:35All right.
- 00:59:37So, that's the idea of a gravitational field.
- 00:59:41It's a vector field and it varies from place to place.
- 00:59:45And, of course, if the particles are moving, it also varies
- 00:59:48in time.
- 00:59:49If everything is in motion, the gravitational field will
- 00:59:52also depend on time.
- 00:59:56We can even work out what it is.
- 00:59:58We know what the force on the Ith particle is.
- 01:00:01Right? The force on a particle is the mass times the
- 01:00:06acceleration.
- 01:00:07So, if we wanna find the acceleration, let's take the Ith
- 01:00:10particle to be the test particle.
- 01:00:12Little i represents the test particle over here.
- 01:00:17Let's erase the immediate step over here and write that this
- 01:00:22is MI times AI but let me call it now capital A.
- 01:00:31The acceleration of a particle at position X is given by the
- 01:00:36right-hand side.
- 01:00:37And we can cross out the MI because it cancels from both
- 01:00:42sides.
- 01:00:45So, here's a formula for the gravitational field at an
- 01:00:51arbitrary point due to a whole bunch of massive objects.
- 01:00:58A whole bunch of massive objects.
- 01:01:02An arbitrary particle put over here will accelerate in some
- 01:01:07direction that's determined by all the others and that
- 01:01:10acceleration is gravitation-- definition.
- 01:01:13Definition is the gravitational field.
- 01:01:18Okay.
- 01:01:19Let's take a little break.
- 01:01:21We usually take a break at about this time and I recover my
- 01:01:26breath.
- 01:01:27To go on, we need a little bit of fancy mathematics.
- 01:01:37We need a piece of mathematics called Gauss's theorem and
- 01:01:44Gauss's theorem involves integrals, derivatives,
- 01:01:47divergences.
- 01:01:51And we need to spell those things out.
- 01:01:52They're essential part of the theory of gravity.
- 01:01:56And much of these things that we've done in the context of
- 01:02:03the electrical forces, in particular the concept of
- 01:02:08divergence, divergence of a vector field.
- 01:02:13So, I'm not going to spend a lot of time on it.
- 01:02:16If you need to fill in, then I suggest you just find any
- 01:02:22book on vector calculus and find out what a divergence, and
- 01:02:26a gradient, and a curl-- we won't do curl today.
- 01:02:29What those concepts are, and look up Gauss's theorem and
- 01:02:34they're not terribly hard but we're gonna go through them
- 01:02:37fairly quickly here since we've done them several times in
- 01:02:43the past.
- 01:02:44All right.
- 01:02:45Imagine that we have a vector field.
- 01:02:49Let's call that vector field A.
- 01:02:52It could be the field of acceleration and that's the way I'm
- 01:02:55gonna use it.
- 01:02:56But for the moment it's just an arbitrary vector field, A.
- 01:03:01It dependence on position.
- 01:03:03When I say it's a field, the implication is that it depends
- 01:03:07on position.
- 01:03:15Now I probably made it completely unreadable.
- 01:03:17A of X varies from point to point.
- 01:03:21And I want to define a concept called the divergence of a
- 01:03:28field.
- 01:03:29Now, it's called a divergence because what it has to do is
- 01:03:34the way the field is spreading out away from the point.
- 01:03:37For example, a characteristic situation where we would have
- 01:03:43a strong divergence for a field is if the field was
- 01:03:46spreading out from a point, like that.
- 01:03:49The field is diverging away from the point.
- 01:03:55Incidentally, after the field is pointing inward, then one
- 01:04:00might say the field has a convergence but we simply say it
- 01:04:04has a negative divergence.
- 01:04:07So, divergence can be positive or negative.
- 01:04:10And there's a mathematical expression which represents the
- 01:04:13degree to which the field is spreading out like that.
- 01:04:16It is called the divergence.
- 01:04:18I'm gonna write it down and it's a good thing to get
- 01:04:26familiar with, certainly if you're going to follow this
- 01:04:28course it's a good thing to get familiar with.
- 01:04:31But if you're gonna follow any kind of physics course past
- 01:04:39freshmen physics, the idea of divergence is very point.
- 01:04:42All right.
- 01:04:44Supposing the field A has a set of components.
- 01:04:48The one, two, and three component or we could call them the
- 01:04:54X, Y, and Z component.
- 01:04:56Now I'll use X, Y, and Z.
- 01:04:59X, Y, and Z.
- 01:05:00Which I previously called X one, X two, and X three.
- 01:05:03It has components at AX, AY, and AZ.
- 01:05:13Those are the three components of the vector.
- 01:05:15Well, the divergence has to do, among other things, with the
- 01:05:19way the field varies in space.
- 01:05:22If the field is the same everywheres in space what would
- 01:05:24that mean? That would men that the field has not only the
- 01:05:28same magnitude, but the same direction anywheres in space.
- 01:05:32Then it just points in the same direction everywheres in
- 01:05:34space with the same magnitude.
- 01:05:36It certainly has no tendency to spread out.
- 01:05:41When does a field have a tendency to spread out in when a
- 01:05:43field varies.
- 01:05:44For example, it could be small over here, growing bigger,
- 01:05:51growing bigger, growing bigger.
- 01:05:54And we might even go in the opposite direction and discover
- 01:05:58that it's the opposite direction getting bigger in that
- 01:06:00direction.
- 01:06:01Now, clearly there's a tendency for the field to spread out
- 01:06:05from the center here.
- 01:06:07The same thing could be true if it were varying in the
- 01:06:09vertical direction or if it was varying in the other
- 01:06:12horizontal direction.
- 01:06:14And so the divergence, whatever it is, has to do with
- 01:06:17derivatives of the components of the field.
- 01:06:19I'll just tell you exactly what it is.
- 01:06:23It is equal to it.
- 01:06:25The divergence of a field is written this way: Upside down
- 01:06:27triangle.
- 01:06:33The meaning of this symbol, the meaning of an upside down
- 01:06:37triangle is always that it has to do with derivatives, the
- 01:06:41three derivatives.
- 01:06:42Derivatives, whether it's the three partial derivatives.
- 01:06:45Derivative with respect to X, Y, and Z.
- 01:06:47And this is by definition.
- 01:06:52The derivative with respect to X of the X component of A
- 01:06:57plus the derivative with respect to Y of the Y component of
- 01:07:01A, plus the derivative with respect to Z of the Z component
- 01:07:06of A.
- 01:07:17That's definition.
- 01:07:20What's not a definition is the theorem and it's called
- 01:07:25Gauss's theorem.
- 01:07:31>> I'm sorry.
- 01:07:31Is that a vector or is it-- Leonard Susskind: No.
- 01:07:33That's a scale of quantity.
- 01:07:35It's a scale of quantity.
- 01:07:37Yeah.
- 01:07:43It's a scale of quantity.
- 01:07:44So, let me write it.
- 01:07:48It's the derivative of A sub X with respect to X, that's
- 01:07:54what this means, plus the derivative of ace of Y with
- 01:07:59respect of Y, plus the derivative of ace of Z with respect
- 01:08:05to Z.
- 01:08:08>> Yeah.
- 01:08:08So, the arrows you were drawing over there they were just A
- 01:08:12on the other board.
- 01:08:13You drew some arrows on the other board that are now hidden.
- 01:08:16Leonard Susskind: Yeah.
- 01:08:18>> Those were just A? Leonard Susskind: Yeah.
- 01:08:19>> Not the divergence.
- 01:08:20Leonard Susskind: Right.
- 01:08:21Those were A.
- 01:08:24And A has a divergence when it's spreading away from a
- 01:08:27point, but a divergence is itself a scale of quantity.
- 01:08:31Let me try to give you some idea of what divergence means in
- 01:08:40a context where you can visualize it.
- 01:08:43Imagine that we have a flat lake.
- 01:08:51Just a shallow lake.
- 01:08:55And the water is coming up from underneath.
- 01:08:58It's being pumped in from somewheres underneath.
- 01:09:01What happens if the water's being pumped in.
- 01:09:04Of course, it tends to spread out.
- 01:09:06Let's assume that depth can't change.
- 01:09:09We put a lid over the whole thing so that it can't change
- 01:09:11its depth.
- 01:09:13We pump some water in from underneath and it spreads out.
- 01:09:16Okay? We suck some water out from underneath and it spreads
- 01:09:20in.
- 01:09:21It anti-spreads.
- 01:09:24So, the spreading water has a divergence.
- 01:09:27Water coming in towards the place where it's being sucked
- 01:09:31out it has a convergence or a negative divergence.
- 01:09:35Now, we can be more precise about that.
- 01:09:41We look down at the lake from above, and we see all the
- 01:09:44water is moving of course.
- 01:09:45If it's being pumped in the water is moving.
- 01:09:49And there is a velocity vector.
- 01:09:51At every point there is a velocity vector.
- 01:09:53So, at every point in this lake there's a velocity vector
- 01:09:58and in particular if there's water being pumped in from the
- 01:10:01center here, right? Underneath the water of the lake there's
- 01:10:04some water being pumped in the water's being sucked in from
- 01:10:07that point.
- 01:10:08Okay? And there'll be a divergence where the water is being
- 01:10:13pumped in.
- 01:10:14Okay if the water is being pumped out then exactly the
- 01:10:18opposite.
- 01:10:19The arrows point inward and there's a negative divergence.
- 01:10:23If there's no divergence, then, for example, a simple
- 01:10:30situation with no divergence.
- 01:10:32That doesn't mean the water is not moving.
- 01:10:34But a simple example of no divergence is the water is all
- 01:10:37moving together.
- 01:10:38You know, the river is simultaneous, the lake is moving
- 01:10:42simultaneously in the same direction with the same velocity.
- 01:10:45It can do that without any water being pumped in.
- 01:10:48But if you found that the water was moving from the right on
- 01:10:50this side and the left on that side, you'd be pretty sure
- 01:10:54that somewheres in between, water had to be pumped in.
- 01:10:56Right? If you found the water was spreading out away from a
- 01:11:00line this way here and this way here, then you'd be pretty
- 01:11:06sure that some water was being pumped in from underneath
- 01:11:10along this line here.
- 01:11:11Well, you would see in another way you would discover that
- 01:11:16the X component of the velocity has a derivative.
- 01:11:20It's different over here than it is from over here.
- 01:11:22The X component of the velocity varies along the X
- 01:11:26direction.
- 01:11:28So, the fact that the X component of the velocity is varying
- 01:11:31along the X direction is an indication that there's some
- 01:11:35water being pumped in here.
- 01:11:37Likewise, if you discovered that the water was flowing up
- 01:11:41over here and down over here, you would expect it in here
- 01:11:46somewheres some water was being pumped in.
- 01:11:49So, derivatives of the velocity are often an indication that
- 01:11:54there's some water being pumped in from underneath.
- 01:11:57That pumping in of the water is the divergence of the
- 01:12:00velocity vector.
- 01:12:01Now, the water, of course, is being pumped in from
- 01:12:09underneath.
- 01:12:10So, there's a direction of flow but it's coming from
- 01:12:13underneath.
- 01:12:14There's no sense of direction-- well, okay.
- 01:12:19That's what divergence is.
- 01:12:21>> I have a question.
- 01:12:24The diagrams you already have on the other board behind you?
- 01:12:24Leonard Susskind: Yeah.
- 01:12:25>> With the arrows? Leonard Susskind: Yeah.
- 01:12:28Leonard Susskind: If you take, say, the right-most arrow and
- 01:12:33you draw a circle between the head and tail in between, then
- 01:12:37you can see the in and the out.
- 01:12:41Leonard Susskind: Mm hmm.
- 01:12:42>> The in arrow and the out arrow of a certain right in
- 01:12:45between those two.
- 01:12:46And let's say that the bigger arrow's created by a steeper
- 01:12:50slope of the streak.
- 01:12:53Leonard Susskind: No, this is faster.
- 01:12:52>> It's going faster.
- 01:12:53>> Okay.
- 01:12:55And because of that, there's a divergence there that's
- 01:12:57basically it's sort of the difference between the in and the
- 01:13:02out.
- 01:13:03Leonard Susskind: That's right.
- 01:13:04That's right.
- 01:13:05If we draw a circle around here or we would see that-- the
- 01:13:10water is moving faster over here than it is over here, more
- 01:13:14water is flowing out over here than is coming in over here.
- 01:13:20Where's it coming from? It must be coming in.
- 01:13:23The fact that there's more water flowing out on one side
- 01:13:27than is coming in from the other side must indicate that
- 01:13:30there's a net inflow from somewheres else and the somewheres
- 01:13:33else would be from the pumping water from underneath.
- 01:13:37So, that's the idea of divergence.
- 01:13:40>> Could it also be because it's thinning out? Could that be
- 01:13:43a crazy example? Like, the lake got shallower? Leonard
- 01:13:44Susskind: Yeah.
- 01:13:48Well, okay.
- 01:13:49I took-- so, let's be very specific now.
- 01:13:52I kept the lake absolutely uniform height and let's also
- 01:13:58suppose that the density of water-- water is an
- 01:14:02incompressible fluid.
- 01:14:03It can't be squeezed.
- 01:14:05It can't be stretched.
- 01:14:06Then the velocity vector would be the right think to think
- 01:14:14about there.
- 01:14:15Yeah.
- 01:14:17You could have-- no, you're right.
- 01:14:19You could have a velocity vector having a divergence because
- 01:14:25the water is-- not because water is flowing in but because
- 01:14:28it's thinning out.
- 01:14:29Yeah, that's possible.
- 01:14:32But let's keep it simple.
- 01:14:35And you can have-- the idea of a divergence makes sense in
- 01:14:38three dimensions just as much as two dimensions.
- 01:14:41You just have to imagine that all of space is filled with
- 01:14:45water and there are some hidden pipes coming in, depositing
- 01:14:49water in different places so that it's spreading out away
- 01:14:53from points in three dimensional space.
- 01:14:57Three dimensional space, this is the definition for the
- 01:15:00divergence.
- 01:15:02If this were the velocity vector at every point you would
- 01:15:05calculate this quantity and that would tell you how much new
- 01:15:08water is coming in at each new point in space.
- 01:15:10So, that's the divergence.
- 01:15:12Now, there's a theorem which the hint of the theorem was
- 01:15:17just given by Michael there.
- 01:15:20It's called Gauss's theorem and it says something very
- 01:15:26intuitively obvious.
- 01:15:28You take a surface, any surface.
- 01:15:34Take any surface or any curve in two dimensions and now
- 01:15:44suppose there's a vector field-- vector field point.
- 01:15:53Think of it as the flow of water.
- 01:15:57And now let's take the total amount of water that's flowing
- 01:16:00out of the surface.
- 01:16:03Obviously there's some water flowing out over here and of
- 01:16:06course we wanna subtract the water that's flowing in.
- 01:16:10Let's calculate the total amount of water that's flowing out
- 01:16:13of the surface.
- 01:16:15That's an integral out of the surface.
- 01:16:18Why is it an integral in because we have to add up the flows
- 01:16:21of water outward when the water is coming inward that's just
- 01:16:25negative flow, negative outward flow.
- 01:16:30We add up the total outward flow by breaking up the surface
- 01:16:34into little pieces and asking how much flow is coming out
- 01:16:38from each little piece here? How much water is passing out
- 01:16:42through the surface? If the water is incompressible,
- 01:16:49incompressible means its density is fixed and furthermore,
- 01:16:52the depth of the water is being kept fixed.
- 01:16:55There's only one way that water can come out of the surface
- 01:16:59and that's if it's being pumped in, if there's a divergence.
- 01:17:03The divergence could be over here, could be over here, could
- 01:17:06be over here, could be over here.
- 01:17:08In fact, anywheres there is a divergence will cause an
- 01:17:13effect in which water will flow out of this region here.
- 01:17:16So, there's a connection.
- 01:17:17There's a connection between what's going on on the boundary
- 01:17:20of this region, how much water is flowing throughout
- 01:17:23boundary on one hand, and what the divergence is on the
- 01:17:27interior.
- 01:17:28There's a connection between the two and that connection is
- 01:17:32called Gauss's theorem.
- 01:17:34What it says is that the integral of the divergence in the
- 01:17:39interior, that's the total amount of flow coming in from
- 01:17:43outside, from underneath the bottom of the lake, the total
- 01:17:46integrated-- now, by integrated, I mean in the sense of an
- 01:17:51integral.
- 01:17:52The integrated amount of flow in, that's the integral of the
- 01:17:57divergence.
- 01:18:01The integral over the interior in the three dimensional case
- 01:18:06it would be integral DX, DY, DZ over the interior of this
- 01:18:11region of the divergence of A-- if you like to think of A as
- 01:18:18the velocity field that's fine-- is equal to the total
- 01:18:23amount of flow that's going out through the boundary.
- 01:18:26Now, how do we write that? The total amount of flow that's
- 01:18:31flowing outward through the boundary we break up-- let's
- 01:18:34take the three dimensional case.
- 01:18:36We break up the boundary into little cells.
- 01:18:39Each little cell is a little area.
- 01:18:42Let's call each one of those little areas D sigma.
- 01:18:47D sigma, sigma stands for surface area.
- 01:18:52Sigma is the Greek letter.
- 01:18:53Sigma stands for surface area.
- 01:18:56This three dimensional integral over the interior here is
- 01:19:03equal to a two dimensional integral, the sigma over the
- 01:19:07surface and it is just the component of A perpendicular to
- 01:19:16the surface.
- 01:19:17It's called A perpendicular to the surface D sigma.
- 01:19:23A perpendicular to the surface is the amount of flow that's
- 01:19:27coming out of each one of these little boxes.
- 01:19:30Notice, incidentally, if there's a flow along the surface it
- 01:19:35doesn't give rise to any fluid coming out.
- 01:19:37It's only the flow perpendicular to the surface, the
- 01:19:40component of the flow perpendicular to the surface which
- 01:19:43carries fluid from the inside to the outside.
- 01:19:47So, we integrate the perpendicular component of the employee
- 01:19:55over the surface, that's still the sigma here.
- 01:19:58That gives us the total amount of fluid coming out per unit
- 01:20:01time, for example and that has to be equal to the amount of
- 01:20:06fluid that's being generated in the interior by the
- 01:20:09divergence.
- 01:20:11This is Gauss's theorem.
- 01:20:12The relationship between the integral of the divergence and
- 01:20:16the interior of some region and integral over the boundary
- 01:20:22where it's measuring the flux-- the amount of stuff that's
- 01:20:28coming out from the boundary.
- 01:20:32Fundamental theorem.
- 01:20:33And let's see what it says now.
- 01:20:40Any questions about Gauss's theorem here? You'll see how it
- 01:20:47works.
- 01:20:48I'll show you how it works.
- 01:20:48>> Now, you mentioned that the water is compressible.
- 01:20:49Is that different from what we were given with the
- 01:20:49compressible fluid.
- 01:20:50Leonard Susskind: Yeah.
- 01:21:02You could-- if you had a compressible fluid you would
- 01:21:05discover that the fluid out in the boundary here is all
- 01:21:08moving inwards in every direction without any new fluid
- 01:21:12being formed.
- 01:21:14In fact, what's happening is the fluid's getting squeezed.
- 01:21:17But if the fluid can't squeeze, if you can not compress it,
- 01:21:20then the only way that fluid could be flowing in is if it's
- 01:21:24being removed somehow from the center.
- 01:21:26If it's being removed by invisible pipes that are carrying
- 01:21:31it off.
- 01:21:32>> So that means the divergence in the case of water would
- 01:21:36be zero would be integrated over a volume? Leonard Susskind:
- 01:21:37If there was no water coming in it would be zero.
- 01:21:45If there was a source of the water-- divergence is the same
- 01:21:48as its source.
- 01:21:50Source of water is-- source of new water coming in from
- 01:21:54elsewhere is. . .
- 01:21:56Right.
- 01:21:56So, with the example of the two dimensional lake, the source
- 01:22:01is water flowing in from underneath, the sink, which is the
- 01:22:04negative of a source, is the water flowing and in the two
- 01:22:08dimensional example this wouldn't be a two dimensional
- 01:22:11surface integral.
- 01:22:13It would be the integral in here equal to a one dimensional
- 01:22:16surface equal to the surface coming out.
- 01:22:17Okay.
- 01:22:18All right.
- 01:22:18Let me show you how you use this.
- 01:22:22Let me show you how you use this and what it has the do with
- 01:22:28what we've said up 'til now about gravity.
- 01:22:30I think-- I hope we'll have time.
- 01:22:38Let's imagine that we have a source it could be water but
- 01:22:43let's take three dimensional case, there's a divergence of a
- 01:22:48vector field, let's say A.
- 01:22:50There's a divergence of a vector field, dell dot A, and it's
- 01:22:55concentrated in some region of space.
- 01:23:00It's a little sphere in some region of space that has
- 01:23:04spherical symmetry.
- 01:23:06In other words, it doesn't mean that the divergence is
- 01:23:10uniform over here but it means that it has the symmetry of a
- 01:23:13sphere.
- 01:23:15Everything is symmetrical with respect to rotations.
- 01:23:19Let's suppose that there's a divergence of the fluid.
- 01:23:21Okay? Now, let's take-- and it's restricted completely to be
- 01:23:29within here.
- 01:23:32It could be strong near the center and weak near the outside
- 01:23:35or it could be weak near the center and strong near the
- 01:23:38outside but a certain total amount of fluid or a certain
- 01:23:42total divergence, an integrated divergence is occurring with
- 01:23:47nice spherical shape.
- 01:23:50Okay.
- 01:23:51Let's see if we can use that to figure out what the A field
- 01:23:56is.
- 01:23:57That's dell dot A in here and now let's see can we figure
- 01:24:03out what the field is elsewhere outside of here? So, what we
- 01:24:07do is we draw a surface around there.
- 01:24:10We draw a surface around there and now we're going to use
- 01:24:16Gauss's theorem.
- 01:24:18First of all, let's look at the left side.
- 01:24:22The left side has the integral of the divergence of the
- 01:24:25vector field.
- 01:24:26All right.
- 01:24:27The vector field or the divergence is completely restricted
- 01:24:31to some finite sphere in here.
- 01:24:36What is-- incidentally, for the flow case, for the fluid
- 01:24:40flow case, what would be the integral of the divergence?
- 01:24:43Does anybody know? It really was the flow of a fluid.
- 01:24:47It'll be the total amount of fluid that was flowing in per
- 01:24:54unit time.
- 01:24:55It would be the flow per unit time that's coming through the
- 01:24:57system.
- 01:24:58But whatever it is, it doesn't depend on the radius of the
- 01:25:03sphere as long as the sphere, this outer sphere here, is
- 01:25:07bigger than this region.
- 01:25:09Why? Because the integral over the divergence of A is
- 01:25:13entirely concentrated in this region here and there's zero
- 01:25:18divergence on the outside.
- 01:25:19So, first of all, the left-hand side is independent on the
- 01:25:25radius of this outer sphere, as long as the radius of the
- 01:25:28outer sphere is bigger than this concentration of divergence
- 01:25:32here.
- 01:25:34So, it's a number.
- 01:25:34Although it's a number.
- 01:25:36Let's call that number M.
- 01:25:38No, no.
- 01:25:40Not M.
- 01:25:40Q.
- 01:25:45That's the left-hand side.
- 01:25:46And it doesn't depend on the radius.
- 01:25:49On the other hand, what is the right side? Well, there's a
- 01:25:52flow going out and if everything is nice and spherically
- 01:25:57symmetric then the flow is going to go radially outward.
- 01:26:01It's going to be a pure, radially outward directed flow if
- 01:26:07the flow is spherically symmetric.
- 01:26:10Radially outward directed flow means that the flow is
- 01:26:13perpendicular to the surface of the sphere.
- 01:26:17So, the perpendicular component of A is just the magnitude
- 01:26:20of A.
- 01:26:21That's it.
- 01:26:22It's just the magnitude of A and it's the same everywheres
- 01:26:25on the sphere.
- 01:26:27Why is it the same? Because everything has spherical
- 01:26:30symmetry.
- 01:26:31Now, in spherical symmetry, the A that appears here is
- 01:26:35constant over this whole sphere.
- 01:26:38So, this integral is nothing but the magnitude of A times
- 01:26:43the area of the total sphere.
- 01:26:45All right? If I take an integral over a surface, a spherical
- 01:26:50surface like this, on something that doesn't depend on where
- 01:26:54I am in the sphere, then it's just you can take this on the
- 01:26:57outside, the magnitude of the field and the integral D sigma
- 01:27:03is just the total surface area of the sphere.
- 01:27:07What's the total surface area of the sphere? >> Four thirds
- 01:27:09pi R.
- 01:27:10Leonard Susskind: No third.
- 01:27:10Just four pi.
- 01:27:10Four pi R squared.
- 01:27:20Oh, yeah.
- 01:27:27Four pi R squared times the magnitude of the field is equal
- 01:27:34to Q.
- 01:27:38So, look what we have.
- 01:27:40We have that the magnitude of the field is equal to the
- 01:27:46total integrated divergence divided by four pi.
- 01:27:53Four pi is just a number, times R squared.
- 01:27:56Does that look familiar? It's a vector field.
- 01:28:03It's pointed radially outward.
- 01:28:05Well, it's pointed radially outward if the divergence is
- 01:28:08positive.
- 01:28:10If the divergence is positive, it's pointed radially outward
- 01:28:14and its magnitude is one of R squared.
- 01:28:16It's exactly the gravitational field after a point particle
- 01:28:24of the center.
- 01:28:25>> It's the magnitude of A.
- 01:28:28Leonard Susskind: Yeah.
- 01:28:29That's why we have to put a direction in here.
- 01:28:34You know what this R is? It's a unit vector pointing in the
- 01:28:46radial direction.
- 01:28:47It's a vector of unit length pointed in the radial
- 01:28:50direction.
- 01:28:51Right? So, it's quite clear from the picture that the A
- 01:28:55field is pointing radially outward.
- 01:28:58That's what this says here.
- 01:29:01In any case, the magnitude of the field that points radially
- 01:29:05outward, it has magnitude Q, and it falls off like one over
- 01:29:12R squared.
- 01:29:13Exactly like the Newtonian field of a point mass.
- 01:29:18So, a point mass can be thought of as a concentrated
- 01:29:26divergence of the gravitational field right at the center.
- 01:29:31A point mass.
- 01:29:32A literal point mass can be thought of as a concentrated-- a
- 01:29:42concentrated divergence of the gravitational field.
- 01:29:47Concentrated in some very little small volume.
- 01:29:52Think of it, if you like, you can think of it as the
- 01:29:55gravitational field, the flow field, the velocity field of a
- 01:30:00fluid that's spreading out.
- 01:30:01Oh, incidentally, of course, I've got the sign wrong here.
- 01:30:04The real gravitational acceleration points inward which is
- 01:30:12an indication that this divergence is negative.
- 01:30:16The divergence is more like a convergence sucking fluid in.
- 01:30:22So the Newtonian gravitational field is isomorphic, is
- 01:30:28mathematically equivalent, or mathematically similar, to a
- 01:30:32flow field to a flow of water or whatever other fluid where
- 01:30:36it's all being sucked out from a single point and, as you
- 01:30:40can see, the velocity field itself or in this case the
- 01:30:46field, the gravitational field, the velocity field would go,
- 01:30:49like, one over R squared.
- 01:30:52That's a useful analogy.
- 01:30:54That is not the say that space is a flow or anything.
- 01:30:58It's a mathematical analogy that's useful to understand the
- 01:31:01one over R squared force law that it is mathematically
- 01:31:06similar to a field of velocity flow from the flow that's
- 01:31:12being generated right at the center of a point.
- 01:31:16Okay.
- 01:31:17That's a useful observation.
- 01:31:21But notice something else.
- 01:31:24Supposing now, instead of having the flow concentrated at
- 01:31:28the center here, supposing the flow is concentrated over a
- 01:31:32sphere that is bigger but the same total amount of flow.
- 01:31:38It would not change the answer.
- 01:31:40As long as the total amount of flow is fixed, the way that
- 01:31:43it flows out through here is also fixed.
- 01:31:47This is Newton's theorem.
- 01:31:48Newton's theorem in the gravitational context says that the
- 01:31:54gravitational field of an object, outside the object is
- 01:32:00independent of whether the object is a point mass at the
- 01:32:04center or whether it's a spread out mass, or whether it's a
- 01:32:08spread out mass this big, as long as you're outside the
- 01:32:13object and as long as the object is spherically symmetric,
- 01:32:16in other words, as long as the object is shaped like a spear
- 01:32:20and you're outside of it, outside of it, outside of where
- 01:32:24the mass distribution is, then the gravitational field of it
- 01:32:28doesn't depend on whether it's a point, it's a spread out
- 01:32:32object, whether it's denser at the center and less dense on
- 01:32:38the outside, less dense at the center and more dense on the
- 01:32:41outside.
- 01:32:42All it depends on is the total amount of mass.
- 01:32:47The total amount of mass is like the total am of flow coming
- 01:32:53into the-- that theorem is very fundamental and important to
- 01:32:59thinking about gravity.
- 01:33:00For example, supposing we are interested in the motion of an
- 01:33:07object near the surface of the earth but not so near that we
- 01:33:10can make the flat space approximation.
- 01:33:12Let's say at a distance two, three, or one and a half times
- 01:33:17the radius of the earth.
- 01:33:19Well, that object is attracted by this point, it's attracted
- 01:33:23by this point, it's attracted by that point.
- 01:33:26It's close to this point, it's far from this point.
- 01:33:29It sounds like a hellish problem to figure out what the
- 01:33:31gravitational effect on this point is.
- 01:33:34But no.
- 01:33:36This tells you the gravitational field is exactly the same
- 01:33:39as if the same total mass was concentrated right at the
- 01:33:42center.
- 01:33:43Okay? That's Newton's theorem.
- 01:33:48It's a marvelous theorem.
- 01:33:49It's a great piece of luck for him because without it he
- 01:33:52couldn't have solved his equations.
- 01:33:57He knew.
- 01:33:58He had an argument, it may have been essentially this
- 01:34:02argument.
- 01:34:03I'm not sure what argument he made.
- 01:34:05But he knew that with the one over R squared force law and
- 01:34:09only the one over R squared force law wouldn't have been
- 01:34:11true if it'd be R cubed, R to the fourth, over R to the
- 01:34:15seventh.
- 01:34:16With the one over R squared force law, a spherical
- 01:34:20distribution of mass behaves exactly as if all the mass was
- 01:34:23concentrated right at the center as long as you're outside
- 01:34:27the mass.
- 01:34:30So, that's what made it possible for Newton to easily solve
- 01:34:34his own equations.
- 01:34:36That every object, as long as it's spherical in shape,
- 01:34:39behaves if it were a point mass.
- 01:34:43>> So, if you're down in a mine shaft that doesn't hold?
- 01:34:46Leonard Susskind: That's right.
- 01:34:47If you're down in a mine shaft it doesn't hold.
- 01:34:50But, that doesn't mean that you can't figure out what's
- 01:34:53going on.
- 01:34:54You can figure out what's going on.
- 01:34:55I don't think we'll do it tonight.
- 01:34:56It's a little too late.
- 01:34:57But yes, we can work out what would happen in a mine shaft.
- 01:35:01But that's right.
- 01:35:02It doesn't hold in a mine shaft.
- 01:35:03For example, supposing you dig a mine shaft right down
- 01:35:10through the center of the earth and now you get very close
- 01:35:14to the center of the earth.
- 01:35:16How much force do you expect to be pulling toward the
- 01:35:19center? Not much.
- 01:35:21Certainly much less than if all the mass were concentrated
- 01:35:25right at the same theory.
- 01:35:27You've got the-- it's not even obvious which way the force
- 01:35:31is but it's toward the center.
- 01:35:34But it's very small.
- 01:35:36You displace away from the earth a little bit.
- 01:35:38There's a tiny, tiny force.
- 01:35:40Much, much less than as if all the mass were squashed
- 01:35:43towards the center.
- 01:35:45So, right.
- 01:35:46It doesn't work for that case.
- 01:35:52Another interesting case is supposing you have a shell of
- 01:35:55material.
- 01:35:56To have a shell of material, think about a shell of source,
- 01:36:07fluid flowing in.
- 01:36:08Fluid is flowing in from the outside onto this blackboard
- 01:36:12and all the little pipes are arranged on a circle like this.
- 01:36:20What does the fluid flow look like in different places?
- 01:36:23Well, the answer is, on the outside it looks exactly the
- 01:36:27same as if everything were concentrated on a point.
- 01:36:29But what about in the interior? What would you guess?
- 01:36:33Nothing.
- 01:36:34Nothing.
- 01:36:34Everything is just flowing out away from here and there's no
- 01:36:40flow in here at all.
- 01:36:41How can there be? Which direction would it be? And so there'
- 01:36:43s no flow in here.
- 01:36:48>> Wouldn't you have the distance argument? Like, if you're
- 01:36:51closer to the surface of the inner shell-- Leonard Susskind:
- 01:36:54Yeah.
- 01:36:55>> Wouldn't that be more force towards that? No.
- 01:36:56See, you use Gauss's theorem.
- 01:36:59Let's use Gauss's theorem.
- 01:37:00Gauss's theorem says okay, let's take a shell.
- 01:37:03The integrated field coming out of that shell is equal to
- 01:37:09the integrated divergency.
- 01:37:10But there is no divergency here.
- 01:37:11So, the net integrated field coming out is zero.
- 01:37:15No field on the interior of the shell.
- 01:37:17Field on the exterior of the shell.
- 01:37:20So, the consequence is that if you made a spherical shell of
- 01:37:23material like that, the interior would be absolutely
- 01:37:27identical like it would be if there was no gravitational
- 01:37:30material there at all.
- 01:37:32On the other hand, on the outside, you would have a field
- 01:37:36which would be absolutely identical to what happens at the
- 01:37:39center.
- 01:37:40Now, there is an analogue of this in the general theory of
- 01:37:42relativity.
- 01:37:43We'll get to it.
- 01:37:47Basically what it says is the field of anything, as long as
- 01:37:50it's spherically symmetric on the outside, looks like
- 01:37:52identical to the field of a black hole.
- 01:37:54I think we're finished for tonight.
- 01:38:00Go over divergence and Gauss's theorem.
- 01:38:06Gauss's theorem is central.
- 01:38:07There would be no gravity without Gauss's theorem.
- 01:38:17>>
- 01:38:17[music playing] the preceding program is sponsored by
- 01:38:22Stanford University.
- 01:38:23Please visit us at Stanford. edu.
- Gravity
- Newtonian physics
- Inertial frame
- Equivalence principle
- Tidal forces
- Newton's theorem
- Gravitational field
- Divergence
- Gauss's theorem
- Kepler's laws